Impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on postoperative recovery and long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

Association of intra-operative red blood cell transfusion on the systemic immune index and recovery in patients undergoing cesarean section: a large propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide. However, the effect of blood transfusion in patients undergoing cesarean section remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis was based on the retrospective evaluation of the pre- and post-operative data for 1231 patients who underwent a cesarean section at our hospital between January 2016 and June 2020. Patients were classified into the blood transfusion group (BT) and the no blood transfusion group (NBT) based on their intra-operative blood transfusion status.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 322 patients were included in both groups and between-group differences in length of hospital stay (LOS), perioperative systemic inflammation indicators, and post-operative complications were evaluated. The LOS was longer in the BT (median, 6.6 days) than the NBT (median, 4.2 days) group (P = 0.026). The post-operative complication rate was higher for the BT than NBT group, as follows: vomiting, 3.2% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.032; fever, 5.41% vs. 2.24%, P = 0.032; wound complications, 15.44% vs. 10.45%, P = 0.028; and intestinal obstructions, 5.88% vs. 2.75%, P = 0.034. Systemic inflammation indicators increased significantly, from the pre-operative baseline, for both groups at post-operative day (POD) 1 and POD3. On multivariate analysis, intra-operative blood transfusion was associated with a longer LOS (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.25).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative blood transfusion for cesarean section was associated with increased levels of systemic inflammation indicators, higher post-operative complication rates, and prolonged hospital stay.

Safe to save blood in ovarian cancer surgery - time to change transfusion habits

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) undergoing surgery are often subjected to red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Both anemia and RBC transfusion are associated with increased morbidity. The aim was to evaluate patient recovery after the implementation of patient blood management (PBM) strategies.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 354 patients with AOC undergoing surgery at Skane University Hospital Lund, Sweden, between January 2016 and December 2021. The gradual implementation of PBM strategies included restrictive RBC transfusion, tranexamic acid as standard medication before laparotomies and intravenous iron administered to patients with iron deficiency. Severe complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3a. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the differences between three consecutive periods.

RESULTS

After the implementation of new strategies, 52% of the patients had at least one transfusion compared to 83% at baseline (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of severe complications (CD ≥ 3a) between the groups, adjusted odds ratio 0.55 (95% CI 0.26-1.17). The mean difference in hemoglobin before chemotherapy was -1.32 g/L (95% CI -3.04 to -0.22) when adjusted for blood loss and days from surgery to chemotherapy. The length of stay (LOS) decreased from 8.5 days to 7.5 days (p 0.002).

INTERPRETATION

The number of patients transfused were reduced by 31%. Despite a slight increase in anemia rate, severe complications (CD ≥ 3a) remained stable. The LOS was reduced, and chemotherapy was given without delay, indicating that PBM is feasible and without causing major severe effects on short-term recovery.

The impact of perioperative transfusions on the oncologic outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer: A population-based study

Perioperative blood transfusion in ovarian cancer patients was associated with a 28% increase in all-cause mortality. The negative impact of perioperative blood transfusion extends beyond the immediate postoperative period.

OBJECTIVES

The effect of perioperative blood transfusions on long-term oncologic outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery remains uncertain. Our study aims to determine the association between perioperative blood transfusion and all-cause mortality in this population.

METHODS

Using province-wide administrative databases, patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 as part of first-line treatment were identified. Perioperative transfusion was defined as any transfusion from date of surgery to discharge from hospital. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine if there was an independent association of transfusion with all-cause mortality, accounting significant confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 5891 patients had cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer between 2007 and 2021, of which 2898 (49.2%) had interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) and 2993 (50.8%) had primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). Perioperative blood transfusion was given to 37.3% of patients (40.5% ICS and 34.2% PCS). On multivariable analysis, there was an increased hazard of all-cause mortality for patients receiving perioperative transfusion compared to those who did not (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.20-1.37). The association of increased all-cause mortality was observed starting 1 year after surgery, was sustained thereafter, and seen in both ICS and PCS groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative blood transfusion after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer is common in Ontario, Canada and was significantly associated with an increase in all-cause mortality. Blood transfusion is a poor prognostic factor, and the negative impact of blood transfusion persists beyond the immediate postoperative period.

