The Surgical Approach to Multifocal Renal Cancers: Hereditary Syndromes, Ipsilateral Multifocality, and Bilateral Tumors

Imaging finding of renal masses associated with pathogenic variation in succinate dehydrogenase subunit B gene

PURPOSE

Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a newly defined, rare subtype of renal cancer, associated with pathogenic variations in the Succinate Dehydrogenase Subunit B (SDHB) gene. Our aim is to investigate the imaging findings of SDHB-associated renal tumors, utilizing cross-sectional and FDG-PET imaging in patients with pathogenic variations in SDHB gene, to facilitate accurate tumor characterization.

METHODS

Twenty SDH-deficient tumors from 16 patients with pathogenic variations in SDHB gene were retrospectively evaluated using cross-sectional and FDG-PET imaging. Clinical findings such as demographics, family history, extra-renal findings and metastases were recorded. Tumor imaging characteristics on CT/MRI included were laterality, size, homogeneity, morphology, margins, internal content, T1/T2 signal intensity, enhancement features, and restricted diffusion.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (median age 31 years, IQR 19-41, 8 males) were identified with 68.8 % of patients having a known family history of SDHB variation. 81.3 % of lesions were solitary and majority were solid (86.7 % on CT, 87.5 % on MRI) with well-defined margins in >62.5 % of lesions, without evidence of internal fat, calcifications, or vascular invasion. 100 % of lesions demonstrated restricted diffusion and avid enhancement, with degree >75 % for most lesions on CT and MRI. On FDG-PET, all renal masses showed increased radiotracer uptake. 43.8 % of patients demonstrated extra-renal manifestations and 43.8 % had distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

SDHB-associated RCC is predominantly noted in young patients with no gender predilection. On imaging, SDH-deficient RCC are frequently unilateral, solitary, and solid with well-defined margins demonstrating avid enhancement with variability in enhancement pattern and showing restricted diffusion.

Multiple and hereditary renal tumors: a review for radiologists

80% of renal carcinomas (RC) are diagnosed incidentally by imaging. 2-4% of "sporadic" multifocality and 5-8% of hereditary syndromes are accepted, probably with underestimation. Multifocality, young age, familiar history, syndromic data, and certain histologies lead to suspicion of hereditary syndrome. Each tumor must be studied individually, with a multidisciplinary evaluation of the patient. Nephron-sparing therapeutic strategies and a radioprotective diagnostic approach are recommended. Relevant data for the radiologist in major RC hereditary syndromes are presented: von-Hippel-Lindau, Chromosome-3 translocation, BRCA-associated protein-1 mutation, RC associated with succinate dehydrogenase deficiency, PTEN, hereditary papillary RC, Papillary thyroid cancer- Papillary RC, Hereditary leiomyomatosis and RC, Birt-Hogg-Dubé, Tuberous sclerosis complex, Lynch, Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 fusion, Sickle cell trait, DICER1 mutation, Hereditary hyperparathyroidism and jaw tumor, as well as the main syndromes of Wilms tumor predisposition. The concept of "non-hereditary" familial RC and other malignant and benign entities that can present as multiple renal lesions are discussed.

Development and External Validation of a Novel Nomogram Predicting Cancer-specific Mortality-free Survival in Surgically Treated Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of cancer control outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients is important for counselling, follow-up planning, and selection of appropriate adjuvant trial designs.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and externally validate a novel contemporary population-based model for predicting cancer-specific mortality-free survival (CSM-FS) in surgically treated papillary RCC (papRCC) patients and to compare it with established risk categories (Leibovich 2018).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2019), we identified surgically treated papRCC patients (n = 3978). The population was randomly divided into development (50%, n = 1989) and external validation (50%, n = 1989) cohorts. Of the external validation cohort, 97% (n = 1930) of patients were included in a head-to-head comparison of the Leibovich 2018 risk categories addressing nonmetastatic patients.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Univariable Cox regression models tested the statistical significance in the prediction of CSM-FS. The most parsimonious model with the best validation metrics was selected as the multivariable nomogram. Accuracy, calibration, and decision curve analyses (DCAs) tested the Cox regression-based nomogram, as well as the Leibovich 2018 risk categories in the external validation cohort.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Age at diagnosis, grade, T stage, N stage, and M stage qualified for inclusion in the novel nomogram. In external validation, the accuracy of the novel nomogram was 0.83 at 5 yr and 0.80 at 10 yr. In nonmetastatic patients, 5- and 10-yr accuracy of the novel nomogram was 0.77 and 0.76, respectively. Conversely, 5- and 10-yr accuracy of the Leibovich 2018 risk categories was 0.70 and 0.66, respectively. The novel nomogram exhibited smaller departures from ideal predictions in calibration plots and higher net benefit in DCAs, when it was compared with the Leibovich 2018 risk categories. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study, absence of a central pathological review, and inclusion of only North American patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nomogram may represent a valuable clinical aid, when papRCC CSM-FS predictions are required.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We developed an accurate tool to predict death due to papillary kidney cancer in a North American population.

