1
|
Ditonno F, Franco A, Wu Z, Wang L, Abdollah F, Simone G, Correa AF, Ferro M, Perdonà S, Amparore D, Bhanvadia R, Brönimann S, Puri D, Mendiola DF, Ben-David R, Moon SC, Yong C, Moghaddam FS, Ghoreifi A, Bologna E, Licari LC, Finati M, Tuderti G, Helstrom E, Tozzi M, Tufano A, Rais-Bahrami S, Sundaram CP, Mehrazin R, Gonzalgo ML, Derweesh IH, Porpiglia F, Singla N, Margulis V, Antonelli A, Djaladat H, Autorino R. Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes in over 1100 patients (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group). BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 39263834 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse surgical, functional, and mid-term oncological outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) in a contemporary large multi-institutional setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were retrieved from the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STtudy (ROBUUST) 2.0 database, an international, multicentre registry encompassing data of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing curative surgery between 2015 and 2022. The analysis included all consecutive patients undergoing RANU except those with missing data in predictors. Detailed surgical, pathological, and postoperative functional data were recorded and analysed. Oncological time-to-event outcomes were: recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with a 3-year cut-off. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was built to evaluate predictors of each oncological outcome. RESULTS A total of 1118 patients underwent RANU during the study period. The postoperative complications rate was 14.1%; the positive surgical margin rate was 4.7%. A postoperative median (interquartile range) estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of -13.1 (-27.5 to 0) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline was observed. The 3-year RFS was 59% and the 3-year MFS was 76%, with a 3-year OS and CSS of 76% and 88%, respectively. Significant predictors of worse oncological outcomes were bladder-cuff excision, high-grade tumour, pathological T stage ≥3, and nodal involvement. CONCLUSIONS The present study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the increasing adoption of RANU. The procedure consistently offers low surgical morbidity and can provide favourable mid-term oncological outcomes, mirroring those of open NU, even in non-organ-confined disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andres F Correa
- Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Stephan Brönimann
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Dinno F Mendiola
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Reuben Ben-David
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sol C Moon
- Department of Urology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Courtney Yong
- Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Farshad S Moghaddam
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Marco Finati
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Emma Helstrom
- Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marco Tozzi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Hooman Djaladat
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dłubak A, Karwacki J, Logoń K, Tomecka P, Brawańska K, Krajewski W, Szydełko T, Małkiewicz B. Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1327-1344. [PMID: 37801187 PMCID: PMC10640513 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and its implications for staging and management outcomes, as well as future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies have demonstrated the limitations of conventional imaging techniques in accurately localizing lymph node metastasis (LNM) in UTUC. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) shows promise for preoperative LNM detection, its specificity is low. Alternative methods such as choline PET/CT and sentinel lymph node detection are under consideration but require further investigation. Additionally, various preoperative factors associated with LNM hold potential for predicting nodal involvement, thereby improving nodal staging and oncologic outcomes of LND. Several surgical approaches, including segmental ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, provide a possibility for LND, while minimizing morbidity. LND remains the primary nodal staging tool for UTUC, but its therapeutic benefit is still uncertain. Advances in imaging techniques and preoperative risk assessment show promise in improving LNM detection. Further research and multi-center studies are needed to comprehensively assess the advantages and limitations of LND in UTUC, as well as the long-term outcomes of alternative staging and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Dłubak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Logoń
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Tomecka
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kinga Brawańska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bobjer J, Gerdtsson A, Abrahamsson J, Baseckas G, Bergkvist M, Bläckberg M, Brändstedt J, Jancke G, Hagberg O, Kollberg P, Lundström KJ, Löfgren A, Nyberg M, Rian Mårtensson L, Saemundsson Y, Ståhl E, Sörenby A, Warnolf Å, Liedberg F. Location of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastases in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Prospective Lymph Node Mapping Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 57:37-44. [PMID: 38020529 PMCID: PMC10658412 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is limited information on the distribution of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (LNMs) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Objective To investigate the location of LNMs in UTUC of the renal pelvis or proximal ureter and short-term complications after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with lymph node dissection (LND). Design setting and participants This was a prospective Nordic multicenter study (four university hospitals, two county hospitals). Patients with clinically suspected locally advanced UTUC (stage >T1) and/or clinical lymph node-positive (cN+) disease were invited to participate. Participants underwent RNU and fractionated retroperitoneal LND using predefined side-specific templates. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The location of LNMs in the LND specimen and retroperitoneal lymph node recurrences during follow-up was recorded. Postoperative complications within 90 d of surgery were ascertained from patient charts. Descriptive statistics were used. Results and limitations LNMs were present in the LND specimen in 23/100 patients, and nine of 100 patients experienced a retroperitoneal recurrence. Distribution per side revealed LNMs in the LND specimen in 11/38 (29%) patients with right-sided tumors, for whom the anatomically larger, right-sided template was used, in comparison to 12/62 (19%) patients with left-sided tumors, for whom a more limited template was used. High-grade complications (Clavien grade ≥3) within 90 d of surgery were registered for 13/100 patients. The study is limited in size and not powered to assess survival estimates. Conclusions The suggested templates that we prospectively applied for right-sided and left-sided LND in patients with advanced UTUC included the majority of LNMs. High-grade complications directly related to the LND part of the surgery were limited. Patient summary This study describes the location of lymph node metastases in patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract who underwent surgery to remove the affected kidney and ureter. The results show that most metastases occur within the template maps for lymph node surgery that we investigated, and that this surgery can be performed with few severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Bobjer
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Axel Gerdtsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Johan Abrahamsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Mats Bergkvist
- Pelvic Cancer Medical Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Bläckberg
- Department of Urology, Helsingborg County Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Johan Brändstedt
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Georg Jancke
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hagberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Petter Kollberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Karl-Johan Lundström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Östersund County Hospital, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Annica Löfgren
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin Nyberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Ymir Saemundsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Elin Ståhl
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anne Sörenby
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Åsa Warnolf