Incorporation of Blood and Fluid Management Within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Complex Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary set of evidence-based interventions to reduce morbidity and accelerate postoperative recovery. Complex spine surgery carries high risks of perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and suboptimal fluid states. This study evaluates the efficacy of a perioperative fluid and blood management component comprised of a restrictive transfusion policy, goal directed fluid management, number of tranexamic acid (TXA) utilization, and autologous blood transfusion within our ERAS protocol for complex spine surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review compared patients undergoing elective complex spine surgery prior to and following implementation of an ERAS protocol with intraoperative blood and fluid management. Outcomes included incidence of blood transfusion, estimated blood loss, intraoperative crystalloids administered, frequency of intraoperative TXA utilized, incidence of patients extubated within the operating room (OR), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Following implementation, the rate of blood transfusion decreased by 11.7%(P = .017) and average crystalloid infusion was reduced 680 mL per case(P < .001). Intraoperative blood loss decreased on average 342 mL per case(P = .001) and TXA use increased significantly by 25%(P < .001). Postoperative ICU admissions declined by 8.5%(P = .071); extubation within the OR increased by 13.3%(P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol presents a unique perspective with the inclusion of an interdisciplinary and comprehensive blood and fluid management protocol as an integral part of our ERAS pathway for complex spine surgery. These results indicate that a standardized approach is associated with reduced rates of blood transfusion and optimized fluid states which was correlated with decreased postoperative ICU admissions.

Pre-Operative Malnutrition in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: What Are the Clinical Implications? Results of a Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition was associated with worse survival outcomes, impaired quality of life, and deteriorated performance status across various cancer types. We aimed to identify risk factors for malnutrition in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and impact on survival.

METHODS

In our prospective observational monocentric study, we included the patients with primary and recurrent EOC, tubal or peritoneal cancer conducted. We assessed serum laboratory parameters, body mass index, nutritional risk index, nutritional risk screening score (NRS-2002), and bio-electrical impedance analysis.

RESULTS

We recruited a total of 152 patients. Patients > 65 years-old, with ascites of >500 mL, or with platinum-resistant EOC showed statistically significant increased risk of malnutrition when evaluated using NRS-2002 (p-values= 0.014, 0.001, and 0.007, respectively). NRS-2002 < 3 was an independent predictive factor for complete tumor resectability (p = 0.009). The patients with NRS-2002 ≥ 3 had a median overall survival (OS) of seven months (95% CI = 0-24 months), as compared to the patients with NRS-2002 < 3, where median OS was forty-six months (p = 0.001). A phase angle (PhAα) ≤ 4.5 was the strongest predictor of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found malnutrition to be an independent predictor of incomplete cytoreduction and independent prognostic factor for poor OS. Preoperative nutritional assessment is an effective tool in the identification of high-risk EOC groups characterized by poor clinical outcome.

Outcomes following perioperative red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative red blood cell transfusion is a double-edged sword for surgical patients. While transfusion of red cells can increase oxygen delivery by increasing haemoglobin levels, its impact on short- and long-term postoperative outcomes, particularly in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of perioperative blood transfusions on postoperative outcomes in elective major abdominal surgery. PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched for studies with data collected between January 1, 2000 and June 6, 2020. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, including all-cause 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included long-term all-cause mortality, any morbidity, infectious complications, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. No randomised controlled trials were found. Thirty-nine observational studies were identified, of which 37 were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Perioperative blood transfusion was associated with short-term all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.89-3.91, P<0.001), long-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.67, P=0.007), any morbidity (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.81-2.64, P<0.001), and infectious complications (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.60-2.26, P<0.001). Perioperative blood transfusion remained associated with short-term mortality in the sensitivity analysis after excluding studies that did not control for preoperative anaemia (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.59-3.24, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery is associated with poorer short- and long-term postoperative outcomes. This highlights the need to implement patient blood management strategies to manage and preserve the patient's own blood and reduce the need for red blood cell transfusion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42021254360).

