Ureteral Fibrin Sealant Injection of the Distal Ureter During Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy—A Novel and Simple Modification of the Pluck Technique

Totally Retroperitoneal One-Position Approach for Laparoscopic Radical Surgery in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Clinical Trial Evaluation

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) traditionally involved open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. Despite the adoption of transabdominal laparoscopic one-stage nephroureterectomy to mitigate this, the persistently high rate of postoperative intestinal obstruction remains a clinical challenge. This study introduces an innovative approach: a single-position, completely retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy coupled with a 75-45-degree positional change for bladder cuff resection in the treatment of UTUC. The study further evaluates the clinical efficacy of this novel surgical technique.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 125 patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at our institution between May 2018 and December 2023. The experimental cohort comprised 65 individuals who received total retroperitoneal one-position laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (TROLN), complete with total intracorporeal bladder cuffing and distal ureterectomy. In contrast, the control cohort included 60 patients who had laparoscopic nephrectomy with a lower abdominal oblique incision for bladder sleeve resection. The study evaluated various perioperative metrics, such as operative duration, blood loss during surgery, incision size, resumption of oral intake postoperatively, drainage tube removal timeline, hospital stay duration, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment, and complication incidence. In addition, pathological and oncological outcomes were scrutinized.

RESULTS

The TROLN group exhibited pronounced benefits across various surgical outcomes, including reduced operative duration, minimized intraoperative blood loss, shorter incision lengths, lower postoperative pain assessments, expedited return to oral nutrition, swifter drain extraction, and a condensed overall hospitalization period (all P < 0. 05). However, the oncological outcomes showed no significant differences between the TROLN group and the control group.

CONCLUSION

Drawing from our clinical insights, TROLN is a safe and effective modified technique that offers advantages over traditional laparoscopic combined with open surgery for treating UTUC, including reduced invasiveness, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays. However, additional prospective studies are imperative to validate these observations.

Controversies in management of the bladder cuff at nephroureterectomy

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for roughly 5% of urothelial carcinomas. Historically, the gold standard for high-risk or bulky low-risk UTUC was an open radical nephroureterectomy with formal bladder cuff excision (BCE). The development of novel endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques has transformed this operation, yet no level I evidence exists at present that demonstrates the superiority of one strategy over another. While new approaches to nephroureterectomy in the last decade have shifted the management paradigm to decrease the morbidity of surgery, controversy continues to surround the approach to the distal ureter and bladder cuff. Debate continues within the urologic community over which surgical approach is best when managing UTUC and how various approaches impact clinical outcomes such as intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific mortality (DSM). When focusing on the existing treatment algorithm, key metrics of quality include (I) removal of the entire specimen en bloc, (II) minimizing the risk of tumor and urine spillage, (III) R0 resection, and (IV) water-tight closure allowing for early use of prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy. In the absence of robust evidence demonstrating a single superior approach, the urologic surgeon should base decisions on technical comfort and each patient's particular clinical circumstance.

Management of the Distal Ureter in Radical Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Introduction: Management of the distal ureter during laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is controversial. The aim of this review was to determine whether this affects oncological outcomes. Methods: A literature review was conducted searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in June 2019. Studies reporting outcomes of LNU in UTUC using either open, laparoscopic, or endoscopic approaches to excise the distal ureter were identified. All eligible studies underwent critical appraisal and were excluded if not of sufficient quality. Cumulative analysis of the results was performed. Results: Nine studies with a total of 383 patients (168 open, 159 laparoscopic, and 56 endoscopic excision of distal ureter) were eligible for inclusion. Study design and outcome reporting were variable between studies. Mean age of patients was comparable (67.7 years versus 65.0 years versus 66.6 years). Mean follow-up duration was comparable between open and laparoscopic groups (46.2 months versus 45.5 months) but reduced in the endoscopic group (33.4 months). The open group had a higher proportion of high grade/G3 tumors and pT2-4 tumors when compared to the laparoscopic and endoscopic groups (P < .001 and P = .002). The open group had a higher rate of intravesical recurrence and the laparoscopic group had a higher rate of distant metastases (P < .001). Conclusion: This review has identified differences in oncological outcomes between different techniques of managing the distal ureter in LNU for UTUC. However, the poor reporting of potentially confounding factors does not enable any one technique to be recommended as superior and requires further research.

