A retrospective analysis of outcomes of dalteparin use in pediatric patients: a single institution experience

SEOM clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2023)

The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) last published clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in 2019, with a partial update in 2020. In this new update to the guidelines, SEOM seeks to incorporate recent evidence, based on a critical review of the literature, to provide practical current recommendations for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of VTE in patients with cancer. Special clinical situations whose management and/or choice of currently recommended therapeutic options (low-molecular-weight heparins [LMWHs] or direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) is controversial are included.

Retrospective study evaluating safety, clinical effect, and dosing of dalteparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in term neonates

BACKGROUND

There is an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among neonates due to their unique hemostatic system. However, there is lack of approved treatment options for VTE in neonatal population. Importantly, dalteparin, a low molecular weight heparin approved for pediatric VTE in children ≥1 month of age, has also been used for the treatment of neonatal VTE. Based on the request from the Food and Drug Administration, this retrospective study aimed to characterize the safety, clinical effects, and dosing of dalteparin for treatment of VTE among neonates.

PROCEDURE

Data from electronic medical records for neonates (born ≥35 weeks of gestation) treated with dalteparin for VTE between January 2010 and December 2021 were collected. The data assessed included bleeding and deterioration in hematological biomarkers among other adverse events, changes in relevant factor antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) levels and VTE status, and dosing of dalteparin and corresponding anti-Xa assay levels.

RESULTS

Sixteen neonates from five participating sites in the United Kingdom were included. There were no bleeding events or deaths. Only one serious adverse event of hypoglycemic brain injury (unrelated to dalteparin) was documented in a patient with a history of hyperinsulinism. Median (range) daily dose of dalteparin at initiation was 309 (297-314) IU/kg. Eight of 16 neonates achieved therapeutic anti-Xa level, including two patients who did so after the first dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalteparin treatment in neonates raised no major safety concerns. Larger cohort studies may help provide further insights on clinical effects of dalteparin for neonatal VTE.

Multiparametric MRI model with synthetic MRI, DWI multi-quantitative parameters, and differential sub-sampling with cartesian ordering enables BI-RADS 4 lesions diagnosis with high accuracy

Objective

To assess the feasibility and diagnostic performances of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and differential subsampling with cartesian ordering (DISCO) in breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4 lesions.

Methods

A total of 98 BI-RADS 4 patients, including 68 cases assigned to a malignant group and 33 cases assigned to a benign group, were prospectively enrolled, and their MRI and clinical information were collected. Two physicians jointly analyzed the characteristics of conventional MRI. T1, T2, proton density (PD), and ADC values were obtained from three different regions of interest (ROIs). Logistic regression analyses were used to select features and build models, and a nomogram was constructed with the best model.

Results

Using the ROI delineation method at the most obvious enhancement to measure the ADC value revealed the best diagnostic performance in diagnosing BI-RADS type 4 mass lesions. The diagnostic efficiency of the maximum level drawing method of the quantitative relaxation model was better than that of the whole drawing method and the most obvious enhancement method. The best relaxation model (model A) was composed of two parameters: T2stand and ΔT1%stand (AUC=0.887), and the BI-RADS model (model B) was constructed by two MRI features of edge and TIC curve (AUC=0.793). Using the quantitative parameters of SyMRI and DWI of the best ROC method combined with DISCO enhanced MRI features to establish a joint diagnostic model (model C: edge, TIC curve type, ADClocal, T2stand, ΔT1%stand) showed the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC=0.953). The nomogram also had calibration curves with good overlap.

Conclusions

The combined diagnosis model of SyMRI and DWI quantitative parameters combined with DISCO can improve the diagnostic efficiency of BI-RADS 4 types of mass lesions. Also, the line diagram based on this model can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic tool.

