1
|
Gontero P, Birtle A, Capoun O, Compérat E, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid HA, Pradere B, Rai BP, van Rhijn BWG, Seisen T, Shariat SF, Soria F, Soukup V, Wood R, Xylinas EN. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ)-A Summary of the 2024 Guidelines Update. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02514-4. [PMID: 39155194 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This publication represents a summary of the updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ. The information presented herein is limited to urothelial carcinoma, unless specified otherwise. The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation. METHODS For the 2024 guidelines on NMIBC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with NMIBC. The guidelines stress the importance of defining patients' risk stratification and treating them appropriately. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This overview of the 2024 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, prognostic factors, treatment, and follow-up of NMIBC. These guidelines are designed for effective integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Western General Hospital, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Hugh A Mostafid
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Robert Wood
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Evanguelos N Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abou Chakra M, Duquesne I, Peyromaure M, Mott SL, Moussa M, O'Donnell MA. Impact of bladder cancer family history on the prognosis of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024; 25:315-324. [PMID: 38393775 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2323609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the impact of having first-degree relatives (FDR) with bladder cancer (BC) among non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with Bacillus Calmette - Guérin (BCG) on their oncological outcomes. METHODS The National Phase II BCG/Interferon (IFN) trial database from 125 sites in the U.S.A. (1999-2001) and multi-institutional databases from France (FR) and Lebanon (LB) (2000-2021) were queried for NMIBC patients treated with BCG. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of BC family history on tumor recurrence and progression in their relatives. RESULTS There were 867 patients in the U.S.A. cohort and 1232 patients in the FR/LB cohort. Almost 8% of patients in both cohorts had FDR with BC. Patients in the FR/LB cohort were more likely to have carcinoma in situ tumors (CIS) (41% vs. 24%, p < 0.01). Having FDR with BC was not significantly associated with tumor recurrence or progression in the U.S.A. cohort. Conversely, on multivariable analysis FDR history was significantly associated with a 2.10 times increased risk of recurrence (p < 0.01) and a 3.01 times increased risk of progression (p < 0.01) in the FR/LB cohort. CONCLUSION A family history of BC could have an important impact on the response to BCG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Abou Chakra
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Igor Duquesne
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Sarah L Mott
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Mohamad Moussa
- Department of Urology, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Michael A O'Donnell
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Flaig TW, Spiess PE, Abern M, Agarwal N, Bangs R, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, Chan K, Chang S, Friedlander T, Greenberg RE, Guru KA, Herr HW, Hoffman-Censits J, Kishan A, Kundu S, Lele SM, Mamtani R, Margulis V, Mian OY, Michalski J, Montgomery JS, Nandagopal L, Pagliaro LC, Parikh M, Patterson A, Plimack ER, Pohar KS, Preston MA, Richards K, Sexton WJ, Siefker-Radtke AO, Tollefson M, Tward J, Wright JL, Dwyer MA, Cassara CJ, Gurski LA. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Bladder Cancer, Version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:866-878. [PMID: 35948037 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer and other urinary tract cancers (upper tract tumors, urothelial carcinoma of the prostate, primary carcinoma of the urethra). These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines regarding the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, including how to treat in the event of a bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage; new roles for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-muscle invasive, muscle-invasive, and metastatic bladder cancer; and the addition of antibody-drug conjugates for metastatic bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shilajit Kundu
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | - Ronac Mamtani
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Omar Y Mian
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | - Anthony Patterson
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | - Kamal S Pohar
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jonathan L Wright
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Compared Efficacy of Adjuvant Intravesical BCG-TICE vs. BCG-RIVM for High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040887. [PMID: 35205635 PMCID: PMC8869903 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravesical immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard therapy for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The superiority of any BCG strain over another could not be demonstrated yet. METHODS Patients with NMIBCs underwent adjuvant induction ± maintenance schedule of intravesical immunotherapy with either BCG TICE or RIVM at two high-volume tertiary institutions. Only BCG-naïve patients and those treated with the same strain over the course of follow-up were included. One-to-one (1:1) propensity score matching (PSM) between the two cohorts was utilized to adjust for baseline demographic and tumor characteristics imbalances. