Patterns of care, predictors and outcomes of chemotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma: a National Cancer Database analysis

Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Retrospective Analysis

Uterine carcinosarcoma is a rare, highly aggressive, rapidly progressing neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. It comprises 1-5% of all uterine malignancies but accounts for 16.4% of all deaths caused by uterine malignancies. There is a definite paucity of data available from the Indian subcontinent. Hence, we retrospectively conducted this study to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics and outcomes of women with uterine carcinosarcoma in the past 10 years managed at the tertiary care center. This is a retrospective study of women with histologically proven uterine carcinosarcoma treated at a tertiary cancer center in South India between August 2009 and April 2019. Inpatient and outpatient records were reviewed; clinicopathological data were collected; and follow-up and survival data were ascertained. Over a period of 10 years, 20 patients were diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma. The majority of patients were postmenopausal (80%). Post-menopausal bleeding was the main presenting complaint in about 80% of patients. More than two-thirds of patients presented in the early stage (stage I, 55%; stage II, 20%). All patients underwent staging laparotomy. Patients with good performance status (85%) received adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 40 months, 7 (35%) patients were alive, out of which 6 are disease-free and 1 had a recurrence. The event-free survival at a median follow-up of 40 months was 40% and the overall survival was 48.5%. The outcome did not significantly differ based on the age, tumor histology (heterologous versus homologous), stage, and depth of myometrial invasion. Uterine carcinosarcoma, though rare, needs to be recognized as a distinct entity, and treated aggressively. Surgery is the cornerstone of therapy. Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation and chemotherapy improve local control and may delay recurrence, but have shown little survival advantage. The optimal adjuvant treatment for this uncommon disease is yet to be established, highlighting the need for larger multicentric studies on this tumor.

Endometrial carcinosarcoma

Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive high-grade endometrial carcinoma with secondary sarcomatous trans-differentiation (conversion theory). The clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up roughly align with those of the more common endometrioid counterpart, although endometrial carcinosarcoma is more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Endometrial carcinosarcoma is not a single entity but encompasses different histological subtypes, depending on the type of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. The majority of endometrial carcinosarcomas are characterized by p53 abnormalities. The proportion of POLE and microsatellite instablity-high (MSI-H) is directly related to the epithelial component, being approximately 25% and 3% in endometrioid and non-endometrioid components.The management of non-metastatic disease is based on a multimodal approach with optimal surgery followed by (concomitant or sequential) chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even for early stages. Palliative chemotherapy is recommended in the metastatic or recurrent setting, with carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet being the first-line regimen. Although the introduction of immunotherapy plus/minus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor shifted the paradigm of treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma were excluded from most studies evaluating single-agent immunotherapy or the combination. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in endometrial cancer (all histotypes) after progression on chemotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy in MSI-H cancers. In the era of precision medicine, emerging knowledge on molecular endometrial carcinosarcoma is opening new promising therapeutic options for more personalized treatment. The present review outlines state-of-the-art knowledge and future directions for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma.

Effects of Adjuvant Radiation Plus Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Stage III C Endometrial Cancer According to Histology: Analysis of Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

Purpose: To evaluate the survival benefit of radiation plus chemotherapy in adult females with stage IIIC endometrial cancer and to investigate whether the benefit varies according to histology. Methods: Data from adult females with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC endometrial cancer, who underwent at least total hysterectomy between 2010 and 2015, were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Adjuvant treatments were categorized as chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), chemotherapy with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT), or chemotherapy with EBRT+VBT. Multivariate Cox regression models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used to assess the association between treatment modality and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 2138 cases were identified: stage IIIC1 (n = 1299 [60.8%]) and stage IIIC2 (n = 839 [39.2%]). Median OS for all patients was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 28-70) months. Regarding adjuvant treatment, 40.5% of patients underwent chemotherapy only, followed by chemotherapy with EBRT (35.5%). Stage IIIC patients treated with chemotherapy plus radiation exhibited a significantly reduced risk for death from endometrial cancer in both univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.001). However, when stratified according to histology, OS also differed according to treatment modality when analyzing each histological type; combination therapy was no longer significantly different from chemotherapy alone for any histology (clear cell and carcinosarcoma). Combination therapy was associated with improved OS in patients with IIIC1 and IIIC2 disease. Similar associations were observed in patients with high-grade stage IIIC endometrioids. However, for low-grade tumors, combination therapy was no longer associated with reduced risk for death compared with chemotherapy alone. Conclusion: For patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer, combined treatment with radiation and chemotherapy was associated with improved OS compared with chemotherapy alone. However, no survival benefit was found, and radiotherapy may be unnecessary in patients with low-grade endometrioids.

Epidemiology and prediction model of patients with carcinosarcoma in the United States

Background

Carcinosarcoma is a rare biphasic tumor composed of both carcinoma and sarcoma elements, which occurs at various sites. Most studies are case reports or small population-based studies for a single disease site, so comprehensive evaluations of epidemiology and prognostic factors for carcinosarcoma are needed.

Methods

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-8 (1975-2019) provided data for the epidemiological analysis. SEER-17 (2000-2019) provided data on the primary tumor sites, initial treatment, construction, and validation of the nomogram.

