Continuing or Discontinuing Low-Dose Aspirin Before Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in Patients with Preoperative Antithrombotic Therapy: A Single-Center Study from a Tertiary Hospital in China

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and postoperative hemorrhage are unavoidable complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). At present, more and more patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) need long-term antithrombotic therapy before operation due to cardiovascular diseases or cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of preoperative antithrombotic therapy history on lower extremity VTE and bleeding after TURP.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TURP in the Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, from January 2017 to December 2021 and took antithrombotic drugs before operation were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline data of patients were collected, including age, prostate volume, preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), complications, surgical history within one month, indications of preoperative antithrombotic drugs, drug types, medication duration, etc. Main outcome measures included venous thromboembolism after TURP, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, and perioperative blood transfusion. Secondary outcome measures included operation duration and postoperative hospitalization days, the duration of stopping antithrombotic drugs before operation, the recovery time of antithrombotic drugs after operation, the condition of lower limbs within 3 months after operation, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and cerebrovascular complications and death.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients after TURP with a long preoperative history of antithrombotic drugs were included in this study. Six patients (19.4%) developed superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) postoperatively. Four of these patients progressed to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) without pulmonary thromboembolism (PE). Only one patient underwent extra bladder irrigation due to blockage of their urinary catheter by a blood clot postoperatively. The symptoms of hematuria mostly disappeared within one month postoperatively and lasted for up to three months postoperatively. No blood transfusion, surgical intervention to stop bleeding, lower limb discomfort such as swelling, MACEs, cerebrovascular complications, or death occurred in all patients within three months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Short-term preoperative discontinuation may help patients with antithrombotic therapy to obtain a relatively safe opportunity for TURP surgery after professional evaluation of perioperative conditions. The risks of perioperative bleeding, VTE, and serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications are relatively controllable. It is essential for urologists to pay more attention to the perioperative management of these patients. However, further high-quality research results are needed for more powerful verification.

Peri-procedure management of antithrombotic agents and thrombocytopenia for common procedures in oncology: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of thrombosis requiring anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents, and they can also encounter thrombocytopenia due to cancer itself or cancer therapies. They often undergo many procedures such as tissue or bone marrow biopsies, placement of central access lines, diagnostic or therapeutic draining procedures, lumbar puncture, and more. Management of antithrombotic agents or thrombocytopenia around the time of these procedures is highly variable. In this document, the Hemostasis and Malignancy Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis aims to provide useful practice guidance in the management of antithrombotic agents and thrombocytopenia around the time of common procedures in patients with cancer.

Safety of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients receiving aspirin: An update meta-analysis including 3373 patients

BACKGROUND

The management of aspirin before transrectal prostate puncture-guided biopsy continues to be controversial. The conclusions in newly published studies differ from the published guideline. Therefore, an updated meta-analysis was performed to assess the safety of continuing to take aspirin when undergoing a transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB).

METHODS

We searched the following databases for relevant literature from their inception to October 30, 2020: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Web of Science, Sinomed, Chinese National Knowledge Internet, and WANGFANG. Studies that compared the bleeding rates between aspirin that took aspirin and non-aspirin groups were included. The quality of all included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Revman Manger version 5.2 software was employed to complete the meta-analysis to assess the risk of hematuria, hematospermia, and rectal bleeding.

RESULTS

Six articles involving 3373 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our study revealed that compared with the non-aspirin group, those taking aspirin exhibited a higher risk of rectal bleeding after TRUS-PB (risk ratio [RR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.09-1.49], P = .002). Also, the meta-analysis results did not reveal any significant difference between the 2 groups for the risk of hematuria (RR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.91-1.16], P = .71) and hematospermia (RR = 0.93, 95%CI [0.82-1.06], P = .29).

CONCLUSION

Taking aspirin does not increase the risk of hematuria and hematospermia after TRUS-PB. However, the risk of rectal bleeding, which was slight and self-limiting, did increase. We concluded that it was not necessary to stop taking aspirin before undergoing TRUS-PB.

The safety of continued low dose aspirin therapy during Complete Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (csPCNL)

OBJECTIVE

Using anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs in patients with cardiovascular and medical comorbidities is prevalent. Because of hyper vascular nature of kidney, physicians tend to stop using aspirin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We have shown the effects of remaining on low dose aspirin in complete supine PCNL (csPCNL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The records of 643 patients who underwent csPCNL between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. Surgical outcomes and complications of patients who were on aspirin therapy and continued it daily (group A) were compared with those not taking aspirin (group B).

RESULTS

Of the 643 csPCNLs, 40 (6%) were performed in patients of group A and the rest of 603 (94%) cases were in group B. The differences between the mean age of groups were statistically significant (60.08±9.45, group A and 48.66±12.32, group B) (P<0.001). Thirty-nine (97.5%) of patients in group A and 548 (90.9%) of group B were stone free by the end of the study which was not statistically significant (P=0.118). The mean operative time between groups A and B (43.20±21.37 and 44.83±16.83, respectively) was not considered significant (P=0.561). There was also no significant difference between 2 groups in any types of complications. Multivariate analysis showed that, perioperative aspirin use was not a significant predictor of transfusion, Hb drop, operative time and other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Remaining on aspirin does not increase the risk of bleeding, transfusionand other complications. Consequently, continuing aspirin prioperatively in csPCNL appears safe. There is no fear for continuing aspirin in csPCNL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Endoscopic Therapy in the Management of Patients With Severe Rectal Bleeding Following Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Case-Based Systematic Review

Rectal bleeding is a known complication of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. It is usually mild and resolves spontaneously. However, massive life-threatening hemorrhage can also rarely occur in this setting, potentially presenting a therapeutic conundrum. We hereby delineate the case of a patient who experienced severe intermittent lower gastrointestinal bleeding following a transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Traditional tamponade methods failed to control the hemorrhage. Subsequently, an urgent flexible sigmoidoscopy revealed an anterior rectal wall prominence with biopsy punctures as the possible source of bleeding. Endoclip was successfully applied at the bleeding site, achieving permanent hemostasis. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged from the hospital. While the use of endoclipping has been widely reported in gastrointestinal endoscopy, its application remains exceedingly rare in this group of patients. To our knowledge, this case represents only the third report of endoclipping alone to treat massive rectal bleeding follwing a prostate biopsy procedure. In addition, we systematically review published medical literature to evaluate endoscopic techniques aimed at managing this important complication. This article illustrates that endoscopic therapy may present an efficient, noninvasive method to deal with severe post-biopsy rectal hemorrhage. Therefore, prompt consultation with the gastroenterology service should be advocated.

