1
|
Stergioula A, Pantelakos P, Varthalitis I, Agrogiannis G, Pantelis E. Treatment of an unresectable cardiac angiosarcoma using paclitaxel and image guided radiotherapy: Case report and literature review. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100619. [PMID: 37025606 PMCID: PMC10070361 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary cardiac angiosarcomas (PCAs) are rare tumors that are typically found in the right atrium between the third and the fifth decade of life. While surgical removal of the tumor combined with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is the treatment of choice, most of the patients present with unresectable tumors and metastatic disease carrying a dismal prognosis with a median survival of less than 1 year. Doxorubicin and ifosfamide based chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy is currently employed in these patients, but no standardized treatment algorithms exist. In this report, we present the management of a patient with an unresectable PCA treated using weekly paclitaxel (120 mg) combined with radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) delivered by a helical TomoTherapy system. Follow-up imaging studies showed a remarkable tumor regression which allowed for surgical excision of the tumor 10 months post treatment. Histopathological examination of the resected mass showed no viable tumor cell. On the latest follow-up study, 12 months post treatment, no sign of disease progression (local or distant) was found, and the patient is in good clinical condition.
Collapse
|
2
|
Papadopoulou E, Tsoulos N, Metaxa-Mariatou V, Tsantikidi A, Kapetsis G, Florou-Chatzigiannidou C, Maravelaki S, Bourkoula E, Fotiou D, Tsaousis G, Touroutoglou N, Trafalis D, Boukovinas I, Varthalitis I, Saridaki Z, Zoublios C, Galani E, Papatsibas G, Papadimitriou C, Zlatintsi T, Iorga P, Orhan B, Tansan S, Özatlı T, Nasioulas G. Abstract P5-13-01: Comprehensive tumor analysis by NGS in metastatic breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p5-13-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Comprehensive tumor analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is imperative for targeted and immunotherapy related biomarkers’ analysis in metastatic breast cancer enabling personalization of cancer treatment in these patients. In parallel with targeted therapies, immunotherapies are also evolving, revolutionizing cancer therapy. Thus, biomarkers such as. Microsatellite Instability (MSI), and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) are commonly employed in NGS analysis due to their correlation to Immune Checkpoint inhibitors treatment.Methods: In the present study, tumor molecular profile analysis was performed in 73 metastatic breast cancer patients using a broad NGS assay, which analyzes more than 500 unique cancer related genes and is able to detect relevant single nucleotide variations (SNVs), indels, copy number variations (CNVs) and gene fusions, in addition to TMB and MS) simultaneously. Results: An actionable alteration was detected in 79.45% of the patients. 35.62% of them had at least one alteration with an on label treatment associated and 10.96% received information related to an off-label treatment (Tiers 1A.1 and 2C.1 respectively). Additionally, 31.51% of the tumors harbored an alteration that could be used for clinical trial inclusion (Table 1). The most prevalent altered gene in these patients was the PIK3CA gene, with 27.40% mutation rate. Moreover, in 11 cases (15.07%) the mutation detected was in a gene involved in the Homologous recombination (HR) pathway, with evidence of response to PARP inhibitors. BRCA1/2 genes were as expected the most prominent HR mutated genes (5 out of 11 HR mutations), while the remaining HR mutations involved other HR genes (ATM, BLM, CHEK2, FANCM, RAD50). 24.66% of the tumors had a TMB value >10muts/MB and thus were eligible for ICI treatment. The addition of TMB to targeted biomarkers’ analysis increased the number of patients with an on-label treatment recommendation by 8.22%. Conclusions: Tumor molecular profile analysis using NGS, in real world samples, is a first-tier method for metastatic breast cancer and provides important information for decision making in the treatment of such patients. Importantly, simultaneous analysis for targeted therapy and immunotherapy biomarkers could lead to better tumor characterization and offered actionable information in 9 out of 10 patients tested. However, appropriate interpretation of results from such analysis is essential for implementation in clinical practice and accurate refinement of the treatment strategy..
Table 1.Biomarker's summary in the 73 patients included in the studyPercentage of patients with Tier1 variantsPercentage of patients with 2C.1 variantsPercentage of patients with 2C.2/2D variantsPercentage of patients with Tier 3 variantsPercentage of patients with TMB>10muts/MBMEDIAN TMBPercentage of MSI-High patients35.62% (26/73)10.96% (8/73)12.33% (9/73)0% (0/73)24.66% (18/73)5.050% (0/73)
Citation Format: Eirini Papadopoulou, Nikolaos Tsoulos, Vasiliki Metaxa-Mariatou, Aikaterini Tsantikidi, Georgios Kapetsis, Chrysiida Florou-Chatzigiannidou, Sonia Maravelaki, Evgenia Bourkoula, Dimitrios Fotiou, Georgios Tsaousis, Nikolaos Touroutoglou, Dimitrios Trafalis, Ioannis Boukovinas, Ioannis Varthalitis, Zacharenia Saridaki, Charalampos Zoublios, Eleni Galani, George Papatsibas, Christos Papadimitriou, Tania Zlatintsi, Polixenia Iorga, Bülent Orhan, Sualp Tansan, Tahsin Özatlı, George Nasioulas. Comprehensive tumor analysis by NGS in metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zacharenia Saridaki
- Asklepios Oncology Department and “Asklepion Crete” Clinic, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Eleni Galani
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, "Metropolitan" Hospital,, Piraeus, Greece
| | - George Papatsibas
- Oncology Department, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Christos Papadimitriou
- Oncology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Bülent Orhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ceylan International Hospital,, Bursa, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Christopoulou A, Ardavanis A, Papandreou C, Koumakis G, Papatsimpas G, Papakotoulas P, Tsoukalas N, Andreadis C, Samelis G, Papakostas P, Aravantinos G, Ziras N, Souggleri M, Kalofonos C, Samantas E, Makrantonakis P, Pentheroudakis G, Athanasiadis A, Stergiou H, Bokas A, Grivas A, Tripodaki ES, Varthalitis I, Timotheadou E, Boukovinas I. Prophylaxis of cancer‑associated venous thromboembolism with low‑molecular‑weight heparin‑tinzaparin: Real world evidence. Oncol Lett 2022; 23:115. [PMID: 35251346 PMCID: PMC8850961 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Thromboprophylaxis, as a preventive measure for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), may be beneficial for patients with active cancer and high-risk for thrombosis. The present post hoc analysis include a total of 407 patients enrolled in the Greek Management of Thrombosis study, who received thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin. The objectives of the present analysis were: i) To obtain sufficient evidence for the administration of prophylaxis in patients with active cancer, irrespective of Khorana risk assessment model score; ii) to identify the selection criteria for both dose and duration of tinzaparin; and iii) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tinzaparin administered for CAT prophylaxis. The main tumor types for the patients included in the present study were as follows: Lung (25.1%), pancreatic (14.3%), breast (9.1%), stomach (8.4%), colorectal (7.9%) and ovarian (7.6%). Furthermore, metastatic disease was observed in 69.5% of the patients. High thrombotic burden agents (HTBAs) were administered to 66.3% of the patients, and 17.4% received erythropoietin. A total of 43.7% of the patients exhibited a Khorana score <2. The results of the present study demonstrated that both the presence of metastatic disease and the use of HTBAs seemed to influence oncologists' decisions for the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients with active cancer, regardless of Khorana score. Tinzaparin, in dose expressed in the standard notation for heparins, i.e., anti-Xa factor international units (Anti-Xa IU), was administered at an intermediate dose (InterD; 8,000-12,000 Anti-Xa IU; once daily) to 52.4% of patients, while the remaining patients received a prophylactic dose (ProD; ≤4,500 Anti-Xa IU; once daily). The average duration of thromoprophylaxis was 5 months. Furthermore, a total of 14 (3.4%) thrombotic events and 6 (1.5%) minor bleeding events were recorded. A total of four thrombotic events were observed following an InterD treatment of tinzaparin, while 10 thrombotic events were observed following ProD treatment. The present study also demonstrated that an InterD of tinzaparin was administered more frequently to patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m2, a history of smoking and a history of metastatic disease, along with administration of erythropoietin. InterD tinzaparin treatment was found to be potentially more efficacious and without safety concerns. The present study is a registered clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov code, NCT03292107; registration date, September 25, 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina Christopoulou
- Oncology/Chemotherapy Department, ‘Saint Andrew’ General Hospital, 26335 Patras, Greece
| | - Alexandros Ardavanis
- 1st Department of Oncology, ‘Agios Savvas’ Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Papandreou
- Oncology Department, ‘Papageorgiou’ General Hospital, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Koumakis
- 1st Department of Oncology, ‘Agios Savvas’ Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Pavlos Papakotoulas
- 1st Chemotherapy/Oncology Department, ‘Theagenio’ Anticancer Hospital, 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Tsoukalas
- Oncology Department, 401 General Military Hospital, 11525 Athens, Greece
| | - Charalambos Andreadis
- 1st Chemotherapy/Oncology Department, ‘Theagenio’ Anticancer Hospital, 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Samelis
- Oncology Department, ‘Ippokrateio’ General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Pavlos Papakostas
- 2nd Oncology Department, Metropolitan General Hospital, 15562 Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- 2nd Oncology Department, ‘Agioi Anargyroi’ Anticancer Hospital, 14564 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Ziras
- Oncology Department, ‘Metaxa’ Anticancer Hospital, 18537 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Maria Souggleri
- Oncology/Chemotherapy Department, ‘Saint Andrew’ General Hospital, 26335 Patras, Greece
| | | | - Epameinondas Samantas
- 2nd Oncology Department, ‘Agioi Anargyroi’ Anticancer Hospital, 14564 Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Helen Stergiou
- Oncology Department, Bioclinic Hospital, 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Alexandros Bokas
- 1st Chemotherapy/Oncology Department, ‘Theagenio’ Anticancer Hospital, 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anastasios Grivas
- 1st Department of Oncology, ‘Agios Savvas’ Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece
| | - Elli-Sofia Tripodaki
- 1st Department of Oncology, ‘Agios Savvas’ Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Eleni Timotheadou
- Oncology Department, ‘Papageorgiou’ General Hospital, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fountzilas E, Eliades A, Koliou GA, Achilleos A, Loizides C, Tsangaras K, Pectasides D, Sgouros J, Papakostas P, Rallis G, Psyrri A, Papadimitriou C, Oikonomopoulos G, Ferentinos K, Koumarianou A, Zarkavelis G, Dervenis C, Aravantinos G, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Papaxoinis G, Theochari M, Varthalitis I, Kentepozidis N, Rigakos G, Saridaki Z, Nikolaidi A, Christopoulou A, Fostira F, Samantas E, Kypri E, Ioannides M, Koumbaris G, Fountzilas G, Patsalis PC. Clinical Significance of Germline Cancer Predisposing Variants in Unselected Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:E198. [PMID: 33429865 PMCID: PMC7827324 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to determine the prevalence, prognostic and predictive role of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in cancer predisposing genes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Germline testing of 62 cancer susceptibility genes was performed on unselected patients diagnosed from 02/2003 to 01/2020 with PDAC, treated at Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)-affiliated Centers. The main endpoints were prevalence of P/LPVs and overall survival (OS). P/LPVs in PDAC-associated and homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes were identified in 22 (4.0%) and 42 (7.7%) of 549 patients, respectively. P/LPVs were identified in 16 genes, including ATM (11, 2.0%) and BRCA2 (6, 1.1%), while 19 patients (3.5%) were heterozygotes for MUTYH P/LPVs and 9 (1.6%) carried the low-risk allele, CHEK2 p.(Ile157Thr). Patients carrying P/LPVs had improved OS compared to non-carriers (22.6 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, there was a trend for improved OS in P/LPV carriers (p = 0.063). The interaction term between platinum exposure and mutational status of HRR genes was not significant (p-value = 0.35). A significant proportion of patients with PDAC carries clinically relevant germline P/LPVs, irrespectively of age, family history or disease stage. The predictive role of these P/LPVs has yet to be defined. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03982446.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki, 54645 Thessaloniki, Greece;
- European University Cyprus, 1516 Engomi, Cyprus
| | - Alexia Eliades
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
| | - Georgia-Angeliki Koliou
- Section of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, 11526 Athens, Greece;
| | - Achilleas Achilleos
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
| | - Charalambos Loizides
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
| | - Kyriakos Tsangaras
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Joseph Sgouros
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, 14564 Athens, Greece; (J.S.); (E.S.)
| | | | - Grigorios Rallis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Amanda Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Christos Papadimitriou
- Oncology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | | | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, 4108 Limassol, Cyprus; (K.F.); (G.F.)