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu A, Dudley V, Hu JC. Same day discharge robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy. Urol Case Rep 2023; 50:102490. [PMID: 37719188 PMCID: PMC10504532 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) decreases length of hospital stay compared to open RNU. We describe and demonstrate with video the first report of an outpatient robotic RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Zhu
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vanessa Dudley
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li KP, Chen SY, Wang CY, Wan S, Yang L. Comparison between robot-assisted versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: outcomes from a pooled analysis. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1227-1238. [PMID: 36884204 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01551-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to locate pertinent studies published in English up to January 2023. The primary outcomes evaluated included perioperative results, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Statistical analyses and calculations were performed using Review Manager 5.4. The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022383035). In total, eight comparative trials, including 37,984 patients were enrolled. Compared to ONU, RANU was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] - 1.63 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.90, - 0.35; p = 0.01), less blood loss (WMD - 107.04 mL, 95% CI - 204.97, - 9.11; p = 0.03), less major complication(OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.88; p < 0.0001), and lower positive surgical margin (PSM) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12, 0.92; p = 0.03). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in operative time, transfusion rates, rate of lymph node dissection, lymph node yield, overall complications, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival. RANU has superior advantages compared to ONU in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative complications, and PSM, while providing comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun-Peng Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Si-Yu Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chen-Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shun Wan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Sullivan NJ, Naughton A, Temperley HC, Casey RG. Robotic‐assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy; a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:246-255. [PMID: 37025468 PMCID: PMC10071076 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is the malignant transformation of urothelial cells, from the renal calyces to the ureteral orifices. While the benefits of minimally invasive nephroureterectomy over their open counterpart have been established, the optimal technique remains a debate. We aimed to assess current evidence in the literature and compare outcomes between robotic-assisted (RANU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies comparing RANU and LNU for bladder cancer. Outcome measurements were recurrence rates (local and distal), positive margins, positive lymph node yield and perioperative outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5. Results Our results demonstrate a significantly higher mortality rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy when compared with the robotic-assisted approach for the treatment of UTUC (1.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.008); however, these results were inconsistent on sensitivity analysis and should therefore be interpreted with caution. No significant difference was observed for other outcomes. Conclusion The ideal approach to minimally invasive radical nephroureterectomy remains undetermined. Future research, ideally prospective randomised studies, should focus on long-term outcomes, in particular recurrence, recurrence-free survival, overall survival and the correlation between surgical technique and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niall J. O'Sullivan
- Department of Urology Tallaght University Hospital Dublin 24 Ireland
- School of Medicine Trinity College Dublin Dublin 2 Ireland
| | - Ailish Naughton
- Department of Urology St. Vincent's University Hospital Dublin 4 Ireland
| | | | - Rowan G. Casey
- Department of Urology Tallaght University Hospital Dublin 24 Ireland
- School of Medicine Trinity College Dublin Dublin 2 Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cui Y, Lu Y, Wu J, Quan C. Benefits of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma only located in the lower ureter: a bicentre retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1115830. [PMID: 37124512 PMCID: PMC10140303 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1115830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and highly malignant urothelial tumor originating from the renal pelvis and ureter associated with poor prognosis. It has been established that 70% of ureteral tumors occur in the lower ureter. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with ipsilateral bladder cuff excision is regarded as the standard treatment for UTUC. Current evidence supports the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in determining tumor staging, but no consensus has been reached on the potential survival benefits. The present study retrospectively analyzed cases of UTUC limited to the lower ureter to evaluate the survival benefits of LND during RNU. Methods The present study retrospectively analyzed data from patients with UTUC limited to the lower ureter from two medical centers from 2000 to 2016 and assessed the survival outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). During subgroup analysis, we stratified by pathological tumor (pT) stages and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Results The study cohort included 297 patients separated into LND (n=111) and non-LND (n=186) groups. The two groups were comparable except for the pathological N stage. The LND group was associated with superior survival in terms of RFS (27.0% vs. 18.3%, p=0.044) and CSS (53.2 vs. 39.8%, p=0.031) compared to the non-LND group (n=186). In pT2-4 patients, the LND group was associated with better 3-year RFS (50.5% vs. 32.3%, p<0.05), 5-year RFS (29.7% vs. 12.0%, p<0.05), and overall RFS (18.7% vs. 6.0%, p<0.05) than the non-LND group. Besides, the LND group was associated with a significantly better 3-year CSS (68.1% vs. 49.6%, p=0.003), 5-year CSS (51.6% vs. 30.8%, p<0.05) and overall CSS (45.1% vs. 24.1%, p<0.05). In patients that underwent AC, the LND group had better survival benefits in terms of RFS (29.4 vs. 16.7%, p=0.023) and CSS (52.9% vs. 40.5%, p=0.038) compared to the non-LND group. Conclusion LND has survival benefits in patients with UTUC localized to the lower ureter, especially for≥pT2 stage UTUC and AC cohorts. Overall, the therapeutic effect of LND in UTUC cannot be replaced by AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Cui
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Youyi Lu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Jitao Wu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
- *Correspondence: Changyi Quan, ; Jitao Wu,
| | - Changyi Quan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- *Correspondence: Changyi Quan, ; Jitao Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Piontkowski AJ, Corsi N, Morisetty S, Majdalany S, Rakic I, Li P, Arora S, Jamil M, Rogers C, Autorino R, Abdollah F. Benefit of lymph node dissection in cN+ patients in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of NCDB registry. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:409.e9-409.e17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Ji R, He Z, Fang S, Yang W, Wei M, Dong J, Xu W, Ji Z. Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:964256. [PMID: 35992849 PMCID: PMC9382403 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.964256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) are two minimally invasive surgical management for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). Though more high-tech, it remains largely unclear whether RANU provides additional benefits over LNU. We aimed to quantitatively compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes between RANU and LNU. Methods The systematic review was performed based on a registered protocol (registration number CRD42022319086). We searched through PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, as well as conference proceedings and references of review articles (May 2022) for comparative studies reporting perioperative and oncologic outcomes independently in RANU and LNU groups. Selection of studies and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results of random-effects meta-analyses were presented as mean differences (MD) or Odds ratio (OR), as appropriate. Subgroup and univariate meta-regression analyses were performed to identify interstudy heterogeneities. Results The review included 8470 patients undergoing RANU and 19872 patients undergoing LNU from 12 comparative original studies. RANU was associated with fewer overall complications (OR=0.71, 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.81), longer operative time (MD=27.70, 95%CI: 0.83 to 54.60) and shorter length of stay (MD=-0.53, 95%CI: -0.98 to -0.07) compared to LNU. In addition, patients receiving RANU were more likely to have lymph node dissected (OR=2.61, 95%CI: 1.86 to 3.65). Recurrence and survival outcomes did not differ between two surgical procedures. Sample size, types of LNU and world region were major sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion For UTUC patients, RANU offers fewer complications and shorter hospitalization. However, RANU requires longer operative time and shares similar oncologic outcomes compared to LNU. Further randomized designed studies are warranted. Systematic Review Registration www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022319086.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruoyu Ji
