Clinicopathologic implications of DNA mismatch repair status in endometrial carcinomas

Prognostic Effect of Mismatch Repair Status in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Radiation: A Multi-institutional Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to report the effect of mismatch repair (MMR) status on outcomes of patients with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEC) who receive adjuvant radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study across 11 institutions in North America. Patients with known MMR status and stage I-II EEC status postsurgical staging were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed via Cox proportional hazard models for RFS and OS. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27.

RESULTS

In total, 744 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years (IQR, 58-71) were included. Most patients were White (69.4%) and had Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009 stage I (84%) and Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology grade 1 to 2 (73%). MMR deficiency was reported in 234 patients (31.5%), whereas 510 patients (68.5%) had preserved MMR. External beam radiation therapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy was delivered to 186 patients (25%), whereas 558 patients (75%) received vaginal brachytherapy alone. At a median follow-up of 43.5 months, the estimated crude OS and RFS rates for the entire cohort were 92.5% and 84%, respectively. MMR status was significantly correlated with RFS. RFS was inferior for MMR deficiency compared with preserved MMR (74.3% vs 88.6%, P < .001). However, no difference in OS was seen (90.8% vs 93.2%, P = .5). On multivariable analysis, MMR deficiency status was associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio, 1.86; P = .001) but not OS.

CONCLUSIONS

MMR status was independently associated with RFS but not OS in patients with early-stage EEC who were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy. These findings suggest that differential approaches to surveillance and/or treatment based on MMR status could be warranted.

Insights into MLH1 Methylation in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma through Pyrosequencing Analysis: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background: In cancer care, the MLH1 gene is crucial for DNA mismatch repair (MMR), serving as a vital tumor suppressor. Evaluating MLH1 protein expression status, followed by analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation, has become a key diagnostic and prognostic approach. Our study investigates the complex link between MLH1 methylation and prognosis in endometrial adenocarcinoma (EA) patients. Methodology: MLH1 methylation status was accessed by a Pyrosequencing (PSQ) assay. Qualitative positivity for methylation was established if it exceeded the 11% cut-off; as well, a quantitative methylation analysis was conducted to establish correlations with clinicopathological data, relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival. Results: Our study revealed that 33.3% of patients without MLH1 methylation experienced relapses, surpassing the 23.3% in patients with methylation. Furthermore, 16.7% of patients without methylation succumbed to death, with a slightly higher rate of 17.6% in methylated patients. Qualitative comparisons highlighted that the mean methylation rate in patients experiencing relapse was 35.8%, whereas in those without relapse, it was 42.2%. This pattern persisted in disease-specific survival (DSS), where deceased patients exhibited a higher mean methylation level of 49.1% compared to living patients with 38.8%. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the efficacy of PSQ for evaluating MLH1 methylation. While unmethylation appears to be associated with a higher relapse rate, the survival rate does not seem to be influenced by methylation. Quantitative percentages suggest that elevated MLH1 methylation is linked to relapse and mortality, though a study with a larger sample size would be essential for statistically significant results.

The Significance of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Grading in Microsatellite Instability-High and POLE-Mutant Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma

With the advancement of diagnostic molecular technology and the molecular classification of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC), it remains to be seen whether conventional International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading retains clinical significance in certain molecular subtypes of EECs. In this study, we explored the clinical significance of FIGO grading in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and POLE-mutant EECs. A total of 162 cases of MSI-H EECs and 50 cases of POLE-mutant EECs were included in the analysis. Significant differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB), progression-free survival, and disease-specific survival were seen between the MSI-H and POLE-mutant cohorts. Within the MSI-H cohort, there were statistically significant differences in TMB and stage at presentation across FIGO grades, but not survival. Within the POLE-mutant cohort, there was significantly greater TMB with increasing FIGO grade, but there were no significant differences in stage or survival. In both the MSI-H and POLE-mutant cohorts, log-rank survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference in progression-free and disease-specific survival across FIGO grades. Similar findings were also seen when a binary grading system was utilized. Since FIGO grade was not associated with survival, we conclude that the intrinsic biology of these tumors, characterized by their molecular profile, may override the significance of FIGO grading.

Prediction of Prognosis, Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy with an Immune-Related Risk Score Model for Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer. The overall survival remains unsatisfying due to the lack of effective treatment screening approaches. Immunotherapy as a promising therapy has been applied for EC treatment, but still fails in many cases. Therefore, there is a strong need to optimize the screening approach for clinical treatment. In this study, we employed co-expression network (GCN) analysis to mine immune-related GCN modules and key genes and further constructed an immune-related risk score model (IRSM). The IRSM was proved effective as an independent predictor of poor prognosis. The roles of IRSM-related genes in EC were confirmed by IHC. The molecular basis, tumor immune microenvironment and clinical characteristics of the IRSM were revealed. Moreover, the IRSM effectiveness was associated with immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients in the low-risk group were more sensitive to immunotherapy and chemotherapy than those in the high-risk group. Interestingly, the patients responding to immunotherapy were also more sensitive to chemotherapy. Overall, we developed an IRSM which could be used to predict the prognosis, immunotherapy response and chemotherapy sensitivity of EC patients. Our analysis not only improves the treatment of EC but also offers targets for personalized therapeutic interventions.

Clinicopathological characteristics of endometrial carcinomas according to DNA mismatch repair protein status

DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd) in endometrial carcinoma is associated with the risk of Lynch syndrome and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. It is also related to microsatellite instability and corresponds to a molecular subtype of endometrial tumor with an unclear prognosis. Here, we evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of 312 consecutive endometrial carcinoma cases submitted to complete surgical staging at a single institution. We compared MMRd and mismatch repair protein-proficient (MMRp) tumors and examined the effects of the MMR protein loss type (MLH1/PMS2 vs. MSH2/MSH6) and influence of L1CAM and p53 expression. The median follow-up period was 54.5 (range, 0-120.5) months. No difference was observed between MMRd [n = 166 (37.2%)] and MMRp [n = 196 (62.8%)] cases in terms of age, body mass index, FIGO stage, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of myometrial infiltration, or lymph node metastasis. More MMRd than MMRp tumors had endometrioid histology (87.9% vs. 75.5%) and despite MMRd had more lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI; 27.2% vs. 16.9%), they presented fewer recurrences and no difference in lymph node metastasis and disease-related death. Relative to those with MLH1/MSH6 loss, tumors with MSH2/MSH6 loss were diagnosed at earlier FIGO stages, were smaller, and had less ≥50% myometrial invasion, LVSI and lymph node metastasis. Outcomes, however, did not differ between these groups. L1CAM positivity and mutation-type p53 expression were more common in MMRp than in MMRd tumors and did not differ between the MLH1/PMS2 and MSH2/MSH6 loss groups. In the entire cohort, L1CAM and mutation p53 expression were associated with worse prognosis, but only non-endometrioid histology, FIGO stage III/IV, and deep myometrial infiltration were significant predictors. In the subgroup of endometrioid carcinomas, only FIGO stage III/IV was associated with poor outcomes. The risk of lymph node metastasis was associated with tumor size, non-endometrioid histology, and multifocal LVSI. For MMRd tumors, only tumor size and myometrial invasion depth were predictive of lymph node involvement. In our cohort, MMRd tumors were associated with greater recurrence-free, but not overall, survival. The precise identification of MMRd status, present in a substantial proportion of endometrial cancer cases, is a challenge to be overcome for proper patient management. MMRd status serves as a marker for Lynch syndrome, and a significant number of these tumors are high risk and candidate to immunotherapy.

