Readmission after surgery

Glaucoma Surgery SOS: Emergency Department Utilization Greater Among Younger and First-Time Surgical Glaucoma Patients

PURPOSE

To describe the frequency, findings, and interventions of patients' emergency department visits after all types of glaucoma surgery DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: All surgical glaucoma patients between 2013 and 2021 METHODS: This single institution study collected demographics, surgery type, and surgical parameters for each patient. Subsequently, for those visiting the emergency department within 50 days of surgery, data was collected on reason for visit, findings, and ophthalmic intervention. Logistic regression models were used to determine the odds of ED visits based on multiple risk factors.

MAIN OUTCOME

Postoperative presentation to ED RESULTS: Among 9155 surgeries in 5505 patients, 5.7% had ED visits within 50 days, with 46.3% having ocular complaints. Patients with ocular diagnoses presented earlier than those without (p < 0.001). Patients who presented to the ED with an ocular diagnosis were found to be significantly younger than those who did not present (62.2 ± 18.6 vs 65.4 ± 18.0 years old, p < 0.028). Furthermore, white patients were more likely than black patients to present with an ocular diagnosis compared to a non-ocular diagnosis (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.67-4.18, p<0.001). Patients undergoing their first glaucoma surgery had a much higher chance of presenting to the ED compared to patients who had undergone more than one surgery (OR: 3.75, 95%CI 2.74 - 5.14, p < 0.001). Those who underwent traditional surgeries were more likely than patients with trabecular meshwork bypass stent (TMBS) to present to the ED with an ocular diagnosis (OR: 3.02, 95% CI 1.29 - 7.08, p = 0.011). Filtering surgeries and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) revisions exhibited more vision-threatening conditions than glaucoma drainage devices (p = 0.037 and p = 0.010 respectively). Ophthalmology consultation was sought for 88.0% of ocular diagnoses. Most received medical therapy (71.0%), primarily IOP-lowering drops.

CONCLUSION

ED visits after glaucoma surgery are infrequent, yet more often seen in younger patients or those undergoing their first glaucoma surgery. TMBS, but not trabecular meshwork excision and/or Schlemm's canal dilation (TME/SCD), were less likely to present to the ED than traditional surgeries. Filtering surgeries and tube revisions presented more often with visual threatening conditions.

Impact of early primary care physician follow-up on hospital readmission following gastrointestinal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

We sought to examine the association between primary care physician (PCP) follow-up on readmission following gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for GI cancer were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariable regression was performed to examine the association between early PCP follow-up and hospital readmission.

RESULTS

Among 60 957 patients who underwent GI cancer surgery, 19 661 (32.7%) visited a PCP within 30-days after discharge. Of note, patients who visited PCP were less likely to be readmitted within 90 days (PCP visit: 17.4% vs. no PCP visit: 28.2%; p < 0.001). Median postsurgical expenditures were lower among patients who visited a PCP (PCP visit: $4116 [IQR: $670-$13 860] vs. no PCP visit: $6700 [IQR: $870-$21 301]; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, PCP follow-up was associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.50-0.55) (both p < 0.001). Moreover, patients who followed up with a PCP had lower risk of death at 90-days (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.51; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PCP follow-up was associated with a reduced risk of readmission and mortality following GI cancer surgery. Care coordination across in-hospital and community-based health platforms is critical to achieve optimal outcomes for patients.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery recommendations that most impact patient care: A multi-institutional, multidiscipline analysis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Compliance to the entire Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol improves surgical recovery, where higher compliance improves outcomes. However, specific items may predict improved recovery more than others. Studies have evaluated the impact of individual ERAS recommendations though they are either single center, not based in the United States (US), or focus on colorectal procedures only. This study aims to evaluate compliance on surgical outcomes in two large healthcare systems in the US across four surgery types.

METHODS

Compliance to individual recommendations, limited patient characteristics, and outcomes data from two US ERAS Centers of Excellence (CoE) for hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, radical cystectomy, and head and neck (HN) resections were evaluated. Outcomes included 30-day Clavien-Dindo≥3, readmission, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariate regressions were performed as appropriate for the data for each surgery type. Clavien≥3 was included to control for severity of complications, and the CoE variable was force-retained.

RESULTS

A total of 2886 records were analyzed. Controlling for CoE and severity of patient complications, early removal of Foley catheter was associated with significant reductions in LOS in the liver, pancreas, and HN procedures and reductions in complications in the liver and pancreas. Limited use of NG tubes reduced LOS in the pancreas and complications in urology. Oral carbohydrate loading reduced LOS in the pancreas, and patient education reduced mortality in HN patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the effect of ERAS compliance on outcomes, by surgery type, in a multi-institutional US setting. Future studies should validate these findings and consider surgery-specific predictive models comprised of individual ERAS recommendations in real-world applications.

Effect of operative time in outcomes following surgical fixation of hip fractures: a multivariable regression analysis of 35,710 patients

BACKGROUND

Prolonged operative time is a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of hip fractures. However, the quantitative nature of such association, including graduated risk levels, has yet to be described. This study outlines the graduated associations between operative time and (1) healthcare utilisation, and (2) 30-day complications after ORIF of hip fractures.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried (January 2016-December 2019) for all patients who underwent ORIF of hip fractures (n = 35,710). Demographics, operative time, fracture type, and comorbidities were recorded. Outcomes included healthcare utilisation (e.g., prolonged length of stay [LOS>2 days], discharge disposition, 30-day readmission, and reoperation), inability to weight-bear (ITWB) on postoperative day-1 (POD-1), and any 30-day complication. Adjusted multivariate regression models evaluated associations between operative time and measured outcomes.

RESULTS

Operative time <40 minutes was associated with lower odds of prolonged LOS (odds ratio [OR] 0.77), non-home discharge (OR 0.85), 30-day readmission (OR 0.85), and reoperation (OR 0.72). Operative time ⩾80 minutes was associated with higher odds of ITWB on POD-1 (OR 1.17). Operative time ⩾200 minutes was associated with higher odds of deep infection (OR 7.5) and wound complications (OR 3.2). The odds of blood transfusions were higher in cases ⩾60 minutes (OR1.3) and 5-fold in cases ⩾200 minutes (OR 5.4). The odds of venous thromboembolic complications were highest in the ⩾200-minute operative time category (OR 2.5). Operative time was not associated with mechanical ventilation, pneumonia, delirium, sepsis, urinary tract infection, or 30-day mortality.

DISCUSSION

Increasing operative time is associated with a progressive increase in the odds of adverse outcomes following hip fracture ORIF. While a direct cause-effect relationship cannot be established, an operative time of <60 minutes could be protective. Perioperative interventions that shorten operative time without compromising fracture reduction or fixation should be considered.

Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Unplanned readmissions (URs) after colorectal surgery (CRS) are common, expensive, and result from failure to progress in postoperative recovery. These are considered preventable, although the true extent is yet to be defined. In addition, their successful prediction remains elusive due to significant heterogeneity in this field of research. This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed to identify the clinically relevant predictors of UR after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using indexed sources (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Embase) to search for published studies in English between 1996 and 2022. The search strategy returned 625 studies for screening of which, 150 were duplicates, and 305 were excluded for irrelevance. An additional 150 studies were excluded based on methodology and definition criteria. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and for the meta-analysis. Independent meta-extraction was conducted by multiple reviewers (JD & SR) in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was defined as UR within 30 days of index discharge after colorectal surgery. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.

RESULTS

The reported 30-day UR rate ranged from 6% to 22.8%. Increased comorbidity was the strongest preoperative risk factor for UR (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.51). Stoma formation was the strongest operative risk factor (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38-1.72). The occurrence of postoperative complications was the strongest postoperative and overall risk factor for UR (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.21-7.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased comorbidity, stoma formation, and postoperative complications are clinically relevant predictors of UR after CRS. These risk factors are readily identifiable before discharge and serve as clinically relevant targets for readmission risk-reducing strategies. Successful readmission prediction may facilitate the efficient allocation of healthcare resources.

