1
|
Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Siech C, Goyal JA, Touma N, Tian Z, Saad F, Califano G, Celentano G, la Rocca R, Napolitano L, Shariat SF, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Unmarried status effect on stage at presentation and treatment patterns in primary urethral carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:161.e17-161.e23. [PMID: 38320935 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unmarried status has been associated with advanced stage at presentation and lower treatment dose intensification rates in several urological and non-urological malignancies. However, no previous investigators focused of the association of unmarried status with locally advanced stage (T3-4N0-2) at presentation and lower bi-/trimodal therapy rates in primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) patients. To address these knowledge gaps, we relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS Within the SEER database 2000 to 2020, all non-metastatic PUC patients were identified. Logistic regression models (LRMs) tested for differences in stage at presentation and treatment modality in the overall cohort and then in a sex-specific fashion, according to marital status (married vs unmarried). RESULTS Of all 1,430 non-metastatic PUC patients, 1,004 (70%) were male vs 426 (30%) were female. Of 1,004 male PUC patients, 272 (27%) were unmarried. Of all 426 female PUC patients, 239 (56%) were unmarried. In multivariable LRMs predicting T3-4N0-2, unmarried status was independently associated with an increased risk of locally advanced stage at presentation in the overall cohort (odds ratio [OR]:1.31; P = 0.03) and in female patients (OR:1.62; P = 0.02), but not in male PUC patients (P = 0.6). In multivariable LRMs predicting bi-/trimodal therapy, unmarried status was an independent predictor of lower bi-/trimodal therapy rates in the overall cohort (OR:0.73; P = 0.02) and in male patients (OR:0.60; P = 0.007), but not in female PUC patients (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS Unmarried female PUC patients more likely harbored locally advanced stage at presentation. Conversely, unmarried male PUC patients are less likely to benefit from bi-/trimodal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nawar Touma
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto la Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Siech C, Goyal JA, Touma N, Tian Z, Saad F, Creta M, Califano G, Celentano G, Shariat SF, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Contemporary sex-specific analysis of the association of marital status with cancer-specific mortality in primary urethral carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:31.e1-31.e8. [PMID: 38101989 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown whether married status may be associated with lower cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates in primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) patients. To test for differences in CSM rates, according to marital status, we relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 2000-2020. METHODS Patient (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status), tumor (stage, histology), and treatment (surgery, systemic therapy) characteristics of PUC patients were tabulated. Then, Kaplan-Meier plots, as well as univariable and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models tested for differences in CSM rates according to marital status in overall cohort and then in sex-specific subgroup analyses. RESULTS Of all 1,571 PUC patients, 70% were male vs. 30% female. Females were statistically significantly younger (68 vs. 73 years), more frequently unmarried (54 vs. 28%), non-Caucasian (43 vs. 24%), more frequently harbored T3-4N0M0 (39 vs. 18%) and less frequently T1-2N0M0 (53 vs. 69%) or TanyN1-2M0/TanyNanyM1 (8 vs. 13%), relative to males. Moreover, we recorded differences in histotype proportions in females vs. males (urothelial 30 vs. 64%; squamous 24 vs. 22%; adenocarcinoma 36 vs. 7%; others 10 vs. 6%) and surgical treatment (none 22 vs. 17%; excisional biopsy 22 vs. 36%; partial urethrectomy 14 vs. 16%; radical urethrectomy 42 vs. 31%). In MCR models focusing on the entire cohort, married status independently predicted lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR]:0.82; P = 0.02). Similarly, in MCR models focusing on females, married status independently predicted lower CSM (HR:0.73; P = 0.03). Conversely, in MCR models focusing on males, married status failed to independently predict lower CSM (HR:0.89; P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS Married status was associated with lower CSM in PUC patients. However, this benefit applies to female PUC patients, but not to their male counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Morra
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, , Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nawar Touma
