Investigation of the Importance of Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 4 (Mrp4/Abcc4) in the Active Efflux of Anionic Drugs Across the Blood-Brain Barrier

Blood-brain barrier transporters: a translational consideration for CNS delivery of neurotherapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Successful neuropharmacology requires optimization of CNS drug delivery and, by extension, free drug concentrations at brain molecular targets. Detailed assessment of blood-brain barrier (BBB) physiological characteristics is necessary to achieve this goal. The 'next frontier' in CNS drug delivery is targeting BBB uptake transporters, an approach that requires evaluation of brain endothelial cell transport processes so that effective drug accumulation and improved therapeutic efficacy can occur.

AREAS COVERED

BBB permeability of drugs is governed by tight junction protein complexes (i.e., physical barrier) and transporters/enzymes (i.e., biochemical barrier). For most therapeutics, a component of blood-to-brain transport involves passive transcellular diffusion. Small molecule drugs that do not possess acceptable physicochemical characteristics for passive permeability may utilize putative membrane transporters for CNS uptake. While both uptake and efflux transport mechanisms are expressed at the brain microvascular endothelium, uptake transporters can be targeted for optimization of brain drug delivery and improved treatment of neurological disease states.

EXPERT OPINION

Uptake transporters represent a unique opportunity to optimize brain drug delivery by leveraging the endogenous biology of the BBB. A rigorous understanding of these transporters is required to improve translation from the bench to clinical trials and stimulate the development of new treatment paradigms for neurological diseases.

Transport Mechanisms at the Blood-Brain Barrier and in Cellular Compartments of the Neurovascular Unit: Focus on CNS Delivery of Small Molecule Drugs

Ischemic stroke is a primary origin of morbidity and mortality in the United States and around the world. Indeed, several research projects have attempted to discover new drugs or repurpose existing therapeutics to advance stroke pharmacotherapy. Many of these preclinical stroke studies have reported positive results for neuroprotective agents; however, only one compound (3K3A-activated protein C (3K3A-APC)) has advanced to Phase III clinical trial evaluation. One reason for these many failures is the lack of consideration of transport mechanisms at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and neurovascular unit (NVU). These endogenous transport processes function as a "gateway" that is a primary determinant of efficacious brain concentrations for centrally acting drugs. Despite the knowledge that some neuroprotective agents (i.e., statins and memantine) are substrates for these endogenous BBB transporters, preclinical stroke studies have largely ignored the role of transporters in CNS drug disposition. Here, we review the current knowledge on specific BBB transporters that either limit drug uptake into the brain (i.e., ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters) or can be targeted for optimized drug delivery (i.e., solute carrier (SLC) transporters). Additionally, we highlight the current knowledge on transporter expression in astrocytes, microglia, pericytes, and neurons with an emphasis on transport mechanisms in these cell types that can influence drug distribution within the brain.

The Extension of the LeiCNS-PK3.0 Model in Combination with the "Handshake" Approach to Understand Brain Tumor Pathophysiology

Micrometastatic brain tumor cells, which cause recurrence of malignant brain tumors, are often protected by the intact blood–brain barrier (BBB). Therefore, it is essential to deliver effective drugs across not only the disrupted blood-tumor barrier (BTB) but also the intact BBB to effectively treat malignant brain tumors. Our aim is to predict pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in brain tumor regions with the disrupted BTB and the intact BBB to support the successful drug development for malignant brain tumors. LeiCNS-PK3.0, a comprehensive central nervous system (CNS) physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, was extended to incorporate brain tumor compartments. Most pathophysiological parameters of brain tumors were obtained from literature and two missing parameters of the BTB, paracellular pore size and expression level of active transporters, were estimated by fitting existing data, like a “handshake”. Simultaneous predictions were made for PK profiles in extracellular fluids (ECF) of brain tumors and normal-appearing brain and validated on existing data for six small molecule anticancer drugs. The LeiCNS-tumor model predicted ECF PK profiles in brain tumor as well as normal-appearing brain in rat brain tumor models and high-grade glioma patients within twofold error for most data points, in combination with estimated paracellular pore size of the BTB and active efflux clearance at the BTB. Our model demonstrated a potential to predict PK profiles of small molecule drugs in brain tumors, for which quantitative information on pathophysiological alterations is available, and contribute to the efficient and successful drug development for malignant brain tumors.

