Brachytherapy: A critical component of primary radiation therapy for cervical cancer

Updated Trends in the Utilization of Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer in the United States: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Study

PURPOSE

Our previous Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study revealed a concerning decline in brachytherapy utilization in the United States between 1988 and 2009. This study evaluates recent trends in brachytherapy utilization in cervical cancer and identifies factors and survival benefit associated with the use of brachytherapy treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using SEER data, 8500 patients with International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians 2009 stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) between 2000 and 2020 were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed on potential factors associated with brachytherapy use: age, marital status, race, ethnicity, income, metropolitan status, year of diagnosis, SEER region, histology, grade, and stage. To adjust for differences between patients who received brachytherapy and those who did not, propensity-score matching was used. Multivariable Cox regression analysis assessed the association of brachytherapy use with cervical cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in the matched cohort.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of the 8500 women received brachytherapy in combination with EBRT; 36% received EBRT alone. The brachytherapy utilization rate declined sharply in 2003/2004 (lowest rate 44% in 2003) and then gradually improved especially in 2018 to 2020 (76%). Factors associated with higher odds of brachytherapy use included younger age, married (vs single), later years of diagnosis, certain SEER regions, and earlier stage. In the propensity-score matched cohort, brachytherapy treatment was associated with lower 4-year cumulative incidence of cancer death (32.1% vs 43.4%; P < .001) and better overall survival (64.0% vs 51.4%; P < .001). Brachytherapy treatment was independently associated with lower CSM (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76; P < .001) and ACM (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy utilization among SEER regions has improved since 2004 in patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer. Brachytherapy use remains independently associated with significantly lower CSM and ACM and is an essential component of treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Developing Next-Generation 3-Dimensional Printing for Cervical Cancer Hybrid Brachytherapy: A Guided Interstitial Technique Enabling Improved Flexibility, Dosimetry, and Efficiency

PURPOSE

We developed a 3-dimensionally (3D) printed tandem anchored radially guiding interstitial template (TARGIT) to increase the simplicity of intracavitary/interstitial technique for tandem-and-ovoid (T&O) procedures in cervical cancer brachytherapy. This study compared dosimetry and procedure logistics between T&O implants using the original TARGIT versus the next-generation TARGIT-Flexible-eXtended (TARGIT-FX) 3D-printed template designed for practice-changing ease-of-use with further simplified needle insertion and increased flexibility in needle placement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing T&O brachytherapy as part of definitive cervical cancer treatment. Procedures used the original TARGIT from November 2019 through February 2022 and the TARGIT-FX from March 2022 through November 2022. The FX design features full extension to the vaginal introitus with 9 needle channels and allows for needle additions or depth adjustments intraprocedure and after computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 148 implants were performed, 68 (46%) with TARGIT and 80 (54%) with TARGIT-FX, across 41 patients. Across implants, the TARGIT-FX achieved higher mean V100% (+2.8%, P = .0019), and across patients, the TARGIT-FX achieved higher D90 (+2.0 Gy, P = .037) and higher D98 (+2.7 Gy, P = .016) compared with the original TARGIT. Doses to organs at risk were overall similar between templates. Procedure times for TARGIT-FX implants were 30% shorter on average than for those using the original TARGIT (P < .0001), and 28% shorter on average for the subset of implants with high-risk clinical target volume ≥30 cc (P = .013). All residents (100%, N = 6) surveyed regarding the TARGIT-FX indicated ease-of-use for needle insertion and interest in applying the technique in future practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The TARGIT-FX achieved shorter procedure times with increased tumor coverage and similar normal tissue sparing compared with the previously applied TARGIT and illustrates the potential of 3D printing to enhance efficiency and shorten the learning curve for intracavitary/interstitial procedure technique in cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Radiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Eighty percent of women who have cervical cancer present at such an alarmingly advanced stage leading to high morbidity and mortality. Due to a lack of public awareness and inadequate infrastructure for screening and early identification in resource-poor countries like India, this tardy presentation is anticipated to continue in the future. Standard management for locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer is radiotherapy. To increase responses and survival, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was introduced to the arsenal. Recent studies from India have shown encouraging results for women getting concomitant chemo-radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, toxicities are still a major problem. The approximated five-year actuarial survival rate with NACT is roughly 45% (95% confidence interval, 37-53%) with a median survival rate of 56 months. Compared to radiotherapy alone, patients receiving chemo-radiation are said to have a considerably better survival rate. Vomiting and nausea are the adverse effects that occur most frequently. Renal dysfunction and myelosuppression can also happen. However, there is evidence of effective tumor control. We will talk about a 55-year-old, para 5 elderly lady who had white discharge coming from her vagina and a cervical mass that bled when touched. She underwent NACT for six weekly cycles, followed by definitive chemo-radiation, and she responded favorably to this management strategy, indicating that the addition of chemotherapy is yet another cause for optimism in the management of cancer of the cervix.