Readmission prediction after colorectal cancer surgery: A derivation and validation study

BACKGROUND

Unplanned readmissions after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery are common, expensive, and result from failure to progress in postoperative recovery. The context of their preventability and extent of predictability remains undefined. This study aimed to define the 30-day unplanned readmission (UR) rate after CRC surgery, identify risk factors, and develop a prediction model with external validation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent CRC surgery between 2012 and 2017 at Christchurch Hospital were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome was UR within 30 days after index discharge. Statistically significant risk factors were identified and incorporated into a predictive model. The model was then externally evaluated on a prospectively recruited dataset from 2018 to 2019.

RESULTS

Of the 701 patients identified, 15.1% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Stoma formation (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.59-3.81), any postoperative complications (PoCs) (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.48-3.52), high-grade PoCs (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.18-5.11), and rectal cancer (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.48-3.52) were statistically significant risk factors for UR. A clinical prediction model comprised of rectal cancer and high-grade PoCs predicted UR with an AUC of 0.64 and 0.62 on internal and external validation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

URs after CRC surgery are predictable and occur within 2 weeks of discharge. They are driven by PoCs, most of which are of low severity and develop after discharge. Atleast 16% of readmissions are preventable by management in an outpatient setting with appropriate surgical expertise. Targeted outpatient follow-up within two weeks of discharge is therefore the most effective transitional-care strategy for prevention.

Operative Time Less Than 1.5 Hours, Male Sex, Dependent Functional Status, Presence of Dyspnea, and Reoperations Within 30 days Are Independent Risk Factors for Readmission After ACLR

Purpose

The purposes of this study are to use a large, patient-centered database to describe the 30-day readmission rate and to identify predictive risk factors for readmission after elective isolated ACLR.

Methods

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database was retrospectively queried for isolated ACLR procedures between 2011 and 2017. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify isolated ACLR patients. Those undergoing additional procedures such as meniscectomy or multi-ligamentous reconstruction were excluded. Readmissions were analyzed against demographic variables with bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to find independent risk factors for 30-day readmissions after ACLR.

Results

A total of 11,060 patients (37.2% female) were included with an average age of 32.2 ± 10.6 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.9 ± 6.5 kg/m² (29.2% were >30). The overall readmission rate was 0.59%. The most reported reason for readmission was infection 0.22 (24 out of 11,060). The following variables were associated with significantly higher readmission rates: male sex (P = .001), history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P = .025), cardiac comorbidity (P = .034), operative time >1.5 hours (P <.001), partially dependent functional health status (P = .002), high preoperative creatinine (P = .009), normal preoperative albumin (P = .020), hypertension (P = .034), and reoperations (P < .001). Operative time >1.5 hours, male sex, dependent functional status, the presence of dyspnea, and undergoing a reoperation were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day readmissions (P < .05 for all).

Conclusions

Isolated ACLR is associated with low 30-day readmission rates. Operative time >1.5 hours, male sex, dependent functional status, the presence of dyspnea, and 30-day reoperations are independent risk factors for readmission that should be considered in patient selection and addressed with preoperative counseling.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Patient functional recovery after a 23-h surgery - a prospective, follow-up study

PURPOSE

We evaluated patients' functional outcomes 2 weeks after a 23-h surgery model in a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised data on 993 consecutive adult patients who underwent a 23-h surgery. Patients were interviewed before surgery and at 14 days after surgery by telephone with a multidimensional structural survey including closed- and open-ended questions. Regarding functional outcomes, the patients were asked to assess their general wellbeing, energy levels and activities of daily living on a 5-point numeric rating scale (1 = poor to 5 = excellent). Data on patient characteristics, medical history, alcohol use, smoking status and pre-, peri- and postoperative pain and satisfaction with the care received were collected and analysed to determine whether these factors contributed to their recovery. The primary outcome measure was patient functional recovery at 14 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Most patients reported moderate to excellent functional outcomes: 93.6% (95% CI, 92.1--95.1) of the patients showed a score ≥ 3 on the 5-point numeric scale. One out of four patients (23%) scored all three domains as excellent. A weak inverse correlation was noted between functional recovery and most pain in the 23-h postanaesthesia care unit as well as pain at 2 weeks after surgery. A weak positive correlation was noted between functional recovery and patient satisfaction with the instructions at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients showed ample functional recovery at 14 days after the 23-h surgery. Higher pain scores in the postanaesthesia care unit and 2 weeks after surgery predicted poor functional outcomes, and satisfaction with postoperative counselling predicted better outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04142203.

Investigating readmission rates for patients undergoing oncologic resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for primary sarcomas and tumors involving bone

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the drivers of readmission in patients undergoing Orthopaedic oncologic resection. The goal of this study was to identify factors independently associated with 90-day readmission for patients undergoing oncologic resection and subsequent prosthetic reconstruction for primary tumors involving bone.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative cohort study of patients treated from 2008 to 2019 who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction for a primary bone tumor or soft tissue tumor involving bone, as well as those who underwent a revision endoprosthetic reconstruction if the primary endoprosthetic reconstruction was performed for an oncologic resection. The primary outcome measure was unplanned 90-day readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were identified who underwent 191 surgeries were for a primary bone or soft tissue tumor. The 90-day readmission rate was 28.3%. Female gender, depression, higher tumor grade, vascular reconstruction, longer procedure duration, longer length of stay (LOS), multiple surgeries during an admission and disposition to a Skilled Nursing Facility were associated with readmission (p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, female sex, higher tumor grade and longer procedure duration were independently associated with risk of readmission (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission rates are high following endoprosthetic reconstruction for Orthopaedic oncologic resections. Further work is necessary to help minimize unplanned readmissions.

Analysis of Rates, Causes, and Risk Factors for 90-Day Readmission After Surgery for Large Hiatal Hernia: A Two-Center Study

Background: Hospital readmissions have become a more examined indicator of surgical care delivery and quality. There is scarcity of data in the literature on the rate, risk factors, and most common reasons of readmission following major hiatal hernia surgery. The primary endpoint was 90-day readmission after surgery for large hiatal hernia. Secondary endpoint was to examine which characteristics related with a higher risk of readmission. Methods: A retrospective review of two distinct institutional databases was performed for patients who had surgery for a large hiatal hernia between January 2012 and December 2019. Demographic, perioperative, and outpatient data were collected from the medical record. Results: A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria, most of them suffering from a type III hernia (66.2%). Mean operative time was 146 (±56.5) minutes and median length of stay (LOS) was 6 days (interquartile range = 3). The overall morbidity was 21.1% and the in-hospital mortality was 1.4%. The 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 7% and 8.5%, respectively. The mean time to readmission was 14.3 (±15.6) days. The reasons for 90-day hospital readmission were dysphagia (50%), pneumonia (16.7%), congestive heart failure (16.7%), and bowel obstruction (16.7%). Grade of esophagitis ≥2, presence of Barrett's esophagus, and LOS longer than 8 days were significant risk factors for unplanned readmission within 90 days. Conclusion: We observed that about 6 out of 71 patients who had surgery readmitted within 90 days (8.5%). Readmissions were most often linked to esophagitis ≥2, presence of Barrett's esophagus, and LOS longer than 8 days. These findings point to the necessity for focused treatments before, during, and after hospitalization to decrease morbidity and extra costs in this high-risk population.

Why Do Patients Undergoing Extremity Prosthetic Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease Get Readmitted?

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic oncology patients are particularly susceptible to increased readmission rates and poor surgical outcomes, yet little is known about readmission rates. The goal of this study is to identify factors independently associated with 90-day readmission for patients undergoing oncologic resection and subsequent prosthetic reconstruction for metastatic disease of the hip and knee.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative cohort study of all patients treated from 2013 to 2019 at a single tertiary care referral institution who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction by an orthopedic oncologist for metastatic disease of the extremities. The primary outcome measure was unplanned 90-day readmission.

