How Effective is Low Vision Service Provision? A Systematic Review

Referral to Vision Rehabilitation Services for Uveitis Patients: Referral Criteria and Barriers

PURPOSE

Despite the benefits of vision rehabilitation services (VRS) for uveitis patients, limited literature has examined issues in VRS access within uveitis. We surveyed American Uveitis Society members regarding VRS referral practices, criteria, and barriers.

METHODS

Survey responses were collected from November 2022 to January 2023. Analysis summarized responses and compared response patterns of frequently-referring and infrequently-referring providers through Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Most of the 33 respondents completed 1 to 5 monthly referrals using criteria of visual acuity loss, visual field loss, and difficulty performing vision-related activities. Key referral barriers included cost of services and insufficient patient-provider communication regarding vision loss. The practice of speaking to patients about vision loss during clinic visits was correlated with higher VRS referral rates (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater patient-provider communication about vision loss may represent an opportunity to increase access to VRS.

Utility values and electronic device use in low-vision people attending rehabilitation services: Data from a nation-wide registry in Italy

PURPOSE

To estimate utility values associated with visual loss using EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire, the impact of low-vision (LV) device use on utilities and the contribution of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score in patients attending vision rehabilitation (VR) services enrolled in the Italian Device & Aids Register (D.A.Re).

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study. D.A.Re. collects general and clinical information, vision-specific variables, use of electronic devices and quality of life questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients (75.0±16.6 years, 275 female) were included, 88 (19.9%) used specialised electronic LV devices, and 116 (26.2%) used smartphones and tablets. Users of smartphones and tablets were younger than non-users (67.5 vs. 77.6 years, p<0.001), but overall, their age ranged between 20 and 93. Stronger associations were found between vision-specific variables and IADL score compared to EQ-5D score. In multivariable age-adjusted models, the utility value of using smartphones and tablets on EQ-5D score was 0.12 (p<0.01), slightly larger than that of 1.0 logMAR difference (-0.09, p<0.01) or visual field damage within 10° of fixation (-0.10, p<0.01). Use of portable low-vision electronic devices and being employed or student (vs. retired) was also associated with better utility values (0.12 and 0.15, respectively, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Visual loss is associated with loss of utilities in Italian patients attending VR services, whereas special-purpose electronic aids, and smartphone and tablet use are associated with better utility values. We found that IADL may be more sensitive to visual loss than EQ-5D and could be a valid health-related quality of life outcome in trials on VR.

Near prescribing trends in two low vision rehabilitation clinics over a ten-year period

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Optical magnification (OM), electronic magnification (EM), and assistive technology (AT) can be prescribed in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) clinics for near vision goals of patients. This study shows the prescription of OM has not decreased with increased availability of EM and AT.

BACKGROUND

Near visual goals are a primary concern for patients with visual impairment. LVR providers can prescribe OM, EM and/or AT to help. With the rapid evolution and availability of EM and AT, we aim to evaluate if there have been changes in the prescription patterns of clinicians with respect to OM over time. We hypothesise that the increased availability of technology may result in declining prescriptions of OM and increasing prescription of EM and AT over time.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated near prescribing between 2008-2017 for 530 new patients to the LVR clinics. Examinations were performed by optometrists specialising in low vision. Near devices prescribed included OM and EM and AT.

RESULTS

Most patients attending the LVR clinics were female, over 60 years old and had age related macular degeneration. Near visual goals were a primary concern of 97.2% of the patients. OM was most prescribed in the 0-19 and >60-year-old age groups. Within the 20-39-year-old age group there was the greatest number of both EM and AT prescriptions. OM was most prescribed in patients with visual acuity better than 6/60. EM and AT showed a trend of increasing prescription as visual acuity decreased. EM prescription peaked in <6/60 to 6/240 category while AT trended upwards from <6/21 to no light perception and peaked in patients with no light perception. Referral rates for additional rehabilitation services were 75.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the prescription of OM is not declining even as the prescription and the breadth of electronic magnification and assistive technology available is expanding. OM continues to be a viable option for patients, especially in the youngest and oldest cohorts.

Access to low vision rehabilitation services in Australia: practitioner perspective

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The burden of vision loss is both personal and economic. Having reduced vision can restrict access to education, job opportunities, and other activities, and patients can require substantial government funds for treatment and rehabilitation. An in-depth investigation of barriers and enablers is required to improve access to low vision rehabilitation services.

BACKGROUND

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation services, leading to improved clinical and functional abilities. However not all patients make use of these resources.

METHODS

A purposive sample of primary eyecare practitioners (optometrists and orthoptists who held a variety of roles in clinical practice, academia and low vision specific organisations) were invited to participate in focus groups that were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The resulting data were de-identified, cleaned, independently coded by two researchers and compared. Data were analysed using an interpretative phenomenological approach that included inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 21 practitioners attending the five focus groups, 67% were female and 33% were male. The participants were optometrists and orthoptists with a wide range (4 to 20+ years) of clinical experience in eyecare service delivery. Four major themes emerged from the analysis: three themes focus on identifying barriers, while one theme highlighted potential enablers. These themes encompassed barriers impacting referral frequency, practitioner knowledge, patient experience, and enablers that suggest improvement options for enhancing low vision services.

CONCLUSION

Miscommunication between service providers, miscommunication between patients and clinicians, late referral, cost of services and social stigma were major barriers preventing patients from receiving low vision services. Most practitioners admitted limited knowledge of the scope of services provided by low vision organisations, suggesting there is a need for enablers such as professional development, improved communication between service providers, enhanced referral guidelines and increased public awareness.

Use and underuse of mobility aids in individuals with visual impairment: a cross-sectional study of a Norwegian sample

PURPOSE

To examine the use and underuse of mobility aids in individuals with visual impairment.

METHODS

A telephone survey including a probability sample of 736 adults who were members of the Norwegian Association of the Blind and Sighted (response rate: 61%). The interviews took place between January and May 2017, collecting information about access, use, underuse and training in five types of mobility aids (white cane, guide dog, GPS, door-to-door transport and sighted guide). For each mobility aid, we obtained data for underuse defined as non-use despite expecting benefits of use in terms of increased mobility or safety. Participants also answered questions about loneliness (Three-Item Loneliness Scale) and life satisfaction (Cantril's Ladder of Life Satisfaction).

RESULTS

Of the participants, 69% reported using at least one type of mobility aid. Use of specific aids ranged from 12% for the GPS to 52% for door-to-door transport. Estimates of underuse ranged between 14% for door-to-door transport and 28% for GPS. Underuse was not related to lack of resources, as many non-users expecting benefits had access to mobility aids and had undergone training in its use. For example, 81% of non-users of the white cane had access to a cane. In post hoc analyses, non-users who expected benefits from use had lower life satisfaction compared with users.

CONCLUSIONS

Many individuals with visual impairment do not use mobility aids. Strategies that help visually impaired individuals overcome barriers to the use of mobility aids may improve their sense of safety, mobility and quality of life.Implications of rehabilitationThe best mobility aids are those being used. Rehabilitation professionals involved in the provision of mobility aids should be sensitive to the user's lived experiences, and be alert of the cultural meanings of mobility aids and on disability in general.Rehabilitation professionals, social service workers and others need more knowledge of the psychosocial and cultural aspects related to why people do not use their mobility aids.A successful integration of mobility aids in people's daily life cannot be achieved by sufficient accessibility alone. Structured routines for follow-up of those who receive aids should be implemented, so that the aids are actually used.Due to the high rates of underuse and its possible relation to quality of life, promoting regular use of mobility aids should be prioritized.

