BRCA germline mutations in an unselected nationwide cohort of Chinese patients with ovarian cancer and healthy controls

Germline Mutational Landscape and Novel Targetable RAD51D Variant in Chinese Patients With Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

Genetic variants of ovarian cancer (OV) show ethnic differences, but data from the Chinese population are still insufficient. Here, we elucidate the inheritance landscape in Chinese patients with OV and examine the functional implications of a Chinese-enriched RAD51D variant.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, 373 consecutive patients with OV were prospectively enrolled. Variants of BRCA1/2, other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. An enriched RAD51D variant was identified, and its functional effects were examined using Cell Counting Kit-8, colony formation, transwell migration, and drug sensitivity assays.

RESULTS

Overall, 31.1% (116/373) of patients had at least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant. BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for 16.09% and 5.36%, respectively, with one patient having both variants. In addition, 32 (8.58%) patients carried other HRR gene variants, whereas three (0.8%) patients had MMR gene variants. The RAD51D variant ranked third (8/373, 2.1%), and its rate was much higher than that in other populations. Remarkably, all eight patients harbored the RAD51D K91fs variant (c.270_271dup, p.Lys91Ilefs*13) and demonstrated satisfactory platinum response and favorable prognosis. This variant confers enhanced sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in OV cells. However, the effects on platinum sensitivity were inconsistent across different cell lines. Against the background of the TP53 variant, RAD51D K91fs variant showed increased sensitivity to cisplatin.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed the inheritance landscape of OV and identified an enriched RAD51D variant in Chinese patients with OV. This can serve as an important reference for OV management and a potential therapeutic target.

Mutation characteristics of cancer susceptibility genes in Chinese ovarian cancer patients

Introduction

The association between mutations in susceptibility genes and the occurrence of ovarian cancer has been extensively studied. Previous research has primarily concentrated on genes involved in the homologous recombination repair pathway, particularly BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, a wider range of genes related to the DNA damage response pathways has not been fully explored.

Methods

To investigate the mutation characteristics of cancer susceptibility genes in the Chinese ovarian cancer population and the associations between gene mutations and clinical data, this study initially gathered a total of 1171 Chinese ovarian cancer samples and compiled a dataset of germline mutations in 171 genes.

Results

In this study, it was determined that MC1R and PRKDC were high-frequency ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in the Chinese population, exhibiting notable distinctions from those in European and American populations; moreover high-frequency mutation genes, such as MC1R: c.359T>C and PRKDC: c.10681T>A, typically had high-frequency mutation sites. Furthermore, we identified c.8187G>T as a characteristic mutation of BRCA2 in the Chinese population, and the CHEK2 mutation was significantly associated with the early onset of ovarian cancer, while the CDH1 and FAM175A mutations were more prevalent in Northeast China. Additionally, Fanconi anemia pathway-related genes were significantly associated with ovarian carcinogenesis.

Conclusion

In summary, this research provided fundamental data support for the optimization of ovarian cancer gene screening policies and the determination of treatment, and contributed to the precise intervention and management of patients.

Population-based BRCA germline mutation screening in the Han Chinese identifies individuals at risk of BRCA mutation-related cancer: experience from a clinical diagnostic center from greater Shanghai area

BACKGROUND

Deleterious BRCA1/2 (BRCA) mutation raises the risk for BRCA mutation-related malignancies, including breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Germline variation of BRCA exhibits substantial ethnical diversity. However, there is limited research on the Chinese Han population, constraining the development of strategies for BRCA mutation screening in this large ethnic group.

METHODS

We profile the BRCA mutational spectrum, including single nucleotide variation, insertion/deletion, and large genomic rearrangements in 2,080 apparently healthy Chinese Han individuals and 522 patients with BRCA mutation-related cancer, to determine the BRCA genetic background of the Chinese Han population, especially of the East Han. Incident cancer events were monitored in 1,005 participants from the healthy group, comprising 11 BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic (PLP) variant carriers and 994 PLP-free individuals, including 3 LGR carriers.

RESULTS

Healthy Chinese Han individuals demonstrated a distinct BRCA mutational spectrum compared to cancer patients, with a 0.53% (1 in 189) prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (PLP) variant, alongside a 3 in 2,080 occurrence of LGR. BRCA1 c. 5470_5477del demonstrated high prevalence (0.44%) in the North Han Chinese and penetrance for breast cancer. None of the 3 LGR carriers developed cancer during the follow-up. We calculated a relative risk of 135.55 (95% CI 25.07 to 732.88) for the development of BRCA mutation-related cancers in the BRCA PLP variant carriers (mean age 42.91 years, median follow-up 10 months) compared to PLP-free individuals (mean age 48.47 years, median follow-up 16 months).

CONCLUSION

The unique BRCA mutational profile in the Chinese Han highlights the potential for standardized population-based BRCA variant screening to enhance BRCA mutation-related cancer prevention and treatment.

