Surgical, Medical, and Hardware Adverse Events in a Series of 141 Patients Undergoing Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

Does Temporary Externalization of Electrodes After Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Result in a Higher Risk of Infection?

OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical therapy for movement disorders that comprises implantation of stimulation electrodes and a pacemaker. These procedures can be performed separately, leaving the possibility of externalizing the electrodes for local field potential recording or testing multiple targets for therapeutic efficacy. It is still debated whether the temporary externalization of DBS electrodes leads to an increased risk of infection. We therefore aimed to assess the risk of infection during and after lead externalization in DBS surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed a consecutive series of 624 DBS surgeries, including 266 instances with temporary externalization of DBS electrodes for a mean of 6.1 days. Patients were available for follow-up of at least one year, except in 15 instances. In 14 patients with negative test stimulation, electrodes were removed. All kinds of infections related to implantation of the neurostimulation system were accounted for.

RESULTS

Overall, infections occurred in 22 of 624 surgeries (3.5%). Without externalization of electrodes, infections were noted after 7 of 358 surgeries (2.0%), whereas with externalization, 15 of 252 infections were found (6.0%). This difference was significant (p = 0.01), but it did not reach statistical significance when comparing groups within different diagnoses. The rate of infection with externalized electrodes was highest in psychiatric disorders (9.1%), followed by Parkinson's disease (7.3%), pain (5.7%), and dystonia (5.5%). The duration of the externalization of the DBS electrodes was comparable in patients who developed an infection (6.1 ± 3.1 days) with duration in those who did not (6.0 ± 3.5 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Although infection rates were relatively low in our study, there was a slightly higher infection rate when DBS electrodes were externalized. On the basis of our results, the indication for electrode externalization should be carefully considered, and patients should be informed about the possibility of a higher infection risk when externalization of DBS electrodes is planned.

Closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders

Despite increasing prevalence and huge personal and societal burden, psychiatric diseases still lack treatments which can control symptoms for a large fraction of patients. Increasing insight into the neurobiology underlying these diseases has demonstrated wide-ranging aberrant activity and functioning in multiple brain circuits and networks. Together with varied presentation and symptoms, this makes one-size-fits-all treatment a challenge. There has been a resurgence of interest in the use of neurostimulation as a treatment for psychiatric diseases. Initial studies using continuous open-loop stimulation, in which clinicians adjusted stimulation parameters during patient visits, showed promise but also mixed results. Given the periodic nature and fluctuations of symptoms often observed in psychiatric illnesses, the use of device-driven closed-loop stimulation may provide more effective therapy. The use of a biomarker, which is correlated with specific symptoms, to deliver stimulation only during symptomatic periods allows for the personalized therapy needed for such heterogeneous disorders. Here, we provide the reader with background motivating the use of closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. We review foundational studies of open- and closed-loop neurostimulation for neuropsychiatric indications, focusing on deep brain stimulation, and discuss key considerations when designing and implementing closed-loop neurostimulation.

Preliminary Experience with a Four-Lead Implantable Pulse Generator for Deep Brain Stimulation

BACKGROUND

Implantable pulse generators (IPGs) store energy and deliver electrical impulses for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat neurological and psychiatric disorders. IPGs have evolved over time to meet the demands of expanding clinical indications and more nuanced therapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the workflow of the first 4-lead IPG for DBS in patients with complex disease.

METHOD

The engineering capabilities, clinical use cases, and surgical technique are described in a cohort of 12 patients with epilepsy, essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, mixed tremor, and Tourette's syndrome with comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder between July 2021 and July 2022.

RESULTS

This system is a rechargeable 32-channel, 4-port system with independent current control that can be connected to 8 contact linear or directionally segmented leads. The system is ideal for patients with mixed disease or those with multiple severe symptoms amenable to >2 lead implantations. A multidisciplinary team including neurologists, radiologists, and neurosurgeons is necessary to safely plan the procedure. There were no serious intraoperative or postoperative adverse events. One patient required revision surgery for bowstringing.

CONCLUSIONS

This new 4-lead IPG represents an important new tool for DBS surgery with the ability to expand lead implantation paradigms for patients with complex disease.

Outpatient Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Is a Safe Alternative to Inpatient Admission

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is usually performed as an inpatient procedure. The COVID-19 pandemic effected a practice change at our institution with outpatient DBS performed because of limited inpatient and surgical resources. Although this alleviated use of hospital resources, the comparative safety of outpatient DBS surgery is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and incidence of early postoperative complications in patients undergoing DBS procedures in the outpatient vs inpatient setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all outpatient and inpatient DBS procedures performed by a single surgeon between January 2018 and November 2022. The main outcome measures used for comparison between the 2 groups were total complications, length of stay, rate of postoperative infection, postoperative hemorrhage rate, 30-day emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions, and IV antihypertensive requirement.

RESULTS

A total of 44 outpatient DBS surgeries were compared with 70 inpatient DBS surgeries. The outpatient DBS cohort had a shorter mean postoperative stay (4.19 vs 39.59 hours, P = .0015), lower total complication rate (2.3% vs 12.8%, P = .1457), and lower wound infection rate (0% vs 2.9%, P = .52) compared with the inpatient cohort, but the difference in complications was not statistically significant. In the 30-day follow-up period, ED visits were similar between the cohorts (6.8% vs 7.1%, P = .735), but no outpatient DBS patient required readmission, whereas all inpatient DBS patients visiting the ED were readmitted (P = .155).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that DBS can be safely performed on an outpatient basis with same-day hospital discharge and close continuous monitoring.

