1
|
Bizoń M, Roszkowska Z, Kalisz R, Szarpak Ł, Olszewski M. Advantages of Robotic Surgery for Patients of Reproductive Age with Endometrial Cancer. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:1108. [PMID: 39337892 PMCID: PMC11432957 DOI: 10.3390/life14091108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 08/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
This review presents current knowledge on the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer in young patients. Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in Europe. Higher morbidity is correlated with obesity, hypertension and diabetes, which are growing worldwide. However, endometrial cancer at an early age is very rare. The first line of treatment for this cancer is radical hysterectomy, which is controversial in young women. There is an alternative method of fertility-sparing treatment. However, there is a group of young patients for whom surgical treatment is recommended. According to European guidelines, minimally invasive surgery is recommended for endometrial cancer. The aim of the study was to present the advantages of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer detected at a young age. The procedure of radical treatment with robot-assisted laparoscopy is more precise. Better visualization and stabilization of instruments allow a shorter procedure time, a brief hospital stay and fewer complications. Quality of life may be at a similar level. Incisions after trocars are painless and more esthetic than a classical wound. Bilateral adnexectomy in endometrial cancer depends on age, molecular status of the cancer, stage, genetic risk factors and individual decision. Conclusions: Robotic surgery seems to be a better surgical method for endometrial cancer in younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Bizoń
- LUX MED Oncology Hospital, św. Wincentego 103, 03-291 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Zuzanna Roszkowska
- Students’ Scientific Club “ROBOTICS”, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (Z.R.); (R.K.)
| | - Renata Kalisz
- Students’ Scientific Club “ROBOTICS”, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (Z.R.); (R.K.)
| | - Łukasz Szarpak
- Department of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, 02-676 Warsaw, Poland;
- Henry JN Taub Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maciej Olszewski
- LUX MED Oncology Hospital, św. Wincentego 103, 03-291 Warsaw, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matoba Y, Devins KM, Milane L, Manning WB, Mazina V, Yeku OO, Rueda BR. High-Grade Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Subtypes, Current Challenges, and Treatment Options. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:2541-2559. [PMID: 38658487 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01544-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Although many recent advancements have been made in women's health, perhaps one of the most neglected areas of research is the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer (EnCa). The molecular classification of EnCa in concert with histology was a major step forward. The integration of profiling for mismatch repair deficiency and Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2) overexpression, can further inform treatment options, especially for drug resistant recurrent disease. Recent early phase trials suggest that regardless of subtype, combination therapy with agents that have distinct mechanisms of action is a fruitful approach to the treatment of high-grade EnCa. Unfortunately, although the importance of diagnosis and treatment of high-grade EnCa is well recognized, it is understudied compared to other gynecologic and breast cancers. There remains a tremendous need to couple molecular profiling and biomarker development with promising treatment options to inform new treatment strategies with higher efficacy and safety for all who suffer from high-grade recurrent EnCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Matoba
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 60 Blossom St, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 02115, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kyle M Devins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 021151, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lara Milane
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 02115, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William B Manning
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 60 Blossom St, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 02115, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Varvara Mazina
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 60 Blossom St, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 02115, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oladapo O Yeku
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 60 Blossom St, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bo R Rueda
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 60 Blossom St, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gamble CR, Huang Y, Quinn J, Melamed A, Rundle A, Wright JD. Neighborhood economic vulnerability as a predictor for patterns of care and outcomes for patients with uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 190:70-77. [PMID: 39146757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.07.671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as it relates to racial disparity in uterine cancer treatment and survival. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy in New York State from 2004 to 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as quantified by the Area Deprivation Index was calculated. Primary outcome was guideline adherent treatment; secondary outcome was 5 year overall survival. RESULTS A total of 34,356 patients were included in the final cohort. Residence within a vulnerable neighborhood was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy (59.7% vs 75.7% with aRR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86) and timely surgery (63.7% vs. 74.5% with aRR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87). All-cause mortality was 24% higher for those who resided in vulnerable neighborhoods compared to affluent neighborhoods (aHR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32). The greatest Black/White racial disparity in 5 year overall survival was seen in the most affluent neighborhoods at 18.6%, with survival being 79.8% for White patients and 61.2% for Black patients (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 1.14-1.51). For patients with advanced stage disease, this disparity was driven by improved survival for White patients with increasing neighborhood affluence but no change in survival for Black patients. On adjusted analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, insurance, tumor histology, stage, and grade, the disparity remained widest in the most affluent neighborhoods in NYC (aHR = 1.59; 95%CI 1.26-1.2.01). CONCLUSIONS Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with poor outcomes for patients with uterine cancer. The greatest Black/White survival disparities are in the wealthiest neighborhoods. Neighborhood affluence may not affect survival of Black patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte R Gamble
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA; Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Yongmei Huang
- Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA; Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - James Quinn
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Andrew Rundle
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA; Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jayraj AS, Abdul-Aziz S, Mburu A, Upadhyay A, Singh N, Ghatage P. Narrative review on the evolving role of HER2/neu targeting in uterine serous cancers. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2024; 12:69. [PMID: 39118940 PMCID: PMC11304437 DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objective Serous endometrial cancers (ECs) are an aggressive histotype of ECs which are disproportionately responsible for 40% of cancer-specific mortality rates despite constituting only 5-10% of all uterine cancers in incidence. In recent times, it has become increasingly evident that about 20-40% of uterine serous cancers (USCs) have molecular alterations in ERBB2 pathway with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) amplification or overexpression. We summarise the evidence on genetic and molecular alterations in HER2/neu pathway in USC with a focus on testing criteria, targeting agents and resistance mechanisms. Methods We conducted a database search of PubMed/Medline up to 28th February 2023 for articles published in the English language using pre-defined search terms. One hundred and seventy-one relevant articles were subsequently reviewed for eligibility and inclusion in the review. Key Content and Findings The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification is a significant development in the molecular profiling of ECs with a positive impact on the treatment of these tumors including USCs. Testing criteria for HER2/neu in USC with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has evolved in more than a decade with progress made towards EC specific testing guidelines. The findings of a recent phase III study have led to the development of practice changing guidelines towards improving patient outcomes. Conclusions Molecular aberration in the HER2/neu pathway contributes to the aggressive behaviour of USC. Considering the clinical benefit conferred by HER2/neu targeted therapy, HER2/neu testing is recommended for all cases of serous EC in advanced and recurrent settings. Trastuzumab in combination with platinum and taxanes based chemotherapy is the recommended treatment option for patients with advanced or recurrent serous cancers who test positive to HER2/neu. Clinical trials on targeted therapy are ongoing and future research should focus on selection of patients who will derive the most benefit from such therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarthi S. Jayraj
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Salamatu Abdul-Aziz
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Anisa Mburu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Aga Khan Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya
| | - Avinash Upadhyay
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Nilanchali Singh
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wijayabahu AT, Shiels MS, Arend RC, Clarke MA. Uterine cancer incidence trends and 5-year relative survival by race/ethnicity and histology among women under 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00694-X. [PMID: 38925206 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine cancers diagnosed before age 50 years are increasing in the U.S., but changes in clinical characteristics and survival over time across racial/ethnic groups have not been previously described. OBJECTIVE To investigate age-adjusted, hysterectomy corrected incidence rates and trends, and 5-year relative survival rates of uterine cancer in women aged <50 years, overall and stratified by race/ethnicity and histology. STUDY DESIGN We included microscopically confirmed uterine cancer cases (diagnosed 2000-2019) in women aged 20 to 49 years from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Age-adjusted incidence and 5-year relative survival rates, and 95% confidence intervals were computed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) ∗Stat and compared across time periods (2000-2009 and 2010-2019). Incidence rates were adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, and trends were computed using the Joinpoint regression program. RESULTS We included 57,128 uterine cancer cases. The incidence of uterine cancer increased from 10.1 per 100,000 in 2000-2009 to 12.0 per 100,000 in 2010-2019, increasing at an annual rate of 1.7%/y for the entire period. Rising trends were more pronounced among women <40 years (3.0%/y and 3.3%/y in 20-29 and 30-39 years, respectively) than in those 40 to 49 years (1.3%/y), and among underrepresented racial/ethnic groups (Hispanic 2.8%/y, non-Hispanic-Black 2.7%, non-Hispanic-Asian/Pacific Islander 2.1%) than in non-Hispanic-White (0.9%/y). Recent (2010-2019) incidence rates were highest for endometrioid (9.6 per 100,000), followed by sarcomas (1.2), and nonendometrioid subtypes (0.9). Rates increased significantly for endometrioid subtypes at 1.9%/y from 2000 to 2019. Recent endometrioid and nonendometrioid rates were highest in non-Hispanic-Native American/Alaska Native (15.2 and 1.4 per 100,000), followed by Hispanic (10.9 and 1.0), non-Hispanic-Asian/Pacific Islander (10.2 and 0.9), non-Hispanic-White (9.4 and 0.8), and lowest in non-Hispanic-Black women (6.4 and 0.8). Sarcoma rates were highest in non-Hispanic-Black women (1.8 per 100,000). The 5-year relative survival remained unchanged over time for women with endometrioid (from 93.4% in 2000-2009 to 93.9% in 2010-2019, P≥.05) and nonendometrioid subtypes (from 73.2% to 73.2%, P≥.05) but decreased for women with sarcoma from 69.8% (2000-2009) to 66.4% (2010-2019, P<.05). CONCLUSION Uterine cancer incidence rates in women <50 years have increased from 2000 to 2019 while survival has remained relatively unchanged. Incidence trends can be primarily attributed to increasing rates of cancers with endometrioid histology, with the greatest increases observed among non-Hispanic-Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic-Asian/Pacific Islander. Sarcomas, while much rarer, were the second most common type of uterine cancer among women <50 years and have poor prognosis and apparent decreasing survival over time. Rising rates of uterine cancer and the distinct epidemiologic patterns among women <50 years highlight the need for effective prevention and early detection strategies for uterine cancer in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akemi T Wijayabahu
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD.