Ferric derisomaltose and Outcomes in the Recovery of Gynecologic oncology: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) (FORGE) - a protocol for a pilot randomised double-blinded parallel-group placebo-controlled study of the feasibility and efficacy of intravenous ferric derisomaltose to correct preoperative iron-deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing gynaecological oncology surgery

INTRODUCTION

Iron-deficiency anaemia is common in gynaecological oncology patients. Blood transfusions are immunosuppressive and carry immediate and long-term risks. Oral iron replacement remains the standard of care but requires prolonged treatment courses associated with gastrointestinal side effects, poor compliance and variable absorption in cancer patients. Intravenous iron has been shown to decrease the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in gynaecological oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy, but the efficacy of this treatment in the preoperative period is unknown. The goal of this pilot study is to determine the effect of intravenous ferric derisomaltose on preoperative haemoglobin in patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological malignancy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a pilot single-centre, parallel-arm randomised controlled trial of intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus placebo among consenting patients with iron-deficiency anaemia having elective major surgery on the gynaecological oncology service. Patients, clinicians and outcome assessors will be blinded. The intervention consists of a single infusion of 500-1000 mg of intravenous ferric derisomaltose administered a minimum of 21 days prior to the planned operation. The primary outcome is mean preoperative haemoglobin concentration measured 0-3 days prior to surgery in patients receiving intravenous ferric derisomaltose compared with those receiving placebo. Secondary outcomes include the following: change in haemoglobin concentration, postoperative haemoglobin concentration, perioperative blood transfusion rates, patient-reported quality of life scores (Quality of Recovery 15, Modified Short Form 36 v1, EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia), surgical site infection, complication rates, length of hospital stay and readmission rate. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles for all randomised participants. All patients will be followed up to 60 days following surgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted by Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta (Project ID: HREBA.CC-22-0187) and Health Canada (HC6-024-c264013). Results will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publication and social and traditional media.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05407987.

The prognostic impact of limited-staging surgery in patients with stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-center study with a propensity score-adjusted analysis

OBJECTIVE

Complete-staging surgery is recommended for stage IA ovarian cancer, but may be omitted for various reasons, including the preservation of fertility and an advanced age. We herein investigated the prognostic impact of limited-staging surgery in patients with stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 4730 patients with malignant ovarian tumors from the databases of multiple institutions and ultimately included 293 with stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer. Limited-staging surgery was defined as one that did not involve hysterectomy, systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy or the collection of ascites cytology. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis with propensity scores and estimated the hazard ratios of recurrence and death with limited-staging surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 176 out of 293 patients (39.9%) were assigned to the limited-staging surgery group. After propensity score adjustments, no significant differences were observed in recurrence-free survival or overall survival between the limited- and complete-staging surgery groups. Even in the subgroup analysis with age stratification, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were similar in the limited- and complete-staging surgery groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results indicate the limited prognostic impact of limited-staging surgery for stage IA epithelial ovarian cancer.

Adverse postoperative outcomes associated with perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidence of perioperative blood transfusion and association with 30 day postoperative outcomes in gynecologic cancer surgery.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all gynecologic oncology cases from 2013 to 2019. Clinical and surgical characteristics and 30 day postoperative complications were retrieved. The primary outcome was 30 day composite morbidity, based on the occurrence of one or more of the 18 adverse events. Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality, length of stay in hospital, and composite surgical site infection, defined as superficial, deep, or organ space surgical site infection. The χ² test and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the outcomes of patients with and without perioperative blood transfusion.

RESULTS

There were 62 531 surgical gynecologic oncology cases with an overall transfusion incidence of 9.4%. The transfusion incidence was significantly higher at 22.4% with laparotomy compared with 1.7% with minimally invasive surgery (p<0.0001). On multivariable analysis for laparotomy patients, blood transfusion was predictive of composite morbidity (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48 to 1.85) and length of stay in hospital ≥5 days (adjusted OR 9.02, 95% CI 8.21 to 9.92). In advanced ovarian cancer patients (n=3890), the incidence of perioperative blood transfusion was 40.8%. On multivariable analysis, perioperative blood transfusion was the most predictive factor for composite morbidity (adjusted OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.07) and length of stay in hospital ≥7 days (adjusted OR 9.75, 95% CI 7.79 to 12.21).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with increased composite morbidity and prolonged length of stay in hospital. Preoperative patient optimization and institutional practices should be reviewed to improve the use of blood bank resources and adherence to restrictive blood transfusion protocols.

