1
|
Yu Z, Fu J, Mantareva V, Blažević I, Wu Y, Wen D, Battulga T, Wang Y, Zhang J. The role of tumor-derived exosomal LncRNA in tumor metastasis. Cancer Gene Ther 2025:10.1038/s41417-024-00852-x. [PMID: 40011710 DOI: 10.1038/s41417-024-00852-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 10/22/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2025]
Abstract
Tumor metastasis regulated by multiple complicated pathways is closely related to variations in the tumor microenvironment. Exosomes can regulate the tumor microenvironment through various mechanisms. Exosomes derived from tumor cells carry a variety of substances, including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), play important roles in intercellular communication and act as critical determinants influencing tumor metastasis. In this review, we elaborate on several pivotal processes through which lncRNAs regulate tumor metastasis, including the regulation of epithelial‒mesenchymal transition, promotion of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, enhancement of the stemness of tumor cells, and evasion of immune clearance. Additionally, we comprehensively summarized a diverse array of potential tumor-derived exosomal lncRNA biomarkers to facilitate accurate diagnosis and prognosis in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhile Yu
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510700, PR China
| | - Jiali Fu
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510700, PR China
| | - Vanya Mantareva
- Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bld. 9, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ivica Blažević
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 35, 21000, Split, Croatia
| | - Yusong Wu
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510700, PR China
| | - Dianchang Wen
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510700, PR China
| | - Tungalag Battulga
- School of Pharmacy, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - Yuqing Wang
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510700, PR China
- The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510140, PR China
| | - Jianye Zhang
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510700, PR China.
- The Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan, 511518, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsuo K, Agarwal J, Chen L, Furey KB, Song BB, Pino C, Matsuzaki S, Suzuki Y, Klar M, Roman LD, Wright JD. Histology-specific prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells, micrometastases, and macrometastases in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2025; 194:51-59. [PMID: 39965448 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/10/2025] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between regional lymph node status based on metastatic size and anatomical location and survival per histology in endometrial cancer. METHODS This retrospective study queried the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database. Study population included 87,904 patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer from 2018 to 2021. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were created to assess overall survival per histology (non-endometrioid / high-grade endometrioid or low-grade endometrioid). RESULTS In both histology groups, comparing to pelvic micro-metastasis, macro-metastasis regardless of anatomical location (pelvic / para-aortic) was associated with decreased overall survival (non-endometrioid / high-grade endometrioid histology, adjusted-hazard ratio [aHR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.59/aHR 1.39, 95%CI 1.13-1.72; and low-grade endometrioid histology, aHR 1.68, 95%CI 1.19-2.36 / aHR 1.78, 95%CI 1.10-2.88) while para-aortic micro-metastases had overall survival similar to pelvic micro-metastasis. Survival effects of macro-metastasis were larger in low-grade endometrioid compared to non-endometrioid / high-grade endometrioid histology (aHR range, 1.68-1.78 vs 1.31-1.39). For non-endometrioid / high-grade endometrioid histology, isolated tumor cells were associated with better overall survival compared to pelvic micro-metastasis (aHR 0.62, 95%CI 0.45-0.85); isolated tumor cells and negative nodal metastasis had similar overall survival (aHR 1.05, 95%CI 0.80-1.38). Contrary, in low-grade endometrioid histology, isolated tumor cells were associated with decreased overall survival compared to negative-node (aHR 1.55, 95%CI 1.18-2.04); isolated tumor cells had overall survival similar to pelvic micro-metastasis (aHR 0.83, 95%CI 0.56-1.24). CONCLUSION The results of this cohort study suggest that tumor metastatic size may be more prognostic than anatomical location in endometrial cancer. Histology-specific interaction of isolated tumor cells warrants further investigation, especially in low-grade endometrioid histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Joel Agarwal
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ling Chen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katelyn B Furey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bonnie B Song
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christian Pino
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shinya Matsuzaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Department of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yukio Suzuki
- Department of Gynecology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li W, Lyu W, Liu S, Ruan F, Zhang X. GLP1R boosts survival, migration and invasion of endometrial cancer cells and protects against ferroptotic cell death. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2024; 44:2301324. [PMID: 38269495 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2301324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the strong evidence concerning carcinogenic roles of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R), the role of this gene in endometrial cancer (EC) remains elusive. This study investigated the properties of GLP1R on EC in vitro. METHODS The expression of GLP1R in EC was detected by RT-qPCR, immunohistochemistry, and western blotting. Cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, migration, invasion and ferroptosis were assessed through CCK-8, flow cytometry, wound healing, transwell, DCFH-DA and western blotting, respectively. RESULTS We found that GLP1R was up-regulated in EC than normal specimens. It had the highest expression in AN3CA cells. Cell viability, migration and invasion were significantly reduced, while cell cycle arrest and apoptosis were induced following GLP1R knockdown. The malignant biological behaviours of AN3CA cells were investigated when treated with exendin-4 (GLP1R agonist). Moreover, GLP1R lowered intracellular ROS level and expression of SLC7A11, and FTH1, but mitigated GPX4 expression in AN3CA cells. CONCLUSION In a word, GLP1R was up-regulated in EC and its up-regulation facilitated the proliferative and metastatic potentials, and protected cells from ferroptosis, thereby accelerating EC progression. These data emphasised the potency of GLP1R as a therapeutic agent against EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Li
- Department of Gynecology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, China
| | - Wen Lyu
- Department of Gynecology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, China
| | - Songjun Liu
- Department of Gynecology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, China
| | - Fan Ruan
- Department of Gynecology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, China
| | - Xinmei Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
How JA, Jazaeri AA, Westin SN, Lawson BC, Klopp AH, Soliman PT, Lu KH. Translating biological insights into improved management of endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:781-800. [PMID: 39198622 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00934-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer among women in high-income countries, with both incidence and mortality continuing to increase. The complexity of the management of patients with EC has evolved with greater comprehension of the underlying biology and heterogeneity of this disease. With a growing number of novel therapeutic agents available, emerging treatment regimens seem to have the potential to help to address the concerning trends in EC-related mortality. In this Review, we describe the epidemiology, histopathology and molecular classification of EC as well as the role of the new (2023) International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) staging model. Furthermore, we provide an overview of disease management in the first-line and recurrent disease settings. With increasing use of molecular profiling and updates in treatment paradigms, we also summarize new developments in this rapidly changing treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A How
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Amir A Jazaeri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barrett C Lawson
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ann H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yasuda M. New clinicopathological concept of endometrial carcinoma with integration of histological features and molecular profiles. Pathol Int 2024; 74:557-573. [PMID: 39175262 PMCID: PMC11551833 DOI: 10.1111/pin.13471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
The dual-stratified pathway of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) has long been dominant. However, in 2013, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) defined four EC subgroups with distinctive prognoses. Inspired by TCGA, in 2018, the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) provided four pragmatic molecular classifiers to apply surrogate immunohistochemical markers to TCGA subgroup categorization. These trends prompted the revision of 2020 WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumors, 5th edition (2020 WHO classification), in which four molecular subtypes are recognized: POLE-ultramutated; mismatch repair-deficient; p53-mutant; and no specific molecular profile. In the 2020 WHO classification, the diagnostic algorithm is characterized by prioritizing POLEmut over other molecular abnormalities. Following the 2020 WHO classification, Federation of International Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) proposed a new staging system in 2023. The updated system focuses on diagnostic parameters, such as histological type and grade, lymphovascular space invasion, and molecular alterations. These new histomolecular diagnostic concepts of ECs are being accordingly introduced into the routine pathology practice. For the first time, the 2020 WHO classification includes mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) as a novel histological entity, mimicking the conventional mesonephric adenocarcinoma, but is considered of Müllerian ductal origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanori Yasuda
- International Medical Center, Department of PathologySaitama Medical UniversitySaitamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bogani G, Lalli L, Casarin J, Ghezzi F, Chiappa V, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Raspagliesi F. Predicting the Risk of nOdal disease with histological and Molecular features in Endometrial cancer: the prospective PROME trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:1366-1372. [PMID: 38658017 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the role of histopathological and molecular features in predicting the risk of nodal metastases in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer patients undergoing sentinel node mapping. METHODS This is a prospective trial. Consecutive patients with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer, undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and sentinel node mapping, were enrolled. Histological and molecular features were used to predict the node positivity. RESULTS Charts of 223 apparent early-stage endometrial cancer patients were included in this study. Four (1.8%) patients were excluded from this study due to the lack of data about molecular features. Additionally, nine (4%) patients did not meet the inclusion criteria (due to the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or bulky nodes (the presence of p53 abnormality correlated with the presence of advanced stage disease (p<0.001)). The study population included 178 (84.8%) and 32 (15.2%) patients with endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, respectively. According to pathological uterine risk factors, 93 (44.3%), 45 (21.4%), 40 (19.1%), and 32 (15.2%) were classified as low, intermediate, intermediate-high, and high-risk, respectively. Using the surrogate molecular classification, 10 (4.8%), 42 (20%), 57 (27.1%), and 101 (48.1%) were included in the POLE mutated, p53 abnormal, MMRd/MSI-H, and NSMP, respectively. Overall, 41 (19.5%) patients were detected with positive nodes. Molecular features were not associated with the risk of having nodal metastases (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.21 to 5.05, p=0.969 for POLE mutated; OR 0.788, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.98, p=0.602 for p53 abnormal; OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.42, p=0.733 for MMRd/MSI-H). At multivariable analysis, only deep myometrial invasion (OR 3.318, 95% CI 1.357 to 8.150, p=0.009) and lymphovascular space invasion (OR 6.584, 95% CI 2.663 to 16.279, p<0.001) correlated with the increased risk of positive nodes. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that molecular classification does not seem useful to tailor the need of nodal dissection in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. p53 abnormality predicts the risk of having advanced disease at presentation. Further external validation is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05793333.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Lalli