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhangyuting He
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shiyuan Fang
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjie Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mengchao Wei
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weifeng Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhigang Ji
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kanno T, Kobori G, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Koterazawa S, Takaoka N, Somiya S, Nagahama K, Ito M, Megumi Y, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H. Oncological outcomes of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection during retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for renal pelvic or upper ureteral tumors: Matched-pair analysis. J Endourol 2022; 36:1206-1213. [PMID: 35607848 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns of clinically node-negative patients with renal pelvic and/or upper or middle ureteral tumors after a template-based retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in conjunction with retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU). METHODS A total of 283 patients who received LRNU with and without RPLND at three Japanese institutions were enrolled. The template of RPLND included the renal hilar and paraaortic lymph nodes (LNs) (left side) and renal hilar, paracaval, retrocaval, and intra-aortocaval LNs (right side). The LNs and kidneys were removed en bloc. The primary endpoint was set as recurrence-free survival. All RPLND cases were matched one-to-one with no RPLND cases using a propensity score matching approach, and 47 matched pairs were included in analyses. RESULTS Compared to the control group, significant differences were not observed in the RPLND group in terms of operation time, blood loss, postoperative complication rate, and pathological findings. The estimated five-year recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the RPLND group (86.8%) compared to the group without RPLND (64.2%) (p = 0.014). The estimated five-year cancer-specific survival showed a similar tendency; however, it did not reach a statistically significant difference (87.5% vs 71.3%, respectively; p = 0.168). As for the first recurrence site, the RPLND group showed a lower incidence of distant recurrence, while a significant difference was not observed in the rate of regional LN recurrence. CONCLUSION This study suggests that a template-based RPLND in conjunction with retroperitoneal LRNU efficiently improves the recurrence-free survival by reducing distant recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Urology, 28-1 Moriminami-cho, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan, 601-1495;
| | | | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Urology, 28-1 ishidamoriminami-cho, fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan, 601-1495;
| | | | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, 38070, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan;
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Urology, Kyoto, Japan;
| | | | - Masaaki Ito
- Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, 13684, Kyoto, Japan;
| | - Yuzuru Megumi
- Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, 38070, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan;
| | | | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan;
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan;
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee HY, Chang CH, Huang CP, Yu CC, Lo CW, Chung SD, Wu WC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Lin CM, Tsai YC, Chen WC, Chiang BJ, Huang HC, Chen CH, Huang CY, Wu CC, Lin WY, Tseng JS, Ke HL, Yeh HC. Is Lymph Node Dissection Necessary During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Clinically Node-Negative Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? A Multi-Institutional Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:791620. [PMID: 35574295 PMCID: PMC9099435 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.791620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) without clinical lymph node metastasis (cN0) undergoing lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (NU).MethodsFrom the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 2726 UTUC patients were identified. We only include patients with ≥ pT2 stage and enrolled 658 patients. The Kaplan–Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in LND (+) and LND (−) groups.ResultsA total of 658 patients were included and 463 patients without receiving LND and 195 patients receiving LND. From both univariate and multivariate survival analysis, there are no significant difference between LND (+) and LND (-) group in survival rate. In LND (+) group, 18.5% patients have pathological LN metastasis. After analyzing pN+ subgroup, it revealed worse CSS (p = 0.010) and DFS (p < 0.001) compared with pN0 patients.ConclusionsWe found no significant survival benefit related to LND in cN0 stage, ≥ pT2 stage UTUC, irrespective of the number of LNs removed, although pN+ affected cancer prognosis. However, from the result of pN (+) subgroup of LND (+) cohort analysis, it may be reasonable to not perform LND in patients with cT2N0 stage due to low positive predictive value of pN (+). In addition, performing LND may be considered for ureter cancer, which tends to cause lymphatic and hematogenous tumor spreading. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Min Lin
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chieh Chen
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Che Huang
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Hsin-Chih Yeh,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lo CW, Li WM, Ke HL, Chang YH, Wu HC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Huang CY, Chen CH, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Tsai CY, Chung SD, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Jou YC, Cheong IS, Chen YT, Chen JS, Chiang BJ, Yu CC, Lin WY, Wu CC, Chen CS, Weng HY, Tsai YC. Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Variant Histology of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:843715. [PMID: 35530335 PMCID: PMC9072967 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.843715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has been reported, whereas its impact on upper tract cancer with variant histology remains unclear. We aimed to answer the abovementioned question with our real-world data. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and were confirmed to have variant UTUC were retrospectively evaluated for eligibility of analysis. In the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration database, we identified 245 patients with variant UTUC among 3,109 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU after excluding patients with missing clinicopathological information. Intervention Those patients with variant UTUC were grouped based on their history of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis Propensity score matching was used to reduce the treatment assignment bias. Multivariable Cox regression model was used for the analysis of overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival. Results and Limitations For the patients with variant UTUC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those without chemotherapy, survival benefit was identified in overall survival in univariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.527; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.285–0.973; p = 0.041). In addition, in multivariate analysis, patients with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated significant survival benefits in cancer-specific survival (OS; HR, 0.454; CI, 0.208–0.988; p = 0.047), and disease-free survival (DFS; HR, 0.324; 95% CI, 0.155–0.677; (p = 0.003). The main limitations of the current study were its retrospective design and limited case number. Conclusions Adjuvant chemotherapy following RNU significantly improved cancer-related survivals in patients with UTUC with variant histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Huei Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Hsi-Chin Wu
