Aldosteronoma resolution score predicts long-term resolution of hypertension

Clinical and biochemical outcomes after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism in tertiary and quaternary referral centers: data from SOPRANO study

Hypertension cure following adrenalectomy in unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) remains uncertain. Previous meta-analyses have shown highly variable surgical outcomes. Our study aimed to determine the unknown proportion of complete clinical and biochemical success in tertiary and quaternary referral centers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting surgical outcomes of unilateral PA patients within the Surgical Outcome of PRimary Aldosteronism progNostic mOdels (SOPRANO) study. From 27 publications we identified 32 eligible studies, of which 22 were judged to be at low risk of bias. Eighteen were single-center studies, while fourteen were multi-center studies, with patients recruited from 132 referral centers worldwide. Adrenalectomy was performed on 5887 patients, with 4861 (83%) included in the final analysis. The pooled estimates of complete clinical and biochemical success for all studies were 39% (95% CI: 34-44%) and 99% (95% CI: 96-99%), respectively, similar to that found for studies at low risk of bias. Multivariate meta-regression analyses for all studies and low-bias risk studies revealed that BMI (P < 0.01), recruitment time period (P < 0.01), and hypertension duration (P < 0.05) inversely correlated with complete clinical success, while BMI (P < 0.05) and the number of enrolled centers (P < 0.05) inversely correlated with complete biochemical success. In summary, our findings offer robust estimates of complete clinical and biochemical success rates following adrenalectomy for unilateral PA in tertiary and quaternary referral centers and identify new potential effect modifiers that can help clinicians to inform and counsel patients about post-surgery expectations, guaranteeing effective treatment and ultimately enhancing outcomes.

Clinical Translationality of KCNJ5 Mutation in Aldosterone Producing Adenoma

Hypertension due to primary aldosteronism poses a risk of severe cardiovascular complications compared to essential hypertension. The discovery of the KCNJ5 somatic mutation in aldosteroene producing adenoma (APA) in 2011 and the development of specific CYP11B2 antibodies in 2012 have greatly advanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of primary aldosteronism. In particular, the presence of CYP11B2-positive aldosterone-producing micronodules (APMs) in the adrenal glands of normotensive individuals and the presence of renin-independent aldosterone excess in normotensive subjects demonstrated the continuum of the pathogenesis of PA. Furthermore, among the aldosterone driver mutations which incur excessive aldosterone secretion, KCNJ5 was a major somatic mutation in APA, while CACNA1D is a leading somatic mutation in APMs and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA), suggesting a distinctive pathogenesis between APA and IHA. Although the functional detail of APMs has not been still uncovered, its impact on the pathogenesis of PA is gradually being revealed. In this review, we summarize the integrated findings regarding APA, APM or diffuse hyperplasia defined by novel CYP11B2, and aldosterone driver mutations. Following this, we discuss the clinical implications of KCNJ5 mutations to support better cardiovascular outcomes of primary aldosteronism.

Assessment of performance of stratum-specific likelihood ratios of the aldosteronoma resolution score for predicting hypertension cure after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Aldosteronoma Resolution Score (ARS) is the most studied scoring system for predicting the high likelihood of hypertension cure after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA). However, the ARS's accuracy in PA patients worldwide is uncertain. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the accuracy, discrimination, and calibration of the ARS using stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLR) by organizing available data from cohort studies. We searched PubMed, Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science to November 2021 according to PRISMA statement. The quality assessment used adapted TRIPOD and PROBAST criteria. Thirteen studies comprising 2158 PA patients from North America (43%), Europe (32%), Asia (22%), and other continents, were included. The pooled estimate of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for all studies was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81), and the ratio of the observed to expected complete resolution of hypertension (CRH) for all studies was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.8-1.0). The summary estimates of the SSLR for all studies were 0.31, 0.89, and 3.1, for the low (ARS 0-1), medium (ARS 2-3), and high-likelihood group (ARS 4-5) of CRH, respectively. However, substantial heterogeneity existed among studies. Follow-up period, and adrenalectomy AVS (adrenal vein sampling)-guided served as potential sources of heterogeneity for quantitative studies, which were measurement and reference standard for qualitative studies selection. In conclusion, in patients with unilateral PA, the ARS is currently an accurate prediction tool, the easiest and cheapest, for identifying long-term high likelihood of CRH after adrenalectomy, particularly when the adrenalectomy is AVS-guided.