The current evidence on surgical management for synchronous bilateral renal tumors: results from a scoping review

PURPOSE

Synchronous bilateral renal masses (SBRM) account for a low percentage of kidney tumors, and there is no current recommendation for their management. The objective was to review evidence regarding the best surgical approach for SBRM in terms of type and timing of surgery.

METHODS

A broad literature search was performed on 28th January 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE. Only English papers dealing with adults were included. Meeting abstracts were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four papers were accepted and included. SBRM behave less aggressively than metachronous tumors, and partial nephrectomy (PN) is the preferred therapeutic option to preserve renal function. Open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches were found to be similar in oncological outcomes, though robot-assisted surgery resulted in lower comorbidities. Same-sitting PN was demonstrated to be a safe approach, particularly in the robotic-assisted one. Finally, the same-siting and staged NSS were similar in preserving renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

PN should be the desirable treatment for SBRM whenever feasible and if patients are fit, but surgeon expertise should also be taken into the account.

Assessment of the VENUSS and GRANT Models for Individual Prediction of Cancer-specific Survival in Surgically Treated Nonmetastatic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background

Guidelines recommend VENUSS and GRANT models for the prediction of cancer control outcomes after nephrectomy for nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC).

Objective

To test the ability of VENUSS and GRANT models to predict 5-yr cancer-specific survival in a North American population.

Design setting and participants

For this retrospective study, we identified 4184 patients with unilateral surgically treated nonmetastatic pRCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2019).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The original VENUSS and GRANT risk categories were applied to predict 5-yr cancer-specific survival. A cross-validation method was used to test the accuracy and calibration of the models and to conduct decision curve analyses for the study cohort.

Results and limitations

The VENUSS and GRANT categories represented independent predictors of cancer-specific mortality. On cross-validation, the accuracy of the VENUSS and GRANT risk categories was 0.73 and 0.65, respectively. Both models showed good calibration and performed better than random predictions in decision curve analysis. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of a central pathological review.

Conclusion

VENUSS risk categories fulfilled prognostic model criteria for predicting cancer-specific survival 5 yr after surgery in North American patients with nonmetastatic pRCC as recommended by guidelines. Conversely, GRANT risk categories did not. Thus, VENUSS risk categories represent an important tool for counseling, follow-up planning, and patient selection for appropriate adjuvant trials in pRCC.

Patient summary

We tested the ability of two validated methods (VENUSS and GRANT) to predict death due to papillary kidney cancer in a North American population. The VENUSS risk categories showed good performance in predicting 5-year cancer-specific survival.

Preclinical optimization of a diode laser-based clamp-free partial nephrectomy in a large animal model

Kidney cancer is a common urologic malignancy with either laparoscopic (LPN) or robotic partial nephrectomy as therapeutic options of choice for localized tumors. However, renal resection and suturing are challenging steps of the procedure that can lead to complications such as prolonged warm ischemia, bleeding, and urinary fistulas. LPN with a diode laser is an efficient technique due to its cutting and/or coagulation attributes. Surprisingly, key laser features such as wavelength and power remain undefined. Using a large porcine model, we evaluated the laser range of wavelength and power in a clamp-free LPN and compared it to the established gold-standard LPN technique (i.e., cold-cutting and suturing). By analyzing surgery duration, bleeding, presence of urine leak, tissue damage related to the resected renal fragment and the remaining organ, hemoglobin levels, and renal function, we show that an optimized experimental diode laser clamp-free LPN (wavelength, 980 nm; power, 15 W) had shorter surgery time with less bleeding, and better postoperative renal function recovery when compared to the well-established technique. Together, our data indicate that partial nephrectomy with a diode laser clamp-free LPN technique is an improved alternative to the gold-standard technique. Therefore, translational clinical trials towards human patient applications are readily feasible.

Critical Appraisal of Leibovich 2018 and GRANT Models for Prediction of Cancer-Specific Survival in Non-Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified 5522 unilateral surgically treated non-metastatic chromophobe kidney cancer (chRCC) patients. This population was randomly divided into development vs. external validation cohorts. In the development cohort, the original Leibovich 2018 and GRANT categories were applied to predict 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival (CSS). Subsequently, a novel multivariable nomogram was developed. Accuracy, calibration and decision curve analyses (DCA) tested the Cox regression-based nomogram as well as the Leibovich 2018 and GRANT risk categories in the external validation cohort. The accuracy of the Leibovich 2018 and GRANT models was 0.65 and 0.64 at ten years, respectively. The novel prognostic nomogram had an accuracy of 0.78 at ten years. All models exhibited good calibration. In DCA, Leibovich 2018 outperformed the novel nomogram within selected ranges of threshold probabilities at ten years. Conversely, the novel nomogram outperformed Leibovich 2018 for other values of threshold probabilities. In summary, Leibovich 2018 and GRANT risk categories exhibited borderline low accuracy in predicting CSS in North American non-metastatic chRCC patients. Conversely, the novel nomogram exhibited higher accuracy. However, in DCA, all examined models exhibited limitations within specific threshold probability intervals. In consequence, all three examined models provide individual predictions that might be suboptimal and be affected by limitations determined by the natural history of chRCC, where few deaths occur within ten years from surgery. Further investigations regarding established and novel predictors of CSS and relying on large sample sizes with longer follow-up are needed to better stratify CSS in chRCC.

