1
|
Huang Y, Li TY, Weng JF, Liu H, Xu YJ, Zhang S, Gu WL. Peritoneal fluid indocyanine green test for diagnosis of gut leakage in anastomotic leakage rats and colorectal surgery patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1825-1834. [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Application of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence has led to new developments in gastrointestinal surgery. However, little is known about the use of ICG for the diagnosis of postoperative gut leakage (GL). In addition, there is a lack of rapid and intuitive methods to definitively diagnose postoperative GL.
AIM To investigate the effect of ICG in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage in a surgical rat GL model and evaluate its diagnostic value in colorectal surgery patients.
METHODS Sixteen rats were divided into two groups: GL group (n = 8) and sham group (n = 8). Approximately 0.5 mL of ICG (2.5 mg/mL) was intravenously injected postoperatively. The peritoneal fluid was collected for the fluorescence test at 24 and 48 h. Six patients with rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic rectal cancer resection plus enterostomies were injected with 10 mL of ICG (2.5 mg/mL) on postoperative day 1. Their ostomy fluids were collected 24 h after ICG injection to identify the possibility of the ICG excreting from the peripheral veins to the enterostomy stoma. Participants who had undergone colectomy or rectal cancer resection were enrolled in the diagnostic test. The peritoneal fluids from drainage were collected 24 h after ICG injection. The ICG fluorescence test was conducted using OptoMedic endoscopy along with a near-infrared fluorescent imaging system.
RESULTS The peritoneal fluids from the GL group showed ICG-dependent green fluorescence in contrast to the sham group. Six samples of ostomy fluids showed green fluorescence, indicating the possibility of ICG excreting from the peripheral veins to the enterostomy stoma in patients. The peritoneal fluid ICG test exhibited a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 83.3% for the diagnosis of GL. The positive predictive value was 71.4%, while the negative predictive value was 100%. The likelihood ratios were 6.0 for a positive test result and 0 for a negative result.
CONCLUSION The postoperative ICG test in a drainage tube is a valuable and simple technique for the diagnosis of GL. Hence, it should be employed in clinical settings in patients with suspected GL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Huang
- Department of Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Tian-Yang Li
- Department of Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jie-Feng Weng
- Department of Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yu-Jie Xu
- Department of Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shuai Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wei-Li Gu
- Department of Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harada T, Numata M, Izukawa S, Atsumi Y, Kazama K, Sawazaki S, Godai T, Mushiake H, Sugano N, Uchiyama M, Higuchi A, Tamagawa H, Suwa Y, Watanabe J, Sato T, Kunisaki C, Saito A. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer with intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10940-6. [PMID: 38858251 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10940-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) reduces anastomotic leakage (AL) in rectal cancer surgery. However, no studies investigating risk factors for anastomotic leakage specific to the group using ICG-FI have ever previously been conducted. The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to ascertain the risk factors for AL in the group using ICG-FI. METHODS A total of 638 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer between April 2018 and March 2023 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: the ICG-FI group (n = 269) and the non-ICG-FI group (n = 369) for comparative analysis. The effects of clinicopathological and treatment-related factors on AL in the ICG-FI group were evaluated using both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The incidence of AL in the ICG-FI group was 4.8%. Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of AL between the two groups, it was observed to be lower in the ICG-FI group. A multivariate analysis revealed a preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) ≥ 0.049 (odds ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-13.70; p = 0.048) as an independent risk factor for AL in the ICG-FI group. CONCLUSIONS In this study, CAR was the only identified risk factor for AL in the ICG-FI group. It was suggested that CAR could be a criterion for early surgical intervention, prior to the escalation of risks, or for considering interventions such as diverting stoma creation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsunosuke Harada
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Masakatsu Numata
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan.
| | - Shota Izukawa
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Yosuke Atsumi
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kazama
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Sho Sawazaki
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Teni Godai
- Department of Surgery, Fujisawa Shounandai Hospital, 2345, Takakura, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-0802, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Mushiake
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Nanbu Hospital, 3-2-10, Konandai, Konan-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 234-0054, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Sugano
- Department of Surgery, Hiratuka Kyosai Hospital, 9-11, Oiwake, Hiratuka, Kanagawa, 254-8502, Japan
| | - Mamoru Uchiyama
- Department of Surgery, Ashigarakami Hospital, 866-1, Matsudasouryou, Matsuda-town, Ashigarakami-gun, Kanagawa, 258-0003, Japan
| | - Akio Higuchi
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, 21-1, Mutsuurahigashi, Kawazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0037, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tamagawa
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, 21-1, Mutsuurahigashi, Kawazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0037, Japan
| | - Yusuke Suwa
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Sato
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Chikara Kunisaki
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Town, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Aya Saito
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Avellaneda N, Pellino G, Maroli A, Tottrup A, Bislenghi G, Colpaert J, D'Hoore A, Carvello M, Giorgi L, Juachon P, Harsløf S, de Buck Van Overstraeten A, Olivera PA, Gomez J, Holubar SD, Naranjo EL, Steele SR, Merchea A, Shaker A, Gallostra MM, Kraft M, Kotze PG, Maruyama BY, Wexner SD, Garoufalia Z, Chen Z, Hahnloser D, Rrupa D, Buskens C, Haanappel A, Warusavitarne J, Williams KJ, Christensen P, Wolthuis A, Potolicchio A, Spinelli A. Short-term outcomes of surgical treatment for primary ileocaecal Crohn's disease: Results of the Crohn's(urg) study, a multicentre, retrospective, comparative analysis between inflammatory and complicated phenotypes. Colorectal Dis 2024. [PMID: 38858815 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
AIM Recent evidence challenges the current standard of offering surgery to patients with ileocaecal Crohn's disease (CD) only when they present complications of the disease. The aim of this study was to compare short-term results of patients who underwent primary ileocaecal resection for either inflammatory (luminal disease, earlier in the disease course) or complicated phenotypes, hypothesizing that the latter would be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. METHOD A retrospective, multicentre comparative analysis was performed including patients operated on for primary ileocaecal CD at 12 referral centres. Patients were divided into two groups according to indication of surgery for inflammatory (ICD) or complicated (CCD) phenotype. Short-term results were compared. RESULTS A total of 2013 patients were included, with 291 (14.5%) in the ICD group. No differences were found between the groups in time from diagnosis to surgery. CCD patients had higher rates of low body mass index, anaemia (40.9% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and low albumin (11.3% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001). CCD patients had longer operations, lower rates of laparoscopic approach (84.3% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.001) and higher conversion rates (9.3% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001). CCD patients had a longer hospital stay and higher postoperative complication rates (26.1% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.083). Anastomotic leakage and reoperations were also more frequent in this group. More patients in the CCD group required an extended bowel resection (14.1% vs. 8.3%, p: 0.017). In multivariate analysis, CCD was associated with prolonged surgery (OR 3.44, p = 0.001) and the requirement for multiple intraoperative procedures (OR 8.39, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION Indication for surgery in patients who present with an inflammatory phenotype of CD was associated with better outcomes compared with patients operated on for complications of the disease. There was no difference between groups in time from diagnosis to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Avellaneda
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- General Surgery Department, CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annalisa Maroli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Anders Tottrup
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gabriele Bislenghi
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Colpaert
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andre D'Hoore
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michele Carvello
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Giorgi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Juachon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Sanne Harsløf
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Pablo A Olivera
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Javier Gomez
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Sinai Health Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Scott R Steele
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Amit Merchea
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew Shaker
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Marc Marti Gallostra
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Kraft
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paulo Gustavo Kotze
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Beatriz Yuki Maruyama
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Zoe Garoufalia
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Zhihui Chen
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dieter Hahnloser
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Djana Rrupa
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christianne Buskens
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouck Haanappel
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Albert Wolthuis
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Analia Potolicchio
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Bordeaux Cancer Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Houqiong J, Yuli Y, Yahang L, Tao L, Yang L, Yaxiong L, Dongning L, Taiyuan L. LASSO-based nomogram predicts the risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome for middle and low rectal cancer underwent robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3378-3387. [PMID: 38714570 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10863-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to analyze the influencing factors of postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in patients with middle and low rectal cancer who underwent robotic surgery. It also seeks to predict the probability of LARS through a visual, quantitative, and graphical nomogram. This approach is expected to lower the risk of postoperative LARS in these patients and improve their quality of life through effective prevention and early intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS This research involved patients with middle and low rectal cancer who underwent robotic surgery in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2015 to October 2022. A series of intestinal dysfunction symptoms arising from postoperative rectal cancer were diagnosed and graded using LARS scoring criteria. After the initial screening of all variables related to LARS with Lasso regression, they were included in logistic regression for further univariate and multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for LARS. A prediction model was then constructed. RESULTS The study included 358 patients. The parameters identified by Lasso regression included obstruction, BMI, tumor localization, maximum tumor diameter, AJCC stage, stoma, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that a higher BMI, lower tumor localization, higher AJCC stage, neoadjuvant therapy, and postoperative adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for total LARS. The AUC of the prediction nomogram was 0.834, with a sensitivity of 0.825 and specificity of 0.741. The calibration curve demonstrated excellent concordance with the nomogram, indicating the prediction curve fit the diagonal well. CONCLUSION Higher BMI, lower tumor localization, higher AJCC stage, neoadjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy were identified as independent risk factors for total LARS. A new predictive nomogram for postoperative LARS in patients with middle and low rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery was developed, proving to be stable and reliable. This tool will assist clinicians in managing the postoperative treatment of these patients, facilitating better clinical decision-making and maximizing patient benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Houqiong
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yuan Yuli
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Liang Yahang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Li Tao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Liu Yaxiong
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Liu Dongning
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
| | - Li Taiyuan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herzberg J, Acs M, Guraya SY, Schlitt HJ, Honarpisheh H, Strate T, Piso P. Anastomotic leakage following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: A clinical cohort study. Surg Oncol 2024; 54:102080. [PMID: 38663060 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended oncological resections for colorectal cancer surgery are associated with a high rate of complications, especially anastomotic leakage (AL). This study determines the incidence of risk factors for postoperative complications following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS In this cohort study, the clinical data of all patients with CRC, treated with CRS and HIPEC, from 2011 to 2021 was analyzed. We considered patients' characteristics, tumor-specific features, postoperative complications, and hospital stay using Chi-Square-test or Fisher's exact test. The Mann-Whitney-U-test was used to measure the probability of differences between two sets of data. RESULTS Of 1089 HIPEC procedures performed in the study center, 185 patients with CRC and peritoneal metastasis were treated with CRS and HIPEC after formation of at least one anastomosis and therefore included in this study. This included synchronous and metachronous peritoneal metastasis with a mean peritoneal cancer index of 8.67 ± 5.22. In this cohort, AL occurred in 12 (6.5 %) patients. There was no correlation between the number of anastomoses and the occurrence of an AL (p = 0.401). CONCLUSION This study reports a low risk of AL after CRS with HIPEC for CRC, comparable to other published data. If a complete cytoreduction seems possible, the risk of anastomotic leakage should not negatively influence the decision to resect. Further studies on this subject are essential to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Herzberg
- Department of Surgery - Hospital Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Hamburger Strasse 41, 21465, Reinbek, Germany.