Interim Safety Profile From the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate Neural Interface System

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are being developed to restore mobility, communication, and functional independence to people with paralysis. Though supported by decades of preclinical data, the safety of chronically implanted microelectrode array BCIs in humans is unknown. We report safety results from the prospective, open-label, nonrandomized BrainGate feasibility study (NCT00912041), the largest and longest-running clinical trial of an implanted BCI.

METHODS

Adults aged 18-75 years with quadriparesis from spinal cord injury, brainstem stroke, or motor neuron disease were enrolled through 7 clinical sites in the United States. Participants underwent surgical implantation of 1 or 2 microelectrode arrays in the motor cortex of the dominant cerebral hemisphere. The primary safety outcome was device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) requiring device explantation or resulting in death or permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant evaluation period. The secondary outcomes included the type and frequency of other adverse events and the feasibility of the BrainGate system for controlling a computer or other assistive technologies.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2021, 14 adults enrolled in the BrainGate trial had devices surgically implanted. The average duration of device implantation was 872 days, yielding 12,203 days of safety experience. There were 68 device-related adverse events, including 6 device-related SAEs. The most common device-related adverse event was skin irritation around the percutaneous pedestal. There were no safety events that required device explantation, no unanticipated adverse device events, no intracranial infections, and no participant deaths or adverse events resulting in permanently increased disability related to the investigational device.

DISCUSSION

The BrainGate Neural Interface system has a safety record comparable with other chronically implanted medical devices. Given rapid recent advances in this technology and continued performance gains, these data suggest a favorable risk/benefit ratio in appropriately selected individuals to support ongoing research and development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00912041.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that the neurosurgically placed BrainGate Neural Interface system is associated with a low rate of SAEs defined as those requiring device explantation, resulting in death, or resulting in permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant period.

Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease and Relationship between Micro-electrode tracks and hemorrhage: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation is a common treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite strong efficacy in well-selected patients, complications can occur. Intraoperative micro-electrode recording (MER) can enhance efficacy by improving lead accuracy. However, there is controversy as to whether MER increases risk of hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis reporting complication rates from deep brain stimulation in PD. We also interrogate the association between hemorrhage and MER.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were implemented while querying the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. All included studies were randomized controlled trials and prospective case series with 5 or more patients. Primary outcomes included rates of overall revision, infection, lead malposition, surgical site and wound complications, hardware-related complications, and seizure. The secondary outcome was the relationship between number of MER tracks and hemorrhage rate.

RESULTS

262 articles with 21,261 patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 25.8 months (range 0-133). Complication rates were: revision 4.9%, infection 4.2%, lead malposition 3.3%, surgical site complications 2.8%, hemorrhage 2.4%, hardware-related complications 2.4%, and seizure 1.9%. While hemorrhage rate did not increase with single-track MER (odds ratio, 3.49; P = 0.29), there was a significant non-linear increase with each additional track.

CONCLUSION

Infection and lead malposition were the most common complications. Hemorrhage risk increases with more than one MER track. These results highlight the challenge of balancing surgical accuracy and perioperative risk.

Additional Benefit of Intraoperative Electroacupuncture in Improving Tolerance of Deep Brain Stimulation Surgical Procedure in Parkinsonian Patients

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective technique to treat patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. The surgical procedure of DBS implantation is generally performed under local anesthesia due to the need for intraoperative clinical testing. However, this procedure is long (5–7 h on average) and, therefore, the objective that the patient remains co-operative and tolerates the intervention well is a real challenge. Objective: To evaluate the additional benefit of electroacupuncture (EA) performed intraoperatively to improve the comfort of parkinsonian patients during surgical DBS implantation. Methods: This single-center randomized study compared two groups of patients. In the first group, DBS implantation was performed under local anesthesia alone, while the second group received EA in addition. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, during the different stages of the surgery, and 2 days after surgery, using the 9-item Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), including a total sum score and physical and emotional subscores. Results: The data of nine patients were analyzed in each group. Although pain and tiredness increased in both groups after placement of the stereotactic frame, the ESAS item “lack of appetite”, as well as the ESAS total score and physical subscore increased after completion of the first burr hole until the end of the surgical procedure in the control group only. ESAS total score and physical subscore were significantly higher at the end of the intervention in the control group compared to the EA group. After the surgical intervention (D2), anxiety and ESAS emotional subscore were improved in both groups, but the feeling of wellbeing improved in the EA group only. Finally, one patient developed delirium during the intervention and none in the EA group. Discussion: This study shows that intraoperative electroacupuncture significantly improves the tolerance of DBS surgery in parkinsonian patients. This easy-to-perform procedure could be fruitfully added in clinical practice.

Surgical and Hardware-Related Adverse Events of Deep Brain Stimulation: A Ten-Year Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective for treating a number of neurological and psychiatric indications, surgical and hardware-related adverse events (AEs) can occur that affect quality of life. This study aimed to give an overview of the nature and frequency of those AEs in our center and to describe the way they were managed. Furthermore, an attempt was made at identifying possible risk factors for AEs to inform possible future preventive measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing DBS-related procedures between January 2011 and July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to inventory AEs. The mean follow-up time was 43 ± 31 months. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive value of selected demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

From January 2011 to July 2020, 508 DBS-related procedures were performed including 201 implantations of brain electrodes in 200 patients and 307 implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacements in 142 patients. Surgical or hardware-related AEs following initial implantation affected 40 of 200 patients (20%) and resolved without permanent sequelae in all instances. The most frequent AEs were surgical site infections (SSIs) (9.95%, 20/201) and wire tethering (2.49%, 5/201), followed by hardware failure (1.99%, 4/201), skin erosion (1.0%, 2/201), pain (0.5%, 1/201), lead migration (0.52%, 2/386 electrode sites), and hematoma (0.52%, 2/386 electrode sites). The overall rate of AEs for IPG replacement was 5.6% (17/305). No surgical, ie, staged or nonstaged, electrode fixation, or patient-related risk factors were identified for SSI or wire tethering.

