1
|
Morris SE, Sundin D, Geraghty S. Women’s experiences of breech birth decision making: An integrated review. Eur J Midwifery 2022; 6:2. [PMID: 35118350 PMCID: PMC8784975 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/143875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Currently, caesarean section is the primary mode of birth for a breech presenting fetus, leading to a deskilling of clinicians and limitation of birth choices for women. The aim of this review is to present a synthesized summary of existing literature related to women’s experiences of breech birth mode decision-making. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted in April 2021, utilizing five databases to identify and obtain peer-reviewed articles meeting the predetermined selection criteria. RESULTS Four major categories were synthesized from the integrated review: 1) Women who desire a vaginal birth may experience a range of negative emotions such as feelings of disempowerment, loss, uncertainty and a sense of isolation; 2) Women who experience a breech presentation at term experience significant pressures to conform to expectations of medical professionals and their families due to perceptions of risk related to breech birth; 3) Breech birth decision-making in a limiting system; and 4) Overall satisfaction with the decision to plan a vaginal breech birth. CONCLUSION Women with a breech presenting fetus at term experience a complex range of emotions and internal and external pressures due to perceptions of risk around breech birth. Midwives were seen as helpful throughout the breech experience. The reduced caesarean section rate for breech, observed in studies exploring specialized care pathways or dedicated services, could reduce the incidence of Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E. Morris
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
- King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Deborah Sundin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - Sadie Geraghty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morris S, Geraghty S, Sundin D. Breech presentation management: A critical review of leading clinical practice guidelines. Women Birth 2021; 35:e233-e242. [PMID: 34253466 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM Clinical practice guidelines are designed to guide clinicians and consumers of maternity services in clinical decision making, but recommendations are often consensus based and differ greatly between leading organisations. BACKGROUND Breech birth is a divisive clinical issue, however vaginal breech births continue to occur despite a globally high caesarean section rate for breech presenting fetuses. Inconsistencies are known to exist between clinical practice guidelines relating to the management of breech presentation. AIM The aim of this review was to critically evaluate and compare leading obstetric clinical practice guidelines related to the management of breech presenting fetuses. METHODS Leading obstetric guidelines were purposively obtained for review. Analysis was conducted using the International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE) Guideline Quality Checklist and reviewing the content of each guideline. FINDINGS Antenatal care recommendations and indications for Caesarean Section were relatively consistent between clinical guidelines. However, several inconsistencies were found among the other recommendations in terms of birth mode counselling, intrapartum management and the basis for recommendations. DISCUSSION Inconsistencies noted in the clinical practice guidelines have the potential to cause issues related to valid consent and create confusion among clinicians and maternity consumers. CONCLUSION Clinical practice guidelines, which focus on the risks of a Vaginal Breech Birth without also discussing the risks of a Caesarean Section when a breech presentation is diagnosed, has the potential to sway clinician attitudes and impact birth mode decision-making in maternity consumers. To respect pregnant women's autonomy and fulfil the legal requirements of consent, clinicians should provide balanced counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Morris
- Edith Cowan University; King Edward Memorial Hopsital.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morris S, Geraghty S, Sundin D. Development of a Breech-Specific Integrated Care Pathway for Pregnant Women: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e23514. [PMID: 33620329 PMCID: PMC7943339 DOI: 10.2196/23514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of an integrated care pathway with multidisciplinary input to standardize and streamline care for pregnant women experiencing breech presentation at 36 or more weeks of gestation poses several challenges because of the divisive and contentious nature of the phenomenon. Although many clinicians are interested in obtaining the skills required to safely support women desiring a vaginal breech birth, the primary trend in most health care facilities is to recommend a cesarean section. