Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a stoichiometry-based model to explain the differing immunogenicities of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux in different clinical settings

Efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange or Cangrelor as an Adjunctive Strategy to Facilitate Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) or intravenous cangrelor to prevent thromboembolism in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with heparin.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

N/A.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults having cardiac surgery with a history of HIT who received preoperative or intraoperative TPE or intravenous cangrelor as an adjunct to CPB with heparin.

INTERVENTIONS

None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The primary outcome was avoidance of thromboembolism (venous or arterial) during or after CPB. Proportional meta-analysis with a random effects model was used to calculate a weighted-pooled proportion/efficacy for the study's primary outcome. Fifty-seven patients in 17 reports received TPE as an adjunctive treatment to prevent HIT-related thrombosis related to heparinization during CPB and 3 (5.3%) experienced thrombosis. Proportional meta-analysis suggested a weighted-pooled freedom from perioperative thromboembolism rate of 91.0% (95% CI 82.6%-96.9%). Fifteen patients in 6 reports received intravenous cangrelor as an adjunctive treatment to prevent HIT-related thrombosis related to heparinization during CPB and 2 (13.3%) experienced thrombosis. Proportional meta-analysis suggested a weighted-pooled freedom from perioperative thromboembolism rate of 83.0% (95% CI 61.2%- 97.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

TPE and cangrelor are feasible strategies to prevent thromboembolism in adults with HIT who require CPB with heparin. Given the relatively small number of cases in the published literature and a high likelihood for publication and detection biases, prudence remains warranted when using these strategies.

Therapeutic strategies in FcγIIA receptor-dependent thrombosis and thromboinflammation as seen in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT)

INTRODUCTION

Fcγ-receptors (FcγR) are membrane receptors expressed on a variety of immune cells, specialized in recognition of the Fc part of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. FcγRIIA-dependent platelet activation in platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody-related disorders have gained major attention, when these antibodies were identified as the cause of the adverse vaccination event termed vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. With the recognition of anti-PF4 antibodies as cause for severe spontaneous and sometimes recurrent thromboses independent of vaccination, their clinical relevance extended far beyond heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and VITT.

AREAS COVERED

Patients developing these disorders show life-threatening thromboses, and the outcome is highly dependent on effective treatment. This narrative literature review summarizes treatment options for HIT and VITT that are currently available for clinical application and provides the perspective toward new developments.

EXPERT OPINION

Nearly all these novel approaches are based on in vitro, preclinical observations, or case reports with only limited implementation in clinical practice. The therapeutic potential of these approaches still needs to be proven in larger cohort studies to ensure treatment efficacy and long-term patient safety.

Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (aHIT) is a severe subtype of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with atypical clinical features caused by highly pathological IgG antibodies ("aHIT antibodies") that activate platelets even in the absence of heparin. The clinical features of aHIT include: the onset or worsening of thrombocytopenia despite stopping heparin ("delayed-onset HIT"), thrombocytopenia persistence despite stopping heparin ("persisting" or "refractory HIT"), or triggered by small amounts of heparin (heparin "flush" HIT), most cases of fondaparinux-induced HIT, and patients with unusually severe HIT (e.g., multi-site or microvascular thrombosis, overt disseminated intravascular coagulation [DIC]). Special treatment approaches are required. For example, unlike classic HIT, heparin cessation does not result in de-escalation of antibody-induced hemostasis activation, and thus high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be indicated to interrupt aHIT-induced platelet activation; therapeutic plasma exchange may be required if high-dose IVIG is ineffective. Also, aHIT patients are at risk for treatment failure with (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT]-adjusted) direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) therapy (argatroban, bivalirudin), either because of APTT confounding (where aHIT-associated DIC and resulting APTT prolongation lead to systematic underdosing/interruption of DTI therapy) or because DTI inhibits thrombin-induced protein C activation. Most HIT laboratories do not test for aHIT antibodies, contributing to aHIT under-recognition.

Immunologic Effects of Heparin Associated With Hemodialysis: Focus on Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Intermittent hemodialysis (HD) is almost invariably performed with heparin, and thus HD patients are at risk of developing the immune-mediated adverse effect heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), caused by anti-platelet factor 4/heparin IgG, which strongly activates platelets. HIT patients develop hypercoagulability with greatly increased risk of thrombosis, both venous and arterial. Certain HIT-associated complications are more likely to develop among HD patients, including hemofilter thrombosis despite heparin, intravascular catheter and/or arteriovenous fistula-associated thrombosis, post-heparin bolus anaphylactoid/anaphylactic reactions, and thrombotic stroke and acute limb artery thrombosis (reflecting the high frequency of underlying arteriopathy in many patients with renal failure). Management of HIT in HD usually requires use of an alternative (non-heparin) anticoagulant; for example, danaparoid sodium (outside the USA) or argatroban (USA and elsewhere). Whether heparin-grafted hemodialyzers (without systemic heparin) can be used safely in acute HIT is unknown. The HIT immune response is remarkably transient and usually not retriggered by subsequent heparin administration. Accordingly, since renal failure patients often require long-term HD, there may be the opportunity-following seroreversion (loss of platelet-activating HIT antibodies)-to restart heparin for HD, a practice that appears to have a low likelihood of retriggering HIT.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: An illustrated review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug effect from unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin that results in thrombocytopenia and potentially catastrophic thrombosis. HIT occurs due to the development of platelet-activating antibodies against multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Given the frequency of thrombocytopenia and heparin use among hospitalized patients, calculation of the 4Ts Score is recommended to identify patients at increased likelihood of HIT and direct further evaluation. In patients with an intermediate or high probability 4Ts Score, an immunoassay and functional assay are recommended to confirm or refute the diagnosis of HIT. Heparin avoidance and initiation of nonheparin anticoagulation are the mainstays of acute HIT management. In this illustrated review, we provide visual summaries of the diagnosis and management of HIT, highlighting connections between pathophysiology and clinical care as well as summarizing efforts in quality improvement in the field. We further emphasize common pitfalls and pearls in diagnosis and management to encourage evidence-based care. We include graphical representation of the unique challenges of HIT with cardiopulmonary bypass and also delineate autoimmune HIT and its subtypes.

