Bouncing back after lumbar spine surgery: early postoperative resilience is associated with 12-month physical function, pain interference, social participation, and disability

The Effect of Patient Resilience on Postoperative Scores After One- and Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between resilience and outcomes of pain and neck-related disability after single- and double-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Patients who underwent single- or double-level ACDF were sent a survey between 6 months and 2 years after surgery. The survey included the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2). Patients completed the VAS and NDI twice, once describing preoperative pain and disability and once describing current pain and disability. Respondents were classified as high resilience (HR), medium resilience (MR), or low resilience (LR). Demographics, PSEQ-2 scores, pre- and postoperative VAS and NDI scores, and change in VAS (ΔVAS) and NDI (ΔNDI) scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients comprised the HR group, 273 patients comprised the MR group, and 47 patients comprised the LR group. All groups demonstrated postoperative improvement in VAS and NDI scores that exceeded previously established MCID values. The HR group demonstrated greater improvement in pain compared with the LR group (ΔVAS: -5.8 for HR vs. -4.4 for LR, P = 0.05). Compared with the MR group, the LR group demonstrated greater postoperative pain (VAS: 3.2 for LR vs. 2.5 for MR, P = 0.02) and disability (NDI: 11.9 for LR vs. 8.6 for MR, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients demonstrated improvement in pain and neck-related disability after single- and double-level ACDF, regardless of resilience score. Patients with greater resilience may be expected to demonstrate more improvement in pain after ACDF.

Resilience, Survival, and Functional Independence in Older Adults Facing Critical Illness

BACKGROUND

Older adults surviving critical illness often experience new or worsening functional impairments. Modifiable positive psychological constructs such as resilience may mitigate postintensive care morbidity.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is pre-ICU resilience associated with: (1) post-ICU survival; (2) the drop in post-ICU functional independence; and (3) a lesser decline in independence before vs after the ICU?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed by using Medicare-linked Health and Retirement Study surveys from 2006 to 2018. Older adults aged ≥ 65 years admitted to an ICU were included. Resilience was calculated prior to ICU admission. The resilience measure was defined from the Simplified Resilience Score, which was previously adapted and validated for the Health and Retirement Study. Resilience was scored by using the Leave-Behind survey normalized to 0 (lowest resilience) to 12 (highest resilience) point scale. Outcomes were survival and probability of functional independence. Survival was modeled by using Gompertz models and independence using joint survival models adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Average marginal effects were estimated to determine independence probabilities.

RESULTS

Across 3,409 patients ≥ 65 years old admitted to ICUs, preexisting frailty (30.5%) and cognitive impairment (24.3%) were common. Most patients were previously independent (82.7%). Mechanical ventilation occurred in 14.8% and sepsis in 43.2%. Highest vs lowest resilience had lower risk of post-ICU mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94). Higher resilience was associated with greater likelihood in post-ICU independence (estimated probability of independence 5 years' post-ICU in highest-to-lowest resilience (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]): 0.53 (0.33-0.74), 0.47 (0.26-0.68), 0.49 (0.28-0.70), and 0.36 (0.17-0.55); P < .01. Resilience was not associated with a difference in the drop in independence across resilience groups, nor a difference in declines in independence post-ICU.

INTERPRETATION

ICU survivors with higher resilience had increased rates of survival and functional independence, although the slope of functional decline did not differ according to resilience group pre-ICU to post-ICU.

Preoperative Resilience and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion

BACKGROUND

It is incompletely understood how preoperative resilience affects 1-year postoperative outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.