Outcome-Based Decision-Making Algorithm for Treating Patients with Primary Aldosteronism

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of primary aldosteronism (PA) is crucial due to the increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard method for determining subtype but is technically challenging and invasive. Some PA patients do not benefit clinically from surgery. We sought to develop an algorithm to improve decision- making before engaging in AVS and surgery in clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted the ongoing Korean Primary Aldosteronism Study at two tertiary centers. Study A involved PA patients with successful catheterization and a unilateral nodule on computed tomography and aimed to predict unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (n=367). Study B involved similar patients who underwent adrenalectomy and aimed to predict postoperative outcome (n=330). In study A, we implemented important feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression.

RESULTS

We developed a unilateral PA prediction model using logistic regression analysis: lowest serum potassium level ≤3.4 mEq/L, aldosterone-to-renin ratio ≥150, plasma aldosterone concentration ≥30 ng/mL, and body mass index <25 kg/m2 (area under the curve, 0.819; 95% confidence interval, 0.774 to 0.865; sensitivity, 97.6%; specificity, 25.5%). In study B, we identified female, hypertension duration <5 years, anti-hypertension medication <2.5 daily defined dose, and the absence of coronary artery disease as predictors of clinical success, using stepwise logistic regression models (sensitivity, 94.2%; specificity, 49.3%). We validated our algorithm in the independent validation dataset (n=53).

CONCLUSION

We propose this new outcome-driven diagnostic algorithm, simultaneously considering unilateral aldosterone excess and clinical surgical benefits in PA patients.

Performance evaluation of scoring systems for predicting post-operative hypertension cure in primary aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension cure following adrenalectomy in unilateral primary aldosteronism is not guaranteed. Its likelihood is associated with pre-operative parameters, which have been variably combined in six different predictive scoring systems. The relative performance of these systems is currently unknown. The objective of this work was to identify the best performing scoring system for predicting hypertension cure following adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis in a single tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

Eighty-seven adult patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism who had undergone adrenalectomy between 2004 and 2018 for whom complete data sets were available to calculate all scoring systems.

MEASUREMENTS

Prediction of hypertension cure by each of the six scoring systems.

RESULTS

Hypertension cure was achieved in 36/87 (41.4%) patients within the first post-operative year, which fell to 18/71 (25.4%) patients at final follow-up (median 53 months, P = .002). Analysis of receiver operating characteristic area under the curves for the different scoring systems identified a difference in performance at early, but not late, follow-up. For all systems, the area under the curve was lower at early compared with late follow-up and compared to performance in the cohorts in which they were originally defined.

CONCLUSIONS

No single scoring system performed significantly better than all others when applied in our cohort, although two did display particular advantages. It remains to be determined how best such scoring systems can be incorporated into the routine clinical care of patients with PA.

A simplified primary aldosteronism surgical outcome score is a useful prediction model when target organ damage is unknown - Retrospective cohort study

Background

Cure of hypertension after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism is no certainty and therefore preoperative patient counseling is essential. The Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) Score is a useful prediction model with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. The PASO Score includes ‘Target Organ Damage’ (TOD) (i.e., left ventricular hypertrophy and/or microalbuminuria), which is often unavailable during preoperative counseling and might therefore limit its use in clinical practice. We hypothesized that the PASO score would still be useful if TOD is unknown at time of counseling. Therefore, we aimed to examine the predictive performance of the simplified PASO Score, without taking TOD into account.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy between 2010 and 2016 in 16 medical centers from North America, Europe and Australia were included. TOD was unknown in our database and therefore assigned as absent. Patients were classified as complete, partial or absent clinical success using the PASO consensus criteria.

Results

A total of 380 (73.9%) patients were eligible for analysis. Complete, partial and absent clinical success were observed in 29.5%, 55.8% and 14.7% of patients, respectively. The simplified PASO Score had an AUC of 0.730 (95% confidence interval 0.674–0.785) in our total cohort.