RESULTS

We identified 112 patients undergoing 127 endoprosthetic reconstruction surgeries. Metastatic disease was most commonly from renal (26.8%), lung (23.6%), and breast (13.4%) cancer. The most common type of skeletal reconstruction performed was simple arthroplasty (54%). There were 43 readmissions overall (33.9%). When controlling for confounding factors, body mass index >40, insurance status, peripheral vascular disease, and longer hospital length of stay were independently associated with risk of readmission (P ≤ .05).

CONCLUSION

Readmission rates for endoprosthetic reconstructions for metastatic disease are high. Although predicting readmission remains challenging, risk stratification presents a viable option for helping minimize unplanned readmissions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Hidden Pandemic: the Cost of Postoperative Complications

Purpose of Review

Population-based increases in ageing and medical co-morbidities are expected to substantially increase the incidence of expensive postoperative complications. This threatens the sustainability of essential surgical care, with negative impacts on patients' health and wellbeing.

Recent Findings

Identification of key high-risk areas, and implementation of proven cost-effective strategies to manage both outcome and cost across the end-to-end journey of the surgical episode of care, is clearly feasible. However, good programme design and formal cost-effectiveness analysis is critical to identify, and implement, true high value change.

Summary

Both outcome and cost need to be a high priority for both fundholders and clinicians in perioperative care, with the focus for both groups on delivering high-quality care, which in itself, is the key to good cost management.

Unplanned Hospital Readmission and Visit to the Emergency Room in the First Thirty Days after Head and Neck Surgery: A Prospective, Single-center Study

Introduction  Head and neck surgery remains a complex field; the patients can suffer important functional or life-threating complications after treatment that need unplanned readmissions, increasing the cost related to the treatment.

Objective  To evaluate the incidence risk factors and causes associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission and visit to the emergency room (ER) after surgery for head and neck cancer.

Methods  Prospective, longitudinal, nonrandomized study.

Results  A total of 834 patients were included, 726 in the major surgery group and 108 in the minor surgery group. The 30-day readmission rate for all causes was of 7,9% for the patients treated by a major surgery and of 0% for the patients treated in the outpatient clinic for minor procedures, to a total readmission rate of 6,8%. The rate of visit to the emergency room for all causes in the first 30 days was of 14% for the patients treated by a major surgery and of 2,7% for the patients treated in the outpatient clinic.

Conclusion  Major surgery, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status and type of wound are conditions related to unplanned readmission or visit to the ER in the first 30 day after discharge. The most commonly associated causes are infections or wound complications. An evidence-based risk stratification of the patients can be important to improve decision-making and resource utilization. An educational strategy can provide possible ways to improve the rate of readmission and reduce the amount of money expended by healthcare systems.

Emergency Department Utilization and Readmissions Following Major Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Medicare Data

BACKGROUND

Reliable strategies for reducing postoperative readmissions remain elusive. As the emergency department (ED) is a frequent source of post-operative admissions, we investigated whether hospitals with high readmission rates also have high rates of post-discharge ED visits and high rates of readmission once an ED visit occurs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,947,621 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing 1 of 5 common procedures in 2,894 hospitals between 2008 and 2011. We stratified hospitals into quintiles based on risk-standardized, 30-day post-discharge readmission rates (RSRR) and then compared rates of post-discharge ED visits, proportion readmitted from the ED, and readmissions within 7 days of ED discharge across these quintiles.

RESULTS

RSRR varied widely across extremes of hospital quintiles (3.9% to 17.5%). Hospitals with either very low or very high RSRR had modest differences in rates of ED visits (12.4% versus 14.6%). In contrast, the proportion readmitted from the ED was nearly 3 times greater in Hospitals with very high RSRR compared with those with very low RSRR (12% versus 32.2%). These findings were consistent across all procedures. Importantly, hospitals with a low proportion readmitted from the ED did not exhibit an increased rate of readmission within 7 days of ED discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hospitals experience similar rates of ED visits following major surgery, some EDs and their affiliated surgeons and health system may deliver care preventing readmissions without an increased short-term risk of readmission following ED discharge. Reducing 30-day readmissions requires greater attention to the coordination of care delivered in the ED.

An additive score optimized by a genetic learning algorithm predicts readmission risk after glioblastoma resection

Thirty-day readmission following glioblastoma (GBM) resection is not only correlated with decreased overall survival but also increasingly tied to quality metrics and reimbursement. This study aimed to determine factors linked with 30-day readmission to develop a simple risk stratification score. From 2005 to 2016, 666 unique resections (467 patients) of primary/recurrent tissue-confirmed glioblastoma were retrospectively identified. We recorded patient demographics and medical history, tumor characteristics, post-operative complications and 30-day readmission. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression, optimized using a genetic learning algorithm, were used to determine factors associated with readmission. The multivariate model was converted to a simple additive score. The 30-day readmission rate was 20.3% in our cohort of 666 unique resections (60.7% first resection). Lower pre/post-operative KPS, recurrent resection, surgical-site infection, post-operative VTE, post-operative VPS, and discharge to a rehabilitation facility were significantly associated with an increased readmission risk (p < 0.05). MGMT methylation and chemoradiation were associated with decreased readmission risk (p < 0.05). Medical co-morbidities and past medical history, location of tumor in eloquent areas of the brain, and length of ICU/hospital stay did not predict readmission. The Glioblastoma Readmission Risk Score, developed from the multivariate model, accounts for increased BMI, decreased pre-operative KPS, current smoking, post-operative complications, MGMT methylation, and post-operative radiation. This risk score can be routinely used to stratify risk and assist in clinical decision making and outcome analyses.

Readmissions at 30 days after inguinal hernia repair: A series of 5126 patients

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation of the re-admission rate within 30 days of inguinal hernia repair represents a patient management quality indicator. The goal of our study was to evaluate the re-admission rate at 30 days after inguinal hernia repair and identify the risk factors for re-admission.

METHODS

Based on a prospective national registry, patient data were collected during two years. The number of and reasons for re-admissions were compiled.

RESULTS

A total of 5126 patients, mean age 61 years, underwent inguinal hernia repair. Ambulatory surgery was performed in 4013 (78%) patients. Failed ambulatory surgery was recorded for 100 (2%) patients. Thirty-three (0.64%) patients were re-admitted within 30 days following surgery for 34 various reasons. The re-admission rate after ambulatory surgery was 0.5%. Half of patients re-admitted presented with a severe complication that required re-intervention. In multivariable analysis, emergency hernia repair (OR 4.899 [1.309-18.327]; P=0.01) and prolonged duration of operation (OR 1.023 [1.009-1.037]; P=0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for re-admission within 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Within this prospective national cohort, the overall re-admission rate after inguinal hernia repair was 0.64%, slightly less among the patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Half of re-admitted patients required surgical re-operation. Emergency hernia repair and prolonged duration of operation were risk factors for re-admission.

Readmissions After Distal Radius Fracture Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: An Analysis of 11,124 Patients

Purpose:

Distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical procedure. This study assesses reasons and risk factors for readmission after DRF ORIF using the large sample size and follow-up of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Methods:

Adult patients who underwent DRF ORIF were identified in the 2011 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patient demographics, comorbidity status, hospital metrics, and 30-day perioperative outcomes were tabulated. Readmission, time to readmission, and reason for readmission were assessed. Reasons for readmission were categorized. Risk factors for readmission were assessed with multivariate analyses.

Results:

Of 11,124 patients who underwent DRF ORIF, 196 (1.76%) were readmitted within 30 days. Based on multivariate analysis, predictors of readmission (P < 0.05) were as follows: American Society of Anesthesiologist class > 3 (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.87), functionally dependent status (OR = 2.25), diabetes with insulin use (OR = 1.97), and staying in hospital after the index surgery (inpatient procedure, OR = 2.04). Readmissions occurred at approximately 14 days postoperatively. Of the recorded reasons for readmission after DRF ORIF, approximately one quarter were for surgical reasons, whereas over 75% of readmissions were for medical reasons unrelated to the surgery.

