Interchangeability and tolerability of a virosomal and an aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine

Coadministered pneumococcal conjugate vaccine decreases immune response to hepatitis A vaccine: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

We explored the influence of coadministration on safety and immunogenicity of the most common travellers' vaccine hepatitis A (HepA) and the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) increasingly used both at home and before travel.

METHODS

Volunteers aged ≥18 years (n = 305) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 into three groups receiving: 13-valent PCV (PCV13) + HepA, PCV13, or HepA. Anti-pneumococcal IgG concentrations, opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titres, and total hepatitis A antibody (anti-HAV) concentrations were measured before and 28 ± 3 days after vaccination. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded over 4 weeks.

RESULTS

After vaccination, the anti-HAV geometric mean concentration was significantly lower in the PCV13+HepA than the HepA group: 34.47 mIU/mL (95% CI: 26.42-44.97 mIU/mL) versus 72.94 mIU/mL (95% CI: 55.01-96.72 mIU/mL), p < 0.001. Anti-HAV ≥10 mIU/mL considered protective was reached by 71 of 85 (83.5%) in the PCV13+HepA group versus 76 of 79 (96.2%) in the HepA group, p 0.008. The increases in anti-pneumococcal IgG and OPA levels were comparable in the PCV13+HepA and PCV13 groups, apart from a bigger rise in the PCV13+HepA group for serotype 3 (one-way ANOVA: serotype 3 IgG p 0.010, OPA p 0.002). AEs proved more frequent among those receiving PCV13 than HepA, but simultaneous administration did not increase the rates: ≥one AE was reported by 45 of 56 (80.4%) PCV13, 43 of 54 (79.6%) PCV13+HepA, and 25 of 53 (47.2%) HepA recipients providing structured AE data.

DISCUSSION

Coadministration of HepA and PCV13 did not cause safety concerns, nor did it impact the patients' response to PCV13, apart from serotype 3. However, coadministered PCV13 significantly impaired antibody responses to HepA.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

This review is withdrawn because it is outdated. A new review is to be published by the end of 2019.

An extra priming dose of hepatitis A vaccine to adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis and drug induced immunosuppression - A prospective, open-label, multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated that a pre-travel single dose of hepatitis A vaccine is not sufficient as protection against hepatitis A in immunocompromised travelers. We evaluated if an extra dose of hepatitis A vaccine given shortly prior to traveling ensures seroconversion.

METHOD

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 69, median age = 55 years) treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitor(TNFi) and/or Methotrexate (MTX) were immunized with two doses of hepatitis A vaccine, either as double dose or four weeks apart, followed by a booster dose at six months. Furthermore, 48 healthy individuals, median age = 60 years were immunized with two doses, six months apart. Anti-hepatitis A antibodies were measured at 0, 1, 2, 6, 7 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Two months after the initial vaccination, 88% of the RA patients had protective antibodies, compared to 85% of the healthy individuals. There was no significant difference between the two vaccine schedules. At twelve months, 99% of RA patients and 100% of healthy individuals had seroprotective antibodies.

CONCLUSION

An extra priming dos of hepatitis A vaccine prior to traveling offered an acceptable protection in individuals treated with TNFi and/or MTX. This constitutes an attractive pre-travel solution to this vulnerable group of patients.

INTERCHANGEABILITY OF VIRAL VACCINES FOR IMMUNIZATION

The review presents the results of the analysis of domestic and foreign scientific literature on the interchangeability of hepatitis A, B and influenza vaccines. The WHO materials, regulatory documents, data from scientific literature of foreign countries and Russia about the vaccine interchangeability are summarized. The problem of objective assessment of interchangeability of drugs is relevant worldwide. The definition of an "interchangeable drug" does not draw a clear line between the interoperability criteria for chemical and immunobiological drugs. The official guidance documents on immunization adopted in several countries define "interchangeability" as the practice of transition from a vaccine available from a certain manufacturer to a similar vaccine available from another manufacturer. The term "interchangeable" can be applied to immunobiological drugs if one of the drugs can be replaced with the other in the course of vaccination. The concept of interchangeability applies to vaccines that do not differ in efficacy (immunological, preventive, epidemiological) and safety and are used in an immunization course involving multiple administration of these vaccines. The definition of interchangeability is important in order to address the problem of replacing unidirectional vaccines available from different manufacturers when purchasing vaccines included in the national schedule of preventive vaccinations and in the schedule of preventive vaccination on epidemic indications. One of the most important conditions for "interchangeability" of vaccines is their application in accordance with the recommended schedule of administration and the dosage indicated by the manufacturer. Research data show that vaccines can be interchangeable if used in accordance with the recommended schedule of administration and the dosage specified by the manufacturer. Control agencies of many countries issue recommendations regulating the procedure of vaccine replacement in case of necessity. However, there are no special regulations of vaccine interchangeability in Russia. The concept of vaccine "interchangeability" should be extended to the continuation of a course of vaccinations in a particular person with a vaccine of another manufacturer and the possibility of applying similar vaccines available from different manufacturers.

Immunogenicity of aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix®) administered as a third dose after primary doses of Japanese aluminum-free hepatitis A vaccine (Aimmugen®) for Japanese travelers to endemic countries

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A vaccination is recommended for travelers to endemic countries. Several inactivated aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccines are available worldwide, but only one licensed hepatitis A vaccine is available in Japan. This vaccine is a lyophilized inactivated aluminum-free hepatitis A vaccine (Aimmugen®). The standard schedule of Aimmugen® is three doses (at 0, 2-4 weeks, and 6 months). Japanese people will go abroad after receiving 2 doses of Aimmugen®. Some long-term travelers will receive the third dose of hepatitis A vaccine at their destination, at 6-24 months after 2 doses of Aimmugen®. Aimmugen® is not available in countries other than Japan. They receive inactivated aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine instead of a third dose of Aimmugen®. This study was undertaken to determine whether the booster vaccination with an aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine is effective following two doses of Aimmugen®.

