Patterns of recurrence and survival in neuroendocrine cervical cancer

State of the art of cervical cancer treatment in rare histologies

The objective of this review is to summarize the current scientific evidence to formulate clinical recommendations regarding the classification, diagnostic approach, and treatment of rare histological subtypes of cervical cancer; neuroendocrine carcinoma, gastric-type mucinous adenocarcinoma, and glassy cell adenocarcinoma. These histological subtypes are generally characterized by their low frequency, aggressive biological behavior, certain chemoradioresistance, and consequently, high recurrence rates with a deleterious impact on survival. Molecular studies have identified several associated mutations in neuroendocrine carcinoma (PIK3CA, MYC, TP53, PTEN, ARID1A, KRAS, BRCA2) and gastric-type adenocarcinoma (KRAS, ARID1A, PTEN) that may serve as molecular targets. While adenocarcinomas are typically treated and classified based on squamous histology across early, locally advanced, and advanced stages, the treatment strategies for neuroendocrine carcinomas in early stages or locally advanced cases differ, particularly in the sequencing of administering chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or surgery. The chemotherapy regimen is based on etoposide plus cisplatin (EP). Unlike squamous cell carcinomas, immune checkpoint inhibitors are yet to establish a standard role in the treatment of recurrent neuroendocrine carcinomas due to the absence of clinical trials. Regarding glassy cell adenocarcinomas and gastric-type adenocarcinoma, the potential use of immunotherapy in advanced stages/disease requires further evaluation through international collaborations, given the limited number of cases.

Competing risk nomogram and risk classification system for evaluating overall and cancer-specific survival in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a population-based retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare malignancy with poor clinical prognosis due to limited therapeutic options. This study aimed to establish a risk-stratification score and nomogram models to predict prognosis in NECC patients.

METHODS

Data on individuals diagnosed with NECC between 2000 and 2019 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and then randomly classified into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated independent indicators of prognosis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis further assisted in confirming candidate variables. Based on these factors, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) nomograms that predict survival over 1, 3, and 5 years were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the concordance index (C-index), and the calibration curve estimated the precision and discriminability of the competing risk nomogram for both cohorts. Finally, we assessed the clinical value of the nomograms using decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Data from 2348 patients were obtained from the SEER database. Age, tumor stage, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery predicted OS. Additionally, histological type was another standalone indicator of CSS prognosis. For predicting CSS, the C-index was 0.751 (95% CI 0.731 ~ 0.770) and 0.740 (95% CI 0.710 ~ 0.770) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the C-index in OS prediction was 0.757 (95% CI 0.738 ~ 0.776) and 0.747 (95% CI 0.718 ~ 0.776) for both cohorts. The proposed model had an excellent discriminative ability. Good accuracy and discriminability were also demonstrated using the AUC and calibration curves. Additionally, DCA demonstrated the high clinical potential of the nomograms for CSS and OS prediction. We constructed a corresponding risk classification system using nomogram scores. For the whole cohort, the median CSS times for the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were 59.3, 19.5, and 7.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

New competing risk nomograms and a risk classification system were successfully developed to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS and OS of NECC patients. The models are internally accurate and reliable and may guide clinicians toward better clinical decisions and the development of personalized treatment plans.

Innovations in Rare Gynecologic Cancer: Melanoma, Neuroendocrine, and Low-Grade Serous Ovarian

In the field of gynecologic cancer, low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) has been poorly understood and underinvestigated until recently. Similarly, understanding of the distinct properties and therapeutic sensitivities of gynecologic melanoma and cervical neuroendocrine tumors has recently accelerated. For each of these rare cancers, we explore the epidemiology and natural history, discuss the prognosis, diagnostic testing, and contemporary molecular classification, and then deliberate existing and emerging therapeutic strategies. In LGSOC, we focus on the clinical relevance of recent molecular studies that shed light on the importance of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway gene mutation and chromosome 1 copy-number change on prognosis and MEK inhibitor sensitivity. We also discuss the relative chemoresistance of this disease and the fact that attention is shifting to combinations of molecular therapies such as endocrine agents plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors or MEK inhibitors plus FAK inhibitors. Gynecologic tract melanomas harbor a lower frequency of canonical BRAF mutations, and have lower tumor mutational burden and immune cell infiltration than cutaneous melanomas (CMs). As a result, patients with this disease are less likely to respond to BRAF/MEK or immune checkpoint inhibition than patients with CM. Emerging strategies include the combination of antiangiogenic agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the use of adoptive cellular therapies. In cervical neuroendocrine cancer, we discuss the use of surgery in early-stage disease, and the uncertainties regarding the role of radiotherapy. We also explore the evidence for chemotherapy and emerging investigational strategies including the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. For all situations, we explore the shared decision-making process with the patient.

