Linear diffusion of thrombin and factor Xa along the heparin molecule explains the effects of extended heparin chain lengths

Not Just Anticoagulation—New and Old Applications of Heparin

In recent decades, heparin, as the most important anticoagulant drug, has been widely used in clinical settings to prevent and treat thrombosis in a variety of diseases. However, with in-depth research, the therapeutic potential of heparin is being explored beyond anticoagulation. To date, heparin and its derivatives have been tested in the protection against and repair of inflammatory, antitumor, and cardiovascular diseases. It has also been explored as an antiangiogenic, preventive, and antiviral agent for atherosclerosis. This review focused on the new and old applications of heparin and discussed the potential mechanisms explaining the biological diversity of heparin.

Heparin - Messias or Verschlimmbesserung?

A heightened risk of thrombosis noted early on with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection led to the widespread use of heparin anticoagulation in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, reports soon started appearing in the literature where an apparent failure of heparin to prevent thrombotic events was observed in hospitalized patients with this viral infection. In this review, we explore the likely mechanisms for heparin failure with particular relevance to COVID-19. We also explore the role of anti-Xa assays and global hemostatic tests in this context. The current controversy of dosing heparin in this disease is detailed with some possible mechanistic reasons for anticoagulant failure. We hope that lessons learnt from the use of heparin in COVID-19 could assist us in the appropriate use of this anticoagulant in the future.

The Anticoagulant and Nonanticoagulant Properties of Heparin

Heparins represent one of the most frequently used pharmacotherapeutics. Discovered around 1926, routine clinical anticoagulant use of heparin was initiated only after the publication of several seminal papers in the early 1970s by the group of Kakkar. It was shown that heparin prevents venous thromboembolism and mortality from pulmonary embolism in patients after surgery. With the subsequent development of low-molecular-weight heparins and synthetic heparin derivatives, a family of related drugs was created that continues to prove its clinical value in thromboprophylaxis and in prevention of clotting in extracorporeal devices. Fundamental and applied research has revealed a complex pharmacodynamic profile of heparins that goes beyond its anticoagulant use. Recognition of the complex multifaceted beneficial effects of heparin underscores its therapeutic potential in various clinical situations. In this review we focus on the anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant activities of heparin and, where possible, discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms that explain the diversity of heparin's biological actions.

Heparins: A Shift of Paradigm

Heparins inhibit the thrombin forming capacity of plasma, i. e., the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), by their anti-thrombin (aIIa) activity, the anti-factor Xa (aXa) activity is of minimal importance. This holds for both unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at aXa/aIIa ratios < 25. Clinical experience and epidemiological evidence show a direct relationship between the ETP and the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Consequently, the therapeutic potency of a heparin is determined by its aIIa activity, i.e., the concentration of a domain in which 12 sugar flank the high affinity antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide (HA5) at one side. The response of individual plasmas to a fixed dose of any heparin is highly variable. This suggests that individualization of heparin dosage, on basis of the ETP, might reduce bleeding or re-thrombosis. There exist simple laboratory methods for both the ETP and the concentration of the active domain. These methods can be used both for unequivocally characterization of a heparin preparation and for controlling heparin therapy and allow arbitrary units relative to a standard to be abandoned. These tests are as robust as any hematological routine test but not yet routinely available, which severely encumbers progress in the field.

A review of the two major regulatory pathways for non-proprietary low-molecular-weight heparins

With the expiry or pending expiry of originator low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) patents, pharmaceutical companies have invested in developing non-proprietary versions of LMWHs. LMWHs are manufactured by depolymerising highly purified unfractionated heparin. In contrast to traditional synthetic drugs with well-defined chemical structures, LMWHs contain complex oligosaccharide mixtures and the different manufacturing processes for LMWHs add to the heterogeneity in their physicochemical properties such that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) consider existing originator LMWHs to be distinct medicinal entities that are not clinically interchangeable. The FDA views LMWHs as drugs and has approved two non-proprietary (generic) LMWHs, using the Abbreviated New Drug Application pathway. In contrast, the World Health Organization and the EMA view LMWHs as biological medicines. Therefore, the EMA and also the Scientific and Standardization Subcommittee on Anticoagulation of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the South Asian Society of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis have all published specific guidelines for assessing non-proprietary (biosimilar) LMWHs. This manuscript reviews why there are two distinct pathways for approving non-proprietary LMWHs. Available literature on non-proprietary LMWHs approved in some jurisdictions is also reviewed in order to assess whether they satisfy the requirements for LMWHs in the three guidance documents. The review also highlights some of the significant difficulties the two pathways pose for manufacturers and an urgent need to develop a consensus governing the manufacture and regulation of non-proprietary LMWHs to make them more widely available.