Characteristics of germline DNA damage response gene mutations in ovarian cancer in Southwest China

DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are responsible for repairing endogenous or exogenous DNA damage to maintain the stability of the cellular genome, including homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, mismatch repair (MMR) pathway, etc. In ovarian cancer, current studies are focused on HRR genes, especially BRCA1/2, and the results show regional and population differences. To characterize germline mutations in DDR genes in ovarian cancer in Southwest China, 432 unselected ovarian cancer patients underwent multi-gene panel testing from October 2016 to October 2020. Overall, deleterious germline mutations in DDR genes were detected in 346 patients (80.1%), and in BRCA1/2 were detected in 126 patients (29.2%). The prevalence of deleterious germline mutations in BRCA2 is higher than in other studies (patients are mainly from Eastern China), and so is the mismatch repair genes. We identified three novel BRCA1/2 mutations, two of which probably deleterious (BRCA1 p.K1622* and BRCA2 p.L2987P). Furthermore, we pointed out that deleterious mutations of FNACD2 and RECQL4 are potential ovarian cancer susceptibility genes and may predispose carriers to ovarian cancer. In conclusion, our study highlights the necessity of comprehensive germline mutation detection of DNA damage response genes in ovarian cancer patients, which is conducive to patient management and genetic counseling.

East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT): founding history and future perspective

Racial and regional differences exist in morbidity, histology, drug response, toxicity, and prognosis of gynecologic cancer. However, most large-scale phase III studies have been conducted in Western countries, and these data on Asians, who account for more than half of the world's population, are limited. To build a global clinical trial network in Asia, four clinical trial groups with high expertise and international competitiveness in East Asia, namely the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Japan, the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group in Korea, the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Taiwan, and the Chinese Gynecologic Cancer Society in the People's Republic of China, established a new group called the East Asia Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) on November 19, 2021. It includes four committees: the Cervical Cancer Committee, Uterine Corpus Cancer Committee, Ovarian Cancer Committee, and Translational Research Committee. The purpose of EAGOT is to conduct international clinical trials in an effort to provide the best treatments for Asian women affected by gynecologic cancer. Discussions on new collaborative clinical trials have already begun. The first Annual EAGOT Meeting was held on May 25-27, 2023 in Niigata, Japan. EAGOT, the largest healthcare/investigational innovation network in Asia in the area of gynecologic cancers, will become a platform for establishing standards of care and lead to guidelines for Asian women suffering from gynecologic cancer. The harmonization of regulatory/investigator-initiated clinical trials, simultaneous approval of unapproved drugs in the four countries under a common protocol, and expansion of indications will improve the prognosis of gynecologic cancers in Asia in the near future.

Factors predicting BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

AIM

To provide accurate figures of the frequency of specific clinical features in ovarian cancer (OC) associated with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and to define their relevance in predicting the presence of a germline pathogenic variant in these genes.

METHODS

A systematic review of papers published from 1995 to February 2022 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data from eligible papers were synthesised through meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven papers were reviewed, including a total of 12 886 patients with OC. Among BRCA carriers, 86.4% displayed serous type, 83.3% high grade (G3), 83.7% FIGO (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage III/IV, 39.7% age at diagnosis ≤50 years and 18.1% personal breast cancer history, while the frequency of these features in non-carriers resulted significantly lower (p<0.001). The meta-analysis showed that the strongest predictor of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants was a personal breast cancer history (OR 5.21, 95% CI 4.02 to 6.55, compared with no previous breast cancer), followed by high grade (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.97 to 3.10, compared with low/intermediate grade), serous histotype (OR 2.33, 95% CI 2.07 to 2.64, compared with other histotypes), advanced (III/IV) FIGO stage (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.15, compared with stage I/II) and age at diagnosis ≤50 years (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42, compared with >50 years).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis provide data on features increasing the prior probability of finding BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants that may prove helpful in counselling patients and prioritising testing.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021271815.

Germline Mutations in 32 Cancer Susceptibility Genes by Next-Generation Sequencing among Breast Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

BRCA1/2 germline mutations are the most well-known genetic determinants for breast cancer. However, the distribution of germline mutations in non-BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility genes in Chinese breast cancer patients is unclear. The association between clinical characteristics and germline mutations remains to be explored.

METHODS

Consecutive breast cancer patients from Peking University People's Hospital were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were collected, and next-generation sequencing was performed using blood samples of participants to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline mutations in 32 cancer susceptibility genes including homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes.

RESULTS

A total of 885 breast cancer patients underwent the detection of germline mutations. 107 P/LP germline mutations of 17 genes were identified in 116 breast cancer patients including 79 (8.9%) in BRCA1/2 and 40 (4.5%) in 15 non-BRCA1/2 genes. PALB2 was the most frequently mutated gene other than BRCA1/2 but still relatively rare (1.1%). There were 38 novel P/LP germline variants detected. P/LP germline mutations in BRCA1/2 were significantly associated with onset age (p < 0.001), the family history of breast/ovarian cancer (p = 0.010), and molecular subtype (p < 0.001), while being correlated with onset age (p < 0.001), site of breast tumor (p = 0.028), and molecular subtype (p < 0.001) in HRR genes.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiple-gene panel prominently increased the detection rate of P/LP germline mutations in 32 cancer susceptibility genes compared to BRCA1/2 alone. Onset younger than or equal to 45 years of age, bilateral and triple-negative breast cancer patients may be more likely to be recommended for detecting P/LP germline mutations in HRR genes.

