1
|
Bourne CM, Taabazuing CY. Harnessing Pyroptosis for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cells 2024; 13:346. [PMID: 38391959 PMCID: PMC10886719 DOI: 10.3390/cells13040346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy is a novel pillar of cancer treatment that harnesses the immune system to fight tumors and generally results in robust antitumor immunity. Although immunotherapy has achieved remarkable clinical success for some patients, many patients do not respond, underscoring the need to develop new strategies to promote antitumor immunity. Pyroptosis is an immunostimulatory type of regulated cell death that activates the innate immune system. A hallmark of pyroptosis is the release of intracellular contents such as cytokines, alarmins, and chemokines that can stimulate adaptive immune activation. Recent studies suggest that pyroptosis promotes antitumor immunity. Here, we review the mechanisms by which pyroptosis can be induced and highlight new strategies to induce pyroptosis in cancer cells for antitumor defense. We discuss how pyroptosis modulates the tumor microenvironment to stimulate adaptive immunity and promote antitumor immunity. We also suggest research areas to focus on for continued development of pyroptosis as an anticancer treatment. Pyroptosis-based anticancer therapies offer a promising new avenue for treating immunologically 'cold' tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cornelius Y. Taabazuing
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abele TJ, Billman ZP, Li L, Harvest CK, Bryan AK, Magalski GR, Lopez JP, Larson HN, Yin XM, Miao EA. Apoptotic signaling clears engineered Salmonella in an organ-specific manner. eLife 2023; 12:RP89210. [PMID: 38055781 PMCID: PMC10699806 DOI: 10.7554/elife.89210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Pyroptosis and apoptosis are two forms of regulated cell death that can defend against intracellular infection. When a cell fails to complete pyroptosis, backup pathways will initiate apoptosis. Here, we investigated the utility of apoptosis compared to pyroptosis in defense against an intracellular bacterial infection. We previously engineered Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to persistently express flagellin, and thereby activate NLRC4 during systemic infection in mice. The resulting pyroptosis clears this flagellin-engineered strain. We now show that infection of caspase-1 or gasdermin D deficient macrophages by this flagellin-engineered S. Typhimurium induces apoptosis in vitro. Additionally, we engineered S. Typhimurium to translocate the pro-apoptotic BH3 domain of BID, which also triggers apoptosis in macrophages in vitro. During mouse infection, the apoptotic pathway successfully cleared these engineered S. Typhimurium from the intestinal niche but failed to clear the bacteria from the myeloid niche in the spleen or lymph nodes. In contrast, the pyroptotic pathway was beneficial in defense of both niches. To clear an infection, cells may have specific tasks that they must complete before they die; different modes of cell death could initiate these 'bucket lists' in either convergent or divergent ways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor J Abele
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
| | - Zachary P Billman
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUnited States
| | - Lupeng Li
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
| | - Carissa K Harvest
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUnited States
| | - Alexia K Bryan
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of EngineeringDurhamUnited States
| | - Gabrielle R Magalski
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUnited States
| | - Joseph P Lopez
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUnited States
| | - Heather N Larson
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
| | - Xiao-Ming Yin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of MedicineNew OrleansUnited States
| | - Edward A Miao
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kulkarni M, Hardwick JM. Programmed Cell Death in Unicellular Versus Multicellular Organisms. Annu Rev Genet 2023; 57:435-459. [PMID: 37722687 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-033123-095833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Programmed cell death (self-induced) is intrinsic to all cellular life forms, including unicellular organisms. However, cell death research has focused on animal models to understand cancer, degenerative disorders, and developmental processes. Recently delineated suicidal death mechanisms in bacteria and fungi have revealed ancient origins of animal cell death that are intertwined with immune mechanisms, allaying earlier doubts that self-inflicted cell death pathways exist in microorganisms. Approximately 20 mammalian death pathways have been partially characterized over the last 35 years. By contrast, more than 100 death mechanisms have been identified in bacteria and a few fungi in recent years. However, cell death is nearly unstudied in most human pathogenic microbes that cause major public health burdens. Here, we consider how the current understanding of programmed cell death arose through animal studies and how recently uncovered microbial cell death mechanisms in fungi and bacteria resemble and differ from mechanisms of mammalian cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhura Kulkarni
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; ,
| | - J Marie Hardwick
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; ,
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li L, Dickinson MS, Coers J, Miao EA. Pyroptosis in defense against intracellular bacteria. Semin Immunol 2023; 69:101805. [PMID: 37429234 PMCID: PMC10530505 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2023.101805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Pathogenic microbes invade the human body and trigger a host immune response to defend against the infection. In response, host-adapted pathogens employ numerous virulence strategies to overcome host defense mechanisms. As a result, the interaction between the host and pathogen is a dynamic process that shapes the evolution of the host's immune response. Among the immune responses against intracellular bacteria, pyroptosis, a lytic form of cell death, is a crucial mechanism that eliminates replicative niches for intracellular pathogens and modulates the immune system by releasing danger signals. This review focuses on the role of pyroptosis in combating intracellular bacterial infection. We examine the cell type specific roles of pyroptosis in neutrophils and intestinal epithelial cells. We discuss the regulatory mechanisms of pyroptosis, including its modulation by autophagy and interferon-inducible GTPases. Furthermore, we highlight that while host-adapted pathogens can often subvert pyroptosis, environmental microbes are effectively eliminated by pyroptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lupeng Li