| | - Miklos Acs
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, D-93049, Germany; Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Regensburg, D-93049, Germany
| | - Salman Yousuf Guraya
- Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, P. O. Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Human Honarpisheh
- Department of Surgery - Hospital Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Hamburger Strasse 41, 21465, Reinbek, Germany
| | - Tim Strate
- Department of Surgery - Hospital Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Hamburger Strasse 41, 21465, Reinbek, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, D-93049, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koskenvuo L, Lunkka P, Varpe P, Hyöty M, Satokari R, Haapamäki C, Lepistö A, Sallinen V. Morbidity After Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Prior to Rectal Resection: The MOBILE2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:606-614. [PMID: 38506889 PMCID: PMC10955353 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Importance Surgical site infections (SSIs)-especially anastomotic dehiscence-are major contributors to morbidity and mortality after rectal resection. The role of mechanical and oral antibiotics bowel preparation (MOABP) in preventing complications of rectal resection is currently disputed. Objective To assess whether MOABP reduces overall complications and SSIs after elective rectal resection compared with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) plus placebo. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 university hospitals in Finland between March 18, 2020, and October 10, 2022. Patients aged 18 years and older undergoing elective resection with primary anastomosis of a rectal tumor 15 cm or less from the anal verge on magnetic resonance imaging were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who were randomly allocated to and underwent elective rectal resection with an anastomosis. Interventions Patients were stratified according to tumor distance from the anal verge and neoadjuvant treatment given and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive MOABP with an oral regimen of neomycin and metronidazole (n = 277) or MBP plus matching placebo tablets (n = 288). All study medications were taken the day before surgery, and all patients received intravenous antibiotics approximately 30 minutes before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall cumulative postoperative complications measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index. Key secondary outcomes were SSI and anastomotic dehiscence within 30 days after surgery. Results In all, 565 patients were included in the analysis, with 288 in the MBP plus placebo group (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-74] years; 190 males [66.0%]) and 277 in the MOABP group (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-75] years; 158 males [57.0%]). Patients in the MOABP group experienced fewer overall postoperative complications (median [IQR] Comprehensive Complication Index, 0 [0-8.66] vs 8.66 [0-20.92]; Wilcoxon effect size, 0.146; P < .001), fewer SSIs (23 patients [8.3%] vs 48 patients [16.7%]; odds ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.27-0.77]), and fewer anastomotic dehiscences (16 patients [5.8%] vs 39 patients [13.5%]; odds ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.72]) compared with patients in the MBP plus placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that MOABP reduced overall postoperative complications as well as rates of SSIs and anastomotic dehiscences in patients undergoing elective rectal resection compared with MBP plus placebo. Based on these findings, MOABP should be considered as standard treatment in patients undergoing elective rectal resection. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281667.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Koskenvuo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pipsa Lunkka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pirita Varpe
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Marja Hyöty
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Reetta Satokari
- Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Carola Haapamäki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna Lepistö
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ville Sallinen
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hain E, Lefèvre JH, Ricardo A, Lee S, Zaghiyan K, McLemore E, Sherwinter D, Rhee R, Wilson M, Martz J, Maykel J, Marks J, Marcet J, Rouanet P, Maggiori L, Komen N, De Hous N, Lakkis Z, Tuech JJ, Attiyeh F, Cotte E, Sylla P. SafeHeal Colovac Colorectal Anastomosis Protection Device evaluation (SAFE-2) pivotal study: an international randomized controlled study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Colovac Colorectal Anastomosis Protection Device. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1271-1284. [PMID: 38750621 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
AIM Although proximal faecal diversion is standard of care to protect patients with high-risk colorectal anastomoses against septic complications of anastomotic leakage, it is associated with significant morbidity. The Colovac device (CD) is an intraluminal bypass device intended to avoid stoma creation in patients undergoing low anterior resection. A preliminary study (SAFE-1) completed in three European centres demonstrated 100% protection of colorectal anastomoses in 15 patients, as evidenced by the absence of faeces below the CD. This phase III trial (SAFE-2) aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the CD in a larger cohort of patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resection. METHODS SAFE-2 is a pivotal, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the CD arm or the diverting loop ileostomy arm, with a recruitment target of 342 patients. The co-primary endpoints are the occurrence of major postoperative complications within 12 months of index surgery and the effectiveness of the CD in reducing stoma creation rates. Data regarding quality of life and patient's acceptance and tolerance of the device will be collected. DISCUSSION SAFE-2 is a multicentre randomized, control trial assessing the efficacy and the safety of the CD in protecting low colorectal anastomoses created during oncological resection relative to standard diverting loop ileostomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05010850.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Hain
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Alison Ricardo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sang Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elisabeth McLemore
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Danny Sherwinter
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca Rhee
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Matthew Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Joseph Martz
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Western Region Northwell/Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, USA
| | - Justin Maykel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Marks
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jorge Marcet
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Leon Maggiori
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Niels Komen
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Nicolas De Hous
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Tuech
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Fadi Attiyeh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eddy Cotte
- Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Hopital Lyon Sud, Oullins-Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rogier-Mouzelas F, Piquard A, Karam E, Dussart D, Michot N, Saint-Marc O, Thebault B, Artus A, Bucur P, Pabst-Giger U, Salame E, Ouaissi M. Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10867-y. [PMID: 38789622 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10867-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is assumed that robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) may facilitate complex pelvic dissection for rectal cancer compared to the laparoscopic-assisted resection (LAR). The aim of this study was to compare perioperative morbidity, short- and long-term oncologic, and functional outcomes between the RAS and LAR approaches. METHODS Between 2015 and 2021, all rectal cancers operated on by (LAR) or (RAS) were retrospectively reviewed in two colorectal surgery centers. RESULTS A total of 197 patients were included in the study, with 70% in the LAR group and 30% in the RAS group. The tumor location and stage were identical in both groups (not significant = NS). The overall postoperative mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups. (0% LAR; 0.5% RAS; NS). The postoperative morbidity was similar between the two groups (60% LAR vs 57% RAS; NS). The number of early surgical re-interventions within the first 30 days was similar (10% for the LAR group and 3% for the RAS group; NS). The rate of complete TME was similar (88% for the LAR group and 94% for the RAS group; NS). However, the rate of circumferential R1 was significantly higher in the LAR group (13%) compared to the RAS group (2%) (p = 0.009). The 3-year recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups (77% for both groups; NS). After a mean follow-up of three years, the incidence of anterior resection syndrome was significantly lower in the LAR group compared to the RAS group (54 vs 76%; p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS The use of a RAS was found to be reliable for oncologic outcomes and morbidity. However, the expected benefits for functional outcomes were not observed. Therefore, the added value of RAS for rectal cancer needs to be reassessed in light of new laparoscopic technologies and patient management options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Rogier-Mouzelas
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de La République, 37044, Tours, France
| | - Arnaud Piquard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Orleans, 14 avenue de l'hôpital, 45100, Orleans, France
| | - Elias Karam
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de La République, 37044, Tours, France
| | - David Dussart
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Orleans, 14 avenue de l'hôpital, 45100, Orleans, France
| | - Nicolas Michot
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de La République, 37044, Tours, France
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Orleans, 14 avenue de l'hôpital, 45100, Orleans, France
| | - Baudouin Thebault
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Orleans, 14 avenue de l'hôpital, 45100, Orleans, France
| | - Alice Artus
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de La République, 37044, Tours, France
| | - Petru Bucur
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de La République, 37044, Tours, France
| | - Urs Pabst-Giger
- Fliedner Fachhochschule, University of Applied Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ephrem Salame
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de La République, 37044, Tours, France
| | - Mehdi Ouaissi
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, Avenue de La République, 37044, Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Taha-Mehlitz S, Wentzler L, Angehrn F, Hendie A, Ochs V, Wolleb J, Staartjes VE, Enodien B, Baltuonis M, Vorburger S, Frey DM, Rosenberg R, von Flüe M, Müller-Stich B, Cattin PC, Taha A, Steinemann D. Machine learning-based preoperative analytics for the prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a swiss pilot study. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10926-4. [PMID: 38777894 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10926-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage (AL), a severe complication following colorectal surgery, arises from defects at the anastomosis site. This study evaluates the feasibility of predicting AL using machine learning (ML) algorithms based on preoperative data. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data including 21 predictors from patients undergoing colorectal surgery with bowel anastomosis at four Swiss hospitals. Several ML algorithms were applied for binary classification into AL or non-AL groups, utilizing a five-fold cross-validation strategy with a 90% training and 10% validation split. Additionally, a holdout test set from an external hospital was employed to assess the models' robustness in external validation. RESULTS Among 1244 patients, 112 (9.0%) suffered from AL. The Random Forest model showed an AUC-ROC of 0.78 (SD: ± 0.01) on the internal test set, which significantly decreased to 0.60 (SD: ± 0.05) on the external holdout test set comprising 198 patients, including 7 (3.5%) with AL. Conversely, the Logistic Regression model demonstrated more consistent AUC-ROC values of 0.69 (SD: ± 0.01) on the internal set and 0.61 (SD: ± 0.05) on the external set. Accuracy measures for Random Forest were 0.82 (SD: ± 0.04) internally and 0.87 (SD: ± 0.08) externally, while Logistic Regression achieved accuracies of 0.81 (SD: ± 0.10) and 0.88 (SD: ± 0.15). F1 Scores for Random Forest moved from 0.58 (SD: ± 0.03) internally to 0.51 (SD: ± 0.03) externally, with Logistic Regression maintaining more stable scores of 0.53 (SD: ± 0.04) and 0.51 (SD: ± 0.02). CONCLUSION In this pilot study, we evaluated ML-based prediction models for AL post-colorectal surgery and identified ten patient-related risk factors associated with AL. Highlighting the need for multicenter data, external validation, and larger sample sizes, our findings emphasize the potential of ML in enhancing surgical outcomes and inform future development of a web-based application for broader clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz
- Clarunis, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Larissa Wentzler
- Medical Faculty, University Basel, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
- Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Cantonal Hospital Basel-Landschaft, 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Fiorenzo Angehrn
- Clarunis, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ahmad Hendie
- Department of Computer Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 0E9, Canada
| | - Vincent Ochs
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167C Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Julia Wolleb
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167C Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Victor E Staartjes
- Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bassey Enodien
- Department of Surgery, GZO-Hospital, 8620, Wetzikon, Switzerland
| | - Martinas Baltuonis
- Department of Surgery, Emmental Teaching Hospital, 3400, Burgdorf, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Vorburger
- Department of Surgery, Emmental Teaching Hospital, 3400, Burgdorf, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Frey
- Department of Surgery, GZO-Hospital, 8620, Wetzikon, Switzerland
| | - Robert Rosenberg
- Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Cantonal Hospital Basel-Landschaft, 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | | | - Beat Müller-Stich
- Clarunis, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philippe C Cattin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167C Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anas Taha
- Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Cantonal Hospital Basel-Landschaft, 4410, Liestal, Switzerland.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167C Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
| | - Daniel Steinemann
- Clarunis, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Guercioni G, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Scatizzi M, Patriti A, Baiocchi GL. Intraoperative left-sided colorectal anastomotic testing in clinical practice: a multi-treatment machine-learning analysis of the iCral3 prospective cohort. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01883-7. [PMID: 38767835 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01883-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence about intraoperative anastomotic testing after left-sided colorectal resections is still controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of Indocyanine Green fluorescent angiography (ICG-FA) and air-leak test (ALT) over standard assessment on anastomotic leakage (AL) rates according to surgeon's perception of anastomosis perfusion and/or integrity in clinical practice. METHODS A database of 2061 patients who underwent left-sided colorectal resections was selected from patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter study. It was retrospectively analyzed through a multi-treatment machine-learning model considering standard visual assessment (NW; No. = 899; 43.6%) as the reference treatment arm, compared to ICG-FA alone (WP; No. = 409; 19.8%), ALT alone (WI; No. = 420; 20.4%) or both (WPI; No. = 333; 16.2%). Twenty-four covariates potentially affecting the outcomes were included and balanced into the model within the subgroups. The primary endpoint was AL, the secondary endpoints were overall morbidity (OM), major morbidity (MM), reoperation for AL, and mortality. All the results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS The WPI subgroup showed significantly higher AL risk (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.02-3.59; p 0.043), MM risk (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.39-3.97; p 0.001), and reoperation for AL risk (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.12-5.31; p 0.025). No other significant differences were recorded. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the surgeons' perception of both anastomotic perfusion and integrity (WPI subgroup) was associated to a significantly higher risk of AL and related morbidity, notwithstanding the extensive use of both ICG-FA and ALT testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy.