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models according to high-risk NMIBC prognostic factors were implemented to address survival differences between the strains. Sub-group analysis modeling of the influence of routine secondary resection (re-TUR) in the setting of the sole maintenance adjuvant schedule for the two strains was further performed. RESULTS 852 Ta-T1 NMIBCs (n = 719, 84.4% on TICE; n = 133, 15.6% on RIVM) with a median of 53 (24-77) months of follow-up were reviewed. After PSM, no differences at 5-years RFS, PFS, and CSS at both Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were detected for the whole cohort. In the sub-group setting of full adherence to European/American Urology Guidelines (EAU/NCCN), BCG TICE demonstrated longer 5-years RFS compared to RIVM (68% vs. 43%, p = 0.008; HR: 0.45 95% CI 0.25-0.81). CONCLUSION When routinely performing re-TUR followed by a maintenance BCG schedule, TICE was superior to RIVM for RFS outcomes. However, no significant differences were detected for PFS and CSS, respectively.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mukherjee N, Julián E, Torrelles JB, Svatek RS. Effects of Mycobacterium bovis Calmette et Guérin (BCG) in oncotherapy: Bladder cancer and beyond. Vaccine 2021; 39:7332-7340. [PMID: 34627626 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette et Guérin (BCG) vaccine was generated in 1921 with the efforts of a team of investigators, Albert Calmette and Camille Guérin, dedicated to the determination to develop a vaccine against active tuberculosis (TB) disease. Since then, BCG vaccination is used globally for protection against childhood and disseminated TB; however, its efficacy at protecting against pulmonary TB in adult and aging populations is highly variable. Due to the BCG generated immunity, this vaccine later proved to have an antitumor activity; though the standing mechanisms behind are still unclear. Recent studies indicate that both innate and adaptive cell responses may play an important role in BCG eradication and prevention of bladder cancer. Thus, cells such as natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils but also MHC-restricted CD4 and CD8 T cells and γδ T cells may play an important role and can be one the main effectors in BCG therapy. Here, we discuss the role of BCG therapy in bladder cancer and other cancers, including current strategies and their impact on the generation and sustainability of protective antitumor immunity against bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neelam Mukherjee
- Department of Urology University of Texas Health San Antonio (UTHSA), San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Esther Julián
- Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Facultat de Biociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Jordi B Torrelles
- Population Health Program, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology University of Texas Health San Antonio (UTHSA), San Antonio, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yassaie O, Chehroudi C, Black PC. Novel and emerging approaches in the management of non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211039052. [PMID: 34408797 PMCID: PMC8366114 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211039052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has traditionally been managed with transurethral resection followed by intravesical chemotherapy and/or bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in a risk-adapted manner. These tumors commonly recur and can progress potentially to lethal muscle invasive disease. A major unmet need in the field of NMIBC is bladder preserving therapy for recurrent high-grade NMIBC after adequate intravesical BCG therapy. The current gold standard treatment for these BCG-unresponsive patients is radical cystectomy, which is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, particularly in older and frailer patients. It is therefore critical to provide alternative treatment options with acceptable oncological outcomes. In this review we explore novel bladder-sparing treatment options including combination intravesical therapy, enhanced instillation methods, immunotherapy, gene therapy, targeted therapy, photodynamic therapy and BCG variants across the spectrum of NMIBC disease states, ranging from low grade BCG-naïve patients through to high-grade BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Yassaie
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cyrus Chehroudi
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tran L, Xiao JF, Agarwal N, Duex JE, Theodorescu D. Advances in bladder cancer biology and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2021; 21:104-121. [PMID: 33268841 PMCID: PMC10112195 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-020-00313-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 330] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The field of research in bladder cancer has seen significant advances in recent years. Next-generation sequencing has identified the genes most mutated in bladder cancer. This wealth of information allowed the definition of driver mutations, and identification of actionable therapeutic targets, as well as a clearer picture of patient prognosis and therapeutic direction. In a similar vein, our understanding of the cellular aspects of bladder cancer has grown. The identification of the cellular geography and the populations of different cell types and quantifications of normal and abnormal cell types in tumours provide a better prediction of therapeutic response. Non-invasive methods of diagnosis, including liquid biopsies, have seen major advances as well. These methods will likely find considerable utility in assessing minimal residual disease following treatment and for early-stage diagnosis. A significant therapeutic impact on patients with bladder cancer is found in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapeutics. These therapeutics have been shown to cure some patients with bladder cancer and significantly decrease adverse events. These developments provide patients with better monitoring opportunities, unique therapeutic options and greater hope for prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Tran
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jin-Fen Xiao