CONCLUSIONS

Major AEs including intracranial surgery-related AEs or AEs requiring surgical removal or revision of hardware are rare. In particular, aggressive treatment is required in SSIs involving multiple sites or when Staphylococcus aureus is identified. For future benchmarking, the development of a uniform reporting system for surgical and hardware-related AEs in DBS surgery would be useful.

Lesser-Known Aspects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Programming Sessions, Hardware Surgeries, Residential Care Admissions, and Deaths

OBJECTIVE

The long-term treatment burden, duration of community living, and survival of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) after deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation are unclear. This study aims to determine the frequency of programming, repeat hardware surgeries (of the intracranial electrode, implantable pulse generator [IPG], and extension-cable), and the timings of residential care and death in patients with PD treated with DBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional, population-based study, individual-level data were collected from the Australian government covering a 15-year period (2002-2016) on 1849 patients with PD followed from DBS implantation.

RESULTS

The mean DBS implantation age was 62.6 years and mean follow-up 5.0 years. Mean annual programming rates were 6.9 in the first year and 2.8 in subsequent years. 51.4% of patients required repeat hardware surgery. 11.3% of patients had repeat intracranial electrode surgery (including an overall 1.1% of patients who were completely explanted). 47.6% of patients had repeat IPG/extension-cable surgery including for presumed battery depletion. 6.2% of patients had early repeat IPG/extension-cable surgery (within one year of any previous such surgery). Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0.3% after initial DBS implantation and 0.6% after any repeat hardware surgery. 25.3% of patients were admitted into residential care and 17.4% died. The median interval to residential care and death was 10.2 years and 11.4 years, respectively. Age more than 65 years was associated with fewer repeat hardware surgeries for presumed complications (any repeat surgery of electrodes, extension-cables, and early IPG surgery) and greater rates of residential care admission and death.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from a large cohort of patients with PD treated with DBS found that the median life span after surgery is ten years. Repeat hardware surgery, including of the intracranial electrodes, is common. These findings support development of technologies to reduce therapy burden such as enhanced surgical navigation, hardware miniaturization, and improved battery efficiency.

Self-adjustment of deep brain stimulation delays optimization in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's Disease patients undergo time-consuming programming to refine stimulation parameters after deep brain stimulation surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the use of the advanced functions of a patient's programmer would facilitate programming of deep brain stimulation.

METHODS

Thirty patients were randomly allocated to the use of advanced versus simple mode of the patient programmer in this single-centre, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Primary outcome was the number of days required to optimize the stimulation settings.

RESULTS

The number of days required to optimize stimulation was significantly lower in the simple mode (88.5 ± 33.1 vs. 142.1 ± 67.4, p = 0.01). In addition, the advanced mode group had a higher number of side effects (5.4 ± 3.1 vs. 2.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.0055).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the advanced functions of patient programmer delays programming optimization and it is associated with a higher number of side effects. These findings highlight the need for other methods for faster and safer stimulation programming.

Deep Brain Electrode Externalization and Risk of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

When evaluating deep brain stimulation (DBS) for newer indications, patients may benefit from trial stimulation prior to permanent implantation or for investigatory purposes. Although several case series have evaluated infectious complications among DBS patients who underwent trials with external hardware, outcomes have been inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a period of lead externalization is associated with an increased risk of infection.

METHODS

We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses compliant systematic review of all studies that included rates of infection for patients who were externalized prior to DBS implantation. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to estimate the pooled proportion of infection across studies, and a meta-analysis of relative risks was conducted on those studies that included a control group of nonexternalized patients. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed via I2 index.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 23 articles, comprising 1354 patients who underwent lead externalization. The pooled proportion of infection was 6.9% (95% CI: 4.7%-9.5%), with a moderate to high level of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 62.2%; 95% CI: 40.7-75.9; P < .0001). A total of 3 studies, comprising 212 externalized patients, included a control group. Rate of infection in externalized patients was 5.2% as compared to 6.0% in nonexternalized patients. However, meta-analysis was inadequately powered to determine whether there was indeed no difference in infection rate between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The rate of infection in patients with electrode externalization is comparable to that reported in the literature for DBS implantation without a trial period. Future studies are needed before this information can be confidently used in the clinical setting.

Indication-based analysis of patient outcomes following deep brain stimulation surgery

BACKGROUND

While considered a safe operation, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been associated with various morbidities. We assessed differences in postsurgical complication rates in patients undergoing the most common types of neurostimulation surgery.

METHODS

The National Readmission Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients undergoing neurostimulation placement with the diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD), epilepsy, dystonia, or essential tremor (ET). Demographics and complications, including infection, pneumonia, and neurostimulator revision, were queried for each cohort and compiled. Readmissions were assessed in 30-, 90-, and 180-day intervals. We implemented nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to control for demographic and sample size differences between groups.

RESULTS

We identified 3230 patients with Parkinson disease, 1289 with essential tremor, 965 with epilepsy, and 221 with dystonia. Following propensity score matching, 221 patients remained in each cohort. Readmission rates 30-days after hospital discharge for PD patients (15.5 %) were significantly greater than those for ET (7.8 %) and seizure patients (4.4 %). Pneumonia was reported for PD (1.6 %), seizure (3.3 %) and dystonia (1.7 %) patients but not individuals ET. No PD patients were readmitted at 30-days due to dysphagia while individuals treated for ET (6.5 %), seizure (1.6 %) and dystonia (5.2 %) were. DBS-revision surgery was performed for 11.48 % of PD, 6.52 % of ET, 1.64 % of seizure and 6.90 % of dystonia patients within 30-days of hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

30-day readmission rates vary significantly between indications, with patients receiving DBS for PD having the highest rates. Further longitudinal studies are required to describe drivers of variation in postoperative outcomes following DBS surgery for different indications.

