1
|
Basile G, Bandini M, Li R, Poch MA, Necchi A, Spiess PE. Gold standard nephroureterectomy, chemoprophylaxis and surveillance in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00208. [PMID: 39529478 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent evidence on surgical management, strategies to reduce tumor recurrence, and surveillance regimens in patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and elected for radical treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Minimally invasive surgery is gaining momentum in the surgical management of UTUC. Chemoprophylaxis is still the gold standard to reduce intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Novel surveillance strategies have been proposed to adapt follow-up regimens to patients' characteristics. SUMMARY Minimally invasive surgery has been associated with comparable oncological outcomes to the open approach while improving postoperative morbidity. In these cases, bladder cuff excision (BCE) is mostly performed by an extravesical approach, that demonstrates a noninferiority compared to the intravesical one in terms of oncological outcomes. Although lymphadenectomy is recommended in patients with high-risk tumors, its benefits are still unclear. Currently, there is a lack of recent prospective trials on chemoprophylaxis to reduce intravesical recurrence post RNU, making single-dose postoperative chemotherapy instillation the standard treatment. Although novel risk stratification models were released by international urological guidelines, their validity is mainly nonevidence-based. Risk-adapted follow-up strategies incorporating cystoscopy and cross-sectional imaging accounting for individual patient factors should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Basile
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael A Poch
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oedorf K, Haug ES, Liedberg F, Järvinen R, Gudjonsson S, Boström PJ, Jerlström T, Gudbrandsdottir G, Jensen JB, Lam GW. Perioperative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Nordic countries. BMC Urol 2024; 24:132. [PMID: 38914985 PMCID: PMC11197368 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01515-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, with typically only few new cases annually per urological department. Adherence to European association of urology (EAU) guidelines on UTUC in the Nordic countries is unknown. The objective of this survey was to examine the implementation of EAU guidelines, the perioperative management and organization of the treatment of UTUC in the Nordic countries. METHODS The electronic survey was distributed to 93 hospitals in the Nordic countries performing radical nephroureterectomy (NU). The survey consisted of 57 main questions and data was collected between December 1st, 2021 and April 23rd, 2022. RESULTS Overall response rate was 47/93 (67%) with a completion rate of 98%. Five out of the 6 examined subjects on diagnostic practice are applied by ≥ 72% of the participating centers. NU as treatment for high-risk UTUC is performed by 37/47 (79%), and 91% include a bladder cuff excision. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to EAU guidelines is high on diagnostic practice in the Nordic countries, whereas disease management is less coherent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimie Oedorf
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skaanes Universitetssjukhus, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Riikka Järvinen
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sigurdur Gudjonsson
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Peter J Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | | | - Gitte Wrist Lam
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang J, Yang M, Wei D, Zhang D, Chen Z, Zhu H. The efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the treatment of postoperative patients with muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:202. [PMID: 38350941 PMCID: PMC10863243 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11919-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy has demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy and safety in treating a variety of cancers, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, its efficacy and safety in patients with muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who are undergoing radical surgery remain uncertain. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (TGC) as a first-line postoperative adjuvant treatment in this population. METHODS This single-center, real-world study retrospectively analyzed the data from 71 patients with muscle-invasive UTUC who had radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between November 1, 2020, and November 1, 2023. Among the 71 patients, 30 received adjuvant therapy of TGC within 90 days after RNU and 41 underwent surveillance. No patients receive preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. The TGC therapy group received adjuvant therapy every 3 weeks postoperatively until the first recurrence, first metastasis, or death due to any reason, whichever occurred first. The patients were followed up telephonically and through outpatient visits to record and evaluate their disease-free survival (DFS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS This study assessed the DFS of 41 and 30 patients in the surveillance group and TGC therapy group, respectively. The median DFS of the surveillance group was 16.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.7-18.3] months, while the median DFS of the TGC group has not yet reached [hazard ratio (HR) 0.367 (95% CI, 0.169-0.796); p = 0.008], with 21 patients still undergoing follow-up. Compared with the surveillance group, the TGC therapy group had dramatically improved DFS after RNU and reduced risk by 63.3%. Of the 30 patients receiving combination therapy, 28 experienced TRAEs; all TRAEs were consistent with the frequently reported events in the chemotherapy-alone regimens, and there were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that TGC therapy exhibits excellent clinical efficacy in patients undergoing radical surgery, significantly improving DFS and displaying great safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwen Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Meng Yang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Dongqun Wei
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Deru Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
| | - Haitao Zhu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klemm J, Bekku K, Abufaraj M, Laukhtina E, Matsukawa A, Parizi MK, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Current Surveillance Strategies for Non-Metastatic Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:44. [PMID: 38201472 PMCID: PMC10777993 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Non-metastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) is a comparatively rare condition, typically managed with either kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Irrespective of the chosen therapeutic modality, patients with UTUC remain at risk of recurrence in the bladder; in patients treated with KSS, the risk of recurrence is high in the remnant ipsilateral upper tract system but there is a low but existent risk in the contralateral system as well as in the chest and in the abdomen/pelvis. For patients treated with RNU for high-risk UTUC, the risk of recurrence in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, as well as the contralateral UT, depends on the tumor stage, grade, and nodal status. Hence, implementing a risk-stratified, location-specific follow-up is indicated to ensure timely detection of cancer recurrence. However, there are no data on the type and frequency/schedule of follow-up or on the impact of the recurrence type and site on outcomes; indeed, it is not well known whether imaging-detected asymptomatic recurrences confer a better outcome than recurrences detected due to symptoms/signs. Novel imaging techniques and more precise risk stratification methods based on time-dependent probabilistic events hold significant promise for making a cost-efficient individualized, patient-centered, outcomes-oriented follow-up strategy possible. We show and discuss the follow-up protocols of the major urologic societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8525, Japan
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada;
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dłubak A, Karwacki J, Logoń K, Tomecka P, Brawańska K, Krajewski W, Szydełko T, Małkiewicz B. Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1327-1344. [PMID: 37801187 PMCID: PMC10640513 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and its implications for staging and management outcomes, as well as future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies have demonstrated the limitations of conventional imaging techniques in accurately localizing lymph node metastasis (LNM) in UTUC. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) shows promise for preoperative LNM detection, its specificity is low. Alternative methods such as choline PET/CT and sentinel lymph node detection are under consideration but require further investigation. Additionally, various preoperative factors associated with LNM hold potential for predicting nodal involvement, thereby improving nodal staging and oncologic outcomes of LND. Several surgical approaches, including segmental ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, provide a possibility for LND, while minimizing morbidity. LND remains the primary nodal staging tool for UTUC, but its therapeutic benefit is still uncertain. Advances in imaging techniques and preoperative risk assessment show promise in improving LNM detection. Further research and multi-center studies are needed to comprehensively assess the advantages and limitations of LND in UTUC, as well as the long-term outcomes of alternative staging and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Dłubak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Logoń
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Tomecka
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kinga Brawańska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bobjer J, Gerdtsson A, Abrahamsson J, Baseckas G, Bergkvist M, Bläckberg M, Brändstedt J, Jancke G, Hagberg O, Kollberg P, Lundström KJ, Löfgren A, Nyberg M, Rian Mårtensson L, Saemundsson Y, Ståhl E, Sörenby A, Warnolf Å, Liedberg F. Location of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastases in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Prospective Lymph Node Mapping Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 57:37-44. [PMID: 38020529 PMCID: PMC10658412 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is limited information on the distribution of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (LNMs) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Objective To investigate the location of LNMs in UTUC of the renal pelvis or proximal ureter and short-term complications after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with lymph node dissection (LND). Design setting and participants This was a prospective Nordic multicenter study (four university hospitals, two county hospitals). Patients with clinically suspected locally advanced UTUC (stage >T1) and/or clinical lymph node-positive (cN+) disease were invited to participate. Participants underwent RNU and fractionated retroperitoneal LND using predefined side-specific templates. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The location of LNMs in the LND specimen and retroperitoneal lymph node recurrences during follow-up was recorded. Postoperative complications within 90 d of surgery were ascertained from patient charts. Descriptive statistics were used. Results and limitations LNMs were present in the LND specimen in 23/100 patients, and nine of 100 patients experienced a retroperitoneal recurrence. Distribution per side revealed LNMs in the LND specimen in 11/38 (29%) patients with right-sided tumors, for whom the anatomically larger, right-sided template was used, in comparison to 12/62 (19%) patients with left-sided tumors, for whom a more limited template was used. High-grade complications (Clavien grade ≥3) within 90 d of surgery were registered for 13/100 patients. The study is limited in size and not powered to assess survival estimates. Conclusions The suggested templates that we prospectively applied for right-sided and left-sided LND in patients with advanced UTUC included the majority of LNMs. High-grade complications directly related to the LND part of the surgery were limited. Patient summary This study describes the location of lymph node metastases in patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract who underwent surgery to remove the affected kidney and ureter. The results show that most metastases occur within the template maps for lymph node surgery that we investigated, and that this surgery can be performed with few severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Bobjer