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Viveros-Carreño D, Mora-Soto N, Pareja R. Value of sentinel node ultrastaging and pathologic techniques in tumoral detection. Curr Opin Oncol 2024; 36:376-382. [PMID: 39007330 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000001061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Sentinel lymph node assessment is an option for patients with clinically early-stage vulvar cancer, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, and, more recently, ovarian cancer. However, although ultrastaging is mandatory as part of the node evaluation, universally accepted pathology protocols are lacking. This review focuses on the current evidence for the most relevant aspects of sentinel lymph node evaluation, as well as some controversial topics like frozen section or one-step nucleic acid amplification. RECENT FINDINGS The diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node detection algorithms for patients with gynecologic neoplasms is high. However, the heterogeneity among the published studies and the absence of clear recommendations from most guidelines make it challenging to recommend one protocol over another. The minimum requirement from ultrastaging protocols (regarding the number of levels to be assessed, among others) to get the highest accuracy with a minor cost is unknown. SUMMARY Sentinel lymph node evaluation is now part of the surgical management for most early-stage gynecologic neoplasms. However, a universally accepted ultrastaging pathology protocol is lacking in literature and clinical practice. This gap requires significant effort from the gynecologic oncology and pathology community to be closed and then to allow advancements in surgical management for early-stage gynecologic tumors to go forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Viveros-Carreño
- Unidad Ginecología Oncológica, Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo - CTIC
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica Universitaria Colombia
| | - Nathalia Mora-Soto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
- Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá
| | - René Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
- Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica ASTORGA, Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bollino M, Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Måsbäck A, Kasselaki I, Persson J. Prevalence and size of pelvic sentinel lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Eur J Cancer 2024; 209:114265. [PMID: 39142212 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY To assess the association of prevalence and size of pelvic sentinel node (SLN) metastases with risk factors in endometrial cancer (EC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 2014 and January 2024 consecutive women with a uterine confined EC undergoing robotic surgery including detection of pelvic SLNs at a University Hospital were included. An anatomically based algorithm utilizing Indocyanine green (ICG) as tracer was adhered to. Ultrastaging and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was applied on all SLNs. The prevalence and size of SLN metastases was assessed with regards to pre- and postoperative histologic types and myometrial invasion estimates. RESULTS Of 1101 included women 72.6 % (759/1045) had low-grade, 7.6 % (79/1045) high-grade endometroid cancer and 19.8 % (207/1045) non-endometroid cancer. SLN-metastases were present in 174/1045 (16.6 %) women; 9.8 % of preoperatively presumed low-grade endometroid uterine stage 1A (6.4 % of low-grade stage 1A at final histology) and in 58.3 % and 47.8 % respectively in women with high-grade endometroid and non-endometroid uterine stage 1B cancer. In low-grade EC 45/95 (47.4 %) had only isolated tumor cells (ITC) in SLNs compared with 15/78 (19.2 %) in high-grade or non-endometroid cancer (p < .0001) CONCLUSION: This large population-based study, applying a consequent SLN-algorithm over time, provides important detailed information on the risk for, and size of, SLN metastases within risk groups of EC. The 9.8 % risk for metastases in women with presumed low grade uterine stage 1A endometrioid EC motivates detection of SLNs within this subgroup. The proportion of ITCs in SLNs was significantly lower in higher risk histologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Bollino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Barbara Geppert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Celine Lönnerfors
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anna Måsbäck
- Department of Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Department of Pathology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ioanna Kasselaki
- Department of Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Department of Pathology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bassetty KC, Begum D, Barmon D, Baruah U, Gupta S, Kumar M, Nath J, Khanikar D, Bhattacharyya M, Roy PS. FIGO 2023 endometrial staging: a leap of faith into the new "prognostic based' rather than "anatomical based" staging-too fast too furious?? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:251. [PMID: 38733417 PMCID: PMC11088549 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05739-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2023 FIGO revised the endometrial cancer staging system after 13 years. There is a lacuna of data regarding the performance and practicality of the revised 2023 FIGO staging schema for endometrial cancer from Low Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). OBJECTIVE To estimate the shift of stage and adjuvant management of endometrial cancer based on the FIGO 2023 system compared to the FIGO 2009 system and assess the predictive potential of the FIGO 2023 system. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2022. All patients with endometrial cancer were staged according to the FIGO 2023 and FIGO 2009 staging system. Follow-up of patients was done to determine recurrence. RESULTS A total of 152 patients were included. Aggressive histology was seen in 66 (45%) patients. Eighteen (11%) had subserosal involvement. Substantial LVSI was noted in 23 (15%) of patients. Twenty-four (47%) patients of FIGO 2009 Stage IA and 26 patients (63%) of FIGO 2009 Stage IB were upstaged. Eleven (50%) patients of FIGO 2009 Stage IIIA were down staged to IA3. Overall 23 patients (15%) had a shift of stage. Fifteen out of 152 patients (15%) would have had a possible risk stratification change which would imply 23 patients (15%) would have needed a more radical treatment. Molecular classification was done in 32 patients; however, only 2 patients could afford POLE testing. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant PFS differences in FIGO 2009 Stage IB and Stage IIIA when restaged according to the FIGO 2023 system. CONCLUSION The FIGO 2023 endometrial staging is a more robust prognosticator; however, the practicality of molecular classification in LMICs is still a distant dream.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dimpy Begum
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
| | - Debabrata Barmon
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Upasana Baruah
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Sakshi Gupta
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Mahendra Kumar
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Jyotiman Nath
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Duncan Khanikar
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | | | - P S Roy
- Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jaafar E, Gaultier V, Wohrer H, Estevez JP, Gonthier C, Koskas M. Impact of sentinel lymph node mapping on survival in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer in the early stage: A matched cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165:677-684. [PMID: 38226675 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare patient survival using sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stating early-stage high risk endometrial cancer. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for early-stage high risk endometrial cancer between 2010 and 2017 were extracted from the incidence registry of the SEER program. We identified patients who underwent SLN mapping. Patients who initially underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy were selected as the comparison group. One-to-one matching was performed according to age, ethnicity, histology, extension and grade. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival. The secondary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 326 patients who underwent SLN mapping and 326 who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy initially were included in the study. The three-year analysis did not find a significant difference between the SLN and lymphadenectomy groups on disease-specific survival probability (88.2% vs 82.7, P = 0.07) and on overall survival probability (82.7% vs 78.2%, P = 0.57). Patients who underwent SLN mapping had a lower mean number of lymph nodes removed (mean 3 vs 16, P < 0.001) and there was a higher rate of patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes (18% vs 14%, P = 0.04). Following adjustment for confounding factors, disease-specific survival did not vary according to the lymph node intervention performed (P = 0.056), but the SLN group had better overall survival than those in the lymphadenectomy group (P = 0.047). CONCLUSION The SLN technique was not associated with poorer disease-specific survival than pelvic lymphadenectomy even after adjustment. These results suggest that SLN is an acceptable and safe procedure in surgical staging for early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eya Jaafar
- Gynecological Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Victor Gaultier
- Gynecological Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
- Gynecological Department, University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Henri Wohrer
- Gynecological Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
- Gynecological Department, University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Juan Pablo Estevez
- Gynecological Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Clementine Gonthier
- Gynecological Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Gynecological Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
- Gynecological Department, University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gravbrot N, Weil CR, DeCesaris CM, Gaffney DK, Suneja G, Burt LM. Differentiation of survival outcomes by anatomic involvement and histology with the revised 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer. Eur J Cancer 2024; 201:113913. [PMID: 38377777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer underwent revision in 2023, incorporating histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and molecular classification. Herein, we compare overall survival (OS) outcomes by anatomic and histologic involvement for patients staged by the 2009 system versus 2023 system. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with newly-diagnosed uterine adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2015, with follow-up data extending through 2020. Stage was determined by both the 2009 and 2023 FIGO staging systems. Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 134,677 patients were analyzed. Per 2023 classification, patients with stage I disease decreased from 96,161 to 70,101 (-27.1%, p < 0.01), while stage II disease increased from 9295 to 36,294 (+390.5%, p < 0.01). Greatest OS change was observed for 2023 stage IA3 patients (low-risk, synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors with a clonal relationship), whose 10-year OS was 73.4%, compared to 52.6% for 2009 stage IIIA disease. Ten-year OS for 2023 stage IIIB2 (pelvic peritoneal involvement), previously 2009 stage IVB, was 49.4%, compared to 18.7% for 2009 stage IVB patients. Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and Harrel's concordance index were used to evaluate OS prognostication of each staging system across all stages, with likelihood ratio favoring the 2023 system (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS With FIGO's 2023 endometrial cancer anatomic and histologic staging system, stage migration is greatest in early-stage disease. New staging groups may offer more precise prognostication. These changes may affect future management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Gravbrot
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Department of Radiation Oncology, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| | - Christopher R Weil
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Department of Radiation Oncology, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cristina M DeCesaris
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Department of Radiation Oncology, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - David K Gaffney
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Department of Radiation Oncology, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Gita Suneja
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Department of Radiation Oncology, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Lindsay M Burt
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Department of Radiation Oncology, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fumagalli D, De Vitis LA, Caruso G, Occhiali T, Palmieri E, Guillot BE, Pappalettera G, Langstraat CL, Glaser GE, Reynolds EA, Fruscio R, Landoni F, Mariani A, Grassi T. Low-Volume Metastases in Apparent Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Prevalence, Clinical Significance, and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1338. [PMID: 38611016 PMCID: PMC11011093 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most diagnosed gynecologic malignancy, and its incidence and mortality are increasing. The prognosis is highly dependent on the disease spread. Surgical staging includes retroperitoneal evaluation to detect potential lymph node metastases. In recent years, systematic lymphadenectomy has been replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and ultrastaging, allowing for the detection of macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Micrometastases and ITCs have been grouped as low-volume metastases (LVM). The reported prevalence of LVM in studies enrolling more than one thousand patients with apparent early-stage EC ranges from 1.9% to 10.2%. Different rates of LVM are observed when patients are stratified according to disease characteristics and their risk of recurrence. Patients with EC at low risk for recurrence have low rates of LVM, while intermediate- and high-risk patients have a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with nodal metastases, including LVM. Macro- and micrometastases increase the risk of recurrence and cause upstaging, while the clinical significance of ITCs is still uncertain. A recent meta-analysis found that patients with LVM have a higher relative risk of recurrence [1.34 (95% CI: 1.07-1.67)], regardless of adjuvant treatment. In a retrospective study on patients with low-risk EC and no adjuvant treatment, those with ITCs had worse recurrence-free survival compared to node-negative patients (85.1%; CI 95% 73.8-98.2 versus 90.2%; CI 95% 84.9-95.8). However, a difference was no longer observed after the exclusion of cases with lymphovascular space invasion. There is no consensus on adjuvant treatment in ITC patients at otherwise low risk, and their recurrence rate is low. Multi-institutional, prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical significance of ITCs in low-risk patients. Further stratification of patients, considering histopathological and molecular features of the disease, may clarify the role of LVM and especially ITCs in specific contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Fumagalli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
