Influenza vaccine improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Association between influenza vaccination and prognosis in patients with ischemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is substantial epidemiological evidence demonstrating that influenza contributes to cardiovascular events in patients who already have cardiovascular diseases. However, the efficacy of influenza vaccination on the prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase on September 13, 2024, to investigate the effects of the influenza vaccine on the prognosis of patients with IHD. The effect sizes were combined using random-effects models, and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was used to assess the reliability and validity of the results.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with a total of 5659 patients (median age ranging from 57.1 to 66 years, 67.8% male) with IHD were included. The use of influenza vaccine reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio [RR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.87, number-needed-to-treat [NNT] of 37, high certainty), cardiovascular death (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.87, moderate certainty), all-cause mortality (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.84, high certainty) and myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.93, high certainty) in patients with IHD compared with control. The analysis revealed no significant benefit regarding hospitalization for heart failure (HF) (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.21-3.99, moderate certainty) and revascularization (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.10-3.45, moderate certainty). The NNT to avoid 1 event was 37 for major adverse cardiovascular events, 56 for cardiovascular death, 67 for MI, and 41 for all-cause death. TSA showed that the benefit of influenza vaccine in reducing MACE was conclusive, no more trials were necessary.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests high level of evidence that the use of influenza vaccine may reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with IHD.

Comparing frequency of booster vaccination to prevent severe COVID-19 by risk group in the United States

There is a public health need to understand how different frequencies of COVID-19 booster vaccines may mitigate the risk of severe COVID-19, while accounting for waning of protection and differential risk by age and immune status. By analyzing United States COVID-19 surveillance and seroprevalence data in a microsimulation model, here we show that more frequent COVID-19 booster vaccination (every 6-12 months) in older age groups and the immunocompromised population would effectively reduce the burden of severe COVID-19, while frequent boosters in the younger population may only provide modest benefit against severe disease. In persons 75+ years, the model estimated that annual boosters would reduce absolute annual risk of severe COVID-19 by 199 (uncertainty interval: 183-232) cases per 100,000 persons, compared to a one-time booster vaccination. In contrast, for persons 18-49 years, the model estimated that annual boosters would reduce this risk by 14 (10-19) cases per 100,000 persons. Those with prior infection had lower benefit of more frequent boosting, and immunocompromised persons had larger benefit. Scenarios with emerging variants with immune evasion increased the benefit of more frequent variant-targeted boosters. This study underscores the benefit of considering key risk factors to inform frequency of COVID-19 booster vaccines in public health guidance and ensuring at least annual boosters in high-risk populations.

Immunizing hearts: exploring the vaccination frontier in heart failure management

Heart failure (HF) is a widespread clinical condition that affects numerous individuals globally and is a leading cause of hospitalization, particularly in the elderly population. Despite efforts to manage HF using various pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions, mortality and hospitalization rates remain alarmingly high. Preventive vaccination has emerged as a key measure endorsed by cardiology societies for reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with HF. This study undertakes an extensive review of existing literature to explore the role of vaccination in managing HF, focusing specifically on the immunological pathways involved and potential benefits offered by immunization in this context. This article highlights the role of various vaccines, including influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccines, in reducing HF-related hospitalization, mortality, and overall disease burden. Additionally, this article will delve into specific vaccines that have shown promise in HF management, such as influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccines, along with the rationale for their use, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and real-world data supporting their effectiveness in patients with HF. This article also considers potential challenges and obstacles to widespread vaccination in individuals with HF, which include vaccine hesitancy, accessibility, and adverse events related to vaccines.

Platelet versus plasma CXCL14, coronary artery disease, and clinical outcomes

Background

Platelets express CXCL14, while platelet-derived CXCL14 induces monocyte chemotaxis and exerts an angiostatic effect on endothelial cells.

Objectives

This study investigated both platelet surface-associated and circulating levels of CXCL14 in patients with heart disease and associations of this chemokine with myocardial function and outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 450 patients with symptomatic heart disease. Platelet surface-associated and plasma CXCL14 levels were analyzed. All patients were followed up for 360 days for a primary composite outcome consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and/or ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes consisted of the single events of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction.

Results

Baseline platelet-associated but not circulating CXCL14 levels were significantly lower in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (mean fluorescence intensity logarithmized, 1.35 ± 0.35) when compared to those with acute coronary syndrome (1.47 ± 0.38) and without CAD (1.51 ± 0.40). Platelet CXCL14 levels were significantly lower (1.37 ± 0.37 vs 1.48 ± 0.39) and circulating CXCL14 levels were significantly higher (lg, 2.88 ± 0.20 pg/mL vs 2.82 ± 0.26 pg/mL) in patients with normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) when compared to those with impaired LVEF. Low baseline circulating CXCL14 (hazard ratio, 2.33; 1.00-5.46) but not platelet CXCL14 was associated with worse outcome in patients with CAD.

Conclusion

Platelet-associated and circulating CXCL14 levels show differential regulation in patients with and without CAD. Although platelet-associated CXCL14 increased and circulating CXCL14 decreased with impairment of LVEF, only lower circulating CXCL14 upon admission was associated with worse prognosis in patients with CAD.

Influenza vaccination is associated with a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Evidence from longitudinal studies has shown that influenza infection is linked to an increased risk of arrhythmia. Therefore, we aimed to assess the role of influenza vaccination in arrhythmia prevention.

Materials and methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies that investigated the potential effects of the influenza vaccine on arrhythmia risk published until October 25th, 2021. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022300815).