Nectin-4 as a Predictive Marker for Poor Prognosis of Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Impairment

The adhesion molecule Nectin-4 is a new potential therapeutic target for different types of cancer; however, little is known about its diagnosis significance in endometrial cancer (EC). We found that Nectin-4 expression was significantly higher in EC tissues than in nonadjacent normal tissue. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.922 indicated good diagnostic accuracy for Nectin-4 expression in EC. Furthermore, Nectin-4 expression was associated with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency. Notably, the high Nectin-4 expression group of patients with MSH2/6-deficient EC had shorter progression-free survival than that of the low Nectin-4 expression group. The number of lymphovascular space invasion-positive patients in groups with MMR deficiency and high Nectin-4 expression was also increased compared with that in the low Nectin-4 expression group. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that alteration in Nectin-4 and MMR genes is associated with Nectin-4 expression in EC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that Nectin-4 expression may be a potential biomarker for EC diagnosis and that high Nectin-4 expression in MMR-deficient patients with EC can predict short progression-free survival, thus providing clues to identify patients for adjuvant therapy.

The Correlation of Histopathologic Parameters With Mismatch Repair Protein-deficient Subgroups and MLH1 Methylation in Endometrial Carcinomas

There are limited data regarding the correlation of clinical and pathologic parameters with mismatch repair (MMR) protein-deficient subgroups and methylation status. In this study, we analyzed the status of MMR proteins in resection specimens of 198 consecutive endometrial carcinomas and the methylation status in tumors with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency. We, therefore, assessed the correlation of clinical and pathologic parameters with MMR protein-deficient subgroups. Univariate analysis revealed that deeper myometrial invasion and the presence of tumor-associated lymphocytes were more frequently observed in tumors with MMR protein deficiency ( P =0.023 and 0.001, respectively). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only the presence of tumor-associated lymphocytes was significantly associated with MMR protein deficiency ( P =0.002, odds ratio=2.674, 95% confidence interval=1.418-5.045). We also compared MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency with other protein deficiency regarding clinical and pathologic parameters. Furthermore, we compared MLH1 methylated tumors with MMR protein-deficient nonmethylated tumors regarding clinical and pathologic parameters. MLH1 was methylated in 51 of 54 tumors with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency. In univariate analysis, a larger tumor size was significantly associated with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency and with MLH1 methylation ( P =0.004 and 0.005, respectively). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a larger tumor size was significantly associated with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency and MLH1 methylation ( P =0.002, odds ratio=14.222, 95% confidence interval=2.560-79.026, P =0.008, odds ratio=22.222, 95% confidence interval=2.220-222.395, respectively). Our results showed a slightly higher rate of MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency (34.3%) than in previous studies. This may likely be due to ethnic differences in frequency of various mutations.

Proteomic and functional characterization of intra-tumor heterogeneity in human endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed gynecological cancers worldwide, and its prevalence has increased by more than 50% over the last two decades. Despite the understanding of the major signaling pathways driving the growth and metastasis of endometrial cancer, clinical trials targeting these signals have reported poor outcomes. The heterogeneous nature of endometrial cancer is suspected to be one of the key reasons for the failure of targeted therapies. In this study, we perform a sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH)-based comparative proteomic analysis of 63 tumor biopsies collected from 20 patients and define differences in protein signature in multiple regions of the same tumor. We develop organoids from multiple biopsies collected from the same tumor and show that organoids capture heterogeneity in endometrial cancer growth. Overall, using quantitative proteomics and patient-derived organoids, we define the heterogeneous nature of endometrial cancer within a patient’s tumor.

•

Proteomic analysis of endometrial cancer intra-tumor heterogeneity

•

Identification of potential biomarkers of tumor volume and invasion

•

Protein signatures correlate with pre-and postmenopausal cancers

•

Patient-derived organoids capture endometrial cancer heterogeneity

The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review

The objective of this systematic review was to summarize our current knowledge of the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers for identifying mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors in endometrial cancer (EC). Identification of MMRd tumors, which occur in 13% to 30% of all ECs, has become critical for patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer for therapeutic management, clinical decision making, and prognosis. This review was conducted by two authors applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the following terms: “immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer”. Among 596 retrieved studies, 161 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were classified and presented according to their interest for the diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnostics for patients with MMRd EC. We identified 10, 18, and 96 articles using IHC expression of two, three, or four proteins of the MMR system (MLH1, MSH2, MHS6, and PMS2), respectively. MLH1 promoter methylation was analyzed in 57 articles. Thirty-four articles classified MMRd tumors with IHC markers according to their prognosis in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), stage, grade, and lymph node invasion. Theragnostics were studied in eight articles underlying the important concentration of PD-L1 in MMRd EC. Even though the role of IHC has been challenged, it represents the most common, robust, and cheapest method for diagnosing MMRd tumors in EC and is a valuable tool for exploring novel biotherapies and treatment modalities.

Comprehensive Clinicopathologic Analysis for Mismatch Repair Protein Expression in Unselected Endometrial Carcinoma Patients With an Emphasis on the Role of MLH1 Deficiency

Screening for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in unselected patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) and the clinicopathologic descriptions of ECs with MMR deficiency have been well demonstrated in Western populations, but studies on Asian populations are relatively scarce. In this study, we described the clinicopathologic features of ECs according to MMR status in unselected Taiwanese patients. We also conducted subgroup analysis of MMR-deficient (dMMR) cases according to the presence or absence of MLH1. Patients diagnosed with ECs between January 2017 and February 2020 at our institution were included. Immunohistochemistry analysis of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins on endometrial primary tumors and clinicopathologic variables were assessed retrospectively. A total of 231 EC patients were enrolled, of whom 50 (21.6%) had dMMR tumors. Of these 50 cases, 39 had tumors that lacked MLH1 expression and 11 were positive for MLH1. The overall dMMR group was significantly related to older age, parity, and high histologic grade compared with the MMR-proficient (pMMR) group. ECs with MLH1 deficiency were obviously associated with several poor pathologic features, including high histologic grade, lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular space invasion. Moreover, we first reported that parity and the late age at menopause are strongly correlated with MLH1-related dMMR EC group compared with pMMR group. In conclusion, triaging EC patients into pMMR, MLH1-related dMMR and non-MLH1-related dMMR groups by immunohistochemistry analysis may help clinicians to predict disease behavior and guide further management. The strong association between parity and MLH1-related dMMR ECs warrants further investigation on the underlying mechanism.

Clinicopathologic significance of DNA mismatch repair protein status in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic implications of DNA mismatch repair protein (MMRP) have not been determined in endometrial cancer. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of DNA MMRP deficiency in endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the MMRP status of 206 patients with endometrial carcinomas, using immunohistochemistry, and analyzed their clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes stratified by MMRP status using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-three cases were deficient for at least one MMRP (20.9%). Loss of MLH1 was the most common (13.1%), followed by MSH6 (7.8%). MMRP deficiency was significantly associated with lympho-vascular space invasion, deep myometrial invasion, and adjuvant treatment (P = 0.032, 0.041, and 0.047, respectively). MMRP-deficient patients had a better overall survival (OS), particularly at advanced cancer stages (III/IV) (100% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.170) or if they had received adjuvant treatment (100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.087).