METHODS

Patients undergoing open lumbar spinal fusion at a single-center institution were identified between November 2019 and September 2022. Preoperative resilience was assessed using the Brief Resilience Scale. Demographic data at baseline including age, gender, comorbidities, and body mass index (BMI) were extracted. Patient-reported outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index, PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Global Physical Health, PROMIS Global Mental Health (GMH), and EuroQol5 scores were collected before the surgery and at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Bivariate correlation was conducted between Brief Resilience Scale scores and outcome measures at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients had baseline and 1 year outcome data. Compared with patients with high resilience, patients in the low-resilience group had a higher percentage of females (69.4% vs. 43.9%; P = 0.02), a higher BMI (32.7 vs. 30.1; P = 0.03), and lower preoperative Global Physical Health (35.8 vs. 38.9; P = 0.045), GMH (42.2 vs. 49.2; P < 0.001), and EuroQol scores (0.56 vs. 0.61; P = 0.01). At 3 months postoperatively, resilience was moderately correlated with GMH (r = 0.39) and EuroQol (r = 0.32). Similarly, at 1 year postoperatively, resilience was moderately correlated with GMH (r = 0.33) and EuroQol (r = 0.34). Comparable results were seen in multivariable regression analysis controlling for age, gender, number of levels fused, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, procedure, anxiety/depression, and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Low preoperative resilience can negatively affect patient-reported outcomes 1 year after lumbar spinal fusion. Resiliency is a potentially modifiable risk factor, and surgeons should consider targeted interventions for at-risk patient groups.

Patient Resilience Does Not Conclusively Affect Clinical Outcomes Associated With Arthroscopic Surgery but Substantial Limitations of the Literature Exist

Purpose

To determine whether low resilience is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or diminished improvements in clinical outcomes after joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Science Direct was performed on September 28, 2022, for studies investigating the relationship between resilience and PROs after arthroscopic surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Results

Nine articles (level II-IV studies) were included in the final analysis. A total of 887 patients (54% male, average age 45 years) underwent arthroscopic surgery, including general knee (n = 3 studies), ACLR-only knee (n = 1 study), rotator cuff repair (n = 4 studies), and hip (n = 1 study). The Brief Resilience Scale was the most common instrument measuring resilience in 7 of 9 studies (78%). Five of 9 studies (56%) stratified patients based on high, normal, or low resilience cohorts, and these stratification threshold values differed between studies. Only 4 of 9 studies (44%) measured PROs both before and after surgery. Three of 9 studies (33%) reported rates of return to activity, with 2 studies (22%) noting high resilience to be associated with a higher likelihood of return to sport/duty, specifically after knee arthroscopy. However, significant associations between resilience and functional outcomes were not consistently observed, nor was resilience consistently observed to be predictive of subjects' capacity to return to a preinjury level of function.

Conclusions

Patient resilience is inconsistently demonstrated to affect clinical outcomes associated with joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery. However, substantial limitations in the existing literature including underpowered sample sizes, lack of standardization in stratifying patients based on pretreatment resilience, and inconsistent collection of PROs throughout the continuum of care, diminish the strength of most conclusions that have been drawn.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level II-IV studies.

Analyzing Resilience in the Orthopedic Sports Medicine Patient Population

Little research has been done to compare resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), across common sports medicine patient populations. Our purpose was to investigate resilience levels across sports medicine patient populations. All patients who underwent reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR), partial meniscectomy (PM), meniscal repair (MR), rotator cuff repair (RCR), or shoulder stabilization (SS) between January 1 and June 30, 2020, were screened for inclusion. At our institution, BRS scores are routinely collected during the preoperative period. Patients with preoperative BRS scores available were included for analysis. Patients who were eligible on the basis of ACLR who underwent concomitant PM or MR were included in the ACL group. A total of 655 patients with a median age of 49 years were included in analysis. The median preoperative resilience score across all patients was 3.83 (interquartile range, 3.50-4.17), and the highest scores were seen in the ACLR group (median, 4.00; interquartile range, 3.67-4.17). On multivariate regression, scores were significantly and independently lower in the PM and RCR groups. Male patients were found to have significantly higher scores than female patients overall (P=.028), but in subgroup analysis by pathology, this effect was only seen in the SS and PM groups. Psychological factors are important to consider when surgically treating patients, and resilience specifically may play a role in predicting treatment success. Patients undergoing PM and RCR tend to report lower resilience scores than patients undergoing ACLR at preoperative baseline. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):95-100.].

