Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of localized (stage I/II) adrenocortical carcinoma: results of a multiinstitutional Italian survey

Impact of Current Technology in Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: 20 Years of Experience in the Treatment of 254 Consecutive Clinical Cases

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), which avoids large abdomen incisions, is considered the gold standard technique for the treatment of benign small- and medium-size adrenal masses (<6 cm) and weighing < 100 g. A trascurable mortality and morbidity rate, short hospitalization and patient rapid recovery are the main advantages compared to traditional surgery. During the past decade, a new surgical technology has been developed that expedites a "clipless" adrenalectomy. Here, the authors analyze a clinical series of 254 consecutive patients who were affected by adrenal gland neoplasms and underwent LA by the transabdominal lateral approach over the two last decades. A literature review is also presented.

METHODS

Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data from 254 patients who underwent LA between January 2003 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Diagnosis was obtained on the basis of clinical examination, laboratory values and imaging techniques. Doxazosin was preoperatively administered in the case of pheochromocytoma (PCC) while spironolactone and potassium were employed to treat Conn's disease. The same surgeon (CG) performed all the LA and utilized the same laparoscopic transabdominal lateral approach. Different dissection tools-ultrasonic, bipolar or mixed scissors-and hemostatic agents were used during this period. The following results were obtained: 254 patients were included in the study; functioning tumors were diagnosed in 155 patients, 52 patients were affected by PCCs, 55 by Conn's disease, 48 by Cushing's disease. Surgery mean operative time was 137.33 min (range 100-180 min) during the learning curve adrenalectomies and 98.5 min (range 70-180) in subsequent procedures. Mean blood loss was respectively 160.2 mL (range 60-280) and 96.98 mL (range 50-280) in the first 30 procedures and the subsequent ones. Only three conversions (1.18%) to open surgery occurred. No mortality or postoperative major complications were observed, while minor complications occurred in 19 patients (3.54%). In 153 out of 155 functioning neoplasms, LA was effective in the normalization of the endocrine profile. According to our experience, a learning curve consisting of 30 cases was identified. In fact, a lower operative time and a lower complication rate was reported following 30 LA.

CONCLUSIONS

LA is a safe procedure, even for masses larger than 6 cm and PCCs. Undoubtedly, the development of surgical technology has made it possible reducing operative times, performing a "clipless" adrenalectomy and extending the indications in the treatment of more complex patients. A multidisciplinary team, in referral high-volume centers, is recommended in the management of adrenal pathology. A 30-procedure learning curve is necessary to improve surgical outcomes.

Laparoscopic or Open Adrenalectomy for Stage I-II Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Surgical resection of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is the only curative treatment. Even in localized (I-II) stages, open adrenalectomy (OA) is the gold standard, though laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) can be proposed in selected patients. Despite the postoperative benefits of LA, its role in the surgical management of patients with ACC remains controversial regarding oncologic outcomes. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes of patients with localized ACC submitted to LA or OA in a referral center from 1995 to 2020. Among 180 consecutive patients operated on for ACC, 49 presented with localized ACC (19 LA and 30 OA). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for tumor size. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year overall survival were similar in both groups (p = 0.166) but 3-year disease-free survival was in favor of OA (p = 0.020). Though LA could be proposed in highly selected patients, OA should still be considered the standard approach in patients with known or suspected localized ACC.

Contemporary conditional cancer-specific survival rates in surgically treated adrenocortical carcinoma patients: A stage-specific analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We examined the effect of disease-free interval (DFI) duration on cancer-specific mortality (CSM)-free survival, otherwise known as the effect of conditional survival, in surgically treated adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) patients.

METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2018), 867 ACC patients treated with adrenalectomy were identified. Conditional survival estimates at 5-years were assessed based on DFI duration and according to stage at presentation. Separate Cox regression models were fitted at baseline and according to DFI.

RESULTS

Overall, 406 (47%), 285 (33%), and 176 (20%) patients were stage I-II, III and IV, respectively. In conditional survival analysis, providing a DFI of 24 months, 5-year CSM-free survival at initial diagnosis increased from 66% to 80% in stage I-II, from 35% to 66% in stage III, and from 14% to 36% in stage IV. In multivariable Cox regression models, stage III (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.38; p < 0.001) and IV (HR: 4.67; p < 0.001) independently predicted higher CSM, relative to stage I-II. The magnitude of this effect decreased over time, providing increasing DFI duration.

CONCLUSIONS

In surgically treated ACC, survival probabilities increase with longer DFI duration. This improvement is more pronounced in stage III, followed by stages IV and I-II patients, in that order. Survival estimates accounting for DFI may prove valuable in patients counseling.

Prognostic Factors of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Experience from a Regional Medical Center in Eastern China

Objective

This study aimed to summarize and analyze the clinical and pathological features and prognostic risk factors of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical and pathological data and the prognoses of 39 adult ACC patients confirmed by pathologic diagnosis at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between August 2009 and October 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze correlations between clinical and pathological parameters and prognosis. A nomogram prediction model was constructed for overall survival (OS) based on the independent prognostic factors and externally validated it with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset.

Results

The mean age of the patient cohort was 53.87 ± 11.1 years (range: 29-80 years), which included 17 men and 22 women. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 83.7%, 64.4%, and 59.8%, respectively; the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates at the same time points were 76.1%, 45.8%, and 23.5%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with poor OS were associated with M1 stage (P = 0.008), late ENSAT stage (P = 0.017), presence of venous tumor thrombus (P = 0.015), Ki67 >20% (P = 0.006), R1/R2 status (P = 0.018), and poorly differentiated tumors (P = 0.047). Patients with late ENSAT stage (P = 0.017), combined with venous tumor thrombus (P = 0.008), Ki67 >20% (P = 0.022) were more likely to have tumor recurrence. However, age, gender, BMI, tumor diameter, clinical symptoms and postoperative treatment were not correlated with OS or RFS (P > 0.05). Univariate and multivariate COX analyses showed that Ki67 >20% (P = 0.013) and R1/2 status (P = 0.040) were independent risk factors for OS, while only Ki67 >20% (P = 0.032) was an independent risk factor for RFS. A nomogram for predicting OS was constructed based on the above factors, and the area under the receiver characteristic curve (ROC)-1, 3, and 5-year survival were 0.8, 0.825 and 0.902, respectively. The C-index of the predicted nomogram was 0.813 and a high C-index value of 0.846 could still be achieved in the external validation of TCGA.

