Progress in computational toxicology

Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury: From Molecular Physicochemical Properties and Scaffold Architectures to Machine Learning Approaches

The process of developing new drugs is widely acknowledged as being time-intensive and requiring substantial financial investment. Despite ongoing efforts to reduce time and expenses in drug development, ensuring medication safety remains an urgent problem. One of the major problems involved in drug development is hepatotoxicity, specifically known as drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The popularity of new drugs often poses a significant barrier during development and frequently leads to their recall after launch. In silico methods have many advantages compared with traditional in vivo and in vitro assays. To establish a more precise and reliable prediction model, it is necessary to utilize an extensive and high-quality database consisting of information on drug molecule properties and structural patterns. In addition, we should also carefully select appropriate molecular descriptors that can be used to accurately depict compound characteristics. The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the prediction of DILI. First, we conducted a comparative analysis of the physicochemical properties of extensively well-prepared DILI-positive and DILI-negative compounds. Then, we used classic substructure dissection methods to identify structural pattern differences between these two different types of chemical molecules. These findings indicate that it is not feasible to establish property or substructure-based rules for distinguishing between DILI-positive and DILI-negative compounds. Finally, we developed quantitative classification models for predicting DILI using the naïve Bayes classifier (NBC) and recursive partitioning (RP) machine learning techniques. The optimal DILI prediction model was obtained using NBC, which combines 21 physicochemical properties, the VolSurf descriptors and the LCFP_10 fingerprint set. This model achieved a global accuracy (GA) of 0.855 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.704 for the training set, while the corresponding values were 0.619 and 0.674 for the test set, respectively. Moreover, indicative substructural fragments favorable or unfavorable for DILI were identified from the best naïve Bayesian classification model. These findings may help prioritize lead compounds in the early stage of drug development pipelines.

In silico ADME/tox comes of age: twenty years later

In the early 2000s pharmaceutical drug discovery was beginning to use computational approaches for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME/Tox, also known as ADMET) prediction. This emphasis on prediction was an effort to reduce the risk of later stage failures from ADME/Tox.Much has been written in the intervening twenty plus years and significant expenditure has occurred in companies developing these in silico capabilities which can be gleaned from publications. It is therefore an appropriate time to briefly reflect on what was proposed then and what the reality is today.20 years ago, we tended to optimise bioactivity and perhaps one ADME/Tox property at a time. Previously pharmaceutical companies needed a whole infrastructure for models - in silico and in vitro experts, IT, champions on a project team, educators and management support. Now we are in the age of generative de novo design where bioactivity and many ADME/Tox properties can be optimised and large language model technologies are available.There are also some challenges such as the focus on very large molecules which may be outside of current ADME/Tox models.We provide an opportunity to look forward with the increasing public data for ADME/Tox as well as expanded types of algorithms available.

Hybrid non-animal modeling: A mechanistic approach to predict chemical hepatotoxicity

Developing mechanistic non-animal testing methods based on the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework must incorporate molecular and cellular key events associated with target toxicity. Using data from an in vitro assay and chemical structures, we aimed to create a hybrid model to predict hepatotoxicants. We first curated a reference dataset of 869 compounds for hepatotoxicity modeling. Then, we profiled them against PubChem for existing in vitro toxicity data. Of the 2560 resulting assays, we selected the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) assay, a high-throughput screening (HTS) tool that can test chemical disruptors for mitochondrial function. Machine learning was applied to develop quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models with 2536 compounds tested in the MMP assay for screening new compounds. The MMP assay results, including QSAR model outputs, yielded hepatotoxicity predictions for reference set compounds with a Correct Classification Ratio (CCR) of 0.59. The predictivity improved by including 37 structural alerts (CCR = 0.8). We validated our model by testing 37 reference set compounds in human HepG2 hepatoma cells, and reliably predicting them for hepatotoxicity (CCR = 0.79). This study introduces a novel AOP modeling strategy that combines public HTS data, computational modeling, and experimental testing to predict chemical hepatotoxicity.

Digital Transformation in Toxicology: Improving Communication and Efficiency in Risk Assessment

Toxicology is undergoing a digital revolution, with mobile apps, sensors, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning enabling better record-keeping, data analysis, and risk assessment. Additionally, computational toxicology and digital risk assessment have led to more accurate predictions of chemical hazards, reducing the burden of laboratory studies. Blockchain technology is emerging as a promising approach to increase transparency, particularly in the management and processing of genomic data related with food safety. Robotics, smart agriculture, and smart food and feedstock offer new opportunities for collecting, analyzing, and evaluating data, while wearable devices can predict toxicity and monitor health-related issues. The review article focuses on the potential of digital technologies to improve risk assessment and public health in the field of toxicology. By examining key topics such as blockchain technology, smoking toxicology, wearable sensors, and food security, this article provides an overview of how digitalization is influencing toxicology. As well as highlighting future directions for research, this article demonstrates how emerging technologies can enhance risk assessment communication and efficiency. The integration of digital technologies has revolutionized toxicology and has great potential for improving risk assessment and promoting public health.

Navigating the bridge between wet and dry lab toxicology research to address current challenges with high-dimensional data

Toxicology research has rapidly evolved, leveraging increasingly advanced technologies in high-throughput approaches to yield important information on toxicological mechanisms and health outcomes. Data produced through toxicology studies are consequently becoming larger, often producing high-dimensional data. These types of data hold promise for imparting new knowledge, yet inherently have complexities causing them to be a rate-limiting element for researchers, particularly those that are housed in "wet lab" settings (i.e., researchers that use liquids to analyze various chemicals and biomarkers as opposed to more computationally focused, "dry lab" researchers). These types of challenges represent topics of ongoing conversation amongst our team and researchers in the field. The aim of this perspective is to i) summarize hurdles in analyzing high-dimensional data in toxicology that require improved training and translation for wet lab researchers, ii) highlight example methods that have aided in translating data analysis techniques to wet lab researchers; and iii) describe challenges that remain to be effectively addressed, to date, in toxicology research. Specific aspects include methodologies that could be introduced to wet lab researchers, including data pre-processing, machine learning, and data reduction. Current challenges discussed include model interpretability, study biases, and data analysis training. Example efforts implemented to translate these data analysis techniques are also mentioned, including online data analysis resources and hands-on workshops. Questions are also posed to continue conversation in the toxicology community. Contents of this perspective represent timely issues broadly occurring in the fields of bioinformatics and toxicology that require ongoing dialogue between wet and dry lab researchers.

