Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a risk factor for peritoneal recurrences?

Localized colorectal cancer database integrating 4 randomized controlled trials; (JCOG2310A)

Although phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the most robust statistical approach for answering clinical questions, they require massive expenditures in terms of time, labor, and funding. Ancillary and supplementary analyses using RCTs are sometimes conducted as alternative approaches to answering clinical questions, but the available integrated databases of RCTs are limited. In this background, the Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) established a database of ancillary studies integrating four phase III RCTs (JCOG0212, JCOG0404, JCOG0910 and JCOG1006) conducted by the CCSG to investigate specific clinicopathological factors in pStage II/III colorectal cancer (JCOG2310A). This database will be updated by adding another clinical trial data and accelerating several analyses that are clinically relevant in the management of localized colorectal cancer. This study describes the details of this database and planned and ongoing analyses as an initiative of JCOG cOlorectal Young investigators (JOY).

Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach

The adoption of laparoscopic surgery in the management of serosa-exposed colorectal cancer has raised concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether laparoscopic surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative recurrence in patients undergoing resection for serosa-exposed colon cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 315 patients who underwent curative resection for pathologically confirmed T4a colon cancer without distant metastases at the Asan Medical Center between 2006 and 2015. Patients were categorized according to the surgical approach method: laparoscopic surgery (MIS group) versus open surgery (Open group). Multivariate analysis was employed to identify risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The MIS group included 148 patients and the Open group had 167 patients. Of the total cohort, 106 patients (33.7%) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. Rates, patterns, and time to recurrence were not different between groups. The MIS group (55.8%) showed more peritoneal metastasis compared to the Open group (44.4%) among recurrence sites, but it was not significant (p = 0.85). There was no significant difference in the five-year OS (73.5% vs. 78.4% p = 0.374) or DFS (62.0% vs. 64.6%; p = 0.61) between the Open and MIS groups. Age and the pathologic N stage were independently associated with OS, and the pathologic N stage was the only associated risk factor for DFS. The laparoscopic approach for serosa-exposed colon cancer did not compromise the DFS and OS. This study provides evidence that laparoscopic surgery does not compromise oncologic outcomes of patients with T4a colon cancer although peritoneal seeding is the most common type of disease failure of serosa-exposed colon cancer.

Preoperative Local Staging of Colon Cancer by CT: Radiological Staging Criteria Based on Membrane Anatomy and Visceral Adipose Tissue

BACKGROUND

Accuracy of preoperative T staging for colon cancer remains disappointing.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to propose specially designed radiological staging criteria based on membrane anatomy and visceral adipose tissue and compare the staging performance with the routinely used method.

DESIGN

This is a prospective observational study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a high-volume colorectal center.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients with colonoscopy-proven colon carcinoma referred for clinical staging and elective resection were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

The preoperative CT data were separately reviewed by 2 teams of radiologists for assigning T-stage categories (T1-2, T3, or T4) using the routine staging method or the newly proposed radiological criteria.

MEASURES

Diagnostic performance for T staging was compared between the 2 criteria.

RESULTS

Between October 2019 and August 2020, 190 patients were included. Compared with pathological results, T stage was correctly determined in 113 of 190 patients (59.5%) with the conventional CT criteria. With the newly developed criteria, 160 patients (84.2%) were found to be correctly staged. Accuracies between the 2 criteria significantly differed ( p < 0.001). For T1-2 staging, there were no significant differences between the sensitivities of conventional and new criteria (57.1% vs 61.9%; p = 0.990) or between their specificities (95.3% vs 98.2%; p = 0.131). However, for T3 and T4 staging, the newly developed CT criteria exhibited significantly higher sensitivity (T3: 85.2% vs 57.4%; p < 0.001; T4: 90.7% vs 64.8%; p < 0.001) and specificity (T3: 82.7% vs 64%; p = 0.006; T4: 89.7% vs 69.1%; p < 0.001) than the conventional criteria. Moreover, the new criteria (area under the curve = 0.902) performed significantly better than the conventional criteria (area under the curve = 0.670; p < 0.001), for identifying the T4-stage tumor.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations are that it is a single-center study and there was no external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The specially designed radiological criteria can offer more accurate T staging than the routine method in colon cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B992 .