Association of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with bleeding complications in image-guided musculoskeletal biopsies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of continuing aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in patients undergoing image-guided musculoskeletal biopsies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prior to October 2017, patients undergoing image-guided musculoskeletal biopsy had aspirin and NSAIDs withheld for the preceding 5-7 days. The policy changed in October 2017 based on new guidelines from the Society of Interventional Radiology such that aspirin and other NSAIDs were not withheld. A retrospective review of patient records was performed for all biopsies prior to and after the policy change to assess for differences in biopsy-related bleeding complications. Additional clinical and biopsy factors including age, gender, liver disease, coagulopathy, biopsy tissue type, and histological diagnosis were assessed.

RESULTS

In the pre-policy change group, there were 1853 total biopsies with 43 biopsy-related bleeding complications (2.3%). Within this group, 362 patients were on aspirin with 7 bleeding complications (1.9%) and 260 patients were on NSAIDs with 5 bleeding complications (1.9%). There were 409 total biopsies in the post-policy change group and 7 bleeding complications (1.7%). Within this group, 71 patients were on aspirin with 1 bleeding complication (1.4%). No bleeding complications were recorded in patients on NSAIDs (0%). There was no significant difference in bleeding complication between the pre- and post-policy change groups overall (p = 0.58) and in patients on aspirin (p = 1.00) or other NSAIDs (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Bleeding complications for musculoskeletal biopsies are rare. Leaving patients on aspirin or other NSAIDs during a musculoskeletal biopsy does not increase the incidence of bleeding complications.

Guidelines for Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Korean Society of Urogenital Radiology Consensus Statement for Patient Preparation, Standard Technique, and Biopsy-Related Pain Management

The Korean Society of Urogenital Radiology (KSUR) aimed to present a consensus statement for patient preparation, standard technique, and pain management in relation to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) to reduce the variability in TRUS-Bx methodologies and suggest a nationwide guideline. The KSUR guideline development subcommittee constructed questionnaires assessing prebiopsy anticoagulation, the cleansing enema, antimicrobial prophylaxis, local anesthesia methods such as periprostatic neurovascular bundle block (PNB) or intrarectal lidocaine gel application (IRLA), opioid usage, and the number of biopsy cores and length and diameter of the biopsy needle. The survey was conducted using an Internet-based platform, and responses were solicited from the 90 members registered on the KSUR mailing list as of 2018. A comprehensive search of relevant literature from Medline database was conducted. The strength of each recommendation was graded on the basis of the level of evidence. Among the 90 registered members, 29 doctors (32.2%) responded to this online survey. Most KSUR members stopped anticoagulants (100%) and antiplatelets (76%) one week before the procedure. All respondents performed a cleansing enema before TRUS-Bx. Approximately 86% of respondents administered prophylactic antibiotics before TRUS-Bx. The most frequently used antibiotics were third-generation cephalosporins. PNB was the most widely used pain control method, followed by a combination of PNB plus IRLA. Opioids were rarely used (6.8%), and they were used only as an adjunctive pain management approach during TRUS-Bx. The KSUR members mainly chose the 12-core biopsy method (89.7%) and 18G 16-mm or 22-mm (96.5%) needles. The KSUR recommends the 12-core biopsy scheme with PNB with or without IRLA as the standard protocol for TRUS-Bx. Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents should be discontinued at least 5 days prior to the procedure, and antibiotic prophylaxis is highly recommended to prevent infectious complications. Glycerin cleansing enemas and administration of opioid analogues before the procedure could be helpful in some situations. The choice of biopsy needle is dependent on the practitioners' situation and preferences.

Complications of transrectal prostate biopsy in our context. International multicenter study of 3350 patients

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is the most common visceral neoplasm in men and the second one in the United States with the highest mortality behind lung cancer and ahead of colorectal cancer. While prostate cancer mortality rates have been reduced in the United States, Austria, United Kingdom and France, 5-year survival rates have been incremented in Sweden, probably due to a higher diagnostic activity and non-lethal tumor detection. TRPB usually has low rates of serious complications, with a not negligible number of minor complications. Mortality directly associated with this procedure is low and usually related to septic shock. The main complications derived from prostate biopsy can be infectious (mild or severe) and non-infectious (hematuria consistent with hemorrhage, urethral bleeding, rectal bleeding or hemospermia, acute urinary retention, pain or vasovagal reactions).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The objective of the study is to compare three usual TRPB protocols and their relationship with the incidence of complications. Retrospective multicenter observational study conducted in three countries (Spain, Italy and Portugal). We have reviewed the medical records of 3350 men who underwent TRPB to evaluate the existence of prostate cancer, with a minimum evolutionary control of 6months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 65,50years, median 66, range 43-79. The subgroup analysis showed that younger patients had higher rates of acute urine retention (AUR) (P=.0000001). Likewise, our results revealed that younger patients presented more procedural pain (P=.0000001) than older patients. Regarding PSA, the mean value was 10.44, SD 7.73, median 8.15, range 0.98-68.09. A higher body mass index (BMI) was not associated with further infection (P=.000004). When performing the multivariate analysis, it was found that the significant variables in the general group were: age (P=.0013), PSA (P=.0402), local infiltration anesthesia (P=.0001) and prophylaxis with metronidazole +tobramycin +amoxicillin/clavulanic acid +gentamicin (P=.0001), presenting a normal distribution with high confidence interval (95%) and significant correlation. Prophylaxis is the most significant variable for no complications and pain (P=.0001), age (P=.0013) and prophylaxis (P=.0001) are for bleeding, age (P=.0013), prophylaxis and PSA (P=.0001) are for infection, and finally, age (P=.0013), anesthesia with local infiltration and prophylaxis (P=.0001) and PSA (P=.0402) are for AUR.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedation has fewer side effects and complications related to the transrectal prostate biopsy procedure with respect to transrectal local anesthesia. The choice of the antibiotic prophylaxis scheme is decisive in the onset of complications arising from the performance of a transrectal prostate biopsy.