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason E Duex
- Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dan Theodorescu
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nowak Ł, Krajewski W, Moschini M, Chorbińska J, Poletajew S, Tukiendorf A, Muilwijk T, Joniau S, Tafuri A, Antonelli A, Orlando R, Di Trapani E, Alvarez-Maestro M, Simone G, Zamboni S, Simeone C, Marconi MC, Mastroianni R, Piszczek R, Xylinas E, Zdrojowy R. Assessment of the oncological outcomes of three different bacillus Calmette-Guérin strains in patients with high-grade T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Arab J Urol 2021; 19:78-85. [PMID: 33763252 PMCID: PMC7954505 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2021.1874628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective : To determine whether there are significant differences in oncological outcomes between three different bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) strains used for adjuvant intravesical immunotherapy in patients with high-grade T1 (T1HG) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients and methods : Data of 590 patients with a diagnosis of primary T1HG NMIBC were retrospectively reviewed. The study included 138 (23.4%) patients who were treated with the Moreau, 272 (46.1%) with the TICE, and 180 (30.5%) with the RIVM strains. All patients included in the analysis received at least five instillations of an induction course and at least two installations of a maintenance course. Due to existing differences in baseline patient characteristics, the association between oncological outcomes and strain groups was investigated by complementary analysis with the implementation of inverse probability weighting (IPW). Results : The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 70.5%, 66.7% and 55.2% for the Moreau, TICE and RIVM groups, respectively (P = 0.016). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 84.4%, 85% and 77.8% in the Moreau, TICE and RIVM groups, respectively (P = 0.215). The IPW-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis did not show any differences in RFS between the Moreau and TICE groups (P = 0.69), whereas the RIVM strain was significantly associated with worse RFS compared to the Moreau (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69 for RIVM; P = 0.034) and TICE (HR 1.87 for RIVM; P = 0.002) strains. The IPW-adjusted analysis did not show any significant differences between study groups in terms of PFS. Conclusions : The results of the present study suggest that the Moreau and TICE strains might be superior to the RIVM strain in terms of RFS in patients with T1HG NMIBC. Abbreviations: CIS: carcinoma in situ; IPW: inverse probability weighting; IQR: interquartile range; HR: hazard ratio; HG: high grade; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; MP: muscularis priopria; NMIBC: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; PFS: progression-free survival; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RFS: recurrence-free survival; T1HG, high-grade T1; (re-)TURB: (re-staging) transurethral resection of bladder; VH: variant histology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Nowak
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical Univeristy, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical Univeristy, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik Für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical Univeristy, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Sławomir Poletajew
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrzej Tukiendorf
- Department of Public Health, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ettore Di Trapani
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- Oncologic Urology, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Zamboni
- Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Claudio Simeone
- Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Marconi
- Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Oncologic Urology, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Radosław Piszczek
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Lowersilesian Specialistic Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Romuald Zdrojowy
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical Univeristy, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schmidt S, Kunath F, Coles B, Draeger DL, Krabbe L, Dersch R, Kilian S, Jensen K, Dahm P, Meerpohl JJ. Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 1:CD011935. [PMID: 31912907 PMCID: PMC6956215 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011935.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder are at risk for recurrence and progression following transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT). Mitomycin C (MMC) and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) are commonly used, competing forms of intravesical therapy for intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive (Ta and T1) urothelial bladder cancer but their relative merits are somewhat uncertain. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of BCG intravesical therapy compared to MMC intravesical therapy for treating intermediate- and high-risk Ta and T1 bladder cancer in adults. SEARCH METHODS We performed a systematic literature search in multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS), as well as in two clinical trial registries. We searched reference lists of relevant publications and abstract proceedings. We applied no language restrictions. The latest search was conducted in September 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravesical BCG with intravesical MMC therapy for non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and rated the quality of evidence according to GRADE per outcome. In the meta-analyses, we used the random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS We identified 12 RCTs comparing BCG versus MMC in participants with intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder tumours (published from 1995 to 2013). In total, 2932 participants were