The Psychology of ACL Injury, Treatment, and Recovery: Current Concepts and Future Directions

CONTEXT

Interest in the relationship between psychology and the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) continues to grow as variable rates of return to preinjury level of activity continue to be observed.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Articles were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on PubMed using a combination of search terms, including psychology, resilience, mental health, recovery, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Further evaluation of the included bibliographies were used to expand the evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

RESULTS

General mental health and wellbeing, in addition to a host of unique psychological traits (self-efficacy, resilience, psychological readiness and distress, pain catastrophizing, locus of control, and kinesiophobia) have been demonstrated convincingly to affect treatment outcomes. Moreover, compelling evidence suggests that a number of these traits may be modifiable. Although the effect of resilience on outcomes of orthopaedic surgical procedures has been studied extensively, there is very limited information linking this unique psychological trait to the outcomes of ACLR. Similarly, the available information related to other parameters, such as pain catastrophizing, is limited with respect to the existence of adequately sized cohorts capable of accommodating more rigorous and compelling analyses. A better understanding of the specific mechanisms through which psychological traits influence outcomes can inform future interventions intended to improve rates of return to preinjury level of activity after ACLR.

CONCLUSION

The impact of psychology on patients' responses to ACL injury and treatment represents a promising avenue for improving low rates of return to preinjury activity levels among certain cohorts. Future research into these areas should focus on specific effects of targeted interventions on known, modifiable risk factors that commonly contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes.

STRENGTH-OF-RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY (SORT)

B.

Psychometric Properties of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) Resilience Short Form in a Sample With Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

To explore the psychometric properties (eg, data distribution characteristics, convergent or discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability) of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life measurement system (SCI-QOL) Resilience 8-item short form (SF) in comparison to the criterion standard resilience measure, Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a sample of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine variable data distribution characteristics. Correlation analyses were conducted for convergent and discriminant validity. Reliability statistics were calculated for resilience and other validity measures.

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with SCI (N=202; 51.5% male, 48% female).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures (depression, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain intensity, fatigue, sleep disturbance), SCI-QOL short forms (SF) (resilience, positive affect and well-being, mobility), CD-RISC, National Institutes of Health Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function - perceived stress (NIH Toolbox-perceived stress), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale were administered.

RESULTS

The mean and SD for the SCI-QOL Resilience SF (mean=48.60; SD=8.20) approximated the normative mean (mean=50, SD=10). The SCI-QOL Resilience SF scores were essentially normally distributed though somewhat kurtotic, with skew=-0.17 and excess kurtosis=1.4; internal consistency reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha=0.89). Convergent validity was supported by significant moderate correlations in expected directions between the SCI-QOL Resilience SF and measures of CD-RISC resilience, depressive symptoms, anxiety, social participation, positive affect and well-being, stress, and satisfaction with life. Discriminant validity was supported by small non-significant correlations between the SCI-QOL Resilience SF and age, sex, injury level, time since injury, pain intensity, mobility, sleep disturbance, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

The SCI-QOL Resilience SF demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Our study showed that the SCI-QOL Resilience SF is a psychometrically valid tool that can reliably estimate levels of resilience in the SCI population.

Pain Self-Efficacy (PSEQ) score of <22 is associated with daily opioid use, back pain, disability, and PROMIS scores in patients presenting for spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pain self-efficacy, or the belief that one can carry out activities despite pain, has been shown to be associated with back and neck pain severity. However, the literature correlating psychosocial factors to opioid use, barriers to proper opioid use, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores is sparse.