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Department of Surgery, S. Salvatore Hospital, AST Marche 1, Pesaro e Fano, PU, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- General Surgical Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia at the ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu B, Zhang ZX, Nie XY, Sun WL, Yan YJ, Fu WH. Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of T4N0M0 colon cancer after R0 resection: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1869-1877. [PMID: 38764842 PMCID: PMC11099430 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paradoxically, patients with T4N0M0 (stage II, no lymph node metastasis) colon cancer have a worse prognosis than those with T2N1-2M0 (stage III). However, no previous report has addressed this issue. AIM To screen prognostic risk factors for T4N0M0 colon cancer and construct a prognostic nomogram model for these patients. METHODS Two hundred patients with T4N0M0 colon cancer were treated at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021, of which 112 patients were assigned to the training cohort, and the remaining 88 patients were assigned to the validation cohort. Differences between the training and validation groups were analyzed. The training cohort was subjected to multivariate analysis to select prognostic risk factors for T4N0M0 colon cancer, followed by the construction of a nomogram model. RESULTS The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86.2% and 74.4% for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Enterostomy (P = 0.000), T stage (P = 0.001), right hemicolon (P = 0.025), irregular review (P = 0.040), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) (P = 0.011) were independent risk factors of OS in patients with T4N0M0 colon cancer. A nomogram model with good concordance and accuracy was constructed. CONCLUSION Enterostomy, T stage, right hemicolon, irregular review, and CA199 were independent risk factors for OS in patients with T4N0M0 colon cancer. The nomogram model exhibited good agreement and accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Zhao-Xiong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Xin-Yang Nie
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Wei-Lin Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Yong-Jia Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Wei-Hua Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sun L, Gao J, Wu G, Meng C, Yang Z, Wei P, Yao H, Zhang Z. Perfusion outcomes with near-infrared indocyanine green imaging system in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer (POSTER): a study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079858. [PMID: 38724058 PMCID: PMC11086471 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anastomotic leakage (AL) is defined as the failure of complete healing or disruption of the anastomosis subsequent to rectal cancer surgery, resulting in the extravasation of intestinal contents into the intra-abdominal or pelvic cavity. It is a serious complication of rectal cancer surgery, accounting for a considerable increase in morbidity and mortality. The use of fluorescence imaging technology in surgery allows surgeons to better evaluate blood perfusion. However, the conclusions of some existing studies are not consistent, so a consensus on whether the near-infrared indocyanine green (NIR-ICG) imaging system can reduce the incidence of AL is needed. METHODS This POSTER trial is designed as a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled clinical study adhering to the "population, interventions, comparisons, outcomes (PICO)" principles. It is scheduled to take place from August 2019 to December 2024 across eight esteemed hospitals in China. The target population consists of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer through pathological confirmation, with tumours located≤10 cm from the anal verge, eligible for laparoscopic surgery. Enrolled patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group will receive intravenous injections of ICG twice, with intraoperative assessment of anastomotic blood flow using the near-infrared NIR-ICG system during total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. Conversely, the control group will undergo conventional TME surgery without the use of the NIR-ICG system. A 30-day follow-up period postoperation will be conducted to monitor and evaluate occurrences of AL. The primary endpoint of this study is the incidence of AL within 30 days postsurgery in both groups. The primary outcome investigators will be blinded to the application of ICG angiography. Based on prior literature, we hypothesise an AL rate of 10.3% in the control group and 3% in the experimental group for this study. With a planned ratio of 2:1 between the number of cases in the experimental and control groups, and an expected 20% lost-to-follow-up rate, the initial estimated sample size for this study is 712, comprising 474 in the experimental group and 238 in the control group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by Ethics committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University (approval number: 2019-P2-055-02). The results will be disseminated in major international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04012645.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liting Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiale Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guocong Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Cong Meng
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengyang Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Pengyu Wei
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongwei Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de’Angelis N, Marchegiani F, Martínez-Pérez A, Biondi A, Pucciarelli S, Schena CA, Pellino G, Kraft M, van Lieshout AS, Morelli L, Valverde A, Lupinacci RM, Gómez-Abril SA, Persiani R, Tuynman JB, Espin-Basany E, Ris F. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae044. [PMID: 38805357 PMCID: PMC11132137 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard surgery for low/mid locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare three minimally invasive surgical approaches for TME with primary anastomosis (laparoscopic TME, robotic TME, and transanal TME). METHODS Records of patients undergoing laparoscopic TME, robotic TME, or transanal TME between 2013 and 2022 according to standardized techniques in expert centres contributing to the European MRI and Rectal Cancer Surgery III (EuMaRCS-III) database were analysed. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the three groups with respect to the complication rate (primary outcome), conversion rate, postoperative recovery, and survival. RESULTS A total of 468 patients (mean(s.d.) age of 64.1(11) years) were included; 190 (40.6%) patients underwent laparoscopic TME, 141 (30.1%) patients underwent robotic TME, and 137 (29.3%) patients underwent transanal TME. Comparative analyses after propensity score matching demonstrated a higher rate of postoperative complications for laparoscopic TME compared with both robotic TME (OR 1.80, 95% c.i. 1.11-2.91) and transanal TME (OR 2.87, 95% c.i. 1.72-4.80). Robotic TME was associated with a lower rate of grade A anastomotic leakage (2%) compared with both laparoscopic TME (8.8%) and transanal TME (8.1%) (P = 0.031). Robotic TME (1.4%) and transanal TME (0.7%) were both associated with a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic TME (8.8%) (P < 0.001). Time to flatus and duration of hospital stay were shorter for patients treated with transanal TME (P = 0.003 and 0.001 respectively). There were no differences in operating time, intraoperative complications, blood loss, mortality, readmission, R0 resection, or survival. CONCLUSION In this multicentre, retrospective, propensity score-matched, cohort study of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, newer minimally invasive approaches (robotic TME and transanal TME) demonstrated improved outcomes compared with laparoscopic TME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de’Angelis
- Unit of Robotic and Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara (Cona), Italy
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP), Clichy, France
- University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Aleix Martínez-Pérez
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
- Biosanitary Research Institute, Valencian International University (VIU), Valencia, Spain
| | - Alberto Biondi
- General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Unit of Robotic and Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara (Cona), Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Kraft
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annabel S van Lieshout
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alain Valverde
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses, Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Renato Micelli Lupinacci
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses, Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Segundo A Gómez-Abril
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Roberto Persiani
- General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eloy Espin-Basany
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederic Ris
- Service of Abdominal Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rutgers ML, Burghgraef TA, Hol JC, Crolla RM, van Geloven NA, Leijtens JW, Polat F, Pronk A, Smits AB, Tuyman JB, Verdaasdonk EG, Sietses C, Consten EC, Hompes R. Total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined low rectal cancer: multicentre study comparing oncological outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision in high-volume centres. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae029. [PMID: 38788679 PMCID: PMC11126316 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The routine use of MRI in rectal cancer treatment allows the use of a strict definition for low rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare minimally invasive total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined low rectal cancer in expert laparoscopic, transanal and robotic high-volume centres. METHODS All MRI-defined low rectal cancer operated on between 2015 and 2017 in 11 Dutch centres were included. Primary outcomes were: R1 rate, total mesorectal excision quality and 3-year local recurrence and survivals (overall and disease free). Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, complications and whether there was a perioperative change in the preoperative treatment plan. RESULTS Of 1071 eligible rectal cancers, 633 patients with low rectal cancer were identified. Quality of the total mesorectal excision specimen (P = 0.337), R1 rate (P = 0.107), conversion (P = 0.344), anastomotic leakage rate (P = 0.942), local recurrence (P = 0.809), overall survival (P = 0.436) and disease-free survival (P = 0.347) were comparable among the centres. The laparoscopic centre group had the highest rate of perioperative change in the preoperative treatment plan (10.4%), compared with robotic expert centres (5.2%) and transanal centres (2.1%), P = 0.004. The main reason for this change was stapling difficulty (43%), followed by low tumour location (29%). Multivariable analysis showed that laparoscopic surgery was the only independent risk factor for a change in the preoperative planned procedure, P = 0.024. CONCLUSION Centres with expertise in all three minimally invasive total mesorectal excision techniques can achieve good oncological resection in the treatment of MRI-defined low rectal cancer. However, compared with robotic expert centres and transanal centres, patients treated in laparoscopic centres have an increased risk of a change in the preoperative intended procedure due to technical limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke L Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs A Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen C Hol
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier M Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen W Leijtens
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anke B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuyman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Esther C Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stephens IJB, Byrnes KG, Burke JP. Transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of technical approaches and clinical outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:153. [PMID: 38705912 PMCID: PMC11070401 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03343-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transanal minimally invasive surgery has theoretical advantages for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. We performed a systematic review assessing technical approaches to transanal IPAA (Ta-IPAA) and meta-analysis comparing outcomes to transabdominal (abd-IPAA) approaches. METHODS Three databases were searched for articles investigating Ta-IPAA outcomes. Primary outcome was anastomotic leak rate. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, post operative morbidity, and length of stay (LoS). Staging, plane of dissection, anastomosis, extraction site, operative time, and functional outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS Searches identified 13 studies with 404 unique Ta-IPAA and 563 abd-IPAA patients. Anastomotic leak rates were 6.3% and 8.4% (RD 0, 95% CI -0.066 to 0.065, p = 0.989) and conversion rates 2.5% and 12.5% (RD -0.106, 95% CI -0.155 to -0.057, p = 0.104) for Ta-IPAA and abd-IPAA. Average LoS was one day shorter (MD -1, 95% CI -1.876 to 0.302, p = 0.007). A three-stage approach was most common (47.6%), operative time was 261(± 60) mins, and total mesorectal excision and close rectal dissection were equally used (49.5% vs 50.5%). Functional outcomes were similar. Lack of randomised control trials, case-matched series, and significant study heterogeneity limited analysis, resulting in low to very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS Analysis demonstrated the feasibility and safety of Ta-IPAA with reduced LoS, trend towards less conversions, and comparable anastomotic leak rates and post operative morbidity. Though results are encouraging, they need to be interpreted with heterogeneity and selection bias in mind. Robust randomised clinical trials are warranted to adequately compare ta-IPAA to transabdominal approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J B Stephens
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Kevin G Byrnes
- Havering and Redbridge University Trust, Greater London, UK
| | - John P Burke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hardt J, Seyfried S, Brodrecht H, Khalil L, Büttner S, Herrle F, Reissfelder C, Rahbari NN. Remote ischemic preconditioning versus sham-control for prevention of anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer (RIPAL trial): a pilot randomized controlled, triple-blinded monocenter trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:65. [PMID: 38700747 PMCID: PMC11068831 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04637-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reportedly reduces ischemia‒reperfusion injury (IRI) in various organ systems. In addition to tension and technical factors, ischemia is a common cause of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal resection. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the potentially protective effect of RIPC on anastomotic healing and to determine the effect size to facilitate the development of a subsequent confirmatory trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-four patients with rectal cancer (RC) who underwent anterior resection were enrolled in this prospectively registered (DRKS0001894) pilot randomized controlled triple-blinded monocenter trial at the Department of Surgery, University Medicine Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, between 10/12/2019 and 19/06/2022. The primary endpoint was AL within 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints were perioperative morbidity and mortality, reintervention, hospital stay, readmission and biomarkers of ischemia‒reperfusion injury (vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF) and cell death (high mobility group box 1 protein, HMGB1). RIPC was induced through three 10-min cycles of alternating ischemia and reperfusion to the upper extremity. RESULTS Of the 207 patients assessed, 153 were excluded, leaving 54 patients to be randomized to the RIPC or the sham-RIPC arm (27 each per arm). The mean age was 61 years, and the majority of patients were male (37:17 (68.5:31.5%)). Most of the patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (29/54 (53.7%)) for adenocarcinoma (52/54 (96.3%)). The primary endpoint, AL, occurred almost equally frequently in both arms (RIPC arm: 4/25 (16%), sham arm: 4/26 (15.4%), p = 1.000). The secondary outcomes were comparable except for a greater rate of reintervention in the sham arm (9 (6-12) vs. 3 (1-5), p = 0.034). The median duration of endoscopic vacuum therapy was shorter in the RIPC arm (10.5 (10-11) vs. 38 (24-39) days, p = 0.083), although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION A clinically relevant protective effect of RIPC on anastomotic healing after rectal resection cannot be assumed on the basis of these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hardt
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hannah Brodrecht
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Leila Khalil
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sylvia Büttner
- Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Florian Herrle
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rennie O, Sharma M, Helwa N. Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks. Front Surg 2024; 11:1371567. [PMID: 38756356 PMCID: PMC11097957 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1371567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are a significant and feared postoperative complication, with incidence of up to 30% despite advances in surgical techniques. With implications such as additional interventions, prolonged hospital stays, and hospital readmission, ALs have important impacts at the level of individual patients and healthcare providers, as well as healthcare systems as a whole. Challenges in developing unified definitions and grading systems for leaks have proved problematic, despite acknowledgement that colorectal AL is a critical issue in intestinal surgery with serious consequences. The aim of this study was to construct a narrative review of literature surrounding definitions and grading systems for ALs, and consequences of this postoperative complication. Methods A literature review was conducted by examining databases including PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases. Searches were performed with the following keywords: anastomosis, anastomotic leak, colorectal, surgery, grading system, complications, risk factors, and consequences. Publications that were retrieved underwent further assessment to ensure other relevant publications were identified and included. Results A universally accepted definition and grading system for ALs continues to be lacking, leading to variability in reported incidence in the literature. Additional factors add to variability in estimates, including differences in the anastomotic site and institutional/individual differences in operative technique. Various groups have worked to publish guidelines for defining and grading AL, with the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC/ISREC) definition the current most recommended universal definition for colorectal AL. The burden of AL on patients, healthcare providers, and hospitals is well documented in evidence from leak consequences, such as increased morbidity and mortality, higher reoperation rates, and increased readmission rates, among others. Conclusions Colorectal AL remains a significant challenge in intestinal surgery, despite medical advancements. Understanding the progress made in defining and grading leaks, as well as the range of negative outcomes that arise from AL, is crucial in improving patient care, reduce surgical mortality, and drive further advancements in earlier detection and treatment of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Rennie