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, , Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, , Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim JM, Lee J, Sung SH. Application of The Paris System in neobladder washing cytology: Comparison between the original diagnosis and correlation with histopathology. Diagn Cytopathol 2023; 51:744-750. [PMID: 37610033 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In urinary diversion after radical cystectomy, the incidence of recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) in upper urinary tract or urethra are reported in 2%-17% of the patients. Urine cytology plays a pivotal role in detecting the recurrence of UC. However, cytologic diagnosis in urinary diversion including neobladder is often challenging due to significant degenerative changes and necro-inflammatory background. Since the proposal of The Paris System (TPS) for reporting cytology, the utility of TPS in urinary diversion specimen has not been studied yet. The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of TPS compared with the original diagnosis and correlate with the matched histopathological results. METHODS Urinary diversion cytology specimens with concurrent or subsequent biopsy or resection at EUMC in recent 16 years (from January 2002 to December 2018) are retrospectively reviewed and reclassified according to TPS criteria. The TPS categories and the original diagnoses were compared and correlated with follow-up histology. RESULTS Concurrent or subsequent biopsy or resection within a 6-month period was available in 45 cases from 28 patients. When applying TPS, the rate of atypical and suspicious categories decreased by 13.4% and 11.1%. Using TPS increased the value of sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy to 93.75%, 93.75%, and 90.91%, respectively. CONCLUSION Application of TPS reduced the rate of indeterminate diagnoses and moreover, improved the sensitivity and accuracy of urinary diversion cytology. Therefore, we believe that diversion urine cytology diagnosis according to TPS is useful to screen patients for detection of recurrence in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Min Kim
- Department of Pathology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Junghye Lee
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Postmortem Investigation Division, National Forensic Service, Wonju, South Korea
| | - Sun Hee Sung
- Department of Pathology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lai S, Wu P, Liu S, Seery S, Liu J, He L, Liu M, Zhang Y, Wang JY, Xu T. Presence of secondary bladder cancer following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: characteristics, risk factors, and predictive value. BMC Urol 2022; 22:211. [PMID: 36566200 PMCID: PMC9789644 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01158-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the characteristics, predictive risk factors, and prognostic effect of secondary bladder cancer (SBCa) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, the authors analyzed clinicopathologic characteristics and survival data from 472 UTUC patients with SBCa after RNU, between 2004 and 2017. Cox's proportional hazard regression model was implemented to identify independent predictors associated with post-recurrence outcomes. The threshold for statistical significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS In total, 200 Ta-3N0M0 localized UTUC patients with complete data were finally included. With a median follow-up of 71.0 months (interquartile ranges [IQR] 36.0 -103.8 months), 52.5% (n = 105) had died, with 30.5% (n = 61) dying of UTUC. The median time interval from UTUC to SBCa was 13.5 months (IQR 6.0-40.8 months). According to multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients with SBCa located at multiple sites, advanced SBCa stage, higher SBCa grade, elderly age and a shorter recurrence time, encountered worse cancer-specific survival (CSS), all p < 0.05. CONCLUSION For primary UTUC patients with SBCa after radical surgery, advanced age, multiple SBCa sites, shorter recurrence time, higher SBCa stage, and grade proved to be significant independent prognostic factors of CSS. We ought to pay more attention to SBCa prevention as well as to earlier signs which may increase the likelihood of early detection. Having the ability to manage what may be seen as the superficial SBCa signs may enable us to improve survival but further research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shicong Lai
- grid.411634.50000 0004 0632 4559Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Pengjie Wu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Shengjie Liu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Samuel Seery
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.9835.70000 0000 8190 6402Department of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW UK
| | - Jianyong Liu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Lei He
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Ming Liu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Yaoguang Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Jian-ye Wang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Tao Xu
- grid.411634.50000 0004 0632 4559Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044 China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laukhtina E, Mori K, D Andrea D, Moschini M, Abufaraj M, Soria F, Mari A, Krajewski W, Albisinni S, Teoh JYC, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Katayama S, Grossmann NС, Rajwa P, Enikeev D, Zimmermann K, Fajkovic H, Glybochko P, Shariat SF, Pradere B. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:806-815. [PMID: 34266740 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the incidence and risk factors of urethral recurrence (UR) as well as summarizing data on survival outcomes in patients with UR after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2021 for studies of patients with UR after RC. Incidence and risk factors of UR were the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoint was survival outcomes in patients who experienced UR. Twenty-one studies, comprising 9,435 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. Orthotopic neobladder (ONB) diversion was associated with a decreased probability of UR compared to non-ONB (pooled OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.31-0.61, P < 0.001) and male patients had a significantly higher risk of UR compared to female patients (pooled OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.83-5.47, P < 0.001). Among risk factors, prostatic urethral or prostatic stromal involvement (pooled HR: 5.44, 95% CI: 3.58-8.26, P < 0.001; pooled HR: 5.90, 95% CI: 1.82-19.17, P = 0.003, respectively) and tumor multifocality (pooled HR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.05-4.29, P < 0.001) were associated with worse urethral recurrence-free survival. Neither tumor stage (P = 0.63) nor CIS (P = 0.72) were associated with worse urethral recurrence-free survival. Patients with UR had a 5-year CSS that varied from 47% to 63% and an OS - from 40% to 74%; UR did not appear to be related to worse survival outcomes. Male patients treated with non-ONB diversion as well as patients with prostatic involvement and tumor multifocality seem to be at the highest risk of UR after RC. Risk-adjusted standardized surveillance protocols should be developed into clinical practice after RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - David D Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Nico С Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kristin Zimmermann
- Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Petr Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Surveillance of Bladder Cancer: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:S126-S138. [PMID: 33958107 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Urothelial cancer is the second most common cancer, and cause of cancer death, related to the genitourinary tract. The goals of surveillance imaging after the treatment of urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder are to detect new or previously undetected urothelial tumors, to identify metastatic disease, and to evaluate for complications of therapy. For surveillance, patients can be stratified into one of three groups: 1) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer with no symptoms or additional risk factors; 2) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer with symptoms or additional risk factors; and 3) muscle invasive bladder cancer. This document is a review of the current literature for urothelial cancer and resulting recommendations for surveillance imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodríguez-Serrano A, Carrión DM, Gómez Rivas J, Álvarez-Maestro M, Sánchez S, Rodríguez de Bethencourt F, Aguilera Bazán A, Martínez-Piñeiro L. Prognostic value of urinary cytology for detecting urothelial carcinoma recurrence after radical cystectomy. Actas Urol Esp 2021; 45:466-472. [PMID: 34148845 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urethral or upper urinary tract (UUT) recurrence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after radical cystectomy (RC) are rare (4-6%), and their diagnosis usually occurs within the first two years. Although it is known that its early detection offers benefit in terms of survival, currently there are no clear recommendations for the detection of recurrence in the remnant urothelium (RU). Our aim is to determine the diagnostic value of urinary cytology for the detection of recurrences in the RU and to estimate its impact as an early diagnostic method on survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective review of patients who underwent RC for urothelial carcinoma between 2008-2016, with a follow-up of at least 24 months. RESULTS The study included 142 patients. In a median follow-up of 68.5 months, nine patients (6.3%) presented recurrences in the RU (urethra: four, UUT: four, synchronous: one). The sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology for the diagnosis of UUT recurrences were 20% and 96%, respectively. No significant differences were found between overall survival and cancer-specific survival among patients according to the urinary cytology results. CONCLUSION Recurrences in the RU after RC are infrequent; our study has shown that urinary cytology offers a low sensitivity for their diagnoses. For these reasons, we do not consider that urinary cytology provides useful information for surveillance of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rodríguez-Serrano
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - D M Carrión
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Gómez Rivas
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Álvarez-Maestro
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Sánchez
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Rodríguez de Bethencourt
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Aguilera Bazán
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Martínez-Piñeiro
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wenzel M, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Würnschimmel C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Tilki D, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI. Sex-Related Differences Include Stage, Histology, and Survival in Urethral Cancer Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:135-143. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
9
|
Ghoreifi A, Djaladat H. Re: Comparison of renal function after open radical cystectomy, extracorporeal robot assisted radical cystectomy, and intracorporeal robot assisted radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:304-305. [PMID: 33551248 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Ghoreifi
