Development and validation of a quantitative competitive ELISA for potency testing of equine anti rabies sera with other potential use

Comparative Neutralization Activity of Commercial Rabies Immunoglobulin against Diverse Lyssaviruses

Novel lyssaviruses, the causative agents of rabies, continue to be described mostly due to increased surveillance in bat hosts. Biologicals for the prevention of rabies in humans have, however, remained largely unchanged for decades. This study aimed to determine if commercial rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) could neutralize diverse lyssaviruses. Two commercial preparations, of human or equine origin, were evaluated against a panel consisting of 13 lyssavirus species. Reduced neutralization was observed for the majority of lyssaviruses compared to rabies virus and was more evident for lyssaviruses outside of phylogroup I. Neutralization of more diverse lyssaviruses only occurred at very high doses, except for Ikoma lyssavirus, which could not be neutralized by the RIG evaluated in this study. The use of RIG is a crucial component of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis and the data generated here indicate that RIG, in its current form, will not protect against all lyssaviruses. In addition, higher doses of RIG may be required for neutralization as the genetic distance from vaccine strains increases. Given the limitations of current RIG preparations, alternative passive immunization options should be investigated.

[Competitive ELISA test system for the detection of antibodies to the rabies virus in animals (Rhabdoviridae: <I>Lyssavirus</I>)]

INTRODUCTION

The main approach to the rabies prevention is the vaccination of domestic and wild carnivores. For the routine evaluation the anti-rabies vaccination effectiveness, World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) recommends various enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA).The aim of the study was to design and validate a competitive ELISA (cELISA) test system for the detection of antibodies to the rabies virus (RABV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The development of the cELISA was carried out following the OIE recommendations.

RESULTS

The repeatability of the cELISA results within one laboratory was satisfactory (coefficient of variation 7.95-13.61%). The coefficient of determination (CD) between the results of the virus neutralization reaction (FAVN) and cELISA was 0.988, p &lt; 0.001. The lower threshold for antibody detection was less than 0.02 IU/ml. The cELISA did not demonstrate cross-reactivity against antibodies to canine distemper virus, parainfluenza virus, parvovirus, coronavirus, and canine adenovirus (types I and II). During the study of 137 dog blood sera, diagnostic specificity (DSp) and diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) for the cELISA were 83.1% and 94.9%, respectively, and CD between the cELISA and FAVN results was 0.968, p &lt; 0.001.

DISCUSSION

Indirect ELISA test systems for determining the level of antibodies to RABV are not sensitive enough compared to reference tests, unlike cELISA. The developed test system is not inferior for its DSp and DSe to the commercial cELISA BioPro ELISA Rabies Ab (DSp 66.7%, DSe 94.4%).

CONCLUSION

The developed cELISA test system can be used to detect antibodies to RABV in the blood serum of dogs for evaluating the effectiveness of mass vaccination programs.

Review of Detection and Quantification of Rabies Virus Antibodies

Rabies is an almost invariably fatal disease. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titers of ≥0.5 IU/mL are considered adequate for rabies protection. Therefore, detection and quantification of RABV antibodies are important. Many methods have been developed for detecting RABV antibodies. In the present study, we reviewed several methods of detecting RABV antibodies in human and animal samples and evaluated and compared their performance. Of 34 methods, 5 demonstrated unsatisfactory sensitivity or specificity. The others exhibited sensitivity and specificity of ≥75%. The correlation coefficient for five of eight methods was >0.8. The Bland-Altman mean bias of five of five methods was <±2.0. The kappa values of 25 of 28 methods were higher than 0.4, demonstrating at least moderate agreement. Analysis of the performance of these methods emphasized that any new technology should be considered carefully and objectively before being used as an appropriate and applicable alternative.

Detection and quantification of anti-rabies glycoprotein antibodies: current state and perspectives

Abstract

Rabies is an ancient fatal disease with no other available treatment than post-exposure vaccination, where the bite of infected animals, mainly dogs, is the leading cause of its transmission to human beings. In this context, global vaccination campaigns of companion animals, as well as wildlife reservoirs vaccination, are key factors to achieve the “Zero by 30” plan that pursues the eradication of dog-mediated human rabies by 2030. Rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies (VNAs) play an essential role in the disease protection, as it correlates with an adequate immune response and allows evaluating pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy. Hence, counting with reliable, accurate, and robust serological tests is of paramount importance. Currently, RFFIT and FAVN are the gold standard VNAs tests recommended by both the WHO and the OIE. Despite these methodologies are efficient and widely used, they present several drawbacks, as they are less easily to standardize and require the use of live rabies virus, containment facilities, and skilled professionals. Thus, in this review, we describe the state-of-the-art of alternative analytical methodologies currently available for rabies serology, with novel approaches based on pseudotyped recombinant viruses and emphasizing in the antigen binding methodologies that detect and quantify antibodies against the rabies glycoprotein. We discussed the wide range of assays that are interesting tools for a faster measurement of anti-rabies glycoprotein antibodies and, in some cases, less complex and more versatile than the gold standard methods. Finally, we discussed the key issues during the design and optimization steps of ELISA assays, highlighting the importance of validation and standardization procedures to improve rabies serology tests and, as a consequence, their results.

Key points

• An exhaustive revision of rabies serology testing was made.