METHODS

Subjects were healthy Japanese adults aged 20 years or older who had received two doses of Aimmugen®. Subjects received a booster dose of Havrix®1440 intramuscularly as the third dose. Serology samples for hepatitis A virus antibody titers were taken 4-6 weeks later. Anti-hepatitis A virus antibody titers were measured by an inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Subjects were 20 healthy Japanese adults, 6 men and 14 women. The mean age ± standard deviation was 37.2 ± 13.3. The seroprotection rate (SPR, anti-hepatitis A virus antibody titer ≥10 mIU/mL) was 85% at enrollment, and increased to 100% after vaccination with Havrix®. The geometric mean anti-hepatitis A virus antibody titer increased from 39.8 mIU/mL to 2938.2 mIU/mL.

CONCLUSION

The three scheduled doses consisting of two doses of Aimmugen® plus a third dose with Havrix® is more immunogenic than using only two doses of Aimmugen®. The vaccination with Havrix® could be allowed to be used instead of a third dose of Aimmugen®. (UMIN000009351).

Immunogenicity and estimation of antibody persistence following vaccination with an inactivated virosomal hepatitis A vaccine in adults: A 20-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

This was a 20-year follow-up study to assess long-term persistence of protective antibody levels against the hepatitis A virus (HAV) in healthy participants vaccinated with 2 doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Epaxal®) between 1992 and 1995.

METHODS

Blood samples for anti-HAV antibody concentrations were obtained during a follow-up visit 20years after vaccination and were analyzed in parallel with samples still available from previous visits using AxSYM® HAVAB 2.0 assay.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age of the participants was 44.71 (3.905) years at year 20 follow-up (N=95). Participants completing 0/12-month Epaxal® immunization regimen (N=94) had seroprotection rate of 100% (95% CI: 96.2, 100.0) with ⩾10mIU/mL seropositivity cut-off and 98.9% (95% CI: 94.2, 100.0) with ⩾20mIU/mL cut-off. With ⩾10mIU/mL cut-off, the estimated median duration of protection was 77.3years (95% CI: 71.8, 83.5) with 95% of the vaccinated participants predicted to be protected for at least 41.5years. At ⩾20mIU/mL cut-off, the estimated median duration of protection was 64.8years (95% CI: 60.1, 68.4) with 95% of the vaccinated participants predicted to be protected for at least 33years. Anti-HAV antibody geometric mean concentrations were higher in women (277.9; 95% CI: 217.7, 354.7) than in men (167.7; 95% CI: 125.2, 224.6).

CONCLUSION

The data from this 20-year follow-up study confirm previous observations that two doses of Epaxal® provide protection against hepatitis A infection for at least 30years in over 95% of healthy participants.

Immunogenicity and safety of a pediatric dose of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine in healthy children in India

As India is transitioning from high to intermediate hepatitis A endemicity, the need for hepatitis A vaccination programs increases. This study investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine (HAVpur Junior) compared with an aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix 720 Junior) in Indian children. Healthy children aged 18-47 months, stratified by age, were randomized to either HAVpur Junior or Havrix 720 Junior. The first dose of vaccine was administered on Day 1 and the second (booster) dose 6 months later. Antibodies against hepatitis A virus (HAV) were measured using a microparticle enzyme immunoassay. The primary objective assessed non-inferiority of HAVpur Junior to Havrix 720 Junior in terms of seroprotection rates (≥ 10 mIU/mL anti-HAV antibodies) at 1 month after the first vaccination. Non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval of the group difference was greater than -10%. Local and systemic adverse events were recorded. The seroprotection rate at 1 month was 95.9% in the HAVpur Junior group and 96.6% in the Havrix 720 Junior group. As the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval of the group difference was greater than -10% (-4.7), non-inferiority of HAVpur Junior to Havrix 720 Junior was established. The overall incidence of adverse events (solicited and unsolicited) after each vaccination was similar in both groups. In conclusion, the aluminum-free virosomal vaccine HAVpur Junior induced a similar immune response to Havrix 720 Junior in healthy Indian children aged 18 to 47 months. Both vaccines were well tolerated. The study shows that the low-dose virosomal HAV vaccine is consistently efficacious and well tolerated in children of all age groups and is suitable for inclusion into Indian childhood vaccination schedules.

Long-term antibody persistence in children after vaccination with the pediatric formulation of an aluminum-free virosomal hepatitis A vaccine

BACKGROUND

The pediatric dose of the virosomal hepatitis A vaccine Epaxal, Epaxal Junior, is safe and immunogenic in children from 1 to 17 years of age. The present study investigated the long-term immunogenicity of Epaxal Junior. The standard doses of Epaxal and aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix Junior) were used as comparators.

METHODS

A total of 271 children who had completed a 0/6-month immunization schedule (priming and booster dose) participated in this follow-up study. Anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody levels were measured using a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (HAVAB 2.0 Quantitative; Abbott Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany) starting at 18 months following the second dose, and then yearly until 66 months (ie, 5.5 years) after the second dose.

