Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Pros and Cons of Cryopreserving Allogeneic Stem Cell Products

The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitously changed the practice of transplanting fresh allografts. The safety measures adopted during the pandemic prompted the near-universal graft cryopreservation. However, the influence of cryopreserving allogeneic grafts on long-term transplant outcomes has emerged only in the most recent literature. In this review, the basic principles of cell cryopreservation are revised and the effects of cryopreservation on the different graft components are carefully reexamined. Finally, a literature revision on studies comparing transplant outcomes in patients receiving cryopreserved and fresh grafts is illustrated.

Risk factors for graft-versus-host-disease after donor lymphocyte infusion following T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Introduction

Unmodified donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can boost the beneficial Graft-versus-Leukemia (GvL) effect but may also induce severe Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD). To improve the balance between GvL and GvHD, it is crucial to identify factors that influence the alloreactivity of DLI.

Methods

We investigated the effects of the presence of patient-derived antigen-presenting cells at time of DLI as estimated by the bone marrow (BM) chimerism status, lymphopenia as measured by the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at time of DLI, and the presence of a viral infection (de novo or reactivation) close to DLI on the risk of GvHD after DLI. The cohort consisted of patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who prophylactically or pre-emptively received DLI as standard care after alemtuzumab-based alloSCT. In patients at high risk for relapse, DLI was administered at 3 months after alloSCT (n=88) with a dose of 0.3x106 or 0.15x106 T cells/kg in case of a related or unrelated donor, respectively. All other patients (n=76) received 3x106 or 1.5x106 T cells/kg, respectively, at 6 months after alloSCT.

Results

For both DLIs, patients with reduced-intensity conditioning and an unrelated donor had the highest risk of GvHD. For DLI given at three months, viral infection within 1 week before and 2 weeks after DLI was an additional significant risk factor (hazard ratio (HR) 3.66 compared to no viral infection) for GvHD. At six months after alloSCT, viral infections were rare and not associated with GvHD. In contrast, mixed BM chimerism (HR 3.63 for ≥5% mixed chimerism compared to full donor) was an important risk factor for GvHD after DLI given at six months after alloSCT. ALC of <1000x106/l showed a trend for association with GvHD after this DLI (HR 2.05 compared to ≥1000x106/l, 95% confidence interval 0.94-4.45). Furthermore, the data suggested that the presence of a viral infection close to the DLI at three months or ≥5% mixed chimerism at time of the DLI at six months correlated with the severity of GvHD, thereby increasing their negative impact on the current GvHD-relapse-free survival.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate that the risk factors for GvHD after DLI depend on the setting of the DLI.

Rituximab for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder - therapeutic, preemptive, or prophylactic?

To minimize mortality due to posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), the following strategies have been used: (1) Therapy without EBV Monitoring, i.e., administration of rituximab after PTLD diagnosis, usually by biopsy, in the absence of routine Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia monitoring, (2) Prompt Therapy, i.e., monitoring EBV DNAemia, searching for PTLD by imaging when the DNAemia has exceeded a pre-specified threshold, and administration of rituximab if the imaging is consistent with PTLD, (3) Preemptive Therapy, i.e., monitoring EBV DNAemia and administration of rituximab when the DNAemia has exceeded a pre-specified threshold, and (4) Prophylaxis, i.e., administration of rituximab to all transplant recipients. The superiority of one of these strategies over the other strategies has not been established. Here we review the pros and cons of each strategy. Preemptive therapy or prophylaxis may currently be preferred for patients who are at a high risk of dying due to PTLD. However, Therapy without EBV Monitoring may be used for both high- and low-risk patients in the future, if effective and relatively non-toxic therapies for rituximab-refractory PTLD (e.g., EBV-specific T cells) have become easily available.

Donor lymphocyte infusions: An experience from a tertiary care center of North India

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) are often recommended products after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant to increase graft - versus - leukemia effect. More success rate of DLI has been reported in relapsed posttransplant chronic myeloid leukemia. Whatever the indication for DLI, mortality related to post-DLI infusion is 5%-20%, and more than one-third of patients will develop acute and/or chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) after DLI. We report two cases where DLIs were used for residual disease after posttransplant. Both of DLI went uneventful. None of the patient's developed signs of GVHD postinfusion. Although both patients expired with different causes, none were related to DLI infusion. Information from published literature suggests that DLI should be administered early after relapse or as a prophylactic strategy in patients receiving T-cell-depleted grafts, and patients with aggressive diseases may benefit from disease reduction before DLI. However, further evidence is required to evaluate its efficacy, especially in relapsed or residual hematological malignancies.

[Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes]

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the treatment options for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This treatment is indicated as first-line treatment for high-risk MDS according to the IPSS and R-IPSS classifications and improves overall survival and progression-free survival. However, allo-HSCT is not indicated in first intention for low-risk MDS. It can be discussed in case of cytopenias needing transfusions, poor evolution under other treatment, or in case of poor prognosis molecular anomaly. Allo-HSCT is a treatment that can be complicated by early or late toxicities (graft versus host disease, infections, chemotherapy toxicity…). The decision to do an allo-HSCT is based on the benefit/risk ratio between the risk of progression from MDS to myeloid leukemia and the risk of transplant related mortality, which increases with the patient's age and comorbidities. The indication of a cytoreductive treatment before allo-HSCT depends on the blasts count, and on the delay before the allograft. The use of reduced intensity conditioning regimen and alternative donors such as haploidentical donors, expanded the indications for allo-HSCT. Relapse remains one of the main causes of mortality after allo-HSCT. Some genetic mutations and karyotype anomalies increase the risk of post-transplant relapse. Preventive treatments for relapse are currently being studied. Treatments such as azacytidine, donor lymphocytes infusions or targeted therapies can be used, prophylactically or preemptively.