Deep brain stimulation: a review of the open neural engineering challenges

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established and valid therapy for a variety of pathological conditions ranging from motor to cognitive disorders. Still, much of the DBS-related mechanism of action is far from being understood, and there are several side effects of DBS whose origin is unclear. In the last years DBS limitations have been tackled by a variety of approaches, including adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS), a technique that relies on using chronically implanted electrodes on 'sensing mode' to detect the neural markers of specific motor symptoms and to deliver on-demand or modulate the stimulation parameters accordingly. Here we will review the state of the art of the several approaches to improve DBS and summarize the main challenges toward the development of an effective aDBS therapy.

APPROACH

We discuss models of basal ganglia disorders pathogenesis, hardware and software improvements for conventional DBS, and candidate neural and non-neural features and related control strategies for aDBS.

MAIN RESULTS

We identify then the main operative challenges toward optimal DBS such as (i) accurate target localization, (ii) increased spatial resolution of stimulation, (iii) development of in silico tests for DBS, (iv) identification of specific motor symptoms biomarkers, in particular (v) assessing how LFP oscillations relate to behavioral disfunctions, and (vi) clarify how stimulation affects the cortico-basal-ganglia-thalamic network to (vii) design optimal stimulation patterns.

SIGNIFICANCE

This roadmap will lead neural engineers novel to the field toward the most relevant open issues of DBS, while the in-depth readers might find a careful comparison of advantages and drawbacks of the most recent attempts to improve DBS-related neuromodulatory strategies.

Survival and Health Care Use After Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

OBJECTIVES

To compare long-term survival of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) to matched controls, and examine whether DBS was associated with differences in injurious falls, long-term care, and home care.

METHODS

Using administrative health data (Ontario, Canada), we examined DBS outcomes within a cohort of individuals diagnosed with PD between 1997 and 2012. Patients receiving DBS were matched with non-DBS controls by age, sex, PD diagnosis date, time with PD, and a propensity score. Survival between groups was compared using the log-rank test and marginal Cox proportional hazards regression. Cumulative incidence function curves and marginal subdistribution hazard models were used to assess effects of DBS on falls, long-term care admission, and home care use, with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

There were 260 DBS recipients matched with 551 controls. Patients undergoing DBS did not experience a significant survival advantage compared to controls (log-rank test p = 0.50; HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.22). Among patients <65 years of age, DBS recipients had a significantly reduced risk of death (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.84). Patients receiving DBS were more likely than controls to receive care for falls (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.19-2.05) and home care (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.32-1.90), while long-term care admission was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving DBS may increase survival for younger PD patients who undergo DBS. Future studies should examine whether survival benefits may be attributed to effects on PD or the absence of comorbidities that influence mortality.

Risk Factors for Wire Fracture or Tethering in Deep Brain Stimulation: A 15-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

In deep brain stimulation (DBS), tunneled lead and extension wires connect the implantable pulse generator to the subcortical electrode, but circuit discontinuity and wire revision compromise a significant portion of treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors predisposing to fracture or tethering of the lead or extension wire in patients undergoing DBS.

METHOD

Retrospective review of wire-related complications was performed in a consecutive series of patients treated with DBS at a tertiary academic medical center over 15 yr.

RESULTS

A total of 275 patients had 513 extension wires implanted or revised. There were 258 extensions of 40 cm implanted with a postauricular connector (50.3%), 229 extensions of 60 cm with a parietal connector (44.6%), and 26 extensions 40 cm with a parietal connector (5.1%). In total, 26 lead or extension wires (5.1%) were replaced for fracture. Fracture rates for 60 cm extensions with a parietal connector, 40 cm wires with a postauricular connector, and 40 cm extensions with a parietal connector were 0.2, 1.4, and 12.9 fractures per 100 wire-years, significantly different on log-rank test. Total 16 (89%) 40 cm extension wires with a postauricular connector had fracture implicating the lead wire. Tethering occurred only in patients with 60 cm extensions with parietal connectors (1.14 tetherings per 100 wire-years). Reoperation rate correlated with younger age, dystonia, and target in the GPI.

CONCLUSION

The 40 cm extensions with parietal connectors have the highest fracture risk and should be avoided. Postauricular connectors risk lead wire fracture and should be employed cautiously. The 60 cm parietal wires may reduce fracture risk but increase tethering risk.

Antibiotic Impregnated Catheter Coating Technique for Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware Infection: An Effective Method to Avoid Intracranial Lead Removal

BACKGROUND

Few studies have proposed alternative salvage methods of deep brain stimulation (DBS) intracranial lead once the infection has already occurred.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic impregnated catheter coverage of DBS leads in case of hardware infection.

METHODS

Patients with a hardware infection and consequent partial removal of extension and internal pulse generator (IPG) were reviewed. To diagnose an infection, criteria provided by the Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection were used. We compared the intracranial lead salvage rate between the group that underwent antibiotic catheter lead protection (group A) and the group that did not (group B).

RESULTS

A total of 231 DBS surgeries and 339 IPG replacements were performed from January 2012 to January 2017. Twenty-three hardware-related infections (4%) were identified. Nineteen patients (82.6%) underwent partial hardware removal with an attempt to spare intracranial lead. Of these, 8 patients (42.1%) had antibiotic catheter lead coverage (group A) while 11 patients (57.9%) did not receive any antibiotic protection (group B). At 6-mo follow-up, 6 patients had the extension and IPG successfully re-implanted in group A, whereas only 1 patient was successfully re-implanted in group B (75 vs 9.1%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The antibiotic impregnated catheter coating technique seems to be effective in avoiding intracranial lead removal in case of IPG or DBS extension-lead junction infection. This method does not require any surgical learning curve, it is safe and relatively inexpensive. Randomized, prospective, larger studies are needed to validate our results.