| | - Luigi A. De Vitis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Occhiali
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Emilia Palmieri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00136 Roma, Italy
| | - Benedetto E. Guillot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Pappalettera
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carrie L. Langstraat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Gretchen E. Glaser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Evelyn A. Reynolds
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Matsuo K, Chen L, Neuman MK, Klar M, Carlson JW, Roman LD, Wright JD. Lymph Node Isolated Tumor Cells in Patients With Endometrial Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240988. [PMID: 38497964 PMCID: PMC10949095 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Isolated tumor cells (ITCs) are the histopathological finding of small clusters of cancer cells no greater than 0.2 mm in diameter in the regional lymph nodes. For endometrial cancer, the prognostic significance of ITCs is uncertain. Objective To assess clinico-pathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes associated with ITCs in endometrial cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database included patients with endometrial cancer who had primary hysterectomy and nodal evaluation from 2018 to 2020. Patients with microscopic and macroscopic nodal metastases and distant metastases were excluded. Data were analyzed from June to September 2023. Exposure Regional nodal status with ITCs (N0[i+] classification) or no nodal metastasis (N0 classification). Main Outcomes and Measures (1) Clinical and tumor characteristics associated with ITCs, assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model, and (2) overall survival (OS) associated with ITCs, evaluated by nonproportional hazard analysis with restricted mean survival time at 36 months. Results A total of 56 527 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 64 (57-70) years. The majority had T1a lesion (37 836 [66.9%]) and grade 1 or 2 endometrioid tumors (40 589 [71.8%]). ITCs were seen in 1462 cases (2.6%). In a multivariable analysis, ITCs were associated with higher T classification, larger tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and malignant peritoneal cytology. Of those tumor factors, LVSI had the largest association with ITCs (7.9% vs 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.37; 95% CI, 3.87-4.93), followed by T1b classification (5.3% vs 1.3%; aOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.30-2.99). At the cohort level, 24-month OS rates were 94.3% (95% CI, 92.4%-95.7%) for the ITC group and 96.1% (95% CI, 95.9%-96.3%) for the node-negative group, and the between-group difference in expected mean OS time at 36 months was 0.35 (SE, 0.19) months, but it was not statistically significant (P = .06). There was a statistically significant difference in OS when the low-risk group (stage IA, grade 1-2 endometrioid tumors with no LVSI) was assessed per nodal status and adjuvant therapy use (P < .001): (1) among the cases treated with surgical therapy alone, 24-month OS rates were 95.9% (95% CI, 89.5%-98.5%) for the ITC group and 98.8% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.0%) for the node-negative group, and the between-group mean OS time difference at 36 months was 0.61 (SE, 0.43) months (P = .16); and (2) among the cases with ITCs, adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy alone, systemic chemotherapy alone, or both) was associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy (24-month OS rates, 100% vs 95.9%; between-group mean OS time difference at 36 months, 0.95 [SE, 0.43] months; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer, the results of exploratory analysis suggested that presence of ITCs in the regional lymph node may be associated with OS in the low-risk group. While adjuvant therapy was associated with improved OS in the low-risk group with ITCs, careful interpretation is necessary given the favorable outcomes regardless of adjuvant therapy use. This hypothesis-generating observation in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer warrants further investigation, especially with prospective setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Ling Chen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Monica K. Neuman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joseph W. Carlson
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Lynda D. Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Jason D. Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cucinella G, Schivardi G, Zhou XC, AlHilli M, Wallace S, Wohlmuth C, Baiocchi G, Tokgozoglu N, Raspagliesi F, Buda A, Zanagnolo V, Zapardiel I, Jagasia N, Giuntoli R, Glickman A, Peiretti M, Lanner M, Chacon E, Di Guilmi J, Pereira A, Laas-Faron E, Fishman A, Nitschmann CC, Kurnit K, Moriarty K, Joehlin-Price A, Lees B, Covens A, De Brot L, Taskiran C, Bogani G, Landoni F, Grassi T, Paniga C, Multinu F, De Vitis LA, Hernández A, Mastroyannis S, Ghoniem K, Chiantera V, Shahi M, Fought AJ, McGree M, Mariani A, Glaser G. Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in low risk endometrial cancer: results from an international multi-institutional study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:179-187. [PMID: 38088182 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells (≤0.2 mm) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of endometrial cancer patients is still unclear. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in patients with low risk endometrial cancer who underwent SLN biopsy and did not receive adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were compared with node negative patients. METHODS Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells between 2013 and 2019 were identified from 15 centers worldwide, while SLN negative patients were identified from Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 2013 and 2018. Only low risk patients (stage IA, endometrioid histology, grade 1 or 2) who did not receive any adjuvant therapy were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence free, non-vaginal recurrence free, and overall survival, evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS 494 patients (42 isolated tumor cells and 452 node negative) were included. There were 21 (4.3%) recurrences (5 SLNs-isolated tumor cells, 16 node negative); recurrence was vaginal in six patients (1 isolated tumor cells, 5 node negative), and non-vaginal in 15 (4 isolated tumor cells, 11 node negative). Median follow-up among those without recurrence was 2.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.1-3.0) and 2.6 years (IQR 0.6-4.2) in the SLN-isolated tumor cell and node negative patients, respectively. The presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells, lymphovascular space invasion, and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) grade 2 were significant risk factors for recurrence on univariate analysis. SLN-isolated tumor cell patients had worse recurrence free survival (p<0.01) and non-vaginal recurrence free survival (p<0.01) compared with node negative patients. Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients without lymphovascular space invasion (n=480). There was no difference in overall survival between the two cohorts in the full sample and the subset excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells and low risk profile, without adjuvant therapy, had a significantly worse recurrence free survival compared with node negative patients with similar risk factors, after adjusting for grade and excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. However, the presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells was not associated with worse overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Cucinella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Sciences (DiChirOnS), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gabriella Schivardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCSS, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Sumer Wallace
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Christoph Wohlmuth
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nedim Tokgozoglu
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Alessandro Buda
- University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno, Italy
| | - Vanna Zanagnolo
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCSS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nisha Jagasia
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Mater Adult Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert Giuntoli
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ariel Glickman
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maximilian Lanner
- Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Julian Di Guilmi
- Gyn Onc, Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Federal District, Argentina
| | - Augusto Pereira
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
| | - Enora Laas-Faron
- Chirurgie Senologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Curie Institute Hospital Group, Paris, France
| | - Ami Fishman
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Israel
| | | | - Katherine Kurnit
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kristen Moriarty
- Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Brittany Lees
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Allan Covens
- University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise De Brot
- Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, University of Milan-Bicocca Department of Medicine and Surgery, Monza, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- San Gerardo Hospital; University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Multinu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Antonio De Vitis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alicia Hernández
- Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Khaled Ghoniem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Maryam Shahi
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Angela J Fought
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michaela McGree
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gretchen Glaser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bogani G, Giannini A, Vizza E, Di Donato V, Raspagliesi F. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e29. [PMID: 37973163 PMCID: PMC10792208 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Nodal status is one of the most important prognostic factors for patients with apparent early stage endometrial cancer. The role of retroperitoneal staging in endometrial cancer is controversial. Nodal status provides useful prognostic data, and allows to tailor the need of postoperative treatments. However, two independent randomized trials showed that the execution of (pelvic) lymphadenectomy increases the risk of having surgery-related complication without improving patients' outcomes. Sentinel node mapping aims to achieve data regarding nodal status without increasing morbidity. Sentinel node mapping is the removal of first (clinically negative) lymph nodes draining the uterus. Several studies suggested that sentinel node mapping is not inferior to lymphadenectomy in identifying patients with nodal disease. More importantly, thorough ultrastaging sentinel node mapping allows the detection of low volume disease (micrometastases and isolated tumor cells), that are not always detectable via conventional pathological examination. Therefore, the adoption of sentinel node mapping guarantees a higher identification of patients with nodal disease than lymphadenectomy. Further evidence is needed to assess the value of various adjuvant strategies in patients with low volume disease and to tailor those treatments also on the basis of the molecular and genomic characterization of endometrial tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kobayashi-Kato M, Fujii E, Asami Y, Ahiko Y, Hiranuma K, Terao Y, Matsumoto K, Ishikawa M, Kohno T, Kato T, Shiraishi K, Yoshida H. Utility of the revised FIGO2023 staging with molecular classification in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:36-43. [PMID: 37748269 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Molecular classification was introduced in endometrial cancer staging following the transition of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2008 to FIGO2023. In the early stages, p53 abnormal endometrial carcinoma with myometrial involvement was upstaged to stage IICm, in addition to the downstaging of POLE mutation endometrial cancer to stage IAm. This study compared the goodness of fit and discriminatory ability of FIGO2008, FIGO2023 without molecular classification (FIGO2023), and FIGO2023 with molecular classification (FIGO2023m); no study has been externally validated to date. METHODS The study included 265 patients who underwent initial surgery at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1997 and 2019 and were pathologically diagnosed with endometrial cancer. The three classification systems were compared using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A higher C-index score and a lower AIC value indicated a more accurate model. RESULTS Among the three classification systems, FIGO2023m had the lowest AIC value (FIGO2023m: 455.925; FIGO2023: 459.162; FIGO2008: 457.901), highest C-index (FIGO2023m: 0.768; FIGO2023: 0.743; FIGO2008: 0.740), and superior time-dependent ROC curves within 1 year after surgical resection. In the stage IIIC, patients with p53 abnormalities had considerably lower 5-year overall survival than those with a p53 wild-type pattern (24.3% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS FIGO2023m had the best discriminatory ability compared with FIGO2008 and FIGO2023. Even in advanced stages, p53 status was a poor prognostic factor. When feasible, molecular subtypes can be added to the staging criteria to allow better prognostic prediction in all stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayumi Kobayashi-Kato
- Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Erisa Fujii
- Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yuka Asami
- Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan
| | - Yuka Ahiko
- Division of Frontier Surgery, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Kengo Hiranuma
- Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Koji Matsumoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan
| | - Mitsuya Ishikawa
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takashi Kohno
- Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kato
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kouya Shiraishi
- Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, Fotopoulou C, Gaffney D, Kehoe S, Lindemann K, Mutch D, Concin N. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e85. [PMID: 37593813 PMCID: PMC10482588 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies. METHODS The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system. RESULTS Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut). SUMMARY The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S Berek
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge and Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zheng W. Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and the 2023 FIGO Staging: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Pathologists. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4101. [PMID: 37627129 PMCID: PMC10452831 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This commentary explores the complexities of the FIGO 2023 staging system and the inclusion of The Cancer Genome Atlas's (TCGA) molecular classification in the management of endometrial cancer. It highlights the importance of histology as a prognostic tool, while scrutinizing the merits and demerits of its application to aggressive endometrial cancers. The commentary review sheds light on the recent introductions of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis size in cancer staging. It outlines the difficulties in differentiating between synchronous and metastatic endometrial and ovarian cancers, underlining their implications on treatment strategies. Furthermore, the commentary discusses the integration of molecular classifications within the FIGO 2023 framework, emphasizing the pivotal yet challenging implementation of the pathogenic POLE mutation test. The commentary concludes by reaffirming the vital role of pathologists in executing the FIGO 2023 staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxin Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, Fotopoulou C, Gaffney D, Kehoe S, Lindemann K, Mutch D, Concin N. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 162:383-394. [PMID: 37337978 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 341] [Impact Index Per Article: 170.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies. METHODS The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system. RESULTS Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut ). SUMMARY The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S Berek
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge and Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tran L, Christensen P, Barroeta JE, Hunter K, Sookram J, McGregor SM, Wilkinson N, Orsi NM, Lastra RR. Prognostic Significance of Size, Location, and Number of Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2023; 42:376-389. [PMID: 36044323 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Regional lymph node metastasis is a well-established negative predictive prognostic factor in endometrial carcinomas. Recently, our approach to the pathologic evaluation of lymph nodes in endometrial carcinomas has changed, mainly due to the utilization of immunohistochemical stains in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes, which may result in the identification of previously unrecognized disease [particularly isolated tumor cells (ITCs)] on hematoxylin and eosin stained slides. However, the clinical significance of this finding is not entirely clear. Following the experience in other organs systems such as breast, the Eight Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer's Cancer Staging Manual has recommended utilizing the N0(i+) terminology for this finding, without impact in the final tumor stage. We performed a comparative retrospective multi-institutional survival analysis of 247 patients with endometrial carcinoma with regional lymph node metastasis of various sizes identified in nonsentinel lymphadenectomy, demonstrating that the cumulative survival of patients with isolated tumor cells in regional lymph nodes is not statistically different from patient with negative lymph nodes, and is statistically different from those with lymph nodes showing micrometastasis or larger metastatic deposits. In addition, we evaluated the prognostic implications of the number of involved regional lymph nodes, demonstrating a worsening prognosis as the number of involved lymph nodes increases from none to one, and from one to more than one. Our data suggests that regional lymph nodes with isolated tumor cells in patients with endometrial carcinoma should likely be considered, for staging purposes, as negative lymph nodes, simply indicating their presence with the (i+) terminology.
Collapse
|
21
|
Martínez A, Chargari C, Kalbacher E, Gaillard AL, Leary A, Koskas M, Chopin N, Serre AA, Hardy-Bessard AC, Akladios C, Lecuru F. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022–2023 : prise en charge du cancer de l'endomètre localisé. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:6S20-6S33. [PMID: 37573036 DOI: 10.1016/s0007-4551(23)00331-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
Recommendations for clinical practice, Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023: Management of localized endometrial cancer Endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynecological cancers in industrialized countries and its incidence increases. The newmolecularclassification allows determination of the risk of recurrence and helps orienting therapeutic management. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Minimally invasive approach must be preferred for stages I and II. Surgery includes hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy even in high risk diseases and omentectomy for non-endometrioid tumors (except in case of clear cells tumors). Fertility preservation can be proposed in low grade, stage I tumors without myometrial involvement. In stage III/IV disease, lymph node debulking without totallymphadenectomy is indicated. In case of peritoneal carcinomatosis, first-line cytoreductive surgery is recommended if complete resection can be achieved. Adjuvant therapy is not recommended in low risk tumors. In intermediate risk tumors, curietherapy is indicated. In tumors with high-intermediate risk, curietherapy and external radiotherapy are indicated according to prognostic factors (stage II, lymphovascular invasion); adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered on a case-by-case basis. In high risk tumors, chemotherapy and external radiotherapy are recommended using a concomitant or sequential approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Martínez
- Département de chirurgie oncologique, institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, France; Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037 INSERM, France.
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, France
| | - Elsa Kalbacher
- Département d'oncologie médicale, hôpital de Besançon, France
| | | | - Alexandra Leary
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Gustave-Roussy, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Bichat, France
| | - Nicolás Chopin
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre Léon-Bérard, France
| | | | | | - Chérif Akladios
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buda A, Paniga C, Taskin S, Mueller M, Zapardiel I, Fanfani F, Puppo A, Casarin J, Papadia A, De Ponti E, Grassi T, Mauro J, Turan H, Vatansever D, Gungor M, Ortag F, Imboden S, Garcia-Pineda V, Mohr S, Siegenthaler F, Perotto S, Landoni F, Ghezzi F, Scambia G, Taskiran C, Fruscio R. The Risk of Recurrence in Endometrial Cancer Patients with Low-Volume Metastasis in the Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072052. [PMID: 37046712 PMCID: PMC10093146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of low-volume metastasis (LVM) on disease-free survival (DFS) in women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping. Patients with pre-operative early-stage EC were retrospectively collected from an international collaboration including 13 referring institutions. A total of 1428 patients were included in this analysis. One hundred and eighty-six patients (13%) had lymph node involvement. Fifty-nine percent of positive SLN exhibited micrometastases, 26.9% micrometastases, and 14% isolated tumor cells. Seventeen patients with positive lymph nodes did not receive any adjuvant therapy. At a median follow-up of 33.3 months, the disease had recurred in 114 women (8%). Patients with micrometastases in the lymph nodes had a worse prognosis of disease-free survival compared to patients with negative nodes or LVM. The rate of recurrence was significantly higher for women with micrometastases than those with low-volume metastases (HR = 2.61; p = 0.01). The administration of adjuvant treatment in patients with LVM, without uterine risk factors, remains a matter of debate and requires further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Buda
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, 12060 Verduno, Italy
| | - Cristiana Paniga
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Salih Taskin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, 06620 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Michael Mueller
- Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Women and Child Health and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Puppo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle, 12100 Cuneo, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of the Italian Switzerland, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Elena De Ponti
- Medical Physics Department, Foundation IRCCS San Gerardo Hospital, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Jessica Mauro
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, 12060 Verduno, Italy
| | - Hasan Turan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34766 İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Dogan Vatansever
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Koc University, 34450 İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mete Gungor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Acibadem University, 34750 İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Firat Ortag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, 06620 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sara Imboden
- Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Stefan Mohr
- Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Stefania Perotto
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, 12060 Verduno, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Women and Child Health and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Koc University, 34450 İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Di Donato V, Giannini A, Bogani G. Recent Advances in Endometrial Cancer Management. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062241. [PMID: 36983243 PMCID: PMC10053513 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, growing attempts have been carried out to improve the quality of care in the setting of gynecologic oncology, and, in particular, in endometrial cancer management [...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Giorgio Bogani
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0223902392; Fax: +39-0223902349
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang J, Jiang P, Huang Y, Tu Y, Zhou Q, Li N, Kong W, Yuan R. Prognostic Value of the Cutoffs for HALP in Endometrial Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:107-113. [PMID: 36700534 PMCID: PMC9946170 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Using preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) scores, a cutoff value of HALP in endometrial cancer was identified, and the significance of HALP value in endometrial cancer prognosis was evaluated to guide the management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 626 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between June 2015 and June 2020. A Cox regression model was used to analyze the correlation between HALP endometrial cancer recurrence and death, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of HALP for predicting the lymph node metastasis (LNM), recurrence, and death of endometrial cancer. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS Univariate analysis revealed that HALP was associated with a lower risk of recurrence and death of endometrial cancer. Multivariate analysis indicated that HALP was an independent protective factor for predicting recurrence and death in endometrial cancer. The thresholds of HALP for predicting LNM, recurrence, and death in endometrial cancer patients are around 33.8. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the recurrence-free and the overall survival rates were significantly lower in the low-HALP group than that in the high-HALP group ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative HALP values in patients with endometrial cancer are important in predicting LNM, recurrence, and death of patients. HALP scores combined with traditional pathologic factors can better guide the prognostic management of patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Bogani G, Di Donato V, Papadia A, Buda A, Casarin J, Multinu F, Plotti F, Gasparri ML, Pinelli C, Perrone AM, Ferrero S, Sorbi F, Landoni F, Palaia I, Perniola G, De Iaco P, Cianci S, Alletti SG, Petrillo M, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Angioli R, Muzii L, Ghezzi F, Vizza E, Mueller MD, Scambia G, Panici PB, Raspagliesi F. Hysterectomy alone vs. hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer: Perioperative and long-term results from a propensity-score based study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1037-1043. [PMID: 36801150 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes after hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping (SNM) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective study, collecting data of EC patients treated between 2006 and 2016 in nine referral centers. RESULTS The study population included 398 (69.5%) and 174 (30.5%) patients having hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus SNM. As the results of the adoption of a propensity-score matched analysis, we selected two homogeneous cohort of patients (150 having hysterectomy only vs. 150 having hysterectomy plus SNM). The SNM group had a longer operative time, but did not correlate with length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss. Overall severe complication rates were similar between groups (0.7% in the hysterectomy group vs. 1.3% in the hysterectomy plus SNM group; p = 0.561). No lymphatic-specific complication occurred. Overall, 12.6% of patients having SNM were diagnosed with disease harboring in their lymph nodes. Adjuvant therapy administration rate was similar between groups. Considering patients having SNM, 4% of patients received adjuvant therapy on the basis of nodal status alone; all the other patients received adjuvant therapy also on the basis of uterine risk factors. Five-year disease-free (p = 0.720) and overall (p = 0.632) survival was not influenced by surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS Hysterectomy (with or without SNM) is a safe and effective method for managing EC patients. Potentially, these data support the omission of side specific lymphadenectomy in case of unsuccessful mapping. Further evidence is warranted in to confirm the role SNM in the era of molecular/genomic profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060, Verduno, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ciro Pinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorbi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Cianci