Diagnosis and management of gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GEA), a rare subtype of cervical cancer, has garnered increasing attention recently for its distinctive histopathological features, unique classification, genetic characteristics, and variable clinical outcomes compared to squamous cell and adenocarcinoma subtypes. Historically, GEA has evolved from a poorly understood entity to a distinct subtype of cervical adenocarcinoma, only recently recognized in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Accordingly, characteristic morphological features define GEA, shedding light on the diagnostic challenges and potential misclassification that can occur in clinical practice. Genetic alterations, including KRAS, ARID1A, and PIK3CA mutations, play a pivotal role in the development and progression of GEA. This article reviews a case of GEA and aims to provide a contemporary overview of the genetic mutations and molecular pathways implicated in GEA pathogenesis, highlighting potential therapeutic targets and the prospects of precision medicine in its management. Patients with GEA have variable clinical outcomes, with some exhibiting aggressive behavior while others follow a more indolent course. This review examines the factors contributing to this heterogeneity, including stage at diagnosis, histological grade, and genetic alterations, and their implications for patient prognoses. Treatment strategies for GEA remain a topic of debate and research. Here, we summarize the current therapeutic options, including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, while also exploring emerging approaches, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This article provides a comprehensive overview of GEA, synthesizing current knowledge from historical perspectives to contemporary insights, focusing on its classification, genetics, outcomes, and therapeutic strategies.

Total hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in neuroendocrine cervical cancer: a SEER-database analysis

PURPOSE

We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of total hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in the treatment of neuroendocrine cervical cancer (NECC).

METHODS

Eligible NECC patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Demographic characteristics, clinical treatment and survival of the patients were collected. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients were included, with 104 patients undergoing total hysterectomy and 182 patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. The 5-year OS were 50.8% in the total hysterectomy group and 47.5% in the radical hysterectomy group (p = 0.450); and the corresponding 5-year CSS were 51.6% and 49.1% (p = 0.494), respectively. Along with surgery, radiotherapy was given to 49.0% of patients in the total hysterectomy group and 50.5% in the radical hysterectomy group; and chemotherapy was administered to 77.9% of patients in the total hysterectomy group and 85.7% in the radical hysterectomy group. Unexpectedly, in patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, the OS was superior in the total hysterectomy group compared with the radical hysterectomy group (p = 0.034). While in patients who received chemotherapy alone and those who received neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy, the OS still remained comparable between the total hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with radical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy was not associated with compromised survival prognosis in patients with NECC. Total hysterectomy has the potential to be a surgical alternative in the multimodal management of NECC.

Application of Small Cell Lung Cancer Molecular Subtyping Markers to Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix: NEUROD1 as a Poor Prognostic Factor

Cervical small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (CSCNEC) is a rare, aggressive type of cervical cancer. The treatment for CSCNEC follows the chemotherapeutic regimens used for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with which it shares similar clinical and histologic features. For the first time, we applied neuroendocrine (NE) and SCLC molecular subtyping immunohistochemical markers [achaete-scute homolog 1 (ASCL1), neurogenic differentiation factor 1 (NEUROD1), POU class 2 homeobox 3 (POU2F3), and yes-associated protein 1] in 45 patients with CSCNEC. For the combined NE score, 51.1% of NE-high and 48.9% of NE-low subtypes were identified. The NE-high subtype tended to show worse progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) than the NE-low subtype ( P =0.059 and P =0.07, respectively). Applying the SCLC molecular subtyping, 53.3% of cases were identified as NEUROD1-dominant, 17.8% as ASCL1-dominant, 13.3% as YAP-dominant, and 4.4% as POU2F3-dominant, while 11.1% of cases showed negative expression for all markers; the distribution was different from that of SCLC. The NEUROD1-dominant subtype exhibited the worst OS, while the POU2F3 subtype exhibited the best OS ( P =0.003), similar to SCLC. In addition, the ASCL1-dominant and NEUROD1-dominant subtypes showed high NE scores, while yes-associated protein 1-dominant and POU2F3-dominant subtypes showed low NE scores ( P =0.008). In multivariate analysis, the NEUROD1 expression was further identified as the independent prognostic factor for worse OS, together with the high FIGO stage. CSCNEC was revealed to be a heterogeneous disease with different biological phenotypes and to share some similarities and differences with SCLC. Regarding the ongoing development of tailored treatments based on biomarkers in SCLC, the application of biomarker-driven individualized therapy would improve clinical outcomes in patients with CSCNEC.

Prognostic model for survival in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix: SEER database analysis and a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is extremely rare in clinical practice. This study aimed to methodologically analyze the clinicopathological factors associated with NECC patients and to develop a validated survival prediction model.

METHODS

A total of 535 patients diagnosed with NECC between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, while 122 patients diagnosed with NECC at Yunnan Cancer Hospital (YCH) from 2006 to 2019 were also recruited. Patients from the SEER database were divided into a training cohort (n = 376) and a validation cohort (n = 159) in a 7:3 ratio for the construction and internal validation of the nomogram. External validation was performed in a cohort at YCH. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, the Log-rank method test was used for univariate analysis of prognostic influences, and the Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with NECC in SEER were 43.6% and 39.7%, respectively. In the training cohort, multivariate analysis showed independent prognostic factors for NECC patients including race, tumor size, distant metastasis, stage, and chemotherapy (p<0.05). For extended application in other cohorts, a nomogram including four factors without race was subsequently created. The consistency index (C-index) of the nomogram predicting survival was 0.736, which was well-validated in the validation cohorts (0.746 for the internal validation cohort and 0.765 for the external validation cohort). In both the training and validation cohorts, the 3-year survival rates predicted by the nomogram were comparable to the actual ones. We then succeeded in dividing patients with NECC into high- and low-risk groups concerning OS using the nomogram we developed. Besides, univariate analysis showed that chemotherapy ≥4 cycles may improve the OS of patients at YCH with NECC.