Conclusion:

This study found the rate of 30-day unplanned readmissions after DRF ORIF to be 1.76%. Demographic, comorbid, and perioperative factors predictive of readmission were defined. Most postoperative readmissions were for medical reasons unrelated to the surgical site and occurred at an average of approximately 2 weeks postoperatively. Multivariate analysis found that patients with increased American Society of Anesthesiologist class > 3, functional dependence, insulin-dependent diabetes, and those who underwent inpatient surgery for any reason were at a greater risk for readmission. Understanding these factors may aid in patient counseling and quality improvement initiatives, and this information should be used for risk stratification and risk adjustment of quality measures.

Weekend readmissions associated with mortality following pancreatic resection for cancer

BACKGROUND

The weekend effect is associated with an increased risk of adverse events, with complex patient populations especially susceptible to its impact. The objective of this study was to determine if outcomes for patients readmitted following pancreas resection differed on the weekend compared to weekdays.

METHODS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization State Inpatient Database for Florida was used to identify patients undergoing pancreas resection for cancer who were readmitted within 30 days of discharge following surgery. Measured outcomes (for readmission encounters) included inpatient morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Patients with weekend readmissions had an increased odds of inpatient mortality (aOR 2.7, 95% C.I.: 1.1-6.6) compared to those with weekday readmissions despite having similar index lengths of stay (15.9 vs. 15.5 days, P = .73), incidence of postoperative inpatient complications (22.4% vs. 22.3%, P = .98), reasons for readmission, and baseline comorbidity.

DISCUSSION

Weekend readmissions following pancreatic resection are associated with increased risk of mortality. This is not explained by measured patient factors or clinical characteristics of the index hospital stay. Developing strategies to overcome the weekend effect can result in improved care for patients readmitted on the weekend.

Fellow Versus Resident: Graduate Medical Education and Patient Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Surgery

INTRODUCTION

The effect of spine fellow versus orthopaedic surgery resident assistance on outcomes in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to determine differences in patient health-related outcomes based on the level of surgical trainees.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of ACDF (n = 407) were reviewed at a single high-volume institution between 2015 and 2017 and were separated into two groups based on whether they were fellow-assisted or resident-assisted. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, and health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) survey. The SF-12, visual analog scale pain score, and neck disability index were compared between the two groups. Surgery level, surgical time, preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index, estimated blood loss, equivalent morphine use, perioperative complications, and 30-day readmission were also recorded. Patient outcomes were compared using an unpaired t-test as well as multivariate linear regression, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, presurgical visual analog scale, SF-12, and neck disability index. Results were reported with the 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Spine surgery fellows and orthopaedic surgery residents participated in 228 and 179 ACDF cases, respectively. No notable demographic differences between the two groups were found. A higher proportion of three or more level ACDF surgeries assisted by fellows versus residents was found. Estimated blood loss was greater in fellow-assisted ACDF cases. Both surgery time and total time in the room were also longer in the fellow-assisted ACDF group. No 30-day readmissions were found in either groups, and only one case of acute hemorrhagic anemia was found in the fellow-assisted group. Overall, postoperative complications were higher in the resident group; however, no difference with regard to intraoperative complications between groups was found.

DISCUSSION

This study shows that patient health-related outcomes are similar in ACDF cases that were fellow-assisted versus resident-assisted. However, fellow-assisted ACDF cases were associated with more blood loss and longer surgery time.

Translating Hand Surgery Evidence to Policy and Practice

Hand surgery researchers should focus on developing high-quality evidence to support the development of health policies affecting surgical care. Policy-makers and leaders of national hand societies can help reduce the variation of care for patients receiving hand surgery by incorporating evidence into guidelines and policies. Comprehensive guidelines for perioperative care help encourage the translation of evidence into practice. Moreover, the identification of institutional-level barriers and facilitators of integration ensures the successful implementation of hand surgery-specific programs. The development of robust metrics to evaluate the effect of policy on practice helps examine the feasibility of clinical guidelines.

Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair

Many patients with hiatal hernias (HH) are asymptomatic; however, symptoms may include heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, or vague epigastric pain depending on the hernia type and severity. The ideal technique and timing of repair remains controversial. This report describes short-term outcomes and readmissions of patients undergoing HH repair at our institution. All patients who underwent HH repair from January 2012 through April 2017 were reviewed. Patients undergoing concomitant bariatric surgery were excluded. 239 patients were identified and 128 were included. Eighty-eight were female (69%) and 40 were male (31%) with a mean age of 59 years (range 20–91 years) and a mean BMI of 29.2 kg/m² (17–42). Worsening GERD was the most common presenting symptom in 79 (61.7%) patients. Eighty-four laparoscopic cases (65.6%) and 44 robotic assisted (34.4%) procedures were performed. Mesh was used in 59 operations (3 polytetrafluoroethylene; 56 biologic). All hiatal hernia types (I-IV) were collected. Majority were initial operations (89%). Techniques included: Toupet fundoplication in 68 cases (63.0%), Nissen fundoplication in 36 (33.3%), Dor fundoplication in 4 (3.7%), concomitant Collis gastroplasty in 4 (3.1%), and primary suture repair in 20 (15.6%). Outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic procedures were compared. Length of stay was reported as median and interquartile range for laparoscopic and robotic: 1.0 day (1.0–3.0) and 2.0 days (1.0–2.5); p = 0.483. Thirty-day readmission occurred in 9 patients, 7 (8.3%) laparoscopic and 2 (4.6%) robotic; p = 0.718. Two 30-day reoperations occurred, both laparoscopic; p = 0.545. Total of 16 complications occurred; 18.6% had a complication with the use of mesh compared to 8.7% without the use of mesh, p = 0.063. There were no conversion to open modality and no mortalities were reported. Hiatal hernia repair can be performed safely with a low incidence of complications.

Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inpatient Administration of Beers List Medications Following Total Knee Replacement

PURPOSE

Beers List drugs are potentially harmful in older adults and are grouped by level of risk. Over 9000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed each year Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals, primarily on older adults. Minimal data on the administration of Beers List drugs following arthroplasty currently exists in the literature. Our goal was to quantify the risks of these drugs following TKA. We hypothesized that increasing doses of Beers List drugs would be associated with increased risks for readmission, reoperation, emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data from TKAs performed in VA hospitals from 2010 to 2014 were examined, with complicated or bilateral procedures excluded. The data were obtained from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. The outcomes examined were readmission, postoperative ED visits, reoperation on ipsilateral knee, and mortality. Beers List drugs were divided into 3 categories: medications to use with caution (Beers 0); medications to avoid in older adults (Beers 1); and medications to avoid in certain disease states (Beers 2). Beers 2 was not included in the final analysis due to an inability to verify appropriate diagnostic criteria without manual chart review. Logistic regression was performed looking at the total number of doses in the first 48 h after surgery compared to the above-mentioned outcomes.

FINDINGS

Data from 12,639 TKAs were analyzed; the mean age of the patients was 65.06 years, and 77.8% of patients received Beers List drugs while admitted. The most frequently administered Beers List drugs were proton pump inhibitors, NSAIDs, insulin, α-blockers, benzodiazepines, antihistamines, muscle relaxants, and antipsychotics. There was a dose-dependent increase in readmission and ED visits in the Beers 1 group. The odds ratios were 1.03 for 30-day readmission and 1.02 at 90 days. The odds ratios for ED visits were 1.05 for 72-h ED visits and 1.04 for ED visits within 7 and 30 days. The odds ratios were set at 1-unit dose intervals. All results were found after control for VA facility, sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, Charlson score, case length, and body mass index.