Racial Disparities in Brachytherapy Treatment among Women with Cervical and Endometrial Cancer in the United States

Brachytherapy improves clinical outcomes among women diagnosed with cervical and endometrial cancers. Recent evidence demonstrates that declining brachytherapy boosts for women with cervical cancer were associated with higher mortality. In this retrospective cohort study, women diagnosed with endometrial or cervical cancer in the United States between 2004 and 2017 were selected from the National Cancer Database for evaluation. Women ≥18 years of age were included for high intermediate risk (PORTEC-2 and GOG-99 definition) or FIGO Stage II-IVA endometrial cancers and FIGO Stage IA-IVA-non-surgically treated cervical cancers. The aims were to (1) evaluate brachytherapy treatment practice patterns for cervical and endometrial cancers in the United States; (2) calculate rates of brachytherapy treatment by race; and (3) determine factors associated with not receiving brachytherapy. Treatment practice patterns were evaluated over time and by race. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of brachytherapy. The data show increasing rates of brachytherapy for endometrial cancers. Compared to non-Hispanic White women; Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NHPI) women with endometrial cancer and Black women with cervical cancer were significantly less likely to receive brachytherapy. For both NHPI and Black women, treatment at community cancer centers was associated with a decreased likelihood of brachytherapy. The data suggest racial disparities among Black women with cervical cancer and NHPI women with endometrial cancer and emphasize an unmet need for brachytherapy access within community hospitals.

Socioeconomic and Racial Determinants of Brachytherapy Utilization for Cervical Cancer: Concerns for Widening Disparities

PURPOSE

Cervical cancer (CC) disproportionately affects minorities who have higher incidence and mortality rates. Standard of care for locally advanced CC involves a multimodality approach including brachytherapy (BT), which independently improves oncologic outcomes. Here, we examine the impact of insurance status and race on BT utilization with the SEER database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 7,266 patients with stage I-IV CC diagnosed from 2007 to 2015 were included. BT utilization, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,832 (52.7%) received combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) + BT, whereas 3,434 (47.3%) received EBRT alone. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, increasing age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99; P < .001); Medicaid (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.88; P < .001), uninsured (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.80; P < .001), and unknown versus private insurance (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.86; P < .001); Black (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.77; P < .001) and unknown versus White race (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.77; P = .047); and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.24; P = .36), stage III (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P = .006), stage IV (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.40; P < .001), and unknown stage versus stage I (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.45; P < .001) were associated with decreased BT utilization. When comparing racial survival differences, the 5-year OS was 44.2% versus 50.9% (P < .0001) and the 5-year DSS was 55.6% versus 60.5% (P < .0001) for Black and White patients, respectively. Importantly, the racial survival disparities resolved when examining patients who received combined EBRT + BT, with the 5-year OS of 57.3% versus58.5% (P = .24) and the 5-year DSS of 66.3% versus 66.6% (P = .53) for Black and White patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates notable inequities in BT utilization for CC that particularly affects patients of lower insurance status and Black race, which translates into inferior oncologic outcomes. Importantly, the use of BT was able to overcome racial survival differences, thus highlighting its essential value.

The value of brachytherapy in the age of advanced external beam radiotherapy: a review of the literature in terms of dosimetry

Brachytherapy (BT) has long been used for successful treatment of various tumour entities, including prostate, breast and gynaecological cancer. However, particularly due to advances in modern external beam techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), there are concerns about its future. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this article aims to summarize the role of BT in cancer treatment and highlight its particular dosimetric advantages. The authors conclude that image-guided BT supported by inverse dose planning will successfully compete with high-tech EBRT in the future and continue to serve as a valuable modality for cancer treatment.

Populations at high risk of cervical cancer in Guangxi Province: Findings from two screening projects in a minority area of South China

Objective

To analyse the positive rates of low-grade (LSIL) and high-grade (HSIL) squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cervical cancer (CC), and identify groups at high risk for CC in Guangxi.

