Biweekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in platinum-resistant/refractory, paclitaxel-pretreated, ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and bevacizumab for first recurrent and refractory ovarian clear cell carcinoma Kansai Clinical Oncology Group-G1601

Patients with advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) have a poor prognosis in the absence of an effective standard treatment. Combination therapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and bevacizumab (GPBev) is promising for ovarian CCC. Thus, we conducted a multi-institutional, phase II trial in Japan to examine the efficacy and safety of GPBev for CCC. This is the first study on the use of GPBev for CCC. Eighteen patients (median age, 56.5 years) with pathologically confirmed first recurrent or refractory CCC and having evaluable regions, as assessed using RECIST, were recruited between January 2017 and May 2019. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2), cisplatin (40 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, every 28 days, for 6-10 cycles, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). Fifteen patients (83.3%) completed 6-10 cycles of treatment; three patients (two with AEs and one with progressive disease) did not. The ORR was 61.1% [complete response (CR) 3 and partial response (PR) 8] and DCR was 88.9% (CR 3, PR 8, and stable disease 5). Grade 3 and 4 hematological AEs were observed in 16.7 and 5.6% of the patients, respectively. Nonhematological AEs of grades 3 and 4 were observed in 27.8 and 5.6% of the patients, respectively. GPBev is a promising therapy for CCC owing to the high ORR and acceptable toxicity for the first recurrence and refractory CCC.

PARP Inhibitor in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Single-Center Real-World Experience

PURPOSE

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have proven efficacy in treatment of BReast CAncer (BRCA) gene mutation-positive platinum-sensitive ovarian cancers. There is paucity of data for their role in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). We report here retrospective analysis of outcome of PARPi treatment in a group of patients including those of PROC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed all consecutive patients who received PARPi. The efficacy of PARPi monotherapy was assessed in patients with relapsed high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with gBRCAm. The drug was procured through compassionate program. Drugs (olaparib and talazoparib) were provided in capsule form.

RESULTS

Between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, 28 patients with ovarian cancer received PARPi. At the time of data censoring (September 30, 2019), four (14.3%) patients are still on treatment. Median age was 54.5 years (range, 39-75 years). Median number of previous lines of chemotherapy received was three (range, 1-6). Eleven platinum-sensitive patients received the drug as maintenance (five in complete response and six in partial response after chemotherapy), whereas 17 (60.7%) had platinum-resistant progressive disease while starting the drug. In PROC, objective response rate (complete response plus partial response) was 47%, median progression-free survival was 8.2 months (5.3-11.3), and overall survival was 14.9 months (11.2-18.5). No new side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study from India evaluating PARPi in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. This study suggests that PARPi is a viable treatment option in patients with PROC with gBRCAm. This should be further evaluated in randomized clinical trial.

The systemic treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer revisited

Treatment approaches for relapsed ovarian cancer have evolved over the past decade from a calendar-based decision tree to a patient-oriented biologically driven algorithm. Nowadays, platinum-based chemotherapy should be offered to all patients with a reasonable chance of responding to this therapy. The treatment-free interval for platinum is only one of many factors affecting patients' eligibility for platinum re-treatment. Bevacizumab increases the response to chemotherapy irrespective of the cytotoxic regimen and can be valuable in patients with an urgent need for symptom relief (e.g. pleural effusion, ascites). For patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian cancer, which responds to platinum-based treatment, maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor can be offered, regardless of the BRCA mutation status. Here we review contemporary decision-making processes in the systemic treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer.

Dose-dense cisplatin with gemcitabine for relapsed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Standard of care treatment for women who develop relapsed ovarian cancer includes sequential platinum- and/or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, with reducing disease-free intervals. Once platinum resistance develops, treatment options become limited and dose-dense regimens may be offered. We report the efficacy and safety of dose-dense cisplatin with gemcitabine chemotherapy for relapsed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients with relapsed, platinum-resistant ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer treated with cisplatin 35 mg/m² of body surface area by intravenous infusion with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² of body surface area by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 of every 21-day treatment cycle between 1 January 2009 and 1 June 2017.