Results

The age-adjusted incidence per 100,000 persons of carcinosarcoma increased significantly from 0.46 to 0.91 [1975-2019; average annual percent change (AAPC): 1.3%, P = 0.006], with localized stage increasing from 0.14 to 0.26 [2005-2015; annual percent change (APC): 4.2%]. The 20-year limited-duration prevalence per 100,000 increased from 0.47 to 3.36 (1999-2018). The mortality per 100,000 increased significantly from 0.16 to 0.51 (1975-2019; AAPC: 1.9%, P < 0.001). The 5-year relative survival was 32.8%. The greatest number of carcinosarcomas were from the uterus (68.7%), ovary (17.8%), lung and bronchus (2.3%). The main treatment is comprehensive treatment based on surgery; however, surgery alone is preferred in older patients. In multivariate analysis (N = 11,424), age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, disease stage, tumor site, and treatment were associated with survival. A nomogram was established to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, and the C-indexes were 0.732 and 0.748 for the training and testing sets, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the nomogram provided a comprehensive and accurate prediction [1-year area under the curve (AUC): 0.782 vs. 0.796; 3-year AUC: 0.771 vs. 0.798; 5-year AUC: 0.777 vs. 0.810].

Conclusions

In this study, the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of carcinosarcoma have increased over the past decades. There was a rapid rise in the incidence of localized stage in recent years, which reflected improved early detection. The prognosis of carcinosarcoma remains poor, signifying the urgency of exploring targeted cancer control treatments. Explicating distribution and gender disparities of carcinosarcoma may facilitate disease screening and medical surveillance. The nomogram demonstrated good predictive capacity and facilitated clinical decision-making.

Endometrial carcinosarcoma: a poor prognosis debut with favourable therapeutic outcome

Endometrial carcinosarcoma (ECS) is a rare, highly aggressive disease characterised by a biphasic growth of malignant epithelial (carcinomatous) and mesenchymal (sarcomatous) components. Clinically, it cannot be distinguished from endometrial carcinoma or uterine sarcoma. The definitive diagnosis can only be made based on histological examination and immunohistochemistry. To date, there aren't standardised treatment protocols for its management. We report a case of a 73-year-old patient who presented postmenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding and was diagnosed with ECS. A non-conventional treatment approach was conducted with favourable oncological outcomes.

Uterine carcinosarcoma: A 10-year single institution experience

Objective

This study aimed to determine 5-year progression-free and overall survival in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma, to determine clinical and surgical-pathologic features, to recognize patterns of recurrence and to identify prognostic factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Design

This was a single institution, retrospective 10-year review of patients treated at Tygerberg Hospital in South Africa with pathologically confirmed uterine carcinosarcoma.

Methods

A total of 61 patients were studied. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment and outcome information were obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effects of variables on PFS and OS.

Results

Eighteen patients (29%) presented as FIGO stage I disease, 5 patients (8%) as stage II, 16 patients (26%) as stage III and 22 patients (36%) as stage IV disease. Fifty of the 61 patients (82%) had surgery. Five-year PFS and 5-year OS were 17.3% (CI 8.9%-27.9%) and 19.7% (CI 10.6%-30.8%), respectively. Seventeen patients presented with recurrence of which 5 (29.4%) were local and 12 (70.6%) were outside the pelvis.

In the univariate analysis, tumour diameter ≥ 100mm (HR 4.57; 95% CI 1.59–13.19; p-value 0.005) was associated with 5-year PFS and in univariate analysis of OS, a positive family history (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18–0.99; p-value 0.047), receiving a full staging operation (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.18–0.78; p-value 0.008) and receiving any other modality of treatment, with or without surgery, (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27–0.85; p-value 0.012) were associated with better survival. An abnormal cervical smear (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.03–5.6; p-value 0.041), late-stage disease (HR 3.48; 95% CI 1.79–6.77; p-value < 0.001), presence of residual tumour (HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.90–7.02; p-value < 0.001), myometrial invasion more than 50% (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.15–4.57; p-value 0.019), cervical involvement (HR 3.38; 95% CI 1.64–6.97; p-value 0.001) and adnexal involvement (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.56–6.63; p-value 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of death.

In the multivariate analysis, full staging operation was associated with a risk of progression of disease (HR 3.49; 95% CI 1.17–10.41; p-value 0.025). Advanced stage (HR 4.2; 95% CI 2.09–8.44; p-value < 0.001) was associated with a higher risk of death. Any other modality of treatment (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.15–0.53; p-value < 0.001) and full staging laparotomy (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12–0.59; p-value 0.001) was a protective factor for death.

Conclusions

Carcinosarcoma is an aggressive cancer with poorer survival in this specific cohort than has been described in other contemporary cohorts. Biological or genetic factors are a possible explanation for lower overall survival in this population. Although it is also possible that later diagnosis and poor access to health care contribute to poorer survival. Most recurrences occur outside of the pelvis. Full staging surgery (including pelvic lymphadenectomy) and additional use of other modalities (either for radical or palliative intent) improve survival.