IMPLICATIONS

The group of medications to avoid (Beers 1) from the 2015 Beers List showed associations with increased frequency of readmission and postoperative ED visits. Reinforcement of the need to avoid those drugs during surgical care will hopefully reduce such complications. Limitations included not controlling for overall discharge drug count and reliance on the outpatient problem list for outpatient diagnoses. Additional subgroup analysis will be performed to see whether specific drugs pose a higher than risk others.

Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?

Increased esophagectomy procedures over the past four decades have correlated with the rise in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Despite advances in technology and procedural expertise, esophagectomy remains a high-risk surgical procedure. Higher volume facilities have more experience with esophagectomy and would be expected to have a lower incidence of surgical complications and attendant morbidity and mortality. By analyzing information from a nationwide United States hospital database, we sought to find out if there is a significant difference between facilities stratified by case volume, with regards to 30-day readmission after esophagectomy. The findings of this study indicated that even with a large applied differential, early readmissions did not differ significantly between high- and low-volume centers. Also, analyzed and discussed were any associated demographic and comorbidity factors as they relate to early readmissions after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma across the country. This is the first study to specifically address these variables.

Thirty-Day Nonindex Readmissions and Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

With increasing emphasis on readmissions as an important quality metric, there is an interest in regionalization of care to high-volume centers. As a result, care of readmitted cardiac surgery patients may be fragmented if readmission occurs at a nonindex hospital. This study characterizes the frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of nonindex hospital readmission after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative sample, we used weighted 2010-2015 National Readmission Database claims to identify all US adult patients who underwent 2 of the major cardiac surgeries, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), during their initial hospitalization. We examined characteristics, predictors, and outcomes after nonindex readmission.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,070,073 procedures were included (844,206 CABG and 225,866 SAVR). Readmission at 30 days was 12.8% for CABG and 14.5% for SAVR. Nonindex readmissions accounted for 23% and 26% at 30 days; these were primarily noncardiac in etiology. The proportion of nonindex readmissions did not change significantly from 2010 to 2015. For CABG and SAVR, in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratios of 1.26 and 1.37, respectively) and major complications (odds ratios of 1.17 and 1.25, respectively) were significantly higher during nonindex versus index readmission, even after adjusting for patient risk profile, case mix, and hospital characteristics. Older age, higher income, and increased comorbidity burden were all independent predictors of nonindex readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of patients readmitted after cardiac surgery are readmitted to nonindex hospitals. This fragmentation of care may account for worse outcomes associated with nonindex readmissions in this complex population.

Avoidable 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing vascular surgery

Background

Vascular surgery has one of the highest unplanned 30-day readmission rates of all surgical specialties. The degree to which these may be avoidable and the optimal strategies to reduce their occurrence are unknown. The aim of this study was to identify and classify avoidable 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing vascular surgery in order to plan targeted interventions to reduce their occurrence, improve outcomes and reduce cost.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of discharges over a 12-month period from a single tertiary vascular unit was performed. A multidisciplinary panel conducted a manual case-note review to identify and classify those 30-day unplanned emergency readmissions deemed avoidable.

Results

An unplanned 30-day readmission occurred in 72 of 885 admissions (8·1 per cent). These unplanned readmissions were deemed avoidable in 36 (50 per cent) of these 72 patients, and were most frequently due to unresolved medical issues (19 of 36, 53 per cent) and inappropriate admission with the potential for outpatient management (7 of 36, 19 per cent). A smaller number were due to inadequate social care provision (4 of 36, 11 per cent) and the occurrence of other avoidable adverse events (4 of 36, 11 per cent).

Conclusion

Half of all 30-day readmissions following vascular surgery are potentially avoidable. Multidisciplinary coordination of inpatient care and the transition from hospital to community care after discharge need to be improved.

The national burden of periprosthetic hip fractures in the US: costs and risk factors for hospital readmission

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic hip fractures (PPFX) are serious complications that result in increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Decreasing hospital readmissions has been a recent healthcare focus, but little is known about the overall costs associated with PPFX or the risk factors associated with readmissions. We investigated patient demographics, treatment types, 30- and 90-day readmission rates, direct costs, and patient risk factors associated with PPFX readmission.

METHODS

We used the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database to select patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA), revision THA, and PPFX treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or revision THA. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the 90-day all-cause hospital readmission rate, and risk factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 1269 patients with PPFX treated with ORIF and 3254 treated with revision THA. 90-day readmissions were 20.9% and 27.3%, respectively. Patients with PPFX were older, female, and had multiple medical comorbidities. Patient factors associated with increased risk of readmission include: age; comorbidities; and discharge to skilled nursing facility; Medicare or Medicaid insurance. Hospital factors associated with increased risk of readmission include: large hospitals; nonprofits; metropolitan and teaching hospitals. The cost of readmission for PPFX treated with ORIF was $17,206 and revision THA was $16,504.

DISCUSSION

Periprosthetic hip fractures have high rates of hospital readmission, implying a significant burden to the healthcare system. Identifying risk factors is an important step towards identifying treatment pathways that can improve outcomes.

Risk factors for 90-day reoperation and readmission after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for 90-day readmission and reoperation after elective surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective consecutive cohort analysis of patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression with or without fusion for LSS with claudication from January 2014 through December 2015.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 1592 consecutive patients. The mean age at surgery was 67.4 ± 10.1 years and 45% of patients were female. The 90-day reoperation rate was 4.7%, and 69.3% of the reoperations occurred within the first 30 days. The 90-day readmission rate was 7.2%. Multivariable analysis showed that postoperative development of a surgical site infection (SSI; odds ratio [OR] 14.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.86–25.18), acute kidney injury (AKI; OR 6.76, 95% CI 2.39–19.57), and urinary tract infection (UTI; OR 3.96, 95% CI 2.43–6.37), as well as a history of congestive heart failure (CHF; OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.69–5.28), were significant risk factors for readmission within 90 days. Male sex (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38–0.92) was associated with decreased odds for readmission. With regards to reoperation, development of SSI (OR 25.06, 95% CI 13.54–46.51), sepsis (OR 7.63, 95% CI 1.52–40.59), UTI (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.31–4.76), and increased length of stay (LOS; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17–1.33) were found to be significant risk factors. A subsequent analysis found that morbid obesity (OR 6.99), history of coronary artery disease (OR 2.263), increased duration of surgery (OR 1.004), and LOS (OR 1.07) were significant risk factors for developing an SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study found rates of 4.7% and 7.2% for reoperation and readmission, respectively, within 90 days: 30.7% of the reoperations and 44.7% of the readmissions occurred beyond the first 30 days. A diagnosis of SSI, AKI, UTI, and history of CHF were significant factors for readmission, while male sex was associated with decreased odds for readmission. A diagnosis of SSI, sepsis, UTI, and increased LOS were found to be significant predictors for reoperation. Understanding 90-day complication rates is imperative because there has been increased discussion and healthcare policy extending the global postoperative window to 90 days. Current literature supports a readmission rate of 3%–9% after spine surgery. However, this literature either is limited to a 30-day window or does not stratify between different types of spine surgeries.

ABBREVIATIONS

AKI = acute kidney injury; BPH = benign prostate hyperplasia; CAD = coronary artery disease; CHF = congestive heart failure; CI = confidence interval; CMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM = diabetes mellitus; EBL = estimated blood loss; LOS = length of stay; LSS = lumbar spinal stenosis; OR = odds ratio; POUR = postoperative urinary retention; SSI = surgical site infection; UTI = urinary tract infection.

Readmissions After Complex Cancer Surgery: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database

PURPOSE

Hospital readmissions after surgery are a focus of quality improvement efforts. Although some reflect appropriate care, others are potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs). We aim to describe the burden, timing, and factors associated with readmissions after complex cancer surgery.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2013) was used to select patients undergoing a complex oncologic resection, which was defined as esophagectomy/gastrectomy, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, colorectal resection, lung resection, or cystectomy. Readmissions within 30 days from discharge were analyzed. International Classification of Diseases (9th revision) primary diagnosis codes were reviewed to identify PPRs. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified demographic, clinical, and hospital factors associated with readmissions.

