Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of persistent BK viremia and BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

Preemptive intravenous human immunoglobulin G suppresses BK polyomavirus replication and spread of infection in vitro

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection causes various diseases in immunocompromised patients. Cells from human lung and kidney were infected with BKPyV and treated with commercially available intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG). Its effects on BKPyV replication and spread of infection were investigated, focusing on administration timing. IVIG treatment 3 hours after infection suppressed BKPyV replication assessed by real-time PCR and expression of the viral capsid protein 1 and large T-antigen. IVIG effectively reduced the number of BKPyV-infected cells 2 weeks after infection in an antibody titer-dependent manner. Virus release in the culture supernatants was not influenced by IVIG treatment 6-80 hours and 3-9 days after infection. Collectively, IVIG did not affect viral release from infected cells but inhibited the spread of infection by neutralizing the released virus and blocking the new infected cell formation, indicating greater efficacy in early localized infection. BKPyV replication resumed in IVIG-treated cultures at 7 days after IVIG removal. Early prophylactic administration of IVIG is expected to reduce the growth and spread of BKPyV infection, resulting in the reduction of infected cell lesions and prevention of BKPyV-associated diseases.

The value and complexity of studying cellular immunity against BK Polyomavirus in kidney transplant recipients

BK Polyomavirus is of particular concern for kidney transplant recipients, due to their immunosuppression. This problem is exacerbated by the high effectiveness of antirejection therapies, which also compromise the organism's ability to fight viral infections. The long-term risk is loss of graft function through BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). The assessment of host immunity and its link to the control of viral infections is a major challenge. In terms of humoral immunity, researchers have highlighted the prognostic value of the pre-transplantation anti-BKPyV immunoglobulin G titer. However, humoral immunity alone does not guarantee viral clearance, and the correlation between the humoral response and the time course of the infection remains weak. In contrast, cellular immunity variables appear to be more closely associated with viral clearance, given that the cellular immune response to the kidney transplant is the main target of immunosuppressive treatments in recipients. However, the assessment of the cellular immune response to BK Polyomavirus is complex, and many details still need to be characterized. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about BKPyV cellular immunity, as well as the difficulties that may be encountered in studying it in kidney transplant recipient. This is an essential area of research for optimizing the management of transplant recipients and minimizing the risks associated with insidious BKPyV disease.

Protocolized polyoma BK viral load monitoring and high-dose immunoglobulin treatment in children after kidney transplant

Background

BKPyV virus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is diagnosed in 5%-16% of pediatric renal transplant recipients (PRTR) and preceded by BKPyV-viruria and DNAemia. Despite the risk of irreversible transplant damage associated with BKPyVAN, evidence-based consensus guidelines for BKPyVAN prevention are still lacking. In this retrospective study, we examined the safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (HD-IVIG) therapy for prevention of BKPyVAN in PRTR with significant BKPyV-viruria/DNAemia.

Methods

Between January 2013 and December 2022, all PRTR under our care underwent routine urine and blood testing for BKPyV viral load, using specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). BKPyV DNAemia, with <103 copies/mL, with BKPyV viruria <107 copies/mL, with no evidence of BKPyVAN, were managed with 50% dose reduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients showing no decline in BKPyV viral load within two months of MMF dose reduction were managed with HD-IVIG (2 g/kg).

Results

Seventy patients were recruited during a ten-year period and 31/70 patients (44%) demonstrated significant post-transplantation BKPyV-viruria/DNAemia, while 13/31 (42%) patients were unresponsive to MMF dose reduction, and were administered HD-IVIG. Of these, 12/13 (92%) patients achieved BKPyV viral clearance within six months from completion of HD-IVIG therapy and 1/13 patient (8%) was unresponsive to HD-IVIG therapy, showing increased BKPyV viral load. There were no major adverse events associated with HD-IVIG, and none of our patients developed BKPyVAN during the study period.

Conclusions

Prophylactic HD-IVIG therapy in PRTR with significant BKPyV-viruria/DNAemia unresponsive to MMF dose reduction is safe and might be effective in preventing BKPyVAN. Our findings remain to be established by large-scale prospective studies.

BK viral infection: A review of management and treatment

BK viral infection remains to be a challenging post-transplant infection, which can result in kidney dysfunction. The mainstay approach to BK infection is reduction of immunosuppression. Alterations in immunosuppressive regimen with minimization of calcineurin inhibitors, use of mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors, and leflunomide have been attempted with variable outcomes. Over the past few years, investigators have explored potential therapeutic options for BK infection. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and treatment was found to have no benefit in kidney transplant recipients. The utility of cidofovir is limited by its nephrotoxicity. Intravenous immunoglobulin is becoming a popular option for treatment and prophylaxis for BK infection, as it increases the neutralizing antibody titers against the most common BK virus serotypes. Virus-specific T cell therapy is an emerging treatment option for BK viremia. In this review, we will explore management and therapeutic options for BK infection and recent evidence available in literature.

Therapeutic strategies against BK polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The selection of antiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection has been extensively debated. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of various treatments for BKPyV infection.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies regarding drug treatments for BKPyV viremia/DNAemia published between January 1, 1970 and September 30, 2022. Two independent authors screened the published studies, extracted pertinent data, and evaluated their methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 4.2.2.

RESULTS

A total of 33 published studies involving 986 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, therapeutic interventions comprised immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), cidofovir, or mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction alone for serum BKPyV clearance was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77; I2 = 78%). Moreover, the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction in combination with leflunomide, cidofovir, IVIG, or mTORi therapy for serum BKPyV clearance was 61% (95% CI: 0.47-0.74; I2 = 83%), 71% (95% CI: 0.63-0.78; I2 = 0), 87% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I2 = 45%), and 80% (95% CI: 0.59-1.00; I2 = 58%), respectively. Compared to immunosuppression reduction alone, immunosuppression reduction combined with IVIG therapy offered a statistically significant benefit in serum BKPyV clearance (P < 0.01) with minimal adverse reactions, whereas other adjunctive drug treatments did not demonstrate considerable effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing immunosuppression remains the primary approach for treating BKPyV infection. Although the combination treatment with IVIG proved to be most effective, other agents might offer varied antiviral advantages of high heterogeneity, which should be substantiated in future long-term randomized controlled trials.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and hyperimmune globulin

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been developed for over 40 years. The mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and diverse, and there may be multiple mechanisms that combine to influence it. IVIG has been used in kidney transplantation for desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and ABO-incompatible transplantation. and treatment or prevention of some infectious diseases. Hyperimmune globulins such as cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IG) and hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) have also been used to protect against cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B virus, respectively. However, IVIG is also associated with some rare but serious adverse effects and some application risks, and clinicians need to weigh the pros and cons and develop individualized treatment programs to benefit more patients. This review will provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and prophylactic measures of IVIG, and hyperimmune globulin will also be introduced in it.