RESULTS

Ninety-four eligible patients had received a median of three (range one-eight) prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for relapsed ovarian cancer. Sixty patients (64%) had received ≥ 1 prior dose-dense chemotherapy regimen. Dose-dense cisplatin with gemcitabine was associated with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.4 months (95% CI 3.6 to 5.3) and overall survival of 7.6 months (95% CI 5.6 to 9.6). The median PFS for dose-dense cisplatin with gemcitabine as first- (n = 34), second- (n = 42), and third-line or later (n = 18) dose-dense therapy was 4.2 (95% CI 3.2 to 5.2), 5.0 (95% CI 3.5 to 6.5), and 4.2 (95% CI 3.3 to 5.1) months respectively. The RECIST objective response rate for first-, second-, and third-line dose-dense cisplatin with gemcitabine was 23%, 14 %, and 7 % respectively. The most common grade 3 - 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (18%), and neutropenia (14%).

DISCUSSION

Dose-dense cisplatin with gemcitabine provides modest efficacy whether it is used as a first- or subsequent line of dose-dense chemotherapy to treat relapsed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and the toxicity is manageable with supportive measures.

Mechanisms underlying acquired platinum resistance in high grade serous ovarian cancer - a mini review

BACKGROUND

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the hardest human malignancies to treat. Standard treatment involves cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, however, median progression-free survival for patients diagnosed with advanced stage disease (FIGO stages III and IV) is approximately 18 months. There has been little improvement in overall survival over the past decade and less than half of women with advanced stage disease will be living 5 years after diagnosis. A majority of patients initially have a favourable response to platinum-based chemotherapy, but most will eventually relapse and their disease will become platinum resistant.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Here, we review our current understanding of mechanisms that promote recurrence and acquired resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer with particular focus on studies that describe differences observed between untreated primary tumors and recurrent tumors, post-first-line chemotherapy. Multiple molecular mechanisms contribute to recurrence in patients following initial treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer including those involving the tumor microenvironment, tumor immune status, cancer stem cells, DNA repair/cell survival pathways and extracellular matrix.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Due to the adaptive nature of recurrent tumors, the major contributing and specific resistance pattern may largely depend on the nature of the primary tumor itself.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Future work that aims to elucidate the complex pattern of acquired resistance will be useful for predicting chemotherapy response/recurrence following primary diagnosis and to develop novel treatment strategies to improve the survival of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, especially in tumors not harbouring homologous DNA recombination repair deficiencies.

A retrospective evaluation of activity of gemcitabine/platinum regimens in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

While many of these agents have been compared in prospective clinical trials, the gemcitabine/platinumbased regimens have not been compared in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. While bothgemcitabine/carboplatin and gemcitabine/cisplatin have a similar ORR in separate clinical trials, the tworegimens have never been directly been compared. With overlapping dose-limiting toxicity of thrombocytopenia, the gemcitabine/carboplatin regimen has been challenging to employ in the clinical setting in previously treated ovarian cancer patients and is often associated with treatment delays and/or dose reductions. Gemcitabine/cisplatin can also be a challenge due to its dose limiting neuropathy and renal toxicity, especially in previously treated patients. In the absence of any prospective, head to head comparison this retrospective study was embarked upon to compare the response rate and toxicity profiles of gemcitabine/cisplatin verses gemcitabine/carboplatin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive verses platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review study that identified patients that had received either gemcitabine/cisplatin or gemcitabine/carboplatin for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer and compared documented hematological and non-hematological toxicity and response based on RECIST (v1.1). Data was evaluated based upon platinum sensitivity/resistance as well.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients were identified that had received a gemcitabine/platinum regimen with 48 with recurrent ovarian cancer that were included in the study. There were 21 patients in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm and 27 patients identified in the gemcitabine/carboplatin arm. Objective response rate (ORR) was greater in platinum-sensitive patients that received gemcitabine/carboplatin compared to gemcitabine/cisplatin (8 (67%) vs 2 (25%), p < 0.05). Conversely, ORR was greater in platinum-resistant patients treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin (4 (57%) vs 1 (25%), NS). Mean time to progression was greater in gemcitabine/cisplatin patients (7.2 vs 5.1 months, p < 0.03). Patients treated with gemcitabine/carboplatin discontinued due to toxicity at a greater rate (8 (33%) vs 5 (24%)). Specifically gemcitabine/carboplatin had a greater incidence (85%) of grade 2 or greater leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia compared to gemcitabine/cisplatin (19%) However, there was no significant difference in dose reductions, treatment delays, or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration between regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine/cisplatin appears to have greater efficacy in platinum-resistant patients, while gemcitabine/carboplatin seems to have greater efficacy in platinum-sensitive patients. Overall, gemcitabine/carboplatin was associated with a greater incidence of myelosuppression and discontinuation due to toxicity. Similar to findings in endometrial cancer, gemcitabine/cisplatin may have benefit specifically in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Capecitabine for Primary Platinum-Resistant or Platinum-Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Retrospective, Single-Institution Study