A phase 2 pharmacodynamic dose-finding, safety, and efficacy study of dalteparin for pediatric venous thromboembolism treatment in children with and without cancer

Data from registrational trials of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment are sparse, especially among cancer patients. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT00952380) on dose-finding, safety, and efficacy (measured by 90-day risks of clinically relevant bleeding [CRB] and symptomatic recurrent VTE [srVTE]) of twice-daily subcutaneous dalteparin for acute VTE treatment in patients ≤18 years old. Among 38 patients (cancer, n = 26; noncancer, n = 12), median dalteparin dose requirements per kilogram varied with age but not cancer status. Risks of CRB and srVTE were <4% in cancer and noncancer subgroups. Dalteparin is an important FDA-approved treatment for pediatric VTE, particularly with cancer.

How to use low-molecular-weight heparin to treat neonatal thrombosis in clinical practice

Among children, neonates have the highest incidence of thrombosis due to risk factors such as catheter instrumentation, an evolving coagulation system and congenital heart disease. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are the most commonly used anticoagulants in neonates. Published guidelines delineate dosing and monitoring protocols for LMWH therapy in newborns. However, challenging clinical situations frequently present that warrant healthcare providers to think critically beyond the range of guidelines, and judiciously resolve specific problems. This review describes the use of LMWH in the neonatal population, including practical aspects such as route and site of administration, preparation from concentrated formulations and methods to minimize pain of subcutaneous injection. It is followed by a discussion on dosing, monitoring and outcomes of LMWH therapy in neonates. The risk of recurrence of thrombosis in neonates after LMWH therapy is approximately 3% based on a pooled analysis of studies reporting this outcome over the last 24 years. The article concludes with an overview of the side-effects of LMWH, including the risk of bleeding which is around 4% based on pooled analyses of more than 30 studies.

FDA approval summary: Dalteparin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients

On May 16, 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dalteparin sodium for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) to reduce the risk of recurrence in pediatric patients 1 month of age and older. Approval was primarily based on FDA review of a single-arm trial evaluating dalteparin administered subcutaneous twice daily in 38 pediatric patients with symptomatic VTE. Efficacy was based on the achievement of therapeutic plasma anti-Xa levels. The FDA concluded that dalteparin has efficacy and acceptable safety for pediatric patients.

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Fondaparinux Use in Pediatric Patients With Obesity

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to comprehensively review the efficacy and safety data of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and fondaparinux in pediatric patients with obesity.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted (1900 to July 2020). Search terms utilized included LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin, fondaparinux, pediatric, child, children, obese, obesity, overweight. No limits or timeline restrictions were imposed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies that reported pediatric patients with described overweight or obesity and utilized LMWHs or fondaparinux were considered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 207 studies screened, 12 were included. Average dose reductions of 12.9% to 37.3% from the starting dose were observed with treatment indications of enoxaparin and increased up to 27.3% for prophylactic indications. Trends could not be concluded in the dalteparin and fondaparinux studies. Four thrombotic and 15 bleeding events were reported in the studies.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Pediatric patients with obesity may initially be underdosed or overdosed with enoxaparin compared with children with healthy body weight, depending on the indication.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients with obesity may benefit from proactively adjusting enoxaparin dosing on initiation of therapy. Further studies are needed for dalteparin and fondaparinux in these populations. Clinical controversy exists with the relevance of monitoring these high-risk medications for therapeutic and prophylactic indications. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic events were similar to reported adult outcomes.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dalteparin in Pediatric Patients With Venous Thromboembolism

This article describes the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of dalteparin in pediatric patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). A prospective multicenter open‐label study was conducted in children who required anticoagulation for the treatment of VTE. The study population included children with and without cancer. The goal was to describe the pharmacokinetics of dalteparin using anti‐Xa as a surrogate marker and to determine the dose required to achieve therapeutic anti‐Xa levels (0.5‐1.0 IU/mL). The anti‐Xa data were supplemented with 2 published studies and analyzed using population pharmacokinetic approaches. The pharmacokinetics of dalteparin following subcutaneous injection in pediatric patients was described by a 1‐compartment model with linear absorption and elimination. Body weight was added as a covariate on both CL/F and Vd/F as a power function with fixed exponents of 0.75 and 1.0, respectively. The estimates of CL/F and Vd/F in the full model were 929 mL/h and 7180 mL, respectively, for a reference female patient aged 12 years with body weight of 43 kg. Body weight‐normalized CL/F decreased with age. Cancer status and sex did not have significant effects on CL/F and Vd/F. Simulations were conducted to select starting doses of dalteparin that would rapidly achieve therapeutic anti‐Xa levels. These simulations suggested that the recommended starting doses of dalteparin administered subcutaneously in pediatric patients of different age cohort groups for treatment of VTE were 150 IU/kg every 12 hours (1 month to <2 years), 125 IU/kg every 12 hours (≥2 to <8 years), and 100 IU/kg every 12 hours (≥8 to <19 years).