- Department of Clinical Affairs, FluidAI Medical (Formerly NERv Technology Inc.), Kitchener, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Manaswi Sharma
- Department of Clinical Affairs, FluidAI Medical (Formerly NERv Technology Inc.), Kitchener, ON, Canada
| | - Nour Helwa
- Department of Clinical Affairs, FluidAI Medical (Formerly NERv Technology Inc.), Kitchener, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yamada T, Endo H, Hasegawa H, Kakeji Y, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, Otsuka K, Matsuda A, Yoshida H, Kitagawa Y. Presurgical mild anemia is a risk factor for severe postoperative complications of rectal cancer surgery: A Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:471-480. [PMID: 38707223 PMCID: PMC11066482 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Anemia has negative effects on long-term outcomes of rectal cancer patients; however, its status as a risk factor for severe complications is disputed. Perioperative risks may differ based on the severity of pre-surgical anemia; nonetheless, no previous study has investigated these differences. This study identified risks of severe postoperative complications in rectal cancer patients based on severity of their pre-surgical anemia. Materials and Methods This study enrolled patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer and were registered in the Japanese National Clinical Database (NCD) between 2017 and 2019. Anemia severity was categorized into three levels: mild, moderate, and severe. A logistic regression model was applied to calculate the risk-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of severe complications after surgery. Results This study analyzed a cohort of 51 765 rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection. Results showed that severe complications occurred in 10.9% of patients and were significantly more frequent in patients with anemia (13.6%) than those with normal hemoglobin levels (9.2%). Risk-adjusted ORs of severe complications in the severe, moderate, and mild anemia groups versus the normal group for males were 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.58), 1.47 (1.34-1.62), and 1.21 (1.12-1.31), respectively. Those for females were 1.39 (0.90-2.15), 1.64 (1.37-1.97), and 1.36 (1.16-1.58), respectively. Conclusions According to this large cohort study, pre-surgical anemia significantly increases the risk of severe postoperative complications in rectal cancer patients. Even mild anemia presents a significant risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hideki Endo
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Project Management SubcommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database CommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Koki Otsuka
- Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic SurgeryFujita Health UniversityToyoakeJapan
| | - Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee GR, Kim HS, Chung YJ, Kim EY. Venous-to-arterial carbon-dioxide tension difference as a useful predictor of patient prognosis after major surgery. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:2152-2160. [PMID: 38238140 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Change in venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference[P(v-a)CO2] could be a useful marker to assess tissue perfusion status. Herein, we assessed the predictive values of postoperative P(v-a)CO2 measurements for mortality in critically ill patients after major surgery. The correlation between P(v-a)CO2 values and other conventional parameters of patient prognosis was also evaluated. METHODS Patients admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU) after abdominal surgery were enrolled. Arterial and venous blood gas analyses were performed within 1 h(T0) and after 24 h(T1) of admission to the ICU, respectively. The relationship between P(v-a)CO2 levels at T1 and other conventional parameters were assessed using a Bland-Altman plot. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the predisposing factors of mortality after surgery. RESULTS A total of 231 patients were finally analyzed. We divided the participants into the high PvaCO2 group[P(v-a)CO2 ≥ 8.6] and the low PvaCO2 group[P(v-a)CO2 < 8.6]. Seven-day-, 28-day, and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in the high PvaCO2 group than in the low PvaCO2 group. There was significant agreement between P(v-a)CO2 values at T1 and APACHE II scores, lactate levels at T1 and total SOFA scores at T1. In multivariate logistic analysis, an increased P(v-a)CO2 value at T1 was the only significant risk factor of 7-day mortality after surgery. [odds ratio:1.341, 95%confidence interval: 1.050-1.714, p=0.019]. CONCLUSION P(v-a)CO2 measurements could be not only a significant predictor of postoperative prognosis, but also a useful surveillance parameter to maintain tissue perfusion after abdominal surgery in patients with a potential risk of fatal complication-related tissue hypoperfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyeo Ra Lee
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye Sung Kim
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Ji Chung
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun Young Kim
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hershorn O, Ghuman A, Karimuddin AA, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Brown CJ. Local Recurrence-Free Survival After TaTME: A Canadian Institutional Experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:664-673. [PMID: 38319633 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal total mesorectal excision is a novel surgical treatment for mid to low rectal cancers. Norwegian population data have raised concerns about local recurrence in patients treated with transanal total mesorectal excision. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze local recurrence and disease-free survival in patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer at a high-volume tertiary center. DESIGN This retrospective study used a prospectively maintained institutional transanal total mesorectal excision database. Patient demographics, treatment, and outcomes data were analyzed. Local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. SETTINGS The study was conducted at a single academic institution in Vancouver, Canada. PATIENTS All patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2022 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was local recurrence-free survival. RESULTS Between 2014 and 2022, 306 patients were treated by transanal total mesorectal excision at St. Paul's Hospital. Of these, 279 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62 years (SD ± 12.3), and 66.7% of patients were men. Restorative resection was achieved in 97.5% of patients, with a conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery of 6.8%. The composite optimal pathological outcome was 93.9%. The median follow-up was 26 months (interquartile range, 12-47), and 82.8% of patients achieved reestablishment of GI continuity to date. The overall local recurrence rate was 4.7% (n = 13). The estimated 2-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 95.0% (95% CI, 92-98) and the estimated 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 94.5% (95% CI, 91-98). LIMITATIONS Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the generalizability of a Canadian population. CONCLUSIONS Recent European data have challenged the presumed oncologic safety of transanal total mesorectal excision. Although the learning curve for this procedure is challenging and poor outcomes are associated with low volume, this high-volume single-center study confirms acceptable oncologic outcomes consistent with the current standard. See Video Abstract . SOBREVIDA SIN RECIDIVA DESPUS DE TATME EXPERIENCIA INSTITUCIONAL CANADIENSE ANTECEDENTES:La excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal es un tratamiento quirúrgico novedoso para los cánceres de recto medio a bajo. Estudios sobre la población noruega han generado preocupación debido a la recidiva local en pacientes tratados con excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal.OBJETIVO:Nuestra finalidad fué de analizar la recidiva local y la sobrevida libre de enfermedad en pacientes tratados mediante la excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal, debido a un cáncer de recto en un centro terciario de alto volúmen.DISEÑO:El presente estudio retrospectivo, utiliza una base de datos institucional sobre la excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal mantenida prospectivamente. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, de tratamiento y los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a la técnica mencionada. La recidiva local, la sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la sobrevida global se analizaron mediante el modelo de Kaplan-Meier.AJUSTES:El estudio se llevó a cabo en una sola institución académica en Vancouver, Canadá.PARTICIPANTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes tratados mediante excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal causado por adenocarcinomas de recto entre 2014 y 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la sobrevida libre de recidiva local.RESULTADOS:Entre 2014 y 2022, 306 pacientes fueron tratados mediante la excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal en el Hospital St. Paul. De estos, 279 pacientes cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. La edad media fue de 62 años (DE ± 12,3) y el 66,7% de los pacientes eran varones. La resección restauradora se logró en el 97,5% de los pacientes con una tasa de conversión de cirugía laparoscópica en laparotomía del 6,8%. El resultado patológico óptimo combinado fué del 93,9%. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 26 meses (rango intercuartil 12-47) y el 82,8% logró el restablecimiento de la continuidad gastrointestinal hasta la fecha. La tasa global de recidiva local fué del 4,7% (n = 13). La sobrevida libre de recidiva local estimada a los 2 años fué del 95,0% (IC del 95%: 92-98) y del 94,5% a los 5 años (IC del 95%: 91-98).LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones incluyen la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio y la generalización de una población canadiense.CONCLUSIONES:Datos europeos recientes han cuestionado la supuesta seguridad oncológica de la excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal. Si bien la curva de aprendizaje de este procedimiento es muy desafiante y los malos resultados se asocian con un volumen bajo, el presente estudio, unicéntrico de gran volumen confirma los resultados oncológicos aceptables consistentes con el estándar actual. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Hershorn
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gerdin A, Park J, Häggström J, Segelman J, Matthiessen P, Lydrup ML, Rutegård M. Preoperative beta blockers and other drugs in relation to anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:974-986. [PMID: 38462750 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
AIM Previous research has indicated that preoperative beta blocker therapy is associated with a decreased risk of complications after surgery for rectal cancer. This is thought to arise because of the anti-inflammatory activity of the drug. These results need to be reproduced and analyses extended to other drugs with such properties, as this information might be useful in clinical decision-making. The main aim of this work was to replicate previous findings of beta blocker use as a prognostic marker for postoperative leakage. We also investigated whether drug exposure might induce anastomotic leaks. METHOD This is a retrospective multicentre cohort study, comprising 1126 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2014 and 2018. The use of any preoperative beta blocker was treated as the primary exposure, while anastomotic leakage within 12 months of surgery was the outcome. Secondary exposures comprised angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, statins and metformin. Using multivariable regression, we performed a replication analysis with a predictive aim for beta blockers only, while adjustment for confounding was done in more causally oriented analyses for all drugs. We estimated incidence rate ratio (IRR) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Anastomotic leakage occurred in 20.6% of patients. Preoperative beta blockers were used by 22.7% of the cohort, while the leak distribution was almost identical between exposure groups. In the main replication analysis, no association could be detected (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68-1.33). In the causally oriented analyses, only metformin affected the risk of leakage (RR 1.59, 95% Cl 1.31-1.92). CONCLUSION While previous research has suggested that preoperative beta blocker use could be prognostic of anastomotic leakage, this study could not detect any such association. On the contrary, our results indicate that preoperative beta blocker use neither predicts nor causes anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Gerdin
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jennifer Park
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jenny Häggström
- Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Josefin Segelman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Marie-Louise Lydrup
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martin Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Patrón Uriburu JC, Araujo S, Mario A, Billy J, Méndez R, Rossi G, Rotholtz N, Luis R, Avellaneda N, Melani A. Intracorporeal anastomosis could be associated with a higher lymph node yield in right colon cancer surgery: Results of the ICA-LATAM study, a retrospective, multicentre, comparative analysis in Latin America. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:940-948. [PMID: 38590005 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this work was to compare lymph node (LN) yield in patients operated on for right colon cancer (RCC) using a laparoscopic approach between those receiving an intracorporeal (ICA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA). METHOD This is a retrospective multicentre study involving patients operated on for RCC in nine tertiary referral centres in Latin America during a 2-year period. The main comparative outcome between groups was the number of LNs harvested between groups. RESULTS The study included 416 patients, 261 (62.7%) in the ECA group and 155 (37.3%) in the ICA group. Patients in the ECA group were elderly (66 vs. 61 years, p < 0.001). Patients receiving an ICA achieved a significantly higher LN yield than those receiving an ECA (24 vs. 18, p < 0.001). This group also had a lower percentage of patients achieving a substandard LN yield (<12 LNs) (10% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.001) and more patients achieving a high number of harvested LNs (>32 LNs) (15.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.039). In the multivariate analysis, ICA was independently related to the primary outcome (LN yield) (OR 3.28, p = 0.027, 95% CI 1.14-9.38). CONCLUSION In this retrospective study, patients operated on for RCC who received an ICA achieved a higher LN yield. Further studies are needed to reconfirm these findings, and also to find an explanation for these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Patrón Uriburu
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Sergio Araujo
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Abedrapo Mario
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Clinical Hospital Univesity of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Jimenez Billy
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Hospital General de Mexico 'Dr. Eduardo Liceaga', Mexico, Mexico
| | - Ramón Méndez
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Santa Izabel, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Rossi
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nicolás Rotholtz
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Romagnolo Luis
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Nicolas Avellaneda
- General Surgery Department, CEMIC University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Armando Melani
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Staff Americas Medical Service, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alharbi R, Almosallam O, Albastaki S, Almughamsi A, Alsanea N. Role of body mass index in anastomotic leakage after curative treatment for rectal cancer. Ann Saudi Med 2024; 44:135-140. [PMID: 38853477 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage (AL) represents a severe complication after rectal surgery, leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Despite improvements in surgical methods and perioperative care, the challenge of AL persists. OBJECTIVES Explore the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of AL following curative treatment for rectal cancer, providing insight into its predictive value. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTINGS Data were collected from a single tertiary center, emphasizing the specialized postoperative outcomes in a high-care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population was comprised patients who underwent sphincter-saving surgery combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer from 2001 to 2011. Patients with anastomotic stenosis were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome investigated was the occurrence of AL post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of local cancer recurrence rates within the AL group. SAMPLE SIZE 224; 13 excluded. RESULTS Of 237 patients who underwent surgery, 13 with anastomotic stenosis were excluded from this study. Of the remaining 224, 15 individuals (6.3%) developed AL. A potential association between higher BMI and increased AL risk was identified. Additionally, the study noted a higher incidence of local rectal cancer recurrence in the group that developed leakage. CONCLUSION The findings suggest BMI as a significant predictive factor for AL after curative rectal cancer treatment. This emphasizes the need for heightened awareness and possible preoperative counseling for obese patients regarding their increased risk of postoperative leakage. LIMITATIONS The study was retrospective with all the inherit biases of such studies. The sample size was small and this may have introduced a type 2 statistical error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Alharbi
- From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Osama Almosallam
- From the Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Abdullah Specialist Children Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara Albastaki
- From the Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Asim Almughamsi
- From the College of Medicine - Taibah University, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser Alsanea
- From the Director General, Health Affairs, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahhman University, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Avellaneda N, Maroli A, Tottrup A, Buskens C, Kotze PG, Pellino G, Dige A, Haase AM, Haanappel A, Giorgi L, Carvello M, Maruyama BY, Christensen P, Spinelli A. Short and long-term outcomes of surgery for inflammatory (uncomplicated) ileocecal Crohn's disease: Multicentric retrospective analysis of 211 patients. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:730-736. [PMID: 38044224 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical management for patients with inflammatory ileocecal Crohn's disease (CD) could be a reasonable alternative to second-line medical treatment. AIM To assess short and long-term outcomes of patients operated on for inflammatory, ileocecal Crohn's disease. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients intervened at four referral hospitals during 2012-2021 was performed. RESULTS 211 patients were included. 43% of patients underwent surgery more than 5 years after diagnosis, and 49% had been exposed to at least one biologic agent preoperatively. 89% were operated by laparoscopy, with 1.6% conversion rate. The median length of the resected bowel was 25 cm (7-92) and three patients (1.43%) received a stoma. Median follow-up was 36 (17-70) months. The endoscopic recurrence-free survival proportion at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 months was 56%, 52%, 45%, 38%, and 33%, respectively. The clinical recurrence-free survival proportion at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 months was 83%, 79%, 76%, 74%, and 74%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, previous biological treatment (HR=2.01; p = 0.001) was associated with a higher risk of overall recurrence. CONCLUSION Surgery in patients with primary inflammatory ileocecal CD is associated with good postoperative outcomes, low postoperative morbidity with reasonable recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Avellaneda
