Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017;31:127-135. [PMID: 27989547 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2016.11.002]

Indications and results of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation

The shortage of deceased liver donor organs over the years has always posed the need to expand the donor pool. A viable alternative to deceased donors is that of the living donor. Indeed, the living donor in liver transplantation, initially in pediatric transplantation, but for several years now also in adult transplantation, is a more than viable alternative to deceased liver donation. In fact, right liver lobe donation has proven to be a surgical procedure with low impact on the donor's life in terms of morbidity and mortality, with excellent results in recipients of such organs. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have been published that show excellent results in right-lobe living donor liver transplantation, encouraging this practice not only in countries that have historically had a shortage of deceased donor organs, such as Asian countries, but making it a practice of increasing use in Western countries as well. In addition, thanks to improvements in surgical technique and the experience of high-volume centers, this surgery has also begun to be performed using minimally invasive surgical techniques, allowing us to envision ever better outcomes for both donor and recipient in the coming years.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Portal vein pressure and flow modulation in pediatric liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) has been indicated for smaller and more clinically severe patients in recent years. Small biliary atresia (BA) patients often show portal hypoplasia and sclerotic portal vein (PV), which may make PV reconstruction more difficult during the operation. Among PV complications, intraoperative PV thrombosis can be considered a disaster, and it is important to prevent this catastrophic event by the precise assessment of the PV structure and PVF using radiological imaging before and during LT. However, there are no objective parameters to indicate whether sufficient PVF can be obtained. PV pressure (PVP) and PV flow (PVF) have mainly been studied in adult living donor LT, for the purpose of preventing small-for-size syndrome, and PVP has been considered an objective parameter of graft inflow modulation (GIM). In the setting of pediatric LT, GIM is mainly performed to prevent hypoperfusion, and it must be performed before graft implantation. GIM to maximize the PVF of pediatric patients with potentially low PVF in LT consists of the interruption of collateral vessels, the assessment of the usability of the native PV, and technical modifications in PV reconstruction. Reliable objective parameters that represent sufficient PVF before graft implantation are desired. Our recent study proposed that a PVP of ≥25 mmHg before graft implantation can be considered an objective parameter to obtain sufficient PVF (cutoff value: 50 mL/min/100 g of graft weight). Further investigation is needed to determine the best strategy for successful PV reconstruction in pediatric LT.

Management of Established Small-for-size Syndrome in Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Medical, Radiological, and Surgical Interventions: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) following living donor liver transplantation is a complication that can lead to devastating outcomes such as prolonged poor graft function and possibly graft loss. Because of the concern about the syndrome, some transplants of mismatched grafts may not be performed. Portal hyperperfusion of a small graft and hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation are recognized as main pathogenic factors for the syndrome. Management of established SFSS is guided by the severity of the presentation with the initial focus on pharmacological therapy to modulate portal flow and provide supportive care to the patient with the goal of facilitating graft regeneration and recovery. When medical management fails or condition progresses with impending dysfunction or even liver failure, interventional radiology (IR) and/or surgical interventions to reduce portal overperfusion should be considered. Although most patients have good outcomes with medical, IR, and/or surgical management that allow graft regeneration, the risk of graft loss increases dramatically in the setting of bilirubin >10 mg/dL and INR>1.6 on postoperative day 7 or isolated bilirubin >20 mg/dL on postoperative day 14. Retransplantation should be considered based on the overall clinical situation and the above postoperative laboratory parameters. The following recommendations focus on medical and IR/surgical management of SFSS as well as considerations and timing of retransplantation when other therapies fail.

Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Enhanced recovery for liver transplantation: recommendations from the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society consensus conference

There is much controversy regarding enhanced recovery for recipients of liver transplants from deceased and living donors. The objectives of this Review were to summarise current knowledge on individual enhanced recovery elements on short-term outcomes, identify key components for comprehensive pathways, and create internationally accepted guidelines on enhanced recovery for liver-transplant recipients. The ERAS4OLT.org collaborative partnered by the International Liver Transplantation Society performed systematic literature reviews on the effect of 32 relevant enhanced perioperative recovery elements on short-term outcomes, and global specialists prepared expert statements on deceased and living donor liver transplantation. The Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach was used for rating of quality of evidence and grading of recommendations. A virtual international consensus conference was held in January, 2022, in which results were presented, voted on by the audience, and discussed by an independent international jury of eight members, applying the Danish model of consensus. 273 liver transplantation specialists from 30 countries prepared expert statements on elements of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation based on the systematic literature reviews. The consensus conference yielded 80 final recommendations, covering aspects of enhanced recovery for preoperative assessment and optimisation, intraoperative surgical and anaesthetic conduct, and postoperative management for the recipients of liver transplants from both deceased and living donors, and for the living donor. The recommendations represent a comprehensive overview of the relevant elements and areas of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation. These internationally established guidelines could direct the development of enhanced recovery programmes worldwide, allowing adjustments according to local resources and practices.

Splenic Artery Ligation: An Ontable Bail-Out Strategy for Small-for-Size Remnants after Major Hepatectomy: A Retrospective Study

It has been reported that the prevention of acute portal overpressure in small-for-size liver grafts leads to better postoperative outcomes. Accordingly, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of the technique of splenic artery ligation in a case series of thirteen patients subjected to major liver resections with evidence of small-for-size syndrome and whether the maneuver results in the reduction of portal venous pressure and flow. The technique was successful in ten patients, with splenic artery ligation alleviating portal hypertension significantly. Three patients required the performance of a portocaval shunt for the attenuation of portal hypertension. Portal inflow modulation via splenic artery ligation is a technically simple technique that can prove useful in the context of major hepatectomies as well as in liver transplantations and the early evaluation and modification of portal venous pressure post hepatectomy can be used as a practical tool to guide the effect of the intervention.

Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Portal inflow modulation (PIM) aimed at reducing portal hyperperfusion is commonly used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to reduce the risk of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Many different techniques, both pharmacological and surgical have been used for this purpose. There is, however, little consensus on the best method of PIM, its exact role in preventing SFSS and on early post-LDLT recovery.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether modifications of portal pressures and flows enhance recovery after LDLT and to provide international expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42021260997.

RESULTS

Five hundred and ninety four articles were identified through databases' search. Of the 24 included for a final review by the working group (WG), there were five randomized control trials, four prospective studies and 15 retrospective series. Six outcome measures which were likely to influence early recovery after LDLT, especially in small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were shortlisted. These included acute kidney injury, SFSS, morbidity including sepsis, length of ICU and hospital stay, morbidity of the PIM technique and overall mortality. The WG noted that PIM in this subset of LDLT recipients had a beneficial effect on all the outcomes measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all decision domains, the panel recommends pre- and intraoperative actual graft weight validation, portal pressure/flow measurements, and a comprehensive donor evaluation for the determination of potentially small-for-size/ small-for-flow grafts as mandatory. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) Pharmacological PIM helps improve early renal function in LDLT recipients. (Quality of Evidence: High | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In selected patients with SFSG, PIM helps reduce SFSS/EAD and sepsis. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) PIM in the form of splenectomy has increased morbidity compared to splenic artery ligation (SAL). (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, PIM may help reduce morbidity/mortality. (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, modification of portal pressures and flows enhances recovery after LDLT. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).

Small-For-Size Syndrome and Graft Inflow Modulation Techniques in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Partial liver transplantation has recently been proposed to alleviate organ shortages. However, transplantation of a small-for-size graft is associated with an increased risk of posttransplant hepatic dysfunction, commonly referred to as small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). This review describes the etiology, pathological features, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic criteria of SFSS. Moreover, we summarize strategies to improve graft function, focusing on graft inflow modulation techniques. Finally, unmet needs and future perspectives are discussed.

SUMMARY

In fact, posttransplant SFSS can be attributed to various factors such as preoperative status of the recipients, surgical techniques, donor age, and graft quality, except for graft size. With targeted improvement measures, satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved in recipients at increased risk of SFSS. Given the critical role of relative portal hyperperfusion in the pathogenesis of SFSS, various pharmacological and surgical treatments have been established to reduce or partially divert excessive portal inflow, and recipients will benefit from individualized therapeutic regimens after careful evaluation of benefits against potential risks. However, there remain unmet needs for further research into different aspects of SFSS to better understand the correlation between portal hemodynamics and patient outcomes.

KEY MESSAGES

Contemporary transplant surgeons should consider various donor and recipient factors and develop case-specific prevention and treatment strategies to improve graft and recipient survival rates.

Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS).

DATA SOURCES

This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS.

RESULTS

Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS.

CONCLUSIONS

With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.

Advances in liver transplantation for unresectable colon cancer liver metastasis

It is estimated that 50% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver metastasis. Surgical resection significantly improves survival and provides a chance of cure for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). Increasing the resectability of primary unresectable liver metastasis provides more survival benefit for those patients. Considerable surgical innovations have been made to increase the resection rate and decrease the potential risk of hepatic failure postoperation. Liver transplantation (LT) has been explored as a potential curative treatment for unresectable CRLM. However, candidate selection criteria, chemotherapy strategies, refined immunity regimens and resolution for the shortage of grafts are lacking. This manuscript discusses views on surgical indication, peritransplantation anti-tumor and anti-immunity therapy and updated advances in LT for unresectable CRLM. A literature review of published articles and registered clinical trials in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify studies related to LT for CRLM. Some research topics were identified, including indications for LT for CRLM, oncological risk, antitumor regimens, graft loss, administration of anti-immunity drugs and solutions for graft deficiency. The main candidate selection criteria are good patient performance, good tumor biological behavior and chemosensitivity. Chemotherapy should be administered before transplantation but is not commonly administered posttransplantation for preventive purposes. Mammalian target of rapamycin regimens are recommended for their potential oncological benefit, although there are limited cases. In addition to extended criterion grafts, living donor grafts and small grafts combined with two-stage hepatectomy are efficient means to resolve organ deficiency. LT has been proven to be an effective treatment for selected patients with liver-only CRLM. Due to limited donor grafts, high cost and poorly clarified oncological risks, LT for unresectable CRLM should be strictly performed under a well-organized study plan in selected patients. Some vital factors, like LT indication and anti-tumor and anti-immune treatment, remain to be confirmed. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to delineate these topics.

Is 0.6% Reasonable as the Minimum Requirement of the Graft-to-recipient Weight Ratio Regardless of Lobe Selection in Adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported favorable outcomes of small-for-size grafts with graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8% in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, their indications should be carefully determined because they must have been indicated for low-risk cases over larger grafts with 0.8% ≤ GRWR. Furthermore, evidence for minimum requirements of GRWR remains inconclusive. We investigated the safety of small-for-size grafts against larger grafts by adjusting for confounding risk factors, and minimum requirement of graft volume in adult LDLT.