Agarwal PolyLoop Ligation Technique for the Management of the Distal Ureter during Laparoscopic Assisted Nephroureterectomy

Objective

Management of the distal ureter during radical nephroureterectomy remains a controversial issue. This article describes a simple endoscopic PolyLoop ligation technique for managing the distal ureter during radical nephroureterectomy.

Technique

This endoscopic technique was used in 6 cases to manage the distal ureter during laparoscopic-assisted radical nephroureterectomy. The distal ureter with en bloc bladder cuff was managed endoscopically. The distal ureteric orifice with 1 cm bladder cuff was circumscribed using a Collins knife. Commercially available, Olympus detachable PolyLoop was used to ligate the ureteric stump to avoid urine spillage from the upper tract. Once ureteric stump was ligated with a PolyLoop, the distal ureter was mobilized by dividing the periureteric adhesions using a Collins knife.

Results

Distal ureter was managed successfully in all 6 cases using commercially available detachable Polyloop from Olympus. There were no perioperative complications relating to this technique.

Conclusion

The PolyLoop ligation technique offers a simple and safer alternative to manage the distal ureter during radical nephroureterectomy.

A comparative study of different surgical techniques for the management of distal ureter during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the oncological outcomes between two open surgical techniques and two endoscopic approaches for the management of the distal ureter during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 152 patients submitted to LRNU for the management of upper urinary tract tumors between 2007-2014. We analyzed the potential impact of two different open surgical (extravesical vs intravesical) and two endoscopic (resection of ureteral orifice and fragment removal vs endoscopic bladder cuff) techniques on the development of bladder recurrence, distant/local recurrence and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients with a mean age of 69.9 years (±10.1) underwent LRNU. We reported 62 pTa-T1 (41%), 35 pT2 (23%) and 55 pT3-4 (36%). Thirty-two were low grade (21.1%) and 120 high grade (78.9%). An endoscopic approach was performed in 89 cases (58.5%), 32 with resection (36%) and 57 with bladder cuff (64%), and open approach in 63 (41.5%), 42 intravesical (66.7%) and 21 extravesical (33.3%). Within a median follow-up of 32 months (3-120), 38 patients (25%) developed bladder recurrence, 42 distant/local recurrence (27.6%) and 34 died of tumor (22.4%). In the univariate analysis, the type of endoscopic technique was not related to bladder recurrence (P=.961), distant/local recurrence (P=.955) nor CSS (P=.802). The open extravesical approach was not related to bladder recurrence (P=.12) but increased distant/local recurrence (P=.045) and decreased CSS (P=.034) compared to intravesical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

LRNU outcomes are not dependant on the type of endoscopic approach performed. The open extravesical approach is a more difficult technique and could worsen the oncological outcomes when compared to the intravesical.

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with laser endoscopic transuretral disinsertion in lateral decubitus: progressive adaptation to retroperitoneocopic approach

BACKGROUND

The ureteral disinsertion with bladder cuff technique continues to evolve. We present the endoscopic laser transurethral technique combined with a transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach in lateral decubitus, without patient repositioning, for treating urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present 3 laparoscopic nephroureterectomies: 1 transperitoneal and 2 retroperitoneal. Disinsertion was performed in lateral decubitus using a flexible cystoscope and a 365-μm holmium laser fiber. The endoscopic technique was progressively adapted to 3-port and single-port retroperitoneoscopic approaches. Before laparoscopic handling of the kidney, ureter was clamped below the tumour. The endoscopic technique was then started. Both approaches were simultaneously employed.

