Five-Year Incidence of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Associated Risk Factors in a Nationwide Cohort of 201 945 Danish Patients with Diabetes

CANBERRA: A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial to Test the Therapeutic Potential of Oral Vicasinabin in Diabetic Retinopathy

Objective

Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) is a progressive disease that can lead to blindness. Current therapies for NPDR are invasive and not extensively used or accessible until the disease progresses, pointing to the need for an early noninvasive treatment. The objective of CANBERRA was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oral administration of vicasinabin (RG7774) on the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in participants with moderately severe to severe NPDR and good vision.

Design

CANBERRA was a global, multicentric randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase II study. The study duration was 36 months.

Participants

A total of 139 treatment-naïve patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) levels of 47 or 53 in ≥1 eye were enrolled.

Intervention

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 36 weeks of daily oral placebo, vicasinabin 30 mg, or vicasinabin 200 mg. Participants were followed for an additional 12 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary safety objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of vicasinabin by the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs). The primary efficacy objective was to assess the effect of vicasinabin on the severity of DR, assessing the proportion of participants with ≥2-step improvement in DRSS from baseline at week 36 in the study eye.

Results

Results are presented in the following order: placebo, vicasinabin 30 mg, vicasinabin 200 mg; 47, 48, and 44 participants were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were balanced. Adherence to treatment was approximately 90%, and pharmacokinetic analysis showed dose-dependent plasma exposure to vicasinabin. The primary efficacy endpoint was not met: the percentage of participants who improved their DRSS by ≥2 steps at week 36 from baseline were 7.9, 9.5, and 5.7, without statistically significant differences. The systemic and ocular safety profiles of vicasinabin were favorable, and AEs distributed evenly across arms. Vicasinabin did not induce changes in glycemic control or any kidney function or cardiovascular parameters. Three patients in the placebo arm discontinued the study due to serious AEs not related to the drug.

Conclusions

At the doses tested, vicasinabin did not improve DRSS in participants with NPDR. The role of the cannabinoid system in DR remains elusive.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04265261. EUDRACT number: 2019-002067-10.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Changes in urine dipstick proteinuria and its relation to the risk of diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is considered as a predictor for cardiovascular complications in diabetes mellitus (DM). However, no study has examined the association between changes in proteinuria and the risk of diabetic microvascular complications.

METHODS

Study participants were 71,825 DM patients who received urine dipstick test for proteinuria both in 2003-2004 and 2006-2007. They were categorized into four groups according to changes in proteinuria over 3 years (negative: negative → negative, resolved: proteinuria ≥ 1+ → negative, incident: negative → proteinuria ≥ 1+, persistent: proteinuria ≥ 1+ → proteinuria ≥ 1+). Cox-proportional hazard model was used in assessing the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for incidence of retinopathy, and neuropathy (adjusted HR [95% CI]).

RESULT

In all of DM patients, risk for comprehensive incidence of retinopathy and neuropathy increased in all types of proteinuria changes. In type 1 DM, HR for retinopathy and neuropathy generally increased in order of negative (reference), resolved (2.175 [1.150-4.114] and 1.335 [0.909-1.961]), incident (2.088 [1.185-3.680] and 1.753 [1.275-2.409]), and persistent proteinuria (1.314 [0.418-4.134] and 2.098 [1.274-3.455]). This pattern of relationship was similarly observed in type 2 DM for retinopathy and neuropathy: negative (reference), resolved (1.490 [1.082-2.051] and 1.164 [0.988-1.371]), incident (1.570 [1.161-2.123] and 1.291 [1.112-1.500]), and persistent proteinuria (2.309 [1.407-3.788] and 1.272 [0.945-1.712]).

CONCLUSION

Risk for diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy generally increased in order of negative, resolved, incident, and persistent proteinuria. Once manifested proteinuria was associated with the increased risk of diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy even after remission of proteinuria.

The Weight on Sight: Exploring the Links Between Obesity and Ocular Diseases

Obesity is a significant public health concern with escalating levels worldwide creating a variety of socioeconomic challenges and imposing a serious risk factor for a range of complications which include diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and stroke, all of which are primary causes of early death. Furthermore, there is growing evidence connecting obesity to the development of several ocular disorders. Excessive weight is a common denominator in the aetiology of many ocular pathologies such as diabetic retinopathy, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, cataract, high intraocular pressures, age-related macular degeneration, and retinal vascular diseases through the association with diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. This review highlights the risks weight gain and a sedentary lifestyle imposes on patients' ocular health and aims to inform the public and raise awareness about the consequences obesity has on sight. This review explores articles available on Ovid-MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) and PubMed regarding the impact of obesity on ocular health and the pathogenesis of obesity-linked ocular diseases.