Identification of a Novel TSC2 c.170G>A Missense Variant: A Case Report and Elaboration on the Yield of Targeted Options against Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Manifestations

BACKGROUND

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare genetic disease that affects multiple organs and affects the quality of life. Mutations in TSC1 and TSC2 genes are causing dysregulations in the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, inducing mostly benign but also malignant tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The diagnosis of TSC, based on established clinical and genetic criteria, is essential for the optimal surveillance and management of patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

With the current report, we present the case of two sisters who were consequently diagnosed with early-stage chromophobe-like RCC, possibly familial given their young age. The younger sister also had a previous diagnosis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, for which she had been treated properly. Genetic testing of both revealed the same heterozygous TSC2 variant that is currently regarded as a variant of unknown significance, while both patients did not fulfill the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of TSC. Owing to these data, we opted to manage and surveil both sisters as TSC patients, while we also considered the specific TSC2 variant to be pathogenic - but of low penetrance - based on clinical judgment and functional analyses. Furthermore, we discussed the implementation of mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of TSC complications.

CONCLUSION

As novel pathogenic variants of TSC genes are constantly being explored, the identification of TSC variants of unknown significance in combination with absent clinical diagnostic criteria cannot exclude a TSC diagnosis. We support the implementation of clinical judgment in assisting the diagnosis of TSC, as well as the enrollment of patients in clinical trials due to the rarity of the disease.

The roaring 2020s: a new decade of systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The genomic and immunologic profiling of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has provided the impetus for advancements in systemic treatments using combination therapy - either with immune check point inhibitor (ICI) + ICI or with ICI + targeted therapy. This approach has been examined in several landmark trials, treating both clear cell (ccRCC) and nonclear cell (nccRCC) histologies. In this review, we highlight systemic therapy advancements made in this new decade, the 2020s.

RECENT FINDINGS

Targeting the programmed death receptor 1/PD-L1 pathway has created more tolerable and effective immunotherapy regimens, expanding the applications of ICIs. These new applications, paired with trial data, include ICI monotherapy in nccRCC and adjuvant pembrolizumab in resected, high-risk RCC. In addition, ICI + ICI and ICI + TKI combination therapy have demonstrated oncologic efficacy in advanced ccRCC and sarcomatoid RCC. Similar progress has been noted regarding new targeted therapies. Along the hypoxia inducible factor pathway, belzutifan has received FDA approval in von Hippel-Lindau-associated RCC. In addition, in papillary RCC, agents such as cabozantinib target the MET proto-oncogene pathway and have demonstrated impressive oncologic outcomes.

SUMMARY

The 2020s utilize the molecular profiling of advanced RCC as a scaffold for recent trials in immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Going forward, emphasizing patient-reported outcomes and careful clinical trial construction remain critical to improve systemic therapy in RCC.

Genetic risk assessment for hereditary renal cell carcinoma: Clinical consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Although renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is believed to have a strong hereditary component, there is a paucity of published guidelines for genetic risk assessment. A panel of experts was convened to gauge current opinions.

METHODS

A North American multidisciplinary panel with expertise in hereditary RCC, including urologists, medical oncologists, clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, and patient advocates, was convened. Before the summit, a modified Delphi methodology was used to generate, review, and curate a set of consensus questions regarding RCC genetic risk assessment. Uniform consensus was defined as ≥85% agreement on particular questions.

RESULTS

Thirty-three panelists, including urologists (n = 13), medical oncologists (n = 12), genetic counselors and clinical geneticists (n = 6), and patient advocates (n = 2), reviewed 53 curated consensus questions. Uniform consensus was achieved on 30 statements in specific areas that addressed for whom, what, when, and how genetic testing should be performed. Topics of consensus included the family history criteria, which should trigger further assessment, the need for risk assessment in those with bilateral or multifocal disease and/or specific histology, the utility of multigene panel testing, and acceptance of clinician-based counseling and testing by those who have experience with hereditary RCC.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first ever consensus panel on RCC genetic risk assessment, 30 consensus statements were reached. Areas that require further research and discussion were also identified, with a second future meeting planned. This consensus statement may provide further guidance for clinicians when considering RCC genetic risk assessment.

LAY SUMMARY

The contribution of germline genetics to the development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has long been recognized. However, there is a paucity of guidelines to define how and when genetic risk assessment should be performed for patients with known or suspected hereditary RCC. Without guidelines, clinicians struggle to define who requires further evaluation, when risk assessment or testing should be done, which genes should be considered, and how counseling and/or testing should be performed. To this end, a multidisciplinary panel of national experts was convened to gauge current opinion on genetic risk assessment in RCC and to enumerate a set of recommendations to guide clinicians when evaluating individuals with suspected hereditary kidney cancer.

