1
|
Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Siech C, Goyal JA, Touma N, Tian Z, Saad F, Creta M, Califano G, Celentano G, Shariat SF, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Contemporary sex-specific analysis of the association of marital status with cancer-specific mortality in primary urethral carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:31.e1-31.e8. [PMID: 38101989 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown whether married status may be associated with lower cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates in primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) patients. To test for differences in CSM rates, according to marital status, we relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 2000-2020. METHODS Patient (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status), tumor (stage, histology), and treatment (surgery, systemic therapy) characteristics of PUC patients were tabulated. Then, Kaplan-Meier plots, as well as univariable and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models tested for differences in CSM rates according to marital status in overall cohort and then in sex-specific subgroup analyses. RESULTS Of all 1,571 PUC patients, 70% were male vs. 30% female. Females were statistically significantly younger (68 vs. 73 years), more frequently unmarried (54 vs. 28%), non-Caucasian (43 vs. 24%), more frequently harbored T3-4N0M0 (39 vs. 18%) and less frequently T1-2N0M0 (53 vs. 69%) or TanyN1-2M0/TanyNanyM1 (8 vs. 13%), relative to males. Moreover, we recorded differences in histotype proportions in females vs. males (urothelial 30 vs. 64%; squamous 24 vs. 22%; adenocarcinoma 36 vs. 7%; others 10 vs. 6%) and surgical treatment (none 22 vs. 17%; excisional biopsy 22 vs. 36%; partial urethrectomy 14 vs. 16%; radical urethrectomy 42 vs. 31%). In MCR models focusing on the entire cohort, married status independently predicted lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR]:0.82; P = 0.02). Similarly, in MCR models focusing on females, married status independently predicted lower CSM (HR:0.73; P = 0.03). Conversely, in MCR models focusing on males, married status failed to independently predict lower CSM (HR:0.89; P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS Married status was associated with lower CSM in PUC patients. However, this benefit applies to female PUC patients, but not to their male counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Morra
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, , Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nawar Touma
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, , Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, , Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baird BA, Lyon TD, Wu K, Anderson A, Broderick GA. Complete pathologic response of bulbar urethral squamous cell carcinoma in situ to topical 5-fluorouracil with urethral milking. Can J Urol 2022; 29:11119-11122. [PMID: 35429432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Primary urethral carcinoma is a rare oncologic condition with limited data to support organ-sparing therapies. Herein, we present a case of primary urethral squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the bulbar urethra treated with intraurethral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) who exhibited a complete pathologic response observed at the time of dismembered urethroplasty. The clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment course of our case are reviewed. These data may support the use of intraurethral 5-FU for similar cases in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryce A Baird
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Timothy D Lyon
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Kevin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang N, Min J, Wei Q, Tan W, Dang Q. Primary Urothelium Carcinoma of the Distal Urethra in a Male: Case Report and Literature Review. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13:6011-6015. [PMID: 32612366 PMCID: PMC7322166 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s252822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Male primary urethral urothelium carcinoma is a rare clinical case. Here, we detail a case of a 58-year-old man with primary urothelium carcinoma of the distal urethra treated in our hospital. The patient with a neoplasm inside the external urethral orifice for 2 years, which was previously diagnosed as condyloma acuminata, had received photodynamic therapy for 3 times, with initial symptoms of urinary stream bifurcation and dysuria. The exfoliative urine cytology showed negative. Cystoscopy showed a tumor growing around the distal urethra. Biopsy and immunohistochemistry revealed high-grade papillary urothelium carcinoma. The patient received partial urethrectomy, followed by urinary bladder irrigation chemotherapy with epirubicin postoperatively. The corpus spongiosum was invaded while the corpus cavernosa were not. Postoperative pathological examination showed high-grade invasive urothelium carcinoma. There is no evidence of tumor recurrence, metastasis or surgical complications during a 61-month follow-up period. Male primary urethral urothelium carcinoma is a rare clinical case with particular clinical and pathological characteristics. There are still no established treatment guidelines and should be studied further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510515, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province 523000, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingxian Min
- Department of Health Management, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Wanlong Tan
- Department of Urology, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510515, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Dang