EFFECT OF GYROSCOPE PARAMETERS ON GYROSCOPIC TREMOR SUPPRESSION IN A SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM

Although tremor is one of the most common movement disorders, there are few effective tremor-suppressing options available to patients. Gyrostabilization is a potential option, but we do not currently know how to optimize gyrostabilization for tremor suppression. To address this gap, we present a systematic investigation of how gyrostabilizer parameters affect tremor suppression in a single degree of freedom (DOF). A simple model with a single DOF at the wrist and a gyroscope mounted on the back of the hand was used to focus on the most basic effects. We simulated the frequency response of the system (hand + gyroscope) to a tremorogenic input torque at the wrist. Varying system parameters one at a time, we determined the effect of individual parameters on the system’s frequency response. To minimize the bandwidth without adding significant inertia, the inertia and spin speed of the flywheel should be as high as design constraints allow, whereas the distance from the wrist joint axis to the gyroscope and the precession stiffness and damping should be kept as low as possible. The results demonstrate the potential of gyroscopic tremor suppression and can serve as foundation for further investigations of gyroscopic tremor suppression in the upper limb.

CONTINUOUS SENSORY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF PARKINSONIAN REST TREMOR

This paper aims to investigate the effect of continuous sensory electrical stimulation (SES) on the suppression of a Parkinsonian rest tremor. Fourteen patients with Parkinson’s disease participated in this study. Three wrist muscles were electrically stimulated on sensory level under motor threshold. Intensity of stimulation was determined for each muscle of each patient as the maximum tolerable current amplitude that does not induce muscle contraction. Tri-axial gyro sensors were attached to three upper limb segments. The angular velocity of each segment was measured for each of the three sessions, i.e., PRE-, ON- and POST- stimulations. Outcome measures were the tremor amplitude and main frequency of each axis in the power spectrum. Decrease in tremor amplitude was significant at ON and POST sessions in finger and at POST session in hand and forearm. Decrease in main frequency was significant mainly at ON session. About one-third of patients showed reduction in tremor power at ON-stimulation and at POST-stimulation. Subjects with suppression of tremor showed greater initial tremor amplitude than those without suppression. Continuous SES suppressed the Parkinsonian rest tremor. The results suggest that the properties of tremor-generating loop may be altered by continuous SES and the effect lasts temporarily.

Towards unambiguous reporting of complications related to deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective single-center analysis and systematic review of the literature

Background and objective

To determine rates of adverse events (AEs) related to deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery or implanted devices from a large series from a single institution. Sound comparisons with the literature require the definition of unambiguous categories, since there is no consensus on the reporting of such AEs.

Patients and methods

123 consecutive patients (median age 63 yrs; female 45.5%) treated with DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (78 patients), ventrolateral thalamus (24), internal pallidum (20), and centre médian-parafascicular nucleus (1) were analyzed retrospectively. Both mean and median follow-up time was 4.7 years (578 patient-years). AEs were assessed according to three unambiguous categories: (i) hemorrhages including other intracranial complications because these might lead to neurological deficits or death, (ii) infections and similar AEs necessitating the explantation of hardware components as this results in the interruption of DBS therapy, and (iii) lead revisions for various reasons since this involves an additional intracranial procedure. For a systematic review of the literature AE rates were calculated based on primary data presented in 103 publications. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with the I² statistic and analyzed further by a random effects meta-regression. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plots.

Results

Surgery- or hardware-related AEs (23) affected 18 of 123 patients (14.6%) and resolved without permanent sequelae in all instances. In 2 patients (1.6%), small hemorrhages in the striatum were associated with transient neurological deficits. In 4 patients (3.3%; 0.7% per patient-year) impulse generators were removed due to infection. In 2 patients electrodes were revised (1.6%; 0.3% per patient-year). There was no lead migration or surgical revision because of lead misplacement. Age was not statistically significant different (p>0.05) between patients affected by AEs or not. AE rates did not decline over time and similar incidences were found among all patients (423) implanted with DBS systems at our institution until December 2016. A systematic literature review revealed that exact AE rates could not be determined from many studies, which could not be attributed to study designs. Average rates for intracranial complications were 3.8% among studies (per-study analysis) and 3.4% for pooled analysis of patients from different studies (per-patient analysis). Annual hardware removal rates were 3.6 and 2.4% for per-study and per-patient analysis, respectively, and lead revision rates were 4.1 and 2.6%, respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I² ranged between 77% and 91% for the three categories; p< 0.0001). For hardware removal heterogeneity (I² = 87.4%) was reduced by taking study size (p< 0.0001) and publication year (p< 0.01) into account, although a significant degree of heterogeneity remained (I² = 80.0%; p< 0.0001). Based on comparisons with health care-related databases there appears to be publication bias with lower rates for hardware-related AEs in published patient cohorts.