Modulation of ultralarge immune complexes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious thrombotic disorder caused by ultralarge immune complexes (ULICs) containing platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin that form the HIT antigen, together with a subset of anti-PF4 antibodies. ULICs initiate prothrombotic responses by engaging Fcγ receptors on platelets, neutrophils, and monocytes. Contemporary anti-thrombotic therapy for HIT is neither entirely safe nor entirely successful and acts downstream of ULIC formation and Fcγ receptor-initiated generation of thrombin.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether HIT antigen and ULIC formation and stability could be modified favorably by inhibiting PF4-heparin interactions with fondaparinux, together with blocking formation of PF4 tetramers using a humanized monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody (hRTO).

METHODS

Results: The combination of fondaparinux and hRTO inhibited HIT antigen formation, promoted antigen dissociation, inhibited ULIC formation, and promoted ULIC disassembly at concentrations below the effective concentration of either alone and blocked Fcγ receptor-dependent induction of factor Xa activity by monocytic THP1 cells and activation of human platelets in whole blood. Combined with hRTO, fondaparinux inhibited HIT antigen and immune complex formation and activation through Fcγ receptors at concentrations at or below those used clinically to inhibit FXa coagulant activity.

CONCLUSIONS

HIT antigen and immune complexes are dynamic and amenable to modulation. Fondaparinux can be converted from an anticoagulant that acts at a downstream amplification step into a rationale, disease-specific intervention that blocks ULIC formation. Interventions that prevent ULIC formation and stability might increase the efficacy, permit use of lower doses, shorten the duration of antithrombotic therapy, and help prevent this serious thrombotic disorder.

Variable serotonin release assay pattern and specificity of PF4-specific antibodies in HIT, and clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requires functional assays to demonstrate that platelet factor 4 (PF4)-specific antibodies activate platelets, typically when therapeutic heparin (H) concentrations are tested ("classical" pattern). Some HIT samples also activate platelets without heparin ("atypical" pattern), but with unclear clinical significance.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess whether platelet activation pattern and some characteristics of PF4-specific antibodies were associated with the severity of HIT.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Serotonin release assay (SRA) pattern of 81 HIT patients were analyzed and compared with their clinical and biological data, including levels of anti-PF4/H immunoglobulin G (IgG) and anti-PF4 IgG in 47 of them.

RESULTS

Higher anti-PF4/H IgG titers were measured in patients with an "atypical" SRA (optical density 2.52 vs. 1.94 in those with a "classical" pattern, p < .001). Patients of both groups had similar platelet count (PC) nadir and time to recovery, but those with an "atypical" SRA more frequently developed thrombotic events (69% vs. 34%, p = .037). Significant levels of anti-PF4 IgG were detected in both groups (38% and 61%, respectively). Whatever the SRA pattern, a lower PC nadir (35 vs. 53 G/L, p = .006) and a longer PC recovery time (6 vs. 3 days, p = .015) were evidenced in patients with anti-PF4 antibodies, compared with those with anti-PF4/H IgG only.

CONCLUSIONS

An atypical SRA pattern with elevated anti-PF4/H IgG titers seems associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in HIT. IgG antibodies to native PF4 may contribute to more severe and persistent thrombocytopenia, and their detection could be useful in clinical practice.

Quantitative interpretation of PF4/heparin-EIA optical densities in predicting platelet-activating VITT antibodies

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a prothrombotic, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)-mimicking, adverse reaction caused by platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies that occurs rarely after adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccination. Strength of PF4-dependent enzyme immunoassay (EIA) reactivity-judged by optical density (OD) measurements-strongly predicts platelet-activating properties of HIT antibodies in a functional test. Whether a similar relationship holds for VITT antibodies is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate probability for positive platelet activation testing for VITT antibodies based upon EIA OD reactivity; and to investigate simple approaches to minimize false-negative platelet activation testing for VITT.

METHODS

All samples referred for VITT testing were systematically evaluated by semiquantitative in-house PF4/heparin-EIA (OD readings) and PF4-induced platelet activation (PIPA) testing within a cohort study. EIA-positive sera testing PIPA-negative were retested following 1/4 to 1/10 dilution. Logistic regression was performed to predict the probability of a positive PIPA per magnitude of EIA reactivity.

RESULTS

Greater EIA ODs in sera from patients with suspected VITT correlated strongly with greater likelihood of PIPA reactivity. Of 61 sera (with OD values >1.0) testing negative in the PIPA, a high proportion (27/61, 44.3%) became PIPA positive when tested at 1/4 to 1/10 dilution.

CONCLUSIONS

VITT serology resembles HIT in that greater EIA OD reactivity predicts higher probability of positive testing for platelet-activating antibodies. Unlike the situation with HIT antibodies, however, diluting putative VITT serum increases probability of a positive platelet activation assay, suggesting that optimal complex formation depends on the stoichiometric ratio of PF4 and anti-PF4 VITT antibodies.

Evaluating the immunogenicity of heparin and heparin derivatives by measuring their binding to platelet factor 4 using biolayer interferometry

Heparin (HP) is a polysaccharide that is widely used in the clinic as an anticoagulant. A major side effect associated with HP is the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is initiated by the immune response to complex formed by HP and platelet factor 4 (PF4). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are the depolymerized version of HP, which have reduced risks of inducing HIT. However, it is still necessary to evaluate the immunogenicity of LMWHs to ensure their drug safety. Since HIT involves very complicated processes, the evaluation of HP and LMWH immunogenicity requires experiments from multiple aspects, of which the binding affinity between HP and PF4 is a key property to be monitored. Herein, we developed a novel competitive biolayer interferometry (BLI) method to investigate the binding affinity between HP and PF4. The influence of different domains in HP on its immunogenicity was compared for better understanding of the molecular mechanism of HP immunogenicity. Furthermore, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of HP and LMWH can be measured by competitive combination, which is important for the quality control during the developing and manufacturing of HP and LMWH drugs.

Platelet factor 4 polyanion immune complexes: heparin induced thrombocytopenia and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

This is a review article on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an adverse effect of heparin therapy, and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, occurring in some patients administered certain coronavirus vaccines.

