Development of micellar reactive oxygen species assay for photosafety evaluation of poorly water-soluble chemicals

Modified ESR-based photosafety test (ESR-PT) detecting singlet oxygen and free radical formation

The electron spin resonance-based photosafety test (ESR-PT) was modified using a new parameter, photoreactivity index (PRI), to detect singlet oxygen and free radical photoproducts simultaneously. With this modification, the modified ESR-PT is expected to reduce the number of false negative results due to chemicals producing free radical photoproducts other than singlet oxygen. The assay performance of the modified ESR-PT was evaluated using 56 chemicals, including hydrophobic chemicals. When using the PRI cutoff value of 2.0 in the modified ESR-PT, the accuracy relative to photosafety reference data was 91.1%, and the applicability (100%) was better than the other non-animal photosafety test. Among the chemicals producing positive results, bithionol, fenticlor, and doxycycline HCl were considered positive based on the detection of free radical photoproducts, suggesting that these three chemicals may have phototoxic or photoallergic potential via radical reactions. Additionally, this finding demonstrated the fundamental advantage of the modified ESR-PT using ESR spectroscopy, which can detect radicals selectively and quantitatively. Accordingly, the new parameter PRI is effective for photosafety evaluations based on not only singlet oxygen but also free radical photoproducts generated from chemicals. Therefore, the modified ESR-PT has a great potential for a photosafety test method applicable to various chemicals.

MLtox, online phototoxicity prediction webpage

Phototoxicity, sometimes in the literature referred to as photo-irritation, is a chemically induced reaction requiring light. While it is generally accepted that phototoxicity testing can be performed in the majority of cases in vitro (i.e. without the use of experimental animals), these tests may sometimes provide contradictory predictions. Understanding the mechanisms of initiating events based on the molecule's structure and its ability to reach the excited state and consequently generate ROS enables the creation of predictive QSAR for this adverse outcome. The ability to predict the phototoxicity potential via a QSAR model is beneficial in reducing the number of mechanical in vitro/in chemico tests needed to demonstrate absence of phototoxicity and it is very helpful in the overall safety assessment process. The QSAR prediction model presented here focused on developing a robust platform freely available on the web via the link http://mltox.online to provide interpretable predictions of the phototoxicity of tested molecules. Great attention was devoted to interpretability and explainability of the prediction results. The web application allows the user to input a chemical by CAS number, SMILES code or trivial name. The user can choose between simple prediction or advanced tools options. These extended tools include the artificial intelligence explainability of model prediction using XSMILES (interactive visualization technique to support the interpretation of SMILES) and SHAP values (impact each element on the prediction). The comprehensive tools in question allow the user to explore the properties of phototoxic substances and to understand the prediction outcomes better.

Causes and countermeasure for blank absorbance increase in the ROS assay

A reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay is an in chemico photoreactivity test listed in ICH S10 guideline and OECD Test Guideline No. 495. We currently utilize the ROS assay to assess the photosafety of cosmetic ingredients. We have recently confronted a problem that there was an absorbance increase of blank assessing superoxide anion generation after irradiation, whereas this did not occur in the negative control (sulisobenzone), leading to a dissatisfaction of the acceptance criteria. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the causes and find countermeasures. No significant effects of impurities and manufacturer differences of sodium phosphate and DMSO on blank absorbance increases were observed. In contrast, when Cu²⁺ was added to the buffer, the increase of blank absorbance after irradiation did not occur. We then confirmed the dose-response relationship and found that adding 0.1 μM of Cu²⁺ (corresponding to 6 ppb of Cu²⁺) was sufficient in suppressing the blank absorbance increase, suggesting the need of Cu²⁺ supplementation to the buffer. Finally, we confirmed that the ROS assay using the buffer supplemented with 0.1 μM of Cu²⁺ obtained stable test results by using 17 proficiency chemicals listed in TG 495. Our results suggest that the modified ROS assay protocol would be useful for obtaining stable test results.

