Is anticoagulation required in plasmapheresis? A University Hospital Experience in Bogota, Colombia

In hospitalized patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange, major bleeding prevalence depends on the bleeding definition: An analysis of The Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III

BACKGROUND

Major bleeding in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been studied in large databases; but without standardizing bleeding definitions. Therefore, we used standardized definitions to evaluate major bleeding in hospitalized patients undergoing TPE using public use data files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we identified TPE-treated adults in a first inpatient encounter. We evaluated major bleeding prevalence using (1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, (2) packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, or (3) hemoglobin (Hgb) decline. Patients with major bleeding prior to their first TPE were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

Among 779 patients undergoing TPE, major bleeding by at least one of the three bleeding definitions occurred in 135 patients (17.3%). For each of the ICD/CPT, PRBC, and Hgb definitions, the prevalence of major bleeding was 2.8% (n = 31), 7.4% (n = 81), and 5.4% (n = 59), respectively. Only 3.7% of bleeds (5/135) were captured by all three definitions and 19.3% (26/135) exclusively by any two pairwise definitions. The addition of PRBC transfusion and Hgb decline to ICD/CPT code definitions increased bleeding prevalence threefold.

CONCLUSION

Among hospitalized adults undergoing TPE in the REDS-III study, the prevalence of major bleeding was 17.3%. The addition of PRBC and Hgb decline to ICD codes increased bleeding prevalence threefold. Future studies are needed to develop validated models that identify patients at risk for major bleeding during TPE.

Research priorities for therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill patients

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a therapeutic intervention that separates plasma from blood cells to remove pathological factors or to replenish deficient factors. The use of TPE is increasing over the last decades. However, despite a good theoretical rationale and biological plausibility for TPE as a therapy for numerous diseases or syndromes associated with critical illness, TPE in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting has not been studied extensively. A group of eighteen experts around the globe from different clinical backgrounds used a modified Delphi method to phrase key research questions related to "TPE in the critically ill patient". These questions focused on: (1) the pathophysiological role of the removal and replacement process, (2) optimal timing of treatment, (3) dosing and treatment regimes, (4) risk-benefit assumptions and (5) novel indications in need of exploration. For all five topics, the current understanding as well as gaps in knowledge and future directions were assessed. The content should stimulate future research in the field and novel clinical applications.

Hemostatic effects of therapeutic plasma exchange: A concise review

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) alters the hemostatic balance. Contributing to TPE's hemostatic effects is the mechanical processing of blood in the extracorporeal circuit, circuit anticoagulant, type of replacement fluid, TPE schedule and number of procedures, TPE timing relative to invasive procedures, and removal of nontargeted components such as platelets, coagulation proteins, and cytokines. Although TPE's hemostatic effects are well established, how it impacts the bleeding risk is not clearly understood. In this concise review, we describe the effects of the above TPE-related factors on hemostatic balance, present data on the effects of TPE on blood hemostasis, including its effects on platelet counts and clotting assays, and review the literature on the impact of TPE-induced hemostatic changes on TPE-associated bleeding events. Finally, we discuss risk factors associated with bleeding during TPE and review the literature on TPE-associated hemostatic effects in the pediatric population.

Central venous catheters are associated with thrombosis among adult inpatients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange

BACKGROUND

For inpatients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the United States, the primary mode of venous access is the central venous catheter (CVC). To evaluate the impact of CVC on thrombosis outcomes of patients undergoing TPE, we analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of the NIS, we identified hospital discharges of adult patients treated with TPE. Cases were classified into two groups based on CVC status. The primary outcome was thrombosis. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and charges.

RESULTS

Among 9863 TPE-treated discharges, CVC was used in 5988 (60%). These numbers correspond to weighted national estimates of 49 315 and 29 940, respectively. There was a positive and significant association between CVC and thrombosis (OR = 1.23, 95% 1.04-1.46, P = 0.0174), PRBC transfusion (OR = 1.15, 95% 1.03-1.29, P = 0.0121), in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.36, 95% 1.10-1.68, P = 0.0043), hospital LOS (15.63 vs 12.45 days, P < 0.0001) and hospital charges ($166 387 vs. $132 655, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized patients undergoing TPE, CVC use is associated with increased rates of thrombosis. Future studies are needed to investigate strategies to decrease CVC use and/or prevent CVC-associated complications in TPE-treated inpatients.

Bleeding outcomes of inpatients receiving therapeutic plasma exchange: A propensity-matched analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is associated with hemostatic abnormalities, its impact on bleeding outcomes is unknown. Therefore, the main study objective was to determine bleeding outcomes of inpatients treated with TPE.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), discharges were identified with 10 common TPE-treated conditions. A 1:3 propensity-matched analysis of TPE- to non-TPE-treated discharges was performed. The primary outcome was major bleeding and secondary outcomes were packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, mortality, disposition, hospital length of stay (LOS), and charges. Multivariable regression analyses were used to examine the association between TPE and study outcomes.

RESULTS

The study population was 15,964 discharges, of which 3991 were TPE- treated. The prevalence of major bleeding was low (5.4%). When compared to non-TPE discharges, TPE had a significant and positive association with major bleeding (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16-1.63, p = .0003). TPE was also associated with PRBC transfusion (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.42-1.94, p < .0001), in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.90, p = .0008), hospital length of stay (12.45 [95% CI: 11.95-12.97] vs. 7.38 [95% CI: 7.12-7.65] days, p < .0001) and total charges, ($125,123 [95% CI: $119,220-$131,317] vs. $61,953 [95% CI: $59,391-$64,625], p < .0001), and disposition to non-self-care (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19-1.39, p < .0001).