Results

One RCT with 2,532 patients and six observational studies with 3,167,445 patients were included. One RCT demonstrated a non-significant benefit of the influenza vaccine against arrhythmias [odds ratio (OR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11–1.64; P = 0.20] in patients after myocardial infarction or those with high-risk stable coronary heart disease. A meta-analysis based on observational studies showed that vaccination was associated with a significantly lower risk of arrhythmia (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70–0.97; P = 0.02; I² = 76%). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98; P = 0.006; I² = 0%) and a non-significant but positive trend concerning ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.42–1.11; P = 0.12; I² = 85%) after influenza vaccination.

Conclusion

Based on the current evidence, influenza vaccination may be associated with a reduced risk of arrhythmia, especially AF. Influenza vaccination may be an effective tool for the prevention of arrhythmias. The effect of influenza vaccination on the risk of VAs and arrhythmias in patients at low risk for cardiovascular diseases should be further studied.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42022300815].

Characteristics and methodological standards across systematic reviews with Meta-analysis of efficacy and/or effectiveness of influenza vaccines: an overview of reviews

BACKGROUND

While systematic reviews (SR) generally suggest that vaccination is an effective way to prevent influenza infection, it is not clear if these conclusions are based on high quality SR methods. As such, we systematically identified, critically appraised, and summarised the characteristics and adherence to methodological standards in SRs with meta-analysis of efficacy/effectiveness of influenza vaccines.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Global Health, and CDSR for English-language SR publications up to July 11, 2022. We summarised the characteristics, adherence to methodological standards and SR quality (AMSTAR 2).

RESULTS

From 11,193 retrieved citations, we included 48 publications (47 SRs). Seventy-five percent were of a critically low quality, 19% of a low quality, 2% of a moderate quality, and 4% of a high quality. Thirteen percent were industry-funded, about 13% co-authored by industry employee(s), and 4% commissioned by an organisation or authority. Only 45% percent reported protocol registration, 6% reported collaboration with a knowledge synthesis librarian/information specialist, and 60% utilised a reporting checklist (e.g. PRISMA).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

SRs with meta-analysis of efficacy/effectiveness of influenza vaccines are mostly of critically low quality and even the more recent reviews did not follow current best SR practices. These findings are significant in view of the controversies that surround influenza vaccines, and the use of SRs in informed decision-making. However, the findings do not justify curtailment or cessation of influenza vaccine use as vaccines continue to offer substantial net public health benefit.HighlightsWe systematically identified, critically appraised, and summarised the characteristics and adherence to methodological standards in 47 systematic reviews with meta-analysis of efficacy/effectiveness of influenza vaccines.13% of the reviews were industry-funded.About 13% of the reviews were co-authored by industry employee(s).4% of the reviews were commissioned by an organisation/authority.45% of the reviews reported protocol registration.6% of the reviews reported collaborating with a knowledge synthesis librarian/information specialist to prepare the search strategy.60% of the reviews reported using the PRISMA (or similar) checklist.75% of the reviews were judged to be of critically low quality; 19% of low quality; 2% of moderate quality; 4% of high quality.

Cardioprotective effects of Influenza Vaccination among Patients with Established Cardiovascular Disease or at High Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of the influenza vaccination on cardiovascular outcomes in people with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still debated.

AIM

The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of influenza vaccination on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes among patients with established CVD.

METHODS

We systematically searched all electronic databases from inception until 15 April 2022. Primary clinical outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM), and major adverse clinical events (MACE). Secondary endpoints were heart failure, myocardial infarction, CV mortality, and stroke.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles (five randomized trials and thirteen observational studies), with a total of 22,532,165 patients were included in the analysis. There were 217,072 participants included in the high cardiovascular risk or established CVD population (vaccinated n = 111,073 and unvaccinated n = 105,999). The mean age of the patients was 68 years old, without any difference between groups (69 vs 71) years. At mean follow-up of 1.5 years, vaccinated group was associated with lower risk for all-cause mortality [HR, 0.71(95%CI, 0.63-0.80), p < 0.001], MACE [HR, 0.83(95%CI:0.72-0.96), p = 0.01], CV mortality [HR, 0.78(95%CI:0.68-0.90), p < 0.001] and myocardial infarction [HR, 0.82(95%CI:0.74-0.92), p < 0.001] compared to unvaccinated group. While incidence of stroke [HR, 1.03 (95%CI, 0.92-1.06), p = 0.61] and heart failure [HR, 0.74 (95%CI, 0.51-1.08), p = 0.12] did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Influenza vaccination reduced major adverse clinical events, all-cause mortality, CV mortality and myocardial infarction. These highlighted the importance of influenza vaccination in established CVD or high cardiovascular risk.

Role of Inflammation in Cardiac Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Atherosclerosis is defined as an inflammatory disease. Low-grade inflammation is present in all phases of the cardiovascular continuum, since the establishment of cardiovascular risk factors and ischemic heart disease until cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction, heart failure and death. Not all inflammatory pathways are linked to cardiovascular outcomes, and thus, not all anti-inflammatory approaches decrease cardiovascular events. The most common cause of ventricular remodeling and heart failure is ischemic heart disease. Biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein can identify individuals at risk of major cardiovascular complications, but this biomarker has no causal effect on cardiovascular disease. On the other hand, interleukin 6 appears to be causally associated with cardiovascular disease. CANTOS was the first proof of concept study showing that anti-inflammatory therapy reduces major cardiovascular outcomes. Based on many anti-inflammatory trials, only therapies acting on the NLRP3 inflammasome, or interleukin 1beta, showed benefits on cardiovascular disease. Ventricular remodeling, particularly after myocardial infarction seems also influenced by the intensity of inflammatory responses, suggesting that anti-inflammatory therapies may reduce the residual cardiovascular risk. Inflammasome (NLRP3) activation, subtypes of lymphocytes, interleukin 6, and some inflammatory biomarkers, are associated with larger infarct size and impaired ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular risk factors commonly present in patients with myocardial infarction, and advanced age are associated with higher inflammatory activity.