Risk assessment based on dose-responsive and time-responsive genes to build PLS-DA models for exogenously induced lung injury

Xenobiotics can easily harm human lungs owing to the openness of the respiratory system. Identifying pulmonary toxicity remains challenging owing to several reasons: 1) no biomarkers for pulmonary toxicity are available that might help to detect lung injury; 2) traditional animal experiments are time-consuming; 3) traditional detection methods solely focus on poisoning accidents; 4) analytical chemistry methods hardly achieve universal detection. An in vitro testing system able to identify the pulmonary toxicity of contaminants from food, the environment, and drugs is urgently needed. Compounds are virtually infinite, whereas toxicological mechanisms are countable. Therefore, universal methods to identify and predict the risks of contaminants can be designed based on these well-known toxicity mechanisms. In this study, we established a dataset based on transcriptome sequencing of A549 cells upon treatment with different compounds. The representativeness of our dataset was analyzed using bioinformatics methods. Artificial intelligence methods, namely partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models, were employed for toxicity prediction and toxicant identification. The developed model predicted the pulmonary toxicity of compounds with a 92 % accuracy. These models were submitted to an external validation using highly heterogeneous compounds, which supported the accuracy and robustness of our developed methodology. This assay exhibits universal potential applications for water quality monitoring, crop pollution detection, food and drug safety evaluation, as well as chemical warfare agent detection.

Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point

Machine learning (ML) models to predict the toxicity of small molecules have garnered great attention and have become widely used in recent years. Computational toxicity prediction is particularly advantageous in the early stages of drug discovery in order to filter out molecules with high probability of failing in clinical trials. This has been helped by the increase in the number of large toxicology databases available. However, being an area of recent application, a greater understanding of the scope and applicability of ML methods is still necessary. There are various kinds of toxic end points that have been predicted in silico. Acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, mutagenicity, and the 12 Tox21 data end points are among the most commonly investigated. Machine learning methods exhibit different performances on different data sets due to dissimilar complexity, class distributions, or chemical space covered, which makes it hard to compare the performance of algorithms over different toxic end points. The general pipeline to predict toxicity using ML has already been analyzed in various reviews. In this contribution, we focus on the recent progress in the area and the outstanding challenges, making a detailed description of the state-of-the-art models implemented for each toxic end point. The type of molecular representation, the algorithm, and the evaluation metric used in each research work are explained and analyzed. A detailed description of end points that are usually predicted, their clinical relevance, the available databases, and the challenges they bring to the field are also highlighted.

Prediction of drug-induced liver injury and cardiotoxicity using chemical structure and in vitro assay data

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and cardiotoxicity (DICT) are major adverse effects triggered by many clinically important drugs. To provide an alternative to in vivo toxicity testing, the U.S. Tox21 consortium has screened a collection of ∼10K compounds, including drugs in clinical use, against >70 cell-based assays in a quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) format. In this study, we compiled reference compound lists for DILI and DICT and compared the potential of Tox21 assay data with chemical structure information in building prediction models for human in vivo hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. Models were built with four different machine learning algorithms (e.g., Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Machine) and model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Chemical structure-based models showed reasonable predictive power for DILI (best AUC-ROC = 0.75 ± 0.03) and DICT (best AUC-ROC = 0.83 ± 0.03), while Tox21 assay data alone only showed better than random performance. DILI and DICT prediction models built using a combination of assay data and chemical structure information did not have a positive impact on model performance. The suboptimal predictive performance of the assay data is likely due to insufficient coverage of an adequately predictive number of toxicity mechanisms. The Tox21 consortium is currently expanding coverage of biological response space with additional assays that probe toxicologically important targets and under-represented pathways that may improve the prediction of in vivo toxicity such as DILI and DICT.

Machine learning in the identification, prediction and exploration of environmental toxicology: Challenges and perspectives

Over the past few decades, data-driven machine learning (ML) has distinguished itself from hypothesis-driven studies and has recently received much attention in environmental toxicology. However, the use of ML in environmental toxicology remains in the early stages, with knowledge gaps, technical bottlenecks in data quality, high-dimensional/heterogeneous/small-sample data analysis and model interpretability, and a lack of an in-depth understanding of environmental toxicology. Given the above problems, we review the recent progress in the literature and highlight state-of-the-art toxicological studies using ML (such as learning and predicting toxicity in complicated biosystems and multiple-factor environmental scenarios of long-term and large-scale pollution). Beyond predicting simple biological endpoints by integrating untargeted omics and adverse outcome pathways, ML development should focus on revealing toxicological mechanisms. The integration of data-driven ML with other methods (e.g., omics analysis and adverse outcome pathway frameworks) endows ML with widely promising application in revealing toxicological mechanisms. High-quality databases and interpretable algorithms are urgently needed for toxicology and environmental science. Addressing the core issues and future challenges for ML in this review may narrow the knowledge gap between environmental toxicity and computational science and facilitate the control of environmental risk in the future.

Mechanism-driven modeling of chemical hepatotoxicity using structural alerts and an in vitro screening assay

Traditional experimental approaches to evaluate hepatotoxicity are expensive and time-consuming. As an advanced framework of risk assessment, adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) describe the sequence of molecular and cellular events underlying chemical toxicities. We aimed to develop an AOP that can be used to predict hepatotoxicity by leveraging computational modeling and in vitro assays. We curated 869 compounds with known hepatotoxicity classifications as a modeling set and extracted assay data from PubChem. The antioxidant response element (ARE) assay, which quantifies transcriptional responses to oxidative stress, showed a high correlation to hepatotoxicity (PPV=0.82). Next, we developed quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict ARE activation for compounds lacking testing results. Potential toxicity alerts were identified and used to construct a mechanistic hepatotoxicity model. For experimental validation, 16 compounds in the modeling set and 12 new compounds were selected and tested using an in-house ARE-luciferase assay in HepG2-C8 cells. The mechanistic model showed good hepatotoxicity predictivity (accuracy = 0.82) for these compounds. Potential false positive hepatotoxicity predictions by only using ARE results can be corrected by incorporating structural alerts and vice versa. This mechanistic model illustrates a potential toxicity pathway for hepatotoxicity, and this strategy can be expanded to develop predictive models for other complex toxicities.