PREDICCIN DE LA MORTALIDAD A DAS POSTERIORES A LA PRIMERA CIRUGA EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE COLON OBSTRUCTIVO DEL LADO IZQUIERDO

ANTECEDENTES:Se cree que la resección aguda para el carcinoma de colon obstructivo del lado izquierdo está asociada con un mayor riesgo de mortalidad que un enfoque puente a la cirugía que utiliza un estoma de descompresión o un stent metálico autoexpandible, pero faltan modelos de predicción.OBJETIVO:Determinar la influencia de la estrategia de tratamiento sobre la mortalidad dentro de los 90 días desde la primera intervención utilizando un modelo de predicción en pacientes que presentan carcinoma de colon obstructivo del lado izquierdo.DISEÑO:Un estudio de cohorte multicéntrico nacional, utilizando datos de una auditoría nacional prospectiva.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se realizó en 75 hospitales holandeses.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección con intención curativa de un carcinoma de colon obstructivo del lado izquierdo entre 2009 y 2016.INTERVENCIONES:La primera intervención fue resección aguda, puente a cirugía con stent metálico autoexpandible o puente a cirugía con estoma descompresor.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:La principal medida de resultado fue la mortalidad a los 90 días después de la primera intervención. Los factores de riesgo se identificaron mediante análisis logístico multivariable. Posteriormente se desarrolló un modelo de riesgo.RESULTADOS:En total se incluyeron 2395 pacientes, siendo la primera intervención resección aguda en 1848 (77%) pacientes, estoma como puente a la cirugía en 332 (14%) pacientes y stent como puente a la cirugía en 215 (9%) pacientes. En general, 152 pacientes (6,3%) fallecieron dentro de los 90 días posteriores a la primera intervención. Un estoma de descompresión se asoció de forma independiente con un menor riesgo de mortalidad a los 90 días (HR: 0,27, IC: 0,094-0,62). Otros predictores independientes de mortalidad fueron la edad, la clasificación ASA, la ubicación del tumor y los niveles índice de creatinina sérica y proteína C reactiva. El modelo de riesgo construido tuvo un área bajo la curva de 0,84 (IC: 0,81-0,87).LIMITACIONES:Solo se incluyeron pacientes que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica.CONCLUSIONES:La estrategia de tratamiento tuvo un impacto significativo en la mortalidad a los 90 días. Un estoma descompresor reduce considerablemente el riesgo de mortalidad, especialmente en pacientes mayores y frágiles. Se desarrolló un modelo de riesgo, que necesita una mayor validación externa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B992 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Effect of various hepatectomy procedures on circulating tumor cells in postoperative patients: a case-matched comparative study

Background

The objective of this study is to elucidate the prevalence of systemic circulating tumor cells (CTCs) prior to and following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to compare the disparities in postoperative CTCs in terms of quantity and classifications between the open liver resection (OPEN) and laparoscopic liver resection (LAP) cohorts.

Patients materials and methods

From September 2015 to May 2022, 32 consecutive HCC patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection at Southwest Hospital were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological data were retrieved from a prospectively collected computer database. Patients in the OPEN group matched at a 1:1 ratio with patients who underwent open liver resection during the study period on age, gender, tumor size, number of tumors, tumor location, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, TNM and Child-Pugh staging from the database of patients to form the control group. The Can-Patrol CTC enrichment technique was used to enrich and classify CTCS based on epithelial-mesenchymal transformation phenotypes. The endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the Kaplan-Meier method and multiple Cox proportional risk model were used to analyze the influence of clinicopathological factors such as total CTCs and CTC phenotype on prognosis.