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; General Surgery Department, CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Annalisa Maroli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Anders Tottrup
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Christianne Buskens
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Amsterdam Medical Hospitals, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paulo Gustavo Kotze
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Brazil
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy; Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anders Dige
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne-Mette Haase
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anouck Haanappel
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Amsterdam Medical Hospitals, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Giorgi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Michelle Carvello
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Garulli G, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, De Luca R, Baldazzi G, Scatizzi M. Bowel preparation for elective colorectal resection: multi-treatment machine learning analysis on 6241 cases from a prospective Italian cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:53. [PMID: 38625550 PMCID: PMC11021318 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04627-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence concerning bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL), surgical site infections (SSIs), and overall morbidity (any adverse event, OM) after elective colorectal surgery using four different types of bowel preparation. METHODS A prospective database gathered among 78 Italian surgical centers in two prospective studies, including 6241 patients who underwent elective colorectal resection with anastomosis for malignant or benign disease, was re-analyzed through a multi-treatment machine-learning model considering no bowel preparation (NBP; No. = 3742; 60.0%) as the reference treatment arm, compared to oral antibiotics alone (oA; No. = 406; 6.5%), mechanical bowel preparation alone (MBP; No. = 1486; 23.8%), or in combination with oAB (MoABP; No. = 607; 9.7%). Twenty covariates related to biometric data, surgical procedures, perioperative management, and hospital/center data potentially affecting outcomes were included and balanced into the model. The primary endpoints were AL, SSIs, and OM. All the results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Compared to NBP, MBP showed significantly higher AL risk (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.23-2.71; p = .003) and OM risk (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.10-1.72; p = .005), no significant differences for all the endpoints were recorded in the oA group, whereas MoABP showed a significantly reduced SSI risk (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.79; p = .008). CONCLUSIONS MoABP significantly reduced the SSI risk after elective colorectal surgery, therefore representing a valid alternative to NBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, Via Vetoio, snc, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | | | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli2 , Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia", Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | | | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Serristori Hospital, Santa Maria Annunziata &, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rutegård M, Jutesten H, Buchwald P, Angenete E, Lydrup ML. Minor impact of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer on long-term male urinary and sexual function. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:49. [PMID: 38589520 PMCID: PMC11001750 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04626-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer induces bowel dysfunction, but the influence on urinary and sexual function is largely unknown. This cross-sectional cohort study evaluated long-term effect of anastomotic leakage on urinary and sexual function in male patients. METHODS Patients operated with anterior resection for rectal cancer in 15 Swedish hospitals 2007-2013 were identified. Anastomotic leakage and other clinical variables were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records. Urinary and sexual dysfunction were evaluated at 4 to 11 years after surgery using the International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function, and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire CR29. The effect of anastomotic leakage on average scores of urinary and sexual dysfunction was evaluated as a primary outcome, and the single items permanent urinary catheter and sexual inactivity as secondary outcomes. The association of anastomotic leakage and functional outcomes was analyzed using regression models with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 84 months (interquartile range: 67-110), 379 out of 864 eligible men were included. Fifty-nine (16%) patients had anastomotic leakage. Urinary incontinence was more common in the leakage group, with an adjusted mean score difference measured by EORTC QLQ ColoRectal-29 of 8.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-16.67). The higher risks of urinary frequency, permanent urinary catheter, and sexual inactivity did not reach significance. CONCLUSION Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection had a minor negative impact on urinary and sexual function in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Henrik Jutesten
- Department of Surgery, Institution for Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Carl-Bertil Laurells Gata 9, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Institution for Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Carl-Bertil Laurells Gata 9, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie-Louise Lydrup
- Department of Surgery, Institution for Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Carl-Bertil Laurells Gata 9, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Adams ED, Salem JF, Burch MA, Fleshner PR, Zaghiyan KN. Blinded Intraoperative Quantitative Indocyanine Green Metrics Associate With Intestinal Margin Acceptance in Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:549-557. [PMID: 38064226 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green is a useful tool in colorectal surgery. Quantitative values may enhance and standardize its application. OBJECTIVE To determine whether quantitative indocyanine green metrics correlate with standard subjective indocyanine green perfusion assessment in acceptance or rejection of anastomotic margins. DESIGN Prospective single-arm, single-institution cohort study. Surgeons viewed subjective indocyanine green images but were blinded to quantitative indocyanine green metrics. SETTING Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS Adults undergoing planned intestinal resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Accepted perfusion and rejected perfusion of the intestinal margin were defined by the absence or presence of ischemia by subjective indocyanine green and gross inspection. The primary outcomes included quantitative indocyanine green values, maximum fluorescence, and time-to-maximum fluorescence in accepted compared to rejected perfusion. Secondary outcomes included maximum fluorescence and time-to-maximum fluorescence values in anastomotic leak. RESULTS There were 89 perfusion assessments comprising 156 intestinal segments. Nine segments were subjectively assessed to have poor perfusion by visual inspection and subjective indocyanine green. Maximum fluorescence (% intensity) exhibited higher intensity in accepted perfusion (accepted perfusion 161% [82%-351%] vs rejected perfusion 63% [10%-76%]; p = 0.03). Similarly, time-to-maximum fluorescence (seconds) was earlier in accepted perfusion compared to rejected perfusion (10 seconds [1-40] vs 120 seconds [90-120]; p < 0.01). Increased BMI was associated with higher maximum fluorescence. Anastomotic leak did not correlate with maximum fluorescence or time-to-maximum fluorescence. LIMITATIONS Small cohort study, not powered to measure the association between quantitative indocyanine green metrics and anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that blinded quantitative values reliably correlate with subjective indocyanine green perfusion assessment. Time-to-maximum intensity is an important metric in perfusion evaluation. Quantitative indocyanine green metrics may enhance intraoperative intestinal perfusion assessment. Future studies may attempt to correlate quantitative indocyanine green values with anastomotic leak. See Video Abstract . LAS MTRICAS CUANTITATIVAS INTRAOPERATORIAS CIEGAS DEL VERDE DE INDOCIANINA SE ASOCIAN CON LA ACEPTACIN DEL MARGEN INTESTINAL EN LA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL ANTECEDENTES:El verde de indocianina es una herramienta útil en la cirugía colorrectal. Los valores cuantitativos pueden mejorar y estandarizar su aplicación.OBJETIVO:Determinar si las métricas cuantitativas de verde de indocianina se correlacionan con la evaluación subjetiva estándar de perfusión de verde de indocianina en la aceptación o rechazo de los márgenes anastomóticos.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospectivo de un solo brazo y de una sola institución. Los cirujanos vieron imágenes subjetivas de verde de indocianina, pero no conocían las métricas cuantitativas de verde de indocianina.AJUSTE:Centro académico terciario.PACIENTES:Adultos sometidos a resección intestinal planificada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La perfusión aceptada y la perfusión rechazada del margen intestinal se definieron por la ausencia o presencia de isquemia mediante verde de indocianina subjetiva y la inspección macroscópica. Los resultados primarios fueron los valores cuantitativos de verde de indocianina, la fluorescencia máxima y el tiempo hasta la fluorescencia máxima en la perfusión aceptada en comparación con la rechazada. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la fluorescencia máxima y el tiempo hasta alcanzar los valores máximos de fluorescencia en la fuga anastomótica.RESULTADOS:Se realizaron 89 evaluaciones de perfusión, comprendiendo 156 segmentos intestinales. Se evaluó subjetivamente que 9 segmentos tenían mala perfusión mediante inspección visual y verde de indocianina subjetiva. La fluorescencia máxima (% de intensidad) mostró una mayor intensidad en la perfusión aceptada [Perfusión aceptada 161% (82-351) vs Perfusión rechazada 63% (10-76); p = 0,03]. De manera similar, el tiempo hasta la fluorescencia máxima (segundos) fue más temprano en la perfusión aceptada en comparación con la rechazada [10 s (1-40) frente a 120 s (90-120); p < 0,01]. Aumento del índice de masa corporal asociado con una fluorescencia máxima más alta. La fuga anastomótica no se correlacionó con la fluorescencia máxima ni con el tiempo hasta la fluorescencia máxima.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de cohorte pequeño, sin poder para medir la asociación entre las mediciones cuantitativas del verde de indocianina y la fuga anastomótica.CONCLUSIÓN:Demostramos que los valores cuantitativos ciegos se correlacionan de manera confiable con la evaluación subjetiva de la perfusión de verde de indocianina. El tiempo hasta la intensidad máxima es una métrica importante en la evaluación de la perfusión. Las métricas cuantitativas de verde de indocianina pueden mejorar la evaluación de la perfusión intestinal intraoperatoria. Los estudios futuros pueden intentar correlacionar los valores cuantitativos de verde de indocianina con la fuga anastomótica. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan D Adams
- Department of General Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jean F Salem
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Miguel A Burch
- Department of General Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Phillip R Fleshner
- Department of General Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Karen N Zaghiyan
- Department of General Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhang L, Hu C, Zhao J, Wu C, Zhang Z, Li R, Liu R, She J, Shi F. The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1912-1921. [PMID: 38326587 PMCID: PMC10978601 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10676-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients experience anorectal dysfunction after rectal surgery, which is known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Robotic systems have many technical advantages that may be suitable for functional preservation after low rectal resection. Thus, the study aimed to explore whether robotic surgery can reduce the incidence and severity of LARS. METHODS Patients undergoing minimally invasive sphincter-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer were enrolled between January 2015 and December 2020. The patients were divided into robotic or laparoscopic groups. The LARS survey was conducted at 6, 12 and 18 months postoperatively. Major LARS scores were analysed as the primary endpoint. In order to reduce confounding factors, one-to-two propensity score matches were used. RESULTS In total, 342 patients were enrolled in the study. At 18 months postoperatively, the incidence of LARS was 68.7% (235/342); minor LARS was identified in 112/342 patients (32.7%), and major LARS in 123/342 (36.0%). After matching, the robotic group included 74 patients, and the laparoscopic group included 148 patients. The incidence of major LARS in the robotic group was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic group at 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, tumour location, laparoscopic surgery, intersphincteric resection, neoadjuvant therapy, and anastomotic leakage were independent risk factors for major LARS after minimally invasive sphincter-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer. Furthermore, a major LARS prediction model was constructed. Results of model evaluation showed that the nomogram had good prediction accuracy and efficiency. CONCLUSIONS Patients with low rectal cancer may benefit from robotic surgery to reduce the incidence and severity of LARS. Our nomogram could aid surgeons in setting an individualized treatment program for low rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Chenhao Hu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jiamian Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Chenxi Wu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Ruizhe Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Ruihan Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Junjun She
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Feiyu Shi
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
- Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shadmanov N, Aliyev V, Piozzi GN, Bakır B, Goksel S, Asoglu O. Perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a retrospective study of 672 patients. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:144. [PMID: 38554211 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01922-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
Although there's growing information about the long-term oncological effects of robotic surgery for rectal cancer, the procedure is still relatively new. This study aimed to assess the long-term oncological results of total mesorectal excision (TME) performed laparoscopically versus robotically in the setting of rectal cancer. Restrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. A total of 489 laparoscopic (L-TME) and 183 robotic total mesorectal excisions (R-TME) were carried out by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2023. The groups were compared in terms of perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. In the R-TME and L-TME groups, male sex predominated (75.4% and 57.3%, respectively), although the robotic group was significantly greater (p = 0.008). There was no conversion in R-TME group, whereas three (0.6%) converted to open surgery in L-TME group. The R-TME group had a statistically significant higher number of distal rectal tumors (85%) compared to the L-TME group (54.6%). Only three (1.7%) patients in the R-TME group received abdomineperineal resection (APR); in contrast, 25 (5%) patients in the L-TME group received APR (p < 0.001). For R-TME, the mean follow-up was 70.7 months (range 18-138) and for L-TME, it was 60 months (range 14-140). Frequency of completed mesorectum was significantly greater in R-TME group (98.9% vs 94.2%, p < 0.001). The 5 year overall survival rates for R-TME and L-TME groups were 89.6% and 88.7%, respectively. The 5 year disease-free survival for R-TME and L-TME groups were 84.1% and 81.1%, respectively. The local recurrences rates were 7.6% and 6.3%, respectively in R-TME and L-TME groups (p = 0.274). R-TME is characterized by no conversion and improved mesorectal integrity. R-TME had longer operation time. The long-term oncological outcomes were comparable between groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vusal Aliyev
- Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of General Surgery, Bagcılar Medilife Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Barıs Bakır
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suha Goksel
- Department of Pathology, Maslak Acibadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Oktar Asoglu
- Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hrebinko K, Anto VP, Reitz KM, Gamboa AC, Regenbogen SE, Hawkins AT, Hopkins MB, Ejaz A, Bauer PS, Wise PE, Balch GC, Holder-Murray J. Prophylactic defunctioning stomas improve clinical outcomes of anastomotic leak following rectal cancer resections: An analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:39. [PMID: 38498217 PMCID: PMC10948474 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04600-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anastomotic leak (AL) is a complication of low anterior resection (LAR) that results in substantial morbidity. There is immense interest in evaluating immediate postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who undergo diverting loop ileostomies (DLI). The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between fecal diversion, AL, and oncologic outcomes. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study using patient data obtained from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database compiled from six academic institutions. The study population included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing LAR. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL among patients who did or did not receive DLI during LAR. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for AL, receipt of adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year recurrence. RESULTS Of 815 patients, 38 (4.7%) suffered AL after LAR. Patients with AL were more likely to be male, have unintentional preoperative weight loss, and are less likely to undergo DLI. On multivariable analysis, DLI remained protective against AL (p < 0.001). Diverted patients were less likely to undergo future surgical procedures including additional ostomy creation, completion proctectomy, or pelvic washout for AL. Subgroup analysis of 456 patients with locally advanced disease showed that DLI was correlated with increased receipt of adjuvant therapy for patients with and without AL on univariate analysis (SHR:1.59; [95% CI 1.19-2.14]; p = 0.002), but significance was not met in multivariate models. CONCLUSION Lack of DLI and preoperative weight loss was associated with anastomotic leak. Fecal diversion may improve the timely initiation of adjuvant oncologic therapy. The long-term outcomes following routine diverting stomas warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Hrebinko
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Vincent P Anto