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Axel Gerdtsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Johan Abrahamsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Mats Bergkvist
- Pelvic Cancer Medical Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Bläckberg
- Department of Urology, Helsingborg County Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Johan Brändstedt
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Georg Jancke
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hagberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Petter Kollberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Karl-Johan Lundström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Östersund County Hospital, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Annica Löfgren
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin Nyberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Ymir Saemundsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Elin Ståhl
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anne Sörenby
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Åsa Warnolf
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hsieh HC, Wang CL, Chen CS, Yang CK, Li JR, Wang SS, Cheng CL, Lin CY, Chiu KY. The prognostic impact of lymph node dissection for clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in patients who are treated with radical nephroureterectomy. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278038. [PMID: 36454803 PMCID: PMC9714942 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision (BCE) for clinically node-negative (cN0) upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 520 patients with cN0 UTUC in a single tertiary referral center from 2000 to 2015. The patients were divided into three groups: patients with and without pathologically proved lymph node metastasis (pN1-3 and pN0, respectively) and patients without LND (pNx). We analyzed associations between overall survival (OS)/ disease-free survival (DFS)/ cancer-specific survival (CSS) and clinical characteristics. RESULTS The patients were divided into three groups (pN1-3, pN0 and pNx with 20, 303, and 197 patients, respectively). OS/DFS/CSS in the pN1-3 group were significantly worse (all p<0.001) compared with the pN0 group. However, there were no significant differences between the pNx and pN0 groups. In the multivariate analyses, CSS was only affected by age [(hazard ratio (HR) = 1.03, p = 0.008]), positive surgical margin (HR = 3.38, p<0.001) and pathological T3-4 stages (HR = 4.07, p<0.001). In the subgroup analyses for patients with LND, locally advanced disease (pT3 and pT4) had significantly more metastases [T3-4: 13.91% (16/115) vs. T0-2: 1.92% (4/208), p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS In the pN0 group, LND for cN0 UTUC did not show therapeutic benefits in terms of DFS, CSS, and OS. However, LND with RNU allowed optimal tumor staging, through patients still had a poor prognosis. Clinically occult LN metastases were found in 6.2% of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Chen Hsieh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Li Wang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Ri Li
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Li Cheng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Yen Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (CYL); (KYC)
| | - Kun-Yuan Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (CYL); (KYC)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xia HR, Li SG, Zhai XQ, Liu M, Guo XX, Wang JY. The Value of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Node-Positive Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:889144. [PMID: 35785156 PMCID: PMC9245452 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeThe value of lymphadenectomy during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effects of the removed lymph node (RLN) counts, positive lymph node (pLN) counts, and pLN density (pLND) on survival outcomes in patients with node-positive upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC).MethodsA total of 306 patients with node-positive UTUC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2016 were identified. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of RLN counts, pLN counts, and pLND on survival outcomes. The maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine the most informative cutoff value for pLND on survival outcomes.ResultsThe RLN counts or pLN counts were not associated with survival outcomes, whereas higher pLND was associated with lower cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, P = 0.014 and HR 1.62, P = 0.036, respectively]. The most informative cutoff value for pLND in relation to survival was 27%. Patients with pLND ≥27% had worse 5-year survival rates than those with pLND <27% (52.9% vs. 75.9% for CSS and 18.7% vs. 34.2% for OS, each P < 0.05). Furthermore, the multivariable Cox regression model with pLND could predict 5-year CSS (AUC 0.732 vs. 0.647) or OS (AUC 0.704 vs. 0.621) more accurately than the model without pLND.ConclusionsFor patients with node-positive UTUC, more lymph nodes removed do not offer a better therapeutic effect. However, pLND provides additional prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-ran Xia
- Department of urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-guang Li
- Department of Urology, Zoucheng People`s Hospital, Zoucheng, China
| | - Xing-quan Zhai
- Department of Urology, Zoucheng People`s Hospital, Zoucheng, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-xiao Guo
- Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Jian-ye Wang, ; Xiao-xiao Guo,
| | - Jian-ye Wang
- Department of urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Jian-ye Wang, ; Xiao-xiao Guo,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pentafecta for Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Proposal for Standardization of Quality Care Metrics. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071781. [PMID: 35406553 PMCID: PMC8997024 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Measuring quality of care indicators is important for clinicians and decision making in health care to improve patient outcomes. Objective: The primary objective was to identify quality of care indicators for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to validate these in an international cohort treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The secondary objective was to assess the factors associated with failure to validate the pentafecta. Design: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with RNU for EAU high-risk (HR) UTUC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Five quality indicators were consensually approved, including a negative surgical margin, a complete bladder-cuff resection, the absence of hematological complications, the absence of major complications, and the absence of a 12-month postoperative recurrence. After multiple imputations and propensity-score matching, log-rank tests and a Cox regression were used to assess the survival outcomes. Logistic regression analyses assessed predictors for pentafecta failure. Results: Among the 1718 included patients, 844 (49%) achieved the pentafecta. The median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who achieved the pentafecta had superior 5-year overall- (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to those who did not (68.7 vs. 50.1% and 79.8 vs. 62.7%, respectively, all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, achieving the pentafecta was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and OS. No preoperative clinical factors predicted a failure to validate the pentafecta. Conclusions: Establishing quality indicators for UTUC may help define prognosis and improve patient care. We propose a pentafecta quality criteria in RNU patients. Approximately half of the patients evaluated herein reached this endpoint, which in turn was independently associated with survival outcomes. Extended validation is needed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Peyrottes A, Califano G, Ouzaïd I, Lainé-Caroff P, Long Depaquit T, Hermieu JF, Xylinas E. Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review. Front Surg 2022; 9:852969. [PMID: 35402485 PMCID: PMC8987284 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.852969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Although lymphonodal dissection is well-accepted for muscle-invasive bladder cancer management, its role is still debated during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge concerning the indication, anatomical template, prognostic, and therapeutic roles of lymph node dissection (LND) performed at the time of RNU. Quality control markers, such as the number of lymph nodes (LN) removed, lymph node density, and safety of the different surgical approaches, were assessed. We performed a narrative review using the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We identified and analyzed articles based on the practice and the role of lymph node dissection for non-metastatic UTUC. There are no clear guidelines regarding the indication of LND for UTUC, but aggressive tumors may beneficiate from lymphadenectomy since lymph node invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor, allowing for adjuvant treatments. It seems that an extended lymphadenectomy may provide therapeutic advantages as a higher number of nodes removed may be related to the removal of undetected LNs micrometastases and a subsequent improvement in recurrence rate and cancer-specific survival. Clear anatomical templates are thus needed based on the location and the laterality of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Peyrottes
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Idir Ouzaïd
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Lainé-Caroff
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Thibaut Long Depaquit
- Urology Unit, Military Teaching Hospital Sainte Anne, French Military Health Service, Toulon, France
| | - Jean-François Hermieu
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
- *Correspondence: Evanguelos Xylinas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Olson KM, Faraj KS, Singh P, Tyson MD. Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
12
|
Challenging Visualization of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235465. [PMID: 34884167 PMCID: PMC8658349 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the possibility of detecting sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and to perform analysis of lymphatic outflow in patients with suspicion of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with the use of a radioisotope-based technique. Methods: During 2018–2021, a prospective study was conducted on 19 patients with the suspicion of UTUC and for whom diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS) was planned. Technetium-99m (99mTc) nanocolloid radioactive tracer injection and a tumor biopsy were performed for staging procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and fusion of images were performed for better localization of lymph nodes (LNs). Detection of SLNs and the analysis of the radiotracer outflow was conducted with the use of single-photon emission-computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) lymphangiography. Results: The mean age of the patients was 73.4 years; 7 (36%) were male. Pathological staging from the biopsy was T0—8 (42%), Ta—7 (36%), T1—4 (21%). SLNs were detected in two of 19 cases (10%). In one patient a single SLN (5.3%) was visualized, and in another case (5.3%), multiple (double) radioactive lymph nodes were visualized. In 17 out of the 19 (89.5%) cases, no lymphatic outflow was observed, and out of these five cases (26.3%) of gravitational leakage of injected radiotracer to the retroperitoneal space was noted. Conclusions: We demonstrated that detection of SLNs in the upper urinary tract is possible yet challenging. Radiotracer injection in the upper urinary tract during ureterorenoscopy is difficult to perform, and the expected result of injection is unsatisfactory. Lymphatic outflow from the tumor site to the first LNs in our studied group of patients is visible in 10.5% of cases. SPECT/CT lymphangiography in cases of UTUC may provide valuable information about a patient’s individual anatomy of the lymphatic system and the position of the first lymph nodes draining lymph with potential metastatic cells from the tumor.