- Research Fellow of Urologic Oncology, Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Associate Professor of Clinical Urology, Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodríguez-Serrano A, Carrión D, Gómez Rivas J, Álvarez-Maestro M, Sánchez S, Rodríguez de Bethencourt F, Aguilera Bazán A, Martínez-Piñeiro L. Prognostic value of urinary cytology for detecting urothelial carcinoma recurrence after radical cystectomy. Actas Urol Esp 2021. [PMID: 33509614 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urethral or upper urinary tract (UUT) recurrence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after radical cystectomy (RC) are rare (4-6%), and their diagnosis usually occurs within the first two years. Although it is known that its early detection offers benefit in terms of survival, currently there are no clear recommendations for the detection of recurrence in the remnant urothelium (RU). Our aim is to determine the diagnostic value of urinary cytology for the detection of recurrences in the RU and to estimate its impact as an early diagnostic method on survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective review of patients who underwent RC for urothelial carcinoma between 2008-2016, with a follow-up of at least 24 months. RESULTS The study included 142 patients. In a median follow-up of 68.5 months, nine patients (6.3%) presented recurrences in the RU (urethra: four, UUT: four, synchronous: one). The sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology for the diagnosis of UUT recurrences were 20% and 96%, respectively. No significant differences were found between overall survival and cancer-specific survival among patients according to the urinary cytology results. CONCLUSION Recurrences in the RU after RC are infrequent; our study has shown that urinary cytology offers a low sensitivity for their diagnoses. For these reasons, we do not consider that urinary cytology provides useful information for surveillance of these patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The clinical significance of ureteral and urethral recurrence in patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is scarce and heterogeneous. The aim of the current review is to summarize the recent literature on incidence, diagnosis and oncologic outcomes of ureteral and urethral recurrences after radical cystectomy. RECENT FINDINGS Frozen section analysis (FSA) of ureteral margin had a sensitivity and specificity of 69-77 and 83-96%, respectively. Considering the ureteral margin, the reported sensitivity and specificity were 33-93 and 99-100%, respectively. Transurethral biopsy of the prostatic urethra might help in counseling patients' treatment, although its accuracy and prognostic role is highly questionable. In patients treated with radical cystectomy, recurrence of the urethra or ureteral are rare, occurring approximately in 5% of patients. During the follow-up, urinary cytology and cross-sectional imaging improve the early detection of recurrence in asymptomatic patients, although the majority are diagnosed for symptomatic presentation. Their use should be tailored to the patient's risk of ureteral and/or urethral recurrence. Urethrectomy is indicated in case of singular urethral recurrence, whereas no clear data exists regarding the best management of ureteral recurrence, except surgical removal. SUMMARY Intraoperative FSA of ureters and urethra share good specificity but poor sensitivity. Recurrence at urethra and upper tract are rare and discordant data exists regarding survival outcomes. Oncologic surveillance after radical cystectomy with the aim to detect these recurrences should be tailored to the individualized patient's risk.
Collapse
|
12
|
Allen BC, Oto A, Akin O, Alexander LF, Chong J, Froemming AT, Fulgham PF, Lloyd S, Maranchie JK, Mody RN, Patel BN, Schieda N, Turkbey IB, Vapiwala N, Venkatesan AM, Wang CL, Yoo DC, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Surveillance of Bladder Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 16:S417-S427. [PMID: 31685109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Urothelial cancer is the second most common cancer, and cause of cancer death, related to the genitourinary tract. The goals of surveillance imaging after the treatment of urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder are to detect new or previously undetected urothelial tumors, to identify metastatic disease, and to evaluate for complications of therapy. For surveillance, patients can be stratified into one of three groups: (1) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer with no symptoms or additional risk factors; (2) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer with symptoms or additional risk factors; and (3) muscle invasive bladder cancer. This article is a review of the current literature for urothelial cancer and resulting recommendations for surveillance imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian C Allen
- Panel Vice-Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Panel Chair, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Oguz Akin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Pat F Fulgham
- Urology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, Texas, American Urological Association
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | - Bhavik N Patel
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Nicola Schieda
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and the Department of Radiology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Neha Vapiwala