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gueli Alletti
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Petrillo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardegna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Laas E, Fourchotte V, Gaillard T, Pauly L, Reyal F, Feron JG, Lécuru F. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Uterine Cancer: Time for a Modern Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020389. [PMID: 36672338 PMCID: PMC9856582 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the validation of the sentinel node technique (SLN) for vulvar cancer 20 years ago, this technique has been introduced in the management of operable cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. For cervical cancer a "one fits all" attitude has mainly been presented. However, this approach, consisting of a frozen section during the operation, can be discussed in some stages. We present and discuss the main option for each stage, as well as some secondary possibilities. For endometrial cancer, SLN is now the technique of choice for the nodal staging of low- and intermediate-risk groups. Some discussion exists for the high-risk group. We also discuss the impacts of using preoperatively the molecular classification of endometrial cancer. Patients with POLE or TP53 mutations could have different nodal staging. The story of SLN in uterine cancers is not finished. We propose a comprehensive algorithm of SLN in early cervical and endometrial cancers. However, several ongoing trials will give us important data in the coming years. They could substantially change these propositions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enora Laas
- Service de Chirurgie Sénologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Virginie Fourchotte
- Service de Chirurgie Sénologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gaillard
- Service de Chirurgie Sénologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Léa Pauly
- Service de Chirurgie Sénologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Service de Chirurgie Sénologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Guillaume Feron
- Service de Chirurgie Sénologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Fabrice Lécuru
- Service de Chirurgie Sénologique, Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Burg LC, Kruitwagen RFPM, de Jong A, Bulten J, Bonestroo TJJ, Kraayenbrink AA, Boll D, Lambrechts S, Smedts HPM, Bouman A, Engelen MJA, Kasius JC, Bekkers RLM, Zusterzeel PLM. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Presumed Low- and Intermediate-Risk Endometrial Cancer Management (SLIM): A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study in The Netherlands. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010271. [PMID: 36612266 PMCID: PMC9818361 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim was to investigate the incidence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and the contribution of SLN mapping in presumed low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer (EC). A multicenter, prospective cohort study in presumed low- and intermediate-risk EC patients was performed. Patients underwent SLN mapping using cervical injections of indocyanine green and a minimally invasive hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The primary outcome was the incidence of SLN metastases, leading to adjusted adjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes were the SLN detection rate and the occurrence of complications. Descriptive statistics and univariate general linear model analyses were used. A total of 152 patients were enrolled, with overall and bilateral SLN detection rates of 91% and 61%, respectively. At final histology, 78.9% of patients (n = 120) had truly low- and intermediate-risk EC. Macro- and micro-metastases were present in 11.2% (n = 17/152), and three patients had isolated tumor cells (2.0%). Nine patients (5.9%) had addition of adjuvant radiotherapy based on SLN metastases only. In 2.0% of patients with high-risk disease, adjuvant therapy was more limited due to negative SLNs. This study emphasizes the importance of SLN mapping in presumed early-stage, grade 1 and 2 EC, leading to individualized adjuvant management, resulting in less undertreatment and overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara C. Burg
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-61-1714-781
| | - Roy F. P. M. Kruitwagen
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie de Jong
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tijmen J. J. Bonestroo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6800 TA Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan A. Kraayenbrink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6800 TA Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Sandrina Lambrechts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Huberdina P. M. Smedts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, 4800 RK Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien Bouman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deventer Hospital, 7400 GC Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam J. A. Engelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zuyderland Medical Center, 6130 MB Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Jenneke C. Kasius
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Centre for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud L. M. Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Petra L. M. Zusterzeel
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Applications and Safety of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216462. [DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymph node status is important in predicting the prognosis and guiding adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer. However, previous studies showed that systematic lymphadenectomy conferred no therapeutic values in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer but might lead to substantial morbidity and impact on the quality of life of the patients. The sentinel lymph node is the first lymph node that tumor cells drain to, and sentinel lymph node biopsy has emerged as an acceptable alternative to full lymphadenectomy in both low-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer. Evidence has demonstrated a high detection rate, sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy. It can also reduce surgical morbidity and improve the detection of lymph node metastases compared with systematic lymphadenectomy. This review summarizes the current techniques of sentinel lymph node mapping, the applications and oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy in low-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer, and the management of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes. We also illustrate a revised sentinel lymph node biopsy algorithm and advocate to repeat the tracer injection and explore the presacral and paraaortic areas if sentinel lymph nodes are not found in the hemipelvis.
Collapse
|
29
|
Otsuka I. Therapeutic Benefit of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Node-Negative Uterine-Confined Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: Omission of Adjuvant Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184516. [PMID: 36139675 PMCID: PMC9497184 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries. Extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors. Abstract Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries, and its incidence has been increasing globally with rising obesity rates and longer life expectancy. In endometrial cancer, extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors. In this review, I discuss the characteristics of lymph node metastasis, the methods of lymph node assessment, and the therapeutic benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isao Otsuka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rau TT, Deppeler MV, Christe L, Siegenthaler F, Imboden S, Papadia A, Mueller MD. Pathological processing of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial carcinoma - routine aspects of grossing, ultra-staging, and surgico-pathological parameters in a series of 833 lymph nodes. Virchows Arch 2022; 481:421-432. [PMID: 35854139 PMCID: PMC9485184 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03377-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Sentinel lymph nodes are widely accepted in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Whereas surgical aspects are well studied, the pathological work-up in terms of grossing, frozen section, and the so-called ultra-staging is still a matter of debate. This results in conflicting national or center-based recommendations. In a series of consecutive 833 sentinel lymph nodes from 206 patients in endometrial carcinomas, we compared three different grossing techniques and the use of frozen section in terms of anatomy, detection rates, and survival. In total, 42 macro-metastases, 6 micro-metastases, and 25 nodes with isolated tumor cells were found. Lymph nodes affected at least with micro-metastasis were about 0.5cm enlarged. Detection rates in lamellation technique increased with a step of 5.9% to 8.3% in comparison to bi-valved or complete embedding. The lamellation technique presented with a slight beneficial prognosis in pN0 subgroup (OS, p=0.05), which besides size effects might be attributed to trimming loss. In frozen section, this effect was less pronounced than expected (OS, p=0.56). Ultra-staging only revealed additional micro-metastases and isolated tumor cells. Exclusively, macro-metastases showed poor survival (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, T-stage, subtype, and lympho-vascular invasion status outperformed this staging parameter significantly. Grossing of sentinel lymph nodes is the most essential step with evidence to prefer lamellation in 2 mm steps. Step sectioning should consider widely spaced protocols to exclude macro-metastases. Frozen sections might add value to the intra-operative assessment of endometrial carcinoma in selected cases. The excellent biological behavior of cases with isolated tumor cells might question the routine application of pan-cytokeratin as ultra-staging method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40235, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- Institute of Pathology, University Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Mona V Deppeler
- Institute of Pathology, University Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lucine Christe
- Institute of Pathology, University Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Siegenthaler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Inselspital University Hospital and University, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sara Imboden
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Inselspital University Hospital and University, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Inselspital University Hospital and University, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Regional Hospital Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Inselspital University Hospital and University, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bogani G, Palaia I, Perniola G, Fracassi A, Cuccu I, Golia D'Auge T, Casorelli A, Santangelo G, Fischetti M, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V. Assessing the role of low volume disease in endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 274:68-72. [PMID: 35598492 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The role of retroperitoneal staging in endometrial cancer is still unclear. Although the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy has been demonstrated no data support the therapeutic value of nodal dissection. Sentinel node mapping represents an evolution of lymphadenectomy. Sentinel node mapping allows a more accurate identification of low-volume diseases (i.e., micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells) that are not always detectable via conventional histopathological evaluation. Adjuvant therapy might play a role in patients with low-volume disease. However, the presence of isolated tumor cells alone seems to not impact outcomes of endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Hence, the choice to deliver adjuvant therapies has to be tailored based on uterine factors only. The introduction of molecular and genomic profiling would be useful in selecting appropriate surgical and adjuvant treatments. The molecular-integrated risk profile should be integrated in clinical practice to overcome the need of retroperitoneal staging (in case of non-bulky nodes) in patients at low risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Alice Fracassi
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D'Auge
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Assunta Casorelli