Conclusion

ACC is a rare and deadly endocrine malignancy with a high rate of recurrence. High Ki67 index (>20%) and R1/R2 resection status were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in ACC patients. A novel nomogram with a relatively good accuracy was established to assist clinicians in assessing the risk of OS in patients with ACC.

Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery is considered a standard treatment for benign adrenal tumors; however, no consensus has been reached on the optimal resection technique for adrenocortical carcinomas. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in the management of adrenocortical carcinoma.

METHODS

The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles from inception to May 2022, by two independent reviewers using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022316050).

RESULTS

From 183 studies screened, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1617 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic surgery (n = 472) or open surgery (n = 1145). Open surgery demonstrated a lower rate of positive resection margin compared with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.10; I² = 0%). Additionally, open surgery had more favorable overall survival (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.72; I² = 0%) and recurrence-free rates (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; I² = 38%) than laparoscopic surgery at 3 years. Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery than open surgery (mean difference - 2.49 days, 95% CI - 2.95 to - 2.04; I² = 45%).

CONCLUSIONS

Open surgery should still be considered the standard operative approach; however, laparoscopic surgery could be regarded as an effective and safe operation for selected adrenocortical carcinoma cases with appropriate laparoscopic expertise. Further randomized controlled studies with tumor stage- and resection margin-dependent survival analysis are necessary to ascertain the safety and efficacy of the treatment.

Construction and validation of a prognostic model for predicting overall survival of primary adrenal malignant tumor patients: A population-based study with 1,080 patients

Objective

Primary adrenal malignant tumor is rare. The factors affecting the prognosis remain poorly defined. This study targeted to construct and corroborate a model for predicting the overall survival of adrenal malignant tumor patients.

Methods

We investigated the SEER database for patients with primary adrenal malignant tumor. 1,080 patients were divided into a construction cohort (n = 756) and a validation cohort (n = 324), randomly. The prognostic factors for overall survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. The nomogram was constructed and then validated with C-index, calibration curve, time-dependent ROC curve, and decision curve analysis in both cohorts. Then we divided the patients into 3 different risk groups according to the total points of the nomogram and analyzed their survival status by Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test.

Results

The baseline characteristics of these two cohorts were not statistically different (P > 0.05). Using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, 5 variables, including age, tumor size, histological type, tumor stage, and surgery of primary site, were distinguished as prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Based on these variables, we constructed a nomogram to predict the 3- year, 5- year, and 10-year overall survival. The C-indexes were 0.780 (0.760–0.800) in the construction cohort and 0.780 (0.751–0.809) in the validation cohort. In both cohorts, the AUC reached a fairly high level at all time points. The internal and external calibration curves and ROC analysis showed outstanding accuracy and discrimination. The decision curves indicated excellent clinical usefulness. The best cut-off values for the total points of the nomogram were 165.4 and 243.1, and the prognosis was significantly different for the three different risk groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

We successfully constructed a model to predict the overall survival of primary adrenal malignant tumor patients. This model was validated to perform brilliantly internally and externally, which can assist us in individualized clinical management.

Reoperation for Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Population-Based Studies

Background

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare neoplasm with a high recurrence rate. This study aimed to assess the role of surgery in the clinical management of recurrent ACC.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the hazard ratios were pooled.

Results

Patients who underwent resection for recurrence had significantly better OS or OS after recurrence than those who received only nonsurgical treatments (HR 0.34, p < 0.001). Prognostic factors were associated with decreased OS after recurrence, including multiple recurrence (HR 3.23, p = 0.001), shorter disease-free interval (HR 2.94, p < 0.001), stage III-IV of the original tumor (HR 6.17, p = 0.001), sex of male (HR 1.35, p = 0.04), and initial non-R0 resection (HR 2.13, p = 0.001). Prolonged OS after recurrence was observed in those who experienced incomplete resection (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31–0.52, I² = 53%) compared with patients who only received nonsurgical treatments. In the reoperated group, patients who underwent complete resection of recurrence had a prolonged OS after recurrence compared with those who underwent incomplete resection (HR 0.23, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

We confirmed the role of reoperation in the clinical management of recurrent ACC. Select patients might benefit from debulking surgery. The preoperative evaluation of the complete resection of the recurrence is the key means to decide whether patients should undergo surgery. Other prognostic factors associated with prolonged OS include single recurrence site, relatively longer disease-free interval, stage I-II of the original tumor, and female sex.

Robotic Adrenalectomy: A 10-Year Clinical Experience at a Tertiary Medical Center

Background and Objective:

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is now the preferred approach for most adrenal tumors. As minimally invasive surgery departments gain familiarity with the robotic platform, the safety profiles and efficacy of robotic adrenalectomy has been an area of continued discussion. The objective of this study is to outline our experience with transitioning to the robotic platform and determining the effectiveness and safety of transperitoneal robotic adrenalectomy.

Methods:

We performed a single-center, retrospective review of 37 patients who underwent transperitoneal robotic adrenalectomy between August 1, 2010 and August 31, 2020. Outcomes included patient morbidity, hospital length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, gland volume, pathology, and postoperative complications.

Results:

Sixty-five percent of the total robotic adrenalectomies were of the left adrenal gland. The average operating room time was 213 minutes. The average gland volume was 71 cm³, estimated blood loss was 74 mL and length of stay was 1.4 days. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the right and left total robotic adrenalectomies. Approximately one-third of our cohort had an adrenal cortical adenoma, while only one patient had adrenal cortical carcinoma. Four patients experienced postoperative complications that resulted in unplanned hospital readmissions and there was one mortality.

Conclusions:

Although the standard of care for most adrenal tumors is laparoscopic resection, our 10-year experience has shown that robotic adrenalectomy is highly effective and can be a valuable tool in the community and academic setting.

Draft of the clinical practice guidelines “Adrenal incidentaloma”

The wider application and technical improvement of abdominal imaging procedures in recent years has led to an increasingly frequent detection of adrenal gland masses — adrenal incidentaloma, which have become a common clinical problem and need to be investigated for evidence of hormonal hypersecretion and/or malignancy. Clinical guidelines are the main working tool of a practicing physician. Laconic, structured information about a specific nosology, methods of its diagnosis and treatment, based on the principles of evidence-based medicine, make it possible to give answers to questions in a short time, to achieve maximum efficiency and personalization of treatment. These clinical guidelines include data on the prevalence, etiology, radiological features and assessment of hormonal status of adrenal incidentalomas. In addition, this clinical practice guideline provides information on indications for surgery, postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up.