Conclusions

The proposed categories are suited for an unequivocal assessment of AEs even in a retrospective manner and useful for benchmarking. AE rates in the present cohorts from our institution compare favorable with the literature.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Moroccan Patients With Parkinson's Disease: The Experience of Neurology Department of Rabat

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is known as a therapy of choice of advanced Parkinson's disease. The present study aimed to assess the beneficial and side effects of STN DBS in Moroccan Parkinsonian patients. Material and Methods: Thirty five patients underwent bilateral STN DBS from 2008 to 2016 in the Rabat University Hospital. Patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up for 6 to 12 months using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in four conditions (stimulation OFF and ON and medication OFF and ON), the levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), dyskinesia and fluctuation scores and PDQ39 scale for quality of life (QOL). Postoperative side effects were also recorded. Results: The mean age at disease onset was 42.31 ± 7.29 years [28-58] and the mean age at surgery was 54.66 ± 8.51 years [34-70]. The median disease duration was 11.95 ± 4.28 years [5-22]. Sixty-three percentage of patients were male. 11.4% of patients were tremor dominant while 45.71 showed akinetic-rigid form and 42.90 were classified as mixed phenotype. The LEDD before surgery was 1200 mg/day [800-1500]. All patients had motor fluctuations whereas non-motor fluctuations were present in 61.80% of cases. STN DBS decreased the LEDD by 51.72%, as the mean LEDD post-surgery was 450 [188-800]. The UPDRS-III was improved by 52.27%, dyskinesia score by 66.70% and motor fluctuations by 50%, whereas QOL improved by 27.12%. Post-operative side effects were hypophonia (2 cases), infection (3 cases), and pneumocephalus (2 cases). Conclusion: Our results showed that STN DBS is an effective treatment in Moroccan Parkinsonian patients leading to a major improvement of the most disabling symptoms (dyskinesia, motor fluctuation) and a better QOL.

Life-threatening DBS withdrawal syndrome in Parkinson's disease can be treated with early reimplantation

INTRODUCTION

The deep brain stimulation (DBS) withdrawal syndrome (DBS-WDS) is a rare, life-threatening complication in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with long disease duration and stimulation when stimulation is terminated for extended periods mostly due to infection of the DBS-hardware.

METHODS, RESULTS

In five patients explantation became necessary because of infection after a mean of 11.4 years (range 4-15 years) of DBS and a mean disease duration of 24.6 years (range 3-22 years). Mean UPDRS motor-score pre-explantation was 38 points (range 24-55 points) which increased to a mean of 78.4 points (range 58-90 points) after explantation, despite optimal Levodopa dosing. Reimplantation of the hardware after 23 days (range 3-45 days) under antibiotic treatment led to an improvement to a mean of 40 points (range 25-73 points) and a complication free survival.

CONCLUSION

Early reimplantation of the DBS-hardware is a treatment option of the DBS-WDS when the life-threatening urgency overrides surgical standards. Observation of the syndrome indicates pharmacological unresponsiveness of the dopaminergic system in advanced PD and long-term DBS.

Technical Note: Preemptive Surgical Revision of Impending Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware Erosion

BACKGROUND

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a relatively safe procedure, skin erosion is a commonly reported hardware complication that can threaten the DBS system. Patients with Parkinson disease are especially at risk for this complication due to their autonomic dysregulation and impaired nutrition. Early detection of impending skin erosion allows for intervention that may prevent hardware destruction. Here we report a novel technique to address this complication preemptively. We describe the use of an acellular dermal matrix to prevent skin erosion in 20 patients with Parkinson disease who were treated with DBS and showed signs of impending skin erosion.

METHODS

Twenty patients with signs of impending hardware erosion were identified. An acellular dermal matrix was surgically placed under the at-risk skin overlying the DBS lead.

RESULTS

None of the 20 patients treated with this technique went on to require further revision surgery or removal of hardware.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical placement of acellular dermal matrix in patients identified as having impending hardware erosions is a safe and cost-effective way to prevent hardware complications.

Robot-assisted procedures in pediatric neurosurgery

OBJECTIVE

During the last 3 decades, robotic technology has rapidly spread across several surgical fields due to the continuous evolution of its versatility, stability, dexterity, and haptic properties. Neurosurgery pioneered the development of robotics, with the aim of improving the quality of several procedures requiring a high degree of accuracy and safety. Moreover, robot-guided approaches are of special interest in pediatric patients, who often have altered anatomy and challenging relationships between the diseased and eloquent structures. Nevertheless, the use of robots has been rarely reported in children. In this work, the authors describe their experience using the ROSA device (Robotized Stereotactic Assistant) in the neurosurgical management of a pediatric population.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, 116 children underwent ROSA-assisted procedures for a variety of diseases (epilepsy, brain tumors, intra- or extraventricular and tumor cysts, obstructive hydrocephalus, and movement and behavioral disorders). Each patient received accurate preoperative planning of optimal trajectories, intraoperative frameless registration, surgical treatment using specific instruments held by the robotic arm, and postoperative CT or MR imaging.

RESULTS

The authors performed 128 consecutive surgeries, including implantation of 386 electrodes for stereo-electroencephalography (36 procedures), neuroendoscopy (42 procedures), stereotactic biopsy (26 procedures), pallidotomy (12 procedures), shunt placement (6 procedures), deep brain stimulation procedures (3 procedures), and stereotactic cyst aspiration (3 procedures). For each procedure, the authors analyzed and discussed accuracy, timing, and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best their knowledge, the authors present the largest reported series of pediatric neurosurgical cases assisted by robotic support. The ROSA system provided improved safety and feasibility of minimally invasive approaches, thus optimizing the surgical result, while minimizing postoperative morbidity.

Thirty-Day Readmission Rates Following Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a safe and efficacious surgical intervention for several movement disorders; however, the 30-day all-cause readmission rate associated with this procedure has not previously been documented.

OBJECT: To perform a retrospective cohort study to estimate the 30-day all-cause readmission rate associated with DBS.

METHODS: We reviewed medical records of patients over the age of 18 who underwent DBS surgery at Pennsylvania Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2009 and 2014. We identified patients who were readmitted to an inpatient medical facility within 30 days from their initial discharge.