Transfusion use and effect on progression-free, overall survival, and quality of life in upfront treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: evaluation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment EORTC-55971 Cohort

BACKGROUND

The impact of blood transfusion on ovarian cancer survival is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether peri-operative blood transfusion negatively impacted progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We performed an ancillary analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) 55971 phase III trial, in which patients were randomized to primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients included in the per-protocol analysis were categorized by receipt of a transfusion.

RESULTS

612 of 632 (97%) of patients had adequate data for analysis. Of those, 323 (53%) received a transfusion. The transfusion cohort was more likely to have had better Word Health Organization (WHO) performance status, serous histology, undergone primary debulking surgery, and received more aggressive surgery, with higher rates of no gross residual disease. Median overall survival was 34.0 vs 35.2 months in the no transfusion and transfusion cohorts (p=0.97). The adjusted HR for death was 1.18 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.48) in favor of the transfusion cohort. Median progression-free survival was 13.6 vs 12.6 months in the no transfusion and transfusion cohorts (p=0.96). The adjusted HR for progression was 1.14 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.43). There were no significant differences in global quality of life, fatigue, dyspnea, or physical functioning between the two cohorts at baseline or at any of the four assessment times. Grade 3 and 4 surgical site infections were more common in the transfusion cohort.

CONCLUSION

Transfusion did not negatively impact progression-free survival or overall survival; however, it was associated with increased peri-operative morbidity without improvements in quality of life.

EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL TRAINING ON POSTOPERATIVE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE INJURY IN ATHLETES HOSPITALIZED

ABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament rupture is a common clinical sports injury, and its incidence has an increasing tendency. The understanding by nurses of the best practices in the postoperative period of various surgeries has contributed to the early return of patients to their activities. Therefore, there is an urgent demand for optimizing the hospital protocol for the postoperative stage. Objective: Optimize perioperative nursing care and postoperative functional exercises in sports ligament injuries. Methods: Thirty patients (18 males, age 29.2±8.7 years) with knee cruciate ligament injury admitted to Sanya University Hospital from January to December were selected. Three to five days after admission, based on a regular physical and chemical examination and cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery under epidural anesthesia. Prevention care for postoperative complications, monitoring of vital signs and alternating position on the stretcher, mobilizations, and pain care were detailed. According to the Lysholm and Tegner activity scales, evaluation was made in the functional loss and level of recovery caused by the knee ligament injury. Results: The hospital stay in this group was 12 to 43 days, with a mean of (25.4±8.6) days. After two months of follow-up, 11 cases showed excellent functional recovery, 17 cases of functional recovery were good, the excellent and good index was 93.3%. After six months of follow-up, all patients in this group returned to work and normal life. Conclusion: Optimized treatment with functional training in the post-surgical period, good care, and adapted exercises are of great importance for the brief recovery of a sports function. Evidence Level II; Therapeutic Studies – Investigating the results.

Impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion, anemia of cancer and global health status on the prognosis of elderly patients with endometrial and ovarian cancer

Introduction

Perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions have been associated with increased morbidity and worse oncological outcome in some solid neoplasms. In order to elucidate whether RBC transfusions themselves, the preoperative anemia of cancer (AOC), or the impaired global health status might explain this impact on patients with endometrial cancer (EC) or ovarian cancer (OC), we performed a retrospective, single-institution cohort study.

Materials and methods

Women older than 60 years with EC or OC were included. The influence of RBC transfusions, AOC, and frailty status determined by the G8 geriatric screening tool (G8 score), as well as the clinical-pathological cancer characteristics on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox regression analyses.

Results

In total, 263 patients with EC (n = 152) and OC (n = 111) were included in the study. Patients with EC receiving RBC transfusions were faced with a significantly shorter 5-year PFS (79.8% vs. 26.0%; p < 0.001) and 5-year OS (82.6% vs. 25.7%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, besides established clinical-pathological cancer characteristics, the RBC transfusions remained the only significant prognostic parameter for PFS (HR: 1.76; 95%-CI [1.01–3.07]) and OS (HR: 2.38; 95%-CI [1.50–3.78]). In OC, the G8 score stratified the cohort in terms of PFS rates (G8-non-frail 53.4% vs. G8-frail 16.7%; p = 0.010) and AOC stratified the cohort for 5-year OS estimates (non-anemic: 36.7% vs. anemic: 10.6%; p = 0.008). Multivariable Cox regression analyses determined the G8 score and FIGO stage as independent prognostic factors in terms of PFS (HR: 2.23; 95%-CI [1.16–4.32] and HR: 6.52; 95%-CI [1.51–28.07], respectively). For OS, only the TNM tumor stage retained independent significance (HR: 3.75; 95%-CI [1.87–7.53]).

