1
|
Naficy A, Kuxhausen A, Seifert H, Hastie A, Leav B, Miller J, Anteyi K, Mwakingwe-Omari A. No immunological interference or concerns about safety when seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine is co-administered with a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccine in adults: A randomized trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2327736. [PMID: 38513689 PMCID: PMC10962584 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2327736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The objective of the study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 booster vaccination when co-administered with an egg-based standard dose seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). This was a phase 3, randomized, open-label study. Eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mRNA-1273 (50 µg) booster vaccination and QIV 2 weeks apart (Seq group) or concomitantly (Coad group). Primary objectives were non-inferiority of haemagglutinin inhibition (HI) and anti-Spike protein antibody responses in the Coad compared to Seq group. 497/498 participants were randomized and vaccinated in the Seq/Coad groups, respectively. The adjusted geometric mean titer/concentration ratios (95% confidence intervals) (Seq/Coad) for HI antibodies were 1.02 (0.89-1.18) for A/H1N1, 0.93 (0.82-1.05) for A/H3N2, 1.00 (0.89-1.14] for B/Victoria, and 1.04 (0.93-1.17) for B/Yamagata; and 0.98 (0.84-1.13) for anti-Spike antibodies, thus meeting the protocol-specified non-inferiority criteria. The most frequently reported adverse events in both groups were pain at the injection site and myalgia. The 2 groups were similar in terms of the overall frequency, intensity, and duration of adverse events. In conclusion, co-administration of mRNA-1273 booster vaccine with QIV in adults was immunologically non-inferior to sequential administration. Safety and reactogenicity profiles were similar in both groups (clinicaltrials.gov NCT05047770).
Collapse
|
2
|
Parker CE, Hause AM, Marquez P, Zhang B, Myers TR, Shay DK. Trends in the administration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines in the United States reported to V-safe during December 14, 2020-May 19, 2023. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2361946. [PMID: 38845409 PMCID: PMC11164217 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2361946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 vaccines may be administered with other vaccines during the same healthcare visit. COVID-19 monovalent (Fall 2021) and bivalent (Fall 2022) vaccine recommendations coincided with annual seasonal influenza vaccination. Data describing the frequency of the co-administration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines are limited. Methods We used V-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. safety surveillance system established by the CDC, to describe trends in the administration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines reported to V-safe during December 14, 2020 - May 19, 2023. Results Of the 21 million COVID-19 vaccinations reported to V-safe, 2.2% (459,817) were administered with at least 1 other vaccine. Co-administration most frequently occurred during the first week of October 2023 (27,092; 44.1%). Most reports of co-administration included influenza vaccine (393,003; 85.5%). Co-administration was most frequently reported for registrants aged 6 months-6 years (4,872; 4.4%). Conclusion Reports of co-administration to V-safe peaked during October 2023, when influenza vaccination most often occurs, possibly reflecting increased opportunities for multiple vaccinations and greater acceptability of the co-administration of COVID-19 vaccine with other vaccines, especially influenza vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey E. Parker
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- ORISE Health Studies Program, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | - Anne M. Hause
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Paige Marquez
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bicheng Zhang
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tanya R. Myers
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David K. Shay
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harris DA, Chachlani P, Hayes KN, McCarthy EP, Wen KJ, Deng Y, Zullo AR, Djibo DA, McMahill-Walraven CN, Smith-Ray RL, Gravenstein S, Mor V. COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccine Coadministration Among Older U.S. Adults. Am J Prev Med 2024; 67:67-78. [PMID: 38401746 PMCID: PMC11193626 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Coadministering COVID-19 and influenza vaccines is recommended by public health authorities and intended to improve uptake and convenience; however, the extent of vaccine coadministration is largely unknown. Investigations into COVID-19 and influenza vaccine coadministration are needed to describe compliance with newer recommendations and to identify potential gaps in the implementation of coadministration. METHODS A descriptive, repeated cross-sectional study between September 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021 (Period 1) and September 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022 (Period 2) was conducted. This study included community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 66 years who received an mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine in Periods 1 and 2. The outcome was an influenza vaccine administered on the same day as the COVID-19 vaccine. Adjusted ORs and 99% CIs were estimated using logistic regression to describe the association between beneficiaries' characteristics and vaccine coadministration. Statistical analysis was performed in 2023. RESULTS Among beneficiaries who received a COVID-19 vaccine, 78.8% in Period 1 (N=6,292,777) and 89.1% in Period 2 (N=4,757,501), received an influenza vaccine at some point during the study period (i.e., before, after, or on the same day as their COVID-19 vaccine), though rates were lower in non-White and rural individuals. Vaccine coadministration increased from 11.1% to 36.5% between periods. Beneficiaries with dementia (aORPeriod 2=1.31; 99%CI=1.29-1.32) and in rural counties (aORPeriod 2=1.19; 99%CI=1.17-1.20) were more likely to receive coadministered vaccines, while those with cancer (aORPeriod 2=0.90; 99%CI=0.89-0.91) were less likely. CONCLUSIONS Among Medicare beneficiaries vaccinated against COVID-19, influenza vaccination was high, but coadministration of the 2 vaccines was low. Future work should explore which factors explain variation in the decision to receive coadministered vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Harris