| | - Meredith S Shiels
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Rebecca C Arend
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Megan A Clarke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Winkler SS, Tian C, Casablanca Y, Bateman NW, Jokajtys S, Kucera CW, Tarney CM, Chan JK, Richardson MT, Kapp DS, Liao CI, Hamilton CA, Leath CA, Reddy M, Cote ML, O'Connor TD, Jones NL, Rocconi RP, Powell MA, Farley J, Shriver CD, Conrads TP, Phippen NT, Maxwell GL, Darcy KM. Racial, ethnic and country of origin disparities in aggressive endometrial cancer histologic subtypes. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:31-42. [PMID: 38277919 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated the risk of an aggressive endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis by race, ethnicity, and country of origin to further elucidate histologic disparities in non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander (API), American Indian/Alaskan Native (AIAN) vs. non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, particularly in Hispanic or API subgroups. METHODS Patient diagnosed between 2004 and 2020 with low grade (LG)-endometrioid endometrial cancer (ECC) or an aggressive EC including grade 3 EEC, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, mixed epithelial carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma in the National Cancer Database were studied. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for diagnosis of an aggressive EC histology was estimated using logistic modeling. RESULTS There were 343,868 NHW, 48,897 NHB, 30,013 Hispanic, 15,015 API and 1646 AIAN patients. The OR (95% CI) for an aggressive EC diagnosis was 3.07 (3.01-3.13) for NHB, 1.08 (1.06-1.11) for Hispanic, 1.17 (1.13-1.21) for API and 1.07 (0.96-1.19) for AIAN, relative to NHW patients. Subset analyses by country of origin illustrated the diversity in the OR for an aggressive EC diagnosis among Hispanic (1.18 for Mexican to 1.87 for Dominican), Asian (1.14 Asian Indian-Pakistani to 1.48 Korean) and Pacific Islander (1.00 for Hawaiian to 1.33 for Samoan) descendants. Hispanic, API and AIAN patients were diagnosed 5-years younger that NHW patients, and the risk for an aggressive EC histology were all significantly higher than NHW patients after correcting for age. Insurance status was another independent risk factor for aggressive histology. CONCLUSIONS Risk of an aggressive EC diagnosis varied by race, ethnicity, and country of origin. NHB patients had the highest risk, followed by Dominican, South/Central American, Cuban, Korean, Thai, Vietnamese, and Filipino descendants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart S Winkler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Suzanne Jokajtys
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Calen W Kucera
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher M Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA. USA
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cheng-I Liao
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pingtung Veterans General Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women's Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Charles A Leath
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Megan Reddy
- California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michele L Cote
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Timothy D O'Connor
- Institute for Genome Sciences, Department of Medicine, Program in Personalized and Genomic Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathaniel L Jones
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center & Research Institute, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - John Farley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Women's Health, Cancer Institute, Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Craig D Shriver
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Neil T Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Massouh N, Jaffa AA, Jaffa MA. Diabetes and the social, biologic, and behavioral determinants of endometrial cancer in the United States. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:540. [PMID: 38684955 PMCID: PMC11057164 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12192-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer is one of the most common types of cancer that affects women's reproductive system. The risk of endometrial cancer is associated with biologic, behavioral and social determinants of health (SDOH). The focus of the work is to investigate the cumulative effect of this cluster of covariates on the odds of endometrial cancer that heretofore have only been considered individually. METHODS We conducted a quantitative study using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national data collected in 2020. Data analysis using weighted Chi-square test and weighted logistic regression were carried out on 84,118 female study participants from the United States. RESULTS Women with diabetes mellitus were approximately twice as likely to have endometrial cancer compared to women without diabetes (OR 1.54; 95%CI: 1.01-2.34). Biologic factors that included obesity (OR 3.10; 95% CI: 1.96-4.90) and older age (with ORs ranging from 2.75 to 7.21) had a significant increase in the odds of endometrial cancer compared to women of normal weight and younger age group of 18 to 44. Among the SDOH, attending college (OR 1.83; 95% CI: 1.12-3.00) was associated with increased odds of endometrial cancer, while renting a home (OR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28-0.88), having other arrangements (OR 0.05; 95% CI: 0.02-0.16), being divorced (OR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.30-0.99), and having higher incomes ranging from $35,000 to $50,000 (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16-0.78), and above $50,000 (OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14-0.62), were all associated with decreased odds of endometrial cancer. As for race, Black women (OR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.84) and women of other races (OR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.88) were shown to have lower odds of endometrial cancer compared to White women. CONCLUSION Our results revealed the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach to the study of the associated factors of endometrial cancer by including social, biologic, and behavioral determinants of health. The observed social inequity in endometrial cancer among women needs to be addressed through effective policies and changes in social structures to advocate for a standardized healthcare system that ensures equitable access to preventive measures and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nour Massouh
- Epidemiology and Population Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ayad A Jaffa
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Miran A Jaffa
- Epidemiology and Population Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang K, Wang T, Liu Z, He J, Sun X, Zhong W, Zhao F, Li X, Li S, Zhu H, Ma Z, Hu K, Zhang F, Hou X, Wei L, Zou L. Clinical characteristics and radiation therapy modality of younger patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, a multicenter study in China's real world. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:360. [PMID: 38509492 PMCID: PMC10956334 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12090-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer is a prevalent gynecologic malignancy found in postmenopausal women. However, in the last two decades, the incidence of early-stage has doubled in women under 40 years old. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics and adjuvant therapeutic modalities of both young and not -young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer in China's real world. METHODS This retrospective study analyzed patients with early-stage endometrial cancer at 13 medical institutions in China from 1999 to 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: young (≤ 45 years old) and non-young (> 45 years old). Statistical comparisons were conducted between the two groups for clinical characteristics, pathological features, and survival. The study also identified factors that affect local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) using Cox proportional risk regression analysis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to compare the effects of local control between vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) alone and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± VBT. RESULTS The study involved 1,280 patients, 150 of whom were 45 years old or younger. The young group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of stage II, low-risk, lower uterine segment infiltration (LUSI), and cervical invasion compared to the non-young group. Additionally, the young patients had significantly larger maximum tumor diameters. The young group also had a significantly higher five-year overall survival (OS) and a five-year LRFS. Age is an independent risk factor for LRFS. There was no significant difference in LRFS between young patients with intermediate- to high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer who received EBRT ± VBT and those who received VBT alone. CONCLUSIONS In the present study, young patients had better characteristics than the non-young group, while they exhibited higher levels of aggressiveness in certain aspects. The LRFS and OS outcomes were better in young patients. Age is an independent risk factor for LRFS. Additionally, VBT alone may be a suitable option for patients under 45 years of age with intermediate- to high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer, as it reduces the risk of toxic reactions and future second cancers while maintaining similar local control as EBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Tiejun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The second hospital Affiliated by Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China