MRD as Biomarker for Response to Donor Lymphocyte Infusion after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with AML

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) can directly target leukemic cells through a graft-versus-leukemia effect and play a key role in the prevention and management of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Predictors of response to DLIs are not well established. We evaluated measurable residual disease (MRD) before, 30 and 90 days after DLI treatment as biomarkers of response. MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing in 76 DLI-treated acute myeloid leukemia patients. MRD status before DLI treatment was independently prognostic for event-free survival (EFS, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, p < 0.001). Within 90 days of DLI treatment, 73% of MRD+ patients converted to MRD- and 32% of patients without remission achieved remission. MRD status 90 days after DLI treatment was independently prognostic for the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, p = 0.011) and relapse-free survival (RFS, p = 0.001), but not for OS. To evaluate the role of DLI treatment in MRD- patients, 23 MRD- patients who received DLIs were compared with a control cohort of 68 MRD- patients not receiving DLIs. RFS (p = 0.23) and OS (p = 0.48) were similar between the two cohorts. In conclusion, MRD is prognostic before (EFS, OS) and after (CIR, RFS) DLI treatment and may help in the selection of patients who benefit most from DLIs.

Pre-emptive and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an allogenic immunotherapy used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DLI takes advantage of the graft-versus-tumor effect induced by the infused CD3 + T cells, but may induce graft-versus-host disease. To date, DLI has been attempted to prevent hematological relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with mixed chimerism and molecular relapse (pre-emptive DLI), and as maintenance therapy in patients with high-risk hematological malignancies (prophylactic DLI). DLI response and efficacy depend on patient, disease, and DLI factors. This review discusses the efficacy and risks of DLI, with a focus on pre-emptive and prophylactic use.

How I treat high-risk acute myeloid leukemia using preemptive adoptive cellular immunotherapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with high-risk acute leukemias, but unfortunately disease recurrence remains the major cause of death in these patients. Infusion of donor lymphocytes (DLI) has the potential to restore graft-versus-leukemia immunologic surveillance; however, efficacy varies across different hematologic entities. Although relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia, transplanted in chronic phase, has proven remarkably susceptible to DLI, response rates are more modest for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To prevent impending relapse, a number of groups have explored administering DLI preemptively on detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) or mixed chimerism. Evidence for the effectiveness of this strategy, although encouraging, comes from only a few, mostly single-center retrospective, nonrandomized studies. This article seeks to (1) discuss the available evidence supporting this approach while highlighting some of the inherent challenges of MRD-triggered treatment decisions post-transplant, (2) portray other forms of postremission cellular therapies, including the role of next-generation target-specific immunotherapies, and (3) provide a practical framework to support clinicians in their decision-making process when considering preemptive cellular therapy for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

A phase II study of chidamide, cytarabine, aclarubicin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and donor lymphocyte infusion for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Chemotherapy followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a promising treatment for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the best strategy for administering this therapy is still unclear. This study sought to explore the efficacy and safety of chidamide and CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) (CCAG) regimen followed by DLI in relapsed AML/MDS after allo-HSCT. This was a single-arm, phase II trial in patients with relapsed AML/MDS after allo-HSCT. CCAG regimen followed by DLI was given according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty adult patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 12 months. The complete remission (CR) rate was 45% and the partial remission (PR) rate was 5%. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 56.7% (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 31.6-75.6%), and the median OS was 19 months. The 1-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 83.3% (95% CI, 27.3-97.5%). Patients relapsing more than 6 months after HSCT and achieving CR/PR after CCAG plus DLI regimen attained significantly higher survival rates. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 9.4%. There was no treatment-related mortality (TRM). These data suggest that CCAG plus DLI regimen is safe and induces durable remission and superior survival in patients with relapsed AML/MDS after allo-HSCT. Trial registration number: ChiCTR.org identifier: ChiCTR1800017740 and date of registration: August 12, 2018.

Allogeneic peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of dogs with high-grade B-cell lymphoma

Autologous peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) cures 33%-40% of dogs with high-grade B-cell lymphoma. We hypothesized, based on human allogeneic bone marrow transplantation literature, that transplanting dogs using canine donor leukocyte-matched CD34+ cells would lead to fewer relapses and increased cure rates. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of dogs diagnosed with high-grade B-cell lymphoma who received an identical allogeneic HCT. A total of 15 dogs transplanted at four facilities were identified. Five of fifteen dogs relapsed before transplant. The mean number of donor CD34+ cells/kg harvested and infused into recipient dogs was 8.0 × 10⁶ /kg (range: 2.08 × 10⁶ /kg-2.9 × 10⁷ /kg). The median disease-free interval and overall survival of all dogs was 1095 days (range: 9-2920 days) and 1115 days (range: 9-2920 days), respectively. Two of five dogs, not in remission at transplant, died in the hospital. The median disease-free interval and overall survival of the remaining three dogs was 25 days (range: 15-250 days) and 1100 days (range: 66-1902 days), respectively. The median disease-free interval and overall survival of the 10 dogs who had not relapsed was 1235 days (range: 19-2920 days) and 1235 days (range: 19-2920 days), respectively. One dog died soon after discharge of presumed gastric-dilatation-volvulus. Eight of nine remaining dogs lived >4 yrs post-alloHCT, leading to a cure rate of 89%. Acute graft versus host disease was seen in three dogs. These results suggest that allogeneic HCT can cure ~50% more dogs than those treated with autologous HCT.

Unrelated cord blood transplantation vs. HLA-matched sibling transplantation for adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in complete remission: superior OS for patients with long-term survival

Background

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an important curative therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For patients who lack a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor, unrelated cord blood (UCB) is an alternative graft option. Previous studies have focused mainly on all T- and B-cell ALL (B-ALL) patients, while data related specifically to adult B-ALL patients after UCB transplantation (UCBT) are scarce.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of UCBT and HLA-matched sibling transplantation (MST) in the treatment of adult B-ALL patients in complete remission (CR) at our center. From June 2006 to December 2020, 156 adult B-ALL patients who achieved CR before transplantation were enrolled. The main clinical outcomes of UCBT and MST were analyzed.

Results

Hematopoietic recovery was significantly faster in MST recipients than in UCBT recipients. Higher incidences of grades II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus host disease (aGVHD) were found in UCBT recipients (P < 0.001 and = 0.03), while a lower incidence of extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was found in UCBT recipients (P < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM), 2-year relapse, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) were comparable between MST and UCBT recipients. The overall survival (OS) during the first 700 days was similar between the MST and UCBT groups, while the OS of patients with a survival time of more than 700 days in the UCBT group was better than that in the MST group according to multivariate analysis (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Our study shows that when treating adult B-ALL patients in CR, UCBT can achieve comparable effects as MST, may provide superior OS for patients with long-term survival, and should be considered a good alternative.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-022-03186-3.