CONCLUSION

Although MMRP deficiency was associated with unfavorable prognostic risk factors in endometrial cancer, we found a trend in favor of OS in MMRP-deficient patients. More studies are needed to confirm its prognostic implication.

An effective algorithm to detect the possibility of being MSI phenotype in endometrial cancer given the BMI status and histological subtype: a statistical study

Purpose

In endometrial cancer, the incidence of mutations in mismatch repair genes (MMR) is estimated at 17–30%. Patients with alterations at this level (MSI) are known to have different clinical and anatomopathological characteristics than those without this genetic alteration (MSS). In this study, we aim to identify the MSI phenotype in patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. We assessed the correlation of this phenotype with anatomoclinical parameters such as obesity and histological subtype.

Methods/patients

Clinical and anatomopathological data were collected from 147 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and an immunohistochemical study of MMR system proteins was performed. PMS2 and MSH6 proteins were evaluated as primary screening and subsequent evaluation of MLH1 and MSH6, respectively, if the former were negative. Statistical association between the anatomopathological data and the immunohistochemical result was analyzed.

Results and conclusions

22.4% of our patients were MSI phenotype. We obtained statistically significant differences by multivariate analysis between endometrioid subtype and higher FIGO classification grade with MSI phenotype and obesity with MSS phenotype. Given these statistical results, we propose a function for predicting the probability of being MSI phenotype taking into account the histological subtype (endometrioid/non-endometrioid carcinoma) and FIGO grade as well as obesity. This prediction may be useful prior to hysterectomy, for genetic study of the MLH1 promoter and subsequent genetic counseling.

Rare Subtype of Endometrial Cancer: Undifferentiated/Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma, from Genetic Aspects to Clinical Practice

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecologic cancers worldwide. There were 417,367 newly diagnosed cases and 97,370 deaths due to this disease worldwide in 2020. The incidence rates have increased over time, especially in countries with rapid socioeconomic transitions, and EC has been the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy in Taiwan since 2012. The new EC molecular classifications of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network include clear-cell carcinoma, serous carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma, while undifferentiated/dedifferentiated EC (UDEC) is not mentioned, and most previous clinical trials for EC have not included UDEC. UDEC is rare, has an aggressive growth pattern, tends to be diagnosed at an advanced stage, and is resistant to conventional chemotherapy. In this review, case series or case reports on the clinical features and genomic/epigenetic and expression profiles on UDEC data are summarized in order to identify potential molecular targets for current and future research.

Management of stage III and IVa uterine cancer

The prognosis of patients with advanced endometrial cancer is poor with limited therapeutic options. Nevertheless, the integration of molecular features in the clinico-pathological classification of endometrial cancer has significantly refined prognostic risk groups, representing a major breakthrough not only in the management of the disease but also in treatment perspectives. New therapeutic compounds such as target therapies, immunotherapy, and hormonal therapies have emerged for this clinical setting. Furthermore, molecular-driven clinical trials may improve significantly the efficacy of new treatments selecting those patients who are highly likely to respond. This review aims at describing the state of the art of advanced stage III-IVa endometrial cancer management, providing also the most interesting clinical perspectives.

Reporting Subclonal Immunohistochemical Staining of Mismatch Repair Proteins in Endometrial Carcinoma in the Times of Ever-Changing Guidelines

CONTEXT.—

The current College of American Pathologists reporting guideline for mismatch repair protein (MMRP) immunohistochemistry for Lynch syndrome (LS) screening considers the presence of any positive nuclear staining as intact MMRP expression. This would include tumors with combined areas of subclonal retention and loss of MMRP staining.

OBJECTIVE.—

To evaluate the clinical significance of reporting subclonal staining patterns of MMRP immunohistochemistry in endometrial carcinoma.

DESIGN.—

We retrospectively reviewed 455 consecutive MMRP immunohistochemistry results of endometrial carcinoma in hysterectomy specimens from 2012 through 2017 and identified cases with subclonal MMRP staining. These results were correlated with the patient's personal and family history of LS-associated carcinoma, MLH1 promoter methylation status, and LS genetic testing.

RESULTS.—

Subclonal staining of MMRP was seen in 48 of 455 cases (10.5%) on review. Thirty cases demonstrated isolated subclonal staining and were reported by pathologists as follows: subclonal (n = 5), complete MMRP loss (n = 4), and intact MMRP (n = 21). Eighteen cases had subclonal staining in combination with complete loss of other MMRP. Cases reported as subclonal or complete MMRP loss had appropriate clinical follow-up. Two of 2 cases with isolated subclonal MSH6 loss tested positive for LS. One of 3 cases with isolated subclonal MLH1/PMS2 loss was negative for MLH1 promoter methylation; LS genetic testing was not performed because of cost.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Our study reveals that LS germline mutation can be detected in endometrial carcinoma patients whose tumors display sole subclonal MMRP staining. Our results stress the importance of reporting subclonal staining patterns to ensure appropriate clinical follow-up.

Prognostic impact of mismatch repair deficiency in high- and low-intermediate-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer following vaginal brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of mismatch repair (MMR) status on prognosis among patients with high- and low-intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) treated with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

198 stage I-II EEC patients with known MMR status treated with adjuvant VBT were identified. Both low-intermediate (LIR) and high-intermediate-risk (HIR) patients were included. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with proficient and deficient mismatch repair (pMMR and dMMR) using Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Patients with dMMR compared to pMMR were more likely to have grade 2-3 tumors (75% vs. 57%, p = 0.006), lympho-vascular invasion (40% vs. 25%, p = 0.034), and HIR classification (65% vs. 49%, p = 0.011). Three-year RFS was inferior for dMMR compared to pMMR patients (75% vs. 96%, p = 0.001). dMMR patients compared to pMMR had similarly reduced 3-year RFS within the LIR (74% vs. 100%, p = 0.026) and HIR (75% vs. 91%, p = 0.038) subgroups. Three-year OS was not different between dMMR/pMMR patients (98% vs. 97%, p = 0.653) or HIR/LIR patients (97% vs. 97%, p = 0.999). On multivariable Cox regression, dMMR status was a significant prognostic variable for RFS (HR 3.774, CI 1.495-9.526, p = 0.005), though it was not significant for OS.

CONCLUSION

Following VBT, patients with dMMR have poorer RFS compared to pMMR patients regardless of HIR/LIR risk classification. The prognosis of intermediate-risk EEC patients may lie more on a continuum dependent on molecular features rather than distinct clinicopathologic risk categories.

Long-Term Survival and Clinicopathological Implications of DNA Mismatch Repair Status in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers in Hong Kong Chinese Women

To investigate the role of DNA mismatch repair status (MMR) in survival of endometrioid endometrial cancer in Hong Kong Chinese women and its correlation to clinical prognostic factors, 238 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer were included. Tumor MMR status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Clinical characteristics and survival were determined. Association of MMR with survival and clinicopathological parameters were assessed. MMR deficiency (dMMR) was found in 43 cases (16.5%). dMMR was associated with poor prognostic factors including older age, higher stage, higher grade, larger tumor size and more radiotherapy usage. Long-term survival was worse in dMMR compared to the MMR proficient group. The dMMR group had more deaths, shorter disease-specific survival (DSS), shorter disease-free survival (DFS), less 10-year DSS, less 10-year DFS, and more recurrence. The 5-year DSS and 5-year DFS in the dMMR group only showed a trend of worse survival but did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, dMMR is present in a significant number of endometrioid endometrial cancers patients and is associated with poorer clinicopathological factors and survival parameters in the long run. dMMR should be considered in the risk stratification of endometrial cancer to guide adjuvant therapy and individualisation for longer follow up plan.