Adaptive release of heparin from anticoagulant hydrogels triggered by different blood coagulation factors

Feedback-controlled anticoagulant hydrogels were formed by crosslinking the anticoagulant heparin with star-shaped poly(ethylene glycol) using peptide linkers, which are selectively cleaved by different activated blood coagulation factors acting as proteolytic enzymes. Various cleavable peptide units, differing either in their thrombin turnover rates or in their responsiveness to factors activated earlier in the course of blood coagulation, were used for the formation of the biohybrid materials. Release triggered by the early coagulation factors Xa (FXa) or FXIIa/kallikrein was shown to enhance the efficiency of the released anticoagulant. Furthermore, FXa-cleavable gels enabled a faster release of heparin, which was attributed to the lower affinity of the factor for heparin. Combining early and fast responses, FXa-cleavable gels were shown to provide anticoagulant protection of biomaterial surfaces at low levels of released heparin in human whole-blood incubation experiments. The results demonstrate the potential for employing biomolecular circuits in the design of functional biomaterials to tailor the adaptive delivery of bioactive molecules.

A century of heparin: past, present and future

Heparin was discovered around 1922 by Howell (Baltimore) and was further developed by the teams of Best (Toronto) and Jorpes (Stockholm). Kakkar (London) propagated its routine use for the prevention of postoperative thrombosis from 1971 onwards. The discovery of low molecular weight heparins (1976, Johnson, London) and their development in the subsequent years led to the present arsenal of clinically useful drugs. In 1976, three teams independently found that a specific structure in heparin binds tightly to antithrombin. This enabled the teams of Lindahl (Stockholm) and Casu (Milan) to determine the pentasaccharide structure responsible for this binding and Petitou, from the Choay team (Paris), to synthesize it (1983). It was found (Olson and others) that heparin facilitates the interaction between antithrombin and a clotting enzyme by allosteric changes in the antithrombin (important for factor Xa) and by facilitating the approach of the enzyme to antithrombin via its "sliding" along the heparin molecule (important for thrombin). Antithrombin action therefore requires a minimum length of seven sugar units next to the pentasaccharide whereas anti-factor Xa action does not. The effect of heparin is almost entirely due to anti-thrombin action (B≐guin), so anti-factor Xa activity does not reflect the concentration of anticoagulant heparin. The anticoagulant effect is poorly reflected by the activated partial thromboplastin time. Because present clinical use is based on the latter tests, it is not generally known that the individual response to heparin shows an extremely wide variation. Individualization of heparin dosage is likely to improve clinical results.

The anticoagulant and antithrombotic mechanisms of heparin

The molecular basis for the anticoagulant action of heparin lies in its ability to bind to and enhance the inhibitory activity of the plasma protein antithrombin against several serine proteases of the coagulation system, most importantly factors IIa (thrombin), Xa and IXa. Two major mechanisms underlie heparin's potentiation of antithrombin. The conformational changes induced by heparin binding cause both expulsion of the reactive loop and exposure of exosites of the surface of antithrombin, which bind directly to the enzyme target; and a template mechanism exists in which both inhibitor and enzyme bind to the same heparin molecule. The relative importance of these two modes of action varies between enzymes. In addition, heparin can act through other serine protease inhibitors such as heparin co-factor II, protein C inhibitor and tissue factor plasminogen inhibitor. The antithrombotic action of heparin in vivo, though dominated by anticoagulant mechanisms, is more complex, and interactions with other plasma proteins and cells play significant roles in the living vasculature.

Heparin-associated anti-Xa activity and platelet-derived prothrombotic and proinflammatory biomarkers in moderate to high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome

Heparin compounds, to include fractionated and unfractionated preparations, exert both antithrombotic and antiinflammatory effects through combined inhibition of factor Xa and thrombin. The contribution of modulated platelet activity in vivo is less clearly defined. The SYNERGY library was a prospectively designed repository for candidate clinical, hemostatic, platelet, and molecular biomarkers from patients participating in SYNERGY--a large-scale, randomized clinical trial evaluating the comparative benefits of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Samples were collected from 201 patients enrolled at 26 experienced, participating sites and shipped to established core laboratories for analysis of platelet, endothelium-derived, inflammatory and coagulation activity biomarkers. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)--a vascular endothelial cell-derived factor Xa regulatory protein-correlated directly with plasma anti-Xa activity (unadjusted: r = 0.23, P < 0.0001; adjusted: β = 0.10; P = 0.001), as did TFPI-fXa complexes (unadjusted: r = 0.34, P < 0.0001; adjusted: β = 0.38; P = < 0.0001). In contrast, there was a direct and inverse relationship between anti-Xa activity and two platelet-derived biomarkers-plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (unadjusted: r = -0.18, P = 0.0012; adjusted: β = -0.10; P = 0.021) and soluble CD40 ligand (unadjusted: r = -0.11, P = 0.05; adjusted: β = -0.13; P = 0.049). All measured analyte relationships persisted after adjustment for age, creatinine clearance, weight, sex, and duration of treatment. Differences in biomarkers between patients receiving UFH and those randomized to enoxaparin were not observed. The ability of heparin compounds to affect the prothrombotic and proinflammatory states which characterize ACS may involve factor Xa-related modulation of platelet activation and expression. Whether this potentially beneficial effect is direct or indirect and achieved, at least in part, through the release of endothelial cell-derived coagulation regulatory proteins will require further investigation.