Overview on population screening for carriers with germline BRCA mutation in China

Carriers with BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants are associated with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancers (also pancreatic and prostate cancers). While the spectrum on germline BRCA mutations among the Chinese population shows ethnic specificity, the identification of carriers with germline BRCA mutation before cancer onset is the most effective approach to protect them. This review focused on the current status of BRCA1/2 screening, the surveillance and prevention measures, and discussed the issues and potential impact of BRCA1/2 population screening in China. We conducted literature research on databases PubMed and Google Scholar, as well as Chinese databases CNKI and Wangfang Med Online database (up to 31 March 2022). Latest publications on germline BRCA1/2 prevalence, spectrum, genetic screening as well as carrier counseling, surveillance and prevention were captured where available. While overall 15,256 records were retrieved, 72 publications using germline BRCA1/2 testing were finally retained for further analyses. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations are common in Chinese patients with hereditary breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers. Within previous studies, a unique BRCA mutation spectrum in China was revealed. Next-generation sequencing panel was considered as the most common method for BRCA1/2 screening. Regular surveillance and preventive surgeries were tailored to carriers with mutated-BRCA1/2. We recommend that all Chinese diagnosed with breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers and also healthy family members, shall undergo BRCA1/2 gene test to provide risk assessment. Subsequently, timely preventive measures for mutation carriers are recommended after authentic genetic counseling.

Ovarian cancer risk of Chinese women with BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants

Estimating the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in Chinese women with BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants (PVs) is of great importance for the clinical management of BRCA1/2 carriers. This cohort study recruited 9903 unselected Chinese breast cancer patients whose BRCA1/2 status was determined. Of these, 3984 probands completed family history questionnaires, which investigated the health status of their relatives, including 11,997 female first-degree relatives. The ovarian cancer risk of BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic carriers was estimated using the ovarian cancer history of proband first-degree female relatives via the Kin-cohort method. Of the 3984 probands, 126 (3.2%) carried BRCA1 PVs, and 183 (4.6%) carried BRCA2 PVs. The estimated cumulative risks of ovarian cancer by age 70 were 15.3% (95% CI 8.4-18.6%) for BRCA1 carriers, 5.5% (95% CI 2.0-10.2%) for BRCA2 carriers, and 0.4% (95% CI 0.3-0.7%) for noncarriers. The cumulative risks of ovarian cancer were very low before the age of 40 for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and were an increase up to age 45. The cumulative ovarian cancer risk of BRCA1 carriers was approximately three times higher than that of BRCA2 carriers, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers had 38- and 14-fold higher risks than non-BRCA carriers, respectively. The findings indicate that Chinese women with BRCA1/2 PVs have high risks of ovarian cancer in their lifetime, especially BRCA1 carriers. These results are useful for devising optimal strategies to reduce ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers.

Assessing the Variations in Breast/Ovarian Cancer Risk for Chinese BRCA1/2 Carriers

Background. Cancer risks vary in different BRCA1/2 mutations. We are interested in identifying regions associated with elevated/reduced risks of breast/ovarian cancers in the Chinese population and comparing with previously reported Caucasian-based breast/ovarian cancer cluster regions (OCCR/BCCR). We also aim to characterize the distribution and estimate the cancer risks of different Chinese recurrent mutations. Methods. A total of 3,641 cancer-free women and 4,278 female cancer patients were included in the study. Germline BRCA1/2 status was detected with amplicon-based next-generation sequencing. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) of breast cancer and OR of ovarian cancer, and their ratio of the two ORs (ROR) for each region. ROR >1 indicated elevated odds of breast cancer and/or decreasing odds of ovarian cancer, and vice versa. The frequency, distribution, and penetrance of six known Chinese founder mutations were characterized, respectively. Haplotype analysis and age estimation were performed on the most prevalent founder mutation BRCA1: c.5470_5477del. Results. A total of 729 subjects were detected with germline BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations. The putative Chinese OCCR/BCCR partially overlapped with Caucasian-based OCCR/BCCR and shared structural-functional characteristics. The six known Chinese founder mutations greatly vary in both distribution and penetrance. The two widely spread mutations are estimated to convey low penetrance, while the area-restricted founder mutations seemed to confer higher/complete penetrance. BRCA1: c.5470_5477del is estimated to have emerged ∼2,090 years ago (70 B.C.) during the Han dynasty. Conclusions. BRCA1/2 carriers with different genotypes have significantly different cancer risks. An optimal risk assessment should be mutation specific, rather than concerning a single figure.

Association between germline pathogenic variants and breast cancer risk in Japanese women: the HERPACC study

Approximately 5-10% of breast cancers are hereditary, caused by germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in breast cancer predisposition genes. To date, most studies of the prevalence of GPVs and risk of breast cancer for each gene based on cases and non-cancer controls have been conducted in Europe and the United States, and little information from Japanese populations is available. Furthermore, no studies considered confounding by established environmental factors and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) together in GPV evaluation. To evaluate the association between GPVs in nine established breast cancer predisposition genes including BRCA1/2 and breast cancer risk in Japanese women comprehensively, we conducted a case-control study within the Hospital-based Epidemiologic Research Program at Aichi Cancer Center (629 cases and 1153 controls). The associations between GPVs and the risk of breast cancer were assessed by odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 25 GPVs were detected among all cases (4.0%: 95%CI:2.6-5.9), whereas four individuals carried GPVs in all controls (0.4%). OR for breast cancer by all GPVs and by GPVs in BRCA1/2 was 12.2 (4.4-34.0, P = 1.74E-06) and 16.0 (4.2-60.9, P = 5.03E-0.5), respectively. A potential confounding with GPVs was observed for the GWAS-identified SNPs, whereas not for established environmental risk factors. In conclusion, GPVs increase the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women regardless of environmental factors and GWAS-identified SNPs. Future studies investigating interactions with environment and SNPs are warranted.

Mutation Landscape of Homologous Recombination Repair Genes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in China and Its Relationship With Clinicopathlological Characteristics

OBJECTIVE

The status of homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations and their impact on the survival of patients with Chinese epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are still unclear. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the mutations of HRR genes in tumor tissues and evaluated their values for predicting the survival of Chinese EOC patients.