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Objective

Primary platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is an area of unmet medical need. There is limited evidence from small studies that platinum-based combinations can overcome “resistance” in a proportion of patients. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of platinum-based combination chemotherapy in the platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory setting.

Methods

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) combination chemotherapy was used at our institution for the treatment of relapsed EOC. From the institutional database, we identified all patients with primary platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant relapse treated with ECX as second-line therapy between 2001 and 2012. We extracted demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data and outcomes. We used logistic and Cox regression models to identify predictors of response and survival respectively.

Results

Thirty-four 34 patients (8 refractory, 26 resistant) were treated with ECX. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) response rate was 45%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months, and overall survival (OS) was 10.6 months. Platinum-resistant patients had better outcomes than did platinum-refractory patients (response rate, 54% vs 0%, P = 0.047; PFS 7.2 vs 1.8 months, P < 0.0001; OS 14.4 vs 3 months, P < 0.001). In regression models, time to progression after first-line treatment and platinum-refractory status were the strongest predictors of response and PFS or OS, respectively. Patients with time to progression after first-line treatment longer than 3 months showed PFS and OS of 7.9 and 14.7 months, respectively. Toxicity was manageable, with only 13% of cycles administered at reduced doses.

Conclusions

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine seems to be active in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC with manageable toxicity. Further prospective investigation of platinum-anthracycline combinations is warranted in patients who relapse 3 to 6 months after first-line platinum-taxane treatment.

Intensive cisplatin/oral etoposide for epithelial ovarian cancer: the Cambridge Gynae-Oncology Centre experience: too toxic for relapse?

Intensive cisplatin and oral etoposide for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), commonly known as the van der Burg (VDB) protocol, has been reported to improve response rates and progression-free survival. We report on all patients with relapsed EOC treated on the VDB protocol at the Cambridge Gynae-Oncology Centre. From the institutional databases, we identified all patients treated since 2001. We extracted demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data and outcomes. We used Cox regression to identify predictors of survival. A total of 35 patients were treated on the VDB protocol. Toxicity was significant, with grade 3/4 fatigue, nausea and vomiting affecting 46, 46 and 29% of patients, respectively. Six patients had grade 3/4 infection and four (11%) deaths occurred on treatment. Efficacy was encouraging, with a radiological response rate of 43%, a median progression-free survival of 5.8 months and a median overall survival of 14.1 months. No significant difference in efficacy was seen between platinum-resistant and sensitive patients. We report significant activity of the VDB protocol in a routine clinical setting. However, the high rates of serious toxicity and treatment-related deaths among patients treated with palliative intent proved unacceptable. The Cambridge Gynae-Oncology Centre no longer uses this regimen in women with relapsed EOC.