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, and National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, and National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, College of Healthcare and Management, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- General Education Center, Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yeong-Chin Jou
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jih-Sheng Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Taipei Medical University Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Han-Yu Weng
- Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Yao-Chou Tsai,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Huang J, Qian H, Yuan Y, Cai X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Kong W, Wu X, Cao M, Huang Y, Chen H, Xue W. Prospective Clinical Trial of the Oncologic Outcomes and Safety of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:791140. [PMID: 35280720 PMCID: PMC8907892 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.791140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the safety and feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Materials and Methods Between May 2018 and March 2019, 39 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) received extraperitoneal laparoscopic RNU and concomitant extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended LND. All patients were followed for at least 90 days. Perioperative and pathological data including nodal status and perioperative complications were collected. Results Among all 39 patients, 12 patients had pT1, 6 had pT2, 20 had pT3 disease, and 1 had T4 disease. The median (range) lymph node count was 10 (5–22), with 8 patients having pathologically proven lymph node metastasis. The median (range) operating time was 225 (165–430) min, and the median estimated blood loss was 200 (60–800) ml. The median postoperative hemoglobin loss was 1.6 (0–4.2) g/dl. The median (range) postoperative hospital stays were 6 (3–26) days. Overall, 7 patients experienced minor (Clavien Grade I–II) postoperative complications with five patients having Clavien Grade I complications and two patients having Clavien Grade II complications. No major complication (Clavien grade III–IV) occurred. With a median follow-up of 38 months, a total of 8 patients (20.5%) developed local or distant recurrence and no regional LNs where extended LND were performed had recurrence. Conclusions The present prospective study demonstrated that extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended LND during extraperitoneal laparoscopic RNU for UTUC is a feasible and safe procedure which provides minimal invasion, rapid recovery, and potentially lower risk of regional LN recurrence. Larger prospective clinical trials with survival endpoints are needed to further determine its potential therapeutic benefits. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 03544437 www.clinicaltrials.gov
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiwei Huang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongyang Qian
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yichu Yuan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xingyun Cai
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yonghui Chen
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Kong
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaorong Wu
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Cao
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiran Huang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haige Chen
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kanno T, Kobori G, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Takaoka N, Somiya S, Nagahama K, Ito M, Megumi Y, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H. Complications and their management following retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in conjunction with retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol 2022; 29:455-461. [PMID: 35144321 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the detailed perioperative complications and their management after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma at three institutions. METHODS Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed on patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma located at the pelvis and/or upper or middle ureter, and its template included the renal hilar and para-aortic lymph nodes (left side) and the renal hilar, paracaval, retrocaval, and intra-aortocaval lymph nodes (right side). The lymph nodes and kidneys were removed en bloc. The primary endpoint was postoperative complication rates, and the secondary endpoints were intraoperative findings and chylous leakage management. The associations of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with postoperative complications were examined using logistic regression with propensity score techniques. RESULTS Eighty-eight (31%) and 195 (69%) patients underwent and did not undergo retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications and other perioperative findings in the entire cohort, except for prolonged operation time. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was not statistically significantly associated with total and serious complications in propensity score analyses. Postoperative chylous leakage could be conservatively managed even though it is common in patients with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (14/88 (16%)). The incidence of chylous leakage was significantly lower in patients whose lymphatic vessels were meticulously clipped completely during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (5.3% vs 24%; P = 0.017). CONCLUSION There was no association between retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy and postoperative complications. However, chylous leakage is often observed after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and careful management is highly required. The use of clips during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is recommended to minimize chylous leakage risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Go Kobori
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kanji Nagahama
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuzuru Megumi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mourmouris P, Argun OB, Tzelves L, Tuna MB, Gourtzelidou M, Tziotis A, Kural AR, Skolarikos A. Is robotic radical nephroureterectomy a safe alternative to open approach: The first prospective analysis. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2021; 93:408-411. [PMID: 34933526 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.4.408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the efficacy and safety profile of robotic radical nephroureterectomy compared to the open approach. METHODS We enrolled 45 consecutive patients who suffered from non-metastatic, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma from September 2019 to March 2021 and underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Patients were divided in two groups: group A consisted of 29 patients (open approach) and group B consisted of 16 patients (robotic approach). The factors which were taken into consideration were age, sex, body mass index, tumour size, side and grade, cancer stage, ASA score, operation time, drain removal time, foley time, hospitalization time, estimated blood loss, surgical margins, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, Hct and bladder recurrences. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of SPSS version 26 and p < 0.05 was the cut-off for reaching statistical significance. RESULTS The mean age in group 1 was 67.12 years and in group 2 68.12 years, whereas the mean body mass index (BMI) in group 1 was 26.54 kg/m2 and in group 2 25.20 kg/m2. Operative time was better in group A (124 vs 186 mins p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss were better in group B compared to group A (137 vs 316 ml p < 0.001). Length of stay (LOS) was significantly less in the robotic group (5.75 vs 4.3 days p = 0.003) and the same applied for time required for drain removal (4.5 vs 3.3 days p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Robotic radical nephroureterectomy is a safe and efficient alternative to open approach. It provides a favorable perioperative profile in patients suffering from upper urinary tract carcinoma without metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Mourmouris
- 2nd Department of Urology, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens.