| | - Zi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianli He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoge Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhong
- Gynaecological Oncology Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengjv Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaomei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Sha Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhanshu Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chi feng University, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chin ese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Lichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University of PLA (the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
| | - Lijuan Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zheng S, Donnelly ED, Strauss JB. Race, Prevalence of POLE and POLD1 Alterations, and Survival Among Patients With Endometrial Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2351906. [PMID: 38231514 PMCID: PMC10794941 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Black patients with endometrial cancer (EC) in the United States have higher mortality than patients of other races with EC. The prevalence of POLE and POLD1 pathogenic alterations in patients of different races with EC are not well studied. Objective To explore the prevalence of and outcomes associated with POLE and POLD1 alterations in differential racial groups. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study incorporated the largest available data set of patients with EC, including American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE (Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange; 5087 participants), Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms (1315 participants), and the Cancer Genome Atlas Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (517 participants), collected from 2015 to 2023, 2013 to 2021, and 2006 to 2012, respectively. The prevalence of and outcomes associated with POLE or POLD1 alterations in EC were evaluated across self-reported racial groups. Exposure Patients of different racial groups with EC and with or without POLE or POLD1 alterations. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was overall survival. Data on demographic characteristics, POLE and POLD1 alteration status, histologic subtype, tumor mutation burden, fraction of genome altered, and microsatellite instability score were collected. Results A total of 6919 EC cases were studied, of whom 444 (6.4%), 694 (10.0%), and 4869 (70.4%) patients were self-described as Asian, Black, and White, respectively. Within these large data sets, Black patients with EC exhibited a lower weighted average prevalence of pathogenic POLE alterations (0.5% [3 of 590 cases]) compared with Asian (6.1% [26 of 424]) or White (4.6% [204 of 4520]) patients. By contrast, the prevalence of POLD1 pathogenic alterations was 5.0% (21 cases), 3.2% (19 cases), and 5.6% (255 cases) in Asian, Black, and White patients with EC, respectively. Patients with POLD1 alterations had better outcomes regardless of race, histology, and TP53 alteration status. For a total of 241 clinically annotated Black patients with EC, a composite biomarker panel of either POLD1 or POLE alterations identified 7.1% (17 patients) with positive outcomes (1 event at 70 months follow up) in the small sample of available patients. Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective clinicopathological study of patients of different racial groups with EC, a composite biomarker panel of either POLD1 or POLE alteration could potentially guide treatment de-escalation, which is especially relevant for Black patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhua Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric D. Donnelly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jonathan B. Strauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Desmond D, Arter Z, Berenberg JL, Killeen JL, Bunch K, Merritt MA. Racial and ethnic differences in tumor characteristics among endometrial cancer patients in an equal-access healthcare population. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:1017-1025. [PMID: 37436537 PMCID: PMC10533614 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01716-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are racial and ethnic differences in endometrial cancer incidence and mortality rates; compared with Non-Hispanic White women, Black women have a similar incidence rate for endometrial cancer, but their mortality is higher. Pacific Islander women may also have worse outcomes compared to their White counterparts. We assessed tumor characteristics and adjuvant therapy by racial and ethnic group among endometrial cancer patients treated within the Military Health System, an equal access healthcare organization. METHODS We retrospectively identified women diagnosed with invasive endometrial cancer among US Department of Defense beneficiaries reported in the Automated Central Tumor Registry database (year of diagnosis: 2001-2018). We compared tumor characteristics and receipt of adjuvant therapy across racial and ethnic groups using Chi-square or Fisher tests. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of all cause mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for age at diagnosis, adjuvant therapy, histology and stage. RESULTS The study included 2574 endometrial cancer patients [1729 Non-Hispanic White, 318 Asian, 286 Black, 140 Pacific Islander and 101 Hispanic women]. Among all cases, a higher proportion of Black patients had non-endometrioid histology (46.5% versus ≤ 29.3% in other groups, P < 0.01) and grade 3-4 tumors (40.1% versus ≤ 29.3% in other groups, P < 0.01). In multivariable Cox models, compared with Non-Hispanic White cases, Black endometrial cancer patients had a higher mortality risk (HR 1.43, 95% CI, 1.13-1.83). There was no difference in mortality risk for other racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSION Black patients with endometrial cancer presented with more aggressive tumor features and they had worse overall survival compared with patients in other racial and ethnic groups. Further study is needed to better direct preventive and therapeutic efforts in order to correct endometrial cancer disparities in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Desmond
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 4494 Palmer Rd N, Bethesda, MD, 20814, 301-319-4627, USA.
| | - Zhaohui Arter
- University of California, Irvine Medical Centeur, CA, Irvine, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Berenberg
- Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Killeen
- Department of Pathology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
- Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | | | - Melissa A Merritt
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee NK, Tiro JA, Odunsi K. Disparities in Gynecologic Cancers. Cancer J 2023; 29:343-353. [PMID: 37963369 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Gynecologic cancer disparities have different trends by cancer type and by sociodemographic/economic factors. We highlight disparities in the United States arising due to poor delivery of cancer care across the continuum from primary prevention, detection, and diagnosis through treatment and identify opportunities to eliminate/reduce disparities to achieve cancer health equity. Our review documents the persistent racial and ethnic disparities in cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancer outcomes, with Black patients experiencing the worst outcomes, and notes literature investigating social determinants of health, particularly access to care. Although timely delivery of screening and diagnostic evaluation is of paramount importance for cervical cancer, efforts for ovarian and uterine cancer need to focus on timely recognition of symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, and delivery of guideline-concordant cancer treatment, including tumor biomarker and somatic/germline genetic testing.