Conclusion

Without taking TOD into account, the simplified PASO Score had a lower predictive value as compared to the original derivation cohort. Ideally, the complete PASO Score should be used, but when data on TOD are not readily available, the simplified PASO Score is a useful and reasonable alternative.

•

We aimed to examine the predictive performance of the PASO Score, without taking ‘target organ damage’ (TOD) into account.

•

This simplified PASO Score had a lower predictive value as compared to the PASO Score in the original derivation cohort.

•

The simplified PASO Score increases the applicability of the model and is reasonable for clinicians to use in daily practice.

•

Ideally, the complete PASO Score should be used, but the simplified PASO Score is a useful and reasonable alternative.

Outcomes of Adrenalectomy and the Aldosteronoma Resolution Score in the Black and Hispanic Population

Background

Outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are variable. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) uses preoperative variables to calculate a score that identifies those patients that are more likely to have resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy. We aim to determine the efficacy of adrenalectomy and whether the ARS accurately predicts clinical success in a Black and Hispanic population.

Methods

We reviewed patients who underwent adrenalectomy for PA from 2004 to 2018 at two academic centers treating primarily Hispanic and Black patients. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome consensus criterion. Retrospectively, the accuracy of ARS was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Forty-three Hispanic and 10 Black patients underwent adrenalectomy for PA. Twenty-two patients (41.5%) had complete clinical success. Variables associated with complete clinical success in the univariate analysis were female gender (p = 0.026), younger age (p = 0.001), lower preoperative aldosterone (p = 0.035), lower preoperative systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications (p = 0.007) and a higher ARS (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, only fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications was independently associated with complete clinical success (p = 0.026). The AUC of the ARS was 0.746.

Conclusion

The rate of clinical success from adrenalectomy is good for Hispanic and Black patients with PA. Our analysis shows that the ARS is an accurate test of clinical success in Hispanic and Black patients. The ARS may be utilized preoperatively to frame expectations after adrenalectomy in these populations.

Nomogram-Based Preoperative Score for Predicting Clinical Outcome in Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism

CONTEXT

More than half of patients diagnosed with unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) suffer from persisting hypertension after unilateral adrenalectomy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work is to develop and validate a nomogram-based preoperative score (NBPS) to predict clinical outcomes after unilateral adrenalectomy for UPA.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The NBPS was developed in an Asian cohort by incorporating predictors independently associated with remission of hypertension after unilateral adrenalectomy for UPA and validated in a Caucasian cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants comprised patients with UPA achieving complete biochemical success after unilateral adrenalectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Measurements included the predictive performance of the NBPS compared with 2 previously developed outcome prediction scores: aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) and primary aldosteronism surgical outcome (PASO) score.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven of 150 (64.7%) patients achieved complete clinical success after unilateral adrenalectomy in the training cohort and 57 out of 165 (34.5%) in the validation cohort. A nomogram was established incorporating sex, duration of hypertension, aldosterone-to-renin ratio, and target organ damage. The nomogram showed good C indices and calibration curves both in Asian and Caucasian cohorts. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the NBPS for predicting hypertension remission in the training cohort was 0.853 (0.786-0.905), which was superior to the ARS (0.745 [0.667-0.812], P = .019) and PASO score (0.747 [0.670-0.815], P = .012). The AUC of the NBPS in the validation cohort was 0.830 (0.764-0.884), which was higher than the ARS (0.745 [95% CI, 0.672-0.810], P = .045), but not significantly different from the PASO score (0.825 [95% CI, 0.758-0.880], P = .911).

CONCLUSION

The NBPS is useful in predicting clinical outcome for UPA patients, especially in the Asian population.

Hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy for primary hyperaldosteronism: Which is the best predictive model?

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the predictive performance of three distinct clinical models purported to predict the resolution of aldosteronoma-associated hypertension after adrenalectomy.

METHODS

A tri-institutional database of aldosteronoma patients who underwent adrenalectomy between 2004 and 2019 was retrospectively reviewed. The three models of interest incorporate various preoperative clinical factors, such as age and sex. The predictive accuracy, as measured by area under the curve of receiver operator characteristic, was estimated. Receiver operator characteristic was evaluated across the whole cohort, then stratified by treatment location.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included (91 American, 109 French). The clinicodemographic variables between groups were similar; the French cohort had a lower mean body mass index (P = .02). The overall complete clinical resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy for the entire data set was 45.5% (n = 91). The regression coefficients in the Utsumi et al (2014) Japanese model produced a superior overall area under the curve (0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.71-0.84]). This model also performed best when the cohort was stratified by treatment location (French area under the curve = 0.74, 95% CI [0.64-0.83], US area under the curve = 0.82, 95% CI [0.72-0.91]).