The role of multimodal adjuvant therapy for FIGO I-II carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a systematic review

The uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare entity with poor prognosis. Treatment of FIGO I-II UCS usually consists of surgery with or without adjuvant treatment. Due to the high metastatic potential, aggressive combined modality adjuvant treatment approaches, consisting of chemo- and radiotherapy, have been of interest. Our systematic review aims to compare survival, disease control and toxicity profiles in patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation to other adjuvant strategies (e.g.observation, chemotherapy or radiotherapy). A total of ten studies were included for a combined cohort size of 6,520 patients. Generally, the studies showed a trend towards improved disease control and survival in patients undergoing adjuvant multimodal treatment, although statistical significance was often not reached. Selection bias and non-randomized treatment allocation pose serious challenges to extrapolate these outcomes to clinical practice. We recommend additional prospective research on the role of adjuvant chemoradiation in FIGO I-II UCS.

Patterns of adjuvant treatment and survival outcomes in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma

•

5-year survival for stage I uterine carcinosarcoma without adjuvant therapy is 43%.

•

Nationally 40% of stage I uterine carcinosarcoma do not receive adjuvant therapy.

•

Adjuvant chemotherapy alone improved OS and CSS in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.

Objective

To determine patterns in type and sequence of adjuvant treatment and associated differences in overall survival among women with Stage I uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

Methods

Women with stage I UCS from 2000 to 2015 were identified through the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database linked to Medicare-based claims follow-up data through 2016. Data including demographics, co-morbidities, surgical procedure, surgical pathology and type and sequence of adjuvant treatment were collected. The primary study outcome was overall survival (OS) by type and sequence of adjuvant therapy. Cancer specific survival was also analyzed.

Results

A total of 755 women with Stage I UCS were identified. Of these, 56.3% (n = 445) received adjuvant therapy, whereas 43.7% (n = 330) did not. In comparison to no adjuvant treatment, an overall survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone for women with Stage I disease (log rank p < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons did not show a benefit in OS of concurrent RT-chemo, sequential RT-chemo, or sequential chemo-RT, over chemotherapy alone (p > 0.05 for all). Likewise, radiation alone and no treatment were associated with worse OS compared to chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001 for both). Adjusted Cox regression models demonstrated an OS benefit only in the chemotherapy alone cohort for Stage I disease (HR 0.43 95% CI 0.32, 0.60, p < 0.0001), as well as for CSS (HR 0.41, 95 %CI 0.26, 0.62, p < 0.0001), compared to no treatment.

Conclusions

In comparison to no adjuvant therapy, an overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone in Stage I UCS.

Adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival when added to surgery and chemotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

BACKGROUND

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) confers a high recurrence risk following surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) is typically administered in all stages. The benefit of radiation therapy (RT) in UCS, when added to adjuvant CHT, is unknown. We sought to analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to ascertain whether RT improves overall survival (OS) when added to surgery and CHT for UCS.

METHODS

SEER 18 Custom Data registries (Nov 2018 submission) were queried for uterine (ICD10 C54.1-9, C55.9) carcinosarcoma (ICD-0-3 8980-3). Patients with stage I-III UCS who underwent surgery and CHT ± RT were analyzed with univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Propensity-score matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to account for indication bias. Furthermore, conditional landmark analysis (minimum three-month follow-up) was performed to minimize immortal time bias.

RESULTS

All 1541 patients (1988-2016) underwent surgery and CHT and 54% received RT. On UVA, RT improved median and 5-year OS from 41 to 87 months and 43-55%, respectively (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.77) (p < 0.001). After IPTW adjustment, RT improved median and 5-year OS from 46 to 65 months and 46-53%, respectively (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87) (p < 0.001). The benefit of RT remained on unadjusted and adjusted MVA and conditional landmark analysis.

CONCLUSION

In stage I-III UCS treated with surgery and CHT, receipt of RT is associated with OS benefit. Further prospective data are needed to investigate the RT's benefit in UCS.

Adjuvant therapy and prognosis in uterine carcinosarcoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant treatment on uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of UCS patients treated between 2005 and 2019 was conducted. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging system was used. Multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify the independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were eligible for descriptive analysis. Excluding 12 patients without surgery, 126 patients with adequate clinicopathologic data were included for prognostic analysis. The median follow-up for survivors was 51.8 months. 5-year OS and PFS rates for FIGO stage I, II, III, IV were 64.5% and 51.8%, 60.8% and 57.7%, 47.7% and 45.9%, 5.1% and 4.1%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, six models each for PFS and OS were formulated including highly correlated variables alternatively. Adjuvant chemoradiation was consistently selected as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.10-0.22, all p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.12-0.23, all p < 0.001), while adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.33-0.41), age≥58 years (HR 1.80-1.91), stage III/IV (HR 3.36-13.34), and adnexal metastasis (HR 2.06-5.02) in three to four of the six models for OS. Stratified analyses revealed that adjuvant chemoradiation significantly improved outcome compared with adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IA patients with lymphovascular space invasion and stage IB-IV, lymph node metastasis, and adnexal metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemoradiation was confirmed as an independent good prognostic factor, while older age, stage III/IV, and adnexal metastasis were associated with poor outcome in UCS.