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giusi Santangelo
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Fischetti
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Matsuo K, Klar M, Khetan VU, Violette CJ, Youssefzadeh AC, Yessaian AA, Roman LD. Association between sentinel lymph node biopsy and micrometastasis in endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 275:91-96. [PMID: 35763967 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is increasingly utilized at surgical staging for early endometrial cancer. This study examined the association between SLN biopsy and micrometastasis in endometrial cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study examining the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program. The study population was 6,414 women with T1-2 endometrial cancer who underwent primary hysterectomy and surgical nodal evaluation. Exclusion criteria included cases with isolated tumor cells. Exposure assignment was surgical nodal evaluation (SLN biopsy or lymphadenectomy). Main outcome measure was micrometastasis, assessed by inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score in a stage-specific fashion. RESULTS In T1a disease (n = 4,608), SLN biopsy was performed in 1,164 (25.3%) cases. SLN biopsy was associated with a 90% increased likeliness of identifying micrometastasis compared to lymphadenectomy (1.3% versus 0.7%, odds ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.55, P = 0.040). In T1b disease (n = 1,369), 270 (19.7%) cases had SLN biopsy. The incidence of micrometastasis was significantly higher in the SLN biopsy group compared to the lymphadenectomy group (8.4% versus 5.0%, odds ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.86, P = 0.028). In T2 disease (SLN biopsy in 57 [13.0%] of 437 cases), the incidence of micrometastasis was similar between the two groups (7.9% versus 7.0%, odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.30-2.60, P = 0.818). CONCLUSION This study suggests that SLN biopsy protocol may identify more micrometastasis in the regional lymph nodes of T1 endometrial cancer. Whether national-level increase in the utilization of SLN biopsy for early endometrial cancer results in a stage-shifting to advanced disease on a population-basis warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Varun U Khetan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Caroline J Violette
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ariane C Youssefzadeh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Annie A Yessaian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bogani G, Di Donato V, Papadia A, Buda A, Casarin J, Multinu F, Plotti F, Cuccu I, D'Auge TG, Gasparri ML, Pinelli C, Perrone AM, Barra F, Sorbi F, Cromi A, Di Martino G, Palaia I, Perniola G, Ferrero S, De Iaco P, Perrone C, Angioli R, Luvero D, Muzii L, Ghezzi F, Landoni F, Mueller MD, Benedetti Panici P, Raspagliesi F. Evaluating long-term outcomes of three approaches to retroperitoneal staging in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:277-283. [PMID: 35725656 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sentinel lymph node mapping (SNM) has gained popularity in managing apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Here, we evaluated the long-term survival of three different approaches of nodal assessment. METHODS This is a multi-institutional retrospective study evaluating long-term outcomes of EC patients having nodal assessment between 01/01/2006 and 12/31/2016. In order to reduce possible confounding factors, we applied a propensity-matched algorithm. RESULTS Overall, 940 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the study, of which 174 (18.5%), 187 (19.9%), and 579 (61.6%) underwent SNM, SNM followed by backup lymphadenectomy (LND) and LND alone, respectively. Applying a propensity score matching algorithm (1:1:2) we selected 500 patients, including 125 SNM, 125 SNM/backup LND, and 250 LND. Baseline characteristics of the study population were similar between groups. The prevalence of nodal disease was 14%, 16%, and 12% in patients having SNM, SNM/backup LND and LND, respectively. Overall, 19 (7.6%) patients were diagnosed with low volume nodal disease. The survival analysis comparing the three techniques did not show statistical differences in terms of disease-free (p = 0.750) and overall survival (p = 0.899). Similarly, the type of nodal assessment did not impact survival outcomes after stratification based on uterine risk factors. CONCLUSION Our study highlighted that SNM provides similar long-term oncologic outcomes than LND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D'Auge
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ciro Pinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University, Hospital University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorbi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Di Martino
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University, Hospital University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Perrone
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Luvero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Matsuo K, Khetan VU, Brunette LL, Jooya ND, Klar M, Wright JD, Roman LD. Characterizing isolated tumor cells in regional lymph nodes of early endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:264-269. [PMID: 35232589 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the characteristics of isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in regional lymph nodes of early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study examining the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program. The study population was 6472 women with non-metastatic, node-negative T1 endometrial cancer who underwent primary hysterectomy and surgical nodal evaluation. Multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify the independent characteristics for ITCs. Postoperative therapy according to ITCs status was also assessed with propensity score weighting. RESULTS ITCs were seen in 111 (1.7%) cases. In a multivariable analysis, ITCs were largely associated with tumor factors including deep myometrial invasion (T1b versus T1a, 4.0% versus 1.0%, adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 3.42, P < 0.001) and larger tumor size (>4 versus ≤4 cm, 3.0% versus 1.6%, aOR 1.55, P = 0.037). Moreover, women undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy had a higher likelihood of identifying ITCs compared to those undergoing lymphadenectomy (LND): 2.7% for SLN alone, 3.7% for SLN/LND, and 1.2% for LND alone (aOR ranged 2.60-2.99, P < 0.001). Women who had ITCs identified were more likely to receive postoperative therapy (81.8% versus 31.7%, P < 0.001), including external beam radiotherapy (EBT) alone (25.1% versus 3.2%) and chemotherapy/EBT (16.3% versus 1.9%). Similar associations were observed in the low-risk group (stage IA, grade 1-2 endometrioid, 78.4% versus 9.2%, P < 0.001), including EBT alone (35.3% versus 0.6%). CONCLUSION This study suggests that a SLN protocol can identify more ITCs in the regional lymph nodes of early endometrial cancer. Deep myometrial invasion and large tumor size were associated with increased risk of ITCs. Postoperative therapy is offered more frequently in the setting of ITCs with variable treatment patterns, warranting further outcome studies and practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Varun U Khetan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laurie L Brunette
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Neda D Jooya
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sabattini S, Faroni E, Renzi A, Ghisoni G, Rigillo A, Bettini G, Pasquini A, Zanardi S, Guerra D, Marconato L. Longitudinal lymph node step-sectioning for the identification of metastatic disease in canine mast cell tumor. Vet Pathol 2022; 59:768-772. [DOI: 10.1177/03009858221088780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Lymph node (LN) metastasis in canine mast cell tumor (MCT) can affect prognosis and postsurgical treatment recommendations; however, routine histological single-section examination may underestimate the incidence of metastases. This prospective study aimed at determining whether longitudinal step-sectioning of the entire LN allows for a more reliable detection of metastases. Dogs with MCT undergoing resection of the primary tumor and regional lymphadenectomy were enrolled. Formalin-fixed LNs were bisected longitudinally, both halves were embedded in paraffin and histological sections prepared at 200 μm steps. The nodal mast cells were classified according to the Weishaar classification. First-section evaluation (FSE; ie, examination of the first section obtained from the blocks) and whole LN step-section evaluation (SSE) were compared. Fifty-eight LNs were included. The median number of sections per LN was 6 (range, 3–28). FSE with toluidine blue (TB) revealed 27 (47%) nonmetastatic (HN0), 14 (24%) premetastatic (HN1), 9 (15%) early metastatic (HN2), and 8 (14%) overtly metastatic (HN3) LNs. SSE with TB resulted in upgrading the LN status in 2 cases (HN2 to HN3; HN0 to HN1). Evaluation of the first section plus an additional step-section resulted in 100% accuracy. Compared with SSE with TB, the accuracy of FSE with HE was 98% for HN3 LNs and 74% for HN2 LNs. FSE appears to reliably allow for the detection of LN metastasis in MCT, although examination of a further parallel section at a 200 μm step may increase the accuracy. A metachromatic stain is recommended for the identification of early metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Sabattini
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Faroni
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Renzi
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Ghisoni
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonella Rigillo
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuliano Bettini
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Arianna Pasquini
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Zanardi
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Dina Guerra
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Marconato
- Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jebens Nordskar N, Hagen B, V Vesterfjell E, Salvesen Ø, Aune G. “Long-term outcome in endometrial cancer patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery with sentinel lymph node mapping”. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 271:77-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
37
|
Martínez Bravo WR, García Vicente AM, Noriega Álvarez E, González García B, López-de la Manzanara C, Cordero García JM, Soriano Castrejón Á. Failure of scintigraphy lymphatic mapping in endometrial cancer. Causes and solutions. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022; 41:78-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
38
|
Casarin J, Bogani G, Multinu F, Mariani A, Abu-Rustum NR, Ghezzi F, Ramirez PT. Paradigm shifts in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1617. [PMID: 34716176 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Varese, Italy .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Varese, Italy
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gill SE, Garzon S, Multinu F, Hokenstad AN, Casarin J, Cappuccio S, McGree ME, Weaver AL, Cliby WA, Keeney GL, Mariani A. Ultrastaging of 'negative' pelvic lymph nodes in patients with low- and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer who developed non-vaginal recurrences. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1541-1548. [PMID: 34706876 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evidence on micrometastases and isolated tumor cells as factors associated with non-vaginal recurrence in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer is limited. The goal of our study was to investigate risk factors for non-vaginal recurrence in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS Records of all patients with endometrial cancer surgically managed at the Mayo Clinic before sentinel lymph node implementation (1999-2008) were reviewed. We identified all patients with endometrioid low-risk (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, grade 1 or 2 with myometrial invasion <50% and negative peritoneal cytology) or intermediate-risk (FIGO stage I, grade 1 or 2 with myometrial invasion ≥50% or grade 3 with myometrial invasion <50% and negative peritoneal cytology) endometrial cancer at definitive pathology after pelvic and para-aortic lymph node assessment. All pelvic lymph nodes of patients with non-vaginal recurrence (any recurrence excluding isolated vaginal cuff recurrences) underwent ultrastaging. RESULTS Among 1303 women, we identified 321 patients with low-risk (n=236) or intermediate-risk (n=85) endometrial cancer (median age 65.4 years; 266 (82.9%) stage IA; 55 (17.1%) stage IB). Of the total of 321, 13 patients developed non-vaginal recurrence (Kaplan-Meier rate 4.7% by 60 months; 95% CI 2.1% to 7.2%): 11 hematogenous/peritoneal and two para-aortic and distant lymphatic. Myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion were univariately associated with non-vaginal recurrence. In these patients, the original hematoxylin/eosin slides review confirmed all 646 pelvic and para-aortic removed lymph nodes as negative. The ultrastaging of 463 pelvic lymph nodes did not identify any occult metastases (prevalence 0%; 95% CI 0% to 22.8% considering 13 patients; 95% CI 0% to 0.8% considering 463 pelvic lymph nodes). CONCLUSION There were no occult metastases in pelvic lymph nodes of patients with low- or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer with non-vaginal recurrence. Myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion appear to be associated with non-vaginal recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Gill
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N and J C Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, Georgia, USA
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexis N Hokenstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Billings Clinic Cancer Center, Billings, Montana, USA
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Serena Cappuccio
- Department of Woman's, Child's and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Michaela E McGree
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amy L Weaver
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William A Cliby
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gary L Keeney