Setting

CC screening options in Guangxi, which is the only minority autonomous area in South China, include the National Cervical Cancer Screening Project (NCCSP) and physical examination (PE).

Methods

This study was based on PE and NCCSP sample data obtained from 2012 to 2019. We calculated the positive rates of LSIL, HSIL, and CC; analysed the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the variables in multivariate logistic regression; and subsequently identified groups at high risk for CC.

Results

The positive rates of LSIL, HSIL, and CC for the total of 873,880 samples were 1.89%, 0.60%, and 0.03%, respectively. Females over 64 years of age (vs. 50–64; aOR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.71–2.46; P < 0.001) and those from urban (vs. rural; aOR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.57–1.76; P < 0.001), minority (vs. non-minority; aOR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.13–1.35; P < 0.001), and coastal (vs. inland; aOR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06–1.25; P = 0.001) areas were associated with a high risk of HSIL. Females over 64 (vs. 50–64; aOR = 4.37; 95% CI, 2.88–6.63; P < 0.001) and those from urban (vs. rural; aOR = 3.05; 95% CI, 2.36–3.95; P < 0.001) areas were significantly associated with a high risk of CC.

Conclusion

Females from urban areas in Guangxi are at high risk for CC. Public health strategies should focus on high-risk populations.

Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The recently published ASTRO cervical cancer guidelines recommend the use of modern radiotherapy. Imaging is now incorporated in the updated FIGO 2018 staging with a new stage IIIC. This study aims to evaluate the oncologic outcomes and predictors of survival using FIGO 2018 staging in a cohort of patients treated in an era of high-precision image-guided radiotherapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 216 adult cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy between 2010 and 2018. Eligible patients had non-metastatic cervical cancer treated at a single academic institution. All patients had pre-treatment MRI and CT/PET. Treatment protocol consisted of external beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D image-guided brachytherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Multivariate cox proportional-hazards model was performed to identify potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 50 and median BMI was 26.4 kg/m². Median follow-up time was 44.3 months. Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival and loco-regional disease-free survival rates were 76.8%, 68.5% and 82.6%, respectively. FIGO 2018 showed better OS discrimination compared to FIGO 2009 classification. OS was increasingly worse with positive pelvic and para-aortic nodes (p < 0.001). In a multivariate prediction model, performance status (p = 0.044) and FIGO 2018 classification (stage III p = 0.016; stage IVA p = 0.010) were predictors of mortality; FIGO 2018 classification (stage III p = 0.003; stage IVA p = 0.001) was a predictor of any recurrence; MRI tumor diameter (p ≤ 0.001) and nodal metastases (p = 0.024) were predictors of loco-regional recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of state-of-the-art imaging in cervical cancer staging and in radiotherapy planning leads to good loco-regional control rates, however distant recurrence remains an important issue. FIGO 2018 staging better reflects patient prognosis, highlighting the need for new treatment strategies for stage IIIC cervical cancer.

Dose rate in the highest irradiation area of the rectum correlates with late rectal complications in patients treated with high-dose-rate computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dose rate to the rectum on late rectal complications in patients treated with computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for cervical cancer. The subjects were 142 patients with cervical cancer who underwent Ir-192 high-dose-rate (HDR)-IGBT between March 2012 and January 2018. The dose rate to the rectum was calculated using in-house software. The minimum, mean and maximum effective dose rate (EDR) was calculated for voxels of the rectal volume covered by cumulative doses >D0.1cc, >D2cc, and > D5cc. The average EDR of three to four brachytherapy sessions was calculated (EDR for patients; EDRp). The total dose of the rectum was calculated as the biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). The associations between EDRp for D0.1cc, D2cc, and D5cc and the respective rectal EQD2 values with late rectal complications were then analyzed. The median follow-up period was 40 months. Patients with rectal complications of ≥Grade 1 received a significantly higher mean EDRp for D0.1cc-5cc and had a greater EQD2 for D0.1cc-5cc. Multivariate analysis was performed using the mean EDRp for D2cc, EQD2 for D2cc, heavy smoking and BMI. Of these four variables, mean EDRp for D2cc (HR = 3.38, p = 0.004) and EQD2 for D2cc (HR = 2.59, p = 0.045) emerged as independent predictors for late rectal complications. In conclusion, mean EDRp and EQD2 were associated with late rectal complications in patients treated with HDR CT-based IGBT for cervical cancer.