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: an overview of prevention and treatment

Despite therapeutic progress in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a major challenge. Here, we aim to provide an overview of prevention and treatment of relapse in this population, including cell-based and pharmacologic options. Post-transplant maintenance therapy is used in patients who have undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD), while pre-emptive treatment is administered upon detection of MRD. Prompt transfusion of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was found to be effective in preventing relapse and overcoming the negative impact of detectable MRD. In addition, patients with persistent targetable mutations can benefit from targeted post-transplant pharmacological interventions. IDH inhibitors have shown promising results in relapsed/refractory AML. Hypomethylating agents, such as decitabine and azacitidine, have been studied in the post-allo-HSCT setting, both as pre-emptive and prophylactic. Venetoclax has been shown effective in combination with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed AML, especially those unfit for intensive chemotherapy. FLT3 inhibitors, the topic of another section in this review series, have significantly improved survival in FLT-3-ITD mutant AML. The role of other cell-based therapies, including CAR-T cells, in AML is currently being investigated.

Next Generation Natural Killer Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy

In recent years, immunotherapy for cancer has become mainstream with several products now authorized for therapeutic use in the clinic and are becoming the standard of care for some malignancies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have demonstrated substantial efficacy for the treatment of hematological malignancies; however, they are complex and currently expensive to manufacture, and they can generate life-threatening adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The limitations of current CAR-T cells therapies have spurred an interest in alternative immunotherapy approaches with safer risk profiles and with less restrictive manufacturing constraints. Natural killer (NK) cells are a population of immune effector cells with potent anti-viral and anti-tumor activity; they have the capacity to swiftly recognize and kill cancer cells without the need of prior stimulation. Although NK cells are naturally equipped with cytotoxic potential, a growing body of evidence shows the added benefit of engineering them to better target tumor cells, persist longer in the host, and be fitter to resist the hostile tumor microenvironment (TME). NK-cell-based immunotherapies allow for the development of allogeneic off-the-shelf products, which have the potential to be less expensive and readily available for patients in need. In this review, we will focus on the advances in the development of engineering of NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. We will discuss the sourcing of NK cells, the technologies available to engineer NK cells, current clinical trials utilizing engineered NK cells, advances on the engineering of receptors adapted for NK cells, and stealth approaches to avoid recipient immune responses. We will conclude with comments regarding the next generation of NK cell products, i.e., armored NK cells with enhanced functionality, fitness, tumor-infiltration potential, and with the ability to overcome tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion.

Role of flow cytometry in evaluation of the cellular therapy products used in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cellular therapy nowadays includes various products from haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) collected from bone marrow, peripheral blood, and umbilical cord blood to more complex adoptive immune therapy for the treatment of malignant diseases, and gene therapy for inherited immune deficiencies. Broader utilization of cellular therapy requires extensive quality testing of these products that should fulfil the same requirements regarding composition, purity, and potency nevertheless they are manufactured in various centres. Technical improvements of the flow cytometers accompanied by the increased number of available reagents and fluorochromes used to conjugate monoclonal antibodies, enable detailed and precise insight into the function of the immune system and other areas of cell biology, and allows cell evaluation based on size, shape, and morphology or assessment of cell surface markers, as well as cell purity and viability, which greatly contributes to the development and progress of the cell therapy. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the current use and challenges of flow cytometry analysis in quality assessment of cellular therapy products, with regard to basic principles of determining HSC and leukocyte subpopulation, assessment of cells viability and quality of thawed cryopreserved HSC as well as the importance of validation and quality control of flow cytometry methods according to good laboratory practice.

The Difficult-to-Treat del 17 p Patient—A Case Report in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment strategies have evolved to include mechanism-driven drugs but now raise new questions regarding their optimum timing and sequencing. In high-risk patients, switching from pathway inhibitors to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is still a matter of intense debate. We report the case of a CLL patient with 17 p deletion treated with ibrutinib as a bridge to allo-HCT. Early relapse after allo-HCT urged the initiation of salvage therapy, including donor lymphocytes infusions, ibrutinib, and venetoclax. We aim to outline and discuss the potential benefits of novel therapies, the current role of allo-HCT in CLL, drug timing and sequencing, and the unmet need to improve the long-term outcome of high-risk CLL patients.

Second unmanipulated allogeneic transplantation could be used as a salvage option for patients with relapsed acute leukemia post-chemotherapy plus modified donor lymphocyte infusion

Relapse is the main problem after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The outcome of a second allo-HSCT (HSCT2) for relapse post-HSCT has shown promising results in some previous studies. However, little is known about the efficacy of HSCT2 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia (AL) post-chemotherapy plus modified donor lymphocyte infusion (post-Chemo + m-DLI) after the first allo-HSCT (HSCT1). Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of HSCT2 in 28 patients with relapsed/refractory AL post-Chemo + m-DLI in our center. With a median follow-up of 918 (457-1732) days, 26 patients (92.9%) achieved complete remission, and 2 patients exhibited persistent disease. The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) 1 year after HSCT2 were 25.0% and 21.4%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality on day 100 and at 1 year post-HSCT2 were 7.1% ± 4.9% and 25.0% ± 8.4%. The cumulative incidences of relapse were 50.0% ± 9.8% and 53.5% ± 9.9% at 1 and 2 years post-HSCT2, respectively. Risk stratification prior to HSCT1 and percentage of blasts before HSCT2 were independent risk factors for OS post-HSCT2, and relapse within 6 months post-HSCT1 was an independent risk factor for DFS and relapse post-HSCT2. Our findings suggest that HSCT2 could be a salvage option for patients with relapsed AL post-Chemo + m-DLI.

Phase I Trial of Prophylactic Donor-Derived IL-2-Activated NK Cell Infusion after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from a Matched Sibling Donor

Simple Summary

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative option for high-risk hematologic malignancies. However, disease recurrence after allo-HSCT remains a critical issue, underlining the need to develop maintenance therapy. In this context, NK cell-based immunotherapies could enhance graft-versus-tumor effect without triggering graft-versus-host disease. In this prospective phase I clinical trial, we demonstrated the safety of donor-derived NK cell infusion as a prophylactic treatment after allo-HSCT for patients with hematological malignancies. This opens perspectives for future developments of NK cell based therapeutic strategies after allo-HSCT with low incidence of GVHD, representing an advantage over post-transplant T cell modulations that are commonly used in clinical routine.