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mary S Dickinson
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jörn Coers
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Miao
- Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huston HC, Anderson MJ, Fink SL. Pyroptosis and the cellular consequences of gasdermin pores. Semin Immunol 2023; 69:101803. [PMID: 37437353 PMCID: PMC10530493 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2023.101803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
The family of gasdermin proteins plays a key role in the host response against external and internal pathogenic signals by mediating the form of inflammatory regulated cell death known as pyroptosis. One of the most well-studied gasdermins within innate immunity is gasdermin D, which is cleaved, oligomerizes, and forms plasma membrane pores. Gasdermin D pores lead to a number of downstream cellular consequences including plasma membrane rupture, or cell lysis. In this review, we describe mechanisms of activation for each of the gasdermins, their cell type specificity and some disease associations. We then discuss downstream consequences of gasdermin pore formation, including cellular mechanisms of membrane repair. Finally, we present some important next steps to better understand pyroptosis and the cellular consequences of gasdermin pore formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna C Huston
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Marisa J Anderson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Susan L Fink
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abele TJ, Billman ZP, Li L, Harvest CK, Bryan AK, Magalski GR, Lopez JP, Larson HN, Yin XM, Miao EA. Apoptotic signaling clears engineered Salmonella in an organ-specific manner. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.06.539681. [PMID: 37205464 PMCID: PMC10187329 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.06.539681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Pyroptosis and apoptosis are two forms of regulated cell death that can defend against intracellular infection. Although pyroptosis and apoptosis have distinct signaling pathways, when a cell fails to complete pyroptosis, backup pathways will initiate apoptosis. Here, we investigated the utility of apoptosis compared to pyroptosis in defense against an intracellular bacterial infection. We previously engineered Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to persistently express flagellin, and thereby activate NLRC4 during systemic infection in mice. The resulting pyroptosis clears this flagellin-engineered strain. We now show that infection of caspase-1 or gasdermin D deficient macrophages by this flagellin-engineered S. Typhimurium induces apoptosis in vitro. Additionally, we also now engineer S. Typhimurium to translocate the pro-apoptotic BH3 domain of BID, which also triggers apoptosis in macrophages in vitro. In both engineered strains, apoptosis occurred somewhat slower than pyroptosis. During mouse infection, the apoptotic pathway successfully cleared these engineered S. Typhimurium from the intestinal niche, but failed to clear the bacteria in the myeloid niche in the spleen or lymph nodes. In contrast, the pyroptotic pathway was beneficial in defense of both niches. In order to clear an infection, distinct cell types may have specific tasks that they must complete before they die. In some cells, either apoptotic or pyroptotic signaling may initiate the same tasks, whereas in other cell types these modes of cell death may lead to different tasks that may not be identical in defense against infection. We recently suggested that such diverse tasks can be considered as different cellular 'bucket lists' to be accomplished before a cell dies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang LJ, Zhan ST, Pan YQ, Bao W, Yang Y. The role of Vps4 in cancer development. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1203359. [PMID: 37404768 PMCID: PMC10315677 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1203359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
VPS4 series proteins play a crucial role in the endosomal sorting complexes required for the transport (ESCRT) pathway, which is responsible for sorting and trafficking cellular proteins and is involved in various cellular processes, including cytokinesis, membrane repair, and viral budding. VPS4 proteins are ATPases that mediate the final steps of membrane fission and protein sorting as part of the ESCRT machinery. They disassemble ESCRT-III filaments, which are vital for forming multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and the release of intraluminal vesicles (ILVs), ultimately leading to the sorting and degradation of various cellular proteins, including those involved in cancer development and progression. Recent studies have shown a potential relationship between VPS4 series proteins and cancer. Evidence suggests that these proteins may have crucial roles in cancer development and progression. Several experiments have explored the association between VPS4 and different types of cancer, including gastrointestinal and reproductive system tumors, providing insight into the underlying mechanisms. Understanding the structure and function of VPS4 series proteins is critical in assessing their potential role in cancer. The evidence supporting the involvement of VPS4 series proteins in cancer provides a promising avenue for future research and therapeutic development. However, further researches are necessary to fully understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between VPS4 series proteins and cancer and to develop effective strategies for targeting these proteins in cancer therapy. This article aims to review the structures and functions of VPS4 series proteins and the previous experiments to analyze the relationship between VPS4 series proteins and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Juan Huang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Hongkou, Shanghai, China
| | - Shi Tong Zhan
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Hongkou, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Qin Pan
- Surgical Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Hongkou, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Bao
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Hongkou, Shanghai, China
| | - Ye Yang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Hongkou, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|