Case report: JC polyomavirus nephropathy in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation: the role of viral-specific in situ hybridization staining

Introduction

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) is a ubiquitous virus that can be latent in the brain and the kidney. It is the etiologic agent responsible for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, a fatal, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, and rarely causes polyomavirus nephropathy in immunocompromised kidney transplant recipients.

Case description

We present the first case of JCPyV nephropathy in a simultaneous heart-kidney transplant patient, where viral-specific in situ hybridization staining of the kidney tissue was utilized to confirm the diagnosis. The patient was diagnosed 6 years after simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and was treated with immunosuppression reduction and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Discussion

JCPyV nephropathy should be considered in the differential diagnosis of kidney allograft injury, particularly, with suggestive light microscopy histologic features in the absence of BK polyomavirus viremia and/or viruria. In addition to obtaining JCPyV PCR in the blood, in situ hybridization staining may have a utility in confirming the diagnosis. To date, we lack effective JCPyV-specific therapies, and prompt initiation of immunosuppression reduction remains the mainstay of treatment.

A quick algorithmic review on management of viral infectious diseases in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

Pediatric solid organ transplant is a life-saving procedure for children with end-stage organ failure. Viral infections are a common complication following pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT), which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Pediatric solid organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk of viral infections due to their immunosuppressed state. The most commonly encountered viruses include cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), adenoviruses, and BK polyomavirus. Prevention strategies include vaccination prior to transplantation, post-transplant prophylaxis with antiviral agents, and preemptive therapy. Treatment options vary depending on the virus and may include antiviral therapy and sometimes immunosuppression modification. This review provides a Quick Algorithmic overview of prevention and treatment strategies for viral infectious diseases in pediatric solid organ transplant recipient.

Time-dependent variations in BK polyomavirus genome from kidney transplant recipients with persistent viremia

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a human DNA virus that resides latent in the host's renal tissue. Reactivation occurs occasionally and in case of kidney transplantation, it can lead to polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Due to the lack of specific antivirals for BKPyV and despite the risk of allograft rejection, reduction of immunosuppression remains the main approach for treating PVAN. Current data suggests that mutations can accumulate over time in the major capsid protein VP1 and can lead to neutralization escape in kidney transplant recipients. Herein, we show that mutations occur throughout the entire BKPyV genome, including in VP1. Changes were identified by per-patient comparison of viral genome sequences obtained in samples from 32 kidney recipients with persistent viremia collected at different post-transplant time-points. Amino acid changes were observed in both earlier and later post-transplant samples, although some of them were only found in later samples. Changes in VP1 mainly consisted in the introduction of a new amino acid. A switch back to the conservative amino acid was also observed. This should be considered in future approaches for treating BKPyV infection in kidney transplant recipients.

IVIg therapy in the management of BK virus infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) induces kidney allograft dysfunction. Although decreasing immunosuppression is the standard for managing BK virus (BKPyV) infection, this strategy is not always effective. The use of polyvalent immunoglobulins (IVIg) may be of interest in this setting. We performed a retrospective single-center evaluation of the management of BKPyV infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients. Among the 171 patients who underwent transplantation between January 2010 and December 2019, 54 patients were excluded (combined transplant n = 15, follow-up in another center n = 35, early postoperative graft loss n= 4). Thus, 117 patients (120 transplants) were included. Overall, 34 (28%) and 15 (13%) transplant recipients displayed positive BKPyV viruria and viremia, respectively. Three had biopsy-confirmed BKPyVAN. The pre-transplant prevalence of CAKUT and HLA antibodies was higher among BKPyV-positive patients compared to non-infected patients. After the detection of BKPyV replication and/or BKPyVAN, the immunosuppressive regimen was modified in 13 (87%) patients: either by decreasing or changing the calcineurin inhibitors (n = 13) and/or switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mTor inhibitors (n = 10). Starting IVIg therapy was based on graft dysfunction or an increase in the viral load despite reduced immunosuppressive regimen. Seven of 15(46%) patients received IVIg. These patients had a higher viral load (5.4 [5.0-6.8]log vs. 3.5 [3.3-3.8]log). In total, 13 of 15 (86%) achieved viral load reduction, five of seven after IVIg therapy. As long as specific antivirals are not available for the management of BKPyV infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients, polyvalent IVIg may be discussed for the management of severe BKPyV viremia, in combination with decreased immunosuppression.

Conversion to mTOR-Inhibitors Plus IV Immunoglobulins in Kidney-Transplant Recipients with BKV Infection: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BK virus-associated nephropathy (PvAN) increases the risk of graft failure justifying treatment. Conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) and Human polyclonal immunoglobulins (IVIg) could prevent the risk of PvAN. Our retrospective study assessed the efficacy of mTORi associated with IVIg therapy (mTORi±IVIg group) versus standard immunosuppression reduction to clear BKV DNAemia. Among forty-three kidney-transplanted patients with positive BKV DNAemia, we included twenty-six patients in the mTORi±IVIg group and reduced immunosuppression therapy for seventeen patients. We focused on BKV DNAemia clearance on the first-year. Renal function, rejection rate, evolution to PvAN, and complications of immunosuppression were assessed. BKV DNAemia decreased faster and significantly in the control group as compared to the mTORi±IVIg group (p < 0.001). Viral clearance was significantly higher in the control group compared to the mTORi±IVIg group (88% vs. 58%; p = 0.033). Death-censored graft loss, rejection rates and kidney-graft function at 12 months did not significantly differ. Multivariate analyses significantly associated BKV DNAemia clearance with reducing immunosuppression (OR = 0.11 (0.06−0.9), p = 0.045), female kidney donor (OR = 0.10 (0.01−0.59/)], p = 0.018) and time to first DNAemia, (OR = 0.88 (0.76−0.96), p = 0.019). In our study, the standard treatment for BKV DNAemia had better outcomes than an mTORi±IVIg conversion.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review

BK virus maintains a latent infection that is ubiquitous in humans. It has a propensity for reactivation in the setting of a dysfunctional cellular immune response and is frequently encountered in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for the virus has been effective in preventing progression to nephropathy and graft loss. However, it can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In this in-depth state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the history of the virus, virology, epidemiology, cellular response, pathogenesis, methods of screening and diagnosis, evidence-based treatment strategies, and upcoming therapeutics, along with the issue of re-transplantation in patients.