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to discuss the mixed methods approach used in a doctoral study conducted to generate new knowledge regarding women's experiences of breech birth in Western Australia and professional recommendations regarding the care of women experiencing breech presentation close to or at term. This study was designed to inform the development of an integrated care pathway for women experiencing a breech presentation. This mixed methods approach situated within the pragmatic paradigm was determined to be the optimal way for incorporating multidisciplinary recommendations with current clinical practice guidelines and consumer feedback. METHODS A mixed methods study utilizing semistructured interviews, an electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) study, and clinical practice guideline appraisal was conducted to generate new data. The interviews were designed to provide insights and understanding of the experiences of women in Western Australia who are diagnosed with a breech presentation. The e-Delphi study explored childbirth professionals' knowledge, opinions, and recommendations for the care of women experiencing breech presentation close to or at term. The clinical practice guideline appraisal will examine the current national and professional breech management and care guidelines. This study has the potential to highlight areas in practice that may need improvement and enable clinicians to better support women through what can be a difficult time. RESULTS Data collection for this study began in November 2018 and concluded in March 2020. Data analysis is currently taking place, and the results will be disseminated through publication when the analysis is complete. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study will guide the development of an integrated care pathway for women experiencing a breech presentation close to or at term, with the hope of moving toward standardized breech care for women in Western Australia. This study protocol has the potential to be used as a research framework for future studies of a similar nature. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/23514.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Morris
- King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Australia.,Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Attitudes towards breech management among a team of maternity clinicians in Australia undertaking breech training. Women Birth 2020; 33:e348-e356. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
5
|
Partridge B. Conceptual and ethical problems underpinning calls to abandon vaginal breech birth. Women Birth 2020; 34:e210-e215. [PMID: 31924567 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The view that vaginal breech birth is unjustifiable due to neonatal safety concerns has resulted in continued calls for breech pregnancies to be managed via a policy of planned caesarean birth. Vaginal breech birth has of course always occurred, but women with term breech pregnancies who seek to have a vaginal birth often face coercive pressures to have a caesarean birth instead. In this paper I argue that even if there is population level evidence that vaginal birth is relatively riskier for the breech presenting fetus, implementing a policy of planned caesarean birth would essentially be an unjustified attempt at forced medical intervention upon women. Advocates of a policy of planned caesarean birth often conflate the acceptability of allocating participants to a treatment group (policy) within the context of a randomized controlled trial with the justifiability of doing that as part of individual health care. Calls for obstetricians to "abandon vaginal breech birth" mistakenly position vaginal breech birth itself as a form of medical intervention that can simply be removed as an option for women by obstetricians. In reality, abandoning vaginal breech birth would entail abandoning women by denying them access to healthcare options that are otherwise available to any woman having a vaginal birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley Partridge
- School of Clinical Medicine - TPCH Northside, The University of Queensland, Rode Road, Chermside, Queensland, 4032, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
What if something goes wrong? A grounded theory study of parents’ decision-making processes around mode of breech birth at term gestation. Midwifery 2019; 78:114-122. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
Morris S, Geraghty S, Sundin D. Moxibustion: An alternative option for breech presentation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.12968/bjom.2018.26.7.440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Morris
- PhD candidate, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - Sadie Geraghty
- Senior lecturer Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - Deborah Sundin
- Clinical Director, School of Nursing and Midwifery Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walker S, Parker P, Scamell M. Expertise in physiological breech birth: A mixed-methods study. Birth 2018; 45:202-209. [PMID: 29205469 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Revised: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety of vaginal breech birth depends on the expertise of birth attendants, yet the meaning of "expertise" remains unclear and subjectively defined. The objective of this study was to define expertise and the roles experts may play in expanding access to this service. METHODS We performed an integrative analysis of two strands of data concerning expertise in physiological breech birth, including the following: survey data from a Delphi study involving 26 very experienced clinicians (mean experience = 135 breech births) and 2 service user representatives, and interviews from a grounded theory study of 14 clinicians more moderately experienced with physiological methods (5-30 upright breech births). Data were pooled and analyzed using constant comparative methods. RESULTS