Barriers and enablers to low vision care and rehabilitation in sub-Saharan Africa within a global context

Low vision is an uncorrectable form of visual impairment that affect millions of people worldwide. Low vision care and rehabilitation are essential to improving the independence of affected individuals. Even though sub-Saharan Africa has one of the highest burdens of low vision globally, there are inadequate care and rehabilitation services in most countries and in some cases they are non-existent This scoping review aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to low vision care and rehabilitation in sub-Saharan Africa and assess these within the global context. The review was conducted using the five-step Arksey and O'Malley framework. Search terms were formulated based on the research questions and a search strategy was designed to search for eligible research articles from electronic databases; Pubmed, Ovid, Medline, and Embase. The data was screened by two members of the research team in accordance with set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty-five out of 260 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria for the study. Inadequate low vision care infrastructure and supplies, non-standardised training of low vision care providers, health system failure and poor awareness of low vision care were the main barriers noted by eye care practitioners. Patients living with low vision cited the cost and availability of low vision aids, societal stigma, and poor awareness of services as the main barriers. No direct enablers were identified in sub-Saharan Africa; however, practitioners suggested improved training in low vision as a potential enabler. The barriers to low vision care and rehabilitation services identified were not unique to sub-Saharan Africa when viewed within a global context. Adopting and adapting solutions from other countries may therefore assist in improving low vision care and rehabilitation in sub-Saharan Africa.

Development and Validation of the Low Vision Severely Constricted Peripheral Eyesight (LV-SCOPE) Questionnaire

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess vision-related functioning in individuals with severe peripheral field loss (PFL).

DESIGN

Prospective outcome measure development/validation study.

METHODS

A 127-item questionnaire was developed based on a prior qualitative interview study. A total of 116 participants with severe PFL due to retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or glaucoma were recruited at the Kellogg Eye Center and completed the Likert-scaled telephone-administered questionnaire. Included participants had a horizontal extent of their visual field <20 degrees (RP) or a mixed or generalized stage 4 to 5 defect using the Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (glaucoma) in the better seeing eye (or in 1 eye if the fellow eye visual acuity was <20/200). Response data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and Rasch modeling. Poorly functioning items were eliminated, confirmatory factor analysis was used to ensure scale unidimensionality, and the model was refit to produce the final instrument.

RESULTS

The final Low Vision Severely Constricted Peripheral Eyesight (LV-SCOPE) Questionnaire contains 53 items across 6 domains: mobility, object localization, object recognition, reading, social functioning, and technology. There were 74 items removed because of high missingness, poor factor loadings, low internal consistency, high local dependency, low item information, item redundancy, or differential item functioning. Using Rasch item calibrations, person ability scores could be calculated for each of the 6 unidimensional LV-SCOPE domains with good test-retest stability.

CONCLUSIONS

The LV-SCOPE Questionnaire provides a valid and reliable measure of vision-related functioning across 6 key domains relevant to individuals with severe PFL. Findings support the clinical utility of this psychometrically valid instrument.

Low vision devices for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a degenerative condition impacting central vision. Evaluating the effectiveness of low vision devices provides empirical evidence on how devices can rehabilitate and overcome deficits caused by AMD. This evidence could help to facilitate discussion on necessary future improvements to vision enhancement technology.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on low vision device use in AMD populations. Relevant peer-reviewed research articles from six databases were screened.

RESULTS

The findings of thirty-five studies revealed a significant positive impact of low vision devices leading to improvements in visual acuity, reading performance, facial recognition, and more. While the studies were found to have moderate risks of bias, a GRADE assessment of the evidence suggested the certainty of the evidence was low-moderate.

DISCUSSION

Simple hand-held low vision devices (e.g., magnifiers) appear to currently have greater preferential support than newer visual enhancement technology (e.g., head mounted devices). Financial, comfort or usability reasons may influence preferences more than performance-based findings. However, there is a lack of studies examining newer technologies in AMD populations, which future research should address. Moreover, given the presence of bias across the studies and limited controlled experiments, confidence in the results may be low.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies indicated that low vision devices have positive impacts on reading and visual performance. But, even though they are reported to be a valuable asset to AMD populations, more rigorous research is required to draw conclusive evidence. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLow vision devices can improve patient outcomes (e.g., vision, reading ability) for age-related macular degeneration populations.A multidisciplinary combination of low vision devices and rehabilitative services (i.e., eccentric viewing training, counselling, education) may enhance quality of life.

Improving access to vision rehabilitation care: implementation of the South East Ontario Vision Rehabilitation Service

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of the South East Ontario Vision Rehabilitation Service (SOVRS), a centrally administered, regionally delivered vision rehabilitation service, on access to vision rehabilitation care.

DESIGN

Pre-implementation (n = 1196) and post-implementation (n = 414) observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients referred for low-vision assessment at the hospital-based Kingston Health Sciences Centre Vision Rehabilitation Clinic and community-based Southeastern Vision Loss Rehabilitation Ontario clinics from 2014 to 2019.

METHODS

Markers for access to care (e.g., patient rurality, diversity of referral source, distance and time travelled, and wait times) were compared before and after SOVRS implementation.

RESULTS

After SOVRS implementation, there was a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the number of rural patients seen in the community. After SOVRS implementation, the hospital-based Vision Rehabilitation Clinic site experienced a significant increase in referrals from outside of Kingston (p < 0.001) and non-eye-care clinicians (p < 0.001), a significant reduction in patient time and distance travelled (p < 0.001), a 6% decrease in median wait time for low-vision assessments, and a significant reduction in wait time between referral and first available appointment (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

SOVRS, a novel service-delivery model for vision rehabilitation care, improved the delivery of and access to vision rehabilitation care in southeast Ontario through the integration of regional resources and services.

Multidisciplinary Approaches and Community-Based Interventions: Adaptable Strategies for Managing Sensory Impairments in Older Adults

Sensory impairments including hearing and vision loss are becoming increasingly prevalent among older adults worldwide, and are adversely affecting their quality of life, independence and cognitive health. This article focuses on the global rise of sensory impairments in the ageing population and evaluates the efficacy of multidisciplinary interventions for management and prevention, including assistive-technology-based medicine, exercise programs and cognitive strategies. Drawing from a wide range of studies, we emphasize the importance of developing globally adaptable, community-based solutions that not only address the direct challenges posed by sensory impairments but also their broader implications for cognitive decline. Additionally, we highlight the need for continuous international research to fine-tune these interventions, to ensure they are holistic and responsive to the diverse needs of older adults across different regions worldwide.

Approaching rehabilitation in patients with advanced glaucoma

Vision loss from advanced glaucoma is currently irreversible and impairs functional visual ability to effectively perform everyday tasks in a number of distinct functional domains. Vision rehabilitation strategies have been demonstrated to be effective in low vision populations and should be utilized in persons with advanced glaucoma to reduce disability and improve quality of life. Initial challenges to rehabilitation include an incomplete understanding of vision rehabilitation by the physician and patient, motivation to integrate rehabilitation into the plan of care, and availability of suitable providers to deliver this care. Physicians, working with well-trained vision rehabilitation providers can maximize function in important visual domains customized to the patient based on their needs, specific complaints, severity/pattern of visual damage, and comorbidities. Potential rehabilitative strategies to be considered for reading impairment include spectacle correction, visual assistive equipment, and sensory substitution, while potential strategies to facilitate driving in those deemed safe to do so include refractive correction, lens design, building confidence, restriction of driving to safer conditions, and avoiding situations where cognitive load is high. Mobility is frequently disrupted in advanced glaucoma, and can be addressed through careful distance refraction, behavior modification, home modification, mobility aids, walking assistance (i.e., sighted guide techniques), and smartphone/wearable technologies. Visual motor complaints are best addressed through optimization of lighting/contrast, sensory substitution, IADL training, and education. Special rehabilitative concerns may arise in children, where plans must be coordinated with schools, and working adults, where patients should be aware of their rights to accommodations to facilitate specific job tasks.

Compliance With the Use of Low-Vision Aids in a Greek Population: An Explorative Study

The aim of this study is to investigate the compliance with low-vision aids (LVAs) among patients with low vision (LV) in a Greek population. An explorative study was conducted in a sample of patients with LV attending our outpatient unit at the School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. Patients' demographics and daily visual demands were recorded, and they were administered with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) at baseline. Participants were trained in the use of a wide range of LVAs before their prescription. Evaluation of the use of the LVAs was conducted at one year after the baseline using a structured phone survey. A total of 100 LV patients were included, with 68% of them being older than 65 years and 50 being males. The main cause of LV (57.0%) was age-related macular degeneration, and the mean VFQ-25 score at baseline was 49.2 (SD= 17.8). Overall, 75 patients had been prescribed LVAs, with 76.0% of these patients preferring an optical aid. The vast majority (98.7%) of these patients stated using the LVA one year after the baseline, and 62.1% of them reported using the aid often to very often. Significantly, 76% of these patients reported that their quality of life was positively affected by the use of the aid, and 97.3% would recommend the use of LVA to another individual with the same problem. Providing appropriate training before the prescription is of high significance to improve the rate of compliance with the use of LVAs. These results can be used to develop appropriate strategies in this field.