Is it safe to continue antithrombotic agents before prostate biopsy?

Background

Whether antithrombotic agents should be stopped before prostate biopsy is unsettled. We investigated the impact of antithrombotic agents on bleeding complications after prostate biopsy.

Materials and methods

Among the patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy from June 2006 to December 2013 at Ebina General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan, 1817 cases were retrospectively assessed. Patients were divided into two groups: those not taking antithrombotic agents (control group) and those taking them (experimental group). The frequency and severity of bleeding complications after the procedure were compared. The severity of bleeding events was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Advanced Events vol. 4.0.

Results

Hemorrhagic complications were classified into grades 1 to 3. Patients with complications of Grade 2 and above needed treatment. As for the Grade 1 event, there were no differences between two groups. The frequency of more than Grade 2 bleeding events was 1.7% and 3.5% in the control and experimental group, respectively; the odds ratio was 2.18 (P = 0.039). Grade 3 events occurred in seven patients of the control group (0.5%) and four patients of the experimental group (1.2%).

Conclusions

The present study showed that continuation of antithrombotic agents increased the frequency of hemorrhagic complications requiring intervention. It suggests that attention should be paid to the patients taking antithrombotic agents before prostate biopsy.

Hemostatic effect and psychological impact of an oxidized regenerated cellulose patch after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective and retrospective study

To investigate the usefulness of the oxidized regenerated cellulose patch (ORCP) for postbiopsy hemostasis, anxiety, and depression in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.This was a prospective-retrospective study of 300 patients who underwent systematic 12-core prostate biopsy from August 2016 through March 2018. The ORCP was inserted into the rectum immediately after prostate biopsy in the prospective group (n = 150), while the retrospective group (n = 150) underwent prostate biopsy alone. The frequency rate and duration of hematuria, rectal bleeding, and hematospermia were compared between the 2 groups. Anxiety and depression were assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale before and after prostate biopsy in the prospective group.The frequency rates of hematuria and hematospermia showed no significant differences between the prospective versus retrospective groups (64.7% vs 66.7%, P = .881; 18 vs 20%, P = .718; respectively). Frequency of rectal bleeding was significantly lower in the prospective group than in the retrospective group (26.7% vs 42.7%, P = .018). However, there were no significant differences in median duration of rectal bleeding, hematuria, or hematospermia between the 2 groups (2, 5, and 2 days vs 2, 7, and 1 day, P > .05, respectively, for the prospective vs retrospective group). Multivariate analysis found that ORCP insertion was a significant protective factor against postbiopsy rectal bleeding (P = .038, odds ratio 0.52). Only anxiety level in the prospective group before versus after prostate biopsy was significantly reduced (5 vs 4, P = .011).ORCP insertion after prostate biopsy is an effective and simple method for decreasing rectal bleeding. ORCP insertion may also alleviate anxiety in patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

Aspirin for patients undergoing major lung resections: hazardous or harmless?†

OBJECTIVES

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is a medication widely used for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, which are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Whether aspirin should be continued or paused in the perioperative period remains controversial, especially in thoracic surgical settings.

METHODS

A single-centred retrospective study comprised 486 patients. Of these, 329 patients did not use aspirin (group ASA-0) and 157 did (group ASA-1) during the perioperative period after anatomical lung resection at our hospital from January 2013 to December 2016. Major outcome measures were the amount of blood loss during the operation and during the first 5 days postoperatively (per Mercuriali's formula), as well as the amount and proportion of the blood transfusion (packed red cells) received. The need for reoperation due to a postoperative haemothorax and/or bleeding was recorded. The groups were also compared according to their rates of morbidity and mortality. Inferential statistical methods with bootstrap analysis using 1000 samples and the Mersenne Twister, a random number generator, were used.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in intraoperative bleeding [ASA-0M = 418.69 ml, standard deviation (SD) ± 364.87; ASA-1M = 399.8 ml, SD ± 323.84; P = 0.58] or in total blood loss according to Mercuriali's formula (ASA-0M = 1111.62 ml, SD ± 816.69; ASA-1M = 1115.08 ml, SD ± 682.12; P = 0.95). A total of 104 patients received transfusions up to postoperative day 5: 71 patients in the ASA-0 group received 151 blood transfusions, whereas 33 patients in the ASA-1 group received 65 blood transfusions (P = 0.66). The indication for reoperation due to bleeding (ASA-1 = 3, ASA-0 = 4; P = 0.69) was similar between the groups. There was a trend towards higher rates of postoperative complications in the ASA-1 group (risk ratio (RR) = 1.28; P = 0.055); neither cardiovascular complications nor deaths were more frequent in either of the 2 groups (P = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients taking aspirin therapy and undergoing anatomical lung resection seem not to be at any disadvantage regarding bleeding. However, a trend towards a higher rate of postoperative complications indicates a basically increased risk for operations due to comorbidities in these patients.