StemPanTox: A fast and wide-target drug assessment system for tailor-made safety evaluations using personalized iPS cells

An alternative model that reliably predicts human-specific toxicity is necessary because the translatability of effects on animal models for human disease is limited to context. Previously, we developed a method that accurately predicts developmental toxicity based on the gene networks of undifferentiated human embryonic stem (ES) cells. Here, we advanced this method to predict adult toxicities of 24 chemicals in six categories (neurotoxins, cardiotoxins, hepatotoxins, two types of nephrotoxins, and non-genotoxic carcinogens) and achieved high predictability (AUC = 0.90-1.00) in all categories. Moreover, we screened for an induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell line to predict the toxicities based on the gene networks of iPS cells using transfer learning of the gene networks of ES cells, and predicted toxicities in four categories (neurotoxins, hepatotoxins, glomerular nephrotoxins, and non-genotoxic carcinogens) with high performance (AUC = 0.82-0.99). This method holds promise for tailor-made safety evaluations using personalized iPS cells.

Machine Learning Models for Mycobacterium tuberculosisIn Vitro Activity: Prediction and Target Visualization

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health challenge, with approximately 1.4 million deaths per year. There is still a need to develop novel treatments for patients infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). There have been many large-scale phenotypic screens that have led to the identification of thousands of new compounds. Yet, there is very limited investment in TB drug discovery which points to the need for new methods to increase the efficiency of drug discovery against Mtb. We have used machine learning approaches to learn from the public Mtb data, resulting in many data sets and models with robust enrichment and hit rates leading to the discovery of new active compounds. Recently, we have curated predominantly small-molecule Mtb data and developed new machine learning classification models with 18 886 molecules at different activity cutoffs. We now describe the further validation of these Bayesian models using a library of over 1000 molecules synthesized as part of EU-funded New Medicines for TB and More Medicines for TB programs. We highlight molecular features which are enriched in these active compounds. In addition, we provide new regression and classification models that can be used for scoring compound libraries or used to design new molecules. We have also visualized these molecules in the context of known molecular targets and identified clusters in chemical property space, which may aid in future target identification efforts. Finally, we are also making these data sets publicly available, representing a significant increase to the available Mtb inhibition data in the public domain.

Increasing the Value of Data Within a Large Pharmaceutical Company Through In Silico Models

The present contribution describes how in silico models and methods are applied at different stages of the drug discovery process in the pharmaceutical industry. A description of the most relevant computational methods and tools is given along with an evaluation of their performance in the assessment of potential genotoxic impurities and the prediction of off-target in vitro pharmacology. The challenges of predicting the outcome of highly complex in vivo studies are discussed followed by considerations on how novel ways to manage, store, exchange, and analyze data may advance knowledge and facilitate modeling efforts. In this context, the current status of broad data sharing initiatives, namely, eTOX and eTransafe, will be described along with related projects that could significantly reduce the use of animals in drug discovery in the future.

Artificial Intelligence in Drug Safety and Metabolism

The use of artificial intelligence methods in drug safety began in the early 2000s with applications such as predicting bacterial mutagenicity and hERG inhibition. The field has been endlessly expanding ever since and the models have become more complex. These approaches are now integrated into molecule risk assessment processes along with in vitro and in vivo methods. Today, artificial intelligence can be used in every phase of drug discovery and development, from profiling chemical libraries in early discovery, to predicting off-target effects in the mid-discovery phase, to assessing potential mutagenic impurities in development and degradants as part of life cycle management. This chapter provides an overview of artificial intelligence in drug safety and describes its application throughout the entire discovery and development process.

In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: current status and future needs in predicting liver toxicity

Hepatotoxicity is one of the most frequently observed adverse effects resulting from exposure to a xenobiotic. For example, in pharmaceutical research and development it is one of the major reasons for drug withdrawals, clinical failures, and discontinuation of drug candidates. The development of faster and cheaper methods to assess hepatotoxicity that are both more sustainable and more informative is critically needed. The biological mechanisms and processes underpinning hepatotoxicity are summarized and experimental approaches to support the prediction of hepatotoxicity are described, including toxicokinetic considerations. The paper describes the increasingly important role of in silico approaches and highlights challenges to the adoption of these methods including the lack of a commonly agreed upon protocol for performing such an assessment and the need for in silico solutions that take dose into consideration. A proposed framework for the integration of in silico and experimental information is provided along with a case study describing how computational methods have been used to successfully respond to a regulatory question concerning non-genotoxic impurities in chemically synthesized pharmaceuticals.

Leveraging high-throughput screening data, deep neural networks, and conditional generative adversarial networks to advance predictive toxicology

There are currently 85,000 chemicals registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Toxic Substances Control Act, but only a small fraction have measured toxicological data. To address this gap, high-throughput screening (HTS) and computational methods are vital. As part of one such HTS effort, embryonic zebrafish were used to examine a suite of morphological and mortality endpoints at six concentrations from over 1,000 unique chemicals found in the ToxCast library (phase 1 and 2). We hypothesized that by using a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) or deep neural networks (DNN), and leveraging this large set of toxicity data we could efficiently predict toxic outcomes of untested chemicals. Utilizing a novel method in this space, we converted the 3D structural information into a weighted set of points while retaining all information about the structure. In vivo toxicity and chemical data were used to train two neural network generators. The first was a DNN (Go-ZT) while the second utilized cGAN architecture (GAN-ZT) to train generators to produce toxicity data. Our results showed that Go-ZT significantly outperformed the cGAN, support vector machine, random forest and multilayer perceptron models in cross-validation, and when tested against an external test dataset. By combining both Go-ZT and GAN-ZT, our consensus model improved the SE, SP, PPV, and Kappa, to 71.4%, 95.9%, 71.4% and 0.673, respectively, resulting in an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.837. Considering their potential use as prescreening tools, these models could provide in vivo toxicity predictions and insight into the hundreds of thousands of untested chemicals to prioritize compounds for HT testing.