Collapse
|
13
|
Mori K, Katayama S, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Zimmermann K, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Fajkovic H, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev DV, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Discordance Between Clinical and Pathological Staging and Grading in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:95.e1-95.e6. [PMID: 34764007 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to evaluate the concordance in tumor stage and grade between ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Records of 1,214 UTUC patients who had undergone URS biopsy followed by RNU were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors contributing to the pathological upstaging. RESULTS The concordance between URS biopsy-based clinical and RNU pathological staging was 34.5%. Clinical understaging occurred in 59.5% patients. Upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in 240 (41.7%) of 575 patients diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. Of those diagnosed with muscle-invasive disease on final pathology, 89.6% had been clinically diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. In the univariable analyses, computed tomography urography (CTU)-based invasion, ureter location, hydronephrosis, high-grade cytology, high-grade biopsy, sessile architecture, age, and women sex were significantly associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). In the multivariable analyses, CTU-based invasion and hydronephrosis remained associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). URS biopsy-based clinical and pathological gradings were concordant in 634 (54.2%) patients. Clinical undergrading occurred in 496 (42.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Clinical understaging/undergrading and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in a high proportion of UTUC patients undergoing RNU. Despite the inherent selection bias, these data underline the challenges of accurate UTUC staging and grading. In daily clinical practice, URS biopsy and CTU offer the most accurate preoperative information albeit with limited predictive value when used alone. These findings should be considered when utilizing preoperative, risk-adapted strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, France; Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | | | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, F-75013 PARIS, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li C, Han D, Huang Q, Xu F, Zheng S, Li X, Zhao F, Feng X, Lyu J. Competing-risks nomogram for predicting cancer-specific death in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048243. [PMID: 34281927 PMCID: PMC8291317 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to use a competing-risks model to establish a nomogram to accurately analyse the prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) cancer-specific death (CSD). DESIGN Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING The programme has yielded a database of all patients with cancer in 18 defined geographical regions of the USA. PARTICIPANTS We selected patients with UTUC from the latest edition of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1975 to 2016. After excluding patients with unknown histological grade, tumour size and lymph node status, 2576 patients were finally selected. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES We used the Fine-Gray proportional subdistribution hazards model for multivariate analysis and compared the results with cause-specific hazards model. We finally constructed a nomogram for 3-year, 5-year and 8-year CSD rates and tested these rates in a validation cohort. RESULTS The proportional subdistribution hazards model showed that sex, tumour size, distant metastasis, surgery status, number of lymph nodes positive (LNP) and lymph nodes ratio (LNR) were independent prognostic factors for CSD. All significant factors associated with CSD were included in the nomogram. The 3-year, 5-year and 8-year concordance indexes were 0.719, 0.702 and 0.692 in the training cohort and 0.701, 0.675 and 0.668 in the validation cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The competing-risks model showed that sex, tumour size, distant metastasis, surgery status, LNP and LNR were associated with CSD. The nomogram predicts the probability of CSD in patients with UTUC at 3, 5 and 8 years, which may help clinicians in predicting survival probabilities in individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengzhuo Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Didi Han
- Department of Clinical Research, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qiao Huang
- Department of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy, Wuhan University Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Fengshuo Xu
- Department of Clinical Research, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shuai Zheng
- Department of Clinical Research, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China
| | - Xiang Li
- Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Fanfan Zhao
- Department of Clinical Research, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaojie Feng
- Department of Clinical Research, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jun Lyu
- Department of Clinical Research, Jinan University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
König F, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Mun DH, Rink M, Pradere B. Quality indicators for the management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma requiring radical nephroureterectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:291-296. [PMID: 33973537 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article was to identify quality indicators for an optimized management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). RECENT FINDINGS RNU with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment of high-risk UTUC. For the bladder cuff resection, two main approaches are accepted: transvesical and extravesical. Lymph node dissection following a dedicated template should be performed in all high-risk patients undergoing RNU as it improves tumour staging and possibly survival. Postoperative bladder instillation of single-dose chemotherapy should be administered after RNU to decrease the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy should always be considered for advanced cancers. Although level-1 evidence is available for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant regimens are still being evaluated. SUMMARY Optimal management of high-risk UTUC requires evidence-based reproducible quality indicators in order to allow guidance and frameworks for clinical practices. Adherence to quality indicators allows for the measurement and comparison of outcomes that are likely to improve prognosis. Based on the literature, we found four evidence-based accepted quality indicators that are easily implementable to improve the management of high-risk UTUC patients treated with RNU: adequate management of the distal ureter/ bladder cuff, template-based lymph node dissection, single-shot postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, and perioperative systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dong-Ho Mun
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Katayama S, Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Moschini M, Grossmann NC, Araki M, Teoh JYC, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev D, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Compérat E, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Accuracy and Clinical Utility of a Tumor Grade- and Stage-based Predictive Model in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:761-768. [PMID: 34053904 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among various clinicopathologic factors used to identify low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), tumor grade and stage are of utmost importance. The clinical value added by inclusion of other risk factors remains unproven. OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of a tumor grade- and stage-based (GS) model to identify patients with UTUC for whom kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) could be attempted. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this international study, we reviewed the medical records of 1240 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Complete data needed for risk stratification according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were available for 560 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine if risk factors were associated with the presence of localized UTUC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GS, EAU, and NCCN models in predicting pathologic stage were calculated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 198 patients (35%) had clinically low-grade, noninvasive tumors, and 283 (51%) had ≤pT1disease. On multivariable analyses, none of the EAU and NCCN risk factors were associated with the presence of non-muscle-invasive UTUC among patients with low-grade and low-stage UTUC. The GS model exhibited the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value among all three models. According to the GS, EAU, and NCCN models, the proportion of patients eligible for KSS was 35%, 6%, and 4%, respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed that the net benefit of the three models was similar within the clinically reasonable range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSIONS The GS model showed favorable predictive accuracy and identified a greater number of KSS-eligible patients than the EAU and NCCN models. A decision-making algorithm that weighs the benefits of avoiding unnecessary kidney loss against the risk of undertreatment in case of advanced carcinoma is necessary for individualized treatment for UTUC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We assessed the ability of three models to predict low-grade, low-stage disease in patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract. No risk factors other than grade assessed on biopsy and stage assessed from scans were associated with better prediction of localized cancer. A model based on grade and stage may help to identify patients who could benefit from kidney-sparing treatment of their cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ishiyama Y, Kondo T, Kubota S, Shimada K, Yoshida K, Takagi T, Iizuka J, Tanabe K. Therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy for older patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a propensity score matching study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:802-809. [PMID: 33434927 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Regional lymphadenectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is sometimes avoided in older patients to reduce surgical burden. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic impact of lymphadenectomy in older patients undergoing curative therapy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. METHODS The patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract older than 75 years at the time of surgery and without lymph node or distant metastasis who underwent curative therapy at two tertiary hospitals between 1994 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Complete-lymphadenectomy was performed as per our protocol. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival and metastasis-free survival after surgery were evaluated between complete-lymphadenectomy and no/incomplete-lymphadenectomy groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS The original cohort included 150 patients (median age, 80.71 years), and complete-lymphadenectomy was performed in 42 (28.00%) patients. Patients in complete-lymphadenectomy group were younger and less likely to be aged >80 years (both, P < 0.0001). After matching, 30 patients were allocated to each group and the ages were comparable (78.58 vs. 77.48 years, P = 0.1738). High-grade perioperative complication rates did not differ between groups both before and after matching. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival and metastasis-free survival were significantly longer in the complete-lymphadenectomy group both before and after matching (all, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that complete-lymphadenectomy may provide therapeutic benefits for older patients. The decision to perform complete-lymphadenectomy must be based on the patient's physical condition, rather than his/her chronological age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudai Ishiyama