National survey of fiducial marker insertion for prostate image guided radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

In the United Kingdom fiducial marker IGRT is the second most common verification method employed in radical prostate radiotherapy yet little evidence exists to support centres introducing or developing this practice. We developed a survey to elicit current fiducial marker practices adopted in the UK, to recommend standardisation of practice.

METHODS

A 16 question survey was distributed across UK Radiotherapy centres via promotion at the British Uro-Oncology Group Conference, 2016. Included were questions relating to workforce planning, patient preparation, insertion procedure and verification methods. The survey was open from September 2016 to January 2017.

RESULTS

Results from 15 centres routinely inserting fiducial markers for prostate IGRT are presented. Eleven professional groups insert fiducial markers across the UK. Fourteen centres insert fiducial markers trans-rectally; one trans-perineally. Centres adopting a trans-rectal approach administer prophylactic ciprofloxacin as a single agent or combined with gentamicin or metronidazole; poor agreement between regimes presented. One centre has introduced targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. Five brands of fiducial markers are utilised nationally. Fourteen centres standardly insert three single fiducial markers, two common configurations emerged. Coupled fiducial markers are routinely implanted by one centre. All centres delay at least one week between fiducial marker insertion and planning CT; seven centres wait two weeks. The most common fiducial verification method is two-dimensional, paired kilo Voltage imaging.

CONCLUSION

Variation in fiducial marker practice across the UK is considerable. Standardisation is required to support centres and healthcare professionals developing this service. Seven recommendations, to unify practice, have been proposed based on survey results and literature.

Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is safe even when patients are on combination antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy

Background

To assess whether hemorrhagic complications associated with transperineal prostate biopsy increased in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy.

Methods

In total, 598 consecutive patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsy. The medication group comprised patients who took anti-thromboembolic agents, and the control group comprised those who did not take these agents. No anti-thromboembolic agent was stopped before, during, or after prostate biopsy in the medication group. Complications developing in both groups were compared and classified using the modified Clavien classification system. Subgroup analyses to compare complications in patients taking single antiplatelet, single anticoagulant, and dual antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents, and multivariate analyses to predict bleeding risk were also performed.

Results

Of the 598 eligible patients, 149 comprised the medication group and 449 comprised the control group. Hematuria (Grade I) developed in 88 (59.1%) and 236 (52.5%) patients in the medication and control group, respectively (p = 0.18). Clot retention (Grade I) was more frequently observed in the medication group than the controls (2.0% versus 0.2%, respectively, p < 0.05). Hospitalization was more frequently prolonged in the medication than the control group (4.0% versus 0.4% of patients, respectively). No complication of Grade III or higher developed in either group. Hematuria was more frequent in patients taking a single anticoagulant (p = 0.007) or two anti-thromboembolic agents (p = 0.04) compared with those taking a single antiplatelet agent. Other complications were generally similar among the groups. In the multivariate analysis, taking more than two anti-thromboembolic agents was the only significant risk factor for bleeding events.

Conclusion

No severe complication developed after the transperineal biopsies in either group, although minor bleeding was somewhat more frequent in the medication group. It may not be necessary to discontinue anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents when transperineal prostate biopsy is contemplated.

The effect of ultrasound-guided compression immediately after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on postbiopsy bleeding: a randomized controlled pilot study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether ultrasound-guided compression performed immediately after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy decreases bleeding complications.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated a total of 148 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between March 2015 and July 2016. Systematic 12-core prostate biopsy was performed in all patients. Of these, 100 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the compression group (n = 50) underwent TRUS-guided compression on bleeding biopsy tracts immediately after prostate biopsy, while the non-compression group (n = 50) underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy alone. The incidence rate and duration of hematuria, hematospermia, and rectal bleeding were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of hematuria and hematospermia were not significantly different between the two groups (60 vs. 64%, p = 0.68; 22 vs. 30%, p = 0.362, respectively, for compression vs. non-compression group). The rectal bleeding incidence was significantly lower in the compression group as compared to the non-compression group (20 vs. 44%, p = 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the median duration of hematuria, hematospermia, or rectal bleeding between the two groups (2, 8, and 2 days vs. 2, 10, and 1 days, p > 0.05, respectively, for compression vs. non-compression group). TRUS-guided compression [p = 0.004, odds ratio (OR) 0.25] and patient age (p = 0.013, OR 0.93) were significantly protective against the occurrence of rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it has no impact on other complications, ultrasound-guided compression on bleeding biopsy tracts performed immediately after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is an effective and practical method to treat or decrease rectal bleeding.

Safety of heparin bridging therapy for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients requiring temporary discontinuation of antithrombotic agents

BACKGROUND

Safety of heparin bridging therapy for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (TRUS) biopsy in patients requiring temporary discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy is unknown. This study aimed to assess the relationship between heparin bridging therapy and the incidence of complications after TRUS biopsy.

METHODS

From January 2005 to November 2015, we performed 1307 consecutive TRUS biopsies on 1134 patients in our hospital. The patients were assigned to two groups: those without heparin bridging (the control group) and those with temporary discontinuation of antithrombotic agents with heparin bridging therapy (the bridging group). A 10-12-core TRUS biopsy was performed; the patients were evaluated for bleeding-related complications.

RESULTS

Of 1134 patients, 1109 (1281 biopsies) and 25 (26 biopsies) were assigned to the control and bridging group, respectively. Patient background did not significantly differ between the control and bridging groups, except for age, history of diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and CHADS2 scores. Compared with the control group, the bridging group showed a significantly higher rate of complication for any complication (35 vs. 8.3%, P < 0.001), bleeding-related complications (27 vs. 4.4%), and urinary tract infection (7.7 vs. 1.2%). No thromboembolic event was observed in the present study. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that heparin bridging therapy was a significant risk factor for the incidence of any complication and bleeding-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin bridging therapy with temporal discontinuation of antithrombotic agents may increase the risk of complications after TRUS biopsy. Further, large-scale studies are required to clarify the safety of heparin bridging therapy.

Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy

CONTEXT

Prostate biopsy (PB) represents the gold standard method to confirm the presence of cancer. In addition to traditional random or systematic approaches, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided technique has been introduced recently.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of complications after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided, transperineal, and MRI-guided PB.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic literature search of Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases up to October 2015, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Complications and mortality following random, systematic, and image-guided PBs were reviewed. Eighty-five references were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The most frequent complication after PB was minor and self-limiting bleeding (hematuria and hematospermia), regardless of the biopsy approach. Occurrence of rectal bleeding was comparable for traditional TRUS-guided and image-guided PBs. Almost 25% of patients experienced lower urinary tract symptoms, but only a few had urinary retention, with higher rates after a transperineal approach. Temporary erectile dysfunction was not negligible, with a return to baseline after 1-6 mo. The incidence of infective complications is increasing, with higher rates among men with medical comorbidities and older age. Transperineal and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy may reduce the risk of severe infectious complications. Mortality after PB is uncommon, regardless of biopsy technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications after PB are frequent but often self-limiting. The incidence of hospitalization due to severe infections is continuously increasing. The patient's general health status, risk factors, and likelihood of antimicrobial resistance should be carefully appraised before scheduling a PB.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the variety and incidence of complications after prostate biopsy. Even if frequent, complications seldom represent a problem for the patient. The most troublesome complications are infections. To minimize this risk, the patient's medical condition should be carefully evaluated before biopsy.

Safety of 12 core transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients on aspirin

Objective:

To prospectively assess safety outcome of TRUS guided prostate biopsy in patients taking low dose aspirin.

Materials and methods:

Consecutive patients, who were planned for 12 core TRUS guided prostate biopsy and satisfied eligibility criteria, were included in the study and divided into two Groups: Group A: patients on aspirin during biopsy, Group B: patients not on aspirin during biopsy, including patients in whom aspirin was stopped prior to the biopsy. Parameters included for statistical analysis were: age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, hemoglobin (Hb %), number of hematuria episodes, number of patient reporting hematuria, hematuria requiring intervention, number of patient reporting hematospermia and number of patient reporting rectal bleeding.

Results:

Of 681 eligible patients, Group A and B had 191 and 490 patients respectively. The mean age, prostate volume, serum PSA and pre-biopsy hemoglobin were similar in both Groups with no significant differences noted between them. None of the post-biopsy complications, including number of hematuria episodes (p=0.83), number of patients reporting hematuria (p=0.55), number of patients reporting hematospermia (p=0.36) and number of patients reporting rectal bleeding (p=0.65), were significantly different between Groups A and B respectively. None of the hemorrhagic complication in either group required intervention and were self limiting.

Conclusion:

Continuing low dose aspirin during TRUS guided prostate biopsy neither alters the minor bleeding episodes nor causes major bleeding complication. So, discontinuation of low dose aspirin prior to TRUS guided prostate biopsy is not required.

[Prostate biopsy: Procedure in the clinical routine]

Over the last decade there has been a 25% decrease in the mortality rates for prostate cancer. The reasons for this significant decrease are most likely associated with the application of urological screening tests. The main tools for early detection are currently increased public awareness of the disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided topographically assignable biopsy sampling. Together with the histopathological results these features provide essential information for risk stratification, diagnostics and therapy decisions. The evolution of prostate biopsy techniques as well as the use of PSA testing has led to an increased identification of asymptomatic men, where further clarification is necessary. Significant efforts and increased clinical research focus on determining the appropriate indications for a prostate biopsy and the optimal technique to achieve better detection rates. The most widely used imaging modality for the prostate is TRUS; however, there are no clearly defined standards for the clinical approach for each individual biopsy procedure, dealing with continuous technical optimization and in particular the developments in imaging. In this review the current principles, techniques, new approaches and instrumentation of prostate biopsy imaging control are presented within the framework of the structured educational approach.

Continuing aspirin therapy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: unsafe or under-utilized?

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin, as an inhibitor of platelets, is traditionally discontinued prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) given the concern for increased surgical hemorrhage. However, this practice is based on expert opinion only, and mounting evidence suggests holding aspirin perioperatively can be more harmful than once thought. We sought to compared PCNL outcomes and complications in patients continuing aspirin to those stopping aspirin perioperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 321 consecutive PCNLs done between July 2012 and March 2014. Patients were separated into two groups. The on-aspirin group consisted of patients continuing aspirin throughout the perioperative period. The off-aspirin group had aspirin held temporarily pre- and postoperatively. Surgical outcomes and complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 321 PCNLs, 60 (18.7%) occurred in patients chronically taking aspirin. The on-aspirin group included 17 PCNLs (5.2%), while the off-aspirin group included 43 PCNLs (13.4%). There were no differences between groups in terms of operative time (77 minutes vs 74 minutes, p=0.212), hemoglobin change (p=0.522), stone size (21 mm vs 22 mm, p=1.0), stone-free rate (p=0.314), median length of hospitalization (p=0.642), transfusion rate (p=0.703), or total complications (p=1.0). No patient experienced a thromboembolic event.

CONCLUSIONS

PCNL is safe in patients continuing aspirin perioperatively and does not result in more blood transfusions, angioembolization procedures, or complications. Patients with large stone burdens who are at high risk for thromboembolic events appear to be able to safely undergo PCNL without discontinuing aspirin.