METHODS

We enrolled 417 cases of primary adult-to-adult LDLT in our center between 2006 and 2019. The outcomes of small grafts (0.6% ≤ GRWR < 0.8%, n = 113) and large grafts (0.8% ≤ GRWR, n = 289) were mainly compared using a multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that small grafts were not a significant risk factor for overall graft survival (GS). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, small grafts did not significantly affect overall GS regardless of lobe selection (versus large grafts). However, GRWR < 0.6% was associated with poor overall GS. Although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves of small grafts were inferior to those of large grafts in subcohorts with ABO incompatibility, and donor age ≥50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar outcomes were observed for small and large graft use regardless of lobe selection. 0.6% in GRWR was reasonable as the minimum requirement of graft volume in LDLT. However, small grafts should be indicated carefully for high-risk cases.

Intraoperative Increase of Portal Venous Pressure is an Immediate Predictor of Posthepatectomy Liver Failure After Major Hepatectomy: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess intraoperative changes of hepatic macrohemodynamics and their association with ascites and posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatectomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Large-scale ascites and PHLF remain clinical challenges after major hepatectomy. No study has concomitantly evaluated arterial and venous liver macrohemodynamics in patients undergoing liver resection.

METHODS

Portal venous pressure (PVP), portal venous flow (PVF), and hepatic arterial flow (HAF) were measured intraoperatively pre- and postresection in 67 consecutive patients with major hepatectomy (ie, resection of ≥3 liver segments). A group of 30 patients with minor hepatectomy served as controls. Liver macrohemodynamics and their intraoperative changes (ie, Δ) were analyzed as predictive biomarkers of ascites and PHLF using Fisher exact, t test, or Wilcoxon rank sum test for univariate and logistic regression for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Major hepatectomy increased PVP by 26.9% (P = 0.001), markedly decreased HAF by 40.7% (P < 0.001), and slightly decreased PVF by 13.4% (P = 0.011). Minor resections had little effects on hepatic macrohemodynamics. There was no significant association of liver macrohemodynamics with ascites. While middle hepatic vein resection caused higher postresection PVP after right hepatectomy (P = 0.04), the Pringle maneuver was associated with a significant PVF (P = 0.03) and HAF reduction (P = 0.03). Uni- and multivariate analysis revealed an intraoperative PVP increase as an independent predictor of PHLF (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative PVP kinetics serve as independent predictive biomarker of PHLF after major hepatectomy. These data highlight the importance to assess intraoperative dynamics rather than the pre- and postresection PVP values.

Renal Implications of Left Renal Vein Ligation for Portal Flow Augmentation in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous lienorenal shunts (SLS) siphon blood away from the portal circulation and may compromise portal inflow in liver transplantation (LT). Performing a left renal vein ligation (LRVL) is a relatively easy and efficacious method of overcoming this portal 'steal'. However, given the delicate state of renal function in these patients, its short and long term effects remain undefined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of LRVL in augmenting portal flow and safety with regards to renal function.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database of 1638 consecutive LT recipients between January 2010 and August 2020 was reviewed. Twenty-eight patients who underwent LRVL were identified. There were six paediatric recipients, who were analysed separately. Data with regards to imaging, renal function, intraoperative portal hemodynamics, and renal morbidity were analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 22 adults, 21 underwent live donor LT. 22.5% had a pre-transplant history of acute kidney injury (AKI). Pre-operative CT demonstrated portal vein thrombosis and SLS in 63.6% and 92.9% of patients respectively. LRVL resulted in a significant augmentation of portal hemodynamics in both the adult and paediatric recipients. Postoperatively, 14.3% and 35.7% of patients developed chylous drain output and AKI respectively. Of 13 patients who underwent CT at various timeframes, 5 patients had a partial re-canalisation of LRV at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

From renal and portal standpoints, LRVL is a safe and effective technique of augmenting portal inflow. Further large-scale multicentre studies and consensus will help define an objective algorithmic approach to LT recipients with SLS.

Liver regeneration after performing associating liver partition and portal vein occlusion for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is histologically similar to that occurring after liver transplantation using a small-for-size graft

PURPOSE

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can achieve marked future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy but this procedure is associated with a risk of mortality due to liver failure because of an insufficient FLR functional increase, a situation comparable to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

The clinical data, morphologic volume changes, and histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings in hepatocytes and bile ductules were compared between ALPPS (n = 10) and LDLT with a risk for SFSS (n = 12).

RESULTS

Although the patient characteristics and short-term outcome differed between the groups, the mean hypertrophy ratios with respect to liver volume for the FLR after performing the first-stage ALPPS procedures resembled those in small-for-size grafts after similar time intervals: 1.702 ± 0.407 in ALPPS vs. 1.948 ± 0.252 in LDLT (P = 0.205). The histologic grades for sinusoidal dilation (P = 0.896), congestion (P = 0.922), vacuolar change (P = 0.964), hepatocanalicular cholestasis (P = 0.969), and ductular reaction (P = 0.728) within the FLR at the second-stage operation during ALPPS or implanted graft were all similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The hepatic regenerative process may be similar in ALPPS and LDLT using a small-for-size graft. Reducing the hepatic vascular inflow that may be excessive for the FLR volume during the first stage of ALPPS might enhance the functional recovery since measures with a similar effect appear to lessen the likelihood of SFSS.

