A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units

Current practice and safety measures in epilepsy monitoring units in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of Epilepsy Monitoring Units (EMU) display various practices and safety protocols. EMU settings should meet clear, standardized safety protocols to avoid seizure adverse events (SAE). We aim to provide the foundational framework facilitating the establishment of unified evidence-based safety regulations to address the practices and safety measures implemented within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, EMU directors in the GCC were contacted directly by phone to personally complete an electronic 37-item questionnaire sent via text messages and email. From January 2021-December 2021.

RESULTS

Seventeen EMUs from six GCC countries participated in the study. All EMU directors responded to the study. Twelve (70.6%) EMUs monitored adults and children, five (29.4%) monitored adults, and none monitored children only. The number of certified epileptologists in the EMUs ranged from one to eight per unit. Fifteen (88.2%) EMUs applied a continuous observation pattern, whereas two (11.8%) performed daytime only. The precautions most commonly used in the video Electroencephalogram (EEG) were seizure pads and bedside oxygen in 15 EMUs (88.2%). For invasive EEG, seizure pads were used in 9 EMUs (52.9%), %) and IV access in 8 EMUs (47.1%). The occurrence of adverse events varied among EMUs. The most common conditions were postictal psychosis 10 (58.8%), injuries 7 (41.2%), and status epilepticus 6 (35.3%). Falls were mainly related to missed seizures or delayed recognition by video monitors in 8 EMUs (47.1%). The extended EMU stay was because of an insufficient number of recorded seizures in 16 EMUs (94.1%), poor seizure lateralization and localization in 10 (58.8%), and re-introduction of AEDs in nine (52.9%). All EMUs had written acute seizure and status epilepticus management protocols. A postictal psychosis management protocol was available for 10 (58.8%). Medications were withdrawn before admission in 6 EMUs (35.3%). The specific medication withdrawal speed protocol upon admission was available in 7 EMUs (41.2%). Pre-admission withdrawal of medication demonstrated a shorter length of stay in both video and invasive EEG, which was statistically significant (ρ (15) = -.529, p =.029; ρ (7) = -.694, p =.038; respectively).

CONCLUSION

The practice and safety regulations of EMUs in the GCC vary widely. Each EMU reported the occurrences of SAE and injuries. Precautions, protective measures, and management protocols must be reassessed to minimize the number of SAEs and increase the safety of the EMU.

Patient Safety in Canadian Epilepsy Monitoring Units: A Survey of Current Practices

BACKGROUND

Guidelines on epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) standards have been recently published. We aimed to survey Canadian EMUs to describe the landscape of safety practices and compare these to the recommendations from the new guidelines.

METHODS

A 34-item survey was created by compiling questions on EMU structure, patient monitoring, equipment, personnel, standardized protocol use, and use of injury prevention tools. The questionnaire was distributed online to 24 Canadian hospital centers performing video-EEG monitoring (VEM) in EMUs. Responses were tabulated and descriptively summarized.

RESULTS

In total, 26 EMUs responded (100% response rate), 50% of which were adult EMUs. EMUs were on average active for 23.4 years and had on average 3.6 beds. About 81% of respondents reported having a dedicated area for VEM, and 65% reported having designated EMU beds. Although a video monitoring station was available in 96% of EMUs, only 48% of EMUs provided continuous observation of patients (video and/or physical). A total of 65% of EMUs employed continuous heart monitoring. The technologist-to-patient ratio was 1:1-2 in 52% of EMUs during the day. No technologist supervision was most often reported in the evening and at night. Nurse-to-EMU-patient ratio was mostly 1:1-4 independent of the time of day. Consent forms were required before admission in 27% of EMUs.

CONCLUSION

Canadian EMUs performed decently in terms of there being dedicated space for VEM, continuous heart monitoring, and adequate nurse-to-patient ratios. Other practices were quite variable, and adjustments should be made on a case-by-case basis to adhere to the latest guidelines.

Safety and efficacy of rapid withdrawal of anti-seizure medication during long-term video-EEG monitoring

Objective

Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are often withdrawn during long-term video-EEG monitoring (LTM) to allow pre-surgical evaluation. Herein, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ultra-rapid withdrawal (URW) and rapid withdrawal (RW) of ASMs in an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU).

Methods

This retrospective study examined all consecutive patients admitted to our EMU between May 2021 and October 2022. Patients were classified into the URW and RW groups according to the way ASMs were withdrawn. We compared the efficacy and safety of the procedures used in the groups in terms of duration of LTM, latency to the first seizure, and incidence of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), seizure clusters (SC), and status epilepticus (SE).