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
| | - Preeti Chachlani
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kaleen N Hayes
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ellen P McCarthy
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine J Wen
- Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Yalin Deng
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Andrew R Zullo
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | | | - Renae L Smith-Ray
- Walgreens Center for Health and Wellbeing Research, Walgreen Company, Deerfield, Illinios
| | - Stefan Gravenstein
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Providence Medical Center Veterans Administration Research Service, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Vincent Mor
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; Providence Medical Center Veterans Administration Research Service, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nham E, Noh JY, Park O, Choi WS, Song JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ. COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies in the Endemic Period: Lessons from Influenza. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:514. [PMID: 38793765 PMCID: PMC11125835 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12050514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious zoonotic respiratory disease with many similarities to influenza. Effective vaccines are available for both; however, rapid viral evolution and waning immunity make them virtually impossible to eradicate with vaccines. Thus, the practical goal of vaccination is to reduce the incidence of serious illnesses and death. Three years after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, the optimal vaccination strategy in the endemic period remains elusive, and health authorities worldwide have begun to adopt various approaches. Herein, we propose a COVID-19 vaccination strategy based on the data available until early 2024 and discuss aspects that require further clarification for better decision making. Drawing from comparisons between COVID-19 and influenza vaccination strategies, our proposed COVID-19 vaccination strategy prioritizes high-risk groups, emphasizes seasonal administration aligned with influenza vaccination campaigns, and advocates the co-administration with influenza vaccines to increase coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliel Nham
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yun Noh
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Ok Park
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Suk Choi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Young Song
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Jin Cheong
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Joo Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moro PL, Ennulat C, Brown H, Woody G, Zhang B, Marquez P, Woo EJ, Su JR. Safety of Simultaneous Administration of Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Drug Saf 2024; 47:487-493. [PMID: 38411838 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01406-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bivalent mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may be simultaneously administered with other recommended vaccines, including seasonal influenza vaccines. However, few studies have evaluated the safety of co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. OBJECTIVE The aim was to describe reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. METHODS We searched the VAERS database for reports of adverse events (AEs) following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines during the period of September 1, 2022-March 31, 2023. We assessed the characteristics of these reports and described the most frequently reported AEs. Clinicians reviewed available medical records for reports of serious AEs and adverse events of special interest (AESI). RESULTS During the period of 1 September 2022 through 31 March 2023, VAERS received 3689 reports of AEs following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. The median age of vaccinees was 59 years (interquartile range 39, 70 years); 342 reports (9.3%) were classified as serious. The most common AEs among non-serious reports were severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection (785, 23.5%), cough (592, 17.7%), and fatigue (568, 17.0%). The most common AEs among serious reports were Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (88, 25.7%), dyspnea (81, 23.7%), and condition aggravated (55, 16.1%). DISCUSSION Reports of AEs following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines did not reveal any unusual or unexpected patterns of AEs. Increased reporting of certain events (e.g., COVID-19) was expected due to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reporting requirements. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor the safety of co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro L Moro
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA.