RESULTS

Nephroureterectomies were achieved performing en bloc endoscopic disinsertion of the bladder cuff and ensuring a closed system comparable to open technique. The second case required reconversion due to technical problems and extension of the surgical time. No relapses were diagnosed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Results are comparable to open surgery, technique ensured compliance to oncology principles, enabled disinsertion in lateral decubitus and avoid patient repositioning saving surgical time. The results reflect the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in all cases.

Techniques to resect the distal ureter in robotic/laparoscopic nephroureterectomy

Treatment of clinically-organ confined high grade urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract has historically comprised open nephroureterectomy, with the distal ureter and bladder cuff mobilized through a separate open pelvic incision. To decrease morbidity, urologists have increasingly adopted laparoscopy and robotics in performing nephroureterectomy. In many published series of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, the distal ureter and bladder cuff are detached from the bladder endoscopically by a variation of the “pluck” technique, with the resulting bladder defect left to heal by prolonged indwelling urethral catheter drainage. While the distal ureter and bladder cuff can be excised laparoscopically, it does require advanced laparoscopic skills. With the wrist articulation and stereoscopic vision in robotic surgery, robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) and bladder cuff excision can be performed in antegrade fashion to mimic the open technique together with the ability to intracorporeally close the bladder defect in a watertight, mucosa to mucosa fashion after excising the bladder cuff. In this review, we discuss the published minimally invasive techniques in resecting the distal ureter and bladder cuff during laparoscopic and RNU.

Laparascopic nephrectomy: different techniques and approaches

Nephrectomy is, perhaps, one of the techniques in which laparoscopic approach has been widely used. It has quickly evolved since Clayman introduced it in 1990 with a renal tumor. Since then, its goodness has been extrapolated to most entities that require surgical removal of the kidney. We review the current most discussed aspects referred to the main laparoscopic nephrectomy techniques (simple nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, radical, and nephron-sparing nephrectomy) and particularities of this approach.

Simultaneous radical nephroureterectomy and transurethral distal ureter balloon occlusion and detachment

Background

Distal ureter bladder cuff (DUBC) excision is an essential part of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) but there is no agreement on the ideal surgical technique to achieve it. We describe a novel technique for endoscopic DUBC excision during RNU that complies with the oncological principle of preventing spillage of tumor cells, by occluding the distal ureter before its excision, while shortening surgical time, and by avoiding repositioning the patient.

Methods

Between June 2010 and May 2012, 10 patients underwent simultaneous open RNU and transurethral distal ureter balloon occlusion and detachment using a flexible cystoscope (f-TUDUBOD) in lumbotomy position. After having ruled out the presence of a concomitant bladder tumor, one surgeon used a flexible cystoscope to occlude the affected ureter with a 5Fr Fogarty catheter and circumferentially incised the orifice until detaching it from the bladder with a boogie electrode or a Holmium laser; meanwhile, two other surgeons performed open RNU through a lumbotomic approach. Data were compared with those of patients who had previously undergone open RNU after TUDUBOD.

Results

Mean surgical time for simultaneous open RNU and f-TUDUBOD was 113.4 ± 29.2 minutes, significantly shorter (P <0.01) than that for open RNU after TUDUBOD (154.2 ± 26.4 minutes). There were no complications. Surgical margins were always negative; at mean follow-up of 31.1 months, there was no recurrence in the perivesical space and a 20% (2/10) bladder recurrence rate comparing favorably with that (23.1%) observed at 30-month follow-up in patients who had undergone open RNU after TUDUBOD.

Conclusions

Simultaneous open RNU and f-TUDUBOD proved to be feasible and to represent a safe and effective means of shortening surgical time, with obvious clinical and economical benefits.

Total retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder-cuff resection for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Open nephroureterectomy (ONU) and bladder cuff resection (ONU-BCR) has been the gold standard of surgical treatment for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (UUT-TCC). The aim of this study is to introduce a modified total retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) with bladder-cuff resection (LNU-BCR) method for treating UUT-TCC and compare its clinical efficacy with ONU-BCR.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with UUT-TCC, who underwent ONU-BCR (n = 36) or LNU-BCR (n = 29) between January 2008 and June 2012, were analyzed in this retrospective study. Perioperative data as well as incidence of disease recurrence at the primary site or distant metastasis was compared in patients with at least 6 months follow-up.