Effect of adjuvant therapy on the prognosis in stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both following the primary surgery on the progression-free survival and 5-year overall survival in patients with stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma.

METHODS

A preliminary investigation was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant studies published up to March, 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by Revman 5.3 software to analysis outcomes.

RESULTS

Six retrospective cohort studies were involved in the analysis, including 1516 patients in observation group, 956 patients in chemotherapy group, 750 patients in radiotherapy group, and 1082 patients in raidochemotherapy group. The results indicated that chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38-0.91, p < 0.05) and radiochemotherapy (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.24-0.53, p < 0.001) were associated with improved progression-free survival in patients. Similarly, pooled results suggested chemotherapy (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.71, p < 0.001) and radiochemotherapy (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.29-0.72, p < 0.001) promoted the 5-year overall survival compared with observation. However, radiotherapy alone had no statistical significance in improving progression-free survival (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.49-1.29, p = 0.36) and 5-year overall survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.38-1.12, p = 0.12).

DISCUSSION

Chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy appeared to be prognostic beneficial to early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma.

Impact of Medicaid expansion on women with gynecologic cancer: a difference-in-difference analysis

BACKGROUND

Women with gynecologic cancer face socioeconomic disparities in care that affect survival outcomes. The Affordable Care Act offered states the option to expand Medicaid enrollment eligibility criteria as a means of improving timely and affordable access to care for the most vulnerable. The variable uptake of expansion by states created a natural experiment, allowing for quasi-experimental methods that offer more unbiased estimates of treatment effects from retrospective data than the traditional regression adjustment.

OBJECTIVE

To use a quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference framework to create unbiased estimates of impact of Medicaid expansion on women with gynecologic cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study from the National Cancer Database files for women with invasive cancers of the uterus, ovary and fallopian tube, cervix, vagina, and vulva diagnosed from 2008 to 2016. Using a marker for state Medicaid expansion status, we created difference-in-difference models to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on the outcomes of access to and timeliness of care. We excluded women aged <40 years owing to the suppression of the state Medicaid expansions status in the data and women aged ≥65 years owing to the universal Medicare coverage availability. Our primary outcome was the rate of uninsurance at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included Medicaid coverage, early-stage diagnosis, treatment at an academic facility, and any treatment or surgery within 30 days of diagnosis. Models were run within multiple subgroups and on a propensity-matched cohort to assess the robustness of the treatment estimates. The assumption of parallel trends was assessed with event study time plots.

RESULTS

Our sample included 335,063 women. Among this cohort, 121,449 were from nonexpansion states and 213,614 were from expansion states, with 79,886 posttreatment cases diagnosed after the expansion took full effect in expansion states. The groups had minor differences in demographics, and we found occasional preperiod event study coefficients diverging from the mean, but the outcome trends were generally similar between the expansion and nonexpansion states in the preperiod, satisfying the necessary assumption for the difference-in-difference analysis. In a basic difference-in-difference model, the Medicaid expansion in January 2014 was associated with significant increases in insurance at diagnosis, treatment at an academic facility, and treatment within 30 days of diagnosis (P<.001 for all). In an adjusted model including all states and accounting for variable expansion implementation time, there was a significant treatment effect of Medicaid expansion on the reduction in uninsurance at diagnosis (-2.00%; 95% confidence interval, -2.3 to -1.7; P<.001), increases in early-stage diagnosis (0.80%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.4; P=.02), treatment at an academic facility (0.83%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.5; P=.02), treatment within 30 days (1.62%; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.3; P<.001), and surgery within 30 days (1.54%; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.3; P<.001). In particular, large gains were estimated for women living in low-income zip codes, Hispanic women, and women with cervical cancer. Estimates from the subgroup and propensity-matched cohorts were generally consistent for all outcomes besides early-stage diagnosis and treatment within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Medicaid expansion was significantly associated with gains in the access and timeliness of treatment for nonelderly women with gynecologic cancer. The implementation of Medicaid expansion could greatly benefit women in nonexpansion states. Gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists should advocate for Medicaid expansion as a means of improving outcomes and reducing socioeconomic and racial disparities.

Uterine carcinosarcoma: Contemporary clinical summary, molecular updates, and future research opportunity

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a biphasic aggressive high-grade endometrial cancer in which the sarcoma element has de-differentiated from the carcinoma element. UCS is considered a rare tumor, but its incidence has gradually increased in recent years (annual percent change from 2000 to 2016 1.7%, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.2) as has the proportion of UCS among endometrial cancer, exceeding 5% in recent years. UCS typically affects the elderly, but in recent decades patients became younger. Notably, a stage-shift has occurred in recent years with increasing nodal metastasis and decreasing distant metastasis. The concept of sarcoma dominance may be new in UCS, and a sarcomatous element >50% of the uterine tumor is associated with decreased survival. Multimodal treatment is the mainstay of UCS. Lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy, and brachytherapy have increased in the past few decades, but survival outcomes remain dismal: the median survival is less than two years, and the 5-year overall survival rate has not changed in decades (31.9% in 1975 to 33.8% in 2012). Carboplatin/paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy improves progression-free survival compared with ifosfamide/paclitaxel, particularly in stages III-IV disease (GOG-261 trial). Twenty-six clinical trials previously examined therapeutic effectiveness in recurrent/metastatic UCS. The median response rate and progression-free survival were 37.5% and 5.9 months, respectively, after first-line therapy, but after later therapies, the outcomes were far worse (5.5% and 1.8 months, respectively). One significant discovery was that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of sarcomatous dedifferentiation in UCS and that heterologous sarcoma is associated with a higher EMT signature compared with homologous sarcoma. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing has revealed that UCS tumors are serous-like and that common somatic mutations include those in TP53, PIK3CA, FBXW7, PTEN, and ARID1A. This contemporary review highlights recent clinical and molecular updates in UCS. A possible therapeutic target of EMT in UCS is also discussed.