RESULTS: Over the study period, 23 (6.6%) of 347 DBS procedures resulted in a readmission to the hospital within 30 days. Causes of readmission were broadly categorized into surgery-related (3.7%): intracranial lead infection (0.6%), battery-site infection (0.6%), intracranial hematoma along the electrode tract (0.6%), battery-site hematoma (0.9%), and seizures (1.2%); and nonsurgery-related (2.9%): altered mental status (1.8%), nonsurgical-site infections (0.6%), malnutrition and poor wound healing (0.3%), and a pulse generator malfunction requiring reprogramming (0.3%). Readmissions could be predicted by the presence of medical comorbidities (P &lt; .001), but not by age, gender, or length of stay (Ps &gt; .15).

CONCLUSION: All-cause 30-day readmission for DBS is 6.6%. This compares favorably to previously studied neurosurgical procedures. Readmissions frequently resulted from surgery-related complications, particularly infection, seizures, and hematomas, and were significantly associated with the presence of medical comorbidities (P &lt; .001).

An Analysis of Scalp Thickness and Other Novel Risk Factors for Deep Brain Stimulator Infections

Introduction: Deep brain stimulator (DBS) infections are a persistent problem for patients undergoing this procedure. They may require further surgery, treatment with antibiotics, or even removal of the device. To date, no consensus exists on the best practices to avoid DBS infections or what factors predispose patients to an eventual infection. The goal of this study was to examine several patient factors for association with DBS infection.

Methods: A single-center, single-surgeon quality improvement database was queried. All patients who experienced an infection were identified. The primary variable analyzed was scalp thickness. Other pre-specified, secondary variables included routine intraoperative cultures, operative time, diagnosis, and age.

Results: None of the independent variables examined were significantly associated with DBS infections. Only two of the 46 infections qualified as surgical site infections as defined by the Centers for Disease Control.

Conclusion: DBS infections are independent of all of the predictor variables analyzed. Surgical site infections, according to traditional definitions, are not the optimal definition for evaluating DBS infections/erosions. New studies must examine new variables that are not routinely gathered in this population. Also, because of the rare event rates and difficulty in randomizing patients to exposures, a large, multicenter registry may be the optimal study design to solve this clinical problem.

Comparison of Bilateral vs. Staged Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's Disease in Patients Under 70 Years of Age

OBJECTIVE

The most popular surgical method for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is simultaneous bilateral DBS. However, some centers conduct a staged unilateral approach advocating that reduced continuous intraoperative time reduces postoperative complications, thus justifying the cost of a second operative session. To test these assumptions, we performed a retrospective analysis of the Truven Health MarketScan® Database.

METHODS

Using the MarketScan Database, we retrospectively analyzed patients that underwent simultaneous bilateral or staged unilateral DBS between 2000 and 2009. The main outcome measures were 90-day postoperative complication rates, number of reprogramming hours one year following procedure, and annualized healthcare cost. The outcome measures were compared between cohorts using multivariate regressions controlling for appropriate covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 713 patients that underwent DBS between 2000 and 2009 met inclusion criteria for the study. Of these patients, 556 underwent simultaneous bilateral DBS and 157 received staged unilateral DBS. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in the rate of infection (simultaneous: 4.3% vs. staged: 7.0%; p = 0.178), pneumonia (3.1% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.283), hemorrhage (2.9% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.844), pulmonary embolism (0.5% vs. 1.3%), and device-related complications (0.5% vs. 0.0%). Patients in the staged cohort had a higher rate of lead revision in 90 days (3.2% vs. 12.7%; RR = 3.07; p < 0.001). The staged cohort had a higher mean (SD) number of reprogramming hours within one year of procedure (6.0 ± 5.7 vs. 7.8 ± 8.1; RR = 1.17; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the mean (SD) annualized payments between the cohorts ($86,100 ± $94,700 vs. $102,100 ± $121,500; p = 0.148).

CONCLUSION

Our study did not find a significant difference between 90-day postoperative complication rates or annualized cost between the staged and simultaneous cohorts. Thus, we believe that it is important to consider other factors when deciding between the staged and simultaneous DBS. Such factors include patient convenience and the laterality of symptoms.

Uncoupling of dopaminergic and subthalamic stimulation: Life-threatening DBS withdrawal syndrome

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is an accepted treatment. Infections of the system and other complications occasionally result in hardware removal and subsequent medical treatment alone for months.

METHODS

We have analyzed the clinical course of 15 patients requiring removal of at least parts of the DBS system, resulting in a cessation of stimulation.

RESULTS

Most had an uncomplicated return to medical treatment. Three had an unfavorable course during withdrawal, including two deaths. These patients had suffered from PD for more than 18 y and had had DBS for more than 8 y.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that DBS withdrawal can be life-threatening, because the whole range of dopaminergic and nondopaminergic medical treatments may be ineffective at this stage. The lack of response to medical treatment might be attributable to advanced disease and long-term changes of the basal ganglia loop in PD.

Surgical adverse events of deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson's disease. The learning curve and the pitfalls

BACKGROUND

Several surgical adverse events (SAEs) have been associated with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients, leading to certain confusion about the risk/benefit ratio of this technique, and giving rise to the need of more and more extensive control studies over longer periods. The aim of this article is to identify and quantify the factors associated with the most frequent AEs from STN DBS in PD-diagnosed patients.

METHODS

The following variables were studied: aborted procedure, misplaced leads, intracranial haemorrhage, and seizures. This study was carried out in 233 patients diagnosed with PD, with 455 STN electrodes implanted and follow-up after 7 (8-14) years follow up.