RESULTS

As compared with patients with ONU-BCR, the patients with LNU-BCR had significantly shorter operative time, lower estimated blood loss, shorter time to oral intake, lower analgesic dose, shorter duration of analgesic use, shorter duration of incision drainage tube, shorter time to ambulation out of bed and reduced postoperative hospital stay (all, p < .05). No significant difference in postoperative complications or incidence of bladder carcinoma recurrence and distant metastasis during the follow-up period was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified LNU-BCR represents an effective and safe alternative technique to ONU-BCR with the advantages of reduced invasiveness, bleeding and hospitalization.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: current treatment and outcomes

The reference standard treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is open radical nephroureterectomy. Many centers have advocated less-invasive treatment modalities. We reviewed contemporary treatments of upper tract urothelial carcinoma and their outcomes. A MEDLINE search was conducted for all relevant published data during the past 15 years. Endoscopic management is feasible for low-grade disease with strict surveillance protocols. Radical nephroureterectomy remains the reference standard for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. The intermediate-term oncologic outcomes are similar between the laparoscopic and open approaches. Controversies still exist regarding the optimal management of the distal ureter, the utility of topical therapy, and the role of lymphadenectomy.

Complete laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with intravesical lockable clip

Introduction

We present a cohort of patients with low-stage pelviureteric neoplastic disease who underwent complete laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (CLNUE) with intravesical lockable clip (IVLC). Due to the absence of a standard technique of NUE, the study was not randomized.

Materials

From 1/2010 to 1/2012, 21 patients were subjected to CLNUE-IVLC. The first step was transurethral excision of the ureterovesical junction with Collin's knife deep into the paravesical adipose tissue. The ureter was grasped with biopsy forceps and the distal end of the ureter was occluded with lockable clip. The applicator was introduced through a 5 mm port inserted as an epicystostomy. The patients were rotated to flank position and CLNUE followed. The endoscopically introduced clip on the distal ureter is proof of completion of the total ureterectomy.

Results

The mean operation time was 161 (115-200) min. In four (19.0%), the application of the clip failed and CLNUE was completed with non-occluded ureter. In three cases, subsequent laparoscopic nephrectomy was converted to open surgery. In two cases, the distal ureterectomy was completed with pluck technique through a lower abdominal incision that was also used for extraction of the specimen. There were four complications (Clavien II 2x, IIIb, V). Follow-up was available for all – mean 10.6 (range: 0-25) months. One died of disease generalization within 11 months.

Conclusion

CLNUE-IVLC is fast and safe. If needed, the endoscopic phase can be switched to open NUE. Disadvantages include: the need to change the position of the patient, the risk of inability to apply the clip on the distal ureter, and the risk of an unclosed defect of the urinary bladder.

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

In the last 4 years many studies have been published on the topic of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This is a recent review of the available literature of the last 3 years. A systematic Medline/PubMed search on UTUC including limits for clinical trials and randomized, controlled trials was performed for English-language articles using the keywords 'upper urinary tract carcinoma', 'nephroureterectomy', 'laparoscopic', 'ureteroscopy', 'percutaneous', 'renal pelvis', 'ureter' and their combinations from January 2008 to December 2010. Additional selected reports from 2007 were included. Case reports and non-English literature were excluded. Publications were mostly retrospective, including some large, multicentre studies from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC). The authors of this article are members of the UTUCC. Altogether, 92 original articles dealing with UTUC were identified and summarized. The vast majority of the available literature has a low level of evidence (level IV), although many multicentre studies tried to overcome the problem of low numbers by pooling data. It was concluded that in the last 3 years our knowledge regarding UTUC has increased dramatically, although new study concepts allowing us to increase the level of evidence are needed.

Evolution of hemostatic agents in surgical practice

Objective:

Topical hemostatic agents are used in a wide variety of surgical settings, and the evolution of this class of surgical tools is an interesting topic. We reviewed and outlined the historical progress of topical hemostats into present day surgery and urology, and highlight opportunities for future research.