In chemico sequential testing strategy for assessing the photoallegic potential

Several non-animal testing methods to assess photoallergic potential have been developed so far, while none of them have yet to be validated and regulatory accepted. Currently, some photoreactivity assays such as UV-VIS spectral analysis and ROS assay are generally used for initial photosafety assessments because of their high sensitivity. However, they have a low specificity, generating a high percentage of false positive results, and the development of a follow-up assessment method is desired. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an in chemico photoallergy testing method, photo-direct peptide reactivity assay (photo-DPRA). Based on photosafety information, 34 photoallergens and 16 non-photoallergens were selected and subjected to UV-VIS spectral analysis, ROS/micellar ROS assays, photo-DPRA, sequential testing strategy (STS) consisting of all three methods, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). Combination of the methods addressing the key events of photoallergy exhibited high prediction performance. Our results showed the proposed strategy would be useful to predict the photoallergic potential of chemicals as the follow-up assessment for false positive chemicals by UV/VIS spectral analysis and ROS assay.

Hydrochlorothiazide Use and Risk of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers: A Biological Plausibility Study

Recent studies reported the association between increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) and the use of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), one of the most commonly prescribed diuretic, antihypertensive drug, over the world. Although HCTZ is known to be photosensitizing, the mechanisms involved in its potential prophotocarcinogenic effects remain unclear. Under acute exposure, therapeutically relevant concentrations of HCTZ (70, 140, and 370 ng/mL) amplified UVA-induced double-strand breaks, oxidative DNA, and protein damage in HaCaT human keratinocytes, and this effect was associated to a defective activity of the DNA repair enzyme, OGG1. Oxidative damage to DNA, but not that to proteins, was reversible within few hours. After chronic, combined exposure to HCTZ (70 ng/mL) and UVA (10 J/cm2), for 9 weeks, keratinocytes acquired a dysplastic-like phenotype characterized by a multilayered morphology and alterations in cell size, shape, and contacts. At the ultrastructural level, several atypical and enlarged nuclei and evident nucleoli were also observed. These transformed keratinocytes were apoptosis resistant, exhibited enhanced clonogenicity capacity, increased DNA damage and inflammation, defective DNA repair ability, and increased expression of the oncogene ΔNp63α and intranuclear β-catenin accumulation (a hallmark of Wnt pathway activation), compared to those treated with UVA alone. None of these molecular, morphological, or functional effects were observed in cells treated with HCTZ alone. All these features resemble in part those of preneoplastic lesions and NMSCs and provide evidence of a biological plausibility for the association among exposure to UVA, use of HCTZ, and increased risk of NMSCs. These results are of translational relevance since we used environmentally relevant UVA doses and tested HCTZ at concentrations that reflect the plasma levels of doses used in clinical practice. This study also highlights that drug safety data should be followed by experimental evaluations to clarify the mechanistic aspects of adverse events.

[Establishment and International Harmonization of Photosafety Testing Strategy]

Considerable attention has been drawn to predict a photosafety hazard on new chemicals. A number of phototoxins tend to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) via energy transfer mechanisms following UV/VIS excitation, including superoxide and singlet oxygen. Then, ROS assay has been designed to assess photoreactivity of pharmaceuticals, of which the principle is to monitor types I and II photochemical reactions of the test chemicals when exposed to simulated sunlight. This simple analytical test could be used to screen potential chemical scaffolds, leads, and candidate drugs to identify and/or select away from those having phototoxic potential. The validation study for the ROS assay has been being carried out by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), supervised by the Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (JaCVAM). Although several false positives appeared, the ROS assay on 42 coded chemicals has provided no false negative predictions. The validation study tentatively indicates satisfactory outcomes in terms of transferability, intra- and inter-laboratory variability, and predictive capacity. Thus, a negative result in this ROS assay would indicate a very low probability of phototoxicity, whereas a positive result would be a flag for follow-up assessment. Upon international harmonization activities supported by several agencies and industrial groups, ROS assay was successfully adopted as International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) S10 guideline (2014) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline 495 (2019).