MAIN BODY/TEXT

Immune-mediated thrombocytopenia occurs when specific antibodies bind to platelet factor 4 /heparin complexes. Platelet factor 4 is a naturally occurring chemokine, and under certain conditions, may complex with negatively charged molecules and polyanions, including heparin. The antibody-platelet factor 4/heparin complex may lead to platelet activation, accompanied by other cascading reactions, resulting in cerebral sinus thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, lower limb arterial thrombosis, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, skin necrosis, and thrombotic stroke. If untreated, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can be life threatening. In parallel, rare incidents of spontaneous vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia can also occur in some patients administered certain coronavirus vaccines. The role of platelet factor 4 in vaccine-induced thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome further reinforces the importance the platelet factor 4/polyanion immune complexes and the complications that this might pose to susceptible individuals. These findings demonstrate, how auxiliary factors can complicate heparin therapy and drug development. An increasing interest in biomanufacturing heparins from non-animal sources has driven a growing interest in understanding the biology of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and therefore, the development of safe and effective biosynthetic heparins.

SHORT CONCLUSION

In conclusion, these findings further reinforce the importance of the binding of platelet factor 4 with known and unknown polyanions, and the complications that these might pose to susceptible patients. In parallel, these findings also demonstrate how auxiliary factors can complicate the heparin drug development.

Frequency of Thrombocytopenia and Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Compared With Cardiopulmonary Bypass and the Limited Sensitivity of Pretest Probability Score

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain: 1) the frequency of thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; 2) positive predictive value of the Pretest Probability Score in identifying heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; and 3) clinical outcome of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in adult patients receiving venovenous- or venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, compared with cardiopulmonary bypass.

DESIGN

A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study from January 2016 to April 2018.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center for cardiac and respiratory failure.

PATIENTS

Patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for more than 48 hours or had cardiopulmonary bypass during specified period.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clinical and laboratory data were collected retrospectively. Pretest Probability Score and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing results were collected prospectively. Mean age (± SD) of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass cohorts was 45.4 (± 15.6) and 64.9 (± 13), respectively (p < 0.00001). Median duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 4.6 hours (2-16.5 hr) compared with 170.4 hours (70-1,008 hr) on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Moderate and severe thrombocytopenia were more common in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation compared with cardiopulmonary bypass throughout (p < 0.0001). Thrombocytopenia increased in cardiopulmonary bypass patients on day 2 but was normal in 83% compared with 42.3% of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients at day 10. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation also followed a similar pattern of platelet recovery following cessation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass were 6.4% (19/298) and 0.6% (18/2,998), respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on venovenous-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (8/156, 5.1%) versus venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (11/142, 7.7%) (p = 0.47). The positive predictive value of the Pretest Probability Score in identifying heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients post cardiopulmonary bypass and on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 56.25% (18/32) and 25% (15/60), respectively. Mortality was not different with (6/19, 31.6%) or without (89/279, 32.2%) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytopenia is already common at extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is more frequent in both venovenous- and venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation compared with cardiopulmonary bypass. Positive predictive value of Pretest Probability Score in identifying heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was lower in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia had no effect on mortality.

Pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

There are currently no effective substitutes for high intensity therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for cardiovascular procedures based on its rapid onset of action, ease of monitoring and reversibility. The continued use of UFH in these and other settings requires vigilance for its most serious nonhemorrhagic complication, heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is an immune prothrombotic disorder caused by antibodies that recognize complexes between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and polyanions such as heparin (H).The pathogenicity of anti-PF4/H antibodies is likely due to the formation of immune complexes that initiate intense procoagulant responses by vascular and hematopoietic cells that lead to the generation of platelet microparticles, monocyte and endothelial cell procoagulant activity, and neutrophil extracellular traps, among other outcomes. The development of anti-PF4/H antibodies after exposure to UFH greatly exceeds the incidence of clinical disease, but the biochemical features that distinguish pathogenic from nonpathogenic antibodies have not been identified. Diagnosis relies on pretest clinical probability, screening for anti-PF4/H antibodies and documentation of their platelet activating capacity. However, both clinical algorithms and test modalities have limited predictive values making diagnosis and management challenging. Given the unacceptable rates of recurrent thromboembolism and bleeding associated with current therapies, there is an unmet need for novel rational nonanticoagulant therapeutics based on the pathogenesis of HIT. We will review recent developments in our understanding of the pathogenesis of HIT and its implications for future approaches to diagnosis and management.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: ELISA optical density value and 4T score in correlation with panel donor platelets activation in functional flow cytometric assay

BACKGROUND

Serological assays for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) detect both platelet-activating and platelet non-activating anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies and have therefore a limited positive predictive value. Functional assays confirm the presence of platelet-activating antibodies but require platelets from healthy donors, whose response to patient serum can differ. Our aim was to investigate the correlation between the level of anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies, 4T score, and the extent of panel donor platelet activation in the functional assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 38 sera from enzyme immunoassays (ELISA) positive patients were tested against panel platelets obtained from 10 healthy, randomly selected donors, using our routine flow cytometry functional test for CD62P expression. Levels of anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies from medical and surgical patients and 4T pretest probability scores (where available) were correlated with the number of activated panel platelets.

RESULTS

Sera with low ELISA optical density (OD) values (0.4-1) activated on average 5.6, sera with intermediate ELISA OD values (>1-2.5) activated on average 7.3, and sera with high ELISA OD values (>2.5) activated on average 8.6 out of 10 panel platelets. One serum with low 4T score did not activate donor platelets, 12 sera with intermediate 4T score activated on average 6.3 donors, 8 sera with high 4T score activated on average 8.5 panel platelets.

DISCUSSION

Sera with higher ELISA OD values activated platelets from a higher number of platelet donors, independently of patient type (medical or surgical). The average number of activated panel platelets increased with rising 4T score. Results indicate that both donor platelet reactivity and quantity of anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies affect the result of the functional assay, meaning special attention is needed in platelet donor selection when testing sera with low levels of antibodies.