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Unit, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Zarkavelis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Medical School, 45500 Ioannina, Greece;
| | - Christos Dervenis
- First Department of Surgery, General Hospital Konstantopouleio Agia Olga, 14233 Athens, Greece;
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, 14564 Athens, Greece;
| | - Dimitrios Bafaloukos
- First Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, 18547 Piraeus, Greece;
| | - Paris Kosmidis
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, 15123 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Papaxoinis
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Agios Savvas Cancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece;
| | - Maria Theochari
- First Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | | | - Nikolaos Kentepozidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, 251 Airforce General Hospital, 11525 Athens, Greece;
| | - Georgios Rigakos
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, 15123 Athens, Greece;
| | | | | | | | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, InRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, 15341 Athens, Greece;
| | - Epaminontas Samantas
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, 14564 Athens, Greece; (J.S.); (E.S.)
| | - Elena Kypri
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
| | - Marios Ioannides
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
| | - George Koumbaris
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
| | - George Fountzilas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, 4108 Limassol, Cyprus; (K.F.); (G.F.)
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Philippos C. Patsalis
- NIPD Genetics Limited, 2409 Nicosia, Cyprus; (A.E.); (A.A.); (C.L.); (K.T.); (E.K.); (M.I.); (G.K.)
- Medical School, University of Nicosia, 2417 Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsoukalas N, Papakotoulas P, Christopoulou A, Ardavanis A, Koumakis G, Papandreou C, Papatsimpas G, Papakostas P, Samelis G, Andreadis C, Aravantinos G, Ziras N, Kalofonos C, Samantas E, Souggleri M, Makrantonakis P, Pentheroudakis G, Athanasiadis A, Stergiou H, Tripodaki ES, Bokas A, Grivas A, Timotheadou E, Bournakis E, Varthalitis I, Boukovinas I. Real-World Data on Thromboprophylaxis in Active Cancer Patients: Where Are We? Are We Getting There? Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071907. [PMID: 32679747 PMCID: PMC7409213 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cancer patients are at high risk for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). CAT is the second leading cause of death in these patients but it can be preventable with thromboprophylaxis. Patients and Methods: An observational, prospective, multicenter study aiming to record CAT management in clinical practice was conducted by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO). Results: A total of 426 active cancer patients (mean age 65.3 years, mean BMI: 26.1 kg/m2) who received thromboprophylaxis, were included from 18 oncology units. Tumor types were lung 25.1%, pancreas 13.9%, breast 8.7%, stomach 8.5%, ovarian 7.8%, and others 36%, while 69% had metastases. A total of 71% had a Khorana score ≤2 and 61% received High Thrombotic Risk Chemotherapy Agents (HTRCAs, e.g., platinum). For thromboprophylaxis patients received mainly Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs), on higher than prophylactic doses in 50% of cases. Overall, 16 (3.8%) thrombotic events and 6 (1.4%) bleeding events were recorded. Notably, patients on higher doses of LMWHs compared to patients who received standard prophylactic doses had 70% lower odds to develop thrombotic events (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.10–1.0, p = 0.04). Conclusion: CAT is an important issue in oncology. Along with the Khorana score, factors as metastases and use of HTRCAs should also be taken into consideration. Thromboprophylaxis for active cancer patients with LMWHs, even on higher doses is safe and efficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Tsoukalas
- 401 General Military Hospital, 11525 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-6977366056
| | - Pavlos Papakotoulas
- “Theagenio” Anticancer Hospital, 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece; (P.P.); (C.A.); (A.B.)
| | | | - Alexandros Ardavanis
- “Agios Savvas” Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece; (A.A.); (G.K.); (E.-S.T.); (A.G.)
| | - Georgios Koumakis
- “Agios Savvas” Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece; (A.A.); (G.K.); (E.-S.T.); (A.G.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria Souggleri
- ‘‘Saint Andrew’’ General Hospital, 26335 Patras, Greece; (A.C.); (M.S.)
| | | | | | | | - Helen Stergiou
- “Bioclinic” Hospital, 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece; (H.S.); (I.B.)
| | - Elli-Sofia Tripodaki
- “Agios Savvas” Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece; (A.A.); (G.K.); (E.-S.T.); (A.G.)
| | - Alexandros Bokas
- “Theagenio” Anticancer Hospital, 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece; (P.P.); (C.A.); (A.B.)
| | - Anastasios Grivas
- “Agios Savvas” Anticancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece; (A.A.); (G.K.); (E.-S.T.); (A.G.)
| | - Eleni Timotheadou
- “Papageorgiou” General Hospital, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece; (C.P.); (E.T.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Papakotoulas P, Tsoukalas N, Christopoulou A, Ardavanis A, Koumakis G, Papandreou C, Papatsimpas G, Papakostas P, Samelis G, Andreadis C, Aravantinos G, Ziras N, Kalofonos C, Samantas E, Souggleri M, Makrantonakis P, Pentheroudakis G, Athanasiadis A, Stergiou H, Tripodaki S, Bokas A, Grivas A, Timotheadou E, Bournakis E, Varthalitis I, Boukovinas I. Management of Cancer-associated Thrombosis (CAT): Symptomatic or Incidental. Anticancer Res 2020; 40:305-313. [PMID: 31892581 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer can be treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) according to guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter prospective observational study was carried out to record anti-thrombotic treatment practice, assess thrombosis recurrence and bleeding, and identify potential risk factors. Adult patients from 18 Oncology Departments throughout Greece were followed-up for 12 months. RESULTS A total of 120 patients with CAT receiving anticoagulant treatment were enrolled (35% incidental); 85% were treated for more than 6 months, 95.8% were treated with tinzaparin and smaller percentages with other agents. Thrombosis recurred in three patients and there was minor bleeding in four patients. Bleeding was associated with high body mass index (>35 kg/m2), trauma history, renal insufficiency and bevacizumab use. CONCLUSION Incidental thrombosis contributes significantly to CAT burden. Long-term use of LMWH seems to be effective and safe. Several risk factors associated with bleeding should be considered during anti-coagulation therapy planning.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fountzilas E, Kotoula V, Koliou GA, Giannoulatou E, Gogas H, Papadimitriou C, Tikas I, Zhang J, Papadopoulou K, Zagouri F, Christodoulou C, Koutras A, Makatsoris T, Chrisafi S, Linardou H, Varthalitis I, Papatsibas G, Razis E, Papakostas P, Samantas E, Aravantinos G, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Koumarianou A, Psyrri A, Pentheroudakis G, Pectasides D, Futreal A, Fountzilas G, Tsimberidou AM. Pathogenic mutations and overall survival in 3,084 patients with cancer: the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Precision Medicine Initiative. Oncotarget 2020; 11:1-14. [PMID: 32002119 PMCID: PMC6967777 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the association between pathogenic mutations and overall survival (OS) in patients with cancer referred to Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group–affiliated Departments.
Patients and methods: Patients referred from 12/1980 to 1/2017 had molecular testing (for research) of archival tumor tissue collected at the time of first diagnosis (non-metastatic, 81%; metastatic, 19%). Tumor-specific gene panels (16-101 genes) were used to identify pathogenic mutations in clinically relevant genes. NGS genotyping was performed at the Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Annotation of mutations was performed at MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Results: We analyzed 3,084 patients (median age, 57 years; men, 22%) with sequencing data. Overall, 1,775 (58% of 3,084) patients had pathogenic mutations. The median follow-up was 7.52 years (95% CI, 7.39-7.61). In patients with non-metastatic tumors, after stratification by tumor type, increasing age, higher grade, and histology other than adenocarcinoma were associated with shorter OS. OS was also shorter in patients with pathogenic TP53 (HR=1.36; p<0.001), MLL3 (HR=1.64; p=0.005), and BRCA1 (HR=1.46; p=0.047) mutations compared to wild-type genes. In multivariate analyses, independent prognostic factors predicting shorter OS were pathogenic mutations in TP53 (HR=1.37, p=0.002) and MLL3 (HR=1.50, p=0.027); increasing age (HR=1.02, p<0.001); and increasing grade (HR=1.46, p<0.001). In patients with metastatic cancer, older age and higher grade were associated with shorter OS and maintained their independent prognostic significance (increasing age, HR=1.03, p<0.001 and higher grade, HR=1.73, p<0.001).