randomised. Time to death from any cause: BCG may make little or no difference on time to death from any cause compared to MMC (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.20; participants = 1132, studies = 5; 567 participants in the BCG arm and 565 in the MMC arm; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 6 fewer deaths (40 fewer to 36 more) per 1000 participants treated with BCG at five years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations and imprecision. Serious adverse effects: 12/577 participants treated with BCG experienced serious non-fatal adverse effects compared to 4/447 participants in the MMC group. The pooled risk ratio (RR) is 2.31 (95% CI 0.82 to 6.52; participants = 1024, studies = 5; low-certainty evidence). Therefore, BCG may increase the risk for serious adverse effects compared to MMC. This corresponds to nine more serious adverse effects (one fewer to 37 more) with BCG. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations and imprecision. Time to recurrence: BCG may reduce the time to recurrence compared to MMC (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09; participants = 2616, studies = 11, 1273 participants in the BCG arm and 1343 in the MMC arm; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 41 fewer recurrences (104 fewer to 29 more) with BCG at five years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations, imprecision and inconsistency. Time to progression: BCG may make little or no difference on time to progression compared to MMC (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.26; participants = 1622, studies = 6; 804 participants in the BCG arm and 818 in the MMC arm; low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to four fewer progressions (29 fewer to 27 more) with BCG at five years. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence two levels due to study limitations and imprecision. Quality of life: we found very limited data for this outcomes and were unable to estimate an effect size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, BCG may reduce the risk of recurrence over time although the Confidence Intervals include the possibility of no difference. It may have no effect on either the risk of progression or risk of death from any cause over time. BCG may cause more serious adverse events although the Confidence Intervals once again include the possibility of no difference. We were unable to determine the impact on quality of life. The certainty of the evidence was consistently low, due to concerns that include possible selection bias, performance bias, given the lack of blinding in these studies, and imprecision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Schmidt
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
| | - Frank Kunath
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
- University Hospital ErlangenDepartment of UrologyKrankenhausstrasse 12ErlangenGermany91054
| | - Bernadette Coles
- Cardiff University Library ServicesVelindre NHS TrustVelindre Cancer CentreWhitchurchCardiffUKCF14 2TL
| | - Desiree Louise Draeger
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
- University of RostockDepartment of UrologyErnst‐Heydemann‐Strasse 7RostockMecklenburg‐VorpommernGermany18057
| | - Laura‐Maria Krabbe
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für UrologieMartin‐Buber‐Str. 10BerlinGermany14163
- University of Muenster Medical CenterDepartment of UrologyAlbert‐Schweitzer Campus 1, GB A1MuensterNRWGermany48149
| | - Rick Dersch
- Medical Center – University of FreiburgDepartment of Neurology and NeurophysiologyBerliner Allee 29FreiburgGermany79110
| | - Samuel Kilian
- University of HeidelbergInstitute of Medical Biometry and InformaticsHeidelbergGermany
| | - Katrin Jensen
- University of HeidelbergInstitute of Medical Biometry and InformaticsHeidelbergGermany
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Minneapolis VA Health Care SystemUrology SectionOne Veterans DriveMail Code 112DMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA55417
- University of MinnesotaDepartment of Urology420 Delaware Street SEMMC 394MinneapolisMinnesotaUSA55455
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Medical Center ‐ University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of
FreiburgInstitute for Evidence in MedicineBreisacher Str. 153FreiburgGermanyD‐79110
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Daniels MJ, Barry E, Schoenberg M, Lamm DL, Bivalacqua TJ, Sankin A, Kates M. Contemporary oncologic outcomes of second induction course BCG in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:5.e9-5.e16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
11
|
Abstract
BCG immunotherapy is the gold-standard treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer at high risk of recurrence or progression. Preclinical and clinical studies have revealed that a robust inflammatory response to BCG involves several steps: attachment of BCG; internalization of BCG into resident immune cells, normal cells, and tumour urothelial cells; BCG-mediated induction of innate immunity, which is orchestrated by a cellular and cytokine milieu; and BCG-mediated initiation of tumour-specific immunity. As an added layer of complexity, variation between clinical BCG strains might influence development of tumour immunity. However, more than 40 years after the first use of BCG for bladder cancer, many questions regarding its mechanism of action remain unanswered. Clearly, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying BCG-mediated tumour immunity could lead to improved efficacy, increased tolerance of treatment, and identification of novel immune-based therapies. Indeed, enthusiasm for bladder cancer immunotherapy, and the possibility of combining BCG with other therapies, is increasing owing to the availability of targeted immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors. Understanding of the mechanism of action of BCG immunotherapy has advanced greatly, but many questions remain, and further basic and clinical research efforts are needed to develop new treatment strategies for patients with bladder cancer.
