Is Lung Transplantation a Valuable Therapeutic Option for Patients With Pulmonary Polymyositis? Experiences From the Leuven Transplant Cohort

Lung Transplantation: A Viable Option for Connective Tissue Disease?

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) caused by connective tissue disease (CTD) are one of the main causes of morbidity and death in patients. Although the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplant suggested that ILD and PH related to CTD are rare indications for lung transplantation in 2006, many lung transplantation centers are concerned that the multisystem involvement of CTD will affect survival outcomes after lung transplantation, and CTD is regarded as a relative contraindication for lung transplantation. However, long-term and short-term survival after lung transplantation in CTD patients is similar compared with survival in common indications for lung transplantation such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and no higher incidence of complications after transplantation in many lung transplant centers. This suggests that lung transplantation may be beneficial in CTD patients with disease that progresses to end-stage lung disease, and CTD should not be considered a contraindication for lung transplantation. In the future, more prospective studies are needed to analyze the risk factors of lung transplantation in CTD patients to improve survival rates and reduce the risk of complications. This narrative review summarizes the selection and evaluation of candidates for CTD before lung transplantation and describes the clinical outcomes in CTD after lung transplantation in large-capacity lung transplantation center. The purpose of this review is to help rheumatologists decide when to refer patients with CTD-related lung involvement to a lung transplantation center and the conditions to consider before transplantation and to provide confidence to lung transplant experts.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myositis: A cohort study

In patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) complicating classical or amyopathic idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), lung transplantation outcomes might be affected by the disease and treatments. Here, our objective was to assess survival and prognostic factors in lung transplant recipients with IIM-ILD. We retrospectively reviewed data for 64 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2009 and 2021 at 19 European centers. Patient survival was the primary outcome. At transplantation, the median age was 53 [46-59] years, 35 (55%) patients were male, 31 (48%) had classical IIM, 25 (39%) had rapidly progressive ILD, and 21 (33%) were in a high-priority transplant allocation program. Survival rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 78%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. During follow-up (median, 33 [7-63] months), 23% of patients developed chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Compared to amyopathic IIM, classical IIM was characterized by longer disease duration, higher-intensity immunosuppression before transplantation, and significantly worse posttransplantation survival. Five (8%) patients had a clinical IIM relapse, with mild manifestations. No patient experienced ILD recurrence in the allograft. Posttransplantation survival in IIM-ILD was similar to that in international all-cause-transplantation registries. The main factor associated with worse survival was a history of muscle involvement (classical IIM). In lung transplant recipients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, survival was similar to that in all-cause transplantation and was worse in patients with muscle involvement compared to those with the amyopathic disease.

Predictors of progression in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with interstitial lung disease

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a group of connective tissue diseases that afect multiple organ systems, including the lungs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common and heterogeneous complication of IIMs, with its degree ranging from mild to fatal. Thus, it is critical to identify clinical features and validated biomarkers for predicting disease progression and prognosis, which could be beneficial for therapy adjustment. In this review, we discuss predictors for rapid progression of IIM-ILD and propose guidance for disease monitoring and implications of therapy. Systematic screening of myositis-specific antibodies, measuring serum biomarker levels, pulmonary function tests, and chest high-resolution computer tomography will be beneficial for the evaluation of disease progression and prognosis.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.

Survival and outcomes after lung transplantation for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases

Background

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the most important treatment for end-stage lung diseases. However, the treatment of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) using LTx is still controversial especially for polymyositis/dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease (PM/DM-ILD).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n=180) and CTD-ILD (n= 36) from 1^st January 2015 to 31^st December 2019 were recruited into the study. We set polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) as a single subgroup, and all the patients underwent LTx at the Wuxi People’s Hospital.

Results

We found that patients with non-myositis connective tissue-related ILD (NM-CTLD) were younger (p=0.007) and had a higher percentage of females (p=0.000) than patients with IPF. PM/DM-ILD was associated with a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) (p=0.006) and a longer time in the intensive care unit (ICU) (p=0.000). The cumulative survival rates of patients with PM/DM-ILD were significantly lower than those with IPF (log rank, p=0.003). However, there were no significant differences when compared with the cumulative survival rates of patients with NM-CTLD and IPF (log rank, p=0.528). Age- and gender-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses indicated that post-LTx PGD (HR 1.498, 95% CI 1.227–1.828, p=0.000) and duration of ICU (HR 1.027, 95% CI 1.007–1.047, p=0.000) were the independent contributors of disease status to survival. Lung infection was the leading cause of post-LTx death in the groups, where the incidence was 65.3% (47/72) in IPF, 66.7% (8/12) in NM-CTLD, and 66.7% (4/6) in PM/DM-ILD.