Abstract

Background: NK cell-based immunotherapy to prevent relapse after allogeneic transplantation is an appealing strategy because NK cells can provide strong antitumor effect without inducing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Thus, we designed a phase-I clinical trial evaluating the safety of a prophylactic donor-derived ex vivo IL-2 activated NK cell (IL-2 NK) infusion after allo-HSCT for patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods: Donor NK cells were purified and cultured ex vivo with IL-2 before infusion, at three dose levels. To identify the maximum tolerated dose was the main objective. In addition, we performed phenotypical and functional characterization of the NK cell therapy product, and longitudinal immune monitoring of NK cell phenotype in patients. Results: Compared to unstimulated NK cells, IL-2 NK cells expressed higher levels of activating receptors and exhibited increased degranulation and cytokine production in vitro. We treated 16 patients without observing any dose-limiting toxicity. At the last follow up, 11 out of 16 treated patients were alive in complete remission of hematologic malignancies without GVHD features and immunosuppressive treatment. Conclusions: Prophylactic donor-derived IL-2 NK cells after allo-HSCT is safe with low incidence of GVHD. Promising survivals and IL-2 NK cell activated phenotype may support a potential clinical efficacy of this strategy.

AML and the art of remission maintenance

Relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is common, especially in older patients, and there is currently no standard of care maintenance therapy for those who achieve complete remission. Finding effective, tolerable maintenance therapy to prolong remission has been a goal for decades, but early clinical trials testing a variety of agents demonstrated disappointing results with no overall survival benefit. CC-486, an oral hypomethylating agent, was recently approved in the United States for maintenance treatment in patients with AML in first remission following chemotherapy. A number of ongoing studies are assessing various therapeutics in the maintenance setting, including other hypomethylating agents, targeted small-molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and immunomodulators. New strategies are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from maintenance therapy, including those for whom a preemptive approach reliant on monitoring of measurable residual disease would be advantageous.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate Mofetil Combination Governs GVHD and Immunosuppression Need, Reducing Late Toxicities in Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from HLA-Matched Donors

Combined direct antineoplastic activity and the long-lasting immunological effects of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) can cure many hematological malignancies, but broad adoption requires non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) control. Recently, posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) given after a bone marrow transplant significantly reduced GVHD-incidence, while PTCy given with tacrolimus/mofetil mycophenolate (T/MMF) showed activity following allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (alloPBSCT). Here, we report the experience of a larger cohort (85 consecutive patients) and expanded follow-up period (03/2011-12/2019) with high-risk hematological malignancies who received alloPBSCT from Human-Leukocyte-Antigens HLA-matched unrelated/related donors. GVHD-prophylaxis was PTCy 50 mg/kg (days+3 and +4) combined with T/MMF (day+5 forward). All patients stopped MMF on day+28 with day+110 = median tacrolimus discontinuation. Cumulative incidences were 12% for acute and 7% for chronic GVHD- and no GVHD-attributed deaths. For surviving patients, the 12, 24, and 36-month probabilities of being off immunosuppression were 92, 96, and 96%, respectively. After a 36-month median follow-up, NRM was 4%; median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) had yet to occur. One- and two-year chronic GVHD-EFS results were 57% (95% CI, 46-68%) and 53% (95% CI, 45-61%), respectively, with limited late infections and long-term organ toxicities. Disease relapse caused the most treatment failures (38% at 2 years), but low transplant toxicity allowed many patients (14/37, 38%) to receive donor lymphocyte infusions as a post-relapse strategy. We confirmed that PTCy+T/MMF treatment effectively prevented acute and chronic GVHD and limited NRM to unprecedented low rates without loss of disease control efficacy in an expanded patient cohort. This trial is registered at U.S. National Library of Medicine as #NCT02300571.

Comparison of Two Strategies for Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Acute Leukemia

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pDLI) could reduce relapse in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia (RRAL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but optimal timing of pDLI remains uncertain. We compared the outcomes of two strategies for pDLI based on time from transplant and minimal residual disease (MRD) status in patients with RRAL. For patients without grade II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) on day +60, pDLI was given on day +60 regardless of MRD in cohort 1, and was given on day +90 unless MRD was positive on day +60 in cohort 2. A total of 161 patients with RRAL were enrolled, including 83 in cohort 1 and 78 in cohort 2. The extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) incidence in cohort 2 was lower than that in cohort 1 (10.3% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.006) and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) in cohort 2 was superior to that in cohort 1 (55.1% vs. 41.0%, P = 0.042). The 2-year relapse rate, overall and leukemia-free survival were comparable between the two cohorts (29.0% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.986; 63.9% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.863; 57.8% vs. 61.5%, P = 0.666). Delaying pDLI to day +90 based on MRD for patients with RRAL undergoing allo-HSCT could lower extensive cGVHD incidence and improve GRFS without increasing incidence of leukemia relapse compared with pDLI on day +60.

Case Report: Humanized Selective CD19CAR-T Treatment Induces MRD-Negative Remission in a Pediatric B-ALL Patient With Primary Resistance to Murine-Based CD19CAR-T Therapy

Background

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CD19CAR-T) has shown great potential to treat acute B cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and B cell lymphoma, and most of anti-CD19 scFv are derived from murine antibody sequences. However, about 10–20% of B-ALL patients exhibit primary resistance to murine-based CD19CAR-T (CD19mCAR-T). Herein, we report that a humanized selective CD19CAR-T (CD19hsCAR-T) may offer a solution to this problem.

Case Description

A 10-year old boy was diagnosed with high-risk B-ALL in Mar., 2013, and relapsed in Oct., 2018, after he underwent haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 2017. The patient then received haplo-identical CD19mCAR-T infusions twice following induction chemotherapy with Vincristine, Dexamethasone and Asparaginase (VDL), but no response was observed. We further treated this patient with CD19hsCAR-T following chemotherapy with Vindesine, Idarubicin, Dexamethasone, and Pegylated Asparaginase (VDLD) plus bortezomib. The patient achieved minimal residual disease-negative (MRDneg) complete remission with incomplete hematopoietic recovery (CRi), and remained in CRi for more than 8 months with manageable side effect. The patient, unfortunately, died of unidentified pulmonary infection on Jan. 25 2020.