- Division of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bogani G, Papadia A, Buda A, Casarin J, Di Donato V, Plotti F, Gasparri ML, Cimmino C, Pinelli C, Perrone AM, Barra F, Cromi A, Di Martino G, Palaia I, Ferrero S, Indini A, De Iaco P, Angioli R, Luvero D, Muzii L, Ghezzi F, Landoni F, Mueller MD, Benedetti Panici P, Raspagliesi F. Factors predicting morbidity in surgically-staged high-risk endometrial cancer patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 266:169-174. [PMID: 34688098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate factors predicting the risk of developing 90-day postoperative complications and lymphatic-specific morbidity in patients undergoing surgical staging for high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Patients affected by apparent early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer (endometrioid FIGO grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion and non-endometrioid endometrial cancer) undergoing surgical staging between 2007 and 2019. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Martin criteria were applied to improve quality of complications reporting. RESULTS Charts of 279 patients were evaluated. Lymphadenectomy, sentinel node mapping (SNM), and SNM followed by back-up lymphadenectomy were performed in 83 (29.7%), 50 (17.9%), and 146 (52.4%) patients, respectively. The former group of patients included 13 patients who had lymphadenectomy after the failure of the SNM technique. Thirteen (4.6%) patients developed severe postoperative events (grade 3 or worse). At multivariate analysis, body mass index (OR: 1.08 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.17)) and open abdominal surgery (OR: 2.27 (95%CI: 1.02, 5.32)) were the two independent factors predictive of surgery-related morbidity. Seven severe lymphatic complications occurred. The adoption of laparoscopic approach (p < 0.001, log-rank test) and SNM (p = 0.038, log-rank test) correlated with a lower risk of developing surgery-related events. Independently, open abdominal surgery was associated with an increased risk of developing lymphatic morbidity (OR: 37.4 (95%CI: 4.38, 319.5); p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The adoption of the laparoscopic approach and SNM technique were associated with lower 90-day complication rates than open surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing staging surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Cimmino
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Ciro Pinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Di Martino
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Italy
| | - Alice Indini
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, ASST dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Luvero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Diestro MD, Berjón A, Zapardiel I, Yébenes L, Ruiz I, Lekuona A, Rezola M, Jaunarena I, Siegrist J, Sánchez-Pastor M, Cuadra M, Sagasta A, Guerra I, Lete LI, Roldán F, Marta CB, Boillos MJ, Cardiel MJ, López-de la Manzanara C, Relea F, Coronado PJ, Pascual A, Román MJ, Peiró G, Matute LJ, Montero B, Muruzábal JC, Guarch R, Zorrero C, Calatrava A, Ribot L, Costa I, Hernández A, Hardisson D. One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Spanish Multicenter Study (ENDO-OSNA). Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4465. [PMID: 34503275 PMCID: PMC8431061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for the detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis compared to standard pathological ultrastaging in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 526 SLNs from 191 patients with EC were included in the study, and 379 SLNs (147 patients) were evaluated by both methods, OSNA and standard pathological ultrastaging. The central 1 mm portion of each lymph node was subjected to semi-serial sectioning at 200 μm intervals and examined by hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry with CK19; the remaining tissue was analyzed by OSNA for CK19 mRNA. The OSNA assay detected metastases in 19.7% of patients (14.9% micrometastasis and 4.8% macrometastasis), whereas pathological ultrastaging detected metastasis in 8.8% of patients (3.4% micrometastasis and 5.4% macrometastasis). Using the established cut-off value for detecting SLN metastasis by OSNA in EC (250 copies/μL), the sensitivity of the OSNA assay was 92%, specificity was 82%, diagnostic accuracy was 83%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. Discordant results between both methods were recorded in 20 patients (13.6%). OSNA resulted in an upstaging in 12 patients (8.2%). OSNA could aid in the identification of patients requiring adjuvant treatment at the time of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Dolores Diestro
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - Alberto Berjón
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (A.B.); (L.Y.)
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - Laura Yébenes
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (A.B.); (L.Y.)
| | - Irune Ruiz
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (I.R.); (M.R.)
| | - Arantza Lekuona
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (A.L.); (I.J.)
| | - Marta Rezola
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (I.R.); (M.R.)
| | - Ibon Jaunarena
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (A.L.); (I.J.)
| | - Jaime Siegrist
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - Margarita Sánchez-Pastor
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - María Cuadra
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (M.C.); (L.I.L.)
| | - Amaia Sagasta
- Department of Pathology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (A.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Isabel Guerra
- Department of Pathology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (A.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Luis I. Lete
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (M.C.); (L.I.L.)
| | - Fernando Roldán
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (F.R.); (M.J.B.)
| | - Carlo B. Marta
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (C.B.M.); (M.J.C.)
| | - María J. Boillos
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (F.R.); (M.J.B.)
| | - María J. Cardiel
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (C.B.M.); (M.J.C.)
| | - Carlos López-de la Manzanara
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain;
| | - Fernanda Relea
- Department of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain;
| | - Pluvio J. Coronado
- Women Health Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, IdISSC, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Alejandro Pascual
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - María J. Román
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario Alicante and Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Gloria Peiró
- Department of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario Alicante and Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Luis J. Matute
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Beatriz Montero
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Juan C. Muruzábal
- Department of Gynecology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Rosa Guarch
- Department of Pathology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Cristina Zorrero
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Fundación IVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Fundación IVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Laia Ribot
- Department of Gynecology, Corporación Sanitaria Parc Taulí Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Irmgard Costa
- Department of Pathology, Corporación Sanitaria Parc Taulí Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Alicia Hernández
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - David Hardisson
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (A.B.); (L.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Castellano T, Hassell L, Conrad R, Davey CS, Husain S, Dvorak JD, Ding K, Gunderson Jackson C. Recurrence risk of occult micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in early stage endometrial cancer: A case control study. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 37:100846. [PMID: 34466648 PMCID: PMC8385390 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Ultra-staging INCREASED the identification of low volume lymph node metastasis in EC. Occult ITC were not associated with increased odds of recurrent EC. Occult ITC were closely associated with known risk factors in early-stage EC.
Objectives To determine whether previously undetected occult micrometastasis (MM) or isolated tumor cells (ITC) is associated with increased recurrence odds in stage I-II endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Methods Women with recurrent stage I/II EC who had complete pelvic and para-aortic were identified as the outcome of interest. A case-control study was designed with the exposure defined as occult MM/ITC not seen on original nodal pathology. Controls were found by frequency-matching in a 1:2 case control ratio. Original nodal slides were re-reviewed, stained and tested with immunohistochemical to detect occult MM/ITC and the odds of associated recurrence was calculated. Results Of 153 included, 50 with and 103 without recurrence, there was no difference in age (p = 0.46), race (p = 0.24), stage (p = 0.75), FIGO grade (p = 0.64), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI); p = 1.00, or GOG 99 high-intermediate risk (HIR) criteria (p = 0.35). A total of 18 ITC (11.8%) and 3 MM (2.0%) not previously identified were found in 19 patients. Finding occult MM/ITC was not associated with more lymph nodes (LN) removed (p = 0.67) or tumor grade (p = 0.48) but was significantly associated with stage (p < 0.01). LVSI (p = 0.09) and meeting high-intermediate risk criteria (p = 0.09), were closely associated but not statistically significant. Isolated ITC were not associated with increased odds for recurrence (OR 0.71, CL: 0.20 – 2.22, p = 0.57), recurrence free survival (RFS) (p = 0.85) or overall survival (OS) (p = 0.92). Conclusions In early-stage EC, identification of occult MM or ITC is uncommon and associated with stage. The presence of ITC was not associated with increased odds of recurrence. Adjusting stage or treatment may avoided based on ITC alone. Isolated MM were rare in our population, and further investigation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Castellano
- The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kai Ding
- The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Martínez Bravo WR, García Vicente AM, Noriega Álvarez E, González García B, López-de la Manzanara C, Cordero García JM, Soriano Castrejón Á. Failure of scintigraphy lymphatic mapping in endometrial cancer. Causes and solutions. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021; 41:S2253-654X(21)00059-7. [PMID: 34420892 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2021.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the effect of technical problems and patient characteristics on sentinel lymph node (SLN) scintigraphic detection and mapping success in early stages of endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS Patients with clinical early stage EC (IA-IB) underwent SLN mapping using technetium-99m-nanocolloid,between September 2011 and February 2020. were included. There were excluded cases with technical problems, 92 patients were included for the analysis of the diagnostic performance and the relation of mapping failure (pelvic unilateral or not detected SLN) with patient (age, body mass index, previous pelvic disease or surgery) and disease characteristics (histology, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space infiltration, tumor size, and lymphatic infiltration risk). RESULTS The overall detection rate was 79%. Lymph node metastases were diagnosed in 7 patients. Age (p=0.01), depth of myometrial invasion ≥ 50% (p=0.04) and high risk of lymphatic infiltration (p=0.02) were positively associated with mapping failure. In multivariate analysis, age was significantly associated with mapping failure [odds ratio=1.63, 95%CI: 1.06-2.50; p=0.027]. CONCLUSIONS Age, depth of myometrial invasion and high risk of lymphatic infiltration were the factors associated with higher mapping failure. An individualized injection technique, optimizing the methodology, could minimize the detection failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A M García Vicente
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, Ciudad Real, España.
| | - E Noriega Álvarez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, Ciudad Real, España
| | - B González García
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, Ciudad Real, España
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Eriksson AGZ, Davidson B, Bjerre Trent P, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Dahl GF, Wang Y, Staff AC. Update on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10143094. [PMID: 34300260 PMCID: PMC8306601 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has emerged as an alternative staging approach in women with assumed early-stage endometrial carcinoma. Through image-guided surgery and pathologic ultrastaging, the SLN approach is introducing “precision medicine” to the surgical management of gynecologic cancers, providing a comprehensive evaluation of high-yield lymph nodes. This approach improves the surgeons’ ability to detect small-volume metastatic disease while reducing intraoperative and postoperative morbidity associated with lymphadenectomy. Although the majority of clinicians in Europe and the USA have recognized the value of SLN biopsy in endometrial carcinoma and introduced this as part of clinical practice, there is ongoing debate regarding its role in very low-risk patients as well as in patients at high risk of nodal metastasis. The significance of low-volume metastasis is not fully understood, and there is no consensus in regard to how the presence of isolated tumor cells should guide adjuvant therapy. Standardized protocols for histopathologic evaluation of SLNs are lacking. In this review article we aim to provide a framework for the introduction of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer, give an updated overview of the existing literature, as well as discuss potential controversies and unanswered questions regarding this approach and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Gerda Z Eriksson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway; (P.B.T.); (B.E.); (G.F.D.); (Y.W.)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (B.D.); (A.C.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Ben Davidson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (B.D.); (A.C.S.)