Small-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Definition, pathophysiology and management

BACKGROUND

Since the first success in an adult patient, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an universally used procedure. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-known complication after partial LT, especially in cases of adult-to-adult LDLT. The definition of SFSS slightly varies among transplant physicians. The use of a partial liver graft has risks of SFSS development. Persistent portal vein (PV) hypertension and PV hyper-perfusion after LT were identified as the main factors. Hence, various approaches were explored to modulate PV flow and decrease PV pressure in order to alleviate this syndrome. Herein, the definition, clinical symptoms, pathophysiology, basic research, as well as preventive and treatment strategies for SFSS are reviewed based on an extensive review of the literature and on our own experiences.

DATA SOURCES

The articles were collected through PubMed using search terms "liver transplantation", "living donor liver transplantation", "living liver donation", "partial graft", "small-for-size graft", "small-for-size syndrome", "graft volume", "remnant liver", "standard liver volume", "graft to recipient body weight ratio", "sarcopenia", "porcine", "swine", and "rat". English publications published before March 31, 2020 were included in this review.

RESULTS

Many transplant surgeons performed PV flow modulation, including portocaval shunt, splenic artery ligation and splenectomy. With these techniques, patient outcome has been improved even when using a "small" graft. Other factors, such as preoperative recipients' nutritional and skeletal muscle status, graft congestion, and donor factors, were also identified as risk factors which all have been addressed using various strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach controlling PV flow and pressure could help to prevent SFSS especially in severely ill recipients. In the absence of efficacious medications to resolve SFSS, conservative treatments, including aggressive fluid balance correction for massive ascites, anti-microbiological therapy to prevent or control sepsis and intensive nutritional therapy, are all required if SFSS could not be prevented.

Transferability of Liver Transplantation Experience to Complex Liver Resection for Locally Advanced Hepatobiliary Malignancy - Lessons Learnt From 3 Decades of Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of LT experience on the outcome of CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:: Despite evolution in LT knowledge and surgical techniques in the past decades, there is yet data to evaluate the significance of LT experience in performing CLR.

METHODS

Postoperative outcome after CLR between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed and correlated with LT experience in a single center with both LT and CLR service. CLR was defined as hepatectomy with vasculobiliary reconstruction, or multivisceral resection, central bisectionectomy (S4/5/8), or associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Spearman rank correlation and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to define the association between CLR-related outcomes and LT experience.

RESULTS

With cumulative single-center experience of 1452 LT, 222 CLR were performed during the study period [hepatectomy with biliary (27.0%), or vascular (21.2%) reconstruction, with multivisceral resections (9.9%), with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (18.5%)] mainly for hepatocellular carcinoma (53.2%), and hilar cholangiocarcinoma (14%). Median tumor size was 7.0 cm. Other features include macrovascular invasion (23.4%), and juxta-visceral invasion (14%). Major postoperative complication rate was 25.2% and mortality rate was 6.3%. CLR-complication rate was inversely associated with LT experience (R = -0.88, P < 0.005). Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed the cutoff for LT experience to have the greatest influence on CLR was 95 with a sensitivity of 100% and Youden index of 1. Multivariable analysis showed that blood transfusion, prolonged operating time, LT experience </=95 were associated with major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

LT experience was complimentary to CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy with improved postoperative outcome.

Effectiveness of terlipressin for prevention of complications after major liver resection - A randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Elevated portal pressure in response to major liver resection is associated with impaired liver regeneration and increased postoperative complications. Terlipressin, a splanchnic vasoconstrictor used for treatment of hepatorenal syndrome, was tested for reduction of complications and renal protection after liver resection.

METHODS

A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial including patients undergoing elective major liver resection was performed. Terlipressin was administered to patients in the intervention group for five days. The primary outcome parameter was the incidence of a clinical composite endpoint of following liver specific complications 6 weeks after surgery: liver failure, ascites, bile leakage, intra-abdominal abscess and operative mortality. Postoperative kidney function was assessed as a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

150 patients (mean age 63.4 years, 73.3% male) were included. No difference was found in the composite endpoint between the placebo and intervention group (32.8% versus 30.8%, relative risk 1.066, 95%CI 0.643 to 1.769, p = 0.85). Patients receiving terlipressin showed a significant lower decrease in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate compared to placebo (two way ANOVA, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative administration of terlipressin during major liver surgery did not affect a composite endpoint of liver specific complications, but significantly protected from postoperative deterioration of kidney function compared to placebo. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01921985.

RAPID procedure for colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Liver transplantation for colorectal cancer has regained renewed interest with reported good overall survival in selected patients. The scarcity of grafts is a major obstacle to wider implementation and exploration of this field of transplant oncology. The use of small segmental auxiliary grafts from deceased or living donors might be one way to expand the donor pool with minimal negative impact on the waiting list for deceased donor transplantation and minimal risk for the donor in case of living donor liver transplantation. This review provides an insight into the physiological background for this technique and summarizes technical and surgical considerations and the experiences with this novel concept. Although the international experience still is very limited, the short term outcome could suggest that this is technically feasible. There is not sufficient data to assess long term oncological outcome. The RAPID concept (i.e. resection and partial liver segment 2-3 transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy) is still an experimental surgical procedure and should be reserved for prospective clinical trials. Herein, we describe the main technical issues of RAPID procedure from deceased and from living donor as well and report preliminary results of the first cases performed worldwide.