Association between definitive chemoradiotherapy wait-time and survival in locally-advanced cervical cancer: Implications during the coronavirus pandemic

OBJECTIVE

The current coronavirus pandemic caused a significant decrease in cancer-related encounters resulting in a delay in treatment of cancer patients. The objective of this study was to examine the survival effect of delay in starting concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) in women with locally-advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study querying the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Women with stage IB2-IVA squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix who received definitive CCRT with known wait-time for CCRT initiation after cancer diagnosis were eligible (N=13,617). Cox proportional hazard regression model with restricted cubic spline transformation was fitted to assess the association between CCRT wait-time and all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

The median wait-time to start CCRT was 6 (IQR 4-8) weeks. In a multivariable analysis, older age, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic ethnicity, recent year of diagnosis, Medicaid and uninsured status, medical comorbidities, and absence of nodal metastasis were associated with longer CCRT wait-time (P<.05). Women with aggressive tumor factors (poorer differentiation, large tumor size, nodal metastasis, and higher cancer stage) were more likely to have a short CCRT wait-time (P<.05). After controlling for the measured covariates, CCRT wait-time of 6.1-9.8 weeks was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to a wait-time of 6 weeks. Similar association was observed when the cohort was stratified by histology, cancer stage, tumor size, or brachytherapy use.

CONCLUSION

An implication of this study for the current coronavirus pandemic is that in the absence of aggressive tumor factors, a short period of wait-time to start definitive CCRT may not be associated with increased risk of mortality in women with locally-advanced cervical cancer.

Comfort Level of US Radiation Oncology Graduates: Assessment of Transition to Independent Clinical Practice

Radiation training programs are designed to prepare graduates for independent practice, with metrics in place to assess appropriateness of clinical decision-making. Here, we investigated the self-assessed preparedness of US graduates during the transition to independent practice.An anonymous, Internet-based survey was distributed to recent graduates of radiation oncology residencies (2016-2017). A Likert scale was used to assess comfort with various aspects of practice, as well as "time" to development of comfort in independent practice.Responses were obtained from 70/210 (33%), the majority reported training in programs with 5-8 residents (n = 35). Most (77%) reported designing between 500 and 900 treatment plans during training (n = 54). Only 41% of respondents reported the opportunity to review treatment plans and make decisions about safety/adequacy without attending input > 50% of the time (n = 29). Thirty percent of residents reported being responsible for seeing/managing on-treatment visits (OTVs) ≤ 75% of the time. Aspects with which practitioners reported the least comfort were understanding of billing/application to practice (2.43, IQR 2-3), orthovoltage (superficial radiation) setup and field design (2.57, IQR 1-4), and planning/delivery of prostate implants (2.82, IQR 2-4). Increased mean comfort levels were reported by those designing > 700 treatment plans in training as well as those reporting an opportunity to evaluate plans and make clinical decisions prior to attending input > 50% of the time during residency. Comfort with the delivery of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) correlated with caseload for liver, spine, prostate, and CNS disease sites but not lung.Variations in training experiences exist across institutions. Here, a lower than expected number of residents reported seeing/managing OTVs as well as reviewing treatment plans prior to attending input during training. Overall comfort was correlated with case volume and opportunities to independently review treatment plans prior to attending input. These data highlight areas of opportunity for improving resident education with implications for ease of transition to independent clinical practice.

Brachytherapy-based radiotherapy is associated with improved survival for newly diagnosed metastatic cervical cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the value of brachytherapy (BT) in metastatic cervical cancer, as it has not been well evaluated before.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed 2391 patients with Stage IVB cervical cancer from 2004 to 2015 by using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. The parameters were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival.

RESULTS

In general, both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that age, histologic type, tumor size, and chemotherapy were associated with CSS and overall survival (p < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis showed BT alone or BT combined with external beam radiotherapy improved CSS despite the tumor size. In addition, chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy prolonged CSS compared with external beam radiotherapy alone or no chemotherapy or radiotherapy independently of tumor size (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For newly diagnosed metastatic cervical cancers, BT with or without external beam radiotherapy is associated with improved survival. As an aggressive option, chemoradiotherapy is also a potential treatment strategy.