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - Pernille Bjerre Trent
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway; (P.B.T.); (B.E.); (G.F.D.); (Y.W.)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (B.D.); (A.C.S.)
| | - Brynhildur Eyjólfsdóttir
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway; (P.B.T.); (B.E.); (G.F.D.); (Y.W.)
| | - Gunn Fallås Dahl
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway; (P.B.T.); (B.E.); (G.F.D.); (Y.W.)
| | - Yun Wang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway; (P.B.T.); (B.E.); (G.F.D.); (Y.W.)
| | - Anne Cathrine Staff
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (B.D.); (A.C.S.)
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhai L, Zhang X, Cui M, Wang J. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:701758. [PMID: 34268126 PMCID: PMC8276058 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.701758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is known as a common gynecological malignancy. The incidence rate is on the increase annually. Lymph node status plays a crucial role in evaluating the prognosis and selecting adjuvant therapy. Currently, the patients with high-risk (not comply with any of the following: (1) well-differentiated or moderately differentiated, pathological grade G1 or G2; (2) myometrial invasion< 1/2; (3) tumor diameter < 2 cm are commonly recommended for a systematic lymphadenectomy (LAD). However, conventional LAD shows high complication incidence and uncertain survival benefits. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) refers to the first lymph node that is passed by the lymphatic metastasis of the primary malignant tumor through the regional lymphatic drainage pathway and can indicate the involvement of lymph nodes across the drainage area. Mounting evidence has demonstrated a high detection rate (DR), sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV) in patients with early-stage lower risk EC using sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) with pathologic ultra-staging. Meanwhile, SLNM did not compromise the patient’s progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with low operative complications. However, the application of SLNM in early-stage high-risk EC patients remains controversial. As revealed by the recent studies, SLNM may also be feasible, effective, and safe in high-risk patients. This review aims at making a systematic description of the progress made in the application of SLNM in the treatment of EC and the relevant controversies, including the application of SLNM in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lirong Zhai
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiwen Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Manhua Cui
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jianliu Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Taran FA, Jung L, Waldschmidt J, Huwer SI, Juhasz-Böss I. Status of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:562-573. [PMID: 34035551 PMCID: PMC8137276 DOI: 10.1055/a-1228-6189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of lymphadenectomy in surgical staging remains one of the biggest controversies in the management of endometrial cancer. The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer has been evaluated for a number of years, with promising sensitivity rates and negative predictive values. The possibility of adequate staging while avoiding systematic lymphadenectomy leads to a significant reduction in the rate of peri- and postoperative morbidity. Nevertheless, the status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer has not yet been fully elucidated and is variously assessed internationally. According to current European guidelines and recommendations, sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer should be performed only in the context of clinical studies. In this review article, the developments of the past decade are explored concisely. In addition, current data regarding the technical aspects, accuracy and prognostic relevance of sentinel lymph
node biopsy are explained and evaluated critically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florin Andrei Taran
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Jung
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Julia Waldschmidt
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Ingolf Juhasz-Böss
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cabrera S, Barahona-Orpinell M, Almansa-González C, Padilla-Iserte P, Bebia V, Martí L, Tejerizo-García Á, Domingo S, Gil-Moreno A. Combined use of ICG and technetium does not improve sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer: Results of the COMBITEC study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:32-37. [PMID: 33992451 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is scarce evidence available about the benefit of combining technetium (99mTc) and indocyanine green (ICG) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the overall and bilateral pelvic detection rates of SLNs in two retrospective cohorts: ICG exclusive vs. combined ICG+99mTc. METHODS The COMBITEC study (COMBined ICG and Technetium for SLN detection in Endometrial Cancer) consisted of a multicentre retrospective study (February 2015-June 2020) including patients diagnosed with endometrial atypical hyperplasia or early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent SLN biopsy by cervical injection of ICG with or without 99mTc in four different referral centers in Spain. RESULTS A total of 180 patients were included, 51% (n = 92) in ICG group and 49% (n = 88) in ICG+99mTc group. Eighty-seven percent of the patients presented endometrioid histology, and over 99% of the procedures were performed by a minimally invasive approach. Both groups were comparable regarding their basal characteristics, except for a higher body mass index in ICG+99mTc group and a bigger proportion of robotic-assisted procedures in ICG group. Overall detection rate was 92.8% without significant differences between groups (ICG: 94.6% vs ICG+99mTc: 90.9%, p = .34). No significant differences were observed neither in bilateral pelvic nor aortic mapping rate. When 99mTc was used, surgical procedures were significantly longer. In 7.3% of mapped patients, at least one positive SLN was found (ICG: 10.3% vs ICG+99mTc: 3.9%, p = .109). Empty node packet rates and number of SLNs retrieved per patient were also similar between cohorts. CONCLUSION Combining preoperative 99mTc to intraoperative ICG did not improve SLN detection in endometrial cancer, but resulted in longer procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Cabrera
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus and Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Spain.
| | | | | | | | - Vicente Bebia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus and Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Spain
| | - Lola Martí
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Santiago Domingo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus and Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Spain; CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ruiz R, Gorostidi M, Jaunarena I, Cobas P, Lekuona A. Maximizing sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer with dual cervical and transcervical fundal indocyanine green injection: 5-year single-center prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 261:59-64. [PMID: 33892210 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe our latest results using dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection for detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in endometrial cancer. METHODS A prospective observational study was conducted between 26 June 2014 and 31 December 2019 with 278 patients that underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer at our institution. In all cases, we performed SLN biopsy with dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection. All SLNs were processed with an ultrastaging technique. A total of 128 patients also underwent total pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS The detection rates were as follows: 93.5 % (260/278) overall for SLNs; 90.7 % (252/278) overall for pelvic SLNs; 68.0 % (189/278) for bilateral SLNs; 66.9 % (186/278) for paraaortic SLNs, and 2.9 % (8/278) for isolated paraaortic SLNs. We found macroscopic lymph node metastasis in 26 patients (10.0 %) and microdisease in lymph nodes in another 48 patients, raising the overall rate of lymph node involvement to 16.2 %. There was one false negative (negative SLN biopsy but positive lymphadenectomy). Applying the SLN algorithm, the sensitivity of detection was 97.9 % (95 % CI 89.1-99.6), specificity 100 % (95 % CI 98.2-100), negative predictive value 99.5 % (95 % CI 97.4-99.9), and positive predictive value 100 % (95 % CI 92.4-100). CONCLUSIONS Dual sentinel node injection is a feasible technique that achieves adequate detection rates. Additionally, this technique allows a high rate of aortic detection, identifying a non-negligible percentage of isolated aortic metastases. Aortic metastases in endometrial cancer are possible and we should not give up actively looking for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Ruiz
- Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Mikel Gorostidi
- Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; BIODONOSTIA Health Research Institute, San Sebastián, Spain.
| | - Ibon Jaunarena
- Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; BIODONOSTIA Health Research Institute, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Paloma Cobas
- Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nasioudis D, Byrne M, Ko EM, Giuntoli Ii RL, Haggerty AF, Cory L, Kim SH, Morgan MA, Latif NA. The impact of sentinel lymph node sampling versus traditional lymphadenectomy on the survival of patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:840-845. [PMID: 33853879 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the survival of patients with lymph node positive endometrial carcinoma by type of surgical lymph node assessment. METHODS Patients diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2015 with endometrial carcinoma and uterine confined disease and nodal metastases on final pathology who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or underwent systematic lymphadenectomy were selected. Overall survival was evaluated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log rank test. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders. RESULTS A total of 1432 patients were identified: 1323 (92.4%) and 109 (7.6%) underwent systematic lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy only, respectively. The rate of adjuvant treatment was comparable between patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and systematic lymphadenectomy (83.5% vs 86.6%, p=0.39). However, patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy were less likely to receive chemotherapy alone (13.6% vs 36.6%, p<0.001) and more likely to receive radiation therapy alone (19.8% vs 5.4%, p<0.001) compared with patients who had systematic lymphadenectomy. There was no difference in overall survival between patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and systematic lymphadenectomy (p=0.27 from log rank test), and 3 year overall survival rates were 82.2% and 79.4%, respectively (p>0.05). After controlling for confounders, there was no difference in survival between the systematic lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy alone groups (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 1.45). CONCLUSIONS Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone was not associated with an adverse impact on survival in patients with lymph node positive endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Nasioudis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maureen Byrne
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily M Ko
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert L Giuntoli Ii
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashley F Haggerty
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lori Cory
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark A Morgan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nawar A Latif
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Niikura H, Toki A, Nagai T, Okamoto S, Shigeta S, Tokunaga H, Shimada M, Watanabe M, Yaegashi N. Prospective evaluation of sentinel node navigation surgery in Japanese patients with low-risk endometrial cancer-safety and occurrence of lymphedema. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:584-589. [PMID: 33388755 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study aimed to clarify the occurrence rate of lymphedema and prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer according to sentinel lymph node biopsy alone with intraoperative histopathological examination. METHODS The study included 45 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital between October 2014 and August 2017. All patients had endometrial carcinoma with endometrioid histology Grade 1 or Grade 2 confirmed by biopsy and stage I on magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography at their preoperative evaluation. Sentinel lymph node detection was performed by radioisotope and dye. Patients who were diagnosed intraoperatively as negative for sentinel lymph node metastasis did not undergo further systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. The occurrence rate of lymphedema and prognosis was evaluated. RESULTS Bilateral sentinel lymph nodes were detected in 44 of 45 patients (97%). Forty-three patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone, and only two patients underwent systematic lymphadenectomy. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in one patient intraoperatively and two patients postoperatively as ITCs. No patients experienced recurrence. New symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema was identified in one of 43 patients (2.3%) who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone. CONCLUSION Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone with intraoperative histopathological diagnosis appears to be a safe and effective strategy to detect lymph node metastasis and to reduce the number of patients with lower-extremity lymphedema among patients with endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitoshi Niikura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan
| | - Asami Toki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Nagai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Satoshi Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shogo Shigeta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hideki Tokunaga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Muneaki Shimada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Mika Watanabe
- Department of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Nobuo Yaegashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|