Tumescent anaesthesia

A Method of Tumescent Anesthesia Based on Facial and Cervical Nerve Block for Face and Neck Liposuction

OBJECTIVE

Liposuction of the face and neck is a common treatment for fat deposition. If conventional methods are used for tumescent anesthesia, patients will experience pain, affecting their surgery experience. Using general anesthesia for liposuction of the face and neck can increase the cost to the patient and cause various adverse effects.

METHODS

The authors selected appropriate parts of the patient's neck, angle of the mandible, and face as needle entry points, and performed nerve block in different directions. Afterward, we performed facial liposuction on these patients and evaluated their level of pain.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 20 female participants who underwent facial liposuction after a nerve block. The Visual Analog Scale score of the 20 participants was 0.55 (±0.60). There were no significant adverse reactions during the treatment process, and all patients expressed satisfaction with this treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this article, the authors present a method of tumescent anesthesia based on facial and cervical nerve block that significantly reduces the pain associated with facial and neck liposuction, eliminating the need for general anesthesia and enhancing the patient's comfort during the procedure.

Perioperatives Schmerzempfinden von Patienten bei dermatochirurgischen Eingriffen in Lokalanästhesie – Eine prospektive Beobachtungsstudie

Hintergrund

Dermatochirurgische Eingriffe finden überwiegend in Lokalanästhesie statt, jedoch gibt es nur wenig Studien zum perioperativen Schmerzmanagement ausgedehnter oder mehrzeitiger Operationen. Das Ziel dieser Erhebung ist die Erfassung von Schmerzen im Rahmen dermatochirurgischer Eingriffe, der Darstellung der perioperativen Schmerztherapie sowie der Identifizierung von Einflussfaktoren auf das Schmerzempfinden.

Patienten und Methodik

In diese prospektive, monozentrische Studie wurden stationäre Patienten von April bis Dezember 2021 eingeschlossen, die einen dermatochirurgischen Eingriff in Lokalanästhesie erhielten. Präoperativ wurden demographische Fragen, ein Schmerzfragebogen und vier psychometrische Fragebögen (PCS, LOT‐R, SFQ, PHQ‐9) erhoben. Postoperativ empfundene Schmerzen und benötigte Schmerzmedikamente der ersten 24 Stunden wurden erhoben.

Ergebnisse

120 Patienten (mit insgesamt 191 Eingriffen) wurden eingeschlossen. Durchschnittliche postoperative Schmerzen wurden sehr niedrig (NRS < 2) angegeben. Präoperativ bestehende Schmerzen und postoperativ erwartete Schmerzen zeigten sich als prädiktive Merkmale für postoperativen Schmerz. Ein starker Zusammenhang zwischen Katastrophisieren und Angst vor der Operation (r = 0,65) sowie ein mittlerer Zusammenhang für Depression und Angst vor der Operation (r = 0,46) konnten dargestellt werden.

Schlussfolgerungen

Dermatochirurgische Eingriffe in Lokalanästhesie werden insgesamt als schmerzarm empfunden. Bei der präoperativen Aufklärung und Untersuchung sollte auf Patienten geachtet werden, die bereits Schmerzen angeben oder postoperativ Schmerzen erwarten, da sie ein erhöhtes Risiko für die Entwicklung postoperativer Schmerzen zeigten.

Perioperative pain perception in patients undergoing dermatologic surgery with local anesthesia - A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Dermatosurgical procedures are predominantly performed under local anesthesia, yet there are few studies on perioperative pain management for extensive or staged procedures under local anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to assess pain during dermatologic surgery, describe perioperative pain management, and identify factors that influence pain perception.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, monocentric study included inpatients undergoing dermatologic surgery under local anesthesia from April to December 2021. Preoperative demographic data, a pain questionnaire, and four psychometric questionnaires (PCS, LOT-R, SFQ, PHQ-9) were collected. Postoperative pain and analgesic use during the first 24 hours were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients (with a total of 191 interventions) were included in the study. Mean postoperative pain was reported to be very low (NRS < 2). Preoperative pain and expected postoperative pain were found to be predictive of postoperative pain. There was a strong correlation between catastrophizing and preoperative anxiety (r = 0.65) and a moderate correlation between depression and preoperative anxiety (r = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatologic surgery under local anesthesia is generally considered painless. During preoperative counseling and assessment, attention should be paid to patients who fear surgery, report pain, or anticipate postoperative pain, as they have an increased risk of experiencing postoperative pain.

Tumescent solution: a game changer in excising refractory arteriovenous malformation

Arteriovenous malformations of the head and neck are rare and inborn errors of vascular morphogenesis. They pose therapeutic challenges owing to their bleeding tendency and a high chance of recurrence. Treatment modalities include digital subtraction angiography with embolisation as a primary treatment or can be done preoperatively followed by surgical excision. We present a case of recurrent arteriovenous malformation of the postauricular region in an adolescent male who was taken up for upfront surgical excision with the help of a tumescent solution, thereby eliminating the need for embolisation and drastically reduced intraoperative blood loss.

Retrospective Study on Optimizing Breast Augmentation Outcomes in Transgender Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of Tumescent Local Anesthesia Technique

BACKGROUND

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) involves the infusion of a saline solution containing lidocaine and epinephrine into tissues to achieve localized anesthesia and vasoconstriction. While the use of TLA in sub-glandular augmentation mammoplasty has been documented, we present a modified TLA approach for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation in transgender patients based on our experience over the past years.

METHODS

Between the years 2014 and 2021, we performed primary sub-muscular breast augmentation on 20 transgender patients under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution consisted of 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. Initially, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, and subsequently, during the surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle.