Liver Transplantation

The field of liver transplantation has changed since the MELD scoring system became the most widely used donor allocation tool. Due to the MELD-based allocation system, sicker patients with higher MELD scores are being transplanted. Persistent organ donor shortages remain a challenging issue, and as a result, the wait-list mortality is a persistent problem for most of the regions. This chapter focuses on deceased donor and live donor liver transplantation in patients with complications of portal hypertension. Special attention will also be placed on donor-recipient matching, perioperative management of transplant patients, and the impact of hepatic hemodynamics on transplantation.

Bilateral proficiency over time leads to reduced donor morbidity in living donor hepatectomy

Background

Although left-lobe donation is considered safer, right-sided donor hepatectomy predominates in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We hypothesized that bilateral proficiency with donor hepatectomy reduces overall donor complications.

Methods

A retrospective review of 834 adult LDLT donors (221 left lobes) from January 2004 to December 2014 was performed, dividing cases into two eras based on left-graft experience. Donor complications within 6 months were investigated, focusing on graft side and surgical era.

Results

The overall complication rate was 17.6%, and was higher in right-lobe donors. In Era 2, during which left-lobe donation rates were three times higher, total complications decreased (14.7% vs. 20.9%, P=0.02). A significant reduction in postoperative ascites accounted for the lower overall complication rate. The proportion of major biliary complications (BCs) was halved from 62.5% to 25.0%. Right-lobe donor complications also decreased significantly (15.8% vs. 22.9%, P=0.032), demonstrating that it was not only increased left-lobe donations leading to lowered complication rates, but also greater experience with donor hepatectomy in general.

Conclusions

Accumulating experience with bilateral donor hepatectomy leads to decreased donor morbidity and comparable outcomes for right and left lobes, further enhancing the goal of donor safety while balancing recipient needs.

Evaluation of the role of transhepatic flow in postoperative outcomes following major hepatectomy (THEFLOW): study protocol for a single-centre, non-interventional cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Liver resection is the only curative treatment for primary and secondary hepatic tumours. Improvements in perioperative preparation of patients and new surgical developments have made complex liver resections possible. However, small for size and flow syndrome (SFSF) is still a challenging issue, rendering patients inoperable and causing postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although the role of transhepatic flow in the postoperative outcome has been shown in small partial liver transplantation and experimental studies of SFSF, this has never been studied in the clinical setting following liver resection. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate transhepatic flow changes following major liver resection and its correlation with postoperative outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The TransHEpatic FLOW (THEFLOW) study is a single-centre, non-interventional cohort study, and aims to enrol 50 patients undergoing major hepatectomy (defined as hemihepatectomy or extended hepatectomy based on the Brisbane classification) with or without prior chemotherapy. The portal venous flow, hepatic artery flow and portal venous pressure are measured before and after each resection. All patients are followed-up for 3 months after the operation. During each evaluation, standard clinical data, posthepatectomy liver failure and overall morbidity and mortality will be recorded. THEFLOW study was initiated on 25 March 2018 and is expected to progress for 2 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg (registration number: S576/2017). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and will also be presented at medical meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03762876.

Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Small-for-size grafts (SFSGs) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) could optimize donor postoperative outcomes and also expand the potential donor pool. Evidence on whether SFSGs would affect medium-term and long-term recipient graft survival is lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in adult to adult LDLT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible studies published before January 24, 2019 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year graft survival. Incidence of small-for-size syndrome and short term mortality were also extracted.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis is reported according to the guidelines of the PRISMA 2009 Statement. Seven retrospective observational studies with a total of 1821 LDLT recipients were included in the meta-analysis. SFSG is associated with significantly poorer medium-term graft survival. The pooled odds ratio for 3-year graft survival was 1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.10-2.29, P = 0.014]. On the other hand, pooled results of the studies showed that SFSG had no significant discriminatory effect on 5-year graft survival with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.97, P = 0.199). Furthermore, incidence of small-for-size syndrome detected in recipients of SFSG ranged from 0-11.4% in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

SFSG is associated with inferior medium-term but not long-term graft survival. Comparable long-term graft survival based on liver graft size shows that smaller grafts could be accepted for LDLT with appropriate flow modulatory measures. Close follow-up for graft function is warranted within 3 years after liver transplantation.

Postoperative Portal Hypertension Enhances Alloimmune Responses after Living-Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients and in a Mouse Model

Controlling portal vein pressure in living-donor liver transplantation has received increased attention owing to its potential importance for graft survival. Portal hypertension may lead to the activation of liver-resident APCs, including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), which have immunological tolerogenic capacity. We investigated the effects of portal hypertension on graft survival and the antidonor immune response using clinical data and a mouse model. We categorized patients (n = 136) according to their portal vein pressure values at the end of surgery. Using propensity score-matching analyses, we found that portal hypertension was significantly associated with a higher antidonor immune response and incidence of acute rejection. To investigate the mechanism, we performed an allogeneic coculture assay using a 70% hepatectomized (HTx) mouse model with or without a portosystemic shunt. Liver cells from HTx mice without a shunt exhibited a significantly greater anti-BALB/c B6 T cell response than those from sham-operated mice or HTx mice with a shunt. LSECs from sham-operated mice, but not from HTx mice, suppressed the B6 T cell alloresponse in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, LSECs from HTx mice without a shunt showed significantly downregulated MHC class I/II and programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and those from mice with a shunt showed recovered expression of these molecules. Postoperative portal hypertension enhances alloimmune responses in recipients after living-donor liver transplantation, likely due, in part, to the impaired immune-suppression capacity of LSECs.