Challenges and Opportunities in the Pharmacological Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Children

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important but historically under-recognized problem in pediatrics, with an incidence concentrated in hospitalized children. A number of specific VTE diseases with discrete triggers have been described, but the most common pediatric trigger is the presence of central venous access devices. VTE diseases, though heterogenous in etiology, are linked by the common therapeutic strategies shared by their management. Historically, the most commonly used drug therapies have been unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, and vitamin K antagonists, based on extrapolation from adult data rather than any specific pediatric trials. Although these widely used drugs appear safe and effective in expert hands, the historical lack of pediatric data is problematic in view of the recognized significant differences between children and adults with regards to hemostatic physiology, VTE etiology, and drug pharmacokinetics. The increasing adult usage of novel VTE pharmacotherapies such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has led to considerable interest in exploring the pediatric applications of these newer drugs. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of existing VTE pharmacotherapies and outlines emerging novel pediatric VTE therapies, particularly DOACs, within the context of the current pediatric trial landscape.

Management of thrombosis in children and neonates: practical use of anticoagulants in children

Venous thrombosis (VTE) in children and neonates presents numerous management challenges. Although increasing in frequency, VTE in children and neonates is still uncommon compared with adults. The epidemiology of VTE is vastly different in neonates vs children vs adolescents vs adults. In reality, pediatric thrombosis should be viewed as a multitude of rare diseases (eg, renal vein thrombosis, spontaneous thrombosis, catheter-related thrombosis, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis), all requiring different approaches to diagnosis and with different short- and long-term consequences, but linked by the use of common therapeutic agents. Further, children have fundamentally different physiology in terms of blood flow, developmental hemostasis, and, likely, endothelial function. The American Society of Hematology 2017 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Treatment of Pediatric VTE provides up-to-date evidence-based guidelines related to treatment. Therefore, this article will focus on the practical use of therapeutic agents in the management of pediatric VTE, especially unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and oral vitamin K antagonists, as the most common anticoagulants used in children. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain in clinical trials in children and should not be used outside of formal trials for the foreseeable future.

Design and rationale for the DIVERSITY study: An open-label, randomized study of dabigatran etexilate for pediatric venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care (SOC) for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprises unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by LMWH or vitamin K antagonists, all of which have limitations. Dabigatran etexilate (DE) has demonstrated efficacy and safety for adult VTE and has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of the current SOC. Pediatric trials are needed to establish dosing in children and to confirm that results obtained in adults are applicable in the pediatric setting.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the design and rationale of a planned phase IIb/III trial that will evaluate a proposed dosing algorithm for DE and assess the safety and efficacy of DE versus SOC for pediatric VTE treatment.

PATIENTS/METHODS

An open-label, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority study will be conducted in approximately 180 patients aged 0 to <18 years with VTE, who have received initial UFH or LMWH treatment and who are expected to require ≥3 months of anticoagulation therapy. Patients will receive DE or SOC for 3 months. DE will be administered twice daily as capsules, pellets, or an oral liquid formulation according to patient age. Initial doses will be calculated using a proposed dosing algorithm.

RESULTS

There will be two coprimary endpoints: a composite efficacy endpoint comprising the proportion of patients with complete thrombus resolution, freedom from recurrent VTE and VTE-related mortality, and a safety endpoint: freedom from major bleeding events.

CONCLUSION

Findings will provide valuable information regarding the efficacy and safety of DE for the treatment of pediatric VTE. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01895777.