Treatment options in recurrent ovarian cancer: latest evidence and clinical potential

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women. Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of OC, the majority of patients experience disease recurrence and receive second-line and sometimes several lines of treatment. Here we review the options available for the treatment of recurrent disease and discuss how different agents are selected, combined and offered in a rationale sequence in the context of multidisciplinary care. We reviewed published work between 1990 and 2013 and meeting abstracts related to the use of chemotherapy and surgery in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. We discuss treatment regimens, efficacy endpoints and safety profiles of the different therapies. Platinum-based drugs are the most active agents and are selected on the basis of a probability of response to retreatment. Nonplatinum-based chemotherapy regimens are usually given in the 'platinum-resistant' setting and have a modest effect on outcome. Molecular targeted therapy of ovarian cancer given alone or integrated with chemotherapy is showing promising results. Many patients are now receiving more than one line of therapy for recurrent disease, usually platinum based until platinum resistance emerges. The sequential use of chemotherapy regimens and the incorporation of molecularly targeted treatments, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have over the last decade significantly extended the median survival of patients with ovarian cancer.

A phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin and bevacizumab for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The doublet gemcitabine and carboplatin is effective for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, while multi-agent chemotherapy with bevacizumab may add additional benefit. This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of a biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or tubal cancer (ROC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients received concurrent gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), carboplatin area under the curve 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 every 28 days for six cycles or up to 24 cycles if clinical benefit occurred. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST, and safety; the secondary end points were objective response rates and overall survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.3). The objective response rate was 69%. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (2%). Grades 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (18%), pain (9%), and nausea/vomiting (4%). There were 2 episodes of cerebrovascular accidents, 2 noted DVTs, and no episodes of bowel perforation. Median OS was 36.1 months (95% CI, 26.7 to 45.5).

CONCLUSION

Biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab were an effective regimen in recurrent ovarian cancer, with comparable toxicity to recently reported day 1 gemcitabine, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and day 8 gemcitabine. Response rate and PFS are improved from reported outcomes of the gemcitabine carboplatin doublet. The degree to which biweekly dosing may present a more rationale schedule for this triplet should be evaluated further.

Gemcitabine as a molecular targeting agent that blocks the Akt cascade in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine (2', 2' -difluorodeoxycytidine) is one of many nonplatinum drugs that exhibit activity in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms by which Gemcitabine treatment inhibits the proliferation of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells still remain unclear. We investigated whether Gemcitabine increases the efficacy of Cisplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer models in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

We used Cisplatin-resistant Caov-3 cells, A2780CP cells and Cisplatin-sensitive A2780 cells to examine the sensitivity of the cell viability of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay and the sensitivity of the invasive activity of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine using an invasion assay with Matrigel. We examined the Akt kinase activity and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) expression following Cisplatin and Gemcitabine treatment using a Western blot analysis and the mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Moreover, we evaluated the effects of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine on the intra-abdominal dissemination of ovarian cancer in vivo.

RESULTS

Gemcitabine significantly inhibited Cisplatin-induced Akt activation in the Caov-3 and A2780CP cells, but not in the A2780 cells. In the presence of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis were significantly enhanced in the Caov-3 and A2780CP cells. Co-treatment with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine almost completely inhibited invasion of both types of cells through the Matrigel; however, neither Cisplatin nor Gemcitabine alone inhibited the invasion of both types of cells. Gemcitabine inhibited not only the Cisplatin-induced activation of Akt, but also the MMP9 and mRNA expression of VEGF. Moreover, treatment with Gemcitabine increased the efficacy of Cisplatin-induced growth inhibition of the intra-abdominal dissemination and production of ascites in the athymic nude mice inoculated with Caov-3 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We herein demonstrated that Gemcitabine inhibits the Akt kinase activity and angiogenetic activity following treatment with Cisplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells. These results provide a rationale for using Gemcitabine in clinical regimens containing molecular targeting agents against platinum-resistant ovarian cancers.