METHODS

A total of 273 primary EOC patients from five different hospitals between 2015 and 2016 were recruited. All patients received staging surgeries or debulking surgeries combined with systemic platinum-based chemotherapy. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections and analyzed for mutations using a 21-gene panel (including 13 well-known HRR genes) by next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC) accounted for 76.2% of the cohort. A total of 34.1% (93/273) cases had 99 deleterious mutations in 9 HRR genes, namely, BRCA1 (56/273, 20.5%), BRCA2 (20/273, 7.3%), ATM (5/273, 1.8%), RAD51C (5/273, 1.8%), RAD51D (5/273, 1.8%), BRIP1 (2/273, 1.8%), CHEK2 (2/273, 0.7%), FANCI (2/273, 0.7%), and RAD54L (1/273, 0.4%). There is a strong mutual exclusion between HRR genes. The mutation landscape revealed several unappreciated deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 and other HRR genes reported previously. Estimated according to the mutation allele frequency, about 4.8% of the patients had potential somatic HRR gene mutations, which might be underestimated. Moreover, HRR mutations mainly exist in HGSOC (83/208, 39.9%), clear cell (2/30, 6.7%), and endometroid subtypes (8/20, 40%), but not seen in other rare subtypes. BRCA1 mutations tend to be present in younger patients with family history or multiple primary foci. Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations tend to have a longer progression-free survival and overall survival, while other HRR mutation carriers tend to have a shorter progression-free survival, but no significant difference in overall survival.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the distribution of HRR gene mutations in Chinese EOC tissues. BRCA1/2 account for the majority of HRR gene mutations and predict long prognosis in HGSOC. Non-BRCA HRR mutations also account for a very important proportion and might be associated with poor prognosis in HGSOC. It is suggested that HRR gene mutations need to be detected in EOC tissues and germline status be further clarified in clinical algorithm for potential targeted therapy, genetic screening, and prognosis prediction.

Characterization of Synonymous BRCA1:c.132C>T as a Pathogenic Variant

Breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 are tumor suppressors involved in DNA damage response and repair. Carriers of germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly increased lifetime risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and other cancer types; this phenomenon is known as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome. Accurate interpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants is important not only for disease management in patients, but also for determining preventative measures for their families. BRCA1:c.132C>T (p.Cys44=) is a synonymous variant recorded in the ClinVar database with “conflicting interpretations of its pathogenicity”. Here, we report our clinical tests in which we identified this variant in two unrelated patients, both of whom developed breast cancer at an early age with ovarian presentation a few years later and had a family history of relevant cancers. Minigene assay showed that this change caused a four-nucleotide loss at the end of exon 3, resulting in a truncated p.Cys44Tyrfs*5 protein. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction identified two fragments (123 and 119 bp) using RNA isolated from patient blood samples, in consistency with the results of the minigene assay. Collectively, we classified BRCA1:c.132C>T (p.Cys44=) as a pathogenic variant, as evidenced by functional studies, RNA analysis, and the patients’ family histories. By analyzing variants recorded in the BRCA Exchange database, we found synonymous changes at the ends of exons could potentially influence splicing; meanwhile, current in silico tools could not predict splicing changes efficiently if the variants were in the middle of an exon, or in the deep intron region. Future studies should attempt to identify variants that influence gene expression and post-transcription modifications to improve our understanding of BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as their related cancers.

Differences in Ovarian and Other Cancers Risks by Population and BRCA Mutation Location

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is caused by a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The frequency of germline BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and the ratio of germline BRCA1 to BRCA2 mutations in BRCA-related cancer patients vary depending on the population. Genotype and phenotype correlations have been reported in BRCA mutant families, however, the correlations are rarely used for individual risk assessment and management. BRCA genetic testing has become a companion diagnostic for PARP inhibitors, and the number of families with germline BRCA mutation identified is growing rapidly. Therefore, it is expected that analysis of the risk of developing cancer will be possible in a large number of BRCA mutant carriers, and there is a possibility that personal and precision medicine for the carriers with specific common founder mutations will be realized. In this review, we investigated the association of ovarian cancer risk and BRCA mutation location, and differences of other BRCA-related cancer risks by BRCA1/2 mutation, and furthermore, we discussed the difference in the prevalence of germline BRCA mutation in ovarian cancer patients. As a result, although there are various discussions, there appear to be differences in ovarian cancer risk by population and BRCA mutation location. If it becomes possible to estimate the risk of developing BRCA-related cancer for each BRCA mutation type, the age at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy can be determined individually. The decision would bring great benefits to young women with germline BRCA mutations.

BRCA Genetic Test and Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: State-of-the-Art

In the field of gynecology, the approval of the PARP inhibitors (PARPi) has been changing the treatment of ovarian cancer patients. The BRCA genetic test and the HRD test are being used as a companion diagnosis before starting PARPi treatment. BRACAnalysis CDx^® and Myriad myChoice^® HRD test are widely used as a BRCA genetic test and HRD test, respectively. In addition, FoundationOne^®CDx is sometimes used as a tumor BRCA test and HRD test. In clinical practice, gynecologists treating ovarian cancer are faced with making decisions such as whether to recommend the gBRCA test to all ovarian cancer patients, whether to perform the gBRCA test first or HRD test first, and so on. Regarding the judgment result of the HRD test, the cutoff value differs depending on the clinical trial, and the prevalence of gBRCA pathogenic variant rate is different in each histological type and country. A prospective cohort study showed that RRSO reduced all-cause mortality in both pre- and postmenopausal women; however, RRSO significantly reduced the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, but not for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers. Moreover, salpingectomy alone is said to not decrease the risk of developing ovarian or breast cancer, so further discussion is evidently required. We discuss the current situation and problems in doing BRCA genetic test and RRSO in this review article.