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether pain self-efficacy is associated with daily opioid use in patients presenting for spine surgery. The secondary aim was to determine whether there exists a threshold self-efficacy score that is predictive of daily preoperative opioid use and subsequently to correlate this threshold score with opioid beliefs, disability, resilience, patient activation, and PROMIS scores.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Five hundred seventy-eight elective spine surgery patients (286 females; mean age of 55 years) from a single institution were included in this study.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OUTCOME MEASURES

PROMIS scores, daily opioid use, opioid beliefs, disability, patient activation, resilience.

METHODS

Elective spine surgery patients at a single institution completed questionnaires preoperatively. Pain self-efficacy was measured by the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). Threshold linear regression with Bayesian information criteria was utilized to identify the optimal threshold associated with daily opioid use. Multivariable analysis controlled for age, sex, education, income, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and PROMIS-29, version 2 scores.

RESULTS

Of 578 patients, 100 (17.3%) reported daily opioid use. Threshold regression identified a PSEQ cutoff score of <22 as predictive of daily opioid use. On multivariable logistic regression, patients with a PSEQ score <22 had two times greater odds of being daily opioid users than those with a score ≥22. Further, PSEQ <22 was associated with lower patient activation; increased leg and back pain; higher ODI; higher PROMIS pain, fatigue, depression, and sleep scores; and lower PROMIS physical function and social satisfaction scores (p<.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting for elective spine surgery, a PSEQ score of <22 is associated with twice the odds of reporting daily opioid use. Further, this threshold is associated with greater pain, disability, fatigue, and depression. A PSEQ score <22 can identify patients at high risk for daily opioid use and can guide targeted rehabilitation to optimize postoperative quality of life.

The prognostic value of fear-avoidance beliefs on postoperative pain and dysfunction for lumbar degenerative disk disease: a meta-analysis

The study aimed to explore the prognostic value of fear-avoidance beliefs (FABs) on postoperative pain and back-specific function for patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease (LDDD). FABs have been proven to be a predictorof pain and disability for patients with low back pain. However, whether FABs are a predictor of surgical outcomes for LDDD is a matter of debate. PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, and EBSCO were searched for eligible cohort studies or secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials. Fixed-effect meta-analysis models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) because of absent or low heterogeneity ( I ² < 50%). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different follow-up durations. Forest plots were used for graphical representation. Six studies with a total of 829 participants were included in the meta-analyses. Risk of bias was high for three studies and moderate for the other three studies. For patients with LDDD, meta-analyses showed that FABs were a predictor of postoperative pain intensity [OR 2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.76-3.00] and back-specific function (OR 3.13; 95% CI, 3.02-3.24). Patients with FABs are less likely to report improvement in pain (OR 2.56; 95% CI, 1.73-3.86) and function (OR 2.81; 95% CI, 2.57-3.07). In conclusion, FABs were a predictor of postoperative pain and back-specific function for patients with LDDD. This prognostic value is sustained for a long period after surgery (>12 months). Clinicians are advised to initiate targeted interventions for patients with FABs at different stages after surgery. Due to the limited number and low quality of included studies, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution.

A scoping review on the methods of assessment and role of resilience on function and movement-evoked pain when experiencing a musculoskeletal injury

BACKGROUND

Resilience refers to an individual's ability to maintain effective functioning, by resisting, withstanding or recovering from stressors or adversity, including pain associated with physical injury (J Clin Psychol Med Settings 28:518-28, 2021). The aim of this scoping review is to determine the role of resilience in the experience of movement-evoked pain (MEP) and return to functional activity following a musculoskeletal injury.

METHODS

This review conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews and the scoping review protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Five databases and one grey literature database were searched using predetermined key words and index terms to capture published and unpublished records on the topic. Two authors independently screened the title and abstract of each record, with the full-text of eligible records being reviewed. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they examined the population, concept and context of interest, were written in English and the full text was available. Data were extracted from each eligible record to guide discussion of the available literature on this topic.