CONCLUSION

We successfully constructed a nomogram that precisely predicts the OS for patients with NECC based on the SEER database and a large single-center retrospective cohort. The visualized and practical model can distinguish high-risk patients for recurrence and death who may benefit from clinical trials of boost therapy effectively. We also found that patients who received more than 4 cycles of chemotherapy acquired survival benefits than those who received less than 4 cycles.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of rare gynaecological cancers

There are a large number of gynaecological cancers with rare histologies, for which the available data are limited and usually retrospective. Because of their rarity and poor prognosis, the management of these cancers must be centralized in expert centres, for both histological diagnosis and treatment. With the exception of sarcomas, most endometrial or cervical cancers with rare histologies respond to the same radiation treatment modalities than cancers with more common histologies, although there are some specificities regarding treatments such as neuroendocrine carcinomas (chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide, major role of surgery). For localized or locally advanced ovarian cancer, external beam radiotherapy has a role in the management of hypercalcaemic small cell carcinoma of the ovary. This article summarizes the current role of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of cancers of the uterine cervix, uterine corpus and ovaries, with rare or very rare histologies, and with localized or locally advanced stages.

Advances in Research, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Cervical Carcinoma: A Review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) were classified separately in the 5th edition (2020) of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of female genital malignancies. Cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is distinguished by its low incidence, high invasiveness, early local dissemination, and distant metastases. The purpose of this review is to outline the achievements in pathology, diagnostics, gene sequencing, and multi-modality treatment of cervical NEC.

Social media use is associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression in patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: A NeCTuR study

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) is rare. Educational resources are limited for NECC patients, leading many to seek information online through patient-led social networks. We sought to characterize the relationships between anxiety and depression levels and social media use among NECC patients.

METHODS

Seven surveys assessing social media use, anxiety, and depression were distributed to living NECC patients enrolled in our NECC registry. The primary outcomes were associations between Social Network Time Use Scale (SONTUS) global score and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) total scores.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients enrolled; 81 who completed at least 1 survey were included. Ninety-seven percent (70/72) of patients completing SONTUS were low-to-average social media users. Seventy-four percent (53/72) of patients visited a patient-led NECC support-group page on Facebook within the past 4 weeks, and of those, 79% (42/53) reported receiving useful information. Among the patients who did not visit the page, 47% (9/19) reported that the page elicited anxiety and/or sadness. The mean GAD-7 and CES-D scores for the entire cohort were 7.3 and 18.1, respectively. The Spearman correlations between social media use and these scores were significant (GAD-7: 0.23 [p = 0.05]; CESD: 0.25 [p = 0.04]). The estimated odds ratios for moderate/severe anxiety and depression as a function of SONTUS global score were 1.26 (95% CI 1.03-1.55; p = 0.03) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.01-1.49; p = 0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NECC patients demonstrated low-to-average social media use and relatively high anxiety and depression. Increased social media use was associated with elevated anxiety and depression.

Expert Consensus Practice Recommendations of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society for the management of high grade gastroenteropancreatic and gynecologic neuroendocrine neoplasms

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

RB1 alteration and poor prognosis in women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a NeCTuR study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the gene alteration status in high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) specimens and to explore the potential association of unique gene alterations with survival.

METHODS

Results from tumor-based molecular testing on specimens from women with high-grade NECC in the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry were reviewed and analyzed. Tumor specimens could be from primary or metastatic sites and obtained at initial diagnosis, during treatment, or at recurrence.

RESULTS

Molecular testing results were available for 109 women with high-grade NECC. The genes most frequently mutated were PIK3CA (mutated in 18.5% of patients), TP53 (17.4%), and MYC (14.5%). Other targetable alterations identified were alterations in KIT (7.3%), KRAS (7.3%), and PTEN (7.3%). Women with tumors having an RB1 alteration (6.4%) had a median overall survival (OS) of 13 months, compared to 26 months for women with tumors that did not have an RB1 alteration (p=0.003). None of the other genes evaluated were shown to be associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Although no individual alteration was found in a majority of tumor specimens from patients with high-grade NECC, a large proportion of women with this disease will have at least one targetable alteration. Treatments based on these gene alterations may offer additional targeted therapies for women with recurrent disease, who currently have very limited therapeutic options. Patients with tumors that harbor RB1 alterations have decreased OS.

Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab improves progression-free survival in patients with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer: a Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR) study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer has a very poor prognosis and limited active treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the 3-drug regimen of topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR), which include data abstracted directly from medical records of women diagnosed with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix from English- and Spanish-speaking countries. The study compared women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen. Patients continued chemotherapy until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxic effects. Progression-free survival from the start of therapy for recurrence to the next recurrence or death, overall survival from the first recurrence, and response rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 62 patients who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and 56 patients who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen for recurrence. The median progression-free survival rates were 8.7 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 3.7 months in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for disease progression of 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.48; P<.0001). In the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, 15% of patients had stable disease, 39% of patients had a partial response, and 18% of patients had a complete response. Compared with patients in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, significantly more patients in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group remained on treatment at 6 months (31% vs 67%, respectively; P=.0004) and 1 year (9% vs 24%, respectively; P=.02). The median overall survival rates were 16.8 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 14.0 months in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.37).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab was an active regimen in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer and improved progression-free survival while decreasing the hazard ratio for disease progression.

Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis

•

A two-tier system (limited- or extensive-stage) has been used for small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix.

•

Concordance probability estimates found that the 2018 FIGO staging system predicted outcome better than the two-tier system.

•

38% of patients had metastases at initial diagnosis, and an additional 38% at subsequent recurrence.