A 25 year perspective on the evolution and advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation and treatment of kidney cancer

The diagnosis, evaluation and management of patients with renal cell carcinoma has transformed in the 21st century. Utilizing biological discoveries and technological advances, the field has moved from blunt surgical and largely ineffective medical treatments, to nuanced and fine-tuned approaches based on biology, extent of disease and patient preferences. In this review we will summarize the last 25 years of progress in kidney cancer.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: Review

Kidney cancer is the 13th most common malignancy globally, and the incidence is rising. Papillary renal cell carcinoma is the second most common subtype, comprising 10-15% of renal cell carcinomas. Though the histologic features of this subtype were initially described in the 1990's, our understanding of the genetic and molecular characteristics of this disease have rapidly evolved over the past decade. In this review, we summarize the contemporary understanding of the clinical, morphologic, radiographic, and genetic characteristics of papillary renal cell carcinoma, as well as clinical considerations, current options for management, and prognosis.

Collaborative Review: Factors Influencing Treatment Decisions for Patients with a Localized Solid Renal Mass

CONTEXT

With the addition of active surveillance and thermal ablation (TA) to the urologist's established repertoire of partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) as first-line management options for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), appropriate treatment decision-making has become increasingly nuanced.

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the treatment options for localized, nonrecurrent RCC; to highlight the patient, renal function, tumor, and provider factors that influence treatment decisions; and to provide a framework to conceptualize that decision-making process.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A collaborative critical review of the medical literature was conducted.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identify three key decision points when managing localized RCC: (1) decision for surveillance versus treatment, (2) decision regarding treatment modality (TA, PN, or RN), and (3) decision on surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive). In evaluating factors that influence these treatment decisions, we elaborate on patient, renal function, tumor, and provider factors that either directly or indirectly impact each decision point. As current nomograms, based on preselected patient datasets, perform poorly in prospective settings, these tools should be used with caution. Patient decision aids are an underutilized tool in decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Localized RCC requires highly nuanced treatment decision-making, balancing patient- and tumor-specific clinical variables against indirect structural influences to provide optimal patient care.

PATIENT SUMMARY

With expanding treatment options for localized kidney cancer, treatment decision is highly nuanced and requires shared decision-making. Patient decision aids may be helpful in the treatment discussion.

Estimation of the carrier frequency of fumarate hydratase alterations and implications for kidney cancer risk in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cancer

BACKGROUND

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cancer (HLRCC) is a cancer syndrome associated with a germline mutation in fumarate hydratase (FH). The syndrome is associated with cutaneous and uterine leiomyomas, and some patients develop a lethal form of kidney cancer. This study provides estimates for the FH carrier frequency and kidney cancer penetrance.

METHODS

Data sets containing sequencing data for the FH gene were used: the 1000 Genomes Project (1000GP) and the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Alterations in the FH gene were characterized on the basis of different variant risk tiers: 1) ClinVar annotated variants, 2) loss-of-function alterations, and 3) highly impactful missense alterations. The cumulative incidence of FH alterations overall and by different world populations was evaluated in 1000GP and ExAC. A lifetime penetrance of HLRCC kidney cancer risk was generated with 3 estimates of the annual incidence.

RESULTS

The overall allele frequencies of tier 1 to 3 FH alterations in the ExAC and 1000GP data sets were 2.54 × 10^-3 (1 in 393) and 1.20 × 10^-3 (1 in 835), respectively. There were differences in the allele frequencies of FH alterations between world populations. Based on various estimates of the percentage of kidney cancers with FH alterations, the lifetime kidney cancer penetrance for carrier estimate 3 in ExAC was 1.7% to 5.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

FH alterations are common and are carried by approximately 1 in 1000 individuals according to the more conservative estimates. The lifetime kidney cancer penetrance appears lower than previously estimated. Although databases are not population cohorts, they provide a useful quantitative estimate of rare variants with low penetrance.

Active surveillance of small renal masses

Most renal masses incidentally detected by cross-sectional images are benign, being mainly cysts, and if they are malignant, they are indolent in nature with limited metastatic potential. Enhanced renal masses less than 4 cm in size are known as small renal masses (SRMs), and their growth rate (GR) and the possibility of developing metastasis are extremely low. Delayed intervention of SRMs by closed and routine imaging follow-up known as active surveillance (AS) is now an option according to urological guidelines. Radiologists have a key position in AS management of SRMs even unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) and also in the follow-up of complex renal cysts by Bosniak cyst classification system. Radiologists play a key role in the AS of both unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) SRMs as well as in the follow-up of complex renal cysts using the Bosniak cyst classification system. Indeed, radiologists must determine which patients with SRMs or complex renal cysts can be included in AS, establish the follow-up radiological test algorithm to be used in different scenarios, perform measurements in follow-up tests, and decide when AS should be discontinued. The purpose of this article is to review the indications and management of AS in SRMs, especially focused on specific scenarios, such as complex renal cysts and multifocal renal tumors (sporadic or hereditary). In this work, the authors aimed to provide a thorough review of imaging in the context of active surveillance of renal masses.