Conclusions: Analysis of molecular data reveals prognostic biomarkers, regardless of tissue or organ of origin to improve patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA.,Current address: Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Athens, Greece
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Eleni Giannoulatou
- Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Papadimitriou
- Oncology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Tikas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kyriaki Papadopoulou
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Angelos Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Thomas Makatsoris
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Sofia Chrisafi
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - George Papatsibas
- Oncology Department, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Evangelia Razis
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Epaminontas Samantas
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Paris Kosmidis
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Amanda Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Pentheroudakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.,Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Andrew Futreal
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Genomic Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Papadopoulou E, Tsoulos N, Tsantikidi K, Metaxa-Mariatou V, Stamou PE, Kladi-Skandali A, Kapeni E, Tsaousis G, Pentheroudakis G, Petrakis D, Lampropoulou DI, Aravantinos G, Varthalitis I, Kesisis G, Boukovinas I, Papakotoulas P, Katirtzoglou N, Athanasiadis E, Stavridi F, Christodoulou C, Koumarianou A, Eralp Y, Nasioulas G. Clinical feasibility of NGS liquid biopsy analysis in NSCLC patients. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0226853. [PMID: 31860648 PMCID: PMC6924668 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Analysis of circulating tumor nucleic acids in plasma of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients is the most widespread and documented form of "liquid biopsy" and provides real-time information on the molecular profile of the tumor without an invasive tissue biopsy. Methods Liquid biopsy analysis was requested by the referral physician in 121 NSCLC patients at diagnosis and was performed using a sensitive Next Generation Sequencing assay. Additionally, a comparative analysis of NSCLC patients at relapse following EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKIs) treatment was performed in 50 patients by both the cobas and NGS platforms. Results At least one mutation was identified in almost 49% of the cases by the NGS approach in NSCLC patients analyzed at diagnosis. In 36 cases with paired tissue available a high concordance of 86.11% was observed for clinically relevant mutations, with a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 88.89%. Furthermore, a concordance rate of 82% between cobas and the NGS approach for the EGFR sensitizing mutations (in exons 18, 19, 21) was observed in patients with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs, while this concordance was 94% for the p.T790M mutation, with NGS being able to detect this mutation in three 3 additional patients. Conclusions This study indicates the feasibility of circulating tumor nucleic acids (ctNA) analysis as a tumor biopsy surrogate in clinical practice for NSCLC personalized treatment decision making. The use of new sensitive NGS techniques can reliably detect tumor-derived mutations in liquid biopsy and provide clinically relevant information both before and after targeted treatment in patients with NSCLC. Thus, it could aid physicians in treatment decision making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - George Pentheroudakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
- Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Petrakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
- Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece
| | | | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - George Kesisis
- Oncology Department, Saint Luke Private Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Pavlos Papakotoulas
- First Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenio Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Flora Stavridi
- Fourth Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Yeşim Eralp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fountzilas E, Kotoula V, Pentheroudakis G, Manousou K, Polychronidou G, Vrettou E, Poulios C, Papadopoulou E, Raptou G, Pectasides E, Karayannopoulou G, Chrisafi S, Papakostas P, Makatsoris T, Varthalitis I, Psyrri A, Samantas E, Bobos M, Christodoulou C, Papadimitriou C, Nasioulas G, Pectasides D, Fountzilas G. Prognostic implications of mismatch repair deficiency in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal and endometrial cancer. ESMO Open 2019; 4:e000474. [PMID: 31231557 PMCID: PMC6555870 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical relevance of mismatch repair (MMR) status in patients with nonmetastatic cancer across tumour types remains unclear. Our goal was to investigate the prognostic role of MMR deficiency in patients with stage I-III colorectal and endometrial cancer. Methods Patients with nonmetastatic colorectal and endometrial cancer with tumour tissue available for analysis were identified through the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)'s tumour repository. Patients had been referred to Departments of Medical Oncology affiliated with HeCOG. MMR protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Results From May 1990 to September 2012, 1158 patients with nonmetastatic colorectal (N = 991) and endometrial cancer (N = 167) were identified (median age: 64 years, men: 544). All patients with colorectal and 109 (65%) with endometrial cancer had received adjuvant treatment. MMR deficiency was observed in 114 (11.5%) of colorectal and 80 (47.9%) of endometrial tumours. More commonly deficient proteins were PMS2 (69 patients, 7%) and MLH1 (63 patients, 6.5%) in colorectal cancer and MSH2 (58 patients, 34.7%) in endometrial cancer. Colorectal MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumours were more likely to be right sided (65 % dMMR vs 27 % proficient MMR, pMMR; p < 0.001), high grade (31% vs 15%, χ2, p < 0.001) and with a mucinous component (64% vs 42%, p < 0.001). Endometrial dMMR tumours were more often of endometrioid histology (51.4 % endometrioid vs 20 % serous/clear cell, p = 0.020). Compared with MMR proficiency, MMR deficiency was associated with improved OS in patients with endometrial cancer (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.76, p = 0.006), but not in patients with colorectal cancer (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.09, p = 0.130). After adjusting for age, stage and grade, MMR deficiency maintained its favourable prognostic significance in patients with endometrial cancer (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.88, p = 0.021). Conclusions DMMR was associated with improved outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic endometrial cancer, but not in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Kyriaki Manousou
- Section of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, Athens, Greece, Athens, Greece
| | - Genovefa Polychronidou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleni Vrettou
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christos Poulios
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Georgia Raptou
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eirini Pectasides
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Georgia Karayannopoulou
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sofia Chrisafi
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Thomas Makatsoris
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Amanda Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Epaminontas Samantas
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, AgiiAnargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Mattheos Bobos
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Christos Papadimitriou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fountzilas E, Kotoula V, Tikas I, Manousou K, Papadopoulou K, Poulios C, Karavasilis V, Efstratiou I, Pectasides D, Papaparaskeva K, Varthalitis I, Christodoulou C, Papatsibas G, Chrisafi S, Glantzounis GK, Psyrri A, Aravantinos G, Koliou GA, Koukoulis GK, Pentheroudakis GE, Fountzilas G. Prognostic significance of tumor genotypes and CD8+ infiltrates in stage I-III colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:35623-35638. [PMID: 30479693 PMCID: PMC6235022 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We explored the clinical significance of tumor genotypes and immunophenotypes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods In primary tumors (paraffin blocks) from 412 CRC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, we examined pathogenic mutations (panel NGS; 347 informative); mismatch repair (MMR) immunophenotype (360 informative); and CD8+ lymphocyte density (high – low; 412 informative). The primary outcome measure was disease-free survival (DFS). Results We evaluated 1713 pathogenic mutations (median: 3 per tumor; range 0-49); 118/412 (28.6%) tumors exhibited high CD8+ density; and, 40/360 (11.1%) were MMR-deficient. Compared to MMR-proficient, MMR-deficient tumors exhibited higher CD8+ density (chi-square, p<0.001) and higher pathogenic mutation numbers (p=0.003). High CD8+ density was an independent favorable prognosticator (HR=0.49, 95%CI 0.29-0.84, Wald's p=0.010). Pathogenic BRCA1 and ARID1A mutations were inversely associated with each other (p<0.001), were not associated with MMR-deficiency or CD8+ density, but both independently predicted for unfavorable DFS (HR=1.98, 95%CI 1.12-3.48, p=0.018 and HR=1.99, 95%CI 1.11-3.54, p=0.020, respectively). Conclusion In non-metastatic CRC, high CD8+ lymphocyte density confers a favorable prognosis and may be developed as a single marker in routine diagnostics. The unfavorable prognostic effect of pathogenic BRCA1 and ARID1A mutations is a novel observation that, if further validated, may improve treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ioannis Tikas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Kyriaki Manousou
- Section of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Athens, Greece
| | - Kyriaki Papadopoulou
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christos Poulios
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasilios Karavasilis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Kleo Papaparaskeva
- Department of Pathology, Konstantopouleio Agia Olga General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - George Papatsibas
- Oncology Department, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Sofia Chrisafi
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios K Glantzounis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina and School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Greece
| | - Amanda Psyrri
- Division of Oncology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - George K Koukoulis
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boukovinas I, Lypas G, Liontos M, Andreadis C, Papandreou C, Papakotoulas P, Aravantinos G, Bournakis E, Karageorgopoulou S, Maragkouli E, Ziras N, Kakolyris S, Athanasiadis I, Linardou E, Koumarianou A, Kalofonos C, Pentheroudakis G, Korantzis I, Christodoulou C, Kosmidis P, Daliani D, Ardavanis A, Koumakis G, Bankousli I, Makrantonakis P, Kesisis G, Nikolaou M, Diamantidou E, Tsoukalas N, Xanthakis I, Fassas A, Barbounis V, Anagnostopoulos A, Polyzos A, Athanasiadis A, Syrios I, Peroukidis S, Mpompolaki I, Baka S, Androulakis N, Georgoulias V, Emmanouilidis C, Mavroudis D, Sgouros I, Stathopoulos C, Katopodi O, Varthalitis I, Sarikaki P, Saloustros E, Saridaki Z. Access to Genetic Testing Impacts Oncologists´ Decisions on Ovarian Cancer Personalized Treatment: Lessons Learned From a National Program in Greece. J Glob Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jgo.18.55800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: State health insurance authorities in Greece do not reimburse genetic testing for cancer predisposition. The Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology has launched and carries out a national program covering genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations detection, with the financial support of pharmaceutical industry. Aim: This analysis evaluates how, during this program, access to genetic testing transformed the oncologists' therapeutic approach toward their ovarian cancer patients and how the results impacted treatment decisions concerning PARP inhibitors. Adoption of testing by healthy relatives and timing of testing in the disease continuum were also evaluated. Methods: Adult patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma, irrespectively of family history or age at diagnosis were eligible for this program. Genetic counseling was recommended before testing, and both were offered at no financial cost. First degree family members of pathogenic mutation carriers were also offered free counseling and testing. Results: From March 2015 through January 2018, 708 patients were enrolled and tested. One hundred and forty seven (20.7%) mutation carriers were identified, 102 (14.4%) in BRCA1 and 45 (6.3%) in BRCA2 gene. Testing was more often pursued at initial diagnosis (61%) than at recurrence (39%), as recorded for 409 patients with available relevant information. During the 1st year of the program, average monthly tests performed were 25.1, while during the 3rd year this number increased to 34.3 tests per month. Among patients who tested positive for deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations, relapse was reported in 58 patients, 94.8% of which (n= 55) received treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib as per its indication. Family members of 21 patients (14.3%), out of the 147 who tested positive, received genetic counseling and testing for the mutation identified in the context of the program. Conclusion: Free access to genetic testing for BRCA1/2 for ovarian cancer patients and genetic consultation facilitates testing uptake, affects common clinical practice & has major impact on patients and their families. Still, diffusion of genetic information and broader testing of family members require further efforts by the oncological community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. Boukovinas
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - G. Lypas
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - M. Liontos
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - C. Andreadis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - C. Papandreou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - P. Papakotoulas
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - G. Aravantinos
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - E. Bournakis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - S. Karageorgopoulou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - E. Maragkouli
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - N. Ziras
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - S. Kakolyris
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Athanasiadis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - E. Linardou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - A. Koumarianou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - C. Kalofonos
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - G. Pentheroudakis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Korantzis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - C. Christodoulou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - P. Kosmidis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - D. Daliani
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - A. Ardavanis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - G. Koumakis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Bankousli
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - P. Makrantonakis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - G. Kesisis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - M. Nikolaou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - E. Diamantidou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - N. Tsoukalas
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Xanthakis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - A. Fassas
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - V. Barbounis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - A. Anagnostopoulos
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - A. Polyzos
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - A. Athanasiadis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Syrios
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - S. Peroukidis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Mpompolaki
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - S. Baka
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - N. Androulakis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - V. Georgoulias
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - C. Emmanouilidis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - D. Mavroudis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Sgouros
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - C. Stathopoulos
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - O. Katopodi
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - I. Varthalitis
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - P. Sarikaki
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - E. Saloustros
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| | - Z. Saridaki
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Athens, Greece: 2Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Thessaloniki, Greece: 3Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology, Larisa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Papaxoinis G, Kotoula V, Giannoulatou E, Koliou GA, Karavasilis V, Lakis S, Koureas A, Bobos M, Chalaralambous E, Daskalaki E, Chatzopoulos K, Tsironis G, Pazarli E, Chrisafi S, Samantas E, Kaklamanos IG, Varthalitis I, Konstantara A, Syrigos KN, Pentheroudakis G, Pectasides D, Fountzilas G. Phase II study of panitumumab combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: clinical results including extended tumor genotyping. Med Oncol 2018; 35:101. [PMID: 29855806 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1160-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This clinical trial assessed the efficacy and toxicity of panitumumab combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine as first-line treatment in KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Patients with exon 2 KRAS wild-type mCRC received panitumumab 9 mg/Kg, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, and capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR, minimum 42 responses). We retrospectively assessed mutations in genes implicated in CRC with massively parallel sequencing; ERBB2 and EGFR amplification with fluorescence in situ hybridization, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density. Among 78 patients enrolled, 45 (57.7%) completed 6 cycles. Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were skin rash (19.2%), diarrhea (18%), and neuropathy (6.4%). Among 5 (6.4%) potentially treatment-related deaths, 2 (2.6%) were characterized toxic. Objective response occurred in 43 (55.1%) of the patients (complete 6.4% and partial response 48.7%; stable 17.9% and progressive disease 7.7%), while 3.8% were non-evaluable and 15% discontinued their treatment early. Additional mutations in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF were found in 11/62 assessable (18%) tumors. After 51 months median follow-up, median progression-free (PFS) was 8.1 and overall survival 20.2 months, independently of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF or PI3K-pathway mutation status. Patients with TP53 mutations (n = 34; 55%), as well as those with left colon primary tumors (n = 66; 85%), had significantly better PFS, also confirmed in multivariate analysis. Although the clinical trial met its primary endpoint, according to the current standards, the efficacy and tolerability of the drug combination are considered insufficient. Extended genotyping yielded interesting results regarding the significance of TP53 mutations.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01215539, Registration date: Sep 29, 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Papaxoinis
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, 11527, Athens, Greece.