Materials and Methods:

A MEDLINE search of all available literature concerning several classes of topical hemostatic agents was performed. Fibrins sealants, Gelatin sponge hemostatics, cyanoacrylate adhesives, oxidized regenerated cellulose, and microfibrillar collagen were included. References were chosen from a broad range of surgical literature.

Results:

Topical hemostatic agents have historically taken advantage of a wide variety of mechanisms for hemostasis. Fibrin sealants have a rich history and large potential for further applications. Gelatin sponge hemostatics have been widely used since their introduction, but have changed little. Cyanoacrylate adhesives have a unique mechanism and opportunity for novel applications of existing products. Oxidized cellulose was original in the use of plant-based components. Microfibrillar collagen hemostats have evolved to a wide variety of formats.

Conclusions:

A review of the evolution of topical hemostatic agents highlights opportunities for potential novel research. Fibrin sealants may have the most opportunity for advancement, and understanding the history of these products is useful. With the drive in urology for minimally invasive surgical techniques, adaptation of topical hemostatic agents to this surgical approach would be valuable and offers an opportunity for novel contributions.

Evolution of hemostatic agents in surgical practice

OBJECTIVE

Topical hemostatic agents are used in a wide variety of surgical settings, and the evolution of this class of surgical tools is an interesting topic. We reviewed and outlined the historical progress of topical hemostats into present day surgery and urology, and highlight opportunities for future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search of all available literature concerning several classes of topical hemostatic agents was performed. Fibrins sealants, Gelatin sponge hemostatics, cyanoacrylate adhesives, oxidized regenerated cellulose, and microfibrillar collagen were included. References were chosen from a broad range of surgical literature.

RESULTS

Topical hemostatic agents have historically taken advantage of a wide variety of mechanisms for hemostasis. Fibrin sealants have a rich history and large potential for further applications. Gelatin sponge hemostatics have been widely used since their introduction, but have changed little. Cyanoacrylate adhesives have a unique mechanism and opportunity for novel applications of existing products. Oxidized cellulose was original in the use of plant-based components. Microfibrillar collagen hemostats have evolved to a wide variety of formats.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of the evolution of topical hemostatic agents highlights opportunities for potential novel research. Fibrin sealants may have the most opportunity for advancement, and understanding the history of these products is useful. With the drive in urology for minimally invasive surgical techniques, adaptation of topical hemostatic agents to this surgical approach would be valuable and offers an opportunity for novel contributions.

Does the surgical technique for management of the distal ureter influence the outcome after nephroureterectomy?

Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The resection of the distal ureter and its orifice is an oncological principle during radical nephroureterectomy which is based on the fact that it represents a part of the urinary tract exposed to a considerable risk of recurrence. After removal of the proximal part it is hardly possible to image or approach it by endoscopy during follow-up. Recent publications on survival after nephroureterectomy do not allow the conclusion that removal of distal ureter and bladder cuff are useless. Several techniques of distal ureter removal have been described but they are not equivalent in term of oncological safety. • The standard treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs) must obey oncological principles, which consist of a complete en bloc resection of the kidney and the ureter, as well as excision of a bladder cuff to avoid tumour seeding. • The open technique is the 'gold standard' of treatment to which all other techniques developed are necessarily compared, and various surgical procedures have been described. • The laparoscopic stapling technique maintains a closed system but risks leaving behind the ureteric and bladder cuff segments. • Transvesical laparoscopic detachment and ligation is a valid approach from an oncological stance but is technically difficult. The major inconvenience of the transurethral resection of the ureteric orifice and intussusception techniques is the potential for tumour seeding. • Management of the distal ureter via the robot-assisted laparoscopic method is technically feasible, but outcomes from these procedures are still preliminary. • Therefore, prospective comparative studies with more thorough explorations of these techniques are needed to solve the dilemma of the management of the distal ureter during nephroureterectomy. However, bladder cuff excision should remain the standard of care irrespective of the stage of the disease.