•

38 patients (60%) had brain imaging: 1 (3%) had brain metastasis at diagnosis and 8 (21%) at subsequent recurrence.

•

Providers should have a low threshold for brain imaging in patients with advanced disease or neurologic symptoms.

Objectives

To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNCC) and determine the staging system most predictive of outcome—the two-tier (limited-stage [LS] vs. extensive-stage [ES]) or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system.

Methods

Patients with SCNCC evaluated at our institution from 1/1/1990–6/30/2021 were included. Medical records were reviewed for variables of interest. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to determine associations. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method. Concordance probability estimates (CPEs) were calculated to evaluate the prediction probability of the staging systems.

Results

Of 63 patients, 41 had LS and 22 ES SCNCC. Patients with ES disease were significantly older than those with LS disease (median, 54 and 37 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Smoking status, race, and history of HPV were not associated with stage or outcomes. Forty-eight patients had metastatic disease (24 [50%] at initial diagnosis). The most common first sites of metastasis were lung (n = 20/48, 42%), lymph nodes (n = 19/48, 40%), and liver (n = 13/48, 27%). Nine patients had brain metastasis (8 symptomatic at recurrence; 1 asymptomatic at initial diagnosis). Both staging systems were associated with progression-free and overall survival. Adjusted CPE found the FIGO staging system was more predictive of outcomes than the two-tier staging system.

Conclusions

Providers should have a low threshold to obtain brain imaging for patients with SCNCC, especially in the presence of visceral metastases. FIGO staging should be used to classify SCNCC. Further research is necessary to understand prognostic factors of this rare disease.

Small Cell (Neuroendocrine) Carcinoma of the Cervix: An Analysis for 19 Cases and Literature Review

Cervical SCNEC is a rare and highly malignant invasive tumor. The incidence is low, at less than 5% of all cervical cancers. Moreover, most patients with small cell carcinoma are interrelated with high risk HPV (more familiar HPV 18). Compared to squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, patients of cevical SCNEC are more prone to lymph node invasion early, so the clinical manifestation is usually local or distant metastasis. We summarized the clinical features of 19 patients with cervical small cell carcinoma in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from 2012 to 2021, and retrospectively analyzed data from 1576 patients in 20 related studies and more than 50 pieces of literature in recent years by searching PubMed, Google schalor, Cochrane Library, Clinicalkey, and other databases. The collected patient data included age, clinical manifestation, TCT, HPV detection, the size and morphology of the tumor, local invasion depth, stage, lymph node status, initial treatment method, tumor-free survival, and so on. The positive rates of CGA, SYN, and CD56 in our cases were high, and NSE was a moderately sensitive index. P16 and Ki67 were the most sensitive, and all patients were positive. We found that multimodal treatment can indeed improve tumor-free survival (DFS), but the prognosis of patients is still very poor. For the early stages, our treatment principles refer to the guidelines of SGO, international gynecological cancer Cooperation (GCIG), and NCCN. We suggest a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, the general state of advanced patients is poor, whether they can tolerate the operation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whether the operation area can remain tumor-free, and whether this treatment will prolong the survival time of patients still need to be further discussed. In order to better prolong the tumor-free survival and prognosis of patients, we need to find gene changes suitable for targeted therapy, so as to complete the clinical application of these treatment methods. Further works are needed to explore more effective therapy for cervical SCNEC.

Impact of the initial site of metastases on post-recurrence survival for neuroendocrine cervical cancer

Objective

To summarize the risk factors and emphasize the prognostic importance of the site of recurrent neuroendocrine cervical cancer (NECC).

Methods

We enrolled 88 patients who developed recurrence after radical surgery for pathological stage I–IVa primary NECC between January 2003 and 30 December 2020 and classified these cases into 7 groups based on the initial recurrence. The risk factors for post-recurrence survival (PRS) were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods.

Results

Among 88 NECC patients, nearly all patients (95.50%) experienced progression within 3 years. The time to progression was significantly longer in patients with lung recurrence than in patients without lung recurrence (p = 0.008). After the first recurrence, the median follow-up was 11.1 months (range 2.37–65.50 months), and the 5-year PRS was only 20.6%. The depth of invasion in the primary surgery, number of recurrent sites, abdominal organ recurrence were correlated with PRS by univariate analysis. Multivariate analyses revealed that the number of recurrent sites (p = 0.025) and abdominal organ recurrence (p = 0.031) were independent prognostic factors. Notably, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy, with or without surgery, showed a 43.8% objective response rate in recurrent NECC.

Conclusion

Patients with abdominal organ recurrence need more sophisticated therapy. The combination of immune therapy and chemotherapy might be an opportunity for recurrent NECC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09737-4.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gynecologic Tract

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine refers to the cells that synthesize and secrete messenger chemicals such as neuropeptides and amines. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are aggressive tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, with an annual incidence of 6.98/100,000 and a prevalence of 170,000 in the United States. Primary gynecologic NENs constitute ≤2% of female reproductive tumors. NENs of the gynecologic tract are associated with high recurrence rates and dismal prognosis, making their treatment challenging. This article focuses on the updated staging classifications, clinicopathological characteristics, imaging, and management of NENs of the gynecological tract.