Platelet factor-4 concentration in adult veno-arterial ECMO patients

BACKGROUND

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is reported at a variable rate in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. A critical factor impacting platelet factor-4 (PF4)-heparin antibody formation is plasma PF4 concentration. We hypothesized that PF4 concentration would be increased during veno-arterial (VA) ECMO.

METHODS

Plasma PF4 concentration was measured during the first 5 ECMO days in 20 VA ECMO patients and 10 control plasma samples. PF4-heparin ratios were estimated using an assumed heparin concentration of 0.4 IU/mL. This correlates with an activated partial thromboplastin time of 60 to 80 seconds, which is the anticoagulation target in our center.

RESULTS

Twenty VA ECMO patients were enrolled, 10 of which had pulmonary embolism. Median PF4 concentration was 0.03 µg/mL [0.01, 0.13] in control plasma. Median PF4 concentration was 0.21 µg/mL [0.12, 0.34] on ECMO day 1 or 2, 0.16 µg/mL [0.09, 0.25] on ECMO day 3, and 0.12 µg/mL [0.09, 0.22] on ECMO day 5. Estimated median PF4-heparin ratios were 0.04, 0.03, and 0.02 respectively. Two patients (10%) developed HIT that was confirmed by serotonin release assay. PF4 concentration did not differ significantly in these patients compared to non-HIT patients (p = 0.37). No patient had an estimated PF4-heparin ratio between 0.7 and 1.4, which is the reported optimal range for PF4-heparin antibody formation.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that PF4 concentration is mildly elevated during VA ECMO compared to control plasma. Estimated PF4-heparin ratios were not optimal for HIT antibody formation. These data support epidemiologic studies where HIT incidence is low during VA ECMO.

Platelet count trends and response to fondaparinux in a cohort of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia suspected patients after pulmonary endarterectomy

A definitive diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is difficult to make, especially in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the platelet count trends and the response to fondaparinux in a population of patients of suspected HIT after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Patients enrolled in this study were over the age of 18 years, and survived longer than 7 days after PEA between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015. HIT likelihood was assessed by the 4 T's score and interpreted by our institutional algorithm. 54 patients were operated, and 49 patients met the inclusion criteria. Six patients met the criteria for suspected HIT and were treated with fondaparinux until the platelet recovered. No significant difference was observed of clinical characteristics between intermediate to high HIT likelihood patients (HIT SUSPECTED) and low HIT likelihood patients (NO HIT SUSPECTED). HIT SUSPECTED patients reached platelet count lowest later (about 5.5 days after PEA), while NO HIT SUSPECTED patients is about 4.0 days after PEA. Percentage of platelet counts decrease (> 50%) was larger than NO HIT SUSPECTED patients (< 50%). There was no difference in mortality or residual pulmonary hypertension between HIT SUSPECTED and NO HIT SUSPECTED patients. Two HIT SUSPECTED patients who used heparin after PEA died, the other four survived by replacing heparin or low molecular weight heparin with fondaparinux. Suspected HIT patients should be surveilled carefully. Platelet counts trends may have some hints in the prevention of HIT. Fondaparinux may be effective for patients with suspected HIT.

Current Perspectives on Diagnostic Assays and Anti-PF4 Antibodies for the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a recognized clinical entity in patients receiving unfractionated heparin and low–molecular weight heparin. Currently, diagnosing HIT includes the combination of a physician’s clinical suspicion based on a clinical scoring system and a series of laboratory tests. In the present article, we discuss challenges in suspecting and diagnosing HIT in consideration of the turnaround time of available tests and recent advances in techniques and methodologies of newer immunoassays and functional assays.

Pathophysiology and Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia

Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a life-threatening clinical syndrome that is under-recognized and difficult to diagnose. Many drugs can cause immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, but the most commonly implicated are abciximab, carbamazepine, ceftriaxone, eptifibatide, heparin, ibuprofen, mirtazapine, oxaliplatin, penicillin, quinine, quinidine, rifampicin, suramin, tirofiban, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Several different mechanisms have been identified in typical DITP, which is most commonly characterized by severe thrombocytopenia due to clearance and/or destruction of platelets sensitized by a drug-dependent antibody. Patients with typical DITP usually bleed when symptomatic, and biological confirmation of the diagnosis is often difficult because detection of drug-dependent antibodies (DDabs) in the patient's serum or plasma is frequently not possible. This is in contrast to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is a particular DITP caused in most cases by heparin-dependent antibodies specific for platelet factor 4, which can strongly activate platelets in vitro and in vivo, explaining why affected patients usually have thrombotic complications but do not bleed. In addition, laboratory tests are readily available to diagnose HIT, unlike the methods used to detect DDabs associated with other DITP that are mostly reserved for laboratories specialized in platelet immunology.

The use of flow cytometry in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) affects some of the patients exposed to heparin. It is mediated by antibodies that recognize neoepitopes on platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. A HIT diagnosis requires both clinical and laboratory evaluation and remains a challenge. Since many patients develop antibodies in response to heparin, but only a few of them generate anti-PF4/heparin antibodies capable of activating platelets which consequently cause clinical complications, the performance of serologic assays is not enough to diagnose HIT. Functional assays can identify pathogenic antibodies capable of platelet activation, but they are more demanding and their limited availability contributes to the problem of diagnosing HIT. Restricted laboratories usually collect sera of multiple patients to perform functional assays only once or twice a week; hence, a HIT diagnosis can take several days. The use of flow cytometry appears to be a promising alternative in the confirmation of pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Flow cytometric assays detect either activation markers on a healthy donor's platelet surfaces or platelet derived microparticles formed after platelet incubation with a patient's serum. Flow cytometers are readily available in many clinical laboratories, so this technology introduces the possibility of an earlier HIT diagnosis. The objective of this review was to collect findings on flow cytometric HIT confirmations to the present date, and to review the currently available flow cytometric assays used in the diagnosis of HIT.