Collapse
|
12
|
Satei J, Afrakhteh AN, Aldecoa KAT. Endometrial Adenocarcinoma in Young Women: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus 2023; 15:e45287. [PMID: 37846282 PMCID: PMC10576867 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer in young women presents a unique challenge to care teams. With over 90% of cases diagnosed in women over the age of 50, its diagnosis can be delayed in younger patients if the medical team does not maintain a high enough index of suspicion. Once diagnosed, treatment options depend on a desire to maintain fertility. We present a case of a 36-year-old female who, following cross-sectional imaging and pathological analysis, was diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. This case explores the epidemiology of endometrial cancer in young women and the importance of a multi-disciplinary approach to the diagnosis and treatment of this rare malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Satei
- Medicine, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle, GBR
| | | | - Kim Abbegail T Aldecoa
- Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Oakland Hospital/Wayne State University Program, Pontiac, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anderson EM, Luu M, Kamrava M. Demographic Factors Predict Risk of Lymph Node Involvement in Patients with Endometrial Adenocarcinoma. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:982. [PMID: 37508411 PMCID: PMC10376236 DOI: 10.3390/biology12070982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
The presence of lymph node positivity (LN+) guides adjuvant treatment for endometrial adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients, but recommendations regarding LN evaluation at the time of primary surgery remain variable. Sociodemographic factors in addition to pathologic tumor characteristics may more accurately predict risk of LN+ in EAC patients. Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 with pathologic T1-T2 EAC who had at least one lymph node sampled at the time of surgery in the National Cancer Data Base were included. Pathologic primary tumor predictors of LN+ were identified using logistic regression. To predict overall, pelvic only, and paraaortic and/or pelvic LN+, nomograms were generated. Among the 35,170 EAC patients included, 2864 were node positive. Using multivariable analysis, younger patient age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), black versus white race (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40, p = 0.04), increasing pathologic tumor stage and grade, increase in tumor size, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were predictive of regional LN+. Both black versus white (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.27-2.09, p < 0.001) and other versus white race (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.12-2.07, p = 0.006) strongly predicted paraaortic LN+ in the multivariable analysis. Independent subset analyses of black and white women revealed that tumor grade was a stronger predictor of LN+ among black women. In addition to standard pathologic tumor features, patient age and race were associated with a higher risk of regional LN+ generally and paraaortic LN+ specifically. This information may inform adjuvant treatment decisions and guide future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric M Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Michael Luu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kucera CW, Tian C, Tarney CM, Presti C, Jokajtys S, Winkler SS, Casablanca Y, Bateman NW, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Wenzel L, Hamilton CA, Chan JK, Jones NL, Rocconi RP, O’Connor TD, Farley JH, Shriver CD, Conrads TP, Phippen NT, Maxwell GL, Darcy KM. Factors Associated With Survival Disparities Between Non-Hispanic Black and White Patients With Uterine Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e238437. [PMID: 37067801 PMCID: PMC10111180 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Disparities in survival exist between non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) patients with uterine cancer. Objective To investigate factors associated with racial disparities in survival between Black and White patients with uterine cancer. Design, Setting, and Patients This cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database on 274 838 Black and White patients who received a diagnosis of uterine cancer from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2017, with follow-up through December 2020. Statistical analysis was performed in July 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival by self-reported race and evaluation of explanatory study factors associated with hazard ratio (HR) reduction for Black vs White patients. A propensity scoring approach was applied sequentially to balance racial differences in demographic characteristics, comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, histologic subtype, disease stage, and treatment. Results The study included 32 230 Black female patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 63.8 [10.0] years) and 242 608 White female patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 63.5 [10.5] years) and had a median follow-up of 74.0 months (range, 43.5-113.8 months). Black patients were more likely than White patients to have low income (44.1% vs 14.0%), be uninsured (5.7% vs 2.6%), present with nonendometrioid histologic characteristics (46.1% vs 21.6%), have an advanced disease stage (34.1% vs 19.8%), receive first-line chemotherapy (33.8% vs 18.2%), and have worse 5-year survival (58.6% vs 78.5%). Among patients who received a diagnosis at younger than 65 years of age, the HR for death for Black vs White patients was 2.43 (95% CI, 2.34-2.52) in a baseline demographic-adjusted model and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.23-1.35) after balancing other factors. Comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, histologic subtype, disease stage, treatment, and unexplained factors accounted for 0.8%, 7.2%, 11.5%, 53.1%, 5.8%, 1.2%, and 20.4%, respectively, of the excess relative risk (ERR) among the younger Black vs White patients. Among patients 65 years or older, the HR for death for Black vs White patients was 1.87 (95% CI, 1.81-1.93) in the baseline model and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.09-1.19) after balancing other factors. Comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, histologic subtype, disease stage, treatment, and unexplained factors accounted for 3.0%, 7.5%, 0.0%, 56.2%, 10.6%, 6.9%, and 15.8%, respectively, of the ERR among Black vs White patients aged 65 years or older. Conclusions and Relevance This study suggests that histologic subtype was the dominant factor associated with racial survival disparity among patients with uterine cancer, while insurance status represented the main modifiable factor for women younger than 65 years. Additional studies of interactions between biology and social determinants of health are merited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calen W. Kucera
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Christopher M. Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Cassandra Presti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Suzanne Jokajtys
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stuart S. Winkler
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nicholas W. Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- Aurora Diagnostics, LMC Pathology Services, Las Vegas, Nevada
| | - Lari Wenzel
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine
| | - Chad A. Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women’s Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - John K. Chan
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Palo Alto Medical Foundation/California Pacific Medical Center/Sutter Health, San Francisco
| | - Nathaniel L. Jones
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, the Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile
| | - Rodney P. Rocconi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Infirmary Cancer Care, Infirmary Health, Mobile
| | - Timothy D. O’Connor
- Institute for Genome Sciences, Department of Medicine, Program in Personalized and Genomic Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
- Program in Health Equity and Population Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
- The University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - John H. Farley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dignity Health Cancer Institute, Dignity Health St Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Craig D. Shriver
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Thomas P. Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women’s Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Neil T. Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - G. Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women’s Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Kathleen M. Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Uribe Y, Brown D, Dean JR, O’Brian CA, Simon MA. Intersectionality Between Epigenetics and Cancer Health Disparities Stemming from Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) Through a Gynecologic Oncology Lens: A Narrative Review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 66:53-62. [PMID: 36044628 PMCID: PMC9851929 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Racial health disparities within gynecologic cancers persist. We aim to explore the impact of epigenetics on these disparities and how social determinants of health fuel this effect. We queried PubMed with terms associated with social determinants of health and epigenetics in the scope of 3 gynecologic cancers: ovarian, endometrial, and cervical. Using the publications found, we highlight various socioeconomic and environmental factors that may influence epigenetic mechanisms and further disparities in cancer incidence, mortality, and treatment. This narrative review exposes existing gaps in evidence and provides recommendations of future preventive efforts that can target the mitigation of gynecologic cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesenia Uribe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Denisha Brown
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Julie Robin Dean
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Catherine Ann O’Brian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Melissa A. Simon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tai YJ, Chiang CJ, Chiang YC, Wu CY, Lee WC, Cheng WF. Age-specific trend and birth cohort effect on different histologic types of uterine corpus cancers. Sci Rep 2023; 13:1019. [PMID: 36658172 PMCID: PMC9852563 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21669-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the uterine corpus cancer incidence rates, age-specific trends, and birth cohort patterns by different histologic types. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of uterine cancer patients (n = 28,769) of all ages from the National Cancer Registry of Taiwan between 1998 and 2017. We estimated the incidence trends, average annual percent changes (AAPCs), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate for the two main subtypes (endometrioid and nonendometrioid) of uterine cancer in Taiwan. During the study period, uterine corpus cancer incidence rates increased over time from 5.3 to 15.21 per 100,000 women. Incidence trends for endometrioid carcinoma increased in all age groups (positive AAPCs > 5% for each age group), and the rise was steeper among women aged 50 years and younger. For nonendometrioid carcinomas, incidence rates increased among women over 50 years. The CSS rate improved among women with stage I (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.81) and stage III (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90) endometrioid carcinomas after 2013 compared with those during 2009-2012. However, the CSS rate remained unchanged for nonendometrioid carcinomas. Age, diagnostic period, stage and histologic types were significant factors associated with the 5-year CSS rate. We found that the incidences of both endometrioid and nonendometrioid carcinomas continued to increase among contemporary birth cohorts. Etiologic research is needed to explain the causes of these trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Jou Tai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chun-Ju Chiang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.,Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ying-Cheng Chiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chia-Ying Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Nantou Hospital, Nantou City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wen-Chung Lee
