Cytoreduction vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Factors Predicting Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Primary Debulking Surgery in Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer-A National Cancer Database Study

OBJECTIVES

We performed a patterns-of-care study to characterize the types of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

We identified patients with stages IIIC and IV EOC in the NCDB diagnosed from 2003 to 2011. Patients who received chemotherapy (CT) prior to surgery were classified as receiving NACT; if surgery preceded CT, then it was classified as PDS. Data collected from the NCDB included demographics, medical comorbidity index, cancer characteristics and treatment, and hospital characteristics. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using χ test, logistic regression, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards modeling as indicated. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 62,727 patients with stages IIIC and IV EOC were identified. The sequence of surgery and CT was identified, of which 6922 (11%) had NACT and 31,280 (50%) had PDS. Neoadjuvant CT was more frequently done in stage IV than stage IIIC (13% vs 9%), and its use markedly increased over time. Variables associated with increased likelihood of NACT use were as follows: age older than 50 years and those with higher comorbidities, stage IV, and higher-grade EOC. Neoadjuvant CT use was also associated with hospitals that were adherent to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, high-volume facilities, those in the Midwest and West, and academic centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that patients with greater adverse risk factors are more likely to receive NACT instead of PDS. Use of NACT has significantly increased over the study period, especially in patients with stage IV ovarian cancer.

Preoperative prediction of suboptimal resection in advanced ovarian cancer based on clinical and CT parameters

Background Cytoreduction is important as a survival predictor in advanced ovarian cancer. Purpose To determine the prediction of suboptimal resection (SOR) in advanced ovarian cancer based on clinical and computed tomography (CT) parameters. Material and Methods Between 2007 and 2015, 327 consecutive patients with FIGO stage III-IV ovarian cancer and preoperative CT were included. During 2007-2012, patients were assigned to a derivation dataset ( n = 220) and the others were assigned to a validation dataset ( n = 107). Clinical parameters were reviewed and two radiologists assessed the presence or absence of tabulated parameters on CT images. Logistic regression analyses based on area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were performed to identify variables predicting SOR, and generated simple score using Cox proportional hazards model. Results There was no statistical difference in patients' characteristics in both datasets, except for residual disease ( P = 0.001). Optimal resection improved from 45.0% (99/220) in the derivation dataset to 64.4% (69/107) in the validation dataset. Logistic regression identified that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (ECOG-PS 2), involvements of peritoneum, diaphragm, bowel mesentery and suprarenal lymph nodes, and pleural effusion were independent variables of SOR. Overall AUROC for score predicting SOR was 0.761 with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 70.6%, 73.2%, 68.7%, and 91.9%, respectively. In the derivation dataset, AUROC was 0.792, with sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 74.3%, and AUROC of 0.758 with sensitivity of 69.2% and specificity of 72.8% in the validation dataset. Conclusion CT may be a useful preoperative predictor of SOR in advanced ovarian cancer.

The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer

Gynecologic oncologists have an essential role to treat women with gynecological cancer. It has been demonstrated that specialized physicians who work in multidisciplinary teams to treat women with gynecological cancers are able to obtain the best clinical and oncological outcomes. However, the access to gynecologic oncologists for women with suspected gynecological cancer is scarce. Therefore, this review analyzes the importance of specialized care of women with ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer. In addition, the role of gynecologic oncologists who offer fertility-sparing treatment as well as their role in assisting general gynecologists and obstetricians is also reviewed.

Selecting the best strategy of treatment in newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients

Although it is assumed that the combination of chemotherapy and radical surgery should be indicated in all newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients, one of the main raised questions is how to select the best strategy of initial treatment in this group of patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery or primary debulking surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The selection criteria to offer one strategy over the other as well as a stepwise patient selection for initial treatment are described. Selecting the best strategy of treatment in newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer patients is a multifactorial and multidisciplinary decision. Several factors should be taken into consideration: (1) the disease factor, related to the extension and localization of the disease as well as tumor biology; (2) the patient factor, associated with patient age, poor performance status, and co-morbidities; and (3) institutional infrastructure factor, related to the lack of prolonged operative time, an appropriate surgical armamentarium, as well as well-equipped intensive care units with well-trained personnel.