Treatment of BK virus with a stepwise immunosuppression reduction and intravenous immunoglobulin in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

BKV and BKVN are common in pediatric kidney transplant, but there is limited data on treatment approaches. Our objective was to study the prevalence of BKV and BKVN utilizing only plasma qPCR and report treatment outcomes with stepwise IR and IVIG.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all pediatric kidney transplants from 2013 to 2020. Excluded patients >21 years at transplant and immediate graft failure. Surveillance was conducted using only plasma BK qPCR at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months and annually. BKV defined as ≥250 copies/ml and resolution as <250 copies/ml. Presumed BKVN as >10 000 copies/ml despite IR; and BKVN if confirmed on histology.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the study; 20 (35.7%) had BKV. BKV was associated with longer duration of stent, 40 vs. 33.5 days (p = .004). Two patients (3.5%) had confirmed, and 2(3.5%) had presumed BKVN. The first-line treatment was IR in 100% of patients. BKVN confirmed and presumed received IVIG every month for six doses. Viral resolution was achieved in 70%, and no difference was noted in estimated glomerular filtration rate between BKV and non-BKV group (p = .438). There were no rejection episodes, and graft survival was 100% over median follow-up of 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma qPCR alone is adequate for screening and monitoring treatment of BKV and BKVN. A stepwise IR and IVIG resulted in BKV resolution in the majority of patients. Larger studies are required to study the role of IVIG in the treatment of BKVN.

Practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Primary Immunodeficiency and Altered Immune Response Committees

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia (SHG) is characterized by reduced immunoglobulin levels due to acquired causes of decreased antibody production or increased antibody loss. Clarification regarding whether the hypogammaglobulinemia is secondary or primary is important because this has implications for evaluation and management. Prior receipt of immunosuppressive medications and/or presence of conditions associated with SHG development, including protein loss syndromes, are histories that raise suspicion for SHG. In patients with these histories, a thorough investigation of potential etiologies of SHG reviewed in this report is needed to devise an effective treatment plan focused on removal of iatrogenic causes (eg, discontinuation of an offending drug) or treatment of the underlying condition (eg, management of nephrotic syndrome). When iatrogenic causes cannot be removed or underlying conditions cannot be reversed, therapeutic options are not clearly delineated but include heightened monitoring for clinical infections, supportive antimicrobials, and in some cases, immunoglobulin replacement therapy. This report serves to summarize the existing literature regarding immunosuppressive medications and populations (autoimmune, neurologic, hematologic/oncologic, pulmonary, posttransplant, protein-losing) associated with SHG and highlights key areas for future investigation.

Bacterial and Viral Infection and Sepsis in Kidney Transplanted Patients

Kidney transplanted patients are a unique population with intrinsic susceptibility to viral and bacterial infections, mainly (but not exclusively) due to continuous immunosuppression. In this setting, infectious episodes remain among the most important causes of death, with different risks according to the degree of immunosuppression, time after transplantation, type of infection, and patient conditions. Prevention, early diagnosis, and appropriate therapy are the goals of infective management, taking into account that some specific characteristics of transplanted patients may cause a delay (the absence of fever or inflammatory symptoms, the negativity of serological tests commonly adopted for the general population, or the atypical anatomical presentation depending on the surgical site and graft implantation). This review considers the recent available findings of the most common viral and bacterial infection in kidney transplanted patients and explores risk factors and outcomes in septic evolution.

The diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma of the co-existence of BK virus nephropathy with acute rejection - an experience from a single Centre and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

BKV nephropathy (BKVN) is one of the major causes of graft loss with the advent of potent immunosuppressive drugs. The literature on the co-existence of acute rejection (AR) and BKVN is scarce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective analysis, where the allograft biopsies of patients transplanted between 2011 and 2021 were reviewed. The biopsies, which showed evidence of coexistent AR and BKVN, were included. In addition, demographic profiles, clinical presentation, treatment details, response to therapy, and follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 1175 live transplants done between January 2011 and March 2021, 49 had BKVN representing 4.17%. Only seven patients (0.59%) had coexistent BKVN with AR. The mean serum creatinine at presentation was 2.3 mg/dl. The mean duration to diagnosis from transplant was seven months (range 3-22 months). All had significant viremia at presentation (17450-4,750,000 copies/ml). All biopsies showed type 1 inclusion bodies with SV40 positivity except one. Coexistent acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) was found in five and acute ABMR in two patients. Three patients received pulse IV methylprednisolone, five received 2 g/kg IVIG, two received plasma exchange as upfront therapies. Maintenance immunosuppression reduction was made in all. Viremia clearance was noted at a mean duration of 3.5 months. However, three patients lost their grafts on follow-up. Four had stable graft function with a mean serum creatinine of 1.54 mg/dl.

CONCLUSION

Intensifying immunosuppression to treat AR followed by a reduction in maintenance immunosuppression and IVIG and antiviral therapies seems optimal strategy and showed good long-term graft survival in patients with coexistent BKVN and AR.