Evaluation of the age-dependent dosing recommendations for the administration of daily tinzaparin in children with thrombosis

Essentials The once-daily dosing of tinzaparin provides an advantage over other low molecular weight heparins. The recommended age-dependent doses of tinzaparin in children have not previously been validated. Once-daily administration of tinzaparin is a safe and effective treatment of childhood thrombosis. Recommended doses are appropriate but monitoring may be required due to inter-individual variation.

SUMMARY

Background The recommended starting doses of tinzaparin for the treatment of thrombosis in children have not previously been validated. There are few data to support the efficacy and safety of once-daily tinzaparin dosing in children with thrombosis. Objectives To investigate the use of tinzaparin for the treatment of childhood thrombosis, and to evaluate the age-dependent dosing recommendations and define outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of children aged 0 to < 16 years treated for thrombosis at a large teaching hospital in the UK between 2008 and 2015. Medical records were reviewed to evaluate tinzaparin dosing, anti-activated factor X (FXa) levels, and patient outcomes. Results Seventy-nine children were identified as having received tinzaparin. Dosing information was available for 57. Younger children required higher doses to reach a therapeutic level. The therapeutic dose requirement varied within age groups, supporting the use of anti-FXa monitoring. Over a median follow-up of 35 months, there were 13 (16%) bleeding episodes (two major; seven clinically relevant but non-major; and four minor). There were two (3%) recurrent episodes of thrombosis. Children were treated for a median duration of 3 months, and the majority (86%) remained on tinzaparin for the duration of their anticoagulant therapy. Conclusion Once-daily tinzaparin is a safe and effective treatment for childhood thrombosis, with rates of recurrence and bleeding similar to those for other anticoagulants used in children. The recommended starting doses are appropriate, but anti-FXa monitoring may be required, owing to interindividual variability in the therapeutic dose requirement.

Weight-based dosing in medication use: what should we know?

BACKGROUND

Weight-based dosing strategy is still challenging due to poor awareness and adherence. It is necessary to let clinicians know of the latest developments in this respect and the correct circumstances in which weight-based dosing is of clinical relevance.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed.

RESULTS

Clinical indications, physiological factors, and types of medication may determine the applicability of weight-based dosing. In some cases, the weight effect may be minimal or the proper dosage can only be determined when weight is combined with other factors. Medications within similar therapeutic or structural class (eg, anticoagulants, antitumor necrosis factor medications, P2Y12-receptor antagonists, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies) may exhibit differences in requirements on weight-based dosing. In some cases, weight-based dosing is superior to currently recommended fixed-dose regimen in adult patients (eg, hydrocortisone, vancomycin, linezolid, and aprotinin). On the contrary, fixed dosing is noninferior to or even better than currently recommended weight-based regimen in adult patients in some cases (eg, cyclosporine microemulsion, recombinant activated Factor VII, and epoetin α). Ideal body-weight-based dosing may be superior to the currently recommended total body-weight-based regimen (eg, atracurium and rocuronium). For dosing in pediatrics, whether weight-based dosing is better than body surface-area-based dosing is dependent on the particular medication (eg, methotrexate, prednisone, prednisolone, zidovudine, didanosine, growth hormone, and 13-cis-retinoic acid). Age-based dosing strategy is better than weight-based dosing in some cases (eg, intravenous busulfan and dalteparin). Dosing guided by pharmacogenetic testing did not show pharmacoeconomic advantage over weight-adjusted dosing of 6-mercaptopurine. The common viewpoint (ie, pediatric patients should be dosed on the basis of body weight) is not always correct. Effective weight-based dosing interventions include standardization of weight estimation, documentation and dosing determination, dosing chart, dosing protocol, order set, pharmacist participation, technological information, and educational measures.

CONCLUSION

Although dosing methods are specified in prescribing information for each drug and there are no principal pros and cons to be elaborated, this review of weight-based dosing strategy will enrich the knowledge of medication administration from the perspectives of safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomics, and will also provide research opportunities in clinical practice. Clinicians should be familiar with dosage and administration of the medication to be prescribed as well as the latest developments.