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleni Giannoulatou
- Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Vasilios Karavasilis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sotirios Lakis
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Andreas Koureas
- Department of Radiology, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Mattheos Bobos
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Elpida Chalaralambous
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Emily Daskalaki
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Kyriakos Chatzopoulos
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - George Tsironis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Elisavet Pazarli
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sofia Chrisafi
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Epaminontas Samantas
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis G Kaklamanos
- Department of Surgery, School of Health Sciences, General Oncologic Hospital of Kifisia, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Konstantinos N Syrigos
- Oncology Unit GPP, Sotiria General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lypas G, Saridaki Z, Saloustros ES, Liontos M, Bournakis E, Papandreou C, Lianos E, Kalofonos H, Maragouli E, Aravantinos G, Xenidis N, Andreadis C, Stergiou E, Bokas A, Gouedard C, Nasioulas G, Papageorgiou F, Athanasiadis A, Varthalitis I, Boukovinas I. Frequent germline BRCA1/2 mutations in women with ovarian cancer and the need for insurance coverage of genetic testing: A Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO) national program. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e13525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Lypas
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Michael Liontos
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | - Elena Maragouli
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Eleni Stergiou
- Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsoukalas N, Bournakis E, Adamidis A, Andreadis C, Arvaniti K, Christopoulou A, Douna S, Moreno J, Goumas G, Kostadima L, Makaronis P, Makatsoris T, Doufexis D, Papatsimpas G, Sgouros I, Stergiou E, Thalassinou P, Boukovinas I, Papakotoulas P, Varthalitis I. Management of thrombosis in cancer patients in Greece. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx388.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
15
|
Liontos M, Koinis F, Chatsidis G, Kamposioras K, Papaxoinis G, Nikolaou M, Tsigaridas K, Voulgaris E, Pantavou E, Aravantinos G, Ardavanis A, Boukovinas I, Galani E, Angelaki S, Mountzios G, Saridaki Z, Varthalitis I, Tsoukalas N. New treatments in Oncology: Clinical practice regarding the management of Adverse Events (AEs). Results from a survey conducted by the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx385.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
16
|
Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Boukovinas I, Papakotoulas P, Kakolyris S, Ziras N, Christophylakis C, Kentepozidis N, Fountzilas G, Rigas G, Varthalitis I, Kalbakis K, Agelaki S, Hatzidaki D, Georgoulias V. Sequential vs concurrent epirubicin and docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk, node-negative, early breast cancer: an interim analysis of a randomised phase III study from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group. Br J Cancer 2017. [PMID: 28641315 PMCID: PMC5584474 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sequential anthracyclines and taxanes are standard adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk axillary node-positive breast cancer. We compared a sequential to a concurrent regimen in high-risk node-negative early breast cancer. METHODS Patients were eligible if they had tumours >2 cm or T1c with two of the following characteristics: no oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression, histological grade III, Ki67 >40% and vascular, lymphovascular or perineural invasion. They were randomised to receive four cycles of epirubicin 90 mg m-2 followed by four cycles of docetaxel 75 mg m-2 (sequential regimen) or six cycles of epirubicin 75 mg m-2 plus docetaxel 75 mg m-2 (concurrent regimen). All chemotherapy cycles were administered every 21 days with G-CSF prophylaxis only for the concurrent arm. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Between 2001 and 2013, 658 women received the sequential (n=329) or the concurrent (n=329) regimen. The median age was 53 years, 43.9% of the patients were premenopausal and of the tumours 44.2% were ⩽2 cm, 52.7% histological grade 3 and 35.3% hormone receptor-negative. After a median follow-up of 70.5 months, there were 29 (8.8%) vs 42 (12.8%) disease relapses (P=0.102) and 11 (3.3%) vs 19 (5.8%) deaths (P=0.135), in the sequential and concurrent arm, respectively. The 5-year DFS rates were 92.6% vs 88.2% for sequential and concurrent arm, respectively (hazard ratio (HR): 1.591; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.990-2.556; P=0.055). Toxicity included grade 2-4 neutropenia in 54% vs 41% (P=0.001), febrile neutropenia 2.7% vs 6.1% (P=0.06), nausea/vomiting 18.5% vs 12.4% (P=0.03) of patients in the sequential and concurrent arm. There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS Sequential compared with the concurrent administration of anthracyclines and taxanes is associated with a non-significant but possibly clinically meaningful improvement in DFS. In the era of molecular selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy, this study offers valuable information for the optimal administration of anthracyclines and taxanes in patients with node-negative disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | | | - Pavlos Papakotoulas
- 2nd Department of Medical Oncology, 'Theageneio' Cancer Center, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stylianos Kakolyris
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Ziras
- 2nd Department of Medical Oncology, 'Metaxas' Cancer Center, Piraeus, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Georgios Rigas
- Chemotherapy Unit, General Hospital of Volos 'Achilopoulio', Volos, Greece
| | | | | | - Sofia Agelaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tsoukalas N, Kamposioras K, Papaxoinis G, Aravantinou-Fatorou E, Korogiannos A, Papadopoulos V, Lazaridis G, Nikolaou M, Voulgaris E, Bournakis E, Tsigaridas K, Liontos M, Papageorgiou E, Chatzifoti N, Zaxaropoulou P, Athanasiadis A, Varthalitis I. Education in oncology and career development in the web-era technology: a European survey conducted by the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw387.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
18
|
Fatorou EA, Papaxoinis G, Kamposioras K, Korogiannos A, Papadopoulos V, Lazaridis G, Nikolaou M, Voulgaris E, Bournakis E, Tsigaridas K, Liontos M, Pantavou E, Chatzifoti N, Zaxaropoulou P, Varthalitis I, Athanasiadis A, Tsoukalas N. Highlighting differences in education satisfaction and professional development between medical and clinical oncologists in Europe. A European survey conducted by the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw387.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
19
|
Tsoukalas N, Aravantinou-Fatorou E, Kamposioras K, Korogiannos A, Papadopoulos V, Kostakis I, Lazaridis G, Nikolaou M, Voulgaris E, Liontos M, Tsigaridas K, Bournakis E, Athanasiadis A, Aravantinos G, Ardavanis A, Boukovinas I, Galani EP, Mountzios G, Saridaki Z, Varthalitis I. Career Development and Oncology Education in Europe: Final results from a survey conducted by the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO). J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e18202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Tsoukalas
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Aravantinou-Fatorou
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Kamposioras
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Korogiannos
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Vasileios Papadopoulos
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kostakis
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - George Lazaridis
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Michail Nikolaou
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Voulgaris
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Michael Liontos
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Kostas Tsigaridas
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Bournakis
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Athanasiadis
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Ardavanis
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Boukovinas
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni P. Galani
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Giannis Mountzios
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Zacharenia Saridaki
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Varthalitis
- On behalf of the Hellenic Group of Young Oncologists (HeGYO), under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Papaxoinis G, Kotoula V, Alexopoulou Z, Kalogeras KT, Zagouri F, Timotheadou E, Gogas H, Pentheroudakis G, Christodoulou C, Koutras A, Bafaloukos D, Aravantinos G, Papakostas P, Charalambous E, Papadopoulou K, Varthalitis I, Efstratiou I, Zaramboukas T, Patsea H, Scopa CD, Skondra M, Kosmidis P, Pectasides D, Fountzilas G. Significance of PIK3CA Mutations in Patients with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Study. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0140293. [PMID: 26452060 PMCID: PMC4599795 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The PI3K-AKT pathway is frequently activated in breast cancer. PIK3CA mutations are most frequently found in the helical (exon 9) and kinase (exon 20) domains of this protein. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of different types of PIK3CA mutations in combination with molecular biomarkers related to PI3K-AKT signaling in patients with early breast cancer. Methods Tumor tissue samples from 1008 early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in two similar randomized trials of HeCOG were examined. Tumors were subtyped with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH for ER, PgR, Ki67, HER2 and androgen receptor (AR). PIK3CA mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing (exon 20) and qPCR (exon 9) (Sanger/qPCR mutations). In 610 cases, next generation sequencing (NGS) PIK3CA mutation data were also available. PIK3CA mutations and PTEN protein expression (IHC) were analyzed in luminal tumors (ER and/or PgR positive), molecular apocrine carcinomas (MAC; ER/PgR negative / AR positive) and hormone receptor (ER/PgR/AR) negative tumors. Results PIK3CA mutations were detected in 235/1008 tumors (23%) with Sanger/qPCR and in 149/610 tumors (24%) with NGS. Concordance between the two methods was good with a Kappa coefficient of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69–0.82). Lobular histology, low tumor grade and luminal A tumors were associated with helical domain mutations (PIK3CAhel), while luminal B with kinase domain mutations (PIK3CAkin). The overall incidence of PIK3CA mutations was higher in luminal as compared to MAC and hormone receptor negative tumors (p = 0.004). Disease-free and overall survival did not significantly differ with respect to PIK3CA mutation presence and type. However, a statistically significant interaction between PIK3CA mutation status and PTEN low protein expression with regard to prognosis was identified. Conclusions The present study did not show any prognostic significance of specific PIK3CA mutations in a large group of predominantly lymph-node positive breast cancer women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Further analyses in larger cohorts are warranted to investigate possible differential effect of distinct PIK3CA mutations in small subgroups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Papaxoinis
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, “Hippokration” Hospital, Athens, Greece
- * E-mail:
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Zoi Alexopoulou
- Health Data Specialists Ltd, Dept of Biostatistics, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantine T. Kalogeras
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Translational Research Section, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, Athens, Greece
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, “Alexandra” Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Timotheadou
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Papageorgiou” Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, “Laiko” General Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Angelos Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, “Agii Anargiri” Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Elpida Charalambous
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Kyriaki Papadopoulou
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Thomas Zaramboukas
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Helen Patsea
- Department of Pathology, IASSO General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Chrisoula D. Scopa
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Maria Skondra
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, “Hippokration” Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Paris Kosmidis
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, “Hippokration” Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bamias A, Peroukidis S, Stamatopoulou S, Tzannis K, Koutsoukos K, Andreadis C, Bozionelou V, Pistalmatzian N, Papatsoris A, Stravodimos K, Varthalitis I, Karamouzis M, Milaki G, Agorastos A, Kentepozidis N, Androulakis N, Bompolaki I, Kalofonos H, Mavroudis D, Dimopoulos MA. Utilization of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Collaborative Study by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group (HGUCG). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:e153-9. [PMID: 26437909 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced urothelial cancer (AUCa) is associated with poor long-term survival. Two major concerns are related to nonexposure to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and poor outcome after relapse. Our purpose was to record patterns of practice in AUCa in Greece, focusing on first-line treatment and management of relapsed disease. METHODS Patients with AUCa treated from 2011 to 2013 were included in the analysis. Fitness for cisplatin was assessed by recently established criteria. RESULTS Of 327 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, 179 (55%) did not receive cisplatin. Criteria for unfitness for cisplatin were: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥ 2, 21%; creatinine clearance ≤ 60 mL/min, 55%; hearing impairment, 8%; neuropathy, 1%; and cardiac failure, 5%. Forty-six patients (27%) did not fulfill any criterion for unfitness for cisplatin. The main reasons for these deviations were comorbidities (28%) and advanced age (32%). Seventy-four (68%) of 109 patients who experienced a relapse received second-line chemotherapy. The most frequent reason for not offering second-line chemotherapy was poor PS or limited life expectancy (66%). CONCLUSION In line with international data, approximately 50% of Greek patients with AUCa do not receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, although 27% of them were suitable for such treatment. In addition, about one third of patients with relapse did not receive second-line chemotherapy because of poor PS or short life expectancy. Enforcing criteria for fitness for cisplatin and earlier diagnosis of relapse represent 2 targets for improvement in current treatment practice for AUCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotle Bamias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Stavros Peroukidis