Brachytherapy care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Practice statement from a cancer center in Wuhan, China

Purpose

COVID-19 broke out in late 2019 and rapidly spread around the world and became a pandemic. This highly contagious disease affects routine health care services and patients with cancer who are susceptible to it. Delivering brachytherapy on time is critical for patients with cancer to get better prognosis. The purpose of this study is to present workflow and standard for radiation centers to deliver brachytherapy and avoid cross-infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods and Materials

This study combined previous literature and guidelines of precaution with clinical experience in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

A workflow covering patients' screening, health care workers’ precaution, training, and other aspects of the whole brachytherapy procedure was established.

Conclusions

From the reopening of radiation center to mid-May in 2020, there is no hospital infection of COVID-19 in patients or health care workers. This recommendation is effective and helpful to other cancer centers.

Telemedicine and Gynecologic Cancer Care

Patients with gynecologic cancers experience better outcomes when treated by specialists and institutions with experience in their diseases. Unfortunately, high-volume centers tend to be located in densely populated regions, leaving many women with geographic barriers to care. Remote management through telemedicine offers the possibility of decreasing these disparities by extending the reach of specialty expertise and minimizing travel burdens. Telemedicine can assist in diagnosis, treatment planning, preoperative and postoperative follow-up, administration of chemotherapy, provision of palliative care, and surveillance. Telemedical infrastructure requires careful consideration of the needs of relevant stakeholders including patients, caregivers, referring clinicians, specialists, and health system administrators.

Inter-observer and intra-observer variability in reporting vaginal dose points for cervical cancer in high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The ICRU 89 recommends reporting a set of vaginal dose points for cervical cancer treatments in order to quantify the goodness of implant. This vaginal dose reporting method for combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy has been adopted by the EMBRACE II study protocol. Large variations in dose between patients and centers have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine possible discrepancies with consensus observers from the same institution. Therefore, the inter- and intra-observer variability were analyzed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For five patients, five experienced observers reported dose at the proposed vaginal points twice. The effect of inter- and intra-observer variations on total dose was analyzed by estimating biologically equivalent dose EQD2 (α/β = 3 Gy). Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to provide a measure of data dispersion as a proportion to the mean.

RESULTS

The maximum inter-observer deviation among all patients and all points ranged from 0.5 Gy to 24.1 Gy in EQD2. The higher inter-observer discrepancies were found at points at 3 o'clock and at 6 o'clock, with respect to ovoids. In case of the maximum intra-observer deviation, it ranged from 0.5 Gy to 14.2 Gy, with higher deviation points at 12 o'clock and 9 o'clock, with respect to ovoids.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to ensure consistency in vaginal points reporting. The impact of the dosimetric inter- and intra-observer variability should also be considered when dealing with dose tolerances and limits due to the potential dose gradient.

Disparities Among Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving Brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of race and insurance status on the use of brachytherapy for treatment of cervical cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database. We identified 25,223 patients diagnosed with stage IB2 through IVA cervical cancer who received radiation therapy during their primary treatment from 2004 to 2015. A univariate analysis was used to assess covariate association with brachytherapy. A multivariable regression model was used to evaluate the effect of race and insurance status on rates of brachytherapy treatment. The Cox proportional hazards model and the multiplicative hazard model were used to evaluate overall survival. P<.05 indicated a statistically significant difference for comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic black patients received brachytherapy at a significantly lower rate than non-Hispanic white patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-0.99; P=.036); Hispanic (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.85-1.02; P=.115) and Asian (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.99-1.29; P=.074) patients received brachytherapy at similar rates. Compared with patients with private insurance, those who were uninsured (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.65-0.79; P<.001), had Medicaid (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89; P<.001) or Medicare insurance (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78-0.92; P<.001) were less likely to receive brachytherapy. Brachytherapy was not found to be a mediator of race and insurance-related disparities in overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Racial and insurance disparities exist for those who receive brachytherapy, with many patients not receiving the standard of care, but overall survival was not affected.

Declining brachytherapy utilization for cervical cancer patients - Have we reversed the trend?