RESULTS

Of the 59,493 eligible patients, 14% experienced a 30-day readmission, and 82% of these were deemed PPRs. Half of the readmissions occurred within the first 8 days of discharge. Infections (26%), GI complications (17%), and respiratory conditions (10%) accounted for most readmissions. Factors independently associated with an increased likelihood of readmission included Medicaid versus private insurance (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.48), higher comorbidity score (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.63), discharge to a facility (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29 to 1.51), prolonged length of stay (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.52), and occurrence of a major in-hospital complication (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.34).

CONCLUSION

One in seven patients undergoing complex cancer surgery suffered a readmission within 30 days. We identified common causes of these and identified patients at high risk for such an event. These data can be used by physicians, administrators, and policymakers to develop strategies to decrease readmissions.

Predictors of Extended Length of Hospital Stay in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Undergoing Posterior Segmental Instrumented Fusion: An Analysis of 407 Surgeries Performed at a Large Academic Center

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to (1) compare patient and procedure-specific characteristics among those who had short versus long hospital stays and (2) identify independent risk factors that may correlate with extended length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent posterior segmental instrumented fusion (PSIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Reducing the LOS and identifying risk factors associated with extended admission have become increasingly relevant to healthcare policy makers. There is currently limited research identifying risk factors that correlate with extended stay in patients undergoing PSIF for AIS.

METHODS

A single-institution, longitudinally maintained database was queried to identify 407 patients who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the distribution and median LOS in the cohort (4 days), patients were divided into those who had long versus short LOS. In both groups, patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative scoliosis curve measurements, surgery-related characteristics, and complications were analyzed. A univariate and multivariate regression analysis was then conducted to identify independent risk factors associated with extended LOS.

RESULTS

Patients who had extended LOS tended to be women (84.6% vs. 75%, P = 0.01), had more levels fused (9 ± 2 vs. 7 ± 2 levels, P < 0.001), had more major postoperative complications (0.8% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.002), had more blood loss during surgery (723 ± 548 vs. 488 ± 341 cm, P < 0.001), and received less epidural analgesia for pain control (69% vs. 89%, P < 0.001). Except for higher thoracic kyphosis, long LOS patients did not have worse preoperative radiographic curve parameters. Multivariate logistic analysis identified female sex, having ≥9 ± 2 levels of fusion, operative blood loss, major postoperative complications, lack of epidural analgesia, and higher thoracic kyphosis as independent risk factors correlating for extended LOS.

CONCLUSION

Independent risk factors identified by this study may be used to recognize patients with AIS at risk of prolonged hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Analysis of predictors of opioid-free analgesia for management of acute post-surgical pain in the United States

OBJECTIVES

Utilization of opioid-free analgesia (OFA) for post-surgical pain is a growing trend to counter the risks of opioid abuse and opioid-related adverse drug events (ORADEs). However, utilization patterns of OFA have not been examined. In this study, we investigated the utilization patterns and predictors of OFA in a surgical population in the United States.

METHODS

Analysis of the Cerner Health Facts database (January 2011 to December 2015) was conducted to describe hospital and patient characteristics associated with OFA. Baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, race, discharge status, year of admission and chronic comorbidities at index admission were collected. Hospital characteristics and payer type at index admission were collected as reported in the electronic health record database. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to identify statistically significant predictors of OFA on patient and institutional levels.

RESULTS

The study identified 10,219 patients, from 187 hospitals, who received post-surgical OFA and 255,196 patients who received post-surgical opioids. OFA rates varied considerably by hospital. Patients more likely to receive OFA were older (OR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.03, 1.10]; p < .001), or had neurological disorders (OR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.10, 1.39]; p < .001), diabetes (OR = 1.20, 95% CI [1.08, 1.33]; p = .001) or psychosis (OR = 1.18, 95% CI [1.01, 1.37]; p = .030). Patients with obesity and depression were less likely to receive OFA (OR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.67, 0.95]; p = .010 OR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.73, 0.98]; p = .030, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of post-surgical OFA was limited overall and was not favored in some patient groups prone to ORADEs, indicating missed opportunities to reduce opioid use and ORADE incidence. A substantial proportion of OFA patients was contributed by a few hospitals with especially high rates of OFA, suggesting that hospital policies, institutional structure and cross-functional departmental commitment to reducing opioid use may play a large role in the implementation of OFA.

Unplanned readmission after lung resection surgery: A systematic review

Urgent readmissions have a major impact on outcomes in patient health and healthcare costs. The associated risk factors have generally been infrequently studied. The main objective of the present work is to identify pre- and perioperative determinants of readmission; the secondary aim was to determine readmission rate, identification of readmission diagnoses, and impact of readmissions on survival rates in related analytical studies. The review was performed through a systematic search in the main bibliographic databases. In the end, 19 papers met the selection criteria. The main risk factors were: sociodemographic patient variables; comorbidities; type of resection; postoperative complications; long stay. Despite the great variability in the published studies, all highlight the importance of reducing readmission rates because of the significant impact on patients and the healthcare system.

The Importance of Safety-Net Hospitals in Emergency General Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Safety-net hospitals provide care to an inherently underprivileged patient population. These hospitals have previously been shown to have inferior surgical outcomes after complex, elective procedures, but little is known about how hospital payer-mix correlates with outcomes after more common, emergent operations.

METHODS

The University HealthSystem Consortium database was queried for all emergency general surgery procedures performed from 2009 to 2015. Emergency general surgery was defined as the seven operative procedures recently identified as contributing most to the national burden. Only urgent and emergent admissions were included (n = 653,305). Procedure-specific cohorts were created and hospitals were grouped according to safety-net burden. Multivariate analyses were done to study the effect of safety-net burden on hospital outcomes.

RESULTS

For all seven emergency procedures, patients at hospitals with a high safety-net burden were more likely to be young and black (p < 0.01 each). Patients at high-burden hospitals had similar severity of illness scores to those at other hospitals. Compared with lower burden hospitals, in-hospital mortality rates at high-burden hospitals were similar or lower in five of seven procedures (p = NS or < 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for patient factors, high-burden hospitals had similar or lower odds of readmission in six of seven procedures, hospital length of stay in four of seven procedures, and cost of care in three of seven procedures (p = NS or < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Safety-net hospitals provide emergency general surgery services without compromising patient outcomes or incurring greater healthcare resources. These data may help inform the vital role these institutions play in the healthcare of vulnerable patients in the USA.

The Practice of Overlapping Surgery Is Safe in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Overlapping surgery occurs when a surgeon performs 2 procedures in an overlapping time frame. This practice is commonplace in the setting of total joint arthroplasty and is intended to increase patient access to experienced surgeons, improve efficiency, and advance the surgical competence of surgeons and trainees. The practice of overlapping surgery has been questioned because of safety and ethical concerns. As the literature is scarce on this issue, we evaluated the unplanned hospital readmission and reoperation rates associated with overlapping and non-overlapping total joint arthroplasty procedures.