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Katherine M Reitz
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Austin, USA
| | - Scott E Regenbogen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Alexander T Hawkins
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - M Benjamin Hopkins
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Philip S Bauer
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Paul E Wise
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Glen C Balch
- Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Jennifer Holder-Murray
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Office Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Sartelli M, Montemurro LA, Baiocchi GL, Tebala GD, Borghi F, Marini P, Scatizzi M, The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage iCral Study Group. Oral Antibiotics Alone versus Oral Antibiotics Combined with Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matching Re-Analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 Prospective Cohorts. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:235. [PMID: 38534670 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13030235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The evidence regarding the role of oral antibiotics alone (oA) or combined with mechanical bowel preparation (MoABP) for elective colorectal surgery remains controversial. A prospective database of 8359 colorectal resections gathered over a 32-month period from 78 Italian surgical units (the iCral 2 and 3 studies), reporting patient-, disease-, and procedure-related variables together with 60-day adverse events, was re-analyzed to identify a subgroup of 1013 cases (12.1%) that received either oA or MoABP. This dataset was analyzed using a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 20 covariates. Two well-balanced groups of 243 patients each were obtained: group A (oA) and group B (MoABP). The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) rates. Group A vs. group B showed a significantly higher AL risk [14 (5.8%) vs. 6 (2.5%) events; OR: 3.77; 95%CI: 1.22-11.67; p = 0.021], while no significant difference was recorded between the two groups regarding SSIs. These results strongly support the use of MoABP for elective colorectal resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, 00157 Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Lucia Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy
| | | | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- General Surgical Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST), 26100 Cremona, Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Marini
- General & Emergency Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lucarini A, Guida AM, Orville M, Panis Y. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography could reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:408-416. [PMID: 38247221 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
AIM Several papers have shown that use of indocyanine green (ICG) decreases incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) during colonic surgery, but no clear evidence has been found for rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, with this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) we aimed to assess if ICG could also reduce risk of AL in rectal cancer surgery. METHOD PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs assessing the effect of intraoperative ICG on the incidence of AL of the colorectal anastomosis. Pooled relative risk (RR) and pooled risk difference (RD) were obtained using models with random effects. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Rob2 tool and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool. RESULTS Four RCTs were included for analysis, with a total of 1510 patients (743 controls and 767 ICG patients). The rate of AL was 9% in the ICG group (69/767) and 13.9% (103/743) in the control group (p = 0.003, RR -0.5, 95% CI -0.827 to -0.172, heterogeneity test 0%, p = 0.460). The RD in terms of incidence of AL was significantly decreased by 4.51% (p = 0.031, 95% CI -0.086 to -0.004, heterogeneity test 28%, p = 0.182) when using ICG. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis suggested that use of ICG during rectal cancer surgery could reduce the rate of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Lucarini
- Colorectal Surgery Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, Neuilly/Seine, France
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Martina Guida
- Colorectal Surgery Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, Neuilly/Seine, France
- Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Marion Orville
- Colorectal Surgery Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, Neuilly/Seine, France
| | - Yves Panis
- Colorectal Surgery Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, Neuilly/Seine, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rutegård M, Svensson J, Segelman J, Matthiessen P, Lydrup ML, Park JM. Anastomotic Leakage in Relation to Type of Mesorectal Excision and Defunctioning Stoma Use in Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:398-405. [PMID: 37994449 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer is more common after total mesorectal excision compared to partial mesorectal excision but might be mitigated by a defunctioning stoma. OBJECTIVE The aim is to assess how anastomotic leakage is affected by type of mesorectal excision and defunctioning stoma use. DESIGN This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluating anastomotic leakage after anterior resection. Multivariable Cox regression with HRs and 95% CIs was used to contrast mesorectal excision types and defunctioning stoma use with respect to anastomotic leakage, with adjustment for confounding. SETTINGS This multicenter study included patients from 11 Swedish hospitals between 2014 and 2018. PATIENTS Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Anastomotic leakage rates within and after 30 days of surgery are described up to 1 year after surgery. RESULTS Anastomotic leakage occurred in 24.2% and 9.0% of 1126 patients operated with total and partial mesorectal excision, respectively. Partial compared to total mesorectal excision was associated with a reduction in leakage, with an adjusted HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29-0.74). Early leak rates within 30 days were 14.9% with and 12.5% without a stoma, whereas late leak rates after 30 days were 7.5% with and 1.9% without a stoma. After adjustment, defunctioning stoma was associated with a lower early leak rate (HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.77). However, the late leak rate was nonsignificantly higher in patients with defunctioning stomas (HR 1.69; 95% CI, 0.59-4.85). LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective observational study design. CONCLUSIONS Anastomotic leakage is common up to 1 year after anterior resection for rectal cancer, where partial mesorectal excision is associated with a lower leak rate. Defunctioning stomas seem to decrease the occurrence of leakage, although partially by only delaying the diagnosis. See Video Abstract . FUGA ANASTOMTICA SEGN EL TIPO DE EXCISIN MESORRECTAL Y LA CONFECCIN DE OSTOMA DE PROTECCIN EN LA RESECCIN ANTERIOR POR CNCER DE RECTO ANTECEDENTES:La fuga anastomótica después de una resección anterior por cáncer de recto es más frecuente después de la excisión total del mesorrecto comparada con la excisión parcial del mismo, pero podría mitigarse con la confección de ostomías de protección.OBJETIVO:El objetivo es evaluar cómo la fuga anastomótica se ve afectada según el tipo de excisión mesorrectal y la confección de una ostomía de protección.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes multicéntrico y retrospectivo que evalúa la fuga anastomótica después de la resección anterior. Se aplicó la regresión multivariada de Cox con los índices de riesgo (HR) y los intervalos de confianza (IC) al 95% para contrastar los tipos de excisión mesorrectal y el uso de otomías de protección con respecto a la fuga anastomótica, realizando ajustes respecto a las variables de confusión.AJUSTES:El presente estudio multicéntrico incluyó pacientes de 11 hospitales suecos entre 2014 y 2018.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos aquellos sometidos a resección anterior por cáncer de recto.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Las tasas de fuga anastomótica dentro y después de los 30 días de la cirugía fueron descritos hasta un año mas tarde al acto quirúrgico.RESULTADOS:La fuga anastomótica ocurrió en el 24,2% y el 9,0% de 1126 pacientes operados por excisión total y parcial del mesorrecto respectivamente.La excisión parcial del mesorrecto en comparación con la total se asoció con una reducción de la fuga, HR ajustado de 0,46 (IC del 95 %: 0,29 a 0,74). Las tasas de fuga temprana dentro de los 30 días fueron del 14,9 % con y el 12,5 % sin estoma, mientras que las tasas de fuga tardía después de 30 días fueron del 7,5 % con y el 1,9 % sin estoma.Después del ajuste de variables de confusión, las ostomías de protección se asociaron con una tasa de fuga temprana más baja (HR 0,47; IC 95 %: 0,28-0,77). Sin embargo, la tasa de fuga tardía no fue significativamente mayor en pacientes ostomizados (HR 1,69; IC 95%: 0,59-4,85).LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del presente estudio estuvieron vinculadas con el diseño de tipo observacional y retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La fuga anastomótica es común hasta un año después de la resección anterior por cáncer de recto, donde la excisión parcial del mesorrecto se asocia con una menor tasa de fuga. La confección de ostomías de protección parece disminuir la aparición de fuga anastomótica, aunque en parte sólo retrasen el diagnóstico. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Johan Svensson
- Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Josefin Segelman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Marie-Louise Lydrup
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jennifer M Park
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li Z, Liu H, Luo S, Hou Y, Zhou Y, Zheng X, Zhang X, Huang L, Zeng Z, Kang L. Long-term oncological outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis of 2502 patients. Int J Surg 2024; 110:1611-1619. [PMID: 38091943 PMCID: PMC10942237 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal total mesorectal resection (taTME) has recently emerged as a promising surgical approach for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. However, there is limited evidence on the long-term survival outcomes associated with taTME. This retrospective study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival of taTME and laparoscopic TME (laTME) in patients with mid-low rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS From July 2014 to June 2022, a total of 3627 patients were identified from two prospective cohorts: the laparoscopic rectal surgery cohort and the CNTAES cohort. To balance the baseline characteristics between the taTME and laTME groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. RESULTS A total of 2502 patients were included in the study. Prior to PSM, the laTME group comprised 1853 patients, while the taTME group comprised 649 patients. The 5-year OS (82.9% vs. 80.4%, P =0.202) and 5-year DFS (74.4% vs. 72.5%, P =0.167) were comparable between the taTME and laTME groups. After PSM, the taTME group showed no statistically significant difference in the 5-year OS (83.1% vs. 79.2%, P =0.101) and 5-year DFS (74.8% vs. 72.1%, P =0.135) compared to the laTME group. Subgroup analysis further suggested that taTME may potentially reduce the risk of death [hazard ratio 0.652; (95% CI, 0.452-0.939)] and disease recurrence [hazard ratio 0.736; (95% CI, 0.562-0.965)] specifically in patients with low rectal cancer. CONCLUSION In this study, taTME demonstrated comparable oncologic safety to laTME in patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Moreover, the results indicate that taTME may confer potential survival benefits for patients with low rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze Li
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huashan Liu
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuangling Luo
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yujie Hou
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yebohao Zhou
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaobin Zheng
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xingwei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang Huang
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ziwei Zeng
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- University Clinic Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Liang Kang
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Manigrasso M, Degiuli M, Maione F, Venetucci P, Roviello F, De Palma GD, Milone M. Is proctoscopy sufficient for the evaluation of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal? A nationwide retrospective analysis of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative group (SICO-CCN). Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:439-448. [PMID: 38229251 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
AIM Several methods for assessing anastomotic integrity have been proposed, but the best is yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to compare the different methods to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. METHOD A retrospective cohort analysis on patients between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 with a defunctioning stoma for middle and low rectal anterior resection was performed. A propensity score matching comparison between patients who underwent proctoscopy alone and patients who underwent proctoscopy plus any other preoperative method to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal (transanal water-soluble contrast enema via conventional radiology, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT, and magnetic resonance) was performed. RESULTS The analysis involved 1045 patients from 26 Italian referral colorectal centres. The comparison between proctoscopy alone versus proctoscopy plus any other preoperative tool showed no significant differences in terms of stenoses (p = 0.217) or leakages (p = 0.103) prior to ileostomy reversal, as well as no differences in terms of misdiagnosed stenoses (p = 0.302) or leakages (p = 0.509). Interestingly, in the group that underwent proctoscopy and transanal water-soluble contrast enema the comparison between the two procedures demonstrated no significant differences in detecting stenoses (2 vs. 0, p = 0.98), while there was a significant difference in detecting leakages in favour of transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT (3 vs. 12, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS We can confirm that proctoscopy alone should be considered sufficient prior to ileostomy reversal. However, in cases in which the results of proctoscopy are not completely clear or the surgeon remains suspicious of an anastomotic leakage, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT could guarantee its detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 'Federico II' University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Maurizio Degiuli
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- San Luigi University Hospital, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Venetucci
- Dipartimento di Oncoematologia, Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia e Medicina Legale, "Federico II" University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lundström S, Buchwald P, Agger E. A retrospective cohort study on renal morbidity related to stoma type in inflammatory bowel disease patients following colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Scand J Surg 2024:14574969241228411. [PMID: 38414142 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241228411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Defunctioning loop ileostomy (DLI) is frequently used to decrease the consequences of anastomotic leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery but is controversial because of stoma-associated morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe stoma-associated morbidity in IPAA-DLI patients compared with terminal ileostomy patients. METHODS Patients treated with colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, between 2005 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Terminal stoma-related morbidity was measured until 12 months after colectomy, IPAA surgery, or conversion to ileorectal anastomosis, whichever occurred first. DLI-related morbidity was measured until 12 months after IPAA surgery or stoma closure, whichever occurred first. Laboratory data were reviewed up to 18 months after surgery since patients without complications were rarely subjected to blood sampling. Data on patient characteristics, renal function, surgical complications, and readmissions were collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes were DLI- and terminal ileostomy-related renal morbidity, whereas secondary outcomes focused on stoma-related complications. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 165 patients with terminal ileostomy after colectomy (median (interquartile range (IQR)): stoma time 30 (15-74) months) and 42 patients with IPAA-DLI (median (IQR): stoma time 4 (3-5) months). One case of anastomotic IPAA leakage was observed. IPAA-DLI patients more often required hospital care due to high-volume stoma output immediately after surgery (0-30 days, 29%) compared with terminal ileostomy patients (4%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in acute renal injury (p = 0.073) or chronic renal failure (p = 0.936) incidences between the groups. DLI closure was achieved in 95% of IPAA-DLI patients, with 5% suffering Clavien-Dindo complications > 2. CONCLUSIONS IPAA-DLI patients exhibited higher incidence of short-term high-volume stoma output without higher rates of acute renal injury or chronic renal failure compared with terminal ileostomy patients in this small single-center retrospective study suggesting that the risk of renal morbidity in IPAA-DLI patients may have been overestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lundström
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Erik Agger
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liu Y, Hu X, Huang Y, Yin X, Zhang P, Hao Y, Li H, Wang G. Does transanal drainage tubes placement have an impact on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:263. [PMID: 38402391 PMCID: PMC10893633 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11990-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether Transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) placement reduces the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer (RC) surgery remains controversial. Most existing meta-analyses rely on retrospective studies, while the prospective studies present an inadequate level of evidence. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on TDTs placement in RC patients after surgery was conducted. The main analysis index was the incidence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL, while secondary analysis index was the incidence of anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, and anastomotic stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed utilizing the databases Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. We recorded Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each included study, and a fixed-effect model or random-effect model was used to investigate the correlation between TDTs placement and four outcomes after RC surgery. RESULTS Seven studies (1774 participants, TDT 890 vs non-TDT 884) were considered eligible for quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of AL was 9.3% (83/890) in the TDT group and 10.2% (90/884) in the non-TDT group. These disparities were found to lack statistical significance (P = 0.58). A comprehensive meta-analysis, comprising four studies involving a cumulative sample size of 1259 participants, revealed no discernible disparity in the occurrence of Grade B AL or Grade C AL between the TDT group and the non-TDT group (Grade B AL: TDT 34/631 vs non-TDT 26/628, P = 0.30; Grade C AL: TDT 11/631 vs non-TDT 27/628, P = 0.30). Similarly, the incidences of anastomotic bleeding (4 studies, 876 participants), incision infection (3studies, 713 participants), and anastomotic stenosis (2studies, 561 participants) were 5.5% (24/440), 8.1% (29/360), and 2.9% (8/280), respectively, in the TDT group, and 3.0% (13/436), 6.5% (23/353), and 3.9% (11/281), respectively, in the non-TDT group. These differences were also determined to lack statistical significance (P = 0.08, P = 0.43, P = 0.48, respectively). CONCLUSION The placement of TDTs does not significantly affect the occurrence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL following surgery for rectal cancer. Additionally, TDTs placement does not be associated with increased complications such as anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, or anastomotic stenosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42023427914.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yating Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