Research progress of BK virus and systemic lupus erythematosus

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which patients are often infected by viruses due to deficient immunity or immunosuppressant use. BK virus (BKV)mainly affects the kidney and can also cause multiple organ involvement throughout the body, which is similar to SLE. BKV is mostly a latent infection in vivo. The incidence of virus reactivation is higher in SLE patients. Reactivation of BKV can induce the production of autoantibodies, thereby promoting the occurrence and development of SLE.Purpose: Aim of this article is to review the prevalence and pathegenesis of BKV infection in SLE patients.Method: The literature search was conducted using four different databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science.Results: BK virus is higher infection and reactivation in SLE patients. The "hapten carrier" mechanism may lead to the production of autoantibodies. Some immunosuppressive drugs, like leflumide and hydroxychloroquine, may show a protective effect.Conclusions: BKV infection plays a role in the occurrence and development of SLE, and its significance deserves further exploration.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Intracellular Low Iron Exerts Anti-BK Polyomavirus Effect by Inhibiting the Protein Synthesis of Exogenous Genes

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a small double-stranded DNA virus and ubiquitous human pathogen that particularly affects immunocompromised individuals. Antiviral therapy for BKPyV is urgently needed. Intracellular irons have an important role in many viral infections, yet its contribution to BKPyV and replication has not been explored. In this study, we explored the interaction between BKPyV infection and intracellular iron and the inhibitory effect of iron depletion on BKPyV infection. By creating a low-intracellular-iron environment, we demonstrated that the iron-chelating-induced iron depletion inhibits BKPyV infection in primary renal tubular epithelial cells (RPTECs) and urinary bladder cancer cells (TCCSUP cells). Iron depletion exerts an inhibitory effect after BKPyV enters the nucleus, which might be due to the inhibition of the protein synthesis of exogenous genes in iron-depleted cells. Further exploration of the target proteins of iron-regulating viral infection could potentially be used to develop new strategies for urgently needed anti-BKPyV therapies. IMPORTANCE BKPyV poses a serious threat to the health of immunocompromised patients, and there are currently no curative drugs. Understanding the relationship between the virus and intracellular environment contributes to the discovery of antiviral targets. We demonstrate here that BKPyV is inhibited in cells with a low-iron environment. We also find that iron-chelating-induced iron depletion inhibits viral and exogenous protein synthesis. Further exploration of the target proteins of iron regulation could have great potential in developing new drugs against BKPyV and other viruses.

Chronic Kidney Allograft Disease: New Concepts and Opportunities

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in most countries and kidney transplantation is the best option for those patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Therefore, there is a significant number of patients living with a functioning kidney allograft. However, progressive kidney allograft functional deterioration remains unchanged despite of major advances in the field. After the first post-transplant year, it has been estimated that this chronic allograft damage may cause a 5% graft loss per year. Most studies focused on mechanisms of kidney graft damage, especially on ischemia-reperfusion injury, alloimmunity, nephrotoxicity, infection and disease recurrence. Thus, therapeutic interventions focus on those modifiable factors associated with chronic kidney allograft disease (CKaD). There are strategies to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury, to improve the immunologic risk stratification and monitoring, to reduce calcineurin-inhibitor exposure and to identify recurrence of primary renal disease early. On the other hand, control of risk factors for chronic disease progression are particularly relevant as kidney transplantation is inherently associated with renal mass reduction. However, despite progress in pathophysiology and interventions, clinical advances in terms of long-term kidney allograft survival have been subtle. New approaches are needed and probably a holistic view can help. Chronic kidney allograft deterioration is probably the consequence of damage from various etiologies but can be attenuated by kidney repair mechanisms. Thus, besides immunological and other mechanisms of damage, the intrinsic repair kidney graft capacity should be considered to generate new hypothesis and potential therapeutic targets. In this review, the critical risk factors that define CKaD will be discussed but also how the renal mechanisms of regeneration could contribute to a change chronic kidney allograft disease paradigm.

Intravenous immunoglobulins do not prove beneficial to reduce alloimmunity among kidney transplant recipients with BKV-associated nephropathy

Reduced immunosuppression during BKV-DNAemia has been associated with T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) may reduce alloimmunity. We studied 860 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) for the development of BKV-DNAuria and BKV-DNAemia (low-level <10 000 IE/ml, high-level >10 000 IE/ml). 52/131 KTRs with high-level BKV-DNAemia received IVIG. The HLA-related immunological risk was stratified by the Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE) algorithm. BKV-DNAuria only was observed in 86 KTRs (10.0%), low-level BKV-DNAemia in 180 KTRs (20.9%) and high-level BKV-DNAemia in 131 KTRs (15.2%). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed significantly less TCMR compared to KTRs with high-level BKV-DNAemia (5.2% vs. 25.5%; P < 0.001) and no BKV-replication (13.2%; P = 0.014), lowest rates of de novo DSA (21.3%), ABMR (9.2%) and flattest glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope (-0.8 ml/min). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed significantly higher median (interquartile range) total PIRCHE if they developed TCMR [100.22 (72.6) vs. 69.52 (49.97); P = 0.020] or ABMR [128.86 (52.99) vs. 69.52 (49.96); P = 0.005]. Administration of IVIG did not shorten duration of BKV-DNAemia (P = 0.798) or reduce TCMR, de novo DSA and ABMR (P > 0.05). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed best protection against alloimmunity, with a high number of PIRCHE co-determining the remaining risk. The administration of IVIG, however, was not beneficial in reducing alloimmunity.

BK polyomavirus-pathogen, paradigm and puzzle

BK virus is a polyomavirus with seroprevalence rates of 80% in adults. Infection is usually acquired during childhood, and the virus is benign or pathologic depending on immune status. The virus reactivates in immunodeficiency states, mostly among transplant (either kidney or bone marrow) recipients. There are approximately 15 000 renal transplants every year in the USA, of which 5-10% develop BK polyomavirus nephropathy; 50-80% of patients who develop nephropathy go on to develop graft failure. BK virus is associated with BK polyomavirus nephropathy, ureteral stenosis, late-onset hemorrhagic cystitis, bladder cancer and other nonlytic large T-expressing carcinomas. The renal spectrum begins with viruria and can end with graft failure. The clinical spectrum and outcomes vary among transplant patients. New noninvasive diagnostic methods, such as urinary polyomavirus Haufen detected by electron microscopy, are currently under study. Treatment is primarily directed at decreasing immunosuppression but may be associated with graft rejection. Repeat transplantation is encouraged as long as viral clearance in plasma prior to transplant is accomplished. There remain no definitive data regarding the utility of transplant nephrectomy.

BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: Balancing Rejection and Infection

BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) and allograft rejection are two closely-associated diseases on opposite ends of the immune scale in kidney transplant recipients. The principle of balancing the immune system remains the mainstay of therapeutic strategy. While patient outcomes can be improved through screening, risk factors identification, and rapid reduction of immunosuppressants, a lack of standard curative therapy is the primary concern during clinical practice. Additionally, difficulty in pathological differential diagnosis and clinicopathology’s dissociation pose problems for a definite diagnosis. This article discusses the delicate evaluation needed to optimize immunosuppression and reviews recent advances in molecular diagnosis and immunological therapy for BKVN patients. New biomarkers for BKVN diagnosis are under development. For example, measurement of virus-specific T cell level may play a role in steering immunosuppressants. The development of cellular therapy may provide prevention, even a cure, for BKVN, a complex post-transplant complication.