Malignant peritoneal cytology and increased mortality risk in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the survival of women with stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer with malignant peritoneal cytology.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to examine the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2010 to 2016. Women with stage I serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated, and mixed endometrial cancer with known peritoneal cytology results at hysterectomy were examined (N = 4506). Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the measured covariates, and survival outcomes were assessed according to peritoneal cytology results.

RESULTS

Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 401 (8.9%) women. In multivariable analysis, older age, serous histology, and large tumors were associated with an increased likelihood of malignant peritoneal cytology (all, P < 0.05). In a propensity score weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with a nearly two-fold increase in all-cause mortality risk compared to negative peritoneal cytology (5-year rates, 63.4% versus 80.2%, hazard ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.78-2.66). In sensitivity analyses, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased overall survival in old and young age groups, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, and mixed histology groups, stage T1a disease, and staged and unstaged cases, but not for stage T1b disease. Difference in 5-year overall survival rates between the malignant and negative peritoneal cytology groups was particularly large among those with clear cell histology (24.0%), stage T1a disease (19.4%), aged >78 years (18.2%), and serous tumors (17.6%).

CONCLUSION

Malignant peritoneal cytology can be prevalent in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Our study suggests that malignant peritoneal cytology is a prognostic factor for decreased survival in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Adjuvant Treatment Modalities, Prognostic Factors, and Outcome of the Uterine Carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of adjuvant therapy and other factors associated with the recurrence and survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

METHODS

A total of 102 patients who underwhent surgery for UCS from 1998 to 2017 were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

At 240 months, the actuarial recurrence rate was 34.3%. Distant recurrence was the most common recurrence pattern. Patients with higher CA 125 levels, sarcoma dominance, cervical involvement, advanced stage, no lymphadenectomy, and residual tumour had a significiantly higher risk of recurrence. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 67% and 77%, respectively. FIGO stage was found to be an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Sarcoma dominance was independently associated with decreased OS.

CONCLUSION

Sarcoma dominance is associated with poor survival in UCS. Adjuvant treatment was not found to affect recurrence or survival. Given this finding, more effective postoperative strategies are needed.

Impact of different adjuvant treatment approaches on survival in stage III endometrial cancer: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III endometrial cancer (EC) have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes. After surgery, adjuvant therapy is recommended with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), chemotherapy (CT) or both EBRT and CT. Recent trials suggest that EBRT + CT is superior to EBRT or CT alone but also results in more toxicity. We have compared the outcome of different adjuvant treatments in a population-based cohort to identify subgroups that benefit most from EBRT + CT.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with FIGO stage III EC and treated with surgery in 2005-2016 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); associations with adjuvant treatment were analysed using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1241 eligible patients, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-2.52) and EBRT alone (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.05-1.79). In stage IIIC, there was a significant benefit of EBRT + CT compared with CT or EBRT alone. In stage IIIA-B, there was no difference between EBRT + CT or EBRT alone. In endometrioid EC (EEC) and carcinosarcomas, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT or EBRT alone. For uterine serous cancers, there was no survival benefit of EBRT + CT over CT. In all analysis by stage and histology, any adjuvant treatment was superior to no adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, adjuvant EBRT + CT was associated with improved OS compared with CT or EBRT alone in FIGO stage IIIC EC, EEC and carcinosarcoma. This suggests that application of EBRT + CT in stage III should be further stratified according to these subgroups.

Racial disparities in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma: A population-based analysis of treatment and survival

OBJECTIVE

To investigate racial disparities in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities.

METHODS

Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS or OCS between 2004 and 2014 were eligible. Differences by disease site or race were compared using Chi-square test and multivariate Cox analysis.

RESULTS

There were 2830 NHBs and 7366 NHWs with UCS, and 280 NHBs and 2586 NHWs with OCS. Diagnosis of UCS was more common in NHBs (11.5%) vs. NHWs (3.7%) and increased with age (P < .0001). OCS diagnosis remained <5% in both races and all ages. NHBs with UCS or OCS were more common in the South and more likely to have a comorbidity score ≥ 1, low neighborhood income and Medicaid or no insurance (P < .0001). Diagnosis at stage II-IV was more common in NHBs than NHWs with UCS but not OCS. NHBs with both UCS and OCS were less likely to undergo surgery and to achieve no gross residual disease with surgery (P = .002). Risk of death in NHB vs. NHW patients with UCS was 1.38 after adjustment for demographic factors and dropped after sequential adjustment for comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, stage and treatment by 4%, 16%, 7%, 19% and 10%, respectively, leaving 43.5% of the racial disparity in survival unexplained. In contrast, risk of death in NHBs vs. NHWs with OCS was 1.19 after adjustment for demographic factors and became insignificant after adjustment for comorbidity. Race was an independent prognostic factor in UCS but not in OCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities exist in characteristics, treatment and survival in UCS and OCS with distinctions that merit additional research.