Results

Overall, 110 patients (38 women) were included. The mean age of patients at the time of LTM was 29 years. All medications were stopped on admission for monitoring in the URW group (n = 75), while in the RW group (n = 35) ASMs were withdrawn within 1 day. In both groups, the duration of LTM was approximately 3 days: URW group (2.9 ± 0.5 days) and RW group (3.1 ± 0.8 days). The latency to the first seizure was significantly different between the two groups; however, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of the distribution of FBTCS, SC, or SE, number of seizures, and the requirement for intravenous rescue medication was low.

Conclusion

The rapid withdrawal of ASMs to provoke seizures during monitoring for pre-surgical evaluation following the URW protocol was as effective and safe as with RW. Ultra-rapid ASM withdrawal has the benefits of reducing LTM duration and shortening the time to first seizure compared to rapid medication tapering.

Electrochemical and electrophysiological considerations for clinical high channel count neural interfaces

Electrophysiological recording and stimulation are the gold standard for functional mapping during surgical and therapeutic interventions as well as capturing cellular activity in the intact human brain. A critical component probing human brain activity is the interface material at the electrode contact that electrochemically transduces brain signals to and from free charge carriers in the measurement system. Here, we summarize state-of-the-art electrode array systems in the context of translation for use in recording and stimulating human brain activity. We leverage parametric studies with multiple electrode materials to shed light on the varied levels of suitability to enable high signal-to-noise electrophysiological recordings as well as safe electrophysiological stimulation delivery. We discuss the effects of electrode scaling for recording and stimulation in pursuit of high spatial resolution, channel count electrode interfaces, delineating the electrode-tissue circuit components that dictate the electrode performance. Finally, we summarize recent efforts in the connectorization and packaging for high channel count electrode arrays and provide a brief account of efforts toward wireless neuronal monitoring systems.

Protocols for multimodal polygraphy for cardiorespiratory monitoring in the epilepsy monitoring unit. Part I: Clinical acquisition

Multimodal polygraphy including cardiorespiratory monitoring in the Epilepsy Monitoring is becoming increasingly important. In addition to simultaneous recording of video and EEG, the combination of these techniques not only improves seizure detection, it enhances patient safety and provides information on autonomic clinical symptoms, which may be contributory to localization of seizure foci. However, there are currently no consensus guidelines, nor adequate information on devices available for multimodal polygraphy for cardiorespiratory monitoring in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. Our purpose here is to provide protocols and information on devices for such monitoring. Suggested parameters include respiratory inductance plethysmography (thoraco-abdominal belts for respiratory rate), pulse oximetry and four-lead electrocardiography. Detailed knowledge of devices, their operability and acquisition optimization enables accurate interpretation of signal and differentiation of abnormalities from artifacts. Multimodal polygraphy brings new opportunities for identification of peri-ictal cardiorespiratory abnormalities, and may identify high SUDEP risk individuals.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the international league against epilepsy and international federation of clinical neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events (see Table S1). For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and establish its clinical utility.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events. For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and to establish its clinical utility.

Current practices in epilepsy monitoring units (EMU) in India

AIM

As an initial step to develop guidelines for epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) appropriate for developing countries, we inquired the existing practices in EMUs in India.

METHODS

After checking for the content and face validity as well for clarity, we sent a 52-item online non-anonymized questionnaire to all the 52 EMUs in India.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 51 of the 52 EMUs (98% response rate). The majority of the EMUs are located in major cities and 51% are located in non-governmental corporate hospitals. There are total of 122 prolonged video-EEG monitoring (PVEM) beds in India and 70% EMUs have ≤2 beds. Approximately two-thirds of the EMUs have defined protocols for pre-procedure consent and risk assessment, management of seizure clusters and status epilepticus, continuous observation of patients, and peri‑ictal testing. Only one-third of the EMUs have protocols for management of post-ictal psychosis, anti-suffocation pillows, and protected environment within bathrooms. The waiting period for PVEM is more (49.9 ± 101 vs. 4.9 ± 10.9 days; p = 0.04) and mean cost for 3-day PVEM is less (INR 8311 ± 9021 vs. 30,371 ± 17,563; p <0.0001) in public as compared to private hospitals. There was a negative correlation between cost of PVEM and the waiting period (r=-0.386; p = 0.01). Safety practices are similar in public and private hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Although practices in EMUs in India vary widely, they are comparable to those in developed countries. India has severe shortage of EMUs and long waiting lists for affordable PVEM.

Acute withdrawal of new-generation antiepileptic drugs in epilepsy monitoring units: Safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Acute withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is a safe and effective approach to provoking seizures in order to complete video-electroencephalogram (V-EEG) studies in a timely manner. Previous studies have focused only on withdrawal from conventional AEDs, and the effects of withdrawal from new-generation AEDs have not been extensively studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study examined adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit between 2015 and 2018. Patients were classified according to whether they received conventional AEDs (Con; n = 13) or new-generation AEDs (N-Gen; n = 26). We then compared the effects of withdrawing these two types of AEDs over a period of one week in terms of efficacy (time to complete V-EEG monitoring) and safety, including the incidence of cluster seizures (CS), focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) and status epilepticus (SE).