| | - Omer Burak Argun
- Department of Urology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul.
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- 2nd Department of Urology, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens.
| | - Mustafa Bilal Tuna
- Department of Urology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul.
| | - Maria Gourtzelidou
- 2nd Department of Urology, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens.
| | - Andreas Tziotis
- 2nd Department of Urology, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens.
| | - Ali Riza Kural
- 2nd Department of Urology, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens.
| | - Andreas Skolarikos
- Department of Urology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li CC, Chang CH, Huang CP, Hong JH, Huang CY, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Lo CW, Yu CC, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Wu WC, Chung SD, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Chen SH, Jiang YH, Tsai YC, Chiang BJ, Lin WY, Jou YC, Wu CC, Lee HY, Yeh HC. Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:731460. [PMID: 34671556 PMCID: PMC8522474 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes and surgical complications of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with different minimally invasive techniques for nephroureterectomy. Methods From the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 3,333 UTUC patients were identified. After excluding ineligible cases, we retrospectively included 1,340 patients from 15 institutions who received hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (HALNU), laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) or robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2001 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the survival outcomes, and binary logistic regression model was selected to compare the risks of postoperative complications of different surgical approaches. Results Among the enrolled patients, 741, 458 and 141 patients received HALNU, LNU and RNU, respectively. Compared with RNU (41.1%) and LNU (32.5%), the rate of lymph node dissection in HALNU was the lowest (17.4%). In both Kaplan-Meier and univariate analysis, the type of surgery was significantly associated with overall and cancer-specific survival. The statistical significance of surgical methods on survival outcomes remained in multivariate analysis, where patients undergoing HALNU appeared to have the worst overall (p = 0.007) and cancer-specific (p = 0.047) survival rates among the three groups. In all analyses, the surgical approach was not related to bladder recurrence. In addition, HALNU was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (p = 0.002), and had the highest risk of major Clavien-Dindo complications (p = 0.011), paralytic ileus (p = 0.012), and postoperative end-stage renal disease (p <0.001). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery can be safe and feasible. We proved that compared with the HALNU group, the LNU and RNU groups have better survival rates and fewer surgical complications. It is crucial to uphold strict oncological principles with sophisticated technique to improve outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yeong-Chin Jou
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A retrospective cohort study across ten years. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101607. [PMID: 34022505 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical nephroureterectomy is the gold standard of treatment for high-risk non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. However, the optimal surgical approach remains a controversial debate. This study compared the perioperative and oncological outcomes of open and robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomies. METHODS 131 consecutive radical nephroureterectomies (66 robot-assisted nephroureterectomies vs. 65 open nephroureterectomies) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract at a single tertiary referral center were included from 2009 to 2019. The perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared between both surgical approaches, including logistic regression analysis, propensity score matching, Kaplan Meier analyses, and Cox regression models. RESULTS Overall, robot-assisted surgery had less blood loss (150 ml vs. 250, p = 0.004) and less positive surgical margins (1.5% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004) at a comparable operating time (robotic 188min vs. 178). Any grade complications were more frequent after open surgery (40.9% vs. 63.1%, p = 0.011), and the length of stay was shorter after robotic nephroureterectomy (9 days vs. 12, p < 0.001). These differences remained significant in the propensity score matched analysis, except for the complication rates, which were still lower for the robotic approach, but no longer significant. At a median follow-up of 30.9 months (range 1.4-129.5), neither the progression-free survival (PFS, 2-year: robotic 66.7% vs. open 55.3%), nor the overall survival differed significantly (OS, 2-year: robotic 76.2% vs. open 68.4%). In the Cox regression, the surgical approach did not impact the PFS or OS. Lymph node metastases (HR 3.32, p = 0.008) had the strongest impact on the PFS besides patient age (HR 1.51 per 10 years, p = 0.025) and prior cystectomy (HR 2.42, p = 0.026) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy had significant perioperative advantages at comparable oncological outcomes compared to open surgery for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract at a high volume center, experienced in robotic surgery.