Radiological predictors of cytoreductive outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess site of disease on preoperative computed tomography (CT) to predict surgical debulking in patients with ovarian cancer.

DESIGN

Two-phase retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, UK.

POPULATION

Women with stage 3 or 4, ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

Preoperative CT images were reviewed by experienced radiologists to assess the presence or absence of disease at predetermined sites. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression models determined sites of disease which were significantly associated with surgical outcomes in the test (n = 111) and validation (n = 70) sets.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity and specificity of CT in predicting surgical outcome.

RESULTS

Stepwise logistic regression identified that the presence of lung metastasis, pleural effusion, deposits on the large-bowel mesentery and small-bowel mesentery, and infrarenal para-aortic nodes were associated with debulking status. Logistic regression determined a surgical predictive score which was able to significantly predict suboptimal debulking (n = 94, P = 0.0001) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.749 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.652, 0.846) and a sensitivity of 69.2%, specificity of 71.4%, positive predictive value of 75.0% and negative predictive value of 65.2%. These results remained significant in a recent validation set. There was a significant difference in residual disease volume in the test and validation sets (P < 0.001) in keeping with improved optimal debulking rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of disease at some sites on preoperative CT scan is significantly associated with suboptimal debulking and may be an indication for a change in surgical planning.

A survival analysis comparing women with ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma to those with high-grade histology

Ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) and high-grade serous carcinoma have distinct molecular profiles, clinical behaviors, and treatment responses. The survival advantage for patients with low-grade carcinoma compared with patients with high-grade histology remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 381 patients with ovarian serous carcinoma at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 2007 to 2010. Patients were classified into two groups according to MD Anderson two-tier system: 35 (9.2%) cases with LGSC and 346 with high-grade serous carcinoma. Patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer had a significantly younger age at diagnosis (46 versus 56 years, P=0.046), and their median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival values were 35.0 and 54.0 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that, for serous ovarian cancer, the histological grade was a significant prognostic factor for PFS but not for overall survival (P=0.022 and P=0.0566, respectively). When stratified by the existence of a residual disease, patients with low-grade disease who underwent cytoreductive surgery without macroscopic residual disease (>1 cm) had a significantly improved median PFS time (36.0 months) compared with that of patients with high-grade carcinoma who received optimal cytoreductive surgery (16.0 months, P=0.017). Conversely, patients with low-grade and high-grade carcinoma who were left with macroscopic residue (>1 cm) experienced a similarly shorter median PFS (10.0 and 13.0 months, respectively, P=0.871). The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and residual disease were significant prognostic factors of low-grade carcinoma, while positive ascites was associated with a worse PFS value. Our data showed that LGSC is a different entity from high-grade carcinoma and that LGSC was associated with improved PFS after optimal cytoreductive surgery but not suboptimal operation.

Interval debulking surgery in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the outcome in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC and IV ovarian cancer were assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

67 patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) and ≥ 4 courses of platinum-based NAC were analyzed for survival, perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 30 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months, the overall survival (OS) 34 months. The PFS of patients without residual disease (n = 23; 34.3%) was 31 months (p = 0.003), the OS 65 months (p = 0.001). PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with no residual disease than in patients with 1-10 mm (n = 34; 47.9%) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively) residual disease. No survival benefit was seen for patients with 1-10 mm compared to > 1 cm (n = 12; 16.9%) residual disease (PFS p = 0.518; OS p = 0.077). 1 patient (1.4%) died; 12 patients needed interventional treatment or operation (16.9%) within the first 30 days postoperatively. Out of these, 5 patients (7.0%) had residual or lasting disability.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC and IDS are safe and feasible in this series of patients with unfavorable prognosis. IDS does not change the goal of complete cytoreduction and therefore does not compensate for a less radical surgical approach.

Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review

Background:

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. Progression-free and overall survival is significantly related to surgical success and residual disease volume. It is unclear whether this survival advantage is due to an intrinsic biological element of the tumour cells which enables successful surgery and improved prognosis, or alternatively the number of tumour sustaining cells remaining irrespective of differences in biology.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was performed identifying studies that have investigated the association between biomarkers and surgical outcomes. We attempted validation of these results using The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian cancer data sets.

Results:

Thirty studies were identified of which sixteen determined protein expression, eight gene expression and one DNA methylation in association with surgical debulking. Individualised linear models adjusting for batch, stage and age identified only expression of the genes MTDH and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) to be significantly associated with debulking surgery (P<0.05, false discovery rate (FDR)<5%), although in the case of IGF1R this was in the opposite direction to previous findings.

Conclusion:

The majority of studies are limited by design, include heterogeneous samples and lack adjustment for major confounding factors. High quality detailed clinical annotations should be routinely collected in future to more accurately evaluate biomarkers of surgical outcome.

Multi-center evaluation of post-operative morbidity and mortality after optimal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

While optimal cytoreduction is the standard of care for advanced ovarian cancer, the related post-operative morbidity has not been clearly documented outside pioneering centers. Indeed most of the studies are monocentric with inclusions over several years inducing heterogeneity in techniques and goals of surgery. We assessed the morbidity of optimal cytoreduction surgery for advanced ovarian cancer within a short inclusion period in 6 referral centers dedicated to achieve complete cytoreduction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The 30 last optimal debulking surgeries of 6 cancer centers were included. Inclusion criteria included: stage IIIc- IV ovarian cancer and optimal surgery performed at the site of inclusion. All post-operative complications within 30 days of surgery were recorded and graded using the Memorial secondary events grading system. Student-t, Chi2 and non-parametric statistical tests were performed.

RESULTS

180 patients were included. There was no demographic differences between the centers. 63 patients underwent surgery including intestinal resections (58 recto-sigmoid resection), 24 diaphragmatic resections, 17 splenectomies. 61 patients presented complications; One patient died post-operatively. Major (grade 3-5) complications requiring subsequent surgeries occurred in 21 patients (11.5%). 76% of patients with a major complication had undergone an ultraradical surgery (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

While ultraradical surgery may result in complete resection of peritoneal disease in advanced ovarian cancer, the associated complication rate is not negligible. Patients should be carefully evaluated and the timing of their surgery optimized in order to avoid major complications.

Primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IV ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has historically been the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Recent data appear to support a paradigm shift toward neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS). We hypothesized that stage IV ovarian cancer patients would likely benefit from NACT-IDS by achieving similar outcomes with less morbidity.

METHODS

Patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary treatment between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2007, were identified. Data were retrospectively extracted. Each patient record was evaluated to subclassify stage IV disease according to the sites of tumor dissemination at the time of diagnosis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) data.

RESULTS

A total of 242 newly diagnosed stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients were included in the final analysis; 176 women (73%) underwent PDS, 45 (18%) NACT-IDS, and 21 (9%) chemotherapy only. The frequency of achieving complete resection to no residual disease was significantly higher in patients with NACT-IDS versus PDS (27% vs. 7.5%; P < 0.001). When compared to women treated with NACT-IDS, women with PDS had longer admissions (12 vs. 8 days; P = 0.01), more frequent intensive care unit admissions (12% vs. 0%; P = 0.01), and a trend toward a higher rate of postoperative complications (27% vs. 15%; P = 0.08). The patients who received only chemotherapy had a median OS of 23 months, compared to 33 months in the NACT-IDS group and 29 months in the PDS group (P = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

NACT-IDS for stage IV ovarian cancer resulted in higher rates of complete resection to no residual disease, less morbidity, and equivalent OS compared to PDS.

Ovarian cancer debulking surgery: a survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study was to survey all practicing gynecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand to determine their definition of optimal debulking, their current surgical techniques used to achieve optimal debulking, and their reasons for using or not using such techniques.