Conclusion

CD19hsCAR-T may have the potential to induce remission in patients who are primarily refractory to CD19mCAR-T.

Low Level Donor Chimerism of CD19 CAR-T Cells Returned to Complete Donor Chimerism in Patients with Relapse After Allo-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Purpose

To investigate the donor chimerism changes and curative effects associated with the use of autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) presenting with a low donor chimerism level and relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT).

Methods

Nine patients with B-ALL showing low donor chimerism level and relapse after allo-HSCT were enrolled. Patients 1–3 received CD19 CAR-T cell therapy using cells derived from autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (comprising a mixture of patient and original donor cells) as their donors could not provide PBMCs. Samples from the other six patients (Patients A–F) were investigated only in vitro. The changes in the degree of donor chimerism, function of the CD19 CAR-T cells and T cells in all nine patients were analyzed in vitro. The therapeutic effects and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated in Patients 1–3.

Results

The CAR-T cells and T cells in all nine patients showed complete donor chimerism restoration following a 12-day culture period in vitro. These CD19 CAR-T cells demonstrated strong cytotoxicity towards Nalm 6 cells in vitro except in patients 3 and D. In the latter patients, the absolute numbers of all subsets, especially the CD8 + T-cell absolute numbers in peripheral blood were very low. Patients 3 and D showed relatively short durations from transplant to recurrence and received chemotherapy after relapse. In the patients receiving CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, the most commonly observed AE was grade 1 to 2 cytokine release syndrome. None of the cases showed acute graft-versus-host disease during treatment. Patients 1 and 2 achieved complete response with complete restoration of donor chimerism. Patient 3, who received the same CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, did not respond to this therapy.

Conclusion

CD19 CAR-T cells derived from patients relapsed after allo-HSCT with a low level of donor chimerism were effective for salvage therapy and could restore to complete donor chimerism after 12 days’ culture in vitro.

Trial Registration

Humanized CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for relapse or refractory B-cell lymphoma or acute B lymphocytic leukemia, ChiCTR1800019622, Registered 24 November 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphomas-Expectations and Pitfalls

T-cell replete Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an emerging therapeutic option for patients with advanced relapsed or refractory lymphoma. The feasibility of this platform is supported by several retrospective studies showing a toxicity profile that is improved relative to umbilical cord blood and mismatched unrelated donor (UD) transplant and comparable to matched unrelated donor transplant. In particular, cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is reduced after Haplo-SCT relative to UD and matched related donor (MRD) transplant thanks to PT-Cy employed as GVHD prophylaxis. This achievement, together with a similar incidence of acute GVHD and disease relapse, results in a promising advantage of Haplo-SCT in terms of relapse-free/GVHD free survival. Unmet needs of the Haplo-SCT platform are represented by the persistence of a not negligible rate of non-relapse mortality, especially due to infections and disease relapse. Future efforts are warranted in order to reduce life-threatening infections and to employ Halo-SCT with PT-Cy as a platform to build new immunotherapeutic strategies.

Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Humanized Anti-CD19-CAR T Therapy in Relapsed B-ALL Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

We studied the acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after humanized anti-CD19-CAR T therapy in relapsed B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Fifteen B-ALL patients were enrolled in our study. Thirteen patients (86.67%) achieved a complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery. The donor chimerism of the 13 patients reached 99.86 ± 0.21%. The development of aGVHD was observed in 10 patients (66.67%). Six patients developed grade I-II of aGVHD, while the other four patients developed grade III-IV of aGVHD. The notable adverse events were grade 1–2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in 10 patients and grade 3–4 CRS in five patients. Two patients died of infection, while another patient died of sudden cardiac arrest. The anti-CD19-CAR T cells were not eliminated in peripheral blood when the patients developed aGVHD. However, we did not observe their expansion peaks again in the process of aGVHD. During the aGVHD, the peaks of IL-6 and TNF-a were correlated with aGVHD levels. By May 31, 2020, the rates of leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) at 180 days were 53.846 and 61.638%, respectively. All the patients who survived to date experienced aGVHD after humanized anti-CD19-CAR T cell therapy.

Trial registration: The patients were enrolled in clinical trials of ChiCTR-ONN-16009862 and ChiCTR1800019622.

Bone marrow aplasia following donor lymphocyte infusion in 4-year-old patient with chronic granulomatous disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: case report

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is typically used in 3 clinical situations: therapeutically for proven relapse of malignancy, prophylactically in patients with high-risk of relapse, and in case of mixed chimerism. Mixed chimerism, which occur after transplantation can be a sign of possible rejection. In case of increased mixed chimerism, immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusions could reverse this process. After DLI, both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease and marrow aplasia are well-known toxicities. In this paper, we present a case report of young patient with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), with successful immunotherapy following mixed chimerism, which was complicated by bone marrow aplasia that required a second stem cell infusion. DLI seems to be an effective and highly promising treatment method of transplant rejection in patients with CGD but can induce bone marrow aplasia and may require a second stem cell infusion.

A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection. We compared the efficacy and safety of gDLI and classical DLI after allo-SCT. We excluded haploidentical allo-SCT. Initial diseases were acute myeloblastic leukaemia (n = 45), myeloma (n = 38), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 20), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), myelodysplasia (n = 8), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 8), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n = 7), chronic myeloid leukaemia (n = 2) and osteomyelofibrosis (n = 1). Indications for DLI were relapse (n = 96) or pre-emptive treatment (n = 43). Sixty-eight patients had classical DLI and 71 had gDLI. The response rate was 38.2%, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 38% (29–48) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 37% (29–47). Graft versus host disease rate was 46.7% and 10.1% of patients died from toxicity. There were no differences between classical DLI and gDLI in terms of response (p = 0.28), 5-year PFS (p = 0.90), 5-year OS (p. 0.50), GvHD (p = 0.86), treated GvHD (p = 0.81) and cause of mortality (p. 0.14). In conclusion, this study points out no major effectiveness or toxicity of gDLI compared to classical DLI.