Continued administration of antithrombotic agents during transperineal prostate biopsy

Purpose

To determine the safety of continued administration of antithrombotic agents during transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy.

Patients and Methods

A total of 811 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided TP biopsy from January 2008 to June 2012 at our two institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Among these 811 men, 672 received no antithrombotic agents (group I), 103 received and continued administration of antithrombotic agents (group II), and 36 interrupted administration of antithrombotic agents (group III). Overall complications were graded and hemorrhagic complications were compared (group I with group II) using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Results

An overall complication rate of 4.6% was recorded. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 1.8% and they were virtually identical in all the three groups, and no severe hemorrhagic complications occurred. One patient in group III required intensive care unit admission for cerebral infarction. PSM analysis revealed no statistical difference between groups I and II with regard to the incidence of gross hematuria, perineal hematoma, and rectal bleeding. Multiple regression analysis revealed that hemorrhagic complications were associated with lower body mass index (<21 kg/m², P=0.0058), but not with administration of antithrombotic agents.

Conclusions

Continued administration of antithrombotic agents does not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications; these agents are well tolerated during TP biopsy.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention

OBJECTIVE

To identify, appraise and summarize the current evidence regarding the pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

METHODS

Two comprehensive systematic reviews were carried out: one examined methods of predicting either high ovarian response or OHSS and the other examined interventions aimed at reducing the occurrence of OHSS. Additionally, we describe the related pathophysiology and staging criteria.

RESULTS

Seven studies examining methods of predicting OHSS and eight more examining methods of predicting high ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation were included. Current evidence shows that the best methods of predicting high response are antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone levels, and that a high ovarian response (examined by the number of large follicles, estradiol concentration or the number of retrieved oocytes) is the best method of predicting the occurrence of OHSS. Ninety-seven randomized controlled trials examining the effect of several interventions for reducing the occurrence of OHSS were included. There was high-quality evidence that replacing human chorionic gonadotropin by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or recombinant luteinizing hormone, and moderate-quality evidence that antagonist protocols, dopamine agonists and mild stimulation, reduce the occurrence of OHSS. The evidence for the effect of the other interventions was of low/very low quality. Additionally, we identified and described 12 different staging criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

There are useful predictive tools and several preventive interventions aimed at reducing the occurrence of OHSS. Acknowledging and understanding them are of crucial importance for planning the treatment of, and, ultimately, eliminating, OHSS while maintaining high pregnancy rates.

Biopsy sampling and histopathological markers for diagnosis of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Irrespective of the method that allows for risk stratification of prostate cancer suspects, diagnosis relies on tissue sampling through prostate biopsy and subsequent histopathological evaluation. This provides critical information about disease aggressiveness, which is required for adequate patient management. Prostate biopsy methods have significantly evolved over the years, including the definition of indications, sampling schemes and use of imaging techniques (ultrasound and MRI) that allow for more accurate tissue sampling. In response to the challenges emerging from more precise collection of minute prostate tissue samples for analysis, histopathological assessment should include not only the observation of routinely stained sections, but also, and increasingly so, a series of ancillary techniques, especially immunohistochemistry, which increment the accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis and may provide relevant information to guide patient management.

Open and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy in men receiving ongoing low-dose aspirin medication: revisiting an old paradigm?

OBJECTIVE

To assess blood loss, transfusion rates and 90-day complication rates in patients receiving ongoing 100 mg/day aspirin medication and undergoing open radical prostatectomy (RP) or robot-assisted RP (RARP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2010 and August 2011, 2061 open RPs and 400 RARPs were performed. All patients received low-molecular-weight heparin for thrombembolism prophylaxis. Aspirin intake during surgery was recorded in 137 patients (5.5%). Descriptive statistics and multivariable analyses after propensity-score matching for balancing potential differences in patients with and without aspirin medication were used to assess the risk of blood loss above the median in patients undergoing open RP or RARP.

RESULTS

The median blood loss in the open RP cohort with and without aspirin medication was 750 and 700 mL, respectively, and in the RARP cohort it was 200 and 150 mL, respectively. Within the same cohorts, transfusions were administered in 21 and 8% and 0 and 1% of patients, respectively. The 90-day complication rates in patients with ongoing aspirin medication were 5.8, 4.4, 7.3 and 0% for Clavien grades I, II, III and IV complications, respectively. In multivariable analyses and after propensity-score matching, prostate volume (odds ratio 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.04; P < 0.01) but not ongoing aspirin medication achieved independent predictor status for the risk of blood loss above the median.

CONCLUSIONS

Major surgery such as open RP and RARP can be safely performed in patients with ongoing aspirin medication without greater blood loss. Higher 90-day complication rates were not detected in such patients. Differences in transfusion rates between the groups receiving and not receiving ongoing aspirin medication may be explained by a higher proportion of patients with coronary artery disease in the group receiving ongoing aspirin medication. This comorbidity may result in a higher peri-operative threshold for allogenic blood transfusion.

[ASA and clopidogrel for urological operations. Perioperative management]

In a systematic overview and meta-analysis among more than 50,000 patients at risk for coronary artery disease, not adhering to or discontinuing aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA) was associated with a significantly increased risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction or death. Withdrawal of low dose aspirin was correlated with a threefold increase in the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. This risk is present irrespective of the length of time patients had been taking low dose aspirin. Therefore, in patients on chronic low dose aspirin for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, aspirin should never be discontinued. In the few available studies in urological surgery the increase in bleeding does not translate into a significant increase in specific morbidity. This seems to be also true for the additional administration of clopidogrel to aspirin. Nevertheless, in patients with drug-eluting stents and dual antiplatelet therapy, urologists should ensure a multidisciplinary management of the perioperative course.