RESULTS

A total amount of 56 SAEs occurred in 49 patients (11.76 % of total procedures, 12.31 % of implanted leads, 21.03 % of patients). SAEs were: five aborted procedures, 26 misplaced leads, ten intracranial haemorrhages, and 15 seizures. Of all the SAEs, long-term effects only happened in two cases of hemiparesis caused by intracranial haemorrhage; the other SAEs were reversible and didn't leave any long-term clinical consequences (0.42 % of procedures, 0.44 % of leads, and 0.86 % of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

STN DBS in PD patients is a safe surgical procedure, with good risk/benefit ratios: procedure reliability/correct lead implantation in 95.59 %, 0 mortality/implanted lead, 0.12 morbidity/implanted lead, and 0.0043 neurological sequelae/implanted lead.

Online tremor suppression using electromyography and low-level electrical stimulation

Tremor is one of the most prevalent movement disorders. There is a large proportion of patients (around 25%) in whom current treatments do not attain a significant tremor reduction. This paper proposes a tremor suppression strategy that detects tremor from the electromyographic signals of the muscles from which tremor originates and counteracts it by delivering electrical stimulation to the antagonist muscles in an out of phase manner. The detection was based on the iterative Hilbert transform and stimulation was delivered above the motor threshold (motor stimulation) and below the motor threshold (sensory stimulation). The system was tested on six patients with predominant wrist flexion/extension tremor (four with Parkinson disease and two with Essential tremor) and led to an average tremor reduction in the range of 46%-81% and 35%-48% across five patients when using the motor and sensory stimulation, respectively. In one patient, the system did not attenuate tremor. These results demonstrate that tremor attenuation might be achieved by delivering electrical stimulation below the motor threshold, preventing muscle fatigue and discomfort for the patients, which sets the basis for the development of an alternative treatment for tremor.

Supraspinal stimulation for treatment of refractory pain

Refractory pain syndromes often have far reaching effects and are quite a challenge for primary care providers and specialists alike to treat. With the help of site-specific neuromodulation and appropriate patient selection these difficult to treat pain syndromes may be managed. In this article, we focus on supraspinal stimulation (SSS) for treatment of intractable pain and discuss off-label uses of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) in context to emerging indications in neuromodulation. Consideration for neuromodulatory treatment begins with rigorous patient selection based on exhaustive conservative management, elimination of secondary gains, and a proper psychology evaluation. Trial stimulation prior to DBS is nearly always performed while trial stimulation prior to MCS surgery is symptom dependent. Overall, a review of the literature demonstrates that DBS should be considered for refractory conditions including nociceptive/neuropathic pain, phantom limb pain, and chronic cluster headache (CCH). MCS should be considered primarily for trigeminal neuropathic pain (TNP) and central pain. DBS outcome studies for post-stroke pain as well as MCS studies for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) show more modest results and are also discussed in detail.

Long-term mortality analysis in Parkinson's disease treated with deep brain stimulation

Background. Few data have been published regarding long-term mortality in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with DBS. Methods. This study analyzed long-term mortality rates, causes, and correlates in PD patients treated with DBS. Results. 184 consecutive patients were included; mean follow-up was 50 months. Fifteen deaths occurred (total 8.15%, annual mortality rate 1.94%). Mean age at disease onset and at surgery was 48 ± 2.4 and 63 ± 1.6 years, respectively. Mean disease duration until death was 21 ± 7.8 years. Most deaths related to stroke, myocardial infarction, other vascular/heart disorders, or severe infection; one suicide was recorded. Deceased PD patients were mostly male and had lower motor benefit after DBS, but univariate analysis failed to show significant differences regarding gender and motor benefit. Survival was 99% and 94% at 3 and 5 years. Conclusions. Long-term survival is to be expected in PD patients treated with DBS, possibly higher than previously expected. Death usually supervenes due to vascular events or infection.

Differential diagnosis of psychiatric symptoms after deep brain stimulation for movement disorders

OBJECTIVES

The presence of a deep brain stimulator (DBS) in a patient with a movement disorder who develops psychiatric symptoms poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for the treating clinician. Few sources discuss approaches to diagnosing and treating these symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors review the literature on psychiatric complications in DBS for movement disorders and propose a heuristic for categorizing symptoms according to their temporal relationship with the DBS implantation process.

RESULTS

Psychiatric symptoms after DBS can be categorized as preimplantation, intra-operative/perioperative, stimulation related, device malfunction, medication related, and chronic stimulation related/long term. Once determined, the specific etiology of a symptom guides the practitioner in treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A structured approach to psychiatric symptoms in DBS patients allows practitioners to effectively diagnose and treat them when they arise.

Subthalamic neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early fluctuations: balancing the risks and benefits

Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an established treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease with pharmacologically unresponsive fluctuations. Compared with pharmacological treatment, subthalamic neurostimulation significantly improves motor symptoms, particularly during the phases of poor response to drug treatment, and reduces the severity of dyskinesias. Importantly, it also significantly improves quality of life and other integral measures of disease severity. The treatment response can last for more than 10 years, although there is no evidence that levodopa-resistant symptoms are delayed by subthalamic neurostimulation. At present, the mean disease duration for patients at the time of implantation is 12 years. In a recent study (EARLYSTIM) in patients with a disease duration of 7·5 years and fluctuations for 1·5 years, similar improvements in clinical outcomes were reported. These findings suggest that neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus could be used earlier in the disease course for carefully selected patients if the benefits of the treatment are weighed against the surgical risks and the lifelong need for specialised care by an experienced team. As mobility is consistently improved during the times with poor mobility by reducing fluctuations and delaying levodopa-sensitive complications, we propose that this treatment changes the disease course.

Bacterial infections of the central nervous system

Bacterial CNS infections comprise a wide spectrum of diseases, which may be acquired outside or inside the hospital, affect immunocompetent or immunocompromised patients, and be associated with trauma or procedures, as well as other exposures.