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Carolyn L Wang
- University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mark E Lockhart
- Specialty Chair, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gakis G, Hassan FN, Schmid MA, Ölschläger M, Hackenberg S, Stenzl A, Renninger M. Prognostic significance of previous tonsillectomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Scand J Urol 2020; 54:297-303. [PMID: 32500778 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1773530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: To examine whether previous tonsillectomy (TE) impacts on survival after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC).Patients and Methods: A total of 320 patients were staged cM0 and underwent RC for BC between 2002 and 2013. We retrospectively investigated whether patients had undergone TE prior to RC. Chi-square/Fisher-Exact test was carried out to compare clinicopathological features between the TE- and non-TE-group. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and multivariable Cox-regression analysis of risk factors of recurrence. The median follow-up was 31 months (interquartile range: 9-54).Results: A history of TE was present in 18 of the 320 patients (5.6%). All TEs were performed for benign conditions. TE prior to RC was associated with a history of appendectomy (p = 0.045), lower age at RC (p = 0.029), tumor unifocality (p < 0.001), advanced histopathological tumor stage (p = 0.015), non-pure urothelial carcinoma (p = 0.025), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.035) and receipt of palliative chemotherapy (p = 0.004). The 3-year RFS was 39.2% for patients with previous TE and 62.4% for those without (p = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for all significant parameters of univariable analysis, lymph-node tumor involvement (p = 0.017), positive surgical margins (p = 0.047), tumor grade (p = 0.032), advanced tumor stage (≥pT3a; p = 0.049) and a history of TE (p = 0.021) remained independent prognosticators of recurrence.Conclusion: In this series, previous TE was an independent predictor of recurrence after RC for BC. Further studies are needed to assess whether TE induces immunological alterations that might exert adverse effects on cancer progression of patients with invasive BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians University, Wuerzburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Fahmy Nabil Hassan
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians University, Wuerzburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Manuel Alexander Schmid
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Markus Ölschläger
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians University, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Hackenberg
- Department of ENT, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians University, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Markus Renninger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Darling HS, Bellmunt J. Immunotherapy in non-metastatic urothelial cancer: back to the ‘future’. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019; 19:685-695. [DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1604673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H. S. Darling
- Medical Oncology & Hemato-oncology, Artemis Hospital, Gurugram, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Risk factors, follow-up, and treatment of urethral recurrence following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of 9498 patients. Oncotarget 2017; 9:2782-2796. [PMID: 29416811 PMCID: PMC5788679 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 08/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients frequently undergo radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for treatment of bladder cancer. However, they remain at risk of urethral recurrence (UR). Studies have determined various risk factors leading to urethral recurrence. However, no publications have weighed the predictive values of these factors. Materials and Methods Studies published between 1971 and 2016 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE. We used STATA software (Version 12.0) to estimate the pooled risk ratio. Results Twenty-five publications with 9498 patients were included. Overall, male patients, especially those with concomitant carcinoma in situ, superficial or intravesical bladder cancer, non-orthotopic diversion, prostatic involvement, bladder neck involvement, positive urethral margins or multifocal bladder cancer were at higher risk of urethral recurrence. The overall risks of recurrence, reported as risk ratios, varied widely. Among all 25 studies, 118 (60.2%) cases in 9 studies were diagnosed through routine follow-up. Another 82 (40.8%) patients in 11 studies first reported symptomatic abnormalities. Prognoses were worse for patients with symptomatic recurrence. Urethral cytology was the most common diagnostic method. Treatment after UR was reported for 272 cases in 14 publications, and 190 patients underwent urethrectomy and 52 underwent urethra-sparing treatments. Outcomes after UR were described in 12 studies reporting 180 cases, and 41 patients were alive through the end of follow-up and 65 patients died of bladder cancer. Conclusions UR following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer was closely related to risk factors. Precautions, strict follow-up protocols and rational therapies were critical to patients with high risks of urethral recurrences.
