Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy

Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group

BACKGROUND

Positive surgical margins (PSMs) are frequent in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). The impact of PSMs on cancer-specific (CSM) and overall (OM) mortality has not yet been proved definitively.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the presence and the features of PSMs were associated with CSM and OM in patients who underwent robotic-assisted RP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 8141 patients underwent robotic-assisted RP with >10 yr of follow-up.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Cox multivariable analyses assessed the impact of margin status (positive vs negative) and PSM features (negative vs <3 mm vs >3 mm vs multifocal) on the risk of CSM, OM, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after adjusting for potential confounders. We repeated our analyses after stratifying patients according to clinical (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment [CAPRA] categories) and pathological characteristics (adverse: pT 3-4 and/or grade group [GG] 4-5 and/or pN1 and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] persistence).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

PSMs were found in 1348 patients (16%). Among these, 48 (3.6%) patients had multifocal PSMs. Overall, 1550 men experienced BCR and 898 men died, including 130 for prostate cancer. At Cox multivariable analyses, PSMs were associated with CSM in patients with adverse clinical (Intermediate risk: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.71, p = 0.048; high risk: HR: 2.20, p = 0.009) and pathological (HR: 1.79, p = 0.005) characteristics. Only multifocal PSMs were associated with CSM and OM in the whole population (HR for CSM: 4.68, p < 0.001; HR for OM: 1.82, p = 0.037) and in patients with adverse clinical (intermediate risk: HR for CSM: 7.26, p = 0.006; high risk: HR for CSM: 9.26, p < 0.001; HR for OM: 2.97, p = 0.006) and pathological (HR for CSM: 9.50, p < 0.001; HR for OM: 2.59, p = 0.001) characteristics. Potential limitations include a selection bias and a lack of information on the Gleason score at PSM location.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find an association between unifocal PSMs and mortality. Conversely, our results underscore the importance of avoiding multifocal PSMs in patients with adverse clinical (intermediate- and high-risk CAPRA score) and pathological (GG ≥4, pT ≥3, pN1, or PSA persistence) characteristics, to enhance overall survival and reduce CSM.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we evaluated whether the presence and the characteristics of positive surgical margins were associated with mortality in patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. We found that the presence of positive surgical margins, particularly multifocal margins, was associated with mortality only in patients with adverse clinical and pathological characteristics.

Clinical outcomes for men with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy-results from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative community-based registry

Objective

Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) indicate failure of surgery to completely clear cancer. PSMs confer an increased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR), but how more robust outcomes are affected is unclear. This study investigated factors associated with PSMs following RP and determined their impact on clinical outcomes (BCR, second treatment [radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy], and prostate cancer-specific mortality [PCSM]).

Methods

The study cohort included men diagnosed with prostate cancer (pT2-3b/N0/M0) between January 1998 and June 2016 who underwent RP from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative database. Factors associated with risk of PSMs were identified using Poisson regression. The impact of PSMs on clinical outcomes (BCR, second treatment, and PCSM) was assessed using competing risk regression.

Results

Of the 2827 eligible participants, 28% had PSMs-10% apical, 6% bladder neck, 17% posterolateral, and 5% at multiple locations. Median follow-up was 9.6 years with 81 deaths from prostate cancer recorded. Likelihood of PSM increased with higher pathological grade and pathological tumor stage, and greater tumour volume, but decreased with increasing surgeon volume (odds ratio [OR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.98, per 100 previous prostatectomies). PSMs were associated with increased risk of BCR (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 2.5; 95% CI 2.1-3.1) and second treatment (sHR 2.9; 95% CI 2.4-3.5). Risk of BCR was increased similarly for each PSM location, but was higher for multiple margin sites. We found no association between PSMs and PCSM.

Conclusion

Our findings support previous research suggesting that PSMs are not independently associated with PCSM despite strong association with BCR. Reducing PSM rates remains an important objective, given the higher likelihood of secondary treatment with associated comorbidities.

Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

The positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) are two main factors associated with poor oncotherapeutic outcomes after prostatectomy. This is an Asian population study based on a single-surgeon experience to deeply investigate the predictors for PSM and BCR. We retrospectively included 419 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy cases. The number of PSM cases was 126 (30.1%), stratified as 22 (12.2%) in stage T2 and 103 (43.6%) in stage T3. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 10 ng/mL (p = 0.047; odds ratio [OR] 1.712), intraoperative blood loss > 200 mL (p = 0.006; OR 4.01), and postoperative pT3 stage (p < 0.001; OR 6.901) were three independent predictors for PSM while PSA > 10 ng/mL (p < 0.015; hazard ratio [HR] 1.8), pT3 stage (p = 0.012; HR 2.264), International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade > 3 (p = 0.02; HR 1.964), and PSM (p = 0.027; HR 1.725) were four significant predictors for BCR in multivariable analysis. PSMs occurred mostly in the posterolateral regions (73.8%) which were associated with nerve-sparing procedures (p = 0.012) while apical PSMs were correlated intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.001). A high ratio of pT3 stage after RARP in our Asian population-based might surpass the influence of PSM on BCR. PSM was less significant than PSA and ISUP grade for predicting PSA recurrence in pT3 disease. Among PSM cases, unifocal and multifocal positive margins had a similar ratio of the BCR rate (p = 0.172) but ISUP grade > 3 (p = 0.002; HR 2.689) was a significant BCR predictor. These results indicate that PSA and pathological status are key factors influencing PSM and BCR.