RESULTS

Of 4771 records, 2695 articles underwent screening based on their title and abstract. After title and abstract screening 132 articles were eligible for full text review, with 24 articles included in the final analysis. This review identified that psychological resilience has primarily been investigated in the context of a range of age-related pathologies. The choice of functional and movement-evoked pain assessments in the included studies were often guided by the pathology of interest, with some being general or injury specific.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review identified inconsistent conclusions regarding the role of resilience in the experience of MEP and the ability to return to function for older adults with a musculoskeletal injury. This scoping review highlights the need for longitudinal research to be conducted that allows a broader age range, including younger adults, to determine if multidimensional resilience may promote recovery form musculoskeletal injury.

Neurosurgeons Relate Heterogeneous Practices Regarding Activity and Return to Work After Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Given the paucity of relevant data, the Council of State Neurosurgical Societies Workforce Committee launched a survey of neurosurgeons to assess patterns in activity restriction recommendations following spine surgery; the ultimate goal was to optimize and potentially standardize these recommendations. The aim of this initial study was to determine current practices in activity restrictions and return to work guidelines following common spinal procedures.

METHODS

The survey included questions regarding general demographics and practice data, postoperative bracing/orthosis utilization, and guidelines for postoperative return to different levels of activity/types of work following specific spine surgery interventions. A spectrum of typical spine surgeries was assessed, including microdiscectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and lumbar fusion, both open and minimal invasive surgery (MIS) approaches.

RESULTS

There was significant interprocedure and intraprocedure variation in the neurosurgeons' recommendations for postoperative activity and return to work recommendations after various spinal surgery procedures. Comparisons of the different surgical procedures evaluated revealed significant differences in cervical collar use (more often used following ≥2-level ACDF than single-level ACDF; P < 0.001), return to both sedentary and light physical work (greater restriction with ≥2-level ACDF than with single-level ACDF; P < 0.001), and return to a light exercise regimen (sooner following MIS versus open lumbar fusion; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This survey demonstrated little consistency regarding return to work recommendations, general activity restrictions, and orthosis utilization following common spinal surgical procedures. Addressing this issue also has significant implications for the societal and personal costs of spine surgery.

Presenting Mental Health Influences Postoperative Clinical Trajectory and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), postoperative patient-reported satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement after minimally invasive surgery lumbar decompression (MIS-LD) in patients stratified by their preoperative 12-Item Short-Form Mental Component Score (SF-12 MCS).

METHODS

Patients who underwent single-level/multilevel MIS-LD were included. PROMs were administered preoperatively and 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year postoperatively. Patients were grouped by preoperative SF-12 MCS. Demographic/perioperative characteristics were compared among groups using a χ² and Student t test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Mean PROM and postoperative satisfaction scores were compared using an unpaired Student t test. PROM improvement within cohorts was assessed with paired-samples t test. MCID achievement rates were compared using χ² analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 297 patients were included: 111 patients in SF-12 MCS <48.9 and 186 patients in the SF-12 MCS ≥48.9 cohort. Cohorts showed mean postoperative differences for visual analog scale (VAS) back score at 12 weeks, VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 weeks/12 weeks, SF-12 MCS at all postoperative time points, and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score at 6 weeks/12 weeks (P < 0.022, all). Of patients in the SF-12 MCS <48.9 cohort, more achieved MCID for SF-12 MCS at all postoperative time points and ODI at 1 year (P < 0.023, all). More patients in the SF-12 MCS ≥48.9 cohort achieved MCID for VAS leg score at 12 weeks and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score at 6 weeks (P < 0.038). Patients in the SF-12 MCS <48.9 cohort showed inferior postoperative satisfaction for VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/1 year, VAS back score at 12 weeks, and ODI at all postoperative time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with inferior mental health preoperatively showed worse mean short-term postoperative clinical outcome for leg/back pain, physical function and disability, short-term and long-term postoperative satisfaction for leg pain and disability, and long-term satisfaction for sleeping/lifting/walking/standing/sex/travel.