| | - Carol Ennulat
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA
| | - Hannah Brown
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA
| | - Gina Woody
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA
| | - Bicheng Zhang
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA
| | - Paige Marquez
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA
| | - Emily Jane Woo
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | - John R Su
- Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amir M, Latha S, Sharma R, Kumar A. Association of Cardiovascular Events with COVID-19 Vaccines Using Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS): A Retrospective Study. Curr Drug Saf 2024; 19:402-406. [PMID: 38031796 DOI: 10.2174/0115748863276904231108095255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccines have played a crucial role in reducing the burden of the global pandemic. However, recent case reports have indicated the association of the COVID- 19 vaccines with cardiovascular events but the exact association is unclear so far. OBJECTIVE Therefore, the objective of the current study is to find out the association of cardiovascular events with COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS The COVID-19 Vaccine Knowledge Base (Cov19VaxKB) tool was used to query the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. The proportional reporting ratio [PRR (≥2)] with associated chi-squared value (>4), and the number of cases > 0.2% of total reports, was used to assess the association of COVID-19 vaccines with cardiovascular events. RESULTS A total of 33,754 cases of cardiovascular events associated with COVID-19 vaccines were found in the Cov19VaxKB tool. The cases were observed in different age groups (18-64, and 65 years and above) and gender. The disproportionality measures indicate a statistically significant association between cardiovascular events and COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSION The current study identified a signal of various cardiovascular events with the COVID-19 vaccines. However, further causality assessment is required to confirm the association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Amir
- Department of Clinical Research, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (DIPSAR), Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi, 110017, India
| | - S Latha
- Department of Pharmacology, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (DIPSAR), Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi, 110017, India
| | - Ruchika Sharma
- Centre for Precision Medicine and Pharmacy, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi, 110017, India
| | - Anoop Kumar
- Department of Clinical Research, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (DIPSAR), Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi, 110017, India
- Department of Pharmacology, Delhi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research (DIPSAR), Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi, 110017, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pascucci D, Lontano A, Regazzi L, Marziali E, Nurchis MC, Raponi M, Vetrugno G, Moscato U, Cadeddu C, Laurenti P. Co-administration of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccines in healthcare workers: Results of two vaccination campaigns in a large teaching hospital in Rome. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2287282. [PMID: 38016914 PMCID: PMC10732597 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2287282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The concurrent administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines has arisen as a promising approach to bolster protection against respiratory pathogens and improve vaccination rates. However, there remains a lack of data regarding the prevalence of co-administration across several vaccination campaigns, especially among healthcare workers (HCWs). Therefore, this study aims to shed light on the acceptance of co-administration strategies among HCWs during the two campaigns following the introduction of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among the HCWs of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, a research hospital in Rome. Hospital administrative databases were accessed to gather information about vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza during the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 vaccination campaigns. The study included 7399 HCWs. The co-administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccines presented a significant rise in 2022/2023 compared to the previous vaccination campaign (+38%): this was confirmed for every professional category, with the largest increases among resident doctors (+47%) and physicians (+44%), and also for every age category, but it was particularly evident for the youngest health professionals. The probability of co-administration uptake during the 2022/2023 campaign was significantly higher for males, and for those that received co-administration during the 2021/2022 campaign, while the probability was lower for nurses and administrative staff. This study highlights the co-administration procedure as a valuable and effective tool in annual vaccination campaigns for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza. The procedure's safety and streamlined logistics make it increasingly attractive for implementation, particularly among HCWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Pascucci
- Health Management, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Lontano
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Regazzi