Expertise is defined by its ongoing function, the generation of comparatively good outcomes, and confidence and competence among colleagues. Although clinical experience is important, expertise is developed and expressed in social clinical roles, which expand as experience grows: clinician, mentor, specialist, and expert. To develop expertise within a service, clinicians who have an interest in breech birth should be supported to perform these roles within specialist teams. CONCLUSIONS Specialist breech teams may facilitate the development of expertise within maternity care settings. Evaluation of expertise based on enablement of women and colleagues, as well as outcomes, will potentially avoid the pitfalls of alienation produced by some forms of specialist authority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Pam Parker
- Department for Learning Enhancement and Development, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK
| | - Mandie Scamell
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Walker S, Scamell M, Parker P. Deliberate acquisition of competence in physiological breech birth: A grounded theory study. Women Birth 2017; 31:e170-e177. [PMID: 28969997 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM Research suggests that the skill and experience of the attendant significantly affect the outcomes of vaginal breech births, yet practitioner experience levels are minimal within many contemporary maternity care systems. BACKGROUND Due to minimal experience and cultural resistance, few practitioners offer vaginal breech birth, and many practice guidelines and training programmes recommend delivery techniques requiring supine maternal position. Fewer practitioners have skills to support physiological breech birth, involving active maternal movement and choice of birthing position, including upright postures such as kneeling, standing, squatting, or on a birth stool. How professionals learn complex skills contrary to those taught in their local practice settings is unclear. QUESTION How do professionals develop competence and expertise in physiological breech birth? METHODS Nine midwives and five obstetricians with experience facilitating upright physiological breech births participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed iteratively using constructivist grounded theory methods to develop an empirical theory of physiological breech skill acquisition. RESULTS Among the participants in this research, the deliberate acquisition of competence in physiological breech birth included stages of affinity with physiological birth, critical awareness, intention, identity and responsibility. Expert practitioners operating across local and national boundaries guided less experienced practitioners. DISCUSSION The results depict a specialist learning model which could be formalised in sympathetic training programmes, and evaluated. It may also be relevant to developing competence in other specialist/expert roles and innovative practices. CONCLUSION Deliberate development of local communities of practice may support professionals to acquire elusive breech skills in a sustainable way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, Northampton Square, London EC1 V0HB, UK; King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, London SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Mandie Scamell
- City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, Northampton Square, London EC1 V0HB, UK
| | - Pam Parker
- City, University of London, Learning Enhancement and Development, Northampton Square, London EC1 V0HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Petrovska K, Sheehan A, Homer CSE. Media Representations of Breech Birth: A Prospective Analysis of Web-Based News Reports. J Midwifery Womens Health 2017; 62:434-441. [PMID: 28703897 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2016] [Revised: 01/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent research has demonstrated that the media presentation of childbirth is highly medicalized, often portraying birth as risky and dramatic. Media representation of breech presentation and birth is unexplored in this context. This study aimed to explore the content and tone of news media reports relating to breech presentation and breech birth. METHODS Google alerts were created using the terms breech and breech birth in online English-language news sites over a 3-year period from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015. Alerts were received daily and filed for analysis, and data were analyzed to generate themes. RESULTS A total of 138 web-based news reports were gathered from 9 countries. Five themes that arose from the data included the problem of breech presentation, the high drama of vaginal breech birth, the safe option of cesarean birth versus dangers of vaginal breech birth, the defiant mother versus the saintly mother, and vaginal breech birth and medical misadventure. DISCUSSION Media reports in this study predominantly demonstrated negative views toward breech presentation and vaginal breech birth. Cesarean birth was portrayed as the safe option for breech birth, while vaginal breech birth was associated with poor outcomes. Media presentations may impact decision making about mode of birth for pregnant women with a breech fetus. Health care providers can play an important role in balancing the media depiction of planned vaginal breech birth by providing nonjudgmental, evidence-based information to such women to facilitate informed decision making for birth.