Results

The mean age of the 64 patients with primary liver cancer was 52.92 years (23-71), and 89.1% were male. The postoperative CTC clearance rate was more significant in the OPEN group. The total residual CTC and phenotypic CTC of the LAP group were significantly higher than those of the OPEN group (p = 0.017, 0.012, 0.049, and 0.030, respectively), which may increase the possibility of metastasis (p = 0.042). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, DFS was associated with several clinicopathological risk factors, including Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, tumor size, and vascular invasion. Of these analyses, BCLC Stage [p = 0.043, HR (95% CI) =2.03(1.022-4.034)], AFP [p = 0.007, HR (95% CI) =1.947 (1.238-3.062)], the number of positive CTCs [p = 0.004, HR (95% CI) =9.607 (2.085-44.269)] and vascular invasion [p = 0.046, HR (95% CI) =0.475 (0.22-1.023)] were significantly associated with DFS.

Conclusion

In comparison to conventional OPEN technology, LAP technology has the capacity to augment the quantity of epithelial, mixed, and mesenchymal circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Following the surgical procedure, there was a notable increase in the total CTCs, epithelial CTCs, and mixed CTCs within the LAP group, indicating a potential drawback of LAP in facilitating the release of CTCs.

Recurrence After Colectomy for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Experience from a Developing Country

Risk factors for disease recurrence following curative resection for locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) remain unclear as conflicting results have been reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to examine these factors in the setting of developing country's health care system affected by limited accessibility to the multimodal cancer treatment. Patients who had undergone curative colon resection for LACC between 2004 and 2018 were included. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Factors associated with disease recurrence, types of recurrence and recurrence-free survival were studied. A total of 118 patients with LACC were operated within the study period. Median follow-up was 36 (2-147) months. Adjuvant therapy was used in 41 (34.7%) patients and 62 (52.5%) were diagnosed with recurrence. In the multivariable analysis, disease recurrence was associated with tumor and nodal stages, as well as with the lymph node yield. Local recurrence, distant metastases, and peritoneal carcinomatosis were observed in 8 (6.8%), 30 (25.4%), and 24 (20.3%) patients, respectively. Early recurrence was diagnosed in 27 (22.9%) cases with peritoneal carcinomatosis being its most common type. Preoperative serum CA 19-9 levels, tumor, and nodal stages were linked to recurrence-free survival in the univariable analysis. Only tumor stage remained such in the multivariable model. Our findings suggest that lymph node yield, tumor, and nodal stages are associated with recurrence following curative resection for LACC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-022-01672-x.

Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for T4 colon cancer: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies

Background

To evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) vs. open colectomy (OC) in patients with T4 colon cancer.

Methods

Three authors independently searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov for articles before June 3, 2022 to compare the clinical outcomes of T4 colon cancer patients undergoing LC or OC.

Results

This meta-analysis included 7 articles with 1,635 cases. Compared with OC, LC had lesser blood loss, lesser perioperative transfusion, lesser complications, lesser wound infection, and shorter length of hospital stay. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of 5-year overall survival (5y OS), and 5-year disease-free survival (5y DFS), R0 resection rate, positive resection margin, lymph nodes harvested ≥12, and recurrence. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) results suggested that the potential advantages of LC on perioperative transfusion and the comparable oncological outcomes in terms of 5y OS, 5y DFS, lymph nodes harvested ≥12, and R0 resection rate was reliable and no need of further study.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible in T4 colon cancer in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. TSA results suggested that future studies were not required to evaluate the 5y OS, 5y DFS, R0 resection rate, positive resection margin status, lymph nodes harvested ≥12 and perioperative transfusion differences between LC and OC.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022297792.

The impact of an open or laparoscopic approach on the development of metachronous peritoneal metastases after primary resection of colorectal cancer: results from a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the impact of open or laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) on the development of metachronous colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) in a population-based cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, population-based study of CRC patients who underwent open or laparoscopic resection of the primary tumour in the Netherlands between January 1st and June 30th 2015. Patients with synchronous metastases were excluded. CPM were considered metachronous if diagnosed ≥ 90 days after resection of primary CRC. Multivariable cox regression analysis was performed to correct for tumour location, histology, differentiation, and stage, nodal stage, tumour perforation, primary surgery type, and unclear resection margins.