Surgical Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Highlights

INTRODUCTION

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor, often discovered at an advanced stage and associated with poor prognosis. Treatment is guided by staging according to the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENSAT) classification. Surgery is the treatment of choice for ACC. The aim of this review is to provide a complete overview on surgical approaches and management of adrenocortical carcinoma.

METHODS

This comprehensive review has been carried out according to the PRISMA statement. The literature sources were the databases PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library. The search thread was: ((surgery) OR (adrenalectomy)) AND (adrenocortical carcinoma).

RESULTS

Among all studies identified, 17 were selected for the review. All of them were retrospective. A total of 2498 patients were included in the studies, of whom 734 were treated by mini-invasive approaches and 1764 patients were treated by open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is the treatment of choice for ACC. Open adrenalectomy (OA) is defined as the gold standard. In recent years laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has gained more popularity. No significant differences were reported for overall recurrence rate, time to recurrence, and cancer-specific mortality between LA and OA, in particular for Stage I-II. Robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has several advantages compared to LA, but there is still a lack of specific documentation on RA use in ACC.

Adrenocortical carcinoma: current state of the art, ongoing controversies, and future directions in diagnosis and treatment

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with an annual incidence of ~1 case per million population. Differentiating between ACC and benign adrenocortical tumors can be challenging in patients who present with an incidentally discovered adrenal mass, due to the limited specificity of standard diagnostic imaging. Recently, urine steroid metabolite profiling has been prospectively validated as a novel diagnostic tool for the detection of malignancy with improved accuracy over current modalities. Surgery represents the only curative treatment for ACC, although local recurrence and metastases are common, even after a margin-negative resection is performed. Unlike other intra-abdominal cancers, the role of minimally invasive surgery and lymphadenectomy in ACC is controversial. Adjuvant therapy with the adrenolytic drug mitotane is used to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery, although evidence supporting its efficacy is limited; it is also currently unclear whether all patients or a subset with the highest risk of recurrence should receive this treatment. Large-scale pan-genomic studies have yielded insights into the pathogenesis of ACC and have defined distinct molecular signatures associated with clinical outcomes that may be used to improve prognostication. For patients with advanced ACC, palliative combination chemotherapy with mitotane is the current standard of care; however, this is associated with poor response rates (RR). Knowledge from molecular profiling studies has been used to guide the development of novel targeted therapies; however, these have shown limited efficacy in early phase trials. As a result, there is an urgent unmet need for more effective therapies for patients with this devastating disease.

Open versus minimally invasive surgery for suspected adrenocortical carcinoma

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although laparoscopy has been widely adopted for management of benign adrenal tumors, minimally invasive surgery for ACC remains controversial. Retrospective analyses, frequently with fewer than one hundred participants, comprise the majority of the literature. High-quality data regarding the optimal surgical approach for ACC are lacking due to the rarity of the disease and the fact that determination of tumor type (e.g., adenoma or carcinoma) is determined after adrenalectomy, since adrenal tumors are generally not biopsied. While the benefits of minimally invasive surgery including lower intra-operative blood loss and decreased hospital length-of-stay have been consistently demonstrated, clinical equipoise for long-term survival and recurrence outcomes between open and minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) remains. This review examines retrospective studies that directly compare patients with ACC who underwent either open or laparoscopic adrenalectomy, and considers these findings in the context of current guideline recommendations for surgical management of ACC.

Reassessing the impact of tumor size on operative approach in adrenocortical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is often a contraindication to minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA). We used an administrative data set to analyze postoperative outcomes. We hypothesized that small tumors would have better short- and long-term outcomes, independent of the operative approach.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2016) identified patients with ACC who underwent adrenalectomy. Tumors were grouped: <5 cm (n = 125), 5-10 cm (n = 431), and >10 cm (n = 443). The primary and secondary outcomes were margin positivity and overall survival, respectively.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and ninety-nine patients were analyzed: 37% MIA and 63% open adrenalectomy (OA). As the size increased, the rate of attempted MIA decreased. Larger tumors were associated with conversion to open. Although tumors with local invasion and those which required conversion to open were associated with an increased likelihood of a positive margin, tumor size was not. Although "complete" MIA (vs. OA) and tumor size were not associated with differences in survival, conversion (HR = 1.83, p = .02), positive margins (HR = 1.54, p = .01), and local invasion (HR = 1.84, p < .001) were associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSION

Positive margins are associated with poor survival in ACC. Tumors ≥ 5 cm were associated with an increased conversion rate and subsequent increase in margin positivity. MIA may be considered for select patients with small tumors but adequate oncologic resection is critical.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for giant adrenal tumours: Technical considerations and surgical outcome

Background:

Giant adrenal tumours are tumours with size ≥6 cm. These are rare cancer associated with malignancy in 25% of cases.

Patients and Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to our high-volume centre of Careggi University Hospital with a giant adrenal tumour and submitted to adrenalectomy between January 2008 and December 2018. The group of patients who underwent to laparoscopic adrenalectomy was compared with a group of patients that was submitted to open adrenalectomy.

Results:

In the past 10 years, we performed about 245 adrenalectomies for benign and malignant adrenal tumours. Fifty (20.4%) of these were giant tumours. The medium size was 9.9 cm (7–22 cm). The mean age was 57 years (21–81 years). Thirty-four (68%) of these cancers were laparoscopically removed and 16 (32%) with an open approach. The surgical outcomes in these patients were optimal if compared to the group of patients submitted to open approach in terms of good pain control, hospital stay, mean operative time and bloodless. No difference was observed about post-operative complications in the two groups. The follow-up after 30 months for malignant tumours did not show local recurrences.

Conclusion:

Our results pinpoint the advantages of performing a laparoscopic adrenalectomy for giant adrenal tumours. The tumour size is only a predictive parameter of possible malignancy, and the laparoscopic approach is a safe and feasible method in terms of surgical and oncological, only if performed by expert surgeons and in high-volume centres.