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Kimon Tzannis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Charalambos Andreadis
- 3rd Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Bozionelou
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, and Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Georgia Milaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Venizelio Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Antonios Agorastos
- 3rd Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikos Kentepozidis
- Medical Oncology Department, 251 General Air Force Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikos Androulakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Venizelio Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Iliada Bompolaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Chania, Chania, Greece
| | - Haralampos Kalofonos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, and Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pentheroudakis G, Raptou G, Kotoula V, Wirtz RM, Vrettou E, Karavasilis V, Gourgioti G, Gakou C, Syrigos KN, Bournakis E, Rallis G, Varthalitis I, Galani E, Lazaridis G, Papaxoinis G, Pectasides D, Aravantinos G, Makatsoris T, Kalogeras KT, Fountzilas G. Immune response gene expression in colorectal cancer carries distinct prognostic implications according to tissue, stage and site: a prospective retrospective translational study in the context of a hellenic cooperative oncology group randomised trial. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0124612. [PMID: 25970543 PMCID: PMC4430485 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2014] [Accepted: 03/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although host immune response is an emerging prognostic factor for colorectal cancer, there is no consensus on the optimal methodology, surrogate markers or tissue for study. Patients and Methods Tumour blocks were prospectively collected from 344 patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Whole section lymphocytic infiltration was studied along with mRNA expression of CD3Z, CD8, CD4, CXCL9, CXCL13, IGHM, FOXP3, SNAI2 and ESR1 by qRT-qPCR in tissue microarray (TMA) cores from the centre of tumour, invasive margin and adjacent normal mucosa. Results Lymphocytic infiltration, deficient MMR (10.9%), KRAS (40.7%) and BRAF (4.9%) mutations or single mRNA gene expression were not prognostic. Tumour ESR1 gene expression (Hazard Ratio [HR] for relapse 2.33, 95% CI 1.35-4.02; HR for death 1.74, 95% CI 1.02-2.97) and absence of necrosis (HR for relapse 1.71, 95% CI 1.05-2.71; HR for death 1.98, 95% CI 1.14-3.43) were adverse prognostic features. We used CD3Z and CD8 expression in order to devise the mRNA-based Immune Score (mIS) and proceeded to partitioning analysis in 267 patients, with age, stage, tumour site (Right vs Left CRC), KRAS mutation and tumour mIS as input factors. Only in patients with stage III right-sided colon cancer, a low immune response was associated with inferior disease-free survival (mIS-low, HR for relapse 2.28, 95% CI 1.05-8.02). No prognostic significance was seen for tumour mIS in any other stage or site of CRC, or for a similar mIS score derived from adjacent normal mucosa. Independent adverse prognostic significance was retained in multivariable analysis for absence of necrosis, tumour ESR1 expression in all patients and low tumour mIS in stage III right-sided CRC. Conclusions In localised CRC, mRNA-based CD3Z/CD8 profiling of tumour immune response may have stage, site and tissue-specific prognostic significance, along with ESR1 expression. Trial Registration ANZCTR.org.au ACTRN12610000509066
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Pentheroudakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
- * E-mail:
| | - Georgia Raptou
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Eleni Vrettou
- Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasilios Karavasilis
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Papageorgiou” Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgia Gourgioti
- Section of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, Athens, Greece
| | - Chryssa Gakou
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Evangelos Bournakis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, “Alexandra” Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Grigorios Rallis
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Papageorgiou” Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Eleni Galani
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, “Metropolitan” Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Georgios Lazaridis
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Papageorgiou” Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - George Papaxoinis
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, “Hippokration” Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, “Hippokration” Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, “Agii Anargiri” Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Makatsoris
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Konstantine T. Kalogeras
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Papageorgiou” Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Translational Research Section, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, Athens, Greece
| | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kourea HP, Kotoula V, Koutras A, Alexopoulou Z, Papaspirou I, Skarlos DV, Efstratiou I, Bobos M, Zagouri F, Papakostas P, Pectasides D, Chrisafi S, Varthalitis I, Aravantinos G, Kosmidis P, Bafaloukos D, Scopa CD, Fountzilas G. Impact of tumor angiogenic profile on the outcome of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with weekly docetaxel. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study. Histol Histopathol 2015; 30:1129-41. [PMID: 25807307 DOI: 10.14670/hh-11-612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metronomic taxane administration has putative antiangiogenic properties. Herein, we examined the baseline tumor angiogenic profile of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) in a prospective-retrospective translational research study. The interplay between the angiogenic factors expressed in the tumors and their prognostic value in MBC were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tumor tissues from patients with MBC treated with weekly docetaxel (n=159) were examined by immunohistochemistry for VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and osteopontin (OPN) and by mRNA analysis for expression of VEGF-A, VEGFxxxa, VEGFxxxb, VEGF-C, thrombospondin-1 (THBS-1), hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) genes. Associations between these parameters and outcome were statistically analyzed. RESULTS Statistically significant correlations were identified between almost all biomarkers examined in continuous form, particularly at the mRNA level: VEGF-A with VEGFxxxa (rho=0.70); VEGF-C with VEGFxxxa, VEGFxxxb and VHL (rho=0.51, 0.60 and 0.44 respectively); HIF-1α with VEGF-C and THBS1 (rho= 0.48 and 0.45). High VEGF-A mRNA was associated with worse survival (p=0.0279) and marginally with progression free survival (PFS). Intratumoral co-expression of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 proteins was associated with more favorable survival (p=0.0337). In multivariate analysis, only high VEGF-A mRNA levels retained their prognostic role for worse PFS and survival (PFS: HR=2.34, 95% CI=1.25-4.40, p=0.0080; survival: HR=3.15, 95% CI=1.48-6.72, p=0.0029). CONCLUSIONS In MBC, this study confirms the adverse prognostic effect of high intratumoral VEGF-A mRNA and reveals the combined VEGFR-1/VEGFR-2 protein expression as a potentially favorable prognosticator, which merits further evaluation in larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen P Kourea
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital, University of Patras School of Medicine, Rion, Greece.
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, and Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Angelos Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras School of Medicine, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | - Mattheos Bobos
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, "Alexandra" Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Pavlos Papakostas
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Hippokration" Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, "Hippokration" Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Sofia Chrisafi
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, "Agii Anargiri" Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Paris Kosmidis
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Chrisoula D Scopa
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital, University of Patras School of Medicine, Rion, Greece
| | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, and Department of Medical Oncology, "Papageorgiou" Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Linardou H, Pentheroudakis G, Varthalitis I, Gogas H, Pectasides D, Makatsoris T, Fountzilas G, Bafaloukos D. Predictive biomarkers to chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma receiving the combination of cisplatin--vinblastine--temozolomide (PVT) as first-line treatment: a study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HECOG). Anticancer Res 2015; 35:1105-1113. [PMID: 25667500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Recent progress with BRAF and immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically changed the treatment landscape of metastatic melanoma (MM). The limited duration of responses to new agents, however, justifies the, still important, role of chemotherapy in the management of MM. This study prospectively explored biomarkers to first-line temozolomide-based chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tumor samples from patients with advanced MM who received first-line therapy with the PVT combination (cisplatin-vinblastine-temozolomide), i.e. cisplatin (CDDP) 30 mg/m2 (days 1-3) i.v., vinblastine (CVT) 2 mg/m2 (days 1-3) i.v., temozolomide (TMZ) 150 mg/m2 (days 1-5) orally, every 21 days, were collected. Biomarkers (MGMT, ERCC1, p16), were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and BRAF mutations by PCR/sequencing. RESULTS Out of 35 patients included in this clinical phase II study, 12 objective response rates were achieved (ORR; 34%) including 1 complete response CR; 9 disease stabilisations (SD; 26%), with overall clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) 60%, median response duration 6 months (95% confidence interval (CI)=2-16), median PFS 4 months (95% CI=2-6), median OS 12 months (95% CI=6-25) and 1-year survival rate 52%. From 24 tumor samples evaluated for biomarkers, 13 (54%) were BRAF mutated and 11 (46%) wild-type (wt). Patients with BRAF-mutated tumors showed better response rates compared to BRAF wild-type (39% vs. 27%) and improved PFS/OS. Sub-analyses, according to BRAF status, did not reveal any significant correlations with excision repair cross-complementation group 1 enzyme (ERCC1), however, in patients with BRAF-mutated tumors, low O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) nuclear expression correlated with better PFS, p=0.0384. CONCLUSION First-line PVT chemotherapy for MM is efficacious and well-tolerated. Interesting 'hypothesis-generating' results show that candidate predictive biomarkers could identify subgroups of patients, i.e. tumors with BRAF mutation and low MGMT expression, with better outcomes following TMZ-based chemotherapy, thus warranting further evaluation in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Linardou
- First Department of Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, "Laiko" General Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, "Hippokration" Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Makatsoris
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - George Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Papageorgiou" Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kritsotakis EI, Dimitriadis I, Roumbelaki M, Vounou E, Kontou M, Papakyriakou P, Koliou-Mazeri M, Varthalitis I, Vrouchos G, Troulakis G, Gikas A. Case-Mix Adjustment Approach to Benchmarking Prevalence Rates of Nosocomial Infection in Hospitals in Cyprus and Greece. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 29:685-92. [DOI: 10.1086/588704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective.To examine the effect of heterogeneous case mix for a benchmarking analysis and interhospital comparison of the prevalence rates of nosocomial infection.Design.Cross-sectional survey.Setting.Eleven hospitals located in Cyprus and in the region of Crete in Greece.Methods.The survey included all inpatients in the medical, surgical, pediatric, and gynecology-obstetrics wards, as well as those in intensive care units. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were used to define nosocomial infection. The information collected for all patients included demographic characteristics, primary admission diagnosis, Karnofsky functional status index, Charlson comorbidity index, McCabe- Jackson severity of illness classification, use of antibiotics, and prior exposures to medical and surgical risk factors. Outcome data were also recorded for all patients. Case mix-adjusted rates were calculated by using a multivariate logistic regression model for nosocomial infection risk and an indirect standardization method.Results.The overall prevalence rate of nosocomial infection was 7.0% (95% confidence interval, 5.9%–8.3%) among 1,832 screened patients. Significant variation in nosocomial infection rates was observed across hospitals (range, 2.2%–9.6%). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the mean predicted risk of nosocomial infection across hospitals ranged from 3.7% to 10.3%, suggesting considerable variation in patient risk. Case mix-adjusted rates ranged from 2.6% to 12.4%, and the relative ranking of hospitals was affected by case-mix adjustment in 8 cases (72.8%). Nosocomial infection was significantly and independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 3.6 [95% confidence interval, 2.1–6.1]).Conclusion.The first attempt to rank the risk of nosocomial infection in these regions demonstrated the importance of accounting for heterogeneous case mix before attempting interhospital comparisons.