MLH1 promoter hypermethylation predicts poorer prognosis in mismatch repair deficiency endometrial carcinomas

Objective

The antitumor effects of anti-PD-1 antibody against mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D)-associated cancers have been reported. MMR-D is found in approximately 20%–30% of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) and frequently occurs due to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH1-PHM). ECs with MLH1-PHM are classified according to the molecular screening of Lynch syndrome (LS), but few detailed reports are available. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical features of EC with MLH1-PHM.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry of MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) was performed on specimens from 527 ECs treated at our university hospital from 2003 to 2018. MLH1 methylation analysis was added to cases with MLH1/PMS2 loss. ECs were classified as follows: cases that retained MMR proteins as “MMR-proficient;” cases with MLH1/PMS2 loss and MLH1-PHM as “met-EC;” and cases with other MMR protein loss and MLH1/PMS2 loss without MLH1-PHM as “suspected-LS.” The clinical features, including long-term prognosis, of each group, were analyzed.

Results

Accordingly, 419 (79.5%), 65 (12.3%), and 43 (8.2%) cases were categorized as “MMR-proficient,” “suspected-LS,” and “met-EC,” respectively. Significantly, “met-EC” had a lower proportion of grade 1 tumors (37.5%) and a higher proportion of stage III/IV tumors (37.2%) than the other groups. The overall and progression-free survival of “met-EC” were significantly worse than those of “suspected-LS” in all cases.

Conclusion

In ECs with MMR-D, “met-ECs” were a subgroup with a poorer prognosis than “suspected-LS.” “Met-ECs” would be the main target for anti-PD-1 antibody treatment, and its clinical susceptibility should be verified individually.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency as a Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Molecularly Classified Endometrial Carcinoma

Simple Summary

We studied mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in endometrial carcinoma. MMR deficiency was associated with poor outcome only when p53 aberrant and polymerase-ϵ mutant tumors were excluded from the MMR proficient subgroup, in accordance with molecular classification based on The Cancer Genome Atlas. MMR deficiency was associated with an increased risk of death in the absence of various clinicopathologic risk factors, but the outcome was not worsened when such risk factors were present. The proportion of pelvic relapses and lymphatic dissemination, defined as primary lymph node involvement or relapses in regional lymph nodes, were higher in the MMR deficient subgroup. In conclusion, the effect of MMR deficiency on the outcome of endometrial carcinoma depends on how MMR proficiency is defined. MMR deficiency is associated with an increased risk of death in the absence of established risk factors and a unique pattern of disease spread.

Abstract

The aggressiveness of mismatch repair (MMR) deficient endometrial carcinomas was examined in a single institution retrospective study. Outcomes were similar for MMR proficient (n = 508) and deficient (n = 287) carcinomas, identified by immunohistochemistry. In accordance with molecular classification based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), tumors with abnormal p53 staining or polymerase-ϵ exonuclease domain mutation were excluded from the MMR proficient subgroup, termed as “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). Compared with NSMP (n = 218), MMR deficiency (n = 191) was associated with poor disease-specific survival (p = 0.001). MMR deficiency was associated with an increased risk of cancer-related death when controlling for confounders (hazard ratio 2.0). In the absence of established clinicopathologic risk factors, MMR deficiency was invariably associated with an increased risk of cancer-related death in univariable analyses (hazard ratios ≥ 2.0). In contrast, outcomes for MMR deficient and NSMP subgroups did not differ when risk factors were present. Lymphatic dissemination was more common (p = 0.008) and the proportion of pelvic relapses was higher (p = 0.029) in the MMR deficient subgroup. Our findings emphasize the need for improved triage to adjuvant therapy and new therapeutic approaches in MMR deficient endometrial carcinomas.

Mismatch repair deficiency and clinicopathological characteristics in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) occurs frequently in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and is an important prognostic marker. However, the frequency of MMR deficiency (D-MMR) in EC remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed this inconsistency and evaluated related clinicopathology.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for articles: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Wiley Online Library. Data were extracted from 25 EC studies of D-MMR to generate a clinical dataset of 7,459 patients. A random-effects model produced pooled estimates of D-MMR EC frequency with 95% confidence interval (CI) for meta-analysis.

Results

The overall pooled proportion of D-MMR was 24.477% (95% CI, 21.022 to 28.106) in EC. The Lynch syndrome subgroup had 22.907% pooled D-MMR (95% CI, 14.852 to 32.116). D-MMR was highest in type I EC (25.810) (95% CI, 22.503 to 29.261) compared to type II (13.736) (95% CI, 8.392 to 20.144). Pooled D-MMR was highest at EC stage and grades I–II (79.430% and 65.718%, respectively) and lowest in stages III–IV and grade III (20.168% and 21.529%). The pooled odd ratios comparing D-MMR to proficient MMR favored low-stage EC disease (1.565; 0.894 to 2.740), lymphovascular invasion (1.765; 1.293 to 2.409), and myometrial invasion >50% (1.271; 0.871 to 1.853).

Conclusions

Almost one-quarter of EC patients present with D-MMR tumors. The majority has less aggressive endometrioid histology. D-MMR presents at lower tumor stages compared to MMR-proficient cases in EC. However other metastatic parameters are comparatively higher in the D-MMR disease setting.

Understanding the clinical implication of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrioid endometrial cancer through a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Findings on impact of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) on patient outcomes in endometrial cancer (EC) have been inconsistent to date. The objective of this study was to compare the oncologic outcomes and recurrence patterns between MMRd and MMR-intact (MMRi) endometrioid EC (EEC).

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, we prospectively recruited 492 EEC cases from three cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Tumors were reflexively assessed for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Clinicopathological, survival and recurrence patterns were compared between MMRd and MMRi cases.

RESULTS

Of 492 EEC, 348 were MMRi (71%) and 144 were MMRd (29%) with median follow-up of 16.8 months (0-69.6). MMRd tumors tended to be grade 2 or 3 (56% vs. 29%, p < 0.001), with propensity for lymphovascular space invasion (28% vs. 18%, p = 0.024), lymph node involvement (7% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) and received more adjuvant treatment (46% vs. 33%, p = 0.027). This group also had significantly lower 3-year recurrence-free survival (78% vs. 90%, p = 0.014) although there was no difference in OS (p = 0.603). MMRd cases were more likely to recur in retroperitoneal lymph nodes (p = 0.045). Upon subgroup analysis, MLH1 methylated tumors had the worst prognostic features and survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

MLH1 methylated EECs exhibit more aggressive features compared to other MMRd and MMRi EECs. This may indicate an inherent difference in tumor biology, suggesting the importance of individualized management based on EC molecular phenotype.