Identification of BRCA1:c.5470_5477del as a Founder Mutation in Chinese Ovarian Cancer Patients

Predisposition of germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAMUT ) increases the risk of breast and ovarian cancer in females, but the mutation prevalence and spectrum are highly ethnicity-specific with different recurrent mutations being reported in different populations. Hereby, we performed hybridization-based target sequencing of BRCA1/2 in 530 ovarian cancer patients from Henan, the central region of China, followed by haplotype analysis of six short tandem repeat (STR) markers in the patients with recurrent mutations to determine their founder effect. About 28.3% (150/530) of the OC patients in our cohort harbored gBRCAMUT ; of the 151 mutations, 117 in BRCA1 and 34 in BRCA2, identified in this study, BRCA1:c.5470_5477del, c.981_982del, and c.4065_4068del are the top three mutants, recurrently detected in eight, seven, and six independent patients respectively. Haplotype analysis identified a region of 0.6 MB genomic length covering BRCA1 highly conserved across all eight carriers of BRCA1:c.5470_5477del, but not c.981_982del, suggesting a consequence of founder effect. Retrospective analysis in a subgroup of serous ovarian cancer patients revealed gBRCAMUT status was not associated with the progression-free survival (PFS); instead, an expression of Ki-67% ≥50% was associated with a shorter PFS (p = 0.041). In conclusion, patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic gBRCAMUT account for 28.3% of the OC cases from Henan, and BRCA1:c.5470_5477del, the most frequently detected mutation in Henan patients, is a founder mutation in the population.

Thai patients who fulfilled NCCN criteria for breast/ovarian cancer genetic assessment demonstrated high prevalence of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes: implication to Asian population testing

BACKGROUND

Germline genetic mutation plays a significant role in breast cancer susceptibility. The strength of such predisposition varies among ethnic groups across the globe, and clinical data from Asian population to develop a strategic approach to who should undergo a genetic test are lacking.

METHODS

We performed a multigene test with next generation sequencing in Thai patients whose clinical history fulfilled NCCN criteria for breast/ovarian cancer genetic assessment, consists of 306 breast cancer patients, 62 ovarian cancer patients, 14 pancreatic cancer patients and 7 prostate cancer patients. Genetic test result and clinical history were then checked with each NCCN criteria to determined detection rate for each indication.

RESULTS

There were 83 pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants identified in 104 patients, 44 of these P/LP variants were novel. We reported a high rate of germline P/LP variants in breast cancer (24%), ovarian cancer (37%), pancreatic cancer (14%), and prostate cancer (29%). Germline P/LP variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for 80% of P/LP variants found in breast cancer and 57% of P/LP variants found in ovarian cancer. The detection rate of patients who fulfilled NCCN 2019 guideline for genetic/familial high-risk assessment of breast and ovarian cancers was 22-40%.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the data from this study strongly support the consideration of multigene panel test as a diagnostic tool for patients with inherited cancer susceptibility in Thailand and Asian population. Implementation of the NCCN guideline is applicable, some modification may be needed to be more suitable for Asian population.

Homologous recombination repair gene mutations show no survival benefits in Chinese high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients

Background

The purpose of our study was to identify germline and somatic homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway gene mutations and their clinical-prognostic impact in Chinese high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) patients.

Methods

We applied next-generation sequencing (NGS) in consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery for HGSC in November and December 2015 at our institution. Paired peripheral blood (or para-carcinoma tissue) samples and tumor samples from 42 Chinese women were tested to identify both germline and somatic deleterious mutations through all exons in BRCA1/2 and 22 other core HRR genes. Clinic-pathological data were collected until February, 2020. Associations between HRR gene mutations and clinical characters and outcomes were also evaluated.

Results

Deleterious germline HRR mutations were identified in 16.7% (7/42) of the HGSC patients. One patient had both germline BRCA2 and ATM mutations. Six patients had only somatic mutations, increasing the HRR mutation rate to 31.0% (13/42). Neither germline nor somatic HRR gene mutations were related with residual disease (P=0.233) nor platinum sensitivity (P=0.851). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, germline HRR gene mutation status was not associated with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). In addition, no prognostic differences between somatic HRR mutated patients and wild-type patients were found.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the HRR gene defect was not associated with improved survival in our Chinese HGSC patient cohort.

Oncologist-led BRCA counselling improves access to cancer genetic testing in middle-income Asian country, with no significant impact on psychosocial outcomes

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with BRCA mutations is clinically important to inform on the potential response to treatment and for risk management of patients and their relatives. However, traditional referral routes may not meet clinical needs, and therefore, mainstreaming cancer genetics has been shown to be effective in some high-income and high health-literacy settings. To date, no study has reported on the feasibility of mainstreaming in low-income and middle-income settings, where the service considerations and health literacy could detrimentally affect the feasibility of mainstreaming.