CONCLUSION

When comparing three predictive models of aldosteronoma-associated hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy, the Utsumi et al model demonstrated the highest predictive validity across all cohorts. Counseling based on this model regarding probability of cure is recommended.

Validation of the Aldosteronoma Resolution Score Within Current Clinical Practice

INTRODUCTION

Complete resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism is far from a certainty. This stresses the importance of adequate preoperative patient counseling. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) is a simple and easy to use prediction model only including four variables: ≤ 2 antihypertensive medications, body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m2, duration of hypertension ≤ 6 years and female sex. However, because the model was developed and validated within the USA over a decade ago, the applicability in modern practice and outside of the USA is questionable. Therefore, we aimed to validate the ARS in current clinical practice within an international cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy, between 2010 and 2016, in 16 medical centers from the USA, Europe (EU), Canada (CA) and Australia (AU) were included. Resolution of hypertension was defined as normotension without antihypertensive medications.

RESULTS

In total, 514 patients underwent adrenalectomy and 435 (85%) patients were eligible. Resolution of hypertension was achieved in 27% patients within the total cohort and in 22%, 30%, 40% and 38% of patients within USA, EU, CA and AU, respectively (p = 0.015). The area under the curve (AUC) for the complete cohort was 0.751. Geographic validation displayed a AUC within the USA, EU, CA and AU of 0.782, 0.681, 0.811 and 0.667, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The ARS is an easy to use prediction model with a moderate to good predictive performance within current clinical practice. The model showed the highest predictive performance within North America but potentially has less predictive performance in EU and AU.

Long-term blood pressure outcomes of patients with adrenal venous sampling-proven unilateral primary aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is mainly treated by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists or laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), but the effectiveness of surgical versus medical treatment in patients with adrenal venous sampling (AVS)-proven unilateral PA is unclear. Fifty-one consecutive patients with AVS-proven PA were enrolled. We compared the therapeutic effects between the surgery group (n = 21) and medication group (n = 30) by evaluating the complete control rate (CCR) of hypertension, blood pressure (BP), and number of antihypertensive drugs after a long-term follow-up (>12 months). The CCR of hypertension was assessed using a multivariate adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model. After a mean follow-up of 21.18 ± 5.35 months, the CCR was significantly higher in the surgery than medication group (85.7% vs. 13.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). Before adjustment for covariates, the CCR of hypertension in patients who underwent LA was 7.75 times higher than that in patients who underwent medical treatment (95% CI, 2.33-25.78; p = 0.001); significant results were also shown in the adjusted models. Systolic and diastolic BP were also lower in the surgery than medication group (120.3 ± 12.99 vs. 133.54 ± 16.60 and 79.00 ± 7.62 vs. 87.35 ± 12.36 mmHg, respectively; p = 0.01 for both), as was the number of antihypertensive drugs (0.19 ± 0.51 vs. 2.33 ± 0.78, respectively; p < 0.001). The rate of hypokalemia was not significantly different between the two groups (0.0% vs. 13.3%, respectively; p = 0.13). In conclusion, AVS plays an essential role in the subtype diagnosis of PA, and surgical candidates with AVS-proven unilateral PA should be highly suggested to undergo LA.

A short review of primary aldosteronism in a question and answer fashion

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to present up to date information concerning the diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism (PA). PA is the most common cause of endocrine hypertension. It has been reported up to 24% of selective referred hypertensive patients.

METHODS

We did a search in Pub-Med and Google Scholar using the terms: PA, hyperaldosteronism, idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia, diagnosis of PA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, adrenalectomy, and surgery. We also did cross-referencing search with the above terms. We had divided our study into five sections: Introduction, Diagnosis, Genetics, Treatment, and Conclusions. We present our results in a question and answer fashion in order to make reading more interesting.