RESULTS

In both groups, approximately one week was required to complete V-EEG analysis: N-Gen group (5.6 days) and Con group (6.3 days). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the median number of seizures, the onset of the 1st seizure, the distribution of CS, FBTCS, or SE. Following acute withdrawal of medication, a high percentage of patients with a history of CS or FBTCS, respectively, presented CS or FBTCS.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe significant differences between patients taking new-generation AEDs and those taking conventional AEDs following withdrawal during V-EEG recording. In the current study, we employed a standard protocol for the rapid withdrawal of AEDs (daily dose reduction of 50%), which was sufficient for 80% of patients to complete V-EEG monitoring within one week.

Epilepsy monitoring units in Saudi Arabia: Where do we stand compared to developed countries?

Objectives:

To descriptively assess Epilepsy Monitoring Units (EMUs) and the provided services in Saudi Arabia and compare them based on the geographic region.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, an electronic questionnaire was emailed to all directors of EMUs in Saudi Arabia from July 2013 to January 2016, with constant updates being made by all respondents throughout the period of data collection.

Results:

All EMU directors participated. There were 11 EMUs in KSA operating in 8 hospitals; 8 (54.5%) EMUs in Riyadh, 2 (18.2%) in Dammam, 2 (18.2%) in Makkah and 1 (9.1%) in Jeddah. Five (54.5%) EMUs were shared for adults and pediatrics, 3 (27.3%) were devoted to adult patients, and 3 (27.3%) to pediatric patients. The average waiting time was 11 weeks (range: 2-52 weeks). The mean percentage of patients coming from an outside region was 30.6%. The average length of stay was 7 days. Less than 100 patients were monitored annually in 54.5% of the EMUs. Seven EMUs (63.6%) admitted less than 100 patients for seizure characterization. Intracranial monitoring was available in all EMUs. Most EMUs (54.5%) admitted less than 100 patients for pre-surgical workup while 36.4% admitted 100-199, and 9.1% admitted more than 300 patients per year. Epilepsy surgeries were performed for less than 50 patients annually in 81.8% of the hospitals.

Conclusion:

There are 11 EMUs in Saudi Arabia fully equipped to serve epileptic patients. However, they are underutilized considering the number of admitted patient and the number of epilepsy surgeries per year. Also, they are unequally distributed throughout the kingdom.

Time to response and patient visibility during tonic-clonic seizures in the epilepsy monitoring unit

OBJECTIVE

There is a high cost associated with recording quality video and electroencephalography (EEG) data in National Association of Epilepsy Center (NAEC) level IV epilepsy monitoring units (EMU). This study considers potential quality measures in EMUs for generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures: types of safety signals, response time, and visibility of patient's limbs for semiology. These quality measures have been summarized across 12 EMUs to estimate response times to GTC seizures and the quality of video data that is captured during admissions.

METHODS

Video electroencephalographies (vEEGs) from two prospective regulatory studies for the Brain Sentinel device were reviewed. A total of 232 subjects with a history of GTC seizures underwent routine clinical EMU stays. Fifty-four of the study subjects had 96 GTC seizures. The vEEG of events were reviewed for safety signal used, response time, and visibility of patient's limbs.

RESULTS

The average response time from members of the hospital team was 22 s from electrographic generalization (minimum -37 s, maximum 111 s, two no response). For caregivers, average response was 11 s (minimum -15 s, maximum 33 s, 45 not present/no response). In 73% of events, the patient visibility was limited at seizure onset. In 55% of events with limited limb visibility, the visibility was improved (by removing sheets or improving camera angle) >30 s after start of the event. The primary safety signals were as follows: an alert from outside the patient room (54%), button press (23%), hospital team present at seizure start (14%), caregiver vocal alert (6%), and no response (2%).

SIGNIFICANCE

The average response time of caregivers was twice as fast as the hospital team, underscoring the importance of having a person in the room during onset of a GTC seizure. Diagnostic yield could be improved with more timely removal of patient coverings. It was observed that when patients experienced a GTC seizure, 40% were fully or partially obscured for more than 30 s during the event, compromising the ability of epileptologists to evaluate semiology during seizure onset. Automated seizure alarms may help staff get to patients more quickly and improve diagnostic characterization.