BK virus nephropathy in a heart transplant recipient

BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplantation is widely recognized as an important cause of graft dysfunction and loss. In the case of transplants of organs other than kidney, BK virus nephropathy in native kidneys has been recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease, which is related with immunosuppression; however, the diagnosis is usually late because the renal dysfunction is attributed to other causes, such as toxicity by anticalcineurinic drugs, interstitial nephritis due to medications, hemodynamic changes, diabetes, hypertension, etc. We report a case of BK virus nephropathy in a patient who underwent heart transplantation due to peripartum cardiomyopathy. The kidney biopsy reported active chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with late stage polyomavirus nephritis and the blood viral load for BK virus was positive (logarithm 4.5). The immunosuppressive treatment was reduced, and after two years of follow-up, the patient had stable renal function with a serum creatinine of 2.5 mg/dL (GFR of 23.4 mL/min/1.73m2). We recommend that the BK virus be considered as a cause of renal dysfunction in heart transplant recipients, with the aim of detecting its replication in time to reduce immunosuppressive therapy before irreversible compromise of renal function may manifest.

Intravenous immunoglobulin as a preventive strategy against BK virus viremia and BKV-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients-Results from a proof-of-concept study

BK virus (BKV) replication occurs frequently in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), potentially leading to BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and graft loss. Patients with high titers of BKV-neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are protected against BKV replication, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) infusion can increase NAb titers. We investigated whether early IVIg administration prevents BKV replication in patients with low NAb titers (<4 log₁₀ against the BKV-specific genotype). Based on NAb titers on the day of transplantation, KTR followed in the Strasbourg University Hospital (n = 174) were retrospectively divided into the following 3 risk categories for BKV replication: (1) patients with low NAb titers ("high-risk") who received IVIg for the first 3 posttransplant months (n = 44), (2) patients with low NAb titers ("high-risk") who did not undergo IVIg treatment (n = 41), and (3) patients with high NAb titers ("low-risk") who did not receive IVIg (n = 89). At 12 posttransplant months, the incidence of BKV viremia in the high-risk group treated with IVIg (6.8%) was similar to that observed in the low-risk group (10.1%) and markedly lower than that of the untreated high-risk group (36.6%; P < .001). Similar results were observed with regard to BKVAN. We conclude that IVIg may be a valuable strategy for preventing BKV replication.

The Role of HLA and KIR Immunogenetics in BK Virus Infection after Kidney Transplantation

BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus with high seroprevalence in the general population with an unremarkable clinical presentation in healthy people, but a potential for causing serious complications in immunosuppressed transplanted patients. Reactivation or primary infection in kidney allograft recipients may lead to allograft dysfunction and subsequent loss. Currently, there is no widely accepted specific treatment for BKV infection and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay therapy. Given this and the sequential appearance of viruria-viremia-nephropathy, screening and early detection are of utmost importance. There are numerous risk factors associated with BKV infection including genetic factors, among them human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) alleles have been shown to be the strongest so far. Identification of patients at risk for BKV infection would be useful in prevention or early action to reduce morbidity and progression to frank nephropathy. Assessment of risk involving HLA ligands and KIR genotyping of recipients in the pre-transplant or early post-transplant period might be useful in clinical practice. This review summarizes current knowledge of the association between HLA, KIR and BKV infection and potential future directions of research, which might lead to optimal utilization of these genetic markers.

Advances in BK Virus Complications in Organ Transplantation and Beyond

Reactivation of BK virus (BKV) remains a dreaded complication in immunosuppressed states. Conventionally, BKV is known as a cause for BKV-associated nephropathy and allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. However, emerging studies have shown its negative impact on native kidney function and patient survival in other transplants and its potential role in diseases such as cancer. Because BKV-associated nephropathy is driven by immunosuppression, reduction in the latter is a convenient standard of care. However, this strategy is risk prone due to the development of donor-specific antibodies affecting long-term allograft survival. Despite its pathogenic role, there is a distinct lack of effective anti-BKV therapeutics. This limitation combined with increased morbidity and health care cost of BKV-associated diseases add to the complexity of BKV management. While summarizing recent advances in the pathogenesis of BKV-associated nephropathy and its reactivation in other organ transplants, this review illustrates the limitations of current and emerging therapeutic options and provides a compelling argument for an effective targeted anti-BKV drug.

Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy After Living Kidney Transplantation

Purpose

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is one of the most difficult infections to be treated after kidney transplantation. Although patients with BKPyVAN usually received a reduction of immunosuppressive agents, the majority of these patients undergo the loss of the graft kidney without any effective treatment afterward. Therefore, development of more effective therapy for BKPyVAN is eagerly expected.

Patients and Methods

Among patients who underwent a kidney transplantation between January 2016 and April 2019 at our hospital, there were five cases of BKPyVAN. After the initial diagnosis, all patients discontinued administration of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which was not enough to diminish decoy cells in urine cytology test. Therefore, all patients received additional intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (100 mg/kg/day) therapy for five days and were evaluated for the therapeutic effect of IVIG with immunohistochemical examination using re-biopsy samples of the graft kidney.

Results

After IVIG therapy, 2 cases showed negative decoy cells in urine and 3 cases showed a drastic decrease of plasma BK virus load. Importantly, simian virus (SV) 40 large T antigens diminished after IVIG administration in all cases, which degraded polyomavirus nephropathy classification.

Conclusion

Although it is difficult to treat BKPyVAN after kidney transplant, IVIG therapy was considered to a promising treatment to improve severity of BKPyVAN especially in cases that dose reduction of immunosuppressive agents was ineffective.

BK Virus Nephropathy: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies

BK virus reactivation as a result of therapeutic immunosuppression following renal transplant can result in BK polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss. This is a complex and challenging clinical problem with a range of management options and practices reported in literature. The current standard for early diagnosis and treatment is surveillance by measuring viral DNA in blood using qPCR. Immunosuppression reduction is the cornerstone of effective management but is associated with a risk of acute rejection following treatment.