Open vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy for localized adrenocortical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) subjected to open vs laparoscopic surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS

This retrospective study included 46 patients with the ACC ENSAT stage I-stage III of whom 23 underwent open surgery (OA group), whereas 23 were subjected to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA group). The main outcomes analysed in the study were differences between the OA and LA groups in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients in OA group had larger tumours (120 [70-250] mm vs 75 [26-110] mm; P < .001), higher Ki-67 index (16 [1-65] % vs 10 [1-25] %; P = .04) and higher disease stage (P = .01) compared with the patients in the LA group. The median duration of follow-up for patients underwent OA and LA was 51 (12-174) and 53 (5-127) months, respectively. Eight patients (5 OA and 3 LA) experienced recurrent disease, whereas six patients (3 OA and 3 LA) died during follow-up. No differences in RFS and OS were found between patients who underwent open or laparoscopic surgery.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that in patients with localized ACC and without invasion of extra-adrenal tissues, LA is a plausible treatment option in terms of RFS and OS. However, our results are limited to referral centres with large experience in the management of patients with ACC and may not necessarily apply to nonspecialized centres.

[Surgery of adrenal diseases]

Incidentally discovered adrenal alterations should be separated into those without any clinical importance and adrenal diseases that have to be surgically or conservatively treated. Before operative treatment, in addition to the possible different functional activity of tumors, a differentiation must be made between sporadically arising singular or multiple adrenal tumors or nodular adrenal hyperplasia, adrenal tumors as part of a familial syndrome and metastases of other primary malignant tumors into the adrenal glands. Benign hormonally active adrenal tumors as well as questionable malignant tumors of the adrenal cortex are resected by minimally invasive techniques. For large malignant tumors infiltrating into surrounding tissues and tumors with proven lymph node metastases, the primarily open approach is indicated. Patients with adrenal diseases should always undergo an interdisciplinary assessment and in cases with clear indications for surgery, sometimes transferred to a center with experience in surgery and postoperative management of these patients.

Implications of Conversion during Attempted Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although advocated by some, minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is controversial. Moreover, the oncologic implications for patients requiring conversion to an open procedure during attempted MIA for ACC are not extensively reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients undergoing resection for ACC. Overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing successful MIA was compared with those requiring conversion, and additionally evaluated with a multivariable Cox regression analysis including other factors associated with OS. After propensity matching, those experiencing conversion were further compared with patients who underwent planned open resection.

RESULTS

Among 196 patients undergoing attempted MIA for ACC, 38 (19.4%) required conversion. Independent of 90-day postoperative mortality, conversion was associated with significantly reduced OS compared with successful MIA (median 27.9 months versus not reached, p = 0.002). Even for tumors confined to the adrenal, conversion was associated with worse median OS compared with successful MIA (median 34.2 months versus not reached, p = 0.003). After propensity matching for clinicopathologic covariates to establish well-balanced cohorts (N = 38 per group), patients requiring conversion during MIA had significantly worse OS than those having planned open resection (27.9 months versus 50.5 months, p = 0.020). On multivariable analysis for predictors of OS, conversion during MIA (HR 2.32, p = 0.003) was independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

ACC is a rare tumor for which adequate oncologic resection is the only chance for cure. Given the relatively high rate of conversion and its associated inferior survival, open resection should be considered standard of care for known or suspected ACC.

Surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma: When and how?

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy that is frequently asymptomatic at presentation, yet has a high rate of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Prognosis is overall poor, particularly with cortisol-producing tumors. While the treatment of ACC is guided by stage of disease, complete surgical resection is the most important step in the management of patients with primary, recurrent, or metastatic ACC. Triphasic chest, abdomen, and pelvis computer tomography (CT) scans and 18F flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT scanning are essential for accurate staging; moreover, MRI may be helpful to identify liver metastasis and evaluate the involvement of adjacent organs for operative planning. Surgical resection with negative margins is the single most important prognostic factor for survival in patients with ACC. To achieve the highest rate of R0 resection, open adrenalectomy is the gold standard surgical approach for confirmed or highly suspected ACC. It is extremely important that the tumor capsule is not ruptured, regardless of the surgical approach used. The best post-operative outcomes (complications and oncologic) are achieved by high-volume surgeons practicing at high-volume centers.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Adrenalectomy in Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Open surgery remains the preferred surgical treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), while the role of minimally invasive adrenalectomy surgery (MIS) in ACC is still controversial. The present study was conducted to compare MIS with open adrenalectomy (OA) in ACC.

METHODS

The Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched. The weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR), and hazard ratio (HR) were pooled.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies incorporating 2207 patients were included in the present study. MIS approaches were likely to have a comparable operation time (WMD - 17.77; p = 0.150) and postoperative complications (RR 0.74; p = 0.091) compared with OA, and were significantly associated with less blood loss (WMD - 1761.96; p = 0.016) and shorter length of stay (WMD - 2.96; p < 0.001). MIS approaches were also more likely to have an earlier recurrence (WMD - 8.42; p = 0.048) and more positive surgical margin (RR 1.56; p = 0.018) and peritoneal recurrence (RR 2.63; p < 0.001), while the overall recurrence (RR 1.07; p = 0.559) and local recurrence (RR 1.33; p = 0.160) were comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, surgical approaches did not differ in overall survival (HR 0.97; p = 0.801), cancer-specific survival (HR 1.04; p = 0.869), and recurrence/disease-free survival (HR 0.96; p = 0.791).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, MIS approaches were likely to have a better recovery. Although MIS approaches were associated with earlier recurrence and more positive surgical margin and peritoneal recurrence, no significant differences in survival outcomes were found. OA should still be considered as the standard treatment, but MIS approaches could be offered for selected ACC cases, and performed by surgeons with appropriate laparoscopic expertise, ensuring an improved survival for patients.

Risk factors associated with positive resection margins in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Positive resection margins are associated with worse survival after surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). We aimed to identify risk factors for positive margins post-resection.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for ACC patients from 2006 to 2015. Patients with positive versus negative resection margins post-surgery were compared using Chi-square tests. Survival based on adjuvant treatment was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

1,973 patients with ACC were identified, 217 (11.0%) with positive margins. Multivariable analysis identified extra-adrenal extension (HR 4.92, p < 0.001), lymph node metastases (HR 2.64, p = 0.001), and distant metastases (HR 1.53, p = 0.03) as risk factors for positive margins. No significant difference in margin status existed between patients who had an open versus minimally invasive procedure (p = 0.6). Positive margin patients receiving adjuvant radiation (p = 0.007) or combined chemo-radiation (p = 0.001) had the longest survival.