Personalized safety measures reduce the adverse event rate of long-term video EEG

Objective

Safety in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) has become an increasing concern because adverse events occur in up to 10% of patients undergoing long‐term video EEG in EMUs. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a specific safety protocol in an EMU.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed the adverse event rates in a group without (group 1, 84‐month period, Innsbruck, Austria) and a group with (group 2, 33‐month period, Salzburg, Austria) personalized safety measures utilizing a standardized protocol for long‐term epilepsy monitoring in high‐risk patients. Differences in adverse event rates during and after long‐term video EEG between the two groups were calculated and compared.

Results

In group 1, 44/507 (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5–11.5%) patients experienced 53 adverse events: 20/507 (4%, 95% CI 2.6–6.0%) patients had psychiatric events, 15/507 (3%, 95% CI 1.8–4.8%) patients sustained a total of 19 injuries during seizures, and 10/507 (2%, 95% CI 1.1–3.6%) patients had 13 episodes of status epilepticus; one adverse event was treatment‐related (valproic acid–induced encephalopathy; 1/507, 0.2%, 95% CI 0.0–1.1%). By using the new safety protocol in group 2, the adverse event rate was only 5% (95% CI 3.4–7.6%; 30 adverse events in 26/491; 45% reduction; p = 0.036), in contrast. These events included 13 psychiatric complications in 13/491 (2%, 95% CI 1.6–4.5%, p = 0.252) patients, 12 seizure‐related injuries in 9/491 (2%, 95% CI 1.0–3.4%, p = 0.250) patients, and 5 episodes of status epilepticus in 4/491 (1%, 95% CI 0.3–2.1%, p = 0.120) patients.

Significance

Implementation of personalized safety measures in high‐risk patients resulted in a clinically relevant reduction of adverse events in the EMU. Safety protocols are a valid tool to reduce the occurrence of adverse events in EMUs.

Drug taper during long-term video-EEG monitoring: efficiency and safety

OBJECTIVES

Anti-epileptic drugs (AED) are often tapered to reduce the time needed to record a sufficient number of seizure during long-term video-EEG monitoring (LTM). Fast AED reduction is considered less safe, but few studies have examined this. Our goal is to examine whether the rate of AED reduction affects efficiency and safety.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study of patients referred for presurgical evaluation. Each patient was categorized by two dichotomous parameters of AED tapering: (i) fast vs slow AED reduction the first 24 h of LTM and (ii) complete vs partial AED discontinuation during LTM.

RESULTS

Of 79 patients, 51% underwent a fast AED reduction and 58% ended up with AEDs completely discontinued. Complete AED discontinuation was associated with three times increased likelihood of receiving rescue therapy during LTM and double risk of having secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (sGTCS) compared to the group partially discontinued. Fast vs slow AED reduction had no effect on the safety of LTM. The fast AED reduction group and the complete AED discontinuation group had a significantly longer time to first seizure and total recording time compared to the slow AED reduction and partial discontinuation groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast AED reduction was found safe in patients undergoing presurgical video-EEG monitoring. Patients completely discontinued from AEDs had more sGTCS than patients partially discontinued. Further studies are suggested to confirm this finding and to evaluate whether fast reduction is safe and efficient in other subgroups of patients referred for LTM.

Long-term monitoring of cardiorespiratory patterns in drug-resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) during inpatient electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring has been a rare but potentially preventable event, with associated cardiopulmonary markers. To date, no systematic evaluation of alarm settings for a continuous pulse oximeter (SpO₂ ) has been performed. In addition, evaluation of the interrelationship between the ictal and interictal states for cardiopulmonary measures has not been reported.

METHODS

Patients with epilepsy were monitored using video-EEG, SpO₂ , and electrocardiography (ECG). Alarm thresholds were tested systematically, balancing the number of false alarms with true seizure detections. Additional cardiopulmonary patterns were explored using automated ECG analysis software.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-three seizures (32 generalized) were evaluated from 45 patients (7,104 h recorded). Alarm thresholds of 80-86% SpO₂ detected 63-73% of all generalized convulsions and 20-28% of all focal seizures (81-94% of generalized and 25-36% of focal seizures when considering only evaluable data). These same thresholds resulted in 25-146 min between false alarms. The sequential probability of ictal SpO₂ revealed a potential common seizure termination pathway of desaturation. A statistical model of corrected QT intervals (QTc), heart rate (HR), and SpO₂ revealed close cardiopulmonary coupling ictally. Joint probability maps of QTc and SpO₂ demonstrated that many patients had baseline dysfunction in either cardiac, pulmonary, or both domains, and that ictally there was dissociation-some patients exhibited further dysfunction in one or both domains.

SIGNIFICANCE

Optimal selection of continuous pulse oximetry thresholds involves a tradeoff between seizure detection accuracy and false alarm frequency. Alarming at 86% for patients that tend to have fewer false alarms and at 80% for those who have more, would likely result in a reasonable tradeoff. The cardiopulmonary findings may lead to SUDEP biomarkers and early seizure termination therapies.