Abstract

Gynecological tract neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare, aggressive tumors from endocrine cells derived from the neuroectoderm, neural crest, and endoderm. The primary gynecologic NENs constitute 2% of gynecologic malignancies, and the cervix is the most common site of NEN in the gynecologic tract. The updated WHO classification of gynecologic NEN is based on the Ki-67 index, mitotic index, and tumor characteristics such as necrosis, and brings more uniformity in the terminology of NENs like other disease sites. Imaging plays a crucial role in the staging, triaging, restaging, and surveillance of NENs. The expression of the somatostatin receptors on the surface of neuroendocrine cells forms the basis of increasing evaluation with functional imaging modalities using traditional and new tracers, including ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-Somatostatin Analog-PET/CT. Management of NENs involves a multidisciplinary approach. New targeted therapies could improve the paradigm of care for these rare malignancies. This article focuses on the updated staging classifications, clinicopathological characteristics, imaging, and management of gynecologic NENs of the cervix, ovary, endometrium, vagina, and vulva, emphasizing the relatively common cervical neuroendocrine carcinomas among these entities.

Construction and validation of the prognostic model for patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a competing risk nomogram analysis

Purpose

Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) is an uncommon malignancy of the female reproductive system. This study aimed to evaluate cancer-specific mortality and to construct prognostic nomograms for predicting the survival of patients with NECC.

Methods

we assembled the patients with NECC diagnosed between 2004 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Meanwhile, we identified other patients with NECC from the Wenling Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between 2002 to 2017. Fine and Gray’s test and Kaplan–Meier methods were used to evaluate cancer-specific mortality and overall survival (OS) rates, respectively. Nomograms were constructed for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS for patients with NECC. The developed nomograms were validated both internally and externally.

Results

a total of 894 patients with NECC were extracted from the SEER database, then classified into the training cohort (n = 628) and the internal validation cohort (n = 266). Besides, 106 patients from the Wenling Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital served as an external validation cohort. Nomograms for predicting CSS and OS were constructed on clinical predictors. The validation of nomograms was calculated by calibration curves and concordance indexes (C-indexes). Furthermore, the developed nomograms presented higher areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves when compared to the FIGO staging system.

Conclusions

we established the first competing risk nomograms to predict the survival of patients with NECC. Such a model with high predictive accuracy could be a practical tool for clinicians.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09104-9.

Current Treatment Strategies and Future Directions for Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: A Review

Importance

Patients with extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EPNECs) receive essentially the same treatment as those with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) despite differences in origin, clinical course, and survival. This SCLC-based approach is attributable to the rarity of EPNECs, which impedes the use of randomized clinical trials. However, neuroendocrine carcinomas are becoming more common because of the increasing use of systemic cancer therapy for adenocarcinomas. This treatment can transdifferentiate certain adenocarcinomas into neuroendocrine carcinomas. In addition, the treatment landscape for SCLC is slowly changing, potentially impacting the treatment paradigms for EPNECs.

Observations

New information on tumorigenesis of EPNECs from different origins, either as a primary malignant tumor or after neuroendocrine differentiation from adenocarcinomas, demonstrates their biological similarity. Activated molecular pathways that appear to underlie the development of EPNECs are potentially targetable, and some of these targets, such as poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase, Wee1, and Aurora A kinase, are currently under investigation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) already constituted a new treatment modality for patients with SCLC and produced some promising results in patients with EPNECs.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although only moderately effective, the introduction of ICIs signifies the first new option in systemic treatment of SCLC in decades. To prove the value of ICIs and other new drugs for patients with EPNECs, these patients should be included in clinical trials independent of the primary tumor site. Furthermore, to optimize clinical decision-making for patients with EPNECs, experts from the neuroendocrine tumor board should collaborate with members from tumor site-specific boards, which will require patient referral to a center with EPNEC expertise.

The puzzle of gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinomas: State of the art and future directions

Primary gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinomas (gNECs) are a heterogeneous spectrum of rare and highly aggressive neoplasms, accounting for about 2% of all gynecologic malignancies, which mostly resemble the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Due to the lack of standardized treatment guidelines, their management poses a noteworthy clinical challenge. Currently, cumulative data retrieved from the management of SCLC and from retrospective studies supports a multimodality strategy, based on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains poor and recurrences are extremely frequent. Hence, there is an urgent need for novel treatment options and promising molecular targets. Recently, there has been an increasing interest on the potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially in the recurrent setting. However, only scant evidence exists and there is still a long road ahead. A solid collaboration between gynecologists and oncologists worldwide is required to improve the treatment of these puzzling tumors.

Molecular Profiling Reveals Limited Targetable Biomarkers in Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NEC) is a rare and highly aggressive cervical malignancy. Given that no targeted therapy has been approved specifically to NEC, we investigated the presence of novel, potentially targetable biomarkers in a large cohort of NEC. Sixty-two NEC were molecularly profiled for biomarkers of targeted therapies including antibody-drug conjugates [delta-like canonical notch ligand 3 (DLL3), a trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2), and folate receptor 1 (FOLR1)], NTRK1-3 gene fusions, and immune checkpoint inhibitors [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability] using immunohistochemistry and DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing assays. A cohort of squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix (n=599) was used for comparison for immune-oncology biomarkers. DLL3 expression was observed in 81% of the cases. DLL3 expression was inversely correlated with commonly observed pathogenic mutations in PIK3CA (17%) (P=0.018) and PTEN (10%) (P=0.006). Other more frequently seen pathogenic mutations (TP53 17%, KRAS 11%, and CTNNB1 5%) were not associated with DLL3 expression. TROP-2 expression was detected in only 1 case and no case expressed FOLR1. Although NTRK protein expression was observed in 21% of the cases, none of these had an NTRK gene fusion. PD-L1 expression (10%) and high tumor mutational burden (3%) were significantly less frequent in NEC compared with the squamous cell carcinoma cohort (79% and 11%, respectively). None of the NEC exhibited high microsatellite instability status. Despite frequent DLL3 expression in NEC, a potential therapeutic benefit of DLL3-targeted drugs remains uncertain given the recent failure of the Rova-T therapeutic trial in small cell lung carcinomas. Small cohorts of NEC enriched in PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT and programmed cell death protein 1/PD-L1 alterations indicate therapeutic roles for their respective inhibitors.