Application of Rasch Analysis to Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Low Vision: A Validation Study

SIGNIFICANCE

This work validates Rasch analysis of a performance-based low vision outcome measure evaluated in patients' own homes to ensure real-world relevance. Inclusion of sources of variance from the patient's home environment in functional outcome measures introduced nonuniform variance in measurements but did not preclude estimation of valid measures.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to validate Rasch analysis of a performance-based outcome measure with real-world relevance.

METHODS

Low vision patients (N = 161) receiving services from an occupational therapist performed Timed Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (TIADL) tasks in their homes. Rasch analysis was applied to error count and performance time data. Internal validity was assessed with evaluations of the accuracy and precision of estimated measures. External validity was assessed by comparing TIADL measures with measures estimated from the Activity Inventory (i.e., from self-reported difficulty ratings).

RESULTS

Task measures were well targeted to person measures estimated from task performance time but were poorly targeted for measures estimated from task performance errors, for which most task trials (72%) were performed without error at baseline. Error-based person measures had larger standard errors with a smaller pseudo- R2 than time-based person or task measures and error-based task measures. Person measure infits for time- and error-based estimates conformed to expected values. The linear regressions between time-based person and task measures and corresponding error-based estimates had slopes of approximately 0.5, an observation consistent with larger estimation error variance for error-based measures than for time-based measures. Time-based TIADL person measures ( x ) and Activity Inventory person measures (estimated from all items, y ) were colinear but weakly correlated ( R = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional ability measures estimated from performance times of instrumental activity of daily living tasks in patients' homes demonstrate good internal and external validity. The ceiling effect from the infrequency of task performance errors in our data set limits use of TIADL error data to measure rehabilitation outcomes.

Telerehabilitation for people with low vision

BACKGROUND

Low vision affects over 300 million people worldwide and can compromise both activities of daily living and quality of life. Rehabilitative training and vision assistive equipment (VAE) may help, but some visually impaired people have limited resources to attend in-person visits to rehabilitation clinics to be trained to learn to use VAE. These people may be able to overcome barriers to care through access to remote, internet-based consultation (telerehabilitation).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of telerehabilitation with face-to-face (e.g. in-office or inpatient) vision rehabilitation services for improving vision-related quality of life and near reading ability in people with visual function loss due to any ocular condition. Secondary objectives were to evaluate compliance with scheduled rehabilitation sessions, abandonment rates for VAE devices, and patient satisfaction ratings.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2021, Issue 9); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any language restriction or study design filter in the electronic searches; however, we restricted the searches from 1980 onwards because the internet was not introduced to the public until 1982. We last searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, and PubMed on 14 September 2021, and the trial registries on 16 March 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) in which participants diagnosed with low vision had received vision rehabilitation services remotely from a human provider using internet, web-based technology compared with an approach involving in-person consultations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts retrieved by the searches of the electronic databases and then full-text articles for eligible studies. Two review authors independently abstracted data from the included studies. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one RCT/CCT that indirectly met our inclusion criteria, and two ongoing trials that met our inclusion criteria. The included trial had an overall high risk of bias. We did not conduct a quantitative analysis since multiple controlled trials were not identified.  The single included trial of 57 participants utilized a parallel-group design. It compared 30 hours of either personalized low vision training through telerehabilitation with a low vision therapist (the experimental group) with the self-training standard provided by eSight using the eSkills User Guide that was self-administered by the participants at home for one hour per day for 30 days (the comparison group). The trial investigators found a similar direction of effects for both groups for vision-related quality of life and satisfaction at two weeks, three months, and six months. A greater proportion of participants in the comparison group had abandoned or discontinued use of the eSight Eyewear at two weeks than those in the telerehabilitation group, but discontinuance rates were similar between groups at one month and three months. We rated the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes as very low due to high risk of bias in randomization processes and missing outcome data and imprecision.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The included trial found similar efficacy between telerehabilitation with a therapist and an active control intervention of self-guided training in mostly younger to middle-aged adults with low vision who received a new wearable electronic aid. Given the disease burden and the growing interest in telemedicine, the two ongoing studies, when completed, may provide further evidence of the potential for telerehabilitation as a platform for providing services to people with low vision.

What are the reasons for abandonment of low vision devices prescribed in a large tertiary eye care centre?

PURPOSE

To investigate abandonment rates of near-vision low vision devices (LVDs) and factors that influence abandonment among patients attending a tertiary low vision rehabilitation centre in South India.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty-six adults with low vision completed the modified device abandonment survey 1 year following device prescription. The survey included six questions: possession of device, timing of last use, reasons for abandonment, tasks for which the device was used, payment type and change in quality of life (QoL) from device use. The primary outcome measure was abandonment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors for abandonment.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twelve near-vision devices were prescribed (mean, 1.09 device per patient.) Stand magnifiers (35%) followed by hand-held magnifiers (24%) were most frequently prescribed. Mean logMAR visual acuity (Snellen) in the better-seeing eye was 0.80 (6/38). Of the prescribed near-vision devices, 22% (95% CI, 17 to 27) were abandoned. Patients who abandoned the device were significantly older than those who did not (49.3 ± 17.2 vs. 43.5 ± 18.1 years; p = 0.03). In multivariable analysis, patients reporting no change in their QoL from device use had higher odds of abandoning the device (OR: 63.97; 95% CI, 23.77 to 172.12). Device-related (31%) and psychological (30%) factors were the most frequent reasons for abandonment. Among device-related issues, the most frequent reason was that patients felt the device was too complex to use (50%) followed by being too cumbersome to use (25%).

CONCLUSION

The abandonment rate for near-vision LVDs in South India was comparable with that reported in high-income countries. Patients reporting no change in their QoL had a higher likelihood of abandoning the device compared with those who reported some change. Device-related and psychological factors were the most frequent reasons for abandonment. These results can be used to develop strategies to improve compliance with use of devices.

Visual and cognitive functioning among older adults with low vision before vision rehabilitation: A pilot study

Introduction

The occurrence of age-related vision changes is inevitable. However, some of these changes can become pathological. Research indicates that vision and hearing loss is correlated with age-related cognitive decline, and with a higher risk of developing dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Low vision rehabilitation could possibly be a protective factor against cognitive decline, as it provides the clients with compensatory strategies to overcome their visual deficits.

Objectives and hypothesis

The aim of this pilot study was to assess correlations between visual and cognitive functions in older adults referred for low vision rehabilitation. We hypothesized that more severe impairment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity would be correlated with more advanced levels of cognitive impairment. The second objective was to examine which of these correlations would remain significant once established variables that influence cognition are statistically removed (e.g., age, education).

Methods

Thirty-eight older adults (age range: 66-97 years old) with a visual impairment (acuity <20/70) were recruited before the onset of their low vision rehabilitation. They underwent vision (reading acuity, reading speed, contrast sensitivity), hearing (audiogram, speech-in-noise perception) and cognitive (global cognition, memory, executive functions) testing, and demographic information was obtained.

Results and discussion

Correlations among global cognition and visual aid use, memory and reading speed, memory and contrast sensitivity, memory, and visual aid use, and between executive functions and contrast sensitivity were significant. Correlations between contrast sensitivity and memory, as well as between global cognition and visual aid use remained significant after controlling for age and education. The present study is relevant to clinicians who are assessing the cognitive status of older adults, such as neuropsychologists, because it highlights the importance of considering low vision when administering neuropsychological tests, especially to persons who have not yet received rehabilitation for their visual impairment.

The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment and (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal.

METHODS

The trial recruited patients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and visual acuity in the range 0.4-1.0logMAR in the better-seeing eye. Participants were randomised to one of the study arms consisting of immediate intervention and delayed intervention. The intervention included: new refractive correction, optical reading aids, in-office training and advice about modifications at home. Visual ability, health-related quality of life and costs were measured. Economic analysis was performed to evaluate whether the intervention was cost-effective. The trial compared the outcomes 12 weeks after the start in both arms.