RESULTS

In total, 1516 CRC patients underwent open resection and 3236 CRC patients underwent laparoscopic resection, with a 3-year cumulative incidence of metachronous CPM of 7.3% and 3.7%, respectively (p < 0.001), after median follow-up of 42 months. Open surgical approach was significantly associated with the development of metachronous CPM: HR 1.4 [95%CI 1.1-1.8]. Other prognostic factors were mucinous adenocarcinoma histology (HR 1.6, 95%CI 1.0-2.5), T4 stage (HR 3.2, 95%CI 2.3-4.5), N1 stage (HR 2.9, 95%CI 2.1-4.0), and N2 stage (HR 4.2, 95%CI 2.9-6.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with open resection had a significantly higher risk to develop metachronous CPM than patients treated with laparoscopic resection. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unknown but might be related to differences in per-operative specimen handling, tumour spill, surgical trauma and pro-inflammatory response. This finding might imply the need for a personalized follow-up after primary resection of CRC.

What is the Risk for Peritoneal Metastases and Survival Afterwards in T4 Colon Cancers?

BACKGROUND

Patients with T4 colon adenocarcinomas have an increased risk of peritoneal metastases (PM) but the histopathologic risk factors for its development are not well-described.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with PM, time to recurrence, and survival after recurrence among patients with T4 colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with pathologic T4 colon cancer who underwent curative resection from 2005 to 2017 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and classified by recurrence pattern: (a) none - 68.8%; (b) peritoneal only - 7.9%; (c) peritoneal and extraperitoneal - 9.9%; and (d) extraperitoneal only - 13.2%. Associations between PM development and patient, primary tumor, and treatment factors were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 151 patients were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 66.2 months; 27 patients (18%) developed PM (Groups B and C) and 20 (13%) patients recurred at non-peritoneal sites only (Group D). Median time to developing metastases was shorter for Groups B and C compared with Group D (B and C: 13.7 months; D: 46.7 months; p = 0.022). Tumor deposits (TDs) and nodal stage were associated with PM (p < 0.05), and TDs (p = 0.048) and LVI (p = 0.015) were associated with additional extraperitoneal recurrence. Eleven (41%) patients with PM underwent salvage surgery, and median survival after recurrence was associated with the ability to undergo cytoreduction (risk ratio 0.20, confidence interval 0.06-0.70).

CONCLUSION

PM risk after resection of T4 colon cancer is independently associated with factors related to lymphatic spread, such as N stage and TDs. Well-selected patients can undergo cytoreduction with long-term survival. These findings support frequent postoperative surveillance and aggressive early intervention, including cytoreduction.

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for locally advanced T4 colonic cancer: meta-analysis of clinical and oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to review the early postoperative and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy for T4 cancer compared with open surgery.

METHOD

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for any relevant clinical study comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy as treatment for T4 colonic cancer. The risk ratio (RR) with 95 per cent c.i. was calculated for dichotomous variables, and the mean difference (m.d.) with 95 per cent confidence interval for continuous variables. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was implemented for assessing quality of evidence (QoE).

RESULTS

Twenty-four observational studies (21 retrospective and 3 prospective cohort studies) were included, analysing a total of 18 123 patients: 9024 received laparoscopic colectomy and 9099 underwent open surgery. Laparoscopic colectomy was associated with lower rates of mortality (RR 0.48, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 0.56; P < 0.001; I2 = 0 per cent, fixed-effect model; QoE moderate) and complications (RR 0.61, 0.49 to 0.76; P < 0.001; I2 = 20 per cent, random-effects model; QoE very low) compared with an open procedure. No differences in R0 resection rate (RR 1.01, 1.00 to 1.03; P = 0.12; I2 = 37 per cent, random-effects model; QoE very low) and recurrence rate (RR 0.98, 0.84 to 1.14; P = 0.81; I2 = 0 per cent, fixed-effect model; QoE very low) were found.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colectomy for T4 colonic cancer is safe, and is associated with better clinical outcomes than open surgery and similar oncological outcomes.

Surgical and survival outcomes after laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-invasive Siewert type II/III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The potential advantage of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) compared with open gastrectomy (OG) for serosa-invasive (pT4a) Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains uncertain. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of LG compared to OG for pT4a Siewert type II/III AEG cancers.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 283 patients with pathological confirmed T4a Siewert type II and type III AEG who underwent LG or OG in our center between January 2004 and September 2015. The short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups using a 1:1 matched propensity score matching method (PSM).