METHODS

We reviewed 3,290 consecutive primary total knee and hip arthroplasty procedures that had been performed between November 2010 and July 2016 by 2 fellowship-trained senior surgeons at a single institution. Overlapping surgery was defined as the practice in which the attending surgeon performed a separate procedure in another room with an overlapping room time of at least 30 minutes. Patient baseline characteristics and 90-day rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations were compared between overlapping and non-overlapping procedures. Subanalyses also were done on patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2 and those with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 or 4. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 2,833 procedures that met the inclusion criteria, 57% (1,610) were overlapping and 43% (1,223) were non-overlapping. Baseline demographics, BMI, and ASA scores were similar between the groups. No significant differences were found between the overlapping and non-overlapping procedures in terms of the 90-day rates of complications (5.2% vs. 6.6%, respectively; p = 0.104), unplanned readmissions (3.4% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.235), or reoperations (3.1 vs. 3.1; p = 1.0) in the analysis of the entire cohort or in subgroup analyses of obese patients and patients with an ASA score of 3 or 4. The total mean operating room time was 5.8 minutes higher for overlapping procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Overlapping procedures showed no increase in terms of the 90-day rates of complications, readmissions, or reoperations when compared with non-overlapping procedures. There was just over a 5-minute increase in mean operating room time for overlapping procedures. Our data suggest that overlapping surgery does not lead to detrimental outcomes following total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. Future investigations evaluating patient-oriented outcomes and satisfaction are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact of Operative Time on Adverse Events Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the impact of operative time on adverse events following arthroplasty. The present study tests for associations between a 15-minute increase in operative time and the occurrence of adverse events following primary total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty during 2006-2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Operative time (as a continuous variable) was tested for association with perioperative outcomes using multivariate regression. All regressions were adjusted for differences in demographic, comorbidity, and procedural characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 165,474 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (±standard deviation) operative time was 91.9 ± 32.5 minutes. Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, an increase in operative time by 15 minutes increased the risk of anemia requiring transfusion by 9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%-10%, P < .001), wound dehiscence by 13% (95% CI = 8%-19%, P < .001), renal insufficiency by 9% (95% CI = 3%-14%, P < .001), sepsis by 10% (95% CI = 6%-14%, P < .001), surgical site infection by 9% (95% CI = 7%-12%, P < .001), and urinary tract infection by 4% (95% CI = 2%-6%, P < .001). Similarly, an increase in operative time by 15 minutes increased the risk of hospital readmission by 5% (95% CI = 4%-6%, P < .001) and of extended hospital length of stay (≥4 days) by 9% (95% CI = 8%-10%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that greater operative time increases the risk for multiple postoperative complications following total joint arthroplasty. These data suggest that surgeons should consider steps to minimize operative time without compromising the technical components of the surgical procedure.

Impact of Post-Discharge Disposition on Risk and Causes of Readmission Following Liver and Pancreas Surgery

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the post-discharge settings and the risk of readmission has not been well examined. We sought to identify the association between discharge destinations and readmission rates after liver and pancreas surgery.

METHODS

The 2013-2015 Medicare-Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) database was reviewed to identify liver and pancreas surgical patients. Patients were subdivided into three groups based on discharge destination: home/self-care (HSC), home with home health assistance (HHA), and skilled nursing facility (SNF). The association between post-acute settings, readmission rates, and readmission causes was assessed.

RESULTS

Among 15,141 liver or pancreas surgical patients, 60% (n = 9046) were HSC, 26.9% (n = 4071) were HHA, and 13.4% (n = 2024) were SNF. Older, female patients and patients with ≥ 2 comorbidities, ≥ 2 previous admissions, an emergent index admission, an index complication, and ≥ 5-day length of stay were more likely to be discharged to HHA or SNF compared to HSC (all P < 0.001). Compared to HSC, HHA and SNF patients had a 34 and a 67% higher likelihood of 30-day readmission, respectively. The HHA and SNF settings were also associated with a 33 and a 69% higher risk of 90-day readmission. There was no association between discharge destination and readmission causes.

CONCLUSION

Among liver and pancreas surgical patients, HHA and SNF patients had a higher risk of readmission within 30 and 90 days. There was no difference in readmission causes and discharge settings. The association between discharge setting and the higher risk of readmission should be further evaluated as the healthcare system seeks to reduce readmission rates after surgery.

The impact of a malignant diagnosis on the pattern and outcome of readmission after liver and pancreatic surgery: An analysis of the nationwide readmissions database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Reducing readmissions is an important quality improvement metric. We sought to investigate patterns of 90-day readmission after hepato-pancreatic (HP) procedures.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was used to identify patients undergoing HP procedures between 2010 and 2014. Patients were stratified according to benign versus malignant HP diagnoses and as index (same hospital as operation) versus non-index (different hospital) readmissions.

RESULTS

Among the 41 059 patients who underwent HP procedures, 26 563 (65%) underwent a liver resection while 14 496 (35%) pancreatic resection. Among all patients, 11 902 (29%) had a benign diagnosis versus 29 157 (71%) who had a cancer diagnosis. Overall 90-day readmission was 22% (n = 8 998) with a slight increase in readmissions among patients with a malignant (n = 6 655;23%) versus benign (n = 2 343;20%) diagnosis (P < 0.001). Readmission to an index hospital was more common (n = 7 316 81%) versus a non-index hospital (n = 1 682 19%). Non-index hospital readmissions were more frequent among patients with malignant HP diagnoses (OR, 1.41;P  = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to one in four patients were readmitted after HP surgery. Late readmission was more common among patients with a cancer-diagnosis. While most readmissions occurred at the index hospital, 19% of all readmissions occurred at a non-index hospital and were more frequent among patients with malignant diagnoses.

Different Perspectives on Predictability and Preventability of Surgical Readmissions

BACKGROUND

Although unscheduled readmissions are increasingly being used as a quality indicator, only few readmission studies have focused on surgical patient populations.

METHODS

An observational study "CURIOS@" was performed at three centers in the Netherlands. Readmitted patients and treating doctors were surveyed to assess the discharge process during index admission and their opinion on predictability and preventability of the readmission. Risk factors associated with predictability and preventability as judged by patients and their doctor were identified. Cohen's kappa was calculated to measure pairwise agreement of considering readmission as predictable/preventable. PRISMA root cause categories were used to qualify the reasons for readmission.

RESULTS

In 237 unscheduled surgical readmissions, more patients assessed their readmissions to be likely preventable compared with their treating doctors (28.7% versus 6.8%; kappa, 0.071). This was also reflected in poor consensus about risk factors and root causes of these readmissions. When patients reported that they did not feel ready for discharge or requested their doctor to allow them to stay longer at discharge during index admission, they deemed their readmission more likely predictable and preventable. Doctors focused on measurable factors such as the clinical frailty scale and biomarkers during discharge process. Health-care worker failures were strongly associated with preventable readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus between readmitted patients and treating doctors about predictability and preventability of readmissions, nor about associated risk factors and root causes. Patients should be more effectively involved in their discharge process, and the relevance of optimal communication between them should be emphasized to create a safe and efficient discharge process.

Costs and Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission After Periprosthetic Knee Fractures in the United States

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFX) around total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are devastating complications with significant morbidity. With growing healthcare costs, hospital readmissions have become a marker for quality healthcare delivery. However, little is known about the risk factors or costs associated with readmission after treatment of PPFX. We sought to identify the patient demographics, prevalence of treatment types (open reduction internal fixation [ORIF] vs revision TKA), 30 and 90-day readmission rates, costs of initial treatment and readmission, and risk factors for readmission.

METHODS

We used the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database to select patients who underwent TKA, revision TKA, and treatment of PPFX with either ORIF or revision TKA. The 90-day readmission rate was determined through a survival analysis, and risk factors were identified using a cox proportional hazards model that adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 1526 patients with PPFX treated with ORIF and 1458 treated with revision TKA. Ninety-day readmissions were 20.5% and 21.8%, respectively. Patients with ORIF were more often female and had multiple medical comorbidities. Patient factors associated with readmission included advanced age, male gender, comorbidities, discharge to a skilled nursing facility or home with health aide, and Medicare or Medicaid insurance. Treatment at a teaching hospital was the only hospital-associated risk factor identified. ORIF cost USD 25,539 and revision THA cost USD 37,680, with associated readmissions costing 15,269 and 16,806, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PPFX results in greater costs compared to primary and revision TKA. This study highlights risk factors for readmission after PPFX treatment.