Computational Screening of Potential Inhibitors of Desulfobacter postgatei for Pyrite Scale Prevention in Oil and Gas Wells

Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), such as Desulfobacter postgatei are found in oil wells. However, they lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide. This in turn leads to the iron sulfide scale formation (pyrite). ATP sulfurylase is an enzyme present in SRB, which catalyzes the formation of adenylyl sulfate (APS) and inorganic pyrophosphatase (PPi) from ATP and sulfate. This reaction is the first among many in hydrogen sulfide production by D. postgatei . Consensus scoring using molecular docking and machine learning was used to identify three potential inhibitors of ATP sulfurylase from a database of about 40 million compounds. These selected hits ((S,E)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(9-((m-tolylimino)methyl)-9,10-dihydroanthracen-9-yl)pyrrolidine-2,5-dione; methyl 2-[[(1S)-5-cyano-2-imino-1-(4-phenylthiazol-2-yl)-3-azaspiro[5.5]undec-4-en-4-yl]sulfanyl]acetate; and (4S)-4-(3-chloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-(6-hydroxypyridazin-3-yl)-3-methyl-4,5-dihydropyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-ol), known as A, B, and C, respectively) all had good binding affinities with ATP sulfurylase and were further analyzed for their toxicological properties. Compound A had the highest docking score. However, based on the physicochemical and toxicological properties, only compound C was predicted to be both safe and effective as a potential inhibitor of ATP sulfurylase, hence the preferred choice. The molecular interactions of compound C revealed favorable interactions with the following residues: LEU213, ASP308, ARG307, TRP347, LEU224, GLN212, MET211, and HIS309.

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes as an in vitro model in toxicology: strengths and weaknesses for hazard identification and risk characterization

INTRODUCTION

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes is one of the most widely used cell-based models that resulted from the discovery of how non-embryonic stem cells can be differentiated into multiple cell types. In just one decade, iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes went from a research lab to widespread use in biomedical research and preclinical safety evaluation for drugs and other chemicals.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript reviews data on toxicology applications of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. We detail the outcome of a systematic literature search on their use (i) in hazard assessment for cardiotoxicity liabilities, (ii) for risk characterization, (iii) as models for population variability, and (iv) in studies of personalized medicine and disease.

EXPERT OPINION

iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes are useful to increase the accuracy, precision, and efficiency of cardiotoxicity hazard identification for both drugs and non-pharmaceuticals, with recent efforts beginning to demonstrate their utility for risk characterization. Notable limitations include the needs to improve the maturation of cells in culture, to better understand their potential use identifying structural cardiotoxicity, and for additional case studies involving population-wide and disease-specific risk characterization. Ultimately, the greatest future benefits are likely for non-pharmaceutical chemicals, filling a critical gap where no routine testing for cardiotoxicity is currently performed.

Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) is a target of interest for endocrine disruption research, as altered signaling can affect normal reproductive and neurological development for generations. In an effort to prioritize compounds with alternative methodologies, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used in vitro data from 11 assays to construct models of AR agonist and antagonist signaling pathways. While these EPA ToxCast AR models require in vitro data to assign a bioactivity score, Bayesian machine learning methods can be used for prospective prediction from molecule structure alone. This approach was applied to multiple types of data corresponding to the EPA's AR signaling pathway with proprietary software, Assay Central. The training performance of all machine learning models, including six other algorithms, was evaluated by internal 5-fold cross-validation statistics. Bayesian machine learning models were also evaluated with external predictions of reference chemicals to compare prediction accuracies to published results from the EPA. The machine learning model group selected for further studies of endocrine disruption consisted of continuous AC50 data from the February 2019 release of ToxCast/Tox21. These efforts demonstrate how machine learning can be used to predict AR-mediated bioactivity and can also be applied to other targets of endocrine disruption.

Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) periodically releases in vitro data across a variety of targets, including the estrogen receptor (ER). In 2015, the EPA used these data to construct mathematical models of ER agonist and antagonist pathways to prioritize chemicals for endocrine disruption testing. However, mathematical models require in vitro data prior to predicting estrogenic activity, but machine learning methods are capable of prospective prediction from the molecular structure alone. The current study describes the generation and evaluation of Bayesian machine learning models grouped by the EPA's ER agonist pathway model using multiple data types with proprietary software, Assay Central. External predictions with three test sets of in vitro and in vivo reference chemicals with agonist activity classifications were compared to previous mathematical model publications. Training data sets were subjected to additional machine learning algorithms and compared with rank normalized scores of internal five-fold cross-validation statistics. External predictions were found to be comparable or superior to previous studies published by the EPA. When assessing six additional algorithms for the training data sets, Assay Central performed similarly at a reduced computational cost. This study demonstrates that machine learning can prioritize chemicals for future in vitro and in vivo testing of ER agonism.

Quantitative Prediction of Hemolytic Toxicity for Small Molecules and Their Potential Hemolytic Fragments by Machine Learning and Recursive Fragmentation Methods

Hemolytic toxicity, as one of the key toxicity endpoints for small molecules, can cause lysis of the erythrocyte membrane and subsequent release of hemoglobin into blood plasma, leading to multiple acute and chronic adverse effects. Hence, it is necessary to assess the hemolytic toxicity of small molecules in an early stage of drug discovery and development process, and it is more significant to quantitatively predict the hemolytic toxicity of small molecules before costly and time-consuming experiments. Nevertheless, this endpoint has never been quantitatively predicted due to the lack of an appropriate dataset. In this work, we manually collected a quantitative hemolytic toxicity dataset containing 805 small molecules with experimental values of HD₅₀ (50% hemolytic dose) from a variety of literature, built the first machine learning-based regression model to quantitatively predict the hemolytic toxicity of small molecules, and developed a pragmatic software for automatic prediction. Based on this model, we further implemented an automatic recursive fragmentation module to predict the hemolytic fragments with high fragment efficiency for the given compound(s), which may be of particular interest to experimental medicinal chemists. Therefore, we anticipate that this quantitative model may help medicinal chemists boost the development of promising lead compounds with low hemolytic toxicity or fuel the discovery of highly hemolytic chemical probes to delve into the in-depth mechanism of the hemolytic process.