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East. 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8567, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East. 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8567, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kubota
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East. 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8567, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Katsunori Shimada
- Department of Biostatistics, STATZ Institute, Inc. 1-18 Haramachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0053, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McIntosh AG, Umbreit EC, Wood CG, Matin SF, Karam JA. Role of lymph node dissection at the time of open or minimally invasive nephroureterectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2233-2245. [PMID: 34159106 PMCID: PMC8185683 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Unlike urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, there is no guideline-based consensus on whether a lymph node dissection (LND) should be performed at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Variable lymphatic drainage based on primary tumor location, lack of prospective trials, and difficulties in developing a risk-adapted approach to LND for UTUC are all challenges to the development of an established approach. The UTUC literature consists of an evidence pool that has historically been limited to single-institution series with heterogenous inclusion criteria for LND and variable LND templates. Areas of controversy exist regarding migration to the great vessel LN beds for mid and distal tumors. A lack of template standardization limits the interpretation of studies relative to one another and a lack of uniformity in reporting templates may lead to inaccuracies in the estimation of lymph node metastasis landing sites. Most clinicians agree that there is a staging benefit to LND for UTUC. Although the data is somewhat heterogenous, it demonstrates a prognostic and staging benefit to LND in higher stages of UTUC. Unlike the staging benefits provided by LND for UTUC, the therapeutic benefits are not as clearly established. Several studies have evaluated differences in cancer-specific survival (CSS) and demonstrated LND to be an independent predictor of CSS when compared to patients not undergoing LND. However, this finding is not consistent across all studies and the literature is again limited by inclusion heterogeneity and inconsistent or lack or template-based resections. LND for UTUC at the time of RNU is a safe and feasible procedure that seems to especially benefit patients with muscle-invasive or locally advanced disease. Prospective, randomized studies with strict inclusion criteria and defined anatomic templates are needed to definitely characterize the role of LND for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G McIntosh
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric C Umbreit
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Consequences of Inadvertent Radical Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2021; 154:127-135. [PMID: 33766715 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine factors associated with performing inadvertent radical nephrectomy (RN) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and to assess the impact of radical nephrectomy on overall survival (OS) compared to radical nephroureterectomy (NU). METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients with UTUC of the renal pelvis who were diagnosed with renal cortical tumors and underwent RN (n = 820) with subsequent surgical pathology demonstrating urothelial carcinoma were identified. These patients were compared to those diagnosed with renal pelvis tumors who appropriately underwent NU (n = 16,464) between 2005 and 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine patient, facility and tumor-related factors associated with undergoing RN. The impact of surgery (RN vs NU) on OS was determined by Cox-regression after propensity score matching. RESULTS A total of 4.7% patients with UTUC underwent inadvertent RN. Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.62, 95%CI 1.23-2.13), larger tumors, advanced tumor stage, and high-grade tumors (P < 0.0001) were associated with RN. However, surgery at a facility performing a higher volume of NU/year was associated with lower odds of having RN performed (aOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.75-0.97). After propensity score matching, the 5-year OS was 39.9% for those undergoing RN vs 49.9% for those undergoing NU (hazard ratio 1.45, 95%CI 1.30-1.62). CONCLUSION Inadvertent RN is not uncommon, occurring in almost 5% of patients with UTUC in the NCDB. Patients who underwent RN had significantly worse OS as compared to those treated with NU. These data highlight that accurate diagnosis of UTUC is paramount and clinicians should not hesitate to perform further workup when imaging findings are equivocal.
Collapse
|
20
|
Collà Ruvolo C, Stolzenbach LF, Nocera L, Deuker M, Wenzel M, Tian Z, La Rocca R, Creta M, Capece M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Tilki D, Briganti A, Mirone V, Karakiewicz PI. Higher Cancer Mortality in Rural Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients. Urol Int 2021; 105:624-630. [PMID: 33709970 DOI: 10.1159/000513361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to investigate differences in the stage at presentation and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) between rural area (RA) and urban area (UA) residence status in nonmetastatic upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. METHODS Newly diagnosed T1-3N0M0 UTUC patients with available residence status were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016). Propensity score (PS) matching (1 RA vs. 3 UA) accounted for age (interval ≤2 years), T stage (exact matching: T1, T2, and T3), and tumor grade (exact matching: high grade, low grade/unknown). Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risk regression models focused on CSM, after adjustment for other-cause mortality. RESULTS Of 6,012 patients, 125 (2.1%) resided in RAs and 5,887 (97.9%) in UAs. RA patients were younger than UA patients (median age 72 vs. 75 years, p = 0.03). No differences were recorded in tumor location, T stage, tumor grade, or surgical treatment between RA and UA patients. After 1:3 PS matching, 125 RA patients and 375 UA patients were assessable. At 5 years of follow-up, CSM rates were 26.7 versus 15.7% according to RA versus UA, respectively. After additional multivariable adjustment for age, sex, tumor location, and surgical treatment, RA remained an independent predictor of higher CSM (hazard ratio 1.75, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Despite no differences in cancer characteristics, UTUC patients in RA are at higher risk of CSM than their UA counterparts. This suggests suboptimal care delivery and compliance as possible causes. Complex and/or rare disease should be centralized to expert centers, which are often in UAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, .,Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada,
| | - Lara F Stolzenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Deuker
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Capece
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mori K, Resch I, Miura N, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Katayama S, D'Andrea D, Kardoust Parizi M, Abufaraj M, Fukuokaya W, Collà Ruvolo C, Luzzago S, Knipper S, Palumbo C, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Enikeev DV, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: results from a large multicenter international collaboration. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 70:2641-2650. [PMID: 33591412 PMCID: PMC8360829 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02884-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the prognostic role of the preoperative systemic immune–inflammation index (SII) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed our multi-institutional database to identify 2492 patients. SII was calculated as platelet count × neutrophil/lymphocyte count and evaluated at a cutoff of 485. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with muscle-invasive and non-organ-confined (NOC) disease. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival (RFS/CSS/OS). Results Overall, 986 (41.6%) patients had an SII > 485. On univariable logistic regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with a higher risk of muscle-invasive (P = 0.004) and NOC (P = 0.03) disease at RNU. On multivariable logistic regression, SII remained independently associated with muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with shorter RFS (P = 0.002), CSS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.004). On multivariable Cox regression analyses SII remained independently associated with survival outcomes (all P < 0.05). Addition of SII to the multivariable models improved their discrimination of the models for predicting muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.02). However, all area under the curve and C-indexes increased by < 0.02 and it did not improve net benefit on decision curve analysis. Conclusions Preoperative altered SII is significantly associated with higher pathologic stages and worse survival outcomes in patients treated with RNU for UTUC. However, the SII appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of SII in prognosticating UTUC is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-021-02884-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science, and Public Health, Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology department, Sorbonne Université, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, GRC n°5, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Almås B, Øverby S, Halvorsen OJ, Reisæter LAR, Carlsen B, Beisland C. Preoperative predictors of pathological tumour stage and prognosis may be used when selecting candidates for intensified treatment