Real-World Efficacy of Intravitreal Faricimab for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a prevalent exudative maculopathy, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first-line choice for treatment. Faricimab, a novel anti-VEGF and anti-angiopoietin-2 bispecific agent, has recently been approved for the treatment of DME. In this study, we systematically reviewed the real-world evidence of the efficacy of faricimab for the treatment of DME.

METHODS

We searched 11 databases for eligible studies. Study selection and data extraction were made independently by two authors in duplicate. Eligible studies were reviewed qualitatively.

RESULTS

We identified 10 eligible studies that summarized data from a total of 6054 eyes with a mean follow-up of between 55 days and 12 months. Five studies reported outcomes in a population of both treatment-naïve and previously treated eyes, and five studies reported outcomes exclusively in relation to eyes that were previously treated. Faricimab improved the best-corrected visual acuity and macular thickness. The extension of the treatment interval was possible in 61-81% of treatment-naïve eyes and 36-78% of previously treated eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Faricimab for DME yields clinical outcomes similar to those known from previous anti-VEGF treatments but with extended treatment intervals, thus lowering the burden of therapy for patients. Long-term real-world studies are warranted.

Diabetic retinopathy incidence, predictors and its association with longitudinal fasting blood sugar level changes among diabetes mellitus patients in Ethiopia: joint model

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global public health problem characterized by an elevated blood glucose level. Monitoring blood sugar levels is vital for effective diabetes management and preventing complications. However, the association between longitudinal biomarkers and the incidence of diabetic complications is often overlooked. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the incidence of diabetic retinopathy, predictors, and association with longitudinal fasting blood sugar level changes among diabetes mellitus patients in Ethiopia.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective follow-up study was carried out in referral hospitals in Amhara region, Ethiopia. A random sample of 462 newly diagnosed DM patients was selected. The proportional hazard assumption was checked for the survival sub-model, and for the longitudinal sub-model, the normality assumption was checked. Then the joint modeling with time-dependent lagged parameterizations was fitted. Model assumptions and comparisons were checked. Finally, the hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI) with a corresponding P-value<0.05 was used to identify predictors.

Results

In this study, Overall, 54 patients developed DR, and the incidence rate was 2.33 per 1000 person-months over the follow-up period, with a 95% CI of [1.78, 3.05]. Rural residence (AHR = 2.21, 95% CI: [1.21, 4.05]), hypertension co-morbidity (AHR = 3.01, 95% CI: [1.85, 6.53]), and longer duration of DM (>5 years) (AHR = 2.28, 95% CI: [1.91, 5.15]) were important predictors for the incidence of DR. In addition, the incidence of DR was substantially correlated with the time-dependent lagged value of FBS change (AHR = 4.20, 95% CI [1.62, 10.85]).

Conclusions

In this study, the incidence of diabetic retinopathy was somewhat high when compared to prior similar studies in Ethiopia. A joint model of longitudinal fasting blood sugar level changes was significantly associated with an increased risk of DR. Besides, being rural residence, hypertension co-morbidity, and a longer duration of DM were significant predictors for the incidence of DR. Therefore, public awareness, an integrated care approach, and prioritizing glycemic control are highly recommended.

Cost-effectiveness of diabetic retinopathy screening for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients: A nationwide population-based propensity score-matched cohort study

AIMS

This study investigated the association between the frequency of screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) versus the development of DR and corresponding medical expenses among patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This longitudinal, population-based study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (2004 to 2020) as a data source. Propensity score matching (PSM) (sex, age, comorbidities and concurrent medication use) was employed in the grouping of T2DM patients according to different frequency of DR screening. Outcome measures included the proportion of patients who developed DR, who received DR treatment, and the associated medical expenses and hospitalizations.

RESULTS

The 17-year cohort included 337,046 patients. After PSM, three groups each containing 35,739 patients were assembled and analyzed. Compared to low-frequency screening, high-frequency screening was more effective in detecting patients requiring treatment; however, the net cost for treatment was significantly lower. Standard-frequency screening appears to provide the best balance in terms of DR detection, diagnosis interval, the risk of DR-related hospitalization, and DR treatment costs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world cohort study covering all levels of the healthcare system, infrequent screening was associated with delayed diagnosis and elevated treatment costs, while a fundus screening interval of 1-2 years proved optimal in terms of detection and medical expenditures.