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marziali
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Cesare Nurchis
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- School of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Raponi
- Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vetrugno
- Health Management, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Moscato
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Cadeddu
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Laurenti
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McGrath LJ, Malhotra D, Miles AC, Welch VL, Di Fusco M, Surinach A, Barthel A, Alfred T, Jodar L, McLaughlin JM. Estimated Effectiveness of Coadministration of the BNT162b2 BA.4/5 COVID-19 Vaccine With Influenza Vaccine. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2342151. [PMID: 37938846 PMCID: PMC10632958 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance No data comparing the estimated effectiveness of coadministering COVID-19 vaccines with seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) in the community setting exist. Objective To examine the comparative effectiveness associated with coadministering the BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2-biv [Pfizer BioNTech]) and SIV vs giving each vaccine alone. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective comparative effectiveness study evaluated US adults aged 18 years or older enrolled in commercial health insurance or Medicare Advantage plans and vaccinated with BNT162b2-biv only, SIV only, or both on the same day between August 31, 2022, and January 30, 2023. Individuals with monovalent or another brand of mRNA bivalent COVID-19 vaccine were excluded. Exposure Same-day coadministration of BNT162b2-biv and SIV; receipt of BNT162b2-biv only (for COVID-19-related outcomes) or SIV only (for influenza-related outcomes) were the comparator groups. For adults aged 65 years or older, only enhanced SIVs were included. Main Outcomes and Measures COVID-19-related and influenza-related hospitalization, emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) encounters, and outpatient visits. Results Overall, 3 442 996 individuals (57.0% female; mean [SD] age, 65 [16.7] years) were included. A total of 627 735 individuals had BNT162b2-biv and SIV vaccine coadministered, 369 423 had BNT162b2-biv alone, and 2 445 838 had SIV alone. Among those aged 65 years or older (n = 2 210 493; mean [SD] age, 75 [6.7] years; 57.9% female), the coadministration group had a similar incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.24) and slightly higher incidence of emergency department or urgent care encounters (AHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.23) and outpatient visits (AHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11) compared with the BNT162b2-biv-only group. Among individuals aged 18 to 64 years (n = 1 232 503; mean [SD] age, 47 [13.1] years; 55.4% female), the incidence of COVID-19-related outcomes was slightly higher among those who received both vaccines vs BNT162b2-biv alone (AHR point estimate range, 1.14-1.57); however, fewer events overall in this age group resulted in wider CIs. Overall, compared with those who received SIV alone, the coadministration group had a slightly lower incidence of most influenza-related end points (AHR point estimates 0.83-0.93 for those aged ≥65 years vs 0.76-1.08 for those aged 18-64 years). Negative control outcomes suggested residual bias and calibration of COVID-19-related and influenza-related outcomes with negative controls moved all estimates closer to the null, with most CIs crossing 1.00. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, coadministration of BNT162b2-biv and SIV was associated with generally similar effectiveness in the community setting against COVID-19-related and SIV-related outcomes compared with giving each vaccine alone and may help improve uptake of both vaccines.
Collapse
|
9
|
O’Leary ST, Campbell JD, Ardura MI, Banerjee R, Bryant KA, Caserta MT, Frenck RW, Gerber JS, John CC, Kourtis AP, Myers A, Pannaraj P, Ratner AJ, Shah SS, Bryant KA, Hofstetter AM, Chaparro JD, Michel JJ, Kimberlin DW, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH, Bernstein HH, Cardemil CV, Farizo KM, Kafer LM, Kim D, López Medina E, Moore D, Panagiotakopoulos L, Romero JR, Sauvé L, Starke JR, Thompson J, Wharton M, Woods CR, Frantz JM, Gibbs G. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2023-2024. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023063773. [PMID: 37641884 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
This technical report accompanies the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of influenza vaccine and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2023-2024 season. The rationale for the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for annual influenza vaccination of all children without medical contraindications starting at 6 months of age is provided. Influenza vaccination is an important strategy for protecting children and the broader community against influenza. This technical report summarizes recent influenza seasons, morbidity and mortality in children, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccination coverage, and provides detailed guidance on vaccine storage, administration, and implementation. The report also provides a brief background on inactivated and live-attenuated influenza vaccines, available vaccines this season, vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding, diagnostic testing for influenza, and antiviral medications for treatment and chemoprophylaxis. Strategies to promote vaccine uptake are emphasized.