Mismatch repair protein and MLH1 methylation status as predictors of response to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Mismatch repair (MMR) system has been implicated in the response of mammalian cells to ionizing radiation and DNA damaging agents. We investigated the value of the MMR system in predicting response to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This was a single institution retrospective study. MMR protein status of endometrial carcinomas was assessed by immunohistochemistry. MMR deficient (MMR-D) tumors were identified as MLH1 methylated or nonmethylated by methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Tumors with abnormal p53 staining or polymerase ϵ exonuclease domain mutation were excluded from the MMR proficient subgroup, which was termed as "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP). Disease-specific survival analyses were adjusted for age, stage, histology and grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion.

RESULTS

A total of 505 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up time was 81 months (range 1-136). Whole pelvic radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.092 vs. no adjuvant therapy) and chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (adjusted HR 0.18) were associated with improved disease-specific survival in the NSMP subgroup (n = 218). In contrast, adjuvant therapies showed no effect on disease-specific survival in the full MMR-D cohort (n = 287) or in MLH1 methylated tumors (n = 154). Whole pelvic radiotherapy (adjusted HR 25 vs. no adjuvant therapy/vaginal brachytherapy) and chemotherapy combined with whole pelvic radiotherapy (adjusted HR 32) were associated with poor disease-specific survival in MMR-D nonmethylated tumors (n = 70).

CONCLUSION

MMR protein and MLH1 methylation status predict the response to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer. The MMR system could be utilized for selection of patients who most likely benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Gynecological Cancers Caused by Deficient Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability

Mutations in mismatch repair genes leading to mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) have been implicated in multiple types of gynecologic malignancies. Endometrial carcinoma represents the largest group, with approximately 30% of these cancers caused by dMMR/MSI. Thus, testing for dMMR is now routine for endometrial cancer. Somatic mutations leading to dMMR account for approximately 90% of these cancers. However, in 5-10% of cases, MMR protein deficiency is due to a germline mutation in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, or EPCAM. These germline mutations, known as Lynch syndrome, are associated with an increased risk of both endometrial and ovarian cancer, in addition to colorectal, gastric, urinary tract, and brain malignancies. So far, gynecological cancers with dMMR/MSI are not well characterized and markers for detection of MSI in gynecological cancers are not well defined. In addition, currently advanced endometrial cancers have a poor prognosis and are treated without regard to MSI status. Elucidation of the mechanism causing dMMR/MSI gynecological cancers would aid in diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Recently, a new immunotherapy was approved for the treatment of solid tumors with MSI that have recurred or progressed after failing traditional treatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the MMR defects and MSI observed in gynecological cancers, their prognostic value, and advances in therapeutic strategies to treat these cancers.

The MLH1 polymorphism rs1800734 and risk of endometrial cancer with microsatellite instability

Both colorectal (CRC, 15%) and endometrial cancers (EC, 30%) exhibit microsatellite instability (MSI) due to MLH1 hypermethylation and silencing. The MLH1 promoter polymorphism, rs1800734 is associated with MSI CRC risk, increased methylation and reduced MLH1 expression. In EC samples, we investigated rs1800734 risk using MSI and MSS cases and controls. We found no evidence that rs1800734 or other MLH1 SNPs were associated with the risk of MSI EC. We found the rs1800734 risk allele had no effect on MLH1 methylation or expression in ECs. We propose that MLH1 hypermethylation occurs by different mechanisms in CRC and EC.

Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

The pathogenesis of DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial carcinoma (EC) is driven by inactivating methylation or less frequently mutation of an MMR gene (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6). This study evaluated the prognostic and clinicopathologic differences between methylation-linked and nonmethylated MMR-deficient endometrioid ECs. We performed MMR immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and classified 682 unselected endometrioid ECs as MMR proficient (MMRp, n = 438) and MMR deficient (MMRd, n = 244), with the latter subcategorized as methylated (MMRd Met) and nonmethylated tumors. Loss of MMR protein expression was detected in 35.8% of the tumors as follows: MLH1 + PMS2 in 29.8%, PMS2 in 0.9%, MSH2 + MSH6 in 1.3%, MSH6 in 2.8%, and multiple abnormalities in 0.9%. Of the 244 MMRd cases, 76% were methylation-linked. MMR deficiency was associated with older age, high grade of differentiation (G3), advanced stage (II-IV), larger tumor size, abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 positivity in immune cells and combined positive score, wild-type p53, negative L1CAM, ARID1A loss, and type of adjuvant therapy. MMRd-Met phenotype correlated with older age and larger tumor size, and predicted diminished disease-specific survival in the whole cohort. In the MMRd subgroup, univariate analysis demonstrated an association between disease-specific survival and disease stage II-IV, high grade (G3), deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, ER negativity, and L1CAM positivity. In conclusion, MMR methylation profile correlates with clinicopathologic characteristics of endometrioid EC, and MMRd-Met phenotype predicts lower disease-specific survival. MMR deficiency, but not MLH1 methylation status, correlates with T-cell inflammation and PD-L1 expression.

Clinicopathologic features of endometrial cancer with mismatch repair deficiency

The inclusion of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) evaluation as a standard of care for endometrial cancer management will result in a growing population of patients with MMR deficiency and negative germline Lynch syndrome testing (MMR-deficient). In this systematic review and study, the clinicopathologic features of endometrial cancer in patients with MMR-intact, MLH1 methylation positive, MMR-deficient or Lynch syndrome are evaluated. A systematic search of online databases between 1990 and 2018 identified studies of endometrial cancer patients with tumour testing (MMR protein immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability) and germline assessment for Lynch syndrome. Extracted data included tumour testing, germline genetic testing, age, body mass index (BMI), family history, tumour stage, grade and histologic type. Associations between MMR-intact, MLH1 methylation positive, MMR-deficient and Lynch syndrome groups were analysed using descriptive statistics. The comprehensive search produced 4,400 publications, 29 met inclusion criteria. A total of 7,057 endometrial cancer cases were identified, 1,612 with abnormal immunohistochemistry, 977 with microsatellite instability. Nine-hundred patients underwent germline genetic testing, identifying 212 patients with Lynch syndrome. Patients in the Lynch syndrome and MMR-deficient groups were significantly younger than patients in the MMR-intact and MLH1 methylation positive groups. Patients with MMR-intact tumours had the highest BMI, followed by MMR-deficient, then Lynch syndrome. MMR-intact tumours were more likely to be grade I at diagnosis than other groups. Patients with Lynch syndrome and MMR-deficient tumours were less likely to have stage I disease as compared to patients with MMR-intact tumours. Endometrial cancer patients with MMR-deficient tumours have similar features to those with germline Lynch syndrome mutations, including age, grade, histology and stage. Even in the absence of a germline mutation, tumour evaluation for MMR status may have important clinical implications.