• No rabies serology assay can be thought as better than others for all intents and purposes.

• The validation procedure guarantees reliable and consistent results among the globe.

Determining the Specific Activity of Anti-Rabies Sera and Immunoglobulin Using Atomic Force Microscopy of Cell Cultures

BACKGROUND

Mouse neutralization test is widely used to determine the level of anti-rabies antibodies, but it is labor-intensive and time consuming. Alternative methods for determining the neutralizing activity of anti-rabies sera and immunoglobulin in cell cultures are also known. Methods such as FAVN and RFFIT involve the use of fluorescent diagnostics. Determination of Cytopathic Effect (CPE) is often complicated due to features of rabies virus replication in cells. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is able to detect the interaction of the virus with the cell at an early stage. Therefore, in this study, a method has been developed for determining the specific activity of anti-rabies sera and immunoglobulin using AFM of cell cultures.

METHODS

The method is based on the preliminary interaction of rabies virus with samples of rabies sera or immunoglobulin drug, adding the specified reaction mixture to cell culture (Vero or BHK-21), and then measuring the surface roughness of the cells using AFM. AFM was carried out in the intermittent contact mode by the mismatch method in the semi-contact mode. The results were compared with the values obtained in the mouse neutralization test. The consistency of the results obtained by both methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The increment in the surface roughness of the cells is a consequence of the damaging effect of the virus, which is weakened as a result of its neutralization by rabies antibodies. A dilution allowing 50% suppression of the increase in the surface roughness of cells was selected as the titer of rabies sera or immunoglobulin. In this case, the recommended range for determining the antibody titer is from 1:100 to 1:3000.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, a new methodological approach in virology and pharmaceutical research is presented in this study. The use of the proposed methodological technique will reduce the time from 21 to 2 days to obtain results in comparison with the mouse neutralization test; also, fewer laboratory animals are required in this approach which is in agreement with 3 R Principle.

Optimization and validation of a blocking ELISA for quantitation of anti-rabies immunoglobulins in multispecies sera

We developed a fast, rabies virus-free, in vitro method, based on a blocking ELISA (bELISA), to detect and accurately quantify anti-rabies glycoprotein antibodies in serum of several animal species. In this method, purified rabies virus-like particles (VLPs) are used as antigen to coat the plates, while the presence of specific rabies immunoglobulins is revealed through blocking the recognition of these VLPs by a biotinylated monoclonal antibody. A quality by design approach was carried out in order to optimize the method performance, improving the sensitivity and, thereby, reducing the limit of detection of this assay. After the method validation, we confirmed that the bELISA method is able to detect a concentration of 0.06 IU/mL rabies immunoglobulins, titer lower than the 0.5 IU/mL cutoff value established as indication for correct vaccination. Further, we assessed the correlation between bELISA, the MNT, and the Platelia methods, confirming the accuracy of this new assay. On the other hand, precision was evaluated, obtaining acceptable repeatability and intermediate precision values, showing that this bELISA could be proposed as a potential alternative method, replacing the gold standard techniques in vaccination schemes and becoming a routine control technique within regional rabies surveillance programs.

Development of a Pertactin-Coated Beads Approach for Screening of Functional Monoclonal Antibodies

Vaccine manufacturers have recently focused on the development of in vitro potency assays to promote 3R's strategy to replace animal testing. To be able to develop an in vitro potency assay, the immunological characteristics of the monoclonal antibodies used in the assay should be well understood as these antibodies likely reflect the biological activity of a vaccine product. The PRN antigen is one of the immunogenic antigens included in many commercialized acellular pertussis vaccines. Development of an in vitro potency assay for PRN is challenging as the biological properties of PRN are not well understood. In addition, binding of Bordetella pertussis to human cells occurs through multiple bacterial molecules, which makes it very challenging to assess if antibodies contribute to prevention of bacterial adhesion. To overcome these challenges, the functionality of several in-house anti-PRN mAbs has been investigated through a novel approach using PRN-coated beads. We were able to consistently quantify the inhibition of PRN-mediated adhesion for each anti-PRN mAb. Application of the protein-coated beads model has not only enabled screening of functional anti-PRN mAbs but can also be expanded for screening of antibodies against other bacterial or viral antigens.

Serological profiling of rabies antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and its comparative analysis with rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test in mouse model

Aim:

In this study, we have used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as an alternative test to replace the cumbersome rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) to ascertain the immune status of immunized mice against rabies virus.

Materials and Methods:

Rabies is a devastating disease worldwide caused by rabies virus. Proper usage of pre- or post-exposure rabies vaccine can prevent the disease transmission. In this study, mice were immunized with Vero cell-adapted inactivated rabies vaccine. RFFIT was used as a test to determine the serum neutralizing titers in infected/vaccinated mice. Seroprofiling of mice sera was done in vitro by ELISA.

Results:

Twenty-one days post-immunization, both ELISA and RFFIT assays indicated similar antibody levels in mice sera that were immunized with Vero cell-adapted inactivated rabies vaccine. Both the tests were correlated, and the linearity was verified by the regression line (R²=0.979).

Conclusion:

In this study, we profiled the serological status of Vero cell-adapted inactivated rabies vaccine through ELISA in mice model that correlated well with the OIE gold standard test RFFIT.