The role of radiotherapy in neuroendocrine cervical cancer: SEER-based study

BACKGROUND

There are few randomised prospective data or guidelines for the treatment of neuroendocrine cervical cancer (NECC). In addition, the role of radiotherapy (RT) in NECC remains controversial. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the role of RT for the treatment of NECC. Particular attention was paid to the different role of RT in patients with or without a metastasis (M1 or M0).

METHODS

The SEER database was queried for studies on NECC. We limited the year of diagnosis to the years 2000 to 2015. A Pearson's two-sided Chi-squared test, the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis models were used for statistical analyses. The overall survival (OS) was studied for the overall group and between-subgroup groups.

RESULTS

NECC was an aggressive disease with a mean OS of only 46.3 months (range of 0-196 months, median of 23 months). No significant differences were shown between the surgery (S) and S + RT groups (p = 0.146) in the M0 (without metastasis) arm. However, there was a statistically significant difference in OS between the S and S + RT groups in the M1 (with metastasis) arm (median of 44.6 months for the S group and 80.9 months for the S + RT group), p = 0.004. The mean survival was significantly longer for M0 patients than for M1 patients when treated with S only (S arm), that is, 82.1 months versus 44.6 months, respectively (log-rank p = 0.000). We also noted that when patients received adjuvant RT (S + RT arm), there were no significant differences between the M0 and M1 groups (median of 90.6 and 81.0 months, p = 0.704, respectively). Age at diagnosis, chemotherapy, T stage and N stage were significant factors for OS in the M0 arm. Interestingly, radiotherapy was the only significant factor for OS with a multivariate HR for death of 0.502 (95% CI 0.206-0.750, p = 0.006) in the M1 arm.

CONCLUSIONS

RT may be carefully used in patients who are negative for metastases. Using SEER data, we identified a significant survival advantage with the combination of radiotherapy and surgery in NECC with metastases. This suggests that active local treatment should be conducted and has a significant impact on OS, even if a distant metastasis has occurred.

Role of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a NeCTuR study

OBJECTIVE

Patients with early-stage, high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma typically undergo radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. To explore the role of radical surgery in patients with this disease, who have a high likelihood of undergoing postoperative adjuvant therapy, we aimed to determine the rate of parametrial involvement and the rate of parametrial involvement without other indications for adjuvant treatment in these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients in the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR) at our institution to identify those with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IA1-IB2, high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma who underwent up-front radical surgery with or without adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

One hundred patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 35 years (range 22-65), and 51% (51/100) had pure high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. No patient had a tumor >4 cm or suspected parametrial or nodal disease before surgery. Ten patients (10%) had microscopic parametrial compromise in the final surgical specimens. Ninety-four (94%) patients underwent nodal assessment, and 19 (19%) had positive nodes. Ten patients underwent both sentinel lymph node biopsy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and none had false-negative findings. Patients with parametrial compromise were more likely to have positive pelvic nodes (80% vs 12%, p<0.0001), and a positive vaginal margin (20% vs 1%, p=0.03). All patients with parametrial compromise had lymphovascular space invasion (100% vs 73%, p=0.10). Of the 100 patients, 95 (95%) were recommended adjuvant therapy and 89 (89%) were known to have received it. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy reduced the likelihood of local recurrence by 62%.

CONCLUSIONS

In carefully selected patients with high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma, the rate of microscopic parametrial involvement is 10%. As most patients receive adjuvant treatment, we hypothesize that simple hysterectomy may be adequate when followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and etoposide followed by additional chemotherapy.

Optimal treatment strategies for small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective multi-center study (KROG 19-03)

OBJECTIVE

This multi-institutional study aimed to identify the optimal treatment strategy for small cell carcinoma of the cervix.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively collected the medical records of 166 patients diagnosed with small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix from January 2000 to December 2015 from 13 institutions of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. After excluding 18 (10.8 %) patients who initially had distant metastasis, the treatment outcomes of 148 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

After a median 46.4 (1.4-231.9) months of follow-up, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of all patients were 45.9 % and 63.5 %, respectively. Distant metastasis was the dominant pattern of failure occurring in 67 patients (45.3 %). We stratified the patients according to the primary local treatment: primary surgery (n = 119), primary radiotherapy (RT) (n = 26), and no local treatment group (n = 3). Although the primary RT group had advanced disease (FIGO stage ≧ IIB) more frequently than the primary surgery group (80.8 % vs. 47.9 %), the PFS and OS did not differ between the groups in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Definitive RT is a reasonable local treatment option for small cell cervical cancer, particularly for advanced cases. Given the high rates of distant relapse, an effective systemic therapy protocol is warranted for small cell cervical cancer patients.