RESULTS

All subjects tested at Month 66 still had protective anti-HAV antibodies (≥10 mIU/mL). Antibody titers were generally lower in subjects 1-7 years old than in subjects 8-17 years old and higher in females 11-17 years old than in males 11-17 years old. In addition, an age-dependent decay was observed, that is, antibody decreased more rapidly in younger than in older children.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination of children with two doses of Epaxal Junior confers a real-time protection of at least 5.5 years. This protection is estimated to last approximately 25 years. Younger children showed lower antibody titers and a faster antibody decline than older children. Additional follow-up studies are needed beyond 5.5 years to further assess the long-term immunogenicity of Epaxal Junior.

The immunogenicity of a single dose of hepatitis A virus vaccines (Havrix® and Epaxal®) in Korean young adults

PURPOSE

Assessing the immunogenicity of a single dose of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines is important because some people receive only a single dose. However, previous studies have shown variable results and have not examined the effects of demographic characteristics other than gender. This study was performed to examine the immunogenicity of a single dose of HAV vaccine according to the vaccine type and demographic characteristics in young adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seronegative medical school students were randomly allocated to receive either Havrix or Epaxal.

RESULTS

After approximately 11 months, the seroconversion rate in 451 participants was 80.7%. In men, the Havrix group showed a significantly higher seroconversion rate (81.9%) than the Epaxal group (69.2%), whereas both vaccine groups showed similarly high immunogenicity in women (Havrix: 90.1%, Epaxal: 92.9%; P for interaction=0.062). According to the results of a multivariate analysis, Epaxal showed significantly lower immunogenicity than Havrix only in men. Age, obesity, drinking, smoking, and follow-up time did not significantly affect seroconversion in either gender.

CONCLUSION

The seroconversion rate of single-dose HAV vaccines was low in men, particularly in those who received Epaxal. Our results suggest that gender effects should be considered when comparing the immunogenicity of different HAV vaccines.

Efficacy of hepatitis A vaccination and factors impacting on seroconversion in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the immune response to hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccinations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We therefore assessed the immunogenicity of HAV vaccine in patients with IBD and evaluated the impact on vaccination efficacy of immunosuppressants, including corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents.

METHODS

This open prospective study evaluated the efficacy of HAV vaccination in 419 anti-HAV-negative adult patients with IBD. Patients were vaccinated against HAV at 0 and 6 to 12 months, with seroconversion (anti-HAV immunoglobulin G) measured 1 to 3 months after the second dose.

RESULTS

Of the 419 vaccinated patients who finished the study protocol (mean age, 26.9 yr), 355 (84.7%) had Crohn's disease and 64 (15.3%) had ulcerative colitis. The overall seroconversion rate was 97.6% (409/419) but was significantly lower in patients treated with the anti-TNF monoclonal antibody infliximab or adalimumab than in those not treated (92.4% [85/92] versus 99.1% [324/327], P = 0.001). In addition, the seroconversion rate was significantly lower in patients treated with ≥2 than with <2 immunosuppressants (92.6% [50/54] versus 98.4% [359/365], P = 0.03). When comparing anti-TNF alone with anti-TNF and other immunosuppressants, there was no significant difference in seroconversion rates (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-5.6; P = 0.83). The sample/cutoff ratio was significantly lower in patients who did receive anti-TNF therapy than in those who did not (5.5 versus 9.6; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although HAV vaccination is generally effective in patients with IBD, the seroconversion rate is lower in patients receiving anti-TNF agents (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT01341808).

Single-dose administration of inactivated hepatitis A vaccination in the context of hepatitis A vaccine recommendations

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to identify evidence on the protection achieved by single-dose use of inactivated hepatitis A vaccines in order to evaluate the potential of a flexible booster administration in the form of a second dose.

METHODS

A search was conducted for evidence on single-dose administration of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine and its potential impacts on long-term seropositivity rates. The main pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturer federations and the corresponding authors of manuscripts were approached for additional epidemiologic data. Correspondence was also sent to the Argentinean Ministry of Health.

RESULTS

We identified 15 data sources reporting on protection achieved by a single dose of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. The consistent finding was that the immune and memory response to the booster dose, or post-booster geometric mean titer, was independent of the time since initial vaccination. The impact of the booster on seroprotection was the same across sexes and age-groups. The longest time interval between initial and booster dose was 10.67 years, indicating that booster doses can be highly immunogenic for up to 10.67 years after primary vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Protective anti-hepatitis A virus antibody levels after a single dose of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine can persist for almost 11 years and increase or reappear after booster vaccination. Further research on the vaccine doses needed to achieve long-term protection against hepatitis A infection is required.

Development of a virosomal malaria vaccine candidate: from synthetic peptide design to clinical concept validation

An ideal malaria vaccine would prevent disease and reduce transmission by targeting several developmental stages of human malaria parasites. To be cost-effective, a modular antigen delivery technology is required for the development of such a multivalent subunit vaccine. In this review, we summarize and discuss a strategy to develop synthetic peptidomimetics of key malaria target antigens for inclusion in a multivalent malaria subunit vaccine based on immunopotentiating reconstituted influenza virosomes. Clinical testing of a bivalent virosomal formulation incorporating two structurally optimized peptidomimetics has demonstrated safety, immunogenicity and pilot efficacy. While this clinical validation supports the concept of using peptide-loaded virosomes for vaccination in humans, it is assumed that additional antigens will have to be added to the bivalent formulation to generate a highly effective malaria vaccine.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