Less correlation between mismatch repair proteins deficiency and decreased expression of HLA class I molecules in endometrial carcinoma: a different propensity from colorectal cancer

Mismatch repair protein deficiency (dMMR) is a favorable prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. It is also associated with aberrant expression of HLA class I molecules, which are required for cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated cancer immunotherapy. Because dMMR is frequently also found in endometrial cancers (ECs), we retrospectively investigated the expression of mismatch repair proteins and HLA class I molecules in 127 EC patients. In this study, EC patients being treated in our hospital were recruited from 2005 to 2009 and observed until December 2017. Lesion specimens were evaluated via immunohistochemistry for MSH6 and PMS2 (mismatch repair proteins) and HLA class I molecules. Expression of these molecules was statistically related to clinical and pathological factors and prognosis. dMMR was detected in 33 patients and did not correlate with the expression level of HLA class I molecules (P = 0.60). On the other hand, unexpectedly, multivariate analysis revealed that intact expression of HLA class I molecules was associated with p53 overexpression (P = 0.004). Neither dMMR nor decreased expression of HLA class I molecules were prognostic factors. These results are inconsistent with previous findings for colorectal cancer. A distinctive local tissue immune microenvironment would underlie the discrepancy in the results between EC and colorectal cancer.

Mismatch repair deficiency and prognostic significance in patients with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers

OBJECTIVES

Mismatch repair deficiency is observed in 25%-30% of all endometrial cancers. This can be detected by the absence of mismatch repair protein staining on immunohistochemistry, and is used as a screen for Lynch syndrome. Only 10% of women with mismatch repair deficiency have Lynch syndrome, but mismatch repair deficiency may still have prognostic significance. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between mismatch repair-deficient and mismatch repair-proficient low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2).

METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2) from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority region from February 2011 to January 2016 that were assessed for mismatch repair deficiency. Any other histology, stage, or grade was excluded from the study. Primary outcome measures were progression-free survival and overall survival calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards model estimated the association between mismatch repair deficiency and recurrence and death after adjustment for covariates, expressed as hazard ratios (HRs). Secondary outcome measures were recurrence rates expressed per 100 person-years (p100py).

RESULTS

There were 475 patients diagnosed with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer, including 131 with mismatch repair-deficient (27.6%) and 344 with mismatch repair-proficient (72.4%) tumors. Women with mismatch repair-deficient tumors had worse progression-free survival (24 months; p=0.0082) and higher recurrence rates (3.56 p100py) compared with those with mismatch repair-proficient tumors (27 months; 1.21 p100py, p=0.04). The absolute number of recurrences was overall low. There were 11 recurrences out of 131 mismatch repair-deficient cases (8.4%) and 14 out of 344 mismatch repair proficient cases (4.1%). After adjustment for age, lymphovascular space invasion status, adjuvant therapy, and post-operative grade, mismatch repair-deficient status remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 3.56, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.95). There was no significant difference in overall survival between mismatch repair groups (mismatch repair-proficient group 27.5 months vs 25.0 months in the deficient group) (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.10).

CONCLUSION

In low-risk stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancers, mismatch repair deficiency is associated with a higher recurrence rate than mismatch repair proficiency after adjustment for covariates, implying that mismatch repair deficiency reflects a different biology in endometrial cancer.

A clinicopathologic study of endometrial cancer metastatic to bone: Identification of microsatellite instability improves treatment strategies

•

Metastasis of endometrial cancer (EC) to bone is rare, occurring in <1.0% of cases.

•

The most common sites of bone metastasis in EC are the spine and hip.

•

Diagnosis of bone metastasis is associated with widely metastatic disease and poor prognosis.

•

The median overall survival following a diagnosis of bone metastasis was 11 months in our series.

•

87.5% of patients with bone metastasis were found to have microsatellite instability.

Metastasis to bone (BM) is an uncommon manifestation of advanced endometrial cancer (EC). The present study will review the clinicopathologic features of a cohort of patients with EC and BM. We conducted a multi-center retrospective review of patients with EC and BM. Demographic and clinical information was extracted from the medical records. Survival outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier Curves. Final analysis included 10 patients. The median age was 65 years (range 31–71). 80% had FIGO stage III/IV disease. The most common site of BM was the spine (66%). All patients presented with extraosseous dissemination at the time of diagnosis of BM and 70% were found to have multiple sites of BM. 80% of patients were diagnosed with BM in the recurrent setting. The median time to diagnosis of bone recurrence was 14 months (range: 0–44). Median survival after diagnosis of BM was 11 months (range: 1–22 months). Patients with endometrioid histology and single site of bone metastasis experienced improved survival (p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively). Eight patients had immunohistochemistry or molecular tumor profiles available for review. Seven of these patients (87.5%) were found to have microsatellite instability (MSI). The most common mutation was hypermethylation of MLH-1 (43%). To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating a correlation between MSI and metastasis to bone. The identification of BM in EC is uncommon, but will alter treatment strategies and dramatically impact prognosis. Molecular tumor profiling should be performed to identify targeted therapy options and optimize adjuvant treatment strategies.

High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas: Classification with Molecular Insights

This article provides an overview of the current diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma subtypes and provides updates, including the most recent molecular findings from The Cancer Genome Atlas and others. Interpretation of relevant immunohistochemistry and critical diagnostic differential diagnosis with pitfalls are discussed.

Endometrial Carcinoma, Grossing and Processing Issues: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic neoplasm in developed countries; however, updated universal guidelines are currently not available to handle specimens obtained during the surgical treatment of patients affected by this disease. This article presents recommendations on how to gross and submit sections for microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens and other tissues removed during the surgical management of endometrial cancer such as salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node dissection—including sentinel lymph nodes. In addition, the intraoperative assessment of some of these specimens is addressed. These recommendations are based on a review of the literature, grossing manuals from various institutions, and a collaborative effort by a subgroup of the Endometrial Cancer Task Force of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. The aim of these recommendations is to standardize the processing of endometrial cancer specimens which is vital for adequate pathological reporting and will ultimately improve our understanding of this disease.

Prognostic implications of mismatch repair deficiency in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal and endometrial cancer

Background

The clinical relevance of mismatch repair (MMR) status in patients with nonmetastatic cancer across tumour types remains unclear. Our goal was to investigate the prognostic role of MMR deficiency in patients with stage I-III colorectal and endometrial cancer.

Methods

Patients with nonmetastatic colorectal and endometrial cancer with tumour tissue available for analysis were identified through the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)'s tumour repository. Patients had been referred to Departments of Medical Oncology affiliated with HeCOG. MMR protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS).

Results

From May 1990 to September 2012, 1158 patients with nonmetastatic colorectal (N = 991) and endometrial cancer (N = 167) were identified (median age: 64 years, men: 544). All patients with colorectal and 109 (65%) with endometrial cancer had received adjuvant treatment. MMR deficiency was observed in 114 (11.5%) of colorectal and 80 (47.9%) of endometrial tumours. More commonly deficient proteins were PMS2 (69 patients, 7%) and MLH1 (63 patients, 6.5%) in colorectal cancer and MSH2 (58 patients, 34.7%) in endometrial cancer. Colorectal MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumours were more likely to be right sided (65 % dMMR vs 27 % proficient MMR, pMMR; p < 0.001), high grade (31% vs 15%, χ², p < 0.001) and with a mucinous component (64% vs 42%, p < 0.001). Endometrial dMMR tumours were more often of endometrioid histology (51.4 % endometrioid vs 20 % serous/clear cell, p = 0.020). Compared with MMR proficiency, MMR deficiency was associated with improved OS in patients with endometrial cancer (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.76, p = 0.006), but not in patients with colorectal cancer (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.09, p = 0.130). After adjusting for age, stage and grade, MMR deficiency maintained its favourable prognostic significance in patients with endometrial cancer (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.88, p = 0.021).