Effect of Salvage Chemotherapy Before Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients With Relapse After Allogeneic Hematologic Stem Cell Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an important treatment option in hematologic malignancies. Relapse after AHSCT is an indicator of poor prognosis. These patients may be treated with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The chemotherapy given before DLI increases the success of the treatment by reducing the burden of disease. The aim of this study is to investigate post-DLI graft vs host disease (GvHD) and survival based on the course of chemotherapy given before DLI.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients who received DLI because of relapsed disease after AHSCT were enrolled. All of the patients received 1 or more courses of cytoreductive chemotherapy before DLI.

RESULTS

Complete remission (CR) after DLI remained in 78.2% of all patients. There is no difference between 1 or multiple courses of chemotherapy in terms of CR (55.6% vs 44.4%; P = .21). During follow-up after DLI, although it did not reach statistical significance (P = .09), the patients receiving single-course chemotherapy tended to have longer survival (36.1 vs 4.3 months, respectively). Four patients who received multiple courses of chemotherapy were lost because of infection-related disease (pneumonia, sepsis) while they were in CR. GvHD development was more frequent in patients receiving multiple courses of chemotherapies (60% of all GvHD patients).

CONCLUSION

It has been demonstrated that reducing the tumor burden by multiple-cycle chemotherapy does not have any advantage in terms of CR and does not improve the overall survival.

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse prevention: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Primary disease relapse (PDR) of malignant hematologic conditions after standard hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is one of the most challenging diseases; therefore ongoing researches are aiming at relapse prevention and minimizing the transplant-related side effects. Prophylactic donor lymphocytes (pDLI) had been proposed as a valuable strategy for PDR prevention, but early studies had been discouraging due to the limited benefit and possible association with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

METHOD

We performed a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Embase database from inception to May 2019 for studies that evaluated the association between pDLI and PDR. We conducted a random effect meta-analysis of 9 studies involving a total of 748 participants (pDLI = 398, non-pDLI = 350) and reported the pooled odd ratio (OR) for association of pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

RESULT

We found a significant decreased odd of PDR in the pDLI group (pooled OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58, I2 = 0%), but there was no significant increased odd of aGVHD (pooled OR of 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.72, I2 = 0.8%). We also found that there was an increased odd of overall survival (OS) (pooled OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.85-5.45, I2 = 50.2%).

CONCLUSION

There are significantly decreased odd of PDR and increased odd of OS in the pDLI group compared to the control group, but there is no statistically significant increased odd of aGVHD as suggested by previous studies. We concluded that pDLI is a potentially valuable method for post-transplant PDR prevention.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Improves the Survival of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients With Relapsed Diseases After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The value of chimeric antigen receptor-modified donor lymphocyte infusion (CAR-DLI) is unclear in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), particularly in patients with relapsed diseases after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this study, 5 B-ALL patients who relapsed after allo-HSCT received CAR-DLI (CAR-DLI group), and the outcome was compared with 27 relapsed B-ALL patients who received DLI therapy (DLI group). The median complete remission duration of CAR-DLI group was significantly (P=0.020) longer when compared with DLI group: 9 months (range, 2-29) versus 3.2 months (range, 0-17.4). Furthermore, patients receiving CAR-DLI showed significant (P=0.049) survival advantage over DLI group, with median overall survival of 12 months (range, 3-29) and 3.7 months (range, 0-65), respectively. Of note, no patient developed acute graft versus host disease in the CAR-DLI group, while incidence of acute graft versus host disease grades I-II and grades III-IV were 2 (7%) and 4 (14.8%) in the DLI group, respectively. In addition, cytokine release syndrome in CAR-DLI group was manageable. Overall, our study demonstrated that CAR-DLI significantly improved the survival of B-ALL patients relapsed after allo-HSCT, thus indicating that CAR-DLI may represent an alternative and more effective therapy for B-ALL patients with relapsed diseases.

Activated Allogeneic Donor-derived Marrow-infiltrating Lymphocytes Display Measurable In Vitro Antitumor Activity

A major limitation in current allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is disease relapse after transplant, indicating that donor-derived T cells are inadequate in imparting an effective antitumor response. The current standard treatment approach to relapse utilizes donor lymphocyte infusions that have limited documented efficacy and are also associated with significant morbidity mainly related to graft-versus-host disease. We have previously shown that marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes (MILs) have a broader antigenic specificity compared with their peripheral blood counterpart in an autologous adoptive T-cell therapy setting. Here, we extend these observations to examine the ability of MILs obtained from patients after an alloHSCT to generate measurable tumor-specific immunity. We show here that allogeneic donor-derived marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes (ddMILs) obtained from patients who underwent alloHSCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide could be reproducibly expanded and activated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads. Phenotypic characterization of ddMILs subpopulations revealed the prevalence of a central memory phenotype. Polyclonally activated ddMILs displayed measurable in vitro antitumor activity. Furthermore, activated ddMILs from all patients effectively targeted third-party allogeneic antigens, but showed no reactivity toward self-antigens presented in an HLA-restricted manner. Collectively, these results underscore the intrinsic polyclonal tumor-specificity of activated ddMILs and describe a novel approach for the generation of tumor-specific T cells that are suitable for adoptive immunotherapy of hematological malignancies relapsed after alloHSCT. This approach has a potential to significantly increase the tumor-specificity and reduce the toxicities associated with current standard donor lymphocyte infusion approaches.

Incidence, Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Risk Score Model of Acute Pancreatitis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Acute pancreatitis (AP) has been recognized as an uncommon yet potentially lethal complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). This retrospective, nested, case-control study reviewed data from 5284 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic (allo)-HSCT between 2009 and 2018 at a single center, identifying 40 patients (0.76%) with AP after allo-HSCT. The diagnosis and severity of AP were established and classified according to existing criteria. Younger age (P = .008), grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .010), a history of donor lymphocyte infusion (P = .033), and pre-existing gallstones (P = .003) were independent risk factors of AP after allo-HSCT. Post-transplant AP had a trend to negatively influence overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (P = .063) for allo-HSCT recipients, but no significant difference was found. Patients with moderately severe and severe AP had significantly lower OS (P = .002) and higher NRM (P = .000) than other patients. Based on these findings, a risk score model was also established to predict the occurrence of AP. Our risk score model performed well in terms of discrimination when applied to derivation samples. Patients were classified into a low-risk group (0 to 1 point), a medium-risk group (2 to 3 points), and a high-risk group (4 points or more). Significant difference was observed in AP incidence among the 3 groups. The predictive tool explored by our study might contribute to target high-risk patients and guide personalized AP prevention in allo-HSCT recipients.

