1
|
Sweet R, Kasali N. Public health intervention amidst conflict: Violence, politics, and knowledge frames in the 2018-20 Ebola epidemic in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Soc Sci Med 2024; 350:116854. [PMID: 38713978 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
Research, policy, and donor interest in health systems in conflict environments has grown rapidly in recent years. The 2018-20 Ebola outbreak in Democratic Republic of the Congo is a critical case of healthcare militarization. The first-ever such outbreak in an active conflict zone, it grew notorious for violence against response teams, with attacks aggravating the spread of disease. However, while medical responders observed physical attacks, the causes of the violence remained largely unknown. Drawing on interviews and participant observation, we contribute civilian vantages of the way health intervention grew militarized, or associated with conflict. The argument builds in two core steps. A first reconstructs civilian experiences of conflict prior to Ebola to trace how the response took on a political meaning. We find that relationships linking state forces with the health response inadvertently tethered Ebola to what civilians perceived as security threats and that by repeating government statements about conflict, response teams unintentionally endorsed a version of the truth that silenced local voices. A second step addresses a central paradox: residents communicated these concerns directly, repeatedly, and via official response channels, yet healthcare teams failed to apply these insights. We locate this gap in the knowledge structures, or frames, accompanying intervention. Medical emergencies in warzones operate with dual sets of frames casting conflict players as "non-state" and public health resistance as "ignorance." Both frames intersect in ways that amplify invisibilities in each, clouding understandings of the nature of conflict and humanitarians' role in it. We suggest this places intervention teams at heightened risk of mis-stepping on political fault lines-and not understanding why. The study advances work on community engagement by showing that instead of simply providing scientific knowledge, effective engagement requires adjusting socio-political lenses within the response. It contributes to studies on health intervention, humanitarian emergencies, and the limits of medical neutrality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Sweet
- Kroc Institute for Institutional Peace Studies, Department of Political Science, Keough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, 306 Hesburgh International Center, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
| | - Noé Kasali
- Bethesda Counseling Center, Université Chrétienne Bilingue du Congo, Quartier Kipriani, Beni, North Kivu, Congo
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bağcı ŞE, Erden Ş, Yengel B. Making sense of COVID-19: manifestations of health capital during the pandemic. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:933. [PMID: 38561712 PMCID: PMC10983716 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18451-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grounded in Bourdieu's theory of human practice, this study aims to examine how individuals as social agents made sense of and acted upon their COVID-19 experiences. A recent conceptualization of health capital is utilized to explain the practices of patients in the pandemic, in relation to their biographical background. METHODS This is a qualitative research in which the data were collected by biographical narrative interviews through a theoretical sampling approach. Eighteen interviews with COVID-19 patients were conducted and 8 of them were analyzed by the Documentary Method. RESULTS The informants made sense of their illness experiences through their health capital, which is manifested in their self-perception of health, their attitudes towards the healthcare system, their conception of terms such as luck, their work status, and the gendered division of labour at home in the COVID-19 pandemic. All the manifestations are mediated by the social, cultural, and economic capital of the informants, and their habitual practices are based on their symbolic capital. CONCLUSION The study depicts how social agents' health capital manifested in the pandemic, relying on their symbolic capital, and shaping their practices. Further research across diverse contexts is needed to fully understand extra dimensions of health capital as a descriptor of the social determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ş Erhan Bağcı
- Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
- Medical Education, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Şengül Erden
- Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Begüm Yengel
- Department of Foreign Languages, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagner A, Polak P, Rudek TJ, Świątkiewicz-Mośny M, Anderson A, Bockstal M, Gariglio L, Hasmanová Marhánková J, Hilário AP, Hobson-West P, Iorio J, Kuusipalo A, Numerato D, Scavarda A, Alcântara da Silva P, Soares Moura E, Vuolanto P. Agency in urgency and uncertainty. Vaccines and vaccination in European media discourses. Soc Sci Med 2024; 346:116725. [PMID: 38432000 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Although Covid-19 was not the first pandemic, it was unique in the scale and intensity with which societies responded. Countries reacted differently to the threat posed by the new virus. The public health crisis affected European societies in many ways. It also influenced the way the media portrayed vaccines and discussed factors related to vaccine hesitancy. Europeans differed in their risk perceptions, attitudes towards vaccines and vaccine uptake. In European countries, Covid-19-related discourses were at the centre of media attention for many months. This paper reports on a media analysis which revealed