BACKGROUND

In many parts of the world, hepatitis A infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and socio-economic loss. Whilst hepatitis A vaccines have the potential to prevent disease, the degree of protection afforded against clinical outcomes and within different populations remains uncertain. There are two types of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, inactivated and live attenuated. It is important to determine the efficacy and safety for both vaccine types.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical protective efficacy, sero-protective efficacy, and safety and harms of hepatitis A vaccination in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to November 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing HAV vaccine with placebo, no intervention, or appropriate control vaccines in participants of all ages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by two authors and verified by a third author. Where required, authors contacted investigators to obtain missing data. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically apparent hepatitis A (infectious hepatitis). The secondary outcomes were lack of sero-protective anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG), and number and types of adverse events. Results were presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using intention-to-treat analysis. We conducted assessment of risk of bias to evaluate the risk of systematic errors (bias) and trial sequential analyses to estimate the risk of random errors (the play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 11 clinical studies, of which only three were considered to have low risk of bias; two were quasi-randomised studies in which we only addressed harms. Nine randomised trials with 732,380 participants addressed the primary outcome of clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Of these, four trials assessed the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (41,690 participants) and five trials assessed the live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (690,690 participants). In the three randomised trials with low risk of bias (all assessing inactivated vaccine), clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 9/20,684 (0.04%) versus 92/20,746 (0.44%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30). In all nine randomised trials, clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 31/375,726 (0.01%) versus 505/356,654 (0.18%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17). These results were supported by trial sequential analyses. Subgroup analyses confirmed the clinical effectiveness of both inactivated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30) and live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17) on clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines had a significant effect on reducing the lack of sero-protection (less than 20 mIU/L) (RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03). No trial reported on a sero-protective threshold less than 10 mIU/L. The risk of both non-serious local and systemic adverse events was comparable to placebo for the inactivated HAV vaccines. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on adverse events for the live attenuated HAV vaccine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis A vaccines are effective for pre-exposure prophylaxis of hepatitis A in susceptible individuals. This review demonstrated significant protection for at least two years with the inactivated HAV vaccine and at least five years with the live attenuated HAV vaccine. There was evidence to support the safety of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. More high quality evidence is required to determine the safety of live attenuated vaccines.

Long-term protective effects of hepatitis A vaccines. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Data on duration and long-term protective effects of hepatitis A vaccines (HepA) have not been reviewed using a systematic approach. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive review of evidence on the duration of protection achieved by HepA, which is needed for revising existing vaccine policies. Limitations in data availability and implications for future research in this area are discussed.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted including all studies published between 1997 and 2011 reporting on long-term protection of HepA. The outcomes considered were hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection and sero-protection measured by anti-HAV antibodies after follow-up times of over 5 years post-vaccination.

RESULTS

299 studies were identified from MEDLINE and 51 studies from EMBASE. 13 manuscripts met our inclusion criteria. The maximum observation times and reported persistence levels of sero-protective anti-HAV antibodies was 15 years for live attenuated HepA and 14 years for inactivated HepA. All data were from observational studies and showed that higher number of doses of live attenuated vaccine led to higher seropositivity and GMT, but dosage and schedule did not significantly impact the long-term protection following inactivated vaccine. Few comparisons were made between the two vaccine types indicating highest levels of antibody titers achieved by multiple doses of live attenuated vaccines 7 years post-vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Available data indicate that both inactivated and live attenuated HepA are capable of providing protection up to 15 years as defined by currently accepted, conservative correlates of protection. Further investigations are needed to continue to monitor the long-term protection afforded by these vaccines. Standardized methods are required for vaccine-follow-up studies including assessment of co-variables potentially affecting long-term protection.

Immunogenicity of a virosomally-formulated Plasmodium falciparum GLURP-MSP3 chimeric protein-based malaria vaccine candidate in comparison to adjuvanted formulations

Background

In clinical trials, immunopotentiating reconstituted influenza virosomes (IRIVs) have shown great potential as a versatile antigen delivery platform for synthetic peptides derived from Plasmodium falciparum antigens. This study describes the immunogenicity of a virosomally-formulated recombinant fusion protein comprising domains of the two malaria vaccine candidate antigens MSP3 and GLURP.

Methods

The highly purified recombinant protein GMZ2 was coupled to phosphatidylethanolamine and the conjugates incorporated into the membrane of IRIVs. The immunogenicity of this adjuvant-free virosomal formulation was compared to GMZ2 formulated with the adjuvants Montanide ISA 720 and Alum in three mouse strains with different genetic backgrounds.

Results

Intramuscular injections of all three candidate vaccine formulations induced GMZ2-specific antibody responses in all mice tested. In general, the humoral immune response in outbred NMRI mice was stronger than that in inbred BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. ELISA with the recombinant antigens demonstrated immunodominance of the GLURP component over the MSP3 component. However, compared to the Al(OH)₃-adjuvanted formulation the two other formulations elicited in NMRI mice a larger proportion of anti-MSP3 antibodies. Analyses of the induced GMZ2-specific IgG subclass profiles showed for all three formulations a predominance of the IgG1 isotype. Immune sera against all three formulations exhibited cross-reactivity with in vitro cultivated blood-stage parasites. Immunofluorescence and immunoblot competition experiments showed that both components of the hybrid protein induced IgG cross-reactive with the corresponding native proteins.

Conclusion

A virosomal formulation of the chimeric protein GMZ2 induced P. falciparum blood stage parasite cross-reactive IgG responses specific for both MSP3 and GLURP. GMZ2 thus represents a candidate component suitable for inclusion into a multi-valent virosomal malaria vaccine and influenza virosomes represent a versatile antigen delivery system suitable for adjuvant-free immunization with recombinant proteins.