Neurophysiological investigations for the diagnosis of non-epileptic attack disorder in neuropsychiatry services: from safety standards to improved effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

The discipline of clinical neuropsychiatry currently provides specialised services for a number of conditions that cross the traditional boundaries of neurology and psychiatry, including non-epileptic attack disorder. Neurophysiological investigations have an important role within neuropsychiatry services, with video-electroencephalography (EEG) telemetry being the gold standard investigation for the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and non-epileptic attacks. This article reviews existing evidence on best practices for neurophysiology investigations, with focus on safety measures for video-EEG telemetry.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review using the PubMed database in order to identify the scientific literature on the best practices when using neurophysiological investigations in patients with suspected epileptic seizures or non-epileptic attacks.

RESULTS

Specific measures need to be implemented for video-EEG telemetry to be safely and effectively carried out by neuropsychiatry services. A confirmed diagnosis of non-epileptic attack disorder following video-EEG telemetry carried out within neuropsychiatry units has the inherent advantage of allowing diagnosis communication and implementation of treatment strategies in a timely fashion, potentially improving clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness significantly.

CONCLUSION

The identified recommendations set the stage for the development of standardised guidelines to enable neuropsychiatry services to implement streamlined and evidence-based care pathways.

Multimodality peak lctal vital signs during video-EEG monitoring

PURPOSE

To assess and compare peak, multimodal ictal vital signs (iVS) during epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).

METHODS

Between 4/1/2010 and 4/1/2011, 183 adults had video-EEG monitoring, with 96 consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria. Heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SaO2), and blood pressure (BP) were obtained at baseline and during an ictus. The motor semiology of each ES and PNES was also assessed. Student t-test, Fischer's Test, Wilcoxon Test (p=<0.05), and linear regression provided statistical correlation.

RESULTS

The 46 patients with ES and 50 patients with PNES had similar baseline VS. Generalized tonic-clonic ES had the highest absolute iVS. ES yielded a higher absolute ictal HR (p=0.0004) and lower SaO2 nadir (p=0.003) than PNES. Systolic and diastolic BP did not differ between groups (p=NS). The upper ranges of iS-BP attained a maximum value of 195/135mm Hg in ES and 208/128mmHg in PNES. For ES, the change in ictal HR was inversely correlated with a reduction in ictal SaO2 (CC= -0.4; p=0.003). In PNES, ictal HR correlated with systolic BP (CC=0.6; p=<0.0001), but not ictal SaO2.

CONCLUSION

The inverse relationship between ictal HR and ictal SaO2 in ES suggests a neurobiological difference, and the concept of intrinsic cardio-respiratory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy. The significantly raised peak elevations in ictal HR and ictal systolic BP during PNES demonstrates the potential for serious adverse outcomes if attacks are prolonged.

Current practices in long-term video-EEG monitoring services: A survey among partners of the E-PILEPSY pilot network of reference for refractory epilepsy and epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE

The European Union-funded E-PILEPSY network aims to improve awareness of, and accessibility to, epilepsy surgery across Europe. In this study we assessed current clinical practices in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in the participating centers.

METHOD

A 60-item web-based survey was distributed to 25 centers (27 EMUs) of the E-PILEPSY network across 22 European countries. The questionnaire was designed to evaluate the characteristics of EMUs, including organizational aspects, admission, and observation of patients, procedures performed, safety issues, cost, and reimbursement.

RESULTS

Complete responses were received from all (100%) EMUs surveyed. Continuous observation of patients was performed in 22 (81%) EMUs during regular working hours, and in 17 EMUs (63%) outside of regular working hours. Fifteen (56%) EMUs requested a signed informed consent before admission. All EMUs performed tapering/withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs, 14 (52%) prior to admission to an EMU. Specific protocols on antiepileptic drugs (AED) tapering were available in four (15%) EMUs. Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) for the treatment of seizure clusters and status epilepticus were available in 16 (59%). Safety measures implemented by EMUs were: alarm seizure buttons in 21 (78%), restricted patient's ambulation in 19 (70%), guard rails in 16 (59%), and specially designated bathrooms in 7 (26%). Average costs for one inpatient day in EMU ranged between 100 and 2200 Euros.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a considerable diversity in the organization and practice patterns across European epilepsy monitoring units. The collected data may contribute to the development and implementation of evidence-based recommended practices in LTM services across Europe.

A description of Canadian epilepsy monitoring units: An initial step toward developing nursing practice consensus guidelines

OBJECTIVE

The epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) is a well-established resource for investigating patients' seizures but is known to be heterogeneous in organization and clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of similarities and differences in EMU characteristics across Canada, with specific emphasis on EMU organization and nursing resources, which were currently unknown. Results would be used to develop a consensus on best nursing practice guidelines in EMUs with the goal to improve patient care and safety during epilepsy monitoring admissions.