RESULTS

The average volume of tumescent solution infiltrated during TLA was 740 mL per breast. There were no reports of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity, and no cases required a conversion to general anesthesia. Patients experienced no pain or discomfort during the preoperative infiltration or surgical procedure. Reoperations due to short-term complications never occurred. We observed a major complication rate of 5%, represented by 1 hematoma. Long-term complications comprised one case of implant dislocation and one occurrence of dystrophic scar formation. No cases of capsular contracture needing reoperation, asymmetry, and implant rupture occurred. In total, one individual (5%) requested larger implants. Follow-up time ranged from 30 days to 1 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, augmentation mammaplasty is a valuable choice for transgender women aiming to enhance their feminine characteristics and alleviate gender dysphoria. It is imperative for patients to conduct thorough research, grasp the potential pros and cons, and consult experienced healthcare professionals in transgender care. Additionally, tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has proven to be a safe and efficient method for sub-muscular breast augmentation, providing effective pain control with minimal postoperative complications, resulting in high patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Clinical Implications of the Fascial System: A Commentary on One Surgeon's Journey

A review of the most important concepts of the last 100 years on the topic of fascia and its fundamental importance to tissue and organ structure and function is provided as a basis for the author's commentary on the self-organizing nature of fascia. Implications for clinical applications in medicine, in both pathophysiology and the treatment of disease, follow from these anatomic insights. Organizing principles of nature put forth by D'Arcy Thompson, Buckminster Fuller, Benoit Mandelbrot, and Adrian Bejan set the stage for understanding tissue and fascial form. The author presents videos from the operating room of living anatomy illustrating the concept of a basic fascia segment, which differentiates according to need in the various locations of the body.

Effects of epinephrine, lidocaine, and prilocaine on viability and differentiation capacity of human adipose stem cells

INTRODUCTION

Local anesthetics (LAs) are routinely administered in plastic and reconstructive surgery, e.g., as tumescent anesthesia adjunct in liposuction. Historically, these substances were assumed to act cytotoxically. Thus, the application of LA was avoided when handling adipose stem cells (ASCs). We recently determined that most LAs are not cytotoxic when ASCs are exposed to concentrations used for tumescent liposuction. However, there is limited information when combining LA with epinephrine and about the effects of prilocaine on ASCs.

METHODS

We analyzed the effects of prilocaine or lidocaine in co-exposure with epinephrine on the viability of primary human ASCs, i.e., proliferation, metabolic activity, and cytotoxicity, using crystal violet-staining, PrestoBlue®-, and WST-1 assay. We quantified the impact of short-term incubation of lidocaine and epinephrine on the differentiation of ASCs into the adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineage.

RESULTS

After 2 h, prilocaine (10 mM) significantly reduced metabolic activity and cell numbers, whereas lidocaine only inhibited metabolic activity. After 6 h, prilocaine (10 mM) and lidocaine significantly decreased metabolic activity as well as cell numbers. The application of high concentrations of epinephrine did not affect cell numbers but diminished metabolic activity. Combining lidocaine with epinephrine had no additional cytotoxic effect. Differentiation into the chondrogenic lineage was significantly inhibited by epinephrine.

CONCLUSIONS

Deducing from our data, neither lidocaine combined with epinephrine nor prilocaine has a cytotoxic impact on ASCs in vitro at concentrations equivalent to those in tumescent anesthesia and has no long-lasting effect on the differentiation capacity of ASCs into the osteogenic and adipogenic lineage.

Comprehensive Analysis of Local Anesthetics Affecting Adipose Stem Cells In Vitro

BACKGROUND

Adipose stem cells (ASCs) hold a great regenerative capacity because of their differentiation capability and their secretory activity. Thus, ASC survival is of great significance during perioperative harvesting. Various local anesthetics are commonly applied during fat grafting procedures. These substances are known to impair cellular viability, which would affect graft survival and final outcomes, but the exact extent of their impact on ASC biology is unknown.

METHODS

The authors analyzed the short- and long-term effects of lidocaine, mepivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine at increasing concentrations (0.1 to 10 mM) on primary human ASC proliferation and metabolic activity. Trilinear differentiation was assessed by oil red O stain (adipogenesis), safranin O (chondrogenesis), and cresolphthalein (osteogenesis) labeling. In supernatants, cytokine [interleukin (IL)-6/IL-8, vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor] secretion was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Bupivacaine at greater than 100 µM demonstrated the strongest anti proliferative effects, whereas lidocaine and ropivacaine did not affect cell numbers. Mepivacaine evoked reciprocal results regarding cell count at greater than 1 mM. Each compound impaired trilinear differentiation. Secretion of hepatocyte growth factor and IL-8 was reduced significantly by local anesthetic exposure; levels were restored after substances were washed out.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro data show that lidocaine, mepivacaine, and ropivacaine could be applied at concentrations of 1 to 10 mM without affecting ASC survival. In contrast, bupivacaine at concentrations greater than 100 µM should be administered with great caution. The differentiation of ASCs and the ASC's secretome might already be decreased by each local anesthetic at 1 mM.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The authors' experimental data can be of great significance to the clinical practice, as local anesthetics are routinely administered during liposuction as a tumescent anesthesia adjunct.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) describes the practice of injecting a very dilute solution of local anesthetic combined with epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate into the tissue until it becomes firm and tense to obtain local anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation intramuscular gluteoplasty has never been described for implants positioning. Advantages of the TLA technique include a reduction in blood loss through epinephrine-induced vasoconstriction and hydrostatic compression from the tumescent effect. We describe TLA technique for primary intramuscular gluteal augmentation, reporting our experience during the last 5 years.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2021, 20 patients underwent bilateral primary gluteal augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution was prepared with 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. The solution was infiltrated with a cannula inside the gluteus maximus muscle intra-operatively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 39, 15 years. The average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated was 240 mL per gluteus. Operating time was 1 h and 40 min, and recovery room time averaged 240 min. Major surgery-related complications were found in 15% of patients (2 hematomas and 1 seroma) and minor complications were described in a total of 8 patients (4 wound dehiscence and 1 dystrophic scar formation). No signs of adrenaline nor lidocaine toxicity were reported and conversion to general anesthesia was never required.

CONCLUSIONS

The tumescent local anesthesia technique represents a safe and efficacious technique for performing gluteal augmentation surgery with an intramuscular implant positioning. The advantages of this technique are safety, reasonable pain control during and after surgery and a low incidence of postoperative side effects due to general anesthesia avoidance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid in Breast Reduction for Symptomatic Macromastia

BACKGROUND

With a surge of tranexamic acid (TXA) use in the plastic surgery community and a constant demand for breast reduction for symptomatic macromastia, questions about the benefits and risks emerge. The aims of this study are to evaluate and compare outcomes of patients undergoing breast reduction while receiving local TXA as opposed to standard procedure without TXA and to assess intraoperative bleeding and operative time.