Complete remission of platinum-refractory primary Fallopian tube carcinoma with third-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin: A case report and review of the literature

Primary Fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is a rare but highly aggressive disease. Currently, treatments are similar to those used in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), however, there are distinct differences between the two diseases. PFTC tends to recur in the retroperitoneal nodes and distant sites more often than EOC. Limited literature with regard to effective agents in platinum-resistant and -refractory (Pt-R) disease exists, particularly after two lines of consecutive treatment. In this case report, a 47-year-old female with PFTC exhibited recurrence in the liver after postoperative chemotherapy. The patient received paclitaxel and cisplatin combination as first-line chemotherapy and topotecan as a second-line treatment, which is considered platinum-refractory. After the second-line treatment failed, this patient received a gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination as third-line chemotherapy for a total of 6 cycles. The liver metastases regressed rapidly and completely. The patient's progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months and overall survival (OS) was 45 months. In conclusion, gemcitabine and cisplatin combination is an effective regimen for refractory PFTC even after the failure of two previous lines of consecutive chemotherapy and this warrants further independent investigation.

Improved survival trends in platinum-resistant patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer treated with first-line paclitaxel/platinum chemotherapy: the impact of novel agents

OBJECTIVE

The prognosis for patients with platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer remains poor. The impact of approved agents on survival has not been clarified during the last decade. We studied survival trends during the last 15 years in platinum-resistant patients treated with cytoreductive surgery followed by paclitaxel/platinum chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer, stages III/IV and platinum-resistant disease after first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel/platinum were included. They were grouped according to the period of chemotherapy: group A 31/3/1995-31/12/2001 (n = 56) and Group B 1/1/2002-24/12/2008 (n = 57). In order to compensate for the difference in follow-up between the 2 groups, we performed minimum follow-up (MFU) analyses by considering as cases only women who had an event within 3 years of follow-up. Patients with no events for up to 3 years were censored at that time.

RESULTS

MFU analyses showed that median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in group B: 12.3 vs. 17.5 months (p = 0.012). This was due to a doubling of the median OS after relapse: 5.7 vs. 10.9 months (p = 0.0180). Multivariate Cox regression indicated group and histology as factors statistically significantly associated with OS. Following relapse, patients in group B were predominantly treated with liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine, and patients in group A were treated with platinum compounds, docetaxel and oral etoposide (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of novel agents without cross-resistance to platinum or taxanes has improved the prognosis of platinum-resistant patients.

Role of gemcitabine in the treatment of ovarian cancer

The US FDA has recently approved the combination of carboplatin and gemcitabine as a second-line therapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This article briefly reviews the pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action of gemcitabine and its synergistic effect with platinum. An overview of the literature on the role of gemcitabine in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer is also presented.

Combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is highly active in women with endometrial carcinoma: results of a prospective phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer remains problematic, because chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have yielded low response rates and limited progression-free survival. Because the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin demonstrated synergism in preclinical studies, the authors attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A prospective, single-institution, phase 2 study was performed in women with histologically documented International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV or recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin at a dose of 35 mg/m2 were administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle; because of myelosuppression, the protocol was revised to gemcitabine at a dose of 900 mg/m2 and cisplatin at a dose of 30 mg/m2. Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were enrolled and received a median of 5 courses of therapy (range, 1-9 courses). The median age at the time of study enrollment was 62 years (range, 41-75 years). Of 20 evaluable patients, 2 (10%) had a confirmed complete response, 8 (40%) had a partial response, 6 (30%) had stable disease, and 4 (20%) developed progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (range, 2.3-33.6 months), and the median overall survival was 18.2 months (range, 2.5-49.4 months). The development of toxicity mandated dose reductions in 16 of 20 patients (80%). Eighteen patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxic effects (graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]).

CONCLUSIONS

The objective response rate of 50% noted with gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy merits the further development of this regimen in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Overcoming platinum resistance in ovarian carcinoma

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Ovarian cancer remains a deadly malignancy because most patients develop recurrent disease that is resistant to chemotherapy, including platinum. Because response rates for current treatment regimens are relatively similar and unfortunately low, no standard chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer exists.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

A systematic literature review of clinical studies published between January 2005 and March 2010 was conducted using search engines, PubMed and MEDLINE with the entry keywords 'ovarian cancer' and 'platinum resistance'. This search revealed 40 clinical trials (1793 patients).