TLR, NLR Agonists, and Other Immune Modulators as Infectious Disease Vaccine Adjuvants

Vaccines based on attenuated or killed viruses and bacteria are highly effective in preventing infection with a range of pathogens, but can have safety issues. Therefore, a move is underway toward the development of subunit vaccines based on recombinant proteins or naked DNA. However, protein subunit vaccines are typically poorly immunogenic when administered alone and therefore require coadministration with adjuvants to boost the immune response. For many decades, very little progress was made in understanding the mechanism of action of adjuvants, but recently several significant breakthroughs have occurred in this area. The binding of pathogen-derived molecules to different immune sensors, including Toll-like receptors (TLR), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLR), and retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG)-1-like receptors (RLR), activates important innate immune pathways and provides not only an understanding of how current vaccines and adjuvants work, but also potential targets for novel adjuvant development.

Immunogenicity and safety of a pediatric dose virosomal hepatitis A vaccine in Thai HIV-infected children

The immunogenicity and safety of a pediatric dose of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine (Epaxal®) was evaluated in a group of 45 Thai children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, age 2-16 years. Vaccines were administered at 0 and 6 months. Anti-HAV antibody titers were measured at baseline (before injection) 1 and 7 months after primary vaccination. The prevalence of HAV protective antibody in 45 Thai HIV-infected children was 13.6%. The seroprotection rate was 71% at 1 month and 100% at 7 months. The booster dose increased geometric mean concentration (GMC) from 106.5 mIU/ml to 3486.1 mIU/ml. Higher CD4 lymphocyte counts at enrollment was a predictive factor for HAV antibody response. Both doses of Epaxal® were well tolerated. These preliminary data suggest that a pediatric dose of Epaxal® is an effective hepatitis A vaccine for HIV-infected children and should be considered for implementation on a larger scale in the pediatric HIV population.

Real-life versus package insert: a post-marketing study on adverse-event rates of the virosomal hepatitis A vaccine Epaxal® in healthy travellers

There are various methods to collect adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials. The methods how AEs are collected in vaccine trials is of special interest: solicited reporting can lead to over-reporting events that have little or no biological relationship to the vaccine. We assessed the rate of AEs listed in the package insert for the virosomal hepatitis A vaccine Epaxal(®), comparing data collected by solicited or unsolicited self-reporting. In an open, multi-centre post-marketing study, 2675 healthy travellers received single doses of vaccine administered intramuscularly. AEs were recorded based on solicited and unsolicited questioning during a four-day period after vaccination. A total of 2541 questionnaires could be evaluated (95.0% return rate). Solicited self-reporting resulted in significantly higher (p<0.0001) rates of subjects with AEs than unsolicited reporting, both at baseline (18.9% solicited versus 2.1% unsolicited systemic AEs) and following immunization (29.6% versus 19.3% local AEs; 33.8% versus 18.2% systemic AEs). This could indicate that actual reporting rates of AEs with Epaxal(®) may be substantially lower than described in the package insert. The distribution of AEs differed significantly between the applied methods of collecting AEs. The most common AEs listed in the package insert were reported almost exclusively with solicited questioning. The reporting of local AEs was more likely than that of systemic AEs to be influenced by subjects' sex, age and study centre. Women reported higher rates of AEs than men. The results highlight the need for detailing the methods how vaccine tolerability was reported and assessed.

Unmet needs in modern vaccinology: adjuvants to improve the immune response

The key objective of vaccination is the induction of an effective pathogen-specific immune response that leads to protection against infection and/or disease caused by that pathogen, and that may ultimately result in its eradication from humanity. The concept that the immune response to pathogen antigens can be improved by the addition of certain compounds into the vaccine formulation was demonstrated about one hundred years ago when aluminium salts were introduced. New vaccine technology has led to vaccines containing highly purified antigens with improved tolerability and safety profiles, but the immune response they induce is suboptimal without the help of adjuvants. In parallel, the development of effective vaccines has been facing more and more important challenges linked to complicated pathogens (e.g. malaria, TB, HIV, etc.) and/or to subjects with conditions that jeopardize the induction or persistence of a protective immune response. A greater understanding of innate and adaptive immunity and their close interaction at the molecular level is yielding insights into the possibility of selectively stimulating immunological pathways to obtain the desired immune response. The better understanding of the mechanism of 'immunogenicity' and 'adjuvanticity' has prompted the research of new vaccine design based on new technologies, such as naked DNA or live vector vaccines and the new adjuvant approaches. Adjuvants can be used to enhance the magnitude and affect the type of the antigen-specific immune response, and the combination of antigens with more than one adjuvant, the so called adjuvant system approach, has been shown to allow the development of vaccines with the ability to generate effective immune responses adapted to both the pathogen and the target population. This review focuses on the adjuvants and adjuvant systems currently in use in vaccines, future applications, and the remaining challenges the field is facing.

Design and pre-clinical profiling of a Plasmodium falciparum MSP-3 derived component for a multi-valent virosomal malaria vaccine

Background

Clinical profiling of two components for a synthetic peptide-based virosomal malaria vaccine has yielded promising results, encouraging the search for additional components for inclusion in a final multi-valent vaccine formulation. This report describes the immunological characterization of linear and cyclized synthetic peptides comprising amino acids 211-237 of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein (MSP-3).

Methods

These peptides were coupled to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE); the conjugates were intercalated into immunopotentiating reconstituted influenza virosomes (IRIVs) and then used for immunizations in mice to evaluate their capacity to elicit P. falciparum cross-reactive antibodies.