OBJECTIVE

Studies examining temporal trends in cervical brachytherapy use are conflicting and examined different health insurance populations. This study examined brachytherapy utilization over time by health insurance type and whether reported declines in brachytherapy have reversed.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with FIGO IIB-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy between 2004 and 2014, identifying 17,442 patients. Brachytherapy utilization over time and by insurance type and other sociodemographic factors were compared using binary logistic regression. A sensitivity analysis was done in a sub-cohort of patients using the boost modality variable in the NCDB.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy utilization declined during 2008-10 (52.6%) compared to 2004-2007 (54.4%; odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.01) and declines were disproportionately larger for patients with government insurance (49.4% vs 52.3%, respectively) than privately-insured patients (57.6% vs 58.9%, respectively). However, rates of brachytherapy use subsequently recovered during 2011-14 in all insurance groups (58.0%, OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.16-1.34) and was especially improved for Medicaid (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.65) and uninsured patients (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.57). Sensitivity analysis using the boost modality variable confirmed these trends.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with FIGO IIB-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy from 2004 to 2014, brachytherapy utilization declined during the late 2000s and disproportionately affected patients with government insurance, but subsequently recovered in the early 2010s. Since government insurance covers vulnerable patient populations at-risk for future declines in brachytherapy use, proposed alternative payment models should incentivize cervical brachytherapy to solidify gains in brachytherapy utilization.

Implementation of peer-review quality rounds for gynecologic brachytherapy in a high-volume academic center

PURPOSE

While peer review is critical for quality and safety in radiotherapy, there are neither formal guidelines nor format examples for brachytherapy (BT) peer review. We report on a gynecologic BT peer-review method implemented at a high-volume academic center.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed discussions at bimonthly gynecologic BT peer-review rounds between July and December 2018. Rounds consisted of 2-5 attending physicians with gynecologic BT expertise, 1-2 BT physicists, and trainees. Peer-review targets included clinical case review, contours, implant technique, dose/fractionation, and target/organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry. The projected/final target and OAR dosimetry were analyzed.

RESULTS

55 separate implants from 44 patients were reviewed. Implants were mostly reviewed after the first BT fraction (n = 16, 29%) or at another time point during BT (n = 20, 36%). One (2%) implant was presented prospectively. The applicator type and BT technique were reviewed for all implants. Dose/fractionation was evaluated for 46 implants (84%); contours were discussed for 21 (38%). Target and OAR dosimetry were reviewed for 54 (98%) and 28 implants (51%), respectively. Six cases (11%) underwent minor changes to the applicator type to improve target and/or OAR dosimetry. One case (2%) had a major change recommended to the dose/fractionation.

CONCLUSIONS

Gynecologic BT peer review may enhance BT quality by allowing for implant optimization and formal review of challenging cases, ultimately improving medical decision-making and team communication. Peer review should be implemented in centers offering gynecologic BT.

Predictors of quality of care and survival in a three-state cohort of locally advanced cervical cancer patients and development of a predictive model to identify women at risk of incomplete treatment

To expand our prior statewide analysis of care distribution for locally advanced cervical cancer in Virginia to include 2 more states and to develop a tool for predicting quality of care. Complete treatment was defined as receiving chemotherapy (CT), brachytherapy (BT), and external beam radiotherapy.State cancer registry databases yielded a three-state cohort of 3197 women diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer from 2000 to 2013. A logistic regression evaluated predictors for receipt of BT, CT, and high (2-3 modalities received) versus low (0-1 modalities received) quality care. A Cox proportional hazards models determined predictors of survival. Finally, a predictive model was developed and preliminarily validated using our cohort.Only 35.3% of the cohort received complete treatment and only 57.3% received BT. Significant predictors of lower odds of receiving high quality care varied by state but included: 66+ age at diagnosis as compared to 18 to 42, 42 to 53, or 53 to 66; cancer stage IVA as compared to IIIx, IIx, or IB2; public insurance with supplement as compared to private; treatment at a low volume facility; and closer distance quintiles to a high volume treatment center as compared to the furthest quintile. Significant predictors of worse survival varied by state but included: low quality score (0-1 modalities received); 2000 to 2004 or 2005 to 2009 year of diagnosis as compared to 2010 to 2013; 66+ age at diagnosis as compared to 18 to 42, 42 to 53, or 53 to 66; cancer stage IVA as compared to IIIx, IIx, or IB2; treatment at a low volume facility; and unmarried/unknown marital status as compared to married. Our treatment quality prediction tool included age, age, treatment at high volume facility, and cancer stage and demonstrated 78.2% sensitivity and a 62.9% specificity.Only 35.3% of patients received complete guidelines-concordant treatment. Additionally, in 2/3 states it appeared that BT usage may have decreased during the study period. Our predictive model may help identify patients/regions at risk of receiving low quality care to target interventions aimed at improving cervical cancer treatment quality and survival.