Collapse
|
16
|
Pichler R, Tulchiner G, Oberaigner W, Schaefer G, Horninger W, Brunner A, Heidegger I. Effect of Urinary Cytology for Detecting Recurrence in Remnant Urothelium After Radical Cystectomy: Insights From a 10-year Cytology Database. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e783-e791. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
17
|
Li Q, Assel M, Benfante N, Pietzak E, Bagrodia A, Cha E, Dalbagni G, Coleman J. Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Panurothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy Following Cystectomy for Metachronous Recurrence. J Urol 2017; 198:546-551. [PMID: 28342936 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report pathological, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy following radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients who underwent radical cystectomy and then radical nephroureterectomy for metachronous urothelial recurrence at our institution between January 1995 and December 2014. Univariable Cox regression was used to assess the association between overall survival and age, grade, stage, lymph node metastasis and radiographic findings. RESULTS Of the 3,173 patients treated with radical cystectomy 64 underwent subsequent radical nephroureterectomy for metachronous urothelial recurrence. Median age at radical cystectomy was 66 years (IQR 61-74). In the 64 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy median time from radical cystectomy to radical nephroureterectomy was 2.7 years (IQR 1.4-4.6). Among 37 patients who underwent ureteroscopy prior to radical nephroureterectomy 29 (78%) had a positive biopsy. Radical nephroureterectomy pathology findings revealed locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4) in 39% of cases and positive node status in 11% compared with locally advanced disease in 17% and positive node status in 6% on radical cystectomy pathology findings. The post-radical nephroureterectomy estimated glomerular filtration rate was less than 60 and less than 30 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in 96% and 40% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival after radical nephroureterectomy was 3.1 years (95% CI 2.4-4.3). Only lymph node involvement at radical nephroureterectomy was significantly associated with worse overall mortality (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.04-7.15, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS The prognosis is poor in patients with panurothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy following cystectomy with locally advanced disease in a large proportion. Renal function after these procedures diminished and almost all patients were ineligible for cisplatin based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Li
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa Assel
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eugene Pietzak
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eugene Cha
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zargar-Shoshtari K, Sexton WJ, Poch MA. Management of Urethral Recurrences: Urothelial and Nonurothelial. Urol Clin North Am 2016; 43:515-521. [PMID: 27717437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This article discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic options in the management of urethral cancer recurrence in patients treated with urethral sparing cystectomy as well as those who had urethral preservation following primary urethral carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Michael A Poch
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gakis G, Black PC, Bochner BH, Boorjian SA, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Kassouf W. Systematic Review on the Fate of the Remnant Urothelium after Radical Cystectomy. Eur Urol 2016; 71:545-557. [PMID: 27720534 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Urothelial carcinoma is considered a pan-urothelial disease. As such, the remnant urothelium in the upper urinary tract and urethra following radical cystectomy (RC) remains at risk for secondary urothelial tumors (SUTs). OBJECTIVE To describe the incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of patients with SUTs after RC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search was conducted using PubMed database according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify studies between 1970 and 2016 reporting on malignant diseases of the urothelium after RC for bladder cancer. The search strategy separated between upper and lower tract urothelial tumors. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of a total of 1069 studies, 57 were considered for evidence synthesis. SUTs occured in approximately 4-10% of patients after RC. Carcinoma in situ of the bladder, a history of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, and tumor involvement of the distal ureter are the strongest risk factors for secondary upper tract tumors. Risk factors for secondary urethral tumors represent urothelial malignancy in the prostatic urethra/prostate and bladder neck (in women), nonorthotopic diversions, and positive findings on permanent sections. The majority of patients (84%) with SUTs, presented with urothelial recurrence without evidence of metastasis. Of those, 84.0% were treated with surgery, 10.5% with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and 5.6% with topical chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. After a median follow-up of 91 mo (range: 26-155), 65.9% of patients died of disease and 21.5% died of other causes. Detection and treatment of SUTs at an asymptomatic stage can reduce the risks of cancer-specfific and overall mortality by 30%. A limitation of the study is that the available data were retrospective. CONCLUSIONS SUTs are rare oncological events and most patients have an adverse prognosis despite absence of distant disease at diagnosis. Therefore, surveillance of the remnant urothelium should be implemented for patients with histological features of panurothelial disease as it may improve timely detection and treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY Secondary tumors of the renal pelvis, ureters, and urethra occur in approximately 4-10% of patients after radical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. These