RESULTS

Of the 46 participants, 34 (74%) were diagnosed with DR, 25 (54%) were female, and mean age was 70.08 years (SD = 8.74). In the immediate intervention arm visual ability increased a mean of 0.523 logits (SE = 0.11) (p < 0.001). Changes in the delayed intervention arm were not statistically significant (p = 0.95). Acuity in the better-seeing eye, near acuity and critical print size also improved during the study. The mean cost of the intervention was €118.79 (SD = 24.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using the EQ-5D-5L was 30,421€/QALY and 1186€/QALY when using near acuity.

CONCLUSION

The current study gives evidence of positive clinical impact of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention and shows that a basic vision rehabilitation service is cost-effective. These findings are important to clinical and rehabilitation practices and for planning vision rehabilitation services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered, 21/01/2019. ISRCTN10894889, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10894889.

Evaluating validity and reliability of the Arabic-version low-vision quality-of-life questionnaire

Low-vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) has not been developed in the Arabic language, and none has been translated into Arabic. This study would demonstrate the effectiveness of the translated questionnaire. The English LVQOL was translated into Arabic (ARB-LVQOL) through five stages. A total of 52 low vision and 30 normally sighted individuals participated in this study. The internal consistency reliability, item-total correlation reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminative validity, and respondent burden of the ARB-LVQOL were calculated. The translation team recommended that the ARB-LVQOL replicated the meaning of the LVQOL. The cultural differences were also noted during the translation process. Cronbach’s coefficient was α = 0.90 in both low vision (LV) and simulated groups. The item-total correlation ranged from 0.50 to 0.70 in both groups. The intra-class correlation coefficient indicated good test–retest reliability (LV group, ranged 0.82–0.93; control group ranged 0.83–0.94). The factor analysis, using varimax rotation, of the ARB-VQOL identified seven factors. A moderate to a strong relationship between the score of each domain with the total index score was observed, indicating an adequate convergent validity. The ARB-LVQOL discriminated between normally sighted and simulated low-vision participants and also to some extent between the simulated and real low-vision individuals. The respondent burden was less than 15 min in most responses. The ARB-LVQOL was found to relate well with patients’ visual functions and some patients’ characteristics, providing further evidence of the validity of ARB-LVQOL. The ARB-LVQOL showed psychometric properties analogous to the English version. The ARB-LVQOL could be used in clinical settings and research in adults with low vision in Arabic populations.

Telerehabilitation Training to Facilitate Improved Reading Ability with New Magnification Devices for Low Vision

SIGNIFICANCE

This pilot study provides some insight about the potential benefits of telerehabilitation training to improve the reading ability of adults with low vision using magnifiers, to spur future work with larger groups. Telerehabilitation services can be implemented clinically to facilitate access to follow-up care for low vision.

PURPOSE

A recent Cochrane systematic review revealed that there are no published visual function outcomes for telerehabilitation with handheld magnification devices for low vision; thus, this study aimed to provide evidence for its preliminary efficacy.

METHODS

One to 4 months after receiving a new magnification device (i.e., handheld or stand optical magnifier or portable electronic magnifier), 14 adult low vision patients (with any visual acuity level or ocular diagnosis) received two training sessions at home via telerehabilitation with their vision rehabilitation provider located remotely in-office. Telerehabilitation included a loaner smartphone for Zoom videoconferencing with remote control access software. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test was administered during each of the telerehabilitation sessions to assess near reading (acuity and speed) with the new magnifier.

RESULTS

Mean reading acuity with the magnifier was 0.17 logMAR across subjects before training at telerehabilitation session 1, which significantly improved to 0.09 on average a few weeks later at telerehabilitation session 2 (95%confidence interval, -0.001 to -0.16; P = .047). Logarithm reading speed with the magnifier for the reading acuity level at session 1 improved significantly by 0.18 log words per minute on average for the same text size at session 2 (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.29; P = .002). With the magnifier at session 2, 71% of participants gained at least 0.1 log unit in reading acuity, and half improved by >0.01 in log reading speed; all participants with increased reading speed also improved in reading acuity ( P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data support that telerehabilitation can enhance reading ability and efficiency with newly prescribed magnifiers as an alternative option to in-office vision rehabilitation.

Increased quantity and diversity of patient referrals following the introduction of a novel vision rehabilitation model

Despite effective vision rehabilitation (VR) interventions, no gold standard model of care delivery has been established. The institution of the South East Ontario Vision Rehabilitation Service (SOVRS) introduced a centralized intake, an occupational therapist as a systems navigator, and improved communication pathways between low vision services in order to optimize regional VR care. The aim of this study is to compare the SOVRS model of VR to a traditional, hospital-based pre-SOVRS-implementation model using referral data.

A single-site (Vision Rehabilitation Clinic at Kingston Health Sciences Center), retrospective medical chart review was performed. Data were gathered from the electronic medical records of patients who received a low vision assessment at the pre-SOVRS-implementation clinic (2017) and the SOVRS clinics (2019).

A total of 245 charts were reviewed over the two study periods. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, or diagnoses causing vision loss between 2017 and 2019. One hundred nine incoming referrals were received in 2017, with 136 in 2019, representing a 25% increase in incoming referrals ( p < .001). The proportion of incoming referrals from non-ophthalmologists rose from 3.7% in 2017 to 31.9% in 2019 ( p < .001). The number of outgoing referrals also increased significantly, from 113 outgoing referrals in 2017 to 259 in 2019 ( p < .001), equivalent to a mean of 1.04 ± 0.68 (± standard deviation) outgoing referrals per incoming referral in 2017 and 1.90 ± 0.97 outgoing referrals per incoming referral in 2019. Outgoing service referrals also diversified significantly in 2019 ( p < .001), with more referrals to services such as VR health service organizations and community services.

The SOVRS model was able to increase both the quantity and diversity of incoming and outgoing referrals by adopting several key strategies during its development. By expanding referrals, SOVRS increased the services available to patients and enabled a larger population to receive VR care.

Scoping review of remote rehabilitation (telerehabilitation) services to support people with vision impairment

OBJECTIVE

Telerehabilitation for individuals with vision impairment aims to maintain maximum physical and/or psychological functioning through remote service delivery. This review aims to describe the type of telerehabilitation services available to people with vision impairment and summarise evidence on health-related outcomes, well-being and cost-effectiveness.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsychINFO, Embase, PubMed, HMIC and Ovid Emcare were searched, without date restrictions up to 24 May 2021. Charity and government websites, conference proceedings and clinical trial databases were also examined.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible studies evaluated benefits of telerehabilitation services for adults with vision impairment. Studies were excluded if they were not available in English, or focused on distance learning of visually impaired students.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. A risk of bias analysis was performed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures of benefit included performance-based assessment, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Of 4472 articles, 10 eligible studies were included. Outcomes addressed patient satisfaction (n=4;33.3%), quality-of-life, activities of daily living and well-being (n=4;33.3%), objective visual function (n=2;16.6%) and knowledge relating to ocular symptoms (n=1;8.3%). Two studies addressed multiple outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was addressed in one article (8.3%). Patients were generally satisfied with their experiences, which had a range of positive benefits on functional and quality-of-life outcomes in areas relating to daily activities (eg, reading, making phone calls). Telerehabilitation allowed patients to undertake vision optimisation training to prevent vision deterioration. Grey literature indicated that there are no completed clinical trials relating to low vision telerehabilitation. Charity services had implemented digital skills training to help beneficiaries communicate remotely.

CONCLUSION

While acceptability of telerehabilitation was mostly high, limited real-world data are available which raises questions around the long-term desirability of this approach. Further trials are needed to evaluate telerehabilitation using a robust set of outcome measures.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021254825.