Development of a method to analyze the complexes of enoxaparin and platelet factor 4 with size-exclusion chromatography

Heparin, a highly sulfated glycosaminoglycan, has been used as a clinical anticoagulant over 80 years. However, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITT) is a serious side effect of heparin therapy, resulting in relatively high risk of amputation and even death. HITT is caused by forming of complexes between heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4). Enoxaparin, one of the most commonly used low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), were developed in 1980's. The lower molecular weight of enoxaparin reduces the risk of HITT by binding to less PF4. To detect the binding capacity between enoxaparin and PF4 could be an effect way to control this risk before it goes to patients. In this work, a size exclusion chromatography (SEC) method was developed to analyze the patterns of complexes formed between PF4 and enoxaparin. The chromatographic condition was optimized to separate PF4, enoxaparin, ultra-large complexes and small complexes. The linearity and stability of this method were confirmed. The impacts of PF4/enoxaparin mixture ratios and incubation time on the forming complexes were investigated. Four enoxaparin samples were analyzed with this method to verify its practicability. It is a robust, accurate and practicable method, and provides an easy way to monitor the capacity of enoxaparin forming complexes with PF4, suggesting the HITT related quality of enoxaparin.

A Simple Clinical Pre-procedure Risk Model for Predicting Thrombocytopenia Associated With Periprocedural Use of Tirofiban in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: No risk model for predicting thrombocytopenia associated with periprocedural tirofiban exposure is available. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple clinical pre-procedure risk model based on pre-procedural characteristics for early prediction of thrombocytopenia before patients were exposed to tirofiban. Methods: The series included 1862 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with tirofiban exposure. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from the hospital information system on admission. The earliest pro-procedural platelets within 72 h were used to evaluate the thrombocytopenia incidence. Risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia in patients with tirofiban exposure were investigated by univariable and multivariable analyses. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing procedure was used to identify the cut points for the numeric variables. The discriminatory power of the scoring system was assessed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The occurrence of thrombocytopenia was 4.02% (75 of 1862), 4.01% (56 of 1396), and 4.08% (19 of 466) in the overall, developmental, and validation data sets, respectively. The risk score was developed based on five independent predictors: age ≥65y, white blood cell ≥12 × 10⁹/L, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. This tool was well calibrated (Hosmer Lemeshow χ² = 6.914; P = 0.546) and good discrimination was well obtained in validation data set (C-statistic, 0.82). Conclusion: The clinical pre-procedure risk model is a simple and accurate tool for early identification of high-risk patients of thrombocytopenia before tirofiban exposure, allowing for timely and appropriate intervention.

A Systematic Review of the Risks and Benefits of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, initiation of pharmacological venous thromboprophylaxis (VTEp) may cause further intracranial hemorrhage. We reviewed the literature to determine the postinjury time interval at which VTEp can be administered without risk of TBI evolution and hematoma expansion.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were studies investigating timing and safety of VTEp in TBI patients not previously on oral anticoagulation. Two investigators extracted data and graded the papers' levels of evidence. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and Cohort studies were evaluated for bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We performed univariate meta-regression analysis in an attempt to identify a relationship between VTEp timing and hemorrhagic progression and assess study heterogeneity using an I 2 statistic.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Eighteen total studies demonstrated that VTEp postinjury in patients with stable head computed tomography scan does not lead to TBI progression. Fourteen studies demonstrated that VTEp administration 24 to 72 hours postinjury is safe in patients with stable injury. Four studies suggested that administering VTEp within 24 hours of injury in patients with stable TBI does not lead to progressive intracranial hemorrhage. Overall, meta-regression analysis demonstrated that there was no relationship between rate of hemorrhagic progression and VTEp timing.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature suggests that administering VTEp 24 to 48 hours postinjury may be safe for patients with low-hemorrhagic-risk TBIs and stable injury on repeat imaging.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with thrombotic microangiopathy

Some cases of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) are refractory to plasma exchange therapy (PE) with persistence or recurrence of thrombocytopenia. We report two patients suffering from TMA of different aetiologies (associated with disseminated malignancy, typical haemolytic uraemic syndrome) with recurrent or persistent thrombocytopenia despite adequate therapy including PE. Since both patients were exposed to unfractionated heparin, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) was suspected as a cause. Pretest probabilities for HIT were intermediate. ELISA for PF4/heparin antibodies was strongly positive in both cases, and HIT was confirmed by heparin-induced platelet activation assay. Anticoagulation with lepirudin was initiated, with subsequent rapid increase of the platelet count.

TMA might represent a predisposition for HIT. This could be due to TMA-related platelet activation with increased PF4 release. In TMA patients exposed to heparin and with refractory or rapidly recurrent thrombocytopenia HIT should always be considered as a possible cause.

Identifying patients at high risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-associated thrombosis with a platelet activation assay using flow cytometry

To diagnose heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), detection of platelet-activating antibodies (HIT antibodies) is crucial. However, serum platelet activation profiles vary across patients and depend on test conditions. We evaluated the association between clinical outcomes and platelet-activating profiles assessed by a platelet microparticle assay (PMA), which detects activation of washed platelets induced by HIT antibodies, in 401 consecutive patients clinically suspected of having HIT. We made modifications to the assay, such as donor selection for washed platelets that increased sensitivity. Serum that activated platelets at a therapeutic (but not high) heparin concentration was defined as positive. Of these, serum that activated platelets within 30 minutes or in the absence of heparin was defined as strongly positive. The remaining samples were considered weakly positive. As a result, 97 % and 93 % of patients who tested strongly and weakly positive had clinical profiles consistent with HIT, respectively. The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEEs) after heparin exposure in patients who tested strongly positive, weakly positive, and negative was 61 %, 40 %, and 29 %, respectively. Among patients who did not experience a TEE on the day HIT was suspected, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of subsequent TEEs between patients who tested strongly and weakly positive when argatroban was initiated on the same day (19.0 % vs 7.1 %, p=0.313), but there was a significant difference when argatroban therapy was delayed by one or more days (61.1 % vs 17.6 %, p=0.007). The modified PMA is effective in diagnosing HIT and identifying patients at high risk for HIT-associated TEEs.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Evaluation of a new nanoparticle-based lateral-flow immunoassay for the exclusion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse complication of heparin caused by HIT antibodies (abs) that recognise platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4/hep) complexes. Several laboratory tests are available for the confirmation and/or refutation of HIT. A reliable and rapid singlesample test is still pending. It was the objective of this study to evaluate a new lateral-flow immunoassay based on nanoparticle technology. A cohort of 452 surgical and medical patients suspected of having HIT was evaluated. All samples were tested in two IgG-specific ELISAs, in a particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA) and in a newly developed lateral-flow immunoassay (LFI-HIT) as well as in a functional test (HIPA). Clinical pre-test probability was determined using 4T's score. Platelet-activating antibodies were present in 34/452 patients, all of whom had intermediate to high clinical probability. PF4/hep abs were detected in 79, 87, 86, and 63 sera using the four different immunoassays. The negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% for both ELISA tests and LFI-HIT but only 99.2% for PaGIA. There were less false positives (n=29) in the LFI-HIT compared to any other test. Additionally, significantly less time was required to perform LFI-HIT than to perform the other immunoassays. In conclusion, a newly developed lateral-flow assay, LFI-HIT, was capable of identifying all HIT patients in a cohort in a short period of time. Beside an NPV of 100%, the rate of false-positive signals is significantly lower with LFI-HIT than with other immunoassay(s). These performance characteristics suggest a high potency in reducing the risk and costs in patients suspected of having HIT.