CONCLUSION

No modifiable risk factors were identified, but patients with positive margins receiving adjuvant radiation or chemo-radiation had the longest survival.

Laparoscopic resection of giant adrenal malignant tumors, a case series and review of the literature

Laparoscopic approach for suspected adrenal malignancies remains a controversial issue and it gets more controversial, when managing giant adrenal malignant tumors. The aim of this paper is to present five cases of patients with giant adrenal malignant tumors that underwent laparoscopic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy in our department between 2010 and 2017. Literature is also reviewed in order to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic resection in these cases.

Antineoplastic Effect of a Combined Mitotane Treatment/Ionizing Radiation in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Preclinical Study

Mitotane (MTT) is an adrenolytic drug used in adjuvant and advanced treatments of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Ionizing radiation (IR) is also used in adrenal cancer treatment, even though its biological action remains unknown. To provide a reliable in vivo preclinical model of ACC, we used mouse xenografts bearing human ACC to test the effects of MTT and IR alone and in combination. We evaluated tumor growth inhibition by the RECIST criteria and analyzed the cell cycle by flow cytometry (FCM). In the xenograft ACC model treated with MTT/IR in combination, we observed a marked inhibition of tumor growth, with strong tumor regression (p < 0.0001) compared to MTT and IR given alone (p < 0.05). The MTT results confirm its antisteroidogenic activity (p < 0.05) in the xenograft ACC model, revealing its ability to render cancer cells more prone to radiotherapy treatment. In addition, to explain the biological effect of these treatments on the Mismatch Repair System (MMR), we interfered with the MSH2 gene expression in untreated and MTT/IR-treated H295R and SW13 cell lines. Moreover, we observed that upon treatment with MTT/IR to induce DNA damage, MSH2 gene inhibition in both the H295R and SW13 cell lines did not allow DNA damage repair, thus inducing cell death. In conclusion, MTT seems to have a radiosensitizing property and, when given in combination with IR, is able to promote neoplastic growth inhibition, leading to a significant reduction in tumor size due to cell death.

Adrenocortical carcinoma: Impact of surgical treatment

Compared to benign adrenal lesions, secreting or otherwise, malignant adrenocortical carcinoma is rare. Overall prognosis is poor, with <50% 5-year survival. Various prognostic factors have been identified, some tumor-related and others directly linked to surgical treatment. Surgery is the only possible curative treatment, and is decided upon in a multidisciplinary medical-surgical team meeting. Surgical approach (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy) remains a matter of debate. In the light of a recent literature search, the present review reassesses the prognostic criteria of surgical resection, the quality of which determines overall and recurrence-free survival.

Treatment of Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. ACC is capable of secreting excess adrenocortical hormones, which can compound morbidity and compromise clinical outcomes. By the time most ACCs are diagnosed, there is usually locoregional or metastatic disease. Surgery is the most important treatment to offer possibility of cure or prolong survival. Several adjuvant therapies are used depending on grade and stage of the tumor and other patient-related factors. This review provides an overview of treatment approaches for ACC, highlighting evidence to support each treatment and acknowledging where more data and research are needed to improve care.

[Resection strategies for adrenocortical carcinoma]

Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are rare and aggressive neoplasms. Due to their high rate of local recurrence and distant metastases (up to 85%) they are associated with a poor survival. The 5‑year survival in ACC patients with lymph node metastasis or local infiltration is 50% and with distant metastasis less than 15%. An R0 resection with locoregional and para-aortic/paracaval lymphadenectomy is the only curative option and reasonable treatment possibility. The treatment of these patients should therefore be planned and carried out in centers. Local recurrences and distant metastases should also be treated with R0 resection when feasible, combined with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation. In the case of an asymptomatic non-resectable ACC, debulking operations cannot be recommended. The primary operation can also be done in a minimally invasive procedure if principles of oncological surgery are followed (radical resection, no damage of the tumor capsule, lymphadenectomy), since survival after open and minimally invasive laparoscopic resection was comparable. Palliative resections are only indicated in symptomatic patients.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy

In the last three decades, endoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of most adrenal diseases. Gagner et al., first reported in 1992, the lateral trans-abdominal laparoscopic approach to adrenalectomy. Afterwards, several retrospective and comparative studies addressed the advantages of minimally invasive adrenalectomy specifically consistent in less postoperative pain, improved patients' satisfaction, shorter hospital stay and recovery time when compared to open adrenalectomy. The lateral transabdominal approach to the adrenals is currently one of the most widely used, since it allows an optimal comprehensive view of the adrenal region and surrounding structures, and provides and adequate working space. On the other hand, from a technical point of view, essential requirements for a successful laparoscopic adrenalectomy are an appropriate knowledge of retroperitoneal anatomy, a gentle tissue manipulation and a precise haemostasis technique in order to identify appropriately the structures of interest and avoid the troublesome 'oozing' that could complicate the surgical procedure.

[Surgical strategies for non-metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma]

Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are rare but highly aggressive tumors. It is very difficult to differentiate small locally limited ACCs from benign adenomas. A spontaneous density >10 Hounsfield units in non-enhanced CT scan and a slow washout after contrast injection are suspicious of malignancy but with a low specificity. Preoperatively, a hormonal work-up is mandatory for all adrenal tumors. Each patient should be discussed in an interdisciplinary board. For non-metastatic ACCs (ENSAT stages I-III) radical resection is the treatment of choice. R0-resection and avoiding violation of the tumor capsule are the most important prognostic factors for long-term survival. Although discrepant reports regarding the benefits of lymphadenectomy have been published, lymph node dissection at least in the periadrenal area and in the renal hilum (optional extension to paraaortal and paracaval nodes) should be performed in the case of lymph node involvement. The role of prophylactic lymphadenectomy needs to be analyzed in further studies. The gold standard remains the open approach but minimally invasive procedures are also an option, especially in stage I-II tumors, if the principles of oncological surgery are respected. In this case, long-term survival rates are comparable. As local recurrence rates are lower and time to local recurrence is longer in patients who are operated on at a dedicated center (>10 adrenalectomies/year), adrenalectomy for ACC should be performed by an experienced surgeon.

