Predicting Response and Recognizing Resistance: Improving Outcomes in Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Therapy Sequence in Advanced Cancer: A Microsimulation Approach with Application to Metastatic Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced cancer may undergo multiple lines of treatment, switching therapies as their disease progresses. We developed a general microsimulation framework to study therapy sequence and applied it to metastatic prostate cancer.

METHODS

We constructed a discrete-time state transition model to study 2 lines of therapy. Using digitized published survival curves (progression-free survival, time to progression, and overall survival [OS]), we inferred event types (progression or death) and estimated transition probabilities using cumulative incidence functions with competing risks. We incorporated within-patient dependence over time; first-line therapy response informed subsequent event probabilities. Parameters governing within-patient dependence calibrated the model-based results to a target clinical trial. We applied these methods to 2 therapy sequences for metastatic prostate cancer, wherein both docetaxel (DCT) and abiraterone acetate (AA) are appropriate for either first- or second-line treatment. We assessed costs and quality-adjusted life-years (5-y QALYs) for 2 treatment strategies: DCT → AA versus AA → DCT.

RESULTS

Models assuming within-patient independence overestimated OS time, which corrected with the calibration approach. With generic pricing, AA → DCT dominated DCT → AA, (higher 5-y QALYs and lower costs), consistent for all values of calibration parameters (including no correction). Model calibration increased the difference in 5-y QALYs between treatment strategies (0.07 uncorrected v. 0.15 with base-case correction). Applying the correction decreased the estimated difference in cost (-$5,360 uncorrected v. -$3,066 corrected). Results were strongly affected by the cost of AA. Under a lifetime horizon, AA → DCT was no longer dominant but still cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: $19,463).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a microsimulation approach to study the cost-effectiveness of therapy sequences for advanced prostate cancer, taking care to account for within-patient dependence.

HIGHLIGHTS

We developed a discrete-time state transition model for studying therapy sequence in advanced cancers.Results are sensitive to dependence within patients.A calibration approach can introduce dependence across lines of therapy and closely match simulation outcomes to target trial outcomes.

177Lu-PSMA-I&T Radioligand Therapy for Treating Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Single-Centre Study in East Asians

Purpose

There is increasing evidence for convincing efficacy and safety of ¹⁷⁷Lu-labled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, data are not available regarding the feasibility of ¹⁷⁷Lu-labled PSMA-targeted RLT in East Asians. The present study summarized the first experience with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy for mCRPC in China.

Methods

Forty consecutive patients with mCRPC were enrolled from December 2019 to September 2021. Eligible patients received ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-I&T RLT at intervals of 8-12 weeks. Toxicity was assessed based on standardized physicians’ reports and the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events criteria. Response to PRLT was evaluated according to the changes of prostate specific antigen (PSA) response and imaging response. Quality of life (QOL), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and pain (visual analogue scale, VAS) were also evaluated. The impacts of baseline parameters on the therapeutic effects were explored by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

All patients underwent a total of 86 cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-I&T (range: 1-5 cycles) with dosages of 3.70-14.43GBq per cycle, with a median of 8 months followed up. Six patients (15%) developed mild reversible xerostomia during follow-up, and 28 patients (70%) experienced grade 1-4 bone marrow dysfunction. Changes in PSA were assessed after therapy, accompanied by the partial response (PR) in 25 patients (62.5%), the stable disease (SD) in 5 patients (12.5%), and the progressive disease (PD) in 10 patients (25%), respectively. QOL, KPS (%) and VAS scores were improved significantly due to treatment (P<0.05). Overweight and elevated AST, ALP, and LDH were associated with poor outcomes.

Conclusions

¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-I&T achieves the favourable response and well tolerance in mCRPC, which associates with not only PSA decline but also with tumor remission including lymphadenopathy and bone metastasis. We also find that patients with overweight and high AST, ALP, and LDH should be cautious to undergo the PRLT. Large-cohort studies are warranted to confirm the initial findings and elucidate the survival benefit of the treatment.

Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE)

Purpose

To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of niraparib with apalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Methods

BEDIVERE was a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study of niraparib 200 or 300 mg/day with apalutamide 240 mg or AAP (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg; prednisone 10 mg). Patients with mCRPC were previously treated with ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, including ≥ 1 androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy for prostate cancer.