METHODS

An 18-item survey was developed addressing EMU locations, types, nursing ratios, nursing roles, and other allied health resources. Surveys were distributed to lead nurses, physicians, and administrators in 29 EMUs across Canada. Results were tabulated and presented for each question in the survey.

CONCLUSION

All EMUs were located in urban, teaching centers and divided similarly by patient age. The survey demonstrated considerable variability in EMU bed location and organization with the majority of EMUs being smaller, open units embedded in wards rather than larger, closed units. Independent of patient acuity, variability also existed in nurse-to-patient ratios, nursing skill level, specialty nursing support, and EEG technician availability. These findings highlight that EMU heterogeneity contributes to the challenges in the development of standardized safe care practices and that nursing education and nursing best practice recommendations need to be developed with baseline EMU nursing competencies, skills, and knowledge in mind.

Fall prevention and bathroom safety in the epilepsy monitoring unit

Falls are one of the most common adverse events occurring in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) and can result in significant injury. Protocols and procedures to reduce falls vary significantly between institutions as it is not yet known what interventions are effective in the EMU setting. This study retrospectively examined the frequency of falls and the impact of serial changes in fall prevention strategies utilized in the EMU between 2001 and 2014 at a single institution. Overall fall rate was 2.81 per 1000 patient days and varied annually from 0 to 9.02 per 1000 patient days. Both seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic events occurring in the bathroom were more likely to result in falls compared with events occurring elsewhere in the room. With initiation of increased patient education, hourly nurse rounding, nocturnal bed alarms, having two persons assisting for high fall risk patients when out of bed, and immediate postfall team review between 2001 and 2013, there was a trend of decreasing fall frequency; however, no specific intervention could be identified as having a particular high impact. In late 2013, a ceiling lift system extending into the bathroom was put in place for use in all EMU patients when out of bed. In the subsequent 15 months, there have been zero falls. The results reinforce both the need for diligent safety standards to prevent falls in the EMU as well as the challenges in identifying the most effective practices to achieve this goal.

A European survey on current practices in epilepsy monitoring units and implications for patients' safety

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to survey current practices in European epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) with emphasis on safety issues.

METHODS

A 37-item questionnaire investigating characteristics and organization of EMUs, including measures for prevention and management of seizure-related serious adverse events (SAEs), was distributed to all identified European EMUs plus one located in Israel (N=150).

RESULTS

Forty-eight (32%) EMUs, located in 18 countries, completed the questionnaire. Epilepsy monitoring unit beds are 1-2 in 43%, 3-4 in 34%, and 5-6 in 19% of EMUs; staff physicians are 1-2 in 32%, 3-4 in 34%, and 5-6 in 19% of EMUs. Personnel operating in EMUs include epileptologists (in 69% of EMUs), clinical neurophysiologists trained in epilepsy (in 46% of EMUs), child neurologists (in 35% of EMUs), neurology and clinical neurophysiology residents (in 46% and in 8% of EMUs, respectively), and neurologists not trained in epilepsy (in 27% of EMUs). In 20% of EMUs, patients' observation is only intermittent or during the daytime and primarily carried out by neurophysiology technicians and/or nurses (in 71% of EMUs) or by patients' relatives (in 40% of EMUs). Automatic detection systems for seizures are used in 15%, for body movements in 8%, for oxygen desaturation in 33%, and for ECG abnormalities in 17% of EMUs. Protocols for management of acute seizures are lacking in 27%, of status epilepticus in 21%, and of postictal psychoses in 87% of EMUs. Injury prevention consists of bed protections in 96% of EMUs, whereas antisuffocation pillows are employed in 21%, and environmental protections in monitoring rooms and in bathrooms are implemented in 38% and in 25% of EMUs, respectively. The most common SAEs were status epilepticus reported by 79%, injuries by 73%, and postictal psychoses by 67% of EMUs.

CONCLUSIONS

All EMUs have faced different types of SAEs. Wide variation in practice patterns and lack of protocols and of precautions to ensure patients' safety might promote the occurrence and severity of SAEs. Our findings highlight the need for standardized and shared protocols for an effective and safe management of patients in EMUs.