in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:100-107. [PMID: 33517813 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1877343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensified treatment such as extended lymph node dissection (LND) and/or perioperative chemotherapy in addition to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) has been suggested for high-risk cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of tumour stage and prognosis in the diagnostic work-up before RNU. Further to evaluate if our findings could be used in selecting patients for intensified treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 179 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) and Vestfold Hospital Trust (VHT) during 2005-2017 were included in this retrospective study. All relevant preoperative variables regarding the patient, the CT and the ureteroscopy (URS) were registered and analysed regarding their ability to predict non-organ confined disease (NOCD, pT3+ and/or N+) at final pathology after RNU. The prognosis was assessed calculating survival for the cohort and stratified by preoperative variables. RESULTS Local invasion and pathological lymph nodes at CT predicted NOCD in uni and multivariate regression analyses (OR 3.36, p=.004 and OR 6.21, p=.03, respectively). Reactive oedema surrounding the tumour (OR 2.55, p=.02), tumour size (4.8 vs. 3.9 cm, p=.006) and high-grade tumour at URS biopsy (OR 3.59, p=.04) predicted NOCD at univariate regression analyses. The 5-year CSS and OS for the entire cohort was 79% and 60%. ECOG, local invasion, pathological lymph nodes and reactive oedema surrounding the tumour at CT predicted CSS. CONCLUSIONS Several variables at the CT predicted both stage and survival. Local invasion at CT seems the most promising feature for selecting patients for intensified treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarte Almås
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Stein Øverby
- Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Ole J Halvorsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars A R Reisæter
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Birgitte Carlsen
- Department of Pathology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Risk Stratification of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma for Kidney-Sparing Surgery. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
24
|
Hoe V, Yao HH, Crozier J, Kanagarajah A, Florescu G, Kearsley J, Dundee P, O'Connell HE, Lawrentschuk N, Agarwal DK. Long-term oncological outcomes of the Agarwal loop-ligation technique for management of the distal ureter during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. BJU Int 2020; 128:112-121. [PMID: 33305469 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the Agarwal loop-ligation technique for the management of the distal ureter during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and report on long-term oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the Agarwal loop-ligation technique, the distal ureteric stump is controlled using endoscopic Endoloop® or PolyLoop® ligation to ensure en bloc excision of the bladder cuff and prevent spillage of upper tract urine into the perivesical space. A retrospective review of the medical records of 76 patients who underwent the Agarwal loop-ligation technique for UTUC at participating centres from July 2004 to December 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, perioperative, and long-term oncological outcomes. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 76 patients were included. The median age was 71.5 years and median operative time was 4.3 h. The intramural ureter and bladder cuff were completely excised in all patients. Distal surgical margins were clear in all, with only two patients found to have tumour extending to the circumferential surgical margin. There were no cases of perivesical recurrence or port-site metastasis. The 5-year bladder, local, and contralateral recurrence-free survival was 59.6%, 89.0% and 93.5%, respectively. Metastasis-free survival at 5-years was 73.5%. The 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were 70.3% and 84.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We have described the Agarwal loop-ligation technique for the management of the distal ureter in LRNU. This technique complies with oncological principles outlined in the European Association of Urology guidelines, which minimises tumour spillage. Long-term oncological outcomes are satisfactory, with no cases of perivesical recurrence detected in this series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venetia Hoe
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Henry H Yao
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jack Crozier
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Abbie Kanagarajah
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Grace Florescu
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jamie Kearsley
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Philip Dundee
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Helen E O'Connell
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Dinesh K Agarwal
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Barton GJ, Tan WP, Inman BA. The nephroureterectomy: a review of technique and current controversies. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:3168-3190. [PMID: 33457289 PMCID: PMC7807352 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The nephroureterectomy (NU) is the standard of care for invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and has been around for well over one hundred years. Since then new operative techniques have emerged, new technologies have developed, and the surgery continues to evolve and grow. In this article, we review the various surgical techniques, as well as present the literature surrounding current areas of debate surrounding the NU, including the lymphatic drainage of the upper urinary tract, management of UTUC involvement with the adrenals and caval thrombi, surgical management of the distal ureter, the use of intravesical chemotherapy as well as perioperative systemic chemotherapy, as well as various outcome measures. Although much has been studied about the NU, there still is a dearth of level 1 evidence and the field would benefit from further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Barton
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wei Phin Tan
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brant A Inman
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Motlagh RS, Rink M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2020; 47:S33-S44. [PMID: 33052841 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, posing many challenges for the treating physician due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. However, novel molecular discoveries and a better understanding of the clinical behavior of the disease lead to a continuous evolution of therapeutic landscape in UTUC. The aim of the review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies in UTUC with a special focus on recent developments and challenges. A comprehensive literature search including relevant articles up to August 2020 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. Despite several technological improvements, accurate staging and outcome prediction remain major challenges and hamper appropriate risk stratification. Kidney-sparing surgery can be offered in low risk UTUC; however, physician and patient must be aware of the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression due to tumor biology and understaging. The value and efficacy of intracavitary therapy in patients with UTUC remains unclear due to the lack of high-quality data. In high-risk diseases, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template lymph node dissection is the standard of care. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy is today accepted as a novel standard for advanced cancers. In metastatic or unresectable disease, the therapeutic landscape is rapidly changing due to several novel agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors. While several diagnostic and treatment challenges remain, progress in endoscopic technology and molecular knowledge have ushered a new age in personalized management of UTUC. Novel accurate molecular and imaging biomarkers are, however, still needed to guide decision making as tissue acquisition remains suboptimal. Next generation sequencing and novel agents are promising to rapidly improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
D'Andrea D, Pradere B, Shariat SF. Re: Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (the POUT Trial): A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2020; 79:163-164. [PMID: 32981804 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Goltzman ME, Gogoj A, Ristau BT. The role of lymphadenectomy at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1860-1867. [PMID: 32944550 PMCID: PMC7475672 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of lymphadenectomy (LND) at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is controversial. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend performing a template-based LND for high-risk primary tumors while the European guidelines state that it is not feasible to determine indication or extent of LND at the time of surgery for UTUC. Herein, we review the anatomic rationale for template-based LND, examine when a LND should be considered, and discuss the impact of LND on staging and survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
29
|
The Performance of Tumor Size as Risk Stratification Parameter in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:272.e1-272.e7. [PMID: 33046411 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of different tumor diameters for identifying ≥ pT2 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at radical nephroureterectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multi-institutional retrospective study that included 932 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic UTUC between 2000 and 2016. Tumor sizes were pathologically assessed and categorized into 4 groups: ≤ 1 cm, 1.1 to 2 cm, 2.1 to 3 cm, and > 3 cm. We performed logistic regression and decision-curve analyses. RESULTS Overall, 45 (4.8%) patients had a tumor size ≤ 1 cm, 141 (15.1%) between 1.1 and 2 cm, 247 (26.5%) between 2.1 and 3 cm, and 499 (53.5%) > 3 cm. In preoperative predictive models that were adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features, tumor diameters > 2 cm (odds ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-3.32; P < .001) and > 3 cm (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.38; P < .001) were independently associated with ≥ pT2 pathologic staging. The addition of the > 2-cm diameter cutoff improved the area under the curve of the model from 58.8% to 63.0%. Decision-curve analyses demonstrated a clinical net benefit of 0.09 and a net reduction of 8 per 100 patients. CONCLUSION The 2-cm cutoff appears to be most useful in identifying patients at risk of harboring ≥ pT2 UTUC. This confirms the current European Association of Urology guideline's risk stratification. Tumor size alone is not sufficient for optimal risk stratification, rather a constellation of features is needed to select the best candidate for kidney-sparing surgery.