METHODS

In October 2007, an email survey was distributed to all 42 practicing gynecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand. Information obtained included practice patterns, as well as surgical expertise, techniques, and rationale with respect to primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

There was an 81% response rate. Fifty-eight percent of respondents considered optimal debulking to be residual disease less than 10 mm, 21% considered it to be less than 5 mm, and 18% considered it to be no visible disease. Sixty-five percent were able to achieve optimal debulking in their patients, as measured by their own criteria. Patient factors considered to be most frequent barriers to optimal debulking were medical comorbidities (91%) and older patient population (59%). Disease findings which most often precluded optimal debulking were disease involving the base of the mesentery (94%), confluent diaphragmatic disease (74%), and large volume, confluent peritoneal disease (50%). A variety of procedures were used by either gynecological oncologists or their colleagues, but more than 50% would never perform resection of diaphragmatic disease, resection of parenchymal liver metastases, or ablation with cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator or argon beam. The most common reasons for not performing ultraradical procedures were concerns regarding benefit (39%), concerns regarding morbidity (24%), and lack of personal expertise (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most gynecological oncologists use a variety of surgical techniques to achieve optimal debulking. However, patient factors as well as concerns regarding benefit and lack of expertise were reasons cited for not performing ultraradical surgery.

The impact of disease distribution on survival in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer cytoreduced to microscopic residual: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the survival impact of initial disease distribution on patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cytoreduced to microscopic residual.

METHODS

We reviewed data from 417 stage III EOC patients cytoreduced to microscopic disease and given adjuvant intravenous platinum/paclitaxel on one of three randomized Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials. We subdivided patients into three groups based on preoperative disease burden: (1) minimal disease (MD) defined by pelvic tumor and retroperitoneal metastasis (2) abdominal peritoneal disease (APD) with disease limited to the pelvis, retroperitoneum, lower abdomen and omentum; and (3) upper abdominal disease (UAD) with disease affecting the diaphragm, spleen, liver or pancreas. We assessed the survival impact of potential prognostic factors, focusing on initial disease distribution using a proportional hazards model and estimated Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

The study groups had similar clinicopathologic characteristics. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in MD patients compared to 80 and 56 months in the APD and UAD groups (P<0.05). The five-year survival percentages for MD, APD, and UAD were 67%, 63%, and 45%. In multivariate analysis, the UAD group had a significantly worse prognosis than MD and APD both individually and combined (Progression Free Survival (PFS) Hazards Ratio (HR) 1.44; P=0.008 and OS HR 1.77; P=0.0004 compared to MD+APD).

CONCLUSION

Stage III EOC patients with initial disease in the upper abdomen have a worse prognosis despite cytoreductive surgery to microscopic residual implying that factors beyond cytoreductive effort are important in predicting survival.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with prolonged primary treatment intervals in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) relative to primary surgery (PS) to determine if there was a difference in the total time and number of chemotherapy cycles given in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We identified 263 consecutive women meeting eligibility from 1993 to 2005 for this institutional review board-approved study. Eligible patients in this analysis were those women with advanced disease (stage IIIC-IV) in whom a maximal cytoreductive effort was planned either at PS or after NC. Time to start chemotherapy was defined as follows: (1) NC group: confirmation of diagnosis through biopsy, cytological diagnosis from ascites, and pleural effusion; (2) PS group: confirmation of diagnosis from the date of surgery that confirmed the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Total chemotherapy cycles: (1) NC group: NC chemotherapy cycles plus postoperative cycles; (2) PS group: chemotherapy after primary tumor debulking surgery. Clinical information evaluated included chemotherapy type, chemotherapy cycle number, total time to administer frontline chemotherapy, and survival.

RESULTS

Median chemotherapy cycles were greater in the NC group compared with the PS group (9 [range, 4-30] vs 6 [range, 3-19]; P < 0.01). The PS group was also more likely to undergo chemotherapy regimens involving platinum and taxane treatment compared with the NC group (79% vs 65%; P = 0.017). Total time undergoing primary chemotherapy from initial diagnosis was greater in the NC group compared with PS (223 vs 151 days; P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in overall survival and progression-free survival in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, NC followed by abdominal hysterectomy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes including optimal cytoreduction, decreased blood loss, and decreased inpatient hospitalization. In this cohort, NC was also associated with prolonged chemotherapy treatment intervals and increased chemotherapy cycles without improvement in survival.