[Current Issues in Photosafety Evaluation]

Phototoxicity is a toxic response elicited by topically applied or systemically administered photoreactive chemicals after exposure to light and can be broadly categorized into photoirritation, photoallergy, photogenotoxicity, and photocarcinogenicity. The need in the 21st century for accurate evaluation of photosafety has led to the publication of a number of guidelines from government agencies in Europe and the U.S.A. as well as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In this review, we first discuss the mechanisms of phototoxicity and how they can be evaluated. We then discuss the state of the art and challenges now faced in photosafety evaluation of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Additionally, we describe the latest developments in OECD test guidelines (TG) for assessing photosafety, including revisions to the in vitro 3T3 neutral red uptake (NRU) phototoxicity test (TG 432) and the newly adopted reactive oxigen species (ROS) assay (TG 495). We will emphasize the importance of selecting the most appropriate means of evaluation with reference to the latest guidelines and other legal criteria for conducting photosafety evaluation.

Development of a new photosafety test method based on singlet oxygen generation detected using electron spin resonance

Photosafety evaluations of chemicals used in consumer products, such as pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, are very important. Currently, two non-animal tests for photosafety evaluations, the in vitro 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity test (NRU PT) and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, are used to detect photoreactive chemicals. However, these two tests are difficult to apply to hydrophobic chemicals. In the present study, we attempted to develop a new photosafety test method, named the electron spin resonance-based photosafety test (ESR-PT), that would be applicable even to hydrophobic chemicals based on the detection of singlet oxygen generation after irradiation using ESR spectroscopy with 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine as a spin trap reagent. To achieve a quantitative evaluation, the singlet oxygen formation (SOF) value, which can be calculated as the increment in relative intensity after irradiation of the test mixture normalized by the increment in relative intensity after irradiation of the vehicle control solution, was calculated. The performance of the ESR-PT was evaluated by testing all the proficiency chemicals of the ROS assay plus additional chemicals, including hydrophobic chemicals and chemicals that tested false negative in the 3T3-NRU PT and ROS assay. SOF values were successfully calculated for all the chemicals tested including the hydrophobic chemicals, and the accuracy of the ESR-PT using a tentative cutoff value of 2.8 against the photosafety information was 100%. Therefore, the SOF value could be an effective parameter for photosafety evaluations, suggesting that the newly developed ESR-PT is a promising non-animal test applicable even to hydrophobic chemicals.

Development of photo-amino acid derivative reactivity assay: a novel in chemico alternative method for predicting photoallergy

Photoallergy test of cosmetics and several types of pharmaceutical substances is often necessary for obtaining approval from authorities. However, there are no official test guidelines for photoallergy evaluation. Therefore, we tried to establish a photoallergy test by utilizing an in chemico alternative sensitization method, amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA). To determine the criteria for judging the photoallergy potential, photo-ADRA with or without photoirradiation was performed using 60 photoallergenic chemicals, and cysteine and lysine derivatives were detected using high-performance liquid chromatography either by absorbance or fluorescence measurement. The accuracy of prediction was 81.4% (48 of 59) and 80.0% (48 of 60) using the absorbance and fluorescence methods, respectively. However, as chemicals can breakdown into multiple chemicals during photoirradiation, the absorbance method often cannot perform accurate detection due to co-elution, whereas the fluorescence method can do this due to lack of co-elution. Moreover, all eight chemicals that were found to be negative or false-positive for photoirritation in the 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity test were confirmed as positive for photoallergy using this method. Furthermore, we prepared three types of pseudo-mixtures where we added one photoallergen along with five nonphotoallergens and performed the photo-ADRA by the ultraviolet and fluorescence methods. The result of the fluorescence method was almost the same as that obtained with the use of a single photoallergen and hence the outcome was not affected by the mixture. Thus, this study not only showed a method of evaluating the photoallergy potential of a single chemical but also a mixture, making it useful as an in chemico photoallergy alternative test.

Phototoxic risk assessment of dermally-applied chemicals with structural variety based on photoreactivity and skin deposition