Results

Thirty-three patients were enrolled (niraparib-apalutamide, 6; niraparib-AAP, 27). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported when combinations included niraparib 200 mg; five patients receiving niraparib 300 mg experienced DLTs [niraparib-apalutamide, 2/3 patients (66.7%); niraparib-AAP, 3/8 patients (37.5%)]. Although data are limited, niraparib exposures were lower when given with apalutamide compared with historical niraparib monotherapy exposures in patients with solid tumors. Because of the higher incidence of DLTs, the niraparib–apalutamide combination and niraparib 300 mg combination with AAP were not further evaluated. Niraparib 200 mg was selected as the RP2D with AAP. Of 19 patients receiving niraparib 200 mg with AAP, 12 (63.2%) had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common being thrombocytopenia (26.3%) and hypertension (21.1%). Five patients (26.3%) had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation.

Conclusions

These results support the choice of niraparib 200 mg as the RP2D with AAP. The niraparib–AAP combination was tolerable in patients with mCRPC, with no new safety signals. An ongoing phase 3 study is further assessing this combination in patients with mCRPC.

Trial registration no.

NCT02924766 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-021-04249-7.

Overall Survival Among Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Under Abiraterone Versus Enzalutamide: A Direct Comparison Based on a 2014-2018 French Population Study (the SPEAR Cohort)

Abiraterone acetate (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are considered to be clinically relevant comparators among chemotherapy-naive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. No clinical trials comparing overall survival with ABI versus ENZ in a head-to-head approach have been published so far. A few observational studies with low power suggested a potential benefit of ENZ. We used the French National Health Data System to compare overall survival of new users of ABI and ENZ among chemotherapy-naive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer in 2014-2017, followed through 2018 (the SPEAR cohort, a 2014-2018 cohort study). With an intent-to-treat approach, a survival analysis was performed, estimating hazard ratios for overall survival with the inverse probability weighted Cox model method. Among 10,308 new users, 64% were treated with ABI and 36% with ENZ. The crude mortality rate was 25.2 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI): 24.4, 26.0) for ABI and 23.7 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 22.6, 24.9) for ENZ. In the weighted analysis, ENZ was associated with better overall survival compared with ABI (hazard ratio = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.96) with a median overall survival of 31.7 months for ABI and 34.2 months for ENZ). When restricting to 2015-2017 new users, the effect estimate shifted up to a hazard ratio of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.01).

Facing life-prolonging treatment: The perspectives of men with advanced metastatic prostate cancer - An interview study

PURPOSE

Several life-prolonging treatment options have recently become available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, research regarding patient experiences while undergoing these treatments is scarce. The aim was to explore the perspectives of men when facing life-prolonging treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

METHOD

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 men as they were starting, undergoing or had completed their first life-prolonging treatment. Interpretive description was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The results illuminate the complexity of facing life-prolonging treatment, with interlaced dimensions beyond just the outcome, and where the men described other dimensions of their lives in relation to the treatment. The results are presented as 4 themes; Considering treatment when the remainder of life is at stake, Preparing for the life-prolonging treatment after deciding to go through with it, Considering the prospect of the life-prolonging treatment not being successful and Reflecting on death and dying in the light of a life-limiting illness.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality and content of the remainder of life are central for men when facing life-prolonging treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This is important when weighing desired treatment outcomes against side effects, and when reflecting upon whether going through with treatment would be worth it or not. The results illuminate the importance of encouraging men at this stage to express expectations, hopes and fears regarding the treatment and the future when considering life-prolonging treatments. Nurses working with these patients are important in the decision-making process and in evaluating treatments, to detect needs for interventions.

Resistance to second generation antiandrogens in prostate cancer: pathways and mechanisms

Androgen deprivation therapy targeting the androgens/androgen receptor (AR) signaling continues to be the mainstay treatment of advanced-stage prostate cancer. The use of second-generation antiandrogens, such as abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, has improved the survival of prostate cancer patients; however, a majority of these patients progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The mechanisms of resistance to antiandrogen treatments are complex, including specific mutations, alternative splicing, and amplification of oncogenic proteins resulting in dysregulation of various signaling pathways. In this review, we focus on the major mechanisms of acquired resistance to second generation antiandrogens, including AR-dependent and AR-independent resistance mechanisms as well as other resistance mechanisms leading to CRPC emergence. Evolving knowledge of resistance mechanisms to AR targeted treatments will lead to additional research on designing more effective therapies for advanced-stage prostate cancer.

[Radium-223 for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) : The androgen receptor-independent active agent in the therapeutic sequence]

BACKGROUND

Radium-223 improves overall survival and preserves quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastases. Radium-223 can be used in combination with a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue and as part of a sequential treatment scheme if disease progresses after at least two prior lines of systemic mCRPC therapies or if no other available systemic treatment is eligible.