Molecular and cellular physiology of organic cation transporter 2

Organic cation transporters play a critical role in mediating the distribution of cationic pharmaceuticals. Indeed, organic cation transporter (OCT)2 is the initial step in the renal secretion of organic cations and consequently plays a defining role in establishing the pharmacokinetics of many cationic drugs. Although a hallmark of OCTs is their broad selectivity, this characteristic also makes them targets for unwanted, adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs), making them a focus for efforts to develop models of ligand interaction that could predict and preempt these adverse interactions. This review discusses the molecular characteristics of these transporters as well as the evidence that established the OCTs as key players in the distribution of organic cations. However, the primary focus is the present understanding of the complexity of ligand interaction with OCTs, particularly OCT2, including evidence for the presence of multiple ligand-binding sites and the influence of substrate structure on the affinity of the transporter for inhibitory ligands. This leads to a discussion of the complexities associated with the development of protocols for assessing the inhibitory potential of new molecular entities to perpetrate unwanted DDIs, the criteria that should be considered in the interpretation of the results of such protocols, and the challenges associated with development of models capable of predicting unwanted DDIs.

Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using Ensemble Learning Methods and Molecular Fingerprints

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major safety concern in the drug-development process, and various methods have been proposed to predict the hepatotoxicity of compounds during the early stages of drug trials. In this study, we developed an ensemble model using 3 machine learning algorithms and 12 molecular fingerprints from a dataset containing 1241 diverse compounds. The ensemble model achieved an average accuracy of 71.1 ± 2.6%, sensitivity (SE) of 79.9 ± 3.6%, specificity (SP) of 60.3 ± 4.8%, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.764 ± 0.026 in 5-fold cross-validation and an accuracy of 84.3%, SE of 86.9%, SP of 75.4%, and AUC of 0.904 in an external validation dataset of 286 compounds collected from the Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base. Compared with previous methods, the ensemble model achieved relatively high accuracy and SE. We also identified several substructures related to DILI. In addition, we provide a web server offering access to our models (http://ccsipb.lnu.edu.cn/toxicity/HepatoPred-EL/).

In Silico Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Based on Ensemble Classifier Method

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major factor in the development of drugs and the safety of drugs. If the DILI cannot be effectively predicted during the development of the drug, it will cause the drug to be withdrawn from markets. Therefore, DILI is crucial at the early stages of drug research. This work presents a 2-class ensemble classifier model for predicting DILI, with 2D molecular descriptors and fingerprints on a dataset of 450 compounds. The purpose of our study is to investigate which are the key molecular fingerprints that may cause DILI risk, and then to obtain a reliable ensemble model to predict DILI risk with these key factors. Experimental results suggested that 8 molecular fingerprints are very critical for predicting DILI, and also obtained the best ratio of molecular fingerprints to molecular descriptors. The result of the 5-fold cross-validation of the ensemble vote classifier method obtain an accuracy of 77.25%, and the accuracy of the test set was 81.67%. This model could be used for drug-induced liver injury prediction.

Repurposing Approved Drugs as Inhibitors of Kv7.1 and Nav1.8 to Treat Pitt Hopkins Syndrome

PURPOSE

Pitt Hopkins Syndrome (PTHS) is a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations of a specific gene, transcription factor 4 (TCF4), located on chromosome 18. PTHS results in individuals that have moderate to severe intellectual disability, with most exhibiting psychomotor delay. PTHS also exhibits features of autistic spectrum disorders, which are characterized by the impaired ability to communicate and socialize. PTHS is comorbid with a higher prevalence of epileptic seizures which can be present from birth or which commonly develop in childhood. Attenuated or absent TCF4 expression results in increased translation of peripheral ion channels K_v7.1 and Na_v1.8 which triggers an increase in after-hyperpolarization and altered firing properties.

METHODS

We now describe a high throughput screen (HTS) of 1280 approved drugs and machine learning models developed from this data. The ion channels were expressed in either CHO (K_V7.1) or HEK293 (Na_v1.8) cells and the HTS used either ⁸⁶Rb⁺ efflux (K_V7.1) or a FLIPR assay (Na_v1.8).

RESULTS

The HTS delivered 55 inhibitors of K_v7.1 (4.2% hit rate) and 93 inhibitors of Na_v1.8 (7.2% hit rate) at a screening concentration of 10 μM. These datasets also enabled us to generate and validate Bayesian machine learning models for these ion channels. We also describe a structure activity relationship for several dihydropyridine compounds as inhibitors of Na_v1.8.

CONCLUSIONS

This work could lead to the potential repurposing of nicardipine or other dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists as potential treatments for PTHS acting via Na_v1.8, as there are currently no approved treatments for this rare disorder.

In Silico Prediction of PAMPA Effective Permeability Using a Two-QSAR Approach

Oral administration is the preferred and predominant route of choice for medication. As such, drug absorption is one of critical drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DM/PK) parameters that should be taken into consideration in the process of drug discovery and development. The cell-free in vitro parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) has been adopted as the primary screening to assess the passive diffusion of compounds in the practical applications. A classical quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) model and a machine learning (ML)-based QSAR model were derived using the partial least square (PLS) scheme and hierarchical support vector regression (HSVR) scheme to elucidate the underlying passive diffusion mechanism and to predict the PAMPA effective permeability, respectively, in this study. It was observed that HSVR executed better than PLS as manifested by the predictions of the samples in the training set, test set, and outlier set as well as various statistical assessments. When applied to the mock test, which was designated to mimic real challenges, HSVR also showed better predictive performance. PLS, conversely, cannot cover some mechanistically interpretable relationships between descriptors and permeability. Accordingly, the synergy of predictive HSVR and interpretable PLS models can be greatly useful in facilitating drug discovery and development by predicting passive diffusion.

Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship models to predict potential nephrotoxic ingredients in traditional Chinese medicines

The broad use of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) and the accompanied incidences of kidney injury have attracted considerable interest in investigating the responsible toxic ingredients. It is challenging to evaluate toxicity of TCMs since they contain complex mixtures of phytochemicals. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is an efficient tool to predict toxicity and QSAR study on TCMs-induced nephrotoxicity remains lacked. We developed QSAR models using three datasets of 609 compounds: natural products, drugs, and mixed (contained both kinds of data) datasets. Each dataset was used for modelling by utilizing artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM) algorithms separately. Both internal and external validations were performed on each model. Six QSAR models were developed and yielded reliable performance in the internal validation. For external validation, 30 ingredients in the TCMs were predicted well by the natural product models (accuracy: ANN 96.7%, SVM 93.3%). The mixed models (accuracy: ANN 76.7%, SVM 66.7%) showed a better performance than the drug models (accuracy: ANN 50%, SVM 53.3%). Particularly, natural product models produced the most reliable results. It has the application not only on screening the nephrotoxic ingredients in TCMs, but it is also helpful at prioritizing the subsequent toxicity testing of natural products.

In Silico Approaches to Predict Drug-Transporter Interaction Profiles: Data Mining, Model Generation, and Link to Cholestasis

Transport proteins play a crucial role in drug distribution, disposition, and clearance by mediating cellular drug influx and efflux. Inhibition of these transporters may lead to drug-drug interactions or even drug-induced liver injury, such as cholestasis, which comprises a major challenge in drug development process. Thus, computer-based (in silico) models that can predict the pharmacological and toxicological profiles of these small molecules with respect to liver transporters may help in the early prioritization of compounds and hence may lower the high attrition rates. In this chapter, we provide a protocol for in silico prediction of cholestasis by generating validated predictive models. In addition to the two-dimensional molecular descriptors, we include transporter inhibition predictions as descriptors and evaluate the influence of the same on the performance of the cholestasis models.

Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction

Many chemicals that disrupt endocrine function have been linked to a variety of adverse biological outcomes. However, screening for endocrine disruption using in vitro or in vivo approaches is costly and time-consuming. Computational methods, e.g., quantitative structure-activity relationship models, have become more reliable due to bigger training sets, increased computing power, and advanced machine learning algorithms, such as multilayered artificial neural networks. Machine learning models can be used to predict compounds for endocrine disrupting capabilities, such as binding to the estrogen receptor (ER), and allow for prioritization and further testing. In this work, an exhaustive comparison of multiple machine learning algorithms, chemical spaces, and evaluation metrics for ER binding was performed on public data sets curated using in-house cheminformatics software (Assay Central). Chemical features utilized in modeling consisted of binary fingerprints (ECFP6, FCFP6, ToxPrint, or MACCS keys) and continuous molecular descriptors from RDKit. Each feature set was subjected to classic machine learning algorithms (Bernoulli Naive Bayes, AdaBoost Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN). Models were evaluated using a variety of metrics: recall, precision, F1-score, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, Cohen's Kappa, and Matthews correlation coefficient. For predicting compounds within the training set, DNN has an accuracy higher than that of other methods; however, in 5-fold cross validation and external test set predictions, DNN and most classic machine learning models perform similarly regardless of the data set or molecular descriptors used. We have also used the rank normalized scores as a performance-criteria for each machine learning method, and Random Forest performed best on the validation set when ranked by metric or by data sets. These results suggest classic machine learning algorithms may be sufficient to develop high quality predictive models of ER activity.

Comparing and Validating Machine Learning Models for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Discovery

Tuberculosis is a global health dilemma. In 2016, the WHO reported 10.4 million incidences and 1.7 million deaths. The need to develop new treatments for those infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb) has led to many large-scale phenotypic screens and many thousands of new active compounds identified in vitro. However, with limited funding, efforts to discover new active molecules against Mtb needs to be more efficient. Several computational machine learning approaches have been shown to have good enrichment and hit rates. We have curated small molecule Mtb data and developed new models with a total of 18,886 molecules with activity cutoffs of 10 μM, 1 μM, and 100 nM. These data sets were used to evaluate different machine learning methods (including deep learning) and metrics and to generate predictions for additional molecules published in 2017. One Mtb model, a combined in vitro and in vivo data Bayesian model at a 100 nM activity yielded the following metrics for 5-fold cross validation: accuracy = 0.88, precision = 0.22, recall = 0.91, specificity = 0.88, kappa = 0.31, and MCC = 0.41. We have also curated an evaluation set ( n = 153 compounds) published in 2017, and when used to test our model, it showed the comparable statistics (accuracy = 0.83, precision = 0.27, recall = 1.00, specificity = 0.81, kappa = 0.36, and MCC = 0.47). We have also compared these models with additional machine learning algorithms showing Bayesian machine learning models constructed with literature Mtb data generated by different laboratories generally were equivalent to or outperformed deep neural networks with external test sets. Finally, we have also compared our training and test sets to show they were suitably diverse and different in order to represent useful evaluation sets. Such Mtb machine learning models could help prioritize compounds for testing in vitro and in vivo.

Naïve Bayesian Models for Vero Cell Cytotoxicity

PURPOSE

To advance translational research of potential therapeutic small molecules against infectious microbes, the compounds must display a relative lack of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Vero cell cytotoxicity (CC₅₀) is a common initial assay for this metric. We explored the development of naïve Bayesian models that can enhance the probability of identifying non-cytotoxic compounds.

METHODS

Vero cell cytotoxicity assays were identified in PubChem, reformatted, and curated to create a training set with 8741 unique small molecules. These data were used to develop Bayesian classifiers, which were assessed with internal cross-validation, external tests with a set of 193 compounds from our laboratory, and independent validation with an additional diverse set of 1609 unique compounds from PubChem.