Combined use of photochemical and pharmacokinetic (PK) data for phototoxic risk assessment was previously proposed, and the system provided reliable phototoxic risk predictions of chemicals in same chemical series. This study aimed to verify the feasibility of the screening system for phototoxic risk assessment on dermally-applied chemicals with wide structural diversity, as a first attempt. Photochemical properties of test chemicals, 2-acetonaphthalene, 4'-methylbenzylidene camphor, 6-methylcoumarin, methyl N-methylanthranilate, and sulisobenzone, were evaluated in terms of UV absorption and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and PK profiles of the test chemicals in rat skin were characterized after dermal co-application. All test chemicals showed strong UVA/B absorption with molar extinction coefficients of over 3000 M^-1⋅cm^-1, and irradiated 2-acetonaphthalene, 6-methylcoumarin, and methyl N-methylanthranilate exhibited significant ROS generation. Dermally-applied 2-acetonaphthalene and 4'-methylbenzylidene camphor indicated high and long-lasting skin deposition compared with the other test chemicals. Based on the photochemical and PK data, 2-acetonaphthalene was predicted to have potent phototoxic risk. The predicted phototoxic risk of the test chemicals by integration of obtained data was mostly consistent with their in vivo phototoxicity observed in rat skin. The screening strategy employing photochemical and PK data would have high prediction capacity and wide applicability for photosafety evaluation of chemicals.

Amorphous Solid Dispersion of Meloxicam Enhanced Oral Absorption in Rats With Impaired Gastric Motility

Meloxicam (MEL) shows a slow onset of action in severe pain patients on account of delayed gastric motility. This study aimed to develop an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) of MEL to achieve rapid oral absorption in severe pain patients. ASD formulations of MEL with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (ASD-MEL/HPMC) and polyacrylates and polymethacrylates (ASD-MEL/EUD) were prepared and physicochemically characterized. Oral absorption behavior of MEL samples was also clarified in both normal and propantheline (PPT)-pretreated rats with impaired gastric motility. MEL in the formulations was amorphous, and ASD formulations of MEL exhibited high dissolution behavior in acidic solution. After oral administration of crystalline MEL (1 mg-MEL/kg), a 69% reduction in AUC_0-4 was observed between normal and PPT-pretreated rats. For orally dosed ASD-MEL/HPMC (1 mg-MEL/kg), there were approximately 9- and 12-fold increases of AUC_0-4 in normal and PPT-pretreated rats, respectively, in comparison with crystalline MEL (1 mg-MEL/kg). However, the oral absorption behavior of ASD-MEL/EUD (1 mg-MEL/kg) was low and similar to that of crystalline MEL. The infrared spectroscopic study revealed potent interactions between MEL and EUD, possibly leading to marked attenuation of MEL absorption. This ASD approach might provide rapid oral absorption of MEL in severe pain patients, possibly leading to better clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of a general toxicity study incorporating phototoxicity assessments in Sprague-Dawley rats

Previously, we showed that phototoxicity assessments in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats can detect phototoxic potential to the same degree as those in guinea pigs. In this study, we examined whether phototoxicity assessments can be incorporated into general toxicology studies, using SD rats. Three phototoxic compounds were tested. Acridine and 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) were transdermally administered, and 8-MOP and lomefloxacin were orally administered. The animals were allocated to three groups for each compound: single-dose, repeated-dose, and repeated-dose plus toxicokinetics (TK). The single-dose group was irradiated with UV-A and UV-B after a single administration of the drug. The repeated-dose and TK groups were irradiated after 8 days of repeated administration of the drug. Blood samples were also collected from the TK group on days 1 and 7 after administration. The phototoxic compounds resulted in skin reactions in all the groups, with no difference in the degree of skin reaction among the three groups. In the TK measurements, all of the phototoxic compounds were detected in the plasma samples, and the irradiation timing was close to the T_max. These results indicate that phototoxic potential could be evaluated in the TK group, and phototoxicity assessments could be incorporated into general toxicology studies. This reduces the number of studies and animals required, thus shortening the research and development period, and supporting the 3Rs principle of animal experiments. The study also provides information regarding appropriate irradiation timings, differences between the sexes, and dose-response, in turn enabling the phototoxic risk of the compounds to be clearly evaluated.