Clinical performance of a smartphone-based low vision aid

Real-time digital image processing to optimally enhance low vision is now realizable with recent advances in personal computers. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a wearable smartphone-based low vision aid (LVA) with customizable vision enhancement in patients with visual impairment. We recruited 35 subjects with visual impairment and who were literate and cognitively capable. The subjects completed a training session and were provided a smartphone-based LVA for a 4-week use. Visual functions including binocular best-corrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities; reading performance (reading speed and accuracy); and facial recognition performance were measured at baseline and after 4-weeks use. All subjects also completed the Low Vision Quality of Life (LVQOL) Questionnaire. Thirty-four subjects (mean age, 43.82 ± 15.06 years) completed the study. Significant improvements in binocular best-corrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities were observed after smartphone-based LVA use (all p < 0.001). Reading accuracy and facial recognition performance also improved significantly (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively), but reading speed did not. LVQOL scores significantly improved after 4 weeks of use in subjects aged < 40 years (p = 0.024), but not in subjects aged ≥ 40 years (p = 0.653). Ocular and non-ocular adverse events were infrequent and resolved when the device was removed. The smartphone-based LVA with customizable vision enhancement could provide clinically significant improvements in the visual function of patients with visual impairment and was generally well tolerated. This study suggests that the smartphone-based LVA would be beneficial for visual rehabilitation.

Characteristics of individual low-vision rehabilitation counseling among older adults: A qualitative 2-year follow-up study

Visual impairments (VI) burden particularly the aging population globally. To ensure healthy aging despite disability, the health care systems must provide effective low-vision rehabilitation services (LVR) for those in need. Low-vision rehabilitation counseling (LVRC) requires specialized multidisciplinary teamwork and has not been studied in detail among the elderly. This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of individual LVRC actions and introduce a LVRC classification to use for attempts to improve the LVRC processes. This study employed a qualitative follow-up design. Data describing the individual LVRC processes in a prospective cohort of elderly patients with VI ( n = 39) were collected individually over 2 years during the years 2016–2019. The data were analyzed through deductive content analysis. The analyzed LVRC provided assistive devices, services, and home modifications, but problems related to independent movement in the living environment, psychosocial burdens, adaptation to disability, and learning new compensatory skills received less attention. To ensure effective LVRC, the multiprofessional team providing the rehabilitation should emphasize goal-setting and continuous assessment. LVRC should be seen as a process of adaptation, adherence, and learning. LVRC should support and promote older adults to participate and function to their full potential in the modern society, which includes utilizing digital technologies.

Low-vision rehabilitation in Italy: Cross-sectional data from the Device and Aids Registry (D.A.Re)

OBJECTIVES

We are reporting on the characteristics of low-vision adults attending large rehabilitation services which provide data to D.A.Re (Devices & Aids REgister) in Italy. D.A.Re aims to gather information about low-vision aids owned by Italian patients with visual impairment.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients attending low-vision rehabilitation centres providing data to D.A.Re from 2019 to July 2021. Demographic features, self-reported use of technology and aids, vision performance, and the Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) score were collected.

RESULTS

720 patients were included in the D.A.Re. About half of the patients were affected by Age-related Macular Degeneration (389, 54.9%). Patients reported a long interval between onset of vision disability and access to low-vision rehabilitation, which was over two years in almost 30% of cases. Blindness registration status was almost complete when reported, but almost 40% were unable to report on this. IADL scores were higher for younger people and those with better visual acuity and critical print size (CPS), and lower for visual field restriction (p < 0.01 for all predictors). Of interest, better IADL scores were recorded for those with computer knowledge who used optical aids and software in univariate analyses and multivariate analyses, adjusting for level of visual disability and employment status (p < 0.01 for all predictors).

CONCLUSIONS

We report on the profile of low-vision patients using rehabilitation services in Italy. Longitudinal data during and after vision rehabilitation were collected. Our results support the validity of the D.A.Re to monitor the use of low-vision devices in Italy.

Cognitive decline, sensory impairment, and the use of audio-visual aids by long-term care facility residents

BACKGROUND

Hearing and vision impairments and the use of audio-visual aids are associated with cognitive decline in community-dwelling older people, but effects in long-term care facilities (LFCF) are unclear. We hypothesize that visual and hearing impairment are associated with cognitive decline and these relationships are mediated by using visual and hearing aids.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis of a longitudinal study was conducted in the 7 government-subsidized LTCF operated by one of the largest non-governmental organizations in Hong Kong using data between 2005 and 2016. Eligible residents were ≥ 60 years of age without severe cognitive impairment at baseline who had stayed in the facilities for more than 3 years. All variables were measured by using the Minimum Data Set-Resident Assessment Instrument Version 2.0, Hong Kong version. The outcome was cognitive decline. Predictors were visual and hearing impairments. Mediators were the use of visual and hearing aids. General linear models were employed to test the hypotheses.

RESULTS

Results for 2,233 residents were analyzed, with a mean age of 82.1 ± 8.2 years and a mean follow-up period of 4.4 ± 0.8 years. Results showed that those who had visual impairment (p = 0.004) and hearing impairments (p = 0.022) had a higher risk of cognitive decline. Using hearing aids (coefficient = 0.0186, p < 0.05) positively mediates the effect of hearing impairment on cognitive decline. Using visual aids (coefficient = -0.0881, p < 0.05) negatively mediates the effects of visual impairment on cognitive decline.

CONCLUSION

In LTCF, hearing and visual impairments are associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline. Hearing aids often-users were associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline. LTCF residents with visual impairment did not use visual aids. Use of visual aids demonstrated potential effects in slowing cognitive decline. A future study with a larger and more diverse sample with attention to quality of devices is proposed to confirm its effects.

Anxiety levels moderate the association between visual acuity and health-related quality of life in chronic eye disease patients

The current study examines the potential moderating effect of depression and anxiety on the relationship between visual acuity and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic eye diseases. Of the 71 patients, 37 (52%) were female and 34 (48%) were male, age (mean ± SD) was 69 ± 12 years. A significant multivariate regression model was found for patients' health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index) (R² = 0.43, p < 0.001), in which visual acuity (logMAR) (p < 0.001), anxiety (HADS-A) (p = 0.007), and age of diagnosis (p = 0.04)  were independently associated with health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The moderation model for anxiety (R² = 0.47, F = 5.91, p < 0.001) revealed a significant interaction of visual acuity and levels of anxiety in relation to health-related quality of life. Conditional effects analysis suggested that higher logMAR values (which indicate more vision loss) were associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index (indicating worse health-related quality of life), this relationship being stronger (even more negative), when levels of anxiety are high. Clinical and rehabilitation services providing care for chronic eye disease patients should include regular checks for patients' levels of anxiety, even in patients who still have preserved visual acuity, to help preventing a synergistic source of long-term poor quality of life and disability.

Change in rehabilitation needs and activity limitations over time of adults with acquired visual impairment following entry to a low vision rehabilitation service in England

PURPOSE

Longitudinal changes in priority rehabilitation needs, vision-related activity limitation and importance of visual goals were evaluated in a sample of people with a visual impairment over a year following entry to low vision rehabilitation services in England.

METHODS

Participants were adults with newly registered visual impairment within Leicestershire. Priority scores, indicating the level of rehabilitative need, were determined from the importance and difficulty scores of the 48 goals of the Participation and Activity Inventory (PAI). Rasch analysis of the difficulty and importance scores examined activity limitation and importance separately. PAI outcome measures were assessed on entry to rehabilitation services and at 4 and 12 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Forty-eight participants (mean age 74.2, SD 14.1 years) completed three visits. Overall, there was a statistically significant reduction in the perceived need for rehabilitation over time (p < 0.001, η_p ²  = 0.29), driven by reduced perceived difficulty (p < 0.001, η_p ²  = 0.32) but stable importance (p = 0.73) of goals, with most change occurring between baseline and 4 months. PAI goals with greatest rehabilitative need at study entry were reading, mobility and writing, and these remained of highest priority over time. The greatest priority score decrease was for the goal 'Hobbies and crafts'. The largest decrease in importance was for 'Mobility outdoors', whereas 'Relationship with loved ones' increased most.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a decline in the perceived need for rehabilitation over the study period, there remains a need for continued support and intervention at 12 months following registration with rehabilitation services, particularly for the key goals of reading, writing and mobility. Early identification and support for individuals' important but difficult goals could prevent such goals being relinquished. Goals concerning relationships and communication became more important over time, indicating that re-evaluation of needs at follow-up is necessary to inform ongoing service provision.