| | - Xuhua Hu
- The Second General Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
| | - Yu Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
| | - Xu Yin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
| | - Pengfei Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
| | - Yaoguang Hao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
| | - Hongyan Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China
| | - Guiying Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ammann Y, Warschkow R, Schmied B, De Lorenzi D, Reißfelder C, Bischofberger S, Marti L, Brunner W. Is survival after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) worse than that after traditional total mesorectal excision? A retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:28. [PMID: 38376756 PMCID: PMC10879364 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04591-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) was developed to provide better vision during resection of the mesorectum. Conflicting results have shown an increase in local recurrence and shorter survival after taTME. This study compared the outcomes of taTME and abdominal (open, laparoscopic, robotic) total mesorectal excision (abTME). METHODS Patients who underwent taTME or abTME for stages I-III rectal cancer and who received an anastomosis were included. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively conducted database was performed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Risk factors were adjusted by propensity score matching (PSM). The secondary endpoints were local recurrence rates and combined poor pathological outcomes. RESULTS From 2012 to 2020, a total of 189 patients underwent taTME, and 119 underwent abTME; patients were followed up for a mean of 54.7 (SD 24.2) and 78.4 (SD 34.8) months, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rates after taTME and abTME were not significantly different after PSM: OS: 78.2% vs. 88.6% (p = 0.073), CSS: 87.4% vs. 92.1% (p = 0.359), and DFS: 69.3% vs. 80.9% (p = 0.104), respectively. No difference in the local recurrence rate was observed (taTME, n = 10 (5.3%); abTME, n = 10 (8.4%); p = 0.280). Combined poor pathological outcomes were more frequent after abTME (n = 36, 34.3%) than after taTME (n = 35, 19.6%) (p = 0.006); this difference was nonsignificant according to multivariate analysis (p = 0.404). CONCLUSION taTME seems to be a good treatment option for patients with rectal cancer and is unlikely to significantly affect local recurrence or survival. However, further investigations concerning the latter are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0496910).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanic Ammann
- Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Spital Grabs, Grabs, Switzerland
| | - Rene Warschkow
- Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Bruno Schmied
- Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Christoph Reißfelder
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stephan Bischofberger
- Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Marti
- Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Walter Brunner
- Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tomminen T, Huhtala H, Kotaluoto S, Veitonmäki T, Wirta EV, Hyöty M. Surgical and oncological results after rectal resections with or without previous treatment for prostate cancer. Front Surg 2024; 11:1298865. [PMID: 38362461 PMCID: PMC10867186 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1298865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Previous treatment for prostate cancer (PC) may potentially affect the surgical and oncological outcomes of subsequent rectal cancer surgery, but there are only a few studies regarding this particular group. In this study, we present the 3-year surgical and oncological results of rectal cancer patients who had received previous treatment for PC at a single Finnish tertiary referral centre. Material and methods Data regarding all male patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and treated at Tampere University Hospital (TAUH) between 1997 and 2016 were gathered from medical records. In total, this study included 553 rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery, and 54 of them (9.8%) had a prior history of treatment for prostate cancer. Results Patients in the PC group were older and had more comorbidities compared with those in the non-PC group. The PC patients had a significantly higher risk of permanent stoma compared with the non-PC patients (61.5% vs. 45.2%, respectively, p = 0.025). The PC patients seemed to have lower tumours than the non-PC patients (87% vs. 75%, respectively, p = 0.05). Overall, the 3-year overall survival (OS) for the PC and non-PC patients was 74.1% and 80.6%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the study groups even in the age-adjusted comparison [hazard ratio (HR): 1.07, confidence interval (CI) 95%: 0.60-1.89]. In the univariable analysis, radically operated patients without a history of PC exhibited an improved overall survival, (HR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.34-4.53, p = 0.004). However, only a higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and a low tumour location (<10 cm) were found to have an independent prognostic impact on worse OS in the multivariable analysis (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.36-1.82, p < 0.001 and HR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.32-5.70, p = 0.007, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of disease-free or local recurrence-free survival. Conclusion Rectal cancer is more frequently found in the middle or lower part of the rectum in patients who have previously received treatment for prostate cancer. These patients also have a higher likelihood of requiring a permanent stoma. In radically operated rectal cancer, the PC group had a worse OS rate, according to the univariable analysis. However, the only independent prognostic factors for a worse OS that were highlighted in the multivariable analysis included a higher CCI and a low tumour location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Tomminen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - H. Huhtala
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - S. Kotaluoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - T. Veitonmäki
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - E.-V. Wirta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - M. Hyöty
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fu J, Zhang X, Li G, Xu Z, Zhou J, Yuan H, Xi J, Wang Y. Pelvic Floor Peritoneum Closure Reduces Severe Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer Patients After Laparoscopic Anterior Rectal Resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:35-42. [PMID: 37725832 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic anterior rectal resection (LAR) is a commonly performed surgery for rectal cancer patients. Pelvic floor peritoneum closure (PC), a vital procedure in conventional anterior rectal resection, is not routinely performed in LAR. STUDY DESIGN A total of 1118 consecutive patients with rectal cancer receiving LAR were included in this retrospective study. Patients were allocated into the PC group and the non-PC group. The occurrence of postoperative complications was compared between the 2 groups. Influential factors in anastomotic leakage (AL) were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS There was no difference between the groups in terms of baseline characteristics. The occurrence of postoperative complications was similar between the groups. The PC group had significantly shorter postoperative hospitalization and longer operation duration compared with the non-PC group. The occurrences of Clavien-Dindo (CD) III-IV complications, CD III-IV AL, and reoperation were significantly lower in the PC group than the non-PC group. PC and a protective ileostomy were independent protective factors for CD III-IV AL. CONCLUSION PC could reduce the occurrence of CD III-IV complications, especially CD III-IV AL, and the rate of secondary surgery, especially in patients with a lower body mass index and patients who did not receive protective ileostomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Fu
- Department of General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
- Department of General Surgery, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen
| | - Xuehua Zhang
- Department of General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| | - Gaohua Li
- Department of General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| | - Zhenzhao Xu
- Department of General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| | - Jinfan Zhou
- Department of General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| | - Haitao Yuan
- Department of General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| | - Jiafei Xi
- Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Lab, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yanan Wang
- Department of General Surgery and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shen Y, Huang LB, Lu A, Yang T, Chen HN, Wang Z. Prediction of symptomatic anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery: A machine learning approach. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:264-272. [PMID: 37795583 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains the most dreaded and unpredictable major complication after low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to identify patients with high risk for AL based on the machine learning method. METHODS Patients with mid-low rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection were enrolled from West China Hospital between January 2008 and October 2019 and were split by time into training cohort and validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method and stepwise method were applied for variable selection and predictive model building in the training cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the models. RESULTS The rate of AL was 5.8% (38/652) and 7.2% (15/208) in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. The LASSO-logistic model selected almost the same variables (hypertension, operating time, cT4, tumor location, intraoperative blood loss) compared to the stepwise logistic model except for tumor size (the LASSO-logistic model) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (the stepwise logistic model). The predictive performance of the LASSO-logistics model was better than the stepwise-logistics model (AUC: 0.790 vs. 0.759). Calibration curves showed mean absolute error of 0.006 and 0.013 for the LASSO-logistics model and stepwise-logistics model, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study developed a feasible predictive model with a machine-learning algorithm to classify patients with a high risk of AL, which would assist surgical decision-making and reduce unnecessary stoma diversion. The involved machine learning algorithms provide clinicians with an innovative alternative to enhance clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Li-Bin Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Anqing Lu
- Department of Transportation Central, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tinghan Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hai-Ning Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Institute of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tsunoda J, Shigeta K, Seishima R, Okabayashi K, Kitagawa Y. Efficacy of transanal drainage tube placement in preventing anastomotic leakage after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:837-845. [PMID: 38082005 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10594-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal drainage tube (TDT) is used to prevent anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear whether intraoperative TDT placement is also useful in preventing anastomotic leakage after ileal pouch-anal or ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative TDT placement in preventing anastomotic leakage after IPAA in patients with UC. METHODS Patients with UC who underwent proctectomy with IPAA in the study institution between January 2000 and December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The relationship between TDT placement and anastomotic leakage was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The study population included 168 patients. TDT was placed intraoperatively in 103 of the 168 patients (61.3%). The rate of anastomotic leakage was significantly lower in the TDT group than in the non-TDT group (7.8% vs 18.5%, p = 0.037). Reoperation was not needed in any patient in the TDT group whereas two reoperations were necessary in the non-TDT group (3.1%). By logistic regression analysis, intraoperative TDT placement was an independent protective factor for anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS TDT placement was significantly associated with anastomotic leakage of IPAA in patients with UC undergoing surgery. Although two-stage surgery with ileostomy is usually preferred in UC surgery, our findings suggest that TDT placement might contribute to the improvement of postoperative outcomes after UC surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junya Tsunoda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Kohei Shigeta
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Ryo Seishima
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Koji Okabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lee MW, Park SS, You K, Lee DE, Lee DW, Park SC, Han KS, Sohn DK, Hong CW, Kim B, Kim BC, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Oh JH. Long-term clinical outcomes after high and low ligations with lymph node dissection around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients with rectal cancer. Ann Coloproctol 2024; 40:62-73. [PMID: 38414122 PMCID: PMC10915527 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00094.0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes based on the ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database that included all patients who underwent elective low anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2019. The clinical outcomes included oncological outcomes, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. The oncological outcomes included overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The functional outcomes, including defecatory and urogenital functions, were analyzed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires. RESULTS In total, 545 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 244 patients underwent high ligation (HL), whereas 301 underwent low ligation (LL). The tumor size was larger in the HL group than in the LL group. The number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was higher in the HL group than in the LL group. There were no significant differences in complication rates and recurrence patterns between the groups. There were no significant differences in 5-year RFS and OS between the groups. Cox regression analysis revealed that the ligation level (HL vs. LL) was not a significant risk factor for oncological outcomes. Regarding functional outcomes, the LL group showed a significant recovery in defecatory function 1 year postoperatively compared with the HL group. CONCLUSION LL with LNs dissection around the root of the IMA might not affect the oncologic outcomes comparing to HL; however, it has minimal benefit for defecatory function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Wan Lee
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sung Sil Park
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kiho You
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dong Eun Lee
- Biostatistics Collaboration Team, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dong Woon Lee
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sung Chan Park
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyung Su Han
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dae Kyung Sohn
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chang Won Hong
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Bun Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Chang
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Hwan Oh
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Xu X, Zhang X, Li X, Yu A, Zhang X, Dong S, Liu Z, Cheng Z, Wang K. Effect of transanal drainage tube on prevention of anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal cancer surgery taking indwelling time into consideration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1307716. [PMID: 38322281 PMCID: PMC10844949 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1307716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Placement of an indwelling transanal drainage tube (TDT) to prevent anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior rectal cancer surgery has become a routine choice for surgeons in the recent years. However, the specific indwelling time of the TDT has not been explored. We performed this meta-analysis and considered the indwelling time a critical factor in re-analyzing the effectiveness of TDT placement in prevention of AL after anterior rectal cancer surgery. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies which evaluated the effectiveness of TDT in prevention of AL after rectal cancer surgery and considered the indwelling time of TDT were identified using a predesigned search strategy in databases up to November 2022. This meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled AL rates (Overall and different AL grades) and reoperation rates at different TDT indwelling times and stoma statuses. Results Three RCTs and 15 cohort studies including 2381 cases with TDT and 2494 cases without TDT were considered eligible for inclusion. Our meta-analysis showed that the indwelling time of TDT for ≥5-days was associated with a significant reduction (TDT vs. Non-TDT) in overall AL (OR=0.46,95% CI 0.34-0.60, p<0.01), grade A+B AL (OR=0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.97, p=0.03), grade C AL (OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.53, p<0.01), overall reoperation rate (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.24-0.53, p<0.01) and that in patients without a prophylactic diverting stoma (DS) (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.14-0.41, p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the abovementioned indicators (p>0.05) when the indwelling time of TDT was less than 5 days. Conclusion Extending the postoperative indwelling time of TDT to 5 days may reduce the overall AL and the need for reoperation in patients without a prophylactic DS. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023407451, identifier CRD42023407451.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinzhen Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Huantai Country People’s Hospital, Zibo, China