- Department of Urology, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510515, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore SJ, Rashidipour O, Moore RB. Primary Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Male Urethra Presenting with Scrotal Abscess and Subsequent Development of Fournier's Gangrene. Clin Med Insights Case Rep 2016; 9:83-86. [PMID: 27721660 PMCID: PMC5045045 DOI: 10.4137/ccrep.s40420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
This male patient presented with a scrotal abscess and urinary obstruction. The patient's history included a perineal abscess and the development of urethrocutaneous fistulae (watering-can perineum). He underwent multiple debridement procedures without resolution. During the fifth debridement for Fournier's gangrene, a biopsy revealed invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The patient was bedridden because of the large mass, a wide en bloc resection with lymphadenectomy and reconstruction was performed revealing a large (22 cm) squamous cell carcinoma originating from the urethra. He also received palliative chemoradiotherapy and hip hemiarthroplasty. Unfortunately, he succumbed to the disease. Given the recognized relationship between inflammation and the development of cancer, it is important to entertain a differential diagnosis of cancer, especially with erosive infections. This case report highlights the all too common late presentation of urethral cancer. Interestingly, despite correction of the bedridden state with palliative surgery, the patient did not perceive an improvement in quality of life based on the FACT-G questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Moore
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Omid Rashidipour
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ronald B Moore
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gakis G, Morgan TM, Daneshmand S, Keegan KA, Todenhöfer T, Mischinger J, Schubert T, Zaid HB, Hrbacek J, Ali-El-Dein B, Clayman RH, Galland S, Olugbade K, Rink M, Fritsche HM, Burger M, Chang SS, Babjuk M, Thalmann GN, Stenzl A, Efstathiou JA. Impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced primary urethral cancer: results of the international collaboration on primary urethral carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1754-9. [PMID: 25969370 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2014] [Accepted: 05/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy in advanced primary urethral carcinoma (PUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A series of 124 patients (86 men, 38 women) were diagnosed with and underwent surgery for PUC in 10 referral centers between 1993 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was used to investigate the impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy on overall survival (OS). The median follow-up was 21 months (mean: 32 months; interquartile range: 5-48). RESULTS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (N-CRT) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACH), and ACH was delivered in 12 (31%), 6 (15%) and 21 (54%) of these patients, respectively. Receipt of NAC/N-CRT was associated with clinically node-positive disease (cN+; P = 0.033) and lower utilization of cystectomy at surgery (P = 0.015). The objective response rate to NAC and N-CRT was 25% and 33%, respectively. The 3-year OS for patients with objective response to neoadjuvant treatment (complete/partial response) was 100% and 58.3% for those with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.30). Of the 26 patients staged ≥cT3 and/or cN+ disease, 16 (62%) received perioperative chemo(radio)therapy and 10 upfront surgery without perioperative chemotherapy (38%). The 3-year OS for this locally advanced subset of patients (≥cT3 and/or cN+) who received NAC (N = 5), N-CRT (N = 3), surgery-only (N = 10) and surgery plus ACH (N = 8) was 100%, 100%, 50% and 20%, respectively (P = 0.016). Among these 26 patients, receipt of neoadjuvant treatment was significantly associated with improved 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.022). Proximal tumor location correlated with inferior 3-year RFS and OS (P = 0.056/0.005). CONCLUSION In this series, patients who received NAC/N-CRT for cT3 and/or cN+ PUC appeared to demonstrate improved survival compared with those who underwent upfront surgery with or without ACH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gakis
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - T M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - S Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles
| | - K A Keegan
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - T Todenhöfer
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - J Mischinger
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - T Schubert
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - H B Zaid
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - J Hrbacek
- 2nd Medical School, Department of Urology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - B Ali-El-Dein
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura Clinic, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - R H Clayman
- Department of Radiooncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S Galland
- Department of Radiooncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - K Olugbade
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - H-M Fritsche
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - S S Chang
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - M Babjuk
- 2nd Medical School, Department of Urology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - J A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiooncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|