Conclusions

This study found that patients with NM-CTLD had a similar survival outcome with IPF. However, patients with PM/DM-ILD-performed LTx had a lower survival rate than those with IPF.

Key Points • Previous studies have shown that the myopathies associated ILD patients had similar post-LTx outcomes with IPF patients. However, our retrospective analysis indicated that patients with PM/DM-ILD-performed LTx had a lower survival rate than those with IPF. • Patients with NM-CTLD had a similar survival outcome with IPF. • We also found that PM/DM-ILD was associated with a higher incidence of PGD and a longer time in the ICU.

Insights into pathogenesis and clinical implications in myositis-associated interstitial lung diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) have been reported to be associated with myositis (including polymyositis and dermatomyositis). These myositis-associated ILDs carry significant morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes recent findings on myositis-associated ILD with a focus on pathogenesis and emerging treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advances in genetics have revealed 22 myositis-associated genome-wide loci, which were significantly enriched in regulatory regions in immune cells. An analysis of such disease-associated loci elucidated potential drug targets (e.g., TYK2 targeted by tofacitinib). In another study, an intronic variant in WDFY4 in association with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) had an effect for higher expression of a truncated WDFY4 isoform. Truncated WDFY4 markedly enhanced the MDA5-mediated NF-κB activation and cell apoptosis, indicating the dysregulated WDFY4-MDA5 pathway as a novel pathogenesis of CADM. As a novel strategy, tofacitinib treatment showed a promising improvement in survival and clinical features of CADM-associated ILD.

SUMMARY

The genetic differences in the myositis-susceptible loci may explain the heterogeneous phenotypes and treatment responses in myositis-associated ILD. The understanding of pathogenesis with the genetic background as well as autoantibodies will enable the practice of personalized treatment in the management of the disease.

Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease Related to Connective Tissue Diseases. A Narrative Review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious pulmonary complications of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and it is characterized by a deep impact on morbidity and mortality. Due to the poor knowledge of CTD-ILD’s natural history and due to the difficulties related to design of randomized control trials, there is a lack of prospective data about the prevalence, follow-up, and therapeutic efficacy. For these reasons, the choice of therapy for CTD-ILD is currently very challenging and still largely based on experts’ opinion. Treatment is often based on steroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, but the recent publication of the encouraging results of the INBUILD trial has highlighted a possible effective and safe use of antifibrotic drugs as a new therapeutic option for these subjects. Aim of this review is to summarize the available data and recent advances about therapeutic strategies for ILD in the context of various CTD, such as systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease and undifferentiated connective tissue disease, and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features, focusing also on ongoing clinical trials.

Inflammatory Myopathy-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

Inflammatory myopathies (IM) are auto-immune connective tissue diseases characterized by muscle involvement and by extramuscular manifestations. As such, pulmonary manifestations, which mainly include interstitial lung disease (ILD), often darken two out of four distinct IM, namely dermatomyositis and overlapping myositis. Being the initiation site of the disease and being the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, ILD is of major importance in this context. ILD has a heterogeneous expression among the patients, with various onset mode, various radiological pattern, various severity and finally with different prognoses, which are particularly difficult to predict at the time of IM diagnosis. Therefore, ILD is a challenging issue. Treatments are based on steroids and immunosuppressive or targeted therapies. Their respective place is yet poorly codified however and remains often based on clinician expertise. Dedicated clinical trials are lacking to date and are also difficult to build, due to difficulty of constituting large and homogeneous patient groups and to rigorously evaluate disease outcomes. Indeed, pulmonary function tests alone are being regularly defeated in IM, in which respiratory muscles are often involved. Composite scores, bringing together several lung parameters, should thus be developed and validated in the future, to better assess the disease response to treatment. This review aims to describe the current knowledge of IM immuno-pathogenesis, the clinical features associated with IM related-ILD, focusing of both severity and prognosis, and the actual therapeutic approaches.