Preoperative Resilience and Early Postoperative Outcomes following Lumbar Spinal Fusion

BACKGROUND

Previous studies identified a correlation between preoperative resilience scores and patient reported outcome measures in several surgical subspecialities. No previous studies, to our knowledge, have analyzed preoperative resilience and patient reported outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion completed the brief resilience scale preoperatively, in addition to measures of disability (Oswestry Disability index (ODI)), quality of life (PROMIS global physical and mental health scales and EuroQOL5], and leg and back pain (VAS) at pre- and 3-months postoperatively. The 3-month follow-up was selected due to the association with return to work. Multiple linear regression evaluated relationships between resilience and postoperative changes in outcomes measures, controlling for baseline values and body mass index, age, number of levels fused, and severity of comorbidities.

RESULTS

Ninety-five participants (mean age = 58 years, 56% male) completed the BRS preoperatively and outcome measures before and 3-months after lumbar fusion. On average, participants reported significant postoperative improvements on all outcome measures (p<.001). Higher preoperative resilience scores related to greater postoperative improvements in back and leg pain, global mental and physical health and EuroQol scores (p<0.05), after controlling for baseline values and other covariates. Resilience scores did not significantly correlate with postoperative changes in ODI (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative resilience is associated with improvement in pain, physical and mental health quality of life during the early postoperative period following lumbar spinal fusion. Additional research is needed to determine if improvements are maintained beyond this interval and whether resilience can be modified to optimize outcomes.

Prediction of Long-Term Recovery From Disability Using Hemoglobin-Based Models: Results From a Cohort of 1,392 Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery

Hemoglobin and its associated blood values are important laboratory biomarkers that mirror the strength of constitution of patients undergoing spine surgery. Along with the clinical determinants available during the preadmission visit, it is important to explore their potential for predicting clinical success from the patient's perspective in order to make the pre-admission visit more patient-centered. We analyzed data from 1,392 patients with spine deformity, disc disease, or spondylolisthesis enrolled between 2016 and 2019 in our institutional Spine Registry. Patient-reported outcome measure at 17 months after surgery was referred to the Oswestry disability index. High preoperative hemoglobin was found to be the strongest biochemical determinant of clinical success along with high red blood cells count, while low baseline disability, prolonged hospitalization, and long surgical times were associated with poor recovery. The neural network model of these predictors showed a fair diagnostic performance, having an area under the curve of 0.726 and a sensitivity of 86.79%. However, the specificity of the model was 15.15%, thus providing to be unreliable in forecasting poor patient-reported outcomes. In conclusion, preoperative hemoglobin may be one of the key biomarkers on which to build appropriate predictive models of long-term recovery after spine surgery, but it is necessary to include multidimensional variables in the models to increase the reliability at the patient's level.

Effect of Patient Resilience and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score on Return to Sport Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

Background

This study aims to determine the effect of resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and perceived self-efficacy of knee function, as measured by the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score on return to sport outcomes following ACL Reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.

Methods

Seventy-one patients undergoing ACLR surgery were followed up for a minimum of one year. At six-months post-op, ACLR patients completed the BRS and the SANE score. Patients were stratified into low, normal, and high resilience groups, and outcome scores were calculated.

Results

The median return to sports participation, in months post-operatively, for the low, normal, and high resiliency groups were 7.1, 7.3, and 7.2 months, respectively (P=0.78). A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the SANE score was a significant predictor of return to sport at nine months when adjusted for age, sex, and BRS score (P=0.01). Patients that returned to sport by nine months demonstrated a mean SANE score of 92.7, compared to a mean of 85.7 (P=0.08). In patients who had returned to sport, neither the BRS resilience group nor the SANE score were significant predictors of the returned level of competition status (P=0.06; P=0.18).

Conclusion

The SANE score may serve as a significant predictor of return to sport when adjusted for age, sex, and BRS score. Resilience, as measured by the BRS, was not significantly associated with return to sport, but may have utility in specific patient populations.