Discussion

The results of this trial demonstrate the negative impact of RBC transfusions on the prognosis of patients with EC. Contrastingly, the prognosis of OC is altered by the preoperative global health status rather than AOC or RBC transfusions. In summary, we suggested a cumulatively restrictive transfusion management in G8-non-frail EC patients and postulated a more moderate transfusion management based on the treatment of symptomatic anemia without survival deficits in OC patients.

Association of Mu-Opioid Receptor Expression With Long-Term Survival and Perineural Nerve Invasion in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer

Background

Opioids are widely used during primary debulking surgery (PDS) for ovarian cancers, and a high mu-opioid receptor (MOR) expression predicts worse cancer outcomes. However, the impact of MOR expression on survival outcomes in ovarian cancers is still not clear.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent PDS in ovarian cancer patients. MOR expression was measured in tumor and normal tissue. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included perineural invasion (PNI), intraoperative sufentanil consumption, length of stay (LOS), and verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) on postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, and POD5.

Results

After propensity score matching, a total of 366 patients were finally enrolled in this study. There were no significant differences in OS rates in patients with high versus low levels of MOR (1-year OS: 82.9% versus 83.3%, 3-year: 57.8% versus 59.1%, 5-year: 22.4% versus 23.1%,respectively) in the ovarian cancers. There were no significant differences in DFS between the groups. Intraoperative sufentanil consumption was higher in the MOR high-expression group compared with the MOR low-expression group. Tumors expressing high levels of MOR showed higher rates of PNI. VNRS in the MOR high-expression group was higher on POD1.

Conclusion

MOR is not an independent predictor of worse survival in ovarian cancers but is associated with high rates of perineural invasion.

Survival impact of bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery on survival.

Methods

We identified patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery between 2008 and 2018 from a single-institution tumor registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were performed comparing patients who underwent bowel resection to those who did not.

Results

Of 158 patients, 43 (27%) underwent bowel resection. Rates of optimal (95%) and sub-optimal (5%) resection did not differ with bowel resection. Patients that required bowel resection had worse three-year survival (43% vs. 63%), even after adjusting for confounding variables of age, stage, number of neoadjuvant cycles, R0 resection, and ASA score (HR 2.27, p < 0.01). Adjusted progression-free survival did not differ between groups (HR 0.92, p = 0.72). Patients who underwent bowel resection were more likely to require blood transfusion (p < 0.01), and have a longer hospital stay (5 days vs 7.5 days, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreduction confers a greater than 2-fold increased risk of mortality and does not impact progression-free survival. Long-term sequelae of the peri-operative morbidity of bowel resection may contribute to increased mortality, and bowel resection may be a surrogate for disease biology with poor prognosis.

International multicentre observational study to evaluate the association between perioperative red blood cell transfusions and 1-year mortality after major cancer surgery (ARCA-1): study design, statistical analysis plan and study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Blood transfusion is still common in patients undergoing major cancer surgery. Blood transfusion can be associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancer. Perioperative Care in the Cancer Patient -1 (ARCA-1) aims to assess in a large cohort of patients the current incidence, pattern of practice and associations between perioperative blood transfusions and 1-year survival in patients undergoing major cancer surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

ARCA-1 is a prospective international multicentre observational study that will include adult patients scheduled to have major cancer surgical procedures with the intention to cure, and an overnight planned hospital admission. The study will be opened for 1 year for enrolment (7 January 2020-7 February 2021). Each centre will enrol patients for 30 days. The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause mortality 1 year after major cancer surgery. Secondary endpoints are rate of perioperative blood product use, cancer-specific mortality at 1 year and PFSs and 30-day morbidity and mortality.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04491409.