significant differences as well as some similarities in the media debates in different countries. The study focused on seven European countries and considered two dimensions of comparison: between the pre-Covid period and the beginning of the Covid pandemic period, and between countries. The rich methodological approach, including linguistics, semantic field analysis and discourse analysis of mainstream news media, allowed the authors to explore the set of meanings related to vaccination that might influence actors' agency. This approach led the authors to redefine vaccine hesitancy in terms of characteristics of the "society in the situation" rather than the psychological profile of individuals. We argue that vaccine hesitancy can be understood in terms of agency and temporality. This dilemma of choice that transforms the present into an irreversible past and must be taken in relation to an uncertain future, is particularly acute under the pressure of urgency and when someone's health is at stake. As such, it is linked to how vaccine meaning is co-produced within public discourses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Juliana Iorio
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith SE, Sivertsen N, Lines L, De Bellis A. Netnography: A novel methodology for nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:4207-4217. [PMID: 37464735 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this paper is to critically reflect on our team's experience of using netnography to explore vaccine-hesitant parents and pregnant women, a group who have traditionally been difficult to recruit to research studies and a methodology that is underutilized in nursing research. DESIGN This paper takes the form of a discussion paper that will utilize data obtained from a qualitative netnographic study. Relevant literature was searched including 2015-2023. METHOD This paper utilized data obtained from a qualitative study that used netnography as methodology and an online minable data source. Netnography is a relatively new methodology that uses the online environment to explore digital cultures and study networked society. It pays particular attention to cultural insights and conditions that impact the human experience. This methodology is particularly relevant to nursing research which is often humanistic and always conducted to ensure optimal patient outcomes. RESULTS Using netnography for the first time has resulted in four main insights. These include the adaptability of the process; the creativity involved in designing the site; the ready acceptance of the site by participants and the co-creation knowledge that resulted. CONCLUSIONS Netnography is a creative methodology that was successful in accessing and engaging the vaccine-hesitant community, a group who are often marginalized. Netnography has the advantage of using a platform that is familiar and safe for many people and provides access to an extensive minable data source.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Smith
- College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nina Sivertsen
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University and UIT Arctic University of Norway, Rural and Remote Arctic health, Campus Hammersfest, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Lauren Lines
- College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anita De Bellis
- College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roshchina Y, Rozhkova K, Roshchin S. Between nudges and mandates: The drivers of COVID-19 vaccination intentions and subsequent uptake in Russia. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)00756-9. [PMID: 37419852 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
Despite high levels of morbidity and mortality, as well as the widespread availability of domestic vaccines, Russia demonstrated significantly low rates of vaccination throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This research explores vaccination intentions before the start of the immunisation campaign and the consequent uptake in Russia after the introduction of mandatory vaccination policy in certain industries and proof-of-immunisation for social activities. Using a nationally representative panel dataset, we analyse factors behind individual vaccination decisions using binary and multinomial logistic regressions. Special attention is given to the effect of employment in industries with vaccine mandates and personal factors which determine individual "nudgeability" to vaccination (e.g., personality traits, beliefs, vaccine alertness, self-perceived vaccine availability etc.). Our results show that 49 per cent of the population received at least one shot of COVID-19 vaccine by autumn 2021 after the introduction of mandatory vaccination. Vaccination intentions before the rollout of the nationwide immunisation campaign are correlated with the consequent attitudes and uptake, although the prediction is not perfect. 40 percent of vaccine refusers eventually got vaccinated, while 16 percent of vaccine supporters turned into refusers, revealing the lack of promotion of vaccine safety and effectiveness. To a large extent, vaccination refusal and hesitance are explained by vaccine alertness. Vaccine mandates significantly increased the uptake in several affected industries, especially education. These results offer important insights for designing information policy, relevant for future vaccination campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yana Roshchina
- Center for Longitudinal Studies and Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology, Department of Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11 Myasnitskaya street, Moscow 101000, Russian Federation.
| | - Ksenia Rozhkova
- Laboratory for Labor Market Studies, Faculty of Economic Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11 Pokrovsky Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russian Federation.