METHODS

A retrospective review of breast reductions at a single institution from June 2020 to December 2021 was performed. The breast was infiltrated with tumescent solution at the time of surgery, with or without TXA. The population was divided into 2 groups: the TXA receiving group and tumescent only group. Demographics, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, complications, and drain duration were compared between groups. T test and χ 2 test analyses were performed on IBM SPSS.TM.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients and 162 breasts were included. Mean age among patients was 30 ± 13.44 years. Mean SN-N distance was 32.80 ± 3.62 cm. Average resected breast specimen weight was 903.21 ± 336.50 g. Mean operating room time was 159 minutes. Intraoperative blood loss and operative time were not statistically different between groups ( P = 0.583 and P = 0.549, respectively). T-junction dehiscence was lower in the TXA group ( P = 0.016). Incidence of suture granulomas was lower in the TXA group ( P = 0.05). Drain duration was statistically significantly higher in the TXA group ( P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

No decreases in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or hematoma were seen after local administration of TXA during breast reduction. The rate of overall complications was not increased by using TXA, and incidence of T-junction dehiscence was lower in the TXA group lending to TXA's relatively safe profile. More research is necessary to further elucidate the TXA-related benefits in standard breast reductions.

Naphazoline and oxymetazoline are superior to epinephrine in enhancing the cutaneous analgesia of lidocaine in rats

This study observed the cutaneous analgesic effect of adrenergic agonists when combined with lidocaine. We aimed at the usefulness of four adrenergic agonists and epinephrine as analgesics or as tools to prolong the effect of local anesthetics using a model of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (pinprick pain) in rats. We showed that subcutaneous four adrenergic agonists and epinephrine, as well as the local anesthetic bupivacaine and lidocaine, developed a concentration-dependent cutaneous analgesia. The rank order of the efficacy of different compounds (ED₅₀ ; median effective dose) was epinephrine [0.013 (0.012-0.014) μmol] > oxymetazoline [0.25 (0.22-0.28) μmol] > naphazoline [0.42 (0.34-0.53) μmol] = bupivacaine [0.43 (0.37-0.50) μmol] > xylometazoline [1.34 (1.25-1.45) μmol] > lidocaine [5.86 (5.11-6.72) μmol] > tetrahydrozoline [6.76 (6.21-7.36) μmol]. The duration of full recovery caused by tetrahydrozoline, oxymetazoline, or xylometazoline was greater (P < 0.01) than that induced via epinephrine, bupivacaine, lidocaine, or naphazoline at equianesthetic doses (ED₂₅ , ED₅₀ , and ED₇₅ ). Co-administration of lidocaine (ED₅₀ ) with four adrenergic agonists or epinephrine enhanced the cutaneous analgesic effect. We observed that four adrenergic agonists and epinephrine induce analgesia by themselves, and such an effect has a longer duration than local anesthetics. Co-administration of lidocaine with the adrenergic agonist enhances the analgesic effect, and the cutaneous analgesic effect of lidocaine plus naphazoline (or oxymetazoline) is greater than that of lidocaine plus epinephrine.

Tumescent local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: A cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia (GA) is the standard anesthetic approach for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Nonetheless, GA is expensive and can be associated with adverse events. Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has been shown to reduce in-room and procedural times and to decrease post-procedural pain, all of which could result in a reduction in procedure-related costs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of GA and TLA in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation.

METHODS

The present study is a prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study of patients who underwent S-ICD implantation between 2019 and 2022. Patients were allocated to either the TLA or the GA group. We performed a cost analysis for each intervention. As an effectiveness measure, the 0-10 point Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 1, 12, and 24 hours post-implantation was analyzed and compared between the groups. A score of 0 was considered no pain; 1-5, mild pain; 6-7, moderate pain; and 8-10, severe pain. Cost-effectiveness was calculated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

Seventy patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation. The total cost of the electrophysiology laboratory was higher in the GA group than in the TLA group (median ± interquartile range US$55,824 ± US$29,411 vs US$37,222 ± US$24,293; P < .001), with a net saving of $20,821 when compared with GA for each S-ICD implantation. There was a significant decrease in post-procedural pain scores in the TLA group when compared with the GA group (repeated measures analysis of variance, P = .009; median ± interquartile range 0 ± 3 vs 0 ± 5 at 1 hour, P = .058; 3 ± 4 vs 6 ± 8 at 12 hours, P = .030; 0 ± 4 vs 2 ± 6 at 24 hours, P = .040).

CONCLUSION

TLA is a more cost-effective alternative to GA for S-ICD implantation, with both direct and indirect cost reductions. Importantly, these reduced costs are associated with reduced postprocedural pain.

Safety and effectiveness of regional anesthesia compared with anesthetic techniques not using regional anesthesia on outcomes after free tissue flap surgery: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review will aim to evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of regional anesthesia, when compared with general anesthesia alone, on the outcomes of free flap surgeries.

INTRODUCTION

Free flap procedures involve complete separation of a flap of tissue from its native vascular bed, followed by reimplantation to a recipient site on the body. Optimal perfusion and successful neovascularization are crucial to survival of the grafted flap. Currently, no best-practice recommendations exist regarding the use of regional anesthesia in free flap surgeries. Regional anesthesia techniques have the potential to alter blood flow and neuroendocrine responses to surgical stress, which may impact perfusion and survival of free flap grafts. This potential for augmentation or hindrance of flap perfusion may have a significant impact on patient outcomes, thus meriting systematic review.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review will include both experimental and observational (analytical only) study designs that examine the vascular outcomes of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia alone in free flap surgery.

METHODS

The databases to be searched include PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and gray literature sources. Identified studies will be independently assessed by two reviewers utilizing JBI critical appraisal tools. Data will be extracted using a standardized data matrix. Certainty of findings will be conducted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Narrative synthesis will be compiled and meta-analysis completed, where possible.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021283584.

Treatment of venous malformations with tumescent-assisted sclero-embolic and ablative lasers (SEALs): Safe and effective long-term outcomes

Background

Perivascular infiltration of tumescent anaesthesia (TA) is an essential element of endovenous thermal ablative procedures employed to treat superficial venous disease. In addition to anaesthesia, TA is administered to achieve vessel wall approximation and to protect surrounding structures from thermal damage. However, its role in the treatment of venous malformations (VMs) has not been established.

Objectives

To assess the safety and efficacy of tumescent-assisted thermal and chemical ablative methods in the treatment of VMs.