RESULTS

Evaluation with independent, external test and validation sets indicated that cytotoxicity Bayesian models constructed with the ECFP_6 descriptor were more accurate than those that used FCFP_6 fingerprints. The best cytotoxicity Bayesian model displayed predictive power in external evaluations, according to conventional and chance-corrected statistics, as well as enrichment factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from external tests demonstrate that our novel cytotoxicity Bayesian model displays sufficient predictive power to help guide translational research. To assist the chemical tool and drug discovery communities, our curated training set is being distributed as part of the Supplementary Material. Graphical Abstract Naive Bayesian models have been trained with publically available data and offer a useful tool for chemical biology and drug discovery to select for small molecules with a high probability of exhibiting acceptably low Vero cell cytotoxicity.

The development and application of in silico models for drug induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), caused by drugs, herbal agents or nutritional supplements, is a major issue for patients and the pharmaceutical industry. It has been a leading cause of clinical trials failure and withdrawal of FDA approval. In this research, we focused on in silico estimation of chemical DILI potential on humans based on structurally diverse organic chemicals. We developed a series of binary classification models using five different machine learning methods and eight different feature reduction methods. The model, developed with the support vector machine (SVM) and the MACCS fingerprint, performed best both on the test set and external validation. It achieved a prediction accuracy of 80.39% on the test set and 82.78% on external validation. We made this model available at http://opensource.vslead.com/. The user can freely predict the DILI potential of molecules. Furthermore, we analyzed the difference of distributions of 12 key physical-chemical properties between DILI-positive and DILI-negative compounds and 20 privileged substructures responsible for DILI were identified from the Klekota-Roth fingerprint. Moreover, since traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-induced liver injury is also one of the major concerns among the toxic effects, we evaluated the DILI potential of TCM ingredients using the MACCS_SVM model developed in this study. We hope the model and privileged substructures could be useful complementary tools for chemical DILI evaluation.

Machine Learning Methods in Computational Toxicology

Various methods of machine learning, supervised and unsupervised, linear and nonlinear, classification and regression, in combination with various types of molecular descriptors, both "handcrafted" and "data-driven," are considered in the context of their use in computational toxicology. The use of multiple linear regression, variants of naïve Bayes classifier, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision trees, ensemble learning, random forest, several types of neural networks, and deep learning is the focus of attention of this review. The role of fragment descriptors, graph mining, and graph kernels is highlighted. The application of unsupervised methods, such as Kohonen's self-organizing maps and related approaches, which allow for combining predictions with data analysis and visualization, is also considered. The necessity of applying a wide range of machine learning methods in computational toxicology is underlined.

The Use of In Silico Models Within a Large Pharmaceutical Company

The present contribution describes how in silico models are applied at different stages of the drug discovery process in the pharmaceutical industry. A thorough description of the most relevant computational methods and tools is given along with an in-depth evaluation of their performance in the context of potential genotoxic impurities assessment.The challenges of predicting the outcome of highly complex studies are discussed followed by considerations on how novel ways to manage, store, share and analyze data may advance knowledge and facilitate modeling efforts.

Comparison of Deep Learning With Multiple Machine Learning Methods and Metrics Using Diverse Drug Discovery Data Sets

Machine learning methods have been applied to many data sets in pharmaceutical research for several decades. The relative ease and availability of fingerprint type molecular descriptors paired with Bayesian methods resulted in the widespread use of this approach for a diverse array of end points relevant to drug discovery. Deep learning is the latest machine learning algorithm attracting attention for many of pharmaceutical applications from docking to virtual screening. Deep learning is based on an artificial neural network with multiple hidden layers and has found considerable traction for many artificial intelligence applications. We have previously suggested the need for a comparison of different machine learning methods with deep learning across an array of varying data sets that is applicable to pharmaceutical research. End points relevant to pharmaceutical research include absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADME/Tox) properties, as well as activity against pathogens and drug discovery data sets. In this study, we have used data sets for solubility, probe-likeness, hERG, KCNQ1, bubonic plague, Chagas, tuberculosis, and malaria to compare different machine learning methods using FCFP6 fingerprints. These data sets represent whole cell screens, individual proteins, physicochemical properties as well as a data set with a complex end point. Our aim was to assess whether deep learning offered any improvement in testing when assessed using an array of metrics including AUC, F1 score, Cohen's kappa, Matthews correlation coefficient and others. Based on ranked normalized scores for the metrics or data sets Deep Neural Networks (DNN) ranked higher than SVM, which in turn was ranked higher than all the other machine learning methods. Visualizing these properties for training and test sets using radar type plots indicates when models are inferior or perhaps over trained. These results also suggest the need for assessing deep learning further using multiple metrics with much larger scale comparisons, prospective testing as well as assessment of different fingerprints and DNN architectures beyond those used.

Predicting Organ Toxicity Using in Vitro Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure

Animal testing alone cannot practically evaluate the health hazard posed by tens of thousands of environmental chemicals. Computational approaches making use of high-throughput experimental data may provide more efficient means to predict chemical toxicity. Here, we use a supervised machine learning strategy to systematically investigate the relative importance of study type, machine learning algorithm, and type of descriptor on predicting in vivo repeat-dose toxicity at the organ-level. A total of 985 compounds were represented using chemical structural descriptors, ToxPrint chemotype descriptors, and bioactivity descriptors from ToxCast in vitro high-throughput screening assays. Using ToxRefDB, a total of 35 target organ outcomes were identified that contained at least 100 chemicals (50 positive and 50 negative). Supervised machine learning was performed using Naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, classification and regression trees, and support vector classification approaches. Model performance was assessed based on F1 scores using 5-fold cross-validation with balanced bootstrap replicates. Fixed effects modeling showed the variance in F1 scores was explained mostly by target organ outcome, followed by descriptor type, machine learning algorithm, and interactions between these three factors. A combination of bioactivity and chemical structure or chemotype descriptors were the most predictive. Model performance improved with more chemicals (up to a maximum of 24%), and these gains were correlated (ρ = 0.92) with the number of chemicals. Overall, the results demonstrate that a combination of bioactivity and chemical descriptors can accurately predict a range of target organ toxicity outcomes in repeat-dose studies, but specific experimental and methodologic improvements may increase predictivity.