Platelet Count Trends and Prevalence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a Cohort of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator Patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and to study platelet count trends potentially suggestive of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a population of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A total of 926-bed teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients who survived longer than 48 hours from extracorporeal membrane oxygenator initiation between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively on all extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing results and platelet count variables were obtained from the electronic medical record. We used our institutional algorithm to interpret the results of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing. Ninety-six extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients met the inclusion criteria. Eight patients met the algorithm criteria for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosis and seven of those had documented thromboembolic event while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia related thrombosis, 8.3 and 7.3, respectively). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive patients were younger; all underwent venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; spent more hours on extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; had significantly higher heparin-induced thrombocytopenia enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays optical density; had a higher prevalence of thromboembolic events and reached platelet count nadir later. There was no difference in mortality between heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive and negative patients. Comparison of platelet count trends revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the predefined study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-related thrombosis among extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients at our institution is relatively high. Using platelet count trends to guide decision to test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not an optimal strategy in extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients. Without a validated pretest probability clinical score, serosurveillance in a defined high-risk group of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients may be needed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune complication of heparin therapy caused by antibodies to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Pathogenic antibodies to PF4/heparin bind and activate cellular FcγRIIA on platelets and monocytes to propagate a hypercoagulable state culminating in life-threatening thrombosis. It is now recognized that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies develop commonly after heparin exposure, but only a subset of sensitized patients progress to life-threatening complications of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Recent scientific developments have clarified mechanisms underlying PF4/heparin immunogenicity, disease susceptibility, and clinical manifestations of disease. Insights from clinical and laboratory findings have also been recently harnessed for disease prevention. This review will summarize our current understanding of HIT by reviewing pathogenesis, essential clinical and laboratory features, and management.

Functional Assays in the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Review

A rapid and accurate diagnosis in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is essential for patient management but remains challenging. Current HIT diagnosis ideally relies on a combination of clinical information, immunoassay and functional assay results. Platelet activation assays or functional assays detect HIT antibodies that are more clinically significant. Several functional assays have been developed and evaluated in the literature. They differ in the activation endpoint studied; the technique or technology used; the platelet donor selection; the platelet suspension (washed platelets, platelet rich plasma or whole blood); the patient sample (serum or plasma); and the heparin used (type and concentrations). Inconsistencies in controls performed and associated results interpretation are common. Thresholds and performances are determined differently among papers. Functional assays suffer from interlaboratory variability. This lack of standardization limits the evaluation and the accessibility of functional assays in laboratories. In the present article, we review all the current activation endpoints, techniques and methodologies of functional assays developed for HIT diagnosis.

The association of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies with early and delayed thromboembolism after cardiac surgery

Essentials We evaluated antibody status, thromboembolism and survival after cardiac surgery. Positive antibody tests are common - over 50% are seropositive at 30 days. Seropositivity did not increase thromboembolism or impair survival after cardiac surgery. Results show heparin induced thrombocytopenia antibody screening after surgery is not warranted.

SUMMARY

Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic response to heparin therapy with platelet-activating, anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies leading to thrombocytopenia associated with thromboembolism. Objective We tested the hypothesis that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are associated with thromboembolism after cardiac surgery. Methods This multicenter, prospective cohort study collected laboratory and clinical data up to 30 days after surgery and longer-term clinical follow-up data. The primary outcome variable combined new arterial or venous thromboembolic complications (TECs) with all-cause death until 90 days after surgery. Laboratory analyses included platelet counts and anti-PF4/heparin antibody titers (GTI ELISA), with a confirmatory excess heparin step and serotonin release assay. Chi-square testing was used to test the relationship between our outcome and HIT antibody seropositivity. Results Initially, 1021 patients were enrolled between August 2006 and May 2009, and follow-up was completed in December 2014. Seropositivity defined by OD > 0.4 was common, being almost 20% preoperatively, > 30% by discharge, and > 60% by day 30. Death (1.7% within 30 days) or TECs (69 in total) were more likely if the partient was seronegative (OD < 0.4), but positivity defined by OD > 1.0 or including an excess heparin confirmatory step resulted in equal incidence of death or TECs, whether the patient was seronegative or seropositive. Incorporating the serotonin release assay for platelet-activating antibodies did not alter these findings. Conclusions Seropositivity for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies does not increase the risk of death or thromboembolism after cardiac surgery. Screening is not indicated, and seropositivity should only be interpreted in the context of clinical evidence for HIT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Duke IRB Protocol #00010736.

Pharmacology of Heparin and Related Drugs

Heparin has been recognized as a valuable anticoagulant and antithrombotic for several decades and is still widely used in clinical practice for a variety of indications. The anticoagulant activity of heparin is mainly attributable to the action of a specific pentasaccharide sequence that acts in concert with antithrombin, a plasma coagulation factor inhibitor. This observation has led to the development of synthetic heparin mimetics for clinical use. However, it is increasingly recognized that heparin has many other pharmacological properties, including but not limited to antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antimetastatic actions. Many of these activities are independent of its anticoagulant activity, although the mechanisms of these other activities are currently less well defined. Nonetheless, heparin is being exploited for clinical uses beyond anticoagulation and developed for a wide range of clinical disorders. This article provides a "state of the art" review of our current understanding of the pharmacology of heparin and related drugs and an overview of the status of development of such drugs.

Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: impact of an avoid-heparin program

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction occurring in up to 5% of patients exposed to unfractionated heparin (UFH). We examined the impact of a hospital-wide strategy for avoiding heparin on the incidence of HIT, HIT with thrombosis (HITT), and HIT-related costs. The Avoid-Heparin Initiative, implemented at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, since 2006, involved replacing UFH with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Consecutive cases with suspected HIT from 2003 through 2012 were reviewed. Rates of suspected HIT, adjudicated HIT, and HITT, along with HIT-related expenditures were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and the avoid-heparin (2007-2012) phases. The annual rate of suspected HIT decreased 42%, from 85.5 per 10 000 admissions in the pre-intervention phase to 49.0 per 10 000 admissions in the avoid-heparin phase ( ITALIC! P< .001). The annual rate of patients with a positive HIT assay decreased 63% from 16.5 to 6.1 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), adjudicated HIT decreased 79% from 10.7 to 2.2 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), and HITT decreased 91% from 4.6 to 0.4 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001). Hospital HIT-related expenditures decreased by $266 938 per year in the avoid-heparin phase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the success and feasibility of a hospital-wide HIT prevention strategy.

Effects of a Foot Pump on the Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Given Edoxaban: A Randomized Controlled Study

We conducted a randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of the A-V Impulse System foot pump for reducing the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients under edoxaban thromboprophylaxis. Patients undergoing primary TKA at our institution between September 2013 and March 2015 were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. The patients were randomized to use the foot pump (n = 58) and not to use the foot pump (n = 62). Both groups were given prophylactic edoxaban. Primary outcomes were any DVT as detected by bilateral ultrasonography up to postoperative day 10 (POD10) and pulmonary embolism (PE) up to POD28. The safety outcomes were bleeding and death of any cause up to POD28. Plasma D-dimer levels were measured before TKA and on POD10 after TKA. Immunoglobulin G (IgG)-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were measured using an IgG-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The incidences of any DVT up to POD28 were 31.0% and 17.7% in patients with or without the foot pump, respectively. The incidences of major bleeding up to POD28 were 5.1% and 4.8% in patients with or without the foot pump, respectively. Foot pump use did not significantly reduce the incidence of DVTs in patients undergoing TKA under edoxaban thromboprophylaxis. Although seroconversion of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies was confirmed in one-fourth of patients, the seroconversion rates did not differ between patients with (20.7%) or without (25.8%) foot pump use. This study shows that the A-V Impulse system foot pump did not affect the incidence of DVT under edoxaban thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing TKA. Seroconversion of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies was detected in a significant number of patients who underwent TKA under antithrombotic prophylaxis using edoxaban.

Mechanical prophylaxis is a heparin-independent risk for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibody formation after orthopedic surgery

Platelet-activating antibodies, which recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes, induce spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome or fondaparinux-associated HIT without exposure to unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). This condition mostly occurs after major orthopedic surgery, implying that surgery itself could trigger this immune response, although the mechanism is unclear. To investigate how surgery may do so, we performed a multicenter, prospective study of 2069 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or hip arthroplasty. Approximately half of the patients received postoperative thromboprophylaxis with UFH, LMWH, or fondaparinux. The other half received only mechanical thromboprophylaxis, including dynamic (intermittent plantar or pneumatic compression device), static (graduated compression stockings [GCSs]), or both. We measured anti-PF4/heparin immunoglobulins G, A, and M before and 10 days after surgery using an immunoassay. Multivariate analysis revealed that dynamic mechanical thromboprophylaxis (DMT) was an independent risk factor for seroconversion (odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-3.02; P = .001), which was confirmed with propensity-score matching (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.17-3.37; P = .018). For TKA, the seroconversion rates in patients treated with DMT but no anticoagulation and in patients treated with UFH or LMWH without DMT were similar, but significantly higher than in patients treated with only GCSs. The proportion of patients with ≥1.4 optical density units appeared to be higher among those treated with any anticoagulant plus DMT than among those not treated with DMT. Our study suggests that DMT increases risk of an anti-PF4/heparin immune response, even without heparin exposure. This trial was registered to www.umin.ac.jp/ctr as #UMIN000001366.

Complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin activate Toll-like receptor 4

BACKGROUND

In some patients, the anticoagulant heparin elicits formation of antibodies that can cause the life and/or limb-threatening syndrome known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT antibodies target complexes formed at specific molar ratios of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4). The unpredictable occurrence and the mechanism of this atypical immune response to PF4:heparin complexes are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether complexes formed at specific PF4:heparin ratios (PHRs) might resemble molecular patterns associated with host defense responses.

METHODS

We used an in vitro cytokine release assay to determine whether defined PHRs caused cytokine release from human whole blood. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used as a positive assay control, and some experiments included antibodies to block Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4).

RESULTS

PF4:heparin complexes caused release of the biomarker interleukin 8 in whole blood, and the level of response varied with the stoichiometric ratio of PF4 to heparin. The profile of response to LPS and to PF4:heparin complexes varied among blood donors, and the interleukin 8 response to both LPS and PF4:heparin was inhibited by TLR4-blocking antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific PF4-heparin complexes can elicit a TLR4-mediated response, suggesting that these complexes can mimic a pathogen-associated molecular pattern, and supporting the suggestion that the HIT immune response represents a misdirected host defense mechanism.