| | - Sergey Roshchin
- Laboratory for Labor Market Studies, Faculty of Economic Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11 Pokrovsky Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russian Federation.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
James M, Kasereka JG, Kasiwa B, Kavunga-Membo H, Kambale K, Grais R, Muyembe-Tamfum JJ, Bausch DG, Watson-Jones D, Lees S. Protection, health seeking, or a laissez-passer: Participants' decision-making in an EVD vaccine trial in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Soc Sci Med 2023; 323:115833. [PMID: 36934528 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
During the 10th Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (2018-2020), two experimental EVD vaccines were deployed in North Kivu. This province has been at the centre of conflict in the region for the last 25 years. Amidst ambivalence towards protracted foreign intervention and controversy about introducing two experimental vaccines, the existing literature has focused on mistrust and 'resistance' towards the Ebola response and vaccines. In this article, we examine why people in the eastern DRC did decide to volunteer for a trial of a second EVD vaccine in North Kivu, despite the controversy. Drawing on ethnographic observation, interviews, and focus groups with trial participants conducted between September 2020 and April 2021, we analyse three motivations for participating: protection, health seeking, and expectations surrounding travel requirements. We make three points. First, participation in vaccine trials may be understood locally to have advantages which have not been considered by the trial, because they go beyond medical considerations and are specific to a particular social setting. Second, despite much of the literature focusing on a causal relationship between rumours and 'vaccine hesitancy', some rumours may in fact encourage participation. Third, material objects associated with trial participation - such as participant vaccine cards - can hold social and political meaning beyond the confines of the vaccine clinic, and influence decisions surrounding participation. Empirical investigation of how medical interventions become entangled in political economies is essential to understanding the perceived functions of participation, and thus the reasons why people volunteer in clinical trials. Participants' narratives about their decision-making provide an insight into how international bioethical debates interact with, but may also stand apart from, the situated social and economic realities driving decision-making around clinical trials on the ground. This highlights the need for ethical approaches that foreground the political, social, and economic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myfanwy James
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; Department of International Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Benjamin Kasiwa
- Ebola Vaccine Deployment Acceptance and Compliance, Goma, Congo.
| | - Hugo Kavunga-Membo
- Laboratoire Rodolphe Mérieux Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale-Goma, Goma, North Kivu, Congo; Faculté de Médecine, Université de Goma, Goma, North Kivu, Congo.
| | - Kasonia Kambale
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
| | - Rebecca Grais
- Épicentre, Médecins Sans Frontières, 34 Avenue Jean Jaurès, 75019, Paris, France.
| | | | - Daniel G Bausch
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
| | - Deborah Watson-Jones
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
| | - Shelley Lees
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roshchina Y, Roshchin S, Rozhkova K. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Russia. Vaccine 2022; 40:5739-5747. [PMID: 36050249 PMCID: PMC9411140 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination is the main tool available to handle the COVID-19 pandemic globally. Though no vaccine is proven to be 100% effective, vaccination secures against getting seriously ill and dying from the disease. Russia announced the development of its first domestic vaccine back in August 2020 and launched the nationwide immunization campaign at the beginning of 2021. Despite these achievements, as of mid-October 2021, only 36% of the population got at least one shot of the vaccine. Massive vaccination hesitancy and refusal pose a great threat to public health and postpone social and economic recovery. Using nationally representative data from the general adult population of Russia, this study explores the scope of vaccination hesitancy and refusal as well as the determinants of vaccination attitudes. The results suggest that only 45% of the Russian population demonstrated positive attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccination prior to the launch of a nationwide vaccination program. We analyze a wide array of demographic, socio-economic, and health-related factors in relation to vaccination intentions and explore the deep-rooted causes of vaccination reluctance by looking at personality traits, religiosity, and trust. The obtained results are vital for designing policy measures to promote vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yana Roshchina
- Center for Longitudinal Studies and Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology, Department of Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11 Myasnitskaya, Moscow 101000, Russian Federation.
| | - Sergey Roshchin
- Laboratory for Labor Market Studies, Faculty of Economic Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11 Pokrovsky Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russian Federation.
| | - Ksenia Rozhkova
- Laboratory for Labor Market Studies, Faculty of Economic Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11 Pokrovsky Boulevard, Moscow 109028, Russian Federation.
| |
Collapse
|