Tumor characteristics and outcome of uterine carcinosarcoma in women aged ≥80 years

OBJECTIVE

To examine clinico-pathological characteristics and outcomes of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) in women aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a previous multicenter retrospective study examining 906 women with stage I-IV UCS who underwent primary hysterectomy. Patient demographics, treatment types, tumor characteristics, and survival were examined across aged ≥80 (n = 82 [9.1%]), aged 60-79, (n = 526 [58.1%]), and aged <60 (n = 298 [32.9%]).

RESULTS

Women in the aged ≥80 group were more likely to be Caucasian, undergo simple hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy, and receive no postoperative therapy (all, P < 0.05). Tumors in the aged ≥80 group were more likely to have high-grade carcinoma, heterologous sarcoma, and sarcoma dominance but less likely to have lympho-vascular space invasion (all, P < 0.05). Lymphadenectomy did not improve survival in the aged ≥80 group (P > 0.05), whereas lymphadenectomy was protective for survival in the younger groups (both, P < 0.05). Postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the aged ≥80 group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.89, P = 0.021). With chemotherapy treatment, women in the aged ≥80 group had PFS similar to those in the aged 60-79 group (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.51-1.83, P = 0.92). In contrast, without chemotherapy treatment, women in the aged ≥80 group had significantly decreased PFS compared to the aged 60-79 group (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.09-2.40, P = 0.016). Similar associations were observed for postoperative radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 10% of women with UCS are aged ≥80 that are characterized by aggressive tumor factors. Postoperative therapy but not extensive surgery may improve survival in this age group.

Current Quality of Gynecologic Cancer Care in North America

Evaluating the quality of care received by gynecologic cancer patients in the real world is essential for excellent outcomes. The recent population-based literature looking at quality of care was reviewed for all gynecologic malignancies. Outcomes are generally highest when care is provided by high-volume providers in high-volume cancer centers. Provision of care according to clinical practice guidelines has also been demonstrated to improve outcomes in many situations. Disparities exist for marginalized groups in terms of the care they receive and subsequent outcomes. Health systems need to improve care for these populations.

Effect of Adjuvant Therapy on Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Confirmed Stage I Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Study

Background:

Uterine carcinosarcoma is rare neoplasm that mostly presents as metastatic disease. Stage is one of the most important prognostic factor, however, the management of the early stage uterine carcinosarcoma is still controversial.

Aims:

To evaluate prognostic factors, treatment options, and survival outcomes in patients with surgically approved stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Methods:

Data of 278 patients with uterine carcinosarcoma obtained from four gynecologic oncology centers were reviewed, and 70 patients with approved stage I uterine carcinosarcoma after comprehensive staging surgery were studied.

Results:

The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (range; 39-82). All patients underwent both pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Forty-one patients received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range; 1-129). Nineteen (27.1%) patients had disease failure. The 3-year disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival of the entire cohort was 67% and 86%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, only age was significantly associated with disease-free survival (p=0.022). There was no statistical significance for disease-free survival between observation and receiving any type of adjuvant therapy following staging surgery. Advanced age (<75 vs ≥75 years) was the only independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio: 3.8, 95% CI=1.10-13.14, p=0.035) in multivariate analysis. None of the factors were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival.

Conclusion:

Advanced age was the only independent factor for disease-free survival in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Performing any adjuvant therapy following comprehensive lymphadenectomy was not related to the improved survival of the stage I disease.

Proposal for a Risk-Based Categorization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

PURPOSE

To propose a categorization model of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) based on tumor cell types (carcinoma and sarcoma) and sarcoma dominance.

METHODS

This secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study examined 889 cases of UCS with available histologic evaluation. Based on survival outcome, cases were clustered into three groups: low-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type A, n = 96 (10.8%)], (1) low-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance and (2) high-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type B, n = 412 (46.3%)], and high-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance [type C, n = 381 (42.9%)]. Tumor characteristics and outcome were examined based on the categorization.

RESULTS

Women in type C category were more likely to be older, obese, and Caucasian, whereas those in type A category were younger, less obese, Asian, and nulligravid (all P < 0.01). Type C tumors were more likely to have metastatic implants, large tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion with sarcoma cells, and higher lymph node ratio, whereas type A tumors were more likely to be early-stage disease and small (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, tumor categorization was independently associated with progression-free survival (5-year rates: 70.1% for type A, 48.3% for type B, and 35.9% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01) and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 82.8% for type A, 63.0% for type B, and 47.1% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Characteristic differences in clinicopathological factors and outcomes in UCS imply that different underlying etiologies and biological behaviors may be present, supporting a new classification system.