The Role of Uptake and Efflux Transporters in the Disposition of Glucuronide and Sulfate Conjugates

Glucuronidation and sulfation are the most typical phase II metabolic reactions of drugs. The resulting glucuronide and sulfate conjugates are generally considered inactive and safe. They may, however, be the most prominent drug-related material in the circulation and excreta of humans. The glucuronide and sulfate metabolites of drugs typically have limited cell membrane permeability and subsequently, their distribution and excretion from the human body requires transport proteins. Uptake transporters, such as organic anion transporters (OATs and OATPs), mediate the uptake of conjugates into the liver and kidney, while efflux transporters, such as multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), mediate expulsion of conjugates into bile, urine and the intestinal lumen. Understanding the active transport of conjugated drug metabolites is important for predicting the fate of a drug in the body and its safety and efficacy. The aim of this review is to compile the understanding of transporter-mediated disposition of phase II conjugates. We review the literature on hepatic, intestinal and renal uptake transporters participating in the transport of glucuronide and sulfate metabolites of drugs, other xenobiotics and endobiotics. In addition, we provide an update on the involvement of efflux transporters in the disposition of glucuronide and sulfate metabolites. Finally, we discuss the interplay between uptake and efflux transport in the intestine, liver and kidneys as well as the role of transporters in glucuronide and sulfate conjugate toxicity, drug interactions, pharmacogenetics and species differences.

Quantitative prediction of pharmacokinetic properties of drugs in humans: Recent advance in in vitro models to predict the impact of efflux transporters in the small intestine and blood-brain barrier

Efflux transport systems are essential to suppress the absorption of xenobiotics from the intestinal lumen and protect the critical tissues at the blood-tissue barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier. The function of drug efflux transport is dominated by various transporters. Accumulated clinical evidences have revealed that genetic variations of the transporters, together with coadministered drugs, affect the expression and/or function of transporters and subsequently the pharmacokinetics of substrate drugs. Thus, in the preclinical stage of drug development, quantitative prediction of the impact of efflux transporters as well as that of uptake transporters and metabolic enzymes on the pharmacokinetics of drugs in humans has been performed using various in vitro experimental tools. Various kinds of human-derived cell systems can be applied to the precise prediction of drug transport in humans. Mathematical modeling consisting of each intrinsic metabolic or transport process enables us to understand the disposition of drugs both at the organ level and at the level of the whole body by integrating a variety of experimental results into model parameters. This review focuses on the role of efflux transporters in the intestinal absorption and brain distribution of drugs, in addition to recent advances in predictive tools and methodologies.

Interactions of anti-COVID-19 drug candidates with hepatic transporters may cause liver toxicity and affect pharmacokinetics

Transporters in the human liver play a major role in the clearance of endo- and xenobiotics. Apical (canalicular) transporters extrude compounds to the bile, while basolateral hepatocyte transporters promote the uptake of, or expel, various compounds from/into the venous blood stream. In the present work we have examined the in vitro interactions of some key repurposed drugs advocated to treat COVID-19 (lopinavir, ritonavir, ivermectin, remdesivir and favipiravir), with the key drug transporters of hepatocytes. These transporters included ABCB11/BSEP, ABCC2/MRP2, and SLC47A1/MATE1 in the canalicular membrane, as well as ABCC3/MRP3, ABCC4/MRP4, SLC22A1/OCT1, SLCO1B1/OATP1B1, SLCO1B3/OATP1B3, and SLC10A1/NTCP, residing in the basolateral membrane. Lopinavir and ritonavir in low micromolar concentrations inhibited BSEP and MATE1 exporters, as well as OATP1B1/1B3 uptake transporters. Ritonavir had a similar inhibitory pattern, also inhibiting OCT1. Remdesivir strongly inhibited MRP4, OATP1B1/1B3, MATE1 and OCT1. Favipiravir had no significant effect on any of these transporters. Since both general drug metabolism and drug-induced liver toxicity are strongly dependent on the functioning of these transporters, the various interactions reported here may have important clinical relevance in the drug treatment of this viral disease and the existing co-morbidities.