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Gemcitabine was the most common drug used in clinical trials reporting higher response rates, ≥ +1 SD of overall response rate (5 out of 8). Gemcitabine-based combination therapy showed an average response rate of 27.2% (95% CI, 22.4-32.0). Combination of gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was the most common regimen (n = 3) and was associated with possible additive effects in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients: response rate, gemcitabine alone 6.1%, PLD alone 19.8%, and gemcitabine with PLD 28.7% (95% CI, 20.4-37.0), respectively.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Analysis of recent clinical trials showed that gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy was associated with the highest antitumor effects in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients during the study period.

Inhibition of carboplatin-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair by gemcitabine in patients receiving these drugs for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The potential of gemcitabine to interact with carboplatin was explored in a phase II trial in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were sampled after drug administration to measure DNA interstrand cross-link formation and repair.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients received carboplatin target area under concentration-time curve (AUC 4) followed by gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) with a second dose of gemcitabine on day 8. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were obtained in 12 patients before and at intervals during the first cycle of chemotherapy. DNA cross-link formation and repair (unhooking) were measured by the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay following ex vivo incubation.

RESULTS

The global response rate was 47% (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors rate, 29%; CA125 rate, 63%). Delays in treatment were seen in 24% of cycles largely due to myelosuppression; 15% of day 8 administration was omitted. Peak carboplatin-induced DNA cross-linking was seen by 24 hours. Significant reduction was seen in the repair of in vivo carboplatin-induced DNA cross-links following administration of gemcitabine.

CONCLUSION

An enhanced activity of carboplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer may be due to synergy with gemcitabine through inhibition of repair of DNA cross-links. Future studies should explore coadministration of these drugs, as this may be a more effective schedule.

Carboplatin/gemcitabine alternating with carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin/cyclophosphamide in platinum-refractory/resistant paclitaxel - pretreated ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

In this phase II study the efficacy and toxicity of an alternating chemotherapy regimen was examined in platinum-resistant relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with platinum-refractory/resistant relapsed EOC, previously treated with carboplatin+paclitaxel+/-epirubicin were included. The regimen was consisted of gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1+8) and carboplatin AUC 5, alternating with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5, alternating with carboplatin AUC 5 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks for a total of 9 cycles.

RESULTS

Among 38 patients with measurable disease, 39.4% (95% CI: 23.2-55.7) responded (five complete response and 10 partial response), while 30 out of 40 (75%) patients assessable by CA125 criteria had a serological response. Responses were more frequent in patients with platinum-free interval (PFI) 3-6 months than in those with PFI 0-3 months, but this was not statistically-significant. After a median follow-up of 19.5 months (range, 1.0-37+ months) the median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 3.4-10.8) and the median survival (OS) was 18.8 months (95% CI: 15.6-22.0). For patients with PFI 0-3 months PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 0.8-7.8) months, while for those with PFI 3-6 months PFS was 8.9 (95% CI: 5.3-12.4) months (p=0.062). The regimen was well-tolerated and the main grade 3-4 toxicity was myelosuppression, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, allergy and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

This alternating regimen, including carboplatin, gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, is an active and well-tolerated treatment in platinum relapsed/refractory EOC patients.

Feasibility study for biweekly administration of cisplatin plus gemcitabine as adjuvant-chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of biweekly administration of cisplatin and gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, single-institutional study. Patients with completely resected NSCLC (p-Stages IB-IIIA) with no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Simon's optimal two-stage design was applied. Both cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) were given on days 1 and 15, every 28 days. The primary endpoint of this study was the feasibility of this combination in the four cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (19 lobectomies and 1 pneumonectomy) were enrolled in this study. Nine (45%) of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 6 (30%) had grade 3/4 anemia. Severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon in this series. No treatment-related death was encountered. Thirteen (65%) patients completed the planned 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The median intensity was 24 (range 21-25) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 24.0 (21-25) mg/(m(2) week) cisplatin and 483 (range 412-500) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 481.0 (412-500) mg/(m(2) week) gemcitabine. The median relative dose intensity of cisplatin was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 87.4 (25-100) % and that of gemcitabine was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 86.8 (25-100) %.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is feasible in the treatment of patients with completely resected NSCLC. A multicenter phase III trial is warranted to assess the efficacy of this regimen at promoting survival and preventing recurrence.