RESULTS

PA should be searched in all high-risk populations. The gold standard for diagnosis PA is the plasma aldosterone/plasma renin ratio (ARR). If this test is positive, then we proceed with one of the four confirmatory tests. If positive, then we proceed with a localizing technique like adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and CT scan. If the lesion is unilateral, after proper preoperative preparation, we proceed, in adrenalectomy. If the lesion is bilateral or the patient refuses or is not fit for surgery, we treat them with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, usually spironolactone.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary aldosteronism is the most common and a treatable case of secondary hypertension. Only patients with unilateral adrenal diseases are eligible for surgery, while patients with bilateral and non-surgically correctable PA are usually treated by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Thus, the distinction between unilateral and bilateral aldosterone hypersecretion is crucial.

KCNJ5 mutation as a predictor for resolution of hypertension after surgical treatment of aldosterone-producing adenoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of KCNJ5 mutations on the cure of hypertension in patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) after unilateral adrenalectomy.

METHODS

Our study included 142 patients with APA, who were detected with an endocrinological abnormality and diagnosed with hypertension, as confirmed by pathological analysis. We sequenced KCNJ5, ATP1A1, ATP2B3, CACNA1D, and CTNNB1 from APA tissue samples, and performed a retrospective analysis to determine correlations between wild-type or mutated KCNJ5 and patient clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Somatic KCNJ5 mutations were identified in 106 of 142 patients with APA, 136 of whom had resolution of hyporeninemic-hyperaldosteronemia 1 year after surgery. Of the 136 patients, 81 patients had resolution of hypertension ('Cured group' vs. 'Improved group'). We found increased prevalence of KCNJ5 mutations in the Cured group compared to the Improved group (85.2% vs. 60.0%, respectively; P = 0.002), which was associated with younger age, shorter duration of hypertension, fewer antihypertensive medications, lower BMI, higher aldosterone level, higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, and milder vascular complications. In both groups we found that harbouring a KCNJ5 mutation, taking fewer antihypertensive medications, and the duration of hypertension were independently associated with resolution of hypertension by unilateral adrenalectomy. In patients with KCNJ5-mutated APA, left ventricular hypertrophy was significantly decreased by surgical treatment in patients from either Cured or Improved groups, although those patients with wild-type KCNJ5 showed no change.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for KCNJ5 mutations in young patients with APA may provide a prognostic indication for resolution of hypertension and severity of vascular complications.

Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for Conn's syndrome

Introduction

The primary treatment of Conn’s syndrome (CS) is laparoscopic adrenalectomy and aims to normalize arterial blood pressure and biochemical parameters.

Aim

To analyse short- and long-term results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for Conn’s syndrome (CS).

Material and methods

The analysis included 44 consecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy between 2004 and 2015 for CS. We analysed short- and long-terms results of operations. All patients were followed up 6 and 24 months after surgery to determine changes in the biochemical parameters, and clinical regression of arterial hypertension. We also evaluated the aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) in predicting the resolution of hypertension.

Results

No conversions were needed. Complications occurred in 5 (11.4%) patients. Preoperative hypokalaemia and hypernatraemia were present in 83.4% and 15.8% of patients, respectively. After surgery, both hypokalaemia and hypernatraemia resolved in all patients. At the follow-up 6 months after the surgery, only 11.3% of patients had complete remission (CR) of hypertension. In 43.2% of cases we observed partial remission (PR). After 24 months CR was found in 13.6% of patients, 45.5% patients fulfilled criteria for PR, and 29.5% of patients changed the group of remission comparison to the first follow-up visit. Only 50% of patients with an ARS of 4 or 5 points achieved CR 6 months after surgery.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe method of treatment for CS. Although it effectively eliminates electrolyte imbalance, it does not allow for the CR of hypertension in the majority of patients, especially in the elderly group. We did not find ARS to be an effective tool in predicting postoperative resolution of hypertension.

Hypertension outcomes of adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The hypertension cure rate of unilateral adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism (PA) patients varies widely in existing studies.