Influence of ABC transporters on the excretion of ciprofloxacin assessed with PET imaging in mice

Ciprofloxacin is a commonly prescribed fluoroquinolone antibiotic which is cleared by active tubular secretion and intestinal excretion. Ciprofloxacin is a known substrate of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4). In this work, we used positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to investigate the influence of BCRP, MRP4, MRP2 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on the excretion of [¹⁸F]ciprofloxacin in mice. Dynamic 90-min PET scans were performed after intravenous injection of [¹⁸F]ciprofloxacin in wild-type mice without and with pre-treatment with the broad-spectrum MRP inhibitor MK571. Moreover, [¹⁸F]ciprofloxacin PET scans were performed in Abcc4^(-/-), Abcc2^(-/-), Abcc4^(-/-)Abcg2^(-/-) and Abcb1a/b^(-/-)Abcg2^(-/-) mice. In addition to non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, a novel three-compartment PK model was developed for a detailed assessment of the renal disposition of [¹⁸F]ciprofloxacin. In MK571 pre-treated mice, a significant increase in the blood exposure to [¹⁸F]ciprofloxacin was observed along with a significant reduction in the renal and intestinal clearances. PK modelling revealed a significant reduction in renal radioactivity uptake (CL₁) and in the rate constants for transfer of radioactivity from the corticomedullary renal region into blood (k₂) and urine (k₃), respectively, after MK571 administration. No changes in the renal clearance or in the estimated kidney PK model parameters were observed in any of the studied knockout models, while a significant reduction in the intestinal clearance was observed in Abcc2^(-/-) and Abcc4^(-/-)Abcg2^(-/-) mice. Our data failed to reveal a role of any of the studied ABC transporters in the tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin. This may indicate that ciprofloxacin is handled in the kidneys by more than one transporter family, most likely with a great degree of mutual functional redundancy. Our study highlights the potential of PET imaging for an assessment of transporter-mediated renal excretion of radiolabelled drugs.

Impact of variants in ATP-binding cassette transporters on breast cancer treatment

There has been substantial interest in the impact of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter variability on breast cancer drug resistance. Here, we provide a systematic review of ABC variants in breast cancer therapy. Notably, most studies used small heterogeneous cohorts and their identified associations lack statistical stringency, replication and mechanistic support. We conclude that commonly studied ABC polymorphisms are not suitable to accurately predict therapy response or toxicity in breast cancer patients and cannot guide treatment decisions. However, recent research shows that ABC transporters harbor a plethora of rare variants with individually small effect sizes, and we argue that a shift in strategy from target variant interrogation to comprehensive profiling might hold promise to drastically improve the predictive power of outcome models.

Evaluation of Hepatic Uptake of OATP1B Substrates by Short Term-Cultured Plated Human Hepatocytes: Comparison With Isolated Suspended Hepatocytes

Hepatic uptake clearance has been measured in suspended human hepatocytes (SHH). Plated human hepatocytes (PHH) after short-term culturing are increasingly employed to study hepatic transport driven mainly by its higher throughput. To know pros/cons of both systems, the hepatic uptake clearances of several organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B substrates were compared between PHH and SHH by determining the initial uptake velocities or through dynamic model-based analyses. For cerivastatin, pitavastatin and rosuvastatin, initial uptake clearances (PS_inf) obtained using PHH were comparable to those using SHH, while cell-to-medium concentration (C/M) ratios were 2.7- to 5.4-fold higher. For pravastatin and dehydropravastatin, hydrophilic compounds with low uptake/cellular binding, their PS_inf and C/M ratio in PHH were 1.8- to 3.2-fold lower than those in SHH. These hydrophilic substrates are more prone to wash-off during the uptake study using PHH, which may explain the apparently lower uptake than SHH. The C/M ratios obtained using PHH were stable over an extended time, making PHH suitable to estimate the C/M ratios and hepatocyte-to-medium unbound concentration ratios (K_p,uu). In conclusion, PHH is useful in evaluating hepatic uptake/efflux clearances and K_p,uu of OATP1B substrates in a high-throughput manner, however, a caution is warranted for hydrophilic drugs with low uptake/cellular binding.