METHODS

The Mainstreaming Genetic Counselling for Ovarian Cancer Patients (MaGiC) study is a prospective, two-arm observational study comparing oncologist-led and genetics-led counselling. This study included 790 multiethnic patients with ovarian cancer from 23 sites in Malaysia. We compared the impact of different method of delivery of genetic counselling on the uptake of genetic testing and assessed the feasibility, knowledge and satisfaction of patients with ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

Oncologists were satisfied with the mainstreaming experience, with 95% indicating a desire to incorporate testing into their clinical practice. The uptake of genetic testing was similar in the mainstreaming and genetics arm (80% and 79%, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high, whereas decision conflict and psychological impact were low in both arms of the study. Notably, decisional conflict, although lower than threshold, was higher for the mainstreaming group compared with the genetics arm. Overall, 13.5% of patients had a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2, and there was no difference between psychosocial measures for carriers in both arms.

CONCLUSION

The MaGiC study demonstrates that mainstreaming cancer genetics is feasible in low-resource and middle-resource Asian setting and increased coverage for genetic testing.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome

BACKGROUND

To establish an individualized surgical strategy for lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer patients with the germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (BRCA1+ and BRCA2+), we investigated the clinicopathological characteristics that are involved in the increased risk of lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of Japanese women registered in the database of the Japanese Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Consortium, who underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing.

RESULTS

We evaluated the predictors of lymph node metastasis in all patients with the information of age at the diagnosis, disease site, histological subtype, 2014 FIGO stage, personal breast cancer history and family history; 233, 153 and 32 patients in the BRCA- (no pathogenic variant), BRCA1+ and BRCA2+ groups, respectively. The prevalence of lymph node metastasis was not markedly different between BRCA- (20.0%), BRCA1+ (18.4%) and BRCA2+ (26.2%). Multivariate analysis revealed an absence of a family history of ovarian cancer as an independent predictor for an increased risk of lymph node metastasis in BRCA1+, and the prevalence of lymph node metastasis was 11.7 and 42.0% in the groups with and without a family history of ovarian cancer, respectively. This subgroup without a family history of ovarian cancer did not show any correlation with a particular variant of BRCA1, including two common variants of c.188 T > A and c.2800C > T.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that certain genetic factors related to the penetrance of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome altered the frequency of lymph node metastasis in BRCA1+ ovarian cancer, and family history may be useful to personalize the indication of lymphadenectomy.

Five Italian Families with Two Mutations in BRCA Genes

Double heterozygosity (DH) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and double mutation (DM) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are extremely rare events in the general population, and few cases have been reported worldwide so far. Here, we describe five probands, all women, with breast and/or ovarian cancer and their families. Particularly, we identified two probands with DH in the BRCA1/2 genes with a frequency of 0.3% and three probands with DM in the BRCA2 gene with a frequency of 0.5%. The DH BRCA1 c.547+2T>A (IVS8+2T>A)/BRCA2 c.2830A>T (p.Lys944Ter) and BRCA1 c.3752_3755GTCT (p.Ser1253fs)/BRCA2 c.425+2T>C (IVS4+2T>C) have not been described together so far. The DM in BRCA2, c.631G>A (p.Val211Ile) and c.7008-2A>T (IVS13-2A>T), found in three unrelated probands, was previously reported in further unrelated patients. Due to its peculiarity, it is likely that both pathogenic variants descend from a common ancestor and, therefore, are founder mutations. Interestingly, analyzing the tumor types occurring in DH and DM families, we observed ovarian cancer only in DH families, probably due to the presence in DH patients of BRCA1 pathogenic variants, which predispose one more to ovarian cancer onset. Furthermore, male breast cancer and pancreatic cancer ensued in families with DM but not with DH. These data confirm that BRCA2 pathogenic variants have greater penetrance to develop breast cancer in men and are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer.

Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation: SOLO1 China cohort

PURPOSE

Maintenance therapy with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib provided a substantial progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with placebo in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm) who were in clinical complete or partial response following platinum-based chemotherapy in the Phase III SOLO1 global study. This led to the approval of maintenance olaparib in China, USA, EU, Japan and other countries, in the newly diagnosed setting. This separate China cohort of the SOLO1 study investigated the efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib within the Chinese population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this double-blind, multicentre study, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive oral olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS (modified RECIST v1.1).

RESULTS

Of the 64 randomized patients, 44 received olaparib and 20 placebo. Olaparib reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 54% compared with placebo (HR 0.46, 95% Cl 0.23-0.97; median PFS was not reached in the olaparib arm vs 9.3 months in the placebo arm). The most common AEs in the olaparib arm were nausea (63.6 vs 25.0% with placebo), anaemia (59.1 vs 15.0%) and leukopenia (54.5 vs 20.0%). Grade ≥3 AEs were experienced by 56.8% of olaparib patients and 30.0% of placebo patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in the SOLO1 China cohort support the use of olaparib as maintenance treatment for Chinese patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who have a BRCAm and are in complete or partial response after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Patients with Primary Ovarian Cancer - Does the German Checklist for Detecting the Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Adequately Depict the Need for Consultation?

BackgroundBRCA1/2 mutations are the leading cause of hereditary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer has defined inclusion criteria, which are retrievable as a checklist and facilitate genetic counselling/testing for affected persons with a mutation probability of ≥ 10%. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of the BRCA1/2 mutation(s) based on the checklist score (CLS).

Methods A retrospective data analysis was performed on EOC patients with a primary diagnosis treated between 1/2011 – 5/2019 at the Central Essen Clinics, where a BRCA1/2 genetic analysis result and a CLS was available. Out of 545 cases with a BRCA1/2 result (cohort A), 453 cases additionally had an extended gene panel result (cohort B).