OBJECTIVES

Today physicians are faced with a previously unknown multitude and complexity of options for the treatment of mCRPC. An increasing number of clinical trials contribute to the dynamics of the therapeutic landscape. Radium-223 was approved for mCRPC treatment in 2013. Up to now the recommendations of use have been adjusted several times. Highlighting recent clinical trials and practice, this paper explores the position of radium-223 within the therapeutic sequence and outlines key elements for the interdisciplinary cooperation between uro-oncologists and nuclear medicine specialists.

RESULTS

The mode of action of radium-223 does not depend on the androgen receptor (AR) pathway. Thus, it is an option in the therapeutic sequence when the efficacy of other agents is reduced by resistance. Furthermore, the efficacy of prior or subsequent medications are neither reduced nor enhanced by radium-223. The opportunity of an AR-independent and survival-prolonging medication should be taken as soon as the indication criteria are met because the incidence of visceral metastases increases during disease progression. According to current mCRPC guidelines, the osteoprotective use of bisphosphonates or denosumab is recommended, before treatment with radium-223 is started or resumed.

Distinct biological responses of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer cells upon exposure to G-quadruplex interacting naphthalenediimide derivatives

Small molecules able to bind non-canonical G-quadruplex DNA structures (G4) have been recently tested as novel potential agents for the treatment of prostate cancer thanks to their repression of aberrant androgen receptor gene. However, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), a letal form of prostate cancer, is still incurable. Here we tested two naphthalenediimide derivatives, previously reported as multitarget agents, on a couple of relevant mCRPC cell models (DU145 and PC-3). We showed that these compounds interfere with the RAS/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways. Interestingly, both these two biological processes depend upon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) activation. By means of biological and analytical tools we showed that our compounds are efficient inducers of the structural transition of the EGFR promoter towards a G-quadruplex conformation, ultimately leading to a reduction of the receptor production. The overall result is an interesting cytotoxic profile for these two derivatives. Thanks to their activity at different steps, these compounds can open the way to novel therapeutic approaches for mCRPC that could contribute to escape resistance to selective treatments.

Expression of AR-V7 and ARv567es in Circulating Tumor Cells Correlates with Outcomes to Taxane Therapy in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treated in TAXYNERGY

PURPOSE

Biomarkers aiding treatment optimization in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are scarce. The presence or absence of androgen receptor (AR) splice variants, AR-V7 and ARv567es, in mCRPC patient circulating tumor cells (CTC) may be associated with taxane treatment outcomes.Experimental Design: A novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay assessed AR-splice variant expression in CTCs from patients receiving docetaxel or cabazitaxel in TAXYNERGY (NCT01718353). Patient outcomes were examined according to AR-splice variant expression, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA)50 response and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of the 54 evaluable patients, 36 (67%) were AR-V7+, 42 (78%) were ARv567es+, 29 (54%) were double positive, and 5 (9%) were double negative. PSA50 response rates at any time were numerically higher for AR-V7- versus AR-V7+ (78% vs. 58%; P = 0.23) and for ARv567es- versus ARv567es+ (92% vs. 57%; P = 0.04) patients. When AR-V mRNA status was correlated with change in nuclear AR from cycle 1 day 1 to day 8 (n = 24), AR-V7+ patients (n = 16) had a 0.4% decrease versus a 12.9% and 26.7% decrease in AR-V7-/ARv567es- (n = 3) and AR-V7-/ARv567es+ (n = 5) patients, respectively, suggesting a dominant role for AR-V7 over ARv567es. Median PFS was 12.02 versus 8.48 months for AR-V7- versus AR-V7+ (HR = 0.38; P = 0.01), and 12.71 versus 7.29 months for ARv567es- versus ARv567es+ (HR = 0.37; P = 0.02). For AR-V7+, AR-V7-/ARv567es+, and AR-V7-/ARv567es- patients, median PFS was 8.48, 11.17, and 16.62 months, respectively (P = 0.0013 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS

Although detection of both CTC-specific AR-V7 and ARv567es by ddPCR influenced taxane outcomes, AR-V7 primarily mediated the prognostic impact. The absence of both variants was associated with the best response and PFS with taxane treatment.See related commentary by Dehm et al., p. 1696.