Surgical therapy of adrenal tumors: guidelines from the German Association of Endocrine Surgeons (CAEK)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Previous guidelines addressing surgery of adrenal tumors required actualization in adaption of developments in the area. The present guideline aims to provide practical and qualified recommendations on an evidence-based level reviewing the prevalent literature for the surgical therapy of adrenal tumors referring to patients of all age groups in operative medicine who require adrenal surgery. It primarily addresses general and visceral surgeons but offers information for all medical doctors related to conservative, ambulatory or inpatient care, rehabilitation, and general practice as well as pediatrics. It extends to interested patients to improve the knowledge and participation in the decision-making process regarding indications and methods of management of adrenal tumors. Furthermore, it provides effective medical options for the surgical treatment of adrenal lesions and balances positive and negative effects. Specific clinical questions addressed refer to indication, diagnostic procedures, effective therapeutic alternatives to surgery, type and extent of surgery, and postoperative management and follow-up regime.

METHODS

A PubMed research using specific key words identified literature to be considered and was evaluated for evidence previous to a formal Delphi decision process that finalized consented recommendations in a multidisciplinary setting.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 general and 52 specific recommendations regarding surgery for adrenal tumors were generated and complementary comments provided.

CONCLUSION

Effective and balanced medical options for the surgical treatment of adrenal tumors are provided on evidence-base. Specific clinical questions regarding indication, diagnostic procedures, alternatives to and type as well as extent of surgery for adrenal tumors including postoperative management are addressed.

Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy typically with poor prognosis. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge regarding the clinical management of ACC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgery remains the cornerstone for localized ACC management. In more advanced cases, debulking surgery when feasible can help with hormonal control and may allow the initiation of systemic therapy. Over the last few years, our understanding of ACC molecular pathogenesis has expanded with no significant change in treatment options. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the gold standard in metastatic ACC despite suboptimal efficacy. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor use did not result in meaningful benefit in ACC patients. Multiple clinical trials are currently exploring the role of immunotherapy in ACC. Despite the remarkable improvement in our understanding of the molecular signature and pathways in ACC, this knowledge did not yield a major breakthrough in management of advanced ACC. Multi-institutional and international collaborations are needed to identify promising treatments and new therapeutic targets to improve the care of ACC patients.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Primary and Metastatic Adrenal Malignancy

Since the first description of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for pheochromocytoma and Cushing syndrome in 1992, the utilization of and indications for a minimally invasive approach to the adrenal gland have vastly expanded. Although minimally invasive adrenalectomy has been established as the preferred approach for patients with benign tumors of the adrenal gland, minimally invasive adrenalectomy for cancer remains controversial. In this article, the authors review the indications for minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenal nodules suspicious for, or established to represent, a primary malignancy or a site of metastatic cancer.

Open adrenalectomy versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study on short-term oncologic prognosis

Purpose

Open adrenalectomy (OA) remains the gold standard of surgical therapy for adrenocortical carcinoma, while the role of laparoscopic approach is controversial. We aim to explore the influence of surgical approaches on the oncologic prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma by comparing the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing OA with those undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the baseline characteristics, perioperative data and short-term prognosis of 42 patients diagnosed with stage I–III adrenocortical carcinoma, receiving OA (n=22) and LA (n=20) as primary therapy. The primary end point was the first recurrence.

Results

OA group had larger mean maximum diameter of tumor (10.1±3.6 versus 6.3±2.2 cm) and lesser benefits in operative time, bleeding loss and postoperative hospital stay than laparoscopic group. Mean disease-free survival (DFS) of OA was 44.8±35.1 months, which was longer than 17.5±10.4 months of LA, and the rate of 2-year DFS after primary surgery in the open group was higher than in the laparoscopic group (61.1% versus 21.4%, respectively). Rates of 1- and 3-year DFS showed no significant difference. All patients undergoing LA (11/11) showed local recurrent lesions at the first time of recurrence, while 5 of 13 patients undergoing OA did not show local recurrence (P=0.03).

Conclusion

OA for adrenocortical carcinoma is superior to laparoscopic approach in terms of DFS and rate of 2-year DFS, in spite of the larger maximum diameter of tumors and lesser benefit during perioperation. After LA, patients are more likely to show local recurrent lesions at the first time of relapse.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with transient renal artery occlusion for large adrenal tumors (≥8 cm)

OBJECTIVES

To analyze our experience in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) with transient renal artery occlusion for large adrenal tumors (≥8 cm) and to explore the safety and feasibility of this surgical procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with a surgical data review of 18 patients with large adrenal tumors who underwent RLA with transient renal artery occlusion in our hospital.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were treated by RLA with transient occlusion of the renal artery, and none were converted to open adrenalectomy. The renal artery occlusion time, operative time, estimated blood loss, perirenal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative drainage were 7.6 ± 1.0 min, 176.3 ± 49.7 min, 247.2 ± 274.1 mL, 4.1 ± 1.02 days, 6.3 ± 1.4 days, and 73.6 ± 47.9 mL, respectively. No severe complications occurred, with the exception of hemodynamic instability in one patient with a pheochromocytoma and one transfusion during the operation. Only one case of adrenal crisis occurred postoperatively. Pathological examination revealed 9 cases of pheochromocytoma, 6 cases of adrenal myelolipoma, 1 case of adrenal ganglioneuroma, 1 case of hygromata, and 1 case of adrenal teratoma. No recurrence or evidence of metastasis was observed during the 7-to-30-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

RLA with transient renal artery occlusion is a feasible, effective, and safe treatment for large adrenal tumors (≥8 cm).

Adrenocortical Cancer: A Molecularly Complex Disease Where Surgery Matters

The development of new therapies has lagged behind for rare cancers without defined therapeutic targets. Adrenocortical cancer is no exception. Mitotane, an older agent considered "adrenolytic," is used both to control symptoms in advanced disease and as adjuvant therapy after surgical resection. Molecular characterization of adrenocortical cancer has deepened our understanding of this genetically complex disease while identifying subgroups whose importance remains to be determined. Unfortunately, such studies have yet to demonstrate a therapeutic target for drug development, and to date, no targeted therapy has achieved meaningful outcomes. Consequently, first-line therapy for metastatic disease remains a combination regimen of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatinum established in a randomized clinical trial. In addition to evaluating recent studies in adrenocortical cancer, we raise one critical clinical issue-the risk of peritoneal dissemination following laparoscopic resection of adrenocortical cancer. In a retrospective case series of 267 patients referred to the NCI for the treatment of recurrent or advanced adrenocortical cancer, we found extensive peritoneal dissemination in 25 of the 45 patients (55.6%) who had undergone laparoscopic resection, compared with only 7 of the 222 patients (3%) who had undergone an open resection (P < 0.0001). Although this has been debated in the literature, our data argue for an end to laparoscopic resection of adrenocortical cancers to avoid peritoneal dissemination, a complication of laparoscopy that is uniformly fatal. Clin Cancer Res; 22(20); 4989-5000. ©2016 AACR SEE ALL ARTICLES IN THIS CCR FOCUS SECTION, "ENDOCRINE CANCERS REVISING PARADIGMS".