RESULTS

The LG group had a longer operation time, less estimated blood loss, less time to first flatus, less time to start liquid diet, less time to first ambulation, and shorter length of incision than the OG group. The conversion rates were 5.4% in the LG groups. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the LG and OG groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were comparable between the LG and OG groups (35.4% vs 32.1%, p = 0.541; 34.1% vs 31.0%, p = 0.523, respectively). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate and pattern between the LG and OG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is associated with better short-term outcomes and similar long-term outcomes for pT4a Siewert type II/III AEG. This study reveals that LG could be a safe and feasible option for pT4a Siewert type II/III AEG compared to OG.

Laparoscopic versus open resection in patients with locally advanced colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) is challenging due to tumor size and the frequent need for multivisceral resection. The role of laparoscopic resection in LACC is controversial. This study aims to compare outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery in LACC.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective review was conducted of patients treated at a Provincial Cancer Center for LACC from 2005 to 2015. Patients with non-metastatic T4 colon cancers were included. Descriptive, survival, and recurrence analyses were used.

RESULTS

In all, 1,328 patients were reviewed, 23% of whom had laparoscopic surgery. A greater number of T4b tumors were removed via an open approach (35.9% vs 12.7%, P < .001). Positive resection margins occurred in 7.5% of laparoscopic and 16.5% of open cases (P < .001), and multivisceral resection was required in 11.0% and 27.7% (P < .001), respectively. Median follow-up was 37 months (interquartile range [IQR] 17-64) during which 48.6% patients died and 42.1% developed recurrence: locoregional (15.0%), distant (35.3%), peritoneal (11.4%). Age, right-sided tumors, nodal status, and laparoscopic approach were independent predictors of peritoneal recurrence. Overall survival (OS) (73 vs 61 months, P = .188) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (39 vs 31 months, P = .288) were similar with both approaches. Age, nodal, and margin status were predictive of OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Open surgical approach is used more frequently when tumors invade adjacent organs or require multivisceral resections. When employed, laparoscopic approach had similar rates of survival and recurrence compared with open approach, but was an independent predictor of peritoneal recurrence. Careful patient selection in operative approach is suggested.

Should be a locally advanced colon cancer still considered a contraindication to laparoscopic resection?

BACKGROUND

The role of elective laparoscopic resection (LR) for the treatment of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) is unclear. Most studies have retrospectively investigated the outcomes of LR for pT4 cancers, while clinical T4 (cT4) cancers are excluded in the large randomized controlled trials comparing LR and open resection (OR). The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes in patients undergoing elective LR for LACC.

METHODS

A prospective single-institution database including consecutive patients undergoing elective LR for clinical LACC (high-risk T3 or T4 N0-2) between March 1996 and March 2017 was retrospectively reviewed. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of conversion to OR and risk factors for adverse oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients undergoing LR for LACC were included. A multi-visceral resection was needed in 17 (5.7%) patients. A total of 63 (21%) LRs were converted to OR, mainly due to suspected adjacent organ invasion (82.5%) or obesity (9.5%). Overall postoperative Clavien-Dindo 3-4 complication rate was 4.7%, with no significant differences between completed and converted LRs. Final pathology showed 18 (6%) pT2, 215 (71.7%) pT3, 54 (18%) pT4a, and 13 (4.3%) pT4b cancers. A R0 resection was achieved in 98.3% of patients. On multivariate analysis, tumor size ≥ 7 cm and tumor site (splenic flexure) were the independent risk factors for conversion to OR. A pT4 colon cancer and LNR of 0.25 or greater, but not conversion to OR, were independently associated with both poorer OS and DFS.

CONCLUSION(S)

Clinical LACC should not be considered a contraindication to LR itself. Bulky tumors ≥ 7 cm and splenic flexure cancers are at higher risk of conversion to OR; however, there is no increased postoperative morbidity or adverse oncologic outcomes in converted patients.