Collapse
|
30
|
Sui W, Wallis CJD, Luckenbaugh AN, Barocas DA, Chang SS, Penson DF, Resnick MJ, Laviana AA. The Impact of Hospital Volume on Short-term and Long-term Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2020; 147:135-142. [PMID: 32891638 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the effect of hospital volume on short and long-term outcomes for radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx). Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is a rare malignancy that few surgeons have experience with. The hospital volume-outcome relationship has been well established for other cancers but not RNUx. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for all cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma that underwent RNUx from 2004 to 2016. Average annual hospital volume for radical nephroureterectomy was stratified into tertiles. The upper tertile, defined as 6 or more RNUx per year, was considered high volume while low volume was less than 6 RNUx per year. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to identify independent predictors of overall survival, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of perioperative outcomes. RESULTS We identified 37,479 RNUx performed across 1290 hospitals. There were no differences in baseline health or cancer staging between patients who presented at low- versus high-volume centers. Both peri-operative survival (30- and 90-day mortality) and long-term overall survival were improved in patients treated at high-volume centers. On multivariable survival analysis, treatment at a high-volume center was associated with improved hazards of survival. This relationship for long-term survival remained consistent on landmark analysis where patients who died within 90 days of surgery were removed. CONCLUSIONS Treatment at a high-volume hospital was associated not only with improved short-term perioperative outcomes but also with improved overall long-term survival. The mechanism behind this is likely multifactorial with surgeon volume, and ancillary support services all playing critical roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilson Sui
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Amy N Luckenbaugh
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Matthew J Resnick
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Aaron A Laviana
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ryan PC, Haroon UM, Keenan RA, O’Donoghue PJ, Hegazy M, McGuire BB. Single-stage minimally invasive nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Perioperative and early oncological outcomes. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415820913449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this article is to present our minimally-invasive techniques for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and review the perioperative and early oncological outcomes at our centre. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing minimally-invasive surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma over a 3-year period following institutional approval was performed. Perioperative and early oncological outcomes were assessed. Results: Twenty-three cases of minimally-invasive single-stage nephroureterectomy were performed with a mean patient age of 69.45 years. Twelve (52%) of these cases were for high-grade disease and six (27%) had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. There were no intraoperative complications, no positive surgical margins and four (17.4%) of patients had a post-operative complication. Mean length of stay was 5.5 days and there was one readmission within 30 days of surgery. Seven patients (30%) experienced either local or distant recurrences with a median time to recurrence of 6 months. Recurrence free survival was 69.6%. Two patients died during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Our minimally-invasive techniques provides a safe and reproducible approach for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Our perioperative outcomes and oncological are comparable to similar studies, but more long-term follow-up and larger patient numbers are required to validate oncological efficacy. Level of evidence: 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PC Ryan
- Department of Urology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Ireland
| | - UM Haroon
- Department of Urology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Ireland
| | - RA Keenan
- Department of Urology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Ireland
| | - PJ O’Donoghue
- Department of Urology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Ireland
| | - M Hegazy
- Department of Urology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Ireland
| | - BB McGuire
- Department of Urology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kenigsberg AP, Meng X, Ghandour R, Margulis V. Oncologic outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1841-1852. [PMID: 32944548 PMCID: PMC7475687 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy is the mainstay of surgical treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a disease which comprises approximately 5% of urothelial malignancies. Minimally-invasive and nephron-sparing interventions have been explored, although thus far have not shown comparable oncologic outcomes except in a relatively narrow set of patients. Due to the relative rarity of the disease, it has taken decades and multi-disciplinary efforts to sufficiently identify prognostic factors of oncologic outcomes. Despite these efforts, however, oncologic outcomes of nephroureterectomy have remained remarkably stable over the past 30 years. New techniques, such as laparoscopic and robotic surgery, have been applied to this procedure. High level evidence regarding equivalent oncologic outcomes is lacking and open surgery remains the standard of care for high-stage disease, although there is a role for laparoscopic and robotic nephroureterectomy. The importance of bladder cuff removal in improving oncologic outcomes has been broadly accepted, although there is no consensus as to the most oncologically appropriate technique. There does appear to be evidence that endoscopic techniques confer worse oncologic control. The role of lymphadenectomy remains controversial, although there is evidence that increased nodal yield could have oncologic benefit. Given disease heterogeneity and varied technical approaches to the procedure, no consensus standardized template has been identified. There is level 1 evidence for the use of intravesical chemotherapy peri-operatively and that this intervention can improve the risk of intravesical recurrence. Advances in systemic neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy have yielded promising results and are likely to become standard of care for patients without contraindications. Immunotherapy and targeted biologic agents are also likely to improve the surgical efficacy of radical nephroureterectomy as well. Ultimately, more high level evidence is needed to identify successful surgical and medical approaches to UTUC and multi-institutional collaboration is critical to this progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2020; 79:62-79. [PMID: 32593530 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 493] [Impact Index Per Article: 123.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
|
34
|
Survival Benefits Based on the Number of Lymph Nodes Removed during Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061933. [PMID: 32575801 PMCID: PMC7357082 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of lymph node dissection (LND) is still controversial for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and there are no guidelines regarding its use. This study was conducted to find a higher level of evidence for the survival benefits based on the number of LNs removed during radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included studies comparing patients who underwent LND during RNUx for UTUC. We searched the major electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase®, and Scopus®) and conducted manual searches of the electronically available abstracts of the major international urology cancer meetings [American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), American Urological Association (AUA), and Eropean Association of Urology (EAU)] prior to April 2019 using grouped terms of nephroureterectomy (nephroureterectom*) and lymph node excision (lymphadenectomy; lymph + node*; lymph* + metasta*) with variations in the terms. Study selection, data collection, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent authors (A and B). Six retrospective case-control studies included a total of 33,944 patients who underwent RNUx for UTUC, 5071 of whom underwent LND and were finally included in the meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) in these studies revealed that an increased number of LNs removed during RNUx was associated with improved cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with UTUC (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99; p = 0.07). In addition, increased numbers of LNs removed were associated with improved overall survival (OS) in pN0 patients. However, in pN+ patients, the number of LNs removed showed no survival benefit on CSS, overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS). Higher numbers of LNs removed during RNUx were associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with UTUC. This study confirmed that LND also has oncological benefits in UTUC patients. Although still a controversial topic, meticulous LND must be considered, and efforts should be made to eliminate as many LNs as possible when administering RNUx for UTUC, especially in patients without clear evidence of LN metastasis.