Collapse
|
18
|
Barton GJ, Tan WP, Inman BA. The nephroureterectomy: a review of technique and current controversies. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:3168-3190. [PMID: 33457289 PMCID: PMC7807352 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The nephroureterectomy (NU) is the standard of care for invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and has been around for well over one hundred years. Since then new operative techniques have emerged, new technologies have developed, and the surgery continues to evolve and grow. In this article, we review the various surgical techniques, as well as present the literature surrounding current areas of debate surrounding the NU, including the lymphatic drainage of the upper urinary tract, management of UTUC involvement with the adrenals and caval thrombi, surgical management of the distal ureter, the use of intravesical chemotherapy as well as perioperative systemic chemotherapy, as well as various outcome measures. Although much has been studied about the NU, there still is a dearth of level 1 evidence and the field would benefit from further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Barton
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wei Phin Tan
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brant A Inman
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chan VWS, Wong CHM, Yuan Y, Teoh JYC. Lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review. Arab J Urol 2020; 19:37-45. [PMID: 33763247 PMCID: PMC7954472 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2020.1791563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To perform a systematic review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, investigating the role of lymph node dissection (LND) during nephroureterectomy (NU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); focussing on survival and complication outcomes. Methods A comprehensive systematic search was completed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to UTUC and LND on multiple databases. Meta-analyses were performed when outcomes were reported under the same definition in two or more studies. Where meta-analysis was not possible, outcomes were reviewed in a narrative manner. Results A total of 21 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 11 cohort studies in the quantitative analysis. Our review did not detect significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.92), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.54–1.46) and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93–1.30). However, when focussing on studies only including patients with pT2/pT3 UTUC, not performing LND significantly worsened RFS (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.72–4.66). Reports of removing more than eight lymph nodes may also provide prognostic benefits in pN0 patients. The performance of LND was not associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications (risk ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00–1.13). Conclusion Overall, LND did not provide additional benefit in RFS, CSS and OS. However, there was a potential benefit in RFS in patients with muscle-invasive and advanced UTUC. LND was also not associated with increased risks of postoperative complications. Abbreviations: CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSS: cancer-specific survival; HR: hazard ratio; LND: lymph node dissection; NU: nephroureterectomy; OS: overall survival; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RFS: recurrence-free survival; RoB, risk of bias; RR: risk ratio; (UT)UC: (upper tract) urothelial carcinoma
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinson Wai-Shun Chan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li X, Cui M, Gu X, Fang D, Li H, Qin S, Yang K, Zhu T, Li X, Zhou L, Gao XS, Wang D. Pattern and risk factors of local recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:114. [PMID: 32473636 PMCID: PMC7261378 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01877-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to identify predictive local recurrence risk factors and site-specific local recurrence pattern of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with different primary tumor locations. Methods Three hundred and eighty-nine UTUC patients with radical nephroureterectomy were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to measure the risk of local recurrence. We also mapped the position of local recurrence sites stratified by primary tumor locations. Results A total of 73 patients (18.7%) developed local recurrence within a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 3-80 months). For patients with local recurrence, the median interval of local recurrence was 9 months. Ureter tumor, multifocality, T stage, G grade, lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymph node dissection (LND), and lymph vascular invasion (LVI) were all significantly associated with increased local recurrence by univariable analyses (P < 0.05). Only multifocality, T3–4, G3, and LNM remained independent predictors of increased local recurrence by multivariable analyses. Adjuvant radiotherapy could reduce the local recurrence (HR = 0.177; 95% CI 0.064-0.493, P = 0.001). Patients with local recurrence had poorer cancer-specific survival (4-year cancer-specific survival rate 36 ± 7.5% vs 88.4 ± 2.2%, P = 0.000). We evaluated local recurrence pattern stratified by tumor locations. Para-aortic lymph node region was the most common recurrence area for all the patients. Left-sided UTUC had more than 70% recurrent lymph nodes in the left para-aortic region (LPA). For right-sided UTUC patients, recurrent para-aortic lymph nodes distributed in the LPA (33.3%), aortocaval (AC) (41.5%), and right paracaval (RPC) (25.2%) regions. Recurrence in the internal and external iliac regions was only found in the distal ureter group (P < 0.05). Renal pelvic fossa recurrence was only found in renal pelvic tumor (22.2%, P = 0.007). The ureter tumor bed recurrence rate was higher for ureter patients (P = 0.001). Conclusions Multifocality, T3–4, G3, and LNM are predictors of higher local recurrence rate of UTUC. Adjuvant radiotherapy can reduce local recurrence rate. Local recurrence patterns are different according to primary tumor locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaobin Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongzhen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Shangbin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianzhao Zhu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wu Z, Li M, Wang J, Veccia A, Xu Y, Zhang C, Ren J, Yin L, Chen M, Wang J, Xu D, Zhang Z, Liu B, Yang B, Xie L, Qu L, Wang L. Pure retroperitoneoscopic extravesical standardized seeable (PRESS) excision of distal ureter and bladder cuff in radical nephroureterectomy: step-by-step technique. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2020; 73:392-400. [PMID: 32284528 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.03711-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns have been raised regarding the management of bladder cuff with these minimally invasive approaches. The aim of this study was to describe a modified radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with pure retroperitoneoscopic extravesical standardized seeable (PRESS) bladder cuff excision (BCE) and to assess its outcomes based on a novel concept of intraoperative "trifecta." METHODS Twenty-four patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma underwent retroperitoneoscopic RNU from August 2017 to August 2019. A modified RNU with PRESS BCE and lymph node dissection (LND) was performed. Descriptive analysis of patients' characteristics, surgical technique, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data was performed. BCE trifecta was defined as en-bloc excision, mucosa-to-mucosa reliable closure and no urine spillage. RESULTS In 23 out of 24 cases (95.8%) the procedure was successfully completed. One patient was converted to open distal ureterectomy with a Gibson incision due to peritoneum rupture during dissection of the distal ureter. BCE trifecta was achieved in 95.7% (22/23) cases of all patients finished with PRESS technique. Median OT was 260 min (IQR: 220-305) with median EBL of 100 mL (IQR: 100-250). Median OT for distal ureterectomy was 52 min (IQR: 40-69). No positive surgical margin occurred. Median postoperative hospital stay was 6 d (IQR: 5-7). Median follow-up time was 7 mo (IQR: 5-17). One patient (4.3%) experienced bladder recurrence and no patient developed distant metastasis or died of the disease. CONCLUSIONS Herein, we demonstrate a standardized retroperitoneoscopic RNU technique that is safe and reproducible, enabling the visual confirmation of complete BCE and facilitating LND. BCE trifecta should be a routine goal in minimally invasive RNU. Prospective comparison with the standard open surgical technique is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingmin Li
- Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianchao Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.,Unit of Urology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Yifan Xu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jizhong Ren
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Yin
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Junkai Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongliang Xu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zongqin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bing Liu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Liping Xie
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China -
| | - Le Qu
- Department of Urology, East Region Military Command General Hospital (Jinling Hospital), Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military (Naval) Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Duquesne I, Ouzaid I, Loriot Y, Moschini M, Xylinas E. Lymphadenectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8081190. [PMID: 31398895 PMCID: PMC6722659 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8081190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The role of lymphonodal dissection during surgery for a tumor of the urinary tract remains controversial. Objective: To analyze anatomical bases of lymphonodal dissection in tumors of the upper urinary tract and analyze its impact on survival, recurrence, and staging. Acquisition of data: A web-based search for scientific articles using Medline/Pubmed was carried out to identify and analyze articles on the practice and the role of lymphonodal dissection in this indication. Data Synthesis: The lymphatic drainage of the upper urinary tract has rarely been studied and is poorly understood. The lymphonodal metastatic extension is the most common extension in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Lymphnode invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor. Therefore, it seems legitimate to offer an extended lymphonodal dissection to patients undergoing surgery to cure these tumors. When lymphnodes dissection respects clear anatomical principles based on the location of the primary tumor and its extension, it improves both survival and recurrence rates. This result could be secondary to the treatment of subclinical metastatic disease. Conclusion: An extended lymphadenectomy during surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma following strict anatomical pattern improves staging with a highly probable therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Duquesne
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75014 Paris, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Institute, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, University of Paris-Sud, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Idir Ouzaid
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Diderot University, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Institute, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, University of Paris-Sud, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6004 Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75006 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goldberg H, Cheung DC, Chandrasekar T, Klaassen Z, Wallis CJD, Kulkarni GS, Sayyid R, Evans A, Masoomian M, Bapat B, van der Kwast T, Hamilton RJ, Zlotta A, Fleshner N. Are there differences between de novo and secondary upper tract urothelial carcinoma tumours? Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 13:E292-E299. [PMID: 30763230 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for <5% of all urothelial cancers. We aimed to ascertain the clinical differences between UTUC tumours presenting de novo (DnUTUC) and those presenting secondary (SUTUC) following a bladder cancer diagnosis. METHODS Our institutional database was queried for all UTUC patients who were surgically treated with radical nephroureterectomy or ureterectomy between 2003 and 2017. Bladder recurrence and cancer-specific mortality were compared. To reduce the possible bias due to confounding variables obtained from a simple comparison of outcomes, DnUTUC patients were matched (for age, gender, tumour location, type of surgery, grade, TNM staging, presence of carcinoma in situ, and lymphovascular invasion) with propensity score to SUTUC patients. Bladder recurrence and cancer-specific mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 117 UTUC patients were identified: 80 with DnUTUC (68.4%) and 37 with SUTUC (31.6%). A greater proportion of males with SUTUC was demonstrated (89.2% vs. 68.8; p=0.02). In both groups, 67.5% of patients had high-grade disease, but SUTUC demonstrated a higher carcinoma in situ rate (43.2% vs. 25%; p=0.047). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the five-year bladder recurrence rate was trending to be higher in SUTUC (65.3% vs. 20.5%; p=0.099). In the Cox model, however, it was associated with increased bladder recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 3.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-8.09; p=0.001). Although univariate analysis demonstrated that SUTUC patients were more likely to die of their disease (30.6% vs. 9%; p=0.009), the multivariable Cox model did not demonstrate this association. The limitations of this study include its retrospective, single-centre design and relatively small cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS In this hypothesis-generating study, some evidence suggests that further research is needed to delineate differences between SUTUC and DnUTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Goldberg
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas C Cheung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher J D Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rashid Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Evans
- Pathology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mehdi Masoomian
- Pathology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bharati Bapat
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Pathology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lymph node dissection could bring survival benefits to patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based, propensity score-matched study. Int J Clin Oncol 2018; 24:296-305. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1356-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
25
|
Clements MB, Krupski TL, Culp SH. Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comparative Survival Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2550-2562. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6557-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
26
|
Danzig MR, Mallin K, McKiernan JM, Stadler WM, Sridhar SS, Morgan TM, Bochner BH, Lee CT. Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. Cancer 2018; 124:2507-2514. [PMID: 29624636 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2017] [Revised: 02/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. METHODS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were characterized according to demographic and clinical factors, including pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion. Associations with overall survival were assessed through proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 4177 patients were identified; 1576 had lymphovascular invasion. Patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion had 5-year survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 52.6; P < .001 by the log-rank test), and approached that of patients with T4 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 26.5%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, grade, lymph node status, surgical margin status, race, sex, and chemotherapy administration, patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion also were found to have significantly worse survival compared with patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.91). CONCLUSIONS Lymphovascular invasion status is a key prognostic marker that can stratify the risk of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma further. Patients with this pathologic feature should be carefully considered for clinical trials exploring existing and novel therapies. Cancer 2018;124:2507-14. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Danzig