Evaluation of Immunostimulatory Potential of Branded and US-Generic Enoxaparins in an In Vitro Human Immune System Model

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have several positive therapeutic effects and can also form immunostimulatory complexes with plasma proteins, such as platelet factor 4 (PF4). We compared the innate response and functional profiles of branded and US-generic enoxaparins from 2 manufacturers in either native or PF4-bound forms in an in vitro model of human immunity. In an analysis of 2 product lots from each manufacturer and multiple separate batches of protein–heparin complexes, branded enoxaparin was shown to be consistently nonstimulatory for innate responses, whereas US-generic enoxaparins generated variable immunostimulatory profiles depending on the enoxaparin lot used to prepare the PF4–LMWH complexes. Production of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), a physiologic heparin-induced inhibitor of tissue factor-induced coagulation that was used as a functional readout of biological activity of enoxaparins in these assays, was heightened in the presence of branded enoxaparin complexes, but its levels were variable in cultures treated with complexes containing US-generic enoxaparins. Analytical analyses suggest that the heightened immunostimulatory potential of some of the US-generic enoxaparin product lots could be tied to their capacity to form ultra-large and/or more stable complexes with PF4 than the other LMWHs included in this study. Although these distinct biological and analytical profiles might be related to the composition and/or consistency of branded and US-generic enoxaparins included in our data set, further studies are warranted to elucidate the pathophysiological relevance of these in vitro findings.

The use of novel oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis after elective major orthopedic surgery

Venous thromboembolism is a common cause of morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. Due to the high incidence of venous thromboembolism in this setting, perioperative anticoagulation is the recommended approach for thromboprophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux and warfarin are the agents commonly used for thromboprophylaxis. The well-recognized limitations of warfarin and the inconvenience and discomfort associated with the subcutaneous administration of low molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux inspired intense investigation to develop novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with more predictable pharmacokinetics, fewer drug interactions and no need for regular laboratory monitoring. Three NOACs have been demonstrated to be effective for thromboprophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in large randomized controlled trials. Here we review the pharmacology of rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban, summarize the major clinical trials of these agents in thromboprophylaxis after THA and TKA, and discuss the clinical factors to be considered by providers when selecting a NOAC for their patients.

Fondaparinux-associated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVES

Large licensing trials did not find any association between the use of fondaparinux and the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Fondaparinux is in fact recommended as an option for the management of HIT. Since the first report of fondaparinux-associated HIT in 2007, additional reports have been published. However, the rarity of these cases, differences in case definition, and lack of larger case series have prevented better understanding of this disease. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical manifestations of fondaparinux-associated HIT, the predictive value of pretest probability (4Ts) scoring system, and the outcomes associated with current management.

METHODS

Using several search terms, we reviewed all cases of fondaparinux-associated HIT reported and indexed in PubMed till May 2013. All references were also checked for additional reports. We categorized the cases of fondaparinux-associated HIT as confirmed, probable, and possible based on our case definition.

RESULTS

A total of eight cases of fondaparinux-associated HIT were identified. Fondaparinux-associated HIT occurred in the setting of pro-inflammatory state, prior HIT, or exposure to heparin products. Bilateral adrenal hemorrhage or infarct, reflecting hypercoagulability or disseminated intravascular coagulation, was seen in 25% of patients. The pretest probability (4Ts) scoring system used for HIT appears to correctly risk stratify all the cases. Although functional assays can be used for the diagnosis, in the presence of recent exposure to heparin products, only the demonstration of fondaparinux-dependent platelet activation should be considered confirmatory. Non-heparin anticoagulants are effective therapy; however, one-third of the patients had poor outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The risk of fondaparinux-associated HIT, although low is real, which along with documented cases of fondaparinux failure mandate its cautious use in the management of HIT.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a drug-mediated, prothrombotic disorder caused by immunization against platelet factor 4 (PF4) after complex formation with heparin or other polyanions. After their binding to PF4/heparin complexes on the platelet surface, HIT antibodies are capable of intravascular platelet activation by cross-linking Fcγ receptor IIA leading to a platelet count decrease and/or thrombosis. Diagnosis of HIT is often difficult. This, and the low specificity of the commercially available immunoassays, leads currently to substantial overdiagnosis of HIT. Timing of onset, the moderate nature of thrombocytopenia, and the common concurrence of thrombosis are very important factors, which help to differentiate HIT from other potential causes of thrombocytopenia. A combination of a clinical pretest scoring system and laboratory investigation is usually necessary to diagnose HIT. Although HIT is considered to be a rare complication of heparin treatment, the very high number of hospital inpatients, and increasingly also hospital outpatients receiving heparin, still result in a considerable number of patients developing HIT. If HIT occurs, potentially devastating complications such as life-threatening thrombosis make it one of the most serious adverse drug reactions. If HIT is strongly suspected, all heparin must be stopped and an alternative nonheparin anticoagulant started at a therapeutic dose to prevent thromboembolic complications. However, the nonheparin alternative anticoagulants bear a considerable bleeding risk, especially if given to patients with thrombocytopenia due to other reasons than HIT. While established drugs for HIT are disappearing from the market (lepirudin, danaparoid), bivalirudin, fondaparinux and potentially the new anticoagulants such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban provide new treatment options.

The skin and hypercoagulable states

Hypercoagulable states (HS) are inherited or acquired conditions that predispose an individual to venous and/or arterial thrombosis. The dermatologist can play a vital role in diagnosing a patient's HS by recognizing the associated cutaneous manifestations, such as purpura, purpura fulminans, livedo reticularis, livedo vasculopathy (atrophie blanche), anetoderma, chronic venous ulcers, and superficial venous thrombosis. The cutaneous manifestations of HS are generally nonspecific, but identification of an abnormal finding can warrant a further workup for an underlying thrombophilic disorder. This review will focus on the basic science of hemostasis, the evaluation of HS, the skin manifestations associated with hypercoagulability, and the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in dermatology.

Emphasis on the Role of PF4 in the Incidence, Pathophysiology and Treatment of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) associated with polyanionic glycosaminoglycan drugs or displayed on vascular cell membranes. These antibodies are elicited by multimolecular complexes that can occur when heparin is administered in clinical settings associated with abundant PF4. Heparin binding alters native PF4 and elicits immune recognition and response. While the presence of heparin is integral to immunogenesis, the HIT antibody binding site is within PF4. Thus HIT antibodies develop and function to cause thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis only in the presence of PF4. Future emphasis on understanding the biology, turnover and regulation of PF4 may lead to insights into the prevention and treatment of HIT.