Collapse
|
35
|
Mori K, Janisch F, Mostafaei H, Kimura S, Lysenko I, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Enikeev DV, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Chlosta P, Nyirady P, Babjuk M, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic role of preoperative De Ritis ratio in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:601.e17-601.e24. [PMID: 32127252 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate the predictive and prognostic role of the De Ritis ratio in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy in a large multi-institutional cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS The preoperative De Ritis ratio was assessed in a multi-institutional cohort of 2,492 patients. An altered De Ritis ratio was defined as a ratio >1.35. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of the De Ritis ratio with advanced disease. The association of the De Ritis ratio with survival outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS An altered De Ritis ratio was observed in 985 (41.5%) patients; it was associated with a more advanced pathological features. In a preoperative model, the De Ritis ratio was an independent predictive factor for the presence of lymph node metastasis and muscle-invasive and nonorgan-confined disease (P < 0.05). Compared to patients with a normal De Ritis ratio, those with an altered De Ritis ratio had worse recurrence free (P <0.0001), cancer specific (P = 0.0003), and overall survival (P = 0.0014) in the Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the multivariable analyses that was adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features, the De Ritis ratio did not retain its independent prognostic value. CONCLUSIONS In UTUC, the preoperative De Ritis ratio is associated with adverse clinicopathologic features and independently predicts features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC. Therefore, it might be useful to incorporate the De Ritis ratio into prognostic tools in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ivan Lysenko
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology Department, PARIS, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Peter Nyirady
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mori K, Janisch F, Mostafaei H, Lysenko I, Kimura S, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic value of preoperative blood-based biomarkers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:315-333. [PMID: 32088103 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the prognostic value of preoperative blood-based biomarkers in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy. METHODS PUBMED, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched in June 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared cancer-specific survival in UTUC patients with and without pretreatment laboratory abnormalities. Formal meta-analyses were performed for this outcome. RESULTS The review identified 54 studies with 23,118 patients, of these, 52 studies with 22,513 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Several preoperative blood-based biomarkers were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival as follows: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.06), C-reactive protein (pooled HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (pooled HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.30-2.17), white blood cell (pooled HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.02-2.46), De Ritis ratio (pooled HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.92-2.99), fibrinogen (pooled HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.86-2.68), albumin-globulin ratio (pooled HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.87-4.84), hemoglobin (pooled HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22-1.87), and estimate glomerular filtration rate (pooled HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.19-1.94). The Cochrane's Q test and I2 test revealed significant heterogeneity for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, white blood cell, hemoglobin, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.022; I2 = 50.7%, P = 0.000; I2 = 80.4%, P = 0.000; I2 = 88.3%, P = 0.010; I2 = 62.0%, P = 0.000; I2 = 83.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Several pretreatment laboratory abnormalities in patients with UTUC were associated with increased risks of cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, blood-based biomarkers may have the potential to serve as prognostic factors to assist patients and physicians in selecting appropriate treatment strategies for UTUC. However, considering the study limitations including heterogeneity and retrospective nature of the primary data, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ivan Lysenko
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Soria F, Giordano A, D'Andrea D, Moschini M, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Bensalah K, Mathieu R, Chlosta P, Babjuk M, Glybochko PV, Enikeev DV, Remzi M, Gust K, Gontero P, Shariat SF. Prognostic value of the systemic inflammation modified Glasgow prognostic score in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy: Results from a large multicenter international collaboration. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:602.e11-602.e19. [PMID: 32037197 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic role of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) for the prediction of oncological outcomes in a retrospective large multicenter cohort of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter cohort of patients treated with RNU for clinically nonmetastatic UTUC. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the ability of mGPS to predict nonorgan confined (NOC) disease and lymph-node involvement (LNI) at RNU. Multivariable Cox-regression models were performed to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative prognostic effect of mGPS on survival outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 2,492 patients were included in the study. Of these, 1,929 (77%), 530 (21%), and 33 (1%) had a mGPS of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. mGPS was associated with characteristics of tumor aggressiveness and independently predicted LNI and NOC at RNU (both P < 0.05). On univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses, higher mGPS was independently associated with recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival, both in a preoperative and in a postoperative setting. The inclusion of mGPS significantly improved the discrimination of a preoperative model for the prediction of oncologic outcomes compared to standard prognosticators. CONCLUSIONS We found that mGPS is independently associated with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes after RNU. Future studies should investigate the role of mGPS in a panel of preoperative markers for the prediction of NOC and LNI in UTUC patients, thus possibly improving the selection for perioperative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Giordano
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr V Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kilian Gust
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhai TS, Jin L, Zhou Z, Liu X, Liu H, Chen W, Lu JY, Yao XD, Feng LM, Ye L. Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1207. [PMID: 31830927 PMCID: PMC6907152 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6364-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to estimate the stage-specific impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on survival for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with nephroureterectomy (NU). Methods Overall, 7278 UTUC patients undergoing NU within the SEER database from 2004 to 2015 were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates according to LND status. Multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed the effect of LND on OS and CSS rates stratified by pathological tumor stage. Results LND was performed in 26.9% of patients, and in 18.6, 23.3, 31.2 and 45.9% for pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 patients, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, LND was associated with a higher OS or CSS in UTUC patients with pT3 and pT4 disease (all P < 0.05), but failed to achieve independent predictor status in patients with pT1 and pT2 disease (all P > 0.05). LND with 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes removed was prone to a higher OS or CSS only in pT4 compared to no LND (both P < 0.01). LND with 4 or more regional lymph nodes removed predisposed to a higher OS or CSS in pT3 or pT4 (all P < 0.05). Conclusions The beneficial effect of LND especially LND with 4 or more regional lymph nodes removed on survival was evident in pT3/4 patients. LND can be considered for pT3 and pT4, for pT1/2 remains to be seen, both of which will be verified by further prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Shuai Zhai
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Liang Jin
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.,Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Xiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200333, China
| | - Huan Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Shawan, Xinjiang, 832100, China
| | - Jing-Yi Lu
- Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, Xinjiang, 834000, China
| | - Xu-Dong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| | - Li-Ming Feng
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Shawan, Xinjiang, 832100, China.
| | - Lin Ye
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China. .,Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, Xinjiang, 834000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Diagnostic Value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography for Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 3:73-79. [PMID: 31591037 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Presence of lymph node metastases (LNM) is an important prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In various neoplasms, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is an established modality for preoperative lymph node (LN) staging. In UTUC, the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging in patients with UTUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data of 152 patients with UTUC who underwent FDG-PET/CT followed by surgical treatment in eight centers between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FDG-PET/CT results were compared with histopathology after lymph node dissection (LND). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and compared for patients with and without suspicious LNs on FDG-PET/CT. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We included 117 patients, of whom 62 underwent LND. Seventeen patients had LNM at histopathological evaluation. Sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of LNM were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57-96) and 84% (95% CI: 71-94), respectively. RFS was significantly worse in patients with LN-positive FDG-PET/CT than in those with LN-negative FDG-PET/CT (p=0.03). CSS (p=0.11) and OS (p=0.5) were similar between groups. This study is limited by its retrospective design and by its sample size. Our results warrant further validation. CONCLUSIONS FDG-PET/CT has 82% sensitivity and 84% specificity for the detection of LNM in patients with UTUC. Presence of suspicious LNs on FDG-PET/CT is associated with worse RFS. PATIENT SUMMARY In patients with upper tract urothelial cancer, positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans can detect lymph node metastases with noteworthy accuracy. Presence of suspicious lymph nodes on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is associated with worse recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
|
40
|
Grimes N, McKay A, Lee SM, Aboumarzouk OM. Lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy: Establishing the existing evidence based on a review of the literature. Arab J Urol 2019; 17:167-180. [PMID: 31489232 PMCID: PMC6711077 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2019.1596401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To determine the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the treatment of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (UTTCC), as the role of LND along with nephroureterectomy in treating UTTCC is unclear and several retrospective studies have been published on this topic with conflicting results. Methods: The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and individual urological journals, were searched for all studies investigating the role of LND in the treatment of UTTCC. Of the studies identified, those that met inclusion criteria were included in this review. Results: In all, 27 studies were included in this review, with 9303 patients who underwent LND. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Tumours were located in the renal pelvis in 62% of patients, in the ureter in 35.5%, and multifocal in 2.3%. In total: 77.1% were LN-negative and 22.9% had LN metastasis. For all patients undergoing LND, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 27–65.4% and 32.3–95%, respectively. For patients who underwent a LND in accordance with a standardised anatomical template, the 5-year RFS and CSS rates were 84.3–93% and 83.5–94%, respectively. Conclusion: LND may provide a survival benefit in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for UTTCC, particularly if following a standardised anatomical template and in those patients with muscle-invasive disease; however, a prospective RCT is required to confirm this. Abbreviations: CSS: cancer-specific survival; LN(D): lymph node (dissection); MeSH: Medical Subject Headings; OS: overall survival; pT: pathological T stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RFS: recurrence-free survival; UTTCC: upper tract TCC