Collapse
|
26
|
Pentheroudakis G, Kotoula V, Raptou G, Karavasilis V, Gourioti G, Papandreou C, Syrigos K, Bournakis E, Rallis G, Varthalitis I, Galani E, Lazaridis G, Papaxoinis G, Pectasides D, Aravantinos G, Kalogeras K, Makatsoris T, Wirtz R, Fountzilas G. Prognostic Significance of Tumour-Associated Immune Response Gene Expression, Esr1 and Clinicopathologic Parameters in Stage Ii/Iii Colorectal Cancer: a Translational Research Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (Hecog). Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu333.68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
27
|
Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Papadimitriou C, Timotheadou E, Gogas H, Eleftheraki AG, Xanthakis I, Christodoulou C, Koutras A, Papandreou CN, Papakostas P, Miliaras S, Markopoulos C, Dimitrakakis C, Korantzopoulos P, Karanikiotis C, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Samantas E, Varthalitis I, Pavlidis N, Pectasides D, Dimopoulos MA. Dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy followed, as indicated, by trastuzumab for one year in patients with early breast cancer: first report at 5-year median follow-up of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:515. [PMID: 25026897 PMCID: PMC4223601 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2013] [Accepted: 07/04/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy including anthracyclines and taxanes has been established in the adjuvant setting of high-risk operable breast cancer. However, the preferable taxane and optimal schedule of administration in a dose-dense regimen have not been defined yet. METHODS From July 2005 to November 2008, 1001 patients (990 eligible) were randomized to receive, every 2 weeks, 3 cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 followed by 3 cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 followed by 3 cycles of intensified CMF (Arm A; 333 patients), or 3 cycles of epirubicin followed by 3 cycles of CMF, as in Arm A, followed 3 weeks later by 9 weekly cycles of docetaxel 35 mg/m2 (Arm B; 331), or 9 weekly cycles of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (Arm C; 326). Trastuzumab was administered for one year to HER2-positive patients post-radiation. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 60.5 months, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 86%, 90% and 88%, for Arms A, B and C, respectively, while the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 96% in all arms. No differences were found in DFS or OS between the combined B and C Arms versus Arm A (DFS: HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.59-1.11, P = 0.20; OS: HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.55-1.30, P = 0.43). Among the 255 patients who received trastuzumab, 189 patients (74%) completed 1 year of treatment uneventfully. In all arms, the most frequently reported severe adverse events were neutropenia (30% vs. 27% vs. 26%) and leucopenia (12% vs. 13% vs. 12%), while febrile neutropenia occurred in fifty-one patients (6% vs. 4% vs. 5%). Patients in Arm A experienced more often severe pain (P = 0.002), neurological complications (P = 0.004) and allergic reactions (P = 0.004), while patients in Arm B suffered more often from severe skin reactions (P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS No significant differences in survival between the regimens were found in the present phase III trial. Taxane scheduling influenced the type of severe toxicities. HER2-positive patients demonstrated comparable 3-year DFS and OS rates with those reported in other similar studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000151033.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Papageorgiou" Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki Ring Road, 564 03 Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pentheroudakis G, Kotoula V, Fountzilas E, Kouvatseas G, Basdanis G, Xanthakis I, Makatsoris T, Charalambous E, Papamichael D, Samantas E, Papakostas P, Bafaloukos D, Razis E, Christodoulou C, Varthalitis I, Pavlidis N, Fountzilas G. A study of gene expression markers for predictive significance for bevacizumab benefit in patients with metastatic colon cancer: a translational research study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG). BMC Cancer 2014; 14:111. [PMID: 24555920 PMCID: PMC3933361 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bevacizumab, an antibody neutralizing Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), is licensed for the management of patients with advanced colon cancer. However, tumor biomarkers identifying the molecular tumor subsets most amenable to angiogenesis modulation are lacking. Methods We profiled expession of 24526 genes by means of whole genome 24 K DASL (c-DNA-mediated, Annealing, Selection and Ligation) arrays, (Illumina, CA) in 16 bevacizumab-treated patients with advanced colon cancer (Test set). Genes with correlation to 8-month Progression-free status were studied by means of qPCR in two independent colon cancer cohorts: 49 patients treated with bevacizumab + chemotherapy (Bevacizumab qPCR set) and 72 patients treated with chemotherapy only (Control qPCR set). Endpoints were best tumor response before metastasectomy (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Five genes were significantly correlated to 8-month progression-free status in the Test set: overexpression of KLF12 and downregulation of AGR2, ALDH6A1, MCM5, TFF2. In the two independent datasets, irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was administered as first-line treatment and metastasectomies were subsequently applied in 8-14% of patients. No prognostically significant gene classifier encompassing all five genes could be validated in the Bevacizumab or Control qPCR sets. The complex gene expression profile of all-low tumor (ALDH6A1 + TFF2 + MCM5) was strongly associated with ORR in the Bevacizumab qPCR set (ORR 85.7%, p = 0.007), but not in the Control set (ORR 36.4%, p = 0.747). The Odds Ratio for response for the all-low tumor (ALDH6A1 + TFF2 + MCM5) profile versus any other ALDH6A1 + TFF2 + MCM5 profile was 15 (p = 0.018) in the Bevacizumab qPCR set but only 0.72 (p = 0.63) in the Control set. The tumor expression profile of (KLF12-high + TFF2-low) was significantly associated with PFS only in the Bevacizumab qPCR set: bevacizumab-treated patients with (KLF12-high + TFF2-low) tumors had superior PFS (median 14 months, 95% CI 2-21) compared to patients with any other (KLF12 + TFF2) expression profile (median PFS 7 months, 95% CI 5-10, p = 0.021). The Hazard Ratio for disease progression for (KLF12-high + TFF2-low) versus any other KLF12 + TFF2 expression profile was 2.92 (p = 0.03) in the Validation and 1.29 (p = 0.39) in the Control set. Conclusions Our «three-stage» hypothesis-generating study failed to validate the prognostic significance of a five-gene classifier in mCRC patients. Exploratory analyses suggest two gene signatures that are potentially associated with bevazicumab benefit in patients with advanced colon cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Kontopodis E, Hatzidaki D, Varthalitis I, Kentepozidis N, Giassas S, Pantazopoulos N, Vardakis N, Rovithi M, Georgoulias V, Agelaki S. A phase II study of metronomic oral vinorelbine administered in the second line and beyond in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group. J Chemother 2013; 25:49-55. [DOI: 10.1179/1973947812y.0000000050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
30
|
Ramalingam S, Crawford J, Chang A, Manegold C, Perez-Soler R, Douillard JY, Thatcher N, Barlesi F, Owonikoko T, Wang Y, Pultar P, Zhu J, Malik R, Giaccone G, Della-Fiorentina S, Begbie S, Jennens R, Dass J, Pittman K, Ivanova N, Koynova T, Petrov P, Tomova A, Tzekova V, Couture F, Hirsh V, Burkes R, Sangha R, Ambrus M, Janaskova T, Musil J, Novotny J, Zatloukal P, Jakesova J, Klenha K, Roubec J, Vanasek J, Fayette J, Barlesi F, Bennouna-Louridi J, Chouaid C, Mazières J, Vallerand H, Robinet G, Souquet PJ, Spaeth D, Schott R, Lena H, Martinet Y, El Kouri C, Baize N, Scherpereel A, Molinier O, Fuchs F, Josten K, Manegold C, Marschner N, Schneller F, Overbeck T, Thomas M, von Pawel J, Reck M, Schuette W, Hagen V, Schneider CP, Georgoulias V, Varthalitis I, Zarogoulidis K, Syrigos K, Papandreou C, Bocskei C, Csanky E, Juhasz E, Losonczy G, Mark Z, Molnar I, Papai-Szekely Z, Tehenes S, Vinkler I, Almel S, Bakshi A, Bondarde S, Maru A, Pathak A, Pedapenki R, Prasad K, Prasad S, Kilara N, Gorijavolu D, Deshmukh C, John S, Sharma L, Amoroso D, Bajetta E, Bidoli P, Bonetti A, De Marinis F, Maio M, Passalacqua R, Cascinu S, Bearz A, Bitina M, Brize A, Purkalne G, Skrodele M, Baba A, Ratnavelu K, Saw M, Samson-Fernando M, Ladrera G, Jassem J, Koralewski P, Serwatowski P, Krzakowski M, Cebotaru C, Filip D, Ganea-Motan D, Ianuli C, Manolescu I, Udrea A, Burdaeva O, Byakhov M, Filippov A, Lazarev S, Mosin I, Orlov S, Udovitsa D, Khorinko A, Protsenko S, Chang A, Lim H, Tan Y, Tan E, Bastus Piulats R, Garcia-Foncillas J, Valdivia J, de Castro J, Domine Gomez M, Kim S, Lee JS, Kim H, Lee J, Shin S, Kim DW, Kim YC, Park K, Chang CS, Chang GC, Goan YG, Su WC, Tsai CM, Kuo HP, Benekli M, Demir G, Gokmen E, Sevinc A, Crawford J, Giaccone G, Haigentz M, Owonikoko T, Agarwal M, Pandit S, Araujo R, Vrindavanam N, Bonomi P, Berg A, Wade J, Bloom R, Amin B, Camidge R, Hill D, Rarick M, Flynn P, Klein L, Lo Russo K, Neubauer M, Richards P, Ruxer R, Savin M, Weckstein D, Rosenberg R, Whittaker T, Richards D, Berry W, Ottensmeier C, Dangoor A, Steele N, Summers Y, Rankin E, Rowley K, Giridharan S, Kristeleit H, Humber C, Taylor P. Talactoferrin alfa versus placebo in patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FORTIS-M trial). Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2875-80. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
31
|
Boukovinas I, Kentepozidis N, Vamvakas L, Karampeazis A, Varthalitis I, Emmanouilides C, Kalbakis K, Athanasiadis A, Georgoulias V, Souglakos J. Phase I Trial of Panitumumab in Combination with Cisplatin, Fluourouracil and Docetaxel (Mdcf) in Advanced/Metastatic Gastric Cancer. Ann Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt203.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
32
|
Briasoulis E, Aravantinos G, Kouvatseas G, Pappas P, Biziota E, Sainis I, Makatsoris T, Varthalitis I, Xanthakis I, Vassias A, Klouvas G, Boukovinas I, Fountzilas G, Syrigos KN, Kalofonos H, Samantas E. Dose selection trial of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer: a hellenic cooperative oncology group clinical translational study. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:263. [PMID: 23718900 PMCID: PMC3674943 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Accepted: 05/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metronomic chemotherapy is considered an anti-angiogenic therapy that involves chronic administration of low-dose chemotherapy at regular short intervals. We investigated the optimal metronomic dose of oral vinorelbine when given as monotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer. Methods Patients with recurrent metastatic breast (BC), prostate (PC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and adequate organ functions were randomly assigned to 30, 40 or 50 mg vinorelbine, taken orally three times a week. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or maximum 24 months. Primary endpoint was time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and secondary were progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, changes in blood concentrations of angiogenesis-associated biomarkers and pharmacokinetics. Results Seventy-three patients were enrolled. Four-month TTF rate did not differ between the three arms: 25.9% (11.1%-46.2% 95% Confidence Interval), 33.3% (15.6%-55.3%) and 18.2% (5.2%-40.3%) for the 30 mg, 40 mg and 50 mg arms (p-value = 0.56). Objective response was seen in 2 patients with NSCLC (treated at 30 and 50 mg respectively), one with BC (at 40 m g) and one with PC (at 50 mg) and lasted from 4 to 100 weeks, with maximum response duration achieved at 50 mg. Adverse events were mild and negligible and did not differ between the three arms. Blood levels of vinorelbine reached steady state from the second week of treatment and mean values for the 30, 40 and 50 mg were respectively 1.8 ng/ml (SD 1.10), 2.2 ng/ml (SD 1.87) and 2.6 ng/ml (SD 0.69). Low pre-treatment blood concentrations of FGF2 and IL8 predicted favorable response to therapy (p values 0.02 and 0.006, respectively), while high levels of TEK gene transcript predicted treatment resistance. Conclusions Considering the antitumor activity and response duration, the negligible toxicity of the highest dose investigated and the lack of drug accumulation over time, we suggest that 50 mg given three times a week is the optimal dose for metronomic oral vinorelbine. Further investigation of metronomic oral vinorelbine (MOVIN) at this dose is warranted in combination with conventional chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapies. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00278070
Collapse
|
33
|
Karavasilis V, Pentheroudakis G, Sgouros J, Dimoudis S, Varthalitis I, Samantas E, Fountzilas G. Gemcitabine combined with the MTOR Inhibitor Temsirolimus(CCI-779) in Patients with Inoperable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (He 3/07). A Phase I Study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(20)33296-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