Minimally invasive adrenal surgery: virtue or vice?

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy associated with poor prognosis despite available treatments. In patients with localized or locally advanced disease, complete resection with negative margins offers the only potential for cure. Unfortunately, most patients develop local and distant recurrence following initial resection highlighting the importance of meticulous surgical technique in the hands of an experienced surgeon. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has supplanted open surgery for small to medium-sized benign adrenal tumors, controversy surrounds the use of MIS for resection of ACC. We sought to provide an overview of the key oncological principles in the surgical management of ACC and to critically review the literature comparing outcomes between the open and MIS approaches.

Single center experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy on a large clinical series

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is considered the gold standard technique for the treatment of benign small and medium size adrenal masses (<6 cm), due to low morbidity rate, short hospitalization and patient rapid recovery. The aim of our study is to analyse the feasibility and efficiency of this surgical approach in a broad spectrum of adrenal gland pathologies.

METHODS

Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data from 126 patients undergone laparoscopic adrenalectomy between January 2003 and December 2015 were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Diagnosis was obtained on the basis of clinical examination, laboratory values and imaging techniques. Doxazosin was preoperatively administered in case of pheochromocytoma while spironolactone and potassium were employed to treat Conn's disease. Laparoscopic adrenalectomies were all performed by the same surgeon (CG). First 30 procedures were considered as learning curve adrenalectomies.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six patients were included in the study. Functioning tumors were diagnosed in 84 patients, 27 patients were affected by pheochromocytomas, 29 by Conn's disease, 28 by Cushing disease. Surgery mean operative time was 137.33 min (range 100-180) during the learning curve adrenalectomies and 96.5 min (range 75-110) in subsequent procedures. Mean blood loss was respectively 160.2 ml (range 60-280) and 90.5 ml (range 50-200) in the first 30 procedures and the subsequent ones. Only one conversion to open surgery occurred. No post-operative major complications were observed, while minor complications occurred in 8 patients (0,79%). In 83 out of 84 functioning neoplasms, laparoscopic adrenalectomy was effective in normalization of endocrine profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and feasible procedure, even for functioning masses and pheochromocytomas. A multidisciplinary team including endocrinologists, endocrine surgeons and anaesthesiologists, is recommended in the management of adrenal pathology, and adrenal surgery should be performed in referral high volume centers. A thirty-procedures learning curve is recommended to improve surgical outcomes.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Adrenalectomy for Localized/Locally Advanced Primary Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ENSAT I-III) in Adults: Is Margin-Free Resection the Key Surgical Factor that Dictates Outcome? A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to review the current literature on the role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the treatment of primary adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC; European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors [ENSAT] I-III) in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nonrandomized controlled trials published between January 1999 and February 2017 were identified by searching the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Primary and secondary endpoints included surgical and pathological parameters (patients age, tumor size, ENSAT stage, type of surgical approach, and period of follow-up), surgical outcomes (operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, conversion rate to laparotomy, R0 resection, and surgical margin's status), and oncological outcomes (rate of recurrence, disease-free survival [DFS], and overall survival [OS] rates).

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies encompassing data on 1171 patients were included in the review. Compared with open approach, LA demonstrated lower tumor size, shorter operative time, lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and equivalent local recurrence rates. No significant differences were observed between groups treated with an open or laparoscopic approach for the following criteria: R0 surgical resection status, tumor overall recurrence, and postoperative DFS and OS rates.

CONCLUSIONS

LA appears to be equivalent to open method for localized/locally advanced primary ACC (ENSAT I-III) in terms of R0 resection rate, overall recurrence, DFS, and OS, therefore suggesting that the extent of surgery with adequate tumor resection is the predominant endpoint, rather than the surgical approach itself. Multicenter randomized controlled trials with long follow-up time periods exploring the long-term oncological outcomes are required to determine the benefits of the laparoscopic over the open approach in adrenocortical carcinoma.

Prognostic Factors of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An Analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database

Objective: To define the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Patients and Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2014) to identify ACC patients. Correlated variables, including age, sex, race, tumor laterality, marital status at diagnosis, treatment of primary site, lymph node dissection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, tumor size and tumor stage, were extracted. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to define the prognostic factors. Harrell’s concordance index (C index) was calculated to evaluate the discrimination ability for the prognostic predictive models. Results: There were 749 ACC patients identified from the database. The overall median survival time was 22 (95%CI, 18-25) months. In multivariate analysis, age, treatment, chemotherapy and tumor stage were independent risk factors for both overall and cancer-specific survival. Tumor stage had a dominant effect on the cancer prognosis. Additionally, the ENSAT stage had better discrimination than the AJCC stage group in different predictive models. Conclusion: Our study shows that age, treatment of primary site, chemotherapy and tumor stage were prognostic factors for overall and cancer-specific mortality in ACC patients. Among these factors, tumor stage had a dominant effect. The ENSAT stage was more discriminative than the 7th AJCC stage group. Further multi-center prospective validation is still needed to confirm these outcomes.