Predicting drug-induced liver injury: The importance of data curation

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major issue for both patients and pharmaceutical industry due to insufficient means of prevention/prediction. In the current work we present a 2-class classification model for DILI, generated with Random Forest and 2D molecular descriptors on a dataset of 966 compounds. In addition, predicted transporter inhibition profiles were also included into the models. The initially compiled dataset of 1773 compounds was reduced via a 2-step approach to 966 compounds, resulting in a significant increase (p-value < 0.05) in model performance. The models have been validated via 10-fold cross-validation and against three external test sets of 921, 341 and 96 compounds, respectively. The final model showed an accuracy of 64% (AUC 68%) for 10-fold cross-validation (average of 50 iterations) and comparable values for two test sets (AUC 59%, 71% and 66%, respectively). In the study we also examined whether the predictions of our in-house transporter inhibition models for BSEP, BCRP, P-glycoprotein, and OATP1B1 and 1B3 contributed in improvement of the DILI mode. Finally, the model was implemented with open-source 2D RDKit descriptors in order to be provided to the community as a Python script.

Predicting Drug-Induced Cholestasis with the Help of Hepatic Transporters-An in Silico Modeling Approach

Cholestasis represents one out of three types of drug induced liver injury (DILI), which comprises a major challenge in drug development. In this study we applied a two-class classification scheme based on k-nearest neighbors in order to predict cholestasis, using a set of 93 two-dimensional (2D) physicochemical descriptors and predictions of selected hepatic transporters' inhibition (BSEP, BCRP, P-gp, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3). In order to assess the potential contribution of transporter inhibition, we compared whether the inclusion of the transporters' inhibition predictions contributes to a significant increase in model performance in comparison to the plain use of the 93 2D physicochemical descriptors. Our findings were in agreement with literature findings, indicating a contribution not only from BSEP inhibition but a rather synergistic effect deriving from the whole set of transporters. The final optimal model was validated via both 10-fold cross validation and external validation. It performs quite satisfactorily resulting in 0.686 ± 0.013 for accuracy and 0.722 ± 0.014 for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 10-fold cross-validation (mean ± standard deviation from 50 iterations).

Identification of potential inhibitors against the Zika virus using consensus scoring

The Zika virus (ZIKV) is a life threatening pathogen of zoonotic importance with prevalence in some parts of Africa and America. Unfortunately, there is yet to be a single approved vaccine or antiviral drug to treat the diseases and deformations being caused by the Zika virus infection. In this study, about 36 million compounds from MCULE database were virtually screened against a real matured ZIKV protein using a consensus scoring method to get improved hit rates. The consensus scoring method combined the result from the 25 top ranked molecules from both MCULE and Drug Score eXtended (DSX) docking programs which led to the selection of two hit compounds. The inhibition constant (Ki) values of 0.08 and 0.30μm were obtained for the two selected compounds MCULE-8830369631-0-1 and MCULE-9236850811-0-1 respectively, to remark them as hit compounds. The molecular interactions of the two selected hit compounds with the amino acids (ALA 48, ILE 49, ILE 468 and LEU 472) present in the ZIKV protein indicated that they both have similar binding modes. The result of the computationally predicted physicochemical properties including ADMET for the selected compounds showed their great potential in becoming lead compounds upon optimization and thus could be used in treating the Zika virus diseases.

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury (IDILI): Potential Mechanisms and Predictive Assays

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is a significant source of drug recall and acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States. While current drug development processes emphasize general toxicity and drug metabolizing enzyme- (DME-) mediated toxicity, it has been challenging to develop comprehensive models for assessing complete idiosyncratic potential. In this review, we describe the enzymes and proteins that contain polymorphisms believed to contribute to IDILI, including ones that affect phase I and phase II metabolism, antioxidant enzymes, drug transporters, inflammation, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA). We then describe the various assays that have been developed to detect individual reactions focusing on each of the mechanisms described in the background. Finally, we examine current trends in developing comprehensive models for examining these mechanisms. There is an urgent need to develop a panel of multiparametric assays for diagnosing individual toxicity potential.

Collaborative drug discovery for More Medicines for Tuberculosis (MM4TB)

Neglected disease drug discovery is generally poorly funded compared with major diseases and hence there is an increasing focus on collaboration and precompetitive efforts such as public-private partnerships (PPPs). The More Medicines for Tuberculosis (MM4TB) project is one such collaboration funded by the EU with the goal of discovering new drugs for tuberculosis. Collaborative Drug Discovery has provided a commercial web-based platform called CDD Vault which is a hosted collaborative solution for securely sharing diverse chemistry and biology data. Using CDD Vault alongside other commercial and free cheminformatics tools has enabled support of this and other large collaborative projects, aiding drug discovery efforts and fostering collaboration. We will describe CDD's efforts in assisting with the MM4TB project.

Applicability of predictive toxicology methods for monoclonal antibody therapeutics: status Quo and scope

Biopharmaceuticals, monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics in particular, have positively impacted millions of lives. MAbs and related therapeutics are highly desirable from a biopharmaceutical perspective as they are highly target specific and well tolerated within the human system. Nevertheless, several mAbs have been discontinued or withdrawn based either on their inability to demonstrate efficacy and/or due to adverse effects. Approved monoclonal antibodies and derived therapeutics have been associated with adverse effects such as immunogenicity, cytokine release syndrome, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, intravascular haemolysis, cardiac arrhythmias, abnormal liver function, gastrointestinal perforation, bronchospasm, intraocular inflammation, urticaria, nephritis, neuropathy, birth defects, fever and cough to name a few. The advances made in this field are also impeded by a lack of progress in bioprocess development strategies as well as increasing costs owing to attrition, wherein the lack of efficacy and safety accounts for nearly 60 % of all factors contributing to attrition. This reiterates the need for smarter preclinical development using quality by design-based approaches encompassing carefully designed predictive models during early stages of drug development. Different in vitro and in silico methods are extensively used for predicting biological activity as well as toxicity during small molecule drug development; however, their full potential has not been utilized for biological drug development. The scope of in vitro and in silico tools in early developmental stages of monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics production and how it contributes to lower attrition rates leading to faster development of potential drug candidates has been evaluated. The applicability of computational toxicology approaches in this context as well as the pitfalls and promises of extending such techniques to biopharmaceutical development has been highlighted.