Role of psychosocial factors on the effect of physical activity on physical function in patients after lumbar spine surgery

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the longitudinal postoperative relationship between physical activity, psychosocial factors, and physical function in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Methods

We enrolled 248 participants undergoing surgery for a degenerative lumbar spine condition. Physical activity was measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) at 6-weeks (6wk), 6-months (6M), 12-months (12M) and 24-months (24M) following spine surgery. Physical function (computerized adaptive test domain version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and psychosocial factors (pain self-efficacy, depression and fear of movement) were assessed at preoperative visit and 6wk, 6M, 12M and 24M after surgery. Structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques were utilized to analyze data, and results are represented as standardized regression weights (SRW). Overall SRW were computed across five imputed datasets to account for missing data. The mediation effect of each psychosocial factor on the effect of physical activity on physical function were computed [(SRW for effect of activity on psychosocial factor X SRW for effect of psychosocial factor on function) ÷ SRW for effect of activity on function]. Each SEM model was tested for model fit by assessing established fit indexes.

Results

The overall effect of steps per day on physical function (SRW ranged from 0.08 to 0.19, p<0.05) was stronger compared to the overall effect of physical function on steps per day (SRW ranged from non-existent to 0.14, p<0.01 to 0.3). The effect of steps per day on physical function and function on steps per day remained consistent after accounting for psychosocial factors in each of the mediation models. Depression and fear of movement at 6M mediated 3.4% and 5.4% of the effect of steps per day at 6wk on physical function at 12M, respectively. Pain self-efficacy was not a statistically significant mediator.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that the relationship between physical activity and physical function is stronger than the relationship of function to activity. However, future research is needed to examine whether promoting physical activity during the early postoperative period may result in improvement of long-term physical function. Since depression and fear of movement had a very small mediating effect, additional work is needed to investigate other potential mediating factors such as pain catastrophizing, resilience and exercise self-efficacy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04622-w.

Examining the relationship between elderly patients' fear of falling after spinal surgery and pain, kinesiophobia, anxiety, depression and the associated factors

This study aimed to examine the relationship between fear of falling in elderly patients who underwent spinal surgery and pain, kinesiophobia, anxiety, depression, and associated factors. The study was a descriptive, cross-sectional design. The research sample consisted of 211 elderly patients who had undergone spinal surgery. The average age of the patients was 66.68 ± 5.57. Of the sample, 83.4% were afraid of falling, and 21.3% were severely afraid of falling. In the study, age (β = 0.115, p = 0.005), being a woman (β = -0.182, p < 0.001), pain (β = 0.269, p < 0.001), risk of falling (β = 0.084, p = 0.49), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) (β = 0.135, p = 0.044), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety-Depression (HADS-D) (β = 0.382, p < 0.001), and kinesiophobia (β = 0.722, p < 0.001) were statistically significant predictors of fear of falling. This study provided important information about the variables that surgical nurses should pay attention to while evaluating the fear of falling in elderly patients who underwent spinal surgery.

Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Classification of Human Wear and Delivery Days in Accelerometry Data

Accelerometers are increasingly being used in biomedical research, but the analysis of accelerometry data is often complicated by both the massive size of the datasets and the collection of unwanted data from the process of delivery to study participants. Current methods for removing delivery data involve arduous manual review of dense datasets. We aimed to develop models for the classification of days in accelerometry data as activity from human wear or the delivery process. These models can be used to automate the cleaning of accelerometry datasets that are adulterated with activity from delivery. We developed statistical and machine learning models for the classification of accelerometry data in a supervised learning context using a large human activity and delivery labeled accelerometry dataset. Model performances were assessed and compared using Monte Carlo cross-validation. We found that a hybrid convolutional recurrent neural network performed best in the classification task with an F1 score of 0.960 but simpler models such as logistic regression and random forest also had excellent performance with F1 scores of 0.951 and 0.957, respectively. The best performing models and related data processing techniques are made publicly available in the R package, Physical Activity.