Results A BRCA1/2 mutation was identified in 23.3% (127/545) in cohort A, pathogenic mutations in non- BRCA1/2 genes were revealed in a further 6.2% in cohort B. In cohort A, 23.3% (127/545) of patients had a BRCA1 (n = 92) or BRCA2 (n = 35) mutation. Singular EOC (CLS 2) was present in 40.9%. The prevalence for a BRCA1/2 mutation in cohort A was 10.8%, 17.2%, 25.0%, 35.1%, 51.4% and 66.7% for patients with CLS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and ≥ 7 respectively. The mutation prevalence in cohort B was 15.9%, 16.4%, 28.2%, 40.4%, 44.8% and 62.5% for patients with CLS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and ≥ 7 respectively.

Conclusions The BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in EOC patients positively correlates with a rising checklist score. Already with singular EOC, the prevalence of a BRCA1/2 mutation exceeds the required 10% threshold. Our data support the recommendation of the S3 guidelines Ovarian Cancer of offering genetic testing to all patients with EOC. Optimisation of the checklist with clear identification of the testing indication in this population should therefore be aimed for.

Prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what is going on in a region of northern Italy?

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 mutation carriers are recommended to undergo prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) between the ages of 35 and 40 or when child bearing is complete, with a possible delay until age 40-45 for BRCA2 mutation carriers.

STUDY QUESTION

Primary outcome was the rate of unsuspected cancer findings during RRSO in a region of northern Italy (Emilia Romagna) and secondary outcomes were details of RRSO: age at surgical intervention, the venue of the procedures in relation to the surgical/pathological quality and the rate/role of concomitant opportunistic hysterectomies.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicentre data collection by invitation to report current RRSO practices.

RESULTS

A total of 222 RRSOs (54.5 % BRCA1, 34.7 % BRCA2, 1.8 % BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined, 5.8 % BRCA-VUS and 3.2 % BRCA not better specified) were reported from 9 different centres, half in non-university hospitals and the remainder in university hospitals. Breast cancer survivors (56.3 %) underwent the RRSO at a younger age (47.8 vs 50.6 years, p =  0.02). The mean and median ages at surgical intervention (49.0 and 48.0, respectively) were similar for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, as was the temporal trend in age distribution, and proportions treated in university and non-university hospitals. A diagnosis of ovarian invasive cancer was reported in 3.5 % of subjects, all BRCA1 or BRCA-combined subjects, at a median and mean age of 57 years (range 42-68). Abnormal tubal findings, such as serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STIL) (100 %), secretory cell outgrowth (SCOUT) (100 %) and STIC (71.4 %), were mainly reported by pathologists in university hospitals. Of the 222 procedures, 15 (6.7 %) included hysterectomies: in none of these cases was a primitive uterine endometrioid or serous cancer found.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this multicentre regional study should guide future preventive health policies for RRSO in BRCA mutation carriers.

BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D mutations are associated with high susceptibility to ovarian cancer: mutation prevalence and precise risk estimates based on a pooled analysis of ~30,000 cases

Background

It is estimated that more than 20% of ovarian cancer cases are associated with a genetic predisposition that is only partially explained by germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Recently, several pieces of evidence showed that mutations in three genes involved in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway, i.e., BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D, are associated with a high risk of ovarian cancer. To more precisely estimate the ovarian cancer risk attributed to BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D mutations, we performed a meta-analysis based on a comparison of a total of ~ 29,400 ovarian cancer patients from 63 studies and a total of ~ 116,000 controls from the gnomAD database.

Results

The analysis allowed precise estimation of ovarian cancer risks attributed to mutations in BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D, confirming that all three genes are ovarian cancer high-risk genes (odds ratio (OR) = 4.94, 95%CIs:4.07–6.00, p < 0.0001; OR = 5.59, 95%CIs:4.42–7.07, p < 0.0001; and OR = 6.94, 95%CIs:5.10–9.44, p < 0.0001, respectively). In the present report, we show, for the first time, a mutation-specific risk analysis associated with distinct, recurrent, mutations in the genes.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the pathogenicity of BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D mutations in relation to ovarian cancer. The level of ovarian cancer risk conferred by these mutations is relatively high, indicating that after BRCA1 and BRCA2, the BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes are the most important ovarian cancer risk genes, cumulatively contributing to ~ 2% of ovarian cancer cases. The inclusion of the genes into routine diagnostic tests may influence both the prevention and the potential treatment of ovarian cancer.

Germline and Somatic BRCA1/2 Mutations in 172 Chinese Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Objective: Despite several nationwide cohort studies of germline BRCA1/2 mutations and several small cohort studies of somatic BRCA1/2 mutations in Chinese epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients, little is known about the impact of these findings on survival outcomes in this population. In this study of 172 retrospectively recruited Chinese EOC patients, germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations and their value for predicting survival outcomes were evaluated.

Methods: Unselected patients who visited the study center from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2015, were recruited and asked to provide peripheral blood samples for this study if they were pathologically confirmed to have primary EOC. All patients received staging surgeries or debulking surgeries involving systemic platinum-based chemotherapy, and the patients were then followed up to December 1, 2017. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections and peripheral blood and sequenced for somatic and germline testing, respectively. The demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected to analyze the distribution of BRCA mutations in subgroups. Survival outcomes were compared among various BRCA mutation statuses using univariate and multivariate models.