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.,Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wen-Fang Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. .,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. .,Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Philp L, Alimena S, Sullivan M, Del Carmen M, Bregar A, Eisenhauer E, Goodman A, Sisodia RC. Black and hispanic women have less support during cancer evaluation and treatment: results from a prospective patient reported outcomes program in gynecologic malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:770-777. [PMID: 36639193 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Race remains a significant predictor of poor outcomes in women with gynecologic cancer and minority patients consistently report worse quality of life during cancer treatment. Disparities between patients in strength of social and emotional supports may contribute to these outcomes. This study's objective was to describe the racial differences in patient reported outcomes of women being evaluated or treated for a gynecologic malignancy at a large tertiary cancer hospital. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, all patients presenting for care at a tertiary care gynecologic oncology clinic between January 2018 and September 2019 were evaluated for inclusion. All patients were administered validated patient reported outcome measure questionnaires at serial visits. Demographic data was gathered including self-reported race. Patients were characterized as White, Black, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, or Other. Patient reported outcomes were compared between respondents of different races using linear and logistic regression. RESULTS Between January 2018 to September 2019, 2022 patients with a known race completed questionnaires. Of these patients, 86.7% were White, 4.3% Black, and 4.9% Hispanic/Latino and 58.7% had a known cancer diagnosis. Non-White patients were significantly less likely to complete questionnaires (p<0.001). Non-White patients reported significantly lower levels of emotional support on all questions (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) emotional support: Q1 p<0.001, Q2 p<0.001, Q3 p=0.013, Q4 p=0.002), and lower overall emotional (p=0.005) and instrumental (p=0.005) support scores when compared with White patients. Hispanic/Latino patients reported the lowest levels of emotional and instrumental support and more cognitive (p=0.043) and financial (p=0.040) difficulties associated with treatment. Black women reported having less support with chores while sick (p=0.014) and being less likely to have someone to talk to (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS Significant differences exist in patient reported outcomes between women of different racial backgrounds. Hispanic/Latino and Black women have less support during gynecologic cancer evaluation and treatment as compared with White women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Philp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network / Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Alimena
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mackenzie Sullivan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital / Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcela Del Carmen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy Bregar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric Eisenhauer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Annekathryn Goodman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rachel Clark Sisodia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schlumbrecht M, Wright K, George S. Unique Considerations in Early Detection, Risk, and Awareness of Endometrial Cancer in Black Women. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231202952. [PMID: 37732413 PMCID: PMC10515581 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231202952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States. Over the last several decades, the incidence of aggressive tumors, and thus the rate of death from disease, has increased significantly. The population most affected by these epidemiologic shifts are Black women. Symptom awareness, lack of treatment access, and failure of providers to provide guideline-concordant care are just some of the drivers behind these changes. Race as a social construct has historically categorized women into groups that are not reflective of the nuanced personalization that is required for cancer prevention strategies and targeted cancer treatments. There is, however, an increasing understanding that disaggregation by place of birth and social context are important to understand care-seeking behaviors, genetic drivers of disease, and factors that lead to deleterious outcomes. In this review, we will focus on specific individual-level influences that impact disease diagnosis and care-seeking among Black women, recognizing that the global disparities which exist in this disease encompass multiple domains. Such considerations are crucial to understanding drivers of self-efficacy and to develop programs for knowledge awareness and empowerment within a framework that is both useful and acceptable to these diverse communities at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Schlumbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kallia Wright
- School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Sophia George
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Endometrial Cancer Detection Using a Cervical DNA Methylation Assay (MPap) in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Validation Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174343. [PMID: 36077877 PMCID: PMC9454900 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We conducted a multicenter validation study using a methylation assay, named MPap, to detect EC. MPap is used to identify the DNA methylation status of two genes, BHLHE22 and CDO1, from cervical scrapings, and the results are combined with age and body mass index. In two stages of validation, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 92.5~92.9%, 71.5~73.8%, 39.8~40.2%, and 98.0~98.1%, respectively. The MPap test is a feasible alternative tool that provides physicians with a reference for assessing susceptibility to endometrial cancer. Abstract Background: We describe a DNA methylation assay, named MPap test, using cervical scraping as an alternative technique for endometrial cancer detection. Methods: A multicenter hospital-based, two-stage validation study was conducted to validate the cancer detection performance of the MPap test. The MPap value was determined from the DNA methylation status of two genes (BHLHE22, CDO1) and combined with two other clinical variables (age, BMI). The cutoff threshold of the MPap value was established in stage 1 and validated in stage 2. A total of 592 women with abnormal uterine bleeding were enrolled from five medical centers throughout Taiwan. Results: In stage 1, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MPap test for detecting endometrial cancer were 92.9%, 71.5%, 39.8%, and 98.0%, respectively. These values were validated in stage 2, being 92.5%, 73.8%, 40.2%, and 98.1%. Moreover, MPap outperformed transvaginal ultrasound in sensitivity and negative predictive values for detecting endometrial cancer. When we applied the algorithm for triage of endometrial cancer detection by MPap in the Taiwan National Health Insurance dataset, we found that it may reduce invasive procedures by 69~73%. Conclusions: MPap may provide a feasible alternative for endometrial cancer detection and can be considered as a triage test to reduce unnecessary invasive procedures.
Collapse
|
20
|
Matsuo K, Mandelbaum R, Deshpande RR, Nusbaum DJ, Yoshihara K, Machida H, Bainvoll L, Matsuzaki S, Klar M, Roman LD, Wright JD. Population incidence and characteristics of secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer: a competing risk analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306:865-874. [PMID: 35235021 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06440-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine incidence and characteristics of women who developed secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer. METHODS This is a population-based retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program from 1973 to 2013. Women with uterine cancer who did not have synchronous or a history of breast cancer were followed after their uterine cancer diagnosis (N = 236,561). A time-dependent competing risk analysis was performed to examine cumulative incidences and clinico-pathological characteristics of those who subsequently developed breast cancer. RESULTS There were 7110 (3.0%) women who developed secondary breast cancers after uterine cancer with 5-, 10-, and 20-year cumulative incidence rates of 1.5, 2.8, and 4.7%, respectively. The increase in the rate of secondary breast cancer was particularly high in the first 3 years after a uterine cancer diagnosis (annual percent change [APC] 4.9), followed by 3-7 years (APC 1.6) after diagnosis (P < 0.001). The median time to develop secondary breast cancer was 6.4 years. Older women had significantly shorter time intervals between uterine and breast cancer diagnoses (3.7 years for aged > 71, 5.9 for aged 64-71, 7.6 for aged 56-63, and 9.4 for aged < 56, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, older age, White race, married status, endometrioid, serous, and mixed histology types, and early-stage tumors remained as independent factors of developing secondary breast cancer (all, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Tumor factors with endometrioid and serous histology types and early-stage disease were the factors associated with secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer diagnosis. Older women had shorter time to develop secondary breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Rachel Mandelbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Rasika R Deshpande
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - David J Nusbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kosuke Yoshihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Liat Bainvoll
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shinya Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Markowska A, Chudecka-Głaz A, Pityński K, Baranowski W, Markowska J, Sawicki W. Endometrial Cancer Management in Young Women. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1922. [PMID: 35454829 PMCID: PMC9033146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) rarely develops in young women. Most cases are associated with known risk factors: BMI > 30, history of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOs), and race differentiation. The molecular EC classification based on The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network divides these heterogeneous cancers into four types: Polymerase Epsilon Mutation (POLE), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), Copy Number Low (CNL), and Copy Number High (CNH). This division was introduced to allow for early assessment of neoplastic changes and clinical management, including targeted therapies. The basic technique for imaging endometrium changes is transvaginal sonography. Hysteroscopy is the standard for obtaining endometrial material for histological evaluation. The MRI result permits assessment of the extent of EC cancer infiltration. In young women who want to preserve fertility, apart from surgery, conservative management is often implemented after strict selection based on clinical and pathological data. This pharmacological treatment involves the administration of progestogens MPA (medroxyprogesterone acetate) and MA (megestrol acetate). The use of metformin may increase the effectiveness of such treatment. An alternative option is to apply progestogens locally—via the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. In addition to pharmacological treatment, hysteroscopic resection may be used—part of the uterine muscle adjacent to the pathologically changed endometrium may also undergo resection. An alternative is the administration of estrogen receptor modulators (e.g., SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors, or GnRH agonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Markowska
- Department of Perinatology and Womens’ Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-535 Poznan, Poland;
| | - Anita Chudecka-Głaz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Kazimierz Pityński
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland;
| | - Włodzimierz Baranowski
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Janina Markowska
- The Clinic of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-569 Poznan, Poland;
| | - Włodzimierz Sawicki
- Chair and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Saris DH, Smith AJB, Brensinger C, Kim SH, Haggerty AF, Latif N, Cory L, Giuntoli RL, Morgan MA, Lin LL, Ko EM. Disparities in Cancer-Specific and Overall Survival in Black Women with Endometrial Cancer: A Medicare-SEER Study. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 40:100922. [PMID: 35242979 PMCID: PMC8866883 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This study uses a dataset made up of women with Medicare who underwent primary surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Data analysis evaluated overall survival and cancer specific survival based upon race, stratified by stage and histology. Black women diagnosed with stage I endometrial cancer have worse 5-year cancer specific survival than white women. Disparities in cancer specific survival persists even when controlling for histology, demographics, and adjuvant therapy. Future research and interventions should target surveillance, recurrence, and differences in tumor cell characteristics.