Optimization of prostate biopsy: review of technique and complications

A 12-core systematic biopsy that incorporates apical and far-lateral cores in the template distribution allows maximal cancer detection and avoidance of a repeat biopsy while minimizing the detection of insignificant prostate cancers. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy has an evolving role in both initial and repeat prostate biopsy strategies, potentially improving sampling efficiency, increasing the detection of clinically significant cancers, and reducing the detection of insignificant cancers. Hematuria, hematospermia, and rectal bleeding are common complications of prostate needle biopsy, but are generally self-limiting and well tolerated. All men should receive antimicrobial prophylaxis before biopsy.

Complications of prostate biopsy

Biopsy of the prostate is a common procedure with minor complications that are usually self-limited. However, if one considers that millions of men undergo biopsy worldwide, one realizes that although complication rate is low, the number of patients suffering from biopsy complications should not be underestimated and can be a clinically relevant problem for healthcare professionals. In this review, the authors present diagnosis and management of postbiopsy of prostate complications. Bleeding is the most common complication observed after prostate biopsy, but the use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is not an absolute contraindication to prostate biopsy. Emerging resistance to ciprofloxacin is the most probable cause of the increasing risk of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. Even though extremely rare, fatal complications are possible and were described in case reports.

Transrectal prostate biopsy

Grayscale transrectal ultrasonographic prostate biopsy using local anesthesia remains the standard approach to the definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer. Careful patient evaluation and preparation are essential to maximize the results and minimize the complications of the biopsy procedure.

Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy

CONTEXT

Prostate biopsy is commonly performed for cancer detection and management. The benefits and risks of prostate biopsy are germane to ongoing debates about prostate cancer screening and treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of complications from prostate biopsy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase, supplemented with additional references. Articles were reviewed for data on the following complications: hematuria, rectal bleeding, hematospermia, infection, pain, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary retention, erectile dysfunction, and mortality.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After biopsy, hematuria and hematospermia are common but typically mild and self-limiting. Severe rectal bleeding is uncommon. Despite antimicrobial prophylaxis, infectious complications are increasing over time and are the most common reason for hospitalization after biopsy. Pain may occur at several stages of prostate biopsy and can be mitigated by anesthetic agents and anxiety-reduction techniques. Up to 25% of men have transient LUTS after biopsy, and <2% have frank urinary retention, with slightly higher rates reported after transperineal template biopsy. Biopsy-related mortality is rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Preparation for biopsy should include antimicrobial prophylaxis and pain management. Prostate biopsy is frequently associated with minor bleeding and urinary symptoms that usually do not require intervention. Infectious complications can be serious, requiring prompt management and continued work into preventative strategies.

Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) was first developed in the 1970s. TRUS-guided biopsy, under local anaesthetic and prophylactic antibiotics, is now the most widely accepted method to diagnose prostate cancer. However, the sensitivity and specificity of greyscale TRUS in the detection of prostate cancer is low. Prostate cancer most commonly appears as a hypoechoic focal lesion in the peripheral zone on TRUS but the appearances are variable with considerable overlap with benign lesions. Because of the low accuracy of greyscale TRUS, TRUS-guided biopsies have become established in the acquisition of systematic biopsies from standard locations. The number of systematic biopsies has increased over the years, with 10-12 cores currently accepted as the minimum standard. This article describes the technique of TRUS and biopsy and its complications. Novel modalities including contrast-enhanced modes and elastography as well as fusion techniques for increasing the sensitivity of TRUS-guided prostate-targeted biopsies are discussed along with their role in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Should more patients continue aspirin therapy perioperatively?: clinical impact of aspirin withdrawal syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To provide an evidence-based focused review of aspirin use in the perioperative period along with an in-depth discussion of the considerations and risks associated with its preoperative withdrawal.

BACKGROUND

For patients with established cardiovascular disease, taking aspirin is considered a critical therapy. The cessation of aspirin can cause a platelet rebound phenomenon and prothrombotic state leading to major adverse cardiovascular events. Despite the risks of aspirin withdrawal, which are exacerbated during the perioperative period, standard practice has been to stop aspirin before elective surgery for fear of excessive bleeding. Mounting evidence suggests that this practice should be abandoned.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed and Medline literature search using the keywords aspirin, withdrawal, and perioperative. We manually reviewed relevant citations for inclusion.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should employ a patient-specific strategy for perioperative aspirin management that weighs the risks of stopping aspirin with those associated with its continuation. Most patients, especially those taking aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention, should have their aspirin continued throughout the perioperative period. When aspirin is held preoperatively, the aspirin withdrawal syndrome may significantly increase the risk of a major thromboembolic complication. For many operative procedures, the risk of perioperative bleeding while continuing aspirin is minimal, as compared with the concomitant thromboembolic risks associated with aspirin withdrawal. Those cases where aspirin should be stopped include patients undergoing intracranial, middle ear, posterior eye, intramedullary spine, and possibly transurethral prostatectomy surgery.

Low-dose aspirin and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

Low-dose aspirin is a common strategy for preventing cardiovascular disease and associated mortality. A recent individual patient data meta-analysis of 8 trials of low- and high-dose aspirin, with long-term follow-up, found important reductions in cancer mortality. We aimed to determine whether cancer mortality also is reduced by low-dose aspirin in the shorter term.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of 10 electronic databases up to December 2011. We conducted a meta-analysis using data from all randomized clinical trials evaluating low-dose (75-325 mg) daily aspirin. We extracted data on non-cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality. We pooled studies using a random-effects model and conducted a meta-regression. We supplemented this with a cumulative meta-analysis and trial sequential monitoring analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three randomized studies reported on nonvascular death. There were 944 nonvascular deaths of 41,398 (2.28%) patients receiving low-dose aspirin and 1074 nonvascular deaths of 41,470 (2.58%) patients not receiving aspirin therapy. The relative risk of nonvascular death was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.96, I(2) = 0%). Eleven trials included data evaluating cancer mortality involving 16,066 patients. There were 162 of 7998 (2.02%) and 210 of 8068 (2.60%) cancer deaths among low-dose aspirin users versus non-aspirin users, respectively, reported over an average follow-up of 2.8 years. The relative risk of cancer mortality was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.95, I(2) = 0%). Studies demonstrated a significant treatment effect after approximately 4 years of follow-up. The optimal information size analysis showed that a sufficient number of patients had been randomized to provide convincing evidence of a preventive role of low-dose aspirin in nonvascular deaths.