34
|
Pectasides D, Papaxoinis G, Kalogeras KT, Eleftheraki AG, Xanthakis I, Makatsoris T, Samantas E, Varthalitis I, Papakostas P, Nikitas N, Papandreou CN, Pentheroudakis G, Timotheadou E, Koutras A, Sgouros J, Bafaloukos D, Klouvas G, Economopoulos T, Syrigos KN, Fountzilas G. XELIRI-bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI-bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase III trial with collateral biomarker analysis. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:271. [PMID: 22748098 PMCID: PMC3466131 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2011] [Accepted: 05/16/2012] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim was to compare two standard chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods Patients previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomized in: group A (irinotecan, capecitabine, bevacizumab, every 3 weeks; XELIRI-bevacizumab) and group B (irinotecan, leucovorin, fluorouracil, bevacizumab, every 2 weeks; FOLFIRI-bevacizumab). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Plasma concentrations of nitric oxide, osteopontin, TGF-β1 and VEGF-A were measured at baseline and during treatment. Results Among 285 eligible patients, 143 were randomized to group A and 142 to group B. Fifty-five patients (38.5%) in group A and 57 (40.1%) in group B responded (p = 0.81). After a median follow-up of 42 months, median PFS was 10.2 and 10.8 months (p = 0.74), while median OS was 20.0 and 25.3 months (p = 0.099), for groups A and B, respectively. Most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities (group A vs group B) were neutropenia (13% vs 22%, p = 0.053) and diarrhea (19% vs 11%, p = 0.082). Baseline plasma osteopontin concentrations demonstrated prognostic significance for both PFS and OS. Conclusions This trial did not show significant differences in efficacy between the groups. However, the toxicity profile was different. Baseline plasma osteopontin concentrations demonstrated independent prognostic significance. (Registration number: ACTRN12610000270011)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pallis AG, Boukovinas I, Ardavanis A, Varthalitis I, Malamos N, Georgoulias V, Mavroudis D. A multicenter randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:1164-1169. [PMID: 21937705 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Breast Cancer Study Group of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group conducted a phase III trial of single-agent capecitabine versus the vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of combination treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with MBC were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine (Cap arm: 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, on days 1-14) or vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet (VG arm: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2); both drugs on days 1 and 15). RESULTS Seventy-four women were treated on each arm and median PFS was 5.4 versus 5.2 months (P = 0.736), for VG and Cap, respectively. Median overall survival was 20.4 months for the VG arm and 22.4 months for the Cap arm (P = 0.319). Overall response rate was 28.4% in the VG arm and 24.3% in the Cap arm (P = 0.576). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Neutropenia and fatigue were more common with VG arm and hand-foot syndrome with Cap arm. CONCLUSIONS This trial failed to demonstrate superiority of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet over single-agent capecitabine in terms of PFS. Given the favorable toxicity and convenience of oral administration, single-agent capecitabine is recommended for compliant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Pallis
- Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | - I Boukovinas
- Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | - A Ardavanis
- Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | - I Varthalitis
- Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | - N Malamos
- Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | - V Georgoulias
- Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | - D Mavroudis
- Breast Cancer Study Group, Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pectasides D, Papaxoinis G, Kotoula V, Fountzilas H, Korantzis I, Koutras A, Dimopoulos AM, Papakostas P, Aravantinos G, Varthalitis I, Kosmidis P, Skarlos D, Bournakis E, Bafaloukos D, Kalofonos HP, Kalogeras KT, Fountzilas G. Expression of angiogenic markers in the peripheral blood of docetaxel-treated advanced breast cancer patients: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study. Oncol Rep 2011; 27:216-24. [PMID: 22025320 DOI: 10.3892/or.2011.1504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2011] [Accepted: 04/18/2011] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well known that low-dose metronomic chemotherapy has antiangiogenic activity. The aim of the present trial was to investigate the antiangiogenic properties of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In total, 157 metastatic breast cancer patients received 35 mg/m2 docetaxel weekly as a recommended treatment. Blood samples were collected before the start of chemotherapy (baseline) and during treatment. Nitric oxide (NO) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) plasma levels were measured at baseline and during treatment, while VEGF-A, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and thrombospondin-1 (THBS-1) peripheral blood mRNA levels were measured at baseline, in 127 patients and 39 female healthy controls. In general, the treatment was well-tolerated. Sixty-one patients (38%) achieved an objective response (4% complete and 34% partial response), while 52 (33%) had stable disease and 27 (17%) progressed. At a median follow-up of 33.5 months (range 2.8-45.0), 118 patients (74%) demonstrated disease progression and 94 (59%) had died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.8 months and median overall survival (OS) was 27.7 months. Median baseline level of plasma NO was significantly lower in patients than in healthy controls (p=0.010), while none of the plasma markers significantly changed upon docetaxel treatment. In addition, the median relative quantification value for THBS-1 mRNA was significantly higher (p<0.001) in patients as compared to healthy controls. NO plasma levels were positively associated with the number of organs involved (p=0.008). In multivariate analysis, low eNOS mRNA levels showed adverse prognostic significance for OS and high THBS-1 mRNA levels were found to be associated with shorter OS and PFS, independently from established clinical prognostic factors. Although an antiangiogenic activity of weekly docetaxel was not demonstrated in the present study, some interesting observations regarding the prognostic role of a number of blood angiogenic markers could be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Koutras AK, Antonacopoulou AG, Eleftheraki AG, Dimitrakopoulos FI, Koumarianou A, Varthalitis I, Fostira F, Sgouros J, Briasoulis E, Bournakis E, Bafaloukos D, Bompolaki I, Galani E, Kalogeras KT, Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Kalofonos HP. Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Pharmacogenomics J 2011; 12:468-75. [PMID: 21844885 DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2011.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the association of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genotypes with treatment efficacy in a randomized trial. This study compared two chemotherapy regimens (FOLFIRI versus XELIRI) combined with bevacizumab, as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. DNA was extracted from blood samples of 173 patients participating in the trial. Genotyping was performed for selected SNPs (VEGF-1154, +936, -634, -2578 and -1498). All candidate genotypes were evaluated for associations with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). There were no significant differences with respect to the distribution of genotypes in the treatment groups. The VEGF-1154 GG genotype was more frequent in patients not responding to treatment compared with responders (65.5 versus 39.8%, P = 0.032). Furthermore, the VEGF-1154 GG genotype was associated with inferior median OS compared with GA (hazards ratio = 1.68; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.57; P = 0.016) or with the alternative genotypes (GA and AA) combined (hazards ratio = 1.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.40; P = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, the VEGF-1154 GG genotype remained a significant adverse factor for OS. Our results support the potential predictive ability of VEGF genotypes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, in terms of RR and OS. However, current results should be validated prospectively, in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Koutras
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pallis AG, Agelaki S, Agelidou A, Varthalitis I, Syrigos K, Kentepozidis N, Pavlakou G, Kotsakis A, Kontopodis E, Georgoulias V. A randomized phase III study of the docetaxel/carboplatin combination versus docetaxel single-agent as second line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2010; 10:633. [PMID: 21092076 PMCID: PMC2994826 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2010] [Accepted: 11/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To compare the activity and toxicity of docetaxel/carboplatin (DC) doublet vs single agent docetaxel (D) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients pre-treated with front-line platinum-free regimens, were randomized to receive either docetaxel/carboplatin (DC), (docetaxel 50 mg/m2; carboplatin AUC4; both drugs administered on days 1 and 15) or docetaxel single-agent (D), (docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15). Results Response rate was similar between the two arms (DC vs D: 10.4% vs 7.7%; p = 0.764). After a median follow-up time of 28.0 months for DC arm and 34.5 months for D arm, progression free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the DC arm (DC vs D:3.33 months vs 2.60 months; p-value = 0.012), while no significant difference was observed in terms of overall survival (OS) (DC vs D: 10.3 months vs 7.70 months; p-value = 0.550). Chemotherapy was well-tolerated and grade III/IV toxicities were relatively infrequent. No toxic deaths were observed. Conclusions This study has not achieved its primary objective of significant OS prolongation with docetaxel/carboplatin combination over single-agent docetaxel in patients who had not received front-line docetaxel; however, the docetaxel/carboplatin combination was associated with a significant clinical benefit in terms of PFS.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kalofonos HP, Papakostas P, Makatsoris T, Papamichael D, Vourli G, Xanthakis I, Aravantinos G, Papadimitriou C, Pentheroudakis G, Varthalitis I, Samelis G, Syrigos KN, Xiros N, Stavropoulos M, Kosmidis P, Christodoulou C, Linardou H, Skondra M, Pectasides D, Economopoulos T, Fountzilas G. Irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin or the same regimen followed by oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2010; 30:4325-4333. [PMID: 21036759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study reports the long-term follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) participating in a randomised phase II study that compared the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan (IRI), fluorouracil (FU) with leucovorin (LV) (arm A) versus sequential chemotherapy with IRI plus FU/LV followed by oxaliplatin (OXA) plus FU/LV (arm B) as first line therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Intent-to-treat analysis was performed on 417 patients (211 in arm A and 206 in arm B). Treatment schedules of weekly IRI 80 mg/m(2) or OXA 45 mg/m(2) plus LV 200 mg/m(2) immediately followed by intravenous bolus FU 450 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks were followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment continued for 4 cycles. Patients in arm A were treated with IRI/FU/LV for 4 cycles, while patients in arm B were initially treated with IRI/FU/LV for 2 cycles followed by sequential administration of 2 cycles of OXA/FU/LV. RESULTS No significant difference emerged in overall response rate or overall survival. There was a difference in progression-free survival (median, 7.3 versus 8.2 months, p=0.040) in favour of arm B. Toxicity profiles were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION IRI/FU/LV and IRI/FU/LV followed by OXA/FU/LV showed comparable activity with a manageable toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haralabos P Kalofonos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, Patras, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Papaxoinis G, Pectasides DG, Korantzis I, Koutras A, Kosmidis PA, Linardou H, Aravantinos G, Varthalitis I, Kalogeras KT, Fountzilas G. Plasma angiogenic markers in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with weekly docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e21004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
41
|
Pectasides DG, Xanthakis I, Makatsoris T, Samantas E, Varthalitis I, Papaxoinis G, Papakotoulas P, Bournakis E, Papandreou C, Fountzilas G. Irinotecan/capecitabine (XELIRI) plus bevacizumab versus irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomized phase III trial of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG). J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.3541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