METHODS

We conducted an observational meta-analysis to summarize the pooled hypertension cure rate of unilateral adrenalectomy in PA patients. Comprehensive electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), WanFang, SinoMed and Chongqing VIP databases were performed from initial state to May 20, 2016. We manually selected eligible studies from references in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The pooled hypertension cure rate of unilateral adrenalectomy in PA patients was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method to produce a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies comprising approximately 4000 PA patients were included. The pooled hypertension cure rate was 50.6% (95% CI: 42.9-58.2%) for unilateral adrenalectomy in PA. Subgroup analyses showed that the hypertension cure rate was 61.3% (95% CI: 49.4-73.3%) in Chinese studies and 43.7% (95% CI: 38.0-49.4%) for other countries. Furthermore, the hypertension cure rate at 6-month follow-up was 53.3% (95% CI: 36.0-70.5%) and 49.6% (95% CI: 40.9-58.3%) for follow-up exceeding 6 months. The pooled hypertension cure rate was 50.9% (95% CI: 40.5-61.3%) from 2001 to 2010 and 50.2% (95% CI: 39.0-61.5%) from 2011 to 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypertension cure rate for unilateral adrenalectomy in PA is not optimal. Large clinical trials are required to verify the utility of potential preoperative predictors in developing a novel and effective prediction model.

Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort

BACKGROUND

Although unilateral primary aldosteronism is the most common surgically correctable cause of hypertension, no standard criteria exist to classify surgical outcomes. We aimed to create consensus criteria for clinical and biochemical outcomes and follow-up of adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism and apply these criteria to an international cohort to analyse the frequency of remission and identify preoperative determinants of successful outcome.

METHODS

The Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) study was an international project to develop consensus criteria for outcomes and follow-up of adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism. An international panel of 31 experts from 28 centres, including six endocrine surgeons, used the Delphi method to reach consensus. We then retrospectively analysed follow-up data from prospective cohorts for outcome assessment of patients diagnosed with unilateral primary aldosteronism by adrenal venous sampling who had undergone a total adrenalectomy, consecutively included from 12 referral centres in nine countries. On the basis of standardised criteria, we determined the proportions of patients achieving complete, partial, or absent clinical and biochemical success in accordance with the consensus. We then used logistic regression analyses to identify preoperative factors associated with clinical and biochemical outcomes.

FINDINGS

Consensus was reached for criteria for six outcomes (complete, partial, and absent success of clinical and biochemical outcomes) based on blood pressure, use of antihypertensive drugs, plasma potassium and aldosterone concentrations, and plasma renin concentrations or activities. Consensus was also reached for two recommendations for the timing of follow-up assessment. For the international cohort analysis, we analysed clinical data from 705 patients recruited between 1994 and 2015, of whom 699 also had biochemical data. Complete clinical success was achieved in 259 (37%) of 705 patients, with a wide variance (range 17-62), and partial clinical success in an additional 334 (47%, range 35-66); complete biochemical success was seen in 656 (94%, 83-100) of 699 patients. Female patients had a higher likelihood of complete clinical success (odds ratio [OR] 2·25, 95% CI 1·40-3·62; p=0·001) and clinical benefit (complete plus partial clinical success; OR 2·89, 1·49-5·59; p=0·002) than male patients. Younger patients had a higher likelihood of complete clinical success (OR 0·95 per extra year, 0·93-0·98; p<0·001) and clinical benefit (OR 0·95 per extra year, 0·92-0·98; p=0·004). Higher levels of preoperative medication were associated with lower levels of complete clinical success (OR 0·80 per unit increase, 0·70-0·90; p<0·001).

INTERPRETATION

These standardised outcome criteria are relevant for the assessment of the success of surgical treatment in individual patients and will allow the comparison of outcome data in future studies. The variable baseline clinical characteristics of our international cohort contributed to wide variation in clinical outcomes. Most patients derive clinical benefit from adrenalectomy, with younger patients and female patients more likely to have a favourable surgical outcome. Screening for primary aldosteronism should nonetheless be done in every individual fulfilling US Endocrine Society guideline criteria because biochemical success without clinical success is by itself clinically important and older women and men can also derive post-operative clinical benefit.

FUNDING

European Research Council; European Union's Horizon 2020; Else Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung; Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development-Medical Sciences; Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; Ministry of Health, Slovenia; US National Institutes of Health; and CONICYT-FONDECYT (Chile).