Collapse
|
11
|
Walker S, Breslin E, Scamell M, Parker P. Effectiveness of vaginal breech birth training strategies: An integrative review of the literature. Birth 2017; 44:101-109. [PMID: 28211102 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2016] [Revised: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety of vaginal breech birth depends on the skill of the attendant. The objective of this review was to identify, synthesize, and report the findings of evaluated breech birth training strategies. METHODS A systematic search of the following on-line databases: Medline, CINAHL Plus, PsychINFO, EBM Reviews/Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, and Pubmed, using a structured search strategy. Studies were included in the review if they evaluated the efficacy of a breech birth training program or particular strategies, including obstetric emergency training evaluations that reported differentiated outcomes for breech. Out of 1040 original citings, 303 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 17 methodologically diverse studies met the inclusion criteria. A data collection form was used to extract relevant information. Data were synthesized, using an evaluation levels framework, including reaction, learning (subjective and objective assessment), and behavioral change. RESULTS No evaluations included clinical outcome data. Improvements in self-assessed skill and confidence were not associated with improvements in objective assessments or behavioral change. Inclusion of breech birth as part of an obstetric emergencies training package without support in practice was negatively associated with subsequent attendance at vaginal breech births. CONCLUSIONS As a result of the heterogeneity of the studies available, and the lack of evidence concerning neonatal or maternal outcomes, no conclusive practice recommendations can be made. However, the studies reviewed suggest that vaginal breech birth training may be enhanced by reflection, repetition, and experienced clinical support in practice. Further evaluation studies should prioritize clinical outcome data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Eamonn Breslin
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Mandie Scamell
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Pam Parker
- Department for Learning Enhancement and Development, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Petrovska K, Sheehan A, Homer CS. The fact and the fiction: A prospective study of internet forum discussions on vaginal breech birth. Women Birth 2017; 30:e96-e102. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Revised: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
13
|
O'Brien D, Butler MM, Casey M. A participatory action research study exploring women's understandings of the concept of informed choice during pregnancy and childbirth in Ireland. Midwifery 2017; 46:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
14
|
‘Stress, anger, fear and injustice’: An international qualitative survey of women's experiences planning a vaginal breech birth. Midwifery 2017; 44:41-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
15
|
Walker S, Scamell M, Parker P. Principles of physiological breech birth practice: A Delphi study. Midwifery 2016; 43:1-6. [PMID: 27788418 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 09/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to establish a multi-professional consensus on shared principles underlying the practice of physiological breech birth. DESIGN three-round Delphi e-survey. SETTING multi-national. PARTICIPANTS a panel of thirteen obstetricians and thirteen midwives, experienced in facilitating physiological breech births in varied settings, and involving varied maternal birthing positions, and two service user representatives. METHODS an initial survey contained open-ended questions. Answers were coded and amalgamated into 60 statements in Round 1 and a further 6 statements in Round 2. Participants considered statements in the following categories: first principles (14), maternal positioning (12), birth environment (18), fetal positions (14), safe progress (8). The panel indicated the extent of their agreement using a 5-point Likert scale. The pre-determined level of consensus was 70% of respondents indicating 4 or 5 on the Likert scale (agreement or strong agreement). FINDINGS the panel indicated consensus on 37 of 66 proposed statements concerning 'Principles of Practice.' Negative data (29/66 statements) are also reported, highlighting areas of divergent opinions. The findings suggest a paradigm shift away from risk management strategies based on prediction and control, and towards facilitation strategies based on relationship and response. Upright positions are a tool and not a rule of physiological breech birth. CONCLUSION the parameters of 'normal for breech' require further exploration to support professionals working within a paradigm of complex normality. The principles articulated in this research can be used to design further research exploring the influence of physiological breech practices on neonatal and maternal outcomes, including women's experiences of maternity care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
| | - Mandie Scamell
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
| | - Pam Parker
- Department for Learning Enhancement and Development, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Watts NP, Petrovska K, Bisits A, Catling C, Homer CSE. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:248. [PMID: 27561416 PMCID: PMC5000477 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1038-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing studies regarding women's experiences surrounding an External Cephalic Version (ECV) report on women who have a persistent breech post ECV and give birth by caesarean section, or on women who had successful ECVs and plan for a vaginal birth. There is a paucity of understanding about the experience of women who attempt an ECV then plan a vaginal breech birth when their baby remains breech. The aim of this study was to examine women's experience of an ECV which resulted in a persistent breech presentation. METHODS A qualitative descriptive exploratory design was undertaken. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS Twenty two (n = 22) women who attempted an ECV and subsequently planned a vaginal breech birth participated. Twelve women had a vaginal breech birth (55 %) and 10 (45 %) gave birth by caesarean section. In relation to the ECV, there were five main themes identified: 'seeking an alternative', 'needing information', 'recounting the ECV experience', 'reacting to the unsuccessful ECV' and, 'reflecting on the value of an ECV'. CONCLUSIONS ECV should form part of a range of options provided to women, rather than a default procedure for management of the term breech. For motivated women who fit the safe criteria for vaginal breech birth, not being subjected to a painful experience (ECV) may be optimal. Women should be supported to access services that support vaginal breech birth if this is their choice, and continuity of care should be standard practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N P Watts
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Petrovska
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - A Bisits
- Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Catling
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - C S E Homer
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|