Results

While all MSP-3-derived peptides were able to elicit parasite-binding antibodies, stabilization of turn structures by cyclization had no immune-enhancing effect. Therefore, further pre-clinical profiling was focused on FB-12, a PE conjugate of the linear peptide. Consistent with the immunological results obtained in mice, all FB-12 immunized rabbits tested seroconverted and consistently elicited antibodies that interacted with blood stage parasites. It was observed that a dose of 50 μg was superior to a dose of 10 μg and that influenza pre-existing immunity improved the immunogenicity of FB-12 in rabbits. FB-12 production was successfully up-scaled and the immunogenicity of a vaccine formulation, produced according to the rules of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), was tested in mice and rabbits. All animals tested developed parasite-binding antibodies. Comparison of ELISA and IFA titers as well as the characterization of a panel of anti-FB-12 monoclonal antibodies indicated that at least the majority of antibodies specific for the virosomally formulated synthetic peptide were parasite cross-reactive.

Conclusion

These results reconfirm the suitability of IRIVs as a carrier/adjuvant system for the induction of strong humoral immune responses against a wide range of synthetic peptide antigens. The virosomal formulation of the FB-12 peptidomimetic is suitable for use in humans and represents a candidate component for a virosomal multi-valent malaria subunit vaccine.

Virosomal hepatitis a vaccine: comparing intradermal and subcutaneous with intramuscular administration

BACKGROUND

Vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) is unaffordable to many developing countries. Substantial reductions in cost occur when vaccines are administered intradermally at low doses. Aluminum-free HAV vaccines are considered more suitable for intradermal use than traditional vaccines which can cause long-lasting local reactions. Thus, we compared the immunogenicity and safety of an aluminum-free virosomal HAV vaccine (Epaxal) administered by different routes: intradermal (i.d.), subcutaneous (s.c.), and intramuscular (i.m.).

METHODS

Two open pilot studies were conducted as sub-studies of a large lot consistency trial. Healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 were enrolled. Study 1 compared two i.d. regimens of a lower dose of Epaxal [0.1 mL (4.8 IU), one or two injection sites] with i.m. administration of the standard dose [0.5 mL (24 IU)]. Study 2 compared the s.c. with the i.m. administration of the standard dose. At month 12, subjects in study 1 received a booster dose of 0.1 mL i.d. or 0.5 mL i.m.; subjects in study 2 received 0.5 mL via the respective route (s.c. or i.m.). Serum was tested for antibodies at baseline, 2 weeks (study 1), and 1 and 6 months after the primary vaccination as well as prior and 1 month after the booster dose. Incidences of solicited and unsolicited adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Seroprotection rates (anti-HAV geometric mean concentration of > or =20 mIU/mL) after 1 month ranged from 93.2% to 100% in all groups and remained high until month 12 (range 85.2&-90.2%). Complete (100%) seroprotection was achieved by all subjects in all groups after booster vaccination. All routes of administration were well tolerated. Local reactions were more common in subjects vaccinated i.d. and s.c. than i.m.

CONCLUSIONS

The aluminum-free virosomal HAV vaccine Epaxal is highly immunogenic and well tolerated when administered either via i.d., s.c., or i.m. Vaccination via the i.d. route may confer significant cost savings over the conventional i.m. route.

Safety and immunogenicity of concomitant vaccination with the cell-culture based Japanese Encephalitis vaccine IC51 and the hepatitis A vaccine HAVRIX1440 in healthy subjects: A single-blind, randomized, controlled Phase 3 study

In travellers often several pre-departure immunizations are indicated, thus data are needed about possible interactions between vaccines. This Phase 3 study investigated the immunogenicity and safety of IC51 (JE vaccine) and HAVRIX1440 (hepatitis A vaccine) when administered alone or concomitantly to healthy subjects. The immune response was compared between single and concomitant vaccination in terms of geometric mean titre (GMT) and seroconversion rate (SCR) on Days 28 and 56. Immunogenicity was comparable for the 2 vaccines whether given together or separately which suggests that travellers to such regions could receive the vaccinations concomitantly.

Epaxal: a virosomal vaccine to prevent hepatitis A infection

Over the last few decades, different types of inactivated hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines have been developed: several aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines and an aluminum-free, virosome-formulated vaccine. Both types of vaccines are whole-virus preparations that are produced by growth of HAV strains in human diploid cell cultures and are subsequently inactivated with formaldehyde. This review summarizes all published papers on a virosome-formulated vaccine, Epaxal, based on formalin inactivated HAV (strain RG-SB) adsorbed to the surface of special liposomes (virosomes), that replace aluminum hydroxide as the adjuvant principle. A single injection of virosomal HAV vaccine is well tolerated and highly immunogenic, with 88-97% of seroprotection 2 weeks after a first dose. HAV virosomal vaccine can be administered concomitantly with other vaccines, without inducing antigenic competition. Direct comparison with aluminum-adsorbed vaccine has shown that the immunogenicity was similar, but fewer local reactions were reported with Epaxal. Recent studies in children have demonstrated that Epaxal Junior is also an excellent HAV vaccine for mass vaccination programs.