The combination of monthly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel is highly active for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response rate and toxicity of a regimen comprised of monthly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel for recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated between 2001 and 2006 at a single institution with carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1), and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15) of a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoints were response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated with this regimen from 2001 to 2006. Stage ranged from stages IC to IV. All received intravenous platinum and taxane as their initial therapy. Histologic subtypes included papillary serous (17), carcinosarcoma (1), and clear cell (2). The median number of prior regimens was 1 (range 1-3). The overall response rate was 85.0% (15 complete responses, 2 partial responses). Patients with tumors categorized as platinum sensitive had a response rate of 93.3% (14/15) and those with tumors deemed platinum resistant had a response rate of 60.0% (3/5). The median survival has not yet been reached after a median follow-up of 28 months. Neutropenia was the only grade 3/4 toxicity, occurring in 7 patients (35.0%). Platinum hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 5 patients (25.0%) who all successfully continued treatment using a carboplatin desensitization protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

A monthly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel regimen is highly active for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. The regimen is well tolerated. This pilot series demonstrates the potential for this regimen as treatment of choice among doublet first salvage regimens for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, thus warranting multi-institutional study.

Prognostic factors associated with response in platinum retreatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

The goal of this study was to determine the factors associated with response to platinum retreatment in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. A review of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer retreated with cisplatin or carboplatin between 2002 and 2004 was performed. The platinum-free interval (PFI) and treatment-free interval (TFI) were determined for each patient. Response was based on serial CA125 levels using a modification of the Rustin criteria. Patients with clinical benefit ([CB] those who attained at least stable disease) were compared to patients with disease progression (PD). An analysis was performed to determine factors associated with CB in platinum-resistant patients retreated with platinum. Of 48 patients identified, 37 were evaluable included in this analysis. CB was observed in 27 (73%) while disease progression was noted in 10 (27%) women. The PFI was longer in those women who achieved CB (12.3 vs 6.9 months; P = 0.02). The TFI was 7.1 months for patients benefited from platinum retreatment vs 3.5 months for those with disease progression (P = 0.06). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of cytotoxic agents between the time of platinum retreatment and the prior platinum regimen (2 vs 1.5 months; P = 0.61). A prolonged PFI was associated with an improved chance of achieving CB with platinum retreatment. There was no association between the response to platinum retreatment and the number of intervening cytotoxic agents utilized. Further prospective study is warranted to define the optimal timing of platinum retreatment.

Gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin alternating with cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in platinum refractory/resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated, ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This phase II study conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (LDOX) alternating with cisplatin (CDDP) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) in platinum-resistant/refractory, paclitaxel pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with CDDP-resistant/refractory and paclitaxel pretreated patients were treated with 8 cycles of GEM 800 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 and LDOX 30 mg/m2 day 1, alternating with CDDP 60 mg/m2 and CTX 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Objective responses were observed in 37.5% of patients (4 complete and 11 partial responses) with measurable disease (n=40). CA125 response occurred in 30 (71.4%) of patients with elevated CA125 (n=42). After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 5.2-8.5), while the median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months (95% CI: 12.7-23.6). A progression-free interval (PFI) of 0-3 months was associated with lower objective responses (10% versus 46.6%, p=0.06). Chemotherapy was well tolerated. The most frequent toxicities were myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, fatigue and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). Overall 31 (65%) patients received G-CSF and 13 (27%) antibiotics because of neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

This alternating combination chemotherapy is feasible for patients with platinum-resistant EOC and is associated with encouraging outcomes and a favorable toxicity profile.