Patients' safety in the epilepsy monitoring unit: time for revising practices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Long-term video-electroencephalography monitoring (LTM) in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) exposes patients to a variety of serious adverse events (SAEs) and safety issues, which have recently caught attention and are summarized in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

SAEs observed during LTM affect about 10% of patients and include secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, seizure clusters and status epilepticus, unusual for the patient; seizure-related falls, injuries, fractures, and aspiration; postictal psychosis; and cardiorespiratory distress, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and near-SUDEP, which were encountered by more than 10% of European and Australian EMUs. Accordingly, 3% of US-based EMUs suffer a death within a 1-year duration census. Many of these SAEs might be promoted by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) withdrawal, for which no specific guideline is currently available. Current recommendations regarding optimal organization of EMUs, and in particular continuous supervision by a dedicated staff, are not followed by respectively 20 and 26% of European and US-based EMUs.

SUMMARY

SAEs during LTM are a significant concern and might be aggravated by suboptimal EMU organization and staff education. Lack of high-level evidence stands out as the main limiting factor to the development and dissemination of appropriate guidelines.

Incidence and mechanisms of cardiorespiratory arrests in epilepsy monitoring units (MORTEMUS): a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of death in people with chronic refractory epilepsy. Very rarely, SUDEP occurs in epilepsy monitoring units, providing highly informative data for its still elusive pathophysiology. The MORTEMUS study expanded these data through comprehensive evaluation of cardiorespiratory arrests encountered in epilepsy monitoring units worldwide.

METHODS

Between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 29, 2009, we did a systematic retrospective survey of epilepsy monitoring units located in Europe, Israel, Australia, and New Zealand, to retrieve data for all cardiorespiratory arrests recorded in these units and estimate their incidence. Epilepsy monitoring units from other regions were invited to report similar cases to further explore the mechanisms. An expert panel reviewed data, including video electroencephalogram (VEEG) and electrocardiogram material at the time of cardiorespiratory arrests whenever available.

FINDINGS

147 (92%) of 160 units responded to the survey. 29 cardiorespiratory arrests, including 16 SUDEP (14 at night), nine near SUDEP, and four deaths from other causes, were reported. Cardiorespiratory data, available for ten cases of SUDEP, showed a consistent and previously unrecognised pattern whereby rapid breathing (18-50 breaths per min) developed after secondary generalised tonic-clonic seizure, followed within 3 min by transient or terminal cardiorespiratory dysfunction. Where transient, this dysfunction later recurred with terminal apnoea occurring within 11 min of the end of the seizure, followed by cardiac arrest. SUDEP incidence in adult epilepsy monitoring units was 5·1 (95% CI 2·6-9·2) per 1000 patient-years, with a risk of 1·2 (0·6-2·1) per 10,000 VEEG monitorings, probably aggravated by suboptimum supervision and possibly by antiepileptic drug withdrawal.

INTERPRETATION

SUDEP in epilepsy monitoring units primarily follows an early postictal, centrally mediated, severe alteration of respiratory and cardiac function induced by generalised tonic-clonic seizure, leading to immediate death or a short period of partly restored cardiorespiratory function followed by terminal apnoea then cardiac arrest. Improved supervision is warranted in epilepsy monitoring units, in particular during night time.

FUNDING

Commission of European Affairs of the International League Against Epilepsy.

A consensus-based approach to patient safety in epilepsy monitoring units: recommendations for preferred practices

Patients in an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) with video-EEG telemetry have a risk for seizure emergencies, injuries and adverse events, which emphasizes the need for strategies to prevent avoidable harm. An expert consensus process was used to establish recommendations for patient safety in EMUs. Workgroups analyzed literature and expert opinion regarding seizure observation, seizure provocation, acute seizures, and activity/environment. A Delphi methodology was used to establish consensus for items submitted by these workgroups. Fifty-three items reached consensus and were organized into 30 recommendations. High levels of agreement were noted for items pertaining to orientation, training, communication, seizure precautions, individualized plans, and patient/family education. It was agreed that seizure observation should include direct observation or use of closed-circuit camera. The use of continuous observation was strongest in patients with invasive electrodes, at high risk for injury, or undergoing AED withdrawal. This process provides a first step in establishing EMU safety practices.

Developing a culture of safety in the epilepsy monitoring unit: a retrospective study of safety outcomes

This study retrospectively reviewed 971 consecutive admissions to our epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) from July 2007 to May 2011 to compare falls and missed seizures before and after implementing stricter safety processes in May 2009. New safety processes included enhanced staff education, a falls prevention signed contract with patient/family, observation of video-EEG monitors only by EEG technologists, hourly nurse rounding, standby assistance for hygiene needs, and immediate review of adverse events. Wilcoxon's two-sample tests were used for statistical analysis of the two groups. Reduced events between pre-intervention (492 patients) and post-intervention (479 patients) were significant for missed seizures (26 pre- vs 6 post-intervention, p=0.009) but not for falls (12 pre- vs 7 post-intervention, p=0.694). Intensive safety efforts in the EMU produced a 15% reduction in the fall rate per 1000 patient days and a 77% decrease in missed seizures. This study shows stricter safety processes help improve EMU patient safety.