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Grimes
- Department of Urology, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, UK
| | - Alastair McKay
- Department of Urology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Su-Min Lee
- Department of Urology, Weston Area Health NHS Trust, Weston-super-Mare, UK
| | - Omar M Aboumarzouk
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Current Disease Management of Primary Urethral Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:722-734. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
42
|
Duquesne I, Ouzaid I, Loriot Y, Moschini M, Xylinas E. Lymphadenectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8081190. [PMID: 31398895 PMCID: PMC6722659 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8081190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The role of lymphonodal dissection during surgery for a tumor of the urinary tract remains controversial. Objective: To analyze anatomical bases of lymphonodal dissection in tumors of the upper urinary tract and analyze its impact on survival, recurrence, and staging. Acquisition of data: A web-based search for scientific articles using Medline/Pubmed was carried out to identify and analyze articles on the practice and the role of lymphonodal dissection in this indication. Data Synthesis: The lymphatic drainage of the upper urinary tract has rarely been studied and is poorly understood. The lymphonodal metastatic extension is the most common extension in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Lymphnode invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor. Therefore, it seems legitimate to offer an extended lymphonodal dissection to patients undergoing surgery to cure these tumors. When lymphnodes dissection respects clear anatomical principles based on the location of the primary tumor and its extension, it improves both survival and recurrence rates. This result could be secondary to the treatment of subclinical metastatic disease. Conclusion: An extended lymphadenectomy during surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma following strict anatomical pattern improves staging with a highly probable therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Duquesne
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75014 Paris, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Institute, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, University of Paris-Sud, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Idir Ouzaid
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Diderot University, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Institute, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, University of Paris-Sud, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6004 Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75006 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nazzani S, Mazzone E, Preisser F, Tian Z, Mistretta FA, Shariat SF, Montanari E, Acquati P, Briganti A, Saad F, Carmignani L, Karakiewicz PI. Rates of lymph node invasion and their impact on cancer specific mortality in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1238-1245. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
44
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Glybochko PV, Enikeev D, Rouprêt M, Fajkovic H, Seebacher V, Shariat SF. Risk stratification of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A Review of the Current Literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:503-513. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1621753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran, Iran
| | - Petr V. Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Veronika Seebacher
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Potential Benefit of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:224-241. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
46
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Similar to bladder cancer, more than 95% tumors of the upper urinary tract are urothelial carcinoma. At initial diagnosis approximately 60% of the tumors are already invasive. In case of distant metastasis (M+) there is no benefit of radical nephroureterectomy. In those cases, systemic therapy is indicated. OBJECTIVES The aim of this article is to present a systematic overview of different therapies in patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). RESULTS Currently there are insufficient data upon which the recommendations for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic UTUC can be based. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the gold standard in first-line treatment of metastatic UTUC. Due to a lower toxicity compared to MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin plus cisplatin), gemcitabine and cisplatin have become standard. However, carboplatin-based chemotherapies should not be considered interchangeable. Immunomodulatory therapies using checkpoint inhibition, particularly with antibodies directed against PD-1 (programmed cell death 1), PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) or CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte antigen-4) have shown significant antitumor activity with tolerable safety profiles and durable responses in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In those patients, unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, good response rates have been reported in case of a positive PD-L1 status. However, preliminary data of the KEYNOTE-361 and IMvigor130 studies showed a reduced survival in case of low PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
|
47
|
Eich ML, Tregnago AC, Faraj SF, Palsgrove DN, Fujita K, Bezerra SM, Munari E, Sharma R, Chaux A, Netto GJ. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2019; 474:21-27. [PMID: 30338346 PMCID: PMC6730551 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2468-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor that plays a crucial role in cell proliferation, growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. IGF1R overexpression has been observed in several cancers, including invasive bladder carcinomas, as a potential prognostic factor. Given known biologic differences between upper and lower urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, we assessed the expression status and prognostic significance of IGF1R in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Two tissue microarrays (TMAs) were built from 99 Japanese patients with non-metastatic UTUC submitted to radical nephroureterectomy between 1997 and 2011. TMAs were constructed with triplicate tumor and paired benign urothelium. Membranous IGF1R staining was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Two scoring methods were applied (Her2-score and H-score). The highest score was assigned to each tumor. IGF1R positivity was defined as Her2-score ≥ 1+. Association with clinicopathologic parameters and outcome was assessed using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and adjusted P values. We found positive IGF1R expression in 70% of UTUC. Outcomes were as follows: tumor recurrence, 33%; tumor progression, 59%; overall mortality, 33%; and cancer-specific mortality, 30%. IGF1R was not associated with any clinicopathologic features. In addition, IGF1R expression was not associated with tumor recurrence (HR = 0.54, CI = 0.25-1.1, P = 0.11), tumor progression (HR = 1.6, CI = 0.8-3.1, P = 0.19), overall mortality (HR = 1.5, CI = 0.68-3.4, P = 0.31), or cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.6, CI = 0.68-3.8, P = 0.27). Positive IGF1R expression was found in more than two thirds of UTUC. This finding provides a rationale to investigate IGF1R as a potential therapeutic target in UTUC. In contrast to bladder cancer, IGF1R expression in UTUC did not correlate with outcome, further pointing to biologic differences between UTUC and bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Lisa Eich
- Department of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, WP Building, Suite P230 l 619 19th Street, South, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7331, USA
| | - Aline C Tregnago
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sheila F Faraj
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Doreen N Palsgrove
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Stephania M Bezerra
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Enrico Munari
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rajni Sharma
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - George J Netto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, WP Building, Suite P230 l 619 19th Street, South, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7331, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lymph node dissection could bring survival benefits to patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based, propensity score-matched study. Int J Clin Oncol 2018; 24:296-305. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1356-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
49
|
Tamhankar AS, Patil SR, Ahluwalia P, Gautam G. Current Status of Lymphadenectomy During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer-Yes, No or Maybe? Indian J Surg Oncol 2018; 9:418-426. [PMID: 30288011 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0807-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
While pelvic lymphadenectomy during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is a well-established standard of care, the same does not hold true for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Indeed, a template-based lymphadenectomy is rarely, if ever, performed in conjunction with radical nephroureterectomy at most centres across the globe. While multiple studies have explored the staging and therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in cases of UTUC, there remain large gaps in our understanding of the indications, extent and safety of this procedure as an adjunct to nephroureterectomy. This article elucidates the current knowledge on outcomes, benefits and complications of template-based lymphadenectomy during radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC. We also explore the current evidence-based guidelines on this controversial topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Saurabh Ramesh Patil
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Gagan Gautam
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Guo R, Zhu Y, Xiong G, Li X, Zhang K, Zhou L. Role of lymph node dissection in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinomas: a meta-analysis. BMC Urol 2018; 18:24. [PMID: 29636103 PMCID: PMC5894184 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-018-0336-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node dissection (LND) is not routinely performed during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC) and the role of LND has been controversial. We aim to investigate whether patients with LND had improved survival in UTUC patients. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library for citations published prior to January 2016, describing LND performed among UTUC patients and conducted a standard meta-analysis of survival outcomes. RESULTS Eleven eligible studies containing 7516 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Pooled HRs for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 1.17 (P = 0.18) and 1.33 (P = 0.19) respectively. However, the patients in the LND group had more advanced tumour stages and grades (P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis showed that among muscle-invasive UTUC patients, the pooled HR for CSS and RFS were 1.10 (P = 0.42) and 0.92 (P = 0.72) respectively. Besides, no difference was found in CSS and RFS between pN0 and pNx individuals in overall populations and in patients with muscle-invasive UTUC, while pN+ patients had significantly worse prognosis when compared to pN0 patients. CONCLUSIONS LND during RNU allows more accurate staging and prediction of survival, but it remains uncertain whether LND independently improves survival in patients with UTUC. However, standard use of LND should be further investigated in a multi-center, prospective evaluation to obtain a definitive statement regarding this matter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runqi Guo
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yuze Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|