BK polyomavirus-specific antibody and T-cell responses in kidney transplantation: update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has emerged as a significant cause of premature graft failure after kidney transplantation. Without effective antiviral drugs, treatment is based on reducing immunosuppression to regain immune control over BKPyV replication. The paradigm of high-level viruria/decoy cells, BKPyV-DNAemia, and proven nephropathy permits early interventions. Here, we review recent findings about BKPyV-specific antibody and T-cell responses and their potential role in risk stratification, immune monitoring, and therapy.

RECENT FINDING

Kidney transplant recipients having low or undetectable BKPyV-specific IgG immunoglobulin G (IgG) are higher risk for developing BKPyV-DNAemia if the donor has high BKPyV-specific IgG. This observation has been extended to neutralizing antibodies. Immunosuppression, impaired activation, proliferation, and exhaustion of BKPyV-specific T cells may increase the risk of developing BKPyV-DNAemia and nephropathy. Clearance of BKPyV-DNAemia was correlated with high CD8 T cell responses to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-types presenting BKPyV-encoded immunodominant 9mers. For clinical translation, these data need to be assessed in appropriately designed clinical studies, as outlined in recent guidelines on BKPyV in kidney transplantation.

SUMMARY

Evaluation of BKPyV-specific immune responses in recipient and donor may help to stratify the risk of BKPyV-DNAemia, nephropathy, and graft loss. Future efforts need to evaluate clinical translation, vaccines, and immunotherapy to control BKPyV replication.

Persistent BK Polyomavirus Viruria is Associated with Accumulation of VP1 Mutations and Neutralization Escape

To investigate the relationship between neutralization escape and persistent high-level BK polyomavirus replication after kidney transplant (KTx), VP1 sequences were determined by Sanger and next-generation sequencing in longitudinal samples from KTx recipients with persistent high-level viruria (non-controllers) compared to patients who suppressed viruria (controllers). The infectivity and neutralization resistance of representative VP1 mutants were investigated using pseudotype viruses. In all patients, the virus population was initially dominated by wild-type VP1 sequences, then non-synonymous VP1 mutations accumulated over time in non-controllers. BC-loop mutations resulted in reduced infectivity in 293TT cells and conferred neutralization escape from cognate serum in five out of six non-controller patients studied. When taken as a group, non-controller sera were not more susceptible to neutralization escape than controller sera, so serological profiling cannot predict subsequent control of virus replication. However, at an individual level, in three non-controller patients the VP1 variants that emerged exploited specific “holes” in the patient’s humoral response. Persistent high-level BK polyomavirus replication in KTx recipients is therefore associated with the accumulation of VP1 mutations that can confer resistance to neutralization, implying that future BKPyV therapies involving IVIG or monoclonal antibodies may be more effective when used as preventive or pre-emptive, rather than curative, strategies.

BK virus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: An update on pathogenesis, immune responses, diagnosis and treatments

In hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients, BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection results in significant morbidity mainly due to hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Despite increased knowledge acquired over recent decades, no treatment has shown effectiveness in the management of organ damage in HCT allografts. This review summarizes the current knowledge on BKPyV, from the virus constitution to the pathophysiology and immune-related mechanisms. We next focus on BKPyV-induced HC in HCT to discuss the benefit of monitoring BKPyV viruria and viremia in the management of patients. At last, we review currently used therapeutics, along with future promising therapies to propose clinical and practical guidelines and further interesting research areas.

Effects of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and Fc gamma receptor polymorphisms on BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is a major complication in kidney transplant patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy against persistent BKVN and to evaluate the association between persistent BKVN and Fc gamma receptor (FcγR) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

METHODS

A total of 86 patients out of 279 kidney recipients with BKVN were investigated in a single-center retrospective study. The majority of 86 patients were Hispanic and Asian (69.8% and 17.4%). Patients were treated with adjunctive IVIG or standard therapy (controls). Subgroup analysis was performed between IVIG responders and non-responders. BK virus copy number and serum creatinine (SCr) were measured to evaluate the impact of IVIG. We analyzed the association between the response to IVIG and genotype at FcγR3A (rs396991) and FcγR2A (rs1801274) SNPs.

RESULTS

Viral load in IVIG non-responders was significantly higher than in responders at the time of diagnosis (219 271.8 vs 29 816.3 copies/mL, P = .015) and after 6 months of IVIG use (12 789.5 vs 1369.5 copies/mL, P < .001). However, analyses SNP of FcγR2A (OR = 0.807, CI = 0.435-1.496 P = .495) and FcγR3A (OR = 0.997, CI = 0.505-1.970, P = .993) SNPs showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

IVIG appears to lower BK DNA viral load significantly in patients with persistent BKVN. However, no associations were identified between BKVN and FcγR2A or FcγR3A SNPs.

JC virus-associated nephropathy in a post-heart and -kidney transplantation patient

JC virus-associated nephropathy is rare in kidney transplant recipients, and even rarer in recipients of other solid organ transplants. We present a case of JC virus-associated nephropathy in a heart-kidney transplant recipient, which to our knowledge is the first case reported in the literature. We discuss the findings on renal biopsy for JC virus nephropathy and our management approach to this rare complication.

Longitudinal study of BK Polyomavirus outcomes, risk factors, and kinetics in renal transplantation patients

BACKGROUND

In the immunocompromised conditions following renal transplantation, BK virus can reactivate and cause BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVN). Increased BK viral loads and extended duration of infection have been linked to development of BKVN. The aim of this study was to observe the incidence of BKV infection and BKVN, and kinetics of infection and disease in renal transplantation recipients.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2018, we conducted a longitudinal cohort observational study of 139 renal transplantation patients treated at a single clinic. Quantitative PCR assay was conducted to assess longitudinal BK viral loads. Analysis of patient clinical characteristics was performed to determine risk factors for BKV infection and associated disease.