| | - Ao Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiqiang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Shuohui Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zitian Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhiqiang Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Kexin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Steyer GE, Puchinger M, Pfeifer J. Successful Clinical Avoidance of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage through Local Decontamination. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:79. [PMID: 38247638 PMCID: PMC10812415 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM An anastomotic leak is an unpredictable postoperative complication during recovery from colorectal surgery that may require a re-operation. Potentially pathogenic bacteria like Pseudomonas (and Enterococcus) contribute to the pathogenesis of an anastomotic leak through their capacity to degrade collagen and to activate tissue matrix metalloprotease-9 in host intestinal tissues. The microbiome, therefore, is the key to preventing an anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. The aim of this trial was to investigate whether perioperative selective decontamination with a new mixture of locally acting antibiotics specially designed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis can reduce or even stop early symptomatic leakage. METHOD All hospitalized patients in our University Clinic undergoing colorectal surgery with a left-sided anastomosis were included as two groups; patients in the intervention group received polymyxin B, gentamicin and vancomycin every six hours for five postoperative days and those in the control group did not receive such an intervention. An anastomotic leak was defined as a clinically obvious defect of the intestinal wall integrity at the colorectal anastomosis site (including suture) that leads to a communication between the intra- and extraluminal compartments, requiring a re-do surgery within seven postoperative days. RESULTS Between February 2017 and May 2023, a total of 301 patients (median age of 63 years) were analyzed. An anastomotic leak was observed in 11 patients in the control group (n = 152), but in no patients in the intervention group (n = 149); this difference was highly significant. CONCLUSION The antibiotic mixture (with polymyxin B, gentamicin and vancomycin) used for local decontamination in our study stopped the occurrence of anastomotic leaks completely. According to the definition of anastomotic leak, no further surgery was required after local perioperative decontamination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Ernst Steyer
- Division of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036 Graz, Austria;
- Doctoral School of Lifestyle-Related Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Puchinger
- Medical Engineering and Computing, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036 Graz, Austria;
| | - Johann Pfeifer
- Division of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036 Graz, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Brito da Silva F, Lopes P, Cavadas D, Pereira Gonçalves B, Bernardo M, Abecasis N, Limbert M, Maciel J. The impact of anastomotic leakage after curative colon cancer resection on long-term survival: A retrospective cohort study. Cir Esp 2024; 102:3-10. [PMID: 37423310 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared postoperative complications in colon cancer surgery due to an association with increased morbidity and mortality, although its impact on long-term survival is not consensual. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of AL on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative colon cancer resection. METHODS A single-centre retrospective cohort study was designed. Clinical records of all consecutive patients undergoing surgery at our institution between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2019 were reviewed. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method to estimate overall and conditional survival and Cox regression to search for risk factors impacting survival. RESULTS A total of 2351 patients submitted to colorectal surgery were screened for eligibility, of which 686 with colon cancer were included. AL occurred in 57 patients (8,3%) and was associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of stay and early readmissions (P < 0,05). Overall survival was inferior in the leakage group (Hazard Ratio 2,08 [1,02-4,24]). Conditional overall survival at 30, 90 days and 6 months was also inferior in the leakage group (P < 0,05), but not at 1 year. Risk factors independently associated with reduced overall survival included AL occurrence, higher ASA classification and delayed/missed adjuvant chemotherapy. AL did not impact local and distant recurrence (P > 0,05). CONCLUSION AL has a negative impact on survival. Its effect is more pronounced on short-term mortality. AL does not appear to be associated with disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisca Brito da Silva
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; Department of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Pedro Lopes
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Daniela Cavadas
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; Department of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Beatriz Pereira Gonçalves
- Department of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Margarida Bernardo
- Department of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Nuno Abecasis
- Department of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Manuel Limbert
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; Department of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - João Maciel
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; Department of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Burghgraef TA, Geitenbeek RTJ, Broekman M, Hol JC, Hompes R, Consten ECJ. Permanent stoma rate and long-term stoma complications in laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:105-115. [PMID: 37932600 PMCID: PMC10776460 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10517-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical resection of rectal carcinoma is associated with a high risk of permanent stoma rate. Primary anastomosis rate is suggested to be higher in robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excision, but permanent stoma rate is unknown. METHODS Patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for MRI-defined rectal cancer between 2015 and 2017 in 11 centers highly experienced in laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal total mesorectal excision were included in this retrospective study. Permanent stoma rate, stoma-related complications, readmissions, and reoperations were registered. A multivariable regression analysis was performed for permanent stoma rate, stoma-related complications, and stoma-related reoperations. RESULTS In total, 1198 patients were included. Permanent stoma rate after low anterior resection (with anastomosis or with an end colostomy) was 40.1% in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, 21.3% in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery, and 25.6% in patients undergoing transanal surgery (P < 0.001). Permanent stoma rate after low anterior resection with an anastomosis was 17.3%, 11.8%, and 15.1%, respectively. The robot-assisted and transanal techniques were independently associated with a reduction in permanent stoma rate in patients who underwent a low anterior resection (with anastomosis or with an end colostomy) (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.25, 0.59] and OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.22, 0.55]), while this was not seen in patients who underwent a restorative low anterior resection. 45.4% of the patients who had a stoma experienced stoma-related complications, 4.0% were at least once readmitted, and 8.9% underwent at least one reoperation. CONCLUSIONS The robot-assisted and transanal techniques are associated with a lower permanent stoma rate in patients who underwent a low anterior resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - R T J Geitenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M Broekman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J C Hol
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Baldazzi G, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, Garulli G, Marini P, Patriti A, Campagnacci R, Sica G, Caricato M, Montemurro LA, Ciano P, Benedetti M, Guercioni G, Scatizzi M. Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts. Updates Surg 2024; 76:107-117. [PMID: 37851299 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01670-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Retrospective evaluation of the effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on data derived from two prospective open-label observational multicenter studies in Italy regarding elective colorectal surgery. MBP for elective colorectal surgery remains a controversial issue with contrasting recommendations in current guidelines. The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group, therefore, decided to estimate the effects of no MBP (treatment variable) versus MBP for elective colorectal surgery. A total of 8359 patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis were enrolled in two consecutive prospective studies in 78 surgical centers in Italy from January 2019 to September 2021. A retrospective PSMA was performed on 5455 (65.3%) cases after the application of explicit exclusion criteria to eliminate confounders. The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates; the secondary endpoints included SSI subgroups, overall and major morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates. Overall length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) was also considered. Two well-balanced groups of 1125 patients each were generated: group A (No MBP, true population of interest), and group B (MBP, control population), performing a PSMA considering 21 covariates. Group A vs. group B resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of AL [42 (3.5%) vs. 73 (6.0%) events; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005]. No difference was recorded between the two groups for SSI [73 (6.0%) vs. 85 (7.0%) events; OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63-1.22; p = 0.441]. Regarding the secondary endpoints, no MBP resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of reoperation and LOS > 6 days. This study confirms that no MBP before elective colorectal surgery is significantly associated with a lower risk of AL, reoperation rate, and LOS < 6 days when compared with MBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Rome 2, Via Dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy.
- General Surgery Unit, "C.&G. Mazzoni" Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| | | | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Gianandrea Baldazzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, MI, Italy
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Nord Milano, Sesto San Giovanni, MI, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Per Lo Studio E La Cura Dei Tumori, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General and Emergency Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Department of Surgery, Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro e Fano, PU, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Sica
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Caricato
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Policlinico Campus BioMedico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Ciano
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Rome 2, Via Dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Rome 2, Via Dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ritter AS, Dumm N, Deisenhofer JM, Franz C, Al-Saeedi M, Büchler MW, Schneider M. Risk Factors for Rectal Stump Leakage After Discontinuity Resection: Stump Length Matters Most. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:138-150. [PMID: 37792564 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discontinuity resection is commonly conducted to avoid anastomotic leakage in high-risk patients but potentially results in rectal stump leakage. Although risk factors for anastomotic leakage have been widely studied, data on rectal stump leakage rates and underlying risk factors are scarce. OBJECTIVE To determine rectal stump leakage rates following Hartmann's procedure and to identify patient-and surgery-associated risk factors. DESIGN A retrospective study with univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to identify risk factors of rectal stump leakage. A subgroup analysis of scheduled operations was performed. SETTINGS The study was conducted at Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. PATIENTS Patients were included who underwent discontinuity resection with rectal stump formation between 2010 and 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measures included rectal stump leakage rates, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, and necessity for further invasive treatment. RESULTS Rectal stump leakage occurred in 11.78% of patients. Rectal stump leakage rates varied considerably depending on the surgical procedure performed and were highest following subtotal pelvic exenteration (34%). Diagnosis of rectal stump leakage peaked on postoperative day 7. A short rectal stump ( p = 0.001), previous pelvic radiotherapy ( p = 0.04), chemotherapy ( p = 0.004), and previous laparotomy ( p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for rectal stump leakage in the entire patient collective. In patients undergoing scheduled surgery, a short rectal stump was the only independent risk factor ( p = 0.003). Rectal stump leakage was not associated with increased 30-day mortality but prolonged length of hospitalization and frequently necessitated further invasive treatment. LIMITATIONS Study results are limited by the retrospective design, a high number of emergency operations, and the mere inclusion of symptomatic leakages. CONCLUSIONS Rectal stump leakage is a relevant complication after discontinuity resection. Risk factors should be considered during surgical decision-making when both discontinuity resection and abdominoperineal resection are feasible. See Video Abstract. FACTORES DE RIESGO PARA LA FUGA DEL MUN RECTAL DESPUS DE UNA RESECCIN POR DISCONTINUIDAD LA LONGITUD DEL MUN ES LO MS IMPORTANTE ANTECEDENTES:La resección de discontinuidad se realiza comúnmente para evitar la fuga anastomótica en pacientes de alto riesgo, pero potencialmente da como resultado una fuga del muñón rectal. Si bien los factores de riesgo de fuga anastomótica se han estudiado ampliamente, los datos sobre las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal y los factores de riesgo subyacentes son escasos.OBJETIVO:Determinar las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal después del procedimiento de Hartmann e identificar los factores de riesgo asociados con el paciente y la cirugía.DISEÑO:Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con análisis univariado y multivariado para identificar los factores de riesgo de fuga del muñón rectal. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de subgrupos de las operaciones programadas.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en el Hospital Universitario de Heidelberg, Alemania.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que se sometieron a resección de discontinuidad con formación de muñón rectal entre 2010 y 2020.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Las principales medidas de resultado incluyeron las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal, la mortalidad a los 30 días, la duración de la hospitalización y la necesidad de un tratamiento invasivo adicional.RESULTADOS:La fuga del muñón rectal ocurrió en el 11,78% de los pacientes. Las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal variaron considerablemente según el procedimiento quirúrgico realizado y fueron más altas después de la exenteración pélvica subtotal (34%). El diagnóstico de fuga del muñón rectal alcanzó su punto máximo en el día 7 del postoperatorio. Un muñón rectal corto (p = 0,001), radioterapia pélvica previa (p = 0,04), quimioterapia (p = 0,004) y laparotomía previa (p = 0,03) fueron factores de riesgo independientes de fuga rectal. Fuga del muñón en todo el colectivo de pacientes. En los pacientes sometidos a cirugía programada, el muñón rectal corto fue el único factor de riesgo independiente (p = 0,003). La fuga del muñón rectal no se asoció con un aumento de la mortalidad a los 30 días, pero con una duración prolongada de la hospitalización y con frecuencia requirió un tratamiento invasivo adicional.LIMITACIONES:Los resultados del estudio están limitados por el diseño retrospectivo, un alto número de operaciones de emergencia y la mera inclusión de fugas sintomáticas.CONCLUSIONES:La fuga del muñón rectal es una complicación relevante tras la resección por discontinuidad. Se deben considerar los factores de riesgo durante la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas cuando son factibles tanto la resección por discontinuidad como la resección abdominoperineal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina S Ritter
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Noemi Dumm
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Julian M Deisenhofer
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Franz
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed Al-Saeedi
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, Gießen University Hospital, Gießen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Qin Q, Huang B, Wu A, Gao J, Liu X, Cao W, Ma T, Kuang Y, Guo J, Wu Q, Shao B, Guan Q, Yao H, Zhang X, Wang H. Development and Validation of a Post-Radiotherapy Prediction Model for Bowel Dysfunction After Rectal Cancer Resection. Gastroenterology 2023; 165:1430-1442.e14. [PMID: 37625498 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The benefit of radiotherapy for rectal cancer is based largely on a balance between a decrease in local recurrence and an increase in bowel dysfunction. Predicting postoperative disability is helpful for recovery plans and early intervention. We aimed to develop and validate a risk model to improve the prediction of major bowel dysfunction after restorative rectal cancer resection with neoadjuvant radiotherapy using perioperative features. METHODS Eligible patients more than 1 year after restorative resection following radiotherapy were invited to complete the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score at 3 national hospitals in China. Clinical characteristics and imaging parameters were assessed with machine learning algorithms. The post-radiotherapy LARS prediction model (PORTLARS) was constructed by means of logistic regression on the basis of key factors with proportional weighs. The accuracy of the model for major LARS prediction was internally and externally validated. RESULTS A total of 868 patients reported a mean LARS score of 28.4 after an average time of 4.7 years since surgery. Key predictors for major LARS included the length of distal rectum, anastomotic leakage, proximal colon of neorectum, and pathologic nodal stage. PORTLARS had a favorable area under the curve for predicting major LARS in the internal dataset (0.835; 95% CI, 0.800-0.870, n = 521) and external dataset (0.884; 95% CI, 0.848-0.921, n = 347). The model achieved both sensitivity and specificity >0.83 in the external validation. In addition, PORTLARS outperformed the preoperative LARS score for prediction of major events. CONCLUSIONS PORTLARS could predict major bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer resection following radiotherapy with high accuracy and robustness. It may serve as a useful tool to identify patients who need additional support for long-term dysfunction in the early stage. CLINICALTRIALS gov, number NCT05129215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyuan Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Binjie Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Aiwen Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jiale Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Xinzhi Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wuteng Cao
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tenghui Ma
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingyi Kuang
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jirui Guo
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Biyan Shao
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Guan
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongwei Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education Beijing, Beijing, China.
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|