Role of Radiation Therapy in the Multidisciplinary Management of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of radiation therapy on outcomes for patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (UC).

METHODS/MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 155 women with stage I (98), II (11), or III (46) UC who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at our institution between 1990 and 2011. Survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (49%) received radiation therapy: 38 (50%) had vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) alone and 38 had external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) ± VBT. Seventy patients (45%) received chemotherapy (12 concurrent, 49 adjuvant, 9 both). The 5-year overall survival rate was 48.6% (stage I, 53.8%; II, 30.0%; and III, 42.5%). The disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 57.2% (stage I, 60.9%; II, 44.4%; and III, 51.8%). Patients treated with EBRT had a higher 5-year pelvic disease control rate (88.3%) than did patients treated with VBT only (67.4%) or no radiation (71.2%; P = 0.04). In stage III patients, EBRT was associated with higher 5-year pelvic disease control (90.0% vs 55.5%, P = 0.046), DSS (64.6% vs 46.4%, P = 0.13), and overall survival (64.6% vs 34.0%, P = 0.04) rates. For all 155 patients, age at least 65 years, cervical involvement, and lymph vascular space invasion were correlated with lower DSS on univariate and multivariate analyses. In addition, treatment with concurrent chemoradiation therapy was independently associated with a higher DSS rate on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with UC have a high rate of relapse in the regional nodes and distant sites. External beam radiation therapy improves locoregional control in all stages and may improve survival in stage III patients who are at the highest risk of pelvic relapse.

Fascin Is Associated With Aggressive Behavior and Poor Outcome in Uterine Carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

The mechanisms underlying the histogenesis and aggressiveness of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) are poorly understood; however, previous studies implicate epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Fascin is a proinvasive, actin-bundling protein and an important component of EMT. It is associated with poor outcomes in human carcinoma, especially in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors arising in organs normally expressing ER. We sought to evaluate fascin expression in UCS and its relationship to ER status, clinicopathologic indicators of tumor aggressiveness, and survival outcomes.

METHOD

Forty-four surgically staged cases of UCS were immunohistochemically evaluated for fascin and estrogen receptor-α expression and correlated with clinicopathologic parameters derived from electronic medical records and pathology reports.

RESULTS

Fascin was only expressed in malignant epithelium and mesenchyma and was uniformly absent in background benign counterparts. Increased expression was associated with extrapelvic disease (P = 0.028), higher stage (P = 0.021), larger tumor size (P = 0.032), shorter progression-free interval (P = 0.035), and reduced estrogen receptor-α expression (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Fascin is aberrantly expressed in both elements of UCS and is associated with aggressive behavior and worse outcome. As a component of EMT and mediator of invasion, fascin may serve as a target in future therapies.

Survival outcome of women with stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To examine survival of women with stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hysterectomy.

METHODS

This is a nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort of 1192 UCS cases. Women who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hysterectomy based-surgery for stage IV UCS (n = 26) were compared to those who had primary hysterectomy-based surgery without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IV UCS (n = 120). Progression-free survival (PFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were examined.

RESULTS

The most common regimen for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was carboplatin/paclitaxel (53.8%). Median number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles was 4. PFS was similar between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the primary surgery group (unadjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.89, P = 0.45). Similarly, CSS was comparable between the two groups (unadjusted-HR 1.13, 95%CI 0.68-1.90, P = 0.64). When the types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were compared, women who received a carboplatin/paclitaxel regimen had better survival outcomes compared to those who received other regimens: PFS, unadjusted-HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.15-0.93, P = 0.027; and CSS, unadjusted-HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.07-0.61, P = 0.002.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that there is no statistically significant difference in survival between women with stage IV UCS who are tolerated neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those who undergo primary surgery.

Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, or Combined Modality Therapy and the Impact on Survival for Uterine Carcinosarcoma Limited to the Pelvis

Objective

Clinical outcomes for patients with uterine carcinosarcoma are poor after surgical management alone. Adjuvant therapies including chemotherapy (CT) and/or radiation therapy (RT) have been previously investigated, but the optimal management of this disease remains controversial. The purposes of this study were to analyze the patterns of use of adjuvant CT and RT and to assess the impact on survival of each of these treatment regimens using the National Cancer Data Base.

Methods/Materials

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients given a diagnosis of uterine carcinosarcoma confined to the pelvis who underwent total hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between 2004 and 2011. Patients were excluded if they survived less than 4 months after diagnosis. Data regarding CT and RT use were collected. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of covariates on OS.

Results

A total of 4906 patients were included in this study. Median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 60–75 years). Median follow-up was 28.9 months (interquartile range, 15.4–52.9 months). There were 1777 patients (36.2%) who received no adjuvant treatment, 971 (19.8%) who received CT alone, 1060 (21.6%) who received RT alone, and 1098 (22.4%) who received both RT and CT. The 5-year OS for patients receiving no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant RT alone, adjuvant CT alone, and combined CT and RT were 44.9%, 47.1%, 47.5%, and 62.9%, respectively. On pairwise analysis, combined CT and RT was associated with improved survival compared with all other subgroups (P < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, combined CT and RT (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.44–0.57; P < 0.001) and CT alone (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.88; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with improved OS, whereas RT alone was not.