Collapse
|
12
|
Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat EM, Gontero P, Mostafid AH, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Sylvester R, Zigeuner R, Capoun O, Cohen D, Escrig JLD, Hernández V, Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Soukup V. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update. Eur Urol 2019; 76:639-657. [PMID: 31443960 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 836] [Impact Index Per Article: 167.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT This overview presents the updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ (CIS). OBJECTIVE To provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation and recommendations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of the NMIBC guidelines has been performed annually since the last published version in 2017. Databases covered by the search included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and the level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Tumours staged as Ta, T1, and/or CIS are grouped under the heading of NMIBC. Diagnosis depends on cystoscopy and histological evaluation of the tissue obtained by transurethral resection (TURB) in papillary tumours or by multiple bladder biopsies in CIS. In papillary lesions, a complete TURB is essential for the patient's prognosis and correct diagnosis. Where the initial resection is incomplete, where there is no muscle in the specimen, or where a T1 tumour is detected, a second TURB should be performed within 2-6 wk. The risks of both recurrence and progression may be estimated for individual patients using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring system. Stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups is pivotal to the recommendation of adjuvant treatment. In patients with tumours presumed to be at a low risk and in those presumed to be at an intermediate risk with a low previous recurrence rate and an expected EORTC recurrence score of <5, one immediate chemotherapy instillation is recommended. Patients with intermediate-risk tumours should receive 1 yr of full-dose bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical immunotherapy or instillations of chemotherapy for a maximum of 1 yr. In patients with high-risk tumours, full-dose intravesical BCG for 1-3 yr is indicated. In patients at the highest risk of tumour progression, immediate radical cystectomy should be considered. Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-unresponsive tumours. The extended version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website: https://uroweb.org/guideline/non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer/. CONCLUSIONS These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Panel has released an updated version of their guidelines, which contains information on classification, risk factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors, and treatment of NMIBC. The recommendations are based on the current literature (until the end of 2018), with emphasis on high-level data from randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses. Stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups is essential for deciding appropriate use of adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy or bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations. Surgical removal of the bladder should be considered in case of BCG-unresponsive tumours or in NMIBCs with the highest risk of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, UPMC Paris VI, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology Department, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Richard Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Daniel Cohen
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Thomas Seisen
- Urology Department, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boegemann M, Aydin AM, Bagrodia A, Krabbe LM. Prospects and progress of immunotherapy for bladder cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2017; 17:1417-1431. [PMID: 28832261 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1366445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With recent advances in immunooncology and the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors into clinical practice for many cancers, the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma has changed dramatically and will continue to change further. Currently, a number of compounds and combinations are under investigation in numerous clinical trials and various clinical scenarios for bladder cancer. Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an overview of the history and rationale for immunotherapy in bladder cancer. They also provide the currently available data evaluating checkpoint inhibitors for bladder cancer, and discuss ongoing trials and future perspectives for urothelial carcinoma treatment. Expert opinion: The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors into the management of bladder cancer marks a significant milestone for this disease. Checkpoint inhibitors have the potential to impact patients across multiple disease states from non-muscle-invasive disease to metastatic tumors refractory to conventional treatment. That being said, validated biomarkers, including genetic signatures, to accurately predict response, and the establishment of optimal sequencing and combination of these immunotherapeutic agents with chemo/radiotherapy are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Boegemann
- a Department of Urology , University of Muenster Medical Center , Muenster , Germany
| | - Ahmet Murat Aydin
- b Department of Urology , The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA.,c Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Hacettepe University , Ankara , Turkey
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- b Department of Urology , The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- a Department of Urology , University of Muenster Medical Center , Muenster , Germany.,b Department of Urology , The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|