Results: In 58 (33.7%) patients, 63 variants were identified, including variants of unknown significance (VUS) in 18 patients (10.5%) and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in a partially overlapping set of 41 patients (23.8%). Germline BRCA mutations, somatic BRCA mutations, BRCA1 mutations in general, and BRCA2 mutations in general were found in 35 (20.3%), 7 (4.1%), 28 (16.3%), and 13 (7.6%) patients, respectively. Five recurrent mutations were identified. Personal and family cancer histories as well as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) criteria were associated with deleterious BRCA mutations both overall and in the germline specifically, whereas only age at diagnosis of EOC was associated with somatic BRCA mutations. In univariate and Cox regression analyses, patients with BRCA1/2 mutations in general had significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Conclusions: In Chinese EOC patients, the distributions and risk factors associated with germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were similar to those previously reported in international studies. Deleterious BRCA mutations in general were associated with improved survival outcomes in this cohort.

BRCA1 c.5470_5477del, a founder mutation in Chinese Han breast cancer patients

The spectrum and frequency of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants may be ethnicity-specific. Whether high-frequency founder mutations are present in Chinese women remains largely unknown. In the current study, germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes were determined in 9,505 unselected Chinese Han breast cancer (BC) patients by next-generation and/ or Sanger sequencing. Four hundred and seventy-one (5.0%) BC patients carried BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in this cohort. A total of 25 recurrent pathogenic variants (at least found in four unrelated patients) were identified in this cohort (8 BRCA1 and 17 BRCA2 recurrent pathogenic variants), 161 patients carried one of these recurrent pathogenic variants in this cohort of 9,505 patients. All of these 25 recurrent pathogenic variants were further explored whether they had founder effect through haplotype analysis. The most common pathogenic variant, BRCA1 c.5470_5477del, was found in 30 BC patients from 29 unrelated families. Twenty-seven of these 29 unrelated patients who carried this BRCA1 c.5470_5477del mutation shared an identical haplotype, indicating that BRCA1 c.5470_5477del was a founder mutation in the Chinese Han population. Furthermore, BRCA1 c.5470_5477del mutation carriers had a significantly worse survival than noncarriers (disease-free survival, p = 0.049; overall survival, p = 0.029). Taken together, our data suggested that BRCA1 c.5470_5477del is a founder mutation in the Chinese Han population and BRCA1 c.5470_5477del mutation carriers have a poor survival.

Prevalence of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) predisposition gene mutations among 882 HBOC high-risk Chinese individuals

Identification of deleterious variants in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility genes allows for increased clinical surveillance and early detection, and could predict the response to poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas. To determine the prevalence and clinical prediction factors for HBOC syndrome, 882 selected individuals underwent multigene panel testing for HBOC risk assessment during the period from January 2015 to March 2018. Overall, 176 deleterious mutations were observed in 19.50% (n = 172) of individuals. Twenty‐six of 176 mutations could not be retrieved in related public databases and were considered to be novel. Among patients with ovarian cancer, 115 deleterious mutations were identified in 429 patients (48.6%) with significant enrichment for a family history of breast or ovarian cancer syndrome (P < .05). In the breast cancer subgroup, 31 deleterious mutations were identified in 261 patients. Besides BRCA1 (8; 25.8%) and BRCA2 (11; 35.5%), the most frequently occurring genes, an additional 12 deleterious mutations (38.7%) were found in seven other susceptibility genes. Higher mutation incidence (57.9%) was observed in subjects with histories of breast and ovarian cancer. Our results highlighted the genetic heterogeneity of HBOC and the efficiency of a multigene panel in carrying out risk assessment.

A family pedigree of malignancies associated with BRCA1 pathogenic variants: a reflection of the state of art in China

Background

Little is known about the status of genetic counseling for ovarian cancer in China.

Case presentation

We report a four-generation Chinese family with several types of cancer. The proband was a patient with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) who was found to harbor a pathogenic BRCA1 variant. Cosegregation analysis identified 7 of 9 relatives with the same deleterious variant. One month after the genetic test, one female carrier 54 years of age was diagnosed with stage IVB HGSOC, and another female 55 years of age accepted risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, which revealed occult cancer of the fallopian tube (Stage IA).

Conclusions

Genetic counseling and testing for ovarian cancer in China have fallen behind international trends. Innovative studies and practices are urgently needed to establish models for cancer screening, prevention and treatment.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in non-selected ovarian carcinoma patients in Brazil

Background

BRCA1/2 pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) germline variants are frequent among patients with ovarian carcinoma. However, these variants have not been extensively characterized in patients with ovarian cancer in Brazil.

Methods

In this retrospective study we evaluated clinical characteristics and BRCA1/2 genetic test results from patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent genetic counseling at A.C.Camargo Cancer Center (Brazil) between 2015 and 2017 and had performed germline genetic testing of BRCA1/2 genes.

Results

Among 158 patients, 33 P and LP variants and were found (20.8%), 27 in BRCA1 and six in BRCA2, and six variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS). Thirteen percent of the patients did not have Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) results. Three P variants in BRCA1 were found in more than one patient: c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74), c.3331_3334delCAAG (p.Gln1111Asnfs5*), and c.211A > G (p.Arg71Gly). One LP variant in BRCA1 had not been previously described, c.4153_4154delCT (p.Leu1385Ilefs*5). Patients with previous diagnosis of breast cancer were carriers of P or LP variant in 8 of 12 cases (66.7%), and patients with a family history of ovarian or breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives were carriers of P or LP variant in 26.7% of cases compared to 16.9% for patients without family history (p = 0.166).

Conclusion

Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline P and LP variants is slightly higher than previously described by the largest occidental studies, with a high prevalence of variant c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74) in BRCA1 observed. Moreover, we identified a new LP variant.