Using a standardized assessment tool to measure patient experience on a seizure monitoring unit compared to a general neurology unit

Seizure monitoring unit (SMU) research typically focuses on diagnostic utility and medical management of epilepsy. However, patient safety and satisfaction are also imperative to high-quality SMU care. This study uses a standardized tool to evaluate patient experience on a SMU compared to a general neurology unit (GNU). The 27-item Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey was telephone-administered post-discharge to a sample of patients from our SMU and GNU. Data from a 33-month period were reviewed, encompassing 217 SMU patient admissions and 317 GNU patient admissions. On average, SMU patients were 14.7 years younger and stayed in the hospital 4.2 days longer than GNU patients. SMU patients provided lower overall mental health ratings (p<.001), perceived nursing staff to be more responsive to the call button (p<.001), and assigned higher overall ratings to their stay (p<0.05). Lower education was associated with more favorable hospital ratings on both units (p<0.05).

Efficacy of safety signals in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU): should we worry?

There is little consensus regarding the critical safety measures to prevent harm in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). We sought to determine whether the safety signals (SS) triggered during EMU events differed by seizure type and the efficacy of SS in alerting responders. We screened 468 consecutive EMU admissions from January 2008 until April 2011 for definitive events to evaluate the first 50 events of complex partial seizures (CPS), generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTC), and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Response to telemetry signal was slower than to push button (PB). When there was PB alarm, response time was slower in patients with PNES. A higher proportion of PNES were triggered by PB. A greater percentage of epileptic seizures were missed compared with PNES. Future studies investigating more effective techniques to capture every epileptic seizure are warranted as 24/7 monitoring by healthcare professionals is not feasible in many settings.

Artifact: recording EEG in special care units

Artifacts may be obtained during routine recording but are more common in special care units (SCUs) outside of the EEG laboratory, where complex electrical currents are present that create a "hostile" environment. Special care units include the epilepsy monitoring unit, neurologic intensive care unit, and operating room, where artifact is present in virtually every recording, increasing with prolonged use. Nonepileptic attacks treated as epileptic seizures have been incorrectly diagnosed and treated due to a misinterpreted EEG. The recent emergence of continuous EEG as a neurophysiologic surrogate for brain function in the neurologic intensive care unit and operating room has also brought a greater amount and new types of EEG artifact. The artifacts encountered in special care units during continuous EEG are becoming more complex and may have adverse therapeutic implications. Our knowledge of artifact needs to parallel our growth in technology to avoid the pitfalls that may be incurred during visual analysis of the EEG.

Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units: a survey of epilepsy professionals

In 2008 a workgroup of health care professionals from the American Epilepsy Society (AES) was convened to address the lack of consensus regarding patient care in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). The group developed a questionnaire designed to identify the extent to which selected adverse events occurred in EMUs, and it was sent via email to all members of the AES. We asked that only one representative from each center report. Seventy responses were received. The number of centers reporting the following adverse events included: falls by 69%, status epilepticus by 63%, and postictal psychosis by 54%. Infrequent events with serious consequences were also reported including pneumonia by 10%, cardiac arrest by 7%, fractures by 6%, and death by 3% (N=2). Of the 58 respondents who reported using intracranial electrodes, 37.9% (N=22) reported that patients pulled out or dislodged electrodes. This study highlights the need for EMUs to identify and address potential safety risks in their environment, patient population, and system of care.

Safety and yield of early cessation of AEDs in video-EEG telemetry and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Video-electroencephalography (VEEG) telemetry is the simultaneous recording of ictal and interictal EEG pattern and paroxysmal behavior to investigate the nature of paroxysmal events.

METHODS

This is a prospective study performed to asses the safety and yield of early discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the telemetry unit. Over a 2.5-year period, 50 patients that met the indications for VEEG monitoring were admitted by an epileptologist to neuro-observation units with continuous monitoring, nursing coverage and EEG technicians support during working hours and on-call thereafter. In most cases AEDs (except Phenobarbital) were discontinued in 24h. We prospectively assessed the yield and safety of the telemetry investigation as well as epilepsy surgery outcomes.

RESULTS

Our monitoring answered the study question in 88% of the patients. The question was not answered in 12% of cases due to the lack of recorded events. Our results changed the management in 74% of cases and potentially improved quality of life by decreasing the AEDs consumption and number of seizures per month. Over all, 22% received epilepsy surgery and became either seizure free or their seizures became non-disabling. Our method significantly decreased the duration of hospital admission for monitoring and minimal complications occurred only in 8% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our method for short VEEG monitoring has a high yield for diagnosis, minimal complications and is cost effective. These qualities, together with good surgery results validate our method for the investigation and treatment of refractory seizure cases.