Conclusions

Combination therapy with CT and RT was associated with significantly improved 5-year OS compared with no further therapy, RT alone, or CT alone.

Impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma

BACKGROUND

To examine recurrence patterns in women with stage I uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) stratified by adjuvant therapy pattern.

METHODS

We examined 443 cases of stage I UCS derived from a retrospective cohort of 1192 UCS cases from 26 institutions. Adjuvant therapy patterns after primary hysterectomy-based surgery were correlated to recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

The most common adjuvant therapy was chemotherapy alone (41.5%) followed by chemotherapy/radiotherapy (15.8%) and radiotherapy alone (8.4%). Distant-recurrence was the most common recurrence pattern (5-year cumulative rate, 28.1%) followed by local-recurrence (13.3%). On multivariate analysis, chemotherapy but not radiotherapy remained an independent prognostic factor for decreased risk of local-recurrence (5-year cumulative rates 8.7% versus 19.8%, adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.83, P=0.01) and distant-recurrence (21.2% versus 38.0%, adjusted-HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.27-0.62, P<0.001). The chemotherapy/radiotherapy group had a lower 5-year cumulative local-recurrence rate compared to the chemotherapy alone group but it did not reach statistical significance (5.1% versus 10.1%, adjusted-HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.13-1.58, P=0.22). Radiotherapy significantly decreased local-recurrence when tumors had high-grade carcinoma, sarcoma component dominance, and deep myometrial tumor invasion (all, P<0.05); and combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy was significantly associated with decreased local-recurrence compared to chemotherapy alone in the presence of multiple risk factors (5-year cumulative rates, 2.5% versus 21.8%, HR 0.12, 95%CI 0.02-0.90; P=0.013) but not in none/single factor (P=0.36).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be effective to control both local- and distant-recurrences in stage I UCS; adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be effective to control local-recurrence when the tumor exhibits multiple risk factors.

Bokhman Redux: Endometrial cancer "types" in the 21st century

In 1983 Jan V. Bokhman, M.D. published a landmark paper entitled "Two Pathogenetic Types of Endometrial Carcinoma" in which an enduring dualistic view of endometrial cancer was first proposed. "Type I" cancers are thought to represent estrogen driven mostly low grade endometrioid tumors strongly associated with obesity and other components of the metabolic syndrome. "Type II" cancers represent higher grade non-endometrioid tumors for which the latter associations are less significant. Basic tenets of this dichotomy including significant prognostic differences have been abundantly confirmed by later literature. The construct has in turn contributed a useful framework for decades of teaching and scientific advancement across disciplines. However, recent large epidemiologic studies indicate a more complex web of risk factors with obesity and hormones likely playing an important role across the entire endometrial cancer histologic and clinical spectrum. Moreover, high quality molecular data and refinements in pathologic classification challenge any simplistic classification of endometrial cancer. For example, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) recently defined four clinically distinct endometrial cancer types based on their overall mutational burden, specific p53, POLE and PTEN mutations, microsatellite instability and histology. Additionally, new histologic categories with clear prognostic implications have been accepted and it is becoming evident from an epidemiologic point of view that metabolic factors may play an important role in endometrial cancer overall. While Bokhman's intuitive dualistic model remains relevant when working with large registries and databases lacking granular information; most other efforts should integrate clinical, pathological and molecular specifics into more nuanced classifications.

Tumor characteristics and survival outcomes of women with tamoxifen-related uterine carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To examine tumor characteristics and survival outcome of women with uterine carcinosarcoma who had a history of tamoxifen use.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study examining stage I-IV uterine carcinosarcoma cases based on history of tamoxifen use. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment pattern, and survival outcomes were compared between tamoxifen users and non-users.

RESULTS

Sixty-six cases of tamoxifen-related uterine carcinosarcoma were compared to 1009 cases with no history of tamoxifen use. Tamoxifen users were more likely to be older (mean age, 69 versus 64, P<0.001) and had a past history of malignancy (100% versus 12.7%, P<0.001). Tamoxifen-related uterine carcinosarcoma was significantly associated with a higher proportion of stage IA disease (48.4% versus 29.9%) and a lower risk of stage IVB disease (7.8% versus 16.0%) compared to tamoxifen-unrelated carcinosarcoma (P=0.034). Deep myometrial tumor invasion was less common in uterine carcinosarcoma related to tamoxifen use (28.3% versus 48.8%, P=0.002). On univariate analysis, tamoxifen use was not associated with progression-free survival (5-year rates 44.5% versus 46.8%, P=0.48) and disease-specific survival (64.0% versus 59.1%, P=0.39). After adjusting for age, past history of malignancy, stage, residual disease status at surgery, and postoperative treatment patterns, tamoxifen use was not associated with progression-free survival (adjusted-hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 1.50, P=0.60) and disease-specific survival (adjusted-hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.29, P=0.24).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that tamoxifen-related uterine carcinosarcoma may have favorable tumor characteristics but have comparable stage-specific survival outcomes compared to tamoxifen-unrelated uterine carcinosarcoma.