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Katherine Mallin
- American College of Surgeons, Commission on Cancer, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Walter M Stadler
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Edwards DC, Cahn DB, Smaldone MC, Kutikov A. Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:193-212. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
28
|
Role of surgical approach on lymph node dissection yield and survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:9.e1-9.e9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
29
|
Kanno T, Kobori G, Kubota M, Funada S, Haitani T, Okada T, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Yamada H. Standardized and Simplified Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection During Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Ureter or Renal Pelvis: En Bloc Resection Technique. Urology 2017; 112:85-91. [PMID: 29158173 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe our en bloc technique of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) during retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and evaluate perioperative outcomes. METHODS From 2002 to 2015, 114 patients with urinary tract urothelial carcinoma located at the pelvis or upper or middle ureter underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy at 2 institutions. Performance of RPLND began in February 2009. The template of RPLND included the renal hilar and para-aortic lymph nodes (left side) and the renal hilar, paracaval, retrocaval, and intra-aortocaval lymph nodes (right side). After incising Gerota fascia longitudinally, the aorta (left side) or inferior vena cava (right side) was exposed, and the lymphatic and surrounding fatty tissue in the template and kidney was dissected in a single monoblock. Preoperative data were compared between the RPLND and the no-RPLND groups using propensity score matching. RESULTS In total, 32 matched pairs were evaluated. RPLND was successfully accomplished without open conversion in all cases. The operative time in the RPLND group was approximately 100 minutes longer than that in the no-RPLND group, but there was no significant difference in the blood loss volume or complication rate. The pathologic stages were similar in both groups. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 10.7 (range 3-27), and lymph node metastasis was detected in 5 (16%) cases. CONCLUSION Retroperitoneoscopic en bloc RPLND permits complete and radical removal of the lymphatic tissue contained in the RPLND template. Our en bloc technique is a safe and feasible procedure with comparable blood loss and complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Go Kobori
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Masashi Kubota
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Funada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takao Haitani
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takashi Okada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Robot assistance has been rapidly adopted by urological surgeons and has become particularly popular for oncological procedures involving the retroperitoneal space. The wide dissemination of robot assistance probably reflects the limited amount of operating space available within the retroperitoneum and the advantages provided by robot-assisted approaches, including 3D imaging, wristed instrumentation and the shorter learning curve compared with that associated with the equivalent laparoscopic techniques. Surgical procedures that have traditionally been performed using an open or laparoscopic approach, such as partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, nephroureterectomy and adrenalectomy, are now often being performed using robot assistance. The frontiers of robot-assisted retroperitoneal oncological surgery are constantly expanding, with an emphasis on maintaining oncological and functional outcomes, while minimizing the level of surgical invasiveness.
Collapse
|
31
|
Li P, Tao J, Deng X, Qin C, Cheng Y, Li P, Zhang J, Cao Y, Yang X, Yang C, Lu Q. Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy and Lymph Node Dissection in Modified Supine Position. Urology 2017; 107:126-131. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Revised: 05/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
32
|
Rodriguez JF, Packiam VT, Boysen WR, Johnson SC, Smith ZL, Smith ND, Shalhav AL, Steinberg GD. Utilization and Outcomes of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma by Surgical Approach. J Endourol 2017; 31:661-665. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F. Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vignesh T. Packiam
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - William R. Boysen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Scott C. Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Zachary L. Smith
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Norm D. Smith
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arieh L. Shalhav
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gary D. Steinberg
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Moschini M, Foerster B, Abufaraj M, Soria F, Seisen T, Roupret M, Colin P, De la Taille A, Peyronnet B, Bensalah K, Herout R, Wirth MP, Novotny V, Chlosta P, Bandini M, Montorsi F, Simone G, Gallucci M, Romeo G, Matsumoto K, Karakiewicz P, Briganti A, Shariat SF. Trends of lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2017; 35:1541-1547. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2026-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
|
34
|
Yoo S, You D, Jeong IG, Hong B, Hong JH, Ahn H, Kim CS. Does lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy affect oncological outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients without suspicious lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging studies? World J Urol 2016; 35:665-673. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1918-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
35
|
Chappidi MR, Kates M, Johnson MH, Hahn NM, Bivalacqua TJ, Pierorazio PM. Lymph node yield and tumor location in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing nephroureterectomy affects survival: A U.S. population-based analysis (2004-2012). Urol Oncol 2016; 34:531.e15-531.e24. [PMID: 27476032 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to characterize the contemporary trends in lymphadenectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a population-based cohort and to determine if number of lymph nodes removed and tumor location are predictors of cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Individuals with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing nephroureterectomy in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program from 2004 to 2012 were identified. Linear regression was used to assess trends in lymphadenectomy. Patients were stratified based on nodal status, quartiles of nodes removed, and tumor location. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare cancer-specific survival and overall survival among groups. RESULTS In the cohort, 25% (721/2,862) of all patients and 27% (566/2,079) of grade 3/4 patients underwent lymphadenectomy. The percentage of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy increased from 20% (60/295) in 2004 to 33% (106/320) in 2012 (P = 0.02). Patients with the highest quartile of lymph nodes removed had improved the 5-year cancer-specific survival of 78% (95% CI: 69%-85%) compared to the second quartile (60%; 95% CI: 51%-67%; P = 0.003) and the third quartile (60%; 95% CI: 51%-68%; P = 0.002) of nodes removed. This trend held for node-negative and node-positive patients. In multivariable modeling, a lower number of lymph nodes dissected (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.98) and ureteral tumors (hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.56) were predictors of worse cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS In patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing nephroureterectomy, rates of lymphadenectomy have increased from 2004 to 2012 in the United States. In this contemporary cohort, an increase in the number of nodes removed and renal pelvis tumors are associated with improved cancer-specific survival, which highlights the importance of intentional lymph node dissection with adequate lymph node yield in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera R Chappidi
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Max Kates
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael H Johnson
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Noah M Hahn
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|