DISCUSSION

The use of TPE in the inpatient setting is positively associated with bleeding; however, with low prevalence. Future studies should address risk factors that predispose patients to TPE-associated bleeding.

Therapeutic plasma exchange: Experience in a third level hospital, 2013-2016, Lima (Peru)

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal procedure which consists of removing the patient's plasma and replacing it with an appropriate replacement fluid. Plasma and blood cells are separated by a centrifugation process. Our department has used TPE for several years, and in 2013 we introduced an institutional apheresis protocol. The main objective of this report is to describe the TPE procedures performed between 2013 and 2016 in the Peruvian population.

METHODS

We analyzed the technical and clinical aspects of 864 centrifugal TPE procedures as well as the associated complications. We evaluated 230 patients treated in our institution.

RESULTS

The therapeutic indications included 16 different diseases: 89.5% (N = 206/230) neurological, 7.3% (N = 17/230) hematological, 1.7% (N = 4/230) rheumatologic, 0.8% (N = 2/230) dermatological and 0.4% (N = 1/230) nephrological. 70.4% (N = 142/230) of patients were diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Albumin 5% solution was the most frequent replacement solution, used in 65.8% (N = 569/864) of the procedures. The mean plasma volume (PV) replaced was 2451.73 ml, corresponding to 1.0 PV in all procedures. Complications occurred in 10.9% (N = 95/864) of the sessions. Allergic reactions were the most common events and cardiopulmonary arrests were recorded in two patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of TPE performed in the Peruvian population. The use of an institutional apheresis protocol was beneficial to improve registries in our service and our professional health attention. This study reports a low rate of complications, suggesting that TPE is safe. There is a need to create a multicenter Peruvian apheresis registry to assess the benefits and risks of TPE in Peru.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in rheumatic diseases: a university hospital experience

INTRODUCTION

Each day, evidence accumulates related to the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in patients with rheumatic diseases. San Ignacio University Hospital has recorded all of the TPE sessions performed by the institution's apheresis group.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the TPE experience of patients with rheumatologic diseases in a hospital setting.

METHODS

Descriptive, observational, retrospective analysis. This study included analyses of the TPE sessions that were performed in patients with rheumatic diseases from November 2009 to November 2013.

RESULTS

The apheresis group performed 136 sessions in 27 patients. The mean patient age was 43 years (SD 18.5), and 59.3% of the patients were female. Regarding the diagnosis, the most frequents ones where: ANCA-associated vasculitis followed by systemic lupus erythematosus and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. The average number of sessions per patient was 5 (SD 1.8), and the average plasma exchange per patient was 1.3 plasma volume replacement units. The most used replacement solution was frozen fresh plasma (FFP; 63.2% of the sessions). Of all the sessions, 4.4% presented complications, and the majority of the complications were related to vascular access. Fifteen patients required renal replacement therapy (RRT) secondary to the same cause that created the need for TPE, 3 patients required RRT due to causes other than the TPE diagnostic intervention and 1 patient had undergone chronic dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE is a therapeutic alternative that is needed for the management of patients with rheumatic diseases with renal involvement and those who are refractory to conventional management. Our clinical results were in agreement with the global literature.

Plasmapheresis and other extracorporeal filtration techniques in critical patients

Plasmapheresis is an extracorporeal technique that eliminates macromolecules involved in pathological processes from plasma. A review is made of the technical aspects, main indications in critical care and potential complications of plasmapheresis, as well as of other extracorporeal filtration techniques such as endotoxin-removal columns and other devices designed to eliminate cytokines or modulate the inflammatory immune response in critical patients.

Double filtration plasmapheresis in the treatment of pancreatitis due to severe hypertriglyceridemia

BACKGROUND

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) leads to major complications such as acute pancreatitis. Lipoprotein apheresis has been proposed as a therapeutic tool for decreasing triglyceride levels, although experience is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience with double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in patients with severe HTG and pancreatitis in the plasmapheresis unit of a tertiary hospital in Spain.

METHODS

We recruited 4 patients with severe HTG (triglycerides [TGs] >1000 mg/dL) and acute pancreatitis. All the patients underwent DFPP as part of their treatment. Epidemiologic and laboratory data were collected before and after each plasmapheresis session.

RESULTS

The average TG level before plasmapheresis was 3136 mg/dL (35.44 mmol/L; range, 1306-6693 mg/dL, 14.76-75.63 mmol/L), and the average Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II level before the first session was 6 (range, 3-8). All patients made a full recovery, with a significant improvement in TG levels after plasmapheresis. The mean number of sessions was 2.1 (range, 1-3), and mean TG level after plasmapheresis was 428 mg/dL (4.84 mmol/L; range, 169-515 mg/dL; 1.91-5.82 mmol/L). After the first session, the mean decrease in TG levels was 69.16% (2169 mg/dL, range, 945-5925 mg/dL; 24.51 mmol/L, range, 10.78-66.95 mmol/L), and after the last session, TG levels fell by 89.09% (2794 mg/dL, range, 945-6198 mg/dL; 31.57 mmol/L, range, 10.68-70.04 mmol/L). None of the patients developed complications related to plasmapheresis.

CONCLUSIONS

According to available evidence and our own experience, DFPP can be an effective and rapid treatment option in patients with severe HTG and complications. However, further research, including randomized controlled studies, is necessary.