Developing consensus-based referral criteria for low vision services in Australia

PURPOSE

To develop expert consensus on referral criteria for low vision services in Australia.

METHODS

In a modified online Delphi process, a panel of 38 Australian experts in low vision (including ophthalmologists, optometrists, orthoptists, occupational therapists, orientation and mobility professionals, researchers and managers) participated in three rounds of consensus building over a period of 5 months commencing in 2019. Initially, 90 statements were developed, addressing what should be included in best-practice low vision referral criteria, currently used criteria, timing of referral and responsibility for referral. By the third round, these had been reduced and refined to a total of four statements.

RESULTS

In three Delphi rounds, the expert panel produced three key recommendations for low vision referral: (1) that low vision referral should be based mainly on the impact of uncorrectable vision impairment on function and well-being; (2) clinical measures of visual acuity and visual field might be a secondary consideration and (3) it is important to fully inform a person about low vision services at an early stage of vision loss and to involve them in decision making about referral. There was consensus on the need for clear referral pathways and that both ophthalmologists and optometrists have primary responsibility to refer for low vision services.

CONCLUSIONS

Although recommendations and guidelines should not replace sound individual clinical judgement, promotion and adoption of these consensus recommendations could assist health care professionals in providing appropriate and timely referral for low vision services to the benefit of people with vision impairment.

Barriers to Low Vision Services Among Optometrists in Saudi Arabia

Introduction:

This study identifies the barriers and challenges to the provision of low vision services among practicing optometrists in Saudi Arabia.

Methods:

In this study, a self-administered online structured survey for practicing optometrists was used. Responses were collected to understand the number and percentage of low vision service providers, level of awareness, and barriers to the provision of low vision services.

Results:

This study included 154 (79 females and 75 males) practicing optometrists. They were from the five regions of Saudi Arabia (23 cities). The age of the practitioners ranged from 22 to 54 years. They had Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctor of Philosophy degrees. Forty-four participants (30%) provided low vision services. The major barriers reported were lack of training (87%), lack of awareness about low vision services (76%), lack of availability of low vision devices (70%), lack of motivation (65%), low vision services being time-consuming (55%), being busy in providing general optometry (65%), and lack of financial sources (31%).

Conclusion:

Building an efficient model for low vision rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia is needed. Moreover, encouraging more optometrists to be involved in low vision rehabilitation is necessary. There is also a need for more low vision education, national health coverage of patients with low vision, and better collaboration between low vision service providers.

A retrospective study of causes of visual impairment and use of low vision devices in the low vision clinic in Trinidad and Tobago

PURPOSE

To determine the causes of visual impairment and the use of low vision devices in patients attending the low vision clinic in Trinidad and Tobago.

METHODS

A retrospective study of the 222 patients attending the low vision clinic at the University of the West Indies, St Augustine Campus was conducted. The presenting visual acuity, causes of low vision and blindness, and prescribed low vision devices were recorded and analysed to determine the major causes of visual impairment and improvement in visual acuity with low vision aids.

RESULTS

Out of the total 222 participants, 66.66% (n = 148) had low vision while the rest (33.33%, n = 74) were legally blind. Glaucoma was the major cause of low vision (31.08%) and blindness (28.38%) followed by diabetic retinopathy (20.94%, low vision and 20.27%, blindness). A total of 193 low vision devices were prescribed, 79.79% (n = 154) near devices and 20.20% (n = 39) distance devices. The low vision devices were effective in improving both near visual acuity (120 participants reading 1M or 2M) and distance visual acuity (VA better than 3/60).

CONCLUSION

The major causes of vision impairment in Trinidad and Tobago were glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy and low vision devices are effective in improving visual acuity. A comprehensive approach to dealing with the causes of low vision and low vision services are required to mitigate the burden of visual impairment in the country.

Developing an Ophthalmology Clinical Decision Support System to Identify Patients for Low Vision Rehabilitation

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate an electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support system to identify patients meeting criteria for low vision rehabilitation (LVR) referral.

Methods

In this quality improvement project, we applied a user-centered design approach to develop an interactive electronic alert for LVR referral within the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute. We invited 15 ophthalmology physicians from 8 subspecialties to participate in the design and implementation, and to provide user experience feedback. The three project phases incorporated development evaluation, feedback analysis, and system refinement. We report on the final alert design, firing accuracy, and user experiences.

Results

The alert was designed as physician-centered and patient-specific. Alert firing relied on visual acuity and International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis (hemianopia/quadrantanopia) criteria. The alert suppression considerations included age < 5 years, recent surgeries, prior LVR visit, and related alert actions. False positive rate (firing when alert should have been suppressed or when firing criteria not met) was 0.2%. The overall false negative rate (alert not firing when visual acuity or encounter diagnosis criteria met) was 5.6%. Of the 13 physicians who completed the survey, 8 agreed that the alert is easy to use, and 12 would consider ongoing usage.

Conclusions

This EHR-based clinical decision support system shows reliable firing metrics in identifying patients with vision impairment and promising acceptance by ophthalmologist users to facilitate care and LVR referral.

Translational Relevance

The use of real-time data offers an opportunity to translate ophthalmic guidelines and best practices into systematic action for clinical care and research purposes across subspecialties.

Personalized Telerehabilitation for a Head-mounted Low Vision Aid: A Randomized Feasibility Study

SIGNIFICANCE

A recent trend in low vision rehabilitation has been the use of portable head-mounted displays to enhance residual vision. Our study confirms the feasibility of telerehabilitation and informs the development of evidence-based recommendations to improve telerehabilitation interventions to reduce device abandonment.

PURPOSE

To develop evidence-based recommendations for telerehabilitation, we conducted a feasibility study in preparation for a future randomized trial on the use of head-mounted displays.

METHODS

We recruited novice eSight Eyewear users, randomized 1:1: the experimental group received telerehabilitation by a low vision therapist using video conferencing; the control group completed at home self-training provided by the device manufacturer. The primary feasibility outcomes were whether the recruitment goal of 60 participants (30/group) was attainable within 1 year and how participants judged the accessibility and acceptability of the telerehabilitation. An exploratory outcome was the impact of telerehabilitation on eSight Eyewear use behavior.

RESULTS

Among 333 eSight users, 57 participants were enrolled, of which 35% withdrew from the study, whereas the remainder completed the 6-month follow-up. The withdrawal rate was higher in the control group but did not differ significantly from the experimental group. High accessibility (93% of participants accessed the platform) and global acceptability (100% overall satisfaction) were reported among those who completed the telerehabilitation protocol. The therapist had no difficulty judging the participants' reading performances qualitatively while participants used their device to read their eSkills and VisExc guides. Most participants improved their daily activities, based on qualitative reports of the attained goals. Seventy-nine percent of individuals declined to participate, whereas 16% of participants decided not to use eSight Eyewear anymore.

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrated the feasibility of a randomized controlled telerehabilitation study for people with low vision using a head-mounted display. Positive feedback from the participants and the therapist suggests the potential value of this modality for low vision services.

Everyday visual demands of people with low vision: A mixed methods real-life recording study

Research has demonstrated that low vison aids (LVAs) can have a positive impact on the functional sight of those living with sight loss. Step changes in technology are now enabling new wearable LVAs with greater potential than those available previously. For these novel devices to receive increased acceptance and therefore adoption by those with sight loss, visual task demands have to be understood more clearly in order to enable better alignment between device design and user requirements. The aim of this study was to quantify these requirements. Thirty-two participants aged 18 to 87 wore a spectacle-mounted video camera to capture and narrate all everyday situations in which they would use a “perfect” sight aid during 1 week. Captured scenes were analyzed through categorization and computational image analysis. Results showed large variation in activities and lifestyles. Participants reported no available sight aid or coping strategy for 57% of the recorded activities. Reading made up 49% of all recorded tasks, the other half comprising non-textual information. Overall, 75% of captured activities were performed ad hoc (duration of 0–5 minutes), 78% occurred indoors, 58% occurred at home, 48% were lit by natural light, 68% included the object of interest within reach, and 69% required a single focus plane only. Around half of captured objects of interest had a size of 2 degrees visual angle (2.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) or smaller. This study highlights the need for a sight aid that can make both textual and non-textual scenes accessible while offering flexibility to accommodate individual lifestyles.