Conclusions

DMMR was associated with improved outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic endometrial cancer, but not in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Mismatch repair deficiency and aberrations in the Notch and Hedgehog pathways are of prognostic value in patients with endometrial cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the Hedgehog (Gli, Patched-1, Shh, Smo) and Notch (Jag1, Notch2, Notch3) pathway members, in comparison to a panel of proteins (ER, PgR, HER2/neu, Ki67, p53, p16, PTEN and MMR) previously suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer, in association with clinical outcome and standard clinicopathological characteristics. A total of 204 patients with histological diagnosis of endometrial cancer treated from 2004 to 2013 were included. The evaluation of protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Univariate analysis showed that higher Ki67 labeling, expression of PTEN, p16, Notch2 and Notch3 proteins, as well as MMR proficiency were associated with increased relapse and mortality rate. Additionally, Patched-1 protein expression was associated with worse DFS, while p53 overexpression was associated with worse OS. In multivariate analyses, patients with MMR proficient tumors had more than double risk for death than patients with MMR deficient (MMRd) tumors (adjusted HR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.05–4.58, p = 0.036). Jag1 positivity conferred reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.23–0.97, p = 0.042). However, as shown by hierarchical clustering, patients fared better when their tumors expressed high Jag1 protein in the absence of Notch2 and Notch3, while they fared worse when all three proteins were highly expressed. Patched-1 positivity conferred higher risk for relapse (HR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.05–3.96, p = 0.036).

Aberrant expression of key components of the Notch and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as well as MMRd may serve as independent prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

Does MMR status in endometrial cancer influence response to adjuvant therapy?

OBJECTIVE

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency occurs in 20-40% of endometrial cancers but its therapeutic implication remains uncertain. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes after adjuvant therapy between MMR deficient and proficient endometrial cancers from a population-based study.

METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all endometrial cancers from the Vancouver Coastal Health authority region from 2011 to 2016, for which adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) was administered. Primary outcome measure was recurrence rates, expressed per 100 person-years (p100 py). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and covariates were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

There were 535 patients who received adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy), including 162 (30.3%) and 373 (69.7%) with MMR-deficient and proficient tumors, respectively. Demographic variables were similar except MMR-deficient patients were younger (62.0 vs. 64.8, p = 0.01). Patients with MMR-deficient tumors were more likely to have endometrioid histotype (85.8% vs. 61.4%), more likely to have Stage I disease (62.3% vs 54.7%), and LVSI (65.4% vs. 53.4%) compared to those with MMR-proficient tumors. There was a trend for MMR-proficient group to have higher recurrence rates (10.7 p100 py vs 5.9 p100 py) and MMR deficiency was associated with better OS and PFS, but on multivariable analysis, MMR status was no longer significant.

CONCLUSION

Women with MMR-deficient endometrial cancers who receive adjuvant therapy have a lower rate of recurrence compared to those with MMR-proficient cancers. However, on multivariable analysis, MMR status does not remain associated with differences in PFS or OS.

DNA Mismatch Repair Protein Immunohistochemistry and MLH1 Promotor Methylation Testing for Practical Molecular Classification and the Prediction of Prognosis in Endometrial Cancer

The incidence of endometrial cancer is rapidly increasing worldwide, and its molecular classification has gained importance for new therapeutic approaches. This study sought to examine the clinicopathologic features and immune markers associated with the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status and MLH1 promoter methylation status of endometrial cancer patients. A total of 173 patients with primary endometrial cancer who had received a hysterectomy were evaluated for four MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2), immune markers (CD8, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)) and p53 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), followed by an MLH1 methylation test. Patients were classified into MMR deficiency or proficiency, sporadic cancer, or probable Lynch syndrome (PLS), and the clinicopathologic features (including the expression of peritumoral immune markers) and prognosis of each group were compared. Patients with MMR deficiency or PLS showed an increase in immune markers compared those with MMR proficiency or sporadic cancer, respectively, and PLS demonstrated higher immune marker expression than MLH1 promoter methylation. Regarding prognosis, patients with MMR deficiency showed significant adverse overall survival (OS) when in stages I and II. Practical molecular classifications based on p53 staining results, in addition to MMR or PLS status, revealed an increased predictive ability for OS compared with the European Society of Medical Oncologists (ESMO) risk groups. The results of this study suggest that PLS may be a better candidate for an immune checkpoint inhibitor than MMR deficiency. The practical molecular classification contributes not only to the screening of Lynch syndrome, but also assists in predicting the prognosis in endometrial cancer.

The practice of universal screening for Lynch syndrome in newly diagnosed endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for 5% of all endometrial cancer (EC) cases and 4% of all lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer. While current guidelines recommend LS screening for all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, there is no such guideline for screening patients with EC.

DISCUSSION

This review addresses LS screening and discusses algorithms for testing patients in the setting of newly diagnosed EC.

CONCLUSION

The successful diagnosis of LS has important implications, including prevention of LS-associated cancers among relatives and immunotherapy recommendations for patients with advanced EC and loss of expression of mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability positive following failure of traditional treatment.

Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status

Objective

The risk of developing endometrial cancer (EC) and/or survival following a diagnosis of EC might differ by tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status. We assessed the association between tumor MMR status (classified as MMR-proficient, somatic MMR-deficient, germline MMR-deficient) and the risk of developing EC and survival following a diagnosis of EC.

Methods

We analyzed data from women who participated in the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) conducted between 2005 and 2007. Risk analyses (698 cases/691 population controls) utilized sociodemographic and lifestyle information obtained from telephone interviews at recruitment. For survival analyses (728 cases), patients' clinical data was abstracted from medical records, and survival data were obtained via linkage with the Australian National Death Index. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between tumor MMR status and EC risk, and proportional hazards models to perform survival analyses with adjustment of known prognostic factors.

Results

Established risk factors for EC did not differ significantly by tumor MMR status. In analyses including all EC subtypes, overall and EC-specific survival did not differ by tumor MMR status. Among women with the most common endometrioid subtype, EC-specific survival was worse for women with somatic MMR-deficient EC compared to women with MMR-proficient EC (hazard ratio [HR]=2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.19–4.01).

Conclusion

The risk of EC is not associated with MMR status. Accurate separation of germline from somatic causes of MMR deficiency suggests that patients with endometrioid subtype somatic MMR-deficient tumors have poorer EC-specific survival than those with MMR-proficient tumors, after accounting for other prognostic factors.

p53 aberrations in low grade endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium with nodal metastases: possible insights on pathogenesis discerned from immunohistochemistry

Background

TP53 mutations are rarely identified in low grade endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium, and their pathogenic significance in such tumors is evidenced by the fact that TP53 aberrations have been associated with reduced recurrence-free survival in this subset of tumors. However, TP53 aberrations may not always represent a driving molecular event in a given endometrial cancer with a mutation. In this case study, the immunophenotype of a distinctive low grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma with an unusual pattern of lymph node metastases is used to explore the possible roles for underlying TP53-related molecular events in its pathogenesis.