Long-term Oncologic Impact of Positive Anterior and Posterior Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the anterior/posterior status of positive surgical margin (PSM) on long-term outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 391 consecutive PSM patients after radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2007 excluding cases with multiple location PSM or lack of anterior/posterior status data. The oncologic impact of anterior-PSM and posterior-PSM were examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 115 cases (29.4%) with apex-PSM, 257 cases (65.7%) with peripheral PSM, and 19 cases (4.9%) with bladder neck PSM. Among the 257 peripheral PSM cases, 58 cases (22.6%) were with anterior-PSM, 174 cases (67.7%) were with posterior-PSM, and 25 cases (9.7%) were with both anterior and posterior PSM. Over a median follow-up of 12.6 years, patients with anterior-PSM, especially those with low to intermediate Gleason score (≤7), showed a biochemical recurrence (BCR) prognosis similar to those with apex-PSM. In contrast, patients with posterior-PSM showed significantly higher BCR risk on both univariate and multivariate analyses when compared with those with apex-PSM. No impact on metastasis-free survival or overall survival was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found that prostate cancer patients with anterior-PSM showed a more favorable BCR prognosis similar to those with apex-PSM when comparing to patients with posterior-PSM. Our study results may help physicians to choose different treatment options for patients diagnosed with different PSM status including considering further adjuvant treatment for patients with posterior-PSM.

Are urologic surgeons performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at the University of Alberta meeting surgical quality performance benchmarks? The PROCURE-02 quality assurance study

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a standard of care primary treatment for men with clinically localized prostate cancer (CLPC). The 2010 Canadian Urological Association (CUA) consensus guideline examining surgical quality performance for radical prostatectomy suggested benchmarks for surgical performance. To date, no study has examined whether Canadian surgeons are achieving these benchmarks. We determined the proportion of University of Alberta (UA) urologic surgeons achieving the CUA surgical quality performance outcome (SQPO) benchmarks.

METHODS

A retrospective quality assurance analysis of prospectively collected data from the PROstate Cancer Urosurgery Repository of Edmonton (PROCURE) was performed. Men who underwent RARP for CLPC between September 2007 and May 2018 by one of seven surgeons were analyzed. SQPO were an unadjusted pT2-R1 resection rate <25%, blood transfusion rate <10%, rectal injury rate <1%, and 90-day mortality rate <1%. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of surgeons achieving the benchmarks.

RESULTS

Data were evaluable for 2821 men. Seven of seven (100%) surgeons achieved a blood transfusion rate <10%, rectal injury rate <1%, and 90-day mortality rate <1%. However, only six of seven surgeons achieved an unadjusted pT2-R1 resection rate <25%; one surgeon had an unadjusted pT2-R1 resection rate of 27.9%. Limitations include the lack of centralized pathology review for surgical margin status by a dedicated genitourinary pathologist.

CONCLUSIONS

UA surgeons are achieving the CUA SQPO benchmarks for blood transfusion, rectal injury, and perioperative mortality. However, not all UA urologists are achieving a pT2-R1 resection rate <25%. Surgical quality performance initiatives designed to improve cancer control may be warranted.

"Real-time" Assessment of Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy: State-of-the-Art

Histopathologic examination of the pathologic specimens using hematoxylin & eosin stains represents the backbone of the modern pathology. It is time-consuming; thus, "real-time" assessment of prostatic and periprostatic tissue has gained special interest in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. The current study focuses on the review of the different available techniques for "real-time" evaluation of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy (RP). We performed a comprehensive search of the Medline database to identify all the articles discussing "real-time" or intraoperative assessment of surgical margins during RP. Several filters were applied to the search to include only English articles performed on human subjects and published between January 2000 and March 2019. The search revealed several options for pathologic assessment of surgical margins including intraoperative frozen sections, confocal laser endomicroscopy, optical spectroscopy, photodynamic diagnosis, optical coherence tomography, multiphoton microscopy, structured illumination microscopy, 3D augmented reality, and ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscope. Frozen section represents the gold standard technique for real-time pathologic examinations of surgical margins during RP; however, several other options showed promising results in the initial clinical trials, and considering the rapid development in the field of molecular and cellular imaging, some of these options may serve as an alternative to frozen section.

Impact of Multifocality and Multilocation of Positive Surgical Margin After Radical Prostatectomy on Predicting Oncological Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of focality and location of positive surgical margins (PSM) on long-term outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa), including biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis and overall mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a total of 2796 cases of RP between 1993 and 2007 in our single hospital, 476 cases with PSMs were identified and included in this study. PSM location was categorized into apex, peripheral, and bladder neck. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the impact of PSM focality and location status on oncologic survival.

RESULTS

Of these 476 cases with PSMs, 335 (70.4%) cases were with single focal (sF) PSMs and 141 (29.6%) cases were with multifocal (mF) PSMs. Furthermore, 406 (85.3%) cases were found to have single location (sL) PSMs, and 70 (14.7%) cases were with multilocation (mL) PSMs. The median follow-up was 12.9 years. mF-PSMs and mL-PSMs showed significant impact on increased BCR risk on univariate analysis, and mL-PSMs remained significant on multivariate analysis (P = .048). Furthermore, the combination of multifocality and multilocation showed added prognostic value on predicting BCR-free survival, but not on metastasis-free survival or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The presence of mF-PSMs and mL-PSMs, and especially the combination of both, demonstrated significant impact on BCR prognosis. Patients with apex sLsF-PSMs were less likely to have BCR when compared with all those with non-apex sLsF-PSMs. These results should be considered when evaluating patients for adjuvant therapy.