Ponatinib therapy in recurrent Philadelphia chromosome-positive central nervous system leukemia with T315I mutation after Allo-HSCT

Central nervous system leukemia (CNSL) relapse is relatively common among Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The prognosis of patients is dismal for those with a BCR-ABL T315I mutation, which is resistant to TKIs including second-generation drugs. We assessed ponatinib for nine patients with recurrent Ph+ CNSL and a T315I mutation after allo-HSCT, including five patients with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia and four with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Five patients experienced isolated CNSL relapse, and four experienced CNSL with hematologic relapse. All patients received ponatinib combined with intrathecal chemotherapy, and four patients with hematologic relapse received systemic chemotherapy and/or donor lymphocyte infusion. All patients achieved a deep molecular response and central nervous system remission (CNSR) at a median time of 1.5 (range: 0.7-3) months after ponatinib treatment. Two patients experienced a second CNSL relapse due to ponatinib reduction, but they achieved CNSR again after an increase to the standard dosage. Six patients developed graft versus host disease. By April 1, 2019, eight patients were alive, and one died of pneumonia. The median time of survival after the first CNSL relapse posttransplantation was 18 (range: 11.2-48.5) months. Our data from a small number of samples suggests that ponatinib is effective for recurrent Ph+ CNSL patients with a BCR-ABL T315I mutation after allo-HSCT and warrants broader clinical evaluation.

Use of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells play an antileukemia role, and can be used to treat or prevent relapse by targeting minimal residual disease for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the infusion of allogeneic CAR-T cells may also cause graft-versus-host disease, which limited their applications during and after allo-HSCT. In this review, we discuss the clinical trials that applying CAR-T cells before allo-HSCT and the use of donor-derived CAR-T cells as conditioning regimen during allo-HSCT. At last, we analyzed the effect of donor-derived CAR-T cells on preventive infusion after allo-HSCT.

Presalvage International Staging System Stage and Other Important Outcome Associations in CD34+-Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Despite ongoing therapeutic advances, multiple myeloma (MM) remains largely incurable, and outcomes in patients who develop resistance to immunomodulatory drugs or proteasome inhibitors remain grim. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is an alternative option that may offer potential for cure. Although rates of transplantation-related morbidity and mortality have decreased in recent years, weighing this approach's potential benefits against nontransplantation therapies demands a thoroughly informed pre-alloHCT assessment. Here we assess the impact of pre-alloHCT variables on important clinical outcomes in a large cohort of relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) CD34⁺-selected alloHCT recipients. We included all patients with MM who underwent CD34⁺-selected alloHCT at our center between June 2010 and December 2015. Patients were conditioned with busulfan (0.8 mg/kg × 10), melphalan (70 mg/m² × 2), and fludarabine (25 mg/m² × 5), followed by infusion of a CD34⁺-selected peripheral blood stem cell graft, without post-alloHCT graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The 73-patient cohort had a median age of 55 years (range, 37 to 66 years). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 70% and 53%, respectively, at 1 year (95% confidence interval [CI], 58% to 79% and 41% to 64%) and 50% and 30%, respectively, at 3 years (95% CI, 38% to 62% and 19% to 41%). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 25% at 1 year (95% CI, 15% to 35%) and 47% at 3 years (95% CI, 35% to 58%). Nonrelapse mortality at 1 year was 22% (95% CI, 13% to 32%). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 7% at 100 days (95% CI, 3% to 14%), and that of any chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 8% at 1 year (95% CI, 3% to 16%). International Staging System (ISS) stage II-III assessed before salvage therapy was associated with poorer 3-year OS (30% versus 54%; P = .037) and 3-year PFS (9% versus 33%; P = .013), and increased 3-year relapse incidence (72% versus 39%; P = .004). Older age and GVHD before 6 months (aGVHD grade II-IV or cGVHD of any grade) were also associated with poorer OS, and a greater number of pre-alloHCT lines of therapy was also associated with increased relapse incidence. Our findings reinforce that CD34⁺-selected alloHCT can achieve prolonged disease control and long-term survival in high- risk, heavily treated refractory MM populations. We also identified numerous pre-alloHCT variables associated with OS, PFS, and relapse. Amongst these, presalvage ISS stage II-III was consistently associated with poorer survival and relapse outcomes. Given the lack of established alternate therapies for patients with RRMM, we advocate the identification of adverse pre-alloHCT variables to inform alloHCT decision making rather than to exclude patient cohorts from this potentially curative treatment option.

A phase 2 study of alpha interferon for molecularly measurable residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

CML therapy has improved dramatically with the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Prior to the TKI era, we conducted two trials of alpha-interferon (IFN) for post-transplant hematologic and cytogenetic relapse. The complete cytogenetic response rate was 33% and 57% respectively. This report describes a third trial in which 40 patients with molecular relapse between 6 and 12 months post-transplant were treated with IFN. The projected cytogenetic relapse at 4.5 years was 12.6% compared with 42% in the historical control group. Although this data may not apply to most patients with CML today due to the availability of multiple TKIs, the effectiveness of short term IFN in post-transplant molecular relapse is supported by long-term treatment-free-survival in 75% of patients after a median follow-up of 15.6 years. This report suggests that alpha-interferon is potentially useful in the rare patient who has post-transplant molecular relapse who does not tolerate, or is resistant to TKIs.

Development of Pre-Engraftment Syndrome, but Not Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease, Reduces Relapse Rate of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia after Single Cord Blood Transplantation

The different effects of pre-engraftment syndrome (PES) and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) on outcomes after cord blood transplantation (CBT) are unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of PES and aGVHD on relapse and survival after single-unit CBT in 138 adult patients with hematologic malignancies at our institution between 2004 and 2016. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that development of grade III-IV aGVHD, particularly with gut or liver involvement, significantly contributed to higher nonrelapse mortality (P < .001), but PES and grade II-IV aGVHD did not. In subgroup analyses of underlying disease type, the development of PES had a significant effect on decreased relapse (P = .032) and better disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .046) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). These data suggest that PES is associated with a reduced relapse rate and better DFS in AML, indicating that the early immune reaction before neutrophil engraftment may provide a unique graft-versus-leukemia effect after single-unit CBT.

[Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLI): Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) can be proposed to treat or prevent the relapse of malignant hemopathies following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The efficiency has been mainly reported in the treatment of CML and low-grade lymphomas while the anti-tumoral activity is less in forms of acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. The GVL benefit should always be compared to the possible toxic effects of GVHD. This article updates the initial SFGM-TC recommendations, proposed in 2013, that were focused on the use of DLI. Doses of DLI in the context of haplo-identical stem cell transplantation are now indicated. We confirm that remaining mobilized stem cells may be used as classical DLI. The definition and the place of preemptive and prophylactic DLI are precisely given. Recommendations regarding the quality of thawed DLI as well as necessary clinical and biological follow-up are also described in detail.

Survivin-peptide vaccination elicits immune response after allogeneic nonmyeloablative transplantation: a safe strategy to enhance the graft versus tumor effect

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is an adoptive immunotherapy strategy whose effectiveness relies on graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect. We explored the feasibility of enhancing GVT after allo-HCT by peptide vaccination. Two myeloma patients were transplanted with a fludarabine-total body irradiation conditioning regimen and vaccinated with an HLA-A*0201-restricted modified survivin nonapeptide, plus montanide as adjuvant. At time of first vaccination, one patient had just attained serological remission despite documented relapse after transplant, while the other patient was in stable disease. Both patients had an immune response to vaccination: the frequency of survivin-specific CD8⁺ T cells increased between second and sixth vaccination and accounted for 0.5-0.8% of CD8⁺ cells; CD8⁺ cells were functional in ELISPOT assay. The first patient persists in complete remission with a follow-up of >5 years, while the second patient did not have a clinical response and vaccination was halted. We analyzed the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of the first patient by spectratyping and found that vaccination did not affect the diversity of TCR profile, indicating that survivin clonotypes were probably spread in multiple TCR families. We generated a limited number (n = 4) of survivin-specific T cell clones: three were reactive only against the modified peptide, whereas one clone recognized also the naive peptide. Peptide vaccination is safe and applicable after allo-HCT and elicits an efficient antigen-specific T cell response without causing graft-versus-host disease.

Donor lymphocyte infusion in myeloid disorders

A number of modalities including both pharmaceutical and cell-based treatments have long been tested and developed to prevent and treat relapses after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The ability of donor T cells to recognize antigenic structures on leukemic cell surfaces and destroy them is a well-known fact. Based on this fact, the idea of using donor T cells to contribute to the development of adoptive immunotherapy has emerged. Donor lymphocytes are easy to obtain and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) have a simple rational while this treatment modality is an effective example of cellular therapy. The group of chronic myeloid leukemia patients who are more likely to benefit from DLI include: a) patients in the chronic phase of hematologic relapse and b) patients with molecular/cytogenetic relapse. DLI appear to be an appropriate treatment option to be used in combination with conventional chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents in the treatment of post-allo-HSCT relapse for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, if:) the burden of tumor is low b) the relapse is at a molecular level rather than an overt hematologic relapse c) the patient has favorable cytogenetic characteristics d) time interval between transplantation and relapse is relatively longer (>5 months) e) response could be obtained after salvage therapies. In the event that minimal residual disease (MRD) or increasing mixed chimerism is detected, prompt administration of DLI for prophylactic purposes without waiting for a manifest relapse, was found to be effective in inducing a full donor chimerism and overcoming MRD and eventually preventing a manifest relapse.

Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome After DLI in a SCID Patient After Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is a clinical condition emerging after immune recovery of an immunocompromised status, mostly in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients but also in several other settings, such as the recovery from the severe combined immunodeficiency status after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Herein, we report a patient transplanted for severe combined immunodeficiency who developed IRIS for 2 times, namely shortly after transplantation and after donor lymphocyte infusion. Pediatric transplant teams need to be aware of the previous IRIS phenomenon of BCG-adenitis while making the decision of donor lymphocyte infusions.

Optimizing peripheral blood stem cells transplantation outcome through amend relapse and graft failure: a review of current literature

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been considered as a valuable approach in treatment of numerous malignant and none malignant hematologic disorders. However, relapse and poor graft function (PGF) after allo-SCT remain to be controversial issues which may affect the transplantation outcome. Relevant articles were searched in MEDLINE database (2000–2016) using keywords and phrases: donor lymphocyte infusions, allogeneic stem cells transplantation, relapsed hematologic malignancies, booster schedules, cell dose, laboratory monitoring protocols and technical aspects of apheresis. Relapse of disease and PGF could be reduced via noting some main points such as choosing the suitable time and patient for donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and also determination of patients who ought to candidate for second allogeneic HSCT or for the use of stem cell boost. DLI and stem cell booster are promising treatment strategies noted in this review. Finally, this paper discusses indications and technical aspects of DLI and stem cell booster in hematological malignancies and emphasizes their therapeutic or pre-emptive potentials.

Allogeneic CD19-CAR-T cell infusion after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in B cell malignancies

Background

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered the cornerstone in treatment of hematological malignancies. However, relapse of the hematological disease after allo-HSCT remains a challenge and is associated with poor long-term survival. Chimeric antigen receptor redirected T cells (CAR-T cells) can lead to disease remission in patients with relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies. However, the therapeutic window for infusion of CAR-T cells post allo-HSCT and its efficacy are debatable.

Main body

In this review, we first discuss the use of CAR-T cells for relapsed cases after allo-HSCT. We then review the toxicities and the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease in relapsed patients who received CAR-T cells post allo-HSCT. Finally, we review clinical trial registrations and the therapeutic time window for infusion of CAR-T cells post allo-HSCT.

Conclusions

The treatment of allogeneic CAR-T cells is beneficial for patients with relapsed B cell malignancies after allo-HSCT with low toxicities and complications. However, multicenter clinical trials with larger sample sizes should be performed to select the optimal therapeutic window and confirm its efficacy.