patients' prognoses are reduced, likely due to delayed diagnosis. Therefore, routine surveillance might be important to detect tumors at an early stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Orthotopic urinary diversion has been performed for more than 30 years. Although it is considered to be the gold standard form of diversion in many centers of expertise, however it is uncommonly performed outside these institutions. The purpose of this article is to review the current indications and outcomes of orthotopic diversion with a focus on male patients and to explore potential barriers to wider dissemination of the technique. RECENT FINDINGS Approximately 75% of patients undergoing radical cystectomy today are candidates for orthotopic diversion and in the absence of absolute contraindications, very few patients chose to undergo an ileal conduit for personal reasons. In a recent quality of life study, the orthotopic neobladder was better than ileal conduit in terms of global health status and physical functioning. In a prospective randomized trial comparing a refluxing versus nonrefluxing neobladder, there was no difference in renal function after 3 years. There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest improved perioperative outcomes with the use of minimally invasive techniques. SUMMARY There are very few absolute contraindications for an orthotopic neobladder, which remains the gold standard form of diversion at many centers of expertise. Surgeon experience and thorough preoperative counseling with realistic expectations can ensure optimal outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
|
21
|
Patterns and prognostic significance of clinical recurrences after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A 20-year single center experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:735-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2015] [Revised: 01/30/2016] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Chan Y, Fisher P, Tilki D, Evans CP. Urethral recurrence after cystectomy: current preventative measures, diagnosis and management. BJU Int 2015; 117:563-9. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Chan
- Department of Urology; Medical Center; University of California, Davis; Sacramento CA USA
| | - Patrick Fisher
- Department of Urology; Medical Center; University of California, Davis; Sacramento CA USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology; Medical Center; University of California, Davis; Sacramento CA USA
| | - Christopher P. Evans
- Department of Urology; Medical Center; University of California, Davis; Sacramento CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen H, Liu L, Pambuccian SE, Barkan GA, Quek ML, Wojcik EM. Urine cytology in monitoring recurrence in urothelial carcinoma after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Cancer Cytopathol 2015; 124:273-8. [DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Revised: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Haiyan Chen
- Department of Pathology; Loyola University Medical Center; Maywood Illinois
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Pathology; NorthShore University Health System; Evanston Illinois
| | | | - Güliz A. Barkan
- Department of Pathology; Loyola University Medical Center; Maywood Illinois
| | - Marcus L. Quek
- Department of Urology; Loyola University Medical Center; Maywood Illinois
| | - Eva M. Wojcik
- Department of Pathology; Loyola University Medical Center; Maywood Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
He YD, Luo ZH, Yang M, Ruan XX, Liu SY, Wu ZQ, Deng WM, Shao CK, Su ZL, He D, Gao X, Li LY. Prospective validation of DACH2 as a novel biomarker for prediction of metastasis and prognosis in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015; 459:416-23. [PMID: 25744029 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Metastasis is the main cause of death from muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), and the metastatic potential of tumors is often unpredictable. The role of Dachshund homolog 2 gene (DACH2) in tumorigenesis remains unexplored. We aimed to investigate whether DACH2 can be used as a biomarker to predict metastasis and prognosis of muscle-invasive UCB in a sequential training and validation fashion. For the training set (n = 40), compared with UCB patients without lymph node (LN) metastasis, both DACH2 protein and mRNA expression were greatly increased in case-matched patients with LN metastasis. For the independent validation set (n = 243), patients with primary UCB that did not express DACH2 had a longer metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) than did those with tumors expressing DACH2 (5-year MFS: 88% [95% CI 80-96] versus 19% [95% CI 7-31], p < 0.001; 5-year OS: 93% [95% CI 87-99] versus 37% [95% CI 23-51], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of DACH2 status showed hazard ratios of 7.34 (95% CI 3.15-11.87, p < 0.001) for MFS and 3.96 (95% CI 2.04-7.16, p < 0.001) for OS which were much higher than hazard ratios associated with other independent risk factors. Collectively, DACH2 is an independent prognostic marker that can be used at initial diagnosis of UCB to identify patients who have a high potential to develop metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Di He
- Center of Health Care, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Zi-Huan Luo
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Ming Yang
- Department of Urology, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Medicine, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Xing-Xing Ruan
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Shao-Yuan Liu
- Department of Urology, Foshan First Municipal People's Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Zhen-Quan Wu
- Department of Urology, Foshan First Municipal People's Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Wei-Ming Deng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, 421000, China
| | - Chun-Kui Shao
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Zu-Lan Su
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Dan He
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Liao-Yuan Li
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
| |
Collapse
|