RESULTS

Of our cohort, 29 (20.9%) patients developed high BK viremia, and 7 (5.0%) developed biopsy-confirmed BKVN. Clinical parameters associated with diabetes (FBS, HbA1c) and hyperlipidemia (TG, TC, LDL-C) were found to be correlated with development of high BK viremia or BKVN. In 3 of 4 patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment, BK viral loads were reduced by at least 1 log within 2-3 months of administration. Significant differences were measured in BK viral loads and kidney function between BK viremic patients and BKVN patients by 3-9 months post-transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified diabetes and hyperlipidemia as potential risk factors for development of high BK viremia and/or BKVN. IVIG was seen to be effective in reducing viral titers. The period 3-9 months post-transplantation was identified as important for development of BKVN from high BK viremia.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in a highly sensitized pediatric renal transplant recipient with severe BK DNAemia and rising DSA

BK DNAemia in renal transplant recipients is a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and can lead to graft loss due to BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy or to graft rejection due to immunosuppression reduction. Currently, the first-line treatment for BK DNAemia is immunosuppression reduction. Second-line treatment for BK DNAemia has not been well-established. In this report, we present a case of a highly sensitized second-time pediatric renal transplant recipient with severe and persistent BK DNAemia and rising DSA, who was treated with IVIG and subsequently found to have clearance of BK viremia with concomitant reduction in DSA.

Viremia Negativization After BK Virus Infection in Kidney Transplantation: A National Bicentric Study

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV) infection represents a potentially dreadful complication after kidney transplantation (KT). When BK viremia is detected, the best therapeutic approach remains not entirely clarified. Critical elements of BK viremia treatment are immunosuppression minimization and introduction of drugs like leflunomide, everolimus, and fluoroquinolones. The study aimed to analyze the results of the BK viremia management in 2 collaborative Italian centers.

METHODS

Ten patients undergoing KT in the 2 collaborative Italian centers of Sapienza University of Rome and University of L'Aquila from January 2013 to December 2017 and showing a post-KT diagnosis of BK viremia were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

Mean time from KT to BKV positivity was 7 months (range: 1-19 months). At diagnosis, the mean viral load was 683,842 copies/mL (range: 5800-4,052,415 copies/mL), with an average zenith of 2,428,410 copies/mL (range: 6762-18,022,500 copies/mL). In the 5 patients with BKV nephropathy, we observed a switch from antimetabolite to leflunomide (n = 5), a switch from tacrolimus to everolimus (n = 3), or an introduction of fluoroquinolones (n = 3). BKV clearance was achieved in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Early BKV diagnosis and stepwise minimization of immunosuppression remain the first-line approach in patients with BK viremia. In the presence of BKV nephropathy, a combination of antiviral drugs like leflunomide and fluoroquinolones/everolimus should favor viremia clearance.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Administration Significantly Increases BKPyV Genotype-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is one of the major causes of kidney graft dysfunction, and there are no BKPyV-specific antiviral therapies available. BKPyV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) play key roles in protecting against BKPyV replication and represent a potential therapeutic or preventive strategy. In this study, we evaluated NAb titers in intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v. Ig) preparations and in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) before and after i.v. Ig administration. NAb titers directed against major BKPyV genotypes were measured using a BKPyV pseudovirion system. Thirty-three KTR receiving high (1 g/kg of body weight/day; n = 17) or low (0.4 g/kg/day; n = 16) i.v. Ig doses were included. Median NAb titers in i.v. Ig preparations ranged from 5.9 log₁₀ 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) for genotype I to 4.1 log₁₀ IC₅₀ for genotype IV. A mean of 90% of patients (range, 88% to 100%) displaying low or negative BKPyV NAb titers against genotype I reached 4 log₁₀ IC₅₀ after the first i.v. Ig administration. This value was reached by a mean of 44% (range, 13% to 83%) and 19% (range, 0% to 38%) of patients against genotype II and genotype IV, respectively. The benefit of i.v. Ig administration persisted until the following course of treatment (day 22 ± 7 days) for genotypes I and II, and no cumulative effect was observed through the three doses. Our findings demonstrate that i.v. Ig administration results in a significant increase in BKPyV NAb titers in KTR. These in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic data provide the rationale for a proof-of-concept study investigating the efficacy of i.v. Ig for the prevention of BKPyV infection in KTR.

Native kidney BK virus nephropathy, a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is a growing base of literature describing BK nephropathy (BKVN) in patients outside of the setting of kidney transplant. Previous systematic reviews of the literature have been limited by methodology or by the scope of patients included.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Systematic Review (Prospero # CRD42018088524).

SETTING & POPULATION

Patients without kidney transplant who had biopsy-proven BKVN.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Full-text articles that describe native BKVN patient cases.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Descriptive synthesis.

RESULTS

The search identified 630 unique articles of which 51 were included in the final review. Sixty-five cases (including two new cases presented in this review) were identified, all but one occurred in the setting of known immunosuppression.

LIMITATIONS

The primary limitation was the exclusion of studies that did not fulfill the stringent review criteria. We excluded reports with only a clinical diagnosis of BKVN, such as those with viruria and/or viremia without biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

As of May 2018, there are 65 reported cases of BKVN in native kidneys. This represents the most comprehensive description of biopsy-proven BKVN in native kidneys to date. Evaluation for BK nephropathy should be considered in immunocompromised patients who exhibit unexplained renal failure.

Clinical outcomes of polyvalent immunoglobulin use in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Polyvalent immunoglobulin is commonly used for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation but its impact on other outcomes is not known. This systematic review investigated the impact of immunoglobulin prophylaxis on infection, rejection, graft loss, and death following kidney transplantation. A comprehensive literature search located 18 studies (n = 8 randomized controlled trials). None examined the effect of immunoglobulin prophylaxis in transplant recipients with hypogammaglobulinemia. Quality of included studies was variable with high to very high risk of bias. In the randomized trials, immunoglobulin use did not reduce cytomegalovirus infection (OR 0.68 [0.39, 1.21]; 6 studies, n = 295), rejection (OR 0.96 [0.50, 1.82]; 4 studies, n = 187), or graft loss (OR 1.03 [0.46, 2.30]; 6 studies, n = 265). In non-randomized studies, immunoglobulin did not reduce cytomegalovirus infection (OR 0.63 [0.20, 1.94]; 6 studies, n = 361) or death (OR 1.32 [0.05, 38.79]; 3 studies, n = 222) but reduce rejection (OR 0.47 [0.24, 0.94]; 4 studies, n = 268) and graft loss (OR 0.15 [0.05, 0.43]; 2 studies, n = 118). Data were scarce and sample size of current evidence was small. Adequately powered randomized trials are needed to determine if immunoglobulin is an effective intervention to reduce infection, rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation with and without hypogammaglobulinemia.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