Low vision rehabilitation in improving the quality of life for patients with impaired vision: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 52 randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND AIM

Low vision rehabilitation optimizes the use of residual vision after severe vision loss, but also teaches skills to improve visual functioning in daily life. These skills promote independence and active participation in society. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy of low vision rehabilitation in improving the quality of life (QoL) in visually impaired adults.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to January 1, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared rehabilitation interventions with active or inactive controls were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated to compare outcomes. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures of RevMan 5.2.

RESULTS

A total of 52 RCTs with 6,239 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to inactive comparators including waiting list or no care, low vision rehabilitation improved vision-related QoL, visual functioning (QoL: psychological aspect), and self-efficacy or self-esteem (QoL: psychological aspect), with pooled SMDs of -0.61 (95% CI -0.95 to -0.26; P = .0006), -1.14 (95% CI -1.69 to -0.59; P < .0001), and -0.84 (95% CI -1.47 to -0.22; P < .0001), respectively. Compared to active comparators, low vision rehabilitation improved vision-related QoL (SMD -0.26; 95% CI -0.46 to -0.06; P = .01) and activities of daily living (QoL: physical aspect) (SMD -0.39; 95% CI -0.67 to -0.12 P < .0001). However, no significant difference in health-related QoL and adaptation to vision loss (QoL: psychological aspect) was found between low vision rehabilitation and inactive comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that low vision rehabilitation interventions, particularly psychological therapies and methods of enhancing vision, may improve vision-related QoL and visual functioning in people with sight loss compared to usual care. Further studies should explore longer maintenance effects and the costs of several types of low vision rehabilitation. Studies characterizing the mechanisms of rehabilitation interventions in different settings, including low-income countries, are also required.

Arts activity and well-being for visually impaired military veterans: a narrative discussion of current knowledge

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to offer an overview of literature relating to the topic of arts as activity within the context of military and veteran health and to consider the implications of current knowledge on future research with visually impaired veterans.

STUDY DESIGN

A search for literature addressing the topic of visual art activities with visually impaired veterans was undertaken. No research addressing this topic was identified. A review of literature on the related topics of mental health and well-being in military veterans, visual impairment and mental health and well-being, and art therapy for veteran populations was carried out to offer an overview of current knowledge.

RESULTS

While there is growing evidence of the benefits of arts engagement among both general and military populations, the role of the visual arts in the everyday lives of broader veteran samples, and the impact of these activities on holistic well-being, remains underexplored. The current article highlights the need for art as activity to be differentiated from art as therapy and argues that the former might offer a tool to positively impact the holistic well-being of visually impaired veterans.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research relating to the use of visual art activities in the context of veteran health and well-being should endeavour to explore the potential impacts of engagement on holistic well-being. Research is needed to build on anecdotal evidence of the positive impact of arts engagement on visually impaired veterans by systematically exploring if, and how, holistic well-being in this population may be impacted by engagement with visual art activities.

Measurement properties of reading tests in subjects with maculopathy

PURPOSE

A reliable reading test provides a standardized measure of the visual component of reading performance. This study evaluated reproducibility, agreement and feasibility of five Dutch language continuous text reading tests used in clinical practice and research in visually impaired participants.

METHODS

In 42 participants with macular pathologies (mean age 77 years), the Colenbrander Reading Card (Colenbrander), International Reading Speed Texts (IReST), Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology (LEO) charts, 'de Nederlanders' (NED) and the Radner Reading Charts (Radner) were evaluated. The coefficient of repeatability was calculated for different reading parameters, and agreement between the reading tests was determined.

RESULTS

Between the reading tests, the differences found in repeatability for reading performance were mainly within the limit of one line (0.1 logMAR). Exceptions were the inter-session repeatability for critical print size: Colenbrander (0.35 logMAR), LEO (0.34), Radner (0.23). The highest agreement was found between the LEO and Radner; Reading acuity bias 0.03 logMAR (SD 0.10), CPS 0.03 (0.12).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that reading performance results obtained with reading tests are not always reliable and reading parameters could not always be properly assessed in participants with maculopathies. Therefore, choices regarding which reading test to use especially for research purposes should be based on both the feasibility and reliability of the reading test. The NED (a historical test) was the least feasible, and it is recommend that this test is no longer used. To allow standardized and comparable analysis of reading performance a highly standardized reading test, like the Radner is recommended.

The Michigan Vision-Related Anxiety Questionnaire: A Psychosocial Outcomes Measure for Inherited Retinal Degenerations

OBJECTIVE

We sought to construct and validate a patient-reported outcome measure for screening and monitoring vision-related anxiety in patients with inherited retinal degenerations.

DESIGN

Item-response theory and graded response modeling to quantitatively validate questionnaire items generated from qualitative interviews and patient feedback.

METHODS

Patients at the Kellogg Eye Center (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) with a clinical diagnosis of an inherited retinal degeneration (n = 128) participated in an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 166 items, 26 of which pertained to concepts of "worry" and "anxiety." The subset of vision-related anxiety questions was analyzed by a graded response model using the Cai Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm in the R software mirt package. Item reduction was performed based on item fit, item information, and item discriminability. To assess test-retest variability, 25 participants completed the questionnaire a second time 4 to 16 days later.

RESULTS

The final questionnaire consisted of 14 items divided into 2 unidimensional domains: rod function anxiety and cone function anxiety. The questionnaire exhibited convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire for symptoms of depression and anxiety. This vision-related anxiety questionnaire has high marginal reliability (0.81 for rod-function anxiety, 0.83 for cone-function anxiety) and exhibits minimal test-retest variability (ρ = 0.81 [0.64-0.91] for rod-function anxiety and ρ = 0.83 [0.68-0.92] for cone-function anxiety).

CONCLUSIONS

The Michigan Vision-Related Anxiety Questionnaire is a psychometrically validated 14-item patient-reported outcome measure to be used as a psychosocial screening and monitoring tool for patients with inherited retinal degenerations. It can be used in therapeutic clinical trials for measuring the benefit of an investigational therapy on a patient's vision-related anxiety.

Topical Review: Assessment of Binocular Sensory Processes in Low Vision

SIGNIFICANCE

This article summarizes the evidence for a higher prevalence of binocular vision dysfunctions in individuals with vision impairment. Assessment for and identification of binocular vision dysfunctions can detect individuals experiencing difficulties in activities including reading, object placement tasks, and mobility.Comprehensive vision assessment in low vision populations is necessary to identify the extent of remaining vision and to enable directed rehabilitation efforts. In patients with vision impairment, little attention is typically paid to assessments of binocular vision, including ocular vergence, stereopsis, and binocular summation characteristics. In addition, binocular measurements of threshold automated visual fields are not routinely performed in clinical practice, leading to an incomplete understanding of individuals' binocular visual field and may affect rehabilitation outcomes.First, this review summarizes the prevalence of dysfunctions in ocular vergence, stereopsis, and binocular summation characteristics across a variety of ocular pathologies causing vision impairment. Second, this review examines the links between clinical measurements of binocular visual functions and outcome measures including quality of life and performance in functional tasks. There is an increased prevalence of dysfunctions in ocular alignment, stereopsis, and binocular summation across low vision cohorts compared with those with normal vision. The identification of binocular vision dysfunctions during routine low vision assessments is especially important in patients experiencing difficulties in activities of daily living, including but not limited to reading, object placement tasks, and mobility. However, further research is required to determine whether addressing the identified deficits in binocular vision in low vision rehabilitative efforts directly impacts patient outcomes.

Effect of Reading Rehabilitation for Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Cognitive Functioning: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Pre-Post Intervention Study

BACKGROUND

Age-related vision impairments and dementia both become more prevalent with increasing age. Research into the mechanisms of these conditions has proposed that some of their causes (eg, macular degeneration/glaucoma and Alzheimer's disease) could be symptoms of an underlying common cause. Research into sensory-cognitive aging has provided data that sensory decline may be linked to the progression of dementia through reduced sensory stimulation. While hearing loss rehabilitation may have a beneficial effect on cognitive functioning, there are no data available on whether low vision rehabilitation, specifically for reading, could have a beneficial effect on cognitive health.