Prognostic factors of oncologic outcomes in metastatic chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide in actual clinical practice in East Asia

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors for chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with enzalutamide in actual clinical practice using easily accessible clinical variables.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the following data from 113 patients with chemotherapy-naïve CRPC treated with enzalutamide: serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), testosterone, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP); platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs); and liver profiles. PSA progression-free survival (PFS), radiological PFS, and overall survival were estimated by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline levels, laboratory values at 2 months showed significantly lower PSA (160.2 ± 351.5 ng/ml vs. 47.4 ± 117.1 ng/ml) and ALP levels (201.86 ± 223.77 IU/l vs. 148.25 ± 146.81 IU/l) and a significantly higher percentage of lymphocytes (28.1% ± 10.6% vs. 31.2% ± 9.7%); those at 1 month showed a significantly lower percentage of neutrophils (61.0% ± 11.0% vs. 57.1% ± 12.5%). In the multivariate analysis, poor prognostic factors for PSA PFS were Gleason score ≥ 9 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.022; P = 0.0250); visceral metastasis (HR 3.143; P = 0.0002); high NLR (HR 1.205; P = 0.0126); and high ALP (HR 1.002; P = 0.0015). For radiological PFS, high NLR (HR 1.249; P = 0.0002) and high ALP (HR 1.002; P = 0.0001) were associated with poor outcomes. The predictors of poor overall survival were visceral metastasis (HR 3.155; P < 0.0001); high NLR (HR 1.341; P < 0.0001); and high ALP (HR 1.001; P = 0.0017).

CONCLUSION

Enzalutamide is less effective in patients with metastatic chemotherapy-naïve CRPC with Gleason scores ≥ 9, visceral metastasis, high NLR, and high ALP.

Down-Regulation of the Androgen Receptor by G-Quadruplex Ligands Sensitizes Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells to Enzalutamide

Stabilization of the G-quadruplexes (G4s) within the androgen receptor (AR) gene promoter to block transcription may represent an innovative approach to interfere with aberrant AR signaling in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). A library of differently functionalized naphthalene diimides (NDIs) was screened for their ability to stabilize AR G4s: the core-extended NDI (7) stood out as the most promising ligand. AR-positive cells were remarkably sensitive to 7 in comparison to AR-negative CRCP or normal prostate epithelial cells; 7 induced remarkable impairment of AR mRNA and protein amounts and significant perturbations in the expression levels of KLK3 and of genes involved in the activation of AR program via feedback mechanisms. Moreover, 7 synergistically interacted with Enzalutamide, an inhibitor of AR signaling used in second-line therapies. Overall, our data show that stabilization of AR G4s may represent an alternative treatment options for CRPC and other malignancies relying on aberrant androgen signaling.

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part II: Recent changes in prostate cancer trends and disease characteristics

BACKGROUND

Temporal trends in prostate cancer incidence and death rates have been attributed to changing patterns of screening and improved treatment (mortality only), among other factors. This study evaluated contemporary national-level trends and their relations with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing prevalence and explored trends in incidence according to disease characteristics with stage-specific, delay-adjusted rates.

METHODS

Joinpoint regression was used to examine changes in delay-adjusted prostate cancer incidence rates from population-based US cancer registries from 2000 to 2014 by age categories, race, and disease characteristics, including stage, PSA, Gleason score, and clinical extension. In addition, the analysis included trends for prostate cancer mortality between 1975 and 2015 by race and the estimation of PSA testing prevalence between 1987 and 2005. The annual percent change was calculated for periods defined by significant trend change points.

RESULTS

For all age groups, overall prostate cancer incidence rates declined approximately 6.5% per year from 2007. However, the incidence of distant-stage disease increased from 2010 to 2014. The incidence of disease according to higher PSA levels or Gleason scores at diagnosis did not increase. After years of significant decline (from 1993 to 2013), the overall prostate cancer mortality trend stabilized from 2013 to 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

After a decline in PSA test usage, there has been an increased burden of late-stage disease, and the decline in prostate cancer mortality has leveled off. Cancer 2018;124:2801-2814. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

The use of long non-coding RNAs as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The most used biomarker to detect prostate cancer is Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), whose levels are measured in serum. However, it has been recently established that molecular markers of cancer should not be based solely on genes and proteins but should also reflect other genomic traits; long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) serve this purpose. lncRNAs are transcripts of >200 bases that do not encode proteins and that have been shown to display abnormal expression profiles in different types of cancer. Experimental studies have highlighted lncRNAs as potential biomarkers for prognoses and treatments in patients with different types of cancer, including prostate cancer, where the PCA3 lncRNA is currently used as a diagnostic tool and management strategy. With the development of genomic technologies, particularly next-generation sequencing (NGS), several other lncRNAs have been linked to prostate cancer and are currently under validation for their medical use. In this review, we will discuss different strategies for the discovery of novel lncRNAs that can be evaluated as prognostic biomarkers, the clinical impact of these lncRNAs and how lncRNAs can be used as potential therapeutic targets.