Present and future screening programs for diabetic retinopathy: a narrative review

Diabetes is a prevalent global concern, with an estimated 12% of the global adult population affected by 2045. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a sight-threatening complication, has spurred diverse screening approaches worldwide due to advances in DR knowledge, rapid technological developments in retinal imaging and variations in healthcare resources.Many high income countries have fully implemented or are on the verge of completing a national Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP). Although there have been some improvements in DR screening in Africa, Asia, and American countries further progress is needed. In low-income countries, only one out of 29, partially implemented a DESP, while 21 out of 50 lower-middle-income countries have started the DR policy cycle. Among upper-middle-income countries, a third of 59 nations have advanced in DR agenda-setting, with five having a comprehensive national DESP and 11 in the early stages of implementation.Many nations use 2-4 fields fundus images, proven effective with 80-98% sensitivity and 86-100% specificity compared to the traditional seven-field evaluation for DR. A cell phone based screening with a hand held retinal camera presents a potential low-cost alternative as imaging device. While this method in low-resource settings may not entirely match the sensitivity and specificity of seven-field stereoscopic photography, positive outcomes are observed.Individualized DR screening intervals are the standard in many high-resource nations. In countries that lacks a national DESP and resources, screening are more sporadic, i.e. screening intervals are not evidence-based and often less frequently, which can lead to late recognition of treatment required DR.The rising global prevalence of DR poses an economic challenge to nationwide screening programs AI-algorithms have showed high sensitivity and specificity for detection of DR and could provide a promising solution for the future screening burden.In summary, this narrative review enlightens on the epidemiology of DR and the necessity for effective DR screening programs. Worldwide evolution in existing approaches for DR screening has showed promising results but has also revealed limitations. Technological advancements, such as handheld imaging devices, tele ophthalmology and artificial intelligence enhance cost-effectiveness, but also the accessibility of DR screening in countries with low resources or where distance to or a shortage of ophthalmologists exists.

A systematic review of diabetic retinopathy screening intervals

The current evidence on whether annual diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening intervals can be extended was reviewed. A systematic review protocol was followed (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022359590). Original longitudinal articles that specifically assessed DR screening intervals were in English and collected data after 2000 were included. Two reviewers independently conducted the search and reviewed the articles for quality and relevant information. The heterogeneity of the data meant that a meta-analysis was not appropriate. Twelve publications were included. Studies were of good quality and many used data from DR screening programs. Studies fit into three categories; those that assessed specific DR screening intervals, those that determined optimal DR screening intervals and those that developed/assessed DR screening risk equations. For those with type 2 diabetes, extending screening intervals to 3- to 4-yearly in those with no baseline DR appeared safe. DR risk equations considered clinical factors and allocated those at lower risk of DR progression screening intervals of up to five years. Those with baseline DR or type 1 diabetes appeared to have a higher risk of progression to STDR and needed more frequent screening. DR screening intervals can be extended to 3-5 yearly in certain circumstances. These include patients with type 2 diabetes and no current DR, and those who have optimal management of other risk factors such as glucose and blood pressure.

Highly-Expressed MiR-221-3p Distinctly Increases the Incidence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). MiR-221-3p is implicated in microvascular dysfunction in DR, and we explored their relationship.

Methods

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were allocated to the non-DR (NDR)/nonproliferative DR (NPDR)/proliferative DR (PDR) groups, with their clinical baseline and pathological data collected. The miR-221-3p and VEGF levels were determined by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and ELISA, respectively. Peripheral blood endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) and endothelial cell (EC) ratios were ascertained by flow cytometry. The correlations between miR-221-3p levels and VEGF/EPCs/ECs, the predictive value of serum miR-221-3p levels in DR, and the independent risk factors for DR occurrence in T2DM were analyzed by Pearson's correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and multifactorial logistic regression analysis.

Results

Serum miR-221-3p was highly expressed in DR. Clinical severity of DR was positively correlated with miR-221-3p levels. Endothelial function was impaired in DR. Serum miR-221-3p levels in DR were favorably correlated with VEGF and ECs and negatively associated with EPCs. The area under the curve of serum miR-221-3p in evaluating DR occurrence in patients with T2DM was 0.8178 (1.235 cutoff value, 69.62% sensitivity, and 82.35% specificity). High expression of miR-221-3p increased DR incidence in patients with T2DM. Diabetes course, VEGF, EPCs, ECs, and miR-221-3p levels were independent risk factors for DR development in patients with T2DM.

Conclusions

Serum miR-221-3p levels in patients with DR were positively correlated with VEGF and ECs and negatively linked with EPCs. Highly expressed miR-221-3p distinctly increased DR incidence in patients with T2DM and was an independent risk factor for DR development in patients with T2DM.

Translational Relevance

This study assessed serum miR-221-3p level and endothelial function indicators (VEGF, EPCs, and ECs) in patients with DR and analyzed the correlation between each indicator. We found that high serum miR-221-3p expression prominently increased the incidence of DR in patients with T2DM and was an independent risk factor for the development of DR in patients with T2DM. This study provided a scientific basis for further clarification of the pathogenesis of DR, and also provided new ideas for clinical prediction and management of DR.