Methods

Adult and paediatric patients presenting with VMs were treated using a combination of endovenous laser ablation, foam embolo-sclerotherapy and liquid embolisation using n-BCA. All procedures were ultrasound-guided. Treatment outcomes were assessed in early and late follow-ups. To assess the efficacy of TA in achieving vessel wall approximation, cross-sectional lesional diameters were measured by ultrasound, before and after the administration of TA during endovenous procedures.

Results

In a 12 month period, 22 patients recruited in the study presented with 27 VMs which included 23 extra-truncular lesions (16 subcutaneous and seven intramuscular) and four truncular anomalies. On average the subcutaneous lesions measured 5.5 mm (1.9–24.5 mm) in diameter, intramuscular lesions measured 9.2 mm (5.9–15.1 mm) and truncular anomalies measured 4.9 mm (1.2–12 mm) in diameter. Perivascular infiltration of TA resulted in a significant reduction in vessel calibre (90% reduction on average). Intramuscular VMs were less compressible with TA (69.2% reduction) compared to subcutaneous lesions (98% reduction). Truncular anomalies such as the embryonic marginal vein achieved complete approximation (100% reduction). Procedures were safely tolerated with no major complications such as thromboembolism, stroke, nerve damage or tissue necrosis. Most patients had significant clinical as well as ultrasonographic improvement.

Conclusion

Tumescent-assisted endovenous laser ablation and foam sclerotherapy provides safe and effective outcomes in patients with a variety of VMs.

Comparing the Efficiency of Tumescent Infiltration Techniques in Burn Surgery

Tangential excision and grafting of burn wounds result in significant intraoperative blood loss, and infiltration of a dilute epinephrine solution (tumescence) is routinely performed to reduce such bleeding. Tumescent infiltration has been described using both a manual technique (syringe) and a pump device. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency of these two methods in terms of time and economy of motion. Consecutive adult burn patients at a single center requiring excision and grafting were enrolled in the study and randomized into either the manual or pump technique. Excisions involving less than 2% TBSA were excluded, along with specific anatomic regions (eg, head and neck). Infiltration with epinephrine solution (1:500,000) was performed to the endpoint of tumescence by a single surgeon and filmed/coded for duration, number of maneuvers, and volume of tumescence injected. Fourteen patients were enrolled, and 16 cases were randomized to either manual (N = 8) or pump infiltration (N = 8). The pump method required less time (2.0 vs 1.1 cm2/s, P < .001) and fewer maneuvers (37.8 vs 1.1 cm2/move, P < .001) to reach the desired endpoint of tumescence. Use of the infiltration pump also resulted in a reduced volume of tumescent fluid required to reach this point of tumescence (1.7 vs 2.4 mL/cm2, P = .01). Compared to the manual technique, an infiltration pump was significantly more efficient in terms of both time and economy of motion. These reductions are potentially useful for improving operating room efficiency as well as minimizing operator fatigue.

Effect of Subcutaneous Adrenaline/Saline/Lidocaine Injection on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Wound Healing

Background

Subcutaneous injection of tumescent solution, which contains local anesthetic, adrenaline, and saline, before split-thickness skin graft harvesting, shows a significant hemostatic effect. This method can reduce the initial bleeding from the donor site. The aim of this study is to assess the benefits of controlling the bleeding from donor sites by tumescent injection. A randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare the wound healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites treated with or without tumescent injection.

Methods

This randomized, controlled trial examined donor site healing days as the main measure of outcome. postoperative pain, donor site ulceration, and scar quality were evaluated as secondary outcome measures. Patients planned for split-thickness skin graft harvest were randomly assigned to receive either pre-harvest subcutaneous injection of local anesthetic, adrenaline, and saline solution (tumescent solution) (Group 1) or post-harvest application of adrenaline solution-soaked gauze to the skin graft donor sites (Group 2). Donor sites were treated with calcium alginate dressings after graft harvesting. On the 10th postoperative day, the dressings were removed and donor site healing were measured. Follow-up evaluation of scar quality was performed 6 months after surgery. Postoperative pain was evaluated on the 1st day after operating.

Results

Forty-five patients (26 males; average age 61.8 years) completed the late follow-up evaluation (6 months postoperatively), with 26 patients in group 1 and 19 in group 2. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the outcome measures.

Conclusion

Tumescent technique provides sufficient hemostasis in split skin graft donor sites, especially the initial bleeding just after graft harvesting, without any negative effects. Larger series should be studied to evaluate the effect in donor site wound healing.

Comparison of tumescent local anesthesia vs normal anesthesia technology in upper blepharoplasty in Asian women

BACKGROUND

Blepharoplasty is the most common type of plastic surgery, used to improve most of the eyelid skin sag caused by aging. In the past, local infiltration anesthesia was widely used in blepharoplasty. Tumescent local analgesia (TLA) is safe and reliable method for anesthesia, even children can use this method.

AIMS

This research aimed to systematically compare the differences between conventional local infiltration anesthesia and TLA in blepharoplasty.

PATIENTS/METHODS

One hundred and seventy-eight bilateral upper blepharoplasty patients participated in this research. Visual analog scale (VAS) was employed to evaluate the postoperative pain in the patients. Periorbital appearances are based on light photography and judged by both medical and nonmedical panel.

RESULTS

The use of TLA decreased the surgery duration but had no influence on the other surgery characteristics of upper blepharoplasty. Using TLA for anesthesia in bilateral upper blepharoplasty generated less pain than using local infiltration anesthesia. At day 7 after upper blepharoplasty, the rate of generation of both ecchymosis and erythema in normal anesthesia (NA) side were higher than in TLA side. The satisfaction of patients after upper blepharoplasty was not influenced by the use of different anesthesia methods.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the normal anesthesia technology, the use of TLA in the upper blepharoplasty shortened the surgery duration, alleviated the postoperative pain, and mitigated the generation of ecchymosis and erythema. So, TLA is suitable for the performance of anesthesia in blepharoplasty.