Innovation in endocrine surgery: robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review

Several studies in the last years demonstrated the better surgical outcome of laparoscopic approach to adrenal gland. Laparoscopic surgery is more difficult to learn and requires different psychomotor skills than open surgery, especially with regard to complex maneuvers requiring precision and dexterity. The development of robotic platform with three-dimensional vision and increased degrees of freedom of the surgical instruments has the aim to overcome these problems. We performed a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to evaluate preoperative data and surgical outcomes of robotic adrenalectomy compared with laparoscopic technique. In September 2016 we performed a systematic literature review using the Pubmed, Scopus and ISI web of knowledge database with search term “robotic adrenalectomy”. We identified 13 studies with eligible criteria that compared surgical outcomes. This present systematic review with meta-analysis includes 798 patients: 379 underwent to robotic adrenalectomy (cases group) and 419 to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (controls group). There were no significant differences between the two groups of patients respect to age, gender, laterality and tumor size. BMI instead was significant lower in the robotic group. In this group we found also patients with higher incidence of previous abdominal surgery. The results from operative time demonstrated lower operative time for laparoscopic group but there were no significant differences with robotic group. Robotic adrenalectomy showed a significant lower blood loss. Robotic adrenalectomy is a safe and feasible technique with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay than laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Laparoscopic approach seems to be a more rapid technique when comparing to robotic technique, although recent studies demonstrate a significant operative time reduction in robotic group with the learning curve improvement and the development of new surgical technology.

Lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for complicated adrenal tumor larger than 5 centimeters

BACKGROUND

The role of lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (LRA) for complicated tumor with large diameter remains controversial, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure on the management of tumor larger than 5cm in diameter.

METHODS

A retrospective comparison was conducted of 67 patients with large complicated adrenal tumor (>5cm). 41 patients received LRA, and 26 received open adrenalectomy (OA) in our hospital between January 2011 and June 2015. Basic characteristics regarding mean age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, tumor side, previous abdominal surgery, resection method, pathology were preferentially analyzed. Operative indicators regarding operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion to ICU, complications, post-operative hospitalization, duration of drain, time to first oral intake and ambulation were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in the basic characteristics. The mean operation time for LRA was shorter than OA (98.7±32.3 min vs 152.7±72.3 min, P = 0.001). EBL was 31.9±20.0 ml for LRA and 590.0±1181.1 ml for OA (P = 0.03). There was no complication in LRA group and one patient in OA group had complications, but this difference was not significant (P = NS). The post-operative hospitalization in LRA was 7.4±2.8 days, and shorter than 9.8±2.7 days in OA group (P = 0.00). The time to first oral intake and ambulation for LRA was shorter than OA (first oral intake, 1.9±0.8 days vs 3.1±1.3 days, P = 0.00; time to ambulation, 2.6±1.4 days vs 4.2±1.6 days, P = 0.00). While the difference between groups were not significant in terms of ICU conversion (3/41 vs 4/26, P = NS) and duration of drain (3.9±2.2 days vs 4.7±1.9 days, P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that LRA can be performed safely and effectively for complicated adrenal tumors larger than 5 cm in diameter, but it remains technically demanding.

European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) and European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours (ENSAT) recommendations for the surgical management of adrenocortical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radical surgery provides the best chance of cure for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), but perioperative surgical care for these patients is yet to be standardized.

METHODS

A working group appointed jointly by ENSAT and ESES used Delphi methodology to produce evidence-based recommendations for the perioperative surgical care of patients with ACC. Papers were retrieved from electronic databases. Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, and were discussed until consensus was reached within the group.

RESULTS

Twenty-five recommendations for the perioperative surgical care of patients with ACC were formulated. The quality of evidence is low owing to the rarity of the disease and the lack of prospective surgical trials. Multi-institutional prospective cohort studies and prospective RCTs are urgently needed and should be strongly encouraged.

CONCLUSION

The present evidence-based recommendations provide comprehensive advice on the optimal perioperative care for patients undergoing surgery for ACC.

New insights and future perspectives in the therapeutic strategy of adrenocortical carcinoma (Review)

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy with an incidence ranging from 0.7 to 2.0 cases/million people per year. Hypercortisolism represents the most common clinical presentation in many patients although, less frequently, some ACC secreting androgens and estrogens are even more pathognomonic compared to cortisol secretion. Currently, radical surgery, when feasible, is still the only curative therapy. Mitotane, an adrenolytic drug, is used in the adjuvant setting and in combination with chemotherapy drugs in metastatic disease. The use of radiotherapy remains controversial, being indicated only in selected cases. New targeted therapies, such as insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1), mammalian-target of rapamycin (m-TOR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and others, have recently been investigated with disappointing clinical results. The partial effectiveness of current treatments mandates the need for new therapeutic strategies against this tumor.

Minimally Invasive Resection of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: a Multi-Institutional Study of 201 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is controversial. We sought to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes following minimally invasive (MIS) and open resection (OA) of ACC in patients treated with curative intent surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective data from patients who underwent adrenalectomy for primary ACC at 13 tertiary care cancer centers were analyzed, including demographics, clinicopathological, and operative outcomes. Outcomes following MIS were compared to OA.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were evaluated including 47 MIS and 154 OA. There was no difference in utilization of MIS approach among institutions (p = 0.24) or 30-day morbidity (29.3 %, MIS, vs. 30.9 %, OA; p = 0.839). The only preoperatively determined predictor for MIS was smaller tumor size (p < 0.001). There was no difference in rates of intraoperative tumor rupture (p = 0.612) or R0 resection (p = 0.953). Only EBL (p = 0.038) and T stage (p = 0.045) were independent prognostic indicators of overall survival after adjusting for significant factors. The surgical approach was not associated with overall or disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

MIS adrenalectomy may be utilized for preoperatively determined ACC ≤ 10.0 cm; however, OA should be utilized for adrenal masses with either preoperative or intraoperative evidence of local invasion or enlarged lymph nodes, regardless of size.

Peritoneal Metastases from Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma Treated by Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Purpose

Adrenal cortical carcinoma is a rare cancer that often presents in an advanced stage. Not only systemic metastases but also local recurrence and peritoneal metastases prevent long-term survival in these patients.

Methods

A profoundly symptomatic patient with extensive peritoneal metastases and local recurrence was treated using cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with melphalan as the chemotherapy agent.

Results

Relative sparing of the small bowel within the abdomen and pelvis allowed a visible complete resection of all cancer. The HIPEC with melphalan was used to control microscopic residual disease. Similar surgical technology used in this patient could be used to prevent local recurrence and peritoneal metastases in patients at the time of resection of the primary adrenal cortical carcinoma.

Conclusions

Rare diseases may have peritoneal metastases as a component of disease progression and profit from treatment with CRS plus HIPEC. The clinical features suggesting a favorable outcome from this combined treatment are relative sparing of small bowel and its mesentery, absence of disease outside the abdomen, low-grade disease, or limited extent of high-grade disease.