Evaluation of PARP and PDL-1 as potential therapeutic targets for women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix

OBJECTIVES

Women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer have few effective treatment options. The aim of this study was to identify potential therapeutic targets for women with this disease.

METHODS

Specimens from patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix were identified from pathology files at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Immunohistochemical stains for PD-L1 (DAKO, clone 22-C3), mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2), somatostatin, and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) were performed on sections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Nuclear PARP-1 staining was quantified using the H-score with a score of <40 considered low, 40-100 moderate, and ≥100 high.

RESULTS

Forty pathologic specimens from patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix were examined (23 small cell, 5 large cell, 3 high-grade neuroendocrine, not otherwise specified, and 9 mixed). The mean age of the cohort was 43 years and the majority of patients (70%) were identified as white non-Hispanic. All 28 (100%) samples tested stained for mismatch repair proteins demonstrated intact expression, suggesting they were microsatellite stable tumors. Of the 31 samples tested for PD-L1 expression, only two (8%) of the 25 pure high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas were positive whereas three (50%) of the six mixed carcinoma tumors tested positive. Of the 11 small cell specimens tested for PARP-1, 10 (91%) showed PARP expression with six (55%) demonstrating high expression and four (36%) showing moderate expression. Somatostatin staining was negative in 18 of 19 small cell cases (95%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pure high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas were microsatellite stable and overwhelmingly negative for PD-L1 expression. As the majority of tumors tested expressed PARP-1, inclusion of PARP inhibitors in future clinical trials may be considered.

Updates and management algorithm for neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix account for less than 2% of all invasive cervical cancers and are classified as low-grade (carcinoid, atypical carcinoid tumor) or high-grade (known as small- and large-cell) neuroendocrine carcinomas. There are increasing data showing that cervical neuroendocrine carcinomas may be associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV), especially HPV18, and most will stain positive for p16. Immunohistochemistry markers such as synaptophysin and CD56 are the most sensitive markers. Although there are no commonly associated mutations, PIK3CA, KRAS, and TP53 are the most frequently found mutations in neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas are exceedingly aggressive tumors with a high tendency for nodal involvement and distant metastases. Age, lymph node metastases, smoking, pure small-cell histology, and tumor size are independent prognostic factors. Overall, the 5-year survival rate is 36% and the median overall survival ranges between 22 and 25 months. Treatment options are often extrapolated from small-cell lung cancer and limited retrospective studies. The preferred treatment is a multimodal approach of surgery, chemoradiation, and systemic chemotherapy. The most common chemotherapy regimen used as initial therapy is a combination of cisplatin and etoposide. In the setting of recurrent disease, a combination of topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab has demonstrated favorable outcomes. Multicenter tumor registries, such as the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR), are an opportunity to evaluate patterns of disease treatment and oncologic outcomes.

Small cell carcinoma of cervix: A population-based study evaluating standardized provincial treatment protocols

Objectives

To describe the patient characteristics, patterns of treatment, and outcome of patients with small cell carcinoma of Cervix (SmCC) treated with radical radiotherapy from a provincial cancer registry database.

Methods

Overall 25 patients with SmCC were treated with radical radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013. Nineteen patients had pure SmCC while 6 had additional neuroendocrine component. Patients were treated with combined chemo-radiotherapy using multi-agent chemotherapy with pelvic or combined pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy. All patients received brachytherapy. Use of prophylactic cranial irradiation was dependent on physician discretion. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test.

Results

We report a median overall survival of 53.8 months for our cohort. After a median follow-up of 54 months for surviving patients, the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) at 5-years were 48% and 46.4% respectively. Patients with stage I-IIA disease had superior 5-year PFS (67.3% vs. 11.1%; p = .004) and 5-year OS (62.5% vs. 22.2%; p = .006). Patients with node-negative disease had a trend towards better 5-year PFS (55.7% vs. 19%; p = .07) and OS (61.1% vs. 14.3% at 5-years; p = .06) Distant metastasis was the predominant site of disease progression (n = 12; 48%).

Conclusion

Distant metastasis is the predominant pattern of failure for patients with SmCC treated with radical chemo-radiotherapy. With modern chemo-radiotherapy protocols we can expect a 5 year survival of around 50%. Early stage and node-negative status appear to be favorable prognostic factors with survival rates at 5-year over 60%.

•

Multi-agent chemotherapy with radiotherapy results in 50% overall survival at 5-years in small cell carcinoma of cervix

•

Distant metastasis remains the predominant site of disease progression

•

Stage and node-involvement bears significant association with survival

Imaging and staging of neuroendocrine cervical cancer

Neuroendocrine cervical cancer (NECC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of cervical cancer, accounting for less than 2% of cervical tumors. They are divided into low-grade and high-grade tumors. High-grade NECC is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) 18 and to a smaller extent type 16. The most common molecular alterations in NECC include PIK3CA, KRAS, and TP53 mutations. Immunohistochemical staining for CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin is a helpful tool in the diagnosis. NECCs pose a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge because of their aggressive nature which is explained by their tendency towards early nodal and hematogenous spread. They have a median survival of 21-22 months, compared to 10 years in cervical squamous cell carcinomas. NECCs have a homogeneous high T2 signal intensity, homogeneous contrast enhancement and lower ADC values in MRI, compared to non-neuroendocrine tumors of the cervix. It is recommended to treat NECC with a multimodality therapeutic approach combining radical hysterectomy, systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The objective of this manuscript is to address the pathogenesis of NECC, elaborate the role of radiological imaging in the diagnosis and staging of NECCs, evaluate their prognosis, and summarize the suggested management plans for this lethal disease.