Aesthetic Breast Surgery Under Cold Tumescent Anesthesia: Feasibility and Safety in Outpatient Clinic

Throughout the last decade, aesthetic breast surgery has enormously spread in the outpatient clinic setting where plastic surgeons perform the vast majority of procedures under local anesthesia as day-case operations. The "tumescent anesthesia" is defined as the injection of a dilute solution of local anesthetic combined with epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate into subcutaneous tissue until it becomes firm and tense, which is "tumescent." The "cold tumescent anesthesia" (CTA) derives from Klein's solution with the introduction of a new concept, which is the low temperature (4°C) of the injected solution. This novelty adds further anesthetic and hemostatic power to the well-known benefits of tumescent anesthesia. The authors report their experience with CTA in the last 15 years in the setting of aesthetic breast surgery, describing in detail the anesthesia protocol, surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction. A total of 1541 patients were operated on during the study period and were included in this retrospective analysis. The types of breast procedures were breast augmentation in 762 cases (49.4%), mastopexy with implants in 123 patients (8.0%), mastopexy without implants in 452 cases (29.3%), and breast reduction in 204 cases (13.3%). Patient mean age was 42.8 years (range, 18-67 years). The mean operating time was 37 ± 32 minutes for breast augmentation, 78 ± 24 minutes for mastopexy with implants, 58 ± 18 minutes for mastopexy without implants, and 95 ± 19 minutes for breast reduction. No major complications occurred, and no conversion to general anesthesia was required. The median recovery time was 150 minutes (range, 120-210 minutes), and all patients were discharged within 3 hours after surgery. Wound or implant infections occurred in 33 patients (2.1%), wound dehiscences in 21 (1.4%), and postoperative bleeding requiring return to theater in 2 cases (0.1%). Thirteen patients (0.8%) developed capsular contracture. Fifteen patients (1%) required reintervention due to implant rotation or rupture. The median visual analog scale score was 1.8 (interquartile range, 1-3) after discharge. Patient satisfaction was very high in 91.3% (n = 1407) of the cases. In experienced hands, CTA can shorten operating time with high patient satisfaction and a low complication rate. These preliminary data could be hypothesis generating for future multicenter prospective trials done to confirm the benefits of CTA in other surgical fields.

Plastic Surgery Complications: A Review for Emergency Clinicians

The number of aesthetic surgical procedures performed in the United States is increasing rapidly. Over 1.5 million surgical procedures and over three million nonsurgical procedures were performed in 2015 alone. Of these, the most common procedures included surgeries of the breast and abdominal wall, specifically implants, liposuction, and subcutaneous injections. Emergency clinicians may be tasked with the management of postoperative complications of cosmetic surgeries including postoperative infections, thromboembolic events, skin necrosis, hemorrhage, pulmonary edema, fat embolism syndrome, bowel cavity perforation, intra-abdominal injury, local seroma formation, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity. This review provides several guiding principles for management of acute complications. Understanding these complications and approach to their management is essential to optimizing patient care.

Dilutional local anaesthetic techniques in oncoplastic breast surgery and potential benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 has changed the approach to operating on breast cancer for the benefit of patients, staff and the general population. One approach involves the switch from operating under general to local anaesthetic. We assess whether diluational local anaesthetic is as effective as the current standard approach.

METHODS

Postoperative pain was recorded in prospective, consecutive patients undergoing wide local excision under dilutional local anaesthetic (concentration < 1mg/ml). Pain scores were documented at 0, 30 and 60 minutes and compared to a control group consisting of combined general with local anaesthetic.

RESULTS

Pain significantly increased in the control group during the postoperative recovery. This was not seen in the dilutional local anaesthetic group that was non-inferior to the standard approach at 0, 30 and 60 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Dilutional local anaesthetic provides a safe and effective alternative approach to operating on breast cancer patients whilst avoiding risky general anaesthetic in a COVID-19 pandemic environment.

Update of the SFMV (French society of vascular medicine) guidelines on the conditions and safety measures necessary for thermal ablation of the saphenous veins and proposals for unresolved issues

Venous insufficiency is a very common disease affecting about 25% of the French population (if we combine all stages of its progression). It is a complex disease and its aetiology has not yet been fully elucidated. Some of its causes are well known, such as valvular dysfunction, vein wall defect, and the suctioning effect common to all varicose veins. These factors are generally associated and together lead to dysfunction of one or more of the saphenous veins. Saphenous vein dysfunction is revealed by ultrasound scan, a reflux lasting more than 0.5 seconds indicating venous incompetence. The potential consequences of saphenous vein dysfunction over time include: symptoms (heaviness, swellings, restlessness, cramps, itching of the lower limbs), acute complications (superficial venous thrombosis, varicose bleeding), chronic complications (changes in skin texture and colour, stasis dermatitis, eczema, vein atresia, leg ulcer), and appearance of unaesthetic varicose veins. It is not possible to repair an incompetent saphenous vein. The only therapeutic options at present are ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, physical removal of the vein (saphenous stripping), or its thermal ablation (by laser or radiofrequency treatment), the latter strategy having now become the gold standard as recommended by international guidelines. Recommendations concerning thermal ablation of saphenous veins were published in 2014 by the Société française de médecine vasculaire. Our society has now decided to update these recommendations, taking this opportunity to discuss unresolved issues and issues not addressed in the original guidelines. Thermal ablation of an incompetent saphenous vein consists in destroying this by means of a heating element introduced via ultrasound-guided venous puncture. The heating element comprises either a laser fibre or a radiofrequency catheter. The practitioner must provide the patient with full information about the procedure and obtain his/her consent prior to its implementation. The checklist concerning the interventional procedure issued by the HAS should be validated for each patient (see the appended document).

Tumescent Injections in Subcutaneous Pig Tissue Disperse Fluids Volumetrically and Maintain Elevated Local Concentrations of Additives for Several Hours, Suggesting a Treatment for Drug Resistant Wounds

PURPOSE

Bolus injection of fluid into subcutaneous tissue results in accumulation of fluid at the injection site. The fluid does not form a pool. Rather, the injection pressure forces the interstitial matrix to expand to accommodate the excess fluid in its volume, and the fluid becomes bound similar to that in a hydrogel. We seek to understand the properties and dynamics of externally tumesced (swollen) subcutaneous tissue as a first step in assessing whether tumescent antibiotic injections into wounds may provide a novel method of treatment.