Clinical Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Carcinoma

Ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinomas make up the deadliest group of malignancies of the female genital tract. Ovarian carcinoma is the second most common malignancy of the female reproductive tract in developed countries and the sixth most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United States. While signs and symptoms of ovarian carcinoma related to the mass-effect of advanced disease are relatively common, no reliable signs or symptoms are seen in patients with early ovarian carcinoma. The diagnosis can only be made by surgical removal and pathologic evaluation of a suspicious mass. The authors present an overview of the disease and discussions of genetic predisposition, prevention, screening, and diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas. Details on staging procedures as well as surgical and chemotherapeutic techniques are outlined for the various stages of disease.

Second-line treatment of first relapse recurrent ovarian cancer

First-line therapy of advanced ovarian cancer involves primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Progression of incompletely resected disease or recurrence after cytoreduction is inevitable. The approach to second-line treatment is ill-defined and chemotherapy remains the conventional approach, with surgery being reserved in some patients to debulk or palliate symptoms. Increasing evidence suggests that secondary cytoreduction improves progression-free and overall survival. This approach may be appropriate in selected patients. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivered in the adjuvant setting postoperatively has been shown to be more effective than systemic chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer after primary surgery. However, its use has not been well accepted and has not been adopted in secondary surgery. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivered intraoperatively during surgery has been of clinical interest and may prove to be efficacious and advantageous. The support of the gynaecological cancer medical and surgical community to embrace the efforts and assist in the recruitment of appropriate patients into randomised trials of first relapse recurrent ovarian cancer will provide answers to questions and establish evidence that would impact the care of ovarian cancer patients.

Choriocarcinoma arising in a serous carcinoma of ovary: an example of histopathology driving treatment

BACKGROUND

Choriocarcinoma within an ovarian carcinoma is exceptionally rare. Nevertheless, recognition of this mixed tumour is important for administration of appropriate chemotherapy.

CASE

A 65-year-old woman underwent resection of an ovarian mass after presenting with a pelvic mass and breast tenderness. On pathologic examination the mass showed a choriocarcinoma in association with a serous carcinoma. This pathologic diagnosis led to a specific chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin, suitable for both types of malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Both gynaecologists and pathologists should be aware that the histopathologic classification of ovarian epithelial carcinoma and its variants, such as this one, may have an increasing role in the management of this disease.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

The current management of advanced ovarian cancer consists of aggressive primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) followed by combination platinum based chemotherapy. Recent studies have suggested that platinum-based chemotherapy may be of benefit in patients with advanced ovarian cancer prior to cytoreductive surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NACT). The concept of NACT has not been completely validated in the treatment of ovarian cancer. This review will discuss the role of NACT in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Multidetector CT predictors of incomplete resection in primary cytoreduction of patients with advanced ovarian cancer

This study was designed to develop a preoperative predictor model using multidetector CT (MDCT) imaging findings for the prediction of surgical outcome in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Seventy-seven patients with advanced EOC who had preoperative MDCT and who had undergone primary cytoreductive surgery between January 1999 and June 2008 were enrolled in the study. All MDCT examinations were analysed retrospectively, assessing nine imaging features without knowledge of the operative findings. The complete debulking rate and optimal debulking rate were 42.5% and 93.2%, respectively. Based on the use of univariate and multivariate analysis, one imaging feature that showed the presence of upper abdominal ascites was significantly associated with incomplete tumour resection (P = 0.019 on univariate analysis, P = 0.04 on multivariate analysis). The combination of the MDCT findings that showed the presence of upper abdominal ascites and diffuse subdiaphragmatic peritoneal nodularity was associated with an incomplete resection of a tumour (P = 0.04; specificity 80.0%; positive predictive value 76.9%). It is important that emphasis on the upper abdominal sites of the tumour is helpful when reporting preoperative MDCT results.