Phototoxicity Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Substances with a Reactive Oxygen Species Assay Using Ultraviolet A

With ultraviolet and visible light exposure, some pharmaceutical substances applied systemically or topically may cause phototoxic skin irritation. The major factor in phototoxicity is the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as singlet oxygen and superoxide anion that cause oxidative damage to DNA, lipids and proteins. Thus, measuring the generation of ROS can predict the phototoxic potential of a given substance indirectly. For this reason, a standard ROS assay (ROS assay) was developed and validated and provides an alternative method for phototoxicity evaluation. However, negative substances are over-predicted by the assay. Except for ultraviolet A (UVA), other UV ranges are not a major factor in causing phototoxicity and may lead to incorrect labeling of some non-phototoxic substances as being phototoxic in the ROS assay when using a solar simulator. A UVA stimulator is also widely used to evaluate phototoxicity in various test substances. Consequently, we identified the applicability of a UVA simulator to the ROS assay for photoreactivity. In this study, we tested 60 pharmaceutical substances including 50 phototoxins and 10 non-phototoxins to predict their phototoxic potential via the ROS assay with a UVA simulator. Following the ROS protocol, all test substances were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide or sodium phosphate buffer. The final concentration of the test solutions in the reaction mixture was 20 to 200 μM. The exposure was with 2.0~2.2 mW/cm² irradiance and optimization for a relevant dose of UVA was performed. The generation of ROS was compared before and after UVA exposure and was measured by a microplate spectrophotometer. Sensitivity and specificity values were 85.7% and 100.0% respectively, and the accuracy was 88.1%. From this analysis, the ROS assay with a UVA simulator is suitable for testing the photoreactivity and estimating the phototoxic potential of various test pharmaceutical substances.

Photochemical Mechanism of Riboflavin-Induced Degradation of Famotidine and a Suggested Pharmaceutical Strategy for Improving Photostability

The present study aimed to clarify the mechanism of photodegradation of famotidine with riboflavin (FMT/RF), and to develop a photochemically stabilized formulation of FMT/RF. Photochemical properties of RF were characterized by UV-VIS spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, and photostability testing. Pharmacokinetic study was conducted in rats after intravenous administration of FMT (1 mg/kg) formulation containing RF (0.01 mg/kg). The UV-VIS spectral pattern of RF partly overlapped with the sunlight spectrum, and ROS generation from photoirradiated RF was remarkable; thus, RF had high photoreactive potential. In the photostability testing, after irradiation (250 W/m(2)), degradation rate for FMT in FMT/RF was ca. 11-fold higher than that in FMT alone. The addition of radical scavengers to FMT/RF led to attenuated photodegradation of FMT/RF; in particular, the addition of L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C; VC) to FMT/RF showed ca. 86% inhibition of the photodegradation of FMT/RF. The pharmacokinetic study on FMT indicated that the addition of VC (1 mg/kg) to FMT/RF had no significant impact on the pharmacokinetic behavior of FMT. These findings suggest that ROS-mediated photochemical reaction would be involved in the photodegradation pathway of FMT/RF, and the complementary use of VC might be an attractive approach to improve the photostability of FMT/RF.

Intra-/inter-laboratory validation study on reactive oxygen species assay for chemical photosafety evaluation using two different solar simulators

A previous multi-center validation study demonstrated high transferability and reliability of reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay for photosafety evaluation. The present validation study was undertaken to verify further the applicability of different solar simulators and assay performance. In 7 participating laboratories, 2 standards and 42 coded chemicals, including 23 phototoxins and 19 non-phototoxic drugs/chemicals, were assessed by the ROS assay using two different solar simulators (Atlas Suntest CPS series, 3 labs; and Seric SXL-2500V2, 4 labs). Irradiation conditions could be optimized using quinine and sulisobenzone as positive and negative standards to offer consistent assay outcomes. In both solar simulators, the intra- and inter-day precisions (coefficient of variation; CV) for quinine were found to be below 10%. The inter-laboratory CV for quinine averaged 15.4% (Atlas Suntest CPS) and 13.2% (Seric SXL-2500V2) for singlet oxygen and 17.0% (Atlas Suntest CPS) and 7.1% (Seric SXL-2500V2) for superoxide, suggesting high inter-laboratory reproducibility even though different solar simulators were employed for the ROS assay. In the ROS assay on 42 coded chemicals, some chemicals (ca. 19-29%) were unevaluable because of limited solubility and spectral interference. Although several false positives appeared with positive predictivity of ca. 76-92% (Atlas Suntest CPS) and ca. 75-84% (Seric SXL-2500V2), there were no false negative predictions in both solar simulators. A multi-center validation study on the ROS assay demonstrated satisfactory transferability, accuracy, precision, and predictivity, as well as the availability of other solar simulators.