Trends in readmission rate by route of hysterectomy - a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the 60-day readmission rates after hysterectomy according to route of surgery and analyze risk factors for postoperative readmission.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included all women who underwent hysterectomy due to benign conditions from 2009 to 2015 at a large academic center in Boston. Readmission rates were compared among the following four types of hysterectomies: abdominal, laparoscopic, robotic and vaginal.

RESULTS

There were 3981 hysterectomy cases over the study period (628 abdominal hysterectomy, 2500 laparoscopic hysterectomy, 155 robotic hysterectomy and 698 vaginal hysterectomy). Intraoperative complications occurred more frequently in women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy (4.8%), followed by robotic hysterectomy (3.9%), vaginal hysterectomy (1.9%) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (1.6%) (p < 0.0001). Readmission rates were not significantly different among the groups; women receiving abdominal hysterectomy had an overall readmission rate of 3.5%, compared with 3.2% after robotic hysterectomy, 2.9% after vaginal hysterectomy and 1.9% after laparoscopic hysterectomy (p = 0.06). When stratifying for relevant variables, women who had an laparoscopic hysterectomy had a twofold reduction of readmission compared with abdominal hysterectomy (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.87; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in readmission when robotic hysterectomy or vaginal hysterectomy were compared individually with abdominal hysterectomy. Regarding risk factors related to readmission it was observed that perioperative complications were the largest driver of readmissions (odds ratio 667, 95% confidence interval 158-99; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy was associated with fewer hospital readmissions compared with the abdominal route; vaginal, robotic and abdominal approaches had a similar risk of readmission. Perioperative complications represent the main driver of readmissions. After adjusting for perioperative factors such as surgeon type and complications, no difference in readmissions between the different routes of hysterectomy were found.

Topical Vancomycin Reduces Surgical-Site Infections After Craniotomy: A Prospective, Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in neurosurgical patients. Topical antibiotics are one potential method to reduce the incidence of these infections.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of topical vancomycin applied within the wound during craniotomy in a large prospective cohort study at a major academic center.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-five patients were studied prospectively in this cohort study; 205 patients received 1 g of topical vancomycin powder in the subgaleal space while 150 matched control patients did not. Patients otherwise received identical care. The primary outcome variable was SSI rate factored by cohort. Secondary analysis examined cost savings from vancomycin usage estimated from hospital costs associated with SSI in craniotomy patients.

RESULTS

The addition of topical vancomycin was associated with a significantly lower rate of SSI than standard of care alone (0.49% [1/205] vs 6% [9/150], P = .002). Based on the costs of revision surgery for infections, topical vancomycin usage was estimated to save $1367 446 per 1000 craniotomy patients. No adverse reactions occurred.

CONCLUSION

Topical vancomycin is a safe, effective, and cost-saving measure to prevent SSIs following craniotomy. These results have broad implications for standard of care in craniotomy.

Impact of Definition and Timeframe on Capturing Surgery-Related Readmissions After Primary Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Readmission rate has emerged as an important metric to measure quality, but varying definitions and timeframes are used. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different readmission definitions (postoperative vs postdischarge) and timeframes (30 vs 90-day) on capturing surgery-related readmissions after primary total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015 were included. The electronic medical records of readmitted patients were reviewed to determine whether a surgery-related event was most responsible for readmission. The performances of 4 definition-timeframe combinations in capturing surgery-related readmissions were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2586 patients were included. Using both postoperative and postdischarge definitions, there were no differences in the proportion of readmissions that were surgery-related when comparing 30 and 90-day timeframes (postoperative: 71% vs 60%, P = .118; postdischarge: 68% vs 60%, P = .219). Greater proportion of readmissions between days 0 and 30 were for surgery-related reasons compared with readmissions between days 31 and 90 using both postoperative and postdischarge definitions (postoperative: 71% vs 47%, P = .005; postdischarge: 68% vs 49%, P = .022). Among 104 patients readmitted for surgery-related reasons within 1 year of discharge, 52% were readmitted within 30 days of surgery compared with 79% within 90 days (P < .001). Similarly, 53% and 81% of readmissions were captured by the 30 and 90-day postdischarge definitions, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A 90-day timeframe is superior in capturing surgery-related readmissions after total joint arthroplasty. Important Total hip and knee arthroplasty adverse events may be missed using a 30-day timeframe.

Which Pediatric Orthopaedic Procedures Have the Greatest Risk of Adverse Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Quality improvement in orthopaedic surgery has received increasing attention; however, there is insufficient information available about the perioperative safety of many common pediatric orthopaedic procedures. This study aimed to characterize the incidence of adverse events in a national pediatric patient sample to understand the risk profiles of common pediatric orthopaedic procedures, and to identify patients and operations that are associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database. Pediatric patients who underwent 29 different orthopaedic procedures were identified in the 2012 NSQIP Pediatric database. The occurrence of any adverse event, infection, return to the operating room, and readmission within 30 days, were reported for each procedure. Multivariate regression was then used to identify the association of patient and operative characteristics with the occurrence of each adverse outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 8975 pediatric patients were identified. Supracondylar humerus fracture fixation was the most common procedure performed in this sample (2274 patients or 25.57% of all procedures), followed by posterior spinal fusion (1894 patients or 21.10% of all procedures). Adverse events occurred in 352 patients (3.92% of all patients). Four deaths were noted (0.04% of all patients), which only occurred in patients with nonidiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal fusion. Infections occurred in 143 patients (1.59%), and 197 patients (2.19%) were readmitted within 30 days. Multiple patient characteristics and procedures were found to be associated with each adverse outcome studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal fusion, multiaxial external fixation, and fasciotomy were procedures associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes within 30 days. Patients with obesity, ASA class ≥3, and impaired cognitive status also had increased rates of adverse outcomes. The results from this study of a large, national sample of pediatric orthopaedic patients are important for benchmarking and highlight areas for quality improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Prognostic.

Preoperative Renal Insufficiency: Underreporting and Association With Readmission and Major Postoperative Morbidity in an Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Making a formal diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the preoperative setting may be challenging because of lack of longitudinal data. We explored the predictive value of a single reduced preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value on adverse patient outcomes in the first 30 days after elective surgery. We compared the rate of major postoperative adverse events, including 30-day readmission rate, hospital length of stay, infection, acute kidney injury (AKI), and myocardial infarction across patients with declining preoperative eGFR values. We hypothesized that there is an association between decreasing preoperative eGFR values and major postoperative morbidity including readmission within 30 days of discharge and that the reasons for unplanned readmissions may be associated with poor preoperative renal function.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the electronic health record of 39 989 adult patients who underwent elective surgery between June 2011 and July 2013 at our institution. Patients with reduced eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m) were identified and categorized by the stages of CKD that correlated with the preoperative eGFR value. Odds of readmission to our hospital within 30 days, as well as new diagnosis of AKI, myocardial infarction, and infection, were determined with multivariate logistic regression. The subset of patients who were readmitted within 30 days also were subdivided further into patients who had an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m and those with an eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m, as well as whether the readmission was planned or unplanned.

RESULTS

Of the 4053 patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m, 3290 (81.2%) did not carry a preoperative diagnosis of CKD. Adjusted odds ratios of being readmitted were 1.48 (99% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.87; P < .001) for eGFR 30 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m to 2.06 (99% CI, 1.32-3.23; P < .001) for eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m compared with patients with a preoperative eGFR value ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m. Patients with a lower eGFR also demonstrated increasing odds of AKI from 2.78 (99% CI, 1.86-4.17; P < .001) for eGFR 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m to 3.81 (99% CI, 1.68-8.16; P < .001) for eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that preoperative renal insufficiency may be underreported and appears to be significantly associated with postoperative complications. It extends the association between a single low preoperative eGFR and postoperative morbidity to a broader range of surgical populations than previously described. Our results suggest that preoperative calculation of eGFR may be a relatively low-cost, readily available tool to identify patients who are at an increased risk of readmission within 30 days of surgery and postoperative morbidity in patients presenting for elective surgery.