Developmental patterns in human blood-brain barrier and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier ABC drug transporter expression

When drugs exert their effects in the brain, linear extrapolation of doses from adults could be harmful for children as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-CSF barrier (BCSFB) function is still immature. More specifically, age-related variation in membrane transporters may impact brain disposition. As human data on brain transporter expression is scarce, age dependent [gestational age (GA), postnatal age (PNA), and postmenstrual age (PMA)] variation in immunohistochemical localization and staining intensity of the ABC transporters P-glycoprotein (Pgp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and multidrug resistance-associated proteins 1, 2, 4, and 5 (MRP1/2/4/5) was investigated. Post mortem brain cortical and ventricular tissue was derived from 23 fetuses (GA range 12.9-39 weeks), 17 neonates (GA range 24.6-41.3 weeks, PNA range 0.004-3.5 weeks), 8 children (PNA range 0.1-3 years), and 4 adults who died from a wide variety of underlying conditions. In brain cortical BBB, immunostaining increased with age for Pgp and BCRP, while in contrast, MRP1 and MRP2 staining intensity appeared higher in fetuses, neonates, and children, as compared to adults. BCSFB was positively stained for Pgp, MRP1, and MRP2 and appeared stable across age, while BCRP was not detected. MRP4 and MRP5 were not detected in BBB or BCSFB. In conclusion, human BBB and BCSFB ABC membrane transporters show brain location and transporter-specific maturation.

Mass spectrometric investigations into the brain delivery of abacavir, stavudine and didanosine in a rodent model

HIV replication in the brain is unopposed due to reduced antiretroviral drug penetration into the central nervous system (CNS). Prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) has increased severely in patients living with HIV despite current treatments. The aims of this study were to evaluate the brain bio-distribution of alternative nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, abacavir, stavudine and didanosine in the CNS and to determine their localization patterns in the brain.Sprague-Dawley rats received 50 mg kg^-1 single i.p dose of each drug. Mass spectrometric techniques were then used to investigate the pharmacokinetics and localization patterns of these drugs in the brain using LC-MS/MS and mass spectrometric imaging (MSI), respectively.Abacavir, stavudine and didanosine reached the Brain C_max with concentration of 831.2, 1300 and 43.37 ngmL^-1, respectively. Based on MSI analysis Abacavir and Stavudine were located in brain regions that are strongly implicated in the progression of HAND.Abacavir and Stavudine penetrated into CNS, reaching a C_max that was above the IC₅₀ for HIV (457.6 and 112.0 ngmL^-1, respectively), however, it was noted ddI showed poor entry within the brain, therefore, it is recommended that this drug cannot be considered for treating CNS-HIV.

Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 in pharmacology: Overview of its contribution to pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics

MRP4 is an ABC membrane transporter involved in clinical outcomes as it is located in many tissues that manages the transport and the elimination of many drugs. This review explores the implication of MRP4 in clinical pharmacology and the importance of its genetic variability. Although there is no specific recommendation regarding the study of MRP4 in drug development, it should be considered when drugs are eliminated by the kidney or liver or when drug-drug interactions are expected.

ABCG2/BCRP: variants, transporter interaction profile of substrates and inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

ABCG2 has a broad substrate specificity and is one of the most important efflux proteins modulating pharmacokinetics of drugs, nutrients and toxicokinetics of toxicants. ABCG2 is an important player in transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (tDDI). Areas covered: The aims of the review are i) to cover transporter interaction profile of substrates and inhibitors that can be utilized to test interaction of drug candidates with ABCG2, ii) to highlight main characteristics of in vitro testing and iii) to describe the structural basis of the broad substrate specificity of the protein. Preclinical data utilizing Abcg2/Bcrp1 knockouts and clinical studies showing effect of ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphism on pharmacokinetics of drugs have provided evidence for a broad array of drug substrates and support drug - ABCG2 interaction testing. A consensus on using rosuvastatin and sulfasalazine as intestinal substrates for clinical studies is in the formation. Other substrates relevant to the therapeutic area can be considered. Monolayer efflux assays and vesicular transport assays have been extensively utilized in vitro. Expert opinion: Clinical substrates display complex pharmacokinetics due to broad interaction profiles with multiple transporters and metabolic enzymes. Substrate-dependent inhibition has been observed for several inhibitors. Harmonization of in vitro and in vivo testing makes sense. However, rosuvastatin and sulfasalazine are not efficiently transported in either MDCKII or LLC-PK1-based monolayers. Caco-2 monolayer assays and vesicular transport assays are potential alternatives.