42
|
Junie L, kastanakis S, Petrascu M, Boboş C, Tsouri A, Karagianni P, Papadomanolaki E, Aleuraki G, Gatzima M, Varthalitis I. The resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitals from Greece and Romania and its importance for the therapy of nosocomial infections and infection control practices. Int J Infect Dis 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.1558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
43
|
Krzemieniecki K, Erdkamp F, Lindman H, Maenpaa J, Puertas J, Schwenkglenks M, Sevelda P, Smakal M, Varthalitis I, Verma S. 3036 G-CSF use and neutropenic events in patients with breast and lung tumours: data from routine clinical practice (IMPACT Solid study). EJC Suppl 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(09)70635-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
44
|
Polyzos A, Malamos N, Boukovinas I, Adamou A, Ziras N, Kalbakis K, Kakolyris S, Syrigos K, Papakotoulas P, Kouroussis C, Karvounis N, Vamvakas L, Christophyllakis C, Athanasiadis A, Varthalitis I, Georgoulias V, Mavroudis D. FEC versus sequential docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with axillary node-positive early breast cancer: a randomized study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 119:95-104. [PMID: 19636702 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0468-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2009] [Accepted: 07/01/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A randomized multicenter phase III study was conducted to compare the sequential docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide combination with that of FEC regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with axillary node-positive early breast cancer. Seven hundred and fifty-six women with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either 4 cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (700 mg/m(2)) (experimental arm) or 6 cycles of FEC (epirubicin 75 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 700 mg/m(2), and 5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m(2); control arm). All regimes were administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was five-year disease-free survival (DFS). After a median follow-up period of 5 years, 233 (30.8%) relapses had occurred (108 and 125 in the experimental and control arms, respectively; P = 0.181). The five-year DFS was 72.6% (95% CI 63.8-81.3%) and 67.2% (95% CI 58.0-76.4%) for women randomized in the experimental and control arms, respectively (P = 0.041; log rank test). There was no difference in the overall survival between the two arms (83.8 and 81.4% in the experimental and control arms, respectively; P = 0.533). The experimental arm was associated with increased neutropenia requiring administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in 90.5% of the patients as compared with 74.1% in the control arm (P = 0.0001). The sequential docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide adjuvant chemotherapy regimen resulted in improved five-year DFS in women with axillary node-positive early breast cancer at the expense of increased but manageable myelotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristides Polyzos
- Medical Oncology Unit, 1st Propedeutic Clinic, University School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pallis AG, Agelidou A, Agelaki S, Varthalitis I, Pavlakou G, Gerogianni A, Papakotoulas P, Rapti A, Chandrinos V, Christophyllakis C, Georgoulias V. A multicenter randomized phase II study of the irinotecan/gemcitabine doublet versus irinotecan monotherapy in previously treated patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2008; 65:187-91. [PMID: 19100647 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2008] [Revised: 10/27/2008] [Accepted: 11/02/2008] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety profile of irinotecan (I) versus the combination of irinotecan/gemcitabine (IG) as second-line treatment of patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). TREATMENT Patients with SCLC who have received at least one chemotherapy regimen were randomized to receive either the IG regimen (gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) on days 1 and 8 and irinotecan 300mg/m(2) i.v. on day 8) or I monotherapy (300mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1) both every 3 weeks. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the IG and 31 in the I arm. Due to slow accrual an early closure of the study was decided. Response rate was significantly higher in the IG than in I arm (23.7% vs. 0%; p=0.004). The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.9 months (range: 0.5-14.5 months; 95% CI: 1.4-6.6) and 1.7 months (range: 0.5-9.9 months; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3) (p=0.010) for the IG and I arms, respectively. There was no difference in terms of median overall survival between the two arms (6.8 months and 4.6 months for the IG and I arm, respectively). The most frequent toxicities were grade III/IV neutropenia and grade III/IV diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS Although the IG regimen seems to be more active than the I monotherapy, the premature closure of the study prevents the drawing of definitive conclusions.
Collapse
|
46
|
Kakolyris S, Souglakos J, Polyzos A, Ardavanis A, Ziras N, Athanasiadis A, Varthalitis I, Amarantidis K, Tsousis S, Vamvakas L, Vardakis N, Georgoulias V. Modified CAPOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) regimen every two weeks as second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy: a multicenter phase II study. Oncology 2008; 74:31-6. [PMID: 18544957 DOI: 10.1159/000138977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2007] [Accepted: 10/11/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of capecitabine (CAP) given every other week and biweekly oxaliplatin (OX; modified CAPOX regimen) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinote- can-based frontline chemotherapy. METHODS Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; the median age was 62 years and 62 (92.5%) had a performance status (ECOG) of 0-1. OX and CAP were administered at the dose of 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2,000 mg/m(2) on days 1-7, respectively, every 2 weeks. RESULTS A total of 429 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 4 (6%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia complicated 1 treatment cycle. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 peripheral sensory neurotoxicity (10% of patients) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (7%). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 (4.5%) complete and 13 (19.4%) partial responses (overall response rate 24%) were observed. Seventeen (24.5%) patients had stable and 27 (40.3%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 5 months and 11.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the modified CAPOX regimen is safe and effective as salvage treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kakolyris
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Gogas H, Linardou H, Kalofonos HP, Briasoulis E, Pectasides D, Samantas E, Bafaloukos D, Stathopoulos GP, Karina M, Papadimitriou C, Skarlos D, Pisanidis N, Papakostas P, Markopoulos C, Tzorakoeleftherakis E, Dimitrakakis K, Makrantonakis P, Xiros N, Polichronis A, Varthalitis I, Karanikiotis C, Dimopoulos AM. Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00. Ann Oncol 2007; 19:853-60. [PMID: 18042835 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A randomized phase III trial in high-risk breast cancer patients was conducted, to further explore the impact of dose-density in the adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. The safety analysis is presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS From October 2000 until June 2005, 1121 node-positive patients were randomized to sequential dose-dense epirubicin 110 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel (Taxol, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA) 250 mg/m(2) (group A), or concurrent epirubicin 83 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 187 mg/m(2) (group B), both followed by three cycles of 'intensified' combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given prophylactically with the dose-dense treatments. RESULTS Median dose intensity of epirubicin and paclitaxel was double in group A, as designed, with significantly less cycles administered at full dose (P < 0.001). Median cumulative dose of all drugs and total treatment duration, however, were identical between groups. Severe taxane-related toxic effects were more frequent in group A, while severe thrombocytopenia was low and present only in group A. There were no differences in the rates of other hematological toxic effects, including febrile neutropenia. The rates of secondary malignancies were low. CONCLUSION Both regimens as used in the present study are well tolerated and safe. The rates of severe taxane-related toxic effects and thrombocytopenia, although low overall, are significantly increased with the dose-dense sequential regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vamvakas L, Karampeazis A, Ardavanis A, Souglakos I, Kalbakis K, Vardakis N, Kouroussis C, Malamos N, Varthalitis I, Mavroudis D. P.39 Docetaxel plus epirubicin (DE) vs docetaxel plus capecitabine (DC) as 1st line treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: a subgroup analysis for elderly patients of a multicenter randomized phase III trial from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(13)70212-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
49
|
Briasoulis E, Fountzilas G, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA, Xiros N, Aravantinos G, Samantas E, Kalofonos H, Makatsoris T, Mylonakis N, Papakostas P, Skarlos D, Varthalitis I, Pavlidis N. Multicenter phase-II trial of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin [IROX regimen] in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of unknown primary: a hellenic cooperative oncology group study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2007; 62:277-84. [PMID: 17901952 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-007-0604-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2007] [Accepted: 09/10/2007] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) lacks established therapy although it affects 3% of cancer patients. We evaluated the irinotecan-oxaliplatin combination (IROX regimen) in previously untreated patients with non-favorable subsets of unknown primary carcinomas. METHODS This was a multicenter phase-II trial. Protocol treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 160 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks. The primary end points were response rate and toxicity, and secondary end points were time to progression and survival. RESULTS Forty-seven patients with liver, bone or multiple visceral metastases entered into the trial and received a median 6 chemotherapy cycles (1-11). The regimen was very well tolerated with one febrile neutropenia case and six cases with diarrhea grade 3 (16%). In intent-to-treat analysis the tumor response rate was 13% (95% CI = 4.8-25.7%) and 12 patients (27%, 95%CI 13.9-40.4%) had at least 4 months' duration of disease stabilization. The median time to progression was 2.7 months and the median survival was 9.5 months, with 40% of patients alive at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS The IROX regimen demonstrated similar efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile compared to other more toxic chemotherapy combinations in patients with poor-prognosis CUP.
Collapse
|
50
|
Georgoulias V, Androulakis N, Kotsakis A, Hatzidaki D, Syrigos K, Polyzos A, Agelidou A, Varthalitis I, Ziras N, Agelidou M, Chandrinos V, Boukovinas I, Geroyianni A, Vamvakas L, Mavroudis D. Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial. Lung Cancer 2007; 59:57-63. [PMID: 17765354 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2007] [Revised: 07/23/2007] [Accepted: 07/23/2007] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC) treated with either docetaxel plus gemcitabine or single-agent docetaxel. Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DG [n=157; gemcitabine 1100mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8], docetaxel 75mg/m(2) on day 8 or D [n=155; docetaxel 100mg/m(2) on day 1] every 3 weeks. A total of 312 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. A predefined interim intention-to-treat analysis showed significantly longer median OS (p=0.037) in favor of the DG regimen (9.4 months versus 8.3 months for DG and D regimens, respectively), resulting in the premature termination of the study. The DG regimen was also associated with a significantly higher response rate compared to D (26.8% versus 11.6%, p<0.001). TTP were 3.5 and 2.3 months for the DG and D regimen, respectively (p=0.054). Although there were two treatment-related deaths in the DG arm, the toxicity profiles of the two regimens were comparable. The DG regimen was associated with a significantly better quality of life. The efficacy of the docetaxel plus gemcitabine combination is superior to single-agent docetaxel in chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
|