METHODS

Subcutaneous injections of saline are performed in live and dead pigs and the physical properties (volume, expansion ratio, residence time, apparent diffusion constant) of the resulting fluid deposits are observed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and 3D scanning.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous tissue can expand to a few times its initial volume to accommodate the injected fluid, which is dispersed thoroughly throughout the tumescent volume. The fluid spreads to peripheral unexpanded regions over the course of a few minutes, after which it remains in place for several hours. Eventually the circulation absorbs the excess fluid and the tissue returns to its original state.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the evidence for dense fluid dispersal and several-hour residence time, a procedure is proposed whereby tumescent antibiotic injections are used to treat drug-resistant skin infections and chronic wounds that extend into the subcutaneous tissue. The procedure has the potential to effectively treat otherwise untreatable wounds by keeping drug concentrations above minimum inhibitory levels for extended lengths of time.

High-volume, Multilevel Local Anesthetics-Epinephrine Infiltration in Kyphoscoliosis Surgery: Blood Conservation

INTRODUCTION

Scoliosis surgery is usually associated with severe bleeding. Various systemic strategies for blood conservation were applied, while the local techniques get less attention. The preemptive use of sufficient volume for proper tissue infiltration at two levels was applied. The local epinephrine may control bleeding without reliance upon deliberate hypotension, permitting a higher tissue perfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 46 patients scheduled for posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis correction. Patients were randomized into two groups. group I received a cocktail of high volume (100 ml/each 10 cm of wound length) of local anesthetics and epinephrine tumescent infiltration at the subcutaneous (SC) followed by intramuscular level bilaterally. Group C received saline infiltration in the same technique. Statistically, data were analyzed according to its distribution using the t-test, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests as appropriate.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in blood loss (38%), reduced blood and fluid transfusion (36% and 23%), and reduced operative time (23%), with higher surgeon satisfaction. The surgical field visibility (Fromme's scale) was much better during SC and muscular dissection in Group I, while it was fair during the bony work. The satisfactory field in spite of higher mean blood pressure in Group I greatly omitted the reliance upon deliberate hypotension.

CONCLUSION

The high-volume multilevel infiltration of epinephrine cocktail can provide a significant blood and operative time conservation in kyphoscoliosis surgery.

Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate

Background:

Fat grafting is a growing field within plastic surgery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and stromal vascular fracture (SVF) may have a role in fat graft survival. Our group previously demonstrated a detrimental effect on ASC survival by the lidocaine used in tumescent solution. Sodium bicarbonate (SB) buffers the acidity of lidocaine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SB buffering is a practical method to reduce ASC and SVF apoptosis and necrosis seen with common lidocaine-containing tumescent solution.

Methods:

Human patients undergoing bilateral liposuction for any indication were included in this study. An internally controlled, split-body design was utilized. Tumescent liposuction on one side of the body was conducted with tumescent containing lidocaine. On the opposite side, liposuction was conducted by adding SB to the tumescent. Tumescent solution and lipoaspirate pH were measured. Lipoaspirate from each side was processed for SVF isolation and ASC culture. The number of viable ASCs was counted and SVF apoptosis/necrosis was examined.

Results:

The pH of the SB-buffered tumescent was significantly higher than that of the standard tumescent, an effect also seen in the lipoaspirate. Adipose-derived stem cell survival in the SB-buffered lipoaspirate was approximately 53% higher. However, there was no significant difference in SVF apoptosis and necrosis between the groups.

Conclusions:

The acidic standard tumescent solution commonly used in liposuction diminishes ASC viability from lipoaspirates. Sodium bicarbonate buffering tumescent solution can enhance ASC viability, but does not affect SVF apoptosis and necrosis. We recommend buffering tumescent with SB to potentially improve fat graft take. Our findings advocate for further research investigating mechanisms and optimal harvest techniques that maximize SVF/ASC survival and the clinical effect on overall fat graft viability.

Sub-muscular Breast Augmentation Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) consists of infiltration of saline solution with lidocaine and epinephrine into the tissues to obtain regional anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation mammoplasty has been described for sub-glandular positioning. We describe a modified TLA technique for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation reporting our experience during the past 7 years.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2017, 300 patients underwent bilateral primary sub-muscular breast augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution was prepared with 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. Firstly, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, secondarily, during surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle.

RESULTS

The average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated while performing TLA was 740 mL per breast. No signs of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity were reported and conversion to general anesthesia was never required. In all patients, no pain nor discomfort was reported during the pre-operating infiltration and surgical procedure. We reported a major complication rate of 3.3% (4 hematomas and 6 seromas) and a minor complication rate of 6.0% (8 implant dislocation and 10 dystrophic scars formation).

CONCLUSIONS

TLA represents a safe and efficacious technique for performing breast augmentation surgery with sub-muscular implant positioning. This technique guarantees good pain control during and after surgery and has low incidence of postoperative side effects. Patients subjected to sub-muscular breast augmentation with TLA were satisfied.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: current perspectives

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a life-threatening adverse event that may occur after the administration of local anesthetic drugs through a variety of routes. Increasing use of local anesthetic techniques in various healthcare settings makes contemporary understanding of LAST highly relevant. Recent data have demonstrated that the underlying mechanisms of LAST are multifactorial, with diverse cellular effects in the central nervous system and cardiovascular system. Although neurological presentation is most common, LAST often presents atypically, and one-fifth of the reported cases present with isolated cardiovascular disturbance. There are several risk factors that are associated with the drug used and the administration technique. LAST can be mitigated by targeting the modifiable risk factors, including the use of ultrasound for regional anesthetic techniques and restricting drug dosage. There have been significant developments in our understanding of LAST treatment. Key advances include early administration of lipid emulsion therapy, prompt seizure management, and careful selection of cardiovascular supportive pharmacotherapy. Cognizance of the mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and therapy of LAST is vital to any practitioner using local anesthetic drugs in their clinical practice.

Tumescent anaesthesia: its applications and well tolerated use in the out-of-operating room setting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tumescent anaesthesia is a method of administering dilute local anaesthetic into the subcutaneous tissue. Many anaesthesiologists are unfamiliar with the technique, its applications and potential risks.

RECENT FINDINGS

The maximum safe dose of lidocaine with epinephrine in tumescent anaesthesia for liposuction is probably between 35 and 55 mg/kg. Without liposuction, the maximum dose of lidocaine with epinephrine should be no more than 28 mg/kg. After tumescent infiltration for liposuction, serum lidocaine concentrations peak between 12 and 16 h after injection. When tumescent lidocaine without epinephrine is used for endovenous laser therapy, peak serum lidocaine concentrations are observed much earlier, between 1 and 2 h after injection. Slow administration of more dilute concentrations of local anaesthetic decreases the risk of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity.