Contributions of Drug Transporters to Blood-Brain Barriers

Blood-brain interfaces comprise the cerebral microvessel endothelium forming the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the epithelium of the choroid plexuses forming the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB). Their main functions are to impede free diffusion between brain fluids and blood; to provide transport processes for essential nutrients, ions, and metabolic waste products; and to regulate the homeostasis of central nervous system (CNS), all of which are attributed to absent fenestrations, high expression of tight junction proteins at cell-cell contacts, and expression of multiple transporters, receptors, and enzymes. Existence of BBB is an important reason that systemic drug administration is not suitable for the treatment of CNS diseases. Some diseases, such epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and diabetes, alter BBB function via affecting tight junction proteins or altering expression and function of these transporters. This chapter will illustrate function of BBB, expression of transporters, as well as their alterations under disease status.

Total hepatocellular disposition profiling of rosuvastatin and pitavastatin in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes

This study describes the total disposition profiling of rosuvastatin (RSV) and pitavastatin (PTV) using a single systematic procedure called D-PREX (Disposition Profile Exploration) in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes (SCHH). The biliary excretion fractions of both statins were clearly observed, which were significantly decreased dependent on the concentration of Ko143, an inhibitor for breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Ko143 also decreased the basolateral efflux fraction of RSV, whereas that of PTV was not significantly affected. To understand these phenomena, effects of Ko143 on biliary excretion (BCRP and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2) and basolateral efflux (MRP3 and MRP4) transporters were examined using transporter-expressing membrane vesicles. BCRP, MRP3 and MRP4-mediated transport of RSV was observed, and Ko143 inhibited these transporters except MRP3. BCRP and MRP4 also mediated the transport of PTV, but the Ko143-mediated inhibition was only clear for BCRP. These results might explain the Ko143-mediated complete and partial inhibition of the biliary excretion and the basolateral efflux of RSV, respectively, in SCHH. In conclusion, D-PREX with sequential sampling of supernatants prior to cell lysis enables the evaluation of total drug disposition profiles resulting from complex interplays of intracellular pathways, which would provide high-throughput evaluation of drug disposition during drug discovery.

Prediction of brain:blood unbound concentration ratios in CNS drug discovery employing in silico and in vitro model systems

Recent years have seen a paradigm shift away from optimizing the brain:blood concentration ratio toward the more relevant brain:blood unbound concentration ratio (K_p,uu,br) in CNS drug discovery. Here, we review the recent developments in the in silico and in vitro model systems to predict the K_p,uu,br of discovery compounds with special emphasis on the in-vitro-in-vivo correlation. We also discuss clinical 'translation' of rodent K_p,uu,br and highlight the future directions for improvement in brain penetration prediction. Important in this regard are in silico K_p,uu,br models built on larger datasets of high quality, calibration and deeper understanding of experimental in vitro transporter systems, and better understanding of blood-brain barrier transporters and their in vivo relevance aside from P-gp and BCRP.

Cell Migration Related to MDR-Another Impediment to Effective Chemotherapy?

Multidrug resistance, mediated by members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) proteins superfamily, has become one of the biggest obstacles in conquering tumour progression. If the chemotherapy outcome is considered successful, when the primary tumour volume is decreased or completely abolished, modulation of ABC proteins activity is one of the best methods to overcome drug resistance. However, if a positive outcome is represented by no metastasis or, at least, elongation of remission-free time, then the positive effect of ABC proteins inhibition should be compared with the several side effects it causes, which may inflict cancer progression and decrease overall patient health. Clinical trials conducted thus far have shown that the tested ABC modulators add limited or no benefits to cancer patients, as some of them are merely toxic and others induce unwanted drug–drug interactions. Moreover, the inhibition of certain ABC members has been recently indicated as potentially responsible for increased fibroblasts migration. A better understanding of the complex role of ABC proteins in relation to cancer progression may offer novel strategies in cancer therapy.