Inherited kidney cancer syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe current paradigms for genetic testing, screening, and treatment of patients with inherited kidney cancer syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

We describe various new aspects of hereditary kidney cancer. Recent data now support that hereditary kidney cancer may account for 5-8% of kidney cancers diagnosed. Methods of testing have evolved including the introduction of multigene next-generation sequencing panels. We continue to learn more about the natural history and management of classic hereditary cancer syndromes. New emerging conditions with lower kidney cancer penetrance have been recognized adding the growing list of syndromes associated with kidney cancer development. The surgical management strategies of enucleation remain however systemic therapy options are being explored both for localized and advanced settings.

SUMMARY

Genetic predisposition to kidney cancer is likely more common than once thought. Knowledge of clinical manifestation and genetic testing strategies are needed to properly identify and treat patient and their families.

Genetic Testing in Kidney Cancer Patients: Who, When, and How?

There are more than a dozen recognized hereditary forms of kidney cancer. While classic syndromic forms are readily recognizable, more recently described conditions are subtler because of lower penetrance. Adequate counseling and implementation of risk assessment before or after management are important aspects of clinical care. Germline testing to assess hereditary risk has rapidly evolved thanks to multigene panel testing, which can be performed quickly and at relatively low cost. This review discusses what is known about germline risk assessment, namely which individuals should be tested and when and how, and covers many of the uncertainties around this process. PATIENT SUMMARY: More than a dozen genes have been linked to predisposition to kidney cancer. We review genetic testing in terms of who should be tested and when and how the testing should be carried out. Results from genetic tests can help in tailoring screening and surgical management and in selecting the most suitable chemotherapy.

[One-stage cryoablation of two renal tumors]

The progressive development of medical technologies allowed the introduction of alternative methods of treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma with a tendency to organ-sparing approach. Cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and some experimental methods of treatment (microwave and laser ablation, therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound) are referred to minimally invasive treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Cryoablation is highly effective alternative method of treatment of renal cell carcinoma. The main advantages of this technique are tumor visualization and formation of 'ice ball' in real time, fewer complications compared with other methods, as well as the possibility of cryotherapy in critically ill patients. Compared to other ablative technologies, cryoablation is followed by low percentage of redo treatment and good intermediate oncological results. We described the experience of one-stage cryoablation of two kidney tumors in this report.

Risk factors for metachronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients treated for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may be diagnosed with a metachronous, contralateral tumor. We evaluated the risks of contralateral tumor development using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

METHODS

Among RCC patients, we identified those with a metachronous, contralateral RCC diagnosed ≥1 year after primary diagnosis. We performed a competing risks analysis to evaluate associations between clinicopathologic factors and metachronous, bilateral RCC. Cumulative incidence and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 80,403 cases of RCC identified, with a median follow-up of 8.3 years; of these, 1063 (1.3%) developed metachronous, contralateral RCC (median of 6 years after diagnosis). The cumulative incidence at 10, 20, and 30 years of follow-up was 1.5%, 3.1%, and 4.7%, respectively. An increased risk was observed among men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.55), blacks (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.71-2.33), and those with papillary histology (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.41-2.10). Risk of metachronous disease decreased with increasing age at primary diagnosis (HR per 1-year increase, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.97). The SIRs were highest among those diagnosed at a younger age and remained elevated even after extended follow-up (>10 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the cumulative incidence of metachronous, contralateral RCC may be higher than previously reported. Younger age, black race, papillary histology, and male sex increase the risk of metachronous, contralateral RCC development. The high SIRs seen in all demographic groups may support a rationale for lifelong surveillance, especially in high-risk subgroups with early disease onset.

Genetic Predisposition to Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Counseling, Testing, Screening, and Management

In many individuals with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a hereditary cause may have contributed to cancer development. Various risk factors can be suggestive of a genetic contribution, including early disease onset, multifocal or bilateral tumors, family history of RCC, and personal/family history of other benign or malignant tumors. Genetic counseling and understanding of the entire family tree are the first steps in evaluation and will determine if the patient should proceed with testing. Methods of testing have changed to next-generation sequencing, which allows multiple genes to be evaluated together. The results of testing have significant implications for the individual and his or her family members. Screening of the kidney and at-risk organs ensues, with most algorithms focused on early diagnosis and intervention to limit morbidity and mortality of disease manifestations. A comprehensive clinical program that can offer multidisciplinary care is useful for several complex cancer syndromes. Management of localized and advanced hereditary kidney cancers may differ from the sporadic forms of RCC. Knowledge of the genetics can have significant management implications and if necessary genetic evaluation can be expedited to allow treatment decisions.

Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature

Objectives

To evaluate the recent developments in robotic urological surgery, as the introduction of robotic technology has overcome many of the difficulties of pure laparoscopic surgery enabling surgeons to perform complex minimally invasive procedures with a shorter learning curve. Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is now offered as the standard for various surgical procedures across multiple specialities.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify studies evaluating robot-assisted simple prostatectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, surgery for urolithiasis, distal ureteric reconstruction, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, augmentation ileocystoplasty, and artificial urinary sphincter insertion. Article titles, abstracts, and full text manuscripts were screened to identify relevant studies, which then underwent data extraction and analysis.

Results

In all, 72 studies evaluating the above techniques were identified. Almost all studies were retrospective single-arm case series. RAS appears to be associated with reduced morbidity, less blood loss, reduced length of stay, and comparable clinical outcomes in comparison to the corresponding open procedures, whilst having a shorter operative duration and learning curve compared to the equivalent laparoscopic techniques.

Conclusion

Emerging data demonstrate that the breadth and complexity of urological procedures performed using the da Vinci® platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is continually expanding. There is a gaining consensus that RAS is producing promising surgical results in a wide range of procedures. A major limitation of the current literature is the sparsity of comparative trials evaluating these procedures.

Robotics in urology

Twenty years after it was introduced, robotic surgery has become more commonplace in urology – we examine its current uses and controversies

Current status of robotic surgery in urology

As a result of ergonomics, optimal magnification of the operative field, surgeon dexterity, and precision of surgical manipulation, robotic technology has been shown to overcome many difficulties associated with pure laparoscopy. With the recent expansion of robot-assisted surgery in the field of urology and following the success of robot-assisted prostatectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, robot-assisted surgery is being applied to treat many other genitourinary diseases, such as bladder cancer and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of the present review is to discuss the role of robotic surgery in urology and summarize recent developments in the field of urologic robotic surgery.

Distinguishing pediatric and adolescent renal cell carcinoma from other renal malignancies

PURPOSE

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a small proportion of renal malignancies early in life. Distinguishing RCC from other malignancies is important as treatment strategies may differ. We analyze the Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify predictive factors of RCC in the pediatric population with renal tumors.

METHODS

We queried SEER to identify patients from ages 0 to 19 diagnosed with a renal malignancy between 1973 and 2013. Cases were sorted using histology and site codes. Age-adjusted standardized incidence rates (SIR) were calculated. We compared differences in characteristics between cancer types. A logistic regression model and a nomogram were created to identify predictors of RCC.

RESULTS

A total of 3,670 patients were identified, of which 281 (7.7%) were diagnosed with RCC. The SIR of RCC increased with age. After age 12, RCC was found in >50% of all newly diagnosed cases. On multivariate analysis, RCC was associated with smaller tumor size (P < 0.001), increasing age (P < 0.001), black race (P < 0.001), and localized stage (P < 0.001). The nomogram predicted RCC pathology with a concordance index of 0.965.

CONCLUSIONS

RCC in childhood and adolescence is relatively uncommon; however, it accounts for >50% of renal malignancies after age 12. For every year of increasing age, the odds of having an RCC diagnosis are increased by 50%. The odds of a renal tumor being RCC are increased in black children, those with localized disease, and those with smaller tumors. In these specific populations, RCC should be favored in the differential diagnosis of the renal mass.

Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis of Sporadic Bilateral Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Series of 148 Cases

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features, treatment, and prognosis of sporadic bilateral renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 148 patients with sporadic bilateral RCC treated in our center from June 1986 to December 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Their clinicopathologic features and treatments were evaluated. The survival and prognostic factors were assessed based on data from follow-up.

RESULTS

The median age was 54 years (range, 31-78 years). There were 88 patients with synchronous bilateral RCC and 60 with metachronous bilateral RCC. The median interval between bilateral tumors of metachronous bilateral RCC was 75.5 months. There was no significant difference in tumor size, nuclear grade, or T stage between metachronous tumors (P = .385, P = .544, and P = .263, respectively). Of 148 patients, 124 patients underwent bilateral surgery, 16 underwent unilateral surgery, and 8 patients did not undergo surgery. Of the 317 tumors with pathologic results, 297 (93.7%) were clear-cell subtype. A total of 136 (91.9%) patients were followed-up, and the median follow-up period was 77 months (range, 2-398 months). During follow-up, 38 (27.9%) patients died. The 5-year overall survival rate was 85.9%. The median survival time of patients with no surgery was 5 months. Older age (P = .001), bilateral nonoperative treatment (P < .001), higher T stage (P < .001), and multifocality (P = .02) were related to worse prognosis in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In metachronous bilateral RCC, the latter occurrence does not bear a significantly worse pathologic biology. The prognosis of sporadic bilateral RCC with no surgery is poor. The overall oncologic results of patients with sporadic bilateral RCC are comparable with that of patients with unilateral RCC.