CONCLUSION

Nonvascular deaths, including cancer deaths, are reduced with low-dose aspirin.

Discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: a single-center experience

Purpose

Historically, it was thought that hemorrhagic complications were increased with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies (TRUS biopsy) of patients receiving anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy. However, the current literature supports the continuation of anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy without additional morbidity. We assessed our experience regarding the continuation of anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy during TRUS biopsy.

Materials and Methods

A total of 91 and 98 patients were included in the anticoagulation/antiplatelet (group I) and control (group II) groups, respectively. Group I subgroups consisted of patients on monotherapy or dual therapy of aspirin, warfarin, clopidogrel, or low molecular weight heparin. The TRUS biopsy technique was standardized to 12 cores from the peripheral zones. Patients completed a questionnaire over the 7 days following TRUS biopsy. The questionnaire was designed to assess the presence of hematuria, rectal bleeding, and hematospermia. Development of rectal pain, fever, and emergency hospital admissions following TRUS biopsy were also recorded.

Results

The patients' mean age was 65 years (range, 52 to 74 years) and 63.5 years (range, 54 to 74 years) in groups I and II, respectively. The overall incidence of hematuria was 46% in group I compared with 63% in group II (p=0.018). The incidence of hematospermia was 6% and 10% in groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of rectal bleeding was similar in group I (40%) and group II (39%). Statistical analysis was conducted by using Fisher exact test.

Conclusions

There were fewer hematuria episodes in anticoagulation/antiplatelet patients. This study suggests that it is not necessary to discontinue anticoagulation/antiplatelet treatment before TRUS biopsy.

Laparoscopic-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation is Safe for the Treatment of Enhancing Renal Masses Among Patients Prescribed Antithrombotic Agents

Patients undergoing laparoscopic-guided radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) for the treatment of a renal mass are commonly prescribed antithrombotic agents for the management of comorbid medical diseases. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of LRFA in this group. From October 2005 to June 2010, 109 patients underwent LRFA. Antithrombotic therapy was prescribed to 52 of these patients. Agents were managed the week of surgery per current practice guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians. Intraoperatively, patients prescribed at least one antithrombotic agent lost a median of 10 mL of blood, while patients not on an antithrombotic agent also lost 10 mL of blood (P = .828). Both groups had a similar rate of procedure-related complications (intraoperative, P = 1.00; postoperative, P = .673). No patient required a blood transfusion or experienced a postoperative thromboembolic event. In conclusion, when current practice guidelines are followed, LRFA is safe among patients prescribed antithrombotic agents.

Low doses of acetylsalicylic acid increase risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed a meta-analysis of data from randomized trials to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality and bleeding (and especially gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding) in patients treated with low doses of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (75-325 mg/d), alone or in combination with other medications.

METHODS

We searched 10 electronic databases (until October 2010) and collected data on adverse events in randomized controlled studies that evaluated low doses of ASA, alone (35 trials) or in combination with anticoagulants (18 trials), clopidogrel (5 trials), or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 3 trials). We analyzed data using random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression, applying Peto's odds ratio (OR) for adverse events.

RESULTS

Low doses of ASA alone decreased the risk for all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99), largely because of effects in secondary prevention populations. The risk of major GI bleeding increased with low doses of ASA alone (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.27-1.90), compared with inert control reagents. The risk increased when ASA was combined with clopidogrel, compared with aspirin alone (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.49-2.31), anticoagulants vs low doses of ASA alone (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.42-2.61), or in studies that included patients with a history of GI bleeding or of longer duration. Importantly, PPI use reduced the risk for major GI bleeding in patients given low doses of ASA (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

In a meta-analysis, low doses of ASA increased the risk for GI bleeding; risk increased with accompanying use of clopidogrel and anticoagulant therapies, but decreased in patients who took PPIs.

Antiplatelet drugs and the perioperative period: What every urologist needs to know

Antiplatelet agents like aspirin and clopidogrel are widely used for indications ranging from primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction or stroke to prevention of coronary stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. When patients receiving antiplatelet drugs are scheduled for surgery, urologists commonly advise routine periprocedural withdrawal of these drugs to decrease the hemorrhagic risks that may be associated if such therapy is continued in the perioperative period. This approach may be inappropriate as stopping antiplatelet drugs often exposes the patient to a more serious risk, i.e. the risk of developing an arterial thrombosis with its potentially fatal consequences. Moreover, it has been seen that the increase in perioperative bleeding if such drugs are continued is usually of a quantitative nature and does not shift the bleeding complication to a higher risk quality. We, in this mini review, look at the physiological role and pathological implications of platelets, commonly used antiplatelet therapy and how continuation or discontinuation of such therapy in the perioperative period affects the hemorrhagic and thrombotic risks, respectively. Literature on the subject between 1985 and 2008 is reviewed. The consensus that seems to have emerged is that the policy of routine discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative period must be discouraged and risk stratification must be employed while making decisions regarding continuation or temporary discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Although antiplatelet drugs may be discontinued in patients at a low risk for an arterial thrombotic event, they must be continued in patients where the risks of bleeding and complications related to excessive bleeding are less than the risks of developing arterial thrombosis.