SUMMARY

Although appealing because of its ability to provide prolonged analgesia, high doses of local anaesthetic are frequently administered using the tumescent technique, and absorption of local anaesthetic from the subcutaneous tissue is variable. When caring for patients having procedures in which tumescent anaesthesia is used, the risk of local anaesthetic toxicity should be acknowledged and lipid emulsion should be available for prompt treatment if needed.

On Beyond Lidocaine: Reconsidering Local Anesthetics in Tumescent Liposuction-A Critical Review

The use of tumescent solution in liposuction is now considered standard of care; however, much debate still exists regarding its ideal components, especially surrounding the inclusion of local anesthetics. This article reviews the discussion regarding the use of local anesthetics in tumescent liposuction and how it may evolve in the future. The need for local anesthetic additives in tumescent liposuction has been questioned, and the use of longer-acting agents discouraged; however, increasing number of reports in recent years have described the increasingly widespread use of tumescent anesthesia where a wetting solution is infiltrated to achieve anesthesia in an operative field for procedures other than liposuction. More high-level evidence, such as randomized controlled clinical trials, will be required; however, it should be possible to develop a useful standardized algorithm that can guide surgeons to optimize patient safety as well as patient experience.

Tumescent mastectomy: the current indications and operative tips and tricks

Background

Tumescent mastectomy refers to usage of a mixture of lidocaine and epinephrine in a diluting saline solution that makes flaps firm and tense, thus minimizing systemic drugs toxicity and making surgery possible with minimal bleeding. This technique is very useful in elder women and those with American Society of Anesthesiologists; score III and IV. The objective was to establish an alternative safe technique to general anesthesia in some selected mastectomy patients.

Patients and methods

Twenty candidate women for total mastectomy and axillary dissection were enrolled and consented to participate. After preparation, an anatomically directed infiltration was made under sedation, using a cocktail of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and epinephrine, followed after 20 minutes by the surgical incision and completion of mastectomy. All intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded.

Results

Although 7 cases required added analgesic medications, no conversion for general anesthesia was recorded. Mean operative time was 81±15.8 minutes. Mean blood loss was 95.8±47.5 mL. There was no recorded intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Postoperative visual analog score was not exceeding 4 till the end of the first 24 hours. Opioids were not required in any case, and the mean dosage of Ketorolac used was 30±8.75 mg. Drains output and the incidence of postoperative complications were acceptable.

Conclusion

We can consider tumescent mastectomy in well-selected patients a safe alternative for performing mastectomy when general anesthesia is hazardous, with minimal blood loss and long lasting postoperative analgesia without an additive effect on the operative time, hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

The Addition of Epinephrine to Proxymetacaine or Oxybuprocaine Solution Increases the Depth and Duration of Cutaneous Analgesia in Rats

BACKGROUND

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the interaction between epinephrine and 2 local anesthetics (proxymetacaine or oxybuprocaine) using subcutaneous injections under the hairy skin, thereby simulating infiltration blocks.

METHODS

Using a rat model of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex in response to local skin pinpricks, the anesthetic properties of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine alone and in combination with epinephrine as an infiltrative anesthetic were tested. Isobolographic analysis was used for the analgesic interactions between adjuvant epinephrine and the local anesthetics. Lidocaine was used as a control group.

RESULTS

Oxybuprocaine, proxymetacaine, and lidocaine elicited a dose-dependent block to pinpricks. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, their relative potencies were proxymetacaine [0.126 (0.113-0.141) μmol] greater than oxybuprocaine [0.208 (0.192-0.226) μmol] greater than lidocaine [6.331 (5.662-7.079) μmol] (P < 0.01 for each comparison). On an equipotent basis (ED25, ED50, and ED75), sensory block duration elicited by oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine was greater than that elicited by lidocaine (P < 0.01). Coadministration of proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, or lidocaine with epinephrine produced a synergistic analgesic effect and prolonged the cutaneous analgesic effect. After adding epinephrine, oxybuprocaine was much faster, reaching its maximal blockade, than proxymetacaine or lidocaine (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine were more potent and produced greater duration of nociceptive block than lidocaine. The use of epinephrine augmented the potency and prolonged the duration of proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and lidocaine as an infiltrative anesthetic.

Tumescent Liposuction without Lidocaine

BACKGROUND

Our previous study demonstrated that lidocaine has a negative impact on adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) survival. Currently for large-volume liposuction, patients often undergo general anesthesia; therefore, lidocaine subcutaneous anesthesia is nonessential. We hypothesized that removing lidocaine from tumescent might improve stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and ASC survival from the standard tumescent with lidocaine. Ropivacaine is also a commonly used local anesthetic. The effect of ropivacaine on ASC survival was examined.

METHODS

Adults who underwent liposuction on bilateral body areas were included (n = 10). Under general anesthesia, liposuction on 1 area was conducted under standard tumescent with lidocaine. On the contralateral side, liposuction was conducted under the modified tumescent without lidocaine. Five milliliters of lipoaspirate were processed for the isolation of SVF. The adherent ASCs were counted after 24 hours of SVF culture. Apoptosis and necrosis of SVF cells were examined by Annexin/propidium iodide staining and analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Average percentage of live SVF cells was 68.0% ± 4.0% (28.5% ± 3.8% of apoptosis and 3.4% ± 1.0% of necrosis) in lidocaine group compared with 86.7% ± 3.7% (11.5% ± 3.1% of apoptosis and 1.8% ± 0.7% of necrosis) in no-lidocaine group (P = 0.002). Average number of viable ASC was also significantly lower (367,000 ± 107) in lidocaine group compared with that (500,000 ± 152) in no-lidocaine group (P = 0.04). No significant difference was found between lidocaine and ropivacaine on ASC cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Removing lidocaine from tumescent significantly reduced SVF and ASC apoptosis in the lipoaspirate. We recommend tumescent liposuction without lidocaine, particularly if patient's lipoaspirate will be used for fat grafting.