A randomized placebo-controlled phase Ia malaria vaccine trial of two virosome-formulated synthetic peptides in healthy adult volunteers

Background and Objectives

Influenza virosomes represent an innovative human-compatible antigen delivery system that has already proven its suitability for subunit vaccine design. The aim of the study was to proof the concept that virosomes can also be used to elicit high titers of antibodies against synthetic peptides. The specific objective was to demonstrate the safety and immunogenicity of two virosome-formulated P. falciparum protein derived synthetic peptide antigens given in two different doses alone or in combination.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The design was a single blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-escalating study involving 46 healthy Caucasian volunteers aged 18–45 years. Five groups of 8 subjects received virosomal formulations containing 10 µg or 50 µg of AMA 49-CPE, an apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) derived synthetic phospatidylethanolamine (PE)-peptide conjugate or 10 ug or 50 ug of UK39, a circumsporozoite protein (CSP) derived synthetic PE-peptide conjugate or 50 ug of both antigens each. A control group of 6 subjects received unmodified virosomes. Virosomal formulations of the antigens (designated PEV301 and PEV302 for the AMA-1 and the CSP virosomal vaccine, respectively) or unmodified virosomes were injected i. m. on days 0, 60 and 180. In terms of safety, no serious or severe adverse events (AEs) related to the vaccine were observed. 11/46 study participants reported 16 vaccine related local AEs. Of these 16 events, all being pain, 4 occurred after the 1^st, 7 after the 2^nd and 5 after the 3^rd vaccination. 6 systemic AEs probably related to the study vaccine were reported after the 1^st injection, 10 after the 2^nd and 6 after the 3^rd. Generally, no difference in the distribution of the systemic AEs between either the doses applied (10 respectively 50 µg) or the synthetic antigen vaccines (PEV301 and PEV302) used for immunization was found. In terms of immunogenicity, both PEV301 and PEV302 elicited already after two injections a synthetic peptide-specific antibody response in all volunteers immunized with the appropriate dose. In the case of PEV301 the 50 µg antigen dose was associated with a higher mean antibody titer and seroconversion rate than the 10 µg dose. In contrast, for PEV302 mean titer and seroconversion rate were higher with the lower dose. Combined delivery of PEV301 and PEV302 did not interfere with the development of an antibody response to either of the two antigens. No relevant antibody responses against the two malaria antigens were observed in the control group receiving unmodified virosomes.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that three immunizations with the virosomal malaria vaccine components PEV301 or/and PEV302 (containing 10 µg or 50 µg of antigen) are safe and well tolerated. At appropriate antigen doses seroconversion rates of 100% were achieved. Two injections may be sufficient for eliciting an appropriate immune response, at least in individuals with pre-existing anti-malarial immunity. These results justify further development of a final multi-stage virosomal vaccine formulation incorporating additional malaria antigens.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00400101

[Drug interchangeability: clinical approach and consumer's point of view]

The rational construction of an essential drug list, considering the patient's need, drug safety, availability and the best cost-benefit ratio, is based on drug safety, efficacy and quality. However, in daily practice, the prescriber's decision is mostly influenced by drug effectiveness, following criteria that increase adherence to the treatment, such as relative drug toxicity, convenience, cost and prescriber's experience. In addition, frequent launching of new molecules for the same therapeutic indication, together with wide publicity targeting prescribers, interferes with the decision-making process. Similarly, the bonuses offered by the industry for over-the-counter drug sales interfere with the consumer's choice. The confrontation between known human biological variability and the knowledge that there is no absolute similarity between drugs of the same therapeutic class, or even generic drugs, has an impact on the prescriber's drug list, which should include the concept of first and second choice drugs. Prescribers' unfamiliarity with these subjects is a determinant factor for irrational drug use: a public health issue. The objective of this study was to introduce to drug prescribers information that can help them building up a rational drug list for their patients, based on the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa) experience of drug regulation.

Concomitant administration of a virosome-adjuvanted hepatitis a vaccine with routine childhood vaccines at age twelve to fifteen months: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this trial were to test for noninferiority of a virosomal hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine (Epaxal) coadministered with routine childhood vaccines compared with Epaxal given alone and to an alum-adjuvanted HAV vaccine (Havrix Junior) coadministered with routine childhood vaccines.

METHODS

Healthy children 12- to 15-month-old were randomized to receive either a pediatric dose (0.25 mL) of Epaxal coadministered with DTPaHibIPV, oral polio vaccine, and measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (n = 109; group A), or Epaxal given alone (n = 105; group B), or Havrix Junior coadministered with DTPaHibIPV, oral polio vaccine, and measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (n = 108; group C). A booster dose was given 6 months later. Anti-HAV antibodies were tested before and 1 month after each vaccination. Safety was assessed for 1 month after each vaccination. Solicited adverse events were assessed for 4 days after each vaccination.

RESULTS

: HAV seroprotection rates (> or =20 mIU/mL) at 1 and 6 months after first dose were: A: 94.2% and 87.5%, B: 92.6% and 80.0%, C: 78.2% and 71.3%, respectively (A versus C: P < 0.001 and P = 0.017 at month 1 and 6, respectively). The respective geometric mean concentrations were: A: 51 and 64 mIU/mL, B: 49 and 59 mIU/mL, C: 33 and 37 mIU/mL (A versus C: P < 0.001 at both time points). All groups achieved 100% seroprotection after the booster dose. The geometric mean concentrations after the booster dose were 1758, 1662, and 1414, for groups A, B and C, respectively (A versus C: P = 0.15). No clinically significant reduction in immune response to all concomitant vaccine antigens was seen. All vaccines were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

: Coadministration of pediatric Epaxal with routine childhood vaccines showed immunogenicity and safety equal to Epaxal alone as well as to Havrix Junior. After first dose, Epaxal was significantly more immunogenic than Havrix Junior.