Objectives To examine overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for different racial groups of women with surgically staged endometrial cancer by histologic subtype. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of women with stage I-III endometrioid, serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma who underwent hysterectomy as primary surgical staging in the 2000–2016 SEER-Medicare database. OS and CSS outcomes were stratified by race (defined as White, Black, Other), stage, and histology. Survival was assessed with descriptive analyses, log-rank tests and unadjusted and adjusted multivariable cox regression models. Results Of the 24,142 women identified, 85.5% were White, 8.5% Black, and 6% other races. Receipt of adjuvant therapy differed only for stage III endometrioid: Black women were less likely to receive adjuvant treatment after hysterectomy (61.2% vs. 70.1% White, p = 0.03). For stage I, Black women had worse CSS for all histologies other than clear cell in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. For stage II, Black women had worse CSS for endometrioid histology in unadjusted analyses and similar OS. For stage III, Black women with endometrioid carcinoma had worse CSS and OS in unadjusted analyses, but no significant difference in CSS in adjusted analyses. “Other” race showed improved OS for Stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma without significant differences in outcomes when compared to White women. Conclusion Across histologies other than clear cell, Black women diagnosed with stage I endometrial cancer had consistently worse CSS, despite similar receipt of adjuvant therapy. Differences in CSS and OS at higher stages disappeared once accounting for treatment disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H. Saris
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Corresponding author at: Pennsylvania Hospital, 800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19107, United States.
| | - Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Colleen Brensinger
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah H. Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashley F. Haggerty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nawar Latif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lori Cory
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert L. Giuntoli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark A. Morgan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lilie L. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - Emily M. Ko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Monk BJ, Smith G, Lima J, Long GH, Alam N, Nakamura H, Meulendijks D, Ghiorghiu D, Banerjee S. Real-world outcomes in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: A retrospective cohort study of US electronic health records. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:325-332. [PMID: 34952707 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize clinical outcomes of women with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (AEC) in routine practice using electronic health records from a real-world database. METHODS Adult women diagnosed with AEC (stage III/IV, or early stage with locoregional/distant recurrence) between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2020, inclusive, were eligible provided they received platinum-based chemotherapy at any time following diagnosis and had ≥2 clinical visits. Follow-up was from initiation of systemic treatment after advanced diagnosis (index) until March 30, 2021, last available follow-up, or death, whichever occurred first. Outcomes, by histological subtype, included Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST). RESULTS Of the 2202 women with AEC, most were treated in a community setting (82.7%) and presented with stage III/IV disease at initial diagnosis (74.0%). The proportion with endometrioid carcinoma, uterine serous carcinoma (USC), and other AEC subtypes was 59.8%, 25.0%, and 15.2%, respectively. The most common first systemic treatment following advanced/recurrent diagnosis was platinum-based combination chemotherapy (82.0%). Median OS (95% CI) from initiation of first systemic treatment was shorter with USC (31.3 [27.7-34.3] months) and other AECs (29.4 [21.4-43.9] months) versus endometrioid carcinoma (70.8 [60.5-83.2] months). Similar results were observed for TFST. Black/African American women had worse OS and TFST than white women. CONCLUSIONS Women with AEC had poor survival outcomes, demonstrating the requirement for more effective therapies. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive evaluation of contemporary treatment of AEC delivered in a community setting to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Monk
- Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Gabriella Smith
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Julianne Lima
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | | - Naufil Alam
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | - Dana Ghiorghiu
- Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Susana Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Williams GR, Manjunath SH, Butala AA, Jones JA. Palliative Radiotherapy for Advanced Cancers: Indications and Outcomes. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:563-580. [PMID: 34053669 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is well-tolerated, effective treatment for pain, bleeding, obstruction, and other symptoms/complications of advanced cancer. It is an important component of multidisciplinary management. It should be considered even for patients with poor prognosis, because it can offer rapid symptomatic relief. Furthermore, expanding indications for treatment of noncurable disease have shown that PRT can extend survival for select patients. For those with good prognosis, advanced PRT techniques may improve the therapeutic ratio, maximizing tumor control while limiting toxicity. PRT referral should be considered for any patient with symptomatic or asymptomatic sites of disease where local control is desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graeme R Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 2nd Floor West, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Healthcare Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Shwetha H Manjunath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 2nd Floor West, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Anish A Butala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 2nd Floor West, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joshua A Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 2nd Floor West, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cole AP, Herzog P, Iyer HS, Marchese M, Mahal BA, Lipsitz SR, Nyambose J, Gershman ST, Kennedy M, Merriam G, Rebbeck TR, Trinh QD. Racial differences in the treatment and outcomes for prostate cancer in Massachusetts. Cancer 2021; 127:2714-2723. [PMID: 33999405 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Massachusetts is a northeastern state with universally mandated health insurance since 2006. Although Black men have generally worse prostate cancer outcomes, emerging data suggest that they may experience equivalent outcomes within a fully insured system. In this setting, the authors analyzed treatments and outcomes of non-Hispanic White and Black men in Massachusetts. METHODS White and Black men who were 20 years old or older and had been diagnosed with localized intermediate- or high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer in 2004-2015 were identified in the Massachusetts Cancer Registry. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess predictors of definitive therapy. Adjusted and unadjusted survival models compared cancer-specific mortality. Interaction terms were then used to assess whether the effect of race varied between counties. RESULTS A total of 20,856 men were identified. Of these, 19,287 (92.5%) were White. There were significant county-level differences in the odds of receiving definitive therapy and survival. Survival was worse for those with high-risk cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.4-1.60) and those with public insurance (adjusted HR for Medicaid, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.38-2.07; adjusted HR for Medicare, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.14-1.35). Black men were less likely to receive definitive therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83) but had a 17% lower cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.7-0.99). CONCLUSIONS Despite lower odds of definitive treatment, Black men experience decreased cancer-specific mortality in comparison with White men in Massachusetts. These data support the growing body of research showing that Black men may achieve outcomes equivalent to or even better than those of White men within the context of a well-insured population. LAY SUMMARY There is a growing body of evidence showing that the excess risk of death among Black men with prostate cancer may be caused by disparities in access to care, with few or no disparities seen in universally insured health systems such as the Veterans Affairs and US Military Health System. Therefore, the authors sought to assess racial disparities in prostate cancer in Massachusetts, which was the earliest US state to mandate universal insurance coverage (in 2006). Despite lower odds of definitive treatment, Black men with prostate cancer experience reduced cancer-specific mortality in comparison with White men in Massachusetts. These data support the growing body of research showing that Black men may achieve outcomes equivalent to or even better than those of White men within the context of a well-insured population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Herzog
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hari S Iyer
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maya Marchese
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua Nyambose
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan T Gershman
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark Kennedy
- Boston Public Health Commission, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gail Merriam
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Javadian P, Washington C, Mukasa S, Benbrook DM. Histopathologic, Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Endometrial Cancer Racial Disparity. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081900. [PMID: 33920951 PMCID: PMC8071317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Black patients are diagnosed and die earlier of endometrial cancer in comparison with their White counterparts. Factors that have been implicated in this racial disparity, such as socioeconomic status, increased frequencies of more aggressive tumor histology, and comorbid conditions, do not account for all of the disparity. Molecular defects in the endometrial tumors likely also contribute to the more aggressive tumor biology and the patient disparities. In this study, we reviewed the published data of molecular characteristics of endometrial cancer in different races. The majority of the publications compare Black and White patients, and identify molecules and pathways that can be targeted with existing drugs. These findings encourage molecular profile studies comparing additional races and ethnicities, and development of race-specific treatments. Abstract In contrast to the decline in incidence and mortality of most other cancers, these rates are rising for endometrial cancer. Black women with endometrial cancer have earlier diagnosis, more aggressive histology, advanced stage and worse outcomes compared with their White counterparts. Socioeconomic status, a higher incidence of aggressive histology, and comorbid conditions are known factors leading to racial disparity in patients with endometrial cancer; nevertheless, they do not account for the entire racial disparity; which emphasizes the roles of molecular, histopathological and genetic factors. We performed a comprehensive review of all published scientific literature up to January 2021 reporting histopathologic, genetic and molecular factors associated with racial disparities in patients with endometrial cancer. The interactions and pathways of molecules reported to have significant differential expression in endometrial cancers from Black and White patients were identified with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. The majority of studies compared Black and White patients; however, limited data are available for other racial and ethnic groups. Reported differences that could account for the worse survival of Black endometrial cancer patients include more aggressive histopathologies and molecular alterations, including upregulation of molecules driving cell cycle progression, and p53 and HER2/NEU signaling. Several of these molecules are targeted by existing pharmaceuticals. These findings encourage further study and the development of race-specific treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Javadian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA;
- Correspondence: (P.J.); (D.M.B.)