Non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective way to decrease the high morbidity and mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, KT does not completely reverse the damage done by years of decreased kidney function and dialysis. Furthermore, new offending agents (in particular, immunosuppression) added in the post-transplant period increase the risk of complications. Cardiovascular (CV) disease, the leading cause of death in KT recipients, warrants pre-transplant screening based on risk factors. Nevertheless, the screening methods currently used have many shortcomings and a perfect screening modality does not exist. Risk factor modification in the pre- and post-transplant periods is of paramount importance to decrease the rate of CV complications post-transplant, either by lifestyle modification (for example, diet, exercise, and smoking cessation) or by pharmacological means (for example, statins, anti-hyperglycemics, and so on). Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major contributor to mortality in this patient population. Although tacrolimus is a major contributor to PTDM development, changes in immunosuppression are limited by the higher risk of rejection with other agents. Immunosuppression has also been implicated in higher risk of malignancy; therefore, proper cancer screening is needed. Cancer immunotherapy is drastically changing the way certain types of cancer are treated in the general population; however, its use post-transplant is limited by the risk of allograft rejection. As expected, higher risk of infections is also encountered in transplant recipients. When caring for KT recipients, special attention is needed in screening methods, preventive measures, and treatment of infection with BK virus and cytomegalovirus. Hepatitis C virus infection is common in transplant candidates and in the deceased donor pool; however, newly developed direct-acting antivirals have been proven safe and effective in the pre- and post-transplant periods. The most important and recent developments on complications following KT are reviewed in this article.

Common viral infections in kidney transplant recipients

Infectious complications have been considered as a major cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation, especially in the Asian population. Therefore, prevention, early detection, and prompt treatment of such infections are crucial in kidney transplant recipients. Among all infectious complications, viruses are considered to be the most common agents because of their abundance, infectivity, and latency ability. Herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B virus, BK polyomavirus, and adenovirus are well-known etiologic agents of viral infections in kidney transplant patients worldwide because of their wide range of distribution. As DNA viruses, they are able to reactivate after affected patients receive immunosuppressive agents. These DNA viruses can cause systemic diseases or allograft dysfunction, especially in the first six months after transplantation. Pretransplant evaluation and immunization as well as appropriate prophylaxis and preemptive approaches after transplant have been established in the guidelines and are used effectively to reduce the incidence of these viral infections. This review will describe the etiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of viral infections that commonly affect kidney transplant recipients.

Management of BK Polyomavirus Infection in Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients: A Review Article

BK virus (BKV) can cause graft dysfunction or failure in kidney transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) emerged as a common complication in the late 1990s, probably due to the introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents. BKVAN occurred in up to 5% of kidney transplant recipients, with graft failure in up to 70%. Since universal implementation of effective screening and treatment strategies, BKV is no longer a common cause of graft failure; reported graft loss is only 0% to 5%. This article briefly describes BK virology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

New England BK consortium: Regional survey of BK screening and management protocols in comparison to published consensus guidelines

INTRODUCTION

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) continues to impact renal transplant recipients (RTR). The New England BK Consortium aims to jointly optimize screening and management of BKPyV.

METHODS

Our first project was to survey centers' BKPyV screening protocols and compare them to consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 15 centers (86.7%) returned the survey. Only two center reported using monitoring parameters that were in line with consensus guidelines for BKPyV screening, while the majority of centers reported less intensive methods and shorter duration. One center reported performing renal biopsies in all patients with plasma viral loads >10 000 copies/mL, while all other centers only perform for-cause biopsies. For presumptive nephropathy, 11 centers recommend a biopsy for confirmation. For management of documented BKPyV-associated nephropathy, 12 centers propose further immunosuppression reduction. Nine centers report CNI dose reduction as their primary treatment. More than half of centers surveyed reported use of leflunomide, cidofovir or intravenous immunoglobulin.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a large variance in BKPyV screening and management strategies among centers. Due to these results, all participating centers agreed to implement uniform screening and aim to optimize management protocols.

High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment of Polyomavirus Nephropathy Developing After T Cell-Mediated Rejection Treatment: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of BK polyomavirus causes destructive virus allograft nephropathy; however, treatment options are limited. Herein, we report a case in which a patient with T cell-mediated rejection was treated with steroid therapy. The patient subsequently developed BK viremia and was successfully treated by using intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) after failing to respond to conventional treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 54-year-old man had been undergoing peritoneal dialysis for 3 years before kidney transplantation. He had an elevated serum creatinine level (2.26 mg/dL; normal range, 1.2-1.4 mg/dL) and reduced urine output 2 months after transplantation. Suspecting T cell-mediated rejection, steroid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 250 mg twice daily) was performed for 3 days. Despite treatment, there was a recurrence of increased serum creatinine, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (serum samples) indicated BK viremia (>5.5 × 10⁵ copies/mL). Results of a kidney biopsy revealed polyomavirus nephropathy (BK virus positive and C4d negative). Thus, the patient's tacrolimus dosage was reduced (from 2.75 mg twice daily to 2 mg once daily), he discontinued mycophenolate mofetil, and he was administered ciprofloxacin and leflunomide. However, the BK viremia showed no improvement, even after 3 months of treatment. Thus, he was administered high-dose IVIG (1 g/kg, 5 times over 5 weeks). The viremia load (blood specimen) decreased to 5197 copies/mL, and the patient's graft function stabilized. His serum creatinine decreased to 2.68 mg/dL. The patient is currently being followed up.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal BK treatment methods have not been established, and IVIG treatment remains controversial. However, the present case provides an example of successful treatment using high-dose IVIG.

BK virus as a mediator of graft dysfunction following kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK virus is a significant risk factor for kidney allograft dysfunction and loss among renal transplant recipients. Currently, there is no proven effective treatment except for the reduction of immunosuppression. In this review, we discuss diagnostic challenges and current treatment options for BK in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antiviral and antibiotic therapies have been employed for BK viraemia with variable efficacy. In addition, novel therapeutic regimens such as adoptive transfer of targeted T cells have been described as possible treatment options for recipients with BK nephropathy. BK can also be seen in the native kidneys of pancreas, heart, lung and liver transplant recipients, suggesting that BK screening measures should be employed to other solid organ transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Early screening for BK combined with reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay of treatment for BK viraemia. New therapeutic advances demonstrate promise in vitro; however, the in-vivo efficacy will be demonstrated by future studies.