Management of Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases

A proportion of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), including the ILDs that are commonly associated with autoimmune diseases, develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterised by worsening of lung function, dyspnoea and quality of life, and early mortality. No drugs are approved for the treatment of ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). At present, immunomodulatory medications are the mainstay of treatment for non-IPF ILDs. However, with the exception of systemic sclerosis-associated ILD, the evidence to suggest that immunosuppression may preserve lung function in patients with these ILDs comes only from retrospective, observational, or uncontrolled studies. In this article, we review the evidence for the treatments currently used to treat ILDs associated with autoimmune diseases and other ILDs and the ongoing trials of immunosuppressant and antifibrotic therapies in patients with these ILDs.Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Management of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Myositis Specific Autoantibodies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review advances in the management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy-associated interstitial lung disease (IIM-associated ILD) in the past 5 years, with highlights in myositis-specific antibody (MSA) groups.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the recent advent of widespread MSA testing, the study of specific homogeneous autoantibody-based subgroups of IIM-associated ILD is now possible. The prevalence, severity, prognosis, and response to treatment are under study for these individual MSAs. Early evidence suggests that PL-7- and PL-12-positive patients are more likely to have ILD and worse severity, compared to Jo-1 patients. Many medications have been efficacious for the treatment of IIM-associated ILD, including calcineurin inhibitors, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide. We suggest vigilant screening and monitoring of ILD in IIM patients with focus on the potential side effects associated with therapy and thus advocate appropriate vaccination, PCP prophylaxis, and bone health protection. Many different agents are used to manage patients with ILD with no comparative effectiveness studies to guide the clinician. The possibility of using MSAs to help guide treatment decisions is an appealing, although unproven, focus of research. Unfortunately, the rarity of non-Jo-1 myositis-specific antibodies has precluded robust study of response to treatment and overall management. Ongoing clinical trials and working groups are coordinating efforts to provide evidence-based management.

Comparison of short-term outcomes for connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis after lung transplantation

Background

Pulmonary involvement is common in connective tissue disease (CTD), and respiratory failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in CTD-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). Lung transplantation is thus important for these patients. However, survival, outcomes, and management of these patients after transplantation have been debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes for CTD-ILD compared to those for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) after lung transplantation.

Methods

We performed a single-centre retrospective study of 62 patients with CTD-ILD or IPF who underwent lung transplantation at a tertiary hospital in South Korea between October 2012 and October 2016.

Results

Patients with CTD-ILD (n=15) were younger (46 vs. 60 years, P=0.001) and were less likely to be male (33.3% vs. 76.6%, P=0.004) than were patients with IPF (n=47). The 1-year cumulative survival rate was 80.0% for CTD-ILD and 59.6% for IPF (log-rank P=0.394). There was no difference in the cumulative survival rate (log-rank P=0.613) of age- and sex-matched patients with CTD-ILD (n=15) and IPF (n=15). The incidence of primary graft dysfunction was similar (P=0.154), and 2 (18.2%) patients developed possible CTD flare.

Conclusions

Patients with CTD-ILD and those with IPF who underwent lung transplantation had similar survival rates.

Survival and outcomes after lung transplantation for non-scleroderma connective tissue-related interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-scleroderma connective tissue-related lung disease (NS-CTLD), including rheumatoid arthritis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, Sjögren syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus, may be at risk for worse outcomes after lung transplantation because of immune dysregulation or extrapulmonary manifestations of their underlying disease. We compared survival, acute and chronic rejection, and extrapulmonary organ dysfunction after transplantation in patients with NS-CTLD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with NS-CTLD and IPF who were listed in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and underwent lung transplantation from May 5, 2005, to March 1, 2016.

RESULTS

Patients with NS-CTLD (n = 275) were younger, a higher percentage female and non-white than patients with IPF (n = 6,346). NS-CTLD patients did not have worse adjusted survival (hazard ratio, 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.42; p = 0.24). They were not more likely to have an episode of acute cellular rejection (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72-1.28; p = 0.77) or to develop bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60-1.12; p = 0.21). Patients with NS-CTLD were not more likely to require plasmapheresis or dialysis or to develop a lymphoproliferative malignancy or liver disease after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant differences in survival, acute or chronic rejection, or extrapulmonary organ dysfunction in patients who underwent lung transplantation for NS-CTLD compared with IPF. In appropriately selected candidates, NS-CTLD should not be considered a contraindication to lung transplantation.

Connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is commonly present in patients with an underlying connective tissue disease (CTD), particularly those with systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory myositis. The clinical spectrum can range from asymptomatic findings on imaging to respiratory failure and death. Distinguishing features in the clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic characteristics of CTD-ILD subsets can predict prognosis and treatment response. Treatment often consists of combinations of immunosuppressive medications, but there is a paucity of guidance in the literature to help clinicians determine appropriate screening and management of CTD-ILD. As such, there is a critical need for studies that can elucidate the natural history of the CTD-ILD, as well as clarify optimal therapies for CTD patients with ILD.