A novel and simple formula to predict liver mass in porcine experimental models

A primary limitation in hepatic surgery is leaving a remnant liver of adequate size and function. Experimental models have been designed to study processes of liver injury and regeneration in this context, yet a formula to accurately calculate liver mass in an animal model is lacking. This study aims to create a novel and simple formula to estimate the mass of the native liver in a species of pigs commonly used in experimental liver surgery protocols. Using data from 200 male weanling Landrace-Large White hybrid pigs, multiple linear regression analysis is used to generate the formula. Clinical features used as variables for the predictive model are body mass and length. The final formula for pig liver mass is as follows: Liver mass (g) = 26.34232 * Body mass (kg) - 1.270629 * Length (cm) + 163.0076; R² = 0.7307. This formula for porcine liver mass is simple to use and may be helpful in studies using animals of similar characteristics to evaluate restoration of liver mass following major hepatectomy.

Portal Inflow Modulation by Somatostatin After Major Liver Resection: A Pilot Study

: Major hepatectomy (MH) can lead to an increasing portal vein pressure (PVP) and to lesions of the hepatic parenchyma. Several reports have assessed the deleterious effect of a high posthepatectomy PVP on the postoperative course of MH. Thus, several surgical modalities of portal inflow modulation (PIM) have been described. As for pharmacological modalities, experimental studies showed a potential efficiency of Somatostatin to reduce PVP and flow. To our knowledge, no previous clinical reports of PIM using somatostatin are available. Herein, we report the results of PIM using somatostatin in 10 patients who underwent MH with post-hepatectomy PVP > 20 mmHg. Our results suggest Somatostatin could be considered as an efficient reversible PIM when PVP decrease is above 2.5 mmHg.

Naturally-Derived Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications

Naturally-derived biomaterials have been used for decades in multiple regenerative medicine applications. From the simplest cell microcarriers made of collagen or alginate, to highly complex decellularized whole-organ scaffolds, these biomaterials represent a class of substances that is usually first in choice at the time of electing a functional and useful biomaterial. Hence, in this chapter we describe the several naturally-derived biomaterials used in tissue engineering applications and their classification, based on composition. We will also describe some of the present uses of the generated tissues like drug discovery, developmental biology, bioprinting and transplantation.

Adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation: The experience of the Université catholique de Louvain

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the treatment for end-stage liver diseases and well-selected malignancies. The allograft shortage may be alleviated with living donation. The initial UCLouvain experience of adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is presented.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 64 adult-to-adult LDLTs performed at our institution between 1998 and 2016 was conducted. The median age of 29 (45.3%) females and 35 (54.7%) males was 50.2 years (interquartile range, IQR 32.9-57.5). Twenty-two (34.4%) recipients had no portal hypertension. Three (4.7%) patients had a benign and 33 (51.6%) a malignant tumor [19 (29.7%) hepatocellular cancer, 11 (17.2%) secondary cancer and one (1.6%) each hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma and embryonal liver sarcoma]. Median donor and recipient follow-ups were 93 months (IQR 41-159) and 39 months (22-91), respectively.

RESULTS

Right and left hemi-livers were implanted in 39 (60.9%) and 25 (39.1%) cases, respectively. Median weights of right- and left-liver were 810 g (IQR 730-940) and 454 g (IQR 394-534), respectively. Graft-to-recipient weight ratios (GRWRs) were 1.17% (right, IQR 0.98%-1.4%) and 0.77% (left, 0.59%-0.95%). One- and five-year patient survivals were 85% and 71% (right) vs. 84% and 58% (left), respectively. One- and five-year graft survivals were 74% and 61% (right) vs. 76% and 53% (left), respectively. The patient and graft survival of right and left grafts and of very small (<0.6%), small (0.6%-0.79%) and large (≥0.8%) GRWR were similar. Survival of very small grafts was 86% and 86% at 3- and 12-month. No donor died while five (7.8%) developed a Clavien-Dindo complication IIIa, IIIb or IV. Recipient morbidity consisted mainly of biliary and vascular complications; three (4.7%) recipients developed a small-for-size syndrome according to the Kyushu criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult-to-adult LDLT is a demanding procedure that widens therapeutic possibilities of many hepatobiliary diseases. The donor procedure can be done safely with low morbidity. The recipient operation carries a major morbidity indicating an important learning curve. Shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient, by moving from the larger right-liver to the smaller left-liver grafts, should be further explored as this policy makes donor hepatectomy safer and may stimulate the development of transplant oncology.