Efficacy and safety of post-cesarean section incisional infiltration with lidocaine and epinephrine versus lidocaine alone in reducing postoperative pain: A randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of incisional infiltration of lidocaine and epinephrine vs. lidocaine only to reduce postcesarean section (C/S) pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It was a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial that was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Egypt and included 153 women undergoing C/S under general anesthesia. They were randomly divided into the following two groups: Group I (control group, number=78), in which the wound was infiltrated before skin closure with 20 mL of 2% lidocaine, and Group II (study group, number=75), in which the wound was infiltrated before skin closure with 20 mL of 2% lidocaine and epinephrine. The primary outcomes were the time to first analgesic (TFA) request (minutes) and the postoperative pain scores that were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included the duration of C/S, onset of mobilization, onset of breastfeeding, duration of hospital stay, local or systemic side effects of lidocaine and epinephrine, postoperative pyrexia, and postoperative wound infection.

RESULTS

The pain score determined using VAS after 1 and 2 h was significantly decreased in Group II than in Group I. However, at 4.8 and 16 h, these results were significantly reversed in Group II than in Group I. The cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was significantly less in Group II than in Group I (50 vs. 90 mg). The onset of mobilization, onset of breastfeeding, and duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group II than in Group I, whereas the TFA request was significantly longer in Group II.

CONCLUSION

Administering epinephrine with 2% lidocaine prolongs the anesthetic effect and reduces the opioid analgesic dose postoperatively required, thereby enhancing patient recovery.

The effect of distraction on pain perception during an endovenous thermal ablation procedure

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether audio and visual distraction can affect the pain perception of a patient undergoing endovenous thermal ablation under tumescent anesthesia.

METHODS

Patients underwent an endovenous thermal ablation procedure and were randomized into two groups: non-distraction (AVD-) and with distraction (AVD+). Visual analogue scale pain score and hospital anxiety depression scale scores were used to measure outcome. The recruited patients were asked to submit an anticipated visual analogue scale pain score prior to treatment as well as the actual experienced post-operative visual analogue scale pain score.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the AVD- and AVD+ groups post-operative pain score 2.85 (SD 1.7) versus 2.60 (SD 2.3), p = 0.68. Pain score in women with distraction (AVD+) decreased from 3.81 to 2.42. The pain score in men with distraction (AVD+) increases from 1.88 to 2.82. In the AVD- group, a significant difference was found between men and women (p = 0.014). Disregarding gender, a significant difference was found between the anticipated pain score and the actual pain score in both the AVD- group (p = 0.009) and AVD+ group (p = 0.021). There was a correlation between depression and the pain score, which was not seen between pain and anxiety score.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that audiovisual distraction has no influence on the visual analogue scale pain score during endovenous thermal ablation under tumescent anesthesia. Despite this, patients appreciate and evaluate audio and visual distraction as pleasant to extremely pleasant when applied.

One-per-mil tumescent technique for bone and joint surgery in hand

BACKGROUND

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of one-per-mil tumescent technique in hand surgery, which involves bone and joint.

METHODS

This is a case series study on 14 patients with 15 operative fields. One-per-mil solution is formulated by mixing 0.05 mL of 1:1,000 epinephrine and 100 mg lidocaine in 50-mL saline solution. The solution was injected subcutaneously into the operative area until the skin turned pale. The surgery started 7-10 min after the last injection. We classified the operative field clarity into four categories: totally bloodless, minimum bleeding, acceptable bleeding, and bloody operative field. We also recorded the amount of tumescent solution, top-ups needed, length of surgery, type of anesthesia, and intraoperative pain reported by the patients under local anesthesia.

RESULTS

Five patients were operated on under local anesthesia while the other ten were under general anesthesia. Eight cases yielded totally bloodless operative fields, while seven were classified as acceptable bleeding. There were no top-ups and conversion of anesthesia needed during surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider one-per-mil tumescent technique as a promising successor of pneumatic tourniquet in bone and joint surgery, especially for lengthy procedures on hand and upper extremity.

Lidocaine-induced ASC apoptosis (tumescent vs. local anesthesia)

BACKGROUND

The purpose for the present study was to determine which anesthetic method, local anesthesia versus tumescent, is superior for liposuction in terms of adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) survival in lipoaspirate; which component, lidocaine versus lidocaine with epinephrine, in anesthetic solutions could affect ASC survival; and which mechanism, necrosis versus apoptosis, is involved in lidocaine-induced ASC death.

METHODS

Human lipoaspirates were harvested using standard liposuction technique. Individuals scheduled for liposuction on bilateral body areas gave consent and were included in the study. On one area, liposuction was conducted under local anesthesia with lidocaine/epinephrine. On the contralateral area, liposuction was accomplished with tumescent wetting solution containing lidocaine/epinephrine. Lipoaspirates were processed for the isolation of stromal vascular fraction (SVF). ASC survival was determined by the number of adherent ASCs after 24 h of SVF culture. Lidocaine dose-response (with or without epinephrine) on cultured ASCs was examined. Lidocaine-induced ASC apoptosis and necrosis was determined by Annexin V-FITC/Propidium Iodide (PI) assay and analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

All of the participants were female adults. The average age was 45 ± 4.0 years (±SEM) and the average BMI was 28 ± 1.0 (±SEM). Lipoaspirate samples (n = 14) treated by local anesthesia (n = 7/group) or tumescent anesthesia (n = 7/group) were investigated. Liposuction sites were located in the hip or thigh. The average number of adherent ASCs was 1,057 ± 146 k in the local anesthesia group, which was significantly lower than the 1,571 ± 111 k found in the tumescent group (P = 0.01). ASC survival was significantly lower in the lidocaine group and in a dose-dependent manner as compared to the correspondent PBS controls (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). ASC survival was significantly lower in both the lidocaine and lidocaine with epinephrine groups when compared to PBS controls. Annexin/PI assay showed that ASC apoptosis (but not necrosis) in the lidocaine group was significantly higher than that in the corresponding PBS control (P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumescent anesthesia is the superior method for liposuction with respect to ASC preservation compared to local anesthesia. Lidocaine could cause significant ASC apoptosis.

What the phlebologist should know about local anesthetics

An increasing number of phlebological interventions are performed under local and tumescent anesthesia. Although the modern local anesthetic agents are generally perceived as being effective and safe drugs, the administration of these drugs may be associated with a number of adverse events. It is therefore mandatory that everyone who uses these compounds has insight into the pharmacological actions of these drugs and is capable of recognizing and adequately treating potential adverse events. The present narrative review summarizes the current knowledge on mechanisms of action of the most important local anesthetic drugs and reviews the potential adverse effects as well as their treatment.