Immunogenicity and safety of a pediatric dose of a virosome-adjuvanted hepatitis A vaccine: a controlled trial in children aged 1-16 years

BACKGROUND

The availability of pediatric formulations of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines would facilitate the introduction of universal mass vaccination against HAV. The objective of this study was to compare a pediatric dose (0.25 mL) of Epaxal, a virosomal, aluminum-free HAV vaccine, to 0.5 mL standard dose, and to alum-adsorbed HAV vaccine.

METHODS

Subjects aged 1-16 years, stratified for age, were randomized (2:2:1) into group A (0.25 mL Epaxal), group B (0.5 mL Epaxal), or group C (Havrix Junior). Vaccines were administered at months 0, 6. Seroprotection rates (>or=10 mIU/mL anti-HAV antibodies) were assessed for noninferiority, defined as lower limit of 1-sided 97.5% CI >-10%. Incidence of local solicited adverse events and unsolicited adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age of 308 enrolled subjects was 8.9 years (range, 1.0-17.0 years). All 3 vaccines were highly immunogenic. Noninferiority of group A versus group B and group C with regard to seroprotection was demonstrated after both vaccine doses for the entire study group and for all age subgroups (11-23 months, 2-4, 5-7, 8-10, 11-13, 14-16 years). One month after first vaccination, geometric mean antibody concentrations were 69.0, 83.5, and 50.5 mIU/mL for the 3 groups, respectively (A versus B, P = 0.0208; A versus C, P = 0.0015). Local injection site pain occurred more frequently in group C than in groups A and B. No subjects withdrew from study or reported any vaccine-related serious adverse event.

CONCLUSION

In children aged 1-16 years, 0.25 mL dose of Epaxal is as immunogenic as standard 0.5 mL dose and Havrix Junior. The aluminum-free vaccine compares favorably to comparator vaccine regarding local reactogenicity.

Immunogenicity and safety of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine in HIV-positive patients

This short report presents results of an open uncontrolled single centre study which evaluated immunogenicity and safety of a virosome-formulated hepatitis A vaccine (Epaxal) in 14 HIV-positive adult patients and 64 healthy adults receiving a primary immunisation and a booster dose 12 months later. Seroconversion rates (> or =20 mIU/mL), geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-HAV antibodies, local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were assessed at baseline and at Months 1, 6, 12, and 13. The seroconversion rate was 63.6% at Month 1 and 91.7% at Month 13 in HIV-positive patients versus 93.8 and 100% in healthy adults. The booster dose increased GMCs from 25.5 to 659.2 mIU/mL in HIV-positive patients versus 104 and 2986 mIU/mL in healthy adults. Epaxal was well tolerated by the HIV-positive patients and was at least as immunogenic as reported for aluminium-adsorbed vaccines. In conclusion, Epaxal can be considered an immunogenic and safe hepatitis A vaccine in HIV-positive patients.

Rate, intensity, and duration of local reactions to a virosome-adjuvanted vs. an aluminium-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine in UK travellers

BACKGROUND

Travellers increasingly require hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine for overseas travel to highly endemic areas. While the inactivated HAV vaccines currently in use are all highly immunogenic, studies have shown the aluminium-free, virosome-adjuvanted vaccine Epaxal to possess a superior local tolerability profile. The objective of this study was to analyse the pattern of local reactions caused by the aluminium-free Epaxal compared with an aluminium-adjuvanted HAV vaccine.

METHODS

Subjects recruited from travel health centres were randomised in a 4:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either Epaxal or Havrix vaccine. Vaccinees noted adverse reactions on a 7-day diary card that was returned by mail to the centre.

RESULTS

529 adults (> or =16 years) were vaccinated, and 413 (78.1%) subjects returned diary cards, 338 (76.5%) in the Epaxal group and 75 (86.2%) in the Havrix group. Subjects reported fewer local adverse reactions for Epaxal (23.4% vs. 57.3%; p<0.0001). Injection site pain categorised as Grade 2 (painful on movement) or Grade 3 (spontaneously painful) (4.7% vs. 22.7%, p=0.0001) was less frequent in the Epaxal group and resolved more quickly (> or =3 days of pain, 8.6% vs. 22.7%, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The lower reactogenicity of the virosome-adjuvanted vaccine is an important feature for travellers.

Immunogenicity and safety of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine (Epaxal) in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Protection against hepatitis A virus (HAV) in the elderly is becoming more important as more senior travelers visit areas of high HAV endemicity, and less have protective antibodies acquired after natural infection during childhood. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of hepatitis A vaccine in elderly compared to young adults.

METHODS

In this open, uncontrolled study, subjects of 18 to 45 years or < or = 50 years of age received two doses of aluminum-free, virosomal HAV vaccine, Epaxal (Berna Biotech Ltd, formerly Swiss Serum and Vaccine Institute, Bern, Switzerland) 12 months apart.

RESULTS

After both the basic and the booster doses, geometric mean titers (GMT) for anti-HAV antibodies were 1.7-fold higher in subjects younger than 45 years compared with those < or = 50 years of age. The proportional increase in GMT after the booster dose, however, was similar in younger and older subjects. Seroprotection (< or = 20 mIU/mL) rates in the younger and older subjects were 100 and 65%, respectively, after the first vaccination and 100 and 97%, respectively, after the booster dose. Systemic and local adverse events were mainly mild and short-lived.

CONCLUSION

These data show that HAV virosomal vaccine (Epaxal) is well tolerated and immunogenic in elderly subjects. The clinical relevance of lower seroconversion rates after the primary dose is unknown in this population of travelers.