| | - Christina Washington
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA;
| | - Shylet Mukasa
- Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Smith, AR 72916, USA;
| | - Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA;
- Correspondence: (P.J.); (D.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cook A, Khalil R, Burmeister C, Dimitrova I, Elshaikh MA. The Impact of Adjuvant Management Strategies on Outcomes in Women With Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma. Cureus 2021; 13:e13505. [PMID: 33786214 PMCID: PMC7992918 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the impact of different adjuvant strategies on outcomes in women with early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Methods Our retrospective database for women with endometrial carcinoma was queried for women with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-II USC who underwent surgical staging between January 1991 and April 2019 followed by adjuvant management (observation, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT), or combined modality treatment (CRT)). Chi-square tests were performed to compare differences in outcome by type of adjuvant management. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to identify statistically significant predictors of survival endpoints. Results We identified 171 women who met our inclusion criteria. The median follow-up time was 70.5 months. Seventy-five percent of the study cohort was FIGO stage IA, 13% were stage IB, and 12% were stage II. All women underwent pelvic lymph node dissection with a median number of dissected lymph nodes of 14. Omentectomy was performed in 64% of patients. Adjuvant RT was utilized in 56% of women (65 patients received vaginal brachytherapy alone, 10 patients received pelvic RT, and 21 patients received a combination of both). The most commonly used chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin and paclitaxel with a median number of cycles of six. A total of 44% of the cohort received CRT, 12% received RT alone, 19% received chemo alone, and 25% were observed. Five-year RFS was 73% for those who received CRT, 84% for those who received RT alone, 68% for those who received CT alone, and 55% for those who were observed (p=0.13). Five-year DSS was 81%, 94%, 71%, and 60%, respectively (p=0.02). Five-year OS was 76%, 70%, 60%, and 56%, respectively (p=0.11). On MVA of OS and DSS, a higher percentage of myometrial invasion, the presence of lower uterine segment involvement, positive peritoneal cytology, and receipt of chemotherapy alone/observation were independent predictors of worse outcomes. The sole independent predictor of worse RFS on MVA was the presence of positive peritoneal cytology. Conclusion In this cohort of women with early-stage USC who underwent surgical staging, adjuvant radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy was associated with improved survival endpoints and trended toward improved recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Cook
- Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | | | | | - Irina Dimitrova
- Gynecologic Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tobias CJ, Chen L, Melamed A, St Clair C, Khoury-Collado F, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Hur C, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Association of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Overall Survival in Women With Metastatic Endometrial Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2028612. [PMID: 33295973 PMCID: PMC7726635 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although primary debulking surgery (PDS) is often considered the criterion standard for treatment of stage IV endometrial cancer, PDS is associated with significant morbidity and poor survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been proposed as an alternative treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE To determine the use of and outcomes associated with NACT for women with stage IV endometrial cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used the National Cancer Database to identify women with stage IV endometrial cancer treated from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. The cohort was limited to women aged 70 years or younger with minimal comorbidity (comorbidity score = 0). Women were stratified based on receipt of NACT or PDS. A propensity score analysis with inverse probability weighting was performed to balance the clinical characteristics of the groups. Survival was examined using flexible parametric Royston-Parmer models to account for time-varying hazards associated with use of NACT. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed, as was a per-protocol (PP) analysis that included only women who received treatment with both chemotherapy and surgery (in either sequence). Data were analyzed from March 15, 2018, to July 20, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Use of NACT and overall survival. RESULTS Of a total of 4890 women (median age, 60 years [interquartile range, 54-65 years]) with stage IV endometrial cancer, NACT was used in 952 women (19.5%). Use of NACT increased from 106 of 661 women (16.0%; 95% CI, 13.2%-18.8%) in 2010 to 224 of 938 women (23.9%; 95% CI, 21.2%-26.6%) in 2015 (P < .001). In a multivariate model, more recent year of diagnosis (risk ratio [RR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21-1.79 for 2015 vs 2010), stage IVB disease (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.67 for stage IVB vs IVA), and serous histology (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13-1.69 for serous vs endometrioid histology) were associated with use of NACT. In a propensity score-balanced cohort, use of NACT displayed a time-varying association with survival. In the ITT analysis, use of NACT was associated with decreased mortality for the first 3 months after diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] at 2 months, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99). After 4 months, the survival curves crossed, and receipt of NACT was associated with increased mortality (HR at 6 months, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39). In the PP analysis, use of NACT was associated with decreased mortality for the first 8 months after diagnosis (HR at 6 months, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.98). After 9 months, the survival curves crossed, and receipt of NACT was associated with increased mortality (HR at 12 months, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.43). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this cohort study suggest that women treated with PDS are at increased risk of early death but have a more favorable long-term prognosis. In contrast, results suggest that women treated with NACT, particularly if they ultimately undergo surgery, may have superior survival in the short term. Based on these findings, NACT may be appropriate for select patients with advanced uterine serous carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire J. Tobias
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
| | - Ling Chen
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Caryn St Clair
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Fady Khoury-Collado
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ana I. Tergas
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - June Y. Hou
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chin Hur
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Cande V. Ananth
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
- Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Alfred I. Neugut
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Dawn L. Hershman
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Jason D. Wright
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- Karen H Lu
- From the Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (K.H.L.); and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (R.R.B.)