Case presentation

A low grade endometrioid carcinoma, 9 cm in greatest dimension, with 35% invasion of the myometrial wall thickness, focal lymphovascular invasion, and metastases to 2 of 16 pelvic lymph nodes, was diagnosed in a 52-year-old woman. The endometrial tumor showed a p53-mutation (aberrant)-type immunohistochemical pattern in 40% of the tumor, but the rest of the tumor, as well as the foci of myometrial and lymphovascular invasion, were p53-wild type. Both lymph nodes with metastatic disease showed a distinct biphasic pattern, comprised of both p53-wild type and p53-aberrant areas in tumoral foci that were spatially apposed but not intermixed. Most p53-aberrant areas (at both the lymph nodes and the endometrium) showed a higher mitotic index and increased atypia as compared to the p53-wild type areas; both showed squamous differentiation. The p53-aberrant areas at both locations were also p16-diffusely positive, vimentin-positive, and estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive, whereas the p53-wild type areas showed an identical immunophenotype with the exception of being p16-mosaic positive. All components of the tumor at both the primary and metastatic sites showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6 and retained MLH/PMS2 expression.

Conclusions

The presence of p53-mutant and wild-type areas in multiple lymph nodes, coupled with the absence of a p53-aberrant immunophenotype in the myometrium-invasive or lymphovascular-invasive portions of the tumor, argues against the possibility that the TP53 mutation in this tumor is a driving event in its pathogenesis, at least regarding the metastatic process. This case illustrates how routine immunohistochemistry can provide important insights into underlying molecular events in cancers, exemplifies an uncommon co-existence of DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency and p53-aberrant immunophenotype in low-grade endometrioid carcinoma, illustrates morphologic differences between p53-aberrant and p53-wild type areas within in the same tumor, and is an exemplar of the emerging theory that lymph node metastases of endometrial cancer may be comprised of different subclones of the primary tumor.

The changing landscape of gynaecological cancer diagnosis: implications for histopathological practice in the 21st century

The era of molecular medicine has led to dramatically improved understanding of the genetic events that give rise to different types of cancers. In the case of gynaecological malignancies, this has resulted in distinct shifts in how these tumours are diagnosed in routine surgical pathology practice, with an increased emphasis on accurate subtype diagnosis. This has happened across all sites in the gynaecological tract and for most cell types, but in ways that are site-specific and may appear to be subtle, as in most instances the diagnostic terminology has not changed. For example, the diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary is still in use, but the diagnostic criteria and clinical implications are different in 2017 from what they were in 2000. As a result, there can be a failure to appreciate how important these changes are and the resulting necessity of incorporating them into our daily practice. In this review we will describe changes in diagnostic surgical pathology occasioned by improved understanding of molecular events during pathogenesis, for cancers of ovary/tube, endometrium, cervix and vulva, and highlight how current practice differs from that of only a few years ago.

Abnormal mismatch repair and other clinicopathologic predictors of poor response to progestin treatment in young women with endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma: a consecutive case series

OBJECTIVE

To report the response to progestin therapy in young women with endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma (FIGO 1 EAC) based on clinicopathologic features, including abnormal DNA mismatch repair (MMR) by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

DESIGN

Consecutive case series.

SETTING

Olive View-UCLA Medical Center in Sylmar, CA, USA, and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA, USA.

POPULATION

Women ≤55 years old with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC.

METHODS

Response to progestin therapy in 84 consecutive patients was assessed based on clinicopathologic factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), initial histology, and IHC staining for MMR proteins.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of abnormal MMR protein expression and response to progestin therapy were determined.

RESULTS

Six (7%) patients had abnormal IHC staining, of whom five (83%) had FIGO 1 EAC at initial diagnosis. Following progestin treatment, none of the endometrial lesions in patients with abnormal IHC for MMR proteins had resolution of hyperplasia or malignancy, in contrast to 41 (53%) with normal staining (P = 0.028). Age ≤40 years and initial lesion (CAH versus FIGO 1 EAC) were predictors of response to progestin; BMI was not.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, 7% of women ≤55 years of age with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC had loss of MMR proteins by IHC. These patients had a higher incidence of invasive cancer and a lower incidence of resolution with progestin therapy.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Abnormal MMR protein expression predicts poor response to progestins in young women with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC.

New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the fourth most common cancer in women in the developed world. Classification of ECs by histomorphologic criteria has limited reproducibility and better tools are needed to distinguish these tumors and enable a subtype-specific approach to research and clinical care. Based on the Cancer Genome Atlas, two research teams have developed pragmatic molecular classifiers that identify four prognostically distinct molecular subgroups. These methods can be applied to diagnostic specimens (e.g., endometrial biopsy) with the potential to completely change the current risk stratification systems and enable earlier informed decision making. The evolution of genomic classification in ECs is shared herein, as well as potential applications and discussion of the essential research still needed in order to optimally integrate molecular classification in to current standard of care.

Long-term survival of patients with mismatch repair protein-deficient, high-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma

AIMS

Gynaecological cancer patients with germline mutations appear to have a better prognosis than those with sporadic malignancies. Following the observation of long-term survival in a patient with stage III ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and possible Lynch syndrome (LS), DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry was performed in a series of high-stage CCC and correlated with patient outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-two consecutive cases of stage III/IV ovarian CCCs accessioned between 1992 and 2015 were examined. The tumours from two patients (6%), including the index case, showed loss of MSH2/MSH6 expression while MLH1/PMS2 staining was retained. The index patient subsequently developed colonic and rectal carcinomas that were also MSH2/MSH6-deficient, while the second patient had a genetically confirmed germline MSH2 mutation. All other tumours showed retained expression of the four MMR proteins. The two patients with MMR protein-deficient tumours were alive 160 months and 124 months following surgery, whereas the median survival of patients with MMR protein-intact CCCs was 11.8 months (75th and 25th percentiles of 8.1 months and 39.3 months, respectively), with 21 patients deceased due to tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger studies are required but high-stage, MMR protein-deficient CCCs may have a relatively favourable prognosis.

Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE

The clinicopathologic significance of mismatch repair (MMR) defects in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) has not been definitively established. We undertook tumor typing to classify MMR defects to determine if MMR status is prognostic or predictive.

METHODS

Primary EECs from NRG/GOG0210 patients were assessed for microsatellite instability (MSI), MLH1 methylation, and MMR protein expression. Each tumor was assigned to one of four MMR classes: normal, epigenetic defect, probable mutation (MMR defect not attributable to MLH1 methylation), or MSI-low. The relationships between MMR classes and clinicopathologic variables were assessed using contingency table tests and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 1,024 tumors were assigned to MMR classes. Epigenetic and probable mutations in MMR were significantly associated with higher grade and more frequent lymphovascular space invasion. Epigenetic defects were more common in patients with higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage. Overall, there were no differences in outcomes. Progression-free survival was, however, worse for women whose tumors had epigenetic MMR defects compared with the MMR normal group (hazard ratio, 1.37; P < .05; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.86). An exploratory analysis of interaction between MMR status and adjuvant therapy showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival for probable MMR mutation cases.

CONCLUSION

MMR defects in EECs are associated with a number of well-established poor prognostic indicators. Women with tumors that had MMR defects were likely to have higher-grade cancers and more frequent lymphovascular space invasion. Surprisingly, outcomes in these patients were similar to patients with MMR normal tumors, suggesting that MMR defects may counteract the effects of negative prognostic factors. Altered immune surveillance of MMR-deficient tumors, and other host/tumor interactions, is likely to determine outcomes for patients with MMR-deficient tumors.