Collapse
|
10
|
Murdoch L, Quan K, Baber JA, Ho AWY, Zhang Y, Xu X, Lu C, Cooper D, Koury K, Lockhart SP, Anderson AS, Türeci Ö, Şahin U, Swanson KA, Gruber WC, Kitchin N. Safety and Immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 Vaccine Coadministered with Seasonal Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2241-2258. [PMID: 37698774 PMCID: PMC10581992 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00863-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination is a critical tool for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza illnesses. Coadministration of the COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2, with seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (SIIV) can provide substantial benefits, including streamlining vaccine delivery. METHODS In this phase 3 study, healthy 18- to 64-year-olds who had received three previous doses of BNT162b2 were randomized (1:1) to the coadministration group (month 0, BNT162b2 + SIIV; month 1, placebo) or the separate-administration group (month 0, placebo + SIIV; month 1, BNT162b2). The primary immunogenicity objective was to demonstrate that the immune responses elicited by BNT162b2 and SIIV [measured by full-length S-binding immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) titers against four influenza strains 1 month post-vaccination, respectively] when coadministered were noninferior to those elicited by either vaccine administered alone, based on a prespecified 1.5-fold noninferiority margin [lower bound 95% CI for geometric mean ratio (GMR) > 0.67]. Reactogenicity and adverse event (AE) rates were evaluated. RESULTS Randomized participants who received study vaccination (N = 1128; coadministration group, n = 564; separate-administration group, n = 564) had a median age of 39 years. Model-adjusted GMRs for coadministration to separate administration were 0.83 (95% CI 0.77, 0.89) for full-length S-binding IgG levels and 0.89-1.00 (lower bound of all 95% CIs > 0.67) for the four influenza strain-specific HAI titers, with all endpoints achieving the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Reactogenicity events were mostly mild or moderate when BNT162b2 was coadministered with SIIV. Serious AEs were reported in < 1% of participants within 1 month after any vaccination; none were considered vaccine-related. CONCLUSIONS BNT162b2 coadministered with SIIV elicited immune responses that were noninferior to those elicited by BNT162b2 alone and SIIV alone, and BNT162b2 had an acceptable safety profile when coadministered with SIIV. The results of this study support the coadministration of BNT162b2 and SIIV in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05310084.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Quan
- Vaccine Clinical Research and Development, Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - James A Baber
- Vaccine Clinical Research and Development, Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Agnes W Y Ho
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Ying Zhang
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Xia Xu
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Claire Lu
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, NY, USA
| | - David Cooper
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Koury
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kena A Swanson
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, NY, USA
| | - William C Gruber
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pedrazzoli P, Lasagna A, Cassaniti I, Piralla A, Squeri A, Bruno R, Sacchi P, Baldanti F, Di Maio M, Beretta GD, Cinieri S, Silvestris N. Vaccination for seasonal flu, pneumococcal infection, and SARS-CoV-2 in patients with solid tumors: recommendations of the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM). ESMO Open 2023; 8:101215. [PMID: 37104930 PMCID: PMC10067463 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer have a well-known and higher risk of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). VPDs may cause severe complications in this setting due to the immune system impairment, malnutrition and oncological treatments. Despite this evidence, vaccination rates are inadequate. The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has been involved in vaccination awareness since 2014. Based on a careful review of the available data about the immunogenicity, effectiveness and safety of flu, pneumococcal and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we report the recommendations of the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica about these vaccinations in adult patients with solid tumors. AIOM recommends comprehensive education on the issue of VPDs. We believe that a multidisciplinary care model may improve the vaccination coverage in immunocompromised patients. Continued surveillance, implementation of preventive practices and future well-designed immunological prospective studies are essential for a better management of our patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Pedrazzoli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Lasagna
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
| | - I Cassaniti
- Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Piralla
- Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Squeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy; School of Specialization in Medical Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - R Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Division of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - P Sacchi
- Division of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - F Baldanti
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - M Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - G D Beretta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - S Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Division and Breast Unit, Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, ASL Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy
| | - N Silvestris
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|