OBJECTIVE

The research questions are: (1) Does low vision rehabilitation reduce reading effort? (2) If so, does reduced reading effort increase reading activity, and (3) If so, does increased reading activity improve cognitive functioning? The primary objective is to evaluate cognition before, as well as at 6 months and 12 months after, 3 weeks of low vision reading rehabilitation using magnification in individuals with age-related macular degeneration, with or without coexisting hearing impairments. We hypothesize that improvements postrehab will be observed at 6 months and maintained at 12 months for participants with vision loss and less so for those with dual sensory loss. The secondary objective is to correlate participant characteristics with all cognitive outcomes to identify which may play an important role in reading rehabilitation.

METHODS

We employ a quasiexperimental approach (nonrandomized, pre-post intervention study). A 3x3 design (3 groups x 3 time points) allows us to examine whether cognitive performance will change before and after 6 months and 12 months of a low vision reading intervention, when comparing 75 low vision and 75 dual sensory impaired (vision & hearing) participants to 75 age-matched healthy controls. The study includes outcome measures of vision (eg, reading acuity and speed), cognition (eg, short-term and long-term memory, processing speed), participant descriptors, demographics, and clinical data (eg, speech perception in noise, mental health).

RESULTS

The study has received approval, and recruitment began on April 24, 2019. As of March 4, 2021, 38 low vision and 7 control participants have been enrolled. Lockdown forced a pause in recruitment, which will recommence once the COVID-19 crisis has reached a point where face-to-face data collection with older adults becomes feasible again.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of protective effects caused by reading rehabilitation will have a considerable impact on the vision rehabilitation community and their clients as well as all professionals involved in the care of older adults with or without dementia. If we demonstrate that reading rehabilitation has a beneficial effect on cognition, the demand for rehabilitation services will increase, potentially preventing cognitive decline across groups of older adults at risk of developing macular degeneration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04276610; Unique Protocol ID: CRIR-1284-1217; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04276610.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/19931.

Vision-related quality of life in adults with severe peripheral vision loss: a qualitative interview study

Background

Existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures may not be relevant to the full range of functional and vision-related quality of life (VR-QOL) concerns of individuals with vision impairment due to severe peripheral field loss (PFL). Measurement of VR-QOL in severe PFL is important in order to determine the effectiveness of vision rehabilitation interventions for this population. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of severe PFL due to retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and glaucoma on VR-QOL as the initial phase in the development of a novel PRO measure.

Methods

Individuals with severe PFL due to RP or glaucoma were recruited from the Kellogg Eye Center and the Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Participants completed semi-structured qualitative interviews, the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Interviews were analyzed by two coders using thematic analysis. A matrix analysis was conducted to compare VR-QOL by cause of severe PFL. Sample size was determined by thematic saturation.

Results

The study included 37 participants (19 RP, 18 glaucoma). Median best-corrected visual acuity for those with RP and glaucoma was 20/40 and 20/27.5, while Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity was 1.2 log contrast sensitivity (logCS) and 1.1 logCS, respectively. Median domain scores on the IVI (reading, mobility, well-being) ranged from a low of − 0.2 to a high of 0.7 logits in those with RP and from 0.5 to 1.2 logits in those with glaucoma. Qualitative interviews identified six VR-QOL themes relevant across participants with both RP and glaucoma, including activity limitations, driving, emotional well-being, reading, mobility, and social function. VR-QOL concerns were largely consistent among those with severe PFL due to RP and glaucoma. These overarching themes contained content relevant to specific challenges related to severe PFL.

Conclusions

There are commonly occurring VR-QOL concerns among individuals with severe PFL due to RP and glaucoma. The outlined themes will serve as the basis for development of the Low Vision Severely Constricted Peripheral Eyesight (LV-SCOPE) Questionnaire.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-020-00281-y.

Essential components of rehabilitation services provided to visually impaired people

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study was conducted to determine the essential components in the delivery of vision rehabilitation services. The findings could be useful in the planning of vision rehabilitation services by optometrists or health managers.

BACKGROUND

Appropriate models of delivering vision rehabilitation services are a challenge for service providers worldwide. Studies have not revealed the key characteristics of a suitable model for delivering vision rehabilitation services. This study investigated the viewpoints of the key informants for identifying the most important components of a suitable model for delivering vision rehabilitation services.

METHODS

Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 19 participants including managers and service providers in Iran. All the interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. An inductive framework analysis approach was used to analyse the data. Qualitative analysis was done using the MAXQDA 10 software.

RESULTS

Four main themes emerged from the data, including creating maximum access (three subcategories: screening for visual impairment, creating a stepped-model for service delivery, and public and professional awareness of vision rehabilitation services), early intervention (two sub-categories: timely identification of people at the onset of disability and starting off with counselling services), need for financial support (two subcategories: providing affordable visual aid equipment and insurance coverage), and informed and skilled personnel (two subcategories: training vision rehabilitation specialists and familiarity of the rehabilitation staff with the rehabilitation program).

CONCLUSION

This study identified the key features of an appropriate model for providing vision rehabilitation services to blind and visually impaired people from the viewpoints of key informants who were experienced in providing vision rehabilitation services. The findings have valuable implications for policy-making and planning for vision rehabilitation services by the health system.

Responsiveness of the Revised Low Vision Independence Measure (LVIM-R)

IMPORTANCE

The Low Vision Independence Measure (LVIM) was designed to measure the effectiveness of occupational therapy to improve visual ability in low vision rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Revised LVIM (LVIM-R) as an outcome measure by determining its sensitivity to visual ability changes after occupational therapy.

DESIGN

In this observational study, LVIM-R scores were collected before and after customary low vision intervention.

SETTING

Home health agency or outpatient facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-four participants with a mean age of 80.2 yr (standard deviation = 11.2) and an average length of visual impairment of 6.2 yr. Twenty-three participants (52.3%) were treated in an outpatient setting, and 21 (47.7%) were treated in the home. The majority of participants were non-Hispanic White (92.8%) and had macular degeneration (54.5%).

INTERVENTION

Customary low vision intervention by occupational therapists.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

LVIM-R scores were collected before and after intervention, and participants' pre- and posttest scores were anchored into Rasch-calibrated item parameters.

RESULTS

Paired t tests demonstrated significant increases in person measures with large effect sizes for both constructs of the LVIM-R, the visual field or scotoma (t[43] = 6.46, p < .0001; Cohen's d = 0.92) and visual acuity (t[43] = 9.08, p < .0001; Cohen's d = 1.14) constructs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The LVIM-R is sensitive to changes in visual ability in clients who have good rehabilitation potential and can be used to examine the effectiveness of occupational therapy for low vision.

WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS

The LVIM-R is useful for measuring occupational therapy outcomes in low vision rehabilitation in the home or in outpatient settings.

Effects of Task on Reading Performance Estimates

Reading is a primary problem for low vision patients and a common functional endpoint for eye disease. However, there is limited agreement on reading assessment methods for clinical outcomes. Many clinical reading tests lack standardized materials for repeated testing and cannot be self-administered, which limit their use for vision rehabilitation monitoring and remote assessment. We compared three different reading assessment methods to address these limitations. Normally sighted participants (N = 12) completed MNREAD, and two forced-choice reading tests at multiple font sizes in counterbalanced order. In a word identification task, participants indicated whether 5-letter pentagrams, syntactically matched to English, were words or non-words. In a true/false reading task, participants indicated whether four-word sentences presented in RSVP were logically true or false. The reading speed vs. print size data from each experiment were fit by an exponential function with parameters for reading acuity, critical print size and maximum reading speed. In all cases, reading speed increased quickly as an exponential function of text size. Reading speed and critical print size significantly differed across tasks, but not reading acuity. Reading speeds were faster for word/non-word and true/false reading tasks, consistent with the elimination of eye movement load in RSVP but required larger text sizes to achieve those faster reading speeds. These different reading tasks quantify distinct aspects of reading behavior and the preferred assessment method may depend on the goal of intervention. Reading performance is an important clinical endpoint and a key quality of life indicator, however, differences across methods complicate direct comparisons across studies.