Living donor liver transplantation with two-stage hepatectomy for patients with isolated, irresectable colorectal liver-the LIVER-T(W)O-HEAL study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy worldwide. The occurrence of liver metastases worsens the prognosis of the patient significantly if the tumor burden is not resectable. Liver transplantation might be an option for otherwise irresectable colorectal liver metastases. In this study, we evaluate the role of two-stage hepatectomy in combination with a left-lateral living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

Patients with irresectable liver metastases having a stable disease or tumor regression after at least 8 weeks of systemic chemotherapy without an extrahepatic tumor burden (except resectable lung metastases) are suitable for study inclusion. A randomization is not planned since the control arm (systemic chemotherapy) is well established and the superiority of the transplantation procedure has to be expected. The surgical treatment consists of two steps: in a first operation, a left hemihepatectomy in the recipient will be performed. At this place, the left lateral liver lobe (segments II and III) of a living donor will be transplanted. To induce a growth of the graft, a portal vein ligation will be performed. Approximately after 2 weeks, the removal of the right hemiliver will be conducted if the control imaging shows a sufficient growth of the graft.

RESULTS

The patient recruitment is ongoing. In total, three patients have been already transplanted with this protocol. Up to now, they are tumor-free and in good clinical health.

DISCUSSION

With the design of the LIVER-T(W)O-HEAL study, it might be possible to offer patients with otherwise irresectable colorectal liver metastases a curative treatment option. The key point of this study will be, most probably, the patient's selection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at Clinical Trials; NCT03488953 ; registered on April 5, 2018.

Survival Outcomes in Split Compared With Whole Liver Transplantation

Split-liver transplantation (SLT) should be cautiously considered because the right trisection (RTS) graft can be a marginal graft in adult recipients. Herein, we analyzed the outcomes of RTS-SLT in Korea, where >75% of adult liver transplantations are performed with living donor liver transplantation. Among 2462 patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantations (DDLTs) from 2005 to 2014, we retrospectively reviewed 86 (3.5%) adult patients who received a RTS graft (RTS-SLT group). The outcomes of the RTS-SLT group were compared with those of 303 recipients of whole liver (WL; WL-DDLT group). Recipient age, laboratory Model for End-Stage-Liver Disease (L-MELD) score, ischemia time, and donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) were not different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, malignancy was uncommon (4.7% versus 36.3%), and the donor was younger (25.2 versus 42.7 years) in the RST-SLT group than in the WL-DDLT group (P < 0.05). The technical complication rates and the 5-year graft survival rates (89.0% versus 92.8%) were not different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (63.1%) and graft-failure-free survival rate (63.1%) of the RTS-SLT group were worse than that of the WL-DDLT group (79.3% and 79.3%; P < 0.05). The factors affecting graft survival rates were not definite. However, the factors affecting OS in the RTS-SLT group were L-MELD score >30 and DRWR ≤1.0. In the subgroup analysis, OS was not different between the 2 groups if the DRWR was >1.0, regardless of the L-MELD score (P > 0.05). In conclusion, a sufficient volume of the graft estimated from DRWR-matching could lead to better outcomes of adult SLTs with a RTS graft, even in patients with high L-MELD scores.

Effects of hepatic blood inflow on liver ultrastructure and regeneration after extensive liver resection in rats with cirrhosis

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of hepatic blood inflow on liver function, liver ultrastructure and the regeneration of future liver remnant (FLR) following major hepatectomy in rats with liver cirrhosis. A rat model of cirrhosis was established through intraperitoneal injection of carbon tetrachloride for 8 consecutive weeks. Extensive liver resection and different blood inflow models by portal vein (PV) and/or hepatic artery (HA) stenosis were conducted on the cirrhosis rats. Animal models were constructed as follows: Control (group A), low-flow PV + high-flow HA (group B), low-flow PV + low-flow HA (group C), high-flow PV + high-flow HA (group D) and high-flow PV + low-flow HA (group E). Hepatic blood inflow was detected by laser speckle contrast analysis, liver function and pathological changes were analyzed, Masson staining was used to identify the fibrosis of the liver and Periodic acid-Schiff staining was used to identify glycogen synthesis and hepatocyte function. The liver cell ultrastructure was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy, and the expression of Ki-67 in hepatocytes and the weight of the FLR were recorded to determine the regeneration of the FLR. Five days after major hepatectomy and liver blood inflow modulation, pathological examination of the livers from groups B and C revealed less congestion and less extensive hepatocellular injury. The serum alanine aminotransferase level of group B at 1, 3 and 5 days after hepatectomy and blood inflow modulation was 460.9±31.7, 331.0±22.0 and 285.6±15.8 U/l, respectively (control group: 676.9±41.7, 574.9±28.0 and 436.1±32.7 U/l, respectively; P<0.05); the total bilirubin of group B at 1, 3 and 5 days was 20.4±1.5, 16.1±1.0 and 13.5±0.6 µmol/l, respectively (control group: 30.3±1.4, 26.5±0.8 and 22.1±1.2 µmol/l, respectively; P<0.05). The size of the endoplasmic reticulum in the low-flow PV groups increased significantly and the mitochondrial swelling was alleviated. The positive rate of Ki-67 in the hepatocytes of groups B, C and D was 23.9±3.6, 15.7±2.3 and 12.9±2.4%, respectively (control group: 10.1±2.1%, P<0.05), and the positive rate of Ki-67 in group E was 6.1±1.4% (compared with that of the control group, P<0.05). The remnant liver weight of group B was 15.4±1.0 g (compared with that of the control group, P<0.05). Therefore, decreased portal blood flow combined with increased hepatic arterial blood flow alleviated the congestion in the liver following major hepatectomy in cirrhotic rats, improved the pathological status and liver function, increased the expression of Ki-67 and promoted liver regeneration.

Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease caused by related risk factors when liver resection is contraindicated. Additionally, despite the decrease in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) over the past two decades, the absolute number of HBsAg-positive people has increased, leading to an increase in HBV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Consequently, a large demand exists for LT. While the wait time for patients on the donor list is, to some degree, shorter due to the development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there is still a shortage of liver grafts. Furthermore, recipients often suffer from emergent conditions, such as liver dysfunction or even hepatic encephalopathy, which can lead to a limited choice in grafts. To expand the pool of available liver grafts, one option is the use of organs that were previously considered “unusable” by many, which are often labeled “marginal” organs. Many previous studies have reported on the possibilities of using marginal grafts in orthotopic LT; however, there is still a lack of discussion on this topic, especially regarding the feasibility of using marginal grafts in LDLT. Therefore, the present review aimed to summarize the feasibility of using marginal liver grafts for LDLT and discuss the possibility of expanding the application of these grafts.

Comparison of Two Devices for Intraoperative Portal Venous Flow Measurement in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Transit Time Ultrasound and Conventional Doppler Ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative portal venous flow measurement provides surgeons with instant guidance for portal flow modulation during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In this study, we compared the agreement of portal flow measurement obtained by 2 devices: transit time ultrasound (TTU) and conventional Doppler ultrasound (CDU).

METHODS

Fifty-four recipients of LDLT underwent intraoperative measurement of portal flow after completion of vascular anastomosis of the implanted partial liver graft. Both TTU and CDU were used concurrently. Agreement of TTU and CDU was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient using a model of 2-way random effects, absolute agreement, and single measurement. A Bland-Altman plot was applied to assess the variability between the 2 devices.

RESULTS

The mean, median, and range of portal venous flow was 1456, 1418, and 117 to 2776 mL/min according to TTU; and 1564, 1566, and 119 to 3216 mL/min according to CDU. The intraclass correlation coefficient of portal venous flow between TTU and CDU was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.80). The Bland-Altman plots revealed an average variation of 4.8% between TTU and CDU but with a rather wide 95% confidence interval of variation ranging from -57.7% to 67.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative TTU and CDU showed moderate agreement in portal flow measurement. However, a relatively wide range of variation exists between TTU and CDU, indicating that data obtained from the 2 devices may not be interchangeable.

Ligation versus no ligation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts during liver transplantation: Audit of a prospective series of 66 consecutive patients

The management of large spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) during liver transplantation (LT) is a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term and longterm outcomes of SPSS ligation versus nonligation during LT, when both options are available. From 2011 to 2017, 66 patients with SPSS underwent LT: 56 without and 10 with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), all of whom underwent successful thrombectomy and could have portoportal reconstruction. The SPSS were either splenorenal (n = 40; 60.6%), left gastric (n = 16; 24.2%), or mesenterico-iliac (n = 10; 15.1%). Following portoportal anastomosis, the SPSS was ligated in 36 (54.4%) patients and left in place in 30 (45.5%) patients, based on the effect of the SPSS clamping/unclamping test on portal vein flow during the anhepatic phase. Intraoperatively, satisfactory portal flow was obtained in both groups. Primary nonfunction (PNF) and primary dysfunction (PDF) rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Nonligation of SPSS was significantly associated with a higher rate of postoperative encephalopathy (P < 0.001) and major postoperative morbidity (P = 0.02). PVT occurred in 0 and 3 patients in the ligated and nonligated shunt group, respectively (P = 0.08). A composite end point, which included the relevant complications in the setting of SPSS in LT (ie, PNF and PDF, PVT, and encephalopathy) was present in 16 (44.4%) and 22 (73.3%) patients of the ligated and nonligated shunt group, respectively (P = 0.02). Patient (P = 0.05) and graft (P = 0.02) survival rates were better in the ligated shunt group. In conclusion, the present study supports routine ligation of large SPSS during LT whenever feasible. Liver Transplantation 24 505-515 2018 AASLD.

Liver graft-to-spleen volume ratio as a useful predictive factor of the early graft function in children and young adults transplanted for biliary atresia: a retrospective study

A graft volume/standard liver volume ratio (GV/SLV) > 35% or graft/recipient weight ratio (GRWR) > 0.8% has been considered as a standard criteria of graft selection. Even if the graft size meets these selection criteria, small-for-size syndrome can still occur depending on the portal venous flow (PVF). The aim of this study was to identify other factors contributing to portal hyperperfusion and the post-transplant course, focusing on the graft volume-to-spleen volume ratio (GV/SV). Thirty-seven BA patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation were reviewed retrospectively. First, we evaluated the preoperative factors contributing to portal hyperperfusion. Second, we evaluated the factors contributing to post-transplant complications, such as thrombocytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia, and coagulopathy. The GV/SLV was >35% in all cases; however, portal hyperperfusion (≥250 ml/min/100 g graft) was found in 12 recipients (35.3%). Furthermore, although the GRWR was >0.8% in over 90% of cases, portal hyperperfusion was found in 10 recipients (32.3%). In contrast, the GV/SV showed a significant correlation with the PVF after reperfusion. If the GV/SV was <0.88, about 80% of recipients developed portal hyperperfusion. Furthermore, the GV/SV also showed a significant correlation with post-transplant persistent thrombocytopenia and hyperbilirubinemia. The GV/SV < 0.88 predicts portal hyperperfusion, post-transplant persistent thrombocytopenia, and hyperbilirubinemia.