[Long-term blood pressure outcome after unilateral adrenalectomy for primary hyperaldosteronism]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate long-term results of adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism (PA) and to identify prognostic factors associated.

METHODS

Exhaustive retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing adrenalectomy for PA between 2002 and 2013 in our department. All patients underwent preoperative: clinical evaluation (age, sex, height, weight, systolic and diastolic BP under treatment, identification of anti-hypertension treatment), biological evaluation (potassium, renin, aldosterone) and radiological evaluation (CT and/or MRI). Blood pressure was assessed postoperatively at 1 month, 1 year, then at the date of the latest news. The patients were classified into three categories: cured (no antihypertensive therapy in postoperative associated with strictly lower blood pressures of 140/90mmHg), improved (decreased number of drugs or number unchanged but with better blood pressure control), and refractory (no change in the number of drug and blood pressure, or deterioration of one or other of these two parameters).

RESULTS

We evaluated 43 patients, 23 men and 20 women, with a median follow-up of 74.4 months [16.8 to 141]. Pathological analysis described 34 adenomas (79%), 7 hyperplasias (16%) (5 micro-nodular and 2 macro-nodular) and 2 adrenocortical carcinoma (5%). The postoperative long-term assessment found 20% of cured patients (n=8), 65% of improved (n=26) and 15% of refractory (n=6). Prognostic factors associated with favorable long-term blood pressure outcome were those typically associated with ARS score [preoperative number of anti-hypertension drugs (P=0.005), BMI<25kg/m² (P=0.009), and duration of hypertension (P=0.007)].

CONCLUSION

Adrenalectomy for PA is a long-term effective treatment for blood pressure control. Prognostic factors associated with long-term success are those conventionally described in ARS score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

A NEW CLINICAL PREDICTION CRITERION ACCURATELY DETERMINES A SUBSET OF PATIENTS WITH BILATERAL PRIMARY ALDOSTERONISM BEFORE ADRENAL VENOUS SAMPLING

OBJECTIVE

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the only available method to distinguish bilateral from unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA). AVS has several drawbacks, so it is reasonable to avoid this procedure when the results would not affect clinical management. Our objective was to identify a clinical criterion that can reliably predict nonlateralized AVS as a surrogate for bilateral PA that is not treated surgically.

METHODS

A retrospective diagnostic cross-sectional study conducted at Slovenian national endocrine referral center included 69 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 8 years, 21 females) with PA who underwent AVS. PA was confirmed with the saline infusion test (SIT). AVS was performed sequentially during continuous adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) infusion. The main outcome measures were variables associated with nonlateralized AVS to derive a clinical prediction rule.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven (97%) patients had a successful AVS and were included in the statistical analysis. A total of 39 (58%) patients had nonlateralized AVS. The combined criterion of serum potassium ≥3.5 mmol/L, post-SIT aldosterone <18 ng/dL, and either no or bilateral tumor found on computed tomography (CT) imaging had perfect estimated specificity (and thus 100% positive predictive value) for bilateral PA, saving an estimated 16% of the patients (11/67) from unnecessary AVS. The best overall classification accuracy (50/67 = 75%) was achieved using the post-SIT aldosterone level <18 ng/dL alone, which yielded 74% sensitivity and 75% specificity for predicting nonlateralized AVS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical prediction criterion appears to accurately determine a subset of patients with bilateral PA who could avoid unnecessary AVS and immediately commence with medical treatment.

Mineralocorticoid and apparent mineralocorticoid syndromes of secondary hypertension

The mineralocorticoid aldosterone is a key hormone in the regulation of plasma volume and blood pressure in man. Excessive levels of this mineralocorticoid have been shown to mediate metabolic disorders and end-organ damage more than what can be attributed to its effects on blood pressure alone. Inappropriate excess levels of aldosterone contribute significantly to the cardiorenal metabolic syndrome and target organ injury that include atherosclerosis, myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis, heart failure, and kidney disease. The importance of understanding the role of excess mineralocorticoid hormones such as aldosterone in resistant hypertension and in those with secondary hypertension should be visited. Primary aldosteronism is one of the commonly identified causes of hypertension and is treatable and/or potentially curable. We intend to review the management of mineralocorticoid-induced hypertension in the adult population along with other disease entities that mimic primary aldosteronism.