Challenges in the management of neuroendocrine cervical cancer during pregnancy: A case report

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an uncommon histological subtype of cervical cancer that is associated with poor survival and its occurrence during pregnancy is particularly rare. We herein present the case of a female patient who was diagnosed with cervical LCNEC during pregnancy. The patient declined pregnancy termination and was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide, without associated toxicity and with good fetal development. At 31.4 weeks of gestation, the fetus was delivered by caesarean section, and the patient underwent radical nerve-sparing hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, along with pelvic and inframesenteric para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The patient received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and there was no evidence of recurrence or metastasis at 38 months postoperatively. The baby has also been followed up, without any signs of neurodevelopmental disorders. To the best of our knowledge, the present report describes the first case of LCNEC with pregnancy-preserving management in the literature to date.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare variant of cervical cancer. The prognosis of women with NECC is poor and there is no standardized therapy for this type of malignancy based on controlled trials.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trials describing the management and outcome of women with NECC.

RESULTS

Three thousand five hundred thirty-eight cases of NECC in 112 studies were identified. The pooled proportion of NECC among women with cervical cancer was 2303/163470 (1.41%). Small cell NECC, large cell NECC, and other histological subtypes were identified in 80.4, 12.0, and 7.6% of cases, respectively. Early and late stage disease presentation were evenly distributed with 1463 (50.6%) and 1428 (49.4%) cases, respectively. Tumors expressed synaptophysin (424/538 cases; 79%), neuron-specific enolase (196/285 cases; 69%), chromogranin (323/486 cases; 66%), and CD56 (162/267; 61%). The most common primary treatment was radical surgery combined with chemotherapy either as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, described in 42/48 studies. Radiotherapy-based primary treatment schemes in the form of radiotherapy, radiochemotherapy, or radiotherapy with concomitant or followed by chemotherapy were also commonly used (15/48 studies). There is no standard chemotherapy regimen for NECC, but cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (EP) was the most commonly used treatment scheme (24/40 studies). Overall, the prognosis of women with NECC was poor with a mean recurrence-free survival of 16 months and a mean overall survival of 40 months. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents were reported as being active in three case reports.

CONCLUSION

NECC is a rare variant of cervical cancer with a poor prognosis. Multimodality treatment with radical surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide with or without radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for early stage disease while chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide or topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab is appropriate for women with locally advanced or recurrent NECC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may be beneficial, but controlled evidence for their efficacy is lacking.

PBX3 is associated with proliferation and poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer

Pre-B-cell leukemia homeobox 3 (PBX3) is upregulated in various malignancies; however, the role of PBX3 in cervical cancer (CC) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the expression characteristics, clinicopathological significance, and molecular biological function of PBX3 in CC. The expression levels of PBX3 were analyzed in CC cell lines and tumor specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blotting, and immunohistochemical staining. The clinicopathological characteristics associated with PBX3 expression were evaluated. An RNA interference approach was employed to suppress PBX3 expression in CC in vitro and in vivo, determine its role in cell proliferation and analyze its molecular function. We found that PBX3 expression was significantly upregulated in CC cell lines and clinical specimens compared with normal cells and adjacent nontumorous cervical tissues. PBX3 was an independent predictive factor of poor prognosis, and its expression was correlated with tumor diameter, pathological grading, lymph node metastasis, invasion depth, vascular invasion, and clinical stage of CC. Multivariate analysis suggested that PBX3 expression may represent an independent prognostic indicator of the survival of CC patients. CC patients with high PBX3 expression exhibited reduced overall survival compared with those with low PBX3 expression. Additionally, stable downregulation of PBX3 expression in CC cell lines suppressed cell proliferation and decreased p-AKT protein expression levels in vitro. Similarly, in vivo assays demonstrated that PBX3 downregulation in CC cells markedly inhibited tumor size and weight. Overall, we demonstrated that PBX3 can promote CC cell proliferation via the AKT signaling pathway and that it may serve as a prognostic marker. Our data indicate that inactivation of PBX3 may be an effective clinical treatment for CC.

Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab improves progression-free survival in recurrent small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix

OBJECTIVES

To assess if the combination of topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (TPB) was active in recurrent SCCC and to compare the survival of patients with SCCC who received TPB to a group of women with SCCC who did not receive this regimen.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed women with recurrent SCCC who received chemotherapy as primary therapy. Women treated with TPB for first recurrence were compared to women treated with non-TPB chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received TPB, and 21 received non-TPB chemotherapy, most commonly platinum with or without a taxane. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.8months for TPB and 4.0months for non-TPB regimens (hazard ratio [HR] 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.54, P=0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 9.7months for TPB and 9.4months for non-TPB regimens (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23-1.22, P=0.13). Eight women (62%) who received TPB versus four (19%) who received non-TPB regimens were on treatment for >6months (P=0.02), and four patients (31%) in the TPB group versus two (10%) in the non-TPB group were on treatment for >12months (P=0.17). In the TPB group, three patients (23%) had complete response, two (15%) had complete response outside the brain with progression in the brain, 3 (23%) had a partial response, 2 (15%) had stable disease, and 3 (23%) had progressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that TPB for recurrent SCCC significantly improved PFS over non-TPB regimens, and trends towards improved OS. Furthermore, a significant number of patients had a durable clinical benefit.