Hereditary Kidney Cancer Syndromes and Surgical Management of the Small Renal Mass

The management of patients with hereditary kidney cancers presents unique challenges to clinicians. In addition to an earlier age of onset compared with patients with sporadic kidney cancer, those with hereditary kidney cancer syndromes often present with bilateral and/or multifocal renal tumors and are at risk for multiple de novo lesions. This population of patients may also present with extrarenal manifestations, which adds an additional layer of complexity. Physicians who manage these patients should be familiar with the underlying clinical characteristics of each hereditary kidney cancer syndrome and the suggested surgical approaches and recommendations of genetic testing for at-risk individuals.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Partial nephrectomy is the standard treatment for small renal masses. Currently, it is commonly performed using minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques. The aim of the present review is to report the surgical technique of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in full detail as well as available literature results.

PET/CT imaging of renal cell carcinoma with (18)F-VM4-037: a phase II pilot study

BACKGROUND

Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX) is a potential imaging biomarker of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Here, we report the results of a phase II clinical trial of a small molecule radiotracer targeting CA-IX ((18)F-VM4-037) in ccRCC.

METHODS

Between October 2012 and May 2013, 11 patients with kidney masses underwent (18)F-VM4-037 PET/CT prior to surgery. Dynamic imaging was performed for the first 45 min post injection and whole-body imaging was obtained at 60 min post injection. Tumors were surgically excised or biopsied within 4 weeks of imaging.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the radiotracer well with no adverse events. Ten of the 11 patients had histologically confirmed malignancy. One patient had a Bosniak Type 3 cyst with no tumor found at surgery. Two patients had extrarenal disease and 9 had tumors only in the kidney. Primary ccRCC lesions were difficult to visualize on PET alone due to high uptake of the tracer in the adjacent normal kidney parenchyma, however when viewed in conjunction with CT, the tumors were easily localized. Metastatic lesions were clearly visible on PET. Mean SUV for primary kidney lesions was 2.55 in all patients; in patients with histologically confirmed ccRCC, the mean SUV was 3.16. The time-activity curves (TAC) are consistent with reversible ligand binding with peak activity concentration at 8 min post injection followed by washout. Distribution Volume Ratio (DVR) of the lesions was measured using the Logan graphical analysis method. The mean DVR value across the 9 kidney lesions was 5.2 ± 2.8, (range 0.68-10.34).

CONCLUSION

18F-VM4-037 is a well-tolerated PET agent that allows same day imaging of CA-IX expression. The agent demonstrated moderate signal uptake in primary tumors and excellent visualization of CA-IX positive metastases. While the evaluation of primary ccRCC lesions is challenging due to high background activity in the normal kidney parenchyma, 18F-VM4-037 may be most useful in the evaluation of metastatic ccRCC lesions.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and cancer: do they really look similar?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this opinion article is to understand to what extent idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can be considered, in its clinical and pathogenic features, similar to cancer. Indeed, IPF has common risk factors with cancer, a low survival, and, most importantly, epigenetic and genetic alterations, abnormal expression of microRNAs, cellular and molecular aberrances, and the activation of similar signalling pathways.

DISCUSSION

The pathogenic link between the two diseases may have a number of practical consequences. It may improve our understanding of IPF drawing on cancer biology knowledge. In addition, the recognition of similar pathogenic pathways may also encourage the use of cancer drugs for the treatment of IPF. Nintedanib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinase receptors initially developed for cancer, has been recently approved for the treatment of IPF thanks to the observation that these receptors are also abnormally activated in IPF. The vision of IPF as a cancer-like disease may improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease also opening new scenarios for repositioning cancer drugs for IPF. In addition, it may increase the level of awareness towards this dreadful disease at the public, political, and healthcare level.

Nephron-sparing surgery for multifocal and hereditary renal tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the controversy surrounding the benefits of nephron-sparing surgery, multiple absolute indications for nephron-sparing surgery still exist, including the classic indications of hereditary and bilateral kidney tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple genetic mutations have been identified which lead to hereditary kidney cancer conditions. These are briefly reviewed because the surgical management of hereditary kidney tumors depends on the genetic and histologic subtypes involved. Clear understanding of these hereditary conditions is crucial for proper surgical management of these tumors.

SUMMARY

Complex partial nephrectomy for multiple renal tumors, or multiplex partial nephrectomy, requires not only exceptional surgical skills but expertise of numerous nonsurgical methodologies, such as hands-on intraoperative ultrasonography and interpretation of multiple imaging modalities. In addition, multidisciplinary management is crucial for optimal outcomes in patient care. This review evaluates the most advanced surgical techniques and perioperative management required to successfully care for these challenging cases.

Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for Unilateral Synchronous Multifocal Renal Cortical Tumors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for unilateral synchronous multifocal renal tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records for 128 patients with nonmetastatic, unilateral, synchronous, multifocal renal tumors who underwent surgical resection at our institution from 1995 to 2012. Five patients with hereditary renal cell carcinoma were excluded. Differences between patient and tumor characteristics from the 2 nephrectomy groups were evaluated. Outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and chronic kidney disease upstaging were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The log-rank test was used for group comparisons.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 78 PN patients (63%) and 45 RN patients (37%); 17 of 95 planned PN (18%) were converted to RN. Tumor diameter and RENAL nephrometry scores were greater in RN patients (P <.0001 and P = .0002, respectively). Pathologic stage T3 was seen in 40% of RN patients and 10% of PN patients (P = .0002). Histologic concordance was apparent in 60 of 123 patients (49%). Median follow-up for patients alive without a recurrence was 4 years. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 98% for PN and 85% for RN. Five-year overall survival was 96% for PN and 86% for RN (P = .5). Five-year freedom from chronic kidney disease upstaging was 74% for PN and 55% for RN (P = .11).

CONCLUSION

Partial nephrectomy for the treatment of unilateral, synchronous, multifocal, renal tumors with favorable characteristics was associated with a low recurrence rate. These findings suggest PN is an appropriate management strategy for this group of carefully selected patients.

The ISUP system of staging, grading and classification of renal cell neoplasia

There have been significant changes in the staging, classification and grading of renal cell neoplasia in recent times. Major changes have occurred in our understanding of extra-renal extension by renal cell cancer and how gross specimens must be handled to optimally display extra-renal spread. Since the 1981 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal tumors, in which only a handful of different entities were reported, many new morphological types have been described in the literature, resulting in 50 different entities reported in the 2004 WHO classification. Since 2004, further new entities have been recognized and reported necessitating an update of the renal tumor classification. There have also been numerous grading systems for renal cell carcinoma with Fuhrman grading, the most widely used system. In recent times, the prognostic value and the applicability of the Fuhrman grading system in practice has been shown to be, at best, suboptimal. To address these issues and to recommend reporting guidelines, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) undertook a review of adult renal neoplasia through an international consensus conference in Vancouver in 2012. The conduct of the conference was based upon evidence from the literature and the current practice amongst recognized experts in the field. Working groups selected to deal with key topics evaluated current data and identified points of controversy. A pre-meeting survey of the ISUP membership was followed by the consensus conference at which a formal ballot was taken on each key issue. A 65% majority vote was taken as consensus. This review summarizes the outcome and recommendations of this conference with regards to staging, classification and grading of renal cell neoplasia.

Diagnosis and management of BHD-associated kidney cancer

In addition to the associated cutaneous and pulmonary manifestations, individuals with the Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome have an increased risk of developing kidney cancer, which is often bilateral and multifocal. The risk of developing a renal tumor in this population does not decrease with age and therefore warrants a lifelong screening approach. We recommend abdominal imaging every 36 months in individuals without renal lesions at initial screening. Once renal tumors are identified, they should be followed with interval imaging studies until the largest tumor reaches 3 cm in maximal diameter, at which point nephron-sparing surgery should be ideally pursued. While the histology of renal tumors can vary in the BHD syndrome, most tumors possess a relatively indolent natural history and do not require adjuvant therapy if resected when localized to the kidney. With this approach, the vast majority of patients will achieve a curative oncologic outcome and avoid the medical sequelae of chronic renal insufficiency that could otherwise result from total nephrectomy.

Hereditary renal cell carcinoma: genetics, clinical features, and surgical considerations

OBJECTIVES

Hereditary renal cancer syndromes have been described and have illuminated novel methods to treat sporadic renal cell carcinoma. In this work, we aimed to review the genetic basis, molecular pathology and clinical manifestations of hereditary syndromes, as well as outline principles of surgical management and use of targeted therapy.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of selected peer-reviewed publications regarding hereditary renal cancer syndromes, their genetic basis, and recommendations for surgical management.

RESULTS

The major syndromes contributing to hereditary renal cell carcinoma are discussed along with relevant literature guiding their management. The evolving surgical and molecular treatments are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of genetic basis of hereditary carcinomas provides opportunity for targeted therapy of metastatic sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Appropriate and timely surgical management of hereditary renal cancers decreases the possibility of development of metastatic disease, and allows for preservation of renal function despite the need for repeat surgical interventions.

Renal tumors with clear cells. A review

The spectrum of primary renal tumors in which clear cells may appear is revisited in this review. The pathologist's viewpoint of this topic is pertinent because not all the tumors with clear cells are carcinomas and not all renal cell carcinomas with clear cells are clear cell renal cell carcinomas. In fact, some of them are distinct entities according to the new WHO classification. The morphological approach is combined with genetics. Renal cell carcinoma related to von Hippel-Lindau disease is reviewed first because many of the genetic disorders underlying this disease are also present in sporadic, conventional renal cell clear cell carcinomas. Subsequently, conventional renal cell clear cell carcinomas, familial, non von Hippel-Lindau-associated renal cell carcinomas, translocation carcinomas, hereditary papillary renal cell carcinomas, carcinomas associated to tuberous sclerosis and to Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, carcinomas associated with end-stage renal disease, and clear cell tubulopapillary carcinomas are reviewed. Finally, epithelioid angiomyolipoma is also considered in this review.