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- From the Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (K.H.L.); and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (R.R.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Francies FZ, Marima R, Hull R, Molefi T, Dlamini Z. Genomics and splicing events of type II endometrial cancers in the black population: racial disparity, socioeconomic and geographical differences. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:3061-3082. [PMID: 33163258 PMCID: PMC7642673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer, also known as uterine cancer, is the most common gynaecological malignancy with burgeoning incidence and mortality rates globally. Racial disparity, socioeconomic and geographical differences are important determinants of endometrial cancer incidence and mortality. Endometrial cancer is mainly categorised as type I and type II. Although less prevalent, type II is the most aggressive form of the disease and typically diagnosed at a late stage, contributing to higher mortality. Black women are at higher risk of developing aggressive, type II disease. Type I tumours are related to higher levels of circulating estrogen with lower-grade tumours that have a good prognosis and frequently related to PTEN mutations. In comparison, type II tumours are estrogen-independent, typically have poor prognosis and associated with the p53, HER2, PPP2R1A, FBXW7 and PIK3R1 mutations. The risk of developing type II malignancy is higher in women with Lynch syndrome as a result of mutations in the MMR gene family. Genetic modifications contribute to aberrant alternative splicing events that are related to tumour development, progression and resistance to therapy. Alternative splicing events are rapidly emerging as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Type II endometrial cancer lacks targeted therapy and biomarkers for novel therapeutic strategies. Recent advances have illustrated a number of molecular targets that are currently explored for the treatment of advanced, late-stage endometrial cancer. The aim of this review is to outline 1) the epidemiology of type II endometrial cancer in black women, 2) discuss the correlated risk factors that contribute to the development of type II endometrial cancer and 3) the associated molecular mechanisms and genetic factors underlying the disease, and 4) aberrant splicing events and biomarkers with therapeutic potential as novel drug targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Zita Francies
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Rahaba Marima
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Rodney Hull
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Thulo Molefi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Zodwa Dlamini
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Paskett ED, Bernardo BM. Eliminating disparities in endometrial cancer: adherence to high-quality care is not enough. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:309-311. [PMID: 32883451 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Electra D Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
| | - Brittany M Bernardo
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Johnson AL, Medina HN, Schlumbrecht MP, Reis I, Kobetz EN, Pinheiro PS. The role of histology on endometrial cancer survival disparities in diverse Florida. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236402. [PMID: 32701999 PMCID: PMC7377497 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endometrial cancer (EC) mortality is particularly high among non-Hispanic Blacks and is twice that of non-Hispanic Whites. However, comparisons of EC survival outcomes by race/ethnicity are often confounded by histology and grade. Here, we analyze EC survival disparities in multiracial Florida with a focus on EC types (1 and 2) and subtypes, defined according to histology and grade. Methods All 27,809 cases of EC diagnosed during 2005–2016 were obtained from the Florida Cancer Registry. Age-standardized, 5-year cause-specific survival by race/ethnicity and histological type were calculated. Fine and Gray competing risk regression was used to estimate sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHRs) for associations between risk of death due to EC and potential predictive factors such as histology/grade, age, stage at diagnosis, and insurance. Results Type 2 EC accounted for only 38.7% of all incident EC-cases but 74.6% of all EC-deaths. Blacks were disproportionately affected by type 2 EC (57.6%) compared to Whites, Hispanics, and Asians (35.6%, 37.7%, and 43.0%, respectively). Age-adjusted 5-year survival for types 1 and 2 were 85.3% and 51.6%, respectively; however, there was wide variation within type 2 subtypes, ranging from 60.2% for mixed cell EC to as low as 30.1% for carcinosarcoma. In the multivariable model, Blacks with type 2 EC had a 23% higher risk of death due to EC (sHR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.12–1.36) compared to Whites. Conclusions Population-based analyses should consider the histological heterogeneity of EC because the less common type 2 EC drives racial/ethnic survival disparities in EC. Black women have a higher proportion of more aggressive histological types and an overall higher risk of death due to EC than Whites. To the extent that some of these histological types may be considered different diseases and require specific treatment approaches, further research on etiology and prognosis for detailed type 2 EC subtypes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariana L. Johnson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Heidy N. Medina
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Matthew P. Schlumbrecht
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Isildinha Reis
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Erin N. Kobetz
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Paulo S. Pinheiro
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Barrington DA, Sinnott JA, Calo C, Cohn DE, Cosgrove CM, Felix AS. Where you live matters: A National Cancer Database study of Medicaid expansion and endometrial cancer outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:407-414. [PMID: 32527568 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine associations between adoption of Medicaid expansion (ME) and changes in insurance status, early stage diagnosis, and cancer survival among women with endometrial carcinoma (EC). METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with EC between the age 40-64 from 2004 to 2015. Difference-in-differences analysis quantified the impact of ME on the proportion of new EC diagnoses with insurance (vs. uninsured), the proportion diagnosed with stage I (vs. II-IV), and overall survival. RESULTS 156,253 patients were included. Among 65,019 women living in ME states, ME is associated with an increase in the percent of EC cases who are insured of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-2.0%, p < 0.0001), with strongest effects among Hispanic women, women in the lowest income quartile, and women in the second age quartile (age 53-57). There was no overall impact of ME on stage, though an increase of early stage diagnoses by 2.4% (95% CI 0.3-4.5%, p = 0.022) was observed among women age 53-57. There was a trend towards improved overall survival with ME, which was strongest in women age 53-57 (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Among women with EC, ME positively impacted insurance coverage, an important hurdle in accessing health care. In women aged 53-57, ME was associated with earlier stage at diagnosis and improved survival, suggesting that the magnitude of the improvement in insurance coverage may correlate with important clinical outcomes. Efforts should continue to understand the complexity of barriers to health care access and to develop effective strategies to surmount them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Barrington
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| | - Jennifer A Sinnott
- Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America; Huntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Corinne Calo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Ashley S Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Felix AS, Cohn DE, Brasky TM, Zaino R, Park K, Mutch DG, Creasman WT, Thaker PH, Walker JL, Moore RG, Lele SB, Guntupalli SR, Downs LS, Nagel CI, Boggess JF, Pearl ML, Ioffe OB, Randall ME, Brinton LA. Receipt of adjuvant endometrial cancer treatment according to race: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:459.e1-459.e11. [PMID: 30096321 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of their disease compared with white women with endometrial cancer. These survival disparities persist even when disproportionately worse tumor characteristics among black women are accounted. Receipt of less complete adjuvant treatment among black patients with endometrial cancer could contribute to this disparity. OBJECTIVE We assessed the hypothesis that black women with endometrial cancer are less likely than their white counterparts to receive adjuvant treatment within subgroups defined by tumor characteristics in the NRG Oncology/Gynecology Oncology Group 210 Study. STUDY DESIGN Our analysis included 615 black and 4283 white women with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy. Women completed a questionnaire that assessed race and endometrial cancer risk factors. Tumor characteristics were available from pathology reports and central review. We categorized women as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk based on the European Society for Medical Oncology definition. Adjuvant treatment was documented during postoperative visits and was categorized as no adjuvant treatment (54.3%), radiotherapy only (16.5%), chemotherapy only (15.2%), and radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (14.0%). We used polytomous logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for multivariable-adjusted associations between race and adjuvant treatment in the overall study population and stratified by tumor subtype, stage, or European Society for Medical Oncology risk category. RESULTS Overall, black women were more likely to have received chemotherapy only (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.86) or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.62) compared with white women in multivariable-adjusted models. No racial difference in the receipt of radiotherapy only was observed. In tumor subtype-stratified models, black women had higher odds of receiving radiotherapy plus chemotherapy than white women when diagnosed with low-grade endometrioid (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.93) or serous tumors (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.08). Race was not associated with adjuvant treatment among women who had been diagnosed with other tumor subtypes. In stage-stratified models, we observed no racial differences in the receipt of adjuvant treatment. In models that were stratified by European Society for Medical Oncology risk group, black women with high-risk cancer were more likely to receive radiotherapy plus chemotherapy compared with white women (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.94). CONCLUSION Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed higher odds of specific adjuvant treatment regimens among black women as compared with white women within specific subgroups of endometrial cancer characteristics.
Collapse
|
35
|
Evaluation of the contribution of demographics, access to health care, treatment, and tumor characteristics to racial differences in survival of advanced prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2018; 22:125-136. [DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0083-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|