A Prediction Model for Metachronous Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Patients with Stage T4 Colon Cancer after Curative Resection

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for assessing individual mPC risk in patients with pT4 colon cancer. Methods: A total of 2003 patients with pT4 colon cancer undergoing R0 resection were categorized into the training or testing set. Based on the training set, 2044 Cox prediction models were developed. Next, models with the maximal C-index and minimal prediction error were selected. The final model was then validated based on the testing set using a time-dependent area under the curve and Brier score, and a scoring system was developed. Patients were stratified into the high- or low-risk group by their risk score, with the cut-off points determined by a classification and regression tree (CART). (2) Results: The five candidate predictors were tumor location, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen value, histologic type, T stage and nodal stage. Based on the CART, patients were categorized into the low-risk or high-risk groups. The model has high predictive accuracy (prediction error ≤5%) and good discrimination ability (area under the curve >0.7). (3) Conclusions: The prediction model quantifies individual risk and is feasible for selecting patients with pT4 colon cancer who are at high risk of developing mPC.

Long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: results of a propensity score-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for colon cancer (CC), as practiced in real-world settings, especially in relation to disease stage, have not been established. We examined, retrospectively, both short- and long-term outcomes of SILC versus those of multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) performed for CC in a propensity-score-matched cohort.

METHODS

The study involved 263 patient pairs matched 1:1 from among 691 patients who, between January 2008 and May 2014, underwent either SILC or MPLC for a primary solitary CC at our hospital. Short-term and long-term operative outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Operation time was the only surgical outcome that varied significantly between the two groups (p = 0.0004). Overall 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the SILC group was 93.7 (95% CI 89.6-96.2)%, and CSS per pathological stage (I, II and III) was 98.5 (90.0-99.8)%, 96.0 (88.2-98.7)%, and 88.3 (79.6-93.6)%, respectively, whereas overall 5-year CSS in the MPLC group was 93.3 (89.4-95.9)%, and CSS per pathological stage was 100%, 95.4 (88.3-98.3)%, and 84.1 (74.1-90.8)% (p = 0.5278, 0.2679, 0.7666, and 0.9073), respectively. Overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) in the SILC group was 94.0 (90.2-96.4)%, and 3-year DFS per pathological stage was 98.6 (90.4-99.8)%, 90.1 (81.4-95.0)%, and 79.0 (69.4-86.2)%, respectively, whereas overall 3-year DFS in the MPLC group was 93.2 (89.4-95.7)%, and 3-year DFS per pathological disease stage was 100%, 94.5 (87.4-97.7)% and 75.5 (64.7-83.8)% (p = 0.2829, 0.7401, 0.4335 and 0.8518), respectively. Thus, oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Incisional hernia occurred in 21 (8.0%) SILC group patients and 17 (6.5%) MPLC group patients, without a significant between-group difference (p = 0.6139).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that perioperative and oncological outcomes of SILC performed for CC are comparable to those of MPLC performed for CC.

Minimally invasive surgery for T4 colon cancer is associated with better outcomes compared to open surgery in the National Cancer Database

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is favored for T1-T3 colon cancer resection due to improved short and long-term outcomes. Recommendations regarding T4 cancers remain controversial due to a paucity of clinical trials or large datasets assessing outcomes. We aim to compare outcomes for pT4 colon cancer patients treated with MIS or open surgery (OS) in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We analyzed adults having MIS or OS for stage II or III pT4 colon cancers between 2010 and 2014 using propensity-score matching, Cox and logistic regression modeling. Of 21 998 T4 patients, 7532 (34.2%) underwent MIS, 14 466 (65.8%) OS and 22.3% were MIS converted to OS. After propensity score matching, 5624 patients in each cohort were included. MIS was associated with improved postoperative mortality (3.4 vs. 7.2%, p > .001), surgical margins, optimal lymph node harvest, adjuvant chemotherapy use and 5-year survival (46% vs. 41%, P < .001). MIS was associated with improved short and long term outcomes for T4 colon cancers compared to OS on multivariate analysis. Based on these findings, well selected pT4 colon cancers can be considered appropriate for MIS however, prospective clinical trials are needed to better define the role of MIS in T4b colon cancer.